Fiscal Year 1992 Annual Report Fiscal Year 1992 of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities (1 October 1991 - 30 September 1992) Volume II -L I I ITEM APPROPRIATIONS ($ MILLIONS) Navigation Flood Control Total Flood Control Mississippi River & Tributaries 1 Multipurpose including power Beach Erosion Control Total New Work s Other Work' TOTAL NAVIGATION (Calendar Year)' Ton(Miles of Commerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports Foreign, Grat Lakes Ports Domestic, Coastal (Intraterritory not compiled) Domestic, Great Lakes Domestic, Inland Domestic, Local TOTAL Tons of Commerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports Foreign, Grat Lakes Ports Domestic, Coastal and Intraterritory Domestic, Great Lakes Domestic, Inland Domestic, Local TOTAL FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED ($ Billion) FLOOD DAMAGES SUFFERED ($ Billion) POWER Installed (Cumulative in millions of kw) Generated (Billions of kwh) RESERVOIR Storate (Millions of acre feet) All Purpose Flood Control (Maximum) Water Supply Irrigatirn PUBLIC ATTENDANCE AT RESERVOIRS tecreation Days of Use (Millions) Visitor Days (Millions)' FUNDING General Investigation Construction General Operations & Maintenance, General Regulatory Program Flood Control Mississippi River & Tribs. General Expenses Flood Control & Coastal Emergencies Revolving Fund Permanent Appropriation TOTAL 1992 STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 461 437 439 519 512 443 299 304.0 257.0 577.0 914 901 879 856 840 787 673 676 647 832 (229) (221) (220) (222) (205) (206) (227) (225) (203) (291) 70 62 60 73 73 69 93 112 171 221 56 66 43 27 27 23 17 12 25 5 1,501 1,466 1,421 1,475 1,452 1,221 1,082 1,104 1,127 1,685 2,167 1,848 1,776 1,770 1,826 1,813 1,658 1,797 1,567 1,734 3,668 3,314 3,197 3,245 3,278 3,135 2,730 2,901 2,668 3,419 72,916.5* 68,563.4 56,208.2 50,985.0 47,274.2 44,769.3 46,508.8 45,286.7 25,153.5 27,118.9 24,448.4 22,003.3 24,235.2 27,171.9 32,249.4 24,309.4 479,099.3 483,888.6 561,594.9 586,818.7 580,888.7 610,976.5 593,923.1 649,749.4 59,329.0 58,307.6 58,159.4 50,076.4 43,198.2 48,184.0 49,784.4 43,088.2 293,330.3 272,157.4 269,035.7 257,336.4 248,116.9 232,707.5 242,855.4 225,628.2 1,087.0 1,196.3 1,183.9 1,197.2 1,102.0 1,157.1 1,099.7 930,915.6 911,232.2 970,685.0 968,403.7 944,910.5 964,911.2 966,478.2 989,161.6 991.1 983.1 923.7 845.1 791.4 723.0 744.5 702.7 50.5 54.8 52.5 45.9 45.7 51.3 58.8 48.4 303.1 307.2 330.3 328.2 312.0 313.2 311.1 312.8 110.2 109.1 109.7 96.5 87.4 92.0 98.0 83.5 622.6 606.0 588.1 569.8 560.5 534.7 542.5 487.1 86.4 80.2 83.7 82.0 77.4 74.2 81.1 73.2 2,163.9 2,140.4 2,088.0 1,874.4 1,788.4 1,836.0 1,707.7 8.1 17.5 17.6 8.3 2.1 5.2 27.3 10.8 16.8 23.5 0.8 1.7 1.6 1.1 0.2 1.4 6.0 0.5 3.5 3.7 20.7 20.7 20.0 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.3 20.1' 19.7' 20.1' 68.2 83.9 81.6 78.5 69.6 74.0 80.7 88.3 91.2 88.2 273.6 273.6 272.1 270.6 123.3 123.3 ,123.0 123.0 9.5 9.5 9.2 9.2 506 502 482 480 203 192 190 191 191 181 194,427 146,433 129,251 142,405 138,767 136,287 128,272 1,284,142 1,143,073 1,083,811 1,184,735 1,200,175 1,152,150 919,345 1,538,329 1,450,656 1,398,219 1,370,714 1,421,733 1,389,846 1,319,973 86,000 71,099 68,455 63,752 55,262 356,437 344,602 330,296 332,550 317,704 310,797 314,760 141,500 126,598 141,997 120,000 115,000 115,000 107,000 55,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 10,000 48,976 0 0 9,860 0 0 12,000 7,000 12,298 11,801 14,700 9,000 9,000 0 8,000 3,668,133 3,314,262 3,196,589 3,245,261 3,278,091 3,135,080 2,830,050 ' Included in Flood Control Total s Advance engineering and design and construction. (Including major rehabilitation projects.) Savings and slippages applied to projects. * Operation and maintenance, surveys, administrative and misc. programs and activities. ' For further information on waterborne commerce, see Waterborne Commerce of the United States, published annually. It may be obtained by writing Commander, U. S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans, ATTN: CELMN-ED-S, Box 60267, New Orleans, Louisiana 70160-0267 ' Includes New Melones and Spettishman, built by the Corps and operated by others ' All Federal agencies changed to "Visitor Days" at the direction of OMIB DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC 20310-0108 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Honorable Albert Gore President of the Senate Washington, D. C. 20510-0010 Dear Mr. President: I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1992 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1988 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1991 and September 30, 1992. Sincerely, G. Edward Dickey Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) HECSA TECHIrC M~. I DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC 20310-0108 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Honorable Thomas S. Foley Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515-6501 Dear Mr. Speaker: I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1992 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1988 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1991 and September 30, 1992. Sincerely, G. Edward Dickey Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) CONTENTS New England Division .................................................................. 1-1 North Atlantic Division: New York, NY, District ....................................... 2-1 Philadelphia, PA, District .............................................................. 3-1 Baltimore, MD, District ................................................................ 4-1 Norfolk, VA, District .................................................................. 5-1 South Atlantic Division: Wilmington, NC, District .......................................................... 6-1 Charleston, SC, District .............................................................. 7-1 Savannah, GA, District ............................................................. 8-1 Jacksonville, FL, District ....................................... . 9-1 Mobile, AL, District ................................................................... 10-1 Lower Mississippi Valley Division: New Orleans, LA, District ................ ........................................ 11-1 Vicksburg, MS, District ............................................................... 12-1 Memphis, TN, District ................... ........................................... 13-1 St. Louis, MO, District ................................................................ 14-1 Ohio River Division: Nashville, TN, District ................................................................ 15-1 Louisville, KY, District ................................................................ 16-1 Huntington, WV, District ........................................ 17-1 Pittsburgh, PA, District .................................. .................... 18-1 O hio R iver ....................................................................... ....... 19-1 North Central Division Buffalo, NY, District ................................................................ 20-1 Detroit, MI, District .................................................................. 21-1 Chicago, IL, District ............................................................... 22-1 Rock Island, IL, District ...................................... 23-1 St. Paul, MN, District ................................................................ 24-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN................. 25-1 Missouri River Division: Omaha, NE, District .................................................................... 26-1 Kansas City, MO, District ............................................................ 27-1 Southwestern Division: Little Rock, AR, District .............................................................. 28-1 Tulsa, OK, District ................................... ................................. 29-1 Fort Worth, TX, District ......................................... 30-1 Galveston, TX, District ........................................................... 31-1 Albuquerque, NM, District .......................................................... 32-1 South Pacific Division: Los Angeles, CA District............................................................... 33-1 San Francisco, CA, District .......................................................... 34-1 Sacramento, CA District .............................................................. 35-1 California Debris Commission ..................................................... 35-1A Pacific Ocean Division ................................................................. 36-1 North Pacific Division: Portland, OR, D istrict ................................................................ 37-1 Seattle, W A , D istrict ................................................................... 38-1 Walla Walla, WA, District ........................................................... 39-1 A laska, AK , D istrict ................................................................... 40-1 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Haibors............................................... 41-1 Mississippi River Commission ............................................................ 42-1 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory ......................................... 43-1 Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory ..................................... 44-1 Waterways Experiment Station ............................................................ 45-1 Engineer Topographic Laboratories ....................................................... 46-1 Water Resources Support Center .......................................................... 47-1 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses ................... 48-1 International Boundary Waters Board .................................................... 49-1 Investigation of Pmrojects Under Federal Power Act .......................................... 50-1 Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal & National Emergency Preparedness .............. 51-1 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery Activities........................... 52-1 Appendices: Flood Control Reservoirs Operable .................................................. A-1 Flood Control Projects Under Construction......................................... B-1 Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction ............................ .. B-1 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable .............................................. C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction ........................................... D-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power in Operation ........................ E-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction ............... F-1 Flood Damages Sustained and Prevented ........................................... G-1 In d ex ........................ ...... ........... ............................................... I-1 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION* The New England Division, an operating division with both district and division functions, comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Page Page Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control .................................. 1-3 2. Boston Harbor, MA ...................................... 1-3 3. Cape Cod Canal, MA .................................... 1-3 4. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA ..................... 1-4 5. Connecticut River below Hartford, CT ........ 1-4 6. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA ............................... 1-5 7. Green Harbor, MA.........................................1-5 8. Guilford Harbor, CT.....................................1-5 9. Hyannis Harbor, MA.....................................1-6 10. Jonesport Harbor, ME ................................. 1-6 11. Kennebec River, ME .................................... 1-6 12. Newburyport Harbor, MA.............................1-7 13. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH....................1-7 14. Saco River, M E ............................................. 1-8 15. Sesuit Harbor, MA.......................................1-8 16. Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, M E ............................................. 1-8 17. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...... 1-9 18. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.........1-9 19. Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) ........................................ 1-9 Alterations of Bridges 20. Authorized Bridge Alteration ...................... 1-9 Beach Erosion Control 21. Revere Beach, MA ........................................ 1-9 22. Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, M E ........................................... 1-9 23. Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI .................................................... 1-10 24. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT .................. 1-10 25. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects .......................................... 1-10 26. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .......................................... 1-10 27. Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) .......................... 1-10 Flood Control 28. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI..........1-11 28A. West Hill Dam, MA....................................1-11 29. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA .................................... 1-11 30. Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, M A and CT..........................................1-11 30A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT ............................ 1-12 30B. Barre Falls Dam, MA.................................1-12 30C. Birch Hill Dam, MA...................................1-13 30D. Colebrook River Lake, CT..........................1-13 30E. Conant Brook Dam, MA.............................1-13 30F. Connecticut River, Middletown, CT ........... 1-13 30G. Connecticut River Basin Fish Passage Facilities for Townshend and Ball Mountain Lakes, West River, VT ....... 1-14 30H. Farmington River, Simsbury, CT..............1-14 30I. Knightville Dam, MA ................................. 1-14 30J. Littleville Lake, MA ................................... 1-14 30K. North Hartland Lake, VT ........................... 1-15 30L. North Springfield Lake, VT ........................ 1-15 30M. Otter Brook Lake, NH ............................... 1-15 30N. Riverdale, West Springfield, MA................1-15 300. Surry Mountain Lake, NH.......................... 1-16 30P. Townshend Lake, VT ................................. 1-16 30Q. Tully Lake, M A ............................................ 1-16 30R. Union Village Dam, VT .............................. 1-16 30S. West Springfield, MA..................................1-16 31. Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA ......... 1-17 31A. Black Rock Lake, CT .................................. 1-17 31B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT ........................... 1-17 31C. Hop Brook Lake, CT.................................... 1-17 31D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT ........................ 1-18 31E. Thomaston Dam, CT .................................. 1-18 1-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Page Flood Control (Continued) 32. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ........ 1-18 32A. Blackwater Dam, NH .................................. 1-19 32B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ................... 1-19 32C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH.............................1-19 32D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH .................. 1-19 33. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA ....................................... 1-19 34. New London, CT ......................................... 1-20 35. Roughans Point, Revere, MA...................... 1-20 36. Stamford, CT .............................................. 1-20 37. Thames River Basin, CT, RI, and MA ....... 1-20 37A. Buffumville Lake, MA................................. 1-21 37B. East Brimfield Lake, MA............................1-21 37C. Hodges Village Dam, MA...........................1-21 37D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT ....................... 1-21 37E. West Thompson Lake, CT...........................1-21 37F. Westville Lake, MA.....................................1-22 38. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA ... 1-22 39. Town River Bay, Quincy, MA .................... 1-22 40. West River, New Haven, CT ...................... 1-22 41. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................................... 1-23 42. Flood Control Reservoir Operations...........1-23 43. Hurricane Barrier Operations..................1-24 44. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 1-24 45. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 1-24 Deauthorized Projects 46. Deauthorized Projects ................................ 1-24 Page General Investigations 47. Surveys ....................................................... 1-24 48. Collection and Study of Basic Data............ 1-25 49. Planning, Engineering and Design ........... 1-25 50. Preconstruction Engineering and D esign ......................................................... 1-25 Tables Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement ........... 1-26 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation .................. 1-35 Table 1-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 1-41 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................. 1-45 Table 1-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 1-46 Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects including Power ... 1-48 Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects ..................... 1-49 Table 1-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Sec. 107 ....................... 1-51 Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 ....................... 1-51 Table 14-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 ....................... 1-52 Table 1-K Blackstone River Basin....................1-52 Table 1-L Connecticut River Basin..................1-53 Table 1-M Housatonic River Basin .................... 1-55 Table 1-N Merrimack River Basin .................. 1-56 Table 1-0 Thames River Basin ........................ 1-57 Table 1-P Boston Harbor, MA........................... 1-57 Table 1-Q Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................ 1-58 Table 1-R Projects Under Special Authorization...................................1-59 1-2 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Navigation 1L AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England Divisionjurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to provide technical assistance in the eradication or control of aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing program.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute at least 50 percent of the cost of planning beyond the reconnaissance stage and at least 50 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations during fiscal year. On request, technical information was provided to local interests on specific aquatic weed problems. These problems included nuisance growth of aquatic vegetation in the Charles River and several lakes. 2. BOSTON HARBOR, MA Location. Harbor includes all expanse of tidewater lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley and extending from that line westward to mainland. This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive of the islands. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13270 and 13272.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1915, 1917, 1938. Existing project Completed work at Boston Harbor, adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor proper and its approaches - Fort Point Channel, Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a more detailed description see page 3 ofAnnual Report for 1974. These improvements were completed in May 1966 with the construction of Chelsea River 35-foot channel and maneuvering basin. New work involves deepening the Mystic River and Reserved Channels from 35 to 40 feet and the Chelsea River Channel from 35 to 38 feet; along with widening and deepening to 40 feet the Inner Confluence Area which provides access to the Mystic and Chelsea River Channels; and widening at the entrance to the Reserved Channel. The proposed project would increase the navigational efficiency and safety of harbor operations and reduce tidal delays for larger vessels. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Formal assurances for new work have not been requested yet. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, currently estimated at $7,790,000; reimburse an additional ten percent of the costs allocated to deep draftnavigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas), currently estimated at $2,165,000; relocate utilities necessary for construction of the project, currently estimated at $950,000; and deepen berthing areas at the terminals of project beneficiaries, currently estimated at $2,400,000. Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and piers in harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth-Fore, and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. For a full description of channel facilities in Chelsea River, refer to House Document 350, 87th Congress, 2nd session. (See Port Series No. 3, Part 2, Port of Boston, MA dated 1967.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued preconstruction engineering and design activities including ship simulation studies and preparation of the Design Memorandum. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $42,417 were incurred for preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for maintenance dredging in association with a proposed improvement project. 3. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from the head of Buzzards Bay, MA, easterly to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13246.) Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965. More recent major rehabilitation of the two highway bridges crossing the canal 1-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 is completed. Rehabilitation of the Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in 1981. The Sagamore Highway Bridge was completed in 1982. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. Seventh terminal is State pier, owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and on north bank of canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract awarded last FY to replace the walkway at Sandwich bulkhead was completed in December 1991. Final contract amount was $29,481. A contract awarded last FY to install storage tanks was completed in April 1992. Final contract amount was $60,939. A contract awarded last FY for road and parking lot repairs in the Bourne Recreation Area was completed in February 1992. Total contract amount was $42,095. A contract for emergency shoreline protection at Wings Neck, Bourne, was awarded in July 1992. Ending the FY the contract was 71 percent complete with earnings of $145,000. A continuing contract to paint the Bourne highway bridge was awarded in September 1992. Work had not started at close of FY. Other FY 1992 maintenance costs were: operation and maintenance of Buzzards Bay railroad bridge $219,498; review of architect engineer proposal for rehabilitation of the Buzzards Bay railroad bridge $55,427. Other FY 1992 costs for work accomplished by hired labor and contract were: vessel traffic control activities $2,118,735; maintenance ofbuildings, grounds and utilities $761,275; operation and maintenance of project recreational facilities $654,073; project administration facilities $490,712; project utilities $163,283; maintenance of roads and bridges $93,829; periodic inspections $113,418; engineering and design $130,194; contract supervision and administration $19,033 and $25,836 for real estate activities. 4. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA Location. At northeastern corner of Nantucket Sound about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, MA, and 66 miles south of Providence Harbor, RI, at northern extremity of Cape Cod. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13237.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1942. Existing project. An entrance channel ten feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Construction of existing project was initiated in September and completed in October 1957. By 1961, a break in barrier beach connecting Morris and Monomoy Islands caused Federal Channel to fill in completely. Local interests dredged an emergency channel to obtain eight-foot depth in June 1962 and performed additional dredging in 1963. Minimal maintenance dredging by the Federal Government in April and May 1964 provided access to inner harbor for 1964 boating season. Anew ten-foot channel through Harding Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The town operates a wharf on the north side of the inner harbor which is leased out to commercial users. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Adjustment of $12,426 for rental cost of Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was made for dredging completed last FY; final costs were $64,574. Hired labor costs of $654 were incurred for supervision and inspection associated with a contract completed last FY for removing timber pile jetty remains. 5. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT Location. Has its source in Connecticut Lake in northern New Hampshire, flows southerly 380 miles and empties into Long Island Sound at Saybrook, CT, 14 miles west of New London. Hartford, now head of commercial navigation, is 52 statute miles, by channel, from mouth. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12373 and 12377.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Eightmile River, CT, elimination as separate project: Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from deep water in Connecticut River to Hamburg and for turning basin of same depth, 150 feet wide, approximately 300 feet long at Hamburg. Project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1910. Costs and expenditures were $9,000 all for new work. In accordance with River and Harbor Act of 1950, project for Connecticut River below Hartford was modified to include project for Eightmile River. Aforementioned Act also provided for an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and about 6.5 acres in area in upper cove in Hamburg. A channel 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide for a distance of 52 miles upstream to Hartford; two riprap jetties at the mouth of the river; and dikes, training walls, revetments and other regulatory works along the river between Hartford and Gildersleeve Island. The project provides for small-boat improvements at Wethersfield Cove; Eightmile River; Essex; and North Cove, Old Saybrook. For a more detailed description of project see page 7 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Existing project was completed in September 1965 with the construction of channel and anchorage in North Cove, Old Saybrook, CT. For further details, see Annual Report for 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Terminal facilities. Along both Connecticut and Eightmile Rivers there are two or three wharves at each river town, one or more in each town being open to public use. At Hartford and Middletown there is about one-half of wharf frontage along west bank of river. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY was completed in October 1991. Earnings this FY were $61,963 with 13,770 cubic yards of material removed. Final contract amount was $337,963 with a total of 75,103 cubic yards of material removed from Saybrook Outer Bar, Calves Island Bar and Essex Shoal. Hired labor costs for supervision and inspection were $21,300 and $10,100 for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys. A contract awarded last FY for a disposal site study at Cornfield Shoals was completed; earnings this FY were $20,000. Total contract amount was $40,000. Costs incurred in conjunction with evaluating potential impacts on Shortnose Sturgeon and their habitat were $39,350 for in-house sampling and testing and $8,166 for contract sampling and testing. A continuing contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging of the channel and anchorages in North Cove commenced in late October 1991 and ceased in mid April 1992 due to an environmental restriction. Approximately 80,993 cubic yards of material were removed and disposed of at the Cornfield Shoals disposal site in Long Island Sound. Ending the FYthe contract was 51 percent complete with earnings of$321,872. Dredging is to continue in October 1992. Earnings this FY on a disposal inspection contract were $15,000. Hired labor costs included $42,200 for supervision and inspection, $1,300 for contract administration, and $32,200 for performing and plotting preand after-dredge surveys. 6. CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MA Location. At eastern end of Cuttyhunk Island, at western entrance to Buzzards Bay, about 14 miles south of New Bedford Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13229.) Existing project. A channel generally 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from outer harbor to westerly terminal in Cuttyhunk Pond, about 3,500 feet; an anchorage in inner harbor 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, and 800 feet wide; and maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. Existing project was completed in 1939. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Disposal areas for maintenance will be furnished when required. Terminal facilities. Two town wharves of timber and pile construction, having total berthing space of 400 feet, are open to public use. Limited mechanical-handling facilities are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging in the entrance channel by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was performed in June 1992 at a rental cost of $75,000. Approximately 9,585 cubic yards of sand were removed and placed in a nearshore disposal site off Church's Beach. Hired labor costs of $27,000 were incurred for performing pre-and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. 7. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield, MA, about 30 miles southeast of Boston, MA, and nine miles north of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253.) Existing project. Provides for channel six feet deep (eight feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with small turning basin at upstream limit; five-acre anchorage near Town Pier, six feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in part, and a 200-foot extension of existing west jetty at elevation +12, with dike to beach berm at elevation +14 feet, and raising eastjetty to elevation +14. (See Table 1- B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Construction was completed in October 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging in the entrance channel by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was performed in May 1992 at a rental cost of $101,430. Approximately 35,600 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of nearshore off Green Harbor Beach. Hired labor costs of $26,842 were incurred for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. A final adjustment of $15,000 was madefor dredging completed last FYby the CURRITUCK. Final rental cost for last FY dredging was $225,145. 8. GUILFORD HARBOR, CT Location. On north side of Long Island Sound about 13 miles east of New Haven Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12354.) Existing project. An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the harbor from Long Island Sound to an anchorage basin in East River, length 0.8 mile, a channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide up Sluice Creek 880 feet to Whitfield Street; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide in East River, length 1,500 feet. Mean and spring tidal ranges are 5.4 and 6.4 feet, respectively. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in April 1957. 1-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. State wharf about 370 feet long provides adequatefacilities for existing commerce. Town wharf on north bank of East River at foot of Whitfield Street is no longer usable. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in September 1992. Work had not started at close of FY. The total contract amount was $522,550 of which $40,000 was obligated this FY. Dredging is expected to start early in November 1992. Hired labor costs included $8,700 for preparation of plans and specifications, $700 for contract administration, and $12,060 for performing pre-dredge surveys. 9. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA Location. On south shore of Cape Cod about 16 miles west of Chatham, MA and 20 miles northeast ofVineyard Haven, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13237.) Existing project. A stone breakwater 1,170 feet long, lying about 0.7 mile offshore, dredging to 15.5 feet deep in protected area behind breakwater; a channel 12 feet deep with widths of 150 and 100 feet in outer and inner harbors respectively, an anchorage area 12 feet deep and about 5 acres in area adjacent to inner harbor channel north of Harbor Bluff; and a riprap jetty 1,000 feet long extending south from Dunbar Point. Mean spring tidal ranges in outer harbor 3.1 and 3.7 feet, respectively. Breakwater was completed in 1882 and dredging behind breakwater in 1906. Rehabilitation was necessary to restore breakwater to its designed purpose of providing aharbor of refuge. Restoration was completed in November 1961. Construction of 12-foot channel and anchorage was initiated in May and completed in November 1959. Commonwealth of Massachusetts constructed the jetty extending south from Dunbar Point in 1962. (See Table 1-B at end ofchapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are two town wharves in the inner harbor. One has a bulkhead frontage of about 800 feet. Other private landings are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Adjustment of $47,800 was made on dredging completed last FY by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK. Final rental cost was $156,189. Hired labor costs of $1,539 were incurred for plotting afterdredge surveys associated with last year's maintenance dredging. 10. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME Location. Jonesport Harbor is situated on the north side of Moosabec Reach in Washington County, ME, about 190 miles northeast of Portland, ME, and about 40 miles southwest of the Canadian border at Eastport, ME. Existing project. A combined rubble mound and cellular steel sheet pile breakwater, 1,200 feet in length; a 15-acre anchorage composed ofnine acres, six feet deep, and six acres, eight feet deep; and an entrance channel 100 feet wide and eight feet deep. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. For full description see Annual Report for 1987. Fully complied with for contribution during construction. Local interests must pay an additional ten percent of project costs ($832,119) within a period of 30 years following completion. Terminal facilities. There are 13 privately owned wharves in the harbor, 12 of which are used by local fishermen and one which is used for receiving about three million gallons of petroleum annually. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Administrative close-out of project completed. 11. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME Location. Drains a large number of lakes and minor streams, and flows from Moosehead Lake about 150 miles southerly and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 25 miles east of Portland, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13298.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. A channel 27 feet deep and not less than 500 feet wide, extending from mouth to bridge at Bath; thence to Gardiner a channel not less than 150 feet wide, 17 feet deep at Beef Rock Shoal, at foot of Swan Island, 18 feet deep through rock at Lovejoy Narrows, near head of Swan Island, decreasing to 16 feet deep at Gardiner; channel west of Swan Island, 100 feet wide, 12 feet deep, except at upper shoal, where depth was to be 15 feet; and channel 125 feet wide and 11 feet deep from Gardiner upstream to Augusta at head of navigation. Section of river included in project is about 44 miles long. Work includes dredging, rock excavation, and two riprap training walls. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharves suitable for landing or loading are at Bath, Woolwich, Richmond, Randolph, Gardiner, Hallowell, and Augusta. Rail connections are available at some wharves. Depths alongside range from 12 to 25 feet. Many facilities are equipped with mechanism for handling passengers and freight. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the Doubling Point Reach was completed in October 1991 by the Government-owned hopper dredge McFARLAND. Rental charges for FY 1992 were $416,080. Total cost, including mobilization last FY, was $526,080. Approximately 69,000 cubic yards of material were removed and disposed of in a deep spot in the river about two miles south of the dredging area and north of Bluff Head. Hired labor costs of $34,877 were incurred for performing and plotting preand after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. A cost of $600 was incurred for rental of a van. 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 12. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA Location. On south bank of Merrimack River, about 2.5 miles above mouth, and about 48 miles by water north of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13282.) Existing project. Two jetties, one projecting 4,118 feet from the north shore, the other projecting 2,445 feet from the south shore, converging until 1,000 feet apart, then extending seaward 1,000 feet parallel to axis of channel; partially closing Plum Island Basin by a timber dike; channel 12 feet deep and 400 feet wide through bar, thence nine feet deep and 200 feet wide to and including a widened turning basin in front of wharves. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existingproject.) Existing project was completed in August 1958, with the improvement of 12-foot channel and outer harbor. North jetty was completed in 1914; south jetty was completed, except for a length of about 30 feet at its outer end, in 1905. Required rehabilitation in these jetties completed in September 1970. Plum Island Basin was partially closed in 1883 by construction of a timber dike. North Rock was removed in 1901. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Marinas, a yacht club, public landings, and a commercial fish pier extend along a frontage of the south bank of Merrimack River below highway bridge and one town pier and four marinas on the north side of river. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $800 were incurred for supervision, inspection and contract administration in association with maintenance dredging performed at the end oflast FY. A payment of$171 was made on a FY 1990 dredging project by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK with final payment still pending at the end of this FY. 13. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME AND NH Location. Piscataqua River forms a portion of boundary between Maine and New Hampshire. Mouth of this river is called Portsmouth Harbor. It is 45 miles northeast of Boston Harbor, MA and 37 miles southwest of Portland Harbor, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13278.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. Removal of ledge rock areas in vicinity of Gangway Rock, southwest point of Badgers Island and Boiling Rock to 35 feet deep; widening 35-foot channel at bends by removal of ledge rock areas in vicinity of Henderson Point, Gangway Rock, Badgers Island, Maine-New Hampshire Interstate Bridge and Boiling Rock; and extending channel from above Boiling Rock to a point about 1,700 feet above Atlantic Terminal Sales dock in Newington generally 400 feet wide, and 35 feet deep below mean low water with maneuvering basins above Boiling Rock and at head ofproject; channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from Little Harbor through Rye-New Castle drawbridge, then northerly between mainland and Leach's Island to deep water in vicinity of Shapleigh and Goat Islands, channel 75 feet wide six feet deep up Sagamore Creek to public landing on downstream side of Sagamore Avenue bridge and anchorage strip, six feet deep, 75 feet wide, totalling three acres, adjacent to channel in Sagamore Creek. Public Law 86- 645, Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended in 1965 and by Chief of Engineers, December 23, 1965 authorized construction of the six-foot channels and anchorages. Modification authorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for: widening of the 35-foot deep channel from 600 feet to 1,000 feet between two vertical lift bridges; widening northern limit of 35- foot deep channel adjacent to Badgers Island by 100 feet; and widening southern limit of existing 35-foot deep channel at Goat Island from 400 to 550 feet. Total estimated cost (September 1990) for new work is $17,890,000 exclusive of $5,384,043 for new work completed before 1971 and amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Assurances for 1986 modification were executed on February 4, 1988. Local interests must pay the initial 25 percent of project costs concurrent with project construction and reimburse the additional ten percent within the 30-year period following completion of construction. In addition, local interests must do the following, for which there is no estimate of cost: provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction and later maintenance of the project including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain adequate depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals; accomplish all alterations and relocations of transportation facilities (excluding railroads, combined highway and railroad and publicly owned highway bridges and approaches thereto), storm drains, sewer outfalls, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the project; prohibit the erection of any structure, within a distance to be determined by the Chief of Engineers, from the bottom edge of the proposed channel and turning basin. Terminal facilities. Waterfront terminals are chiefly on south bank of Piscataqua River in Portsmouth and Newington. U.S. Navy Yard is on opposite bank at Kittery, ME. Eighteen piers, wharves, and landings represent available terminals for handling the port's waterborne commerce. Navy Yard is not used for commercial activities. On Maine side of river are a town landing and two docks. On New Hampshire side there are 13 terminals, six of which include a public landing, 1-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 two docks, three facilities used for vessel mooring and landings, are at Portsmouth. In addition there are a number of private recreational boat docks. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 1 for Ports of Searsport and Portland, ME, and Portsmouth, NH.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for widening the channel adjacent to Goat Island was awarded October 4, 1991. Work began in December 1991 and was completed in April 1992. Payments through July 1992 were $2,431,364 with final payment pending at close of FY. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in November 1991. Work began on December 11 and was completed on December 15, 1991. Final payment was still pending at the end of the FY with earnings to date of $91,948. Approximately 20,100 cubic yards of material were removed and disposed of at a riverine disposal site about 3,000 feet downstream from the dredging area. Hired labor costs included $6,500 for supervision and inspection; $500 for contract administration; and $15,500 for performing and plotting pre- and post-dredge surveys. 14. SACO RIVER, ME Location. Rises in White Mountain region of New Hampshire at an elevation about 1,900 feet above sea level, flows about 105 miles in a general southeasterly direction, and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 16 miles southwest of Portland, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13287.) Existing project. For description of completed existing portion of project see Annual Report for 1978. For a description of completed improvement of project see Annual Report for 1983. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves of solid fill construction at Saco and Biddeford, none of which has railroad connection; and a small pier near mouth of river used for summer passenger business. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was performed south of Half- Tide Island near the upstream limit of the project from July 20 to August 12, 1992 at a rental cost of $163,000. Approximately 15,785 cubic yards of material were removed and placed in deep areas of the river located about 4,000 feet downstream from the dredging site. A contract for maintenance dredging at the mouth of the river was awarded in August 1992 in the amount of $649,589. Mobilization took place this FY at a cost of $130,000. Dredging is to commence in October 1992. Hired labor costs included $22,500 for the preparation of plans and specifications; $10,600 for supervision and administration; and $86,400 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys. 15. SESUIT HARBOR, MA Location. Sesuit Harbor is located on the north shore ofDennis in Barnstable County, about85 miles southeast of Boston, MA. The town of Dennis is bordered on the north by Cape Cod Bay, Brewster and Harwich on the east, Nantucket Sound on the south, and Yarmouth on the west. Land area within the town is 20.66 square miles and has a tidal shoreline of 29.8 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13250.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep below mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water in Cape Cod Bay to a point opposite the Dennis Yacht Club thence reducing in width to 80 feet at the entrance to the inner harbor basin, for a total channel length of 2,400 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in August 1982. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging in the entrance channel by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was performed from May 23 to June 6, 1992 at a rental cost of $94,226. Approximately 37,360 cubic yards of sand were removed and placed in near-shore areas east of the entrance channel off Cold Storage Beach. Hired labor costs of $24,300 were incurred for performing pre- and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. 16. WOOD ISLAND HARBOR AND THE POOL AT BIDDEFQRD, ME Location. This harbor is situated at the southern end of Saco Bay, ME, immediately south of the mouth of the Saco River. It is 20 miles southwest of Portland, ME, and 30 miles northeast of Portsmouth, NH. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13286.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in the Pool 6 feet deep, approximately 9.7 acres in extent, and three icebreakers south of Fishermen's Wharf. This work was completed in 1956. New work provides for a navigation channel from deep water in Wood Island Harbor to a point just inside the gut at Biddeford Pool. The channel is approximately 4,200 feet long, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on February 5, 1992 between the Corps and the city of Biddeford, ME for new work. The local sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; perform all alterations and relocations of facilities and utilities determined by the Government to be necesary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; provide during the period of construction a cash contribution equal to ten percent of total project costs; and repay with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years following completion of construction, an additional ten percent of total project 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION costs, partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves in the harbor. Three are of pile and timber, and the other two are solid-fill construction. One wharf is used for the receipt of seafood, two are used in connection with a yacht club, and the remaining two are private. There is no public-owned wharf but one of the wharves is open to the public free of charge. None of the wharves have railroad connections. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for improvement dredging at Wood Island Harbor was awarded March 5, 1992. Work is scheduled to begin next FY due to environmental restrictions. Maintenance: Project condition surveys were conducted at a cost of $5,400. 17. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter.) 18. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 1-C at end of chapter.) 19. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-H at end of chapter.) Alterations of Bridges 20. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, MA. Construction was completed in October 1961 with a Federal cost of $138,518. In addition non-Federal contributed funds amounted to $8,062. For details see page 63 of Annual Report for 1962. Beach Erosion Control 21. REVERE BEACH, MA Location. In the city of Revere, Suffolk County, MA, approximately seven miles north of the main entrance channel to Boston Harbor, and six miles northeast of the city of Boston, MA. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chart No. 13275 and U.S. Geological Survey Maps, Boston Bay quadrangle.) Existing project. Placement of sandfill along 13,000 feet of beach. The top of the sandfill will be placed at 18 feet above mean low water, including a 50-foot wide berm, sloping one-foot vertical in 15 feet horizontal to meet the existing beach. The total width of the beach will extend approximately 300 feet, of which, about 185 feet is above the mean high waterline. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances were executed on May 31, 1990 between the Corps and the Metropolitan District Commission. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts contained in the Water Resources DevelopmentAct of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), local interests are required to: contribute in cash 35 percent of the cost of construction of the project, presently estimated at $3,605,000; contribute in cash 35 percent of the periodic nourishment cost for an initial period of 50 years, now estimated at $22,000 annually, such contribution to be prior to each nourishment operation; assure the continued performance of the periodic nourishment and repair of the project after the first 50 years and during the economic life as may be required to serve the intended purpose; assure that water pollution that would endanger the health of bathers would not be permitted; hold the United States free from damages due to construction ofthe project; provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way for the initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; assure continued public ownership of the shore and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract awarded in FY 1990 to place initial beach fill was completed in June 1992. Final contract amount was $4,374,664. 22. ROOSEVELT CAMPOBELLO INTERNATIONAL PARK, LUBEC, ME Location. The Roosevelt Campobello International Park is located on the southeast end of Campobello Island. The island is politically part of New Brunswick, Canada, and is separated from Lubec, ME, by the Lubec Narrows and connected by FDR Memorial Bridge. It is approximately 120 miles east of Bangor, ME. Existing project. Stone slope revetment to provide shoreline protection for the lighthouse at Mulholland Point. The stone protection extends 375 feet around the point at a height of about 10 feet and ties into stable ground at either end of the project. The upper slope, above the stone protection, is graded and seeded. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages due to the fault or 1-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The Operation and Maintenance Manual was in the process of being completed. 23. SOUTHEAST LIGHTHOUSE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. Southeast Lighthouse is located atop a 150-foot bluff on the southeast tip of Block Island in the town of New Shoreham, RI. The lighthouse was first illuminated in 1875 and has been a popular tourist attraction for over a century. It is the highest lighthouse in New England, visible from 35 miles at sea, and its 237,000 candle power is the strongest on the Atlantic coast. Existing project. Provides for all work necessary to relocate Southeast Lighthouse and the attached dwelling some 245 feet away from the erodingbluff. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on April 5,1992 between the Corps, the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management and the Southeast Lighthouse Foundation. Local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rightsof- way; provide 50 percent of project costs for relocating Southeast Lighthouse; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $970,000; and bear all costs for operation and maintenance of the lighthouse after project completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A competitive services contract for the relocation of Southeast Lighthouse was negotiated, however, award was delayed pending receipt of local funds. 24. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT Location. Woodmont Beach is located on the northern shore of Long Island Sound in the borough of Woodmont, city of Milford about five miles southwest of New Haven, CT and some 82 miles northeasterly of New York City. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the amount of one-third of the first cost of protection and improvement ofthose portions ofthe shore which are publicly owned by widening to a width of 100 feet by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore in the first pocket beach west of Merwin Point; widening to a width of 100-150 feet, 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street northerly to a point about 400 feet north of Anderson Avenue; and construction offive impermeable groins 300 to 400 feet long. This work was completed by the State of Connecticut in 1959. (For details see Annual Report for 1961.) New work provides for the direct placement of sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet ofbeach between Clinton and Bonsilene Streets to form a berm 50 feet wide. Reconstruction of the Usher Road/Dunbar Street and Bonsilene Street groins. Mitigation to replace rocky habitat for Blue Mussels lost as a result of sand placement. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on May 18, 1992 between the Corps and the city of Milford, CT for the new work. The local sponsor must provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-ofway for the initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; contribute in cash 35 percent of the cost to construct the project; contribute in cash 35 percent of the periodic beach nourishment cost and 100 percent of the groin maintenance cost for the 50-year economic life of the project; assure continued public ownership of the beach and its administration for public use for 50 years; control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and if necessary provide a drainage system to divert freshwater runoff away from the beach. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of shore protection and erosion control measures at Woodmont Beach was awarded August21, 1992. The contractor began work on the administrative phase of the contract but had not mobilized by FY end. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of beach erosion projects were not conducted in fiscal year 1992. 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-D at end of chapter.) 27. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-I at end of chapter.) 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Flood Control 28. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan include a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a localflood protection project at lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd Session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI, along the Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the Blackstone River in Millbury, MA, and on the Clear River in Burrillville, RI, were authorized in 1985. (See Table 1-K at end of chapter on Reservoir and Local Protection Projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan.) 28A. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, three miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast ofUxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY to replace gate operators and install generator was completed in October 1991. Final contract amount was $100,114. 29. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. The project provides for Federal acquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage areas totalling 8,102 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The acquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed is intended as a multiple-purpose project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife management. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Land acquisition is complete. A total of 3,210 acres have been acquired in fee at a cost of $2,152,853 and restrictive easements have been obtained for 4,892 acres at a cost of $591,193. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plain lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances were provided by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs for ordinary maintenance activities, project surveillance and inspection, as well as land use administration, were $144,366. In addition $65,616 was expended on a fish and wildlife management contract. 30. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT, and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction often reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as setforth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir 1-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch ofWestfield River, MA, and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin ofplan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, VT project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, VT; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH, were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, NH project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, West Springfield, MA, Hartford, VT, Wethersfield, CT, and Keene, NH authorized and constructed in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville, VT, Conway, MA, Milford, CT, Simsbury, CT authorized in accordance with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act were completed. (See Table 1-L at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works for Connecticut River Basin.) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified the comprehensive plan for the control of flood-waters in the Connecticut River Basin, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, authorized by Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1572) by authorizing the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities at Townshend Dam, West River, VT to enable upstream migrant adult Atlantic salmon to bypass that dam and Ball Mountain Dam, VT, and to provide at both Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams facilities as necessary for the downstream passage of juvenile Atlantic salmon. The estimated project cost is $1,500,000. 30A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is two miles north of village ofJamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Construction of initial recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of fish passage facilities at Townshend and Ball Mountain Lakes on the West River was awarded in May 1992. Work at Ball Mountain Lake involves automation of the center gate to regulate the spring pool elevation for downstream passage ofjuvenile salmon. Ending the FY the contract was 67 percent complete with earnings of $391,550. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to paint the service gates at two projects was awarded in June 1992. Work had not started at close of FY. 30B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles, northwest of Worcester, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA and Wachusett Mountain, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY to replace the electrical service at the Environmental Laboratory was completed in January 1992. Final contract amount was $34,659. A contract for addition to the Water Quality Laboratory was awarded in April 1992. Ending the FY the contract was 95 percent 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION complete with earnings of$40,774. A contract to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded in July 1992. Work had not started at FY end. 30C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with the Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of city of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-NH and Templeton, MA) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY for road repairs was completed in October 1991. Final contract amount was $116,693. A contract to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded in July 1992. Work had not started at FY end. A contract to repair the New Boston Road bridge was awarded in August 1992. Work had not started at FY end. 30D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is in town ofColebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY to repair six bridges at various locations was completed in October 1991. Final contract amount was $306,666 of which $28,836 was for Colebrook River Lake. A contract awarded last FY for pavement repairs at two projects was completed in December 1991. Final contract amount was $61,156. 30E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about two miles southeast of community of Monson, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a cost of $84,492. 30F. CONNECTICUT RIVER, MIDDLETOWN, CT Location. The city of Middletown is located in Middlesex County, in the lower Connecticut Valley, in south-central Connecticut. Middletown is approximately 15 miles south of Hartford, CT and 20 miles north of New Haven, CT. Existing project. The project is located along the Connecticut River in the vicinity of River Road at the intersection with Eastern Drive, approximately 6,500 feet downstream of the Arrigoni (Route 66) Bridge. The project consists of 500 linear feet of 6-inch concrete paving block protection underlain by a 1-foot layer of gravel bedding and riprap toe protection along River Road. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on February 13, 1992 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The local sponsor shall provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, railroads, and bridges determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay a cash contribution in the amount necessary to bring the non-Federal share of project costs to 25 percent (a minimun cash contribution of 5 percent is required); assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; and bear all operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were issued in Feburary 1992, however, receipt of bids had to be temporarily postponed when the city of Middletown identified utilities in the project area. Plans and specifications were revised and an amendment to the original solicitation was issued and favorable bids were opened on September 22, 1992. 1-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 30G. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN FISH PASSAGE FACILITIES FOR TOWNSHEND AND BALL MOUNTAIN LAKES, WEST RIVER, VT Location. The West River watershed is located in southern Vermont. Townshend Lake dam is located on the West River about 19.5 miles above its confluence with the Connecticut River. Ball Mountain Lake dam is situated on the West River approximately 9.5 miles upstream of Townshend Lake and 29 miles upstream of the Connecticut River. Existing project. Construct a fish barrier and fish holding structure 300 feet downstream of Townshend Lake, modifications to the Townshend outlet structure, automation of the gate controls at Ball Mountain Lake, and procurement of a fish transport tank (truckmountable for depositing fish). Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on May 4, 1992, between the Corps and the State of Vermont. Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the Government, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; and hold and save the Government free from damages arising from the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for the construction of fish passage facilities at Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams was awarded on May 12, 1992. Work began during June and was 67 percent complete at the end of FY with earnings of $391,550. 30H11. FARMINGTON RIVER, SIMSBURY, CT Location. The town of Simsbury is located in the central portion of Hartford County in north-central Connecticut, approximately 25 miles east of the New York- Connecticut state line and 14 miles northwest of the city of Hartford, CT. Existing project. The proposed project includes concrete grid block and stone slope protection along 900 feet of eroding Farmington River streambank. The project will protect the river bank and an adjacent three-foot diameter sewer trunk line. Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, currently estimated at $12,000; perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, railroads and bridges, determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; provide during the period of construction a cash contribution of five percent of total project costs, currently estimated to be $26,000; provide during the period of construction an additional cash contribution of 17.6 percent, presently estimated at $91,000, so that the total contribution equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume the responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; no less than once each year, inform affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of plans and specifications was completed. 30I. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is four miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final payment on the contract for installation ofsafety fencing, completed last FY, was pending at close of FY. A contract to repair concrete spillway weir/retaining wall was awarded in May 1992. Ending the FY the contract was 42 percent complete with earnings of $59,233. A contract to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded in July 1992. Work had not started at FY end. 30J. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, one mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded in July 1992. Work had not started at FY end. 30K. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and one mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for miscellaneous concrete repairs, awarded last FY, was completed in July 1992. To date the contractor has received $95,240 with final payment pending at the close of the FY. 30L. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and three miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT, and Claremont, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $662,997. 30M. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene, NH. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $455,920. 30N. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA Location. The town of West Springfield is situated in southwestern Massachusetts on the west bank of the Connecticut River, about 90 miles west of Boston, MA and 135 miles northwest of New York City. Riverdale is in the northern portion of the town of West Springfield, MA. Existing project. The project involved the construction of approximately 12,700 feet of earth levee, two pumping stations and three stop-log structures. The project, with the approved plan of upstream reservoirs, is designed to protect against a flood greater than any of record. The project is a unit of the comprehensive plan of flood control and other purposes in the Connecticut River Basin and was authorized by the Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941. Construction of this work was initiated in April 1949 and completed in December 1950. (For details see Annual Report for 1950.) A plan of improvement authorized in 1987 calls for the expansion of the gravity outflow and pumping capacity of the existing Riverdale Pumping Station. This includes adding a 24-inch diesel powered pump into the existing station. The proposed project also includes jacking a separate 5-foot diameter, reinforced concrete culvert through the dike, running parallel to the existing culvert to increase the gravity outflow capacity. The new gravity conduit will be equipped with an ungated inlet and an outlet structure which includes a 60" x 6" self contained, electronically operated sluice gate. During emergencies, the gate could be operated manually from a new bridge and tower structure on the river side of the dike. An existing nine-foot diameter culvert, about 400 feet downstream on Bagg Brook will be replaced with a realigned eight-foot x 13-foot corrugated metal arch and a 50-foot long transition aligned to tie smoothly into the existing downstream channel. Project cost estimate for the modification is $890,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 16, 1992 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management for new work. The local sponsor shall be solely responsible for operating, maintaining, replacing, and rehabilitating the project; provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of five percent of total project costs, currently estimated to be $44,500; provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, sewers, and related and special faciltiies determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project, currently estimated to be $50,000; provide during the period of construction an additional cash contribution of 14.4 percent, presently estimated at $128,000, so that the total contribution equals 25 percent of total project costs; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords, or that would 1-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 hinder operation and maintenance; and the local sponsor will assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of $5 million. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project plans and specifications were updated. Continued coordination with the local sponsor to assist in the acquisition of required real estate. 300. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and five miles north of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY to replace underground fuel tanks was completed in January 1992. Final contract amount was $44,958. 30P. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and about two miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream about four miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969. Secondary phase completed in September 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of fish passage facilities at Ball Mountain and Townshend Lakes on the West River was awarded in May 1992. Work at Townshend Lake involves the construction of a fish trap facility approximately 300 feet downstream of the dam and construction of a plunge pool just downstream of the overflow weir. Ending the FY the contract was 67 percent complete with earnings of $391,550. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to paint the service gates at two projects was awarded in June 1992. Work had not started at FY end. 30Q. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is one mile north of Fryville, MA, and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded in July 1992. Work had not started at FY end. 30R. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, four miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is onefourth mile north of Union Village, VT, and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June1950. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in September 1989 to repair Route 132 bridge was terminated for non-performance in June 1991. After readvertising, a contract was awarded in September 1991 and completed in July 1992. Final contract amount was $56,997. A contract to replace the stairs and railing was awarded in August 1991 and completed in February 1992. Total contract amount was $43,357. A contract to upgrade the electrical system at various dam sites was awarded in July 1992. Work had not started at FY end. A contract to replace guard rails was awarded in July 1992. Work had not started at FY end. 30S. WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA Location. The West Springfield local protective works are located in the town of West Springfield, MA. The project is on the west bank of the Connecticut River, 76 miles above its mouth. (See Geological Survey maps for Springfield South and West Springfield, MA-CT.) Existing project. This project consists of a system of earth levees and concretefloodwalls approximately 24,500 feet in length. The system starts at high ground, in the vicinity of Harrison Place, and extends downstream 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION along the Connecticut River and up the north bank of the Westfield River to high ground at the Boston & Albany Railroad. The work involved raising 13,700 feet of existing levee, constructing 2,300 feet offloodwall, improving 2,400 feet of river bank, and treating 6,100 feet of existing levee foundation. Three pumping stations with appurtenant drainage facilities were also constructed for the disposal of interior drainage. The project, with the approved plan of upstream reservoirs, is designed to protect against a flood greater than any of record. The project is a unit of the comprehensive plan offlood control and other purposes in the Connecticut River Basin and was authorized by the Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938. Construction of this work was initiated in March 1939 and completed in July 1942 with the exception offoundation treatment along the Westfield River south of Agawam Bridge, which was initiated in May 1947 and completed in November 1947, and relief well and drainage system, which was initiated in August 1952 and completed in July 1953. A modification of the project was authorized in October 1982 providing for the raising of the floodwall sections by one foot and the provision of a flood forecasting system. Work for floodwall modification began in April 1984 and was completed in August 1984. The National Weather Service and the town of West Springfield have entered into a Memorandum of Agreement for the installation and operation of an automated flood forecasting system. This system includes a centralized micro-computer, four precipitation gages, two river gages and a repeater site. Installation of the automated flood forecasting system was completed in February 1991 and provides the town with timely and accurate forecasts ofpotential flooding along both the Connecticut and Westfield Rivers. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A supplemental Operation and Maintenance Manual for the flood forecasting system was completed and final project costs were apportioned between Federal and non- Federal accounts. 31. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA Seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and three local protection projects have been specifically authorized as part of an overall plan for flood control in the Housatonic River Basin. The Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency bank protection projects at: Alford, Green River, MA; Sheffield, MA; Salisbury, CT; and Squantz Pond, Fairfield, CT were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Projects for local flood protection for: West Branch, Torrington, CT; East Branch, Torrington, CT; Pittsfield, MA; and Waterbury-Watertown, CT, were authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-M on dams, reservoirs, and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 31A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook, about two miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY to repair six bridges at various projects was completed in October 1991. Final contract amount was $306,666 of which $24,500 was for Black Rock Lake. Another contract awarded last FY for pavement repairs at two projects was completed in December 1991. Final contract amount was $61,156. 31B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook, in town of Plymouth, CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $136,332. 31C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook, in city of Waterbury and towns ofMiddlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 1.4 miles upstream of confluence of Naugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY to repair six bridges at various projects was completed in October 1991. Final contract amount was $306,666 of which $88,964 was for Hop Brook Lake. A contract awarded last FY for remedial repairs was completed in August 1992. To date the contractor has received $703,768 with final payment pending at the close of the FY. A contract awarded last FY to repair roads and parking aprons was completed in August 1992. Final contract amount was $187,970. Acontract awarded last FY for construction of restroom was 26 percent complete at FY end. Earnings to date were $18,710. 31D. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook, about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town ofThomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY to repair six bridges at various projects was completed in October 1991. Total contract amount was $306,666 of which $134,166 was for Northfield Brook Lake. A contract to build a picnic area restroom was awarded in October 1991. Ending the FY the contract was 72percent complete with earnings of $76,977. A contract to renovate the beach area restroom was awarded in May 1992. Ending the FY the contract was 56 percent complete with earnings of $25,900. 31E. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River, about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River, and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY to repair six bridges at various locations was completed in October 1991. Total contract amount was $306,666 of which $30,200 was for Thomaston Dam. 32. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system of four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized two of the reservoirs and one of the local protection projects. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction ofSaxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. An emergency bank protection project at Amesbury, MA was authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-N at end of 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works for Merrimack River Basin.) 32A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River, and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, NH, just above village of Swetts Mills, NH, 18 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to clean and paint the service and emergency gates was awarded in February 1992. Ending the FY the contract was 97 percent complete with earnings of $89,207. 32B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, NH, and 14 miles east of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $292,138. 32C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2.5 miles upstream of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for deleading and repainting the service bridge was awarded in April 1992. Work had not started at FY end. Another contract for conduit repairs awarded in May 1992 was completed in September 1992. Earnings to date were $192,940 with final payment pending at close of the FY. A contract to rehab the Knox Brook bridge was awarded in July 1992. Work had not started at FY end. 32D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton, NH. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River, and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of EastWeare, NH. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last fiscal year to repair Dike P-1 was 97 percent complete ending the FY with earnings of $310,332. A contractfor miscellaneous concrete repairs was awarded in June 92. Ending the FY the contract was 40 percent complete with earnings of $12,374. 33. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN, AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction ofbarrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction ofthe pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A 1-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 contract awarded last FY to repave the access road to barrier office was completed in November 1991. Final contract amount was $57,455. A contract for miscellaneous concrete repairs was awarded in May 1992. Ending the FY the contract was 80 percent complete with earnings of $5,465. A contract for roof repairs was awarded in June 1992. Ending the FY the contract was 99 percent complete. Operating costs included $144,000 forprojectoperations; $33,599 for administration; $29,280 for engineering and design; $11,647 for contract supervision and inspection. The cost of maintenance work accomplished by contract included $3,300 for replacement of garage door. 34. NEW LONDON, CT Location. In the city of New London, CT, about 45 miles southeast of Hartford, CT, and 50 miles southwest of Providence, RI. (See Geological Survey map for New London, CT.) Existing project. The hurricane protection project consists of approximately 715 feet of rock-faced earthfill dike and 800 feet of I-walls around the northerly shore of Shaw Cove and the regrading of approximately 21 acres of land along the west shore of the cove to elevation 12.5 feet mean sea level. Top of dike and floodwalls are 14.5 feet mean sea level. Appurtenant structures include a street gate, pressure conduit and a pumping station to discharge interior drainage. Project is complete. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final adjustment of project costs between Federal and non- Federal accounts. 35. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA Location. The city of Revere is a coastal community located in Suffolk County about five miles northeast of the city of Boston, MA. Roughans Point is a low-lying, ocean front neighborhood of Revere. The area has 55 acres and about 300 structures, mostly residential homes, which lie below elevation ten feet NGVD. Existing project. Project consists of 3,125 feet of stone revetment to dissipate incoming waves, prevent overtopping and stabilize existing facilities along the shoreline. The revetment would extend from a point about 250 feet south of Eliot Circle southerly to a point 200 feet south of the intersection of Winthrop Parkway and Leverett Avenue. The project also calls for "backwater" protection by constructing an earth berm one foot high and 200 feet long on the existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road and a sluice gate on the 42-inch drain from the Roughans area to Sales Creek. Interior drainage improvements consist of a new intake structure at the existing pump station and a new gravity drain with a sluice gate. The total estimated project cost (October 1992) is $13,800,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have notbeen requested yet. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessary for construction of the structural elements of the project, including ponding areas, borrow areas, and disposal areas for excavated material presently estimated at $880,000; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance ofthe project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacements, presently estimated at $25,000 annually; pay an amountin cash, presently estimated at $3,950,000, to bring the total non-Federal share to 35 percent of project costs allocated to storm damage reduction; provide and maintain necessary access roads; and accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities, highway bridges, and other structures necessary for construction of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of project plans and specifications was initiated during April 1992. The General Design Memorandum was appproved on September 20, 1992 and work on the Project Management Plan continued. 36. STAMFORD, CT Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City, and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for $662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY to repair fenders and replace camels was completed in January 1992. Final contract amount was $165,690. Another contract awarded last FY to install sluice gates was completed in February 1992. Final contract amount was $49,523. A contract to replace the roof was awaded in July 1992. Work had not started at FY end. 37. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. Local flood protection project for West River, New Haven, CT was authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-0 at end of chapter on reservoirs and local protection districts, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 37A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River, and eight miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to renovate the recreation area restroom was awarded in June 1992. Work had not started at close of FY. 37B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, and one mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY to replace weir gates and repair/repaint service gates was completed in August 1992. Earnings to date were $75,505 with final payment pending at close of FY. 37C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about five miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last FY to paint the service gates was completed in July 1992. Earnings to date were $40,844 with final payment pending at close of FY. 37D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is four miles northeast of city of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to paint the service gates was awarded in March 1992. Ending the FY the contract was 16 percent complete with earnings of $7,359. 37E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, in town of Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, two miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, for Putnam, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $546,909. 1-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 37F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $359,577. 38. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND BRAINTREE, MA Location. The project is located in the city of Quincy and the town of Braintree on the south side of Massachusetts Bay, along the eastern shore of Massachusetts, seven miles south of Boston in Norfolk County. The watershed is approximately 4.5 square miles. Existing project. Project provides for the construction of a 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below ground, intake and outlet structures, and improvements to the Town River downstream of the outlet shaft. The tunnel and its appurtenances will be supplemented by reconstruction of the Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, located at the headwaters of Town Brook. Reconstruction work includes a new spillway and outlet structure. The estimated total project cost (October 1992) is $40,600,000, and includes $6,100,000 in approved credit for compatible work that has been accomplished by the project sponsor. Total project costs do not include dam safety measures at Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, which are anon- Federal responsibility. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 7, 1992 between the Corps and the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). The MDC is required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, presently estimated at $830,000; reconstruct Old Quincy Dam to insure its structural integrity, presently estimated at $4,550,000; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $3,220,000; so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacements, presently estimated at $38,000 annually. In addition, local interests must do the following: prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on both the improvements and unimproved channels, and manage all project-related channels to preserve capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A continuing contract for construction of Town River improvements was awarded on September 30, 1992. 39. TOWN RIVER BAY, QUINCY, MA Location. The city of Quincy is located in Norfolk County in eastern Massachusetts, approximately five miles north of Braintree, MA and ten miles southeast of Boston, MA. Quincy is bordered by Milton, MA to the west, Weymouth, MA to the south, and the Atlantic Ocean to the east. Existing project. Construct a stone revetment approximately 280 feet long and 15 feet high along an eroding section of Town River Bay shoreline. The project will protect a subsidized housing structure situated about ten feet from the top edge of the eroding shoreline. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on December 31, 1990 between the Corps and Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management (DEM) for the project. Local interests are required to furnish all lands, easements, and rightsof- way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas; accomplish all alterations and relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for construction; provide 25 percent of total project costs during construction; and bear all costs for maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of emergency shoreline protection measures along Town River Bay was awarded March 6, 1992. Work began in April 1992 and was completed in June 1992. Final contract amount was $28,850. 40. WEST RIVER, NEW HAVEN, CT Location. New Haven, CT is located in southern New Haven County, about 35 miles south of Hartford, CT. The project area is located upstream of the intersection of Route 63 and West River in northwestern New Haven. Existing project. The West River will be widened for 1,150 feet from its existing 25- to 30-foot width to a 50- to 70-foot width; a 1,150-foot modular wall will be built along the right bank and a 600-foot cantilever sheet pile wall will be built along the left bank. For Wintergreen Brook the channel will have a 20- to 30-foot width, and a 550-foot sheet pile wall and 450-foot dike on the right bank. A recreational walkway on top of the modular wall with lighting and fencing to connect two existing city parks is also included. (See Table 1-B at end ofchapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on January 17, 1989 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way and reloca- 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION tions, presently estimated at $1,700,000; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at five percent or $291,000 so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; pay 50 percent of the costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated to be $140,000; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of the project after completion, presently estimated at $7,000 annually. In addition, local interests must do the following, for which there is no estimate of cost: participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on the project which would reduce level of protection afforded; notify, not less than once a year, affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract awarded during FY 1990 for construction of the project was 94 percent complete ending the FY with total earnings of $3,310,000. 41. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regularinspections ofthefollowingprojects were made during the fiscal year: CONNECTICUT: April 92 - Bridgeport, Colchester/ East Hampton, East Branch, East Hartford, HallMeadow, Hartford, Mad River, Milford, New London, North Canaan, Norwalk, Pawcatuck, Salisbury, Stamford, Sucker Brook, Waterbury, Wethersfield, Woodbury; May 92 - Ansonia, Danbury, Derby, North Fairfield, Torrington, Winsted; September 92 - Ansonia, Derby, Hartford, New London, Stamford. MAINE: April 92 - Ogunquit; June 92 - Beals, Blaine, Castine, Cherryfield, Fort Kent, Gouldsboro, Harpswell, Hartland, Indian Island, Islesboro, Lubec, Machias, Perry, Whiting. MASSACHUSETTS: April 92 - Alford, Amesbury, Blackstone, Canton, Conway, Fitchburg, Haywood Creek/ Braintree, Holyoke, Huntington, Lancaster, Lee, Millbury, Pittsfield, Quincy, Saxonville, Scituate, Sheffield (covered bridge), Sheffield (state maintenance), Three Rivers, Ware, West Haven, Westfield, Weymouth/ Braintree, Worcester; May 92 - Charles River Dam, Chicopee, Gardner, Haverhill, Lowell, Northampton, Springfield, West Springfield; September 92- Fitchbus 4, Springfield, West Springfield. NEW HAMPSHIRE: April 92 - Charlestown, Farmington, Nashua, North Stratford,Wilton; May 92 - Lincoln, Shelbourne; September 92 - Keene, Nashua. RHODE ISLAND: April 92 - Burrillville. VERMONT: April 92 - Brownsville, Saxtons River, Weston. 42. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of reservoirs, many of which are multipurpose in nature and all containing significant amounts of storage for flood control purposes, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of the flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases were made from selected reservoirs. Winter pools are maintained at many projects to submerge the flood control gates and keep them from freezing. During FY92, there was only one significant inland flood event in New England which required notable regulation activities at our reservoirs. Over the weekend of 5-6 June, three to eight inches of rainfall occurred over southern New England with the highest concentrations in central Connecticut in the Wallingford-Waterbury area. Some reservoirs within the Naugatuck, Farmington and Westfield watersheds were throttled back during the storm resulting in storages of 2 to 25 percent being utilized. Flooding occurred predominantly in the Naugatuck watershed and resulting reservoir regulation activities provided about $2 million in benefits. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN Regulation for canoe activities occurred at Ball Mountain and Townshend - April 1992; Otter Brook - March 1992; Birch Hill, Tully, Littleville and Knightville -April 1992; Surry Mountain -May 1992. Non-flood releases from Colebrook Lake were made throughout FY92 for hydropower generation, as required by the Hartford MDC. Non-flood releases were made from Union Village and North Hartland in March 1992, in support of the Dynamic Ice Breakup Experiment sponsored by the State of New Hampshire and CRELL. Additional non-flood releases from North Hartland Lake were controlled by the Vermont Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative for hydropower throughout FY92. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN Blackwater was regulated for canoe races in May 1992. THAMES RIVER BASIN Regulation activities in the basin included releases for canoe races at Mansfield Hollow in June 1992; Hodges Village in May 1992 and East Brimfield in April 1992. The permanent pool at West Thompson was raised on several occasions to accommodate the American Kennel Club (AKC) retriever trials. 1-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 43. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Five hurricane barriers are situated along the southern coast of New England, protecting coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes and severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, CT and New Bedford- Fairhaven, MAbarriers. The Fox Point, RI, the Pawcatuck and New London, CT barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: STAMFORD BARRIER. The barrier gates were operated on 13 occasions for coastal storms during FY92. Benefits associated with the operation totalled $2.15 million. NEW BEDFORD BARRIER. During FY92, the New Bedford Barrier was operated on 11 different occasions resulting in a total of $300,000 in benefits. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER. The Fox Point Hurricane Barrier was operated one time during FY92. No benefits were attributed to the operation. PAWCATUCK HURRICANE BARRIER. The Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY92 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. NEW LONDON HURRICANE BARRIER. The New London Hurricane Barrier was not operated duringFY92 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. 44. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-E at end of chapter.) 45. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-J at end of chapter.) Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Quaboag River, Brookfield, MA $ 9,065 Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Baker River, Rumney, NH Belfast, ME Blynman Canal, Gloucester, MA Cold River, Alstead, NH Connecticut River, Cromwell, CT Connecticut River, Middletown, CT Conn. River, (Wellfield), Middletown, CT Farmington River, CT Fort Trumbull Beach, Milford, CT Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME Johnson Bay (Retention Wall), Lubec, ME Lighthouse Beach, Chatham, MA Machias Bay (Rte. 92) Machiasport, ME Merrimack River, Hooksett, NH Mosman Park, Searsport, ME Myers Brook, Glastonbury, CT Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME Nashua River, Leominster, MA North Nashua River (Sewer Line), MA Ocean Grove Beach, Swansea, MA Packer Brook, Tilton, NH Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA Sheepscot River, Alna, ME Sylvia State Beach, Oak Bluffs, MA Town River Bay, Quincy, MA Westfield Rvr. (Frog Hole), Westfield, MA $ 2,922 40 11,000 3,911 2,408 9,446 7,000 2,079 369 8,166 10,660 28,600 6,035 985 9,000 561 3,973 17,937 34,097 3,944 1,910 31,830 7,651 25,138 19,502 308 Fish passage facilities (Section 872 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act.) Fiscal year costs were as follows: Townshend & Ball Mountain Lakes, VT $602,542 Emergency flood control activities--repair,f lood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for fiscal year were $594,555 for disaster preparedness. Deauthorized Projects 46. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 1-G at end of chapter.) General Investigations 47. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds were $1,242,304 ofwhich $171,411 was for four navigation studies; $472,834 for two flood damage prevention studies; $52,972 for two special studies; and $545,087 for coordination studies. 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 48. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and a continuing program of compilation of basic hydrologic information is carried out. Division Engineer's representatives during the past year kept closely in touch with development in the basin and cooperated with their Canadian counterparts assisting in development of basins' resources. Total costs for the fiscal year were $3,534. Total costs to 30 September 1992 are $253,277. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year were $424,796. Total costs to 30 September 1992 are $7,086,378. The April 1987 flood was one of the largest of recent times in New England, resulting in spillway discharge at six Corps flood control reservoirs. A comprehensive hydrologic analysis of this flood event is needed to develop a base of information for use in future planning and design studies, as well as reservoir operation. Fiscal year 1992 funds were used to initiate a generalized hydrologic investigation of the 1987 flood with consideration of overall rainfall patterns and frequency. Total costs for the FY were $17,880. Total costs to 30 September 1992 are $17,880. The New England Division has initiated a program to consolidate the vast amount of sediment chemistry data it maintains using the Geographic Information System (GIS). This data management system will allow Project Managers, as well as other agencies, to quickly retrieve historical data for specific waterways andhelp determine the quality of material in that area. FY 1992 funds were used to initiate a joint effort with U.S. Geological Survey to collect existing sediment chemistry data for Boston Harbor and enter this information into GIS. Total costs for the FY were $11,985. Total costs to 30 September 1992 are $11,985. 49. PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Total costs for Planning, Engineering and Design were $1,417,907 for local protection studies for Saugus River and Tributaries, MA. 50. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction Engineering and Design costs were $635,889 for the navigation project at Boston, MA and $104,779 for the local protection project at Massachusetts Coastal, Roughans Point, Revere, MA. 1-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sep. 30, 1992 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Boston Harbor, MA 3. Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) 4. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 5. Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (Contributed Funds) 6. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 12,000 9,454 10,000 6,527 - 10,000 8,811 131,383 88,,881111 113311,,338833 - - 5,338,954 4,812,428 5,646,961 4,743,139 70,392 833,430 70,326 832,130 54,622 59,443 54,465 59,043 3,420 3,420 7,298 7,298 1,000 10,794 571,000 441,041 14,029 14,029 1,000 1,014 293,496 293,381 599,000 24,526,974 41 635,889 24,423,904 41 43,836 10,201,709 42 43,253 10,201,036 42 - 21,798,322 1,2 - 21,798,322 1,2 4,785,446 5,078,637 116,925,083 4,725,917 5,113,557 116,654,772 - - 115,432 - - 115,432 - - 390,677 - - 390,677 - - 26,609,000 - - 26,609,000 - - 266,705 12 - - 266,705 12 168,240 164,705 839,332 414,000 16,080 16,080 17,441 3,730,501 s 22,421 3,729,974 9 - 43,500 - 43,500 - 1,541,185 7,8 - 1,541,185 7,8 361,156 16,545,369 4 601,116 16,358,997 4 60,000 60,000 130,410 130,410 27,168 27,168 136,680 1,214,647 43 136,679 1,214,646 4a 11,643 11,643 1-26 TABLE 1-A (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sep. 30, 1992 7. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 8. Guilford Harbor, CT (Contributed Funds) 9. Hyannis Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 10. Jonesport Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds--Required) 11. Kennebec River, ME 12. Newburyport Harbor, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 254,512 254,512 24,947 220,167 25,356 218,910 323,226 323,422 174,938 2,875,037 127,210 2,826,058 162,341 162,341 137,222 137,222 2,275 2,275 11,347 550,000 478,037 25,216 25,216 15,049 15,049 293,172 275,323 -10,759 -260,000 2,792 2,792 33,000 50,560 17,884 78,995 1,385.429 37,855 1,344,289 - 25,500 - 25,500 - 24,700 - 6,950 484,137 484,137 911,617 s 910,866 s 103,363 103,363 -927 7,489,073 - 7,489,073 934 3,726 934 3,726 - 833,000 - 832,119 1,599,9406 1,599,9406 50,225 972,598 50,225 972,379 167,543 167,606 477,568 3,937,116 477,509 3,936,901 565,224 565,224 18,752 401,313 18,752 374,789 543,000 567,405 21,671 5,515,621 23,081 5,514,546 1,415,524 1,415,524 1-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sep. 30, 1992 13. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH (Contributed Funds-Required) 14. Saco River, ME (Contributed Funds-Required) 15. Sesuit Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 16. Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, ME (Contributed Funds) 21. Revere Beach, MA (Contributed Funds) 22. Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME 23. Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI 24. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 4,400,000 5,676,000 1,378,000 8,183,675 40,157 39,957 1,000,000 400,000 32,863 32,863 3,500,000 2,553,326 368,000 2,327,927 18,456,228 10 812,769 2,482,034 18,447,88810 1,634 1,634 744,819 141,345 2,173,248 116,842 2,148,545 - 4,599,707 456,966 4,254,818 1,064,983 1,064,983 81,007 81,385 -9,603 1,158 481,690 481,344 50,000 105,664 157,390 31,829 31,489 14,976 14,976 530 425 3,450,000 134,384 2,293,000 10,256 40,000 - 65,044 65,490 16,990 16,990 25,000 550 -10,904 -10,064 2,771,316 1,260,000 -5,000 858 190,000 153,914 46,386 975,562 2,847,935 456,051 2,328,317 215,785 159,379 262,700 37,049 5,400 5,400 74,996 74,996 226,306 226,306 510,862 454,456 124,588 124,588 430,812 180,711 566,909 566,909 28,400 40,400 - 12,000 -400,000 3,858,712 13 135,919 3,820,513 s13 -144,000 2,291,965 747,188 2,150,153 634 780,000 48,784 250,000 20,277 239,200 228,335 970,000 202,698 343,838 120,501 111,679 a 111,679 4 1-28 TABLE 1-A (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sep. 30, 1992 28A. West Hill Dam, MA 29. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA 30A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT 30B. Barre Falls Dam, MA 30C. Birch Hill Dam, MA (Contributed Funds) 30D. Colebrook River Lake, CT 30E. Conant Brook Dam, MA 30F. Connecticut River, Middletown, CT 30G. Connecticut River Basin Fish Passage Facilities for Townshend and Ball Mountain Lakes, West River, VT 30H. Farmington River, Simsbury, CT New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,306,902 14 2,306,902 14 639,400 446,664 690,987 381,399 7,236 495,700 514,607 43,066 124,300 145,743 127,825 125,039 103,900 114,090 522,000 5,629,698 533,639 5,584,606 - 8,606,000 - 8,606,000 205,000 1,411,343 209,982 1,399,376 - 11,039,298 5s - 11,039,298 15 418,700 432,684 435,932 404,120 451,400 463,933 478,718 433,065 476,400 601,502 623,168 506,086 130,800 287,383 178,771 243,582 105,900 126,417 45,000 40,000 4,540 70,517 45,810 15,000 56,274 30,000 23,646 419,200 420,098 401,400 388,071 538,900 484,120 192,300 208,495 109,900 123,252 5,000 5,884 300,000 157,602 10,000 42,648 458,000 7,854,723 468,128 7,830,161 - 1,967,819 - 1,967,819 438,000 6,194,060 431,956 6,127,565 - 4,815,679 s16 - 4,815,679 16 566,000 6,795,429 658,696 6,725,979 - 32,000 17 - 32,000 17 - 14,263,971 - 14,263,971 321,000 3,549,027 330,462 3,528,548 - 2,950,530 - 2,950,530 76,000 1,654,197 84,492 1,648,699 10,000 9,446 640,000 602,542 2,079 75,000 71,604 940,000 760,144 120,000 112,939 1-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sep. 30, 1992 30I. Knightville Dam, MA 30J. Littleville Lake, MA 30K. North Hartland Lake, VT 30L. North Springfield Lake, VT 30M. Otter Brook Lake, NH 30N. Riverdale, West Springfield, MA (Contributed Funds) 300. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 30P. Townshend Lake, VT 30Q. Tully Lake, MA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 507,500 371,742 522,977 343,235 621,500 620,486 - 3,415,640 18 - 3,415,640 18 580,000 7,783,446 501,874 7,642,788 7,013,412 7,013,412 561,200 312,836 574,335 231,465 - - 433,900 442,728 381,073 473,378 1,196,369 1,314,280 466,983 461,934 260,000 349,207 346,300 312,921 445,500 410,366 271,000 5,232,927 242,654 5,179,350 - 7,312,22519 - 7,312,22519 470,000 6,028,543 528,790 6,005,457 - 6,831,52620 - 6,831,52620 589,000 10,189,449 662,997 10,161,174 4,360,44821 4,360,44821 456,600 394,583 583,497 358,570 15,000 826 3,202 330,000 363,648 351,551 288,745 421,900 422,768 1,047 503,200 475,904 435,000 6,153,297 455,920 6,135,592 25,000 1,303,000 13,279 1,280,670 - 25,000 - 25,000 - 2,833,61022 - 2,833,610" 383,000 6,664,491 475,776 6,653,286 7,398,413 23 7,398,413 23 392,000 419,047 402,749 385,736 455,900 440,639 452,772 383,216 327,400 346,364 421,200 483,014 415,000 7,381,418 400,839 7,321,621 - 1,666,752 24 - 1,666,752 24 460,000 6,038,725 456,312 6,013,012 40,000 17 40,000 17 1-30 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sep. 30, 1992 30R. Union Village Dam, VT 30S. West Springfield, MA (Contributed Funds) 31A. Black Rock Lake, CT 31B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT 31C. Hop Brook Lake, CT 31D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT 31E. Thomaston Dam, CT 32A. Blackwater Dam, NH 32B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 482,900 485,337 474,338 292,022 21,368 12,390 10,000 10,218 -86 454,700 520,111 1,133 2,200 506,000 5,963,393 545,910 5,845,447 -5,272 1,798,452 5 -2,039 1,798,452 s -857 2,039 14,343 14,343 8,182,300 8,182,300 272,300 234,572 285,311 196,744 271,300 239,230 280,000 3,613,581 346,003 3,606,727 4,178,911 4,178,911 87,900 145,385 90,163 92,555 129,900 174,115 132,000 1,751,934 136,332 1,744,757 6,151,562 26 6,151,562 26 920,300 1,029,440 834,840 722,931 1,768,800 1,067,000 9,971,325 942,275 1,874,473 9,789,965 2,850,512 27 2,850,512 27 158,500 282,597 210,899 161,938 349,400 362,175 432,468 309,606 323,300 238,909 336,978 210,802 341,400 329,177 350,042 267,761 410,300 472,018 445,400 459,772 220,200 235,228 320,900 354,784 448,000 3,307,708 466,801 3,262,177 - 14,282,112 - 14,282,112 513,000 6,969,342 519,966 6,933,911 - 1,319,746 28 - 1,319,746 28 365,000 4,469,094 372,960 4,462,385 - 2,014,253 29 - 2,014,253 29 277,000 5,320,569 292,138 5,304,919 1-31 4,095,160 25 4,095,160 25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sep. 30, 1992 32C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH 32D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH 33. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (Contributed Funds) 34. New London, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds- Other) 35. Roughans Point, Revere, MA 36. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds - Other) 37A. Buffumville Lake, MA 37B. East Brimfield Lake, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 561,500 439,123 556,450 396,856 611,000 641,213 - 7,950,487 3 - 7,950,487 30 945,000 8,685,382 834,456 8,555,998 - - - - 21,452,440 31 - - - - 21,452,440 s31 817,400 817,308 1,228,100 1,111,000 11,551,570 962,420 685,643 1,091,214 1,243,716 11,406,245 - - - - 11,510,088 - - - - 11,510,088 193,400 636,257 173,421 562,783 4,726 422,200 380,424 85,000 9,094 245,000 -15,000 116,622 290,741 195,700 238,719 209,717 186,438 205,700 321,394 214,535 298,391 339,300 472,156 355,006 346,595 100,000 113,329 439,700 340,563 341,300 347,133 374,900 400,740 240,400 5,292,821 299,281 5,208,205 151,583 -81,001 -235,584 81,001 84,001 230,000 104,779 6,513,763 32 6,513,763 32 8,504,919 44 8,504,919 44 2,173,999 33 2,015,709 33 303,251 303,251 975,779 849,309 9,911,300 9,900,640 446,000 4,016,191 497,172 3,912,102 - 3,367,970 34 - 3,367,453 34 - 210,000 - 209,969 - 2,998,603 ** - 2,998,603 * 553,000 4,953,016 521,885 4,902,796 7,057,043 " 7,057,043 36 343,000 4,516,439 435,671 4,508,161 1-32 TABLE 1-A (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sep. 30, 1992 37C. Hodges Village Dam, MA 37D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT 37E. West Thompson Lake, CT 37F. Westville Lake, MA 38. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (Contributed Funds) 39. Town River Bay, Quincy, MA (Contributed Funds) 40. West River, New Haven, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds-Not Required) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 4,461,268 37 4,461,268 37 510,200 1,642,659 496,116 1,656,803 390,100 362,869 361,000 6,809,947 387,547 6,795,595 6,447,164 38 6,447,164 38 309,500 309,102 331,485 273,978 375,500 388,355 523,000 5,211,599 399,276 5,059,611 7,001,220 39 7,001,220 3 404,100 407,399 425,327 385,655 257,100 352,663 304,048 331,714 550,000 509,110 400,000 359,252 31,000 30,972 25,000 34,747 419,800 436,725 327,000 313,840 175,000 268,427 2,102 563,000 5,814,997 546,909 5,780,964 - 5,684,683 40 - 5,684,683 40 328,000 5,069,059 359,577 5,062,618 746,000 2,741,740 198,271 2,174,020 144,000 26,500 19,502 144,000 57,500 52,576 - 23,750 - 23,750 - - 17,200 17,200 190,000 1,300,000 1,900,000 3,985,000 84,849 1,284,991 1,821,672 3,781,046 822,000 94,400 9,764 154,629 100 317,036 47,371 822,000 471,665 94,400 57,235 'Excludes $ 6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 Code 713 funds. 3 Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired 1961. 4 Includes $366,348 for previous projects. 6 Includes $245,000 Public Works Funds. 6 Includes $509,411 for previous projects. ' Includes $287,374 for previous projects and excludes $9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, CT." 8 Excludes $60,000 expended for major rehabilitation. 9 Includes $83,276 for maintenance of previous project. o1I0n cludes $130,390 for previous projects. " Includes $12,000 for previous project. 12 Includes $7,889 for previous project. 13 Excludes $73,800 for previous project. 14 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 1-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 15 Includes $504,062 Code 711 funds. 16 Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 funds. 17 Recreational cost sharing. 18 Includes $199,303 Code 711 funds. 19 Includes $229,436 Code 711 funds. 20 Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 21 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. SIncludes $470,077 Code 711 funds. * Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds. 24 Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. SIncludes $88,931 Code 711 funds. 26 Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 27 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. 28 Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 9 Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 3 Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 31 Includes $179,727 Code 711 funds. 32 Cash for construction only. Excludes $146,020 expended to date for land condemnation. 33 Excludes $27,961 expended to date for land condemnations. Cash for construction only; excludes $1,629,256 for lands. SCash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. Includes $207,700 Code 711 funds. 7 Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 713 funds. Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. 4Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 41 Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Excludes $935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. 42 Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. 4Excludes $50,000 Contributed Funds expended for maintenance. Excludes $852,127 non project cost per 1976 WRDA. 4Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1825 June 14, 1880 Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19,1890 July 25, 1892 July 13, 1892 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13,1902 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30,1935 a Do. Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Sep. 7, 1940 July 24,1946 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 28, 1990 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text.) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BOSTON HARBOR, MA (See Section 2 of Text.) Preservation of islands and seawalls. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep, 100 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Fort Point Channel.4 Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) from mouth of Wier River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate Shoal (Nixes Mate to Nubble Channel). Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads. Dredge Chelsea River channel to 18 feet. For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 and 40-foot channels. For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard, Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at outer entrance. Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 ft. Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. Present project dimensions of channel from President Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and anchorage area north side of President Roads. Present project dimensions of that part of approach channel to U.S. Navy drydock No.3 at South Boston between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. Chelsea River, channel 30 feet deep. Reserved channel 30 feet deep. Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc.262,76th Cong., 1st sess.) Extension of President Roads anchorage. Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending one mile from 40-foot main channel to L Street. Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. Deepen Mystic River and Reserved Channels to 40 feet; Chelsea River Channel to 38 feet; widen and deepen Inner Confluence Area to 40 feet. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 H. Ex.Doc. 206,48th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1885, p. 543. Annual Report, 18 9 0,p. 503 Annual Report, 1893, p. 769 Annual Report, 1887, p.517 Annual Report, 1893, p. 766 H. Ex. Doc. No. 162,53rd Cong., 3rd sess.,Annual Report, 1895, p. 648 H. Doc. 133, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. H. Doc. 119, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1901, p. 1096 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. Mar. 11,1913. H. Doc. 272, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 931, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 244, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., 1st sess.2 Public Law 420,78th Cong. H. Doc. 244, 80th Cog., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 349, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 350, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 2 Section 101, Public Law 101-640. 1-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jan. 21, 1927 (Section 2) Included in Public Works Administration program, Sep. 6, 1933 June 26, 1934 (Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act) Included in Public Works Administration Program Apr. 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 June 10, 1872 Mar. 3, 1881 June 25, 1910 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 May 24, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960, as amended CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 3 of Text.) Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, executed by that company. Construct three bridges and widen canal to 250 feet. Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct a mooring basin. Dredging and bank protection. Existing project for main canal adopted. 15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of eight feet. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA (See Section 4 of Text.) Entrance channel ten feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT (See Section 5 of Text.) Jetties at mouth The Hartford dike Channel and turning basin in Eightmile River. Present project dimensions of channel over Saybrook Bar. Dikes, training walls, and revetments. Present project dimensions of channel and additional dikes, training walls, revetments, and accessory works. Park River declared nonnavigable. Channel and anchorages, North Cove, Old Saybrook. Channel and anchorage in Essex Cove. Channel and anchorage in Wethersfield Cove. H. Doc. 139, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 795, 71st. Cong., 3rd sess. Do. Do. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 168, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 456, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1942. Present project dimensions approved by Chief of Engineers, December 22, 1887. Present project dimensions authorized by Chief of Engineers in 1889. H. Doc. 327, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1294, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 132, 65th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 49, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Ltr. Sec. War, April 21, 1937. H. Doc. 368 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 18, 1961. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 15, 1960. 1-36 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960, as amended Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1827 July 11, 1871 Aug. 5, 1886 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 4, 1913 Oct. 17, 1940 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960, as amended Nov. 16, 1986 CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MA (See Section 6 of Text.) Channel 10 feet deep, 75 feet wide. Anchorage 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, 800 feet wide. Maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 7 of Text.) Channel six feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing, rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. GUILFORD HARBOR, CT (See Section 8 of Text.) Entrance channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep; a channel 60 feet wide, 6 feet deep; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA (See Section 9 of Text.) Breakwater. Present dimensions of breakwater. Dredging behind breakwater. Channel, anchorage and jetty. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME (See Section 10 of Text.) A steel sheet pile breakwater 1200 feet in length. A 15-acre anchorage composed of nine acres six feet deep and six acres eight feet deep. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and eight feet deep. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME (See Section 11 of Text.) Channel between Augusta and Gardiner, ME. Channel below Gardiner, ME. Channel west of Swan Island, ME. 27-foot channel from mouth of Bath, ME. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA (See section 12 of Text.) Construction of rubblestone jetties. Dredging the bar at entrance to harbor. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR & PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME and NH (See Section 13 of Text.) Removal of ledge rock; widening 35-foot channel; extending channel and maneuvering basins above Boiling Rock and at head of project. Modified existing project for widening and extending 35-foot channel. Construct six-foot channels and anchorages. Widen 35-foot channel to 1,000 feet between two vertical lift bridges; widen northern limit of 35-foot channel by 100 feet and widen southern limit to 550 feet at Goat Island. H. Doc. 81, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 15, 1965. H. Doc. 149, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 32, 18th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 63, 41st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Ex. Doc. 96, 48th Cong. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 98, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 481, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. September 23, 1976 and S. Res. October 1, 1976 pursuant to Section 201 of cited Act. H. Doc. 262, 56th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 321, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. ' H. Doc. 746, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. ' S. Doc. 55, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' Annual Report 1910, p. 59. Annual Report 1892. H. Doc. 556, 82nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 482, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 23, 1965. Section 202, P.L. 99-662. 1-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1827 June 23, 1866 Sep. 19, 1890 June 25,1910 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 July 14, 1960, as amended July 14, 1960, as amended May 17,1950 July 14, 1960, as amended Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 July 7,1964 Nov. 28, 1990 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 SACO RIVER, ME (See Section 14 of Text.) Extension of piers, placing bouys, and removal of obstruction at entrance to harbor. Breakwater on north side of mouth of river. Jetty on north side or mouth of river. Channel improvements and jetty extension on south side of mouth of river. Present project channel dimensions and extensions of north breakwater about 1,600 feet. Extension of north breakwater to Sharps Ledge. Anchorage and maneuvering basin. SESUIT HARBOR, MA (See Section 15 of Text.) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. WOOD ISLAND HARBOR and the POOL at BIDDEFORD, ME (See Section 16 of Text.) Dredged basin 6 feet deep and construction of three ice breakers. Channel 4,200 feet long, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. REVERE BEACH, MA (See Section 21 of Text.) Placement of sandfill for protection and improvement. Raising and widening of about 13,000 feet of beach by placement of sandfill. ROOSEVELT CAMPOBELLO INTERNATIONAL PARK LUBEC, ME (See Section 22 of Text.) Stone slope protection for the lighthouse at Mulholland Point. SOUTHEAST LIGHTHOUSE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 23 of Text.) Relocate the lighthouse approximately 200 feet north of its present location. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT (See Section 24 of Text.) Widening to 100-foot width by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore west of Merwin Point; widening 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street; and construction of 5 impermeable groins. Placement of suitable sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet of beach. Reconstruction of groins. Mitigation to replace rocky habitat for Blue Mussels. S. Ex. Doc. 44, 48th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1884, p. 482 H. Doc. 752, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 1 H. Doc. 477, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 14, 1967. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, February 6, 1980. H, Doc. 49, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 18, 1990. H. Doc. 146, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 211, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. December 15, 1970 and S. Res. December 17, 1970 pursuant to Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Roosevelt Campobello International Park Act, P.L. 88-363. Section 416, P.L. 101-640. H. Doc. 203, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. Section 103, P.L. 101-640. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, March 30, 1992. 1-38 TABLE 1-B (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DIVISION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE Mar. 7. 1974 July 24, 1946, as amended Nov. 16, 1986 July 24, 1946, as amended Aug. 18, 1941 June 30, 1948, as amended June 28, 1938 June 30, 1948, as amended July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 AREAS), MA (See Section 29 of Text.) Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial natural valley storage areas totalling 8,422 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. CONNECTICUT RIVER, MIDDLETOWN, CT (See Section 30F of Text.) Bank protection of 500 linear feet with 6-inch concrete paving block and riprap toe protection. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN FISH PASSAGE FACILITIES FOR TOWNSHEND AND BALL MOUNTAIN LAKES, WEST RIVER, VT (See Section 30G of Text.) Construct fish passage facilities along the West River in Vermont. FARMINGTON RIVER, SIMSBURY, CT (See Section 30H of Text.) Bank protection by clearing and grubbing existing slope and refilling eroded areas with compacted granular fill. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA (See Section 30N of Text.) Approximately 12,700 feet of earth levee, two pumping stations and three stop-log storage structures. Construct improvements to existing pumping station and gravity outflow channel. WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA (See Section 30S of Text.) A system of earth levees and concrete floodwalls approx. 24,500 feet long. Work involves raising 13,700 feet of existing levee; constructing 2,300 feet of floodwall; improving 2,400 feet of river bank; treating 6,100 feet of existing levee foundation. Three pumping stations with appurtenant drainage facilities also constructed. Raise the floodwall section of the West Springfield project by one foot in combination with a flood forecasting system. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA (See Section 33 of Text.) Hurricane barriers in New Bedford Harbor. NEW LONDON, CT (See Section 34 of Text.) Hurricane barrier protecting city of New London from tidal damage. Chief of Engineers report dated December 6, 1972. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 17, 1991 Section 872, P.L. 99-662. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 27, 1988. H. Doc. 724, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 13, 1986. H. Doc. 455, 75th Cong., 2nd sess. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 5, 1982. S. Doc, 59, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 1-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA (See Section 35 of Text.) Nov. 16, 1986 Stabilize existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot Section 401, P.L. 99-662. long armor stone revetment. Construct earth berm one-foot high and 200 feet long on existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. STAMFORD, CT (See Section 36 of Text.) July 14, 1960 Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong., 1st sess. tidal damage. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY & BRAINTREE, MA (See Section 38 of Text.) Nov. 17, 1986 Construct 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined H. Doc. 39, 99th Cong., 1st sess. tunnel in bedrock approximately 190 feet below ground. TOWN RIVER BAY, QUINCY, MA (See Section 39 of Text.) Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized July 24, 1946, Stone revetment approximately 280 feet long and 15 feet high. by Chief of Engineers, as amended August 16, 1990. WEST RIVER, NEW HAVEN, CT (See Section 40 of Text.) June 30, 1948, Widen river for 1,150 feet to 50-70 feet. Widen the Wintergreen Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized as amended Brook channel to 20-30 feet. Construct recreational walkway by Secretary of the Army, connecting two existing city parks. September 26, 1988. Contains latest maps. 2 Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 (seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual Report, 1903, p. 770 (Fort Point Channel.) 3Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933. 4A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 91-624, December 31, 1970. 1-40 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Andrews River, MA"6,"5 Apponaug Cove, RI' Bagaduce River, ME"4 ,5 Bar Harbor, ME1' Bass Harbor, ME ', Bass Harbor Bar, ME' Beals Harbor, ME' Belfast Harbor, ME' Bellamy River, NH"s,4 Beverly Harbor, MA' Black Rock Harbor, CT' Boothbay Harbor, ME' Branford Harbor, CT' Bridgeport Harbor, CT' Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI 8 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME ,6 Bucksport Harbor, ME' Bullocks Point Cove, RI' Bunker Harbor, ME"6 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA' Camden Harbor, ME' Canapitsit Channel, MA"4 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME' Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME' Cathance River, ME"' Clinton Harbor, CT' Coasters Island Harbor, RI" 4 Cobscook Bay, ME"3"4 Cocheco River, NH s,4 Cohasset Harbor, MA' Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME ,6 Criehaven Harbor, ME' Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA' Damariscotta River, ME",4 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME",4 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA" Duck Island Harbor, CT' Duxbury Harbor, MA' East Boothbay Harbor, ME' Edgartown Harbor, MA' Essex River, MA' Exeter River, NH",4 Fall River Harbor, MA'5 Falmouth Harbor, MA' Fivemile River Harbor, CT 5 Frenchboro Harbor, ME' Georges River, ME' Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA' Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI 5 Greenwich Bay, RI' Greenwich Harbor, CT' Hampton Harbor, NH"6 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI' Harraseeket River, ME",4 1990 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1988 1953 1990 1983 1987 1976 1907 1979 1969 1985 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1985 1911 1866 1913 1979 1984 1939 1954 1906 1916 1968 1953 1978 1953 1978 1948 1913 1984 1978 1969 1978 1978 1983 1989 1893 1969 1988 1990 1896 $ 219,042 156,874 2 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,561 32 34,643 246,048 18,000 9,537 4,491,119 4 316,288 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 163,855 102,400 9,113 175,037 147,438 21,000 191,406 5,500 4,173 119,089 267,737 38 795,253 40,776 24,200 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,297 29 6,500 65,614 21,759 62,454 9 6,164,757 40 123,763 35,490 657,345 25,788 1,296,934 36 189,037 2,000 198,758 200,000 576,856 30,963 $ 619,438 42,189 39 2,187 21,995 12,175 132,289 260,952 23,808 1,633,728 33,543 1,925,607 2,090,576 50 16,838 20,833 268,369 28,406 220,563 46 152,411 12,279 347,865 24,465 1,043,938 13,161 42,617 313,953 83,243 10,117 54,328 905 5,376 362,224 399,546 881,239 17,238 62,980 83,938 14 3,032 2,064,767 34 331,187 188,802 24,616 263,899 1,570,626 578,321 6,527 204,872 2,170,817 1,735,562 5,309 $ 187,500 100,000 147,887 123,757 69,323 20,000 111,289 35,000 30 10,000 35,000 25,000 100,000 193,761 1-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expend. Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY' Hendrick's Harbor, ME' Hingham Harbor, MA' Housatonic River, CT 5 Ipswich River, MA' Island End River, Chelsea, MA '" Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME' Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH' Josias River, ME' Kennebunk River, ME' Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA' Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA'" Lamprey River, NH"4 Little Harbor, NH' ,4 ,2 6 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA' 4 Lubec Channel, ME' Lynn Harbor, MA' Machias River, ME' Malden River, MA' 20 Matinicus Harbor, ME' Medomak River, ME' Menemsha Creek, MA' Merrimack River, MA' Mianus River, CT' Milford Harbor, CT 522 Moosabec Bar, ME' Mystic River, CT' Mystic River, MA' Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA' Narraguagus River, ME' New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA' New Harbor, ME' New Haven Breakwater, CT' New Haven Harbor, CT' New London Harbor, CT' Newport Harbor, RI' Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT 1,6 ' Northeast Harbor, ME' Norwalk Harbor, CT' Owl's Head Harbor, ME "3 Patchogue River, CT 1,22 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT' Pawtuxet Cove, RI' Penobscot River, ME' Pepperell Cove, ME 5 Pig Island Gut, ME' 6 Pleasant River, ME' Plymouth Harbor, MA' Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI' Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA ' Portland Harbor, ME' 1931 1957 1954 1983 1969 1983 1980 1977 1977 1985 1895 1976 1913 1977 1906 1956 1956 1972 1922 1962 1953 1981 1940 1985 1989 1930 1957 1986 1989 1969 1953 1966 1950 1990 1986 1953 1972 1954 1983 1968 1984 1978 1975 1985 1969 1966 1892 1990 1991 1956 1985 $ 8,401 28,204 28,316 859,691 5,618 311,850 137,653 80,691 115,565 350,334 8,940 99,098 19,980 133,227 18,000 380,322 755,576 32,000 104,853 14,000 21 17,000 56,926 369,891 132,435 90,506 3' 11,400 197,582 3,222,777 502,661 58 821,144 1,857,618 118,620 24 1,242,246 4,423,162 62 638,774 17 733,524 66,464 138,942 531,129 39 124,158 351,181 318,787 28 295,356 501,020 171,351 191,753 3,500 2,127,218 52,53 2,714,510 19 1,083,504 9,588,710 27 $ 38,462 6,325 166,800 2,496,878 32,947 180,786 651,644 125,573 1,243,802 28,064 33,563 266,119 13,144 23,941 216,321 222,352 45,097 8,989 92,359 716,094 322,685 659,390 1,349,790 56 25,227 143,385 2,008,406 742,106 102,327 708,967 28,611 40,273 14,353,389 55 1,851,070 145,023 111,789 51,047 3,822,092 42 13,867 693,299 662,713 173,547 951,886 46,882 86,456 217 1,360,832 54 6,163,374 33 846,590 7,940,340 $ 222,010 192,336 48 26,813 88,917 80,990 62,000 12,500 46,500 11,380 5' 14,000 20,385 7,015 65,139 34,500 4,383 156,694 20,000 295,356 541,611 17,587 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Potowomut River, RI1 Providence River and Harbor, RPI Provincetown Harbor, MA5 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MAs ,8 Richmond Harbor, ME",4 Richmond's Island Harbor, ME",4 Rockland Harbor, ME1 Rockport Harbor, ME' 3 Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, MA' Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA' Royal River, ME ,6 Rye Harbor,NH' St. Croix River, ME' Sakonnet Harbor, RI' Sakonnet River, RpI" 0o Salem Harbor, MA' Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA'8 Sasanoa River, ME" 4 Scarboro River, ME' Scituate Harbor, MA' Searsport Harbor, ME' Seekonk River,RI' South Bristol Harbor, ME' Southport Harbor, CT' Southwest Harbor, ME' Stamford Harbor, CT' Stockton Harbor, ME" 3,4 Stonington Harbor, CT' Stonington Harbor, ME'6 Stony Creek, Branford, CT ,6 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME' Taunton River, MA' Tenants Harbor, ME' Thames River, CT' Union River, ME 3"' Vineyard Haven, MA' Wareham Harbor, MA' Warren River, RI' Warwick Cove, RI ,6 Wellfleet Harbor, MA' Wells Harbor, ME' Westcott Cove, CT' Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT5 Weymouth Back River, MA' Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivs., MA" Wickford Harbor, RI"' Wilson Point Harbor, CT"4 Winnipesaukee Lake, NH' Winter Harbor, ME",6 Winthrop Harbor, MA' Woods Hole Channel, MA' 1882 1990 1985 1972 1883 1882 1976 1989 1986 1989 1986 1991 1950 1983 1909 1969 1922 1915 1976 1971 1966 1954 1971 1962 1962 1980 1915 1959 1985 1978 1914 1948 1920 1967 1912 1943 1896 1890 1975 1981 1991 1978 1972 1944 1979 and 1983 1973 1895 1952 1976 1895 1940 $ 5,000 25,417,022 60 3,548,954 41 38,764 20,000 119,844 1,948,462 32,000 59 22,000 1,786,754 336,704 130,342 179,550 764,651 38,427 1,693,202 1,925,553 35,000 392,635 379,851 572,568 16 672,214 89,593 59,213 ' 180,042 892,824 37 33,000 377,328 898,500 112,487 19,871 442,895 18,750 1,471,919 146,855 27,186 95,997 5,000 155,430 157,634 25 360,973 55,960 19,308 48,740 30,194,613 43 233,410 54,177 7,500 162,937 8,992 230,000 1-43 $ 50 4,176,754 61 1,053,966 1,808 473,776 252,853 197,147 29,816 770,108 12 698,592 36,392 211,852 13,578 573,063 16,060 124 1,239,293 181,929 54,070 821,854 40,730 388,649 66,540 1,745,024 a 23,216 123,060 16,491 328,569 32,917 20,332 1,624,978 132,356 16,795 30,184 85,451 944,059 1,875,501 347,248 180,824 27,353 1,527,377 4 111,363 29,870 19,967 38,515 55,614 760,000 51,430 49,562 " 61,338 47 19,892 21,928 10,000 69,976 67,792 2,567 18,285 7,501 169,636 85,176 133,985 65 32,000 212,0000 64 21,000 20,000 630,133 49,094 23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) York Harbor, ME' 1977 $ 239,654 $ 354,690 $ 32,161 1 Completed. 2 Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation requirements, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. 3 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. 4 No commerce reported. 5 Completed except for inactive portion. 6 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107.) ' Excludes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. 8 Inactive. 9 Includes $53,254 for previous projects. o1C0o mmerce included under Tiverton Harbor, RI. 11 Authorized work remaining on project is comprised of an incomplete and an inactive portion. 12 Excludes $20,000 expended from Contributed Funds, Other for maintenance. 13 Recommendation for abandonment of existing project made in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. Portion of project authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107) is complete. 14Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds expended. 15 Improvement adequate for commerce. 16 Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. 17 Includes $40,800 for previous project. 18 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. 19 Includes $12,000 for previous project. 20 Under State maintenance. 21 Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. 2 Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 23 Excludes $10,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 24 All assurances of local cooperation have not been fulfilled. Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107.) 25 Includes $11,350 for previous project. 26 H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. recommended eliminating maintenance dredging. 27 Includes $692,435 for previous projects. 28 Includes $133,357 for previous project. 29 Includes $37,000 for new work for previous project. 30 Excludes local requirements of $65,000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction costs. 31 Includes $42,340 for previous project. 32 Includes $22,000 for previous project. 3"Excludes $1,926,000 expended for rehabilitation. SIncludes $81,410 for previous project. *5Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. * Includes $21,000 for previous projects. 37 Includes $135,143 for previous project. " Includes $10,000 for previous project. 39 Includes $162,517 for previous project. 4 Includes $330,204 for previous project. 41 Includes $215,801 for previous project. 42 Includes $66,120 for previous projects. 4a Includes for previous projects $735,900 (Weymouth, Fore R.) and $25,000(Town R.). 4 Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore River) and $12,577 (Weymouth, Town River.) S Includes $59,420 for previous project. 4 Includes $35,214 for previous project. 4 Excludes $81,548 Contributed Funds, Other. 48 Excludes $582,188 Contributed Funds, Other expended. 49 Includes $378,450 for previous project. 50 Includes $11,949 for maintenance of previous project. 51 Excludes $18,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 52 Includes $188,647 for previous project. 53 Excludes $894,475 major rehabilitation for Long Beach Dike. 54 Includes $2,013 for previous projects. In addition $400 was expended for maintenance from Contributed Funds. 5 Includes $32,570 for previous projects. 5 Includes $3,160 for previous project. 57 Excludes $173,425 Contributed Funds, Other. 5 Includes $45,835 for new work for previous project; excludes $211,649 expended for minor rehabilitation; jetty repaired in 1963. 59 Excludes $15,000 expended for previous project. o Includes $3,761,412 for previous projects. e Includes $650,136 for previous projects. 62Includes $331,626 for previous projects. Includes $290,877 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 Public Works Funds. 3 Excludes $37,200 Contributed Funds, Other. 64 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 65 Excludes $10,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sep. 30, 1992 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT 1 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT ' 1964 56,386 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA 1 1982 228,081 228,080 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI 4 1984 405,491 955,237 Compo Beach, Westport, CT 1 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, CT ' 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT ' 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT ' 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT 1 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT 1 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH 1 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT ' 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT 1 1961 3,930 7,859 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA 5 1986 50,000- Middle Beach, CT ' 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI 2 1963 14,512 29,024 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA 1 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA' 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI ' 1982 559,200 181,175 Plum Island, MA ' 1977 118,882 104,875 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT ' 1958 104,573 240,819 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA 1 1962 621,464 1,242,880 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI ' 1959 40,143 82,000 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT 1 1961 23,759 47,518 Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven CT 1 1991 292,545 157,533 Seaside Park, CT 1 1958 150,000 329,921 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT' 1983 1,186,830 889,330 Short Beach, CT 3 1956 - - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1 1964 62,560 270,695 Southport Beach, CT 1 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA4 1964 5,490 10,981 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH 1 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA 1 1971 180,944 200,208 Willard Beach, South Portland, ME 5 1983 171,000- Winthrop Beach, MA 1 1960 176,567 353,134 1 Completed. 2 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874. 3 Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. (See page 88 of the 1956 Annual Report.) 4 Completed except for inactive portion. 6 Inactive. 1-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alford, Green River, MA 34 Alley Bay, Beals, ME3,4.10 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA 3,4 Ansonia - Derby, CT 3 Bagaduce River, ME 3,4,10 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 3,4 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA s4.10 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA 3.4 Canton, MA 3*4 Charles River Dam, MA 3 Charlestown, NH 34 Cherryfield, ME 3,4 Chicopee, MA 3 Chicopee Falls, MA3 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 3.4 Cocheco River, NH 3,4 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH 3,4 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH 3.4 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA 3,4,10 Danbury, CT 3 Derby, CT 3 East Branch Dam, CT 3 East Hartford, CT 3 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 3,4 Fort Kent, ME 3.4 Fox Point Barrier, RI3 Gardner, MA 3.4 Gulf Street, Milford, CT 3.4,10 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT 3 Hartford, CT 3 Hartford, White River, VT 3.4 Haverhill, MA 3 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA34 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME 34.o10 Holyoke, MA 3 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA .4 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT 3.4.1 0o Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA 3.4.10 Huntington, MA 3,4,10 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA 34 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME 3,4,10 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME 3,4.o10 Keene, NH 3.4 Lancaster, Israel River, NH 3' 4 Lee, Housatonic River, MA 3.4,10 Little River, Belfast,ME3,4 Lowell, MA 3 Lower Woonsocket, RI3 Machias River, Machias, ME3,4 Mad River Lake, CT 3 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME '4 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME 3.4.1o Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 3,4,.o Nashua, NH s Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT3 ,4, o 1977 1979 1978 1977 1985 1989 1986 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1987 1963 1982 1976 1988 1978 1977 1973 1951 1979 1979 1976 1970 1991 1970 1960 1973 1940 1979 1980 1953 1985 1982 1981 1960 1983 1985 1985 1955 1982 1976 1990 1945 1977 1987 1973 1987 1980 1988 1950 1985 $ 41,419 190,500 132,113 18,266,040 129,500 2,591,000 249,999 47,300 156,568 5 41,170,921 113,330 191,095 1,433,600 2,183,912 168,000 183,100 180,000 54,703 250,000 13,143,000 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,447 13 220,284 1,997,820 11,112,801 495,161 250,369 2,572,357 6,094,100 9 332,236 1,743,485 2,325,470 207,390 3,418,000 25 739,003 102,800 202,608 3,900 172,000 165,500 163,082 44,146 551,606 37,852 166,682 490,600 11 6,600,681 152,000 4,773,020 243,000 107,682 110,000 270,000 8 222,500 $ 21 4,576 92,981 5,554,088 15 385 411,292 22 180,000 2 19 7,637 3,616,290 14 15,000 21,000 2,781,100 120,000 24,447 43,000 1,266,638 20 327 1-46 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Northampton, MA 3 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT 3'4 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA3 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA s,4,10 Norwalk, CT3 ,4 Norwich, CT 3 Park River, Hartford, CT 3 Pawcatuck, CT 3 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI 3,4 Penobscot River, Old Town, ME 34 Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME3'4 Phillips Lake, MA' Pleasant Point, Perry, ME*3,4 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT 3,4,10 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME s,4,10 St. John River Basin, ME 24 Salmon River, Colchester, CT 3,4 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME 3,4,10 Saxonville, MA3 Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME 34 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH 3,4,10 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA 3,4 South River, Conway, MA3,4,10 Springdale, MA3 Springfield, MA 3 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT 3,4 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH 3,4 Sucker Brook Dam, CT' Three Rivers, MA3 Torrington, East Branch, CT 3*4 Torrington, West Branch, CT 3*4 Trumbull Lake, CT ' Village of Saxtons, VT 3,4,10 Ware, MA 34 Waterbury-Watertown, CT 3,4 Weston, VT 3,4 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA3,4 West Warren, MA3,4 Whitmanville Lake, MA ' Winsted, CT 3 Woonsocket, RI 3 Worcester Diversion, MA3 'Inactive. 2 Excludes $1,146,828 expended from Contributed Funds, Other. sCompleted. 4 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. ' Reflects FY1967 settlement of outstanding claims in the amount of $13,295. 6 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. ' Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. 8 Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency funds expended. 9 Excludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. o1E0m ergency Bank Protection. " Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 12 Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 13 Includes $380,000 Public Works Administration Funds. 14 Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnation. 15 Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. 16 Excludes $259,408 Contributed Funds, Other. 17 Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 18 Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 19 Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 20 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 21 Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 1-47 1950 1977 1981 1979 1952 1960 1986 1966 1986 1986 1990 1982 1987 1986 1980 1983 1984 1980 1985 1977 1978 1987 1952 1950 1983 1973 1976 1970 1963 1963 1983 1985 1963 1963 1957 1983 1964 1979 1954 1962 1978 $ 680,000 17 73,865 3,235,000 23 81,671 52,150 1,209,000 60,176,919 644,311 3,174,260 178,045 85,998 300,000 189,000 227,500 73,674 55,595 247,100 127,500 4,218,700 1,857,475 37,657 1,803,738 133,500 700,000 577,000 18 116,296 19,500 2,227,792 1,577,189 389,237 228,237 1,498,800 140,500 400,000 265,300 13,079 119,433 389,176 605,023 245,500 4,033,100 5,086,896 $ - 16 214,106 18,600 6 5,350 58,800 - 12 41,000 224,476 70,161 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. 23 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 24 Irrigation demonstration project. SIncludes $610,000 Public Works Administration funds. TABLE 1-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER Cost to September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME ' 1935 $ 6,384,394 SWork discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-48 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual. Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir Andover Lake, CT Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) Baker Brook, MA Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) Beards Brook Reservoir, NH Beaver Brook Lake, NH Bennington Reservoir, NH Big River Reservoir, RI Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Brockway Lake, VT Cambridgeport Lake, VT Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) Claremont Lake, NH Clyde, RI Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (uncompleted portion) Cotuit Harbor, MA Dickey - Lincoln School Lakes, ME Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted portion) Eastport Harbor, ME Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Gaysville Lake, VT Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) Greenwich Point Beach, CT Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) Honey Hill Lake, NH Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion) Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion) Ludlow Lake, VT Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) Manchester Harbor, MA Marblehead Harbor, MA Mattapoisett Harbor, MA Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) Monoosnoc Brook, MA Monoosnoc Lake, MA Mountain Brook Dam, NH Mystic, CT Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion) Nantasket Beach, MA Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion) Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA (inactive portion) Napatree Beach, RI 1972 1932 1949 1973 1949 1987 1986 1984 1961 1980 1946 1954 1968 1948 1932 1979 1962 1984 1968 1984 1978 1984 1969 1970 1983 1959 1983 1979 1949 1969 1986 1956 1949 1968 1950 1981 1967 1967 1949 1968 1986 1971 1965 1989 Aug 1977 $- Aug 1977 Oct 1978 Nov 1979 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Apr 1978 Aug 1977 Nov 1990 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Nov 1979 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Dec 1970 Apr 1951 Jan 1990 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Jan Nov Nov Nov Oct Oct 94,000 78,000 378,300 205,000 242,700 8,800 132,146 8,541 26,285,298 1990 1983 1986 1986 1978 1976 Nov 1986 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Nov 1986 Nov 1979 Oct 1978 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Aug 1972 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Nov 1979 638,675 141,530 206,600 92,000 23,986 43,711 57,000 67,700 1-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 $ 115,590 $ - New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion) 1953 Nov 1986 - - New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Nookagee Lake, MA 1976 Nov 1986 563,677 - North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 - North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH 1963 Nov 1981 - - Norwalk-Wilton, CT 1973 Nov 1979 - - Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT (uncompleted portion) 1978 Nov 1986 - - Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Pawtucket, RI 1949 Nov 1977 - - Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1981 - - Pleasant Bay, MA 1971 Nov 1986 - - Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 - Pontiac Diversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200 - Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1976 Nov 1986 - - Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 - - Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) 1976 Nov 1986 - - Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1979 - - Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1982 Jun 1982 176,000 - Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1986 - - Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978 - - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1 1964 Nov 1986 - - South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000 - South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) 1979 Jan 1990 - - Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1959 Nov 1986 - - Stonington Harbor, ME 1961 Nov 1979 2,543 - Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - - Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) 1948 Jan 1990 - - Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1967 Nov 1986 - - The Island Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) 1964 Jan 1990 - - Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA 1961 Nov 1986 - - Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) 1896 Jan 1990- Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 - Victory Lake, VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 - West Brookfield Reservoir, MA 1948 Jul 1960 67,000 - West Canaan Lake, NH 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 - Westerly, RI 1966 Nov 1986 - - Westfield, MA 1967 Sep 1969 507,200 - Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 - Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1972 Nov 1979 - - Westport River, MA 1942 Jan 1990 - - Williamsville Reservoir, VT 1949 Dec 1944 146,500 - Winthrop Beach, MA (uncompleted portion) 1960 Nov 1986 - - 'Walnut Beach and impermeable groins. 1-50 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA $ 574 $ 39,000 Bass Harbor, Tremont, ME 12 Danvers River, Danvers, MA 45,628 East River, Wareham, MA 21,088 Gloucester Harbor, Gloucester, MA 26,716 Mill Creek, Yarmouth, MA 18,042 Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, MA 1,971 Perkins Cove, Ogunquit, ME 27,007 Provincetown Harbor, MA 446 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA 62,307 Westport Harbor, Westport, MA 2,048 Winthrop Harbor, Winthrop, MA 9,585 TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 78-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Drakes Island Beach, Wells, ME Lighthouse Beach, Chatham, MA Morris Cove, New Haven,CT North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA Planting Island Causeway, Marion, MA Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA Poppenessett Spit, Mashpee, MA Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT Sandy Point, West Haven, CT Sylvia State Beach, Oak Bluffs, MA Town Beach,Madison, CT Town Beach, Narragansett, RI West Haven Beaches, CT $ 8,000 9,152 18,224 15,765 11,000 3,000 3,721 50,988 11,743 2,733 9,000 8,000 2,915 1-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Cedar Beach, Milford, CT $ 1,724 Deerfield River, Wilmington, VT 72 Israel River, NH 5,568 Kennebec River, Madison, ME 714 Lake Shirley, Lunenburg,MA 15,000 Mad River, Waterbury, CT 1,413 Mad River, Wolcott, CT 3,660 Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA 39,261 Point Beach, Milford, CT 2,991 Sebasticook River, Pittsfield, ME 1,325 Silver Beach, Milford, CT 827 Ten Mile River, Cheshire, CT 949 TABLE 1-K BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 28 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total West Hill2 Worcester,MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,902 $940,000 $2,306,902 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. 1-52 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-K (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Worcester, MA 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,000 2 $6,102,500 Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,733,100 1,069,000 ' 4,802,100 Lower Woonsocket, Flood wall, conduits and RI 13 channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 32 Slope protection 254,575 - 254,575 5 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 23 Retaining wall 168,000 - 168,000 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI - Land acquisition 4,125,000 - 4,125,000 4 ' Includes relocation. 4 $3,300,000 Federal; $825,000 non-Federal. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 5 $249,999 Federal; $4,576 non-Federal. a $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. TABLE 1-L CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 30 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Reservoir Lands ticut Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village 2 North Hartland 2 North Springfield 2 Ball Mountain 2 Townshend 2 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Otter Brook 2 Massachusetts: Birch Hill 2 Tully 2 Barre Falls 2 Knightville 2 Littleville 2 Conant Brook 2 Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Mad River Sucker Brook White River Jct. White River Jct. Springfield Brattleboro Brattleboro Keene Keene 228.4 170 Earthfill 211.7 185 Earthfill 191.3 120 Earthfill 178.2 265 Rockfillearth 168.3 133 Earthfill 174.4 86 171.2 133 Gardner Athol Worcester Northampton Northampton Springfield Winsted Winsted Winsted 153.3 148.7 130.2 102.8 102.0 122.0 56 62 62 160 150 85 38,000 71,400 50,600 54,600 33,200 $3,186,860 6,349,225 4,781,526 10,689,298 $ 908,300 963,000 2,050,000 350,000 $4,095,160 7,312,225 6,831,526 11,039,298 5,520,413 1,878,000 7,398,413 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 Earthfill Earthfill Rockfillearth Earthfill Earthfill Rockfillearth 116.0 223 Rockfillearth 120.0 178 Earthfill 118.5 68 Earthfill 49,900 22,000 24,000 49,000 32,400 3,740 98,500 1,740,679 1,298,752 1,928,819 2,594,440 5,863,412 1,935,530 3,075,000 368,000 39,000 821,200 1,150,000 1,015,000 4,815,679 1,666,752 1,967,819 3,415,640 7,013,412 2,950,530 8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 9,700 4,773,020 2,210,000 * 6,983,020 1,480 2,227,792 180,0003 2,407,792 ' Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. 3 Non-Federal cost. 4 Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. 1-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-L (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Lands ticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 170.4 Channel improvement $ 2,591,000 $ - $ 2,591,000 Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection 113,330 - 113,330 Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,434,000 250,000 1,684,000 Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,135,447 271,000 2,406,447 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel improvement 220,284 - 220,284 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 495,691 35,000 530,691 Gulf Street, Milford, CT - Slope protection 290,277 - 290,277 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 6,930,000 s 1,150,000 8,080,000 Hartford, White River, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,418,000 150,000 3,568,000 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,100 - 44,100 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 200.3 Streambank stabilization 110,000 - 110,000 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,000 ' 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 Park River, CT 51 Conduit 60,176,919 1,300,000 61,476,919 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,263,724 50,000 1,313,720 Salmon R., Colchester, CT 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 South River, Conway, MA 107 Slope protection 133,500 - 133,500 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 932,000 272,000 1,204,000 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,000 2,000 15,000 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 1,789,141 2 30,000 1,819,141 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 389,200 64,000 453,200 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 'To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests portion of relocation. For details see individual report. 2 Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 3 Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 4 Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 5 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 1-54 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-M HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 31 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Nauga- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages 2 Total Hall Meadow 4 Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,0003 $3,862,357 East Branch 5 Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,959,836 1,290,0003 3,249,836 Thomaston Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 earthfilloMfouth Northfield Brook Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 Black Rock Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Brook Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,594,911 2,585,000 4,179,911 Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 ' For details of projects, see individual reports. * For last full report, see Annual Report for 1970. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. s For last full report, see Annual Report for 1973. cost of lands borne by local interests. aIncludes LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS 1 Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Alford, Green River, MA 111.0 Earth dike and stone slope $41,419 $ - $ 41,419 protection Ansonia-Derby, CT 13.0 Wall, levee, channel 18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 improvement and pumping station Danbury, CT 56.0 Walls, channel improvement 13,143,000 1,862,000 15,005,000 and bridge replacememt Derby, CT 12.0 Walls, levees and pumping 7,582,642 647,000 8,229,642 station North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT 83.0 Snagging and clearing project 73,865 - 73,865 Pittsfield, MA 133.0 Stone arch culvert 739,003 85,000 824,003 Salisbury, CT 76.0 Gabionade with slope 102,800 - 102,800 protection Sheffield, MA 96.0 Stone slope protection 205,608 - 205,608 Squantz Pond, New 43.0 Timber Bulkhead 116,296 - 116,296 Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT 51.0 Dike and channel improvement 389,200 - 389,200 Torrington, West Branch, CT 52.0 Walls, dikes and channel 228,300 - 228,300 Waterbury- Watertown, CT 32.0 Wall, dike and channel 263,300 - 263,300 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 1-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-N MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 32 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages 2 Total Franklin Falls 2 Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 Blackwater 2 Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 1,319,746 Hopkinton- Everett 2,4 Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 Edward MacDowell 2 Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,253 306,000 2,014,253 Phillips Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,000 Whitmanville Fitchburg, MA 110.6 76 Earthfill 9,350 11,590,000 6,210,000 17,800,000 ' Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. 3Based on "large" Phillips plan which would eliminate Nookagee Lake. 4 Substituted for Bennington and Beards Brook. Distance and height are for Everett Dam. Distance and height for Hopkinton Dam are 118 miles and 76 feet, respectively. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 1 Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and revetment $ 132,113 $ - $ 132,113 Merrimack Rivers, MA 2 Haverhill, MA 2 21.0 Floodwall, conduit and 1,743,485 - 1,743,485 6 pumping station Lowell, MA 2 39.0 Wall and levee 490,600 5 90,000 580,600 Nashua, NH 2 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,000 4 North Nashua River, MA 2,3 100.5 Channel improvement 3,241,421 - 3,241,421 Saxonville, MA 2 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 'To be borne by local interests. 2 Project completed. 3 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration Funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 4 Excludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 5 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration Funds. 6 Excludes $120,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 1-56 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-0 THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 37 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Thames Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages 1 Total Hodges Village 2 Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,268 $3,144,000 $4,461,268 Buffumville 2 Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 East Brimfield 2 Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 Westville 2 Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 West Thompson 2 Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,220 1,965,000 7,001,220 Mansfield Hollow 2 Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 SIncludes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 1 Total Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 West River, New Haven, CT - Channel improvements 1,959,374 - 1,959,374 1 Borne by local interests. TABLE 1-P BOSTON HARBOR, MA Total Federal Cost for Existing Project to September 1992 Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $21,881,851 $8,766,496 $30,648,347 Public Works 1,030,806 - 1,030,806 Emergency Relief 935,303 - 935,303 $23,847,960 $8,766,496 1 $32,614,456 1 Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. 1-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 1-Q RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted CONNECTICUT Bridgeport Harbor Clinton Harbor Connecticut River below Hartford Guilford Harbor Housatonic River Milford Harbor New Haven Harbor Norwalk Harbor Stamford Harbor Belfast Harbor Biddeford Pool Boothbay Harbor Camden Harbor Deer Island Thorofare Isle of Shoals Harbor Josias River Kennebec River Narraguagus River Rockland Harbor Searsport Harbor South Bristol Harbor Stonington Harbor Tenants Harbor Wells Harbor Winter Harbor York Harbor MASSACHUSETTS Jan 1992 Oct/Nov 1991 Sep 1992 May/Jun 1992 Apr/May 1992 Nov/Dec 1991 Nov 1991 Jun/Jul 1992 May/Jun 1992 Sep 1992 Jul 1992 May 1992 Feb 1992 Oct 1991 Sep 1992 Feb 1992 Jul/Aug 1992 May-Jul 1992 Jan/Feb 1992 May 1992 Feb/Mar/Jun/ Sep 1992 Oct 1991 Apr/May 1992 Jul 1992 May 1992 Sep 1992 Andrews River Annisquam River Chatham (Stage) Harbor Cohasset Harbor Cuttyhunk Harbor Duxbury Harbor Falmouth Harbor Green Harbor Hyannis Harbor Lagoon Pond Little Harbor Menemsha Creek Nantucket Harbor Newburyport Harbor Onset Bay Rockport Harbor Scituate Harbor Sesuit Harbor Vineyard Haven Wareham Harbor Weymouth Fore & Town River NEW HAMPSHIRE Hampton Harbor RHODE ISLAND Block Island Point Judith Pond Providence River & Harbor Sakonnet Harbor Seekonk Harbor Wickford Harbor Feb 1992 Nov/Dec 1991 Feb/Mar/Apr 1992 Jan 1992 Sep 1992 Feb 1992 Mar 1992 Oct 1991 Feb 1992 Feb/Mar 1992 Mar 1992 Sep 1992 Oct 1991 Mar 1992 May 1992 Aug 1992 Aug/Sep 1992 May 1992 Mar/Apr 1992 Jan/Feb/Apr 1992 Mar 1992 Apr/May 1992 Nov 1991 Jul/Aug 1992 Oct/Dec 1991 Jan 1992 Mar/Apr 1992 Jun/Aug 1992 Dec 1991 Jan/Feb 1992 Aug/Sep 1992 May/Jun 1992 Major activities under the Dredged Material Management Program under PCS for fiscal year 1992 were (1) monitoring surveys at the Jonesport, New London, Cornfield Shoals, Central Long Island Sound, Western Long Island Sound, Massachusetts Bay, and Portland disposal sites (2 ) maintenance, replacement, and repositioning of disposal site buoys. Additionally, 3 monitoring study reports and a public information brochure were completed and distributed to the public and regional resource agencies. Total cost of contracts was $690.000. Labor costs of $260,000 for program management, sampling and testing, and environmental analysis were incurred. 1-58 MAINE TABLE 1-R Study Identification MFS, Howard Complex, Cranston, RI NEW ENGLAND DIVISION PROJECTS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal Year Authority Costs Code 140 $ 44,124 1-59 I NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT* This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State Line to, but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. In addition it exercises jurisdiction over Navigation matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters of Long Island Sound. Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control...............................................2-3 2. Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels, N.Y.......................2-3 3. East Chester Creek, N.Y .......................................... 2-3 4. East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y ........................................ 2-4 5. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, N.Y ................................. 2-4 6. Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y................................... -5 7. Great South Bay, N.Y .............................................. 2-5 8. Hempstead Harbor, N.Y............................................2-6 9. Hudson River, N.Y...................................................2-6 10. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. & N.J ...................... 2-7 11. Jam aica Bay, N.Y ..................................................... 2-8 12. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y................2-8 13. Long Island Intacoastal W/W, N.Y........................2-9 14. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. 15. New York and New Jersey Channels ....................... 2-9 16. New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift ..................................................... 2-10 17. New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas..............................................2-11 18. Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y.............................................. 2-11 19. Shrewsbury River, N.J ........................................... 2-12 20. Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y...........................................2-13 21. Westchester Creek, N.Y ........................................... 2-13 22. Supervisor of New York Harbor .............................. 2-13 23. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................. 2-14 24. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.....................2-14 25. Navigation work under special authorization..........2-14 Beach Erosion Control 26. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island) N.Y ................................................ 2-14 27. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J ........................ 2-14 28. Other Authorized Beach erosion control projects.......................................................2-15 29. Beach erosion control work under special authorization ................................................ 2-15 Flood Control 30 North Ellenville, N.Y ............................................... 2-15 31. Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y ........................... 2-16 32. Inspection of completed flood control projects.......2-17 33 Other authorized flood control projects...................2-17 34 Flood control work under special authorization................................................2-17 35 Emergency steambank and shoreline protection under special authorization.....................2-17 General Investigations 36. 37. 38. Surveys ..................................................................... 2-17 Collection and study of basic data ..................... 2-17 Deauthorized projects ............................................. 2-17 Tables Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement............................2-18 Table 2-B Authorizing legislation .................................. 2-22 Table 2-C Hudson River, N.Y. Features of Lock and Dam Included in Existing Project..............................................2-27 2-1 IMPROVEMENTS Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Page Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor Statement of Activities .................................. 2-27 Table 2-F Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ........... 2-28 Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects...........2-29 Table 2-H Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .............................. 2-31 Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................................. 2-32 Page Table 2-J Surveys ........................................................... 2-33 Table 2-L Costs for Flood Plain Management Services .......................................................... 2-33 Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects ..................................... 2-34 Table 2-N Section 107 Study..........................................2-35 Table 2-P Section 205 Projects ...................................... 2-35 Table 2-Q Section 14 Reports and Plans and Specs ...................................... 2-36 2-2 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water chestnut, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 changed the local responsibility from 30% to 50%. In FY 87 the States involved in the program were permitted to keep the cost sharing at 30% by order of the Secretary of the Army. Starting FY 88, however, local sponsors contributed 50% of the costs. Operations and results during period. FY 1992 has been the eleventh year of a control program started in FY 1982 for the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in Lake Champlain. Recent work continued the removal of water chestnut from portions of the south end of the lake. The State of Vermont was able to identify alternative sources to fund the FY 1991 program at no Federal cost. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division areas was completed in August 1967. The General Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this control program to date is $1,809,605. In October 1991, waterways experiment station was directed to conduct a 3-year study for $90,000 which would identify and test potential biocontrol agents of water chestnuts. Early results are good, as a particular wevil has tested successfully as a biocontrol agent of water chestnut. 2. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. Location. These channels lie along east shore of Upper Bay, New York Harbor and, with Buttermilk Channel, form an easterly channel along Brooklyn waterfront from the Narrows to East River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327 and 12334). Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938, page 1768 and 195 respectively. Existing projects. A channel 1,200 feet wide 40 feet deep at mean low water from the Narrows to Bay Ridge Avenue, Brooklyn, thence 1,750 feet wide to junction of Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, thence 1200 feet wide through Red Hook Channel to junction with Buttermilk Channel and a channel of same depth extending into Gowanus Bay from junction of Bay Ridge Channel with Red Hook Channel, narrowing uniformly in width to about 500 feet at 28th Street Brooklyn. Section included in project is 4 miles long. Mean tidal range, 4.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.6 feet: irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.2 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $4,277.197 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1988. Vol. 2 Operations and results during period. Approximately 178,000 of material was removed by Corps' Hopper Dredge "McFarland" during FY92 at the Gowanus Bay portion of the Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channel, NY. The total cost was $2,080,098 for maintenance work. Condition as of September 30. New work under existing project was commenced March 1901 and completed June 1940. 3. EAST CHESTER CREEK N.Y. Location, This creek also known as Hutchinson River, is a small tidal stream emptying into East Chester Bay, an indentation in north shore of Long Island Sound immediately north of Throgs Neck, 12 miles southwest of Connecticut State line and 21 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12366) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 1929, 1938 and 1949, pages 1761, 167, 163, and 208. respectively. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and generally 150 feet wide from Long Island Sound through East Chester Bay to a point 700 feet below Boston Post Road Bridge, and thence 70 feet wide extending to a point where the creek divides into a Y, thence approximately 1,000 feet into east branch of the Y and Approximately 500 feet into west branch, of the Y; a passing basin south of Boston Post Road Bridge; widening channel at Boston Post Road Bridge and construction of a check dam at head of navigation. Section included in project is 5 miles. Mean tidal range,7.3 feet in the estuary; mean range of spring tides, 8.6 feet irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.1 feet above mean high water.(See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Note: The 10-foot project has been deauthorized. The 8-foot project, with same widths as above, authorized in 1930, remains as the existing project. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, provides that local interests furnish lands, rights of-way, and suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. City of New York has complied with requirements. Assurances are yet to be received from other local interests concerned with improvement. Terminal facilities. Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2, Operations and results during period. An engineering and design effort for East Chester Creek, NY was conducted during this period to determine the feasibility to perform dredging at the "Y" portion of the upper channel. The total cost of the E&D effort was $172,697, Conditions as of September 30. No work has been accomplished under the existing project. Work under the 1930 project was completed in August 1941. 4. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12353.) Existing project. A channel. 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12 foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmosphere pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including. $100,000 contributed funds (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are numerous terminals in Oceanside. Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway, including oil terminals. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with mechanical handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A contract for the maintenance dredging of the Inlet was awarded onl8 July 1991. Work commenced on 26 September 1991 and was completed on 11 November 1991. Approximately 157,000 c.y. of material was removed. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $357,062 was expended on Supervision and Inspections, and contract work for this project during FY 1992. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4.250 feet tong was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May 1935. 5. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y., Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A jetty at Fire Island Inlet extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel 14 feet deep and 450 feet wide between the north-western edge of the Inlet's shoaling area and the tip of the Sore Thumb connecting the ocean to the deep water in the Inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 feet and 2.4 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements and rights-of-way: Terminal facilities. Great South Bay has extensive public and private facilities for mooring and servicing recreational boats. Much of this traffic uses the inlet during the boating season, and some traffic (Coast Guard craft and party and head fishing boats) continues throughout the year. Operations and results during period. A contract for dredging in the Inlet and placement of 1,200,000 cubic yards of sand on Gilgo Beach, N.Y. was awarded on 21 August 1992. Work commenced in September 1992 and is scheduled to be completed in Feb 1993 as a combined dredging and beachnourishment project, The total of Operations and Maintenance funds expended on the project during FY 92 is $2,519,744, with New York State contributing an additional $530,829 for beach placement of sand. Additional $4,025,480 in Construction general funds together with New York State's matching $847,947 are reserved for FY 93. Condition as of September 30. The jetty, completed in 1941, surpassed its capacity as a sand entrapping agent in a little over a decade. Since then extensive sand bars and shoals continued to form west of the jetty and in the inlet throat. Hydraulic dredging in the inlet was undertaken in 1959 and again in 1964 under a combined beach erosion control and navigation authorization (1958 Act). Since then 3 more hydraulic dredging operations were conducted starting in 1973 and completed in 1977 under provisions of the 1962 Act (see Table 2-4 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 2B). Maintenance dredging using small hopper dredges has also been done from time to time. Due to local concerns about inlet dredging and erosion at Oak Beach, maintenance had been deferred since 1979 which has allowed the complete shoaling of the authorized project channel. To facilitate navigation in this period the existing natural channel was dredged in FY 1985 and in FY 1987. In FY 1987 sand was deposited offshore of Gilgo Beach by hopper dredge using operations and maintenance funds. O&M funds were also used during FY 1987 and 1988 to make repairs to the inner portion of the jetty. In March 1988 the District recommended a plan to maintain a realigned channel in the vicinity of the natural channel to a depth of 14 feet (plus 2 feet of allowable overdepth) and a width of 450 feet. The plan also recommended placement of the dredged material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purposes. The recommended plan was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on 2 August 1988. During FY 1990 and 1991 the realigned channel was dredged to project depth, with placement of material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purpose. 6. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY Location. On north shore Long Island, opening into East River, 12 miles by water northeast of the battery, New York City. Bay is 1.8 miles long in a northwest-southeast direction and from 0.4 to 0.8 mile wide. Flushing Creek enters bay from southeast and is about 1.1 miles long. (Chart No. 12339) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1932 and 1938; pages 1772, 169, and 168 respectively. Existing project. (a) A bay channel for a depth of 15 feet at mean low water, and 3000 feet wide from deep water in East River 1.8 miles to maneuvering area; (b) thence a creek channel with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water and 200 feet wide to Northern Boulevard Bridge, thence decreasing uniformly in width to 170 feet at a point 50 feet downstream from Van Wyck expressway Bridge, a distance of about 1.1 miles; (c) a branch channel with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water and width of 200 feet from bay channel, maneuvering area 0.1 mile long; (d) an irregularly shaped maneuvering area about 2,000 by 750 feet with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water except approach to west side of municipal boat basin which will remain at 12 feet at mean low water; (e) an anchorage basin about 2,100 feet by 1,800 feet, encompassing about 84 acres with a depth of 6 feet at mean low water, and (f) riprap revetment of 1,400 feet extension of earth dike. Mean Tidal range, 6.5 feet at mouth of Flushing Bay, 6.8 feet at Northern Boulevard Bridge; mean range of spring tides 8.1 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet low water to 7.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $1,894,282, including $8,752 expended by local interest for requiredwork, $580,435 contributed, other, funds, and amounts expended on previous projects (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish lands, easements and rights-of way for maintenance and for aids to navigation upon request of Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; make necessary removals or relocations of pipelines, cables and other utilities and all necessary protective measures to bridges and all other maintain necessary mooring facilities and utilities for recreational boating open to all on equal terms. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2 Part 2, pages 244-248. Operations and results during period. Under contract for removal and satisfactory disposal of all material except ledge rock above the planes of 15, and 6 feet below mean low water, work began on 6 July 1992 and was completed on 20 September 1992. Approximately 195, 425 c.y. was removed at a total project cost of $1,984,967 Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced April 1963 and was completed October 1964. 7. GREAT SOUTH BAY, N.Y. Location. This is a lagoon inside south shore of Long Island, N.Y. about 26 miles long and 2 to 6 miles wide. Principal entrance, through Fire Island Inlet, is about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery New York City (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. (12352) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1918, pages 1773, and 182, respectively, Existing project. A channel 200 feet Wide and 10 feet deep at mean low water from Fire Island Inlet to central basin in Great South Bay, and a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from central basin in bay to head of navigation in Patchogue River. Length of section included in project is about 19,1 miles. Mean tidal range in bay, 0.7 foot; mean range of spring tides, 0.8 foot irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 1.7 feet below mean water up to 4.6 feet above mean high water. New Work for completed project cost $226,900 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. For latest published map, see 1916 Annual Report, page 2018. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required Terminal facilities. In Great South Bay there are boat repair and storage yards, several commercial fish terminals, and ferry service to Fire Island. Many terminals have travelifts and there are public docks. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. In addition to the commercial facilities there are numerous privately-owned terminals. 2-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Operations and results during period . A contract for removal and satisfactory disposal of all material lying above the plane of 10 'below MLW was awarded on May 18, 1992. Dredging commenced on 30 September 1992. Operations & Maintenance funds in the amount of $357,369 was expended on Great South Bay during FY92. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Work under existing project was commenced November 1902 and completed June 1958.Channel in Patchogue River was completed in 1904. West jetty, 1700 feet long, completed under previous project in 1897 and repaired in 1914, and east jetty formed of a sand spit, 1,000 feet long, with a riprap extension 330 feet long, completed in 1917, are in good condition. 8. HEMPSTEAD HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On the north shore of Long Island, 25 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City, and 13 miles southwest of Stamford Harbor, Conn. (Chart No. 12366.,) Previous project. For details see page 165, Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. (a) a channel 13 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide from deep water in the harbor to North Hempstead Turnpike Viaduct, a distance of 2.1 miles; (b) thence 6 feet deep at mean low water and 50-80 feet wide to head of navigation, a distance of 0.2 miles; and (c) a turning basin off west side of channel north of Viaduct 9 feet deep at mean low water, 190 in net width and 470 feet in maximum length. Dredging the 13-foot channel is subject to the condition that no work -shall be done by the United States within 50 feet of any established pierhead line, wharf or other structure. Section included in project is about 2.3 miles long. Mean tidal range, 7.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.4 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.3 feet above mean high water. The present work in Hempstead Harbor involves removal and disposal of derelict barges in the shallow waters along the western shore. Estimated cost is $2,465,000 federal funds and $1,232,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must pay 33% of the construction cost of the barge removal project and ensure that the area will remain free of derelict vessels after construction is completed and hold the U.S. free from damages. A local cooperation agreement was signed in Sept. 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work on the barge removal project was initiated in April 1992, resumed in Sept. 1992, and is about 30% completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under the navigation portion of the project was commenced March 1912 and the 6- foot channel completed October 1912, Deepening the project to 13 feet, as described above, has not been done, and has since been deauthorized. 9. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery. New York, City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay- Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335,12341,12343.12347,12348, and 14786.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 164 and 226, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston, and thence 400 feet wide to Albany. with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, I near Hudson and I near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2.200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of Mall Bridge, thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State N.Y. In the tidal section below the Federal dam at Troy, the assumed lowest low water plane downstream to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. Mean tidal range is about 5 feet below the dam and about 4.9 feet at Albany. The normal pool level above the dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.3 feet above mean sea level, with the mean range of pool level in seasons of moderate rains being 2.2 feet. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep ata cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category, and has since been deauthorized. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6 2-6 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Operations and results during period. A continuing cotract in the amount of $934,000 was awarded on August 31, 1992 to North Atlantic Trailing Company Limited Partnership for removal of approximately 100,000 cubic yards of material for the Hudson River Federal Navigation Project Channel. Funds in the amount of $549,996 were expended to initiate work on the continuting contract during FY 1992.In addition, Operation and Maintenance funds in the amoutnt of $80,850 were expended on engineering, design, supervision and administration for the dredging contract during FY 1992. Government Plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year in the removal of stumps, snags and other obstructions which constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a coat including supervision and administration of $250,608 for maintenance in FY 1992., A contract in the amount of $30,813 was initiated and completed by a LaBarge Bros. Co. Inc. for chipping and grinding of previously placed material at the Van Wies Snag Placement Site during FY 1992. Government plant end hired labor were employed throughout the fiscal year with operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam, including the associated building and grounds. Operation of the Lock was suspended for the 1992 navigation season on November 27,1992 and was resumed for the 1992 navigation season on May 1, 1992. Total funds expended for the operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and the associated building and grounds, including supervision and administration was $867,807 for FY 1992. A continuing contract in the amount of $1,868,485 was awarded during FY 1991 to perform concrete repairs at the Troy Lock and Dam to insure continued operability and safety of the facility. FY 1992 funds in the amount of $1,720,014 were expended to substantially complete the contact work. In addition, Operation and Maintenance funds in the amount of $157,534 were expended on supervision administration on the contract. Condition as of September 30. Work underexistingproject began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Additionally, the 1.300 linear feet of 27-foot project remains undredged. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet except for a small part of the widening to form a harbor at Troy. 10: HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, N.Y. & N.J. Location. Hudson River empties into Upper Bay of New York Harbor at the Battery, New York City. Section included under this title extends from deep water in Upper New York Bay about 14.5 miles to just north of Harlem River (Spuyten Duyvil Creek). Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938, pages 1765, and 213 respectively. Existing project. A channel 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, suitably widened at bends from West 59th Street, Manhattan, to West 40th Street thence 45 feet deep of same width to deep water in Upper Bay; a channel 40 feet deep to full width of river extending from northline of 59th Street to south side of Little Basin, and thence a channel of same depth to deep water in Upper New York Bay off Ellis Island, substantially as shown on maps in H. Doc. 309, 72d Cong., 1st sees., subject to provision that no dredging be done under project within 50 feet of pierhead lines; a channel 750 feet wide and 30 feet deep along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront; removal of a shoal on New York side between West 59th and West 61st Streets to a depth of40 feet; and removal of an obstruction north of mouth of Spuyten Duyvil Creek to depth surrounding river bottom. Channel included in project is about 11 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range at the Battery, 4.4 feet, and West 129th Street, 4.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.3 and 4.9 feet respectively: irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet below mean low water at the Battery up to 6.2 feet above mean high water and at West 129th Street from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 5.3 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1988. Operations and results during period. Approximately 252,600 c.y. of material was removed by Corps' Hopper Dredge McFarland during FY92. at the Edgewater-Weehawken reach of Hudson River, Channel, NY. The total cost for the work was. $2799, 533. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project as commenced April 1913 and completed September 1952. Widening and deepening Weehawken-Edgewater Channel to project dimensions was completed in August 1937.Widening 40-foot channel for full width of river from Ellis Island to West 59th Street, Manhattan, was completed in March 1939. Widening 48-foot project to full project width of 2,000 feet from West 40th Street to West 59th Street was completed in November 1950. Deepening 45-foot channel for a width of 2,000 feet from Upper Bay to West 40th Street was completed to project dimensions in September 1952. 2-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 11. JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. Location. Inside south shore of Long Island, the entrance being about 17 miles by water south and east of the Battery. New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12350). Previous projects. For details see page 1770 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 185 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an interior channel extending from vicinity of Marine Parkway Bridge along west and north shores of the bay, 18 feet deep at mean low water and 300 feet wide to Mill Basin, with a swinging basin, 1,000 feet wide and 1.000 feet long at the point- thence 12 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Fresh Creek Basin; and interior channel extending from the same locality alone south shore to Head of Bay, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, a channel in Mott Basin, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide extending from the channel along south shore. 3.000 feet to junction of the two branches, thence 2,200 feet in north branch (Inwood Creek) and 3,200 feet in south branch: and an entrance channel connecting the two interior channels with deep water in Atlantic Ocean, of suitable hydraulic dimensions to maintain present tidal prism in the bay, but not less than 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from opposite Barren Island to Rockaway Point, thence enlarging to not less than 200 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide to the sea, protected by one riprap jetty. Length of section included in project is 19.7 miles. Mean tidal range, 4.9 feet at Barren Island, and 5.1 feet at Head of Bay; mean range of spring tides, 5.9 and 6.1 feet, respectively: irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water to 4.9 feet above mean high water Cost for new work for completed project is $4,466,421 (July 1961). excluding amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that in lieu of conditions heretofore prescribed local interest furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged materials for new work and subsequent maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages, City of New York was notified of conditions of local cooperation in letter dated January 25, 1946. In letter dated February 7, 1946, the Mayor of New York advised that disposal areas are available and necessary document" holding the United States free from claim for damages" would be executed. Riverand Harbor Act of 1950provides local interests furnish lands. easements, rights-of-way, and suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during construction and subsequent maintenance. hold the United States free from damages and perform all necessary alterations to existing terminals and bulkheads, and dredge adequate approaches thereto. These conditions have been fulfilled. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5 revised 1988. Operation and results during period. A contract for the removal and disposal of material lying above the plane of 20 feet below mean low water in Jamaica Bay, NY was awarded on 21 February 1992. Work commenced 21 March 1992 and was completed 15 April 1992. The dredged material (sand) was placed at the nearby Plumb Beach to replenish the eroding shoreline. Approximately 146,000 c.y. of material was removed at total project cost of $1,485,000 Condition as of September 30. 'Work under existingproject was commenced in August 1912 and completed in June 1961. Westerly interior channel from Barren Island to Fresh Creek Basin and swinging basin at Mill Basin were completed in April 1929. Southerly interior channel and channel in Mott Basin, including its two branches were completed in June 1961 No new work dredging of entrance channel, was done, since depths provided underprevious project were greater than thoserequired under existing project. East jetty was restored to project dimensions in August 1963. 12. KILL VAN KULL - NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The project includes Kill Van KULL connecting upper New York Bay with Newark Bay, and channels in lower Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning and maneuvering areas, as well as deepening the Elizabeth and Port Newark channels. The deepening to be done from the existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 44 feet. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at over $312,000,000 with an additional $194,000,000 to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Government which was executed on 30 May 1986. A supplemental agreement was executed on 21 May 1987. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Stage 1, channel deepening to 40 feet in six contracts, is underway. Contract No.1, awarded in June 1987, is completed. Contract No. 2 was awarded in July 1988 and is completed. Contract No. 3 was awarded in Sept. 1988 and is completed. Contract No. 4 is planned to remove rock and hard material in the Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay. This work is divided in two contracts, 4A. and 4B. Contract 4A was awarded in April 1991 and is scheduled for completion in April 1994. Contract No. 5 was awarded in May 1988 and is complete. 2-8 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 13. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. Location. Extends from East Rockaway Inlet, on the south side of Long island, to Great Peconic Bay at the eastern end of Long Island. Section included under this project extends from Great South Bay opposite Patchogue to the South end of Shinnecock Canal. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at mean low water from the federally improved channel in Great South Bay, opposite Patchogue to south end of Shinnecock Canal, Section included in project is 34 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 1 foot in Shinnecock bay to 0.7 foot in Patchogue Bay; mean range of spring tides varies from 1.2 feet to 0.8 foot; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low water to 12 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are boat repair and storage yards within the area immediately adjacent to the federal improvement. There is ample room for expansion and development of terminals when future traffic warrants. Operations and results during period. A contract for removal and satisfactory disposal of material lying above the plane of 10 feet below mean low water was awarded on August 14, 1992. Dredging commenced on September 29, 1992 and expected to be completed by November 1993. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $669,820 was expended on Long Island Intracoastal Waterway during FY92. Condition as of September 30. Original work under the existing project was commenced October,1939 and completed September 1940 14. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. &VT. Location. This waterway. 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point. N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, Vt. (See N.O.S. Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y. at head of Lake Champlain to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and, Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low take level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2- B for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. Government plant end hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year in removal of stumps and snags that posed a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $16,809. Government plant and hired labor were employed in the replacement of deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $8,081. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $13,884 were expended in FY 1992 on surveys and funds in the amount of $1,227 were expended on supervision and administration. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow, where the width is 110 feet. Fender booms have. been placed at the elbow. (Putts Leap and Putts Rock.) 15. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between States of New York and New Jersey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333, 12331, and 12327.) Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report pares 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinity of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively, thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing, north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike on its northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide for a point opposite the east end of Constable Hook to a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line: and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels 2-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is .30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5. 1 feet; mean range of spring tides 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Location cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interest must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No.5, revised 1988, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period A study entitled "Assessment and Treatment of Disposal Options for New York/ New Jersey Harbor Sediments" was performed and a contract was awarded on 22 September 1992 for additional Architect Engineer services in connection with the Long-Term dredged material plan for the NewYork/New Jersey region. Engineering and Design for future maintenance dredging of Perth Amboy & the Mainship Channel was also performed. Operation & Maintenance funds in the amount of $987,366 was expended for this project during FY92. Condition as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. 16. NEW YORK HARBOR-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J. and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1974 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterway and was funded as maintenance activity. The current estimate of first cost is $260,000,000 (October 1992 P.L.) including $61,000,000 cash contribution from local interests plus to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rightsof- way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results (New work-cumulative to date) A total of five Liberty State Park contracts have been completed at a cost of $10,321,121. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the removal of Piers 17 and 1 8 on the East River was completed at a cost of $219,604. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $791,656. The Stapleton, Staten Island contract was completed at a cost of $2,910,400. A contract for the City of Hoboken was completed at a cost of $2,123,404. Work along the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at a cost of $979.580. Contract Number One at Weehawken toEdgewater was completed at acostof $1,697,487. The Brooklyn Reach One contract was completed at a cost of $5,057,920. Work is continuing on the Weehawken to Edgwater contract No.2. and Jersey City North ContractNo.2. The Bayonne One contract has been completed at a cost of $735,800. Hoboken Pier B was completed at a-cost of $973,590, and Jersey City North I was completed atacostof $2,358,000. Engineering and design is in progress for Brooklyn Reach 2. Maintenance. U.S. Derbris Boats Drifmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to navigation. Removal and disposal of 548,970 cubic feet (4,253 cords) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging 2-10 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT in size from small blocks to large timbers, including pilings, pieces, of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated pier structure was accomplished at a cost of $4,289,000 in FY 1992. Condition as of September 30. For work authorized by Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park, the City of Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Weekawken and Edgewater. In New York City, work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River inclusive Of Piers 17 and 18, Stapleton, Staten Island. Removal work is currently underway at Weehawken-Edgewater Contract 2, and of Jersey City North Contract 2. 17. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower Bays, New York Harbor is 330. miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor. Mass, and 165 miles northwest of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey charts 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay opposite anchorage grounds about 5.7 miles long and southerly entrance channel. Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35- foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel alone New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage. 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long. extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks Flats to depths of 45,40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesand Bay to47 feet deep. Projectdepthsrefer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol.2. Operations and results during period, The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Dredge"McFarland" was employed in FY92 to restore projects dimensions in New York Harbor Red Hook Flats Anchorage, A total of 26,186 cubic yards of material was removed at a project cost of $329,162. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing projects began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2.000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600- foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was competed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends nearly southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed to depths of 45, and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Ancjorage was accordingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay was completed to a47- foot depth in November 1977. 18.. SHINNECOCK INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 95 miles east of the Battery. New York City. It is an opening through the sandy barrier beach, connecting Shinnecock Bay with the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides fora channel 10 feet deep (mlw) and 200 feet wide with a deposition basin, thence extending through the inlet to Shinnecock Bay for a distance of about 0.7 mile thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of about 1 mile: rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost for work is S22,300.000 of which the Federal share is $16.900,000 and non-Federal share is $5.400.000. 2-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Local cooperation. The navigation improvement will accrue both recreational and commercial benefits which result in a first cost allocation of 69 percent Federal and 31 percent non- Federal. The authorizing document also requires that local authorities: provide without cost to the United States, all lands easements, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance, when and as required; hold and save theUnited States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; maintain and operate the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlet and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; maintain, for the duration of the economic life of the project, continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration for public use, and continued availability for public use of the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the Federal share of the costs is based. A Local Cooperation Agreement for the dredging element of the project was executed with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on 7 June 90. A Local Cooperation Agreement for the jetty reconstruction phase of work was executed on Dec 10,1991. Terminal facilities. Shinnecock Bay, and adjacent ocean area, constitute an important marine fishery. The public fishing facility includes three docks, one of which, the Shinnecock Fishermens Cooperative, stores and market the catch for the fishermen. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded on March 31, 1992 for Jetty Repair and maintenance dredging for Shinnecock Inlet. Jetty repair commenced on May 21,1992, and maintenance dredging will be completed in FY93. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $545,596 was expended for O&M portion of the work during FY92. Condition as of September 30. The initial dredging element of the project has been completed. Work is proceeding on the jetty re-construction project and also maintenance dredging of the channel. 19. SHREWSBURY RIVER, N.J. Location. Mainly a large tidal basin in eastern part of New Jersey, the outlet being at the southeast end of SandiHook. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12324.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports of 1915, 1918, and 1938. pages 1778, 373, and 267, respectively. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide, following the westerly shore, from deep water in Sandy Hook Bay 2.2 miles to a point 500 feet south of former location of railroad bridge at Highlands; then 9 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide, suitably widened at bends and turns, in south branch of river 6.8 miles to Branchport Avenue Bridge in city of Long Branch: and a channel in north branch (Navesink R.) 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide 6.1 miles from the junction to Red Bank. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide at Highlands, 3.8 feet; at Seabright, 1.7 feet; at Branchport, 1.7 feet; and at Red Bank, 3 feet. Mean range of spring tides is 4.7, 2.1, 2.2, and 3.6 feet respectively, irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.5 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2- B for Authorization Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain a suitable public wharf on each of the creeks to be improved, which shall be open to all on equal terms; remove Locust Avenue bridge over Claypit Creek; and make cash contributions of $25,000. $33,000 and $27,500 toward cost of improvement of Claypit. Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks. respectively. Provided further that construction of any unit of proposed improvement may be undertaken independently of the other units when the required local cooperation has been provided. These conditions have not been fulfilled. Requirements under prior acts have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are numerous terminals along the waterway. Some of which are open to the public. In addition, many private pleasure boat landings have been constructed by owners of riverfront property. None of the terminals has direct rail connections. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract in the amount of $2,884,932 for maintenance dredging was awarded in June 1990. Work commenced on July 1990 and was substantially completed by September 1991. Additional $300,000 was obligated in FY92 for this project. Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion ofexistingprojectbegan in October 1919. Work completed consisted of providing authorized project dimensions in 12-foot entrance channel. 9-foot channel in South Branch, and a 6-foot channel in North Branch of the river. Work remaining (dredging an inlet channel across the base of Sandy Hock protected by jetties and bulkheads, a bay channel extending to the existing Shrewsbury River Channel and a six-lane fixed highway, bridge to span the new inlet as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965) was subsequently reclassified to inactive because of state and local opposition. Formal close out of this work remains. Under the RiverandHarbor Actof 1950 work remaining consists of dredging turning basin and anchorage in vicinity of Red Bank and channels in Claypit, Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks. 2-12 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Note: Work under the Acts of 1950 and 1965 has since been deauthorized. 20. TARRYTOWN HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Extends along east shore of Hudson River for about 1 mile below Kingsland Point, 29 miles above the Battery, New York City. Existing project. A channel along wharf front of the harbor 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide, and northerly and southerly connections with deep water in Hudson River of same depth and 150 feet wide; total length, about 1 mile. Mean tidal range, 3.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 3.7 feet; extreme range due to wind and barometric pressure, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations are infrequent and do not materially affect navigation. New work for completed project cost $69,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminals with a total available dockage of about 3,000 feet are along the waterfront. Railroad connections are adjacent to the waterfront. Terminals are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during period. -Under a continuing contract for maintenance dredging to restore project depth of 12 feet, work commenced on 22 September 1992 and was completed on 22 October 1992 to remove 109,069 cubic yards, place measurement of material. Operations & Maintenance funds in the amount of $220,195 was expended on this project during FY92. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project commenced in April and was completed in July 1937. Controlling depth mean low water (Oct-Nov. 1965) was 12 feet for 150 feet width in southerly connecting channel, then 12 feet for 250 feet width in the channel along the wharf, then 12 feet for a width varying from 250 to 150 feet in northerly channel. 21.WESTCHESTER CREEK, N.Y. Location. A tidal stream flowing into East River from north at a point 14 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12336.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1921 and 1938, pages 238 and 164, respectively. Existing project. A 2.6 mile channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 100 feet wide for 2,000 feet through the estuary; thence 80 feet wide for 3,000 feet; and thence 60 feet wide 8,800 feet to head of navigation at East Tremont Avenue (Fort Schuyler Road), with widening at bends, and two turning basins, one near upper end of channel, the other near Eastern Boulevard (Unionport) Bridge. Mean tidal range, 7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.4 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed active portion of the project cost $98,751 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Dredging turning basin to a depth of 12 feet below mean low water, 250 by 1250 feet in extend. 500 feet downstream from head of navigation, is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides that local interests agree to furnish lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction and maintenance and furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance as required; hold the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain a suitable bulkhead or other works approved by Chief of Engineers for retaining the east bank of the turning basin alongside Hutchinson River Parkway; and that local interests give assurances they will construct a public wharf when required. Requirements under prior acts have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1988, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal of all material, except ledge rock, lying above the plane of 12 feet below mean low water with satisfactory disposal of dredged material at the EPA's approved Mud Dump site in the Atlantic Ocean was awarded on 28 June 1991. The dredging work commenced on 5 Sept. 1991 and was completed on 22 November 1991. Approximately 110,000 c.y. of material was removed from the project channel. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $180,006 was expended on Westchester Creek during FY92. Condition as of September 30. Work under the entire existing project is about 82 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project commenced March 1932 and was relocated by city of New York in 1941. Head of navigation is at East Tremont Avenue, Bronx, about 2.6 miles above the mouth. Work remaining under existing project, consists of dredging to 12 feet below mean low water a turning basin 250 by 250 feet in extent to be 500 feet downstream from head of navigation. 22. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR(PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONAND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C.441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York 2-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18,1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of deep draft traffic; the River and Harbor Act of March 3. 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 407, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the New York District is accomplished by means of a patrol vessel whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the water front for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance to the 3-mile limit of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol is limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios patrol shorefront facilities and property. The inspectors operate out of the New York District Office. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit, as well as investigating unauthorized construction activities. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps' role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit application. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 23. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Pre-authorization). (See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) BEACH EROSION CONTROL 26. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND AREA), N.Y. Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, in Brooklyn (Kings County), approximately nine miles south of the Battery, N.Y. City. Existing project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized plan provides for beach erosion control by restoring the Coney Island public beach up to 250 feet beyond its historic shoreline; the extension of the westerly terminal groin; construction of a terminal groin at the easterly end of the restored beach, and a fillet of beachfill from the terminal groin at W. 37th St. extending approximately 2300 ft. into the community of Sea Gate. The authorized plan also provides, for restoration of the beach by periodic beach nourishment. The estimated project construction cost is $144,780,000 (Oct 1992. P.L.). Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the N.Y. State Dept. of Environmental Conservation. The local agreement has not been finalized, but the customary provisions are that local interests will; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas necessary for construction of the project, hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from the construction works and subsequent maintenance of the project; provide a cash contribution toward the total first cost; assure that water pollution that would affect the health of bathers will not be permitted; assure continued conditions of public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based, during the economic life of the project; maintain public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms and maintain all improvements after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including periodic nourishment during the economic life of the project as may be required to serve the intended purpose, subject to Federal participation in the cost of periodic nourishment for the economic project life. Operations and results during period, and condition as of September 30. The General Design Memo was approved in '92. The final Supplemental EIS was submitted in May '92. The Local Cooperation Agreement is in process. Initiation of construction is expected in June 1993. 27. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. Location. The northern portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey extending from Sandy Hook southerly to Barnegat Inlet - length about 48 miles. Erosion has seriously reduced the 2-14 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective tributary population. SECTION I - SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, N.J. Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Sea Bright southerly to Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. The WaterResources Development Act of 1988 (PL 100-670) authorized a plan substantially in accordance with the plan recommended in the General Design Memorandum for the project dated May, 1988. In general the plan provides for beach erosion control along approximately 12 miles of coastline, extending from Sea Bright southward to Ocean Township, New Jersey, by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach berm to 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water with an additional 2 foot high berm cap to provide an extra increment of protection from overtopping. The project also provides for the notching of 15 groins, and periodic nourishment throughout the 50 year economic life of the project. Total estimated Federal cost for Section I is $620,900,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $331,600,000. Local cooperation. Includes reconstruction of sea wall at Sea Bright and all lands easements, rights of way and drainage outfall extensions. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The Local Cooperation Agreement has been signed by the State of New Jersey. It is anticipated that construction will begin in the Spring of 1993. The State of New Jersey has completed reconstructing the seawall. SECTION II- ASBURY PARK TO MANASQUAN, N.J. Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Asbury Park southerly to Manasquan - length about 9 miles. Recommended project. Provides for Federal participation in the restoration and protection of the shore from Asbury Park to Manasquan by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 50 years from the year that the total quantity to fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions. Total estimated cost is $236,500,000 (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The project is in active planning status. A draft General Design Memo was submitted for approval on Sept 30 1992. 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter.) 29. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Public Law 826, 84th congress as amended (None during FY 1992) FLOOD CONTROL 30. NORTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. Location. In Ellenville, N.Y., on Beer Kill and Fantine Kill, at their confluence with Sandburg Creek. which discharges into Rondout Creek at Napanoch, N.Y., about 2 miles downstream from Ellenville. (See Geological Survey, Ellenville quadrangle). Existing project. Improvementincludes construction of levees and floodwalls along Beer Kill and Fantine Kill-I capping retaining walls along Beer Kill; removing concrete dam, channel improvements and stream diversion on Fantine Kill; providing interior drainage including diversion ditches drainage structures, popnding areas; alteration of 6 bridges: and relocating structures and utilities. The project was completed in 1975. Since that time severe storms in March 1980 and April 1987 caused erosion of the riprap bank protection and significant damage to the project floodwalls and levees, Subsequent repairs to damaged areas were undertaken in 1981-82 and in 1987-88 under PL-84-99 authority. A Design Deficiency Report has been prepared and submitted to Office of Chief of Engineers. The recommended plan for design deficiency correction involves repair, reinforcement, and replacement of undermined floodwalls, placement of riprap protection along the Beer Kill Channel bottom and toes of banks; repair and replacement of riprap along the side slopes and toes of the levees, and possible removal of a rock outcrop to reduce erosive velocities. The current Federal cost estimate is $4,650,000 (Oct. 92-P.L.) Local cooperation. Assurances of Local Cooperation were received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in 1968 and 1970. An additional Local Cooperation Agreement was signed in November 1987 to cover the repairs accomplished through the PL-84-99 effort. In a letter dated 9 November 1990, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation indicated their willingness to participate and act as local sponsor under the terms of Section 414 2-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 of the 1990 WaterResources Development Act (the non Federal share of the cost to correct the deficiency will be the same as at the time the project was authorized and constructed). Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. The Project Deficiency Report was approved and the work allowance was used in preparation of a Design Memorandum. Construction has not been initiated. 31. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The Passaic Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide - and contains portions or Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Three Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal, and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, NJ. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, NJ., was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. A $1.5 million basin-wide project to improve the Flood Warning and Preparedness System was completed in 1988. This project includes enhanced and increased number of rain and stream flow gauges in combination with a state-of-the-art communication and computer system designed to improve the occupancy and reliability of flood warning in the Passaic River Basin. The project was implemented by the Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the National Weather Service and U.S. Geological Survey, the State of New Jersey is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. Project history. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers involvement in Passaic River planning was first authorized in the Flood Control Acts of 1936. Since then, reports recommending plans of action were issued in 1939, 1948, 1962, 1972, and 1973. None of these plans were implemented because they did not receive widespread public support, with opposition based on the concerns of municipalities and various other interests throughout the Basin. In 1976, Congress authorized a Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study in Section 101 (a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Congressional Guidance on the conduct of the study was provided in House Report 94-1702. This reformulation study was initiated in October 1977 and the overall study was completed in December1989. Local protection plans were completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern,N.Y., Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, N.J., the Ramapo River at Oakland, N.J., and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, N.J. These projects were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 A wide range of feasible basin-wide alternative plans were developed. These alternatives, which were presented for extensive public review, included tunnel diversions, channel modification, levees and floodwalls, and nonstructural measures. In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated to be the worst in 40 years. In June 1984, the State of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as the preferred Basin-wide alternative for detailed plan formulation. . The Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft Environmental Impact Statement, (EIS), recommending the Pompton River/Passaic Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, were completed during FY 1988. The Phase I report was approved by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH) on July 23, 1988 and by the office of the Chief of Engineers on 3 February 1989. The final EIS was filed with EPA in December 1988, with the comment period ending in January 1989. OMB approved the report 5 February 1990. OASA (CW) transmitted the report to the House of Representatives on 8 March 1990. Condition as of September 30. Section 101 (a) 18 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1990 (PL 101- 640), as modified by section 102(p) of WRDA'92 (PL 102-580) authorizes construction of the Passaic River Flood Protection Project for the Passaic River Basin which will address both environmental and engineering objectives of the Act. The Passaic River Flood Protection Project combines diversion tunnels, levees, flood walls, channel modification, and natural flood storage to provide flood protection to about 35 towns in the Passaic River Basin. The Federal government is to pay $1,017 million; the State of New Jersey's share of the project's cost - $353 million in today's dollars-will be paid in increments spread over the duration of construction. However, the actual cash contribution by the State of New Jersey may be reduced by crediting provisions of the WRDA '90 and WRDA "92. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is designing the $1.37 billion flood control project for the State of New Jersey, the non-Federal sponsor. The Corps' goal is to restore or replace any wetlands and wildlife habitats that the project may disturb so that there is no net loss of wetlands. 2-16 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT The authorizing legislation modifies the project recommended in the Phase 1 report by eliminating 13.5 miles of levees and floodwalls in South Bergen and Essex counties, and by extending the flood diversion tunnel .by over six miles to outlet in Newark Bay. The tunnel extension provides fluvial flood protection to the lower Passaic River without any structural works whatsoever. The legislation also authorizes the Corps to participate in the maintenance and operation of the water diversion tunnels, the most expensive part of the project. The authorization also provides for a $25 million streambank restoration in the City of Newark. The project calls for the acquisition of 5,350 acres of water storage areas, 5,200 of which are wetlands. In an agreement with the Corps, the State has promised to continue to protect an additional 6,300 acres that are part of the project. Thus there will be no secondary development in these areas. The act also establishes a wetlands bank and allows the State of New Jersey to credit more wetlands, parklands, watershed lands toward its share of the project cost. WRDA '92 expanded the streambank restoration features, authorized a flood warning and emergency operations center and amended the wetland bank credit provision. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of completed flood control works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects were performed to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with operation and maintenance requirements. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-1 at end of chapter.) 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation provides for disaster preparedness, emergency operation, rehabilitation, advance measures, emergency water, and drought assistance. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District completed revisions of various emergency manuals and pamphlets, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response and preparation, and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fighting and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York District provided technical assistance and sandbags to local and county governmental organizations which requested such aid during several minor storm/flood events. Pursuant to Public Law 93-228 the New York District providedassistance to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in connection with Hurricane Andrew disaster recovery operations in Florida. 35. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION Activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 2-Q at end of chapter.) 36. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $92,281 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 38. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Projects having all, or inactive or uncompleted portions deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Water Resources Development Acts (See-Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT see Section Total Cost to in Text Projects Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY92 September 30, I1992 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Bay Ridge & Red Hook'Channels, N.Y. 3. East Chester Creek, N.Y. 4. East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. 5. Fire Island To Jones Inlet, N.Y. 6. Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y. 7. Great South Bay, N.Y. 8. Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Week Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 140,000 140,000 121,294 129,117 132,000 20,000 1,885,806 1 24,310 114,007 1,809,065 2 5,523.297 5,523,297 27 3,091,000 136,368 3,090,000 138,204 2,020,000 2,080,110 40,921,666 2,019,901 2,080,098 40,921,313 592,056 592,056 969,000 972,107 215,678 64,942 161,530 173,001 3,122,251 161,529 172,697 2,970,469 83,969 4 533,334 855,000 855,866 836,820 834,653 486,000 1,556,555 50,000 6,567,178 1,558,999 51,410 368,000 358,003 10,405,559 370,296 357,062 10,404,614 3,341,000 125,000 4,060,360 3,299,572 336,017 4,229,944 2 1,420,103 16,780,054 1,414,825 16,841,504 2,113,502 10.11 2,102,905 121,000 125,210 103,714 103,679 60,035 60,034 1,985,000 7,690,629 10 1,984,967 7,688,769 266,857 266,857 360,000 306,703 200,000 290,582 100,000 360,000 1,743,699 100,000 357,369 1,741,068 270,000 2,508,000 3,434,470 287,054 337,348 1,298,149 76,497 76,497 2-18 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT see Section Total Cost to in Text Projects Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY92 September 30, 1992 9. Hudson River, N.Y. 10. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. 11. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. 12. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y. 13. Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. 14. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. 15. New York and New Jersey Channels New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. cost. - - - - 44,-249,800 6.'7 - - - - 44,249,865 2,110,000 2,384,226 2,545,000 3,926,911 46,553,452 8.9 2,114,916 2,392,670 2,544,978 3,922,485 46,438,629 - - - - 6,771,870 - - - - 6,771,870 13 295,000 294,998 45,000 S44,939 640,000 2,800,002 28,750,639 640,060 2,799,533 28,750,167 4,545,753 4,545,753 47,350 47,212 2,390.000 1,485,000 8,760,477 2,390,138 1,485,000 8,737,032 14,904,000 16,300,000 12,792,000 51,139,000 146,849,000 42,443,863 22,826,306 12,109,869 56,699,017 146,460,398 -- - - 235,964 -- - - 235,964 47,000 71,296 55,000 55,253 222 222 64,396 64,854 245,002 680,006 8,874,877 244,996 669,820 8,877,402 40,000 40,002 39,999 40,002 681,811 12 681,811 1,282,091 1,282,061 - - - - 73,052,435 15,16,17 - - - - 73,052,435 97,000 2,039,022 1,690,000 989,161 15,020,542 1,212,679 1,948,728 2,078,515 987,366 49,367,835 18 2-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT see Section Total Cost in Text Projects Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY92 September 30, I1992 16. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift 17. New York Harbor- Entrance Channels & Anchorage Areas 18. Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. 19. Shrewsbury River, N.J. 20. Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. 21. Westchester Creek, N.Y. 22. Supervisor of New York Harbor New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp- Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Approp. Cost 1,269,000 700,000 2,400,000 Z,2 Co ' 45,,660,000 3,137,515 2,424,393 2,539,547 iZ45 32,77,215 19 3,656,000 3,368,662 3,976,000 4,564,788 76,231,247 3,856,047 3,375,831 3,980,579 4,542,752 76,475,837 45,009,710 45,009,710 20 4,708,000 5,192,886 4,827,000 3,520,856 61,787,166 4,699,288 5,223,871 4,838,456 3,499,950 64,594,805 51,014 5,226,000 1,613,738 3,537,000 9,017,000 1,204,480 1,742,111 4,814,330 550,000 545,596 550,000 545,596 1,145,457 21 1,145,457 83,000 82,515 2,148,304 1,410,000 299,921 5,814,263 2,145,927 1,412,782 299,950 5,815,153 35,000 34,803 220,197 220,195 69,836 69,836 686,396 686,197 175,933 24 175,933 83,032 82,624 725,000 724,927 1,075,000 180,006 5,209,349 " 1,075,402 180,006 5,209,343 595,055 605,000 822,457 32,097,959 599,054 601,729 814,078 32,569,330 2-20 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to .2, in Text Projects Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 September 30, 1992 26. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), N.Y. 27. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, NJ. 30. North Ellenville. N.Y. 31. Passaic River, N.J. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 3. Includes $1,040,000 for new work and $1,040,000 expended for the portion under construction general. 4. Excludes $100,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public work fund. 5. Includes $39,465 expended for previous project. 6. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $311,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81.373 expended from contributed funds. 8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 9. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 10.Includes $628,502 for new work and $210,365 for maintenance for previous projects 11. Excludes $419,879 for new work expended from contributed funds and $58,425 contributed funds from other, and $8,752 expended by the Worlds Fair Corp. for riprap protection of rubble dike. 12. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 13.Includes $69,629 for new work for previous projects and $668,820 expended from public works funds. 15. Includes $12,809,975 for new work for previous projects. 685,000 587,796 531,000 587,483 825,000 750,000 3,291,000 724,140 474,996 2,843,706 1,200,000 1,613,000 1,354,000 2,000,000 13,202,000 946,329 1,305,100 1,246,343 1,042,781 11,496,873 350,000 176,000 270,000 4,766,450 431,670 197,900 4,530,220 750,000 3,900,000 5,800,000 7,145,000 36,681,700 1,104,308 3,975,359 4,605,177 7,497,720 35,680,390 16. Includes $7,712 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $22,861 incurred in FY 1963 to be transferred to construction of Staten Island Rapid Transit Bridge during FY 1971. 17.Includes $807,000 for new work expended from public works funds and $2,023,308 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 18. Includes $1,160,380 for maintenance for previous project, and $1,621 for maintenance of Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 19.Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in 0 & M funds.) 20.Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing projects 21.Includes $220,894 for new work for previous projects. 22.Includes $286,600 for maintenance for previous projects. 23.Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 24.Includes $77,182 for new work for previous projects. 25. Includes $66,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 27. Includes $1,246,100 for new work for previous projects and $64,560 extended from public work funds. 28.Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. Additional NY State funds were $200,000 in 1990 and $581,000 in 1991. 2-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document River and Harbor Act of 1959 Section 104 and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 302 River and Harbor act of 1965 March 3,1989 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and Progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths Provided that all research and Planning cost to be borne fully by the United States Modified project to include control of waterchestnut BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 40 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide H.Doc. 37, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 337,54th Cong., 2nd sess. (Annual Report 1899, P. 1177.) March 2, 1907 July 30, 1930 May 17,1950 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17,1950 1958 River & Harbor Act 1962 River & Harbor Act Oct 23,1962 June 13,1902 Dredging to obtain first a depth of 35 feet, subsequently increasing depth of 40 feet for full width. Widening of Bay Ridge Channel to 1,780 feet. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 71st Cong., 1st sess. EAST CHESTER CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 to 70 feet wide. (Deauthorized in 1992) H. Doc. 749, 80th Cong., The 8-foot channel, authorized in 1930, completed in 1941, 2nd sess. remains as the existing project. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. H. Doc 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) construction of jetty. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Channel 10 feet deep. H. Doc. 762, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., beaches westerly of the inlet 2nd sess.. Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation chan- H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., nel and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches 1st sess. FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 6 of text) 15 foot bay, creek and branch channels: 15-foot maneuvering area; 6-foot anchorage basin; revetment of dike H. Doc. 551, 87th Cong., extension; & abandonment of portion of creek channel & repair of dike 2nd sess.. GREAT SOUTH BAY, N.Y. (See Section 7 of text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Fire Island Inlet to central basin in Great South Bay. Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from central basin to head of navigation in Patchogue River. H. Doc. 103, 56th Cong., 2nd sess.. 2-22 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document June 25, 1910 August 13, 1968 W.R. D. A. of 1986 June 25, 19 1 0 March 3, 1925 July 3. 1930 July 1, 1935 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 September 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 March 4, 1913 March 4, 1915 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1925 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 HEMPSTEAD HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Channel 6 deep, 50-80 feet wide Channel 13 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and turning basin 9 feet deep. (Deauthorized in 1990) Removal of derelict barges HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam. Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, NY Channel 27 feet below Hudson. Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project. Relocation of 12 foot channel between Troy and Waterford. Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany & Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities Note: The 12 and 27 foot classification have been deauthorized. HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, N.Y. (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 30 feet deep from Ellis Island to Neward St., 40 feet deep through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point and channel 26 by 550 feet along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Remove shoal east side of river between West 19th and West 32nd Sts.; remove rock near Battery to 40 feet; remove obstruction near Spuyten Duyvil Creek. Additional dredging through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point. Remove shoal between West 32nd and West 61st Sts. to 40 feet and widen 40 foot channel between the Battery and Canal St. to 2.000 feet. Channel 30 by 750 fee.along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Modification of conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 40 feet deep between pierhead lines from 20th St., Manhattan, to a point 1,300 feet below Newark St. Hoboken, thence 2,800 feet wide to deep water off Ellis Island. Channel 30 feet deep between 40 foot channel and channel along Jersey City waterfront. Widen 40 foot channel to full width of river from north line of 59th St. to south side of Little Basin, thence a channel of same depth to deep water off Ellis Island. 2-23 Rivers & Harbors Conm. Doc. 1, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 350, 68st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 155, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 228, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 719, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report 1914, pp. 234-235 H. Doc. 1697, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 313, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 450, 70th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 309, 72th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 June 25, 1910 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. (PL99-98) August 26, 1937 August 8, 1917 September 6, 1933 August 30, 1965 May 28, 1935 May 17. 1950 October 27, 1965 March 14, 1915 July 3, 1930 December 31, 1970 Waiver all conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 45 and 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of I jetty. Interior channel along west shore of bay, 18 and 12 feet deep; interior channel along south shore, 15 feet deep; entrance channel 20 and 18 feet deep; and I riprap jetty all in lieu of work heretofore authorized. Modified conditions of local cooperation. Channel 15 feet deep in Mott Basin including its 2 branches KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, NJ. & N.Y. (See Section 12 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and then 44 feet. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATER, N.Y. (See. Section 13 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Sectio 14 of Text) Chanpel 12 feet aeep and 150 feet wide. NEW YORK AND JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 15 of Text) Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet E Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of Piles Creek. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a minimum width of 1,000 feet. NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 16 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. 2-24 Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 49,72 Cong., 2nd sess. Senate Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H Doc. 1488, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 700, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H.Doc. 665, 80th Cong., H. Doc. 181, 75th Cong., I st sess. H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee )oc. 17, 71 st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., I st sess. H. Doc. 233, 8 1 st Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 108, 98th Cong., I st sess. P.L. 91-611, 91 st Cong., H.R. 1987 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document March 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 March 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 August 8. 1917 August 8. 1917 July 14, 1960 Mar..2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1975 Aug. 30. 1935 May 17, 1950 Mar. 3,1905 Sept. 22, 1922 Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore structures. NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 17 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet leerfor width of 1,000 feet (Dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, December 27, 1886 by authority of Act of August 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel) to 40 feet. Maintenance of entrance channel under I head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay. Removal of Craven Shoal SHINNECOCK INLET, N.Y. (See Section 18 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in Inlet, and 6 feet deep and I 00 feet wide in the Bay, and 2 jetties. SHREWSBURY RIVER, N.J. (See Section 19 of Text) Channel 6 feet in North Branch Channel 12 feet deep. Channel 9-feet deep Turning basin and anchorage 6 feet at Red Bank and Channels 6 feet deep in Claypit, Ocean port, and Little Silver Creeks. (Deauthorized in 1990) TARRYTOWN HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 20 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide in approach arms, and 150 feet wide along waterfront. Widening channel to 150 feet in approach arms and 250 feet along waterfront. WESTCHESTER CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and two turning basins. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. Annual Reports 1887 p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc- 159, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc- 518, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., I st sess. H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., I st sess. FY 83 Supplemental Appropriations Act H. Doc. 1296, 62nd Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 157, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee. Doc.' 31, 74th Cong., H. Doc. 285, 81 st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 283, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 262 72nd Cong., 1 st sess Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 67th Cong., 2d sess. 1986 Water Resources Development Act Section 501 ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND) N.Y. (See Section 26 of Text) Provide beach fill to public beach to furnish storm damage protection to the area. Extension of terminal groins at W. 37 St. and Brighton Beach Fillet of beach fill at Sea Gate. 2-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document July 3. 1958 1988 Water Resources Development Act 1962 Flood Control Act 1990 Water Resources Development Act 1976 and 1990 Water Resources Development Acts SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ. (See Section 27 of Text) Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of 10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and extension of 14 existing groins. NORTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (See Section 30 of Text) Levees and floodwalls, removing concrete dam, stream diversion, interior drainage structures. Subsequent damage repairs. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. (See Section. 31 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. H. Doc. .332, 85th Cong., 2nd sess. modified by Appr. Act for Energy & Water Dev. for FY 85 S. Doc. 113, 87th Cong., 2d sess. PL-84-99 H. Rpt. 94-1702 2-26 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-C HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT LSection 9 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Complete: 1917 Cost $1,463,014 TABLE 2-E 2.2 miles 152.6 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 13.0 feet SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (Section 22 of Text) Statement of Activities-FY 1992 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore b. Vessel c. Air (helicopter) 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities b. Vessels 3. Disposition of Cases a. Voluntary Restoration b. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted c. Permit not required or already under permit d. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney e. Other misc. f. Cases pending as of October 1, 1992 242 218 463 229 459 21 18 89 2 38 20 359 2-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1992 NAME OF PROJECT DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED NEW JERSEY Cheesequake Creek ......................................................................................................................................... Feb 91 Keyport Harbor............................................................................................................................................. Jun 91 Hackensack River..........................................................................................................................................Sep 92 M atawan Creek.............................................................................................................................................. Jun 91 N ew ark Bay..................................................................................................................................................... Jul92 Passaic River..................................................................................................................................................Jun 92 Raritan Riven.................................................................................................................................................. Jan 91 Raritan River Cut-off...................................................................................................................................... Jan 91 Sandy Hook Bay at A tlantic H ighlands............................................................................................Feb & M ar-91 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo.......................................................................................................................M ar 91 Shrewsbury River...........................................................................................................................................Jun 91 NEW YORK Bay Ridge & Red Hook Channels................................................................................................................. Sep 92 Brow ns Creek................................................................................................................................................. Sep 92 Coney Island Channel....................................................................................................................................Jun 91 Coney Island Creek........................................................................................................................................Feb 91 Eastchester Creek.......................................................................................................................................... M ar 92 East Rockaw ay Inlet ..................................................................................................................................... N ov 91 East River...................................................................................................................................................... A ug 92 Fire Island Inlet.............................................................................................................................................N ov 90 Flushing Bay & Creek....................................................................................................................................Jun 91 Great South Bay................................................................................................................................ M ar & Apr 91 Greenport Harbor.......................................................................................................................................... M ar 91 Hem pstead H arbor........................................................................................................................................ M ay 91 H udson River Channel................................................................................................................................... Apr 92 Jamaica Bay ...................................................................................................................................................... Jul 92 Jones Inlet ....................................................................................................................................................... Apr 92 Lake M ontauk H arbor .................................................................................................................................... N ov 91 Long Island Intra: W 'W ay ....................................................................................................... Feb, M ar & Apr 91, Mamaroneck Harbor....................................................................................................................................... Aug 92 M ilton,H arbor................................................................................................................................................ Oct 91 N ew tow n Creek..............................................................................................................................................Oct 91 New York Harbor a. Am brose Channel ................................................................................................................................. Jun 91 b. Liberty Island Anchorage ................................................................................................................... Feb 91 c. M ain Ship Channel .............................................................................................................................. Jun 91 d. NJ Pierhead Channel ............................................................................................................ Feb & Oct 91 e. Red Hook Flats A nchorage ................................................................................................................ Feb 92 f. Sandy Hook Channel ....................................................................................................................... Jun 92 New York & New Jersey Channels a. Arthur K ill ................................................................................................................................ Jan & Feb 91 b. K ill V an K ull .................................................................................... ............................................. Jun 91 c. Perth Am boy Anchorage .................................................................................................................. Jan 91 Peconic R iver .......... ...... ... ............................................................. ............................................. Jun 91 Port Chester H arbor .................................................................................... ............................................... N ov 91 Sheepshead Bay...... ................................................................................................................... O ct 90 & Jun 91 2-28 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-F (Cont.) RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1992 NAME OF PROJECT (Continued) DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED NEW YORK Shinnecock Inlet..............................................................................................................................................Jul 92 Sw ash C hannel.............................................................................................................................................. Feb 92 Tarrytow n H arbor...........................................................................................................................................Jun 91 W estchester C reek........................................................................................................................................... Jun 91 Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 1992 was $1,479,606. TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Buttermilk Channel, NY Bronx River, NY Browns Creek, NY Burlington Harbor, VT Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT. Cheesequake Creek, NJ Coney Island Channel, NY Coney Island Creek, NY East River, NY Echo Bay Harbor, NY Fire Island Inlet, NY Glen Cove Creek, NY Gordon's Landing, VT Gowanus Creek Channel, NY Great Chazy River, NY Great Kills Harbor, NY Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, N.Y. Greenport Harbor Harlem River, NY Huntington Harbor, NY Jones Inlet, NY Keyport Harbor, NJ Lake Montauk Harbor, NY Larchmont Harbor, NY Little Neck Bay, NY Mamaroreck Harbor, NY Mattituck Harbor, NY Matawan Creek, NJ 1990 1991 1987 1966 1909 1953 1973 1952 1991 1953 1973 1986 1982 1972 1980 1962 1976 1953 1969 1953 1990 1990 1991 1970 1969 1990 1990 1984 $45590,201 $5,041,920 1,149,946 12 3,802,517 33,5976 673,369 706,414 9 303,555. 31,000 1,288 40,000 210,675 111,371 423,148 69,489 6,203 32,723,662 13 5,935,215 64,584 21,571 594,355 2,908,786 29,760 130,760 34,1750 115 346,831 394,004 18,000 292,919 137,301 88,029 - 457 74,681 21,720 3,616,119 493,491 91,08117 57,527 1,822,530 14,455,619 40,475 1,417,437 791,680 14 1,288163 76,065 267,768 1,741,210 19 537 513,764 1,351,086 177,925 1,417,832 21,000 315,613 2-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 2-G (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Milton Harbor, N.Y. Moriches Inlet, N.Y. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J. Newtown Creek, N.Y. New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. Northport Harbor, N.Y. Peconic River, N.Y. Peekskill Harbor, N.Y. Plattsburgh Harbor N.Y. Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. Port Henry Harbor, N.Y. Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. Raritan River, N.J. Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-Off Channel, N.J. Rondout Harbor Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. Sag Harbor, N.Y. Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. Sandy Hook Bay @ Leonardo, N.J. St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, N.Y. Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. Shark River, N.J. Sheepshead Bay. N.Y. Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, N.J. Staten Island. Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur Kill, N.Y. Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. Wallabout Channel, N.Y.. Wappinger Creek, N.Y. Washington Canal and South River, NJ Woodbridge Creek, N.J. 1. Excludes $104,800 for new work expended from contributed funds 2. Includes $1,836,400 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $285,600 expended from contributed Funds. 3. Includes $496,250 for new work for previous projects and $122,051 from public works fund. 4. Excludes S1,822,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 5. Excluded $34,580 from contributed funds. 6. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for pervious projects. 7. Includes $17,000 for new work for previous projects 1984 1990 1989 1986 1971 1956 1953 1951 1986 1990 1931 1977 1991 1991 1989 1895 1964 1985 1991 1917 1988 1987 1948 1990 1973 1895 1953 1950 1953 1953 151,373 1 1,057,266 7,725,843 101,840 29,014,500 2 25,255,368 1,168,354 11760,745 73,214 * 212,411 78,644 23 615487 25,000 116,500 19,400 66,037 198,415 6 256,415 433,470 1,742,097 69,406 2 1,299 221,128 359,294 1,551,470 16, 114,463 810,500 3,965,631 142,437 3,185,437 98,468 249 121,805 26 11,710 508,936 4,002,330 56,479 679,916 3,125 385 81,905 2 429,180 150,000 1,254,813 33,828 64,078 124,572 1,822,938 7,730,476 7,000 18,174 36,312 13,000 44,691 206,116 30 212,827 48,823 178,398 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,425,133 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 11. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 12. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for mainte nance forprevious projects. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $6,187,690 for new work and $37,664 formain tenance for previous projects. 14. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contrib uted funds. 2-30 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 15. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,5\60 expended from public works funds. 16. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previou projects. 17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contrib uted funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 18. Excludes $119,276 required contributed funds and $72,619 other contributed funds. 19. Excluded $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds TABLE 2-H 23. Excludes $15,000 for new york expended from con tributed funds 25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contrib uted funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 28. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 30. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Includes cost for new work $171,427 and maintenance $10,646 for previous projects. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic.Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet 1 1959 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay. N.Y. (Part 1) 1989 $25,238,400 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 2 1981 18,044,667 217,899 1. Reactivated as a modified project in 1985 (Sec 27) 2. Listed since 1982 as a navigation and beach nourishment project (Sec 5). 2-31 TABLE 2-G (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 2-1 Cost to Sept 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass.1 1964 6,282,307 2 - Ardsley, N.Y. 1990 5,522,846- Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn.' .3 1959 363,515- East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt.' 1963 2,898,334- Elizabeth, NJ. 1985 54,374,070- Fire Island to Montauk Point. N.Y. 1984 12,741,660 6 143,753 Herkimer, N.Y. 1973 1,249,530 ' - Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin. N.Y.' 1956 1,064,626- Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwich Dams .6 1939 - - Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J. 1990 17,888,670- Missisquoi River at Richford, Vt.1-3 1965 238,169- North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. 1968 15,572,988 7 Rahway. N.J.: 1971 973,142 8 Rahwav. South Branch, NJ. 1979 15,863,723- Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, N.J. 1981 11,061,256 262 Rosendale, N.Y. 1975 3,684,966- Sandburg, Creek. Spring Glen, N.Y. 1976 109,702 Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh. N.Y. 1987 59,142 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River. N.Y.' 1967 1,564,976- South Ellenville. N.Y. 1984 289,702- South Orange, NJ. 1981 6,857,484- Staten Island. N.Y. 1983 644,998- Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y. 1'-3 1959 142,075 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, Vt. 1976 1,438,845 8,200 Winooski River. Vt. 1940 5,897,427- Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. 1970 1,549,929 Yonkers, N.Y. 1984 113,729,270 10to TABLE 2-1 (continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 1. Completed. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended. 4. Inactive. 5. Includes $213.507 emergency relief funds. 6. Includes 3,788,341 contributed funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized on August 5, 1977. 10. Includes $622,8171 contributed funds. 2-32 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-J SURVEYS Study Class FY 92 Cost Navigation Studies Flood Control Studies Beach Erosion Special Studies TOTAL $533,510 2,428,610 455,890 591,850 4,009,860 1. Includes Dam Inventory and safety criteria studies, National Estuary Studies, Ferc licensing activities, Coordination studies. Community Ass't Progr. FEMA, and Sec 933 and 934 studies. TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES Study Class FY 92 Cost Flood Plain Technical Services $68,621 Flood Plain Management Unit 23,660 TOTAL 92,281 2-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Operation See Annual And Funds Funds and Projects Report For Authority Expended Construction Expended Maintenance 1974 1981 1980 1953 1952 1992 1963 1976 Bennington. VT (1936 & 41 Acts) Bronx River, N.Y. Brown's Creek, N.Y. Cheesequake Creek, NJ. , Coney Island Creek, N.Y. '46 East Chester Creek, N.Y. (1950 Act) East Rockaway (Debs) Inlet, N.Y., East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part 11) Elizabeth, N.J. Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. Hempstead Harbor, NY (68-Act) '14 Hudson River, NYC to Albany (12 Ft, 27 Ft)18 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. Irvington Harbor, N.Y. Lamoille River, Vt. Lemon Creek, NY Manhasset Bay, NY Matawan Creek, NJ (1881 Act) N. Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic 1982 River, N.J. 16 N.Y. & N.J. Channels 4.18 1982 Orowoc Creek, NY. 1949 Otter Creek, Vt. 1937 Perth Amboy, NJ. 1966 Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. 2.3 1967 Port Jefferson Hbr. N.Y. (1890,1930 & 68 Acts) 1977 Rahway River, N.J. 6.7 1948 Raritan River, NJ.4 6 1981 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y. 6,7. 1959 Rutland, Otter Creek, VT 1963 Sag Harbor, N.Y. (Channel) 1 1964 Shooters Island, NJ. & N.Y. 9- Shrewsbury River, N.J. (1950 & 1965 Act) 1992 Swanton Harbor, VT6 1888 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. 16 1895 Waterbury, VT (1941 Act) 7.8 1951 Waterford. N.Y. 6.7 1939 Waycake Creek, NJ 1949 Westchester Creek, N.Y. 4 1981 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug.1982 Jul 1992 Aug. 1977 1988 1948 Aug.1977 1966 Aug. 1977 1989 Jan 1990 1982 Aug. 1987 1953 Aug. 1977 1947 Aug. 1977 1939 Aug. 1977 1937 1988 1948 1988 1984 1988 1979 Jan 1990 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 1988 Jan 1990 Jan 1990 Aug. 1977 Jan. 1990 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 1988 Oct. 1992 Jul 1992 Jan 1990 Aug. 1977 Nov. 1983 Nov. 1981 Aug. 1982 1988 Aug. 1982 1,149,946 33,976 40,000 69,489 3,503,969 13 60,481 165,882 49,035 49,837 433,470 1,551,470 7,000 167,760 9,253 175,933 670,000 1,159,946 33,976 8 40,000 69,489 100,000 1,185,365 60,481 165,882 4-11 39,468 68,581 49,837 6,621 21,000 -- 433,470 " 37,000 ' 1,617,470 15 7,000 211,015 70,500 4 16,500 9,253 2,781 175,933 12 10,000 829,421 19,546 1,947,853 505,369 30,675 1,622 -- 59,391 2,455 76,497 51,566 1,621 4,636 257,237 4,951 - 441,656 307 66,000 10,113,903 235 1.260 2,921,311 2-34 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-M (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Operation See Annual And Funds Funds and Projects Report For Authority Expended Construction Expended Maintenance 1. No Commerce reported. 10. Deepening 8 foot project to 10 feet. 2. Completed. 11. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. 3. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 12. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. 4. Uncomplete portion deauthorized. 13. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. 5. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contrib- 14. Depening project to 13 feet. uted and $31,454 to be contributed. 15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 6. Inactive. 16. 1912 authorization. 7. Entire project deauthorized. 17. 1935 authorization. 8. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 18. 1910 construction dikes. 9. Removal for navigation. TABLE 2-N SECTION 107 (Sec. 26 of Text) Project FY 92 Cost CONTINUE FEASIBILITY STUDY Belford, N.J. $48,960 TABLE 2-P SECTION 205 Project FY 92 Cost COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Mill Brook,-Highland Park, NJ. CONTINUE INITIATIVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Elizabeth River, Hillside, N.J. CONTINUE COORDINATION FOR CONSTRUCTION Ramapo River, Monroe, N.J. Yonkers, Nepera Park, N.Y. $52,930 252,110 17,670 2-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 2-Q SECTION 14 (Sec 35 of Text Project FY 92 Cost CONTINUE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Green Brook (Regional Center), NJ. 2-36 523 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southeastern Delaware, and a small Part of northeastern Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 21. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.........................................................3-12 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ .................................................... 3-2 2. Cedar Creek, NJ.......................................................3-2 3. Chesapeake and Delaware Canal St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE ...................... 3-2 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ...............................................3-3 5. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ............................3-3 6. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea ............................................ 3-4 7. Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ..................3-5 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE...............................3-5 9. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay DE, MD...........................3-5 10. Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE...............................................3-6 11. Mispillion River,DE ................................................ 3-7 12. Murderkill River, DE ............................................... 3-7 13. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway .......................... 3-8 14. Salem River, NJ.......................................................3-8 15. Schuylkill River, PA................................................3-9 16. Wilmington Harbor, DE ........................................ 3-10 Beach Erosion Control Page 17. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ..................................................3-10 Flood Control Local Protection Page 18. Beltzville Lake, PA.................................................3-11 19. Blue Marsh Lake, PA ............................................ 3-11 20. Delaware Coast Protection, DE.............................3-12 22. Emergency Bank Protection .................................. 3-12 23. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA ................................... 3-12 24. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA ......................................................... 3-13 25. Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ.................................................3-13 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects......................................................3-14 27. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees.........................3-14 28. Prompton Lake, PA................................................3-14 29. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys ................................................................... 3-14 30. National Emergency Preparedness ........................ 3-14 General Investigations 31. 32. 33. Surveys .................................................................... 3-14 Collection and Study of Basic Data.......................3-15 Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ............. 3-15 Tables TABLE 3-A Cost and Financial Statement ................ 3-16 TABLE 3-B Authorizing Legislation ......................... 3-20 TABLE 3-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects................................3-25 TABLE 3-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects........................3-27 TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................................... 3-27 TABLE 3-F Deauthorized Projects.............................3-28 * All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 Page Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 L BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is main the entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Previous Project: None Existing project: The existing project, adopted as HD 73-19 in 1935 and modified as HD) 74-85 in 1937 and HD 79-358 in 1946, provides for a channel eight feet deep through the inlet and ten feet deep through the outer bar, protected by two converging stone jetties and a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from the gorge in the inlet to Oyster Creek channel and through the latter channel to deep water in the bay. The project was modified in 1946 to provide for the maintenance of a channel eight feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat Light Harbor with the main inlet channel. The project length is about 4.5 miles. (For details see page 203, Annual Report 1964.) The Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985 contained language stating that the existing project has not worked as projected and, in fact, has created a hazard to navigation. As a result, the following administratively approved modifications are to be constructed as design deficiency correction measures: a new south jetty 4,270 feet in length along an alignment generally parallel to the existing north jetty, extending from the existing groin located near the Barnegat Lighthouse to the tip of the existing south jetty; a navigation channel 300 feet wide to a depth of 10 feet below mean low water from the outer bar in the Atlantic Ocean to the north end of the existing sand dike in Barnegat Bay; remove the shoal located between the north jetty and the proposed navigation channel; jetty sport fishing facilities on the new jetty. All dredged material from initial construction would be placed on the shores of Barnegat Light between the existing and new south jetties, and would be stabilized by vegetation and sand fence. Dredged material from maintenance operations would be placed on the down draft beaches, the area between the existing and new south jetties, or in other locations as determined by a shoreline monitoring program. Estimated cost for new work (October 1990) Federal share is $31,200,000 and non-Federal is $14,230,000. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A local cooperation agreement for the approved modification was executed on 19 May 1986 and a modification to the local cooperation agreement was executed on 20 March 1987. Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operation during fiscal year: New Work, contract: Work included construction of South Jetty and sport fishing pier,maintenance dredging was accomplished by American Dredging Company from October 23, 1991 to July 19, 1992 removing a total of 183,057 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,495,338 and inlet monitoring. New Work, hired labor: Work included dredging, engineering and design and supervision and administration for South Jetty and sport fishing pier. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, repair of North Jetty, surveys, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Dredging by the U.S. Government Dredge Currituck was accomplished from November 14, 1991 to December 12, 1992, from April 18, 1992 to May 9, 1992, from June 29, 1992 to July 19,1992, and from August 12, 1992 to September 13, 1992 removing 148,880 cubic yards at a total of $ 752,468. 2. CEDAR CREEK, NJ Location: In the northeastern corner of Sussex County DE, approximately five miles east of the Town of Milford. The area is accessible via State Route 36. Existing project: Cedar Creek, with headwaters in Sussex County, meanders northward through coastal salt marsh to its terminus at Mispillion River. The creek currently ranges in depth from 13 feet below mean low water at the Route 36 bridge to less than 5 feet at several locations. The channel width varies from approximately 75 feet to 250 feet. Tidal range in the lower reaches of the creek is approximately 4 feet. Existing project was adopted by the Chief of Engineers, 10 December 1979 under the small navigation program, section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: Five marinas are located along the lower stretch of the creek, with residential areas being situated near the Delaware Bay shore. The area is sparsely populated, and there are no major metropolitan areas nearby. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, BCR updates, and supervision and administration. 3. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL, ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE Location: The new St. Georges Bridge will carry the new Delaware State Route 1 over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in New Castle County, Delaware and will be located approximately 2,200 feet west of the existing St. Georges Bridge. 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT* Previous project: None New project:This project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It states that the project for navigation, Inland Waterway from the Delaware River to the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (45 Stat. (030) and modified by the Act entailed an Act authorizing construction of a highway bridge across the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal at Saint Georges, Delaware" approved August 7, 1939 (53 Stat. 1240-1241) is modified to direct the Secretary to replace the highway bridge on United States Route 13 in the vicinity of St. Georges, Delaware, to meet current and projected traffic needs, at a Federal cost of $115,000,000. Local cooperation: The state will carry out the bridge replacement and the Secretary will reimburse the State for cost incurred. Terminal facilities: None Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included reimbursement to state of Delaware for construction of St. Georges Bridge Replacement. 4. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ Location: In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project: An entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942.(For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See table at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included repair of jetty, surveys, supervision and administration, and engineering and design. Dredging by the U.S. Government Side Casting Dredge Schweizer was accomplished from April 20, 1992 to April 30, 1992 and from September 14, 1992 to September 28, 1992 removing a total of 111,692 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $169,600. 5. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous project: For details see page 1778 of annual report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S.Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in the vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 3-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general surveys, BCR update, environmental monitoring, general maintenance, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 6. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location: See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous project: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938 Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details). Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on the waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included aerial surveys, lease of amphibious carrier, construction of dikes and sluices, lease of equipment, ditching and chemical testing. Maintenance dredging by was accomplished Norfolk Dredging Company from September 30 1991 to January 14, 1992 and from July 31,1992 to September 30,1992 removing a total of 2,716,665 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,410,927. Dredging was accomplished by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company from June 3,1992 to August 14, 1992 removing a total of 200,000 cubic yards of material a cost of $1,834,560. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, general maintenance, disposal area well and environmental testing and monitoring, preparation arch site, pipelines, conditions and operation study, construction of subdrainage, leasing of equipment, rock removal at Oldmans's Groundwater and BCR update. Work on spot shoals, drainage and maintenance dredging, construction of dikes and sluices, disposal ditching, and plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration was also accomplished. 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT There was also maintenance dredging by the Government dredge McFarland from June 23, 1992 to August 13, 1992 removing 300,000 cubic yards material at a cost of $1,578,118. 7. DELAWARE RIVER VICINITY OF CAMDEN, NJ Location: Camden, NJ, on east bank of Delaware River, is directly opposite the city of Philadelphia, PA. It is about 51 miles above mouth of the river and about 101 miles above Harbor of Refuge at the mouth of Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast Guard and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 295 and 280.) Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of June 25, 1910. No work was done on this project, for further details, see page 321, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: The existing project which is a modification to the Delaware River from Philadelphia to the Sea project was adopted as House Document No. 63-1120 in 1919 and modified by House Document No. 70-111 in 1930 and House Document No. 77-353 in 1945. Dredging to project depth of 37 feet in front of the Camden Marine Terminal was completed in March 1988. It also provides for dredging in of Camden to Newton Creek, with the depth increased to 40 feet in front of the Beckett Street Marine Terminal. These depths extend from the ship channel in Delaware River to a line parallel with and 50 feet distant from the established pierhead line. The project length is about four miles. Projects depths are well maintained in 30 foot depth section of channel. Work is scheduled to initiate dredging the project depth of 40 feet in front of the Beckett Street Marine Terminal in FY 1992. Estimate cost for New Work (October 1990) is Federal, $4,500,000 and non-Federal, $1,500,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1992.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: New Work, contract: Work included dredging by T.L. James from June 6, 1992 to September 30, 1992 removing 217,216 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $2,503,028. New Work, hired labor: Work included tide gage, supervision and administration, engineering and design. 8. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No.1219.) Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steelsheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963.(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the highway bridgenear the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included hydo-dynamic model testing inlet scour and stabilization. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included inlet scour, stabilization study, tide gage, and engineering and design. 9. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY DE, AND MD Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through the sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles 3-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous project: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep;dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide. Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening of the Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is federal cost $139,000,000 and non-federal cost $17,189,000 (October 1990). Major Rehabilitation of St. Georges and Summit Bridges was completed in fiscal year 1991 at an approximate federal cost of $20,868,000. Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $145,000 (July 1954). (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-ofway required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included electrical maintenance, environmental monitoring, bridge inspection, night lighting, operation and minor maintenance on museum , maintenance of bridges. There was also maintenance dredging by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company from October 28, 1991 to November 8, 1991 removing a total of 498,314 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $1,389,000. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance of rip-rap, bridges, roadways, monitoring of stabilization banks, night lighting, ditching, buildings, locks, and grounds. Also included in work was drainage of disposal areas, lease of equipment, bridge inspections, dispatch, surveys, flow and tide monitoring, flow and environmental monitoring, maintenance dredging, snagging and clearing, modification to hydrodynamic, plans and specifications, mosquito control, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 10. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE Location: A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, DE It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Previous project: A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of the one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge to Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. The Sheet Pile Jetty at the Delaware Bay entrance was removed during FY 1987. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1991. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year Maintenance hired labor: Work included survey on maintenance dredging and plans and specifications. Maintenance, contract: Work included removal of sheet pile jetty. 11. MISPILLION RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County and Sussex Counties, DE, flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and emties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen .(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218). Previous project: For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 80 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford, with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water; in October 1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Report 1957, (See Table 3-A end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1992.) Local cooperation: Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities: For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included breach repair , environmental monitoring, disposal area sub-surface exploration and design. 12. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 1218.) Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21,52d Cong., 1st Sess. See page 981 Annual Report for 1892). Latest published map is in House Document 1058,62d Congress 3d Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, 3-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 hired labor: Work included plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 13. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525,79th Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240,82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining consists of dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Section 860 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized, for preconstruction engineering and design, a 15 foot depth in the Vicinity of Cape May Harbor, titled as Cold Spring Inlet. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvements. Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included Pt. Pleasant bulkhead coating, environmental monitoring, bank stabilization, and repair bank erosion. There was maintenance dredging by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company from September 30, 1991 to December 17, 1991 and from March 17, 1992 to September 30, 1992 removing a total of 450,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $1,548,056. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, dike construction, surveys, repair of bank erosion, maintenance dredging, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 14. SALEM RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Salem County, NJ, flows through the county westerly 13 miles, thence southerly 7 miles to the City of Salem, and thence westerly 3 miles, emptying into Delaware River about 45 miles below Philadelphia, PA. It is joined at Salem by Little Salem River, or Fenwick Creek, from the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 294.) Previous project: The River and Harbor Act of July 11, 1870, provided for a survey and the original project 3-8 PIILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT was adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1871, and modified in 1878, and a subsequent project adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1907. For further details see page 1784, Annual Report for 1915; page 349 of Annual Report for 1924; and page 346 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware River across Salem Cove to the mouth, thence 100 feet wide to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River at Salem, 2 1/4 miles above the mouth. It also provides for a cutoff to eliminate a large horseshoe bend between the mouth and Salem. The total length of the section included in the project is about 4 miles. The mean tidal range is 5.4 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. The estimate of cost for new work 51,825 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $51,825 contributed by local interests. The portion of the project comprising the deepening of Little Salem River to 12 feet is to be restudied and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. The estimated cost of this portion revised in 1953 is $28,000 excluding an equal amount to be contributed by local interests. The existing project is about 64 percent completed. The dredging of the channel from Penns Neck Bridge to project dimensions, including the cutoff, was completed in 1928. The channel from Penns Neck Bridge to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River was dredged to a depth of 9 feet under a previous project. The work remaining to be done is the deepening of the channel in Little Salem River from 9 feet to 12 feet. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existingproject to Sept. 30, 1992.) The controlling depths at mean low water were as follows: In January 1961, Delaware River to Penns Neck Highway Bridge 12.0 feet; and thence in December 1956 to the fixed highway bridge at Salem, 0.9 feet. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925 (H.Doc. 110, 68th Cong. 1st Sess.) The latest published map is in this document. Section 859 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized a project depth of 20 feet. Local cooperation: The existing project required local interest contribute 50 percent of the estimated costs of new work and that a right-of-way for the proposed cutoff shall be conveyed to the United States free of cost. The contributions thus far made provided the right of way for the cutoff and 50 percent of the cost of the 12-foot channel up to a point 225 feet above the county (Penns Neck) highway bridge, amounting to $51,825. Terminal facilities: There are 9 wharves on the river all at Salem, NJ. Eight wharves are privately owned and one is owned by the City. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year*. Maintenance, contract: Work included einvornmental monitoring, dredging by Cottrell Dredging from August 4, 1992 to October 18, 1992 removing 90,173 cubic yards of material at a cost of $314,000. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, supervision and administration on maintenance dredging, engineering and design and plans and specifications. 15. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA Location: Rises in Schuylkill County, PA, flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $2,809,007. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 1967, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: There was maintenance dredging by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company from December 5,1991 to December 31, 1991 removing 413,593 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,010,583. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, general maintenance, plans and specifications, en- 3-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 gineering and design, and supervision and administration. 16. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the City of Wilmington, DE, and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous project: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No.4; and thence 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a distance of of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 38 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 320 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962.) Authority from Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 1960 provide for channel and turning basin deepening from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin widened from 200 to 320 feet. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992. See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within limits of the improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No.8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included construction of dikes and sluices, lease of equipment, wetland mitigation, monitoring of artificial reef, boundary monumentation, and installation and maintenance stream gaging. There was maintenance dredging by American Dredging Company from September 30,1991 to December 5,1991 removing a total of 255,319 cubic yards of material at a cost of $255,319. Dredging was also done by Norfolk Dredging Company from July 9, 1992 to July 25,1992 removing 360,982 cubic yards of material at a cost of $507,932. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, environmental monitoring, wetland mitigation, BCR updates, monitoring of artificial reefs, construction of dikes and sluices, plans and specifications, survey, mapping, ditching and drainage of disposal area, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Beach Erosion Control: 17. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TWP., NJ Location: The proposed project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project: The plan, as presented in HD 94- 641, was authorized for the Phase I Design Memorandum Stage of Advance Engineering and Design by Section 101a of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, proposes the following features: breakwater on the updrift side of Cape May Inlet; beachfill from Cape May Inlet to Cape May Point; provision of a dune with sand fence and grass from Cape May Inlet to Wilmington Avenue; construction of two groins in Cape May City and seven groins in Lower Township; inclusion of all groins comprising the existing project; and periodic nourishment of the beaches and maintenance of the dune and dikes. The Phase I GDM, completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981, determined that only beach erosion control measures in Cape May City are warranted. The plan proposed in that document consists of modifying the existing navigation project for Cape May Inlet to provide; a weir-breakwater at Cape May Inlet with construction being deferred pending demonstration of need; two new groins at Trenton and Baltimore Avenues in Cape May City; placement ofbeachfill between Cape May Inlet and the terminal groin at Third Avenue in Cape May City; maintenance of two new groins and existing groins in Cape May; periodic beach maintenance with material obtained from deposition basin on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet; and institution of a beach monitoring program in Lower Township area. Work for the initial beachfill was accomplished as follows; USGS feeder beach fiscal year 1989, Cape May City groin fiscal year 1990, and Beachfill Cape May City fiscal year 1991. Project estimate costs (October 1990) is Federal, $112,000,000, which includes $61,034,000 of Coast 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Guard contributions non-Federal costs are $124,300,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. Continuation of planning and engineering for this proposed project was initiated in October 1977. The Phase I GDM was completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981. Phase II AE&D studies were completed in July 1983. The project was authorized for separable elements under Section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local cooperation: The State of New Jersey furnished a letter of intent on 6 May 1981 regarding their willingness to comply with the above items of local cooperation. In addition, a draft Section 221 local cooperation agreement has been coordinated with letter of intent on 31 May 1983 regarding compliance with the items of local cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included inlet beachfill, periodic nourishment, and construction of groins at Cape May City. New Work, hired labor: Work included inlet monitoring, surveys, mapping, and supervision and administration. Flood Control 18. BELTZVJLLE LAKE, PA Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, PA-1960.) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around the north end of dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The construction of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16,1966. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance of stream gauge, water quality testing and monitoring, surveys, concrete testing, computer maintenance, installation of water supply joint use facility, maintenance of dam tower, and leak detection device, and weir study. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, USGS snow surveys, water quality testing and monitoring, painting of service bridges, , engineering and design on dam slope, ditches and stilling basin, and supervision and administration. 19. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, PA) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with spillway about. 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control.(For details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Cost of project $63,163,791. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year:. Maintenance, contract: Work included recreation safety program, computer maintenance, electrical services, installation of tiolet partitions, leak detection device, bridge inspection, survey monitoring, water quality testing, surveys by USGS, work on stilling basin, arch survey, sewage treatment plant, snow survey and NOAA Weather Service Cooperation. Work also included lawn maintenance, janitorial services, trash removal, and cost incurred for Lower Heidelberg and Bern Township 3-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 police department. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of recreation area, instrumentation and surveillance, leak detection device, reservoir, water quality testing and monitoring. There was joint use of water facilities, work on stilling basin, boat launch, day use area, drilling of well, installation of siding on storage barn, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Also incurred were costs for seasonal employment at recreation area and boat launch repairs. 20. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Previous Project: The previous project, adopted as HD 85-216 in 1958 and modified by P.L. 87-874 in 1962, provided for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, and the initial periodic nourishment was completed in 1957 by local interests. The second increment of beach replenishment by local interest was completed in 1963. Existing project: Provides a plan of improvement which consists of the construction of a sand bypass system and periodic nourishment until 2027. (For details, see S. Doc. 90,90th Cong. 2d Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1989) is 22,400,000 of which 10,300,000 are federal costs and $12,100,000 are required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Other work undertaken has been engineering and design associated for the remaining portion of the project. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Section 869 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized the unshceduled portion of the project. Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included operation of sand bypassing plant and monitoring. New work, hired labor: Work included monitoring sand bypassing plant, and engineering and design. 21. FLOOD AND CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1992 Feasibility Reports Newton Creek, Woodlynne N.J. Palmerton, PA. Shabakunk Creek, Ewing, NJ Construction Poquessing Creek Bucks County, PA $ 161,350 $ 2,484 $40,210 $ 2,979 Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $540,570 for disaster preparedness. 22. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Emergency Bank Protection Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Feasibility Reports Manasquan River, Howell Township, NJ $ 27,174 23. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA(See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587,79th Cong.,2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.522,87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing height of dam, constructing a new intake tower, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 264 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 181,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1988) is $21,200 including $108,800 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is completed. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission expressed its support by a resolution dated 23 April 1980 and reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1985, October 1985, and July 1988. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included USGS Stream Gage repair, bridge inspection, rehabilitation operations building, repair stop logs, surveys, computer emergency maintenance, repair access road, NOAA Weather Service, and installation of water control device. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance of reservoir, repair access road, periodic inspection, leak detection device, USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, and stair installation. There was also, rehabilitation of operations building, reservoir regulation data collection, water quality testing and monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 24. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, PA. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H.Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Project completed in June 1960. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included surveys, management planning, USGS Stream Gaging, and NOAA Weather Service. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of the reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, repair guard rail, survey monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 25. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ Location: The project is located in Cape May and Atlantic Counties, New Jersey. Great Egg Harbor Inlet, an unimproved inlet, is about 1.1 miles wide at its narrowest point and provides a tidal connection between the Atlantic Ocean, Great Egg Harbor Bay, the New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway, and Great Egg Harbor River. Peck Beach is occupied in its entirety by the City of Ocean City and extends from Great Egg Harbor Inlet southward to Corson Inlet. The ocean frontage is about eight miles in length. Existing project: The recommended plan consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. The beachfill will extend from Surf Road southwest to 34th Street with a 1000 foot taper south of 34th Street. This plan will require the initial placement of 4,118,000 cubic yards of material and subsequent periodic nourishment of approximately 1,072,000 cubic yards every three years. The material for the initial construction, and periodic nourishment will be taken from the ebb shoal area located approximately 5,000 feet offshore of the Great Egg Harbor Inlet. Additionally, the construction of the project will require the extension of 38 storm drain pipes. All work is programmed. Estimated cost for new work (October 1990) Federal share is $430,000,000 and non-Federal is $232,000,000. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30,1992.) Local Cooperation: Federal participation in the proposed project is recommended and contingent on the local sponsor signing the Local Cooperation Agreement which identifies the required items of cooperation. In a letter dated 28 September 1990, the State of New Jersey identified a funding source for their costs and indicated that they were prepared to proceed with the final negotiations to sign the Local Cooperation Agreement as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611, 42 U.S.C. 196d-5b) and by the Water Resource Development ACT of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).The Local Cooperation agreement was executed in September 1991. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included Phase I of construction. There was dredging by Bean Dredging Company/Weeks Marine Incorporated from October 30, 1991 to September 30, 1992 removing 2,617,666 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $10,914,910. New work, hired labor: Work included surveys, preparation work, engineering and design, plans and specifications. 3-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as tions were made as follows: PROJECT INSPECTION Lehigh River at Allentown, PA Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA Delaware River at East Branch, NY Rancocas Creek at Mount Holly, NJ Chester River at Chester, PA required, inspec- DATES April 8, 1992 October 15, 1991 -April 7, 1992 April 20, 1992 July 31, 1992 August 28, 1992 Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection Cape May to Barnegat, NJ 9-11 October 1991 Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $9,125. 27. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection of non-federal levees were conducted at the following sites: Allentown, PA February 27, 1992 Cheltenham, PA April 30, 1992 Honesdale, PA April 27, 1992 Norristown, PA April 30, 1992 Weissport, PA April 28, 1992 White Mills, PA April 27, 1992 28. PROMPTON LAKE, PA. Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, PA, and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, and will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet: 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1990) is $47,610,000 including $44,570,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was preconstruction engineering and design. (See table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1992.) Local cooperation: Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated in 1966 and suspended in 1968 and resumed in 1986. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, repairing of access roads and other road improvements, water quality monitoring and testing, surveys, and installation of relief well. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, maintenance of relief well, water quality monitoring and testing, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 29. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition Surveys Salem River, NJ Mispillion River, DE Murderkilll River, DE Oystser Creek, NJ Date Survey Conducted January 6-8 1992 March 20, 25 & 26 1992 April 7, 1992 June 6 & 10 1992 30. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $115,500. General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Cost for the period were $1,208,430 for navigation studies: $217,599 for flood control studies, $622,215 for 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT shoreline protection studies, $261,823 for special 33. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING studies: a total of $2,532,748 AND DESIGN 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC Cost and expenditures during the period $625,968 for DATA navigation studies; $257,026 for flood control: a total of $882,994. Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $257,521. 3-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 SEPT. 30,1992 1. Barnegat Inlet. NJ New Work (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Cedar Creek, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 3. Chesapeake & DelawareMaint. Canal, St. George's Approp. Bridge Replacement Cost 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Delaware River, PA, NJ, AND DE Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds) 7. Delaware River Vincinity of Camden (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 7,025,000 8,449,126 734,000 727,851 4,550,000 3,523,181 6,052,000 7,018,368 984,798 979,610 4,175,000 4,721,899 4,344,000 3,236,000 2,938,806 6,718,919 - 727,000 - 721,945 1,400,000 1,500,000 516,571 2,985,298 287,200 285,095 35,100 35,100 26,000 25,643 - 7,000,000 14,000,000 - 6,999,999 13,979,822 173,000 1,028,344 469,800 563,000 178,547 1,024,244 474,236 561,463 1,757,000 469,630 472,547 612,000 1,766,834 470,428 472,198 611,586 13,316,400 11,341,749 13,275,220 11,251,631 14,122,500 15,369,767 14,254,971 15,371,772 94,000 3,930,000 988 3,364,363 1,648 - 1,720,000 - 1,145,122 31,083,849 31,083,379 14,300,933 14,280,291 13,917,000 13,892,847 256,100 256,100 313,200 310,738 35,100 35,100 21,000,000 20,979,821 879,275 879,275 5,379,651 5,378,107 1,134,346 1,134,346 150,000 10 150,000 10 72,147,800 o 72,147,800 41,143,037 4 41,142,538 4 15,000 15,000 57,879,872 5 57,879,872 5 404,894,568 19 404,865,029 19 508,324 508,324 5,816,906 1 5,362,2181 362,962 362,799 2,705,000 1,940,078 3-16 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (Contined) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 SEPT. 30,1992 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, and MD (Regular Funds) 10. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE and MD (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Mispillion River 28 (Regular Funds) 12. Murderkill River, DE (Regular Funds) 13. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Salem River, NJ New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 23,000 103,245 475,875 79,000 33,804 103,045 475,539 78,624 6,566,500 6,527,440 576,000 578,316 11,003,107 11,049,585 3,343,031 3,364,748 9,671,000 9,641,060 3,933,000 3,918,075 8,913,000 8,809,414 (278,151) (265,000) 511,210 18 511,210 18 3,939,043 3,937,698 1,323,775 1,323,775 210,000 210,000 132,535,5918 132,532,598 227,916,365 9 227,738,465 9 17,376,718 17,364,106 561,514 561,514 43,400 309,880 44,600 303,428 12,000 86,000 12,860 87,828 2,320,258 2,316,394 60,000 60,000 197,000 196,938 - 100,000 176,000 - 97,543 151,782 738,83926 738,839 26 2,147,807 27 2,120,132 27 37,630 37,630 335,100 21,781 328,756 40,000 335,016 20,082 329,031 33,052 1,648,000 3,060,445 2,438,000 3,196,000 1,643,711 3,062,892 2,425,386 3,185,888 - 274,169 390,000 - 275,000 389,000 2,033,114 2,026,166 71,549 1 71,549 38,206,316 12 38,178,743 12 1,196,581 1,196,581 99,000 99,000 107,634 2 107,634 2 2,767,173 6 2,767,133 6 3-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 3-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 SEPT.30,1991 (Contributed Funds) 15. Schuylkill River, PA (Regular Funds) 16. Wilmington Harbor, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Beltzville Lake, PA (Regular Funds) 19. Blue Marsh Lake, PA (Regular Funds) 20. Delaware Coast Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (Regular Funds) 24. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost NewWork Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 51,825 51,825 141,000 1,351,520 424,536 965,000 140,940 1,345,895 432,769 961,697 5,585,800 4,824,340 2,204,920 2,611,000 5,613,926 4,866,118 2,188,084 2,610,850 4,759,000 3,502,390 200,000 58,993 2,213,000 1,282,829 1,335,300 146,297 2,648,000 4,014,549 839,258 1,965,786 136,785 107,986 406,500 562,914 597,000 686,000 427,026 519,341 629,371 676,836 11,874 1,442,500 1,429,509 1,100,000 920,187 974 296 1,315,772 1,872,000 1,355,899 1,863,945 - 230,000 545,089 210,274 - 30,000 - 30,000 900,000 712,986 549,000 546,206 135,427 570,928 585,470 14,008 (47,000) 4,625 693,000 682,545 1,053 2,093,800 2,050,013 165,000 96,789 4,339 909 1,448,000 1,450,336 145,000 129,000 228,000 259,000 151,308 114,381 227,559 235,652 3,334,00713 3,334,007 13 30,007,045 30,003,742 1,954,725 14,7 1,954,725 14,7 74,944,725 74,914,300 60,00017 60,000 17 9,219,176 9,355,911* 2,174,758 2,279,062 22,931,831 22,931,831 8,846,089 8,823,842 63,180,300 63,180,299 15,700,594 15,626,248 4,498,953 20 3,991,89820 215,350 215,350 1,268,67121 1,259,00221 12,449,68215 12,352,75315 9,179,949 9,167,573 4,073,105 4,073,105 2,658,064 2,601,308 3-18 PHILADELPIIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 SEPT.30,1995 25. Great Egg Harbor New Work Inlet & Peck Approp. - 159,000 750,000 8,317,000 9,226,00( Beach, NJ Cost - 140,600 451,994 6,352,622 6,945,21( (Regular Funds) (Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. - - 1,500,000 6,000,000 7,500,00( Cost - - - 4,978,243 4,978,24 31. Prompton Lake New Work Approp. - - - - 4,609,48 (Regular Cost - - - - 4,609,48& Funds) Maint. Approp. 506,700 537,779 703,000 730,000 6,504,64: Cost 497,921 541,355 712,166 714,452 6,488,98& *Total adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. 1. Includes $1,950,906 for 30 and 37 foot projects. 2. Includes $55,809 for new work funds expended on previous project. 3. Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment (new work) toDelaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project underl954 modification. 4. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000Jobs Bill Funds. 5. Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 6. Includes $1,285 for reconnaissance and condition surveys in FY 1957, $1,792 Operations and Maintenance cost incurred for preperation of environmental impact statement, and $48,000 expended for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Excludes $412,400 spent for Continueing Authority project. 8. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Job Bill Funds. 10. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds. 11. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 12. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department Funds expended for maintenance. 13. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 14. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $40,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 16. Includes 63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710Recreation Facilities, excluded $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 17. Excludes $213,336 spent on Continuing Authority project. 18. Excluded $10,000 for previous projects. 19. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 20. Includes $704,000 AE&D. 21. Excludes $85,000 cash and $130,000 (services) furnished during preconstruction planning. 22. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 23. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 24. Includes $555,600 for previous project. 25. 10 & 12 foot anchorages are considered deauthorized. 26. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 27. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previouse projects. 28. 9 foot turning basin is considered inactive. 3-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Dcurnents Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 2, 1985 Dec 10, 1979 Oct 27, 1990 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 19352 Aug 26,1937 July 24, 1946 Sept 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. Construction of a parallel, 4270 foot rubble mound south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. CEDAR CREEK, NJ (See section 2 of Text) Creek ranges in depth from 13 feet at the Route 36 bridges to less than 5 feet at several locations. Channel with varies from 75 feet to 250 feet. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE (See Section 3 of Text) The replacement of the U.S. Route 13 bridge near St. Georges, DE, and the state may be reimbursed if it carries out the work COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 4 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 5 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, NJ, and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 73d Con.,2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 85 74th Con.,2d sess. H. Doc.358,79th Cong 2d sess. H. Doc.236,99th Cong 2d sess. River and Harbor Act of 1960 WRDA 1990 H. Doc.388,59th Cong 2nd sess. H. Doc.262,77th Cong 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 61st Cong, 2d sess. 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 19353 June 20, 19384 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 March 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 Oct 20, 1988 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 7, 1939 Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, PA A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200,13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. DELAWARE RIVER VICINITY OF CAMDEN, NJ (See Section 7 of Text) A depth of 30 feet from Newton Creek to Kaighn Point, thence 18 feet to Cooper Point. Extending the 30-foot depth upstream to Berkely Street terminal A depth of 37 feet in front of the Camden Marine terminal A depth of 40 feet in front of the Camden Marine terminal INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 8 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD (See Section 9 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 3d sess. H. Doc. 580,76th Cong. 1st sess. 1 H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong. 1st sess. 1 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83rd Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong. 1st sess. 74th Cong., 1st sess. 1 H. Doc. 1120, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 111, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 353, 77th Cong., 1st sess. WRDA 1988 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 330,76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 18 and 24, 736 Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 3-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts WorkAuthorized Documents Sept 3, 1954 Aug 30, 1935 July 25, 1912 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 March 2, 1912 August 26, 1937 September 3, 1954 July 13, 1982 July 1, 1945 Nov 17, 1986 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay. For an 8-foot depth and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE (See Section 10 of text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties. MISPILLION RIVER, DE (See Section 11 of Text) A 6-foot depth and extention of south. Extention of north jetty. A channel 9 feet deep, 80 feet wide from like depth in Delaware Bay to the landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, including 3 cutoffs, with a turning basin at Milford. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 12 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material on each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. To increase the depth of the 2,000, foot reach of the Waterway in Cape May County to 15 feet. SALEM RIVER, NJ (See Section 14 of Text) A channel of 10-foot depth from Delaware River Masters Sand Plant Extention of project to Clements Bridge. A channel of 20-foot depth SCHCUYLKILL RIVER, PA (See Section 15 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the S. Doc. 123, 83d Cong. 2d sess. H.Doc.275,73d Cong. 2d sess. 1 . H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 2st sess. H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 678, 62d Cong. 2d sess. 1 Rivers and Harbor Comm., Doc. 83 S.Doc 229, 81st Cong., 2d sess. 1 1 H.Ex.Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess.)(See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) H.Doc. 133,76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.525 79th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA of 1986 H. Doc. 217, 70th Cong. 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 15 73d Cong., 1st sess. 1 WRDA of 198611 H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors 3-22 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts WorkAuthorized Documents July 24, 1946 Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2d sess 1 H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2d sess mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel below Passyunk Ave., by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 16 of Text) Depths of 21,10 and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Completion of new south jetty by the United States subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion ofjetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ (See Section 17 of Text) Consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; maintenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA (See Section 18 of Text) Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply flood control and recreation BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA (See Section 19 of Text) Provides for multiple purpose development for water supply, flood, control, and recreation. Site is located on Tulpehocken Creek about 1 1/2 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about six miles northwest of Reading, PA. Rivers & Harbors Act of 1968 WRDA of 1986 H. Doc.522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 3-23 H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1897 p. 12501 H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 2d sess. June 3,1896 July 25,1912 Sep 22,1922 July 3,1930 Aug 30, 19358 Oct 17, 1940 July 14, 1960 Nov 17, 1986 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 3-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts WorkAuthorized Documents DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION (See Section 20 of Text) Provides for Federal participation in the cost H. Doc.90, 90th Cong of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, 2nd sess. not to exceed 10 years, of the shore from Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet. Nov 17, 1986 Project is modified to authorized the construction WRDA of 1986 of sand bypass facilities and stone revetment erosion Sec. 869 control measures at Indian River Inlet, DE. * FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA (See Section 23 of Text) Provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir H. Doc 587, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Provides for a multiple-purpose development for H. Doc 522,87th Cong., water supply and recreation. 2d sess. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA (See Section 24 of Text) A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a H. Doc 113, 80th Cong., capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth 1st sess. embankment. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ (See Section 25 of Text) Nov 17, 1986 Project may be constructed separately or in River and Harbor Act of combination with any other feature of the project. 1965. WRDA of 1986. Consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. PROMPTON LAKE, PA (See Section 28 of Text) Provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Provides for multiple-purpose development for water H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., supply and recreation in addition to present single- 2d sess. purpose flood control project. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works AdministrationSeptember 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935 3. Also Public Works Administration 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 5. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide fromPhiladelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. 6. Extension ofjetties considered to be active. 7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 8. Also May 28,1935, under Emergency Relief Administration. 9. Deauthorized the remaining portion of the project. 10. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 11. Contains latest published maps. 3-24 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1992 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Absecon Creek, NJ Absecon Inlet, NJ Alloway Creek, NJ Appoquinimink River,DE Big Timber Creek, NJ Broadkill River, DE Cooper River, NJ2 1 Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ Double Creek, NJ' Harbor of Refuge, Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay Little River, DE Manasquan River, NJ 2 5 Mantua Creek, NJ Maurice River, NJ Delaware Bay to Millville Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project ** Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA Oldmans Creek, NJ ** Pepper Creek, DE Raccoon Creek, NJ St. Jones River, DE Delaware Bay to Lebanon1 '1 1 Jetties and entrance at mouth Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA1 Smyrna River, DE Delaware River t Wharf at Smyrna Landing" Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. Toms River, NJ Channel 5 feet deep Channel 12 feet deep � Tuckerton Creek, NJ Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE Woodbury Creek, NJ' COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-F COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-F COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-F COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED 1989 1990 1989 1934 1989 1976 1989 1912 1912 1981 1980 1991 1966 1948 1968 1941 1989 1981 1961 1955 1949 1950 1986 1991 1940 11,935 534,20918 21,398 36,973 58,665 68,228 33,102 256,624 7,800 5,162,23020 168,41213 12,016 8,008,2782224 169,687 143,98421 128,20316 31,188 138,09422 83,66515 207,102 4,291,810 - 198,844 10,050 60,242 27,09312 84,186' 5,98517319 55,117 41,270 71,925 * 243,641 396,528* 5 1,169,01421 98,36014 288,310 3,615,70023 339,340 161,913 54,601 32,125 38,988 * 341,734 66,093 5 197,327 33,311 638,860 328,634 56,474 3-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1992 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alloway Creek INACTIVE 1931 21,398 35,761 Aquatic Plant Control INACTIVE 1975 87,594 - Dennis Creek, NJ 1 INACTIVE 1897 4,701 - Goshen Creek, NJ1 INACTIVE 1905 15,359 870 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA1" 6 INACTIVE 1928 208,964 14,336 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE"1,6 INACTIVE 1898 224,704 - Leipsic River, DE 1INACTIVE 1931 36,956 32,345 Little Egg Harbor, NJ "'4 INACTIVE - 15,048 - Maurice River, NJ-Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth INACTIVE 1948 - For Last Full Report Cost to September 30,1992 See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, DE 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon 1 '10 - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth DEFERRED - -- 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Abandonment recommended in House Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st Sess. 4. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 5. Harbor not now required by commerce. 6. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 7. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Deferred 9. Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 10. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 11. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 12. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. 13. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous project. 14. Includes $39,000 for new work on previous projects. 15. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 16. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. 17. Excludes $38,988 non-Federal funds. 18.Includes $116,497 for new work on previous projects. 19.Includes $2,489,173 for maintenance for previous projects. 20. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 21. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys fiscal year 1963. 22. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 23. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 24. Incluses $555,600 for previous projects. 25. 10 & 12 foot anchorages are considered deauthorized. * Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. ** Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3-26 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30,1992 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Brigantine Island INACTIVE* - - - Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ INACTIVE* 1978 314,400 Hereford Inlet INACTIVE* --- Long Beach Island INACTIVE - - Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ INACTIVE* - - - 1. Operation and maintenance required under Public Works expended for extension Acceleraion Program for by law to be assumed by local interests. 3. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Extension of five existing groins completed Federal participation expended under extension of five existing 2. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public 11 May 1964. Works funds groins completed 11 May 1964. * NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1992 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 - Mt. Holly, NJ COMPLETED 1946 283,655 -1 Pottstown, PA ACTIVE 1984 487,366 - Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA INACTIVE 1984 335,299 Tamaqua, PA ACTIVE 1990 628,4674 - 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing project. 2. New project deferred. 3. $1,316,464 expended for preconstruction planning only. 4. Transfer from Baltimore District in Fiscal Year 1989. 3-27 Millville fixedbridge to upper end of project Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA Ocean City, NJ Oldmans Creek, NJ3 Rancocas River, NJ4 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, DE Smyrna River, DE5 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. Tocks Island, PA,NJ,and NY9 HD 00-000 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. HD 00-000 Route 209 only) PA9 Toms River, NJ6 Channel 12 feet deep Trexler Lake, PA 1963 1969 1941 1942 1965 1949 1979 $65,106,2600 1979 $195,223 1950 1981 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 HD 184 918 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 HD 216 918 2 Nov 79 HD 95-157 0 000 00 0 000 00 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 17 Nov 86 PL 99-66276 Stat. 1180 $395,831 $ 63,313 $ 57,590 $326,116 $396,169 $ 43,361 Flood Control Projects Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA7 1966 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $4,520,995 3-28 I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 3-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Appoquinimink River, DE1 1931 3 Oct 78 HD 95-351 $ 78,243 - Aquashicola Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Atlantic City, NJ 1972 HD 538 918 $2,083,289 - Barnegat Light, NJ 1964 HD 208 918 $ 70,908 - Cape May City, NJ 1961 3 Sep 54 HD 206 918 $ 22,9578 - Chester River, 17 Nov 86 Delaware County, PA 1931 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323 $ 7,139 - Delaware River, Mouth of 5Aug 77 Neversink 1917 HD94-192 - - Long Beach Island, NJ 1964 14 Jul 60 HD 208 918 $ 40,665 - Maurice River, NJ 1948 Section 12 PL 93-251 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-F (continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Includes $10,050 new work, and $33,311 for maintenance. 7. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 8. Excludes $58,585 accelerated Public 11 May 1964. Work funds expended for extension. 9. Includes $3,489,088 for AE&D. 10. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps authority to proceed with project. Legislation would be required to proceed with the project. 3-29 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT* This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA ............... 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift ....... 3. Bonum Creek, VA ..................... 4. Chester River, MD ................... 5. Knapps Narrows, MD ................. 6. Nanticoke River, MD .................. 7. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD ................ 8. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift ............... 9. Potomac River-Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC ......... 10. Potomac River at Alexandria, VA ..................... 11. Potomac River below W ashington, DC ................... 12. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD ............... 13. Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD ................. 14. Washington Harbor, DC ............... 15. Wicomico River, MD .................. 16. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys... 17. Navigation work under special authorization ....................... Beach Erosion Control 18. Beach Erosion Control Work under special authorization ........... 19. Atlantic Coast of Maryland ............ 20. Colonial Beach, MD ................... Page 4-3 4-4 4-4 4-4 4-5 4-5 4-5 4-6 Flood Control Page 21. Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC & MD ............ 4-9 22. Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV ..... 4-10 23. Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD.................... 4-10 24. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV... 4-10 25. Lackawanna River Basin, PA ........... 4-11 25A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA ............ 4-11 26. Lock Haven, PA ...................... 4-11 27. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA................... 4-11 28. Southern New York Flood 4-6 28A. 4-6 28B. 28C. 4-7 28D. 28E. 28F. 4-7 28G. 28H. 4-7 28I. 4-7 28J. 4-8 28K. 4-8 28L. 28M. 4-8 4-9 4-9 Control Projects ...... Addison, NY ............ Almond Lake, NY ........ Arkport Dam, NY ....... Avoca, NY............. Binghamton, NY ......... Canisteo, NY ........... Corning, NY ............ East Sidney Lake, NY.... Elmira, NY ............ Hornell, NY............ Lisle, NY ............... Oxford, NY ............. Whitney Point Lake, NY.. ............ 4-12 ....... . 4-12 ............ 4-12 ....... . 4-12 ............ 4-12 ....... . 4-13 . 4-13 ....... . 4-13 ... ...... . 4-14 ....... 4-14 ....... 4-14 ....... . 4-15 ............ 4-15 ............ 4-15 28N. Whitney Point Village, NY............. 29. Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne Co., PA ............ 30. Solomons Island, Calvert County, M D ........................ 31. Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA ............... S4-16 S4-16 4-16 4-16 4-1 4-8 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Flood Control (cont'd) Page 32. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA .......................... 4-17 33. Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA ................ 4-17 33A. Cowanesque Lake, PA ................. 4-17 33B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ............ 4-18 34. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA .......................... 4-18 34A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA ............... 4-18 34B. Curwensville Lake, PA................. 4-18 34C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA ......... 4-19 35. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA............ 4-19 36. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 4-19 37. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ......................... 4-19 38. Flood Control Work under special authorization ....................... 4-19 Water Supply 39. Washington Aqueduct ................. 4-20 General Investigations 40. Surveys ............ ....... ..... 41. Collection and Study of Basic Data. 42. Pre-construction Engineering and D esign ........................ Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement... Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ........ Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.......... Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects............. Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............. Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects........ Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........... Table 4-I Inspection of Completed Projects .......... Page ..... 4-20 ..... 4-20 ..... 4-20 ... 4-22 ... 4-27 ... 4-32 ... 4-34 ..... 4-35 ..... 4-36 ..... 4-37 ..... 4-38 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 3.0 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.4 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 10.3 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 20.2 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 15.6 miles long from the Cutoff Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Channels; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch; Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.5 miles; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.3 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,200 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (3) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $361,581,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $38,411,000 for work completed under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $33,991,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,360,000 is non-Federal; and $314,840,000 (October 1989 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $460,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $314,380,000 is Corps of Engineers and non- Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The two grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 8 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1991)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, Baltimore District: None. New Work, Norfolk District: None. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channels were made. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension and Tolchester Channel commenced on October 14, 1991 and was completed on April 15, 1992. Approximately 3,048,844 cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility and the Pooles Island open water placement areas in the Chesapeake Bay at a cost of $10,686,567. A contract in the amount of $3,169,000 was awarded on September 21, 1992 to dredge an estimated 1,381,400 cubic yards of material from the Craighill 4-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Entrance, Cutoff Angle, and Swan Point Channel and deposit the material in the approved Pooles Island open water placement areas in the Chesapeake Bay. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys of the Cape Henry, York Spit, and Rappahannock Shoal Channels were made. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the Cape Henry Channel commenced on March 31, 1992 and was completed on June 10, 1992. Approximately 711,360 cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the approved Dam Neck Dredged Material Placement Area in the Atlantic ocean at a cost of $1,659,560. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 9,200 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 3. BONUM CREEK, VA Location. A tidal estuary of the Potomac River, enters its right bank 18 miles upstream from Chesapeake Bay. It is in Westmoreland County, VA, about 90 miles southeasterly of Washington, DC. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12286.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in the Potomac River to and including an anchorage basin at the same depth 160 feet wide and 200 feet long in front of the proposed public landing to be provided by local interests. Project also provides for the entrance channel to be protected on both sides by jetties, the north jetty being about 700 feet long and the south jetty being about 300 feet long. Cost of new work for completed project was $205,998 for construction, of which $202,000 was for the Federal cost, exclusive of aids to navigation and preauthorization and $3,998 was the non-Federal contribution. Local cooperation. Local interest must furnish lands, and rights-of-way for new work and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; build and maintain a suitable public landing with adequate approaches thereto; make alterations, relocations, and removals as required of utility facilities, and wrecks and stakes; establish a competent public body to regulate the harbor facilities; and make a lump sum cash contribution of 2 percent of the first cost of general navigation facilities. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on January 11, 1967. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned piers or wharves are available on Bonum Creek. Local interests constructed an oyster packing house and a public landing. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the project channel, by contract, began October 3, 1992. Dredged material will be placed in open water, covered with oyster shell in anticipating an oyster set. This beneficial use of dredged material to create an oyster bar may be used as a long-term effort. 4. CHESTER RIVER, MD Location. Rises in Kent County, DE, flows 50 miles generally southwesterly and empties into the Chesapeake Bay. Kent Island Narrows is a passage connecting Chester River and Eastern Bay. Wells Cove is an indentation on the easterly side of Kent Island Narrows about 0.4 miles south of the highway bridge crossing the Narrows. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 12266 and 12270.) Previous project. For details see page 262 of the 1960 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing, section included in project is about 5.5 miles long with the lower end of the section being about 37 miles above mouth of river; for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows; and a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from 7-foot deep curve in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of same depth and 300 feet square at head of channel. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,454, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Widening 7-foot deep channel from 75 to 100 feet from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows was deauthorized and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance of Wells Cove section of the project. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead vharves on Chester River section. Facilities on the Kent Island Narrows section of the existing project consist of about 10,000 linear feet of timber pile bulkheaded wharf. About 1,350 linear feet of the wharf is owned and operated by 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT the Queen Anne's County; the remainder is privately owned. The privately owned bulkheaded wharf is operated mostly by the 7 marinas located on the Narrows with the remainder being owned and operated by the seafood packing houses in the area. In addition to the slips of the marinas, there are marine railways, launching ramps, and travel-lifts. All of these facilities are in good condition and are located adjacent to the proposed improvements. In Wells Cove there is a small wharf, a small marine railway, and a public landing. All facilities are privately owned except the public landing on Wells Cove. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. The material will be placed behind segmented offshore breakwaters and planted with marsh grass. Dredging is expected to begin in the spring 1993. 5. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Location. A small channel separating Tilghman Island from mainland of eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles south of Baltimore, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, MD. Mean range of tide is 1.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $46,121. Existing project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration, September 16, 1933, and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf exists on each side of the southerly abutment of the bridge across the Narrows. There are several small-boat landings within the Narrows and several marine railways for repairing boats of a few feet in draft. A bulkhead landing is available for public use at the turning basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 20, 1991 to remove 72,000 cubic yards of material. Dredging was completed in February 1992. 6. NANTICOKE RIVER, MD Location. The Nanticoke River flows in a southwesterly direction to Tangier Sound, Chesapeake Bay, and is about 50 miles long. The town of Nanticoke, Md., is on the east side of the river, about 3 miles from the mouth, just north of Roaring Point. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 567.) Existing project. Provides for a small-boat harbor 7 feet deep, 120 feet wide, and 400 feet long in the marsh at Nanticoke, with an entrance channel of the same depth and 60 feet wide, protected by twin stone jetties in the river, the north jetty being about 870 feet long and the south jetty being about 770 feet long. The mean range of tide is about 2.6 feet. The cost of new work for the completed project was $73,243. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish placement sites as required for subsequent maintenance and guarantee the United States and its contractors against claims for damages to oyster beds attributable to subsequent maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are three privately owned wharves open to the general public. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging, by contract, to restore channel and basin to authorized dimensions began in April 1992 and was completed in September 1992. A total of 49,867 cubic yards of material, place measure, was removed and deposited in an upland placement site. 7. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12211.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 200 feet wide and 10 feet deep through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep to the project harbor; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. The modification authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in December 1989. This work included 16 and 14 foot depth channels with widths from 300 to 100 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to the head of the harbor. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. 4-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 8. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 19 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 262,430 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 9. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Location. The project is located in the Potomac River and its tributaries with the northern boundary at Chain Bridge in Washington, DC extending southward to the U.S. Route 301 Bridge (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart 12289). Existing project. On July 2, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under the authority of Section 302 of the 1965 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized the control of hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 6, 1986 between the Corps, MD, VA, DC and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. The LCA which must be reexecuted annually expired on September 30, 1991 included the following provisions: 1. Local sponsors share 50 percent of the program cost; 2. Local sponsors provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 3. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments is responsible for coordinating local interests and issuing work orders for the program. Terminal facilities. There are 75 marina activities between DC and the U.S. Route 50 Bridge providing approximately 3,400 commercial and recreational boat slips and 50 boat ramps. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Harvesting operations resulted in about 16 acres of nuisance aquatic plants at sites in Maryland and Virginia. Due to budget constraints, Maryland did not participate in the program this year and Virginia participated late into the season. There were no harvesting operations conducted in the District of Columbia or Maryland this fiscal year. 10. POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA. Location. Alexandria is 3 miles below Washington, D.C., on right bank of Potomac River, which flows southeasterly into Chesapeake Bay 105 miles downstream. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing project. Provides for depth of 24 feet in front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. Project area is about 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: Mean, 2.8 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.6 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $95,215. Existing project was adopted by 1910 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2d sess.). Map is in project document. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Alexandria has 12 regular shipping wharves or landings; nine of these are privately owned (of which four are open to the public by special arrangement) and three owned by the United States. Terminal and transfer facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 11. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Location. Potomac River is formed 21 miles below Cumberland, MD, and flows southeasterly about 285 miles and enters Chesapeake Bay, about 80 miles from Atlantic Ocean. Washington, DC is 108 miles upstream of mouth, and head of tidewater is at mile 117. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 12233, 12286, 12287, 12288, and 12289.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between the mouth of the river and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC a distance of 108 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 1.3 feet at mouth, 2.9 feet at Washington; irregular, 2 feet at mouth, 4.5 feet at Washington; extreme, about 6 feet at mouth, 10.7 feet at Washington. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $153,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In general, the improvement is a main river channel, and terminal facilities are only served where the channel runs close to either bank of river. In all, 11 wharves are thus served. These wharves are of open and solid fill construction and bulkhead type. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 12. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 75 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks and/or fishing appurtenance. There were two detailed investigations of obstructions or sunken vessels/wrecks. 13. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Location. A tidal waterway about 4 miles long traversing Smith Island, MD, southeasterly from Chesapeake Bay on the west to Tangier Sound on the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Twitch Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare, thence through canal at Ewell, MD, thence through Levering Creek and Big Thorofare to vicinity of Swan Point, thence of same depth and 100 feet wide through offshore bar to deep water in Chesapeake Bay, with twin stone jetties at entrance, north jetty is about 2,080 feet long, and south jetty about 1,800 feet long; and anchorage basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 700 feet long connecting with west side of existing project channel at Ewell; extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long; and a channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide around point between Big Thorofare and Tylers River. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet, and extreme tidal range is 3 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $193,175. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish placement sites for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous privately owned pileand- timber wharves and bulkheads at Ewell are open to the public for business transactions with the owners. A county wharf is also at west end of town. Five crab houses are on Levering Creek, and one oyster house on project waterway west of Town of Ewell. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. Contract awarded on March 25, 1992, to remove 95,000 cubic yards of material from Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare West River. Dredging completed in September 1992. Dredged material was used for beach nourishment and for submerged aquatic vegetation habitat creation. 14. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within District of Columbia at junction of Anacostia River with Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. A combination and extension of latest projects for Potomac River at Washington, DC, and Anacostia River, DC. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial 4-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operation and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers are open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained by hired labor. 15. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is site of improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, section included in project is 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pileand- timber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the T-shaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 16. RECONNASSISANCE AND CONDITION SERVICES (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 17. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $3,339 for Monroe Bay, VA; $54,132 for Pocomoke Creek, MD; $395 for Shallow Creek, Spur Channel, MD; and $16,090 for Solomon Island Harbor, MD. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $30,497 for Solomon Island Harbor, MD. Beach Erosion Control 18. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $3,219 for Town of North Beach, MD. 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 19. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Location. The project is located on Fenwick Island at Ocean City, Maryland which is about 35 miles south of the entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1220.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a steel sheetpile bulkhead along the oceanward edge of the boardwalk from about 4th Street to 27th Street and a sand dune from 27th Street to about 0.3 miles across the Delaware line. The bulkhead is fronted by a 165-foot wide beach and the dune is fronted by a 100-foot wide beach. The project also provides for periodic nourishment over the 50-year project life. The current estimated total project cost is $540,000,000 (including a future inflation allowance through the project completion) which includes $45,822,000 for initial construction and $494,178,000 for periodic nourishment. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 30, 1990. The sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges and other facilities; pay 35% of the first costs and 47% of periodic nourishment costs; and bear all costs of operation maintenance, replacement and major rehabilitation of storm damage reduction facilities. To date the sponsor has fully complied with these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Following project dedication on October 30, 1991, Atlantic storms smashed the northeast coast on October 30 and 31, November 9 and 10, 1991 and January 4 and 5, 1992. The combination of these storms eroded about 80% of the completed sand dune. A construction contract to reconstruct the dune and beach was awarded April 9, 1992 and was essentially completed by September 1, 1992. 20. COLONIAL BEACH, VA Location. Colonial Beach, Westmoreland County, VA, is located on the right bank of the Potomac River 40 miles upstream from its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 69 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12286.) Existing project. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineering under authority of Section 103 of the River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: The project provides for extending the existing Central Beach area and beach at Castlewood Park; off shore breakwaters; and one terminal groin at Castlewood Park. The Central Beach extension begins downstream from Hawthorne Street and continues southward for 1,570 feet, a maximum width of 120 feet and provides 107,200 square feet of area, stabilized with vegetation about 200 feet of embankment behind the beachfill. There are four 200-foot breakwaters to stabilize this beach area. At Castlewood Park there are: a 59,300 square feet beach area; three breakwaters and one 100-foot terminal groin to reduce shoaling to the entrance channel to Monroe Creek. The breakwaters are two each at 200 feet in length and one at 300 feet. The beach will have periodic nourishment when needed. Local cooperation. The May 4, 1981 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and the Town of Colonial Beach, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold and save U.S. from damages; assure public ownership; assure maintenance and repair of the breakwaters; provide 50 percent of the initial construction cost; provide 50 percent of the cost of periodic beach nourishment. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was performed in connection with proposed beach nourishment. Flood Control 21. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FLOOD PROTECTION AND NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, D.C. and MD. Location. Project is on Anacostia River at confluence of northeast and northwest branches of Bladensburg, Md., about 9 miles above mouth at Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 560.) Existing project. Channel improvements of Anacostia River from foot of 15th Street SE in District of Columbia, to junction of Northeast and Northwest Branches at Bladensburg, Md.; channel improvement in Northeast Branch from mouth upstream to near Longfellow Street in Riverdale, Md.; channel improvement in Northwest Branch from mouth upstream to near 38th Street in Brentwood, Md.; levees along both banks of the streams to protect Bladensburg, Edmonston, Riverdale, Cottage City, and Colmar Manor, Md.; interior drainage facilities in these communities, including four pumping stations and necessary intercepting sewers and alterations and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Portion of channel improvement of Anacostia River from vicinity of 15th Street SE in District of Columbia to near Defense Highway Bridge on U.S. Route 50, provides for navigation channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide with a commercial boat basin, and a recreational boat basin having a capacity of 150 boats, both on east bank of river near Bladensburg, Md. Federal cost for new work for completed project was $6,042,325. Estimated cost to local interests for construction, lands, and damages is $6,275,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. Beneficial use of dredged material to restore Kenilworth Marsh. Contract awarded on September 30, 1992 to remove 154,000 cubic yards of material from Benning Road Bridge in the District of Columbia to Bladensburg, Maryland. 4-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 22. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On North Branch of Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with the South Branch of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements of North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees along the right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal costs of new work for the completed project were $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 23. ISLE OF WIGHT BAY, OCEAN CITY, MD Location. The project is located on Chicago Avenue along the Isle of Wight Bay between 2nd and 4th Streets, in downtown Ocean City, Worcester County, Maryland. Ocean City is located on the Atlantic Ocean approximately 20 miles south of the Maryland-Delaware line. (See NOAA Chart No. 12211.) Existing project. On October 6, 1988 the Chief of Engineers, under the authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended, authorized the construction of shoreline protection. The work consists of the placement of 3,500 tons of stone against a deteriorated steel sheetpile bulkhead along Chicago Avenue. This stone is required to prevent the bayward movement of the bulkhead due to increased scour at the toe of bulkhead. The estimated project implementation cost is $520,000 of which the sponsor will be paying $127,600. Local cooperation. The July 14, 1988 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and Ocean City, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide modifications and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges, and related utilities; operate and maintain completed works; hold and save U.S. from damages; pay 25 percent of the total project costs; provide cash contribution not less than 5 percent of total project costs; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the $500,000 Federal limitation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract was completed on May 25, 1990. Several contract claims were settled and paid during the fiscal year. 24. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, "Kitzmiller" and "Westernport," MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Final project cost is $176,325,300. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia has been executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 25. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 25A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interest include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. In September 1978 a cost-sharing agreement for construction of bathhouse facilities was signed. The cost for the facilities which were completed in July 1979 was $104,400 of which $52,200 was Federal and $52,200 was non- Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 26. LOCK HAVEN, PA Location. On the West Branch Susquehanna River in the City of Lock Haven, PA about 194 miles above the mouth of the Susquehanna River in Clinton County, Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Lock Haven and Mile Hall, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, five ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. The current estimated total project cost is $86,400,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Lock Haven Area Flood Protection Authority, a municpal authority created by the City of Lock Haven and Woodward Township, is the sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement was signed March 14, 1991. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities, pay 5% of structural flood control costs during construction; pay 50% of separable recreation costs; and bear all operation maintenance and replacement costs for the project after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction continued on the Bald Eagle Creek levee contract. The second major construction contract (West Branch Susquehanna River levees below Jay Street) was awarded December 3, 1991. The overall project which is about 45% complete is scheduled for completion in July 1994. 27. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Dam site is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, hiking, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Construction of a private hydroelectric plant at Raystown Lake was completed May 1988. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract was awarded in July 1991, 4-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 to construct Seven Points Water Treatment Plant. The contract work has been completed and the plant is now operational. 28. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 28A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscaroroa Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a draining area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 28C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 125 feet of existing flood wall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17; a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bennetts Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bennetts Creek and the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street; 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28G. CORNING, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) Existing project. Flood protection for this community was originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1936. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete flood walls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and bout 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the City; about 200 feet of conrete flood walls; about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over 4-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28I. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elmira, NY, about 27 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and East Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete flood wall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT opposite Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A Phase I contract for removal of sediment from selected locations along the project was completed in October 1990. Phase II contract for repair and replacement of floodwalls, replacement of check dams and other miscellaneous repairs to slopes and channels was completed in October 1991. Phase III contract for repair at floodwalls was awarded in fiscal year 1992 and is expected to be completed by end of fiscal year 1993. 28K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River, realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract was awarded in September 1991 to replace some deteriorating sections of concrete at the project. This work will be completed in fiscal year 1993. 4-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 28N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 29. SOLOMON CREEK, ASHLEY BOROUGH, LUZERNE COUNTY, PA Location. Solomon Creek is located in central Luzerne County in northeastern Pennsylvania, approximately .5 mile south of Wilkes Barre. Existing project. On September 25, 1990, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works authorized the Chief of Engineers, under authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended, to construct an emergency streambank protection project at Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Pennsylvania. The project consists of constructing 30 feet of gabion retaining wall along an eroding streambank. Without construction of the Federal project, Solomon Creek would continue to erode the streambank resulting in the eventual collapse of the roadway above. The gabion wall will tie into the existing concrete wall at the downstream end of the project and an existing stone masonry wall at the upstream end. The structure is approximately 11 feet high. A small section of the streambank upstream of the project area will also be protected with additional gabions. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the Borough of Ashley was executed on October 4, 1990. The local sponsor is responsible for providing all lands, easements, and rights of way as well as 25 percent of the total construction costs. Following more than two years of coordination, the easements were obtained by the local sponsor and advertisement for construction of the project was initiated in late fiscal year 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded on September 29, 1992. Following issuance of a Notice to Proceed, construction will be initiated in November 1992. Construction should be completed in January 1993. 30. SOLOMONS ISLAND, CALVERT COUNTY, MD Location. Solomons Island is located in Calvert County, Maryland, approximately 40 miles southeast of Washington, DC and 55 miles south of Baltimore, Maryland. Existing project. On February 4, 1992, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works authorized the Chief of Engineers, under authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended, to construct an emergency shoreline erosion control project at Solomons Island, Calvert County, Maryland. The project consists of 500 linear feet of stone revetment placed against a deteriorating steel sheetpile bulkhead. The project is designed to protect the roadway adjacent to the shoreline. Without construction of the Federal project, continued wave attack will result in structural failure of the steel sheetpile bulkhead and collapse of the roadway. The revetment consists of a bedding stone layer placed over a geotextile fabric. Armor stone weighing between 200-800 lbs will be placed over the bedding layer at a varying slope. The revetment ties into the existing bank on the seaward side of the roadway at an average elevation of 7.5 feet above mean low water (MLW). Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the Maryland Department of Transportation, State Highway Administration, was executed on April 14, 1992. The local sponsor is responsible for providing all lands, easements, and rights of way, as well as 25 percent of the total construction costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded on September 29, 1992. Following issuance of a Notice to Proceed, construction will be initiated on October 9, 1992 and should be completed in December 1992. 31. SPRING BROOK CREEK, PITTSTON TOWNSHIP, PA Location. The project is located in the Township of Pittston along the banks of Spring Brook Creek adjacent to PA state route 502. Pittston Township is located in northeastern Luzerne County, PA approximately 1 mile southeast of Scranton, PA. (See USGS quad sheets "Pittston, PA" and "Avoca, PA".) Existing project. On January 26, 1989, the Chief of Engineers, under the authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended, authorized construction of streambank protection. The work consists of the excavation and backfilling of the existing streambank and placement of approximately 870 feet of stone riprap. Additional riprap is being placed as a betterment that was proposed by the sponsor. The estimated project implementation cost is $460,000, of which the sponsor has contributed $115,000 as well as provided $40,000 for the betterment. 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Local cooperation. The July 24, 1989 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and Pittston Township, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide modifications and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges, and related utilities; operate and maintain completed works; hold and save U.S. from damages; pay 25 percent of the total project costs; provide cash contribution not less than 5 percent of total project costs; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the $500,000 Federal limitation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract was awarded on September 30, 1989 and was physically completed in June 1990. A construction contract claim was settled during the fiscal year and the project is expected to be fiscally closed out early in fiscal year 1993. 32. STILLWATER LAKE LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and the remainder utilized to maintain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres,and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 33. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 33A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project constructed under the Flood Control Act of 1958 provides for an earthfill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing day-use recreation facilities, and expanding both day-and overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1991) of the modification is $55,198,000 of which $1,257,000 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $53,941,000 is non- Federal (which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocated to water supply storage, $13,270,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $1,257,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to terrestrial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts were executed by the 4-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission on June 30, 1986. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work was completed on modifications to the intake tower which completes project construction. Fiscal close-out is expected through December 1992. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Federal cost of completed work was $185,620,000 of which $125,029,000 is for completed construction and $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. Estimated Federal cost (October 1988) of Mill Creek recreation facilities (inactive) is $7,500,000. Local cooperation. None required on the completed portion of the project; however, construction of the Mill Creek Area recreation facilities was reclassified to inactive (May 16, 1990) since The Mill Creek Project, Incorporated was unable to gain private funding for construction of specialized facilities, as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. An additional $50,000 was provided in Fiscal Year 1992 to reopen an access road to the Mill Creek area of Tioga Lake which had been closed due to unsafe conditions. This work has been completed, and the road is now open. 34. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush (formerly known as Kettle Creek) and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard) on the West Branch about 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, PA; on Kettle Creek 8.4 miles above the mouth and 17 miles upstream from Renovo, PA; and on Bald Eagle Creek about one mile upstream from Blanchard, PA, respectively. In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 34A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure,about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Recreation facilities are provided for camping, fishing, boating, picnicking, hiking, winter sports, hunting, and swimming by the State of Pennsylvania at Kettle Creek State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 slide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 square miles, or about 98 percent of the West Branch Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT at Clearfield. Clearfield County provides recreation including boating, fishing, picnicking, and swimming. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, camping, fishing, picnicking, hunting, swimming, hiking, and winter sports by the State of Pennsylvania at Bald Eagle State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Pennsylvania-York and Hanover.) Existing project. Indian Rock Dam is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of 28,000 acre-feet. Dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. Reservoir will control entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Phase II contract for rehabilitation of the Codorus Creek was awarded in September 1992. Contract work consisted of construction of stop log closure, riprap repair, and drainage structure repairs. This work is scheduled for completion in fiscal year 1993. 36. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See Table 4-I. 37. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $46,734. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $66,393. 38. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Cost for the period was $2,907,607 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). 4-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Fiscal year costs were $56,541 for Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD; and $48,488 for Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $464 for Gwynns Falls, MD. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $68,247 for Chesapeake Bay, Hoopersville, MD; $8,566 for McCreadys Point Rd, MD; and $15,122 for Middle Hooper Island, MD Water Supply 39. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in Chief of Engineers (See Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. An uninterrupted and adequate supply of purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, VA and Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1992 was 66,878 million gallons; the maximum daily consumption was 237 million gallons and average daily consumption was 183 million gallons. The average amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, VA was 38.0 million gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed in the amount of $5,939,067 for water furnished to the Virginia communities by the Washington Aqueduct. The treated water delivered to the 1.1 million consumers served by the Washington Aqueduct met or surpassed all Water Quality standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.I. 93-523). General Investigations 40. SURVEYS Federal costs for the fiscal year were $1,830,129 of which $201,690 was for navigation studies, $1,019,476 for flood damage prevention studies, -$1,917 for shoreline protection studies, $49,525 for special studies, $144,200 for review of completed projects, $120,000 for special investigations, $27,939 for interagency Water Resource development, $4,942 for North American waterfowl management plan, and $266,274 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $578,964 of which $435,177 was for flood damage prevention studies, $94,088 for review of completed projects, and $49,699 for coordination with other agencies and non- Federal interests. 41. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $209,751. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 42. PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Curwensville Lake, PA-Reallocation-The recommended project includes modification of project features to allow reallocating an estimated 5,360 acre-feet of storage from conservation to water supply. Contract negotiations for a water supply contract were underway during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering costs is $523,000, which will be repaid by the sponsor during the first year of construction. Total costs during the fiscal year were $14,886. Lackawanna River at Olyphant, PA-The recommended project includes about 5,200 feet of levees and walls, one closure structure and other minor features to protect against a 100-year design flood. Surveying and mapping and preparation of a detailed project management plan were initiated during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $800,000 pending the results of the detailed project management plan. Total costs during the fiscal year were $42,119. 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA-The recommended project includes about 7,400 feet of levees and walls, four closure structures and other minor features to protect against a 100-year design flood. Surveying and mapping and preparation of a detailed project management plan were initiated during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $1,200,000 pending the results of the detailed project management plan. Total costs during the fiscal year were $72,459. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising)-The authorized project provides for raising the existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and 5 feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities, and providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the system's integrity. The plan also includes raising four other local protection projects, removing an abandoned railroad bridge, and providing non-structural measures to mitigate any significant induced damages and the potential of a catastrophic failure of an existing project. Preparation of a Phase II General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. The estimated planning and engineering cost is $11,400,000 and costs during the fiscal year were $1,674,069. Washington, DC & Vicinity-The authorized project would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 23rd Street) regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street and constructing a removable closure structure across 17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore the design level of protection of the existing project and to reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a flood. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum was completed during the fiscal year and total costs were $71,803. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,600,000. Moorefield, WV-The authorized project includes 21,735 feet of earth levee, 1,290 feet of floodwall, replacement of the South Branch Valley Railroad bridge, and appurtenant project features, such as ramps, closures, riprap, and relocations. Preparation of a project design memorandum continued during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,437,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $754,754. Petersburg, WV-The authorized project includes 19,370 feet of earth levee, 920 feet of floodwall, 35,430 cubic yards of channel excavation near the Main Street bridge, bridge replacement/modification and appurtenant project features, such as ramps, closures, riprap, relocations, and ponding areas for local drainage. Preparation of a project design memorandum continued during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $1,802,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $838,317. 4-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 1. Baltimore Harbor New Work & Channels, Approp. MD & VA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 2. Baltimore Harbor Maint. MD Collection & Approp. Removal of Drift Cost 3. Bonum Creek, VA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4. Chester River, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Knapps Narrows, New Work MD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Nanticoke River, New Work MD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7. Ocean City Harbor New Work and Inlet and Approp. Sinepuxent Bay, MD Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 8. Potomac and Maint. Anacostia Rivers, Approp. DC, Collection & Cost Removal of Drift 9. Potomac River- New Work Aquatic Plant Approp. Control, MD, Cost VA, DC Contributed Approp. Cost 10. Potomac River at New Work Alexandria, VA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14,100,000 18,096,000 17,579,367 17,818,943 211,510 - 142,230,712' (50,818) 142,042,0541 3,748,4852 4,455,0634 13,330,3006 15,983,4628 119,428,6691� 3,752,0643 4,316,7556 13,277,589' 15,993,6009 119,247,699 � 13,178,920 12,714,500 13,769,831 12,690,072 224,000 223,999 337,789 337,776 (318,933) 379,000 377,288 30,000 29,997 (3,000) (2,999) (67,500) (67,498) 20,000 19,623 5,000 4,282 85,000 85,353 201,000 195,687 (94,300) 65,659,600 270,795 64,781,728 329,000 330,551 108,000 98,003 60,000 48,284 458,200 464,230 519,000 517,723 74,100 74,100 516,000 516,324 175,000 257,475 (20,278) 27,202 382,772 379,284 565,500 565,420 94,000 (24,925) 22,003 169,900 169,302 548,100 546,898 46,000 43,907 596,000 597,207 130,000 116,331 98,000 47,307 5,061,999 5,061,823 202,000" 202,000"11 282,576 272,576 70,49512 70,49512 1,803,924 1,792,184 46,12113 46,12113 2,551,775 2,551,774 73,243 73,243 568,841 567,564 350,19314 350,19314 10,376,380 10,370,201 4,335,900 4,335,900 9,502,775 9,502,519 2,123,065 1,957,787 291,866 291,865 95,214 95,214 606,658 555,892 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 11. Potomac River below Washington, DC 12. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD 13. Twitch Cove & Big Thorofare, MD 14. Washington Harbor, DC 15. Wicomico River, MD 19. Atlantic Coast 20. Colonial Beach MD 21. Anacostia River & Tributaries, Flood Protection & Navigation Improve ments, DC & MD 22. Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV 23. Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost -Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 153,836 153,836 55,900 56,312 372,000 372,000 20,000 19,996 742,000 742,002 69,320 68,562 543,005 543,005 13,887 13,529 56,252 55,624 8,085,000 5,490,279 6,417,600 2,866,545 47,400 47,994 375,000 374,830 32,500 32,240 49,000 46,700 79,000 76,295 8,991,000 9,499,409 2,215,100 4,846,249 16,260 12,117 56,000 54,164 72,000 72,000 313,800 231,421 127,612 85,083 68,184 68,184 7,500 87,450 2,500 41,119 75,000 72,264 500,000 515,671 3,910 57,000 2,206,294 54,432 2,203,547 365,000 6,640,045 365,170 6,460,045 - 193,175 - 193,175 862,000 3,448,911 812,541 3,399,192 - 3,191,07715 - 3,191,077 5 68,600 5,025,783 ' 6.1'7 71,262 5,025,78316.1'7 - 471,60918 - 471,60918 153,000 8,351,989 156,332 8,351,988 3,400,000 5,213,051 3,127,797 3,214,978 1,409 20,476,000 20,202,739 11,760,497 10,927,772 535,260 531,556 414,977 414,977 6,042,325 6,042,325 140,000 1,645,65519 129,242 1,633,06119 - 15,633,970 - 15,633,970 82,000 1,071,413 84,735 1,071,412 71,400 71,207 973,200 972,988 130,112 130,112 4-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 24. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD & WV 25A. Aylesworth Lake Creek, PA 26. Lock Haven, PA 27. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 28A. Addison, NY 28B. Almond Lake, NY 28C. Arkport Dam, NY 28D. Avoca, NY 28E. Binghamton, NY 28F. Canisteo, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - 2,310 1,224,200 1,272,444 1,284,900 1,332,000 1,247,520 1,264,520 1,229,745 1,384,577 214,000 213,962 105,321 99,214 102,700 107,217 1,045,000 5,500,000 925,615 4,532,728 - 12,637,000 169,000 169,541 16,212,000 15,090,644 1,996,495 2,237,274 176,325,300 176,324,093 13,103,122 13,091,699 2,320,400 2,320,400 1,784,523 1,783,373 22,757,000 20,548,935 14,633,495 2,237,274 - - - - 77,408,770 - - - - 77,408,770 2,568,100 2,358,655 2,761,000 3,056,000 32,986,815 2,587,911 2,342,366 2,716,846 3,098,539 32,975,205 13,800 13,780 322,000 323,338 142,000 141,763 9,100 9,098 30,000 50,271 30,700 30,700 42,400 42,368 9,700 9,430 301,106 295,354 138,638 138,743 8,300 6,285 26,200 24,087 45,800 44,160 24,000 23,801 313,400 318,055 147,000 147,298 4,000 3,840 17,000 18,770 18,000 15,218 11,100 11,588 351,000 351,775 171,000 170,494 13,200 13,377 38,200 36,542 45,900 50,331 827,050 827,050 252,755 252,754 5,760,211 5,760,211 4,942,681 4,941,931 1,910,00020 1,910,00020 2,531,712 2,530,714 436,37421 436,37421 455,761 455,760 3,460,00022 3,460,00022 569,981 569,980 1,183,11123 1,183,11123 843,135 843,099 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 28G. Corning, NY 28H. East Sidney Lake, NY 28I. Elmira, NY 28J. Hornell, NY 28K. Lisle, NY 28L. Oxford, NY 28M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 28N. Whitney Point Village, NY 29. Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne Co, PA 30. Solomons Island, Calvert Co, MD Luzerne Co. PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 26,700 26,655 1,130,600 1,130,829 12,100 12,100 50,200 49,386 690,852 690,098 15,500 14,825 48,530 49,112 341,700 431,023 8,600 9,200 267,400 1,469,293 2,007,150 267,337 1,453,919 2,020,870 3,200 31,998 11,000 11,000 731,700 733,420 20,100 20,098 19,200 18,895 11,200 10,384 43,000 43,051 10,000 9,949 582,717 1,068,000 582,411 1,047,249 18,600 17,986 10,020 10,422 53,000 53,189 374,000 372,058 19,000 19,075 578,900 573,242 34,200 34,456 13,000 13,867 3,939 1,166,139 18,000 18,215 71,000 12,552 17,300 135,300 14,779 90,625 4-25 3,322,00024 3,322,00024 913,888 913,800 6,049,504 6,049,504 6,727,771 6,813,998 6,883,305 6,883,305 355,249 355,249 4,558,69825 4,558,69825 8,121,276 8,113,897 661,19926 661,19926 821,722 821,722 131,00027 131,00027 260,932 260,932 5,421,539 5,421,539 7,417,296 7,558,009 424,096 424,096 423,281 423,282 71,000 12,552 17,300 135,300 14,779 90,625 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project 31. Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Twp, PA 32. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA 33A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 33B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA 34A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA 34B. Curwensville Lake, PA 34C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA 35. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 287,000 20,976 315,000 392,400 393,128 (524,248) 1,110,400 1,111,622 5,341,000 5,572,939 3,779 1,333,600 1,337,198 426,000 427,276 449,600 450,171 550,300 551,937 617,400 617,951 270,535 150,653 316,681 314,459 (837,120) 1,168,627 1,156,918 1,121,308 2,070,014 63,588 1,607,989 1,596,890 494,354 494,304 674,587 669,293 488,524 488,594 1,001,663 997,228 11,500 (35,676) 264,700 266,368 (1,114,000) 80,532 2,009,000 1,273,953 568,068 1,574,600 1,580,952 552,300 546,086 479,200 482,625 519,900 519,084 1,153,700 1,155,730 61,500 59,624 19,570 292,000 283,740 (170,000) 240 1,425,000 1,427,617 190,682 148,389 8,575 1,786,400 1,786,728 436,000 445,696 461,000 459,947 563,000 557,431 525,300 520,719 1. Includes $8,764,003 for previous project. 2. Includes $310,485 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 3. Includes $314,269 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 4. Includes $96,594 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 5. Includes $94,883 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 6. Includes $230,660 for District. 7. Includes $221,674 for District. sections of project in Norfolk sections of project in Norfolk 8. Includes $1,955,262 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 9. Includes $1,961,340 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 10. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 4-26 420,000 413,357 315,000 134,547 5,725,700 5,725,700 3,789,590 3,780,377 107,576,700 107,574,623 11,567,581 11,549,388 13,504,759 13,388,613 19,244,800 19,244,800 17,988,243 17,982,568 7,103,001 7,103,001 8,279,076 8,288,443 20,396,060 20,396,060 10,314,576 10,310,507 30,887,06328 30,887,06328 9,713,108 9,705,876 5,061,16729 5,061,16729 10,646,28030 10,643,77030 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 11. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 21. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 12. Includes $38,041 for previous project. 22. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 13. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 23. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 14. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 24. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 25. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes 15. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. $15,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,831,609 for previous project. 26. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 17. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provi- 27. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. sions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 28. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance 18. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of a sanitary sys- $14,000 contributed funds. tem for public use. 19. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 29. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 20. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 30. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug. 8, Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 1917 400 feet wide Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor.' Jan. 21, Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Increased anchorage facilities. Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot 1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordinance Depot. Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39 feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Avenue Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers 4-27 1. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1970 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch-West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Jun. 30, Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary 1948 waters. May 12, 1966 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1873 Sep. 19, 1980 Jun. 30, 1948 BONUM CREEK, VA A channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep from that depth in the Potomac River to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth, 160 feet wide and 200 feet long. Protection of the entrance channel on both sides by jetties. The north jetty is about 700 feet long and south jetty is about 300 feet long. CHESTER RIVER, MD A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from the 7-foot depth in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of the same depth and 300 feet square at the head of the channel. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Aug. 30, A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends 1935 from deep water in Chesapeake Bay in deep water in Harris Creek, MD with a turning basin west of the drawbridge, 7 feet deep at mean low water, about 320 feet long and 120 feet wide. Project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration September 16, 1933 and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. NANTICOKE RIVER, MD Aug. 26, A small boat harbor 7 feet deep, 120 feet wide, and 400 feet long in the 1937 marsh at Nanticoke with an entrance channel of the same depth and 60 feet wide protected on either side by stone jetties in the river. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Act of 1948 Detailed Project Report, August 1965 E. Doc. 25, 42d Cong., 3d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 65, 51st. Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 380, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H. Doc. 308, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 242, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.2 4-28 5. 6. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents OCEAN CITY HARBOR & INLET & SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 19353 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the 19354 west side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet 19455 above mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC-COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia 1965 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Jul. 2, Control of Hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting 1986 to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Jun. 25, A channel 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide for depth of 24 feet in 1910 front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Mar. 3, A channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between mouth at Chesapeake Bay 1899 and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC, a distance of 108 miles. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 28, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, 1958 and its tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Jul. 25 A channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide from Tangier Sound into Big Thorofare 1912 River, and one of same dimensions around point between said river and Tyler River. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant; (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street SE Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 444, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. State Design memorandum July 2, 1986 H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 33, 52nd Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Act, June 29, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1958 H. Doc. 285, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.2 4-29 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 4-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized 15. Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 WICOMICO RIVER, MD Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet 1954 deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a T-shaped harbor. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Nov. 17, Consists of a dune beginning at 27th Street extending north to the Delaware 1986 line; a steel sheetpile bulkhead from 27th Street south to Fourth Street; and widened and raised beach from Third Street to just beyond the Delaware line. COLONIAL BEACH, VA Sept. 15, Extending and widening the existing Central Beach area, stabilizing the bank 1980 behind the beachfill with vegetation, and constructing four segments of offshore breakwater; and extending and widening of the existing Castle Beach area, constructing three segments of offshore breakwater, removing debris in the beachfill area, and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the southern end of Castlewood Park beachfill. ANACOSTIA RIVER & TRIBUTARIES, FLOOD PROTECTION & NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, D.C. & MD. May 17, Channel improvements, levees, pumping stations with connecting storm 1950 sewers, pressure conduit and relocation and reconstruction of 4 highway bridges and 1 railroad bridge. CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 6, 1988 Sec. 14 Oct. 23, 1962 Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. ISLE OF WIGHT BAY, OCEAN CITY, MD Consists of the placement of 3,500 linear feet of steel sheetpile bulkhead along Chicago Avenue. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local pro- 1962 tection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947, H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.2 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 2 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Sept. 29, 1981 Detailed Project Report, May 1980 H. Doc. 202, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. Initial Appraisal Report Jul. 1986 H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 4-30 Documents 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents LOCK HAVEN, PA Nov. 17, Consists of 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along 1986 the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, seven ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. Oct.23, 1962 Jun. 22, 1936 modified by Acts of Jun. 28, 1938; Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1958 RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. SOLOMON CREEK, ASHLEY BOROUGH, LUZERNE CO, PA July 11, Consists of restoration which will include the placement of compacted back- 1988 fill material and the construction of a gabion wall approximately 24 feet in length along the alignment of the collapsed stone masonry wall. SOLOMONS ISLAND, CALVERT COUNTY, MD July 11, Construction of a stone revetment along the 500-foot reach of shoreline in 1988 order to stabilize the deteriorating steel bulkhead and prevent roadway subbase material from moving through the revetment. Jan. 26, 1989 Sec. 14 Aug. 18, 1941 SPRING BROOK CREEK, PITTSTON TOWNSHIP, PA Consists of the excavation and backfilling of the existing streambank and placement of approximately 870 feet of stone riprap. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Construction of a flood control reservoir. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood 1958 protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at Cortland, NY. Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to 1976 relocate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Mar. 1, Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by 1983 Section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). Sep. 3, 1954 WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Construction of three flood control reservoirs. 27. 28. 4-31 26. H. Doc. 187, 98th Cong., H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. Feasibility Report, August 25, 1989 Detailed Project Report, May 31, 1989 Initial Appraisal Report Nov. 1985 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 29, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 35. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Jun. 22, Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus H. Doc. 702, 1936 Creek. 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive por- September 16, 1933. The site chosen for the inlet under this tion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from authorization was that opened just south of Ocean City by Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Ocean City. Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the 4. Included in Emergency Relief program 1935. upper end. 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above 2. Contains latest published maps. mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 3. Included in Public Works Administration program 1956. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C Cost to September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Annapolis Harbor, MD Accotink Creek, VA2 Anacostia River and Flats3 Aquia Creek, VA Back Creek, MD Black Walnut Harbor, MD Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Breton Bay, MD5 Broad Creek River, DE Broad Creek, MD Cambridge Harbor, MD Choptank River, MD8 Claiborne Harbor, MD 2 Corsica River, MD Crisfield Harbor, MD Cypress Creek, MD Duck Point Cove, MD Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD'1 Fishing Bay, MD Fishing Creek, MD Goose Creek, MD' 5 Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD Herring Creek, MD Honga River and Tar Bay, MD Island Creek, MD Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MD Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1991 1878 1953 1928 1946 1982 1950 1950 1964 1962 1991 1979 1987 1948 1990 1947 1982 1932 1990 1991 1973 1989 1989 1990 1948 1988 $ 34,250' 5,000 3,910,582 52,4654 23,061 32,631 15,755 47,9245 64,5106 28,227 195,9747 96,796 42,974 39,0719 349,154' 0 3,057 25,289 90,12112 33,87414 111,242 75,900 50,591 1,506,259 66,11916 6,230 23,836 $ 45,352 11,770 41,378 431,478 17,675 12,621 133,088 104,215 930,668 94,095 681,933 106,565 1,771,351 14,729 334,396 53,80813 1,580,960 1,841,803 8,312 769,550 148,329 41,148,167 54,828 478,035 4-32 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C (Continued) Cost to September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance La Trappe, MD Completed 1980 8,06417 40,475 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Completed 1958 23,000 7,327 Little Wicomico River Completed 1991 81,88518 1,747,479 Lowes Wharf, MD Completed 1986 2,100 322,080 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1904 9,916 25,143 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Completed 1988 1,787,15819 640,938 Madison Bay, MD"15 Completed 1977 125,550 33,353 Manokin River, MD 20 Completed 1919 34,78821 43,534 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Completed 1947 38,71522 50,934 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA Completed 1989 12,460 387,685 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, MD Completed 1990 64,001 666,075 Nan Cove, MD4 Completed 1965 34,86123 22,498 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD 12 Completed 1983 240,817 142,131 Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork) DE and MD Completed 1990 143,13424 1,097,524 Neabsco Creek, MD Completed 1978 14,600 14,800 Neale Sound, MD Completed 1991 12,60025 903,450 Neavitt Harbor, MD 15 Completed 1968 36,500 34,533 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA 26 Completed 1946 78,446 42,063 Northeast River, MD Completed 1984 28,48927 937,074 Occoquan Creek, VA" Completed 1971 66,25328 203,198 Parish Creek, MD Completed 1988 19,17029 525,886 Patuxent River, MD" Completed 1905 14,0003� - Pocomoke River, MD31 Completed 1990 191,72632 2,045,392 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Completed 1977 - 184,394 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Completed 1920 10,234 6,216 Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA" Completed 1984 17,000 331,219 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DC2 Completed 1956 1,744,69233 27,46134 Queenstown Harbor, MD Completed 1985 72,85835 321,803 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD Completed 1988 304,000 1,003,857 Rock Hall Harbor, MD Completed 1982 1,072,50036 71,059 Shad Landing State Park, MD Completed 1966 33,53137 19,198 Shallow Creek, MD 15 Completed 1989 278,100 - Slaughter Creek, MD Completed 1987 4,140 615,897 St. Catherines Sound, MD Completed 1989 29,94738 648,618 St. Georges Creek, MD Completed 1985 147,650 - St. Jeromes Creek, MD Completed 1991 44,35739 719,788 St. Michaels Harbor, MD 15 Completed 1964 16,72340 14,403 St. Patricks Creek, MD Completed 1987 15,752 141,506 St. Peters Creek, MD15 Completed 1963 46,7404' 31,716 Smith Creek, MD Completed 1936 5,252 16,448 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD Completed 1985 293,57042 849,350 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA5 Completed 1974 57,0314s 41,437 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD Completed 1983 424,800" 395,785 Town Creek, MD Completed 1950 43,220 41,959 Tred Avon River, MD Completed 1988 523,310 845,243 Tuckahoe River, MD Completed 1980 9,727 23,489 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD Completed 1988 193,175 2,574,002 Tyaskin Creek, MD Completed 1923 16,297"' 54,302 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1971 20,281 34,777 4-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C (Continued) Cost to September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Upper Thorofare, MD Completed 1987 62,446 814,657 Warwick River, MD Completed 1984 22,04146 148,728 1. Includes $8,476 for previous projects. 2. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized August 5, 1977. 3. Project deferred for restudy. 4. Includes $31,065 for previous project. 5. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 6. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 7. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds and includes $61,321 for previous projects. 8. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 9. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 10. Includes $87,740 for previous project. 11. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 12. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes $8,414 contributed funds. 13. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 14. Includes $2,839 for previous project. 15. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 16. Excludes $2,200 contributed funds and includes $27,668 emergency relief funds. 17. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 19. Includes $5,000 for previous porject. 20. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 21. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 22. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and $52,000 from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 24. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 25. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 26. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 27. Includes $20,640 for previous project. 28. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 29. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration funds. 30. Includes $10,617 for previous project. 31. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. 32. Includes $20,500 for previous project. 33. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds expended for waterchestnut removal. 35. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 36. Excludes $672,880 contributed funds. 37. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 38. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 39. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 40. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 41. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 42. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress funds and $97,390 for previous project. 43. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 44. Excludes $16,409 contributed funds. 45. Includes $10,158 for previous project. 46. Includes $6,000 for previous project. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Oxford, MD' Completed 1978 $ 97,7502 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 4-34 TABLE 4-D BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-E Cost to September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD1 Completed 1977 1,000,0002 - Bainbridge, NY 2,3 Completed 1959 382,000 - Bath, NY' Completed 1970 638,332 - Bayard, WV3 Completed 1965 55,2185 - Black Walnut Point, MD Completed 1985 200,500 - Bridgewater, VA3 Completed 1953 136,500 - Bull Run, PA Completed 1984 2,742,000 - Conklin-Kirkwood, NY3 Completed 1955 71,000 - Cortland, NY6 Completed 1970 324,486 - Elkland, PA Completed 1971 1,297,850 - Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Completed 1979 7,034,534' - Forest Heights, MD 3 Completed 1964 430,0008 - Fourmile Run, VA Completed 1987 52,480,000 - Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD 2 Completed 1989 186,077 - Greene, NY 3 Completed 1951 37,000 - Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Completed 1979 4,731,3949 - Kitzmiller, MD 3 Completed 1965 501,50010 - Latta Brook Rd., NY Completed 1984 115,500 - Nichols, NY Completed 1974 1,487,800 - Norwich, NY 3 Completed 1950 94,500 - Painted Post, NY 4 Completed 1970 414,181 - Plymouth, PA Completed 1958 1,911,689"11 - Savage River Dam, MD Completed 1954 2,271,93912 33,999 Scranton, PAl3 Completed 1971 2,006,800 - Sunbury, PA Completed 1953 6,063,000"14 - Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA Completed 1968 2,728,113 - Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA Completed 1991 174,49115 - Tyrone, PA16 Deferred 1980 6,401,016 - Unadilla, NY Completed 1970 1,000,000" - Upper Marlboro, MD 3 Completed 1965 590,013 - Verona Lake, VA"8 Deferred 1978 992,000 - Washington, DC and Vicinity Completed 1953 331,92719 - Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Completed 1958 3,853,45720 - Williamsport, PA Completed 1979 12,964,89321 - Wyoming Valley, PA Completed 1987 25,549,098 - 1. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 2. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 4. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 5. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 6. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 7. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 9. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 10. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 11. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 12. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 13. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 14. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $53,383 contributed funds. 16. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 17. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 18. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 19. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 20. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 21. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. 4-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Almond Village, NY 1" 2 Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD (Ferry Bar & Spring Garden Channel) Betterton Harbor, MD Breton Bay, MD (1902 River & Harbor Act) Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD2 Cambridge Harbor, MD (1948 River & Harbor Act) Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, MD Chester River, MD (1873 River & Harbor Act) Coan River, VA 1970 1920 1960 1950 1949 1949 1989 1940 1988 1937 1970 1978 1977 1970 1970 1954 1950 1937 Copes Corner Lakes, NY 2 Cuckold Creek, MD4 Cunninghill Cove, MD4 Davenport Center Lake, NY 2 Fall Brook Lake, PA Genegantslet Lake, NY Governors Run, MD Harpers Ferry, WV May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act Nov. 17, 1986 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1914 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-36 $ 24,6223 787,710 3,482 10,424 212 112 25,419 106,7003 5,720 11,200 286,4003 46,100 214,5783 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G (Continued) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hellens Creek, MD Lake Ogleton, MD Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV 1950 1950 1949 1941 1978 1989 1989 1989 1971 1974 1953 1939 1970 Neabsco Creek, VA (1881 River & Harbor Act) Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD & VA (1954 River & Harbor Act) Saint Georges Creek, MD Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA6 South Plymouth Lake, NY Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD West Oneonta Lake, NY 2 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Sep. 23, 1986 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 29, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization Engineers. expired May 26, 1953. 5. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 6. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of ad- 3. Cost for preliminary work only. vanced engineering and design. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 4-H Date Survey Project Completed MARYLAND Crisfield Harbor June 1992 4-37 7,9286 14,600 100,0368 305 189,1008 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 4-H (Continued) Date Survey Project Completed Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek Honga River and Tar Bay Little Creek, Kent Island Lower Thorofare, Deal Island Madison Bay Nan Cove Nanticoke River Queenstown Harbor St. Georges Creek St. Jerome Creek St. Peters Creek Tyaskin Creek Warwick River VIRGINIA Little Wicomico River Monroe Bay Nomini Bay and Creek Pocomoke River Upper Machodoc Creek June 1992 May 1992 December 1991 February 1992 April 1992 August 1992 September 1992 April 1992 December 1992 September 1992 July 1992 March 1992 April 1992 October 1991 July 1992 April 1992 May 1992 October 1991 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS TABLE 4-I Project Date Inspected MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Cumberland Forest Heights Kitzmiller Savage River Dam Upper Marlboro NEW YORK Bainbridge-Newton Creek Bath-Cohocton River Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Corning-Monkey Run Cortland Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal Greene Nichols Norwich Oneonta Owego Painted Post Port Dickinson Sherburne Unadilla PENNSYLVANIA Elkland Kingston-Edwardsville Milton Plymouth Scranton October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 September 1992 October 1991 October 1991 4-38 a BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS TABLE 4-I (Continued) Project Date Inspected Sunbury September 1992 Swoyersville-Forty Fort October 1991 Tyrone October 1991 Wilkes-Barre-Hanover Twp. October 1991 Williamsport September 1992 VIRGINIA Bridgewater October 1991 Fourmile Run October 1991 District of Columbia & MD Projects October 1991 Anacostia River October 1991 Washington, DC & Vicinity October 1991 WEST VIRGINIA Bayard October 1991 Ridgeley October 1991 4-39 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT This district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke, and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, VA, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, VA. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherrin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION PA 1. Appomattox River, VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL................. 3. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Bennett Creek, VA ...................... 5. Channel to Newport News, VA .............. 6. Chincoteague Inlet, VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. Cranes Creek, VA ... .................. 8. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) . . . . . . . . . . . 9. James River, VA .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10. Newport News Creek, VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11. Norfolk Harbor, VA .................. 12. Tangier Channels, VA . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . 13. Tylers Beach Channel, VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Rudee Inlet, VA.................. ... ...... 15. Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) . . . . . . . . . . 16. Waterway on the Coast of VA ... . . . . . . ..... 17. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... BEACH EROSION CONTROL 18 Virginia Beach, VA................... 19 Cape Charles, VA . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. 20 Beach Erosion Control . . . . . . . . . . ..... Under Special Authorization GE FLOOD CONTROL PA 5-2 21. James R. Olin Flood Control Project . . . . . . . . . . 22. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA . . . . . . . 5-2 23. Richmond, VA ..................... 24. Emergency Flood Control Activities . . . . . . . . . 5-2 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 5-3 25. Surveys ................ ........ 5-3 26. Collection and Study of Basic Data . . . . . . . . . . 5-3 TABLES 5-3 TABLE 5-A Cost and Financial Statement ... . . . . . . A TABLE 5-B Authorizing Legislation . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4 5-4 5-4 5-5 5-5 5-6 5-6 5-6 5-6 5-7 5-7 5-7 5-7 TABLE 5-C Data Relative to the Completed Locks . . . . 5-16 TABLE 5-D Other Authorized Navigation Projects . . . . 5-17 TABLE 5-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects.................5-18 TABLE 5-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . . . 5-18 TABLE 5-G Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys . . . 5-19 5-1 \GE 5-7 5-8 5-8 5-8 5-8 5-8 5-9 5-13 t! Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1992 Navigation 1. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA Location. This river rises in Appomattox County, VA, flows northeasterly 137 miles, and empties into the James River at Hopewell, VA. The portion under improvement extends from its mouth to Petersburg, VA, a distance of 11 miles, which is the length of the tidal and navigable reach. (See U.S. Coast Geodetic Survey Chart No. 531.) Previous Projects. For details see page 469 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. This provides for a channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep from the mouth of the river to a point 400 feet above Lieutenant Run; thence 80 feet wide and of such depth, not exceeding 10 feet, as can be obtained without rock excavation to the head of navigation at Petersburg; including a basin at the mouth of Poes Run 200 feet long, 150 feet wide, and 20 feet deep: and a turning basin at the mouth of Lieutenant Run 500 feet long, 140 to 160 feet wide, and 12 feet deep in the upper 300 feet, the removal of rock to a depth of 18 feet in the north half of the lower 200 feet, and removal of soft material to rock in the south half of the lower 200 feet of this basin. All depths are referred to mean low water. The project also provides for a dam at Petersburg and the excavation for a width of from 200 to 300 feet of a diversion channel connecting the river above the dam with the river at a point 2.5 miles below; for about 1.7 miles of levees on the low grounds between the navigable and the diversion channels; for a highway bridge and a railway bridge across the diversion channel; and for other work incidental to the diversion channel. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.9 feet and the extremes 2.4 and 3.3 feet. There are no records available of the heights of stage due to ordinary floods. These are estimated at 6 to 8 feet above mean low water at Petersburg, where the extremes are from 15.6 feet to 17.1 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 212 of Annual Report for 1969. Terminal Facilities. There are about 2,500 feet of wooden bulkhead and a shore landing in Petersburg Harbor. These facilities are in an abandoned, dilapidated condition and have not been used by commercial traffic on the river since 1950. There are two large recreational facilities now in operation on the Appomattox River. One is located about 2 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA and the other is at Hopewell, VA near the confluence of the Appomattox and the James. Operations and results during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract awarded at the end of the fiscal year 1991 continued intermittently during fiscal year 1992. Between October 17,1991 and June 19,1992 there were 381,418 cubic yards of material removed from the channel. At year end approximately 260,000 cubic yards remained under contract to be removed, which is delayed due to the creosote-laden apperance of the material. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location.Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, Va 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia-North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Service Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting certain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges, under maintenance. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are nontidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Cost for new work for completed project was $3,396,276. Protection of canal property at Great Bridge portion is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $265,000. For details of previous projects, see page 476 of Annual Report for FY 1938. Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for FY 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on the 5-year operation and maintenance contract, awarded Feb 88 is progressing. A contract to replace the bulkheads at Great Bridge and South Mills, NC awarded 4 Aug 90 was completed during the fiscal year 1992. 3. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Existing project. Provides for deep water approach channels in Baltimore Harbor. Northern portion including Baltimore Harbor is under jurisdiction of Baltimore District. Portion under jurisdiction of Norfolk District is more fully described below. 3A. CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA Location. At mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12222.) Existing project. A channel about 2.3 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water through shoal at mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. 5-2 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 3B. RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of Rappahannock River and about 50 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12225.) Existing project. A channel about 9.9 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay, opposite Rappahannock River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. 3C. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of York River and about 20 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12221.) Existing project. A channel about 18.2 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay opposite York Spit. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1932. Terminal facilities. These three channels form the access between lower and upper Chesapeake Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Operations performed included condition studies, engineering and design, and supervision and inspections. Maintenance dredging by contract between March 31, 1992 and June 10,1992 removed 860,850 cubic yards from Cape Henry Channel. 4. BENNETT CREEK, VA Location. Bennett Creek is a tidal estuary of the Nansemond River wholly in the city of Suffolk, Va. It is about 3 miles in length, flows in a northeasterly direction, and empties into the Nansemond River at its juncture with the James River.(See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12222.) Previous Project. None. Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 6 foot contour in the Nansemond River to the 6 foot contour within the mouth of Bennett Creek, and extending upstream to the city boat ramp at Bennett Creek Park, a distance of approximately 2.4 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for construction. Local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. A privately owned commercial dock and berthing facility on the southside of the creek at the U.S. Route 17 crossing and a public boatramp and parking area at the city park. Operations during fiscal year. New Work dredging by contract between May 16 and May 31,1992 removed 110,737 cubic yards to complete construction of the project. 5. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel, connects deep water in James River with Hampton Roads. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 400.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Dredging a channel 55 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from Norfolk Harbor Channel in Hampton Roads to Newport News, a distance of about 4.5 miles, and two deep-draft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over a 1,200-foot swinging radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 2, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. New work coordination with the sponsor regarding the scheduling of additional deeping, and dredge material management alternatives. Maintenance dredging by contract between July 26, and August 9, 1992 removed 461,785 cubic yards from the two 45 foot deep anchorages. 6. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12211.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal, and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract between April 20 and May 29, 1992 removed 148,420 cubic yards from the Entrance Channel, and from July 27 to August 29, 1992 removed 58,754 cubic yards from the Inner Harbor and 79,247 cubic yards from the Lewis Creek Reach. 7. CRANES CREEK, VA Location. Cranes Creek in Northumberland County, Virginia is a small tidal estuary approximately 2 miles long and entering the right bank of the Great Wicomico River 2-1/2 miles upstream to the Chesapeake Bay. The creek is about 76 miles northerly from Norfolk, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart No. 12235) 5-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1992 Existing project. This provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and, 1,500 feet long from deepwater in the Great Wicomico River to deepwater within Cranes Creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are mean 1.1 feet, irregular 2.0 feet, and extremes approximately 7.2 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for construction. Local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as required for maintenance. Terminal Facilities. There are several small privately owned wharfs and landings on the creek which are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract between October 30, and November 11, 1991 removed 9,802 cubic yards. 8. HAMPTON ROADS, VIRGINIA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248, 12245 and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or from other available appropriations and that this work shall be carried on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, VA and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using government plant and hired labor. 9. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by the junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows easterly 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide form the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the Deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock; a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long alongside the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels are referred to mean low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1962. However, the local sponsor (Richmond Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Deepening the project from 25 feet to 35 feet, and the widening, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 has not been started. Terminal facilities. River commerce at Richmond is handled by city-owned terminals, city wharf, Richmond dock, and 16 privately-owned wharves within or in the immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper Terminal, located on the north bank within the manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 miles downstream from the Upper Terminal which provides about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with about 190,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwater terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide trading. Below the deepwater terminals the improvement is served by 42 wharves. Richmond terminals and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and the river's mouth are adequate for river's commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract between July 1 and August 8, 1992 removed 1,225,114 cubic yards. 10. NEWPORT NEWS CREEK, VA Location. Newport News Creek, Va., is located on the southeastern end of the peninsula between the James and York Rivers and within the corporate limits of the city of Newport News. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 400 and 1222.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water with widths varying from 200 to 60 feet from deepwater in Hampton Roads to and through the municipal boat harbor entrance, thence 12 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide to and including a turning basin and anchorage of the same depth 220 feet wide and 400 feet long in the upper end of the harbor. The mean tidal range is 2.6 feet and the extreme 3.1 feet. The extremes of irregular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946 (H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess.). The latest published map is in the project document. Significant modifications to the entrance to the project, constructed to accomodate construction of Interstate Highway 664 crossing Hampton Roads, 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT has been incorporated on the unpublished map maintained at the District. Local cooperation. Fully complied with as to initial construction. Local interests are required to simultaneously dredge certain areas adjacent to the project during periods of future maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are 4,210 linear feet of steel-andwood bulkhead, and two marine railways, which can accomodate vessels up to 85 feet in length, on Newport News Creek. The city of Newport News maintains 400 feet of bulkhead open to the public without charge and operates a pleasure boat marina with 18 finger piers at which a nominal wharfage fee is charged. The remaining facilities are privately owned or are leased by the city to private firms. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging, by contract, between April 13 and April 21, 1992 removed 43,721 cubic yards. 11. NORFOLK HARBOR, VA Location. Norfolk, VA is 187 miles south of Baltimore, MD and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway bridge over a Southern Branch of Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 400 and 452.) Previous Projects. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER: A channel 55 feet deep and 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads to a point approximately 6.3 miles upstream from the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel; thence 55 feet deep and 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence 45 feet deep and 750 feet wide to the junction of Southern Branch and Eastern Branch. SOUTHERN BRANCH: A channel 45 feet deep and 450 feet wide from the junction with the Eastern Branch to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railway Bridge; thence 45 feet deep and 375 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge; thence 40 feet deep and 250 feet to 500 feet wide to the U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge; thence 35 feet deep and 250 to 300 feet wide to a point 0.8 mile above Interstate 64 high level bridge. Project includes an approach and turning basin 45 feet deep opposite the Norfolk Naval Shipyard; a turning basin at the mouth of St. Julians Creek 40 feet deep, 400 to 600 feet long, and 800 feet wide; a turning basin at the mouth of Milldam Creek 40 feet deep and 800 feet square and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek, the upstream end of the project, 35 feet deep and 800 feet square. EASTERN BRANCH: A channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the junction of the branches to Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge, from the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Campostella Bridge, channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge (formerly Virginian), including a turning basin 25 feet deep and approximately 5.5 acres in size located at the upstream end of the project. WESTERN BRANCH: A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a point 0.78 mile from the 40-foot channel, thence 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for a distance of 0.38 mile; thence 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 0.57 mile to a point 0.34 mile above the West Norfolk Bridge. SCOTTS CREEK: A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from the 40-foot channel for a distance of 0.73 mile. ANCHORAGES: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. DISPOSAL AREA: a disposal area of about 2,500 acres adjacent to and north of Craney Island, enclosed by stonefaced levee of sand; rehandling basin, approach and exit channels connecting rehandling basin and Norfolk Harbor 55-foot channel and hopper dredge unloading facility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 15, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11 (revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with the sponsor and other agencies regarding scheduling of additional deepening, and dredge material management alternatives. Maintenance: Dredging by contract in progress at the beginning of fiscal year 1992 was completed on December 29, 1991 removing 1,201,500 cubic yards from the 45 and 50 foot channel reaches. The annual dredging contract for fiscal year 1992 was rescheduled to fiscal year 1993 due to contractor protest. Operation and Maintenance of the Craney Island Dredged Material Management Area continued. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 367,461 cubic yards of material was dredged from the Norfolk Harbor 40' channel between 7 Aug and 19 Sept 91. Maintenance dredging of the Norfolk Harbor 45' and 50' channels removed 874,500 cubic yards of material between 1 Aug and 30 Sept 91 and is continuing into FY 92. 12. TANGIER CHANNELS, VA Location. A tidal channel about 2 miles lng extending from Tangier Island, Virginia, northeasterly to deepwater in Tangier Sound, Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Services Chart No. 12228.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from 8 foot contour to Tangier Sound to day marker No. 4, and thence 8 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the town of Tangier, with an anchorage basin adjacent of town 400 feet 5-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1992 square and 7 feet deep. A channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide about 4,000 feet from the anchorage basin northwesterly across Tangier Island to Chesapeake Bay. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet and extreme tidal range 4.7 feet. Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish spoil disposal area as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Accomack County constructed a public dock in 1961. There are four privately owned docks adjecent to existing project and two marine railways. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract between September 10 and September 28, 1992 removed 76,895 cubic yards. 13. TYLERS BEACH HARBOR, VA Location. On south shore of James River in Isle of Wight County in a deep indentation known as Burwells Bay about 13 miles above the mouth of the James River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chrt No. 12248.) Existing project. Provides for harbor of refuge 6 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long, just south of Tylers Beach, and a channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 2,350 feet long from that depth in Burwells Bay to the harbor of refuge. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project was modified in 1981 to provide for construction of two 370 foot placed stone revetment/ jetty structures along the banks of the inlet throat leading to the harbor. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests must furnish spoil disposal area as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A public landing has been constructed by a local interest under the requirements of local cooperation. Watermen basing operations at Tylers Beach have constructed mooring facilities in the harbor of refuge for their vessels. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract between September 29 and October 5,1992 removed 18,209 cubic yards. 14. RUDEE INLET, VA Location. Rudee Inlet is located on the Atlantic Ocean at Virginia Beach in an area where boating is a major activity. It provides a gateway to a variety of oceanic pursuits varying from pleasure cruising to commercial deep sea fishing. Existing project. An entrance channel 10-ft deep, 110 to 72-ft wide and 1605-ft long; an inner channel 7-ft deep, 72 to 53-ft wide and 2,495-ft long including a safety area 7-ft deep, and approximately 1.9 acres in size and a turning basin 7-ft deep, 175-ft wide and 1,570-ft long; a sand trap 18-ft deep and approximately 3.3 acres in size; and a weir and jetty system at the mouth of the inlet. Local cooperation. Complied with for initial dredging as a Federal project in fiscal year 1991. Local interests are to financially participate in continued annual maintenance at an increasing rate as described in the Local Cooperation Agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging between March 18 and May 5, 1992 removed 128,786 cubic yards. 15. SUPERVISOR OF NORFOLK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451) as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virginia, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia. The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409) as amended prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of Norfolk Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the Norfolk District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels performing inspections, removing debris and investigating navigational hazards and sunken or abandoned vessels. A derrickboat and crane barge performed removal of sunken vessels and navigational hazards and supported Federal dredging projects. In addition, surveillance of the harbor was performed regarding the Corps' regulatory program, using also two small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land and occasional chartered aerial reconnaissance. This regulatory surveillance involved compliance surveys of permitted activities and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed piers and other structures. 16. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12211, 12210, and 12221.) Existing projects. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, VA. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized relocation of portions of the waterway and widening of 100 feet. 5-6 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging by contract between June 14 and July 10, 1992 removed 230,417 cubic yards. 17. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The District continued work on five studies: Hunting/Gilford Creeks, VA; Lynnhaven River, VA; Back River, Poquoson, VA; York and Pamunkey Rivers, VA; and Newport News Creek, VA. Total expenditures amounted to $140,830. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 18. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Location. On the Atlantic Seaboard, 22 miles north of Virginia- North Carolina State line, 3.5 miles south of Cape Henry, and 19 miles east of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. Federal participation in restoration and protection of shore of Virginia Beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street by artificial placement of sand to provide a minimum beach width of 100 feet at elevation 7 feet above mean low water, and maintenance of such beach by periodic replenishment of losses to ensure continuous protection; including construction of a groin system to be undertaken at such times as estimated annual charges therewith would be less than the annual cost of beach replenishment alone. The 1962 modification provided that the United States participate in periodic nourishment of the beach for 25 years. The 1974 modification which provides for structural and nonstructural improvements was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Structural measures will be provided for the 6 mile reach of shoreline between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street. This will include maintaining the beach and construction of a seawall from Rudee Inlet to 58th Street, and raising and strengthening sand dunes from 58th Street to 89th Streets. Local cooperation. The city of Virginia Beach has complied with the 1962 requirements. Cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, will be required for construction of the 1974 modification. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project, as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, expired Feb 87. Federal participation has been extended from 25 years to 35 years, on March 10, 1988 by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. The 1974 modification project is in the preconstruction engineering and design phase. 19. CAPE CHARLES SHORELINE, VA Location. The Mason Avenue Sewage Lift Station is on the north bank of the entrance to Cape Charles City Harbor, on the Chesapeake Bay side of the Delmarva Peninsula separating the bay from the Atlantic Ocean, about 11 miles north of the southern extremity of the peninsula and 45 miles south of the Maryland-Virginia State line. Previous projects. None. Existing project. A free-standing, engineered rubble-mound revetment structure with 4.5 foot crest width, 5.25 above mean low water, to control erosion along a 265 foot segment of shoreline. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for construction. Local interests will be responsible for operation and maintenance of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was approved May 19, 1992. Bids were opened September 1 and the contract awarded September 25, 1992. 20. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The district completed work on one study: Cape Charles City Harbor, VA. FLOOD CONTROL 21. JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, VA (Formerly- Buena Vista, Va.) Location. The city of Buena Vista is on the left bank of the Maury River, 40 miles below the river's origin and about 11 miles upstream of its juncture with the main stem of the James River at the community of Glasgow. The Maury River Basin above Buena Vista contains a drainage area of some 649 square miles. Existing projects. The recommended plan of improvement provides for a combination earth levee and floodwall along the left bank of the river for nearly the full length of the city. The main features of the plan are (a) an 11,900-foot combination riprapped levee and floodwall, extending to high ground just upstream of Universal Match Company to high ground downstream from General Cable Corporation at a point near the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge across the Maury River; (b) 4,000 feet of improved channel in the Maury River, provided by straightening and widening the existing channel to a bottom width of 200-300 feet, for the purpose of eliminating a backwater effect upstream, which would otherwise increase natural flood damage to the property located in that area; (c) diversion of internal runoff from surface sources and from Indian Gap Run and Pedlar Gap Run into an abandoned canal bed, appropriately improved for a distance of 7,400 feet downstream and thence discharged by gravity, into the Maury River; and (d) a 2,270 foot concrete ringwall at the Georgia Bonded Fibers manufacturing facility. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (City of Buena Vista) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for project construction, and maintain and operate all works after completion. Operations during the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning, design, and engineering was in progress. 5-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1992 22. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA Location. Gathright Dam is on the Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 in Alleghany County. Gathright Dam site is in the reach of the Jackson River known as the Gorge, about 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA At the elevation of the top of the conservation pool, the lake extends upstream about 9 miles. (See Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-foot long, rolled-rock-fill dam with an impervious core, with the top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam; a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixed-crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation pool elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Care of service and recreational facilities, water control management, testing and monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering and design. 23. RICHMOND, VA Location. The city of Richmond, the capital of Virginia, is located in the Piedmont Plateau and is bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. The James River flows directly through Richmond separating its business district into two areas, the Shockoe Creek area on the north bank and the industrial-commercial complex on the south bank. Previous project. None. Existing project. The project will provide a system of floodwalls and levees on both sides of the river in the downtown area which would protect against a flood higher than that which occurred in June 1972 which is the maximum flood of recent record. The project to be constructed is that generally described in House Document 98-178, 98th Congress, 2nd Session with modifications recommended by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on February 21, 1984. The present construction cost of the project is now estimated at $122,300,000. Local Cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was signed with the city of Richmond on June 16, 1986. For details see Annual Report for 1986. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was initiated December 1988 and is continuing. Completion is scheduled for Sep 1993. 24. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES During FY 92, $171,865 was spent on the National Emergency Preparedness Program, and $235,527 on the Disaster Preparedness Program. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 25. SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $492,259. The work performed consisted of a flood damage prevention study of the upper James River Basin, $18,970; review of the completed AIWW Bridge, $366,448; miscellaneous activities consisting of Special Investigations, Intragency Water Resouces Development and American Waterfoul Management Plan amounting to $33,880; Coordination Studies with other agencies and states, $36,601; and Preauthorization Studies, $36,360. 26. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, cost of collection and study of Basic Data was $150,078 consisting of $43,173 for Management Service Unit, $80,563 for Technical Services, and $26,342. for Va. Beach Hurricane Evacuation study. 5-8 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total to Sect. Project Funding FY89 FY 90 FY91 FY92 30 Sept 92 in Text. 1. Appomattox River, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - 212,025 211,957 270,128 266,423 1,763,859 1,755,304 , 1,673,600 1,670,788 870,341 870,341 4,808,805 4,793,665 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, between Norfolk, VA and St. John's River, FL (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 3. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 4. Bennetts Creek, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Channel to Newport News, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Chincoteague Inlet,VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Cranes Creek, VA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Major Rehab Approp Cost Recreation Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - - - - 3,688,372' - - - - 3,688,372 2,255,274 3,479,644 4,707,862 3,562,589 64,358,7602 3,046,911 3,373,880 4,641,338 3,590,029 64,213,093 -- - - 479,947 - - - - 479,947 -- - - 59,871 - - - - 59,871 319,453 323,236 1,730 4,783 96,594 94,883 261 - 8,015,0733 - 8,015,073 230,660 1,955,262 12,934,465 221,674 1,959,561 12,927,207 75,000 37,914 285,000 453,229 311,459 442,602 104,700 104,621 334,020 1,010,871 1,344,891- 231 331 78,921 70,485 1,424,410 1,780,206 713,341 723,695 800,686 793,577 104,700 104,621 S- 4,097,1176 - - 4,097,117 53,000 1,270,326 7,165,886 60,741 1,271,031 7,165,886 - - 4,918,544 - - 4,695,108 - - 227,000 - - 227,000 450,997 1,412,747 10,272,427 457,354 1,412,571 10,271,104 3,850 3,850 6,274 6,274 9,738 9,738 5-9 9,205 9,205 182,010 181,933 39,634 639,871 39,651 639,871 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Sect. Project Funding FY89 FY 90 FY91 FY92 To 30 Sept 92 in Text. 8. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) 9. James River, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Newport News Creek, VA (Regular Funds) 11. Norfolk Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Tangier Channels, VA (Regular Funds) 13. Tyler Beach Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) 14. Rudee Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 193,000 193,000 204,400 189,096 216,000 231,304 496,000 4,501,384 485,169 4,490,553 - - - - 7,639,9045 - - - - 7,639,904 900,219 1,762,027 1,061,066 1,517,949 35,503,648 898,399 1,249,130 1,578,387 1,518,707 35,503,251 - - - - 413,456 - - - - 379,792 - 50,000 - 2,520 29,636 29,636 8,305 8,305 1,015,121 1,815,129 1,185,908 813,749 38,641 38,641 53,836 441,441 - 183,080 45,754 181,354 196,248 423,175 196,247 423,174 100,000 6,795,6326 290,672 6,543,316 3,384,391 2,508,553 5,466,669 3,354,059 96,610,683 3,633,105 2,500,064 5,444,477 3,360,293 96,581,208 104,989 - - - 1,805,4516 145,452 13,092 274 - 1,762,697 - 116,550 - 116,550 8,606 8,474 10,000 32,998 1,799 50,000 6,592 18,018 16,645 15,625 4,298 4,298 37,000 36,093 515,556 517,058 40,637 3,460,419 40,637 3,460,417 - 311,201 - 311,201 184,615 160,614 584,949 579,568 - 70,000 - 67,723 - 138,100 42,940 35,631 167,916 766,958 191,855 766,896 - 872,949 7,866 873,489 723,243 793,243 725,502 793,225 210,000 398,100 254,668 339,831 5-10 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Sect. Project Funding FY89 FY 90 FY91 FY92 To 30 Sept 92 in Text. 15. Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads, VA (Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits) (Regular Funds) 16. Waterway on the Coast of VA (Regular Funds) 17. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization 18. Virginia Beach, VA (Regular Funds) 19. Cape Charles Shoreline, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization 21. James R. Olin Flood Control Project, VA (Regular Funds) 22. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (Regular Funds) 23. Richmond, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. Emergency Flood Control Activities 26. Surveys 27. Collection and Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Cost Cost Cost 518,000 536,031 473,500 494,000 472,765 495,662 308,000 7,780,324 306,574 7,778,631 - 850,498 - 850,498 996,215 999,506 62,088 513,000 157,402 20,000 4,797 4,797 899,530 898,584 1,271,274 16,722,833 877,747 921,795 1,218,254 16,666,041 67,249 76,993 140,830 - (14,000) 900,000 8,746,195 358,138 66,445 716,366 8,528,113 10,000 18,000 22,632 18,072 22,632 18,072 38,900 94,400 28,863 74,364 10,000 10,000 13,729 - 604,644 1,565,000 1,831,000 4,000,644 - 493,403 1,415,058 1,244,937 3,153,398 - - - - 80,970,527 - - - 80,970,527 1,086,000 1,214,736 989,537 1,357,721 13,845,158 1,159,993 1,221,310 981,540 1,362,875 13,833,550 3,800,000 19,562,999 22,700,000 3,339,978 13,717,076 28,159,456 26,813,000 77,042,000 27,533,293 76,663,089 90,012 3,019,978 5,494,337 5,515,000 14,019,326 - 2,908,710 4,176,021 6,105,961 13,190,692 174,385 210,475 199,488 407,392 550,842 1,000,046 712,350 492,259 154,051 5-11 248,829 133,214 150,078 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Sect. Project Funding FY89 FY 90 FY91 FY92 To 30 Sept 92 In Text. 1 Includes $292,096 for previous projects. 2 Includes $52,804 for previous projects. 3 Costs prior to 1942 are included in the project "Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD" (Baltimore District). Costs listed are for York Spit Channel, VA and Rappahannock Channel, VA. 4 Includes $445,291 military funds expended from new work dredging on existing project and $83,041 expended military funds for construction of a wharf. 5 Includes $763,000 for previous projects. 6 Excludes previous projects. See Annual Report for FY 1986. 5 -12 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1992 TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 3, 1871 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1909 June 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Mar. 2, 1945 APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep at mean high water and 60 feet wide. Diversion channel and work incidental thereto. increasing channel to width of 80 feet and maintenance of diversion works. Channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep at mean low water between mouth and Petersburg. Existing project dimensions. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) Mar. 3, 1899 Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, VA to sounds of North Carolina July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) July 3, 1930 Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 June 26, 1934 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors Mar. 2, 1945 Construct dikes for protection of canal property against floodtides BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 3 of Text) CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) July 3, 1958 Channel 42 feet deep; 1,000 feet wide Dec. 31, 1970 Channel depth increased to 50 feet RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) July 3, 1958 Channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide Dec. 31, 1970 Channel width increased to 1,000 feet and depth increased to 50 feet Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet Channel depth increased to 37 feet Channel depth increased to 39 feet Channel depth increased to 42 feet Channel depth increased to 50 feet July 14, 1960 BENNETTS CREEK, VA (See Section 4 of Text) (Sec. 107) Existing Project Approved in 1992 June 25, 1910 Aug 8, 1917 Jan 21, 1927 Oct27th 1965 Oct 17, 1986 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40- feet deep, 800 feet wide, two deep-draft anchorage Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA (See Section 6 of Text) Existing Project CRANES CREEK, VA (See Section 7 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 Entrance Channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide Annual Report 1874, pt. 11 p. 54 H. Doc. 139, 56 Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1901, p. 1467 H. Doc. 952, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 215, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 223, 76th Cong., 1st sess.(1) H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong., 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 3rd sess. AR 1899 H. Doc. 391, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 589, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 23, 71st Cong., 1st sess.1 Not available H. Doc. 117, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept, 21, 1970 H. Doc. 186, 57th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 190, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 29, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 Unpublished Report H. Doc. 550, 61st cong.,2nd sess. H. Doc. 486, 67th Cong., 4th sess. H. Doc. 143, 89th Cong., 2nd sess. Approved in 1972 H. Doc. 687, 76th Cong., 3d sess. 5-13 TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 8 of Text) May 17, 1950 Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton Roads and specified in Act its tributary waters JAMES RIVER, VA (See Section 9 of Text) July 5, 1884 Channel 22 feet deep from mouth of Richmond and construct spur and training dikes June 13, 1902 Extension of improvement to Richmond lock gate Mar. 3, 1905 Form a turning basin by widening channel at Richmond July 3, 1930 Channel 25 feet deep mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Aug. 26, 1937 Removal of Trigg cofferdam Mar. 2, 1945 Turning basin at Richmond Harbor May 17, 1950 Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Oct. 23, 1962 Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal NEWPORT NEWS CREEK (See Section 10 of Text) July 24, 1946 Existing project Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 NORFOLK HARBOR CHANNEL, VA (See Section 11 of Text) HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal 45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk International Terminal to Lambert Point Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet deep SOUTHERN BRANCH June 25, 1910 Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet Aug. 8, 1917 Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line RR Bridge Mar. 30, 1925 Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia RR bridge: thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR bridge Aug. 30, 1935 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a turning basin 500 feet square June 30, 1948 Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard: thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a turning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end Oct. 27, 1965 45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge, 35-foot deep turning basin opposite St. Julians Creek Oct. 22, 1976 Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen existing 40-foot portions to 45-feet deep Deepen portion of the 35-foot, from mile point 15 to Gilmerton Bridge, to 40 feet deep Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 EASTERN BRANCH Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet Removal of shoals at mouth Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley 5-14 S. Ex. Doc. 714, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 68 74th Cong., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. J. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 182, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 373, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71st Cong., 1st sess. 3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1992 TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella bridge Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 WESTERN BRANCH Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge SCOTTS CREEK July 3, 1930 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept, 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 3, 1934 (P.W,A,Act) & Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) July 14, 1960- (Sec. 107) ANCHORAGES 30-foot anchorage at Lambert Point 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1,200-foot swinging radius Construct a 55-foot anchorage and increase the radius to 1500 feet for an existing 45-foot anchorage TANGIER CHANNEL, VA (See Section 12 of Text) Channel from Tangier Sound and anchorage Modified project deminsions Channel across Tangier Island TYLERS BEACH, VA. (See Section 13 of Text) Existing Project Jetty Modification RUDEE INLET, VA (See Section 14 of Text) Jul 14, 1960 Project Authorized (Sec. 107) Existing Project Approved in 1986 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 5, 1992 Jul. 24, 1946 (Sec. 14) Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 5, 1992 WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 16 of Text) Existing project adopted Project modified VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (See Section 18 of Text) Project authorized Project modified Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Project Modified Participation after Feb. 6, 1987 Cost Sharing H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 556, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess.1 S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.1 H. Docs. 187 & 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 107, 63rdCong., 1st sess. River harbors Comm. Doc. 51, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 141, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1964 Approved in 1966 Approved in 1981 Unpublished Report H. Doc. 957, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 186, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 382, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 365, 92nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 216, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. CAPE CHARLES SHORELINE, VA (See Section 19 of Text) Existing Project Approved in 1992 Unpublished Report JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, VA (See Section 21 of Text) (Formerly BUENA VISTA, VA) Project authorized Chief of Engineers Report, July 27, 1990 Name of Project Changed GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA (See Section 22 of Text) July 24, 1946 Project authorized H. Doc. 325, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. RICHMOND, VA (See Section 23 of Text) Existing project H. Doc. 178, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. 5-15 Aug. 15, 1985 TABLE 5-C Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1992 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 2 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Length Depth on Width Available Miter Sills Year Miles of for Full Character Opened Construction From Location Chamber Width Lift Upper Lower of to Cost Norfolk, VA feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Navigation 12.4 Albemarle and 75 600 2.7 1 1 Piles in sand 1932 $499,913 Chesapeake Canal and shells (Great Bridge, VA) 10.7 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 12 Natural earth 1940 $348,879 Canal (Deep Creek) with cutoff walls 33.1 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 13 Natural earth 1941 $373,226 Canal with cutoff walls (South Mills, NC) 116 feet at mean low water. 5-16 TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For 1992 Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Aberdeen Creek, VA 1975 109,643 221,827 Appomattox River, VA 1 1992 $870,341 4,794,436- Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA 1991 608,255 -- Bennett Creek, VA 1992 442,602 - 104,621 Blackwater River, VA Active portion2 10 1975 342,118 181,317 19,300 Broad Creek, VA2 1986 27,888 684,156 500 Cape Charles, VA 1989 622,644 2,449,473 Carters Creek, VA Active portion2 3 1951 28,398 3,277- Channel to Newport News, VA 1992 4,097,117 7,105,145 4,965,108 Channel from Phoebus, VA to deepwater in Hampton Roads2 1944 11,500 64,919 1,200 Channel connecting York River, VA Back Creek to Slaights Wharf2 1950 14,855 38,634 2,500 Chesconessex Creek, VA2 1968 25,516 43,775- Chincoteague Bay, VA 1984 25,126 499,340- Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA 1985 49,396 217,592 Chowan River, NC2 1975 107,220 - 5,700 Cockrells Creek, VA4 1949 - -- Cranes Creek, VA 1992 6,274 639,871- Davis Creek, VA 2 1971 97,612 213,105 4,000 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., VA 1974 83,000 142,907- Deep Creek, Newport News, VA2 1991 288,278 3,271,714- Dymers Creek, VA2 1953 5,582 4,610- Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA 1988 68,656 - 7,763 Greenvale Creek, VA 1991 20,003 609,112- Hampton Creek, VA 1989 186,237 1,219,638 62,969 Horn Harbor, VA2 1990 13,987 346,230- Hoskins Creek, VA2 1990 44,100 1,608,896 500 Jackson Creek, VA2 1971 8,500 36,486- Jarvis Creek, VA4 1979 39,259 - Kings Creek, VA4 1957 5,593 -- Lafayette River, VA2 1982 242,047 364,452 188,962 Little Machipongo River, VA 1990 211,990 533,700 1,211 Little River (Creek), VA212 1966 168,623 520,995 16,955 Locklies Creek, VA2 1928 11,581 64,517 Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 1991 459,612 2,984,952- Mattaponi River, VA 1971 83,836 209,040 Meherrin River, VA 1987 47,734 54,764 Miliford Haven. VA 1950 24,568 33,001 Mill Creek, VA 1937 5,445 21,536- Mulberry Creek, VA2 1950 2,393 2,458 Nandua Creek, VA2 1950 6,988 91,265 Nansemond River, VA6 1978 167,477 499,555 Newport News Creek, VA2 1992 181,354 423,174- Nottoway River, VA2 1986 44,295 8,734 43,000 Occohannock Creek, VA Active portion2 1951 13,859 92,044- Onancock River, VA25 1963 187,914 492,703- Oyster Channel, VA2 1991 119,117 756,517 Pagan River, VA2 6 1950 51,425 311,612 Pamunkey River. VA Active portion 1964 31,376 161,183 Parker Creek, VA 1991 15,530 559,767 Parrotts Creek, VA2 1957 37,045 54,575 Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot2 1947 165,566 66,162 Queens Creek2 1991 26,949 397,274 Quinby Creek, VA 1991 104,176 1,484,027 Rappahannock River, VA 9 1 1 1983 414,633 1,962,057 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, VA4 1950 - - Starlings Creek, VA 1991 66,242 1,095,549 Tangier Channels, VA 1992 116,550 3,460,417 Taskinas Creek, VA 1975 7,479 135 Thimble Shoal Channel, VA13 1991 17,934,772 14,789,255 3,459,868 Totuskey Creek, VA 1970 167,869 451,293 2,000 Tylers Beach Harbor, VA2 1982 311,201 766,896- 5-17 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1992 TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds 1992 Urbanna Creek, VA 2 7 1963 55,724 113,300 Whitings Creek, VA 1990 21,630 405,720 500 Winter Harbor, VA2 1981 171,334 337,178 2,973 Willoughby Channel, VA2 1953 8,500 67,319- Wishart Point Channel, VA2 1975 118,762 102,527 30,625 York River, VA Active portion2 1986 180,904 302,068 1lncludes $22,500 for previous projects. 8In addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 2Completed. 9lncludes $197,146 for previous new work projects. 31n addition, $700 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. 1 lncludes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. 45Innaclcutidvees. 11ncludes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for pre- 12Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work vious projects. 131n addition, $143,000 for maintenance was expended from contributed 61ncludes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. funds. In addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation TABLE 5-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintence 1992 Contributed Funds Anderson Park, Newport News, VA 1979 $471,474 632 $176,671 Hampton Institute, VA 1976 $156,906 1,589 $175,845 Rapidan River, Orange, VA 1984 45,000 - - Saxis Island, VA 1987 $273,600 - $ 3,145 Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA 1990 $2,478,825 1,812 1,379,371 TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds 1992 Newmarket Creek, VA 1970 1,000,000 13,295 $550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, VA 1973 1,851,933 40,342 516,256 Richmond Filtration Plant, VA 1985 478,2241 Scottsville, VA 1989 3,431,746 7,725 32,954 Virginia Beach Canal No. 2, VA 1990 4,692,063 48,785 216,596 1 Preconstruction planning terminated. 5-18 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5G RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MO Aberdeen Creek Atlantic Ocean Channel Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway: Deep Creek Dismal Swamp Canal Baltimore Harbor and Channels: Cape Henry Rappahannock Shoal Channel York Spit Channel Broad Creek, Middlesex Co. Cape Charles City Harbor Channel connecting York River with Back Creek to Slaights Wharf Chesconessex Creek Davis Creek Deep Creek, Accomack Co. Hoskins Creek James River: Jordon Point to Windmill Point Richmond Deepwater Terminal to Hopewell Richmond Deepwater Terminal Rocklanding Shoal Channel Tribell Shooal Lynnhaven Inlet Onancock River Nansemond River: Western Branch Norfolk Harbor: Southern Branch Western Branch Starlings Creek Tangier Channels Whitings Creek Whitings Creek Willoughby Channel NTHIYEAR TYPE OF SURVEY Oct 91 Oct 91 Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Jun 92 Mar 92 Aug 92 Oct 91 Sep 92 May 92 Aug 92 Nov 91 Jun 92 Jul 92 May 92 Apr 92 Jan Dec Jul Feb May Mar Sep Reconnaissance Condition Condition Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Condition Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance 92 91 92 92 92 92 92 May 92 Nov 91 Dec 91 Sep 92 Aug 92 Nov 91 Sep 92 Jun 92 Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition 5 -19 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT* This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those portions of the Yadkin- Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Actof 1965).........................6-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (Wilmington District).............. 6-2 3. Beaufort Harbor, N. C........................6-4 4. Cape Fear River, N. C. Above Wilmington...... 6-4 5. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C.........................6-5 6. Drum Inlet, N. C............................6-5 7. Far Creek, N. C............................6-5 8. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C................ 6-5 9. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C.. .......... 6-6 10. Morehead City Harbor, N. C...................6-7 11. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C..................6-7 12. Rollinson Channel, N. C......................6-8 13. Shallotte River, N. C ............ ............ 6-8 14. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C.....................6-8 15. Stumpy Point Bay, N. C....................6-9 16. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C...................6-9 17. Wilmington Harbor, N. C....................6-9 Flood Control 18. Cape Fear River Basin, N. C................ 6-10 18A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C........ 6-11 18B. Randleman Lake, N. C.................. 6-11 19. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C.......... 6-11 20. Neuse River Basin, N. C.................. 6-12 20A. Falls Lake, N. C...........................6-12 21. Hamlet City Lake, N. C......................6-13 22. Lower Creek, Lenoir, N. C...............6-13 23. Neuse River, Oriental, N. C............... 6-14 24. Roanoke River Upper Basin, Va.- Headwaters Area.....................6-14 Page 25. Yadkin River Basin, N. C. and S. C............6-14 25A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C................ ............ 6-15 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.....................6-15 27. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization....................... 6-15 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 28. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N. C.. ..... 6-15 28A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N .C................. .............. 6-15 28B. Philpott Lake, Va...........................6-16 29. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations......................6-16 General Investigations 30. 31. 32. Surveys..................................6-17 Collection and Study of Basic Data...........6-18 Preconstruction Engineering and Design....... 6-18 Tables Page Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement.......... 6-19 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation.............. 6-23 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................6-26 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects..................... 6-27 Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...... ...................... 6-28 6-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Tables Page Table 6-F Not Applicable Table 6-G Deauthorized Projects................ 6-29 Table 6-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys.................... 6-30 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization................. 6-30 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs................ 6-31 Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................ 6-32 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the program. Recon studies are 100 percent Federal. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Operations for FY 92 included chemical control on about 66 river miles of alligatorweed (about 15 treatment acres), biological control of hydrilla at 1 lake (25 acres of hydrilla), and monitoring of biological control of hydrilla at 8 sites stocked with triploid grass carp in previous years. All alligatorweed control in FY 92 was by the application of rodeo herbicide. All treatment sites are under maintenance control. Control sites include the Scuppernong Basin (5 acre/21 river miles), Little River Basin (1 acre/9 river miles), Pasquotank River Basin (2.5 acres/14 river miles), Alligator River Basin (4 acres/9 river miles), Lumber River Basin (4 acres/21 river miles) and Mackeys Creek (.5 acres/? river miles). No new alligatorweed treatment areas were added to the program in FY 92. One hydrilla biological control site, Brier Creek Reservoir (a 500 acre impoundment with 25 acres of hydrilla) was stocked with triploid grass carp in FY 92. About 5 acres of hydrilla in Lake Crabtree were treated with aquatic herbicide in FY 92. Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp to determine the effectiveness of the stocking and predict future control was continued in FY 92. Condition at end of fiscal year. All alligatorweed treatment sites under maintenance control in FY 92 are expected to remain under maintenance control. A biennial treatment schedule in some maintenance level alligatorweed control sites implemented in FY 92 will continue in FY 93. Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp indicates that overall our biological control efforts have been effective. Supplemental stocking has been required to achieve control in some sites. Restocking on at least a once every 5-year basis is expected to be required to maintain weed control in these sites. Investigations of aquatic weed problems, in response to requests by county governments and muncipalities, may result in the addition of new treatment sites and species in future years. All planning efforts in FY 92 were at the reconnaissance level and included ongoing work for the expansion of the program for inclusion of new treatment areas. Operations were accomplished for a Federal cost of $44,085. Planning was accomplished at a Federal cost of $3,145. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwaterintrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New 6-2 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville Beach by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Joseph P. Knapp (formerly Coinjock) bridges was authorized in October 1976. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding at Core Creek, Hobucken, and Fairfield bridges was authorized in November 1986. Estimated Federal cost is $69,497,000 (1992). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut was deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. The 12-foot-deep channel in Peltier Creek was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The 12-foot deep channel modification to New River was deauthorized January 1, 1990, under Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. The jetties at Masonboro Inlet are complete except for the training wall. The training wall has an estimated Federal cost of $3,470,000 (1992). The wall was reclassified to the "inactive" category on August 14, 1992. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Acts of 1976 and 1986 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for all five bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of Core Creek Bridge was continued at a cost of $5,087,639. Design of Hobucken Bridge was continued at a cost of $603,966. Design of Fairfield Bridge was continued at a cost of $219,129. Work in connection with the completion of Joseph P. Knapp Bridge resulted in a negative cost of $25,546. Work in connection with the General Design Memorandum for the Masonboro Inlet jetties cost $38. Maintenance: Through Channel -During intermitent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $116,901. Between November 30, 1991, and February 1, 1992, the contract dredge Jekyll Island removed 231, 268 cubic yards from shoals in Inlet Crossings at a cost of $1,577,626. Between December 6, 1991, and January 13, 1992, the contract dredge Marion removed 129,337 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $410,613. Between January 13 and May 1, 1992, the contract dredge Juanita B removed 327,289 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $595,603. Between January 27 and April 10, 1992, the contract dredge Stuart removed 245,596 cubic yards from shoals in Inlet Crossings at a cost of $949,058. Removal of ordnance in connection with prior year pipeline dredging of the AIWW-Wilmington District thru Camp Lejeune, N. C., between Brown and Bear Inlets, cost $9,479. Design cost for future year maintenance dredging was $1,354. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $36,000. Archeological investigations of sounds and inlets cost $74. Condition and operation studies cost $508,812. Interim inspection of three remaining bridges cost $1,949. Longterm environmental dredging and monitoring study cost $1,524. Master Plan supplement for Snow's Cut cost $10,921. Three highway bridges and utilties were operated and maintained at a cost of $620,209. Design cost changes for future year pipeline dredging cost $5,930. Environmental Review Guide for Operations (ERGO) investigations cost $2,500. Bogue Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 119,042 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $480,892. Condition and operation 6-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 studies cost $24,062. Carolina Beach Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. debis boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilties at a cost of $34,823. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 57,956 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $264,587. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Curritusck removed 110,937 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $290,252. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 74,081 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $267,994. Monitoring of Carolina Beach Inlet cost $14,025. Condition and operation studies cost $23,333. Masonboro Inlet - Work in connection with prior year pipeline dredging Masonboro Inlet and Banks Channel cost $31. Condition and operation studies cost $294. Preparation of the rehabilitation report for the north jetty at Masonboro Inlet was continued at a cost of $48,851. Monitoring at Masonboro Inlet cost $35,736. New River Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 154,168 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $478,359. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 84,231 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $237,600. Condition and operation studies cost $35,192. New Topsail Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $2,489. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 36,981 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $151,900. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 22,689 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $79,226. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 77,883 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $491,050. Between April 11 thru 25,1992, the contract dredge Stuart removed 75,519 cubic yards from shoals in Banks Channel at a cost of $177,830. Archeological investigations cost $1,266. Conditions and operation studies cost $23,342. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in November 1986 except for the training wall, three tie-up dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the three remaining bridges. The construction contract for Core Creek Bridge was awarded September 27, 1991, with completion scheduled for June 1994. Design of Hobucken and Fairfield Bridges was continued. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992, was $165,589,642, of which $50,958,277 was for new work including $86,851 in contributed funds and $114,631,365 was for maintenance, including $667,300 in contributed funds. 3. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; a channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-footlong section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 7.3 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $16,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965 except for the Morgan Creek modification which was completed November 12, 1983. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1992, were $827,040 for new work, including $34,000 contributed funds and $4,050,182 for maintenance, including $326,225 contributed funds, a total of $4,877,222. 4. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared and maintained the buoy systems at the locks at a cost of $194,430. Periodic inspections of locks and dams cost $2,561. Slope failure repairs at Lock and Dams 1 and 2 cost $79,954. Repairs at lock gates of Lock and Dams 1 and 2 cost $89,638. Investigation of slope failure in new rip-rap at Lock and Dam 2 cost $4,118. Between October 25, 1991 and March 29, 1992, the contract dredge Long Bay removed 33,088 cubic yards from shoals in the Cape Fear River above Wilmington at a cost of $90,968. Environmental compliance assessments cost $5,408. Conditions and operation studies cost $124,270. Operation and Maintenance of three locks and dams cost $304,719. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1992, were $20,874,094 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $17,263,640 for maintenance. 5. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N. C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937, and March 2, 1945. For details see Annual Report for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between December 17, 1991 and January 14, 1992, the contract dredge Richmond removed 54,900 cubic yards from shoals in the Channel at a cost of $123,910. Adjustment in prior year pipeline dredging costs resulted in a negative cost of $2,444. Conditions and operation studies cost $4,834. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 6. DRUM INLET, N. C. Location. Drum Inlet is an opening through the barrier beach which separates Core Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. It is about 1,100 feet wide and is about 35 miles northeast of Beaufort and opposite the village of Atlantic. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1233 and 419.) Existing project. The project provides for a channel 12 feet deep at a mean low water and 200 feet wide from the gorge in the inlet to the Federally improved channel in Core Sound, about 1 mile. The mean range tide is 3.8 feet in the ocean and 0.3 foot in Core Sound at Atlantic. The project also provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 9 feet deep from the gorge in the inlet to deep water in the Atlantic Ocean. The Core Sound portion of the project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of June 20, 1938. (H.D. 414, 75th Cong., 2nd sess.) The channel from the inlet to the Atlantic Ocean was authorized under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $683. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in February 1972. The feasibility of resuming maintenance is under investigation. 7. FAR CREEK, N.C. Location. Flows easterly from Engelhard into Pamlico Sound, about 95 miles south of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 80 to 100 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to highway bridge at Engelhard, with a turning basin 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide � and 900 feet long at the head. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and May 17, 1950. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Project is served by 12 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,300 feet, all privately owned. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging was $5,650. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed June 1957. 8. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep 6-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for a distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interests must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in groundwater levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers and, (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $2,489. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 116,058 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly River at a cost of $476,755. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 55,665 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly River at a cost of $132,000. Archeological investigations in Lockwoods Folly River cost $308. Design cost for future year pipeline dredging in Lockwoods Folly River was $7,163. Conditions and operation studies cost $44,739. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 9. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot-deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deep water near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12-foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $77,700,000 (1992). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) and establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (i) pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreational navigation presently estimated at $8,088,000, 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreational navigation facilities presently estimated at $1,125,000 annually; (j) pay 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation during construction presently estimated at $7,712,000; (k) pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas presently estimated at $6,800,000. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for the modification continued at a cost of $140,724. Monitoring of the terminal groin built by the State of North Carolina cost $12,156. Additional engineering and design work is being accomplished under preconstruction engineering and design. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell maintained dredging ranges and mooring dolphins at a cost of $12,989. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 602,896 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $1,447,036. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 66,899 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $184,445. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 88,802 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $344,552. Between October 1 and November 5, 1991, the contract dredge Adco removed 94,331 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $709,522. Between July 25 and September 5, 1992, the contract dredge Georgia removed 900,592 cubic yards from shoals in the vicinity of Oregon Inlet at a cost of $3,042,914. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging in Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese was $24,954. Cost in connection with prior year maintenance dredging in the ocean bar was $119,238. Design cost for future year pipeline dredging in Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese was $5,141. Expansion of dispoal island cost $5,076. Environmental coordination for realignment of intersection from Old House Channel to the inlet cost $6,857. Project monitoring cost $21,284. Conditions and operation studies cost $176,391. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) 10. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. The authorized project provides for deepening of the channel, from the 42-foot-depth contour in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar to the gorge in Beaufort Inlet, to 42 feet over a bottom width of 450 feet, thence to a depth of 40 feet in the east leg of the turning basin including the 1,200-foot diameter turning area, with widths of 600 feet in the cutoff channel, and 400 feet wide to the turning basin and connecting shallow-draft channels. Project deepening was completed on August 2, 1978. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The jetties were deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. In general the project as it now exists was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st sess.) and the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between December 1, 1991, and February 20, 1992, the contract dredge Eagle 1 removed 831,637 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $1,653,281. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging of the inner harbor was $172,154 and contributed funds cost was $18,355. Design cost for future year pipeline dredging cost $56. Monitoring at Morehead City Harbor cost $17,852. Ocean dumping monitoring in conjunction with EPA cost $6,637. Conditions and operation studies cost $121,020. Condtion at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1992, was $56,768,970 of which $6,501,569 was for new work (including $553,477 public works funds) and $50,267,401 for maintenance, including $1,373,330 contributed funds. 11. PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, N. C. Location. The two names apply to the same river, known as the Tar above and as the Pamlico below Washington, N. C. This stream rises in Person County, flows southeasterly 180 miles to Washington, thence 38 miles to Pamlico Sound. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 537.) Previous project. For details see page 502 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from 12-foot contour in the river below Washington to Atlantic Coastline Railroad bridge at Washington; thence 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, 300 feet long, in Hardee Creek, 1,500 feet above its mouth; thence 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide to Greenville; thence 20 inches deep, 60 feet wide to Tarboro; and thence to clear the natural chan- 6-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 nel to Little Falls. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876; March 3,1879; August 11, 1888; March 2,1907; July 25,1912; July 3,1930; and August 26, 1937. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 54 wharves on the portion of this river under improvement, of which 34 are along the waterfront at Washington, 19 between Washington and the mouth, and only 1 in usable condition above Washington. They have a frontage of 3,570 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between October 1 thru 3 and October 7 and 8, 1991, the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared at a cost of $24,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. (For details see Annual Report for 1962.) 12. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935; March 2,1945; September 3, 1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between February 18 and 26, 1992, the contract dredge Richmond removed 19,147 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $184,640. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed August 22, 1966. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 13. SHALLOTTE RIVER, N. C. Location. A small stream in Brunswick County, N. C., rising in the large swamp country between Cape Fear and Waccamaw Rivers, known as Green Swamp. Stream is about 30 miles long and flows southerly into Atlantic Ocean and 20 miles west of mouth of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 835.) Previous project. For details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 36 feet wide from the mouth to town of Shallotte. Section under improvement is 9 miles long. River is tidal, range varying from 5 feet at mouth to 3 feet at Shallotte. Hurricane Hazel in 1954 caused a tide about 16 feet above mean sea level in the river at Shallotte Point. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, and January 21, 1927. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A marine railway and shop at Shallotte Point and another in town of Shallotte with facilities for building and repairing boats up to about 60 feet long. On Shallotte River, there are 17 docks varying from 16 to 321 feet of frontage, providing 1,334 feet of wharf and docking space. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Design cost for future years pipeline dredging of Shallotte River was $9,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 1929. 14. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 8 and April 28, 1992, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 215,204 cubic yards from shoals in Bigfoot Slough at a cost of $653,748. Conditions and operation studies cost $27,252. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 6-8 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 15. STUMPY POINT BAY, N. C. Location. On southeastern side of the mainland, Dare County, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. A channel 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Pamlico Sound to a basin in the harbor at Lake Worth, 75 to 100 feet wide, 550 feet long and 10 feet deep, plus an irregularly shaped area providing access to the public wharf, together with protective breakwaters at entrance to the harbor. Project was authorized by 1948 River and Harbor Act and under Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Bulkheads in existing basin provide about 550 linear feet of berthing space, and a wholesale fishhouse provides about 250 feet. Part of the space along the bulkheads is publicly owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, but any appreciable increase will require additional facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between January 26 and February 29, 1992, the contract dredge Richmond removed 159,187 cubic yards from shoals at a federal cost of $392,900 and $135,000 contributed funds. Work in connection with condition and operation studies cost $797. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed on September 20, 1967. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1966.) 16. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between November 16, 1991 and January 14, 1992, the contract dredge Richmond removed 128,150 cubic yards from shoals at a cost of $486,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 17. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River; a 38-footdeep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. A modification to widen the existing anchorage basin by 100 feet was authorized on July 13, 1982, under Sec. 5 of the Cong. Appro. Act of March 4, 1915. A modification to widen the 38-foot by 400-foot Fourth East Jetty Channel to 500 feet; deepen the 32-foot by 400-foot channel between Castle Street and the N. C. 133 bridge to 35 feet; widen the 32-foot by 1000-foot by 800-foot turning basin just above the mouth of the Northeast Cape Fear River by 50 feet on the west side and deepen to 35 feet; and environmental improvements to include acquiring, by easements or fee title, about 2,800 acres of wetlands, river bluffs and ecotones and provision for a minimum number of specially designed corridors across the wetlands for industrial access to the river was authorized by the Water Resources 6-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Development Act of November 17, 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal cost is $14,300,000. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for latest modification. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must (1) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas including necessary retaining dikes presently estimated at $1,046,000, and bear all operation and maintenance costs for dikes presently estimated at $5,000 annually; (2) modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project, presently estimated at $14,436,000; (3) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction presently estimated at $3,353,000 and reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (which is entirely offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas; and (4) pay 25 percent of the first costs allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement presently estimated at $1,425,000, and pay 25 percent of the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $15,000 annually. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. (For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of. Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between November 23, and December 19, 1991, the contract dredge Illinois deposited 442,325 cubic yards of sand on Bald Head Island under Section 933 at a contributed funds cost of $246,261. Between November 23, 1991, and February 14,1992, contract dredges Padre Island, Manhatten Island and Northerly Island moved 1,051,323 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $2,711,961. Between February 1 and April 5, 1992, the contract dredges Enterprise and Hampton Roads removed 1,027,326 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin at a federal cost of $1,920,459 and 88,311 cubic yards from shoals at the State Ports at a contributed funds cost of $226,076. Between March 12 and April 6,1992, the contract dredge Carolina removed rock from the ocean bar at a federal cost of $2,586,658 and a State Ports contributed funds cost of $252,343. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging of the anchorage basin was $11,010 federal and $6,224 State Ports contributed funds. Design for repairs to dikes at Eagle Island was performed at a contributed funds cost of $45,238. During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $308,957. Design cost for future year pipeline dredging in the anchorage basin was $7,271. Design cost for future year ocean bar dredging was $3,194. National Ocean Survey Tidal Datum Determination cost $1,255. Environmental analysis of proposed dredged material disposal sites cost $13,554. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $77,804. Rock investigations at Cape Fear River entrance cost $9,200. Hilton Wreck damage assessment site documentation cost $105,043. Section 933 dredge material study for Bald Head Island cost $745. Ocean Bar Reevaluation Report and rock dredging study cost $16,519. Endangered species study cost $69,399. Conditions and operation studies cost $407,042. Environmental Review Gide for Operations (ERGO) investigations cost $6,907. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed October 1982 except for latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1992, was $98,911,889 or which $14,089,612 was for new work and $78,924,351 was for maintenance, including $5,897,926 contributed funds. The remaining uncompleted portion of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945, was deauthorized in accordance with Section 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. Flood Control 18. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. The study was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1990, and Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in October 1980 due to the current lack of economic justification. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 6-10 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 18A. B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N.C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 753,500 acre-feet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated cost for new work is $146,200,000 (1992), consisting of $87,795,000 for construction, and $58,405,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30, 1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,700,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $46,000 annually; and contribute toward the cost of the ranger security buildings, an amount presently estimated at $43,000. A contract between the State of N. C. and the United States for water supply storage space was executed by ASA (CW) on April 10, 1988. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $806,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hope Overlook recreation area was continued at a cost of $1,034,412. Robeson Creek recreation area was continued at a cost of $293,326. Total Federal expenditures were $1,902,208, including above items. Adjustments in costs of maintenance center ranger security building resulted in a contributed funds cost of $5,567. Status of plans and specs: Rivers End, 98 percent and Wilderness Island O&M roads, 95 percent. Maintenance: Periodic inspection cost $1,255. Sedimentation resurveys cost $12,134. expenditures were $4,490,985, including the above items. $14,711. Replacement of management center septic system cost $14,804. Environmental Review Guide for Operations (ERGO) investigations cost $16,307. Automatic gate control system and piezometer reading equipment cost $3,498. Normal operation and maintenance cost $924,317. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $79,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. All facilities are basically complete expect for recreation facilities and project operations facilities. Impoundment was completed in February 1982 with dedication on May 1, 1982. Project completion is scheduled for June 1993. 18B. RANDLEMAN LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on Deep River, N. C., about 15 miles south of Greensboro and about 2 miles upstream from the town of Randleman. The damsite and about two-thirds of the reservoir would lie in Randolph County. The upper one-third of the reservoir would lie in Guilford County. Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of an earth dam 2,300 feet long with a maximum height of 110 feet above the streambed to create a reservoir with gross storage of 108,000 acre-feet, consisting of 46,000 acre-feet for flood control and a conservation pool of 62,000 acre-feet for water supply, water-quality control and sedimentation. Randleman Lake is the second project of the comprehensive plan of development for the Cape Fear River Basin, providing reservoir storage for flood control, water supply, and recreation. Estimated cost of new work is $124,000,000 (1992), consisting of $62,300,000 for construction and $61,700,000 for lands and damages, including relocations. The existing project was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (H.D. 343, 90th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Based on the termination of Federal interest in the project by the ASA(CW), no local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project coordination cost $217. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed in FY 1982. The Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority is building a water supply and possible recreation facility at Randleman. All pertinent data that may be useful in the construction has been provided. The project was reclassified to the deferred category in April 1992 due to the current lack of economic justification. 19. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of a dune with a base generally bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 31,800 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach; initial deposition of sufficient material north of Carolina Beach to serve as a feeder beach; and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 10 years from the year of completion of initial placement. Along the northern 6-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 2,050 feet, the project includes a rock revetment at elevation 12 fronted by a 130-foot-wide berm at elevation 8. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the actin category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $139,349,000 (1992). The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for 50 years. This cost for the Carolina Beach portion is not included. However, these costs will be included upon completion of the reevaulation report. Local cooperation. For the Carolina Beach portion, local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. For the Area South portion, local interests must: (a) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including borrow areas; (b) pay 35 percent of the first costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of hurricane and storm damage reduction facilities; (c) contribute, in cash, 35 percent of the total project cost; (d) inform affected interests of the limitation of the protection afforded by the project no less than once each year; (e) assure that water pollution which would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted to the extent of its power; (f) assure the continued public ownership of the above shore and its administration for public use during the 50 year economic life of the project; (g) to the extent of its powers, prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords or that would hinder operation or maintenance; and (h) provide and maintain necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: An economic reanalysis of the area south of Carolina Beach was continued at a cost of $427,154. An economic reanalysis of the Carolina Beach portion was initiated at a cost of $167,164. Final cost and adjustments in cost sharing for project renourishment in FY 1991 resulted in a decrease in Federal cost of $40,716 and an increase in contributed funds cost of $42,947. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was completed August 12, 1982, except for grassing which was completed in September 1983. The second increment of renourishment was completed in May 1988. The third increment of renourishment was completed in July 1991. 20. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1989. 20A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 95 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100 feet wide, is located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 374,450 acre-feet, of which 243,050 acre-feet is for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 61,330 acre-feet for water quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $183,000,000 (1992) consisting of $88,564,000 for construction and $94,436,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $13,900,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $105,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $20,600,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,445,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non- Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Wildlife subimpoundments were completed at a cost of $83,751. Holly Point recreation area was initiated at a cost of $618,150. Beaverdam recreation area was continued at a cost of $1,302,781. B. W. Wells and Shinleaf recreation areas were continued at a cost of $1,446,182. Total Federal expenditures were $4,490,985, including the above items. Status of plans and specs: Dam Fix, 90 percent; and Modifications to Miscellaneous Recreation Areas, 90 percent. Maintenance: Periodic inspection cost $15,850. Seismologic evaluation report cost $14,182. Intake tower gate maintenance cost $32,507. Flood gate indication and control system cost $55,673. Normal operation and maintenance cost $879,995. Maintenance and operations of dams cost $79,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30, 1983. All facilities are basically complete except for fish and wildlife facilities, recreation facilities, 0 & M facilities and project modifications due to the water storage shortage. Project completion is scheduled for July 1994. 21. HAMLET CITY LAKE, HAMLET, N. C. Location. The project is located on Marks Creek within the city limits of Hamlet, N. C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Hamlet, N. C.) Existing project. A small earth dam constructed in the 1930's under the WPA Program impounds the shallow 50-acre lake. Much of the City's storm runoff empties into the lake and has contributed significantly to a sediment problem. Local interests desire removal of accumulated sediment and debris including construction of sediment traps and providing other devices or equipment to prevent and abate the further deposit of sediment. Results from the bottom sampling and testing program show that contaminants are much more widespread than originally estimated. The final scope of the project is being negotiated with the project sponsor. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $3,200,000 (1992). The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Sec. 206, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must pay 25 percent of the total cost of the project estimated at $1,070,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning, engineering, and design was continued at a cost of $210,354. Condition at end of fiscal year. Sediment testing was completed. Proposed project was drafted and sent to project sponsor for review. 22. LOWER CREEK, LENOIR, N. C. Location. The project is located in northwest North Carolina near the city of Lenoir in Caldwell County and is approximately 60 miles northwest of Charlotte and approximately 60 miles northeast of Asheville. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Lenoir, N. C.) Existing project. The authorized project involves about 1.4 miles of Lower Creek and .4 miles of Zacks Fort Creek of channel widening with a combination of trapezoidal and bench channel design. The improved channel bottom widths range from 50 to 75 feet, roughtly doubling the size of the existing channel. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction is $1,940,000 (1992). The project was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on September 4, 1991, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable disposal areas as may be determined by the Chief of Engineers to be necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the process of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of total project cost, estimated at $693,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash. The amount to be provided shall include the value of cost of all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and facility and utility alterations and relocations necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable excavated material disposal areas, as may be determined by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; at least annually inform affected interests that the channel will not provide complete flood protection and assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $5,000,000. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate planning was continued at a cost of $6,455. Engineering and design was continued at a cost of $24,040. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are substantially complete. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed in November 1991. The City of Lenoir has begun the rights-of-way acquisition. Contract award is scheduled for March 1994. 6-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 23. NEUSE RIVER, ORIENTAL, N. C. Location. The Town of Oriental, North Carolina, is located in the Neuse River Drainage Basin near the Pamlico Sound. The Hodges Street bulkhead is located at the head of the harbor which provides berthing facilities for transient craft as well as resident commercial vessels. The harbor is part of the Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), North Carolina, project which was dredged in 1956. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Oriental, N. C.) Existing project. The approved plan is for the replacement of 230 linear feet of existing timber bulkhead (Hodges Street Bulkhead) with a steel sheet-pile system and replacement of attendant features disturbed by construction. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 14, 1990, under Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas as determined by the Chief of Engineers to be necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to but not less than 25 percent of total project costs, at least 5 percent of which will be cash. This amount shall include the value or cost of all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and facility and utility alterations and relocations necessary for construction of the project, including suitable borrow and excavated material disposal areas, as may be determined by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army and assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Adjustments in cost-sharing cost resulted in a decrease in Federal cost of $2,705 and an increase in contributed funds cost of $2,979. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in December 1990 and was completed in July 1991. 24. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, VIRGINIA, HEADWATERS AREA Location. The project is located on the Roanoke River in the City of Roanoke, VA. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Roanoke, VA.) Existing project. The authorized plan includes about 6.4 miles of channel widening along the 10-mile project reach through the City of Roanoke, VA. Channel widening will be accomplished with the construction of a benched channel above the elevation of the average streamflow. Other flood damage reduction features include floodproofing at one location, training walls to prevent floodwater intrusion into low areas along the river (total length 7,200 feet), replacement of two low-level bridges with constrict streamflows and a flood warning system. Recreation facilities consist of a 5-mile recreation trail along the project reach and access and parking areas. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $21,800,000. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H.R. 6, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including spoil disposal areas presently estimated at $7,768,000; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project presently estimated at $2,508,000; pay 25 percent of the cost of flood warning system (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations) presently estimated at $10,000; pay 5 percent of the total cost allocated to flood control in cash in addition to all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $1,452,000; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation (partially offset by a credit for land, easements, rights-ofway and relocations) and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities presently estimated at $1,503,000; and pay 25 percent of the cost of non-structural floodproofing (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) presently estimated at $359,000. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate planning was continued at a cost of $9,172.Logperch monitoring was continued at a cost of $70,807. Planning, engineering and design was continued at a cost of $880,342. Condition at end of fiscal year. The contract for the flood warning system was completed in January 1991. The contract for the sewage treatment plant floodproofing was awarded in August 1991 and is scheduled for completion in January 1993. HTW investigations are being accomplished by the sponsor. Completion of the total project is scheduled for July 1997. 25. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24,1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authoriza- 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT tion established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the two-reservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 25A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acrefeet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Installation of underground fuel tanks cost $14,742. Replacement of management center cost $29,025. Liquefaction study cost $2,137. Indication and control system/flood gates cost $48,712. Archeological surveys cost $3,600. Commercial activities study of Natural Resources management functions cost $9,804. Revision of water control manual cost $169,712. Conversion of package plants to septic tile fields cost $25,232. Road paving cost $158,625. Environmental Review Guide for Operations (ERGO) investigations cost $27,879. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,392,457. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $79,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in August 1962. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1992: Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.; Gapway Swamp, Columbus County, N. C.; Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N. C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N. C.; New River, Onslow County, N. C.; Pungo Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; South Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Pungo River, Beaufort County, N. C.; Filberts Creek, Edenton, N. C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.; Pasquotank Dike, Pasquotank County, N. C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N. C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N. C.; Princeville Dike, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Swift Creek, Pitt County, N. C.; Carolina Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Wrightsville Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N. C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.; Black River, Harnett County, N. C.; Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.; Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.; Ararat River, Surry County, N. C.; South Mayo River, Stuart, Va; and Leith Creek, Scotland County, N. C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $13,000. Total cost to September 30, 1992, was $486,529, charged to operations. 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 6-K.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). National Emergency Preparedness Program cost $133,483. Disaster Preparedness Program cost $207,918. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 28. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Table 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 28A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, 6-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Estimated cost is $67,529,000 (1983) for construction and $24,521,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $92,050,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Replacement of shoreline bulkhead cost $19,022. Work in connection with acquisition of land in South Boston area cost $1,209. Archeological salvage at Satterwhite Point Historic Site cost $3,332. Replacement of the powerhouse computer was continued at a cost of $1,667. Periodic inspection of the dam bridge cost $7,887. Adjustments in cost for the North Bend Park water system improvements resulted in a negative cost of $7,008. Construction of North Bend Park lift station cost $2,851. Island Creek Pumping Station Abandonment Study cost $81,437. Secondary bus damage at Island Creek Pumping Station cost $14,563. Safety and removal action plan for removal of DDT cost $220,397. Initiation of design for earth dike modification cost $11,744. Renovation of Rudds Creek recreation area cost $1,114,864. Periodic inspection and evaluation of dam cost $3,773. Analysis of swim beaches for contaminated soil cost $34,850. Determination of action for contaminated soil at reservoir and recreation areas cost $134,309. Installation of fuel tanks cost $20,917. Archeological survey cost $15,157. Clean and paint tainter gates cost $31,993. Waterfowl subimpoundments and environmental studies cost $27,894. Sleeve gun equipment to deter striped bass from entering power plant turbines cost $10,573. Preparation of a drought manangement plan cost $1,195. Normal operation and maintenance cost $5,329,975. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $79,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 28B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. The project is located on Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Federal cost estimate is $13,933,000 (1983) for construction and $1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $15,090,000. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Drought Management Plan cost $7,294. Waterfowl subim-, poundment and archeological and cultural resources investigations cost $3,873. Historical and archeological survey for proposed historical properties management plan cost $500. Installation of replacement computer cost $8,415. Operation and Maintenance boathouse and docking bulkhead cost $92,622. Commercial activities study of Natural Resources management functions cost $7,265. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,758,510. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $79,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 29. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1992 at elevation 215.24 feet, m.s.l., or 0.76 feet below guide curve. Below normal rainfall from October to the latter part of December caused the lake level to gradually be drawn down to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year at elevation 212.69 feet, m.s.l. or 3.31 feet below guide curve on December 26, 1991. Heavy rainfall then caused the lake level to rise to elevation 219.08 feet, m.s.l., on January 6, 1992. Jordan Lake was drawn down to the normal pool elevation of 216.0 feet, m.s.l., on January 13, 1992. The lake level remained near guide curve through April 1992 except for two peaks of 219.17 and 221.78 feet, m.s.l., on February 28, and April 24, 1992, respectively. The latter peak elevation was the maximum elevation of the fiscal year and was 5.78 feet above guide curve. Jordan Lake then remained near normal through the end of August except for two minor rises to 217.95 and 216.74 feet, m.s.l., on June 11 and August 17, respectively. The lake level was gradually drawn down the reminder of the year because inflows were only 20 percent of normal. Jordan Lake ended the fiscal year at elevation 214.10 feet, m.s.l., or 1.90 feet below guide curve. Maximum flood storage utilized during the fiscal year was 17 percent and the maximum conservation pool drawdown was 30 percent, respectively. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1992 were $56,400 making the cumulative total since inception of the project in 1981 at $13,892,400. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $154,998. Falls Lake, located in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1992 at elevation 247.59 feet, m.s.l, or 3.41 feet below guide curve. Below normal rainfall from October through December 1991 caused the lake level to draw down to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year at 244.98 feet, m.s.l., or 5.12 feet below the guide 6-16 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT curve on December 26. Heavy rainfall then caused the lake level to rise to 251.20 feet, m.s.l., on January 6, 1992. Falls Lake then remained near guide curve through the end of June except for three minor rises of 251.55, 252.00 and 251.54 feet, m.s.l, on February 28, March 8 and April 23, respectively. The peak elevation of 252.00 feet, m.s.l., occuring on March 8 was the maximum elevation of the fiscal year and was 1.90 feet above guide curve. On July 4, the lake level rose to 251.82 feet, m.s.l. Afterwards, Falls Lake was gradually drawn down for the remainder of the fiscal year due to below normal inflows and water quality releases to meet downstream minimum flow requirements. Falls Lake was at elevation 248.77 feet, m.s.l., or 2.23 feet below guide curve at the end of the fiscal year. The maximum flood storage utilized during the year was 10 percent, and the maximum conservation pool drawdown was 54 percent. Although, no flood damages were prevented during fiscal year 1992, flood damages prevented since inception of the project in 1983 total $37,850,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $87,649. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia, and North Carolina, began fiscal year 1992 at elevation 298.26 feet, m.s.l., or 1.24 feet below the guide curve. Since the guide curve drops from 300 to 295.5 feet, m.s.l., during October and November, the reservoir level met and fluctuated near the guide curve through the end of December. Heavy rainfall in early January caused a rise to 300.87 feet, m.s.l., on January 7. The resevoir level was steadily drawn down to slightly below guide curve to elevation 295.36 feet, m.s.l., on January 22 which was the minimum elevation of the fiscal year. Kerr Reservoir remained near guide curve until February 25 when rainfall caused the reservoir level to rise to 301.22 feet, m.s.l., on March 30 which was near the rising guide curve elevation of 301.0 feet, m.s.l., at the end of March. Heavy rainfall produced two peaks of 306.19 feet, m.s.l., the maximum elevation of the fiscal year, and 303.06 feet, m.s.l., on April 26 and June 10, respectively. The reservoir level was near guide curve the remainder of the summer and ended the fiscal year at elevation 299.41 feet, m.s.l. In cooperation with State and Federal fish and wildlife agencies, the Wilmington District continued operating under a 4-year trial fish flow regime started in fiscal year 1989 in the lower Roanoke River to enhance the striped bass spawning. Fish flows commenced on April 1 and concluded on June 15. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 26 percent. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest lake elevation was 32 percent. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 341,024,900 kilowatt hours or 18 percent below normal and net marketed power revenue was $5,540,626, making a cumulative total of $151,689,510 since inception of the project in 1952. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1992 were $2,535,000 making the cumulative total of $158,739,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $391,655. Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan River Basin, Virginia, began fiscal year 1992 at elevation 969.50 feet, m.s.l., or 2.00 feet below guide curve. Because inflows during October were only 30 percent of normal, the lake level was drawn down to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year at 968.52 feet, m.s.l., or 2.98 feet below guide curve on November 1. Philpott Lake returned to guide curve on December 30. Minor lake level rises into the flood pool occurred on January 4 and March 16 at elevations 974.32 and 974.58 feet, m.s.l., respectively. Heavy rains on April 20 and 21 produced a sharp rise to 982.26 feet, m.s.l., on April 22, which was the maximum elevation of the fiscal year and, also, the second highest lake elevation on record since inception of the project in 1952. The lake level was drawn down to guide curve on April 30. Excessive rainfall produced two peaks of 975.16 and 977.29 feet, m.s.l., on May 18 and June 6, respectively. Philpott Lake elevation was near guide curve the remainder of the fiscal year, and ended the year at 971.28 feet, m.s.l., or 022 foot below guide curve. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 74 percent. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest lake elevation was 73 percent. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 28,986,830 kilowatt hours or 14 percent above normal and net marketed power revenue was $1,026,716 making the cumulative total since inception of $21,716,608. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1992 were $117,270,000, making the cumulative total since inception of the project at $272,081,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $135,757. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1992 at elevation 1,029.38 feet, m.s.l., or 0.62 foot below guide curve. The reservoir level was gradually drawn down to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year at 1027.97 feet, m.s.l., or 2.03 feet above guide curve on November 6 as the rainfall for October and November was below normal. W. Kerr Scott returned to guide curve on December 1. Minor rises in the reservoir level to elevations 1033.06,1032.32,1031.24 and 1031.58 feet, m.s.l., occured on December 4, January 4, February 26 and March 7, respectively. Heavy rainfall in April produced the maximum elevation of the fiscal year at 1043.11 feet, m.s.l., or 13.11 feet above guide curve on April 22. The reservoir level returned to guide curve on April 28 and remained at or near guide curve the remainder of the fiscal year except for one rise to 1038.33 feet, m.s.l., on June 5. W. Kerr Scott reservoir was at elevation 1029.99 feet, m.s.l., at the end of the fiscal year. Maximum flood storage utilitzed during the fiscal year was 20 percent, and the maximum conservation pool drawdown was 7 percent, respectively. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1992 were $4,354,000 raising the cumulative total since inception of the project in 1963 to $89,351,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $79,540. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $890,686 of which $333,955 was for navigation studies, $10,199 was for flood control studies, $230,282 was for beach erosion studies, $147,007 6-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 was for Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study, $95,000 for Special Investigations, $2,278 for FERC licenses review, $29,000 for interagency water resources development, $11,000 for National Estuary studies, $9,683 for the North American Waterfowl Management Plan, $5,000 for Soil Conservation Service, $718 for hydrologic studies, and $16,564 for cooperation with states. Contributed funds in the amount of $42,244 were expended for navigation studies, and $7,085 for cooperation with states. 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non- Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $289,585. Total costs to September 30, 1992 were $5,355,099. Contributed funds in the amount of $10,340 were expended for flood plain information studies. 32. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for Wilmington Harbor, Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C., was continued at a cost of $221,984. PED was completed on Roanoke River Upper Basin, Virginia, Headwaters Area at a cost of $448. PED was continued on Brunswick County Beaches, N. C., at a cost of $55,647. PED was continued on Sugar Creek, N. C. and S. C., at a cost of $105,556. PED was continued on West Onslow Beach and New River Inlet, N. C., at a cost of $197,954. PED was continued on Morehead City Harbor, N. C., at a cost of $331,744. PED was accomplished on Manteo (Shallowbog) Bay, N.C., at a cost of $214,885. PED was initiated for Wilmington Harbor, Ocean Bar, N. C., at a cost of $481,561. PED was accomplished on Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C., at a cost of $217,124. 6-18 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. Johns River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Cape Fear River, N. C. above Wilmington 5. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C. 6. Drum Inlet, N. C. 7. Far Creek, N. C. 8. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 78,000 75,645 570,000 550,674 6,375,785 6,462,571 106,200 101,800 37,000 46,538 810,000 752,765 7,544,270 7,660,282 172,997 178,369 9,000 35,730 2,198,000 1,704,957 5,183,100 4,757,743 77,000 77,000 750 577,200 574,023 154,800 156,933 8,700 8,700 346,700 353,386 680,207 674,822 25,953 26,328 2,700 2,700 217,763 217,563 585,247 584,312 836,000 704,266 -8,400 -8,400 13,300 12,617 360,100 360,300 540,600 541,081 20,000 47,230 5,465,000 5,885,226 7,555,800 8,011,687 621,400 609,275 31,809 31,809' 51,249,973' 51,070,133' 114,113,615' 114,071,699 ' 86,851 86,851' 667,300 667,300 - 818,040' - 818,040' 16,300 3,736,811* 16,300 3,736,811* - 34,000 - 34,000 - 326,225 - 326,225 - 3,759,573' - 3,759,573' 754,900 17,273,2216 896,066 17,271,818' - 88,328 - 88,328 126,300 2,924,324 126,300 2,924,324 - 166,119 - 166,119 - 1,066,579 683 1,066,579 - 164,642 - 164,642 5,650 1,774,217 5,650 1,774,217 - 241,272' - 241,272 '1 663,000 6,396,893 663,454 6,396,893 - 92,650 - 92,650" 6-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 9. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C. 12. Rollinson Channel, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Shallotte River, N. C. (Regular Funds) 14. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Stumpy Point Bay, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib: Cost - 493,000 - 162,890 5,526,300 4,630,799 5,445,397 4,746,173 418,000 -210,725 - 192,275 1,873,400 1,775,087 89,778 82,762 18,000 18,000 669,500 669,500 269,200 269,797 995,455 1,137,632 57,500 57,500 8,414 8,414 -44,778 2,840 466,456 466,456 4,500 4,500 2,260 2,636 464,000 614,879 8,411,800 8,339,095 484,000 477,427 1,040,000 1,040,000 111,646 98,289 21,000 21,000 7,000 7,000 416,000 416,000 6,254 393,697 6,254 393,697 - 150,000 - 135,000 4,200 4,200 6-20 152,879 6,080,310 6,100,398 -27,781 1,973,000 1,971,000 -730 18,355 24,500 24,500 184,640 184,640 9,800 9,800 681,000 681,000 8,606,94512 8,580,59312 66,824,916 66,753,791 1,891,434 1,891,434 6,546,053"3 6,546,053"3 49,180,628" 49,178,628" 1,375,330 1,373,330 674,651 674,651 988,205 988,205 589,105 589,105 1,901,863 1,901,863 41,142 41,142 18,181 18,181 540,197 540,197 184,284 184,284 7,365,874 7,365,874 75,000 75,000 268,381 268,381 1,141,266 1,141,266 274,000 259,000 502,567 502,567 3,433,669 3,433,669 2,452 2,452 486,500 486,500 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 17. Wilmington Harbor, N. C. New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) Maint: Contrib. Cost 18A. B. Everett Jordan New Work: Dam and Lake, N. C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 18B. Randleman Lake, N. C. New Work: Approp. Cost 19. Carolina Beach and New Work: Vicinity, N. C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 20A. Falls Lake, N. C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 21. Hamlet City New Work: Lake, N. C. Approp. Cost 22. Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C. New Work: Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 23. Neuse River New Work: Oriental, N. C. Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 24. Roanoke River Upper Basin New Work: Va. - Headwaters Area Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 25A. W. Kerr Scott Dam New Work: and Reservoir, N. C. Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 3,868,100 3,888,351 422,041 231,738 3,647,000 5,392,728 1,002,400 1,050,647 31,572 308 270,000 176,764 -120,511 3,510 5,0 6,1 1,0 1,1 3,836,047 3,761,008 174,182 345,635 2,604,000 4,111,778 1,042,587 982,900 -105 -28,208 6,066,000 5,936,134 391,304 534,125 928,000 1,936,246 921,000 984,145 108 285,000 262,349 )50,000 8,479,000 88,558 5,803,487 95,000 1,301,061 121,837 1,286,917 - 350,000 - 242,924 17,000 125,000 17,876 1,937 300 0 e,VU 8,175 1,325 30,000 22,800 32,654 21,367 - 7,000 - 6,462 - 246,000 - 121,344 - 496,000 - 97,856 1,307,000 1,435,956 1,351,320 1,412,626 67 1,421,000 1,520,178 1,263,000 1,207,696 3,479,000 6,637,146 996,000 974,643 - 18,715,226' s - 18,715,226" 8,155,000 79,653,06716 8,256,978 79,526,96516 895,614 6,224,744" 776,142 6,076,977" 2,300,000 142,444,641 1,902,208 141,740,498 1,047,000 10,229,843" 1,066,026 10,196,705'" -56,654 1,764,735 5,567 1,764,735 - 4,797,588 217 4,786,051 678,000 553,602 -12,357 42,947 4,434,000 4,490,985 1,015,700 1,077,207 11,472,533 11,294,381 7,925,09720 7,925,097 � 168,719,996 168,302,119 10,677,361"8 10,668,598"9 450,000 - 800,000 225,380 210,354 678,658 119,000 - 500,50021 182,981 30,495 469,97622 - - 114,00023 - - 114,00023 219,000 -3,864 277,936" 219,274 -2,705 277,9362' 88,092 -2,582 92,510 83,069 2,979 92,510 363,000 745,000 1,354,000 256,971 880,321 1,258,636 113,300 17,286 626,586 334,049 122,389 554,294 - - 8,841,326 - - 8,841,326 1,576,000 1,774,400 21,452,504" 1,423,951 1,961,125 21,404,56627 6-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 28A. John H. Kerr Dam New Work: and Reservoir, Va. & N.C. Approp. - - - - 94,402,927 Cost 2,131 - - - 94,402,927 Maint: Approp. 5,245,400 5,683,442 6,353,400 7,116,000 96,126,78428 Cost 6,333,731 5,686,512 6,270,462 7,161,602 95,684,76429 28B. Philpott Lake, Va. New Work: Approp. -- - - - 14,796,384 Cost - - - - 14,796,384 Maint: Approp. 1,796,600 1,772,490 1,957,000 1,913,300 29,998,6965o Cost 1,892,879 1,830,346 1,902,895 1,957,479 29,897,03051 1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 2. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 3. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 4. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 6. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 7. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 8. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 9. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 10. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 11. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 12. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual cost. 13. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 14. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 15. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 16. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 17. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823; FY 85, $60,000. 18. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000. 19. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000. 20. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 83, $400,000; FY 84, $128,345; FY 85, $82,600. 21. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 84, $42,500; FY 85, $25,000; FY 86, $20,000; FY 87, $85,000; FY 88, $67,000; FY 89, $17,000 and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 90, $125,000 and FY 91, $119,000. 22. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 84, $32,715; FY 85, $18,492; FY 86, $31,355; FY 87, $67,544; FY 88, $86,581; FY 89, $17,876 and FY 90, $1,937. 23. All contributed funds and cost thru FY 91 are for preauthorization study. 24. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 88, $10,000; FY 89, $30,000 and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 90, $22,800. 25. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 88, $7,346; FY 89, $32,654; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 90, $21,367. 26. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200. 27. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444; FY 85, $2,379; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200. 28. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000. 29. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $67,850; FY 85, $5,149; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000. 30. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000. 31. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000. 6-22 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4, 19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 November 29, 1963, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 November 7, 1966 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 2 of textj Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock.' An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins.5 A 12-foot channel in New River.," Vicinity of Fairfield - drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet.7 A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek. 8 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 ft. wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. Maintenance of a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N. C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken, and Core Creek. H. D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1478, 63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H. D. 450, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report July 1965 H. D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 6-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 7, 1983, sec 107 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 March 3, 1881 March 2, 1907 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 May 21, 1965, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 12, 1983, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1930 October 17, 1940 February 7, 1967, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 30, 1935' August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 6-24 Work Authorized Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue Inlet through the ocean bar. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Core Creek, Hobucken, and Fairfield Bridges. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 3 of text) A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and shore protection. Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants Channel, and in front of Beaufort. Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, all to 12 feet deep. Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. A channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long, from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 14 of text) Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; channels 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 16 of text) A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide to Atlantic. Channels 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. Documents H. D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 Detailed Project Report June 1980 Detailed Project Report May 1983 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1013 Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 776, 69th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. D. 334, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 111, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1965 Detailed Project Report June 1983 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report July 9, 1965 H. D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 99, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by S. D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.' 500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. May 17, 1950 A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by H. D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. July 11, 1963, A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet Dec. 12, 1962 July 14, 1960 wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 100 feet. September 22, 1967, An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at March 13, 1967 July 14, 1960 west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. February 17, 1969, A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side Detailed Project Report sec. 107 channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, Dec. 21, 1967 July 14, 1960 with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point. April 3, 1975, Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis Detailed Project Report sec. 107 to 7 feet. Feb. 8, 1974 July 14, 19601'0 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River, deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 7. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 8. A 6-foot by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12-foot by 90-foot project deauthorized November 17, 1986 under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 9. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, Jan. 3, 1934. 10. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 11. Deauthorized January 1, 1990, under authority of Sec. 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. 6-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control' (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664 - Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C. 1990 18,501 232,019 Avon Harbor, N. C.1 1986 74,096 440,364 Bay River, N. C.' 1950 44,382 49,627 Belhaven Harbor, N. C. ' 1989 126,687 376,401 Black River, N. C. 1969 12,358 124,846 Cashie River, N. C. 1950 40,403 15,905 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.' 1975 69,610 25,615 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N. C.' 1975 42,029 5,685 Chowan River, N. C. 1950 - - Contentnea Creek, N. C.' 1941 64,395 32,247 Edenton Harbor, N. C.' 1960 73,750 47,642 Fishing Creek, N. C.' 1922 22,715 8,633 Knobb's Creek, N. C.', 2 19613 80,500 48,969 Mackay Creek, N. C.' 19383 13,375 6,273 Neuse River, N. C.' 1982 477,223 s 332,107 Newbegun Creek, N. C. 19283 4,802 247 Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' 1950 10,688 61,139 Oracoke Inlet, N. C. 1991 346,240 946,110 Pembroke Creek, N. C. 1976 60,000 - Perquimans River, N. C.' 19103 13,750 414 Roanoke River, N. C.' 1989 404,584 572,409 Scuppernong River, N. C.' 1950 81,164 80,682 Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), N. C. ' 1989 113,273 52,945 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' 1950 8,507 18 South River, N. C.' 1936 12,452 23,686 Swift Creek, N. C.' 1940 1,600 5,422 Trent River, N. C.', ' 1968 115,199 143,579 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. 1965 132,834 85,299 Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,893,812 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C. 1984 911,099 182,725 Wrights Creek, N. C.' 1984 68,325 166,602 1. Completed. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin River, N. C., Transferred to Norfolk District. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 4. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, N. C. 6-26 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 6-D For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. 1984 490,000 - Fort Macon Park, N. C.' 1973 620,000 - 1. Uncompleted portion of project was deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 6-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Ararat River, Mount Airy, N.C.' Black River, Harnett County, N. C.' Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.' Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line)" Conetoe Creek, N. C.' Contentnea Creek, N. C.' Core Creek, N. C.' Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, N. C.' Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.' Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.' Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.' Filberts Creek, N. C.' Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C.','0 Gardners Creek, N. C.' Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.' Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. Howards Mill Lake, N. C.' 2 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.' Leesville, Va.' Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C.', '3 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.' Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C.', '� New River, N. C.' New River, Onslow County, N. C.' Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' Old Field Swamp, N. C.','0 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.' Pungo Creek, N. C.' Pungo River, N. C.' Reddies River Lake, N. C.' 3 Roaring River Lake, N. C.'3 Simmons Bay, N. C.'0 South Creek, N. C.' Stuart, Va.' Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.' Tar River, N. C. Tar River, N. C.' Tar River and tributaries, N. C.' Tar River, Princeville, N. C. Trent River, N. C.' Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N.C. & S.C.','0 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.' Wrightsville Beach, N. C. 1987 1984 1972 1976 1960 1939-1943 & 1958 1965 1989 1984 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1985 1984 1980 1984 1989 1982 1974 1978 1979 1950 & 1956 1972 1961 1969 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1980 1978 1963 1971 1989 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1953 1961 1963 1991 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special continuing authority. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 4. Includes $3,081 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 7. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 6-: 8. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 9. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 10. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 11. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 12. Reclassified to deferred category October 2, 1980. 13. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1984. 28 14. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests. 15. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 4,901,854 475,574 283,846 572,114s 29,867 50,889 236,223s 175,315 394,055 223,413 138,1176 37,7773 374,005 54,5978 167,800 50,430 698,400 606,189'" 367,755 430,151 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 51,896 580,977 95,873 86,600 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,6022,3 985,800 370,000 186,435 194,3677 2,220,440 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 64,769 67,821 214,286 4,843,284's - - - - 623,687 61,473 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Report Date Funds Funds Project For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adkin Branch, N. C. AIWW - Mooring Basins AIWW - New River Onslow County, N. C. AIWW - Peltier Creek, 12-foot project AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut Bodie Island, N. C. Brunswick County Beaches - Long Beach Portion, N. C. - Berm Cape Lookout, N. C. Conoho Creek, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C. Davis, N. C. Fort Macon State Park, N. C., Remaining Work Harbor of Refuge, N. C. Hominy Swamp, N. C. Hyde County Dike, N. C. MacKay Creek, N. C. Mann's Harbor, N. C. Mill Creek, N. C. Mocassin Swamp, N. C. Morehead City Harbor, N. C., Jetties at Beaufort Inlet Moyock Creek, N. C. Nahunta Swamp, N. C. Neuse River, N. C. Neuse River Barrier, N. C. Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide channel in front of New Bern North River Dike, N. C. Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, N. C. Ocracoke Island, N. C. Roanoke River, 50 mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon Rockfish Creek, N. C. Scuppernong River, N. C. Six Runs Creek, N. C. Sweetwater Creek, N. C. Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. Topsail Beach and Surf City, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C. Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. Wilmington Harbor Widening and Deepening, N. C. 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as amended. 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H Act of 1960 as amended. 5. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(1), PL 99-662. 7. Cost-to-date included in remaining authorized portion of project (Engineering and Design only). 6-29 1982 None 1990 None None None 1990 None 1974 1972 1982 1973 1934 1973 None 1976 1973 1973 1973 1986 1973 1973 None None None None 1986 1975 1983 1976 1987 1971 1973 1976 None 1974 None 1990 8 Sept. 812 5 Aug. 771 1 Jan. 906 17 Nov. 86 s 23 Sept. 86' 5 Aug. 77' 1 Jan. 906 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 783 31 Mar. 82' 17 Nov. 86 s 1 Nov. 811 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 78' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 17 Nov. 86 s 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 78' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 17 Nov. 86 s 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 20 Apr. 882 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77' 11 Jan. 852 5 Aug. 77' 1 Jan. 906 219,477 - 79,782 4,250 25,419 1,396,653 107,472 130,900 7,265 116,395 36,680 64,416 65,673 30,911 - 129,592 - 157,721 234,032 64,977 64,584 132,767 139,339 13 93 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 6-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted None NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 Ipreauthorization) TABLE 6-I Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Shallotte Inlet, N. C. 55,036 Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Passing Lane3 25,022' Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Turns and Bends3 16,4672 1. Includes $8,229 contributed funds. 2. Includes $12,502 contributed funds. 3. Combined into one project - Wilmington Harbor, Channel Widening, N. C. 6-30 TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construc- Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (ft) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) tion and Damages' 18. Cape Fear River Basin, N.C. 20. Neuse River Basin, N.C. 26. 29. Yadkin River Basin, N.C.&S.C. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C. B. Everett Jordan 2 Howards Mill 2 . 14 Randleman2 Small reservoirs Falls 2 Wilson Mills Beulahtown Bakers Mills Little Buffalo Buckhorn Wiggins Mill Stantonsburg Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Hillsboro Orange W. Kerr Scott, N.C. John H. Kerr, Va., and N.C. 2 Philpott, Va. 2 Gaston, Va. and N.C. 6 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. 7 Smith Mountain, Va. 8 Leesville, Va. 9 Taber, Va. Melrose, Va. Randolph, Va. Stuart, Va. and N.C. Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Moncure, N.C. Carthage, N.C. Randleman, N.C. Falls, N.C. Wilson Mills, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Princeton, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Stantonsburg, N.C. Fremont. N.C. Wilson, N.C. Fremont N.C. Durham, N.C. Durham, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Boydton, Va. Bassett, Va. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Brookneal, Va. Chase City, Va. Spray, N.C. Danville, Va. Haw Deep Deep Various Neuse Neuse Little Little Little Buffalo Creek Contentnea Creek Contentnea Creek Tisnot Swamp Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Eno Little Yadkin Pee Dee Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke 4.3 112 55.0 106 85.0 110 - 20 to 70 + - 92 - 81 - 50 - 53 - 51 - 63 - 42 - 36 - 39 - 33 - 37 - 136 - 107 404.0 148 E E E E E CG,E E E E E E E E E E E E E 753,500 233,000 108,000 923,000 374,450 201,000 81,000 36,000 13,000 119,000 35,000 48,000 18,000 17,000 7,000 123,000 57,000 153,000 - 87,795,000 - 18.874,000 - 62,300,000 - 88,564,000 5,749,343 3,360,657 178.7 144 CG.E 2,808.000 204,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 92,050,000' 336.2 144.9 137.0 314.2 293.7 275.0 262.9 227.8 297.2 265.9 220 108 75 244 95 54 110 147 138 126 CG 1 1 CG,E CG CG CG,E CG CG.E CG,E E CG,E 249,800 432,000 59,300 825,000 76,900 34,000 120,000 350,000 163,000 248,000 14,000 54,000 83,000 41,000 20,000 12,000 43,000 48,000 15,000 80,000 13,933,000 27,000,000 31,300,000 28,000,000 9,100,000 8,000,000 17,700,000 22,100,000 9,000,000 27,800,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,700,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests and $100,000 cash contribution for construction of ranger security buildings. 4. Includes $13,900,000 presently allocated to water supply and $20,600,000 recreation and fish and wildlife to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $74,058,000 presently allocated to water supply, $8,646,000 allocated to recreation and $8296,000 to flood control to be paid by local interests during construction. 14. Reclassified to the deferred category October 2, 1980. Key E - Earth C('G - Concrete Gravity 58,405,000 14,726,000 61,700,000 94,436,000 164,200,000* 33,600,000'" 124,000,000' 38,454,000 183,000,000' 13,000,000 9,300,000 6,600,000 1,100,000 17,300,000 6,700.000 5,100,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 550,000 8.100,000 3,500,000 9,110,000 1,157,000 3,500,000 800,000 3,800,000 1.000,000 1,700,000 6,0001,000 4,700,000 1,100,000 6,400,000 15,090,000 30,500,000 32,100,000 31.800,000 10,100,000 9,700,000 23,700,000'* 26,800,000 10.100,000 36,000,000 r zy z z A d CS) tra REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended TABLE 6-K (Preauthorizationl Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Adkin Branch, Kinston, N. C. 39,626 Bear Creek, Robbins, N. C. 6,471 Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA. 10,753 Brake Branch, Montgomery County, VA. 3,333 Catfish Branch, Kingston, N. C. 6,573 Crooked Creek, Union County, N. C. 980 Cross Creek, Fayetteville, N. C. 53,923 Cumberland County Streams, N. C. 5,577 Danville, VA. 27,643 Glade Creek, Roanoke County and Vinton, VA 9,877 Great Coharie Creek, N. C. 50,468 Hominy Swamp, Wilson, N. C. 14,506 Linville River, Avery County, N. C. 65,947 Little Cross Creek, Fayetteville, N. C. 52,301 Mason Creek, Franklin County, VA. 3,000 Mill Creek, Catawba River, Old Fort, N. C. 7,784 Moravian Creek, Wilkesboro, N. C. 69,544 6-32 CHARLESTON, S.C. DISTRICT * This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean S.C., DISTRICT* between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackey and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control, SC .............. 7-1 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ....... 7-2 3. Brookgreen Gardens, SC ................ 7-2 4. Charleston Harbor, SC ................. 7-2 5. Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC ........................ 7-3 6. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ...... 7-4 7. Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC ..... .7-4 8. Folly River, SC ....................... 7-4 9. Georgetown Harbor, SC ................ 7-5 10. Jeremy Creek, SC ..................... 7-5 11. Little River Inlet, NC and SC ............. .7-6 12. Murrells Inlet, SC ..................... 7-6 13. Port Royal Harbor, SC .................. 7-7 14. Shipyard River, SC .................... 7-7 15. Town Creek, SC ...................... 7-7 16. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...... 7-8 17. Other Authorized Navigation Reports ....... .7-8 18. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 7-8 Beach Erosion 19. Folly Beach, SC ....................... 20. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ...................... 21. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ........................ Flood Control 22. Socastee Creek, SC .................... 7-8 7-8 7-8 7-8 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................... 7-9 24. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................. 7-9 25. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 7-9 Miscellaneous 26. Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization ........................ 7-9 General Investigations 27. Active Investigations ................... 7-9 Tables Table 7-A Cost and Financial Statement ........ 7-10 Table 7-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 7-13 Table 7-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .. 7-17 Table 7-D Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................... 7-17 Table 7-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects ......................... 7-17 Table 7-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ 7-18 Table 7-G Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 7-18 Table 7-H Other Authorized Streambank Erosion Projects ................. 7-19 Table 7-I Active General Investigations ........ 7-19 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC Location. The project includes all public waters in the State of South Carolina. Existing Project. The project provides for the control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths from public waters in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, and public health. Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 50 percent of the total cost. The South Carolina Water Resources Commission is designated as the 7-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets local interest requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Aquatic plants now infest approximately 39,000 acres, with the worst infestations occurring in Lake Marion and Lake Moultrie. During FY 92, 4,400 acres of aquatic plants in 24 water bodies were treated with herbicides. Grass carp (100,000) were purchased and stocked in Lake Marion to control aquatic plants in approximately 12,000 acres. The total cost of work performed in FY 92 was $1,078,222. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is ongoing. Federal costs for the project to date have been $6,326,548 for new work. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts near Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston, Johns Island, and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by pipeline dredge in the AIWW from the Winyah Bay to Charleston area during February 1992 - August 1992, removing 1,217,116 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,727,785. The mosquito abatement control contract costs were $77,350. The cost of operating the Snagboat Snell in the Myrtle Beach area was $324,040. Costs of $397,361 were incurred for contract dike maintenance. Condition and operation studies, inspections and reports, real estate, project operations management, lands and damages, water control management, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administrative costs were $533,208. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $7,345,888 for new work and $56,367,447 for maintenance, for a total of $63,713,335. 3. BROOKGREEN GARDENS, SC Location. The project is located on the western boundary of Brookgreen Gardens near Murrells Inlet in Georgetown County, SC. Existing project. The project provides for a 3,600 foot canal with a 30 foot bottom width maintained to a depth of four feet mlw. (See table as the end of the chapter for acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Easement acquisition costs for the year were $1,017. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1990. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $94,700 for new work and $1,017 for maintenance, a total of $95,717. 4. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, SC, and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 425 of the Annual Report for 1962; page 1808 of the Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of the Annual Report for 1926; and page 562 of the Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for deepening of the 35-foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 27.1 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage 7-2 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT* basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintaining the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with their responsibility to date. Terminal facilities. Piers and slips extend for about one mile along the eastern waterfront of the City of Charleston with an additional mile of marginal wharves. The South Carolina State Ports Authority operates eight piers for fruit, wood, cold storage facilities and general cargo, a grain elevator and a beltline railway which serves the entire Cooper River water-front. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The U. S. Navy Department has modern facilities for maintenance of naval vessels including nuclear-powered submarines. Loading docks and storage areas for missile-carrying type vessels have also been constructed and are being operated by the U. S. Navy. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: All new work is cost shared 75/25, Federal/non-Federal respectively. Contract dredging was performed: (a) by hopper/clamshell/pipeline dredges in the Entrance Channel during August 1991 - August 1992, removing 1,125,867 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $11,874,210, (b) by pipeline dredge in the Ordnance to Navy Yard Reach area during August 1991 - November 1991, removing 127,766 cubic yds of material, at a cost of -$13,488 which reflects adjustments made to accrued earnings for work performed in FY 91, (c) in the Town to Tidewater Reach area during September 1991- February 1992, at a cost of -$2,000 which reflects adjustments made to accrued earnings for work performed in FY 91. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $411,567, and $511,562, respectively. Federal costs for the project were $9,586,388. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed: (a) by hopper/clamshell/pipeline dredges in the Entrance Channel during August 1991 - August 1992, removing 1,039,371 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,152,705, (b) by pipeline dredge in the Anchorage Basin from September 1991 - November 1991, removing 867,830 cubic yards of material at a cost of $597,969, (c) by pipeline dredge in the Navy Yard to Ordnance Reach area during August 1991 - November 1991, removing 318,934 cubic yards of material at a cost of $15,308 (Note: The low cost for this year reflects an adjustment made for FY 91 costs. This figure does not reflect true cubic yards dredging costs.), (d) by pipeline dredge in the Tidewater Reach to Ordnance Reach area during August 1992, removing 162,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $589,780 (Note: The high cost for this year reflects $400,000 for work performed in September 1991. This figure does not reflect true cubic yards dredging costs.), (e) in the Lower Charleston Harbor area during September 1992, at a cost of -$39,500 which reflects adjustments made to accrued earning for work performed in FY 91, for a total contract cost of $3,316,262. Removal of wrecks costs were $920. Condition and operation studies, water control management, natural resource management, inspections and reports, project operations management, lands and damages, planning, engineering and design, and construction management costs were $673,689. Condition at end of fiscal year. At the end of FY 92, physical construction of the project was 92% complete. Federal costs through FY 92 for the existing project have been $34,777,673 for new work and $110,711,900 for maintenance. 5. CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFI), SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston, SC. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) All works of improvement are in Berkeley County about 45 miles from Charleston, SC. Existing Project. The completed Cooper River, Charleston Harbor Project (See Section 6) resulted in significant reduction in the transfer of blueback herring into the Santee Cooper Lakes. The landlocked striped bass fishery, a major tourist attraction, is dependent on these fish for forage. A model study, completed in March 1992 at CEWES, was conducted to determine how the turbine discharge could be prevented from overwhelming the attractant flow through the fish lift, plus testing various operational and structural modifications to determine how best to improve fish passage. Design of the selected modification is scheduled for completion by November 1993. Construction is expected to be completed during FY 95. Monitoring of the fish lift operation for two years after modification will be required to gather and analyze data to be used to refine the operation of the fish lift and to ensure its effectiveness. Total estimated cost of the project is $4,825,000, all Federal. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funds of $213,182 were spent in FY 92 for model studies and coordination meetings with Federal and State resource agencies. 7-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 6. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor was the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, which caused density currents which trapped sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem was to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River, as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act, provided that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydroplant be reduced to a flow which would not establish a density current in the harbor. This flow was estimated at 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the design phase of the project, but after operational tests this flow is estimated at 4,500 cfs. The excess water impounded in Lake Moultrie is being directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility was constructed on the new canal at the edge of the swamp adjacent to the Santee River. This plant replaces those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 11,000 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the 4,500 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, approximates the historical average flow at Pinopolis. The three generators at the new plant are rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the project includes a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a relocated fish hatchery. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Costs during FY 92 were $163 for construction management. Maintenance: Funds of $2,455,864 were spent for maintenance of completed work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated March 1977. The power-on-line date was March 1985. The power plant, channels and canals, and attendant work was completed in FY 85. We have a open letter of credit with the SC Highway Department until they exercise option to initiate construction to widen the existing Highway 52 bridge over the tailrace canal or until 28 May 2001. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $196,874,134 for new work and $25,161,285 for maintenance, a total of $222,035,419. 7. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATION, SC Location. The Cooper River Seismic Project is located in Berkeley County, South Carolina, about 50 miles north of Charleston, South Carolina. Existing project. The project provides for constructing three bolster sections totaling 4,500 feet along the downstream side of the dam and strengthening the foundation under the toe of the existing dam. The project calls for the placement of 1.25 million cubic yards of material in three sections which range in length from 700 to 2,200 feet and will be approximately the same elevation as the existing dam. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Current estimated cost of the project is $30,270,000, of which $29,500,000 is Federal and $770,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 92 costs totalled $188,142 with $18,566 being used for planning, engineering and design, $94,213 for construction management, and $75,363 for the contract. Condition at end of fiscal year. Funds to initiate preconstruction, engineering and design were appropriated in FY 83 and funds to initiate construction were appropriated in FY 86. The project was accepted for beneficial occupancy on 14 September 1990 and the entire project was accepted by Santee Cooper on 9 December 1992. The only remaining issue is the resolution of one outstanding claim. Federal costs through FY 92 for the existing project have been $29,397,454. 8. FOLLY RIVER, SC Location. The project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel, eleven feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River one mile through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from U. S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with the Folly River. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) 7-4 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by pipeline dredge during July 1992 - August 1992 removing 73,600 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $226,476. Condition and operations studies, water control management, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administrative costs were $40,682. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in FY 79. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $337,736 for new work and $3,146,891 for maintenance, a total of $3,484,627. 9. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U. S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one marginal concrete pier and one of creosote-timber construction. For intracoastal waterway traffic there are a number of smaller wharves and landings along the Georgetown waterfront on the old channel. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) in the Sampit River and Upper Winyah Bay area by pipeline dredge during September 1991 - August 1992, removing 729,107 and 671,351 cubic yards of material, respectively, at a cost of $1,633,024, (b) in the Sampit River and Upper Winyah Bay area by pipeline dredge during September 1990 -January 1992 at a cost of $21,599. Contract dike management costs were $29,085. The mosquito abatement control contract costs were $8,542. Water control management, natural resource management, inspections and reports, condition and operation studies, project operations management, easement acquisition, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $584,329. Applied a credit of -$17,459 for funds received for disposal area user fees. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903 - 1904. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $4,615,903 for new work and $57,745,057 for maintenance, a total of $62,360,960. 10. JEREMY CREEK, SC Location. Jeremy Creek is located at McClellanville, SC approximately 40 miles northeast of Charleston and 20 miles southwest of Georgetown. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11531 and 11518.) Existing project. The project provides for a turning basin twelve feet deep and 150 feet in diameter at the head of the previously existing Jeremy Creek navigation channel. The dredging of Jeremy Creek or "Side Channel to McClellanville" was authorized as a part of the channel from Charleston to McClellanville (or part of what is now the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway) by the River and Harbor Act of 2 March 1907. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimping facilities, one oyster packing shed, a crabbing operation, an icehouse, a fuel dock and a public launching ramp located on Jeremy Creek. The commercial facilities are privately owned, but are open to all on an equal basis. The existing facilities are considered adequate for present and near future commerce. There are areas along the east bluff shore available for the expansion of existing facilities or the construction of new ones. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by pipeline dredge from February 1992 - August 1992 removing 6,139 cubic yards of material at a cost of $8,718. Condition and operations studies, water control management, inspections and reports, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administrative costs were $4,121. Condition at end of fiscal year. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $49,987 for new work and $97,343 for maintenance, a total of $147,330. 7-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 11. LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC 12. MURRELLS INLET, SC Location. The project is located near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shallotte, N. C. to Georgetown, S. C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel is stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,284 feet and 3,830 feet long on the east and west sides of the inlet, respectively. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. It is expected that existing facilities will expand and new ones will be added as demands for services exceed current capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A 5-year monitoring program was initiated in 1981 to provide information for management of the project and to determine the effect of the project on nearby coastal areas. Charleston District (CESAC) collects the data and Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. Following conclusion of the initial 5-year monitoring plan (February 1986), CERC presented results of their preliminary analysis to CESAC and CESAD at a meeting in Charleston on 8 April 1986. The data indicated that coastal processes in the vicinity of the inlet have not reached an equilibrium condition and recommended continued monitoring at a reduced level. This effort is currently underway. Condition and operation studies, water control management, inspection and reports, project operations management, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administrative costs were $80,840. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in FY 84. Federal costs for the existing project have been $17,037,428 for new work and $2,788,372 for maintenance, a total of $19,825,800. Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel is stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Facilities are expected to be expanded and new ones added as demands for services outstrip capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: A monitoring program was initiated in April 1978 to provide site specific information for proper management of the project and to provide data on coastal response to the project. Charleston District collects most of the data and Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. The monitoring program has been adjusted several times based on CERC recommendations. Currently the program includes annual aerial photography, jetty surveys and site inspections, semi-annual surveys of beaches and the deposition basin. Channel surveys are not scheduled but are conducted on an "as needed" basis. Results of the monitoring program have led to recommendations for dredging the deposition basin, nourishment of a reach of eroded beach at North Litchfield Beach and erosion protection of a section of the south jetty sand dike. Condition and operations studies, water control management costs, project operations management, inspections and reports, planning, engineering and design, breakwater, jetty and seawall maintenance, and supervision and administrative costs were $76,925. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1981. Federal costs for the existing 7-6 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT project to date have been $15,502,240 for new work and $3,712,232 for maintenance, a total of $19,214,472. 13. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 57 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of the mouth of the Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. (See the table at the end of the chapter for acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. The South Carolina State Ports Authority constructed a marginal concrete wharf and operates modern terminal facilities which are considered adequate for present commerce of the port. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by hopper dredge in the entrance channel during February 1992 - April 1992, removing 833,820 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,514,418. Natural resource management, condition and operation studies, water control management, inspections and reports, easement acquisition, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $117,850. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1959. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $1,786,100 for new work and $10,986,099 for maintenance, a total of $12,772,199. 14. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U. S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about three miles and empties into the Cooper River, about three-fourths miles above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to MacAlloy Corporation's plant, including two turning basins, one opposite Chevron Oil Corporation Terminal and another at the upper end of the project. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are large marginal wharves of the Chevron Oil Corporation and Shipyard River Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products, coal and fertilizer materials. In the upper channel is MacAlloy Corporation's wharf for handling ores. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Water control management, project operations management, condition and operations studies, natural resource management, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administrative costs were $29,523. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $487,824 for new work and $9,783,084 for maintenance for a total of $10,270,908. 15. TOWN CREEK, SC Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, SC. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. (See table at end of the chapter for acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in the entrance channel by the sidecaster dredge Fy during April 1992 - June 1992 at a cost of $413,590. Condition and operations studies, water control management, inspection and reports, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administrative costs were $22,778. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1975. Federal costs under the 7-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 existing project to date have been $219,521 for new work and $4,808,906 for maintenance, a total of $5,028,427. 16. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs incurred for condition surveys were as follows: Adams Creek, SC Ashley River, SC Edisto River, SC Great Pee Dee River, SC Lynches River & Clark Creek, Mingo Creek, SC Salkehatchie River, SC Santee River, SC Village Creek, SC Waccamaw River, NC & SC Wateree River, SC Total $ 2,082 9,596 975 975 SC 975 975 1,067 975 975 975 1,950 $21,520 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION REPORTS (See Table 7-C.) 18. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization) and Section 111, Public Law 90-433, as amended. (See Table 7-D.) Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1934 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) None. Beach Erosion 19. FOLLY BEACH, SC Location. The municipality of Folly Beach, SC is located along the Atlantic shoreline of Folly Island, approximately 12 miles south of the City of Charleston, SC. Folly Island is the second island south of the Charleston Harbor entrance channel. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for protection from a 5-year storm event and would place about 2.48 million cubic yards of sand over a total project reach of 28,200 feet of beach. The project would have an initial berm with a top width of 15 feet at an elevation of 9.0 feet above the national geodetic vertical datum. Nine groins constructed of wooden piles, timbers, and large rocks which extend perpendicular into the surf for an average distance of approximately 250 linear feet will be rehabilitated. The rehabilitated groins will be built of steel sheet pile and will tie into only the wooden sections of existing groins which are deemed salvageable. Initial construction is expected to take approximately 6 months with construction expected to begin in January 1993. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet. Periodic nourishment will be required approximately every eight years with a total volume of 1.74 million cubic yards each cycle. Estimated cost (October 1992 price levels) of initial construction is $14,290,000 Federal and $2,522,000 non- Federal for a total of $16,812,000. Estimated cost of periodic nourishment is $84,399,000 Federal and $14,893,000 non- Federal for a total project cost of $116,104,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 15 percent of all costs associated with the initial construction and periodic nourishment costs; provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; and maintain all project works after completion. Operations and results during fiscal year. PED was completed in July 1992. Funds of $219,709 were spent for engineering and design in order to ready the project for construction. 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 21. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, 1960 River & Harbor Act, as amended, consisted of one reconnaissance study - Edisto Beach, SC. FY 92 costs on this study totaled $2,485. Flood Control 22. SOCASTEE CREEK, SC Location. Socastee Creek is a small coastal stream located 5 miles inland and adjacent to Myrtle Beach, Horry County, SC. The creek originates in Big Bay Swamp and flows in a southwesterly direction for approximately eight miles to its confluence with the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW). The total drainage area of the creek above the AIWW is 22.5 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of clearing and enlarging approximately 2.1 miles of the existing 7-8 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT creek channel with the inclusion of two low flow weirs to protect the quality of the existing natural environment. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; accomplish all alterations and relocations of structures, utilities, highways, bridges, railroads, sewers, and related and special facilities; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of the total project costs, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; operate and maintain all projects works after construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; publicize flood plain information in the area concerned and provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the flood plain; prescribe and enforce, to the extent of its powers, regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords or that would hinder operation and maintenance; and at least annually, inform affected interests that the project will not provide complete flood protection. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction began in February 1992 and is expected to be completed in April 1993. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $10,463 and $40,884, respectively. Total contract costs were $263,880. Federal costs for the project were $261,296. Condition at end of Fiscal Year. Federal costs through FY 92 for the existing project have been $378,841 for new work. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made of the following projects during the period: Gapway Swamp, Cowpen Swamp, Crab Tree Swamp, Simpson Creek; Todd Swamp, Buck Creek, N. Edisto River, Sawmill Branch, Shot Pouch Creek, Turkey Creek, Kingstree Branch, Cow Castle Creek, Wilson Branch, Eagle Creek, Scotts Creek, and Pompion Chapel. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works when appropriate. Cost for the period was $24,597. 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-F.) 25. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-G) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). Federal costs for FY 92 were $218,254 for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies and $125,942 for the National Emergency Preparedness Program. Miscellaneous 26. STREAMBANK EROSION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Streambank erosion activity pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act (as amended) was Drayton Hall, Charleston County, SC and Middleton Place, Charleston County, SC. FY 92 costs for these projects were $40,540 and $2,877, respectively. (See Table 7-H for previous work in this category.) General Investigations 27. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-I which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development Activities. 7-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC (Contributed Funds) 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, FL 3 Brookgreen Gardens, SC (Contributed Funds) 4 Charleston Harbor, SC (Contributed Funds) 5 Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC 6 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC 7 Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 427,000 491,838 0 0 524,000 666,566 0 0 1,038,000 1,036,881 0 0 0 0 1,060,000 1,078,222 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,332,605 6,326,548 52,028 52,028 7,455,378 7,455,378 2,019,400 1,669,282 2,855,000 2,764,000 56,481,686 2,337,601 1,648,820 2,650,502 3,059,744 56,436,869 3,000 3,971 0 0 62,100 49,614 7,200 4,489 -13,900 -1,192 0 0 600 3,311 00 4,000 1,017 0 0 94,700 94,700 4,000 1,017 7,800 7,800 7,045,000 7,847,000 5,378,000 9,051,000 45,623,564 8,248,738 6,585,093 6,965,732 9,586,388 45,073,237 2,914,900 2,804,942 3,138,000 3,984,000 111,247,429 3,163,395 2,090,648 3,762,453 3,990,871 111,113,889 2,763,000 2,180,000 2,190,000 3,215,000 11,645,000 2,749,580 2,195,032 2,321,912 3,195,463 11,385,069 250,000 213,182 125,000 7,043,608 9,484 7,064,558 43,000 1,192 250,000 213,182 0 198,681,191 163 196,874,134 3,764,200 3,122,259 3,846,000 2,692,000 25,501,459 3,745,712 3,095,470 4,020,940 2,455,864 25,161,285 3,602,000 1,900,000 13,123,808 11,025,936 0 181,588 0 29,500,000 188,142 29,397,454 7-10 TABLE 7-A CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 8 Folly River, SC 9 Georgetown Harbor, SC 10 Jeremy Creek, SC 11 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (Contributed Funds) 12 Murrells Inlet, SC (Contributed Funds) 13 Port Royal Harbor, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 0 0 337,736 337,736 260,600 291,107 501,000 266,000 3,147,707 259,916 123,602 668,469 267,158 3,146,891 0 0 7,061,755 7,061,755 2,893,400 3,263,737 1,673,000 2,261,000 57,920,917 2,845,413 3,087,347 1,986,794 2,259,120 57,859,613 0 0 51,000 54,061 19,675 13,235 1,000 12,000 6,372 12,839 0 0 49,987 49,987 97,675 97,343 17,037,428 17,037,428 52,000 194,326 109,000 71,000 2,792,002 57,918 165,296 128,774 80,840 2,788,372 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 2,033,000 3,039 2,091,736 1,521,920 1,521,920 15,502,240 15,502,240 143,000 118,231 56,000 70,000 3,782,500 124,252 110,628 81,744 76,925 3,779,232 156,893 156,893 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,536,893 1,536,041 1,786,100 1,786,100 474,000 1,711,252 242,000 1,625,000 10,994,660 473,388 1,671,838 278,022 1,632,268 10,986,099 7-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 14 Shipyard River, SC New Work: Approp. 0 0 0 0 491,974 8 Cost 0 0 0 0 491,974 Maint: Approp. 40,000 101,520 363,000 33,000 9,791,212 Cost 96,188 32,340 430,948 29,523 9,783,084 15 Town Creek, SC New Work: Approp. 0 0 0 0 219,521 Cost 0 0 0 0 219,521 Maint: Approp. 393,000 414,051 569,000 444,000 4,823,051 Cost 392,959 354,796 622,612 436,368 4,808,906 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 0 0 0 8,600 Cost 0 0 0 8,600 19 Folly Beach, SC New Work: Approp. 0 0 0 300,000 300,000 Cost 0 0 0 219,709 219,709 22 Socastee Creek, SC New Work: Approp. 69,000 14,000 50,000 741,000 874,000 Cost 5,909 67,830 43,806 261,296 378,841 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 0 0 187,000 0 187,000 Cost 0 0 2,313 53,931 56,244 1 Includes $109,490 for new work for previous projects. 2 Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 3 Includes $10,165,564 for previous projects and $752,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design. 4 Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects and $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds for the existing project. 5 Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 6 Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects 7 Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L. 79-11 incurred through FY 73. 8 Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 7-12 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19351 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Jun. 18, 1878 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 18, 1918 Jan. 21, 1927 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC (See Section 1 of text.) Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from cnhavanignaebllse, waters, tributary streams, connecting and other allied waters of the U.S., m combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL See Section 2 of text.) hannel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway eight feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, SC. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of ten feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to twelve feet deep and 90 feet wide. Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, twelve feet deep, near Myrtle Beich, SC. (Deauthorized by 1989 WRDA) BROOKGREEN GARDENS, SC See Section 3 of text.) rovides for a 3,600 foot canal with a 30-foot bottom width, maintained to a depth of four feet mlw. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC See Secton 4 of text.) jetties. Increase in depth to 30 feet with width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved Jul 1 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 89-298 Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1900, p.19 08 Annual Report 1903, p. 1133 H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., 1st. sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 19, 1988. Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572. H.D. 288, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd sess, pt.1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 64-68. H.D. 249, 69th Cong. 1st sess. 7-13 TABLE 7-B REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Work Authorized Documents Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 17, 1991 Aug. 13, 1968 Jul 29, 1983 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and ten feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and ort Moultrie. (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project is authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advanced Engineering and Design. Deepening 35 foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42 foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a distance of 27.1 miles, construction of one turmning basin modification of existing turning basins,deepenmng and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintamn the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at Federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet if economically justified. CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFT), SC (See Section 5 of text.) ee Cooper River Charleston Harbor. Modify the fish lift at the Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (Rediversion Project) and monitor operation of the fish lift for two years following such modifications. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC (ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) (See Section 6 of text.) edivert most of the Santee River waters Pinopolis Dam into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATION, SC See Section 7 of text.) onstruct such measures as necessary to improve the seismic stability of the Pinopolis West Dam on the Cooper River. FOLLY RIVER, SC ee Section 8 of text.) onsists of stable all-tide channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and Folly Creek and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and eleven feet deep. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.D.3 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 94-436, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 99th Cong. 2nd sess., P.L. 96-662 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 102nd Cong., P.L. 102-104 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 H.D. 3069, 98th Cong., 1st sess., P.L. 98-63 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 23, 1977. 7-14 CHARIESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-B Date of Authorizing Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC See Section 9 of text.) etties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Mar 2. 1945 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 2, 1945 Auth. by the House Committee on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971, and the Senate Committee on Public Works on Nov 18, 1971, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. JEREMY CREEK, SC See Section 10 of text.) o provide a turning basin twelve feet deep and 150 feet in diameter at the head of the previously existing Jeremy Creek. LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC See Section 11 of text.) rovides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence ten feet by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. MURRELLS INLET, SC (See Section 12 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. H. Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. H.D. 398, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, 11 Jan 82. Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H.D. 362, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H.D. 137, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 7-15 Documents REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authoriing Act Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 2 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 17, 1991 Jun. 30, 1948 PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC See Section 13 of text.) channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, SC.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the SC State Ports Authority. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC (See Section 14 of text.) Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of twelve to twenty feet. 28-feet from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to twenty feet from the depth of twelve feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, with a turnng basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extensioii of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburg Metallurgical Co. Plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. TOWN CREEK, SC See Section 15 of text.) An entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 6.2 miles. FOLLY BEACH, SC (See Section 19 of text.) Shoreline protection. Construct hurricane and storm protection measures. SOCASTEE CREEK, SC (See Section 22 of text.) Clearing and enlarging approximately 2.1 miles of the existing creek channel with the inclusion of two low flow weirs. H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S.D. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 12, 1974. P.L. 99-662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 102-104 102nd Cong. Sec. 205 P.L. 858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Apr. 26, 1989. 1/Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 2/Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. 3/ Contains latest published maps. 4/ Inactive. 5/ Completed under previous projects. 6/ For national defense. 7-16 CHARESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 17 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report for Construction Maintenance Adams Creek, SC 1 1978 $125,697 $29,143 Aquatic Plant Control, NC and SC 1 '5 1968 379,680 -- Archers Creek, Sp 1914 20,646 -- Ashley River, SC 1955 260,996 562,195 Edisto River, SC 1.2 1938 33,103 2,485 Great Pee Dee River, SC 1 1950 183,712 271,098 Mingo Creek, SC " 1950 29,050 8,575 Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC 1 1982 9,500 85,595 Salkahatchie River, SC 1'2' 1896 15,841 1,847 Santee River, NC & SC 1 1950 99,750 182,469 Village Creeks SC 1985 26,500 111,314 Waccamaw River, NC and SC 1978 262,814 284,347 Wateree River, SC 1940 60,000 154,559 1 Completed 2 No commerce reported SCurtailment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Session) 4 Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H.D., 69th Cong., 1st Session) 5 Pilot Program TABLE 7-D NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 18 of Text) Study Identification Section Fiscal Year Costs Calabash Creek, Brunswick County, NC 107 $19,224 Shipyard River, SC 107 -1,354 OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 7-E BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 20 of the Text) For Last Fall Report See AnnualOeration & Project Report for Construction M ntenace Hunting Island Beach, SC 1984 $2,872,7171 -- 1 Excludes $1,249,336 contributed funds 7-17 REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 7-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 24 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual "on & Project Report for Construction intenance Buck Creek, NC 7 SC 1,2 1970 $298,167 -- CowCasCtl e reek, SC '2 1985 250,000 -- Cowpens Swamp, SC 1,2 1960 18,679 -- Crabtree Swam, SC 12 1969 97,000 -- Eagle Creek, SC 1986 1,245,063 -- Edisto River, SC 1'3 1947 6,379 -- Edisto River, North Fork, SC 1'2 1969 127,660 -- Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC 1 2 1958 3,160 -- Gapway Swamp, SC" 1969 339,197 -- Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC 1978 247,242 -- Leith's Creek, SC 12 1982 430,951 -- Reddies River Lake, NC 1980 985,800 -- Reedy River, SC 13 1974 4,500 -- Roarmg River, Wilkes County, NC 1 4 1978 370,000 -- Saluda TRiver SC 12 1963 99,000 -- Sawmill Branch, Sc 1'2 1971 248,605 -- Scotts Creek, SC 1988 545,000 Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter Co., SC 1 2 1971 77,400 -- Sim son Creek, S~ 2 1957 81,000 -- Todd Swamp, SC 1964 29,000 -- Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC 1'2 1974 319,669 -- Wilson Creek, Sumter County, SC 1'2 1985 277,111 -- 1Authorized by Chief of Engineers 3 Discontinued due to lack of interest 2 Completed 4 Phase I only TABLE 7-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies (See Section 25 of Text) Study Identification Section Fiscal Year Costs Alligator Branch, Sumter County, SC 205 3,000 Cow Castle Orangeburg County, SC 205 8,080 Eagle Creek, Dorchester County, SC 205 9,784 Eight Mile Creek, Richland County, SC 205 20,658 Four Holes Swamp, Orangeburg County, SC 205 68 Gills Creek Above Lake Katherme, Richland County, SC 205 26,045 Gills Creek Below Lake Katherine, Richland County, SC 205 23,892 Green Swamp, Sumter County, SC 205 30,665 Halfway Branch, Spartenburg, SC 205 6,767 Horsepen Branch, Sumter County, SC 205 3,000 Jackson Creek, Richland County, SC 205 6,289 Jeffries Creek, Darlington County, SC 205 18,777 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, SC 205 67,585 Middle Penn, Orangeburg County, SC 205 4,218 Old Kingstree Canal, Williamsburg County, SC 205 7,903 Otranto Watershed, Charleston County, SC 205 22,321 Pleasant Meadow Swamp, Loris, SC 205 573 Pocotaligo River, Manning, SC 205 11,844 Popperdam Creek, North Charleston, SC 205 2,830 Powder Horn Branch, Sumter County, SC 205 6,153 Rawls Creek, Irmo, SC 205 22,382 Rumphs Hill Creek, Dorchester County, SC 205 9,979 Summerville Creek, Dorchester County, SC 205 29,897 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC 205 27,440 7-18 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT STEAMBANK EROSION TABLE 7-H UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 26 of the Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report for Construction M tenance Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC 1987 $211,1001-- 1 Completed TABLE 7-I ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 27 of Text) ITEM FISCAL YEAR COSTS SURVEYS (CATEGORY 100) NAVIGATION STUDIES (CATEGORY 110) Charleston Harbor Deepening/Widening $ 222,578 SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 130) South Carolina Shores, North Portion 16,916 South Carolina Shores, South Portion 451 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES (CATEGORY 170) Special Investigations $ 66,803 FERC Licensing Activities 4,035 Interagency Water Resources Development 29,144 North American Waterfowl 2,990 COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Department of Agriculture, SCS $ 5,052 Planning Assistance to States 14,162 TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) $ 362,131 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (CATEGORY 200) FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) $145,909 HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) Hydrologic Studies 5,098 TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) $151,007 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (CATEGORY 400)$ Myrtle Beach, SC $ 8 TOTAL (CATEGORY 400) $ 8 ADVANCE ENGINEERING & DESIGN (CATEGORY 600) Folly Beach, SC 191,865 Myrtle Beach, SC 677,764 TOTAL (CATEGORY 600) $ 869,629 TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,382,775 7-19 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT* The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, and includes the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers............................8-2 2. Aquatic Plant Control ............... 8-2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA, and St. Johns River, FL (Savannah District).......... 8-3 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA .............. 8-3 5. Savannah Harbor, GA ................ 8-4 6. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA ..................... . 8-5 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................... 8-5 8. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 8-5 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..................... . 8-5 Beach Erosion Control 10. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization .......... 8-6 11.TybeelIsland,GA .................. 8-6 Flood Control 12. Oates Creek, Richmond County, GA ... 8-6 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................... 8-7 14. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... 8-7 15. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 8-7 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 16. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization.. 8-7 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 16A.Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Under Special Authorization ..................... . 8-7 16B. Lower Savannah River ............. 8-7 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 17. Savannah River Basin, GA and SC ..... 8-8 17A. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) ................... . .. . 8-8 17B. Hartwell Lake, GA and SC .......... 8-8 17C. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) .................. 8-9 18. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and FL ............. 8-10 General Investigations 19. Surveys .................... ..... 8-10 20. Collection and Study of Basic Data ... 8-10 21. Research and Development ......... 8-10 22. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .................. . 8-10 Tables Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement .. 8-11 Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation ....... 8-13 Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... 8-18 Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 8-19 Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes ............ 8-19 8-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 1. ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Location. These rivers are entirely within the State of Georgia. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Survey Map of Georgia, formerly U. S. Geological Survey Map of Georgia.) For a full description of these rivers, see page 636, Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. Prior projects for the Altamaha River have been adopted, and expenditures made under them, by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1881, and September 19, 1890; for the Oconee River by the River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878, September 19, 1890, and March 3, 1905; for the Ocmulgee River, by the River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876, and September 19, 1890. For Further Details, see page 1815, Annual Report for 1915, and page 589, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This project covers the entire Altamaha River (including a channel between the river and Darien, GA), a length of 137 miles. The lower 139 miles of the Oconee River has a mean tidal range of 6.4 feet at its mouth which gradually decreases to mile 33, where there is no perceptible tidal effect. At Doctortown, mile 59, ordinary floods attain a height of about 10 feet above low water, and at extreme floods, a height of about 15 feet above low water. On the Oconee River at Dublin the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 22 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 32 feet above low water. On the Ocmulgee River at Macon the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 15 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 25 feet above low water. There is no approved estimated cost for improvement or for maintenance. Published maps of these rivers are in the following documents; Altamaha River, HED 282, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Oconee River, HED 211, 51st Cong., 1st sess., Ocmulgee River, HED 215, 51st Cong., 1st sess., and Lower Altamaha River and Darien Harbor, GA, HD 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along these rivers there are numerous natural shore landings which are considered ample for existing commerce. Facilities for recreational boats have been constructed at several points. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: There were no maintenance costs this fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is such that the percentage of completion cannot be stated. Channel depths have been increased by excavating rock shoals and sandbars, by constructing contraction and bank-protection works, and by closing cutoffs. Navigation has been rendered safer by removing obstructions. Many of the closing dams and contractions and bank-protection works need repairs. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 21, 1977. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control of water-hyacinth, lyngbya, alligator weed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes. The project provides for continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H. S. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. The authorizing act provides that research costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with EPA on August 6, 1979, and its notice of availability appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement). Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the planning and actual control operations of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported nuisance aquatic plant infestation in Lakes Jackson, Blackshear, Worth, and in Ebenezer Creek. Total 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT projected cost of the FY92 program was $140,000 of which the portion contributed bythe Federal government was $70,000. FY 92 treatments include introduction of biological control agents and chemical applications. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, SC, with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL. (See NOAA charts 11489-11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL) For details see pages 1814, 1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters between Savannah, GA, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Isle of Hope, GA. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL is from 6 to 8 feet with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive or adequate terminal facilities at port of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The District prepared plans and specifications for the FY93 contract. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the south channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay Rivers near St. Simons Island, GA, was accomplished after construction of a new bridge for the Torras Causeway. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976. Total expenditures for the FY are $2,285,093. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 4. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA, and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Co. wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Co.; 30 feet deep and 400 feet in South Brunswick River;27 feet deep and 350 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of the former Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the City of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modern docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space (three general cargo berths) on East River. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1990). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The District used "M" Operating Company to dredge the East River during the second and fourth quarters of the fiscal year. Their dredge, the "Stuart", removed a total of 650,000 cubic yards of silt at a total cost of $586,900. The work for others consisted of dredging in front of three of Georgia Ports Authority's (GPA) docs at the contract 8-3 REPORT TO THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 price. The GPA then reimbursed the District for the work performed outside of the Navigation channel. The District prepared plans and specifications for the FY 93 Brunswick Entrance Channel Contract. Total operation and maintenance cost amounted to $2,234,587 for FY 92. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3, 1975. Authorized depths were maintained throughout the fiscal year. Costs for existing completed project to September 30, 1992 were $78,752,596 of which $6,947,412 was for new work and $71,805,184 was for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 5. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston, SC, and 70 miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA. (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles; 38 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal) and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc. about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings Island Turning Basin 38 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of the Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet long near Savannah Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near the Continental Can Company terminal; and a 1,200 foot long by 1,050 foot wide by 40 foot deep Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority's LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide; about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively The tide gate structure across Back River was taken out of operation as of March 1991. The drainage canal across Argyle Island, which was part of the original tide gate project, was closed as of April 1992 by the new cut closure contract. The cost of this contract was $1,531,847. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable disposal areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 46,930 linear feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depths ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1990. Savannah Harbor Widening. The Savannah Harbor Widening project was awarded on 28 September 1990 for $7,735,512. The scope of work included widening 5.6 miles of channel from 400-500 feet with 1.8 million cubic yards of material dredged after demolition and removal of structures in the riverbank. Chatham County, the local assurer, completed real estate acquisition prior to award expending $3,688,000 in providing LERR as required by the LCA. Construction was completed on 10 April 1992. Significant difficulty was experienced by the contractor in removing debris and obstructions, the quantity of which was only partially quantified. Six additional parcels of real estate had to be acquired during the project due to greater than anticipated amounts of bank sloughing. One parcel required deletion from the contract of 1000 feet of the widened channel due to impacts to an existing radio tower. This work will be completed under the Savannah Harbor Deepening Contract. The total Federal Cost exlusive of con- 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT tract claims and additional real estate costs was $8,270,000 and the Non-Federal cost was $6,441,000. A final modification of approximately $2.7 million for excessive dredge downtime due to debris will be needed to close the contract. A PAC report was prepared to seek authorization to conduct additional widening in the vicinity of the north pier of the old Talmadge Bridge once the north pier structure is removed. Maintenance. The District dredged the Savannah Harbor during FY 92, the navigation channel from Station 40 to 112 + 500. The Ship Channel contract removed 1,884,327 cubic yards of sediment at a cost of $2,167,864. This work was performed by Southern Dredging Company. Total costs for operation and maintenance for the fiscal year was $4,679,913 which included such items as salinity monitoring, surveying, cultural resources. The Tidegate was taken out of operation in 1992 to decrease salinity levels in wildlife refuge. In addition to this action a Section 1135 program was executed to close New Cut. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25,1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. 6. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 second-feet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of the Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, above the 13th Street Bridge (R.M. 202.6), a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, over hanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at mile 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Due to lack of coimmercial use, the river has not been dredged since FY 79. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a state port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during fiscal year. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. The total cost for the year was $85,943.71. There were no dredging projects during this fiscal year. 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Survey Section performed condition surveys on the following active O&M navigation projects: Savannah Harbor Brunswick Harbor AIWW Savannah River Below Augusta General regulatory function expenditures for the fiscal year were $2,349,529. 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Funds of $18,000 were received under Section 107 of the Continuing Authorities Program for small navigation to conduct an initial appraisal of the need for deepening the Port Wentworth channel of upper Savannah Harbor. 8-5 REPORT TO THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Beach Erosion Control 10. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 11. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee Island is located directly south of the Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11512, 11513, and 11509, formerly U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in HD 92-105, 92nd Cong.) The only portion of the island that has developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 mile. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225-foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200-foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. In 1981, the plan was modified and now calls for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin and renourishment. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost (including costs for construction, engineering and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocation) of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers. The local contribution is presently estimated at 51.0 percent to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide (after the first 10 years of project life) periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project, and provide further that construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from First Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. In January 1987, the South Groin contract was completed at a cost of $607,392. In February 1987, the first periodic renourishment contract was awarded, calling for the placement of approximately 1 million cubic yards of sand on two reaches of the island; the south end from the mouth of Tybee Creek to 14th Street, and the north end from the North terminal groin to about 6th Street. The contract was completed in May 1987 at a contract cost of $1,988,843. A Beach monitoring program has been performed for three years to monitor the performance of the design. The Local Sponsor has invested over $200,000 in' additional funds for the implementation of a dune building program for the North and South ends of the islands. Fiscal year costs were $53,953. A reevaluation study under Section 934 WRDA 86 was initiated in 1990 for the Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project. The purpose of the study is to determine if the authorized Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project should be extended to a project life of 50 years, and determine if the Federal Government should continue to participate in the project. The study is using current Federal policy and economic guidelines to evaluate the economic and environmental feasibility of additional periodic beach nourishment. The study is also considering the feasibility of adding the south tip beach, from the existing south terminal groin to the south end of the island, to the authorized project. The study is scheduled for completion in February 1993. FLOOD CONTROL 12. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN AT OATES CREEK, GEORGIA. Oates Creek is a major drainage outlet for flood water from an urban area of Augusta, GA. A flood control study of Oates Creek was authorized 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT and completed as part of the Savannah River Basin study. The Oates Creek study area is located just south of Augusta, in Richmond County. The recommended plan is a channel and bridge modification flood control plan and has received support from Federal, State, and local governmental agencies with no environmental opposition. In 1987, the local sponsor, Richmond County, expressed support for the project and intent to participate financially. The plan consists of improvements to approximately 12,300 feet of channel and consists of concrete-lined channels, grass-lined channels, a low levee, modifications of bridges and culverts, and relocation of utilities. The CP&E effort began in October 1983 and consisted of the preparation of a General Design Memorandum. Upon the completion and approval of the General Design Memorandum (Sep 1986), negotiations were initiated with the local sponsor to develop a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA). The LCA was signed by Richmond County and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on 10 March 1988. Fiscal year expenditures were $2,486,766. Conditions at end of FY92: During FY92, the channel construction contract was completed. At the end of the FY, claims were being finalized for the Channel Construction contract. Anticipate project completion date, with fiscal document closeout, i.e. April 1993. 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Expenditures for inspections of completed flood control projects amounted to $19,725. (See Table 8-D.) 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D) 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These Flood Damage Reduction activities are acomplished under the authority of Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948 (Public Law 858, 80th Congress) as amended. During FY 92 a total of $367,741.86 was spent on pre-authorization flood damage reduction study effort. Study efforts during the FY were as follows: Augusta Canal/Lake Olmstead, Auguta, GA, completed Reconnaissance Phase -$10,000; Dry Branch Creek, Twiggs County, GA completed Reconnaissance Phase - $8,930.68; Johnson County, GA completed Reconnaissance Phase - $8,000; Kalmia Drainage Basin, Aiken County, SC, completed Reconnaissance Phase - $26,244.44; Nutgrove Drainage Basin, Aiken County, SC, completed Reconnaissance Phase - $6,000; Ocmulgee River Levee, Macon, GA, Feasibility Phase - Cost Shared funding, $81,285.03 (Federal and $88,084.07 (Non-Federal); Raes Creek, Augusta, GA, completed Reconnaissance Phase - $26,365.95; Reid Creek, Columbia County, GA, completed Reconnaissance Phase - $14,549.76; Rocky River, Augusta, GA completed Reconnaissance Phase - $4,949.21; Springfield Canal, Savannah, GA, Plans and Specifications Phase -$212,458.16; Wise Hollow Drainage Basin, Aiken County, SC, completed Reconnaissance Phase - $6,000. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 16. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. During the FY two Emergency Streambank protection activities were carried out under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. A Feasibility Study of erosion protecion at the 5th Street Docks along the Savannah River, in Augusta, GA was completed at a cost of $3,047.04. An initial Feasibility Study of Streambank erosion and protection at Fort Jackson, along the Savannah River in Chatham County, GA was begun at a cost of $2,207.26. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 16A. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These project modifications are accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as amended. Environmental modification study efforts during FY 92 were as follows: Savannah Harbor, Chatham County, GA - Jasper County, SC, completed plans and specifications and construction - Cost Shared funding, $1,313,748.74 (Federal) and $499,783.48 (Non-Federal); Hartwell Lake, Stephens County, GA completed Feasibility Phase - $10,283.74; Thurmond Lake, McCormick County, SC, completed Feasibility Phase - $18,594.67. Total FY expenditures on these preauthorized studies were $1,842,241.06. 16B. LOWER SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION STUDY A Reconnaissance Study was initiated on the need to conduct environmental restoration activities on various cut off bends and oxbow channels formed 8-7 REPORT TO THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 by previous navitation improvements for the Savannah River Below Augusta inland navigation project. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 17. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on the Savannah River and its tributaries in GA and SC. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River basin for flood control and other purposes (H.D/ 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) was authorized for construction by the Flood Control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell Lake, and Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes.) Duke Power Company has completed construction on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jocassee pump-storage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee- Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry-OId Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell Lakes follow. Local cooperation. None required. 17A. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) GA AND SC Location. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir is located at mile 237.7 on the Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. The total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. The lake covers 71,100 acres at maximum power pool elevation 330. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydropower 1,045,000 acre-feet; dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000-kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 282,000 kilowatts with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Gross generations of electric energy for the period was 595,476,300 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. There were no flood damages prevented or incurred in FY 92.. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $7,319,291. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18, 1981 Federal Register. In FY 92 5,787,000 persons visited the facility. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development.(See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 17B. HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, GA.(See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravitytype structure 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 568 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,390 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,880 feet. At maximum conservation pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control - 293,000 acre-feet, hydropower - 1,416,000 acre-feet, dead storage - 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000 kilowatt generators having a generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. A fifth 80,000 kilowatt generating unit has been installed which increased the rated capacity to 344,000 kilowatts. 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Gross generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 450,579,000 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. There were no flood damages prevented or incurred in FY 92. Maintenance. Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $7,372,891. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register on August 21,1978. Approximately 15,688,000 persons visited the lake in FY 92. During FY 92, funds were expended to examine the need and justification for major rehabilitation of the four original units at the Hartwell power facility. 17C. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA AND SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is located on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam, and about 37.4 miles above J. Strom Thurmond Dam (formerly Clarks Hill Dam). (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations. The latest approved (fiscal year 1992) cost estimate for the project is $569,000,000 of which $444,590,000 is for construction; $28,594,000 for lands and damages; $4,683,000 for cultural resources; and $97,016,000 for engineering/design, supervision/administration, and all project studies including environmental. Approval was received in January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A Feasibility Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement to address the installation and operation of four 90 MW (uprated from 75 MW) reversible pump-turbines were prepared in 1979 with the Record of Decision signed in August 1980. The Richard B. Russell Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan was completed in 1981, approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in September 1982, and the provisions are being implemented. Since 1986, the District has conducted various fishery studies in the Russell tailrace and J. Strom Thurmond Lake (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) downstream. In addition, the District is conducting water quality studies, hydraulic modeling, and an evaluation of various fish protection measures associated with hydroelectric projects. The results of these study efforts have been used to evaluate the need to develop fish protection at the Richard B. Russell Project associated with pumped storage operations. This evaluation is presented in a supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) on pumped storage. The record-of-decision (ROD) was signed September 1991. Installation of pumped storage is complete; environmental testing is scheduled from Feb 93 thru Oct 94. South Carolina McCalla State Park, (a cost-shared Recreation Facility) is scheduled to be awarded in FY93 or FY 94 pending receipt of State funding. During FY 92 408,023,000 kilowatts of power were generated. Maintenance. The operation and maintenance cost for the fiscal year amounted to $4,784,343. These funds were for management of lake and power activities. Approximately 1,027,700 persons visited the lake in FY 92. Condition at the end of fiscal year. The project is 94 percent complete. Costs of project to September 30, 1992 were $566,579,288 of which $533,499,066 was used for new work and $33,080,222 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) During FY 92, PED funds were used to locate and study potentially suitable Georgia and South Carolina lands to be acquired as R. B. Russell mitigation lands to compensate for wildlife habitat lost from construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake. In accordance with the 1982 R. B. Russell mitigation plan as authorized by Section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL. 99-662), approximately 10,100 acres would be acquired in South Carolina and an additional 11,400 acres acquired in Georgia. The District worked closely with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, and the Georgia Department of Natural Resources to locate and study suitable tracts. Acquisition of land in FY 92 in South Carolina consisted of the 3,408 acre Donnelly Wildlife Management Area in Colleton County. In Georgia, the 1,153 acre R. E. Towns Tract in Screven County was acquired along with the 8,042 acre Di-Lane Plantation in Burke county. Total project funding through FY 92 is $11,691,000. The acquired tracts are intensively being managed for wildlife by the South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department and the Georgia Department of Natural Resources respectively. 8-9 REPORT TO THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 18. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER Location. The West Point Lake is located on the Chattahoochee River, 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, GA, and was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 (H.D. 570, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The project was designed and constructed for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and stream flow regulation for downstream navigation. Design and construction was accomplished by the Savannah District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers for the Mobile District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. For more detail, see the Mobile, AL, District's Report of the Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army 1987. General Investigation 19. SURVEYS Fiscal year expenditures were $773,400.44 of which $364,083.77 was for navigation studies; $9,441.94 for flood control studies; $57,911.68 for special investigations; $57,911.68 for coordination with other agencies; $16,324.03 for dam safety criteria studies, and $25,536.53 for review of FERC Licenses activities. Expenditures for Planning Assistance to States were $13,063.59, Shoreline Protection Study $226,140.42 and North American Waterfowl Management Plan were $2,986.80. 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During FY 92, under the Flood Plain Management Services and Technical Services programs, flood hazard related information and assistance were provided to state and local goverments on a nonreimbursable basis and to other Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery basis. Federal agencies and private persons were not charged for services or information that could be provided in less than 10 minutes. Total FY 92 expenditures were $72,498.34 for Flood Plain Management Services and $80,754.92, for Technical Services. These services included flood hazard information, flood plain analysis and continued support to the hurricane evacuation planning efforts along the Coast. 21. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development during the fiscal year. 22. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Savannah Harbor Deepening. Authorized in WRDA 1992, the Savannah Harbor Deepening project calls for the deepening of the channel 4 feet from -40 ft mean low water (mlw) to -44 ft mlw, from Station -14 + 000 + -60 + 000, and -38 ft mlw to -42 ft mlw from -14+000 to + 103+ 000. The Georgia Ports Authority (GPA), as local sponsor, has approved a draft Local Cooperative Agreement (LCA), which is currently in HQUSACE for review and approval. Because of a need for the project by the sponsor, the GPA has offered to advance to the government the necessary funds to allow the project to proceed prior to the appropriation of Federal construction funds. Reimbursement of the Federal share will not take place until the project has been completed and all audits are complete. The current schedule calls for the advertisement of the Phase I contracts upon the signing of the LCA, with construction beginning in FY93. The estimated cost of the project is $50,050,000. With the accelerated schedule, the project is scheduled for completion March 1994. 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A See Section in Text Project 1. Altamaha, Oconee, & Ocmulgee Rivers, GA 2. Aquatic Plant Control (1965 R&H Act) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA, and the St. John's River, FL 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA 5. Savannah Harbor, GA 6. Savannah River below Augusta, GA 11. Tybee Island, GA 12. Oates creek, Richmond County, GA 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 17.A J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30. 1992 - New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 75,000 39,402 2,036,500 2,010,362 117,000 210,925 651,500 1,063,076 136,000 167,606 3,581,000 3,620,820 11,191 153,550 212,123 1,800,000 271,390 17,000 16,852 )00 512 51,000 74,873 49,0 63,5 968,7 976,6 996,7 1,160,5 2,972,1 2,968,1 205,0 640,9 7,125,6 6,958,4 28,2 210,7 216,8 200,C 23,4 4,036,( 2,466,7 17,C 14,C 50,000 97,055 958,096 958,096 2,326,000 2,285,093 95,000 70,801 2,260,000 2,234,587 2,951,000 3,640,529 4,458,000 4,679,913 6,790,031 6,790,031 86,000 67,028 30,000 53,953 2,568,000 2,486,766 16,000 19,725 84,884,440 18,595 821,457(1) 821,457(1) 1,917,982(2,3) 1,917,982(2,3) 861,159 823,678 958,096(4) 958,096(4) 24,064,507(5) 24,019,518(5) 6,839,798(6) 7,018,213(6) 71,944,928(7) 71,805,184(7) 54,656,721(8) 53,934,525(8) 174,186,693(9) 173,949,758(9) 6,790,031(10) 6,790,031(10) 18,196,771 18,153,352 4,510,249(11) 4,499,870(11) 9,025,000 8,822,547 329,064 328,326 84,884,440(12) 84,879,504(12) 10,508,885 7,307,939 6,796,667 7,256,000 117,466,345(13) 10,858,490 6,997,183 6,855,050 7,319,291 117,027,799(13) 8-11 X86 253,000 81 284,978 X50 583,440 514 642,937 134 3,568,000 119 3,564,608 )00 3,257,000 )55 2,969,297 353 9,585,000 X59 9,402,238 ?74 -- 729 76,000 391 85,944 )00 -77,000 X22 65,246 )00 273,000 735 3,372,056 )46 58,000 )82 56,660 -- 43,150 -- 20,646 REPORT TO THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 8-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30. 1992 17.B Hartwell Lake, GA and SC 17.C Richard B. Russel Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -26,878 -- -60,000 280 -- -3,000 115,874,985(14,15) -114 115,874,985(14,15) 7,566,035 8,461,499 7,591,667 7,524,900 107,186,527(16) 8,003,569 7,971,044 7,763,926 7,372,891 107,265,834(16) 19,983 1,429 27,950 21,236 20,000 10,284 12,800,000 20,751,000 12,208,000 14,911,000 31,104,225 18,772,385 17,067,848 15,152,291 3,419,698 4,570,705 4,513,666 4,643,900 3,497,898 4,264,427 4,669,220 4,784,343 6,666,950 6,640,536 535,169,509 533,499,066 23,992,191 33,080,222 1. Includes $760,610 for previous projects. 2. Includes $111,950 for previous projects. 3. Does not include $69,356 contributed funds. 4. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 5. Includes $134,789 for previous projects. Does not include $35,000 appropriated but unexpended of contributed funds in FY's 86 and 87. 6. Includes $643,456 for previous projects and $97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Does not include $10,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $54,414 for previous projects, $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project, and $2,150,000 under 1983 Job Bill Act. Does not include contributed funds by Brunswick and Georgia Port Authority. 8. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels or contributed funds. 9. Includes $298,894 for previous projects and $62,727 contributed funds. 10. Includes $93,480 for previous projects and $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 11. Does not include $61,856.45 contributed funds. 12. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,558,613 appropriated under Code 710. Also includes $1,000,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 13. Includes $576,665 under special recreation use fees and $736,000 under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 14. Includes $17,515,000 appropriated for construction of 5th Unit of which $17,469,002 has been expended. 15. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,861,000 appropriated under Code 710 of which $4,851,306 has been expended and $545,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 16. Includes $797,558 expended special recreation use fees. 8-12 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July 25, 1912 & March 2, 1945 2. Oct. 27, 1965 Section 302 3. June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 July 13, 1892 Mar. 3, 1905 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 15, 1981 4. Mar. 3, 1879 ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Channel 3 feet deep and 60 to 100 feet wide. HD 443,62D Cong., 2d sess. HD 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT 1962) Provides for control and progressive eradi- HD251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. cation of noxious aquatic plant growths. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA, (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Section from Beaufort, SC, to Savannah, GA HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. Route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. Section from Savannah, GA, to Fernandina, HD 41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. FL. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. HD 450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. Incorporated alternative routes previously HD 1236, 60th Cong.,2d sess. improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Section from Cumberland Sound, GA and FL to St. Johns River, FL. Consolidation of the 3 sections shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort, SC, and St. Johns River, FL." Section from Beaufort, SC, to Cumberland HD 581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Sound, GA and FL. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 HD 1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess. feet deep and 150 wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, SC, SD 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. and Savannah, GA. Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. SD 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. A 7-foot protected channel around St. Senate committee print, 74th Andrews Sound. Cong., 1st sess. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, SC, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Savannah, GA, via Beaufort River and Port Doc. 6, 75th Cong.,3d sess. Royal Sound. A 12-foot channel between Savannah, GA, and HD 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Femandina, FL, various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, GA. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet HD 114, 77th Cong.,1st sess. wide in that part of Frederica River, GA, not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Main channel relocated from Frederica Project authorized by Chief River to Mackay River in the vicinity of of Engineers under the Small Torras Causeway. Navigation Project Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, PL 86-645 as amended. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Construction of East River jetty. Annual Report, 1980, p.959. 8-13 TABLE 8-B REPORT TO THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct. 22, 1976 July 14, 1981 July 13, 1983 Oct. 17, 1986 5. Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Jan. 21, 1927 Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of two spur dikes. Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. Enlargement of the maneuvering area of the entrance to East River and dredging Brunswick and Turtle Rivers to obtain depths authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of May 17, 1950. Enlargement of the East River Turning Basin to a length of 1,000 feet and and a width of 750 feet. Incorporated Georgia Port Authority's 30 foot deep by 300 foot wide by 8000 foot channel in South Brunswick River serving Colonel's Island into Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge. Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging HD 407,59th Cong., 1st sess. HD 393,64th Cong., 1st sess. SD 57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. SD 132, 71st Cong., 2d sess. HD 690, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD 110, 81st Cong.,l1st sess. Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. HD 177, 97th Cong., 1st sess. PL 98-360 HR 6,99th Cong. 2d sess. Section 846 HD 181,59th Cong.,lst sess. HD 563, 62d Cong., 2d sess. HD 1471, 64th Cong.,2d sess. HD 261,69th Cong., 1st sess. HD 262,69th Cong., 1st sess. 8-14 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1945 July 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Drakes Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide, increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement, made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and the Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long 8-15 SD 39,71st Cong., 1st sess. HD 276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. HD 283,76th Cong., 1st sess. HD 227,79th Cong., 1st sess. HD 678, 79th Cong., 2d sess. HD 110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. SD 115,87th Cong., 1st sess. HD 226,89th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT TO THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Oct. 27, 1965 SPCW Resolution June 15, 1976 and HPWTC of June 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 July 16, 1984 Oct. 17, 1986 6. Sep. 19, 1980 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 11. SPWC Resolution June 22, 1971 HPWC of June 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965 by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. Providing sediment control works consisting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long; with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 38 feet. Construction of three new work curve wideners in the inner harbor channel. Curve Widener #1 is between mile 11.1 and 11.9. Curve widener #2 is between mile 13.2 and 13.8 and curve widener #3 is between mile 14.0 and 14.8. The Wideners are located on the north side of the channel. Savannah Harbor widening as described in Report of Chief of Engineers date Dec. 19, 1978. Widen channel from 400 feet to 500 feet between Kings Island turning Basin and Fig Island Turning Basin. Allows planning, engineering and design to remove drift and debris as part of operations and maintenance. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA For a 5-foot channel. Special improvement by bank protection work of 20 or 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam, GA. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin nourishment. HD 223,89th Cong., 1st sess. HD 94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976 PL 98-360 HD 6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct 17, 1986 Section 201 Section 867 HD 255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. HD 962,60th Cong., 1st sess. HD 101,70th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Comn., Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. SD 6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. HD 105, 92d Cong. 8-16 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Oct. 17, 1986 12A. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Oct. 17 1986. 17A. Flood Control Act of Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 17, 1986 Jan. 1988 17B. Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950. Flood Control Act of July 3, 1958. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. 17C. Flood Control Act of Nov. 7, 1966. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Extends authority for renourishment with HR 699th Cong., 2d sess. Federal participation from 15 to 50 years. Dated Oct.17, 1986 Section 867 OATES CREEK, GA Provided for construction of the Oates HR 699th Cong., 2d sess. Creek Project. dated Oct. 17, 1986 Section 401 J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR Approved the general plan for the HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Project. Recreation and fish and wildlife added as HR 699th Cong., 2d sess. name changed. (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake). Section 864 HJR 376 HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Provided for construction of Hartwell HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Project. PL 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Provided for the completion of the PL 85-500, 85th Cong., Hartwell Project. 2d sess. Provides for installation of 5th unit. PL 94-587, Sec. 182b. 85th Cong. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA Provided for construction of the Trotters SD 52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Shoals Project. Authorized mitigation plan. HR 699th Cong., 2d sess. dated Oct. 17, 1986 Section 601 8-17 REPORT TO THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 8 In text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bellville Point, GA Completed Cedar Point, GA Completed Darien Harbor, GA Completed Fancy Bluff Creek, GA ! Completed St. Mary's River, GA and FL, and Completed North River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA 2, 3 Completed Satilla River, GA 1 , 5, 6 Completed Savannah River above Augusta, GA 2 , 3 , 4 See Notes Savannah River at Augusta, GA 2 , 3 , 5 See Notes 1986 1982 1975 1935 1951 1929 1951 1929 1929 599,379 656,233 199,723 8,000 15,688 17,906 9,452 69,600 200,556 185,433 7,200 69,936 19,594 57,172 85,944 17,444 1. Channel adequate for commerce. 2. Project recommended for abandonment in H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. No commerce reported. 4. About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction of two power dams which submerged much of the work under the present and former projects, this improvement cannot be completed as originally planned. 5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for construction and $12,849 for operation and maintenance). 6. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized demonstration project on the Umbrella Creek - Dover Creek for the purpose of reducing shoaling. Monitor for 10 years, develop a hydrodynamic model. 8-18 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 in text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Completed 1941 $643,016 $38,242 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA(1) See Note 1974 ---- ---- Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden Completed 1977 132,640 5,219 County, GA Macon, GA Completed 1955 380,043 38,243 Oates Creek, GA Authorized N/A 12,000,000---- Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA Completed 1976 582,163 5,219 1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 2. Authorized by HR 6, Water Resource Development Act of 1986 dated Oct. 17, 1986. First Federal cost of $9,600,000 and non-federal cost of $4,100,000. TABLE 8-E SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 16 in text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total J. Strom Thurmond Dam & Reservoir, GA and SC Hartwell, GA and SC Goat Island, GA and SC(5) Middleton Shoals, GA and SC(5) Chattooga Units(4), GA and SC Tallow Hill, GA Anthony Shoals, GA Newry-OId Pickens, SC(6) Savannah Savannah Savannah Savannah Chattooga Broad Broad Keowee $79,156,000(4) 89,240,000 36,400,000 16,500,000 41,700,000 39,000,000 18,100,000 29,500,000 $79,156,000(1,4) 89,240,000(2) 36,400,000(3) 16,500,000(3) 41,700,000(3) 39,000,000(3) 18,100,000(3) 29,500,000(3) 1. Final Cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) 2. Approved Aug. 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) 3. Approved July 1954. 4. Excludes Code 710 funds. 5. Replaced by Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake). 6. Site of Duke Power Co. Keowee - Toxaway Project. 8-19 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT* With the exception of a small area in the northeastern section of Florida, this district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) .. 2 2. Arecibo Harbor, PR ................ 2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ..... 2 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL ............ 2 5. Canaveral Harbor, FL ................ 3 6. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass . .. 3 7. Charlotte Harbor, FL ................. 4 8. Cross Florida Barge Canal ............. 4 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, FL ................ 4 10. Fernandina Harbor, FL .............. 5 11. Fort Myers Beach, FL ............... 5 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, FL .............. 5 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL ............ 6 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL ........................ 6 15. Jacksonville Harbor, FL .............. 7 16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL ...... 7 17. John's Pass, FL ................... 8 18. Longboat Pass, FL ................ 8 19. Manatee Harbor, FL ................ 8 20. Mayaguez Harbor, PR ............... 9 21. Melbourne Harbor, FL .............. 9 22. Miami Harbor, FL .................. 9 23. New Pass, Sarasota, FL .............. 10 24. Okeechobee Waterway, FL ........... 10 25. Oklawaha River, FL ................ 10 26. Palm Beach Harbor, FL ............. 11 27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL ............. 11 28. Ponce Harbor, PR ................. 11 29. Port Everglades Harbor, FL ........... 12 30. Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida ......... 12 31. St. Augustine Harbor, FL ............. 13 32. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL ...................... 13 33. St. Lucie Inlet, FL .................. 13 34. San Juan Harbor, PR 14 35. Tampa Harbor, FL 15 36. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period .................... 15 37. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 16 38. Navigation Work under Special Authorization 16 Beach Erosion Control Page 39. Brevard County, FL ................ 16 40. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project .. 16 41. Duval County, FL .................. 17 42. Indian River County, FL ............. 17 43. Manatee County, FL ................ 17 44. Nassau County, FL .................. 18 45. Palm Beach County, FL ............... 18 46. Pinellas County, FL ................ 19 47. Sarasota County, FL ............... 20 48. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects . ....................... 20 49. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization ............... 20 Flood Control 50. Central and Southern Florida .......... 20 51. Dade County, FL .................. 21 52. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL . . 22 53. Four River Basins, FL ................ 22 54. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR ....... 23 55. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 23 56. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . . 23 57. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization .................... 23 General Investigations 58. Surveys .. ..................... 23 59. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 24 60. Continuation of Planning and Engineering . . 24 61. Advance Engineering and Design . ...... 24 General Regulatory 62. Permit Evaluation ................... 24 63. Enforcement ..................... 24 64. Other Navigation Regs .............. 24 Project Modifications 65. Kissimmee River Restoration .......... 25 *AII cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of the chapter. 9-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H 251/89/1. The Water Resource Development Act of 1986 amended the River and Harbor Act of 1965 requiring the local sponsor to share 50 percent of planning costs and 50 percent of research costs that are local in nature. The cost of research that is regional or national in scope shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Florida Department of Natural Resources holds the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contributes 50 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: There were 10,456 acres of hyacinth and/or water lettuce, 3,399 acres of hydrilla and 202 acres of minor plant controlled during the period. Costs incurred for engineering and design and construction management were $304,374 and $63,211 respectively, and $1,799,375 for operations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress, water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25668.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep by 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area, and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing a deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet, and a 300 by 100 foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: none. Maintenance: Project condition sediment survey $51. Engineering and design cost $9,649. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused damage. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracoastal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, FL, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, FL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11489.) Previous project. For details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 1 50 feet wide from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River, about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (H 898/62/2) and 1938 (H 618/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Permanent operating equipment costs $5,004. Condition, environmental and operation studies costs $19,488. Contract cost for disposal facility maintenance was $547,425. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $194,436 and $59,770 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. 4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FL Location. The inlet connects the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 11 by 200 feet, thence 8 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and a marina basin 8 by 200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT* completed in December 1964. 5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11478 and 11484.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 37 foot deep entrance channel and maintenance of the 44 foot deep Navy channel in the 37 foot channel reach; and 35 foot depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; south entrance jetty 1,100 feet long and the entrance jetty 1,150 feet long; a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-1 for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (October 1992 price levels) for Canaveral Harbor Deepening project is $6,600,000 Federal cost and $7,800,000 non-Federal cost ($2,471,000 contributed funds, $245,000 lands and damages, $3,749,000 relocations and $1,335,000 other costs) and project cost for Canaveral Harbor Sand Transfer System is $22,686,000 Federal cost and $4,719,000 non-Federal ($167,000 contributed funds and $4,552,000 relocations. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must; provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2nd session. Non- Federal contribution for new work is $1,146,500. Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space capacity of 168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 1,413,000 barrels of tank storage. Available warehouse storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Open storage is 189 acres. Three cruise ship berths totaling 1,400 feet long by 34 foot depth and three 8,800 square foot cruise terminals are also located on the south side. the western cruise ship berth is equipped with a roll on/off ramp and is adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. Hoisting facilities consist of one 45 ton floating crane and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services. There are 2 waterfront marine repair facilities with the nearest drydock facilities located at Port Everglades and Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 horsepower are also available. There is no rail service available at the port. The nearest rail service is the Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction costs $908,107. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $38,782 and $41,118 respectively. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of lock and dam amounted to $165,106 for the fiscal year. Operation of service utilities costs $71,843. Natural resource management cost $2,674. Condition and operation studies cost $161,404. Real estate management was $4,830. Project operations cost was $ 5,969. Lands and damages cost $7,969. Contract for lock maintenance cost $879,617. Contract for channel and canal maintenance $2,100,053. Engineering and design and construction management cost $251,749 and $227,447 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The mitigation contract was completed in May. DM for Harbor Deepening was approved March 1992. PED was completed in October 1992. Work remaining to complete the project is completion of the harbor extension and construction of the sand transfer plant. 6. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1 mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11430.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10 foot depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8 foot depth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $1 59,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood packing houses; 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Project and condition studies cost $5,921. Engineering and design cost $54,551. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 9-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 7. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11429.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin at 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water levels about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower water levels about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of service utilities cost was $4,586. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $44,256. Lands and damages cost $7,238. Engineering and design costs was $216,574. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-J for Locks and Dams.) WRDA 92 authorizes and directs ASA(CW) to offer to enter into a contract to operate and maintain the project at a level necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent deterioration of the structures. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design costs were $73,036. Maintenance: (See Table 9-K for work accomplished.) Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway; Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. Project was deauthorized in Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) and $5,000,000 of prior appropriations were withdrawn. 9. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to and including a 300 by 600 foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. The project is about 2,700 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost nontidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of docking space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also 2 marine railways and repair and storage facilities available. The facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling depth of the channel was 5 feet. 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 10. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11503.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32 foot depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800 foot wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and 2 jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. The project is 7 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $892,000. Terminal facilities. There are 2 large wharves operated by industrial plants; 12 wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; 3 oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance. Operations of service utilities cost $5,004. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $60,775. Real estate management cost $5,389. Maintenance costs for bank stabilization, revetments and dikes was -$723. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $719,381 and $6,491 respectively. Maintenance dredging by contract was $432,024. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel has been deepened to 46 feet for the Kings Bay project. Authorized depths were restored as of March 1991. 11. FORT MYERS BEACH, FL Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11427.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are 3 shrimp-packing houses and several fish-packing houses, 2 marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreational craft facilities include 9 marinas, a boat motor testing laboratory which is closed, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 12. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11475.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27 foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Station 100+00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30 +00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130+00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 feet at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Estimated cost of new work (October 1992 price levels) $5,936,000 Federal and $2,465,000 non- Federal ($2,361,000 contributed funds and $104,000 lands and damages). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $18,574. A 25% contribution and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals is required. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit packing house. The north pier is served by railway and both piers by highway connections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deepdraft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operations of service utilities was $3,255. Condition and environmental studies cost $25,624. Lands and damages cost $3,398. Maintenance dredging 9-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 costs were $90,868. Engineering and design cost was $35,998. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938 except for the fishing walkway atop the south jetty which was completed by local interests in 1968. Local interests installed lighting atop the jetty in 1969. The south jetty and revetments are in good condition. Authorized project depths were restored as of November 1990. 13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11411, 11425 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Caseys Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grands, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciege Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water levels by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water levels by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and 11 privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are 6 wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use by commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of service utilities cost $2,253. Condition surveys cost $33,360. Real estate audits and administration costs were $286. Lands and damages cost was $11,669. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. A contract to maintain the jetties at Caseys Pass was completed in 1983. 14. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL Location. The Waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11489, 11485, 11472 and 11467.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8 foot depth, and operation and maintenance of Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $61,000. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of service facilities was $29,088. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $282,373. Real estate management cost $31,205. Project operations management cost was $138. Lands and damages cost was $72,033. Maintenance cost of roads, railroads and bridges was $13,860. Maintenance of non-recreational buildings, grounds, and utilities cost $93. Contract dredging costs were $1,834,817. Engineering and design and construction management cost $234,620 and $240,423 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete. (Construction of the channel and turning basin at 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Sebastian, Florida, was deauthorized by W.R.D.A. of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 15. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 feet deep by 400-1,200 feet wide from ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the FEC railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30 foot channel in Arlington cut in the old Dames Point- Fulton channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40 foot depth entrance channel; widening of channel by 100 feet near mile 5 and by 200 feet near mile 7; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; construction of training walls and revetments; a navigation and floodway channel 26 by 200 feet along south side of Commodore Point; on approach and mooring basin 20 feet deep, 1,300 feet long at 20 foot depth contour and 600 feet long at pierhead line near Naval Reserve Armory in south Jacksonville; a depth of 24 feet between that depth contour and the pierhead line from Hogan Creek to the foot of Laura Street; and a depth of 28 feet to within 60 feet of pierhead line between foot of Laura Street and St. Elmo W. Acosta (formerly Upper State) bridge. Length of project is about 26.8 miles. In addition the Navy has provided funds for a deeper Jacksonville Harbor entrance channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet long, intersecting with the Navy's Mayport entrance channel to the Mayport turning basin; also an extension of the existing project to provide 38 foot depth for the Navy fuel depot, at Drummond Creek. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and one foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $927,654. Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total storage space of 1,009,800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of tank storage. Warehouse storage at the port includes 3,266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 233 acres. Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tons. Various phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other companies located offwater. Drydock facilities consist of 6 floating drydocks with capacities from 800 to 33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce (See Port Series No. 15, Rev. 1978.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of service facilities cost was $5,004. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $176,039. Real estate management cost $3,314. Lands and damages cost was $14,252. Channel and canal contract maintenance cost was -$210,025. Engineering and design and construction management cost $301,801 and $390 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty was repaired in FY 1985 to prevent further damage to the Mayport Naval Station. Revetments and retaining walls were in poor condition. Authorized project depths were restored as of January 1991. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 16. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL Location. The authorized Mill Cove project comprises a 6 square mile body of shallow water on the St. Johns River approximately 10 miles from the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous project. None. Existing project. The authorized project provides improved flow and circulation through Mill Cove to eliminate further shoaling. This large shallow area averages about 2 to 4 feet deep, is about 5.5 miles long, and varies from 0.5 to 2.0 miles wide. It is situated along the St. Johns River near the Dame Point- Fulton Cutoff portion of the Jacksonville Harbor navigation project. The Mill Cove project includes dredging a 650 foot by 3,600 foot flow channel at the west end to -12 feet MSL; enlarging the weir opening at the eastern end to 1,300 feet wide and -1 2 feet MSL; and installing flow diversion features at the west 9-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 and east ends of the cove. Mean tidal range is 4.9 feet at entrance, 4.5 feet at Mayport, 3.0 feet at Dame Point, and 1.2 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. In conformance with Section 221, Public Law 91-611, and prior to commencement of construction, the Jacksonville Port Authority, as local sponsor, must provide written agreement to the following local cooperation requirements: provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages that result due to construction and maintenance other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for construction. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $53,045. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1990. 17. JOHNS PASS, FL Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the Gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately 1,000 linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by the Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft are in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 18. LONGBOAT PASS, FL Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alignment to the Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contributed funds for new work were $172,324. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $44. Construction management cost -$470. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 19. MANATEE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in Manatee County on the east side of Tampa Bay 10 miles form the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11414.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the existing 40 foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basin which extends from Tampa Bay Channel to berthing facilities at Port Manatee. Also provide initial construction for a widener at the northwest end of the Manatee Harbor Channel and initial construction to deepen approximately 6.6 acres adjacent to the southern berthing area to provide a larger turning basin. All material from the project will be placed on upland sites west and northeast of the port slip. Estimated cost of new work (October 1992 price levels) $13,940,000 Federal and $16,814,000 non- Federal ($13,608,000 contributed funds $3,206,000 lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Port Manatee consist of 675 acres of port operational lands, a ship basin 1,500 feet long by 788 feet wide; and an approximately 3 mile access channel, with a design width of 400 feet, which connects with the Federally authorized Tampa Bay Channel. The Manatee project was constructed between August 1968 and February 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 1970. The required design depth was 40 feet, and the dredging contractor was allowed a pay overdepth of 2 feet. Port Manatee also operates its own terminal railroad, which is licensed under the Interstate Commerce Commission, and publishes a switching tariff as a Class III railroad. It also maintains and operates 2 switch engines and about 30,000 feet of track which connects with the CSX Railroad. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $33,037. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specs for the first contract are complete. PED completion (SAD approval) occurred in June 1992. Due to recent maintenance dredging performed by Port Manatee, dikes must be raised to provide for adequate capacity for the first deepening contract. Submittal of a LCA with a revised financial plan is scheduled for December 1992. 20. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR Location. The Project is on the west coast of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25673.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30 by 1,000 foot approach channel to the deep water terminal, decreasing to a 500 foot width opposite the westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to the easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulkhead wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey cost $19. Engineering and design cost was $8,681. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 21. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to a 400 by 800 foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north end of the turning basin has a 350 foot steel bulkhead with 11 finger piers, each about 40 feet long. There are also 2 privately owned storage and repair facilities and several privately owned boathouses and docks. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel depths as authorized were available throughout the project. 22. MIAMI HARBOR, FL Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11468.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38 by 500 foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36 foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; 2 rubblestone jetties at the entrance; and a channel 15 feet deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet 5.5 miles inland. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15 foot channel in Miami River where depths are based on flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 13 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. Estimated cost (October 1992 price levels) for Miami Harbor Channel is $55,757,000 Federal cost and $23,867,000 non-Federal ($53,000 Lands and damages, $2,397,000 relocations and $21,417,000 contributed funds.) (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,300,710. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 21,373 feet of usable berthing space, 13 transit sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 square feet, and 9 freight stations with a total storage capacity of 270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. Available sharehouse storage includes dry storage of 1,450,500 square feet and cold storage of 11,204,000 cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open storage at the port. Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40 ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons available through local rental. Twelve waterfront repair yards and 2 offwater yards serve the port. Drydock 9-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CMIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat lifts with haulout capacities ranging from 40 to 1,000 tons and lifting capacities ranging from 79 to 500 tons. Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and 13 tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, are also available. Rail Facilities at the port are served by the CSX and the Florida East Coast Railway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $108,763. Construction management cost was $102,252. Maintenance: Operation of service facilities cost $5,004. Condition, operation and environmental studies cost $10,151. Real estate management and audit cost was $561. Lands and damages cost $6,161. Maintenance dredging cost $177,554. Engineering and design and construction management cost $480,165 and $4,254 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Inner harbor portion Phase I contract is 60% complete. The Port of Miami is modifying contract to bring additional equipment to complete the outer portion. Port of Miami is proceeding with design and construction of the project on their own. 23. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with 2 finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey cost $21. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. Authorized project depths were restored as of April 1991. 24. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11428.) Previous project. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucia Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80-100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, near Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200 foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Ft. Myers with a 10 foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80 foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60 foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $503,700. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, one municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120 foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River, St Lucia Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations on Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440 foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125 foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150 foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125 foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50 foot wharf at Alva; and a 30 foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-L for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. (The 8 foot depth basin at Stuart was deauthorized by W.R.D.A. of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) 25. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles upstream from Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Roads 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Ocklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel maintenance cost $36,431. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. (A 6 foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs Run was deauthorized.) The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Florida flood control project. 26. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities include 5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds with a total of 118,030 square feet of storage capacity. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable berthing space is not available at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are no floating cranes, repair facilities or drydock facilities located at the port. A 100 ton vertical boat lift is located on the Intracoastal Waterway south of the port for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 1,000 horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No.16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of service facilities $4,587. Condition, operation and environmental studies for the project totaled $27,505. Real estate management cost $1,894. Lands and damages cost was $4,688. Channel maintenance cost $888,270. Engineering and design and construction management cost $48,091 and $41,943 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in need of repair. The south jetty was completed in FY 1986. Authorized project depths were restored as of November 1990. 27. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long respectively, and weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet, the project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $2,415,600. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition, operation and environmental studies for the project totaled $37,873. Real estate management and audits cost $2,261. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Repair of the north jetty was completed in FY 1986. Authorized project depths were restored as of January 1990. 28. PONCE HARBOR, PR Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway 9-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25677.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2,400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, and a 36 foot deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 959 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation: Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from mayor of Ponce, assuring compliance with local requirements and to cost share the project. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $717,304. A 25 percent contribution is required and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 40 ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has 4 steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Project condition surveys cost $86. Engineering and design cost was 1,314. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. South and north jetties are in fair condition. 29. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11470.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty fishing walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under H 144/93/1, local interests must: provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 13,807 feet of usable berthing space, 7 transit sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 square feet, and 6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 9,564,800 barrels. There is no usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 cubic feet and open storage at 100.3 acres. Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Drydock facilities include 2 drydocks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 tons and a 4,270 ton vertical boat lift. Three tugs with ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port Everglades Belt Line connects with the CSX railroad to serve the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT complete the project is construction authorized in H 144/93/1. 30. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Water hyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further detaile, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None. required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation and Table 9-M for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 24,556 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinth and/or water lettuce), and 2,136 acres of hydrilla were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinth in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed is under maintenance control. 31. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 by 200 feet along the best natural new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sandtight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coextensive with the groin; future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 feet in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge. These consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Environmental studies cost $1,393. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. 32. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Florida, near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11492.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel is 13 by 200 feet from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H 445/78/2) and July 24, 1946 (SD 208/79/2). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to 1963 Annual Report.) 9-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 33. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 7 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about one foot on the land side of the inlet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.1 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each 5 years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required to sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification were signed by the local sponsor on August 24, 1978. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $3,086,026. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies cost $4,827. Maintenance dredging cost was $49,778. Engineering and design cost $91,382. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in HD 294/93/1. Authorized project depths were restored as of July 1991. 34. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico and about 35 miles from the east end of the island and 1,100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25670.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, and 1938. Existing project. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alinement 350 feet west; deepening Anegado and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, the Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing 6 mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500 foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. Estimated cost of new work (October 1992 levels) $57,051,000 Federal and $21,799,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required to sewer, water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, 2 piers and a three-level ramp facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, 9 at the eastern side and 3 at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and 3 on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, 7 are U.S. Government property, and 24 are owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for handling loaded containers. Twentyfour are open to the general public. Pier No. 6 was repaired and improved in 1985. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18 foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Maintenance contract cost was $1,731,999. Engineering and design and construction management cost -$453 and $143,302 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Remaining work to complete project is modification authorized in 1976. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712 (this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in Table 9-A costs). 35. TAMPA HARBOR, FL Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11413 and 11414.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 fec in Tnanml pa Bayb yfr om3 Mulfleett Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alafia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; a 43 by 200 foot Port Suttonl Terminal Channel 3,700 feet long; turning basins at Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, a 43 by 200 feet by 3,700 feet long in Port Sutton Terminal Channel, and 34 by 300 feet in East Bay Channel. (The 46 foot and 44 foot depth portions of the project include a 5 foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that 4 feet underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a one foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 87 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, H 401/91/2 and H 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. The LCA for branch channels was signed June 20, 1986. An amendment to the LCA reflecting cost sharing requirements of WRDA of 1986 for section 6 was signed August 31, 1987. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,009,450. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years is required from locals. Terminal facilities. There are 102 commercial waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 7,226 feet of usable berthing space and 15 transit sheds with a total of 585,200 square feet of storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities include 16,440 feet of usable berthing space and 316 storage tanks for a total capacity of 11,610,350 barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,904,750 square feet, cold storage at 14,309,000 cubic feet, and open storage at 59.4 acres. There are 2 wharves available for coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain elevators with a 3,400,000 bushel total capacity. One elevator on Ybor Channel has a 1,000,000 bushel capacity. Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler and mobile cranes available locally. Marine repair yards include 9 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other offwater companies engaged in various phases of marine repair. There are 4 floating and 4 graving docks available at the port with capacities ranging from 548 to 5,400 long tons. Floating equipment includes 24 tugs with up to 3,350 horsepower and 4 companies with tank barges of capacities up to 14,000 barrels. The CSX Railroad serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 17, Rev. 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing dredging contract costs were $50,566 Federal and $16,855 non-Federal. Engineering and design and construction management cost $42,849 and $1,238 respectively. Maintenance: District Radio Communication Network cost $5,004. Condition and operation studies cost $281,765. Real estate management cost $4,890. Lands and damages $586. Maintenance dredging cost $3,885,556. Engineering and design and construction management cost $99,637 and $320,626 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (H 401/91/2 is 70 percent complete). Authorized project depths were restored as of December 1990. 36. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. (See Table 9-H.) 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 9-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 (See Table 9-C.) 38. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Aquadilla Harbor, PR, $81,993; Benner Bay-Mangrove Lagoon, VI, $2,218; Buena Vista, Humacao, PR, $50,962; Canaveral Harbor, Cap Fund $66,354; Fernandina Harbor, FL, $119,754; Island of Vieques, PR, $43,572; Moore Haven Channel, Glades City, FL, $1,621; Punta Tuna, Maunabo, PR, $1,322. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Section 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion Control 39. BREVARD COUNTY, FL Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11484 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sand-transfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. (See Table 9- B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indialantic and Melbourne beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $3,460,990. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $10,574. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill has been provided at Indialantic and Melbourne beaches. 40. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on the lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in the northern part of Broward County. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a shoreline protection and recreational beach at 4 locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water; a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestlemounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (October 1992 price levels) is $36,992,000 Federal and $36,197,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet; establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand-transfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,758,841. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing beach nourishment cost $3,983,362. Engineering and design and construction management cost $62,417 and $3,066 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete. 41. DUVAL COUNTY, FL Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11488.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of construction with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work (October 1992 price levels) $82,250,000 Federal and $54,841,000 non- Federal ($52,462,000 contributed funds, $45,000 lands and damages and $2,334,000 for relocations). Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H 273/89/1). Local cooperation: Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United states free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $11,609,567. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Beach nourishment continued at a cost of $698,303. Engineering and design and construction management cost $44,758 and $129,381 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill and 4 year advance nourishment has been completed. 42. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL Location. Indian River County is on the east coast of Florida, midway between Jacksonville and Miami. The authorized project comprises 2.65 miles of beach along the ocean shore of Vero Beach and 1.7 miles along the Sebastian Inlet State Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11474 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorized project provides nourishment for 8,870 feet (1.68) miles) of the State Park, south of Sebastian inlet. The initial beach fill would consist of 202,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 202,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment at 5-year intervals would be required. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 65 percent of this segment. The plan also provided for nourishment of 9,180 feet (1.74 miles) of Vero Beach. The initial beach fill consisted of 572,000 cubic yards of material, including advance nourishment. The restored beach would have a 20 foot wide level berm at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water. The beach fill as designed would provide protection against a 10 year return interval storm. An estimated 120,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment would be required at 5 year intervals. In addition to the beach fill a "Sabecon" reef breakwater was recommended. The structure would be placed 500 feet offshore of the new beach and would be 400 feet in length, with a zero mean low water crest elevation. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 43.7 percent for this segment. The project was authorized on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) by the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Local cooperation. The authorization of a beach erosion control project for Indian River County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of way; including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material, and relocations; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore; assure maintenance and repair during the economic life of the project; provide and maintain as necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishments for the life of the project; provide an additional cash contribution for the Sebastian Inlet State Park Beach. The project, as authorized, provides that the work may be accomplished in separate units or features and that the written agreement with non- Federal interests be obtained. The Indian River County Board of Commissioners, by letters dated December 21, 1984 and January 15, 1987, affirmed their support for the project and their willingness and ability to share in project costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Continuation of planning and engineering. 43. MANATEE COUNTY, FL Location. Manatee County is on the west coast of Florida, just south of the entrance to Tampa Bay. The county's 14 mile gulf shoreline consists of 2 barrier islands, Anna Maria Key and the northern half of Longboat Key, separated from the mainland by Tampa and Sarasota Bays and from each other by Longboat Pass. Project consists of about 7.5 miles of gulf shoreline. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the shore protection project for Manatee County which includes the entire 7.5 mile gulf shoreline of Anna Maria Key. The project consists of restoration of 3.2 miles of gulf shore beach to an elevation 6 feet above mean low water with a level berm 50 feet wide and a natural slope seaward as would be shaped by wave action. The project also provides for periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be and justified for the project life. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet. Estimated cost (October 1992 price levels) is $23,262,000 Federal funds and $19,180,000 non- Federal funds ($19,124,000 contributed funds and $56,000 lands and damages). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Manatee County, Florida was 9-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 made with the provision that Federal cost sharing would be in accordance with policy established by existing law, and the percentages based on conditions of shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction: Provided that, prior to construction, local interests furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) Provide a cash contribution equal to 47 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Corps construction line, the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) Provide all costs of construction for nourishment landward of the Corps construction line; (d) Provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 41 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) Hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (f) Assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) Adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) Agree to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitations costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost $28,082. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $298,653 and $1,692 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The revised GDM for construction of 3.2 miles of initial beach fill at Anna Maria Island was completed in October 1991. Contract awarded August 1992 and is scheduled for completion in September 1993. 44. NASSAU COUNTY, FL Location. Nassau County is on the east coast of Florida, north of Jacksonville and adjoins the state of Georgia. The authorized project comprises 4.3 miles of beach along the ocean shore of northern Amelia Island, and tightening 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the existing south jetty at the entrance to Fernandina Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project would provide initial restoration of 3.6 miles of eroded beach, starting at a point about .7 mile south of the Fernandina Harbor south jetty and extending south to Sadler Road; sand tightening about 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the south jetty; and periodic nourishment of 4.3 miles of shore between the south jetty and Sadler Road. The restored beach would have a 20 foot wide level berm at an elevation of 13 feet above mean low water. The initial beach fill would consist of an estimated 1,100,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 240,000 cubic yards of nourishment at 2- year intervals would be required. Sand tightening would require about 16,700 tons of stone. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 77%. (Sand tightening, accomplished as part of the Navy's effort to deepen and widen the navigation channel, was deleted from the plan.) Estimated cost of new work (October 1992 price levels) $9,874,000 Federal and $2,426,000 non-Federal contributed funds. Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Nassau County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way , including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material and relocations required for construction of the project, including that required for periodic nourishment; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from construction and subsequent maintenance, operation and public use of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during the useful life of the project; assure maintenance and repair during the useful life of the project as required to serve the project's intended purpose; provide and maintain clearly marked beach access, nearby parking areas, and other public use facilities, open to all on equal terms, and as required to realize the benefits upon which Federal participation is based; provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated to this function, exclusive of lands, easements, rights-of-way, alterations, and relocations, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law and based on shore ownership at the time of implementation; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment during the useful life of the project, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment, with the actual amount to be based on existing law and conditions of ownership at the time of each nourishment; and at least annually inform affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Planning and engineering continued. 45. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL Location. Palm Beach County is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. Project consists of about 30 miles of ocean coastline under 2 separate authorizations. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project authorization, the River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 62.1 percent of the cost for Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 55.8 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 50 percent for south Lake Worth Inlet- Delray Beach; and 53 percent of cost for Delray Beach- Boca Raton inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorization provides for Federal participation in the costs of a plan for protection of the shore of Palm Beach Island, comprising restoration of a protective beach with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, to a general width of 150 feet at mean high water from Lake Worth Inlet to a point about 1,000 feet south of Southern Boulevard extended, thence with a general width of 100 feet to South Lake Worth Inlet, construction and operation of a sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet, and additional periodic nourishment from Lake Worth or other suitable source, substantially in accordance with the plan developed by the district engineer, with such modifications thereof as may be considered advisable by the Chief of Engineers. Federal assistance would entail contribution of funds in amount of 4.7 percent of the initial construction cost of the beach restoration and appurtenant drainage work, and of the expenditures for periodic nourishment from Lake Worth for a period of 10 years from the year of the initial placement, plus 19.3 percent of the expenditures for construction, and for operation, maintenance, and current replacements of parts of the sand-transfer plant for the same period. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (October 1992 price levels) for Palm Beach County is $38,448,000 Federal and $32,981,000 non-Federal cash contribution and for Palm Beach Island $12,452,000 Federal and $88,325,000 non-Federal cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project (except the sand-transfer plant already under contract), of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) make appropriate modification of the location of the end of the discharge line of the sand-transfer plant to accomplish satisfactory dispersion of bypassed material; (c) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic life as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals, including operation of the sand-transfer plant; (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost $1,592. Engineering and design cost $112,188. Condition at end of fiscal year. Review is ongoing of locally prepared GDM for Jupiter/Carlin with approval scheduled for April 1993. The contract for the third renourishment of Delray beach is scheduled to be completed February 1993. The local sponsor submitted a draft GDM in June 1991 for initial construction of 1.5 miles of beach fill at Midtown. The GDM is currently under review in SAD. 46. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (October 1992 price levels) is $95,463,000 Federal funds and $77,941,000 non-Federal funds ($77,470,000 contributed funds and $471,000 lands and damages). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $12,629. Contract costs were $6,067,280. Engineering and design and construction management cost $229,486 and $579,659 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Sand Key's initial construction will be completed in 1993. The WRDA of 1986 authorization provides for extension of Federal participation to 50 years for Long Key, Treasure Island, Sand Key, and Clearwater Beach Island. A new countywide LCA is under preparation for future periodic 9-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 nourishments. An addendum to the GDM is under preparation for extension of the revetment at the northern end of Treasure Island. Completed works include groins at Treasure Island, Pass-A-Grille, and Johns Pass; breakwaters at Redington Shores and Long Key, and initial fill at Treasure Island, Long Key and Sand Key. 47. SARASOTA COUNTY, FL Location. Sarasota County is on the Gulf coast of Florida about 30 miles south of Tampa Bay. The northern most portion of the project adjoins the Manatee County Beach Erosion Control Project on Longboat Key. The total project consists of about 5.7 miles of gulf shoreline on Longboat Key and Venice Beach. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in the construction of a protective beach 12,600 feet long at Longboat Key and a protective beach 29,400 feet long at Manasota Key at the City of Venice, Florida. Two borrow areas will be required. The first is located within 2 shoal areas located between 1 to 2 miles offshore of Manasota Key south of the project area. This borrow area will be supplemented by material located within the ebb tidal shoal of Big Sarasota Pass which is about 13 nautical miles north of the project beach at Venice. The project also provides periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be needed and justified for life of the project. The mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. Estimated cost (October 1992 price levels) is $29,036,000 Federal and $17,697,000 non-Federal ($17,673,000 contributed funds and $24,000 lands and damages). The Federal share of each periodic nourishment is 72.55 percent for Venice, and 15.4 percent for Longboat, of applicable nourishment costs. Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b)provide a cash contribution equal to 29.3 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, and rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Erosion Control Line (ECL), the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) provide all costs of construction for nourishment of private lands and share in the costs of construction for public lands landward of the Erosion Control Line (ECL); (d) provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 29.3 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors;(f) assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) agrees to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $262,057. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specs were approved in June 1992. A construction contract is scheduled for award in October 1993 following coordination of the storm water outfall relocation plan by the City of Venice. The plan is expected to be completed in March 1993. 48. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Key West, FL; Lido Key, FL; Mullet Key, FL; Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, FL were deauthorized January 1, 1990 by the W.R.D.A. of 1988, P.L. 100-676. (See Table 9-D.) 49. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Fort Pierce Beach, FL $122,858; Little Talbot Island, FL $33,562; Isla de Cabras, PR $51; Northside Drive, Fredricksted, VI $10,798; Patillas, PR $9,625; Puerto Nuevo Beach, PR $144. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-433, Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1074, Public Law 93-251. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Flood Control 50. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is generally located within the southeastern 18 counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section north of the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, FL (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, FL) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 and August 30, 1935. For 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT further information, see Annual Reports for 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargement of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shores of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent overdrainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around the lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-Q. Also, see Table 9-N for principal features of locks and dams. Estimated cost for new work (October 1992 price levels) is $994,013,000 Federal funds and $572,706,000 Non-Federal funds ($241,322,000 contributed funds, $257,469,000 lands, $73,915,000 relocations), exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects.(See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-R for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9- S for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie Locks; 5 hurricane gates; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 -- total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, LD3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S- 11, S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Section 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gaging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. The scheduled work of project is 77 percent complete. Planning for the entire project began in November 1948 and has been continued. For construction completed prior to FY 1980 see Annual Reports for 1960-1979. Construction completed under existing project during the fiscal year is set forth in Table 9-0. All Federally maintained features of the project were generally in good condition at the end of the fiscal year. (For status of work under contract at end of fiscal year see Table 9-P.) 51. DADE COUNTY, FL Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic 9-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (October 1992 price levels) is $109,934,000 Federal cost and $98,292,000 non-Federal cost ($96,443,000 contributed funds and $1,839,000 lands and damages). Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (H 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cash for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal Faparticipation is based; (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 16, 1973. A supplemental agreement for Bal Harbour portion was approved June r30, 1976. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $27,857,335. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Beach renourishment contract cost was $980,581. Engineering and design and construction management cost $158,137 and $15,145 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The local sponsor desires renourishment of 6 areas of the 13 mile project in 1993. Surveys are underway to determine the location and quantity of fill required. Contract scheduled for award in August 1993. 52. DADE COUNTY, NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL Location. On the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline extending 2.5 miles north of Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The existing shore protection project for Dade County provides for Federal participation in the cost of construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control and hurricane protection along 9.3 miles of shore between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet and for the construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control along the 1.2 miles of shore fronting Haulover Beach Park and provides for protection and nourishment of 2.5 miles of beach shore north of Haulover Beach Park and for extension of the period of Federal participation from 10 years to the life of the project. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Consistent with the cost-sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the administration and Senate Majority Leadership, local interests will be required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway and relocations; pay 50 percent of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; pay 35 percent of the cost allocated to storm damage prevention; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from local sponsors. Non-federal contribution for new work was $7,499,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and construction management cost $370 and $153 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Continuation of planning and engineering. 53. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins -- the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers -- and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provided for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provided for: Green Swamp Area - a conservation area and 3 storage reservoirs 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River - 4 flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures and levees; Ok/awaha River -a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of parts of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River -- one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River -- Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas- Lake Tarpon; outlet canal and control structure; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-T on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (October 1992 price level) is $171,715,000 Federal funds and $147,053,000 non-Federal ($34,508,000 contributed funds, $48,018,000 relocations and $64,527,000 for lands and damages). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction and 50 percent of recreation costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $38,536. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and the scheduled work is 98 percent complete. relocations, and highway bridges and approaches). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been completed, except for Cerrillos Reservoir which was signed March 15, 1982. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $90,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $1,080. Contract for Cerrillos Dam & Spillway continued at a cost of $11,082,388. Contract for the Cerrillos Reservoir clearing cost $124,915. Cerrillos Dam instrumentation installation contract cost was $167,620. Hired labor cost was $1,410,949. Portugues Debris Basin contract no. 3 cost $729,793. Bucana Shoal Removal contract cost $1,879,405. Hired labor for channels and canals cost $8,965. Cultural resource investigations cost $33,779. Area office equipment cost $6,689. Engineering and design and construction management cost $2,329,919 and $1,771,054 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Cerrillos Dam was completed in January 1992. The recreation DM is scheduled for approval in November 1992 with construction in February 1994. Constancia Park was awarded in July 1992, and Debris Basin #4 was awarded in September 1992. Project commenced in September 1975 and is 74 percent complete. 55. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD 54. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, CONTROL PROJECTS PR (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Caribbean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for 2 multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement - one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2 mile long tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (October 1992 price levels) is $385,927,000 Federal and $135,215,000 non-Federal ($42,078,000 contributed funds, $73,296,000 for lands and damages, $19,841,000 for Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $10,976. 56. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-E.) 57. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 9-V.) Emergency flood control activities -- repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $319,136 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. No costs were incurred for Emergency Operations. 9-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY" 1992 Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization). Federal cost for the fiscal year was Bradenton Beach, FL $3,105; Ft. Clinch, Nassau County, FL $395,323; Guanica, PR $39,562; Ponce Regional, PR $11,867; and Juan Mendez Channel, PR $1,173. General Investigations 58. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year were: navigation studies $589,100; flood damage prevention studies $1,804,227; shoreline protection studies $101,876; review of authorized projects $33,865; special investigations $104,199; and coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests $125,484; for a total cost of $2,758,801. 59. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. FPMS Unit Jacksonville, FL cost $32,602; Technical Services $90,029; Hurricane Evacuation Study PR $49,491; Hurricane Evacuation Study VI $19,621; Quick Responses $6,840; and Hydrologic studies $- 133; HES Palm Beach $42,677; for a total cost of $273,415. 60. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Navigation costs were Canaveral Harbor, FL $548,343; Miami Harbor Channel, FL $152,020; and Tampa Bay, Port Sutton, FL $1,901. Beach erosion cost was Monroe County, FL $110,753. Local protection cost was Rio De La Plata, PR $933,968 and Rio Grande De Loiza, PR $358,658. 61. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation cost was Canaveral Harbor Sand Bypass, FL $196,188; Miami River Sediments, FL $250,537; and San Juan Harbor, PR $466,558. Beach erosion control cost was Martin County, FL $167,958; Nassau County, FL $217,713; and St. Johns County, FL -$203. Local protection cost for Puerto Nuevo River, PR was $1,033,419. General Regulatory 62. PERMIT EVALUATION (R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MPRSA of 1972) Location. Navigable waters of the United States, including tributary systems, headwaters and isolated waters, and ocean waters to the limits of the territorial seas. Existing Program. The program evaluates permit applications for work in navigable waters (dredging, filling, and other structures) of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material to the oceans for ocean disposal. Geographic coverage includes Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Decision making criteria consist of the public interest review, Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines, and ocean dumping criteria. Local Cooperation. Joint application agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) continues to work smoothly. Future FDER delegation to South and Southwest Florida Water Management Districts anticipated to work smoothly, with possible increased sharing of project review information in the future. Started discussions with FDER on developing a comprehensive programmatic general permit which could move both agencies into joint application review. Discussions continue with the USVI Department of Planning and Natural Resources to improve the existing joint application process. Booklets describing both joint application processes have been reviewed and extensively revised. The updated Corps/FDER booklet has been published. Operations and results during fiscal year. A total of 7339 applications were received during the fiscal year, up slightly from 7313 received in FY 1991. Of these, 1441 were individual or letters of permission (compared to 1592 in FY 1991), 1987 were requests for nationwide permit verification (versus 1910 in FY 1991), and 3911 were for regional general permits (versus 3811 in FY 1991). FY 1992 cost for permit evaluation was $4,019,578. Condition at end of fiscal year. A total of 445 individual or letters of permission permit applications were carried forward into FY 1993. 63. ENFORCEMENT (R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MPRSA of 1972) Existing program. The program takes appropriate enforcement action against both unauthorized work requiring a permit and noncompliance findings on issued permits. Operation of the program is making increased use of alternative dispute resolution processes to remediate violations. Close coordination with and cooperation of Department of Justice continues, with development of consent orders and fines as appropriate. Local cooperation. Local memoranda of agreement on enforcement have been developed with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and FDER. The agreement with EPA has allowed considerable workload sharing and closer working relations. The agreement with FDER is being reviewed for possible revision. Negotiations are ongoing for a separate agreement with EPA to cover Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands. In addition a Local Cooperative Agreement (LCA) has been finalized with Dade County to realize permit compliance inspections of rock mining activities in Dade County. This agreement will result in these site inspections being conducted in FY 1993. Operations and results during fiscal year. A total of 167 unauthorized activities were reported during the fiscal year. 225 unauthorized activities were resolved. Compliance inspections were performed on 315 permits. Overall 85 percent were found in compliance. 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Cost incurred this fiscal year for enforcement was $974,520. Condition at end of fiscal year. 190 enforcement files on unauthorized activities are carried into FY 1993. 9 cases were transferred to the EPA under the enforcement MOAs. Approximate settlement terms for 15 consent orders have been finalized, with total fines of $1.7 million, restoration of 32 acres of wetlands required; and after-the-fact permitting of 31 acres of wetlands authorized. The ATF permits all required compensatory mitigation. Cost for enforcement was $974,520 for FY 1992. 64. OTHER NAVIGATION REGS (R&H Act of 1899) Location. Navigable waters of the United States in Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Existing program.. This program conducts studies to determine geographic extent of navigable waters of the United States, and establishment of danger or restricted zones in these waters. Local cooperation. This program is carried out with informal cooperation with the State of Florida and cooperation of other Department of Defense agencies needing restricted zones in which to conduct their defense related missions. Operations and results during fiscal year. No tributary system navigability studies were conducted during the fiscal year, although navigability determinations were conducted on the Short Canal. Litigation continues on a navigability determination on Fisheating Creek. Cost incurred for FY 1992 was $15,868. Condition at end of fiscal year. The district has conducted 14 navigability studies of State tributary systems. State assumption of the Section 404 program may occur in the next three years. Additional navigability studies will be programmed to help delineate nonassumable waters as funds permit. Project Modification 65. KISSIMMEE RIVER, FLORIDA Location. The Kissimmee River Basin comprises 3,013 square miles, and extends from Orlando southward to Lake Okeechobee, the second largest freshwater lake in the United States. The area is bounded on the north by the lakes of the Orlando area, on the west by the Peace River Basin, on the south by Lake Okeechobee, and in the east by the Upper St. John's and the Taylor Creek-Nuddin Slough Basins. The watershed is about 105 miles long and has a maximum width of 35 miles. Existing Project. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent of Federal participation in the Level II Backfilling Plan, as developed by the South Florida Water Management District, for restoration of the Kissimmee River and flood plain ecosystem. It is expected that restoration will restore the ecological integrity of the river system. Environmental improvements through modification of operations for Lake Kissimmee, Cypress, and Hatchineha. The project will include canal and/or structure improvements and real estate acquisition. The recommended plan consists of backfilling approximately 29 miles of C-38. This will result in the restoration of almost 29,000 acres in the floodplain. Three structures will be removed and two bridges and associated utilities will be relocated. Real estate interests will be acquired for effected portions of the floodplain. Estimated cost of the project (October 1992 price levels) for Kissimmee Headwaters Revitalization is $46,105,000 Federal and $46,105,000 non-Federal. Project cost for Kissimmee River Restoration is $132,218,000 Federal and $314,988,000 non-Federal ($183,200,000 contributed funds, $123,088,000 lands and damages and $8,700,000 relocations). Local Cooperation. The South Florida Water Management District, an agency of the State of Florida, is the feasibility study cost sharing partner, and has expressed its intent to be the project sponsor. Local cost for the Headwater Revitalization is to be credited towards the total project cost. The sahuathreodr ization calls for the restoration to be cost- 50%-50% and that the lands be credited toward the total cost of the Kissimmee River Restoration. A draft Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) has been reviewed by the sponsor and a letter of intent has been provided for the Headwaters Revitalization. LCA for the River Restoration project is scheduled for execution in May 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $36,026, study cost was -$213,726 and Engineering and Design cost was $768,201. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Section 1135 report is 27% complete and scheduled for submission in July 1994. Initiation of construction is scheduled for October 1995. PED is underway and the first construction contract for the test fill is scheduled for June 1996. 9-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Federal Funds) 2. Arecibo Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 3. Atlantic Intlracoastal Waterway between orfolk, VA and St.Johns River, FL (Federal Funds) 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) 5. Canaveral Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 7. Charlotte Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 2,450,000 2,125,000 2,048,000 2,180,000 30,964,500 2,510,571 2,007,829 2,064,140 2,166,960 30,809,757 - - 1,128,075 1 - - 1,128,075 1 - 9,700 4,301,431 - 9,700 4,301,431 5,032 5,032 195,000 193,967 11,902 4,966,850 4,945,994 171 987 3,464,569 3,229,000 16 - 42,350 - 35,281 183,290 183,595 269,118 261,369 826,300 826,123 1,035,000 25,000 52,273 973,477 1,925,000 3,887,000 2,197,275 3,878,661 - 4,500 - 14,530 15,655 22,713 255,000 261,142 361,225 2 361,225 2 6,322,042 6,320,832 243,235 3 243,235 3 185,688 185,688 15,198,910 * 15,164,598 ' 55,456,240 55,442,351 1,110,500 1,106,782 - 305,290 - 305,290 69,000 1,733,535 60,472 1,724,996 - 159,975 - 159,975 - 533,169 s - 533,169 271,000 12,517,644 272,654 12,517,606 9-26 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 8. Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 10. Fernandina Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Fort Myers Beach Channel, FL (Federal Funds) 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (Federal Funds) 14. Intracoastal Waterway Jacksonville to Miami, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Aprop. Cst Maint: Approp. ost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: A&prop. Cst Maint: Approp. Cost 450,000 159,241 3,107,979 3,096,182 (5,000,000) 76,415 1,774,234 1,720,057 28,098 1,689,000 1,701,964 73,036 1,841,000 1,892,291 63,647,473 63,643,469 31,984,176 ' 31,964,068 ' 9,627 9,627 710,900 710,900 134,000 56,997 766,950 766,931 59,000 17,858 10,145 11,488 506,326 506,288 61,209 63,268 904,692 983,309 148,097 757,619 548,015 17,000 31,169 5,000 10,833 769,000 978,529 4,700 25,324 235,000 119,754 1,234,700 1,228,341 10,345 4,639,816 ' 4,523,428 27,777,288 27,770,653 935,000 934,050 - 158,140 ' - 158,140 ' - 1,184,091 - 1,184,090 662,555 651,867 36,262 36,262 734,369 583,133 287,500 48,934, 93,770 98,458 66,750 63,763 3,110,500 3,256,940 468,000 644,648 163,000 159,143 45,000 47,568 2,788,500 2,738,650 718,000 5,938,686 5,928,772 18,574 18,574 8,112,557'9 8,112,557' 8,123,959 10 8,123,508 10 19,251,598 " 19,251,598 38,705,028 1 38,646,884 n 61,000 61,000 9-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 15. Jacksonville Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Jacksonville Hbr. (Mill Cove), FL (Federal Funds) 17. Johns Pass, FL (Federal Funds) 18. Long Boat Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Manatee Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 20. Mayaguez Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 21. Melbourne Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 399,700 415,056 4,408,579 4,173,562 1,169,000 1,453,730 293,200 290,775 47,596,278 1 47,596,278 1 69,468,068 " 14 69,464,868 14 - 102,813 - 102,813 - 927,654 - 927,654 - 25,000 - 25,000 450,000 78,053 - 112,000 374,964 46,859 32,425 63,350 264,000 32,425 62,319 265,030 - 49,954 49,954 377,350 609,000 162,033 824,142 200,000 500,000 218,089 396,275 716 716 53,045 4,104,000 4,091,775 - 82,098 16 - 82,098 16 - 359,775 - 359,775 (600) (426) - (137,000) 163,325 33,037 - 8,700 - 8,700 1,020,233 1,020,233 2,436,191 2,436,190 172,324 172,324 1,040,500 1,035,013 168,187 168,187 1,061,561 1,061,561 - 17,696 - 17,696 - 634,864 - 634,863 9-28 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 22. Miami Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23. New Pass Sarasota, FL (Federal Funds) 24. Okeechobee Waterway, FL (Federal Funds) 25. Oklawaha River, FL (Federal Funds) 26. Palm Beach Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Ponce Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 307,194 203,755 203,754 1,562 1,249,937 1,233,456 65,422 1,147,600 65,414 1,062,377 2,391,330 2,952,854 1,859,725 1,750,197 72,595 39,661 72,535 28,205 235,644 435,155 448,738 - 100,000 182,812 2,062,500 2,174,033 341,00 211,01 690,00 683,85 (2,40( 2 4,544,25 4,537,69 28,000 40,00 39,140 36,43 934,651 996,177 180,845 930,993 976,085 204,172 2,802,500 817,752 2,801,297 818,954 500,000 1,325,000 1,954,609 199,739 679,406 1,017,00 1,016,97 68,189 37,60 65,656 40,13 - (320,000) (72,549) 4,741 (56,764) (14,811) 1,40 1,40 )0 32,977,066 ' 5 31,495,082 17 )0 5,039,517 0 5,155,522 - 2,300,710" - 2,274,595 " - 45,811 " - 45,811 19 0) 4,418,926 1 4,418,926 - 21,756,418 w - 21,756,418 w 0 47,264,971 21 )8 47,262,141 21 - 315,264 2 - 315,264 10 2,341,576 1 2,337,630 23 - 6,924,021 - 6,911,204 2 )0 14,109,756 8 14,109,721 - 1,953,276 - 1,953,276 )0 19,229,127 4 19,208,582 - 2,415,600 - 2,415,600 - 1,379,000 - 1,379,000 - 2,462,907 2 - 2,462,438 2 )0 1,614,270 0 1,614,270 - 717,304 - 706,607 9-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total CostTo Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 29. Port Everglades Harbor, FIl (Federal Funds) 30. Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 31. St. Augustine Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 32. St. Johns River, FL Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 33. St. Lucie Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. San Juan Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 35. Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35. Tampa Harbor, FL (Cont) (East Bay - Branch Channels) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost (45,000) 7,266 20,698 20,668 - (37,000) - 1,265 19,700 19,864 (134)- - 54,426,773 - 54,416,635 27 - 1,757,742 - 1,757,742 2,815,387 2,781,380 2,946,000 2,692,000 44,720,137 2,820,856 2,617,006 3,082,770 2,721,820 44,719,702 - 54,000 - 52,563 364,279 363,799 917 269,700 263,126 342,736 51,553 2,260,504- 2,263,294 1 17,967 884,410 857,218 155,885 10,000 37,431 6,699 3,688,163 3,216,680 335,000 196,186 100,000 35,695 700,500 702,981 110,750 99,767 - 1,476,434 ' - 1,476,434 - 4,768,107 1,393 4,768,063 - 1,171,243 2 - 1,171,243 2 - 1,300,299 - 1,300,299 0 102,000 102,746 430,000 43,241 231,500 1,862,00 218,514 1,874,84 2,426,000 2,898,514 700,000 946,332 330,000 292,769 4,656,0 4,598,06 (100,000) 60,804 16,855 7,766,689 31 7,766,489 31 6,244,485 6,240,757 3,516,026 3,265,643 - 13,744,968 n - 13,744,968 n D0 18,790,135 " 18 18,790,134 n - 173,767,490M - 173,766,190 30 33,743.095 54 35,161,772 U - 1,083,162 - 1,038,711 1,700,000 1,689,301 814,450 718,406 9-30 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. PROJECT 35. Tampa Harbor, FL (Port Sutton) (Federal Funds) 37. Brevard County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 40. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control & Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Proj. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 41. Duval County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 42. Indian River County, FL (Federal Funds) 43. Manatee County, FL (Federal Funds) 44. Nassau County, FL (Federal Funds) 45. Palm Beach County, FL (Federal Funds) 46. Pinellas County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Total Cost To FUNDING FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cos New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 16,410 12,777 2,511,000 380,337 174,579 100,000 207,547 64,028 2,992,000 674,349 135,542 241,027 - 3,750,000 109,616 369,577 1,421,917 1,699,856 432,000 119,360 400,000 241,677 2,005,000 1,813,682 3,199,000 3,168,144 4,756,700 2,458,842 150,000 139,696 4,493 (82,000) 4,040,811 1,702,149 1,702,149 (1,254,000) 1,403,906 512,237 (331,000) 11,762 525,000 645,686 125,641 994,000 3,999,143 8,361,000 5,629,609 45,000 33,849 10,574 3,916,000 4,048,845 250,000 219,827 (490,000) 652,615 2,100,000 186,661 1,800,000 141,766 93,000 113,780 4,098,000 3,265,479 1,501,462 3,623,575 9-31 195,000 173,545 2,346,492 2,324,168 29,001 29,001 2,262,000 2,257,081 19,345,100 19,251,323 26,884 26,884 3,460,990 ' 3,460,990 ' 14,463,900 14,201,776 11,609,567 11,414,073 401,000 385,208 3,025,000 1,074,024 1,800,000 141,766 7,877,834 7,752,653 13,621 13,621 18,280,693 16,971,222 5,625 5,625 20,160,345 17,121,627 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 47. Sarasota County, FL (Federal Funds) 50. Central and Southern Florida (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 51. Dade County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 52. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 53. Four River Basins, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 54. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 62. General Regulatory (Federal Funds) 65. Kissimmee River, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 400,000 200,000 269,000 - 238,048 268,548 262,057 16,100,000 17,603,265 4,807,619 4,685,876 971,000 1,407,080 1,711,000 149,102 576,000 10,408 351,400 (576,000) 2,182,572 400,000 342,380 425,941 856,061 29,203,000 26,063,497 5,428,010 5,489,488 1,066,000 1,082,021 1,518,105 1,721,250 1,879,876 18,800,000 12,324,984 6,419,000 6,499,045 26,000 115,824 869,000 768,653 7,187,000 377,500,398 n 7,942,357 376,164,664 " 6,049,750 83,657,040 6,035,778 83,588,082 - 57,624,049 83,983 57,500,926 (241,000) 489,000 36,502,430" 48,291 661,611 36,349,874 " - - 27,857,335 " - 492,252 27,494,564 " - (129,000) 400,403 189,431 306,880 103,471 369,000 171,000 357,584 (9,568) 146,046 18,321 - 6,941,000 523 6,928,345 - 7,499,000 - 7,018,544 (59,000) 38,536 202,145 74,333,095 74,145,329 ' 14,109,946 13,903,316 8,500,000 41,254,000 25,336,000 19,380,000 304,621,569 30,861,960 35,971,382 31,529,182 19,558,294 301,455,847 50,000 90,000 22,901 111,366 3,500 900,000 56,847 (11,738) 1,263,500 351.074 4,236,100 4,124,000 4,863,500 5,240,000 22,191,200 * 4,158,774 4,071,922 4,933,661 5,010,334 21,850,787,1 2,300,000 656 -- 600,000 134,267 1,912,699 590,501 2,900,000 2,638,123 ' Excludes $288,000 for contributed funds for new work. 2 Includes $97,566 for previous project. SExcludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work. SExcludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock. s Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project in Boca Grande entrance channel from contributed funds. ' Excludes $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. ' Includes $905,221 expended for recreation facilities. $ Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. 9 Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 10 Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. 9-32 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT " Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. Excludes $2,199,842 expended from public works funds for new work. u Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. u Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. " Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. n Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local interests. " Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R&H Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. " Includes $5,502,126 expended from public work funds for new work. Includes costs of $6,777,906 for recreation facilities. " Includes $381,479 work-in-kind and $172,314 in costs for north jetty recreation facility. " Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work. m Includes $21,101,919 for new work under previous project, $626,925 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. 2' Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects, $67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement, and $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. SIncludes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. a Includes $11,414 for operating and care under provisions for permanent indefinite appropriation. " Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes $509,506 contributed funds. SIncludes $30,000 for maintenance from public works funds. , Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 expended for new work from contributed funds. , Excludes $1,033,069 contributed funds. " Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed funds. " Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status were deauthorized by Public Law 93-251 section 12. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. 3 Includes $25,838 under previous project. " Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. � Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 3 Includes $44,730 for maintenance from public works funds under previous project. " Includes $853,050 for new work from public works funds under previous project & $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds. " Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. " Excludes work-in-kind. " Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, FL, project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. Includes. $175,000 appropriation and $175,000 cost for new work at C&SP St. Johns Water Management District. " Includes $2,294,134 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbor. " Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. o Includes costs of $89,691 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. " Funds appropriated under General Regulatory Functions 96X3126 only. 9-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 August 26, 1937 March 4, 1913 June 20, 1939 July 14, 1960 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 Report of the Chief of Engineers October 1985 June 20, 1938 July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet. Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cutoffs. BAKERS HAULOVER (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 11 x 200 feet in ocean entrance, thence 8 x 100 feet to Intracoastal Waterway; Marina basin 8 x 200 feet; reconstruction of jetties and protection of inlet shores. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock. Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant. Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at Port Canaveral West Turning Basin Project. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL (See Section 6 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet. Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance. Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at bend. Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin. Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend. H.Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 189, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 95, 74th Cong., 2d sess. 9-34 JACKSOVIILjE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 P.O. 675/77 July 23, 1942 W.R.D.A. November 17, W.R.D.A. November 28, June 20, 1938 June 14, 1880 July 13, 1892 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 W.R.D.A. November 28, July 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief Engineers December 6, 1 under Sec. 107 1960 R&H Act Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel. H CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet. H Establishment of the Cross Florida National Conservation Area. P. 1986 Deauthorized project purposes in the Act of July 23, 1942, transferred P. 1990 lands and completed facilities to the state, and required state payments to Citrus, Clay, Duval, Levy, Marion and Putnam counties. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. H. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance jetties. A Raising and extending jetties to provide a 19-foot depth. An Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20 to 24-foot depth and 400 to H. 600-foot channel width. Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor. Provided for a 26-foot channel. H. 1st sess. Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin. H. 3 Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from H. 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity 1 vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin. H. 2 Redesignated location of turning basin until Section 107 (R&H Act of P.I 1990 1960) study is completed and the resulting project constructed. 1 FORT MYERS BEACH, FL (See Section 11 of Text) 12 x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in H. Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals. 1 of Extension of 11 x 125 foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in 968 Matanzas Pass. of t .Doc. 186, 81st Cong., 1st sess. .Doc. 109, 79th Cong., 1st sess. L. 99-662, 17 Nov 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. L. 101-640,28Nov. 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. .Doc. 497, 75th Cong., 3d sess. nnual Report 1879 nnual Report 1891 & 1896 Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Doc. 227, 68th Cong., Doc. 548, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Doc. 284, 87th Cong., st sess. Doc. 662, 80th Cong., Zd sess. L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990 01st Cong., 77?s?e ss. Doc. 183, 86th Cong. st sess. 9-35 REPORT OF TEE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Def. Act of March 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, March 4, 1933 August 30, 1935 Report of the Chief of Engineers December 14, 1987 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Auth. March 1, 1962 FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL (See Section 12 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests. Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel. Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions. Deepening and enlarging channels and turning basin. Total cost of $6,742,000. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL (See Section 13 of Text) 9 x 100 foot channel; deepening channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice. Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U.S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used. Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area. Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-1. Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to 9 x 100 feet. by Senate and House Public Works Comm. Auth. by Chief of 6 x 80 foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay. Engineers, March 1, 1963, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, (See Section 14 of Text) January 21, 1927 Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami. July 3, 1930 Channel width of 100 feet. PARA June 26, 1934 Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge. August 26, 1937 Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach. March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 Channel 12 x 125 feet. Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian (deauthorized). Turning basin at Vero Beach. Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 100-676,17 Nov. 1988, 100th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong., 1st sess. FL H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 9-36 JACKSOWVILLB, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami. Report of July 22, 1960, Mod. 12-foot channel March 2, 1907 November 17, 1986 JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL (See Section 15 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad H.Doc 663, 59th Cong., bridge. 1st sess. Deauthorized the 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast P.L. 99-662,28 Nov. 1986, Railroad bridge. 99th Cong., 2d sess. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL (See Section 16 of Text) Report of the Chief of Engineers 12 Feb. 1982 Enlarge weir structure and west opening controlling flow into Mill Cove, to reduce shoaling and improve navigation as well as circulation. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. JOHN'S PASS, FL (See Section 17 of Text) Auth. by Chief of Channel 10 x 100 feet in gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, Engineers Dec. 2, 6 x 100 feet to IWW, 2.6 miles long. 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act LONGBOAT PASS, FL (See Section 18 of Text) Auth. by Chief of 12 x 150 foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Engineers, April Bridge; 10 x 100 foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly 20, 1976 under to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge. Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act, as amended Report of the Chief of Engineers 12 May 1980 W.R.D.A. November 28, 1990 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 MANATEE HARBOR, FL (See Section 19 of Text) Provide for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basin from Tampa Bay to Port Manatee. Initial construction of a widener at Manatee Harbor and deepen area adjacent to berthing area. Modified the project for navigation authorized by the W.R.D.A. of 1986 to construct substantially in accordance with the post authorization change report dated April 1990. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR (See Section 20 of Text) Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 101st Cong., ?? sess. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 390, 74th Cong., 2d sess. 9-37 July 3, 1958 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 PWA Program Sept. 6, 1933 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1907 March 4, 1913 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 August 13, 1968 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 September 1989 MIAMI HARBOR, FL (See Section 22 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth. The channel at Dinner Key Airport. An 18-foot channel in a land cut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty. Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet. Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912. A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties. A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited to $200,000. A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay. Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward. Specified in Act S.Doc. 95, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. The Virginia Key improvement. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project 1st sess. widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interests contribute one-third of the cost. Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key approach channel, S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and 2d sess. increasing the width of the 300-foot wide section to 500 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth. Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 400-foot wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing 2d sess. turning basins at Biscayne Boulevard terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet. Deauthorized the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, widths; and the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin, 99th Cong., 2d sess. to Government Cut, and to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel. P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 101st Cong, ?? sess. 9-38 JACKSOVII, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorised Documents Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 Auth. by Chief of Engineers Nov. 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act September 19, 1890 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 PARA June 26, 1934 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 March 13, 1934 December 10, 1934 August 30, 1935 NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL (See Section 23 of Text) 10 x 150 foot entrance channel; 8 x 100 foot inner channels; and 8-foot deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL (See Section 24 of Text) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from R&H appropriations. New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal. Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston. Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart. Deauthorized basin at Stuart. Enlarge existing 8 x 90 foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL (See Section 25 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg. Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run. Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river. Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed. Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors. Deauthorized channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL (See Section 26 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests. Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local interests, to 20 feet. Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point Specified in Act Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1889,p. 1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. I.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. Recommended by Chief of Engineers to Public Works Administration October 17, 1934 I.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Comm. 9-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Report of the Chief of Engineers 10 Dec. 1985 October 27, 1965 March 3, 1925 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 H.R. September 23, 1976, S.R. October 1, 1976 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 on south side of the inlet, reverting the banks of the inlet, and Doc. 42, 74th restoring existing jetties. Cong., 1st sess. Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed 2d sess. $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949. An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 1st sess. (contains mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet latest published map) north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west. Assume maintenance of locally expanded turning basin to a depth of P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 25 feet on north side of existing basin. 99th Cong., 2d sess. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL (See Section 27 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south sides of inlet; H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment basin inside the weir. 1st sess. PONCE HARBOR, PR (See Section 28 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local Cong., 4th sess. interests. Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. Rivers and Harbors undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds Committee Doc. 18, previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the 72nd Cong., 1st sess. improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests. Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., for dredging 30-foot depth area and 18 acres off the municipal 2d sess. pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero. Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion adjacent to the 2d sess. municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL (See Section 29 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests. H.Doc. 357, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet Rivers and Harbors square. Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., and enlarge flare at entrance channel. 2d sess. Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alinement and increase H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., turning basin in size and depth. 2d sess. 9-40 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1905 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1919 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1945 Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen H.Doc. 144, 93rd Cc Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning 1st sess. for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed post authorization studies. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 30 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms Annual Report 1899 for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State. Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, Specified in Act chemical or other means. Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle. Specified in Act ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL (See Section 31 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin. H.Doc. 555, 75th C Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 32 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka. The improvement of Deep Creek. Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed under previous project). A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney. Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and easing bends at other points. A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends. (Cutoffs deauthorized) Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, FL, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff). A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL (See Section 33 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet. 3d sess. H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1899 p. 1343 H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report for 1879, pp. 795-798 H.Doc. 1111, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 9-41 ong., ong., REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents November 7, 1966 Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet. H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 August 8, 1917 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 August 4, 1976 Report of the Chief of Engineers 23 December 1982 Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet through bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR (See Section 34 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth. Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel. Modified condition of local cooperation. Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth. Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage area to 329 acres. Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock. Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal. Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32- foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage. A bar channel 48 x 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 x 250 feet; provide a 38-foot aepth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alinement 350 feet to the west; deepening Anegado, and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, and Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area "E" to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500-foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. 9-42 JACKSOUVIBL, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 3, 1899 March 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1899 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 TAMPA HARBOR, FL (See Section 35 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay. For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa. TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay. For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary. HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12 x 200 foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under title Improving Hillsborough Bay, FL) TAMPA HARBOR Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor. Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1998, pp 1357-1360 Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., 1st sess. For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth S.Doc. 22, 72nd Cong., of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth 1st sess. of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals. For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending 3d sess. the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet. For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Sen. Comm. Print. Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest. 76th Cong., 1st sess. For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and TYbor Channel to 500 feet; S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 2d sess. 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly; and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly. For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, 1st sess. and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge. 9-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough S.Doc. 16, 77th Cong., Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River. 1st sess. (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950). For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port 1st sess. Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns. Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests. 2d sess. Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 34 x 400 feet. 2d sess. For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet. 1st sess. Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the H.Doc. 401, 91st Cong., Gulf to Mullet Key. 2d sess. Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet. Do. Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut through Do. Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels. Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction with Do. Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels. Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet. Do. Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a Do. turning diameter of 1,200 feet. Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet. Do. Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet. Do. Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and Do. an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin. Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the Do. junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin. Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing Do. length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet. An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from Do. the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet. A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning Do. diameter of 1,200 feet. An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Do. Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet. 9-44 JACKSOYVIII, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet. August 15, 1985 Maintenance of East Bay channel to 34 x 300 feet for a distance of 5,500 feet. Report of the Port Sutton Channel deepening to 43 feet for a distance of 3,700 Chief of Engineers feet and a width of 200 feet. 28 March 1988 W.R.D.A. Maintenance of Alafia Channel to a depth of 34 feet, if a Non-Federal November 28, 1990 Sponsor agrees to reimburse the Secretary TAMPA HARBOR BRANCH CHANNELS Report of the Enlarging Hillsborough Bay Cut D, Sparkman Channel, Port Tampa Channel Chief of Engineers and existing turning basins at the entrance to Ybor Channel and 25 January 1979 at Port Tampa, all to a depth of 41 feet with varying lengths and widths and deepening Ybor Channel to a depth of 39 feet. This work will be associated with the Main Channel deepening. TAMPA HARBOR EAST BAY CHANNEL W.R.D.A. Maintenance dredging at an average annual cost of $471,000. 17 Nov. 1986 BEACH EROSION BREVARD COUNTY, FL (See Section 39 of Text) CONTROL PROJECTS August 13, 1968 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL, NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 40 of Text) October 27, 1965 Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, FL and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades. W.R.D.A. Deauthorized navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet. November 17, 1986 W.R.D.A. Continued authorization for Hillsboro Inlet dredging for 5 years. November 28, 1990 CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FL Report of the Shoreline protection. Chief of Engineers 2 April 1982 August 13, 1968 August 15, 1985 DADE COUNTY, FL (See Section 48 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. DADE COUNTY-NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL (See Section 48 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. Do. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 100-676,17 Nov. 1988, 100th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 9-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Report of the Chief of Engineers 27 December 1983 October 27, 1965 W.R.D.A. 17 Nov. 1986 S.R. 31 May 1974 and H.R. 20 Nov. 1975 W.R.D.A. 1990 November 28, 1990 Report of the Chief of Engineers 22 April 1984 Report of the Chief of Engineers May 19, 1986 October 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 November 7, 1966 Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors 23 April 1985 Extending of existing shore protection project for Dade County to P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, provide for protective beach fill and subsequent nourishment 99th Cong., 2d sess. along 2.5 miles of shore north of Haulover Beach Park. DUVAL COUNTY, FL (See Section 41 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project. H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL (See Section 42 of Text) The plans provide for a 2.65 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, Vero Beach, a 1.7 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Sebastian 99th Cong., 2d sess. Inlet State Park and for periodic nourishment of the new beaches. MANATEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 43 of Text) The plan provides for a level berm 50 feet wide at an elevation 6 feet S.Doc. 37, 93rd Cong., (MLW) along 3.2 miles of shore on Anna Maria Island and nourishment 1st sess. of entire Gulf shore of that island as needed throughout project life. MARTIN COUNTY Periodic nourishment over the 50 year life of the project. P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. MONROE COUNTY, FL Modification of existing project from 6,200-foot long to 8,770-foot P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, long beach fill stabilized with 2 groins and periodic nourishment. 99th Cong., 2d sess. NASSAU COUNTY, FL Improvement for beach erosion control on Amelia Island. P.L. 100-676,17 Nov. 1988, 100th Cong., 2d sess. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 44 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., sand-transfer plant. 1st sess. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM LAKE WORTH INLET TO SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET, FL (See Section 44 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project on H.Doc. 772, 80th Cong., Palm Beach Island. 2d sess. Federal participation in cost of local sand-transfer plant at Lake H.Doc. 342, 85th Cong., Worth Inlet and shore protection project. 2d sess. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL (See Section 45 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island, P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key, 92,000 feet of beach at Treasure 99th Cong., 2d sess. Island, and construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key. Also, renourishment of each island. 9-46 JAK, PL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents SARASOTA COUNTY, FL (See Section 46 of Text) Report of the Shoreline protection along 12,600 feet of shoreline on central Chief of Engineers Longboat and 21,100 feet on Manasota Key in the vicinity of 28 February 1986 Venice, Florida and periodic nourishment of these areas. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL Report of the Shoreline protection along 2.5 miles of problem area in the St. Chief of Engineers Augustine Beach and Coquina Gables area and periodic nourishment. 26 February 1980 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (See Section 49 of June 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes. September 3, 1954 Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement. July 14, 1960 Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County. October 23, 1962 Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando. Do. Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami. Do. Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County. Do. Project Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of Reedy Creek Swamp. Do. Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage. October 27, 1965 Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County. Do. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County. August 13, 1968 Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties. Do. Improvement of supply, distribution and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. Approved Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. December 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Text) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 9-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TEE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Deauthorized flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando; primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County; and navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. W.R.D.A Extended modified water delivery schedules to Everglades National Park to November 17, 1988 January 1, 1992. Everglades National Park Protection and Expansion Act of 1989 October 23, 1962 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 Construct modifications to the Central and Southern Florida Project to improve water deliveries into the park and shall, to the extent practicable, take steps to restore the natural hydrological conditions within the park. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL (See Section 52 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. Deauthorized Anclote River control structure and channel improvement. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 100-676,17Nov. 1988, P.L. 101-229, 13 Dec. 1989, 101st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (See Section 53 of Text) December 31, 1970 LAGO de CERILLOS, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. LAGO de PORTUGUES, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. PONCE, PR Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control. Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 April 1986 Report of the Chief Engineers January 1989 RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR Project for flood control. RIO DE LA PLATA, PR Project for flood control. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 SAVAN GUT, *ST. THOMAS, VI Project for flood control. Increased maximum allotment to $100,000. W.R.D.A. Set maximum amount allotted under Section 205 of the Flood November 28, 1990 Control Act of 1948 at $10,000,000. W.R.D.A. November 28, 1990 KISSIMMEE RIVER, FL Conduct a feasibility study for the purpose of determining modifications of the flood control project for central and southern Florida, authorized by section 203 of Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1176), which are necessary to provide a comprehensive plan for the environmental restoration. P.L. 858, 30 Jun. 1948, 80th Cong, 2d sess. P.L. 101-640,28 Nov. 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640,28 Nov 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. 9-48 W.R.D.A. November 17, 1986 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, FL 1974 $ 267,427 $ 636,427 Aquatic Plant Control, FL (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) 1968 1,640,997 2 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL 1939 5,099,153- Bayport, FL' 1972 58,495 - Cedar Keys Harbor, FL 1977 168,569 s 76,023 Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI' 1964 303,317 58,595 Clearwater Pass, FL2' 1980 46,349 ' 1,257,684 Courtnay Channel, FL' 1940 22,846 26,779 Crystal River, FL' 1941 25,000 135,212 Everglades Harbor, FL' 1964 221,509 ' 51,034 Fajardo Harbor, PR' 1945 - - Guayanes Harbor, PR' 1945 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, FL' 1974 38,850- Hillsboro Inlet, FL 1965- Homosassa River, FL' 1937 3,999' 26,454 Horseshoe Cove, FL 1977 347,521 161,864 Hudson River, FL' 1974 9,889- Intracoastal Waterway1 Miami to Key West, FL' 1963 243,079 28,046 Key West Harbor, FL 1972 1,548,892 " 534,623 Kissimmee River, FL' 1931 23,479 112,954 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL" 1931 10,276 9,035 Largo Sound Channel, FL' " 1966 117,443 U 51,149 Little Manatee River, FL".n 1949 11,903 " Manatee River, FL"s 1970 123,350 194,516 New River, FL' 1956 36,518 31,296 Orange River, FL' 1962 2,000 24,918 Ozona, FL, channel and turning basin' 1963 105,527 15,089 Palm Beach, FL, side channel and basin' 1946 - - Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL" 6 1966 41,297 ' 60,686 Pithlachascotee River, FL 1973 400,000 s 261,401 Rice Creek, FL' 1957 85,208 19 18,814 St. Petersburg Harbor, FL 1983 255,608 1,570,552 21 St. Thomas Harbor, VI' 1949 1,989- Steinhatchee River, FL' 1940 135,053 44,439 Suwannee River, FLU 1977 76,418 219,570 Withlacoochee River, FLU 1969 614,912 23 431,545 ' Complete. 2 Excludes $1,640,997 contributed funds. ' Inactive. Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. s Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 6 Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. Excludes $42,783 contributed funds. ' Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 'In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 10 Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. n Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. u Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. " Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 1 Expended on restudy. SInactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. " Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of R&H Act of 1960. '7 Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. " Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 9 Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. ' Includes $32,689 under previous project. 21 Includes $20,532 under previous project. SIncludes $10,154 expended under previous project. 2 Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. ' Authorized by Section 301, R&H Act of 1965 and Section 107 of P.L. 101-640. 9-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 48 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park, FL 1969 $34,862 $ - El Tuque Beach, Ponce, PR 1985 1,396,730 Lee County, FL 1971 - Manatee County, FL 1983 217,600 - Punta Salinas, PR 1984 855,511- Palm Beach County, FL, from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,140 6,257 San Juan, PR 1965 - TABLE 9-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 56 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, FL 1960 $66,485 1- Biscayne Bay, FL, Hurricane Protection 2 1966 - - Hillsborough Bay, FL 2 1969 - - Phillippi Creek Basin, FL2 1966 - - Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. 2 Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 9-50 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 36 of Text) Date Survey Cost Incurred Project Conducted During Period AIWW, Norfolk to St. Johns River, FL 9-92 -1,519 Anclote River, FL 11-91 4,910 Channel, Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL 11-91 22,699 Cedar Key Harbor, FL 2-91 20,890 Clearwater Pass, FL 3-92 29,747 Eau Gallie Harbor,FL 9-91 3,237 Fort Myers Beach, FL 9-92 5,073 Key West Harbor, FL 5-91 4,137 Mayaguez Harbor, PR 12-91 3,362 Melbourne Harbor, FL 11-91 1,854 Miami Harbor, FL 9-92 19,043 Oklawaha River, FL 11-91 87 Palm Beach Harbor, FL 11-91 75 Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL 2-92 801 Ponce Harbor, PR 12-91 2,300 Port Everglades, FL 3-92 4,138 St. Johns River to Lake Harney, FL 5-92 497 St. Lucie Inlet, FL 2-92 24,900 A/E Contract 195,918 Total $ 342,149 9-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-I CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 5 of Text) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, FL Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock dimensions 90' wide; 600' long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of Sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,979,670 ' 56x400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was with increased width. Operation and maintenance of lock is a constructed 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost Federal responsibility. ($700,000). Length increased to 600 feet to be compatible TABLE 9-J CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 8 of Text) R.N. Henry H. Buckman Eureka Lock Bert Dosh Dunellon Inglis Lock Lock and Dam Lock Lock and Dam Nearest town Palatka, Sparr, Ocala, Dunnellon, Inglis, (miles) 11.2 15.8 8.9 2.5 3.2 Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 90.4 111.4 127.7 156.5 168.6 Lock dimensions (ft.)' 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 Normal lift (ft.) 20 20 0-152 12-272 28 Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) 14 17 16-312 16-312 18 Character of Piles in Piles in Piles in Rock Rock foundation sand sand sand Kind of dam Movable Movable None None Movable Type construction Earth3 Earth' - - Earth3 Percent complete 100 100 0 0 100 Estimated contract cost $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 Clearwidt.andgreaest.aailale.lngth 2 Clear width and greatest available length. 2 Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. 'With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-52 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-K CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 8 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operation and Maintenance: Operations of locks, operations and maintenance of dams, spillways, reservoirs and bypasses, debris removal, performance monitoring system $ 223,445 Buildings and grounds maintenance, trash removal, potable water testing 217,575 Natural Resources Management 4,073 Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, sanitary facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters and contract maintenance of grounds 86,453 Condition and operations studies and periodic inspections 77,529 Energy Conservation 0 Water quality studies, data collection and processing, reimbursement to USGS, water control analysis Lake Oklawaha and Inglis Bypass, and water management control 100,388 Real Estate audits, inspections and outgrants 27,699 OSHA medical exams 4,859 Construction Management 373,272 Sub-Total $1,115,293 Maintenance: Lands and Damages $ 55,590 Maintenance of dams and spillways and contract maintenance 59,498 Maintenance of locks and lock repair contract 119,186 Maintenance of roads, bridges 44,008 Maintenance of recreational facilities, roads and bridges 72,692 Maintenance of levees and floodwalls 35,941 SRUF 0 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment (Recreation) 84,282 Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment 0 Bank stabilization-maintenanceof slopes and berms, Rodman and Inglis dams, and bank stabilization contract 220,094 Maintenance of canals, clearing and snagging 28,621 Engineering and Design 498 Construction Management 58,382 Income Credits -1,794 Sub-Total $ 776,998 Grand Total $1,892,291 9-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-L OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 24 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operations and Maintenance: Operations: Operations of Locks, and Permanent Monitoring System Contract maintenance buildings, grounds, potable water testing, repair and replacement of project signs, operation and maintenance of District communications network Natural resource management Management of recreation areas and facilities Real estate management and energy conservation reports OSHA medical exams and inspections Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections Construction Management Sub-Total Maintenance: Maintenance of locks and dams Real estate acquisitions, surveys, and encroachments Maintenance of recreational roads Maintenance of recreational facilities Maintenance of banks, revetments and dikes Maintenance of permanent operating equipment non-recreational Channel and canal maintenance Engineering and Design Construction Management Income Credits Sub-Total $ 607,479 313,636 170,828 204,494 26,756 1,672 131,860 103,887 1,560,612 64,793 29,468 26,083 1,578,148 35 207,973 510,993 213,766 -7,846 2,984,935 Total $ 4,537,698 9-54 TABLE 9-N CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 50 of Text) Miles Elevation From Lock Normal of Normal Depth Character Kind Kind Nearest Nearest Dimensions lift Pool of sills of of of Percent Contract Town Town (ft.) (ft.) surface (ft.) (ft.) foundation Dam Construction Complete Cost W.P. Franklin At Olga Lock and Dam 1 S-65 Lock Frostproof S-65A Lock Avon Park S-65B Lock Sebring S-65C Lock Sebring S-65D Lock Okeechobee I S-65E Lock Okeechobee U, U, Moore Haven Moore Haven Lock (HGS- 1 Mod.) S-310 Clewiston (HGS-2 Mod.) S-193 Okeechobee (HGS-6 Mod.) S-308B Pahokee (Port Mayaca) S-57 Ashton S-58 S-59 S-60 S-61 S-62 S-63 S-63A S-96 S-96A S-53 S-55 S-157 S-158 Ashton Kissimmee Ashton St. Cloud Ashton Ashton Ashton Sebastian Sebastian Eau Gallie Christmas Sebastian Titusville 0 56 x 400 2.5 3.0 23 30x90 26 30x90 20 30x90 25 30x90 14 30 x 90 10 30 x 90 0.5 50 x 250 0.5 50 x 60 0.5 50 x 60 11 56 x 400 9 20x90 5 20x90 6 20x90 6 20x90 6 20x90 10 20x90 12 20 x 90 14 20x90 14 20x60 16 20x60 8 20x60 12 20x60 4 20x60 15 20x60 4.2 6.3 6.0 7.2 5.8 4.6 9.4 5.0 7.5 4.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 7.5 3.5 10.0 20.0 4.5 48.5 - 52.3 s 46.3 40.0 34.0 26.8 21.0 15.5 - 17.5 ' 15.5 - 17.5 ' 15.5 - 17.5 3 15.5 - 17.5 ' 62.0 64.0 58.0 64.0 55.0 61.0 62.0 57.0 24.0 25.0 17.5 14.0 20.0 4.0 14 Piles in clay 6 Earth foundation, sand 6 Earth foundation, sand 6 Earth foundation, sand 6 Earth foundation, sand 6 Earth foundation, sand 6 Earth foundation, sand 11 Piles in sand lockwalls 12.9 Slab on sand 7.5 Piles in sand and slab on sand 18 Slab on sand 6 Earth foundation, sand 6 Do. 6 Do. 6 Do. 6 Do. 6 Do. 6 Do. 6 Do. 6 Do. 6 Do. 6 Do. 6 Do. 6 Do. 6 Do. Movable Reinforced 100 $3,803,655 concrete None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete None Steel sheet pile None Reinforced concrete None Reinforced concrete Fixed Reinforced concrete None Concrete and steel sheet pileNone None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. $1,211,465 $1,531,490 $1,068,397 $1,357,246 $1,242,909 $1,320,040 $433,000 2 $3,448,406 $615,0002 $8,308,700 $2,355,000 2 $2,355,000 2 $2,349,000 $2,355,000 2 $2,355,000 2 $689,217 2 $2,355,000 $2,305,000 2 $2,063,000 $1,965,000 2 $1,908,000 2 $1,955,000 2 $2,486,000 2 $2,247,000 : Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (S-79) is a Federal responsibility. SEstimated (Oct 1990). C, 4 0 n 0" d H '1 H0o H 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 100 0 00 10 100 000000000 lOO lO 1oo ooo REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-M REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 30 of Text) Locality Acres Controlled Cost St. Johns River and tributaries and Withlacoochee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers 15,800 $ 1,742,536 Okeechobee Waterway and tributaries 10,892 691,083 Acquisition and maintenance of airboats, engines and work tools -82,229 Operation of service facilities 15,000 Income credits - - OSHA medical exams - 1,997 Engineering and Design- 1,191 Construction Management- 187,784 Total 26,692 $ 2,721,820 9-56 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 (See Section 50 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Channels and Canals: C-51 (Kirk Rd to Turnpike) September 1989 - September 1992 Levees: Upper St. Johns L-77 & L-74N (Part) January 1990 - September 1992 Structures: Upper St. Johns S-251, S-254 & S-255 January 1990 - September 1992 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1992 (See Section 50 of Text) Construction Approx. % Feature Started Complete Channels and Canals: Upper St. Johns S-254 Flow-Way October 1991 86 Levees: Upper St. Johns L-75 & S-5 June 1990 98 Upper St. Johns L-74W September 1991 99 Upper St. Johns L-74N (Part) and L-75 (Rem) September 1992 0 Upper St. Johns Recreation September 1992 0 Structures: Upper St. Johns S-250A, S-250B, S-250C & S-250D September 1991 87 Upper St. Johns S-256 & S-259 September 1992 0 9-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARME ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-Q CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 50 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate' Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Com- Actual No. Name (miles) (feet) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, FL 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, FL 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, FL 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, FL 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, FL 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector gates and have no lift. Gate No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. TABLE 9-R CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 50 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized Cash Contribution1 Jun. 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sep. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 Jul. 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 12.8 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Backflow Features 20.0 P.L. 89-72 Recreation Features 50.0 Water Resources - St. Lucie 20.0 Recreation Features 50.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for under provisions of recreational craft 50.0 Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act (Deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 by P.L. 99-662) P.L. 99-662 Upper St. Johns River Basin - non-structural flood protection 25.0 Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administation except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. 9-58 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-S CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 50 of Text) Work Performed New Work: Lands and damages Construction of Railroad bridges Channels and canals Levees Floodway control and diversion structures Pumping plants Buildings, grounds and utilities Cultural Resource Preservation Equipment operation Depreciation Engineering and Design Construction Management Total cost Operations: Operation of locks, dams, reservoirs and performance system Maintenance, buildings and grounds, operation of District communications network, repair and replacement of project signs Patrol, inspection, and maintenance of Herbert Hoover Dike, HGS 3, 4, and 5, operation and maintenance of drainage ditches, culverts and 16 spillways, and pumping costs Natural resource management Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, dam safety studies Water quality/water control studies, data collection, regulation of Lake Okeechobee and three conservation areas Energy conservation Real estate outgranting OSHA inspections Construction Management Sub-Total Maintenance: Maintenance of natural resources Maintenance of locks and dams Maintenance of non-recreational roads and bridges Repair and stabilization of Crown Road, Herbert Hoover Dike, removal of weeds, rebuilding and regrading levee slopes, modification and maintenance of safety barriers, HGS 3, 4, and 5, cleaning landside toe ditches, repair of culverts, replacement of fences, removal of trees, topping of trees, control of Melaleuca, replacement of rip rap on slopes and berms Maintenance of recreational facilities Maintenance of hydrometrological network Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment Bank stabilization Non-dredging channel maintenance and debris removal Engineering and Design Construction Management Income credits Sub-Total Total Special recreation user fees 9-59 Cost $ -1,204 0 1,007,092 2,528,929 576,047 00 484 00 3,089,877 825,115 $ 8,026,340 736,860 355,015 541,094 138,087 193,206 68,574 1,274,089 6,390 6,719 2,412 148,601 $ 3,471,047 1,803 419,004 0 597,975 550,499 0 458,934 16,514 0 260,977 259,025 0 2,564,731 6,035,778 00 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 9-T FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1992 (See Section 53 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period for Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 Alteration of Facilities B-195 B-594 Alteration of Facilities B-196 SCL RR Bridge, B-196 Channels and Canals: C-135 C-135, Sec. 1A C-135, Sec. lB C-135, Sec. I1C & 2 C-135, Sec. 3A C-135, Sec. 3B C-135, Sec. 4A C-136 C-231, Phase I C-231, Phase II C-331 C-531 C-534 C-135 Structures: S-160 S-161 S-162 S-353 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway S-551 Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 L-212, Sec. 2 L-112 L-112 & Floodway S-155 S-163 S-159 Middle & Lower S-159 Upper Recreation: Morris Bridge & Flint Creek Sites Dead River Sites Jul 1968 - Mar 1970 May 1971 - Jan 1973 Jan 1973 - Jan 1974 Oct 1972 - Jan 1975 Dec 1972 - Jul 1975 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Jul 1966 - Aug 1967 May 1968 - Sep 1972 Jan 1971 - Dec 1973 Dec 1972 - Apr 1975 Feb 1975 - Aug 1977 Apr 1976- Jan 1979 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Jul 1973 - Apr 1975 Jul 1973 - Jan 1974 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1966 - Jan 1969 Jun 1979 - Jul 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Apr 1975 - Jun 1977 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1967 - Mar 1969 Jul 1970 - Feb 1972 Jun 1968 - Jul 1970 Jul 1970 - Sep 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 Apr 1979 - Aug 1981 Jun 1979 - Sep 1981 Dec 1982 - Aug 1984 Mar 1985 - Jul 1986 Not transferred Do. Do. Do. Jul 1975 Dec 1968 Oct 1967 Not transferred Not transferred Oct 1977 Not transferred Not transferred Nov 1977 Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Sep 1968 Apr 1969 Nov 1971 Dec 1968 Nov 1977 Apr 1977 Nov 1968 Dec 1975 Not transferred Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Oct 1980 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Oct 1981 Jan 1985 Dec 1986 9-60 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 53 of Text) Nearest town Name of nearest town Distance above mouth of river Lock dimensions Normal lift Elevation of normal pool surface Depth of sills Character of foundation Kind of dam Type of construction Percent complete Estimated cost (including dam and spillway) 20 miles Ocala, FL 65.5 miles 30 x 125 feet 18.0 feet 58 feet 12 feet Piles in sand None Reinforced concrete 100 $1,990,138 TABLE 9-V 'FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 57 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Bradenton Beach, FL Curiosity Creek, Tampa, FL Cano Cacul, Aguadilla, PR Cano Madre Vieja, Aguadilla, PR Cedar Creek, Jacksonville, FL Cedar Hammock, Bradenton, FL Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, VI Fortuna Bay, St. Thomas, VI Ft. Clinch State Park, Nassau County, FL LaGrange Gut,Frederiksted, St. Croix, VI Guanica, PR Linderberg Bay Area, St. Thomas, VI Long Branch, Jacksonville, FL Juan Mendez Channel, PR Moncrief Creek, Jacksonville, FL Naguabo River, PR Ponce Regional, PR Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel, PR Rio El Ojo De Agua, PR Rio Fajardo, PR Rio Guadiana, Naranjito, PR Rio Guamani, Guayama, PR Rio La Plata, Comerio, PR Rio Loco, Guanica, PR Rio Manati, PR Rio Manati, Barceloneta, PR Rio Niqua, Arroyo, PR Sabana Grande, PR Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI Strawberry Hill, St. Croix, VI Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI TABLE 9-U 3,105 0 2,882 621 45,706 44,327 24,688 54,011 7,554 395,323 70,149 39,562 0 4,865 1,173 6,438 11,867 1,446 110,236 47,476 45,776 382 59,927 54,081 245 296 125 53,042 158,124 158,124 0 13,422 0 33,654 8,752 9-61 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT* This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pear River Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until October 1, 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Water from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Apalachicola Bay, FL ................................ 10-3 2. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965) .................................... 10-3 3. Bayou Coden, AL ....................................... 10-3 4. Bayou La Batre, AL..................................... 10-4 5. Biloxi Harbor, M S ...................................... 10-4 6. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ................................................... 10-5 6A. Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL .............................. 10-6 6B. Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL....................................... 10-6 7. Bon Secour River, AL.................................10-7 8. Dauphin Island, AL...................................... 10-7 9. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL............................ 10-8 10. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL ...................... 10-8 11. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL .............................. 10-9 12. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and M exican Border............................................ 10-9 13. Gulfport Harbor, MS.................................. 10-10 14. Mobile Harbor, AL ..................................... 10-10 15. Panama City Harbor, FL ........................... 10-11 16. Pascagoula Harbor, MS.............................. 10-12 17. Pensacola Harbor, FL................................. 10-12 18. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ........................ 10-13 19. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS .............................. 10-13 19A.Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL and MS................ 10-14 20. Deauthorized Projects ................................ 10-15 21. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................................... 10-15 22. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization................................. 10-15 23. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys...................................... 10-15 Page Beach Erosion Control 24. Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Special Authorization...................... 10-15 25. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project ........................................... 10-15 Flood Control 26. Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL ............................................ 10-15 27. County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., M S .................................... 10-16 28. Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL ......................................... 10-16 29. Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL.......................... 10-16 30. Fort Toulouse, W etumpka, AL........................................... 10-17 31. Hurricane Creek, Prentiss Co., M S ........................................ 10-17 32. Mill Creek, Dalton, GA.............................. 10-17 33. Mill Creek, Sum rall, M S .............................................. 10-17 34. Mound State Park, M oundville, AL.......................................... 10-18 35. Murder Creek, Brewton, AL ...................... 10-18 36. Okatibbee Lake, MS ................................. 10-18 37. Portersville Bay-East, M obile Co., AL ......................................... 10-19 38. Portersville Bay-West, M obile Co., AL .......................................... 10-19 39. Proctor Creek A tlanta, GA ............................................... 10-19 10-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Flood Control Page 40. Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA................ 10-20 41. Silver Creek, Rom e, GA ............................................... 10-20 42. Sowashee Creek, M eridian, M S..........................................10-20 43. Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS ................... 10-21 44. Threemile Creek, Mobile, AL.................. 10-21 45. Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL ............................. 10-21 46. Tombigbee River and Tributaries, MS & AL.............................. 10-22 47 Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, M S ...................................... 10-22 48. Village Creek, Birmingham, AL......................................10-22 49. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.................... 10-23 50. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................ 10-23 51. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................ 10-23 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 52. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA ......... 10-24 52A. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA ............. 10-24 52B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL.................. 10-25 52C. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL ........................................... 10-25 52D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL ........... 10-25 Tables Table 10-A Table 10-B Table 10-C Table 10-D Table 10-E Table 10-G Table 10-H Table 10-J Cost & Financial Statement ......... 10-33 Authorizing Legislation .............. 10-39 Other Authorized Navigation Projects...................... 10-49 Other Authorized Beach Control Erosion Control Project .......................................... 10-49 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............................ 10-50 Deauthorized Projects.................. 10-50 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization................... 10-51 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................... 10-51 Multiple Purpose Projects Includ. Power Page 52E. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL........10-26 53. Allatoona Dam Coosa River Basin, GA ........................... 10-26 54. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA.....................10-27 54A. Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA........................... 10-28 54B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA ....................................... 10-28 54C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA.........................................10-29 54D. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA ....................................... 10-29 54E. West Point Lake Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA .... 10-30 55. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations................................ 10-30 56. Deauthorized Projects...............................10-31 Miscellaneous 57. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC&CE)............................10-31 58. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP)......................................10-31 59. Regulatory Functions Program.................10-31 General Investigations 60. Surveys....................................................10-31 61. Collection and Study of Basic Data..........10-31 62. Advance Engineering and Design ............ 10-31 63. Continuation of Planning and Engineerin g ........................................ 10-32 64. Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds.................................... 10-32 Table 10-K Table 10-L Table 10-M Table 10-N Table 10-0 Table 10-P Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................................ 10-52 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA Development Proposed Under Existing Project ........................... 10-52 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, Al, GA, and FL, Locks and Dams and Multiple-Purpose Development Included In Existing Projects........ 10-53 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ................................... 10-54 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and M S .................................. 10-55 Completed Flood Insurance Studies And Flood Hazard Information Reports For FY 1982 Thru FY 1991......... 10-56 10-2 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Navigation 1. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and 9 feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, and a connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound, with twin breakwaters on either side parallel to the shore and having a total length of 5,300 feet; (f) a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-and-timber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $34,558. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $2,033,461 for new work and $4,012,778 for maintenance, a total of $6,046,239. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The existing project provides for management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 50 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state of Alabama by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. Water quality studies and overhead amounted to $5,877. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $727,588. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 3. BAYOU CODEN, AL Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) 10-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence 8 feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a tumrning basin 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Water Control Management cost $420. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated March 31, 1975 and completed March 26, 1976. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $330,701 for new work and $1,150,567 for maintenance, a total of $1,481,268. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000 and $50,000 for maintenance. 4. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, Al., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southemrn tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the 12-foot depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a tuming basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, the plan of improvement is to deepen channel to 18-foot by 100-foot from the mouth through the tumrning basin, a distance of about 1.8 miles; deepen channel from turning basin to 0.29 miles above highway 188 bridge to 14-feet by 75-feet, a distance of about 0.89 miles; extend a 14-foot by 50-foot channel from tumrning basin into Snake Bayou for about 730 feet and a 12-foot by 50-foot channel within Snake Bayou about 790 feet; extend 18-foot by 120-foot channel in Mississippi Sound to connect with GIWW, then along GIWW alignment to connect with Pascagoula ship channel. This channel dimensions would be 18-feet by 120-feet for a distance of about 20 miles. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Several boatways for construction of small seagoing vessels are also available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous real estate activities cost $4,652; engineering and design cost $166,011; and supervision and administration amounted to $54,860. A total Federal cost of $225,523 for new work. Maintenance: Project Condition Surveys cost $10,024. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. The contract for deepening the Sound Channel is scheduled for award in March 1993. The plans and specifications for the Bayou Channel are scheduled for completion in March 1993. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $536,618 for new work and $3,649,737 for maintenance, a total of $4,186,355. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $10,500. 5. BILOXI HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastemrn Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The existing project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through 10-4 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12- foot deep by 100-foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12- foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel authorized by River and Harbor Act of Nov. 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in Feb. 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on March 28, 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet, for use by commercial small craft, and an East Harrison County Canal project which provides for a 12- foot project depth, 130-feet wide and about 2,100 feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot project depth. This work was completed in April 1980. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-andtimber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract Dredging cost $727,600. Condition surveys cost $77,800. Water Quality Studies, and miscellaneous costs totaled $125,320. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. The 1966 modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in FY 1980. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $1,431,919 for new work and $10,866,989 for maintenance, a total of $12,298,908. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $238,640. 6. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to vicinity of Birmingham is about 430 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams and 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new 110- by 600-foot locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Armistead I. Selden replaced locks 8 and 9; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. The Coffeeville Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. A replacement lock for the old Oliver Lock located 2,300 feet downstream is under construction. The replacement lock has dimensions of 110 feet by 600 feet. A fixed crest spillway will extend 800 feet across the river. Minimum provision will be provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to the old lock 1, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at lock 1,100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet 10-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufactures, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging of the river system cost $4,292,700. Condition surveys costs $499,000. Engineering and design cost $329,300. Supervision, administration and other general charges for the overall river project totaled $4,306,532. Natural Resources Management and Recreation cost $2,456,200. Recreation attendance CY 1991 totaled 6,571,553 user days. Other O&M costs for the system include: Coffeeville Lock and Dam, $735,900; Demopolis Lock and Dam, $666,200; Selden Lock and Dam, $760,000; Oliver Lock and Dam, $594,900; Bankhead Lock and Dam, $805,200; Holt Lock and Dam, $783,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original lock and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1, 2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15 and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed February 6, 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam and Holt Lock and Dam, was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Construction of the new Oliver Lock and Dam is underway with the new lock open to traffic as of July 1991. Project construction began in November 1986 and is scheduled for completion in January 1993. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $88,461,935 for new work and $267,417,909 for maintenance, and $52,292,880 for major rehabilitation, a total of $408,172,724. 6A. JACKSON PORT, JACKSON, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River in Clarke County in southwest Alabama in the city of Jackson, Alabama, approximately 90 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. Existing project. None. The authorized Port would be located on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System, which is a federally authorized 9 by 300 feet navigation project connecting Birmingham, Alabama with the Port of Mobile. In conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation project, the district has been directed to construct a port at Jackson. Local cooperation. Local Cooperation Agreement requirements have not been determined. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $89,060; and supervision and administration $15,341. A total Federal cost of $104,401 for new work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the Design Memorandum is currently underway and is scheduled to be approved in March 1993. Design (P&S) is scheduled for completion in October 1993. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1992 is $447,931. 6B. OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL Location. The project is located at mile 337.7 on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 10-6 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Existing project. The existing navigation facilities on the Black Warrior and Tombigbee include six (6) locks having a total lift of 255 feet. Each of the locks have chamber dimensions of 110 by 600 feet. Original work on the waterway was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1884. The 17 original locks have been replaced by the existing six (6) locks . Prior to this year, Oliver Lock was the only lock in the system with chamber dimensions of 95 by 460 feet. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the plan of improvement was to replace Oliver Lock and Dam at a new location 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock with chamber dimensions of 110 by 600 feet was opened to traffic in July 1991. The fixed crest spillway, which is still under construction, will extend 800 feet across the river. Minimum provisions are being provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. Land Acquisition is complete. Construction was initiated in November 1986 with the award of the Alabama Power Company relocation contract. The first stage cofferdam and river diversion contract was awarded in February 1987 and the lock and dam construction contract was awarded in March 1988 with scheduled completion set for December 1992. For other information see description of Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers project. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required. One-half of the total cost of construction of the navigation lock and dam will be paid by amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contracts $3,453,372; engineering and design $157,845; and $793,851 for supervision and administration and miscellaneous expenditures. A total Federal cost of $4,405,068 for new work. Contributed funds expended in FY 1992 totaled $4,393,130. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 97% complete and scheduled completion date for the entire project is January 1993, at an estimated cost of $120,000,000. Total Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost under existing project to September 30, 1992 is $55,738,759 for new work. Contributed funds (Inland Waterways Trust) expended total $57,073,773. 7. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Also a 10 by 80 foot South Fork channel from the intersection with the Bon Secour channel, 1.14 miles to a 150 x 150 foot turning basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal wharves used by the seafood industry and a marine ways are located along the existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Feasibility studies cost $15,255; supervision and administration cost $3,340. A total Federal cost of $18,595. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $1,755. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $137,210 for new work and $1,378,691 for maintenance, a total of $1,515,901. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 8. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about 7 acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7 - foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, 10-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 except during storms is about 4 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Feasibility studies cost $18,278; supervision and administration cost $4,050. A total Federal cost of $22,328. Maintenance: Contract Dredging cost of $40,100. Condition surveys cost $3,279. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $292,864 for new work and $2,351,505 for maintenance, a total of $2,644,369. 9. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The Dog River project provides for a 7 by 100-foot channel with a total length of 4.5 miles to provide access to the Mobile ship channel. The Fowl River project provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. boaTtyearrmdi nfoarl ffaabcriilcitaiteisn. g Estxeieslt invges sefla cihliutliless, ncionnes imst arionf asa, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Water Control Management, $850. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing Fowl River portion of the project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Work on the Dog River channel realignment was initiated and completed during FY 1986. Total Federal cost on the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $2,849,080; $391,354 for new work and $2,457,726 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $195,250. 10. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 12-foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 10-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost amounted to $5,000. Condition surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $101,016. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $916,715 for new work and $8,470,020 for maintenance, a total of 10-8 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT $9,386,735. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 11. FLY CREEK, AL Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Alabama, 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Fairhope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Alabama. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on the south bank near mouth of creek, consisting of a pile-and-timber service wharves, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a commercial marina on north bank of creek. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30, 1992 amounted to $588,907 of which $29,000 was for new work and $559,907 for maintenance. 12. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land cuts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou LaBatre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christain, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Carrabelle-Apalachicola Bay section: Dredging navigation channel maintenance cost $2,400. Condition surveys, water quality studies, supervision and administration totaled $37,300. Apalachicola Bay - St. Andrew Bay section: Dredging navigation channel maintenance cost $18,900. Condition surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous cost totaled $34,700. St. Andrew Bay - Choctawhatchee Bay section: Condition surveys and dredging studies cost $336,300. Dredging navigation channel maintenance cost $67,300. Water quality studies, supervision and administration and miscellaneous totaled $479,500. Choctawhatchee Bay - Pensacola Bay section: Condition surveys, dredging studies, and bank stabiliziation cost $39,800. Pensacola Bay - Mobile Bay section: Dredging Contracts $1,700. Condition surveys, dredging studies, supervision and administration and miscellaneous totaled $125,200. 10-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Mobile Bay - Rigolets section: Condition surveys and miscellaneous cost totaled $82,700. Condition surveys, water quality studies, real estate activities, and miscellaneous cost pertaining to the waterway in general not site specific totaled $769,062. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Flonrida, which has been deauthorized. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12- foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1992 is $69,700,828, of which $6,480,299 was for new work and $63,220,529 for maintenance. 13. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 35 miles west of Pascagoula, Mississippi, and 60 miles east of New Orleans. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747, Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commercial smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straight-approach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a smallboat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is authorized in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1986, and further amended by WRDA 1988 to modify the existing ship channel to 36 by 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 by 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the turning basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. The FY 91 construction appropriation provided for constructing an increment of the authorized project and provide a 36 by 220 feet channel in Mississippi Sound and 38 by 300 feet across the bar. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modem rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Thin-layer contract administration cost $9,911,468; Engineering and design cost $119,066; and supervision and administration cost $261,132. A total Federal cost of $10,291,666. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $2,340,800. Condition surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $460,708. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Awarded thin-layer monitoring contract in June 1991 under the authority of WRDA 1986 and 1988. The channel contract was awarded in April 1992, thin-layer monitoring program is continuing. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $11,328,790 for new work and $42,255,295 for maintenance, a total of $53,584,085. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $4,069,717. 14. MOBILE HARBOR, AL Location. The project is located along the lower 5 miles of Mobile River, and channel extends thru Mobile Bay and into Gulf of Mexico,in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 47-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar, (b) a 45-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River, (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Complex ocean terminal, and continuing thence a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, 10-10 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel serving the Theodore Industrial Park 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100- feet, extending 6,500 feet and terminating in a 300-by 300- foot tumrning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channels is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. Further authorization provides for future development to deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 feet by 700 feet about 7.4 miles long, deepen and widen bay channel to 55 feet by 550 feet about 27.0 miles long, deepen and widen an additional 3.6 miles of bay channel to 55 feet by 650 feet and provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island. All dredged material will be placed in an approved disposal area in the Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the local sponsor to construct the project for the first increment of work. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract cost $544,803, engineering and design $63,893, and supervision and administration cost $20,914. A total Federal cost of $629,610. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $16,904,900. Condition surveys cost $321,900. Water quality studies, engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $3,198,495. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I of the project modification was completed in June 1990. A draft supplement to the GDM for construction of a turning basin has been reviewed and comments received are being incorporated. Current estimated Federal cost is $218,548,000, and non-Federal cost is $178,452,000. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $96,077,200 for new work and $153,332,950 for maintenance, a total of $249,410,150. Contributed funds expended amounted to $18,170,860 for new work. 15. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel about 3.5 miles long, extending from deep water in St. Andrew Bay through barrier peninsula, known as Lands End, to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 32 feet deep in the bay through Lands End; and 450 feet wide and 34 feet deep in the gulf, protected by east, west jetties, extending 2,075 feet and 2,896 feet respectively; a channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities; and the maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou, an arm of St. Andrew Bay, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in bay to highway bridge. Authorized modifications includes branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel. Mean tidal range is about normally 1.3 feet and 3.0 feet extreme. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 10-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $39,100. Engineering and design, water quality studies, and miscellaneous costs totaled $58,785. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $1,638,045 for new work and $9,066,114 for maintenance, a total of $10,704,159. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 16. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), and through Mississippi Sound into the Gulf of Mexico, in southeastern Mississippi, about 38 miles west of Mobile, Alabama, and about 100 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a tumrning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Escatawpa (or Dog) River, then up Escatawpa River to Highway 613 (formerly 63) bridge; (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Escatawpa River, and (f) a 12-foot by 80-foot channel extending from deep water in the Pascagoula River (about one-half mile north of the railroad bridge) to a turning basin in Krebs Lake a distance of about 1,500 feet, then along the south bank of the lake a channel 10-foot by 60-foot and terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of 2,700 feet from the first. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Further authorization provides for deepening and widening gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Hom Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and construct tumrning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modem rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $2,615,300. Condition surveys cost $21,700. Water quality studies, supervision and administration, and miscellaneous costs totaled $515,528. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965 and the Krebs Lake project was completed in November 1983. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was approved in June 1992 for deepening and widening channels. Precor.struction Engineering and Design was completed September 1992. Total Federal cost of existing project to September 30, 1992 is $6,572,985 for new work and $50,336,544 for maintenance, a total of $56,909,529. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $3,788,266. 17. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) 10-12 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT a 33-foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300- foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner harbor channel; (d) an inner harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modemrn rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and dredging studies cost $65,200. Miscellaneous costs totaled $7,039. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except for features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1992 is $1,469,693 for new work and $8,300,456 for maintenance, a total of $9,770,149. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $297,587. 18. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southem arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredge Contract cost at $891,400. Condition surveys and miscellaneous costs totaled $97,599. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in March 1969. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1992 is $629,860 for new work and $7,788,997 for maintenance, a total of $8,418,857. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 19. TENNESSEE-TOMBGIBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks and consists of three sections as follows: (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile long divide cut in which the bottom width is 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River. The total lift of 341 feet is accomplished by 10 locks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 10-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Local cooperation. Local interests have made and are maintaining alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with the United States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized the formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held December 5, 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 to finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities and handling equipment are still being developed along this new waterway. As of September 30, 1992, twelve such facilities were operational, while five were under construction, and five more are planned. The operational facilities are handling grain, wood chips, and logs. When all facilities are complete, about half will be publicly owned and operated. Additional ports and terminals must be completed before the waterway can achieve its full potential. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction cost $3,321,034; relocations cost $41,714; recreation facilities $7,814,806; real estate $175,558; engineering and design cost $395,842 and supervision and administration cost $1,227,708, a total of $12,976,662 for new work. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost $5,511,600. Total cost for operation and maintenance of the project for FY 92 amounted to $21,229,316, which included general charges of $6,649,516; Gainesville Lock and Dam, $377,600; Tom Bevill Lock and Dam, $531,200; Columbus Lock and Dam, $414,700; Aberdeen Lock and Dam, $384,100; Lock A, $371,700; Lock B, $417,700; Lock C, $360,800; Lock D, $375,700; Lock E, $413,300; Bay Springs Lock and Dam, $364,700. Recreation costs totaled $5,056,700. Recreation attendance for FY 1992 totaled 6,096,944 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $1,030,087,228 for new work, and $160,724,566 for maintenance for a total of $1,190,811,794. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is essentially complete. There are currently 8 contracts underway on the project: 6 recreational, 1 relocation, and 1 contract for grouting water wells. The waterway was opened for navigation in January 1985. 19A. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION PROJECT, AL AND MS Location. This project is in Alabama and Mississippi at the following locations: (1) Existing Project Lands - Approximately 72,500 acres of Tennessee-Tombigbee Project Lands have been designated for mitigation purposes. An additional 20,100 acres have also been designated at Coffeeville Lake, Demopolis Lake, Claiborne Lake and Dannelly Reservoirs in Alabama and at Okatibbee Lake in Mississippi. (2) Separable Lands - Acquisition and management of 88,000 separable lands in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta, Alabama (not less than 20,000 acres); the Pascagoula, Pearl, and Mississippi Delta Basins in Mississippi (not less than 25,000 acres); and the balance at any location in the two states. Previous project. None. This project was a new construction start in Fiscal year 1990. It was authorized by Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Existing project. The authorized project calls for the acquisition of separable lands at the above named locations. The Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) will assist in the selection of separable lands. 10-14 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT The selected lands will be purchased from willing sellers at fair market value. Emphasis will be placed on forested wetlands, with a minimum of 34,000 acres of bottomland hardwoods being purchased. The separable lands and the existing project lands designated for mitigation purposes will be managed for wildlife. The States will be primarily responsible for managing these lands in accordance with a management plan jointly developed by the States, Corps and the FWS. However, due to operational constraints it will be necessary for the Corps to retain management responsibility for some of the existing project lands included in the mitigation program. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required since the cost of this project is a 100% Federal responsibility. Operation and results during fiscal year. Land acquisition cost $19,761,880. Engineering and Design $574,127. Supervision and administration, $893,309. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial funding for the project was received in January 1990. At the end of September 1992, 20,209 acres had been acquired in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta; 28,435 acres in the Pascagoula River Basin, and 92 acres along the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway in northeast Mississippi. Evaluation of tracts offered for consideration in the Mississippi Delta, Pearl River Basin, and other areas in Alabama and Mississippi are completed. A variety of activities were also undertaken to begin managing the 92,600 acres of existing project lands included in the Mitigation Program. Scheduled completion date is September 1996. The total project cost is estimated to be $84,600,000. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1992 is $34,913,892. 20. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 10-G.) 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-C.) 22. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $151,537 in FY 1989. (See Table 10-H.) 23. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-K.) Beach Erosion Control 24. BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Studies conducted under Section 103, 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended, amounted to $243 in FY 1989. (See Table 10-I.) 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-D.) Flood Control 26. BOGGY BAYOU, VALPARAISO, FL Location. The project is located in the city of Valparaiso, Florida in Okaloosa County on the west bank of Boggy Bayou which indents the north shore of Choctawhatchee; about 10 miles northeast of Fort Walton Beach. Existing project. The project provides for shoreline bank protection along 700-feet of shoreline of Boggy Bayou and precludes possible destruction of Bayshore Drive and utilities. The protective works consist of a stone dike having a crest elevation of 3.0 feet NGVD and a 15- foot wide base between +1 and -1 foot NGVD. An 18-inch thick layer of riprap was placed from the top of the dike to elevations 6.0 feet NGVD. The riprap was placed on 6-inches of bedding material and filter cloth. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract $2,226; Engineering and design cost $428. Supervision and administration cost $72. 10-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed in FY 1990. The project was completed in July 1991. Estimated Federal cost is $156,300; and the non-Federal portion is $52,100. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $135,251. 27. COUNTY LINE ROAD BRIDGE, ITAWAMBA COUNTY, MS Location. County Line Road Bridge crossed Mantachie Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi and is located approximately one mile west of Centerville along an unnumbered county road between County Hwy. 363 and the county line. The Mantachie Creek drainage area is located in northeast Mississippi and is a part of Tombigbee River Basin. Existing Project. The project provides protection for both banks and the channel at the bridge crossing Mantachie Creek. The banks and channel were graded and protected with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. This precludes any streambank erosion from high velocities or from sudden drawdown associated with receding floodwaters. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction Contract $2,891. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded in August 1989 and completed in January 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $81,800; and the non- Federal portion is $33,000. Total Federal cost to date is $116,662 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $28,109. 28. CRIBBS MILL CREEK, TUSCALOOSA, AL Location. Cribbs Mill Creek begins in the northeastern part of the city of Tuscaloosa, AL and flows generally southwestward through the city into the Black Warrior River. Existing project. The project consists of channel modification of about 7,300 feet of the creek. Modification consists of widening the existing channel. The proposed plan would extend upstream from 1-359 to the confluence of Tributary 1 with the creek. Work would also be performed on 600 feet of Tributary 5. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract $17,125. Engineering and design cost $12,871. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $2,694. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded in November 1989 and was completed in July 1991. Estimated Federal cost is $1,605,000; and the non-Federal portion is $1,200,000. Total Federal cost to date is $1,805,826 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $152,932. 29. ESLAVA CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The city of Mobile, Alabama, which is located on the Gulf Coast of Alabama. The project begins at Pine Hill Drive and ends 2.1 miles upstream at Emogene Street. Existing project. None. The plan of improvement consists of channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and increasing the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard by adding an additional barrel. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile was signed on September 14, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract $11,160; engineering and design $44,645; and supervision and administration $16,658. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications on first two phases are complete. The first increment of work was awarded in February 1988 and completed in August 1988. The second increment of work was awarded in September 1990 and completed in September 1991. Anticipate the third increment contract to be awarded in April 1993 and construction to be completed in December 1993. Current estimated Federal cost is $4,000,000; and the non-Federal portion is $1,046,800 for land and relocation, and $190,925 cash contributions. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1992 is $2,989,060. Contributed funds expended $196,004. 10-16 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 30. FORT TOULOUSE, WETUMPKA, AL Location. The project is located near the confluence of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers; approximately 20 miles north of Montgomery, Alabama. Existing project. The project provides bank stabilization for the National Historical Landmark and Taskigi Indian Mounds and consists of a 1,140-foot section of riprap revetment on the upper end of the site and 720-feet of stone dike at the lower end of the site. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction Contract $222,129; Engineering and design cost $21,206. Supervision and administration cost $24,392. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completed plans and specifications in FY 1990. Construction initiated in FY 1991 and was completed in March 1992. The project was transferred to the sponsor in August 1992. Current estimated Federal cost is $721,000 and non-Federal portion is $240,000. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $358,797 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $194,000. 31. HURRICANE CREEK, PRENTISS CO., MS Location. Southeast Prentiss County, Mississippi. Marietta-Hazeldell Road Bridge crosses Hurricane Creek Tributary to Big Brown Creek and is located about 20 miles northeast of Tupelo, Mississippi. Existing project. The project provides emergency streambank protection to the banks and the bottoms of the channel to retard erosion at the Marietta-Hazeldell Road Bridge crossing Hurricane Creek, a tributary to Big Brown Creek. The banks and bottoms were graded and protected with 12 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric upstream of and downstream from the bridge. Through the bridge section, 18 inches of riprap were placed on 6 inches of bedding materials and filter fabric. This precludes any streambank erosion from high velocities or sudden drawdown associated with receding floodwaters. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract $1,108. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in August 1989 and construction was completed in December 1989. Total Federal cost to date is $52,720. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $12,892. 32. MILL CREEK, DALTON, GA Location. The Mill Creek watershed comprises an area of 51.0 square miles in northeastern Walker County and west central Whitfield County, Georgia. The creek rises about 8 miles southwest of Dalton and flows in a northerly direction to its confluence with the North Fork of Mill Creek. From this point the creek flows generally in an easterly direction through the northern part of Dalton and enters Coahulla Creek 5.5 miles above its mouth. Existing project. The project consists of clearing and snagging Mill Creek from its mouth to downstream face of Willowdale Drive or a distance of 8.6 miles. This work involves the clearing of all material, trees, shrubs, and any underbrush within the creek banks. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $3,858. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $592. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Detail Project Report was revised in November 1987. These revisions reflected the changes due to cost sharing and contained a revised local cooperation agreement. A construction contract was awarded on 6 November 1989. Project construction was completed in August 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $245,000; and the non-Federal portion is $200,000. Total Federal cost to date is $474,065 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $25,000. 33. MILL CREEK, SUMRALL, MS Location. Mill Creek originates in Lamar County, Mississippi; about 2 miles south of Sumrall. The town of Sumrall is located in southeastern Mississippi; about 16 miles northeast of Hattiesburg. Existing project. The project consists of clearing and snagging 1.0 mile along Mill Creek with overbank clear- 10-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 ing for 0.63 miles to provide a 50-foot wide floodway along the left descending banks. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract $607; engineering and design cost $13,914. Supervision and administration cost $2,628. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded in August 1992 and is scheduled for completion in February 1993. Current estimated Federal cost is $83,300 and the non-Federal portion is $59,000. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $104,104 for new work. 34. MOUND STATE PARK, MOUNDVILLE, ALABAMA Location. The bank stabiliziation project is located on the left descending bank of the Black-Warrior River, about 16 miles south of Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Existing project. The project provides bank stabilization for the Mound State Park National Historical Landmark. The plan consists of grading approximately 800-feet of unstable bank to IV:3H and protect with riprap. Steeper upper bank sections around buildings are protected with a 250-feet long gabion wall. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract $232,965; engineering and design cost $29,147; supervision and administration cost $18,340. Condition at end of fiscal year. Completed plans and specifications in FY 1990. The construction contract was awarded in March 1992 and is scheduled for completion in April 1993. Current estimated Federal cost is $803,000 and non-Federal portion is $268,000. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $416,857 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $100,044. 35. MURDER CREEK, BREWTON, AL Location. The project is located in the city of Brewton, AL near the confluence of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks in the commercial district of downtown Brewton. Existing project. The existing project provides for clearing and snagging in the vicinity of Brewton, Alabama on Murder Creek and on Burnt Corn Creek. Clearing was accomplished by felling and removing trees leaning more than 30 degrees and snagging by removal of snags and debris from bottom and sides of the channel. A limited stream clearing and snagging project was completed in 1980 on portions of both creeks to remove obstructions to flows. This interim measure was undertaken to reduce flooding in Brewton and East Brewton. Further, an evacuation plan for East Brewton was implemented under the Section 205 authority. The project involved removal of damageable structures from the low-lying flood plain of Murder Creek. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of project as of September 30, 1992 is $1,178,684. 36. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally form 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and top-of-conservation- pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 to 59,500 acre-feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been 10-18 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $1,397,215. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during CY 1991 totaled 1,648,035 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $9,739,528 for new work and $15,272,708 for maintenance, a total of $25,012,236. 37. PORTERSVILLE BAY - EAST, MOBILE COUNTY, AL Location. The project is located in the town of Coden, in south Mobile County, Alabama. Portersville Bay, an arm of Mississippi Sound, is about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. Existing project. None. The project will provide for shoreline bank protection along 5,600 feet of Shell Belt Road. The protective works will consists of a timber bulkhead constructed of 12-inch diameter and 12-foot long vertical piles. Treated timber sheeting will penetrate 3 feet below the dredged line to prevent scour at the toe. The sheeting will be backed by non-woven filter fabric and backfilled. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with Mobile County, Alabama was signed on March 24, 1992. The non-Federal sponsor has made all required cash payments, and all other items of local cooperation have been fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $16,512; and supervision and administration cost $2,327. A total Federal cost of $18,839. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded on August 11, 1992, and construction of the shoreline protection project was commenced in September 1992. All work on the project is expected to be completed by the end of February 1993. 38. PORTERSVILLE BAY - WEST MOBILE COUNTY, AL Location. The project is located in the town of Coden, in south Mobile County, Alabama. Portersville Bay, an arm of Mississippi Sound, is about 7.0 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. Existing project. None. The project will provide for shoreline bank protection along 3,500 feet of Coden Belt Road. The protective works will consist of a timber bulkhead constructed of 12-inch diameter and 12-foot long vertical piles. Treated timber sheeting will penetrate 3 feet below the dredged line to prevent scour at the toe. The sheeting will be backed by non-woven filter fabric and backfilled. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with Mobile County, Alabama was signed on March 24, 1992. The non-Federal sponsor has made all required cash payments, and all other items of local cooperation have been fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $7,990; and supervision and administration cost $1,684. A total Federal cost of $9,674. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded on August 11, 1992, and construction of the shoreline protection project was commenced in September 1992. All work on the project is expected to be completed by the end of February 1993. 39. PROCTOR CREEK, ATLANTA, GA Location. The Anthony Street area south of Bankhead Highway; about a mile west of Georgia Tech in Atlanta, Georgia. Existing project. The project consists of the evacuation of 32 residential structures in the Anthony Street area. These structures were purchased and removed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operating and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate cost $67,312. Supervision and administration cost $310. 10-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate acquired 31 residential structures with remaining one under negotiation. Construction is scheduled for completion in June 1992. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $850,243 for new work. 40. RACCOON CREEK BACONTON, GA Location. The project is located in the community of Baconton in northwest Mitchell County approximately 20 miles south of Albany and 40 miles northeast of Bainbridge, Georgia. Exiting project. The flood control project consists of raising about 1500 feet of South Jackson Street near the West Daniels Street bridge to elevation 176.0 feet NGVD. The channel and 30 feet on each overbank of Raccoon Creek were cleared and snagged from State Hwy. 3 to U.S. Hwy. 19. Raising South Jackson Street prevents overbank flows from entering downtown Baconton. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $3,786. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $646. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications were initiated in August 1988. A construction contract was advertised in May 1989, and a contract was awarded on 29 August 1989. The project was completed in May 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $251,000; and the non-Federal portion is $89,000. Total Federal cost to date is $380,645 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $35,000. 41. SILVER CREEK, ROME, GA Location. Silver Creek is located about 2 1/2 miles south of Rome, Georgia in Floyd County. Silver Creek originates south of Rome and flows northerly through Lindale into the Etowah River downstream of East Second Avenue Bridge. Existing project. The project provides for non-structural flood control measures along Silver Creek. The plan consists of purchasing and removing 15 houses from the 2- year flood plain. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate cost $29,481. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate acquired 15 residences. Construction completed in March 1991. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $604,719. 42. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS Location. The project is located in East Central Mississippi, Lauderdale County, in the city of Meridian, which is approximately 90 miles east of Jackson, Mississippi. Existing project. In 1955, the Corps of Engineers completed channel improvement on the lower 10.5 miles of Sowashee Creek. This work was accomplished under the authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The plan of improvement consists of a combination of channel enlargement (3.9 miles), and clearing and snagging (6.6 miles) over a reach of 10.5 miles. One (1) railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require modification for the channel improvement. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the Pat Harrison Waterway District was completed on September 23, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Relocation contract cost $39,200; Construction contract cost $2,277,896; engineering and design $572,464; and supervision and administration $159,091. Condition at end of fiscal year. All contracts have been completed except for the recreation contract. Plans and specifications for the expanded recreation will be initiated in FY 1993. Upon completion, the project will be officially transferred to the city. An Operation and Maintenance Manual will be provided within 90 days of the transfer. Current estimated Federal cost is $20,145,000; and the non-Federal portion is $12,155,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1992 is $13,658,299 for new work. Contributed funds expended $931,493. 10-20 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 43. TALLAHALLA CREEK, LAUREL, MS Location. The project is located in the city of Laurel, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin in southeastern Mississippi. Existing project. None. The project along Tallahalla Creek would consist of channel clearing and snagging with overbank clearing of brush and trees less than 4 inches diameter for a distance of 30 feet on each bank. The project would begin about 1.5 miles below Queensburg Avenue Bridge and extend 7.25 miles to US Highway 84. Also, a flood warning system would be installed in the Tallahalla Creek Basin to relay data to a base station. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $44,444. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $8,081. Condition at end of fiscal year. The advertisement for bids for clearing and snagging portion of the project was cancelled in August, 1989 due to erosion at two sites along Masonites Lagoon Dikes. A flood warning system for the Tallahala Creek basin was awarded in January 1990 and completed in May 1990. The construction contract was awarded in September 1992 and is scheduled for completion in August 1993. Estimated Federal cost is $713,000; and the non-Federal portion is $321,000. Total Federal cost to date is $241,365 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $40,000. 44. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The project is located near the Gulf of Mexico in the southwest corner of the state of Alabama and in the city of Mobile, approximately 180 miles southwest of Montgomery, Alabama. Threemile Creek originates in the western part of Mobile and flows easterly about 14 miles to enter Mobile River near the Alabama State Docks. The drainage area of the basin consists of 39 square miles of urbanized area. Existing project. None. The authorized flood control project will consist of channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. The plan also includes development of certain recreational facilities of the type associated with urban parks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile, Alabama was completed on September 30, 1987. The local sponsor has agreed to make all payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Relocation cost $1,012,055. Construction contracts $5,880,465; engineering and design cost $117,672; and supervision and administration cost $260,815. Condition at end of fiscal year. All channel contracts have been completed; 3 bridge relocation contracts have been completed; and 2 bridge relocation contracts are underway. The final bridge relocation contract was awarded August 1992, but work will not start until the other bridges are complete. Current estimated Federal cost is $16,677,000; and the non-Federal portion is $7,923,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1992 is $13,285,884 for new work. Contributed funds expended $973,427. 45. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line. Existing project. Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing and snagging and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1936 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. 10-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Maintenance: Routine maintenance of channels cost $16,062. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $134,801 for new work and $2,943,885 for maintenance, a total of $3,078,686. 46. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Luxapalila Creek is the last project currently being considered under the 1958 congressional authority. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of the Tombigbee River Basin by means of channel clearing and snagging. The Luxapalila Creek project consists of 2.1 miles of completed channel modifications. The remaining effort consists of approximately 26 miles of various channel work. Approved estimate of cost for new work is $42,108,000; consisting of $37,743,000 Federal funds, and $4,365,000 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion, with the exception of Twenty Mile Creek from mile 11.7 to mile 22.0. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost $18,840; engineering and design $289,142, and supervision and administration cost $54,239. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as funds are made available. Total project is 85% complete. Luxapalila Creek is the only remaining work scheduled to be accomplished. Plans and specifications are complete and construction contract scheduled for award in April 1993. The clearing and snagging contract is scheduled for award in June 1993. Total Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $25,110,746 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $63,342. 47. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The proposed project on Gordons Creek is located in Hattiesburg, MS. Existing project. A Federal project on the lower 2.5 miles was constructed in 1979 under the Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consisted of clearing and snagging from the creek's confluence with the Leaf River upstream to Bay Street and channel widening to a 40-foot bottom width between Bay and Broad Streets. The work will consist of real estate acquisition of ten (10) residences on Brookland Street and South 17th Avenue and removed from floodplain; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement for 1.1 miles between Broad and Hardy Streets; and flood damages mitigation downstream of Broad Street. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $63,867. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $12,068. Work Accomplished to Date: Preparation of Plans and Specifications are essentially completed. It is anticipated a construction contract would be awarded in July 1992, provided necessary right-of-ways for channel improvement are available and necessary relocations are performed by non-federal sponsors. Also, initiation of the mitigation of damages downstream of Broad Street and real estate acquisition of nine residences upstream of Hardy Street have been initiated. Estimated Federal cost is $4,412,250; and the non-Federal portion is $3,087,750. Total Federal cost to date is $787,758 for new work. 48. VILLAGE CREEK, BIRMINGHAM, AL Location. The project is located in central Alabama, Jefferson County, in the city of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. None. The project is basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures, in six (6) 10-22 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT separate neighborhoods, from the floodplain; enlarging 2 miles of the stream channel in the vicinity of the Municipal Airport which also involves modification of three (3) bridges, demolishing two (2) unused bridges, and relocating two (2) waterlines and other utilities, installing three (3) emergency floodwarning devices; and creating an area of 210 acres which can be utilized for future recreation development. Channel enlargements (2 miles) will reduce annual damages near Municipal Airport by 82 percent and evacuation of 642 structures will reduce annual damages in residential areas by 61 percent. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Birmingham, Alabama was executed on December 14, 1988. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with the project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate cost $5,051,145; engineering and design $35,866; and supervision and administration $471,368. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate design memorandum complete February 1988. Real Estate acquisition started January 1989. The project is 80% complete. Acquisition of 479 tracts out of a total of 631 tracts have been completed through September 30, 1992. Project scheduled to be completed June 1994. Current estimated Federal cost is $26,870,000; and the non-Federal portion is $10,130,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1992 is $18,102,071 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $5,910,642. 49. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work under Public law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistance under Public law 288, 93d Congress.(See Table 10- J) 50. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Beaver Creek at Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Little Wills Creek at Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin. Channel recitification projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama and Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donivan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Burketts Creek and Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, Mississippi, and Luxapalila Creek, Lowndes County, Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; Burnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Poley Bridge, Goose Pone and Walnut Creeks, Clanton, Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, and Cahaba River, Trussville, Alabama; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection and erosion control projects include Harrison County, Mississippi; Leaf River, Mahned, Mississippi; Chattahoochee River at La Grange, Troup County, Georgia; Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Georgia; and Chickasawbogue Creek, US Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Alabama. The project at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia and Collinsville, Alabama include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 91 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the project. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of the-local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Followup for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $15,395. Total cost to September 30, 1992 is $671,163 charged to maintenance. 51. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.)Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 10-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 52. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junctions of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The plan was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. The present phase of improvement includes the construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose improvements, Claibome Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and construction of Carters Dam, a multiple-purpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. Wofford Oil Company has a small wharf about 10 miles below Montgomery equipped for handling petroleum products. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging of the river system at a cost of $2,439,500. General charges for water control management, condition surveys, engineering and design, supervision and administration amounted to $4,086,800. Claibome Lock and Dam charges were $429,800 with recreation and resource management costs of $612,419. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claibome Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in March 1966. Carters Dam was completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is essentially complete at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam is essentially complete. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $82,351,213, including $3,245,400 for new work and $79,105,813 for maintenance. (See Table 10-L.) 52A. CARTERS DAM AND RESERVOIR, GA Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Oakman, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The existing project consists of a 1,950-foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a powerhouse on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with 10-24 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum power pool elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and administration totaled $5,412,945. This amount includes $2,347,900 for turbine repairs and generator rewinding. Gross power generation amounted to 352,650,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1992, of which 352,650,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during Fy 1992 totaled 882,628 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 was essentially completed in September 1980. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $163,700,083, including $111,140,340 for new work and $52,559,743 for maintenance. 52B. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The existing project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60-mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the lock and dam totaled $392,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $27,997,450. 52C. COOSA RIVER, MONTGOMERY TO GADSDEN, AL Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Oostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama- Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on January 27, 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured.The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $14,986,400 for new work. 52D. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains three 25,000 kilowatt units. The 103- mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 areas at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. 10-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration cost $3,681,102. Gross power generation amounted to 424,968,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1992, of which 422,045,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during FY 1992 totaled 3,921,634 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operations in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was essentially completed in 1980. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1992 is $63,125,300 for new work and $49,100,587 for maintenance, a total of $112,225,887. 52E. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AN D DAM, AL Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 281.2 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The existing project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 281.2. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 17,000-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs amounted to $2,947,285. Gross power generation amounted to 357,549,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1992, of which 354,391,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 1992 totaled 2,592,261 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 and is essentially complete. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1992 is $115,387,634, including $83,360,800 for new work and $32,026,834 for maintenance. 53. ALLATOONA DAM, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twenty-six feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twenty-six feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3 One 48- inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration totaled $6,281,198. Gross power generation amounted to 149,276,400 kilowatt hours during FY 1992 of which 146,560,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Allatoona Lake during FY 1992 totaled 11,934,721 user days. 10-26 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $35,709,085 for new work and $85,106,560 for maintenance, a total of $120,815,645. 54. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the Apalachicola River from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styz also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles to be accomplished by dredging, contract works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River. Three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project also provides for minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a 9-foot by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane side of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage are provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. The project was originally authorized in section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. A water supply study is currently being conducted on the upper portion of the ACF River System. Local cooperation. The six Florida Counties that originally served as local sponsors for the Florida portion of the waterway have all informed the District in writing that they no longer wish to serve as local sponsors. The State of Florida has also declined assumption of responsibilities of local sponsorship. At this time no items of local cooperation are being complied with. No local sponsors are required for the Alabama and Georgia portions of the waterway. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10-M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost $2,305,900. George W. Andrews Lake recreational and resource management costs totaled $334,800. Operation and maintenance of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $539,200. All other costs for the project amounted to $1,971,073. Recreational attendance during FY 1992 totaled 349,333 user days. 10-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam, is complete. West Point is essentially complete with the exception of adding recreation facilities. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $4,452,162 for new work and $92,774,060 for maintenance, a total of $97,226,222. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 54A. BUFORD DAM, LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest at elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $7,053,258. Gross power generation amounted to 174,154,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1992, of which 171,510,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during FY 1992 totaled 18,707,441 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 10, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $53,028,418 for new work and $109,831,975 for maintenance, a total of $162,860,393. (See also Table 10-M.) 54B. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama). The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading 10-28 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock and dam cost $539,200. Maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963 at a total cost of $13,038,427. (See also Table 10-M). 54C. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $4,390,701. Gross power generation, Jim Woodruff Powerhouse, amounted to 217,482,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1992, of which 214,599,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during FY 1992 totaled 3,038,648 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The pool was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first power-generating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third on April 26, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $47,978,751 for new work and $75,600,212 for maintenance, a total of $123,578,963. (See also Table 10-M.) 54D. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,000 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project 10-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost for FY 1992 was $6,198,975. Gross power generation amounted to 410,322,000 kilowatt hours, of which 402,907,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 1992 totaled 6,777,326 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed onthe- line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $88,330,669 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $10,617,080 and $105,192,895 for maintenance, a total cost of $204,140,644. (See also Table 10-M.) 54E. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The existing project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intakepowerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acrefeet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in operation in March and April, 1975. The current installation is 108,375 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the project totaled $4,504,052. Gross power generation amounted to 189,328,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1992, of which 183,273,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 1992 totaled 7,950,378 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, was essentially complete at the end of FY 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1992 is $131,565,287 for new work and $61,463,730 for maintenance, a total of $193,029,017. (See also Table 10-M.) 55. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and.maintenance costs for the Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers System. 10-30 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 56. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 10-G.) Miscellaneous 57. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Program ........................... $451,959 Emergency Operations..............................................38,006 Rehabilitation............................................................62,903 Total FC & CE $552,868 58. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Mobilization Preparedness.................................... $101,755 Government Preparedness ........................................ 76,309 Total NEPP $178,064 59. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Perm it Evaluation............................................... $1,573,663 Enforcem ent ........................................................... 471,060 Studies ........................................................................ 16,713 Other Navigation Regulations ................................... 34,053 Total Regulatory $2,095,489 General Investigations 60. SURVEYS During FY 1992, costs of $1,002,022 were incurred as shown below: HFlood Damage Preventive Studies........................ $823,161 N avigation Studies....................................................48,812 Interagency Water Resources Development ............ 18,459 Special Investigations ............................................... 70,265 Special Studies ............................................................. 0 Coordination with Other Agencies, and non-Federal Interests..................38,928 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission... ..... 1,477 Miscellaneous Activities....................920 Total Surveys $1,002,022 61. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, HFlood Plain Management services were performed at a cost of $212,122. (See Table 10-P for listings of studies completed during FY 1992.) Costs incurred for hydrologic studies were $516 and miscellaneous cost of $0. 62. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Gulfport Harbor, MS. The authorized plan of improvement consists of modifying the existing ship channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. Dredged material disposal will be in the Gulf of Mexico. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was completed in August 1989. Preparation of plans and specifications were completed in FY 1991. Fiscal year 1992 expenditures for AE & D were $3,200. Pascagoula Harbor, MS. The authorized plan of improvement calls for: Deepening and widening the Gulf entrance channel to 44 x 550 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly, and providing for future realignment as conditions warrant. Deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to 42 feet. Deepening and widening the Bayou Casotte Channel to 42 x 350 feet, and constructing a turning basin at the mouth of Bayou Casotte. Provide for bend widening for navigation and allow for reconfigurating the impoundment basin at the entrance channel. A resurvey of project economics and initial coordination on environmental issues were completed in FY 1991. Indications are that the project is economical. A letter of assurance was received from Jackson County Port Authority. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was approved in June 1992. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) was completed in September 1992. The project is eligible for consideration for a construction new start in FY 1995. Fiscal year 1992 expenditures for AE & D were $228,789. 10-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Fort Toulouse, AL. The authorized plan consists of a curved 4500-foot long cutoff within the inside of the bend opposite the unstable slope, 3600 feet of riprap protection on the outside of the curved channel, and closure of the existing river channel adjacent to the Fort and Indian Mounds with two (2) dikes, filled in between with dredged material. The recommended plan in the General Design Memorandum consists of approximately 1200 feet of riprap bank protection adjacent to the Fort and Indian Mounds with a 700-foot free standing stone dike from the Indian Mound downstream. Plans and Specifications were initiated in FY 1990 and construction initiated in FY 1991. Fiscal year 1992 expenditures for AE & D were $562. Panama City Beaches, FL. The authorized plan consists of the placement of a protective beach to elevation 4', with a storm berm to elevation 7' with an artificial dune system having a top width of 30 feet at elevation 15 and stabilized by vegetation. A comprehensive damage survey was completed during FY 1989 as part of the reevaluation effort. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) is currently 47% complete. A General Reevaluation Report (GRR) is scheduled for completion in December 1993, and PED in September 1994. Fiscal year 1992 expenditures were $588,843. Panama City Harbor. The authorized plan of improvements are the same as described in existing project (see Section 15 in text). Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) is currently 43% complete. A General Reevaulation Report (GRR) is scheduled for completion in October 1994 and PED in September 1996. Fiscal year 1992 expenditures were $227,804. Total fiscal year 1992 expenditures for Advance Engineering and Design were $1,108,044. 63. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Bayou La Batre, AL. The authorized plan for the project consists of an 18-foot deep channel from the turning basin within Bayou La Batre, extending into Mississippi Sound then along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway alignment connecting with the existing Pascagoula ship channel. Extensions of the existing channel to above the Highway 188 bridge at a depth of 14 feet and into Snake Bayou at a depth of 12 feet are also incrementally justified. The Final Feasibility report was completed, and has been through all required Washington level review. The project was authorized in the 1990 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA). Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) work completed in September 1991. The contract for deepening the Sound chanel is scheduled for award in FY 1993. Fiscal year 1992 expenditures were $40,885. 64. RIVERS AND HARBORS CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Contributed funds required for authorized Federal studies included $66,959 for Valley Creek, AL; $5,800 for environmental study at Dauphin Island, AL; and $2,996 for flood plain management a total of $92,845 for contributed funds. 10-32 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 Navigation 1. Apalachi icola Bay FL 2. Aquatic Plant Control (Contributed Funds) 3. Bayou Coden, AL (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Bayou La Batre, AL (Contributed Funds) 5. Biloxi Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, AL 6A. Jackson Port Jackson, AL 6B. Oliver Lock & Dam (Replacement), AL (Contributed Funds) 7. Bon Secour River, AL (Contributed Funds) 8. Dauphin Island, Bay, AL New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 76,000 76,043 45,000 -7,398 58,000 52,161 119,000 119,415 1,273,000 1,268,893 13,772,500 13,982,154 45,000 67,537 4,150,000 12,017,726 4,150,000 11,988,032 94,500 93,934 90,251 88,880 41,000 46,598 338,025 338,234 412,594 410,833 134,889 136,753 14,422,518 14,305,196 65,000 58,259 15,723,000 14,107,605 15,723,000 14,129,908 557,080 551,939 133,100 123,010 17,500 40,589 4,000 5,301 2,473 142,000 132,952 16,575,000 16,648,208 136,000 138,245 5,891,000 7,675,727 5,891,000 7,788,927 40,000 445,000 441,544 23,000 34,558 25,000 5,877 10,000 420 326,000 225,523 10,000 10,024 950,000 930,720 16,430,000 16,229,632 148,000 104,401 4,887,000 4,405,068 4,887,000 4,393,130 -8,000 18,595 1,755 2,033,461i 2,033,461 4,013,0582 4,012,778 781,187 727,588 21,225 21,225 330,701 330,701 1,164,758 1,150,567 100,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 637,095 536,618 3,649,746 3,649,737 10,5004 10,500 1,431,9195 1,431,9195 10,898,1956 10,866,9896 102,600 102,600 238,640 238,640 88,461,9357 88,461,935 267,836,9948 267,417,909 52,292,880 52,292,880 514,000 447,931 56,607,000 55,738,759 57,698,000 57,073,773 150,615 137,210 1,386,258 1,378,691 9,700 9,700 292,864 292,864 10-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 9. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (Contributed Funds) 10. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL (Contributed Funds) 11. Fly Creek, AL 12. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border 13. Gulfport Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) 14. Mobile Harbor, AL (Contributed Funds) 15. Panama City Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 16. Pascagoula Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) 17. Pensacola Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) Funding Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp.. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 574,300 569,979 461,393 464,840 121,251 120,788 86,700 86,873 4,504 104 669,000 635,698 - 298,500 298,700 3,567 I1,851 19,500 15,287 101,000 101,321 30,000 39,851 2,522,000 2,554,913 3,540 415,000 415,393 1,000,000 14,295,571 5,680,300 6,146,522 5,070,000 5,277,168 93,000 94,424 516,000 520,634 163,162 417,737 981,000 978,543 312,350 297,587 2,046,524 3,014,000 1,955,771 2,991,923 - 90,000 - 68,125 1,831,004 1,873,000 1,828,231 1,823,602 - 530,000 - 236,070 1,368,000 - 5,004,390 339,755 10,875,857 21,754,000 10,813,901 21,686,655 1,714,000 -421,000 1,296,211 3,451 59,979 590,000 60,231 558,150 4,098,972 1,728,000 4,075,169 1,716,872 179,000 218,000 225,512 52,020 45,000 48,495 24,175 10-34 50,000 43,379 850 155,000 106,016 1,000 1,960,000 1,994,862 10,697,000 10,291,666 2,881,000 2,801,508 3,880,000 3,833,647 468,000 629,610 20,497,000 20,425,295 301,000 20,000 67,000 97,885 3,194,000 3,152,528 253,000 458,131 60,000 72,239 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 2,358,626 2,351,505 391,354 391,354 2,458,686 2,457,726 197,450 195,250 916,715 916,715 8,553,111 8,470,020 398,000 398,000 29,000 29,000 561,721 559,907 6,480 2999 6,480,299' 63,314,24610 63,220,52910 11,756,00011 11,328,79011 42,387 50212 42,255,29512 4,410,000 4,069,717 96,101,93513 96,077,200' 153,546,34014 153,332,950' 18,452,500 18,170,860 1,638,04515 1,638,045 9,068,01316 9,066,11416 80,000 80,000 6,572,98517 6,572,98517 50,414,59218 50,336,544 3,870,884 3,788,266 1,469,69319 1,469,69319 8,316,3582o 8,300,4562" 312,350 297,587 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 18. Perdido Pass New Work: (Contributed Funds) 19. Tennessee- Tombigbee Waterway AL and MS 19A. Tenn-Tom Wildlife Mitigation Flood Control 26. Boggy Bayou Valparaiso, FL (Contributed Funds) 27. County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS (Contributed Funds) 28. Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL (Contributed Funds) 29. Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL (Contributed Funds) 30. Fort Toulouse Wetumpka, AL (Contributed Funds) 31. Hurricane Creek Prentiss Co., MS (Contributed Funds) 32. Mill Creek, Dalton, GA (Contributed Funds) 33. Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS 34. Mound State Park Moundville, AL (Contributed Funds) 35. Murder Creek, Brewton, AL Channel, AL 58,000 57,732 151,,100005,,00X1 19,043,4C 18,516,2E 734,400 733,503 Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work:: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 28,00 84,000 20,397 31,000 8,000 85,000 44,453 1,435,000 293,640 25,500 34,000 14,278 14,000 10,000 11,354 21,300 4,484 215,536 68,52 ,-o 23,000 1,555,000 594,821 170,000 150,000 1,095,000 97,593 150,000 29,781 14,000 235,000 212,803 25,000 25,000 20,000 30,920 150,000 67,392 9,587 1,149 0 18,323,000 5 8,428,941 '9 17,984,000 6 17,553,985 0 14,481,000 8 13,620,228 0 125,200 - 113,829 - 16,900 - 15,407 - 6,000 5 14,749 760,711 2,877 1,210,353 39,800 82,504 45,227 1,000 603 534 5,766 7,167 69,014 8,659 1,008,000 988,999 4,081,000 12,976,662 20,660,000 21,229,316 17,319,000 16,342,226 2,726 1,274 1,800 2,891 -2,891 -2,891 -100,000 32,690 55 -938,900 72,463 236,000 267,727 193,000 194,000 -4,300 1,108 -1,108 -1,108 -10,000 4,450 63,540 17,149 578,000 280,452 106,000 100,044 -25,000 629,860 629,860 7,808,217 7,788,997 510,000 510,000 10,325 10,325 1,035,202,20021 1,030,087,22821 160,963,83522 160,724,56622 37,000,000 34,913,892 153,200 135,251 16,900 16,680 116,800 116,662 28,109 28,109 1,924,327 1,805,826 170,000 152,932 3,040,221 2,989,060 235,800 196,004 386,000 358,797 194,000 194,000 52,803 52,720 12,892 12,892 490,000 474,065 25,000 25,000 151,340 104,104 728,000 416,857 106,000 100,044 1,215,000 1,178,684 10-35 00 420,00 15 7,184,96 00 17,807,67 61 19,614,11 - 5,200,00 - 4,951,43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 36. Okatibbee Dam, New Work: MS Approp. - - - - 9,739,528 Cost - - - - 9,739,528 Maint.: Approp. 1,000,000 1,401,043 1,327,000 1,356,000 15,453,735 Cost 1,057,387 1,347,393 1,182,180 1,397,215 15,272,708 37. Portersville Bay-East New Work: Mobile Co., AL Approp. 30,000 - 75,000 30,000 115,000 Cost 23,304 8,150 58,632 18,839 87,448 (Contibuted Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - 327,900 327,900 Cost - - - 15,000 15,000 38. Portersville Bay-West New Work: Mobile Co., AL Approp. - - - 30,000 30,000 Cost - - - 9,674 9,674 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - 162,700 162,700 Cost - - - - 39. Proctor Creek New Work: Atlanta, GA Approp. 100,000 849,000 -81,000 -40,000 871,000 Cost 4,361 735,047 1,838 67,622 850,243 40. Raccoon Creek, New Work: Baconton, GA Approp. 261,000 - - -37,000 386,300 Cost 46,637 195,886 7,184 4,432 380,645 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 35,000 - - - 35,000 Cost - 35,000 - - 35,000 41. Silver Creek, New Work: Rome, GA Approp. 15,000 336,000 29,000 - 609,000 Cost 2,936 344,480 1,421 29,481 604,719 42. Sowashee Creek, New Work: Meridian, MS Approp. 1,100,000 4,723,000 2,455,000 3,459,000 14,487,000 Cost 1,553,805 4,487,799 2,634,125 3,048,651 13,658,299 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 290,000 388,000 431,000 - 1,599,000 Cost 59,025 573,387 290,793 -116,711 931,493 43. Tallahalla Creek, New Work: Laurel, MS Approp. 130,000 647,000 - -355,000 464,000 Cost 46,312 102,326 24,434 52,525 241,365 (Contributing Funds) New Work: Contrib. - 40,000 - - 40,000 Cost - 40,000 - - 40,000 44. Three Mile Creek, New Work: Mobile, AL Approp. -2,300,000 526,000 4,224,000 7,808,000 14,906,000 Cost 912,533 460,018 3,418,602 7,271,007 13,285,884 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - 235,000 516,000 1,216,000 Cost 112,458 - 484,000 348,668 973,427 45. Tombigbee River New Work: (East Fork) Approp. - - - - 134,801 MS and AL Cost - - - - 134,801 Maint.: Approp. 66,000 62,101 174,000 15,000 2,963,201 Cost 66,102 56,408 160,044 16,062 2,943,885 46. Tombigbee River New Work: Tributaries, Approp. - -208,000 496,000 331,000 25,184,825 MS and AL Cost 1,291,495 714,310 427,592 362,221 25,110,746 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - - 94,700 Cost - - - - 63,342 47. Upper Gordon Creek, New Work: Hattiesburg, MS Approp. 250,000 - 50,000 60,000 827,000 Cost 153,585 75,650 27,897 75,935 787,758 48. Village Creek, New Work: Birmingham, AL Approp. 2,310,000 7,446,000 2,897,000 5,933,000 18,861,000 Cost 2,071,571 5,050,071 5,184,999 5,558,379 18,102,071 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 647,000 2,059,710 1,420,000 2,045,000 6,171,710 Cost 487,000 1,927,886 1,593,457 1,902,299 5,910,642 10-36 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 Multiple Purpose Projects, Lock and Dam 52. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA 52A. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA 52B. Claibome Lock and Dam, AL 52C. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL 52D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL 52E. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL 53. Allatoona Dam Coosa River Basin, GA 54. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, AL and GA 54A. Buford Dam Lake Sidney Lanier, GA 54B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL and GA 54C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, GA and FL 54D. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL and GA New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Major Rehab.: Approp. Cost 8,300,100 8,392,210 4,905,500 4,958,589 3,780,000 3,917,320 2,220,000 2,289,096 4,977,900 5,267,320 3,608,500 3,633,107 7,533,100 8,015,948 7,576,394 7,521,290 7,136,984 7,108,541 3,506,013 3,484,108 2,734,375 2,713,471 5,127,601 5,058,313 3,884,587 3,862,405 8,193,115 8,001,686 - - 30 30 5,728,500 6,029,775 7,421,000 7,664,649 1,111 6,103,000 5,780,640 7,003,000 6,950,332 3,825,000 3,552,091 2,945,000 2,944,225 4,673,000 4,375,042 3,829,000 3,635,119 6,415,000 6,386,380 30 30 - - 4,589,017 4,521,000 4,490,448 4,361,962 - 47,000 - 30,907 8,534,233 5,932,000 8,540,470 5,856,388 - 165,000 5,751 153,643 10-37 7,427,234 7,568,519 5,430,000 5,412,945 3,481,333 3,681,102 3,150,333 2,947,285 6,305,000 6,281,198 5,183,000 5,150,973 6,933,000 7,053,258 3,245,400 3,245,400 79,385,188_ 79,105,813 111,140,340 111,140,340 52,779,584 52,559,743 27,997,450 27,997,450 14,986 400 14,986:40023 63,125,300 63,125,300 49,245,211 49,100,587 83,360,800 83,360,800 32,284,861 32,026,834 35,709,085' 35,709,085" 85,588,824 85,106,560 4,452,162w 4,452,162 93,063 96427 92,774,0602 53,030,038a 53,028,418 110,042,622 109,831,975 13,038,42729 13,038,42729 30 30 47,978,85831 47,978,75131 75,887,397 75,600,212 88,330,66932 88,330,66932 105,367,597 105,192,895 10,642,000 10,617,080 -39,000 4,345,000 4,390,701 -12,111 3,983 6,228,000 6,198,975 TABLE 10-A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 54E. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. - - - - 131,568,76033 Basin, GA and AL Cost 35,616 - - - 131,565,28733 Maint.: Approp. 5,753,000 4,449,608 5,012,000 4,658,200 61,881,908 Cost 5,771,673 4,499,341 4,826,791 4,504,052 61,463,730 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $1,243,661 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 11. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M Funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public Work funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special O and M funds. 15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $1,993,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $3,347,489 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and $809,553 for Lazer Creek design and $301,310 for Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $8,233,325 for recreational facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers projects. 31. Includes $1,515,822 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,441,029 for recreational facilities. 33. Includes $35,045 for previous project costs. 10-38 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 19631 Feb. 5, 19751 Aug. 11, 19831 Jul 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 2, 19691 Oct. 27, 1965 APALACHICOLA BAY, FL (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels. 10 feet deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. At Eastpoint, Fl., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fl., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fl., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channel is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and about 1 mile long, parallel to shore at Two Mile, Fl., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater of about 6,150 feet, includes two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a total length of 5,300 feet. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fl., Al., Ms., and La. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BAYOU CODEN, AL (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre channel. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL (See Section 4 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. 10-39 TABLE 10-B H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR(Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) H Doc 37, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 87-874 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec 107) H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 28, 1990 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 19791 Aug. 15, 1985 Jul. 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sep. 19, 1890 Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Deepen existing channel to 18 feet to the bridge; to 14 feet above bridge, and into Snake Bayou at a depth of 12 feet. BILOXI HARBOR, MS (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi Relocation of channel. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou. Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500 by 2,600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence, a channel 12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport Lake for about 2 miles to a 300-by 500- foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150 foot spur channel from themain channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about 1 mile to a 400-by 600- foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6-by 40- foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150- foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; coninuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. A channel 12-feet deep; 130-feet wide and 2,100-feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot depth. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL (See Section 6 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887 Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis. Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement to Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. 10-40 Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) H. Doc. 754. 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 639.75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258.76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 326.76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256. 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p. 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293 Public Law 317 H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918, p. 876 H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 21, 1982 Jul. 30, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 18, 1986 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 May 16, 19631 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 16, 1991 Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage. the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Conduct a feasibility study of protection from erosion problems on the southern bank from river mile 253 to river mile 255. MOUND STATE PARK (See Section 38 of Text) Correct erosion problems along the banks of the Warrior River in order to protect Mound State Park, near Moundville, Alabama. JACKSON PORT, AL (See Section 6A of Text) Construct a spur canal 9 feet deep, 280 feet wide, and 680 feet long in conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation project. (Jackson Port) OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL (See Section 6B of Text) Construction and land acquisition for Oliver Lock Replacement Construction of a lock and dam to replace the William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL (See Section 7 of Text) A 10-by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL (See Section 8 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Deepen existing 4-foot channel to 7-feet and 40-feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay. 10-41 H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 45.73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26. 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 97,377 Public Law 98-63 Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act 1987 (P.L. 99-591) The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 19, 19691 Jul. 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 1, 1980 May 17, 1950 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul 3, 1930 Jul 3, 1930 Jul 23, 1942 Jun. 17, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 3, 1899 DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL (See Section 9 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) Modifications to provide a channel length of approximately 3,800 feet in lieu of 2,000 feet from the East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon, with no changes in width and depth. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 11 of Text), A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 12 of Text) APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FL., TO MOBILE BAY, AL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, AL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Ms., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. 10-42 DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. Energy and Water Development Appropriation H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 23, 1930 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 30 feet across Ship Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Ms. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Modify the existing Ship Channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. Modify the WRDA of 1986 and authorize disposal of dredged material in open waters of the Gulf of Mexico; and by Thin-layer disposal in Mississippi Sound under a demonstration program. MOBILE HARBOR, AL (See Section 14 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point to Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 42 by 600 feet, Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basins and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Magazine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of 27 November 1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307 to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' x 1600'. Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 53 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-676) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) 10-43 TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY OF THE CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 19671 Jun. 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 by 700 feet, a distance of about 7.4 miles, deepen and widen Mobile Bay Channel from mouth of bay to south of Mobile River, 55 by 550 feet, a distance of about 27.0 miles, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of Mobile Bay Channel to 55 by 650 feet, provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island, and construct a 1710 acre disposal area adjacent to the Brookley Industrial Complex. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL Shoreline protection to provide a 110-foot wide beach with an artificial dune system and stabilization of vegetation. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL (See Section 15 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40,42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River, 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass. thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30- by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the same depth 1 mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet 10-44 The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 11, 19831 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 27, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. Modification to provide for channel dimensions 12 x 80 feet extending about 2,750 feet from deep waters in the Pascagoula River into Krebs Lake to a turning basin, thence, along the south bank of the lake a channel with dimensions of 10 x 60 feet terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of about 2,750 feet. The project was constructed by hydraulic dredging with the disposal placed in an unpland diked area. Deepen and widen gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL (See Section 17 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvement of Bayou Chico. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 13 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet, PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL (See Section 18 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemount jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS (See Section 19 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Ms.; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. 10-45 DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 May 4, 19904 Oct. 7, 19884 Nov. 17, 19872 Sep. 10, 19872 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 7, 19884 Oct. 13, 19882 Mar. 14, 19902 Apr. 18, 19862 Oct. 23, 1962 Sep. 27, 19904 Sep. 27, 19904 Jan. 10, 19892 Oct. 13, 19882 Jan. 10, 19892 Nov. 17, 1986 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WILDLIFE MITIGATION Acquire from willing sellers in a timely manner at fair market value 88,000 acres of land for mitigation of wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the project for the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. BOGGY BAYOU, VALPARAISO, FL (See Section 26 of Text) Provide bank protection along 700-feet of shoreline and preclude possible destruction of Bayshore Drive and utilities. COUNTY LINE ROAD BRIDGE, ITAWAMBA CO., MS (See Section 27 of Text) Provides protection for both banks and the channel at the bridge crossing Mantachie Creek. CRIBBS MILL CREEK, TUSCALOOSA, AL (See Section 28 of Text) Channel modification of about 7,300 feet of the creek. Modification consists of widening the existing channel. ESLAVA CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 29 of Text) Channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and increasing the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard by adding an additional barrel. FORT TOULOUSE (See Section 30 of Text) Preserve and protect the Fort Toulouse National Historic Landmark and Taskigi Indian Mound by instituting bank stabilization measures. HURRICANE CREEK, PRENTISS CO., MS (See Section 33 of Text) Provides emergency streambank protection to the banks and the bottom of the channel to retard erosion at the Marietta-Hazeldell Road Bridge crossing Hurricane Creek. MILL CREEK, DALTON, GA (See Section 36 of Text) For clearing and snagging Mill Creek from its mouth to downstream face of Willowdale Drive or a distance of 8.6 miles. MILL CREEK, SUMRALL, MS (See Section 37 of Text) Clearing and snagging 1.0 mile along Mill Creek with overbank clearing for 0.63 miles MURDER CREEK, BREWTON, AL (See Section 39 of Text) Non-structural project providing for the alleviation of flood problems at Brewton by the removal of 31 damageable structures from the 10-year flood plains of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS (See Section 40 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control water supply, water quality control, and recreation. PORTERSVILLE BAY - EAST, MOBILE CO., AL (See Section 37 of Text) Provide shoreline bank protection along 5,600 feet of Shell Belt Road. PORTERSVILLE BAY - WEST, MOBILE CO., AL (See Section 38 of Text) Provide shoreline bank protection along 3,500 feet of Shell Belt Road. PROCTOR CREEK, ATLANTA, GA (See Section 41 of Text) Purchase and remove residential structures within flood plain. RACCOON CREEK, BACONTON, GA (See Section 42 of text) Raise about 1500 feet of South Jackson Street Bridge to elevation 176.0 feet NGVE. Clear and snag from Hwy. 3 to U.S. Hwy. 19. SILVER CREEK, ROME, GA (See Section 43 of Text) Provide non-structural flood control measures along Silver Creek. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS (See Section 44 of Text) Channel enlargement, and clearing and snagging over a reach of 10.5 miles. One railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require modification for the channel improvement. Development of recreation facilities. 10-46 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Sep. 30, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 23, 1958 Jul. 8, 1980 Oct. 13, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 28, 1954 May 25, 1982 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 TALLAHALLA CREEK, LAUREL, MS (See Section 45 of Text) Channel clearing and snagging with overbank clearing of brush and trees less than 4 inches diameter for a distance of 30 feet on each bank. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 46 of Text) Channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. Development of recreational facilities. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL (See Section 47 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL (See Section 48 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 49 of Text) Real Estate acquisition of nine (9) residences; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement. VILLAGE CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, BIRMINGHAM, AL (See Section 50 of Text) Basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures in six separate neighborhoods from floodplain; enlarge 2 miles of channel and relocate necessary facilities; Install flood warning devices. Authorized the Secretary to acquire private vacant lands within the definite project boundaries established in the Real Estate Design Memorandum as a nonstructural element of the project. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA (See Section 55 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, GA Claibomrne Lock and Dam, AL, Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, AL, and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam. Modification to the plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden, AL to carry out planning, engineering, and design in accordance with the Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, AL, Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA (See Section 56 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation. 10-47 Documents DPR (Sec. 205) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Special Report on Record in OCT. (Public Law 222,) 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Supplemental Appropriations and Recession Act, DPR (Sec. 205) 1980 (P.L. 96-304) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. S.2034 97th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Public law 228, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76 Cong., 3d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA AND FL (See Section 57 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. 1st Sess. Jul. 24, 1946 Modified general plan for full development of H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and auth- 1st Sess. orized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Dec. 22, 194 Authorized recreation facilities. Jan. 27, 1981 Modified the existing project to provide for nine foot DPR (Sec. 107) deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fl. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT Nov. 17, 1986 Modified Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945 to restore and Water Resources maintain access to bendways and interconnecting waterways Development Act in the course of routine maintenance dredging; and of 1986 to acquire lands for and to construct, operate, and (P.L. 99-662) maintain water-related public use and access facilities. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA (See Section 57A of Text) Jul. 24, 1944 Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA (See Section 57B of Text) Jul. 24, 1946 Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., and low dam at George W. Andrews site. 1st Sess. Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL (See Section 57C of Text) Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL, AND GA (See Section 57D of Text) May 19, 1953 Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George H. Comm. on site and low dam at Columbia site. Public Works WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL (See Section 57E of Text) Oct. 23, 1963 Authorized construction for flood control, power H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., recreation, fish and wildlife development, and 2d Sess. streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 14 of Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 10-48 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Blackwater River, FL 1981 $41,650 $328,614 Bluff Creek, MS 1963 1,000 6,883 Cadet Bayou, MS 1984 87,921 1,138,608 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL 1979 481,627 403,723 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL 1973 171,885 291,694 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL 1981 208,499 1,136,744 Holmes Creek, FL 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, FL 1972 289,496 142,659 Noxubee River, MS 1902 47,528 14,472 Panacea Harbor, FL 1979 122,383 101,631 Pascagoula River, MS 1956 15,000 179,535 Pass Christian Harbor, MS 1976 59,313 139,653 Port St. Joe Harbor, FL 1984 1,960,862 2,958,516 Removing Water Hyacinths 1984 - 1,100,471 St. Marks River, FL 1965 1,710,809 84,115 Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS 1988 500,500- Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 1979 29,195 481,515 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. TABLE 10-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT For Last Cost to September 30,1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance2 Harrison County, MS, shore protection1 1953 $1,133,000- 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 10-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Alabama River at Montgomery, AL' Armuchee Creek, GA Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA Big Brown Creek, Prentiss Co, MS Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS Black Creek, Gadsden, AL Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL Burketts Creek, Amory, MS Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL Clanton, AL Collinsville, AL Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co., FL Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., MS Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS Houston School Rd. Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL Lake Douglas, Decatur County, GA Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL Magby Creek, Columbus, MS Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, GA Rome, Coosa River, GA Sewerline Protection, Valley, AL Sope Creek, Marietta, GA Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS Tallahala Creek, Pascagoula River, MS Town Creek, Americus, GA Trim Cane Creek, Oktibbeha County, MS Trussville, AL Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA Whorton's Bend Road, Etowah Co., AL Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Wolf Creek, U.S. Hwy. 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA 1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration (no construction work has been done. Includes $17,000 for 1965 1966 1958 1987 1985 1953 1986 1987 1984 1988 1985 1964 1940 1988 1985 1991 1990 1991 1982 1988 1987 1970 1990 1986 1991 1991 1988 1980 1986 1988 1987 1985 1946 1985 1955 1989 1990 1956 1984 1988 1988 1965 1984 1965 1986 1955 1991 1985 1986 1O6 $144,194 115,547 149,815 137,500 132,174 125,389 181,500 178,600 1,366,454 206,600 121,718 274,024 71,119 91,500 802,026 147,432 71,000 268,691 238,219 59,300 155,200 164,998 1,585,000 231,618 144,047 156,508 78,500 190,974 903,474 119,500 143,936 250,000 649,280 85,029 384,550 180,937 1,538,555 142,637 55,569 81,000 3,945,757 340,409 145,519 141,334 215,860 599,637 448,956 114,753 154,641 S37 4 pre-authorization studies. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. TABLE 10-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Year of Last Deauthorization Date Project Type Full Report Document Deauthorized Buttahatchee Creek, MS Flood Control 19891 Public Law 99-662 Jan. 9, 1992 (Auth P.L. 96-304) 99th Congress Little Browns Creek, AL Flood Control 19891 Public Law 99-662 Jan. 9, 1992 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) 99th Congress 1. Deauthorized tributaries of Tombigbee River improvements. 10-50 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATON Fiscal Year Study Authority 1992 Costs Eastpoint Channel, FL 107 $ 513 Fort Gaines, Dauphin Island, AL 107 60,311 Ocean Springs Harbor, MS 107 32,844 South Fork, Bon Secour River, AL 107 210 Total $93,8781 TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal Year Study Authority 1992 Costs Alabama River, Montgomery, AL 205 $8,410 Alabama River, Selma, AL 205 3,871 Barbour Creek, Eufaula, AL 205 46,415 Black Warrior River, North Port, AL 205 62,059 Blackwater River, Milton, FL 205 6,367 Burkett's Creek, MS 205 46,442 Carysville, FL 205 170 Chattooga River, Trion, GA 205 9,942 Coosa River, Rome, GA 205 47,452 Flat Branch, Gulfport, MS 205 36,711 Greens Creek, Petal, MS 205 15,319 Little Wills Creek, AL 205 587 Lost Creek, Carbon Hill, AL 205 2,975 Mill Creek, McGee, MS 205 21,620 Murder & Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL 205 27 North Shore, Santa Rosa Island, FL 205 13,601 Pea River, Elba, AL 205 280 Pea & Choctawhatchee Rivers, Geneva, AL 205 8,509 Peachtree Creek, Basin, Atlanta, GA 205 9,823 Pensacola Beach, FL 205 13,994 Sweetwater Creek, Austell, GA 205 530 Tiger Creek, Columbus, GA 205 21,566 Tombigbee River, Demopolis, AL 205 9,963 Vernon Branch, Columbus, MS 205 20,148 Atkinson Creek, Green Co., MS 14 22,533 Chattahoochee River, Franklin, GA 14 11 County Road 55, Etowah Co., AL 14 28 Fosters Loop Rd., Tuscaloosa Co., Al 14 9,967 Gordon's Creek, Hattiesburg, MS 14 4,330 Hancock County, Seawall, MS 14 1,159 Leaf River Br., Green Co., MS 14 20,491 Maynor Creek State Park, Wayne, MS 14 944 Tombigbee Rv Bd #6, Monroe Co., MS 14 37,894 Total $504,138 10-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 10-K RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Cost During Project Date of Survey Fiscal Year Apalachicola Bay, FL June 1992 $13,074 Bayou Coden, AL June 1992 10,350 Bayou La Batre, AL June 1992 8,050 Biloxi Harbor, MS September 1992 4,655 Blackwater River, FL March 1992 6,170 Bon Secour, AL June 1992 14,630 Cadet Bayou, MS August 1992 7,980 Carrabelle Harbor, FL April 1992 13,787 Dauphin Island, AL June 1992 14,630 Escambia Bay, FL March 1992 24,756 Fly Creek, AL July 1992 4,600 Fowl River, AL July 1992 9,200 La Grange Bayou, FL September 1992 608 Panacea Harbor, FL April 1992 7,558 Pensacola Harbor, FL September 1992 15,052 Perdido Pass, AL April 1992 16,856 Port St. Joe, FL April 1992 8,920 St. Marks River, FL April 1992 16,646 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS August 1992 10.640 Total $208,162 TABLE 10-L ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 55 of Text) Claiborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam 3 Dam Miles above mouth of river 81.11 42.21 245.41 26.82 47.84 Nearest town Claiborne, Ala. Camden, Ala. Benton, Ala. Carters, Ga. Cartersville, Ga. Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 -- Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 -- Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 -- Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 840 Depth over sills at low water 13 Upper 15 Upper 15 -- (feet) Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Cost to date: $27,997,450 $63,125,300 $83,360,800 $111,140,340 $35,709,085 1. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles) 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10A. 10-52 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA., LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 57 of Text) Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam Miles above mouth Nearest town Distance (miles) Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) Maximum lift (feet) Elevation of normal pool surface (msl) Depth over sills at low water (feet) Character of foundation Kind of spillway Height of dam (feet) Type of construction Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) Power-development (kilowatts) Percent complete Year opened to navigation Cost to date:3 107.61 Chattahoochee FL., 1 450 82 33 77 14 Limestone Fixed-gated 67 Concrete and Earth 367,300 30,000 100 1954 $47,978,751 Existing Projects George W. Walter F. Andrews George Lock Lock and Dam and Dam 46.52 75.02 Columbia, Al. Ft. Gaines, Ga. 1 2 450 450 82 25 102 13 Limestone Fixed-gated 62 Concrete 18,180 100 1962 $13,038,427 82 88 190(Summer) 185(Winter) 13 Limestone Gated 114 Concrete and Earth 934,400 130,000 100 1963 $98,947,7494 Buford Dam Lake West Point Sidney Lake Lanier 201.42 348.32 West Point, Ga. Buford, Ga. 2.8 5 635(Summer) 625(Winter) Rock Gated 95 Concrete and Earth 604,500 73,875 100 $131,565,287 1071(Summer) 1070(Winter) Rock Fixed 192 Earth 2,554,000 86,000 100 $53,028,418 1. Above the mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 3. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 4. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge and $10,617,080 for major rehabilitation. 10-53 . . REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 10-N BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 6 of Text) Armistead I. William John Hollis Coffeeville Demopolls Selden Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock Lock Lock & Dam Lock Lock and Dam and Dam and Dam (Replacement) and Dam and Dam1 Miles above Mobile 116.7 213.2 261.1 337.7 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Distance (miles) 3(within city) 6 15 (within city) 6 30 Lock: Greatest length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 600 600 600 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 18.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated Type construction Lock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth- Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 19924 1969 1985 Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1991 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam3 $21,597,264 $19,774,583 $13,295,553 $120,000,000 $28,100,000 $52,292,880 1. Single lift lock. 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 4. Scheduled. 10-54 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-0 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI (See Section 19 of Text) Existing Projects Gainesville Aliceville Columbus Aberdeen Lock A Lock B Lock C Lock D Lock E Bay Springs Lock Lock Lock Lock and and and and and Lock and and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway and Dam Miles above mouth1 266 307 335 358 371 376 39 398 407 412 Nearest town Gainesville, AL Aliceville, AL Columbus, MS Aberdeen, MS Amory, MS Smithville, MS Fulton, MS Fulton, MS Belmont, MS Tupelo, MS Greatest lock length 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 available for full width (feet) Width of Chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 11 0 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 84 Elevation of normal 109 136 163 190 220 245 270 300 330 (Summer)414 pool surface (msl) (Winter)409 Depth over sills at 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 low water (feet) Character of foundation Mooreville Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Sandstone Chalk Sand & Clay Sand & Clay Sand Lam. Sand Sand & Clay Clay Sand Clay and Shale. Kind of spillway Fixed & Fixed & Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated N/A Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 56 57 57 57 46 48 53 52 44.5 103 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth Total reservoir capacity 45,290 655 59,483 31,564 4,400 19,000 13,300 24,900 6,900 (Summer)180,000 (acre-feet)(Winter)143,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Year opened to 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 navigation Estimated Cost $103,214,000 151,255,000 182,650,000 128,262,000 102,685,000 96,905,000 71,375,000 98,205,000 88,173,000 147,000,000 Cost to date $100,010,600 143,190,800 174,620,500 112,620,200 92,190,500 93,106,700 62,197,000 89,610,800 76,917,700 130,398,000 1. Miles above Mobile, Alabama (Mile 0.00 is at Bankhead Tunnel on U.S. Highway 90) 10-55 TABLE 10-P REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1983 THRU FY 19921 Date Federal Study Requesting Agency Completed Cost Flood Insurance Studies Cave Springs, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 84 22,500 Floyd County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 84 230,000 Columbus, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 85 36,000 Lowndes County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 85 229,000 Aberdeen, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 35,000 Amory, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 50,000 Cherokee County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) July 85 168,000 Monroe County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Oct 85 140,000 Dale County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 86 82,000 Lauderdale County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 87 144,000 Houston County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 87 114,000 St. Clair County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 87 43,000 Marengo County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 87 36,000 Greene County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 88 18,550 Covington County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 35,000 Pickens County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 50,000 Fulton County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 88 180,000 Monroe County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 88 33,000 Colquitt County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 48,000 Murray County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 68,000 Coffee County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 89 48,500 Montgomery County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jul 89 175,000 Clayton County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 89 250,000 Jefferson County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 91 397,000 Calhoun County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 91 200,000 Special Flood Hazard Information Canton Creek, GA City of Canton, GA Dec 82 3,000 Oktasasi Creek, AL Alexander City, AL Jan 83 3,000 Cordele Creek & City of Cordele, GA May 83 4,000 Malcolm Branch, GA Hull Branch, MS East Central Planning and Jun 84 7,000 Development District Percosin Creek & Tribs., GA City of Albany, GA Nov 84 14,000 Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay City of Ellijay, GA Jul 86 22,000 Rivers, Vicinity of Ellijay, GA Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS Ellisville, MS Jan 87 19,000 Springers Branch, MS Starkville, MS May 87 13,000 Dixie Creek, GA La Grange, GA Jun 87 15,000 Little Scooba Creek, MS Scooba, MS Jun 87 18,000 Fishpond Drain & Trib., GA Donalsonville, GA Dec 87 18,000 Dearmenville & Golden Springs, AL Anniston, AL Mar 88 9,000 Chickasawhay River, MS Quitman, MS Jun 89 19,000 Archusa Creek, MS Quitman, MS Jun 89 9,000 Leaf River, MS New Augusta, MS Sep 89 27,000 Shades Creek, AL Jefferson County, AL Sep 90 45,000 Leaf River, MS Taylorsville, MS Sep 91 25,000 Oostanaula River, GA City of Rome, GA Jan 92 10,000 Coosa River, GA City of Rome, GA Jul92 10,000 1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY 1965 thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports completed in FT 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-44; and for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. Set page 10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports, and see page 10-43 FY 1984 Annual Report for FY 1979 through FY 1984 reports. 10-56 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT* District comprises a portion of Louisiana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes (AHP), drainage area of Ouachita-Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. The New Orleans District territory encompasses 30,000 square miles. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (cont.) 1. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ..... 11-2 2. Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA ............ 11-2 3. Navigaton work under special authorization ............... 11-3 Flood Control 4. Grand Isle and vicinity, LA .......... 11-4 5. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) ........... 11-4 6. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection) .............. 11-5 7. Morgan City and vicinity, LA (hurricane protection) .............. 11-6 8. New Orleans to Venice, LA (hurricane protection) .............. 11-7 9. Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (hurricane protection) .............. 11-8 10. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. 11. Flood control work under special authorization .................... Page 11-9 11-9 Tables Table 11-A Cost and Financial Statement .............. 11-10 Table 11-B Authorizing Legislation ... 11-12 Table 11-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 11-15 Table 11-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......... .11-17 Table 11-E Deauthorized Projects .... 11-18 Table 11-F Active General Investigations ........... 11-19 11-1 Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 1. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and the territorial waters of the United States and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1989 (57th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending easterly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of Meraux to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. Estimated cost for new work (October 1992) is $565,500,000 Federal and $316,400,000 non-Federal. This does not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. The Federal cost excludes $45,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-4 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. A public facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at Mile 63. Two cQntainer ship berths are in operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work by hired labor: Engineering and economic studies continued for the new lock and connecting channels feature. Four dredging contracts for removal of 14,450,000 cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of $11,720,482 were awarded in FY 92. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958. The channel unit is 90 percent complete and the shiplock unit is 0 percent complete. The total project is 75 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. Approximately 3 miles of first- and second-lift stone jetties have been constructed on north side of channel and approximately 8.27 miles of first-lift and 7.34 miles of secondlift stone jetties have been constructed on south side of channel in Breton Sound. The foreshore protection, south bank, Chalmette Area, Station 367+00 to Station 1007+00 is complete. Principal work required to complete project, raising and extending jetties as required and foreshore protection. (Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to Bayou Bienvenue), is in a deferred status. The site for the lock remained the major problem. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the Corps to look at both the Industrial Canal site and the Violet site. The studies at the Violet site are now complete. The Corps has established an Open Planning Process working directly with the local affected people at the Industrial Canal site. The aim is to develop a comprehensive solution that will benefit both the neighborhoods and navigation interests. A Site in the Industrial Canal between Claiborne and Florida Avenues, north of the existing lock, has been tentatively identified as the location that could be the only "win-win" solution. Additional studies are being focused on this site. An Evaluation Report is scheduled for completion in FY 1995. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of Louisiana below Baton Rouge, and consists of the Mississippi River and its major outlet to the Gulf of Mexico, Southwest Pass. Existing project. Provides more efficient deepdraft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce - maintenance. Estimated cost of existing project (Oct. 1, 1992) is $149,000,000 Federal and $375,000,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $1,200,000. Local cooperatioh. The cost sharing provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 require that prior to initiation of construction, 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT local interests shall: (a) Provide to the Federal Government lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform the necessary relocations required for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction or operation and maintenance of the project except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Provide to the Federal Government, the non-Federal share of all other costs of construction of the project. These costs include 25 percent of the construction costs incurred for construction of the navigation channel to a depth of 45 feet, and 50 percent of the construction costs incurred for deepening the channel between 45 and 55 feet. In addition, the local sponsor shall repay the Government 10 percent of the construction costs over a 30-year period. The local sponsor may be permitted to include, toward sums to be reimbursed, all or part of the value of any lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas and relocations, including utility relocations contributed or expended by the non-Federal sponsor; (d) Be responsible for 50 percent of the incremental maintenance below 45 feet on a channel depth greater than 45 feet. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) between the Government and the state of Louisiana was signed on Jun. 30, 1986. This agreement provided for dredging of a 45-foot channel from the Gulf to Mile 181 AHP. A supplement to the LCA was executed on Jun. 15, 1987, to comply with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. A second supplement to the LCA was executed on Jun. 25, 1990, to comply with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676. A third supplement to the LCA addressing the Permanent Saltwater Intrusion Mitigation Plan has been prepared and is currently under review. The state of Louisiana has requested that we proceed with the construction of the 45-foot channel from Mile 181 to Mile 232.4 (Phase II). We have prepared a design memorandum that provides for the dredging of the deeper channel. This design memorandum is under review. Terminal facilities. See Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. A revised feature Design Memorandum (DM) on the 45-foot channel from Mile 181 to Baton Rouge was submitted in May 1991. The DM reflected a schedule of constructing rock dikes at four crossings (to reduce maintenance dredging) then dredging the 45- foot channel. After being informed of the plan, the navigation industry opposed construction of the rock dikes. Their main concerns were safety and congestion caused by the dikes. Opposition was so great that the local sponsor withdrew support for the rock dike plan. Therefore, work on the dike plan was terminated. In July 1991, we initiated an economic analysis to investigate the feasibility of providing the 45-foot channel to Baton Rouge by dredging only. The analysis revealed that the dredging only plan was justified. The Permanent Saltwater Intrusion Mitigation plan (required due to the deepening of the channel between the Gulf and Mile 181 AHP) consists of the Government providing an underwater sill, when needed, and upgrading the existing water distribution system in Plaquemines Parish to provide fresh water to water treatment plants impacted by increased saltwater intrusion caused by the deeper channel. A Supplemental Design Memorandum (DM) was submitted on Jul. 17, 1990, outlining the details of Permanent Saltwater Intrusion Mitigation plan. Between October 1990 and July 1991, LMVD comments on the DM were submitted and resolved. The DM was forwarded to HQUSACE for review on Aug. 9, 1991. Substantive comments were received from HQUSACE and the Washington Level Review center. A response to the comments was submitted on Apr. 23, 1992. Additional comments were received from HQUSACE on Jul. 30, 1992 and a response to these comments was submitted on Aug. 24, 1992. A draft third Supplement to the basic LCA covering this work was submitted on Jul. 16, 1990. LMVD comments required a complete rewrite of the Supplemental LCA. The rewritten Supplemental LCA was negotiated with the local sponsor and submitted back to LMVD on Apr. 23, 1991. No action was taken on the Supplemental LCA since the DM had not been approved. Based on comments received on the DM, the LCA has been revised and is under review. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 45-foot channel is completed from the Gulf to Mile 181.0 AHP. Studies have been completed on the most economical plan to mitigate for saltwater intrusion caused by the deeper channel. Until the recommended plan is executed, an interim plan has been developed that will provide for the barging of fresh raw water to two water treatment plants in Plaquemines Parish. 3. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies costs as of Sep. 30, 1992, were Lake Charles Ship Channel for $6,737; North Pass-Pass Manchac, LA, $316; and Vermilion River, LA, $1,228. 11-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Flood Control 4. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of Southwest Pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune would have a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet NGVD, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm would slope from an elevation of 8.5 feet NGVD at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet NGVD and, from this point, would assume its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 3,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1991) is $20,321,000 Federal and $12,779,000 non-Federal, including $7,547,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Local interests have the responsibility of providing rights-of-way, 30 percent of hurricane protection costs, 75 percent of beach erosion costs, and operation and maintenance of the completed work. The Louisiana Legislature, by Act 833 of 1982, authorized the Office of Public Works of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development to provide the non-Federal assurances for the Grand Isle Hurricane Protection and Beach Erosion Project. On Jan.11, 1983, the Louisiana State Government authorized the Office of Public Works to execute the required assurances as a cosponsor with the town of Grand Isle. The required assurances were executed on Mar. 10, 1983, the construction rights-of-way were provided on May 4, 1983, and local interest provided a cash contribution of $2,100,000 on Jun. 1, 1983, $70,000 in November 1985, $368,000 in September 1987 and $259,000 in May 1989. An additional $4,750,000 has been deposited in escrow to complete restoration of the dune. Maintenance of the project is the responsibility of the local assurer. The local assurer will receive Federal aid for repairing erosion and other damage to the project for a period of 15 years. The average annual Federal maintenance cost identified in the Act of Assurances is $44,000; however, this is not a fixed amount. Periodic nourishment to repair erosion will not necessarily be conducted every year, but as needed, with an estimated frequency of one in eight years on the average. It is estimated that the Federal share of the maintenance cost will be 12 percent for the 15-year period. Operations and results during the fiscal year. No work performed during FY 92. Condition as of Sep. 30. The repair and restoration of Grand Isle were accomplished by two separate contracts. The jetty extensions and sand bar removal contract (partial fix), which was completed in early 1988. The dune repair and structural reinforcement contract was physically completed Sep. 4, 1991. An O&M Manual has been approved. The project has been turned over to the state of Louisiana for operation and maintenance. 5. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the Gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides protection to the greater New Orleans area and other communities bordering Lake Pontchartrain from the effects of hurricane- generated floods. The project is comprised of two major features: The Chalmette Area Plan and the High Level Plan. The Chalmette Area Plan consists of a levee and floodwall system around the Chalmette area and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, with connections to the Mississippi River levees. The High Level Plan provides for heightening and strengthening the existing hurricane protection levee systems in Orleans Parish and the east bank of Jefferson Parish, repairing and rehabilitating the Mandeville Seawall in St. Tammany Parish; building a new mainline hurricane levee on the east bank of the St. Charles Parish just north of U.S. Highway 61 (Airline Highway); raising and strengthening the existing levee which extends along the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT boundary between Lake Pontchartrain and Airline Highway; and deferring construction of the proposed Seabrook lock until its feasibility as a feature of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet navigation project can be determined. Areas which will be enclosed by the levee and floodwall construction will be provided protection against tidal surge resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The estimated project cost for work (October 1992) is $501,000,000 Federal and $195,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all rights-of-way; bear 30 percent of the first cost, consisting of fair market value of providing all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow and spoil disposal areas for construction, accomplish alteration and relocation of roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, drainage structures, and other facilities; maintain and operate all works after completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages. See H. Doc. No. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. for more detailed requirements of local cooperation. Assuring Agency: The Orleans Levee District, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, Louisiana Office of Public Works, and Pontchartrain Levee District. The State of Louisiana formed the East Jefferson Levee District and assigned to it the east Jefferson Parish levees, previously the responsibility of the Pontchartrain Levee District. Basic assurances were received from the following: Orleans Levee District for the entire barrier plan and that portion of the Chalmette Area Plan in Orleans Parish; Pontchartrain Levee District for the Barrier Plan; Lake Borgne Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury for the Chalmette Area Plan in St. Bernard Parish. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from the Orleans Levee District and the Pontchartrain Levee District. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, and the East Jefferson Levee District. The St. Tammany Parish portion of the project has been placed in an inactive status since the local sponsors have not provided acceptable assurances. Supplemental Assurances in connection with the High Level Plan were executed by the Orleans Levee District on May 29, 1985, and approved by the United States Jun. 21, 1985. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan were executed by the East Jefferson Levee District for the Jefferson Parish portion of the project on Jan. 16, 1987. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan were executed by the Pontchartrain Levee District for the St. Charles Parish portion of the project on Apr. 20, 1987, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Aug. 7, 1987. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan are not required from St. Bernard Parish Police Jury and the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District for St. Bernard Parish. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor. One design memorandum was completed in FY 90. A Draft Reevaluation Report (including Draft Environmental Impact Statement) recommending the tentatively selected High Level Plan (lieu of Barrier Plan) was submitted by New Orleans District to the Lower Mississippi Valley Division in December 1983. The final Reevaluation Report was submitted to LMVD on Aug. 8, 1984. A Record of Decision was signed in February 1985 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on Jan. 17, 1975. By Court Order dated Dec. 30, 1977, a revised Environmental Impact Statement was ordered. A draft revised Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the High Level Plan and reevaluation report which documents the proposal to adopt that plan instead of the Barrier Plan was released to the public and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Dec. 16, 1983. The final revised Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Dec. 7, 1984. A draft mitigation report with corresponding EIS was prepared and distributed for public review on Mar. 16, 1988. A series of public meetings and workshops were held to facilitate participation in mitigation plan formulation by other agencies, environmental groups, local sponsors, and other interested groups. Prior to selecting the tentative plan, the three final plans were presented to the public at a meeting on Jul. 29, 1985. A final mitigation report is currently being prepared. The Louisiana Department of Natural Resources has agreed to fund the Local Sponsor's share of mitigation. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 80 percent complete. Contract work continued on nine contracts in FY 92 and will continue on 17 contracts in FY 93. Five contracts were awarded in FY 92 and ten are scheduled for award in FY 93. Plans and specifications are underway on four contracts scheduled for award in FY 93. 6. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet 11-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point a la Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayo4 crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage. Estimated cost for new work (October 1992) is $79,800,000 Federal and $34,200,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas, and accomplish alterations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities necessary for the construction of the project; all at an estimated cost of $12,562,000; bear 30 percent of the total project cost, a sum presently estimated at $34,200,000 consisting of the items listed above, and a cash contribution presently estimated at $21,638,000 or equivalent work specifically undertaken as an integral part of the project after authorization and in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity is provided promptly without cost to the United States; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611) in acquiring real property. The Board of Commissioners of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on Nov. 13, 1972, which was executed by the United States on Jul. J 0, 1973, and approved on behalf of the Secretary of the Army on Aug. 29, 1973. Section 38, Paragraph 1051 et seq., Louisiana Revised Statutes created the South Lafourche Levee District. The South Lafourche Levee District assumed the rights and obligations of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District with respect to this project. Local interests have requested and received funds from the State of Louisiana for right-of-way acquisition and relocations required to support construction work. Operations and results during fiscal year. One contract was completed in FY 92. Plans and specifications are underway on two contracts scheduled for award in FY 1993. Planning, engineering, and design activities will continue in FY 93 for future construction work. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced in February 1972 and is 73 percent complete. 7. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In south-central Louisiana, Morgan City proper, and the adjacent areas. It includes the land south of Grand Lake, Six Mile Lake, and Lake Palourde extending from Morgan City westward to Charenton drainage and navigation canal. Lower Atchafalaya River and Wax Lake Outlet, the principal outlets for Atchafalaya Basin Floodway, traverse the area. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway crosses the area in an east-west direction. Numerous bayous and artificial canals excavated for drainage purposes or for access to oil developments exist throughout the area. (See Engineer quadrangles Bayou Sale, Jeanerette, Foster, Belle Isle, Point Au Fer, Morgan City, and Lake Decade; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1116.) Existing project. Morgan City: Construction of about 5.6 miles of new levees along shore of Lake Palourde and west bank of Bayou Ramos and about 0.5 mile of new levee from Southern Pacific railroad embankment near Wyandotte to tie in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee, and construction of three gravity drainage structures. Franklin and vicinity: Enlargement of about 21.6 miles of back levee and construction of about 3.5 miles of new levees to effect a complete closure of area to be protected, construction of one floodgate and eight gravity drainage structures, and alteration of existing drainage facilities where necessary. Normal range of tide is 1.6 feet. Storm and hurricane tide have produced elevations up to 10 feet while northerly storms during winter depress the gulf level as much as 3 feet below mean sea level. During low water periods on Atchafalaya River, generally September through November, the effect of tide extends about 35 miles above Morgan City. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-8 of the FY 1986 Annual Report. Operations and results during period. The GDM for the Morgan City area was completed in FY 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Due to lack of financial local support this project has been moved to a deferred status. 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 8. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from City Price to Empire, 15 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Empire to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia (construction recently completed by local agency with credit given as equivalent work), 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and raising the river levee on the west bank (MR&T levee) from City Price to Venice, to a grade high enough to prevent overtopping by tidal surges from the east, generally called the West Bank River Plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Empire to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1992) is $168,000,000 Federal and $72,000,000 non-Federal, including $54,798,000 cash contributions or equivalent work. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $7,053,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $10,149,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $72,000,000, and cash contribution presently estimated at $54,798,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, or as a substitute for any part of the cash contribution, accomplish in accordance with approved construction schedules items of work of equivalent value as determined by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of costs to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping is provided promptly; and at least annually, notify those affected that the project will not provide complete protection from tidal flooding and that further local actions must be taken during hurricane emergencies. Local interests are also required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), in acquiring real property. Public Law 91-611. Not applicable. Construction started prior to Jan. 1, 1972. Public Law 91-646. A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana Legislature on Feb. 1, 1972, allowing local interests to comply. The estimated cost to local interests is $48,000. Assurances of local cooperation for Reaches A, B-i, B-2, and C, furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council were accepted on behalf of the United States on Apr. 14, 1965. Supplemental assurances covering provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jun. 20, 1973. Local interests were requested to furnish separate assurances for the East Bank Barrier Levee on Jun. 10, 1975, Feb. 23, 1976, and again on Aug. 19, 1983. By letter dated Feb. 5, 1985, the local sponsor requested the Corps of Engineers to defer further work on the design of Reach A and direct their efforts toward earliest possible construction of the East Bank Barrier Levee or a suitable alternative thereto. The Corps, with the concurrence of the local sponsor, selected a West Bank Levee alternative to the East Bank Barrier. On Dec. 29, 1987, the local sponsor provided supplemental assurances for the West Bank River Levee. These assurances were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 28, 1988. By letter dated Jul. 28, 1987, the local sponsor also requested the Corps of Engineers to advance construction on Reach A, based on the results of the geotextile test section. All negotiations for relocations are the responsibility of local interests. These mainly consist of raising several petroleum and natural gas pipelines to the levee configuration and relocation of privately owned frame structures used as fishing and boating camps. To assure that there will be no delay in construction of levees, local interests are notified well in advance so that the owners of the pipelines can be advised. The local sponsor has requested that an area extending from the upstream limits of Reach A at City Price to St. Jude, Louisiana be incorporated into the project. This work involves upgrading 3.3 miles of existing non-Federal levees to project standards. The local sponsor has elected to pay all of the costs of this reach of levee. While the sponsor will not receive credit for these costs, the increased protected area would be eligible for Federally subsidized flood insurance. A 11-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Postauthorization Change report was prepared for this reach and was approved by the Lower Mississippi Valley Division on March 6, 1992. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Government. Assurances for all reaches of the project have been furnished, except for the City Price to St. Jude reach. We anticipate that Plaquemines Parish Government will execute the assurances for this reach in FY 93. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction during FY 92 was initiated on two contracts and continued on nine others. Plans and specifications were initiated on three construction items. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 62 percent complete. 9. WESTWEGO TO HARVEY CANAL, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. The project includes the Urban area within Jefferson parish between Westwego and the Harvey Canal on the west bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, Louisiana. The project area is generally bounded by the Harvey Canal to the east, Lakes Cataouatche and Salvador to the west, the Mississippi River to the north, and Barataria Bay to the south. Existing project. The project will provide protection for about 43,000 acres of urban land within Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, on the west bank of the Mississippi River. The plan of protection consists of about 22 miles of floodwalls and new and enlarged levees designed to protect against tidal floodwaters resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The SPH has a frequency of recurrence of once in about 500 years. The elevation of the SPHIT floodwalls and levees varies from 9 feet NGVD to 17 feet NGVD. The project plan includes mitigation which consists of the construction of a timber pile and tire breakwater on the west bank of Lake Cataouatche adjacent to the Salvador Wildlife Management Area and the acquisition and management of 1,024 acres of wooded wetlands. The estimated project cost (October 1992) is $91,300,000 ($59,300,000 Federal and $32,000,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and the West Jefferson Levee District was signed on Dec. 18, 1990. The West Jefferson Levee District has agreed to the following items of local cooperation: (1) Provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including borrow and excavated material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project. (The current estimate is $6,734,000.) (2) Accomplish all necessary alteration and relocations to roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project. (The current estimate is $8,095,000.) (3) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. (4) Bear 35 percent of the first cost of construction. (The current estimate is $32,000,000.) Funds provided by non-Federal interests for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as a part of the non-Federal contribution of the project pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and subsequent policies. (5) Maintain and operate all features of the project in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including levees, floodgates and approach channels, drainage structures, drainage ditches or canals, floodwalls, and stoplog structures. (6) Provide a cash or in-kind contribution for fish and wildlife mitigation features of the project in an amount equal to the same percentage as the non-Federal share of the basic project. (7) Comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL 91-646). (8) Comply with Section 221 of Public Law 91-611, Flood Control Act of 1970; and (9) Comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PL 88-352) that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination in connection with the project on the grounds of race, creed, or national origin. Requirements of PL 91-611 and 91-646: (1) Local interest are legally qualified to execute the assurances. (2) A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana legislature on Feb. 1, 1972, allowing local interest to comply. The local sponsor (West Jefferson Levee District) applied for and received ASA (CW) approval (May 13 1988) for $6.7 million, subject to audit, for work accomplished during the 5-year period prior to project authorization. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed on the mitigation break- 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT water at the west bank of Lake Cataouatche, and construction continued on the LA Hwy 45 Levee and the East of Vertex Levee (non-Federal contract). All three contracts were awarded in FY 91. The Company Canal Floodwall contract was awarded in Sep. 1992. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Project construction began in Feb 1991 and is 10 percent complete. Completion is scheduled in 2002. 10. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (a) Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 1992. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $274,965. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1992, were $3,607,204. (b) Mississippi River and Tributaries floodwalls, levees and flood control projects were inspected during FY 1992. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as-needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $148,231. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1992, were $853,010. 11. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecendent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, fiscal year costs for the period were $159,096. Emergency operations costs for FY 92 were $155,353. Rehabilitation costs for FY 91 were $85,000. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies cost as of Sep. 30, 1992, Bayou Chevreuil and Grand Bayou, LA, at a cost of $2,475; and Choctaw Bayou, LA, $4,301. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies costs as of Sep. 30, 1992, on Mississippi River at So. University, Baton Rouge, LA, $75; and Parish Road 218, Mermentau River at Grand Chenier, LA, $301. 11-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 1992 1. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Mississippi River Ship Channel-Gulf to Baton Rouge (Contrib. Funds) 4. Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (Contrib. Funds) 5. Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,450,000 1,369,000 1,841,000 1,619,000 95,996,200 1,370,207 1,516,752 1,451,762 1,897,964 95,826,974 4,469,000 6,456,396 9,740,000 13,269,000 4,809,722 6,438,802 9,416,764 11,720,482 149,752,476 147,858,689 -- 1,240,4771 -- 1,196,4771 1,167,000 894,000 1,250,000 61,000 11,699,000 820,130 1,194,808 1,295,924 331,875 12,273,202 318,000 671,315 -- 275,000 3,157,000 -- 247,622 3,057,937 1,901,000 2,507,000 3,257,000 1,849,231 1,824,391 3,162,024 259,000 1,600,000 3,116,000 258,318 1,422,827 2.754,182 -- 10,740,776 -- 10,732,538 0 18,708,500 319,518 18,133,535 0 7,623,000 185,990 7,159,317 9,214,000 32,882,000 -4,989,000 9,852,000 13,770,957 17,751,531 8,979,174 11,257,484 636,579 404,647 389,181 3,265 255,070,000 254,093,848 505,000 1,200,000 4,920,800 -- 269,246 3,064,000 2,675,000 4,316,000 2,644,000 747,000 61,983,000 2,386,886 4,486,100 2,991,299 1,102,724 61,947,724 -- 2,000,000 105,760 -- 2,000,000 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 1992 7. Morgan City and New Work Vicinity, LA Approp. -- -- -- 1,953,000 (Hurricane Cost -- -- -- 1,975,628 Protection) 8. New Orleans to New Work Venice, LA Approp. 17,200,000 18,325,000 17,682,000 14,006,000 129,331,000 (Hurricane Cost 16,623,500 14,616,098 19,822,229 15,250,568 128,211,879 Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. -- 153,720 3,086,488 2,791,000 10,790,197 Cost -- 153,720 779,420 4,401,640 10,093,769 9. Westwego to New Work Harvey Canal, Approp. 1,050,000 1,085,000 3,341,000 723,000 7,199,000 LA (Hurricane Cost 1,291,000 911,000 2,119,975 1,974,712 7,055,687 Protection) 1. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 11-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Approp. Act of 1985, dated Jul. 2, 1986 (PL 99-88) LAKE CHARLES, LA The project for deepening of the project for navigation, Lake Charles, Louisiana, to a depth of 45 feet, at a total cost of $1,070,000. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel, 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 1 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. The Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet feature is modified to provide that the replacement and expansion of the existing industrial canal lock and connecting channels or the construction of an additional lock and connecting channels shall be in the area of the existing lock or at the Violet site. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA (See Sec. 2 of Text) Will provide more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 11-12 TABLE 11-B (Continued) NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) Aug. 30, 1985 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19762 Oct. 27, 1965 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Formalizes the cost sharing provisions of the project, permits the State of Louisiana to enact user fees to defray their portion of the project costs, and implements harbor maintenance fees to help pay for the Federal cost of the project. It also provides an option to the local sponsor to defer their initial payment for one year following initiation of construction. In terms of channel depths up to 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal for construction and 100 percent Federal for maintenance. For channels deeper than 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal for both construction and maintenance. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. BAYOU RIGOLETTE, LA A project to construct six additional floodgates at Bayou Rigolette, LA, adjacent to the existing drainage structure, at a total cost of $2,300,000. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 4 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 5 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, NORTH SHORE, LA The project for navigation, Lake Pontchartrain North Shore, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 14, 1979, at a total cost of $1,310,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $655,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $655,000. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 11-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 6 of Text) A loop levee about 36 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 7 of Text) Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee and three gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 8 of Text) Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. WEST BANK HURRICANE PROTECTION LEVEE, JEFFERSON PARISH, LA, Westwego to Havery Canal (See Sec. 9 of Text) Structural and nonstructural measures to prevent flood damage to those areas identified in the Feb. 1984 draft Environmental Impact Statement for the West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA, at a total cost of $61,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $40,000,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $21,500,000. Funds provided by non-Federal interest for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non- Federal contribution of the project pursuant to Section 104 of this Act. H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 1 H. Doc. 167, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge1 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Barataria Bay Waterway, LA Bayou Bonfouca, LA Bayou Dorcheat, Logy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA,3,4,5 Bayou Dupre, LA Bayou Lacombe, LA Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA Bayou Teche, LA Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA Bayou Terrebonne, LA3 '7 Bayou Vermilion, LA3 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA Calcasieu River and Pass, LA Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA8 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA9 Cane River, LA2'5 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA10 Freshwater Bayou, LA Grand Bayou Pass, LA Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, & Mexican Border Houma Navigation Canal, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA1' 11 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA12 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA1 3 Leland Bowman Lock, LA Little Caillou Bayou, LA Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Mermentau River, LA Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete CoCmompplelteete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete -- Complete Complete Complete Complete 1967 1978 1984 1984 1981 1984 1974 1887 1968 1967 1984 1970 1950 1970 1958 1984 1983 1961 1947 1936 1984 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1984 1950 1985 1984 1960 1956 1950 1987 1973 1977 1985 $ -- 28,234 16,411,921 30,356,691 501,963 1,572,685 30,997 5,000 38,915 4,716 1,624,424 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 754,330 2,891,822 120,089 34,900 27,830,835 1,015,81410 5,856,200 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,116,224 7,676 $ 69,087 -- 75,947,924 24,573,336 320,758 -- 104,187 119,191 2,172,246 223,616 36,780 28,315 651,956 6,680,950 1,753,062 251,691 200,169 37,169 128,553,811 -- .-- 2,000 463,401 452,611 23,679,484 14,48010 1914 Nov. 1963 1931 1939 1938 May 1956 1915 Mar. 1923 Mar. 1957 1916 1896 2 Oct. 1968 Apr. 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 1959 Dec. 1914 Aug. 1968 1939 63,284,470 442,146,350 -- 24,123,692 249,052 -- 32,200,010 77,761 5,197,97514 4,672,579 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 114,519 26,712,867 2 Mar. 1985 1929 Jul. 1952 11-15 1928 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Mississippi River Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA -- 1991 84,568,12816 691,607,95317-- Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA Complete 1976 2,499,555 -- Nov. 1974 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA Complete 1986 10,014,012 18,933,089 Complete Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA) 15 -- 1957 -- 139,755 -- Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1950 79,845 13,545 1912 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Complete 1981 -- 1,450,172 Nov. 1980 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA 1984 -- 32,307,860 Sulphur River, AR and TX2'5 -- 1919 45,989 -- --. Tangipahoa River, LA -- 1985 -- 1,050,201 -- Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA3 Complete 1973 8,115 92,163 1921 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA11 -- 1948 10,904 0,742 -- Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 1,510,719 Jun. 1950 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA Complete 1990 641,608 1,276,032 Aug. 1964 1. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. 2. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 3. Includes previous project costs. 4. No commerce reported. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. 7. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. 8. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. 9. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." 10. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 11. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, LA." 12. Not completed; superseded for most of it length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides with or parallels it. 13. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. 14. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. 15. Work is under continuing authority. 16. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 17. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 18. Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 19. Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 11-D Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Amite River and Tributaries, LA 1964 3,034,2551 -- Feb. 1964 Bayou Choupique, LA2 1954 129,930 -- Mar. 1954 Bayou Rapides, LA2 1952 95,179 -- Dec. 1951 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA 1979 1,018,005 -- -- 1. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ..................... $ 430 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA .......... 425,209 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended) 11-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 11-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for Authority Expended Expended Baton Rouge Harbor Segment Between Mi 2.5 and 5.0 Bayou Grosse Tete, LA Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur Bulkheads and Jetties Vinton Waterway, LA 1946 1969 1942 1950 Nov. 2, 1979 Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74) May 6, 1981 DAEN-CWP-A Letter Subj: Completed Action on 5th Deauthorization Rpt, dated Jun. 17, 1981 Nov 1979 Nov. 2, 1979 Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA of 1974) 11-18 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 92 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation(110) Intracoastal Waterway Locks, LA-81289 $ 395,641 Bayou Lafourche & Lafourche-Jump Waterway, LA-10009 19,406 GIWW LA & TX Section-10032 8 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, St. Bernard Parish, LA (Bank Erosion) - 10241 2,072 Port of Cameron, LA-10360 123,502 540,629 Flood Control Studies(120) Amite River & Tributaries, LA-50100 314,595 Jefferson-Orleans Parishes Urban Flood Control, LA-12863 653,043 Lake Cataouatche Levee, LA-12864 258,809 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Land Loss & Marsh Creation-12348 34,598 Mermentau, Vermilion & Calcasieu Rivers & Bayou Teche, LA-34014 64,217 West Bank of Mississippi River-Vicinity of New Orleans, LA-59360 159,282 1,484,544 Special Studies(140) Louisiana Coastal Wetlands, LA-14172 -128 Miscellaneous Activities(170) Special Investigations-17250 64,795 Interagency Water Resources Development 20,168 National Estuary Program 18,218 North American Waterfowl Management 4,241 107,422 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies(180) Planning Assistance to States(186)-14822 13,347 Planning Assistance to States, LA Flood Damage-22001 21,336 Water Supply-22002 26,876 Wastewater Facilities Database-22003 8,809 Digitized Flood Plain Mapping - Amite River Basin-22004 70,000 Livingston Parish-Emergency Response-22005 6,862 Lake Pontchartrain Wetland Demo-22006 3,224 E. Baton Rouge Parish Digitized Mapping-22007 2,731 St. Benard Parish Digitized Mapping-22008 1,760 154,945 TOTAL (Category 100) $2,287,412 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services(250) Flood Plain Management Services 162,979 Oakdale, LA - 83003 101 South East Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation - 83001 1,434 Special Studies Computer Automation of Flood Hazard Data - 83005 18,292 Sunset, LA-83004 5,897 188,703 TOTAL (Category 200) $188,703 11-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 11-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Item and CWIS Number PROJECTS NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION (Category 400) Flood Control Projects (450) Comite River, LA-77059 TOTAL (Category 400) PROJECTS NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION (Category 600) Flood Control Projects (650) Tangipahoa, Tchefuncte, and Tickfaw Rivers, LA - 75457 TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Federal Cost FY 92 $ 1,411,573 $ 5,180 11-20 Totals by Categories $ 1,411,573 $ 5,180 $3,892,868 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT* This district comprises western and central Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi- Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, AR; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas-Arkansas state line. The Vicksburg District territory encompasses 68,000 square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR ..................... 12-2 2. Red River emergency bank protection ...................... 12-2 3. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La ............ 12-3 4. Navigation work under special authorization ................... 12-3 Flood Control 5. Aloha Rigolette, LA ............... 12-3 6. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ..................... . 12-4 7. Canal43,AR ..................... 12-4 8. Chauvin Bayou, LA ................ 12-5 9. Ouachita River Levees, LA ......... 12-5 10. Ouachita River and tributaries AR and LA ....................... 12-5 11. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA ...... 12-6 12. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA ....................... 12-7 13. Porter Bayou, MS ................. 12-7 14. Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg Dist.) .................. 12-7 15. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (Vicksburg District) ............... 12-8 16. Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR ................. 12-8 Flood Control (cont) 17. Inspection of completed Flood Control Projects ................ 18. Flood control work under special authorization ............. Tables Table 12-A Table 12-B Table 12-C Table 12-D Table 12-E Table 12-F Table 12-G Table 12-H Table 12-I Table 12-J Page 12-8 12-9 Cost and Financial Statement............... 12-10 Authorizing Legislation ... 12-12 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA (9-Foot Project), Locks and Dams ......... .12-15 Other Authorized Navigation Project .................. 12-16 Ouachita River and Tributaries Existing Project .... 12-18 Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) New Projects ............ 12-19 Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) Incorporated Projects ..... .12-20 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......... 12-21 Deauthorized Projects .... 12-23 Active General Investigations ........... .12-24 12-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation 1. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of the old 6.5-foot navigation project. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR. Authorized features for the modified project include four new locks and dams, in-river construction dredging to achieve a 9-foot navigation channel depth, and channel realignment. All 4 locks and dams are complete and in operation and initial channel dredging is complete providing 9-foot navigation depth. Remaining work consists of realignment of 25 restricted bendway sites between river miles 195 at Sterlington, LA, and river mile 335 at Camden, AR, on the Ouachita River. With these improvements in place the river system will be navigable by a four-barge tow (two abreast) to Crossett, AR, river mile 237, and a two-barge tow (abreast) to Camden, AR. Mitigation features include the 65,000-acre Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge in Arkansas, the 18,000-acre D'Arbonne National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana, a series of recreation facilities along the waterway, and improvements to Catahoula Lake to preserve it for migratory waterfowl. Estimated total cost for the nine-foot navigation project is $278,130,000, which includes $261,000,000 Federal costs and $17,130,000 non- Federal costs. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to furnish the construction rights-of-way for the realignment work. Seven of the 25 sites are within the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge and are already owned by the Federal Government. However, there have been no indications that the land for the remaining 18 sites will be forthcoming because of strong opposition to the realignment work by local environmental groups. The six remaining recreation facilities are unscheduled at this time due to the lack of required cost sharing agreements. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossett, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two grainhandling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, and a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction continued for installation of a hinged crest gate in the navigation pass of Felsenthal Lock and Dam. Maintenance dredging performed by the contract dredges Butcher, and Pontchartrain during the FY 92 removed 676,065 cubic yards of material from the waterways. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 92 percent complete and provides limited navigation as far north as Camden, AR. All four locks and dams associated with the project are complete and in operation. Design and construction of the remaining features is on hold pending a consensus between the states of Arkansas and Louisiana concerning the type of development desired or the additional studies needed to reach a decision. 2. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, AR. Existing project. Provides for realigning the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for this work (October 1992) is $90,762,000 Federal and $2,182,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $7,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and specifications, surveys, and general engineering. Slay Bend Revetment, river mile 339-R, was completed, and below Garland City Dikes Flood Damage Repair, Little River/Clipper Flood Damage 8(a), Young, Horseshoe, Kenny & Goose, Bear/Goose Lake Flood Damage Repair, and Bushy Revetment Flood Damage 8(a) were initiated and completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 91 percent complete. 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 3. RED RIVER WATERWAY-PROJECT Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA Reach Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. Existing project. Provide a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development will include five locks and dams, realignment and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work is $1,753,332,000 Federal and $93,503,000 non-Federal, including $47,418,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost includes $332,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 80. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana. These were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. The Corps entered into an agreement with the City of Alexandria, LA, whereby material excavated from the Philip Bayou Realignment could be used as fill for port construction at mile 109. Construction of the realignment and port fill are complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued work on Design Memoranda, Project Cooperation Agreements, Plans and Specifications, Surveys, General Engineering, and Model Studies. The following contracts were awarded in FY 92: Pool 1 - Reinforcement Flood Damage Repair; Pool 2 - Lock and Dam 3 Downstream Dikes and Wiggins Capout; Pool 3 - Ile Au Vaches Capout; Pool 4 - Lock and Dam 4, Phase II; Pool 5 - Lock and Dam 5, Phase II, McDade Revetment, Sunny Pt. Dikes, Curtis Revetment, Cupples Capout. The following contracts were awarded and completed in FY 92: Pool 1 - Lock and Dam 1 Access Bridge and Boat Ramp, Joffrion Capout; Pool 2 - Deloges Bluff Capout; Pool 3- Fausse Capout, Smith Island Capout, Lumbra Capout; Pool 4- Carroll capout. Contracts continuing in FY 92 included: Pool 2 - L&A Railroad Bridge Relocation, Missouri-Pacific Railroad Bridge Modification, Lock and Dam 2 Resident Office Renovation & POL Building; Pool 3 - Grappe Realignment, Ph. II; Pool 4 - Piermont Realignment, Westdale Realignment; Pool 5 - Moss Revetment, Elm Grove Revetment, Cecile Revetment. Contracts continuing included: Pool 2 - Missouri- Pacific Railroad Bridge Modification L&A Bridge Relocation, L&D 3 Downstream Dikes; The following contracts were completed in FY 92: Pool 1 - Ben Routh Recreation Facilities, Hog Lake/Moncla/Larto Flood Damage Repair; Pool 2 - Alexandria Recreation Facilities, Deloges Bluff/Marteau Flood Damage Repair; Pool 3 - Lock and Dam 3, Ph. III, Socot Capout Campti/St. Maurice Flood Damage Repair; Pool 4- Bull Revetment Howard Realignment, Lock and Dam 4, Ph. I; Pool 5- Lock and Dam 5, Ph. I, Wilkerson Pt./Lucas Bend Flood Damage Repair. Maintenance dredging was performed by the Contract Dredges Butcher, Alabama, Pontchartrain, and Jahncke during Fiscal Year 1992. All maintenance dredging was below Alexandria, LA. 2,220,256 cubic yards of material was removed from the channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 71 percent complete. Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX Reach. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended. Reevaluation Studies of the authorized project and alternative plans were initiated in FY 89 at the direction of congress and continued in FY 92. Flood Control 5. Aloha Rigolette, LA Location. The project is located in north-central Louisiana between the towns of Winnfield and Pineville on the left descending bank of the Red River. Authorized Project. The recommended plan consists of a three-barrel floodgate structure installed at the mouth of Bayou Darrow to reopen it to the Red River, 8.2 miles of clearing and snagging of Bayou Darrow from its mouth upstream, construction of a closure and low-flow structure on Bayou Rigolette just below its junction with Bayou Darrow, and 12-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 realignment of Sam's Bayou and appropriate mitigation features. Local Cooperation. The City of Colfax, LA, has agreed to cost share this project. The Project Cooperation Agreement is scheduled to be signed in FY 93. Operations And Results During Fiscal Year. Continued work on plans and specification for the first item of work, Item 1. Condition as of Sep. 30. continuing. Design work is 6. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. In east bank flood plain of Red River. Bayou Bodcau rises in vicinity of Hope, AR, and flows southerly through Bayou Bodcau Reservoir and Bodcau Lake to join Cypress Bayou and form Red Chute Bayou, continues through Red Chute Bayou, Flat River, and Loggy Bayou to Red River, about 40 miles below Shreveport, LA. Authorized project. Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee: Extend existing levee from about 8 miles southeast of Benton, LA, proceeding southerly to junction of Cross and Red Chute Bayous, and then parallel to Red Chute Bayou on the right descending bank to its junction with Cutoff Bayou for a total distance of approximately 25 miles; construct landside drainage channel and several culverts with flap gates to Red Chute Bayou; construct approximately 5 miles of levee on left descending bank of Red Chute Bayou extending south from Louisiana Highway 612, and relocate utility lines as needed. Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee: Extend from lower end of existing Red River levee in vicinity of Ninock, LA, along high (left descending) bank of Red River to a point on right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, about 1 mile above its mouth, thence generally along right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, Red Chute, CutoffBayou, and Flat River to Taylortown to tie into existing Red River levee; close Flat River near its junction with Cutoff Bayou and install one 36-inch round corrugated metal pipe with automatic flap gate to drain isolated pockets and provide uninterrupted drainage; construct drainage structures on Flat River near its junction with Red Chute Bayou and along alignment of the Loggy Bayou in the vicinity of Grassy Lake; and make necessary utility relocations. Flat River channel improvement: Enlarge to average bottom width of 50 feet with flat side slopes and deepen by 2 to 6 feet from the confluence with Cutoff Bayou to junction with Cooper Bayou, 11.6 miles, including required relocations and modifications of utilities. The subject project was one of the Water Resources projects reviewed in March 1977 in accordance with the President request. As a result of this review, the President recommended that project construction be halted and the project be deauthorized. Congress subsequently directed the Corps to take the following two actions: Construct levees on Red Chute Bayou below Cutoff Bayou that are required to prevent induced flood damage that would otherwise result from the abandonment of partly completed project. Initiate studies to determine if modifications to the authorized project would permit its completion in a form consistent with the current executive policy. Engineering and design work for the induced flood prevention plan below Cutoff Bayou and project modification studies were being conducted when President Reagan signed, on Dec. 4, 1981, the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill of 1982, which contained language that "reconfirmed without further study and analysis" the plan for flood control for the project as approved by the Flood Control Act of 1965. Resumption of construction was scheduled to begin in 1984. The project sponsor, however, requested that construction be delayed while a reevaluation of the project was made. The reevaluation study has been completed. A summary of study results was submitted in January 1987 which recommended no further Federal action. The Lower Mississippi Valley Division approved the report and a notice of study termination was disseminated in June 1987. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-24 and 11-25, Annual Report for FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Red Chute Bayou Levee crevassed during the May-June 1991 flooding and was repaired under contract with PL 84-99 funding. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1974 and is 17 percent complete. Reconnaissance Studies of Flood Control Alternatives along Red Chute Bayou were initiated in November 1991, as part of the Bossier Parish, LA, study. The reconnaissance phase is scheduled for completion in May 1993. Feasibility studies are scheduled for completion in 1996. 7. CANAL 43, AR Location. Canal 43 drains into Lake Chicot and is located in Lincoln and Desha Counties,.Ar. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for enlarging the channel beginning approximately 1500 feet downstream of State Highway 54 and extending approximately 11.2 miles upstream; and provides a 1-year frequency protection to adjacent agricultural lands. Total estimated Federal cost is $892,000. 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Local cooperation. The Cummins Drainage District has provided the necessary rights-of-way for project construction plus cash requirements totaling five percent of the total project costs. In addition, the drainage district is accomplishing all required relocations and will operate and maintain the project upon completion. Condition as of Sep 30. The construction contract was awarded Sep. 12, 1989, and construction was essentially completed on Aug. 17, 1990. 8. CHAUVIN BAYOU, LA Location. The Chauvin Bayou area is located immediately north of the city of Monroe, Louisiana. It is bounded on the west by the Ouachita River, on the north by Bayou Bartholomew, and on the east by Bayou DeSiard. Existing Project. The plan of improvement consists of a 250-cfs pumping plant located adjacent to Chauvin Bayou at the Ouachita River levee and a water control structure in Canal L-11. The project will provide the Chauvin Bayou area with improved flood protection. The total estimated Federal cost of the project is $4,248,000. Local cooperation. The city of Monroe, Louisiana, and the Ouachita Parish Police Jury are the local sponsors for the project. They are providing the necessary rights-of-way and relocations for project construction plus cash requirements totaling twenty-five percent of the total project costs. In addition, they will operate and maintain the project upon completion. Condition as of Sep 30. The construction contract for the Canal L-11 control structure was awarded Jun. 29, 1991 and is substantially complete. The construction contract for the pumping plant was awarded in November 1991. The contract for Chauvin Bayou was awarded Nov. 7, 1991, and is approximately 43% complete. 9. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existingproject. There are 105.8 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A letter report, approved by the Chief of Engineers, authorized gravel surfacing 40.3 miles of levee, enlargement of 40.4 miles of levee, and a 5.7-mile southward extension of the east bank levee. Estimated Federal cost is $17,826,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $5,174,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. A supplemental agreement for the Bawcomville segment was executed in FY 90. The 1991 Water and Energy Appropriations Act gave the Federal government responsibility for the repair and/or replacement of the deteriorated drainage structures. The Assurances Agreement for Local Cooperation was supplemented to reflect this change in responsibility. The supplemental agreement covered work performed in Fiscal Year 1992. This agreement will be further supplemented to cover the work to be performed in Fiscal Year 1993. Condition as of Sep. 30. Item 1 of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed Jul. 7,1978. Additonal work was deferred pending results of a comprehensive study of the entire Ouachita River Levee System. A summary report indicating that it is economically feasible to raise portions of the existing levee to authorized grade and that complete rehabilitation of the levee system is necessary was approved by LMVD on Oct. 1, 1986. The study results were disseminated to the project sponsor and interested parties in October 1986. The Project was reclassified as an active project on May 7, 1987. The final summary report was sent to the Office of the Chief of Engineers in July 1988 and design was initiated on the Bawcomville segment of the Ouachita River levees. A construction contract for the Bawcomville levee enlargement was awarded in FY 90, and is substantially complete as of Sep. 30, 1992. In FY 92, we lined three deteriorated culverts and awarded contracts to line nine additional culverts, replace one deteriorated drainage structure, and replace the headwalls and gates at 16 drainage structures. 10. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-E. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to include 10 water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and 6 local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. 12-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports in 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-E. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual reports in 1985 report. A reconnaissance study for flooding problems in the vicinity of Hot Springs, Garland County, AR, has been completed. Feasibility studies were recommended and were initiated in FY 93. Construction on the Chauvin Bayou Project continues. Planning and design for the Youngs Bayou Project are still on hold due to the Sponsor's inability to participate in the project. 11. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA Location. The basin comprises most of the Southcentral portion of Mississippi and a small part of southeast Louisiana. The Pearl River begins in Neshoba County, MS, and flows southwesterly 113 miles to the vicinity of Jackson, MS, then southeasterly 233 miles to the vicinity of Bogalusa, LA. At that point, the Pearl River splits into the East and West Pearl Rivers, and flows southerly 44 and 48 miles, respectively, before entering the Rigolets and Lake Borgne. Existing projects. The Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project provides for improvements of the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project includes two levee systems totaling 13.1 miles in length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, and 5.34 miles of channel rectification including three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the Pearl River. This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of Jul. 14, 1960. Construction began in July 1964 and work was completed in FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was $7,190,200. The FY 83 Jobs Bill authorized extension of the Jackson-East Jackson West Bank levee system along the Fortification Street 1-55 exit. This extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. Public Law 98-63, dated Jul. 29, 1983, authorized the vicinity of Jackson project. This authority provided for additional measures to prevent recurring flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson and included 3.3 miles of floodway clearing and enlarging the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge. This work has been completed. Mitigation lands for the clearing were purchased by the local sponsor in May 1985 and the Corps has reimbursed the local sponsor to cover the cost of these lands. Total Federal cost of this project is $1,800,000. Authorized projects. Public Law 99-88, dated Aug. 15, 1985, authorized planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system in Slidell, LA, to protect 3,265 residential and commercial structures from floods in the West Pearl. Public Law 99-662, dated Nov. 17, 1986, authorized construction of Shoccoe Dam and various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, MS. Local cooperation. For the Jackson-East Jackson and vicinity of Jackson projects, the requirements are as prescribed in Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended. This Act requires that a local sponsor provide the easements, and rights-ofway necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. The Slidell levee project authorization required cost-sharing and new guidelines for local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement consistent with Public Law 99-88 was signed by the Slidell local sponsor and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on Jun. 30, 1986. The local sponsors are as follows: Jackson-East Jackson, Rankin- Hinds Pearl River Flood Control Drainage District; Vicinity of Jackson Project, Pearl River Basin Development District; Slidell Levee Project, St. Tammany Levee Board. Condition as of Sep. 30. An overall basin study is essentially complete, except for alternative studies to Shoccoe Dry Dam as discussed below. Flood control feasibility studies for Jackson, MS, recommending Shoccoe Dam, and for Slidell, LA, recommending a 15-mile levee system, have been completed. Detailed engineering and design studies were on hold for the Slidell levee system, due to the failure of a local funding referendum. The local sponsor is now seeking alternative funding sources. As a result of upstream opposition, Shoccoe Dam is not implementable. In response to a request by the local sponsor, the Pearl River Basin Development District, reconnaissance studies to evaluate alternatives to Shoccoe for flood damage reduction in the Jackson Metropolitan Area have been completed and a potentially feasible levee plan identified. A Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement was signed with the Local Sponsor on Sep. 25, 1991, and feasibility studies are underway. Studies of various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, Columbia and Picayune, MS; Bogalusa, LA, and the Bogue Chitto Subbasin have been completed. 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT None were found economically feasible. Navigation studies have been conducted on the East and West Pearl Rivers. Results of these studies indicate that maintenance necessary to reopen the existing West Pearl River navigation project is economically justified. However, future dredging will depend on the outcome of the EIS which is scheduled to be completed in late FY 93. Studies also indicate that the East Pearl River does not have sufficient existing flows to support a 7- to 9-foot-deep navigation channel. The navigation study for Port Bienville, MS, has been terminated due to withdrawal of the Hancock County Port and Harbor Commission as local sponsor. Reconnaissance studies of flow distribution between the West Pearl River and the East Pearl River (boundary between the States of Louisiana and Mississippi) in the Lower Basin have been completed. A water resources development plan for flow redistribution in the Lower Basin was found economically feasible. However, the primary benefit of the plan would accrue to recreation. Reconnaissance studies did not find any problem that would be solved by a Federal project, given the current policies and priorities of the Administration. Reconnaissance studies of flood damage prevention and erosion control along Caney Creek in Jackson, MS, have been completed. These studies indicated that flood damages attributable to headwater flooding from Caney Creek are relatively insignificant and will not economically justify a water resource improvement plan under current conditions. Studies also found that most of the more serious streambank erosion problems along the creek have been corrected through actions undertaken by other public entities and agencies. 12. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of the State of Louisiana and consists of the area bounded by the West Pearl River on the east, Interstate 10 on the west, and Lake Pontchartrain on the south. Authorized project. The project is broken into two segments of levees. The segment north of 1-10 will consist of 4.0 miles of levee, a pumping station, a floodgate structure, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area north of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River. The segment south of 1-10 will consist of 9.0 miles of levees, three pumping stations, floodgates, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area south of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River and provides the same level of protection against hurricane surges. These two levee segments total 13 miles of levee and would protect some 3,029 homes. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, St. Tammany Levee Board, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), in an agreement consistent with the Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act Public Law 99-88) and Senate Report 1567, signed the Local Cooperation Agreement Jun. 30, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued engineering studies to complete General Design Memorandum. Condition as of Sep. 30. Preparation of final General Design Memorandum is on hold pending identification of a source of funding for the project by locals. No construction has taken place. 13. PORTER BAYOU, MS Location. Porter Bayou is located in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS. It lies approximately 25 miles east of the Mississippi River, is approximately 5 miles south of Cleveland, MS, and runs through the town of Shaw, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement called for selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3. This plan provides a 0.5-year frequency protection for the Porter Bayou area. All construction was performed from one side of the stream, leaving the other side undisturbed. The total estimated Federal cost of the project is $860,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. The original construction contract was completed in November 1983. However, the work on one reach of the stream (2.55 miles) remains unfinished due to a growth of aquatic weed that has never been successfully removed in spite of a previous attempt at biological (insect) treatment. With the exception of that one reach, the project was turned over to the local sponsor for operation and maintenance in May 1984. There are plans to treat the weed with a herbicide in FY 93 so that the remainder of the project can be turned over to the local sponsor and the project closed out. 14. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River" - 1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combina- 12-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 tion with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. (See Table 12-H for new projects and Table 12-I for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 15. RED RIVER BELOW DENSION DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, AR, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA. on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1992) is $67,105,000 Federal and $1,560,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. Construction of the McKinney Bayou Replacement floodgate and Dutch John Bottom Revetment were completed, and construction of Twelve-Mile Bayou Revetment was initiatied. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the levees are complete and bank stabilization is 96 percent complete. 16. RED RIVER WATERWAY SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red River between Shreveport, LA, and Index, AR. Existing project. To provide for realigning the channels of Red River from Shreveport, LA, to the levee system near Index, AR, by means of dredging, cutoffs, and training works and for stabilizing its banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1989) is $249,000,000 Federal and $29,073,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on pages 12-10 and 12-11 of Fiscal Year 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued reevaluation studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. The reevaluation study was completed in January 1991. The study investigated the feasibility of providing bank stabilization and recreation features in the Shreveport to Index reach of the Red River Waterway Project. None of the solutions were found to be economically feasible. No further studies are planned at this time. 17. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $270,287 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1992, is $3,177,672. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) Total FY costs for emergency bank protection work was $183,283. This included work on Highway 119, Derry, LA, $28,898: Highway 438 Bridge, Bogue Chitto, LA., $139,832; Highway 495, Natchitoches parish, LA, $23,269; and Highway 3049, Caddo Parish, LA, $29. and Culley-Brashear Ditch, Madison County, MS, $11,075. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Construction work continued on Chauvin Bayou, LA, at a cost of $1,721,264. Detailed studies continued on Calion, AR, at a cost of $31,343. Studies were terminated on Bayou DeSiard, Ouachita Parish, LA, 12-8 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT $3,417; Magnolia, AR, $4,094; Moorhead, MS, $3,063; Pine Creek, Franklin Parish, LA, $3,741; and Silver Creek, MS, $7,459. 18. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) FY 92 costs for the period were $466,564 for disaster preparedness, $8,002 for advance measures, and $6,399 for hazard mitigation team activities. Rehabilitation costs for FY 92 were $291,286. Flood Emergency Operations costs for FY 92 were $2,417,508. This consisted of emergency operations conducted in FY 91 and reimbursed in FY 92 in the Ouachita/Black, Red, Yazoo, and the Sunflower River Basins in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Total Public Law 99 cost during FY 92 was $3,189,752. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) No activity during the period. 12-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 1992 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (6.5-foot navigation project) Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (9-foot navigation project) 2. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 3. Red River Waterway Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) 5. Aloha- Rigolette, LA 6. Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, AR and LA 7. Canal 43, AR (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost -- $ -- -- $ 5,248,6191 -- 5,248,6191 1,033,000 2,263,000 -830,000 100,000 229,974,251 2,009,983 1,189,516 +874,028 195,727 229,443,265 4,854,300 4,953,338 4,947,900 5,322,000 98,878,505 4,953,458 4,797,841 5,047,000 5,341,565 98,625,269 5,571,000 1,972,000 4,100,000 7,300,000 42,908,000 4,175,110 2,771,269 2,336,140 4,211,400 35,202,497 -- -- -- -- 6,825 -- -- -- -- 6,825 118,000,000 100,375,000 92,636,000 123,681,000 937,106,000 121,938,473 96,280,732 91,320,805 135,607,493 917,738,198 3,686,697 10,426,394 4,449,100 6,221,000 33,209,791 3,642,852 6,570,884 8,294,163 5,423,654 31,805,347 647,000 220,104 414,424 212,000 401,864 493,480 85,000 627,000 53,818 696,305 -- 31,086 19,191 0 1,402 21,716 3,396,244 -- 3,349,3923 249,000 249,000 243,637 243,637 -- 1,038,000 -- 1,037,952 372,000 1,003,000 400,856 772,921 0 892,000 348 870,326 0 25 32,473 12-10 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 1992 8. Chauvin Bayou New Work Approp. Cost 9. Ouachita River New Work Levees, LA Approp. Cost 10. Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson, MS New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11. Pearl River, New Work Slidell, St. Approp. Tammany Parish, Cost LA 12. Porter Bayou, MS 14. Red River New Work Approp. Cost New Work below Denison Approp. Dam Levees and Cost Bank Stabilization (Vicksburg District) 15. Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR New Work Approp. Cost 660,000 240,000 1,301,000 700,000 3,261,000 626,765 351,715 187,560 1,721,264 3,148,780 292,000 943,000 388,000 2,429,758 6,868,758 265,208 264,124 612,070 628,042 4,540,602 3,530 0 116,973 -1,000 --. 215 -- 2,080,000 -- 2,079,999 -- 480,000 577,500 -- 390,516 390,516 585,000 750,000 659,000 100,000 3,456,000 644,866 803,715 562,336 193,639 3,449,690 0 1,035,278 414 555,000 1,030,226 1,300,000 300,000 3,561,000 2,300,000 67,105,000 835,640 2,070,085 89,171 3,408,656 64,717,552 -- 1,010,0003 355,688 -- 855,497~ 12-11 1. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,854,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 3. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 30, 1948 Nov. 17,1986 OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 1 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Section 2 of Text). Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. ALOHA-RIGOLETTE AREA, LA (See Section 5 of Text) BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 6 of Text) Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction wish Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. CANAL 43, AR (See Section 7 of Text) Channel enlargement CANEY CREEK, MS Authorizes construction of such bank stabilization measures for Caney Creek in the vicinity of Jackson, MS, between McDowell Road and Raymond Road as the Secretary determines necessary for flood damage prevention and erosion control along approximately 3,000 feet of the creek. 12-12 S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101- 101 Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1988. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 30, 1948 as amended Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 13, 1983 Jul. 29, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 CHAUVIN BAYOU, LA (See Section 8 of Text) Construction of a 250-cfs pumping plant located adjacent to Chauvin Bayou at the Ouachita River levee and a water control structure in Canal L-11. LEAD BAYOU, MS Channel enlargement. MONROE AND WEST MONROE, LA, AND OUACHITA PARISH, LA Authorizes such structural and nonstructural measures as the Secretary deems feasible to prevent flood damage to the cities of Monroe and West Monroe, LA, and Ouachita Parish, LA. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 10 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl River, vicinity of Jackson, MS Accomplish the clearing and channel improvements at Hwy 25 bridge on the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS Planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system for Slidell, LA, pending binding cost-sharing arrangements acceptable to the Secretary of the Army or under terms and conditions provided in subsequent legislation when enacted into law. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers Feb. 6, 1990. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 441, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 153, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 98-63, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-88, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 12-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 12-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Authorizes the Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, MS, for the construction of the Shoccoe Dam plus upstream flood control measures at east-central Leake County, south part of Carthage, MS, Highway 35 vicinity, upstream reservoirs on the Pearl River and upstream channels on the Pearl River and elsewhere in Leake County. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA (See Section 12 of Text) Authorizes flood control improvements for Pearl River Basin, St. Tammnany, LA, subject to a favorable Chiefs report and approval by the Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. PORTER BAYOU, MS (See Section 13 of Text) Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS, from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3 RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA (See Section 14 of Text) Water Resources Development of 1986 authorized for construction the project for mitigation of wildlife losses, Red River Waterway, LA, which may include all or such portion of any land adjacent to the Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See Section 15 of Text) Levee and bank stabilization. Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River from Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 12-14 TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Still at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Per- Total from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Estimated Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Project Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Moving Tainter gated dam; 1002 $43,400,000 bascule gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Columbia, LA 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 952 45,200,000 fixed crest navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Felsenthal, AR 1 227 84 600 18 701 13 Earth do Tainter gated dam; 882 101,600,000 hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. Calion, AR 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 882 70,800,000 (H. K. hinged crest gated Thatcher) navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. Estimated Federal Cost $261,000,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost 17,130,000 Total Estimated Cost 278,130,000 1. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. Navigation pool elevation 65. 2. The percent complete reflects all work within the pool. or Ax I2 0d REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR 1 " 2' 3'4 -- 1931 $ 45,874 $ 42,857 1 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA1'2,4 -- 1941 19,000 37,804 1 Big Black River, MS" 4'5 -- 1895 15,000 -- Big Sunflower River, MS" 4'6'7 -- 1942 560,027 459,328 1 Boeuf River, LA"13'4'7',89, -- 1949 30,000 103,737 1 Claiborne County Port, MS -- 1985 2,000,000 270,252 Dec. 1983 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA15 Complete 1971 202,817 452,611 Dec. 1914 Homochitto River, MS4 -- 1910 15,482 8,518 1 Lake Providence Harbor, LA -- 1985 208,537 3,943,443 Nov. 1963 Little Missouri River, AR"14'5 -- 1873 19,992 -- 1 Little River, LA"4'5"0 -- 1890 1,500 -- 1 Little Tallahatchie River, MS" 7 -- 1913 19,000 -- 1 Madison Parish Port, LA -- 1985 656,000 593,571 Dec. 1980 Mouth of Yazoo River, MS"7"' -- 1953 1,179,211 605,6411 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA, Felsenthal Canal -- 193712 -- 4,387,1921 Overton-Red River Waterway, LA -- 1985 -- -- 1 Pearl River, MS -- 1985 8,562,908 3,011,812 1956 Red River below Fulton, AR"' 6" 7"8 -- 1978 1,963,806 2,147,8901 Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX"7,1 8 -- 1969 -- -- 1 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX' -- 1976 150,800 -- 1 Removings snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers" -- 1948 -- 272,5001 Rosedale Harbor, MS -- 1985 2,000,000 3,411,836 Sep. 1978 Saline River, AR 1 3'4'5 -- 1931 26,900 12,792 x Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS1,4'5 -- 1939 43,481 173,066 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA"8," 2 -- 1949 38,367 85,352 12-16 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For. Construction Maintenance Completed Yalobusha River, MS ,'4,51' 4 -- 1937 7,000 15,936 1 Yazoo River, MS -- 1987 9,341,826 1,201,895 1 Yellow Bend Port, AR Complete 1991 3,793,069 -- Aug. 1991 1. Status and Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA. (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 17. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 18. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 12-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 12-E OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR 1985 $ 44,100,000 DeGray Lake, AR 1985 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR 1985 20,900,000 Calion, AR 1960 970,9963 Columbia, LA 1941 204,7403 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,1813 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7423 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7003 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,5823 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) 1984 2,561,0003 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $153,904,7434 1. 2. 3. 4. See individual reports herein. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply to be reimbursed by local interests. Actual cost of completed project. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954)was $4,190,000. 12-18 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-F RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 14 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR2 and LA -- 1,158 -- -- $25,100,0003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA -- -- -- -- 70,7174 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 -- -- -- -- 243,3363 Caddo Lake, LA' Caddo Lake -- -- -- 3,586,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River -- -- -- 1,950,0003 Garland City, AR1"6 -- -- -- -- 1,450,0003 Maniece Bayou, AR -- -- -- -- 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, AR7'8 -- -- -- -- 5,610,0003 Posten Bayou, AR and LA2 '6'9 -- -- -- -- 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA1 "3 -- -- -- -- 66,775,0003 Total 99,191,885 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Details presented in individual report herein. Construction on this project not started. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ................................................... $5,300,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution) ..................................... 89,047 Caddo Lake, LA ....................................................................... 28,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA ............................................. 480,000 East Point ......................... .................................................... 67,000 Garland City, AR . ......... ............................................................ 6,000 Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ...................................................... 18,000 McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution)......................................................... 508,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX,AR, and LA ........................ 1,560,000 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. Inactive. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. Joint-use pool (sediment). Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 12-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 12-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 14 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For: Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,2371 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,7401 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,200' 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 255,5291 4 Black Bayou Lake, LA5'6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481' 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,8091 1941 Hempstead County levee district No.1, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,006' 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,92718 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,4261 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,0001 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,4351 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,1111 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,3711'3 4 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District, August 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 12-20 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA1 1956 $ 1,896,826 $ -- Apr. 1955 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA' 1948 319,200 -- Jan. 1948 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA 1985 -- 4,234,577 Apr. 1961 Bayou Pierre, LA 1985 -- 278,255 FY 1939 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1 "2 1951 243,3362 - Jun. 1939 Big Black River, MS3 1956 910,185 670,750 3 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA3'4 1966 248,823 -- Black Bayou Reservoir, LA1 " 5'6 1945 -- -- -- Blakely Mt. Dam - Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AR 1985 34,023,108 65,793,736 Oct. 1955 Caddo Lake Dam, LA 1986 -- 1,185,922 -- Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA 1978 1,655,700 -- Jul. 1978 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA"' 1938 70,348 -- -- DeGray Lake Caddo River, AR 1985 72,033,992 43,813,077 Dec. 1971 East Point, LA 1969 286,069 3,051,536 Aug. 1968 Garland City, AR 1976 1,335,841 -- Jul. 1974 Grant Parish below Colfax, LA"3 1941 38,809 -- 3 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR"3 1941 88,006 -- Homochitto River, MS3 1956 205,000 144,6503 Maniece Bayou, AR1 "2 1970 970,9322 -- Aug. 1969 Monroe Floodwall, LA 1984 2,560,000 -- -- Murfreesboro Dam and Lake4 1951 -- -- -- Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AR 1985 16,516,689 46,547,745 May 1950 Natchez Port Area, MS 3'4 1969 538,000 -- 5 Natchitoches Parish, LA"2 1956 1,529,478 -- Aug. 1955 Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS 1986 290,000 -- -- Pineville, Red River, LA3'4 1953 232,426 -- Dec. 1951 Lead Bayou, MS 1991 1,961,089 -- Nov. 1988 12-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 12-H (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Posten Bayou, AR8 1973 -- -- -- Poverty Point, LA 1986 250,000 -- Oct. 1985 Red River Parish, LA13 1939 149,435 -- 3 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' 1953 3,908,000 -- Mar. 1953 Saline Point, LA1,3 1945 124,111 -- -- Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 1966 335,433 -- May 1965 Wallace Lake, LA 1985 -- 1,228,755 Dec. 1946 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ................................................................ $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA ....................................................... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA ............................................................ 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ....................................................... 425,209 M aniece Bayou, AR ....................................................................... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ................................................................... 250,000 3. Completion Date Unavailable. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. Construction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12-22 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Extended Exp Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA 1990 May 17, 1950 974,000 -- S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Buffalo River, MS1 1940 Nov 1986 -- -- McKinney Bayou, Finn 19632 Aug 1977 -- -- Bayou Segment, AR 1. Deauthorized by Sec. 1002, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 2. Date Authorized. 12-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 12-J ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 92 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (120) Bossier Parish, LA -12956 Hot Springs, Garland Co., AR -12737 Jackson Metro Area, MS -12742 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Interagency Water Resources (173) -14713 Special Investigations (171) -17250 North American Waterfowl Management Plan (175) -53904 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 200) CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 400) Flood Control Projects (450) Aloha Rigolette (451) -12123 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 400) ADVANCE E&D (Category 600) Locks and Dams (622) RRWW Shreveport to Daingerfield (622) -75024 Flood Control Projects (650) Aloha Rigolette, LA -12123 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 322,914 40,331 445,514 808,759 17,768 24,036 3,979 45,783 185,564 130,999 316,563 1,010 1,010 2,635,318 150,000 150,000 2,785,318 $ 3,957,433 12-24 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation P 1. Navigation work under special authorization ...................... 'age Tables 13-1 Flood Control 2. Fletcher Creek at Memphis, TN ...... 13-1 3. Millington, TN .................... 13-2 4. Nonconnah, Creek at Perkins, Memphis, TN ..................... 13-2 5. Quince Road Bridge Memphis, TN .... 13-2 6. Inspection of completed flood control projects ......................... 13-2 7. Flood control work under special authorization ...................... 13-2 Navigation 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $14,982 was expended on reconnaissance studies on Cairo Harbor, IL and $1,612 on feasibility studies on DeValls Bluff Harbor, AR. Table 13-A Table 13-B Table 13-C Table 13-D Table 13-E Table 13-F Page Cost & Financial Statement .............. Authorizing Legislation .... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... Deauthorized Projects ..... Active General Investigations ............ 13-4 13-4 13-5 13-6 13-7 13-8 Flood Control 2. FLETCHER CREEK AT MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE Location. Fletcher Creek is a major tributary of the Wolf River located in the northeast portion of Memphis, Tennessee. Existing project. The project was approved for construction Mar. 22, 1991, under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. 13-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Streambank erosion was threatening public utilities along Fletcher Creek. The project consists of stabilizing the channel slopes and bed via stone armoring for a distance of 725 feet along the channel approximately 3,000 feet downstream from its intersection with Germantown Road. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division on Apr. 26, 1991. The sponsor was required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 12, 1991, and completed Sep. 6, 1991. 3. MILLINGTON, TN Location. Millington is located in north Shelby County, TN. Existing project. The project was approved for construction on May 14, 1990, under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of 5,600 feet of levee along the right (north) bank of Big Creek in the reach between U. S. Highway 51 and the I.C. Railroad. The levee is designed to provide a 100-year frequency level of protection to the leveed area from backwater flooding. The estimated construction cost for the project is $809,000. A contract for project construction was awarded in August 1990. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the city of Millington on May 15, 1990. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project flood protection was provided in February 1991. Remaining project related drainage modifications are scheduled to be completed early in calendar year 1993. 4. NONCONNAH CREEK AT PERKINS STREET, MEMPHIS, TN Location. The project is located in southeast Memphis. Existing project. The project was approved for construction Oct. 28, 1988, under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of the placement of stone, gabions, and concrete to armor the streambank and channel bed against erosion which had placed the Perkins Street bridge in imminent danger. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the City of Memphis on Jan. 10, 1989. The sponsor was required to provide the lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Jan. 27, 1989, and completed May 26, 1989. Because of shifting in the protection, additional stone was added on Feb. 4-6, 1992. 5. QUINCE ROAD BRIDGE MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE Location. Quince Road Bridge is located in east Memphis on an unnamed tributary of Nonconnah Creek about 250 feet from the confluence with the Creek. Existing project. The project was approved for construction Mar. 5, 1991, under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Stream bank and bed erosion was threatening Quince Road Bridge. The project consists of stabilizing the stream banks and bed beneath the bridge and along a reach from 30 feet upstream to 60 feet downstream of the bridge, a total distance of 140 feet, by means of a combination of stone-filled gabions, revetment mattresses, and riprap. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the city of Memphis on Aug. 8, 1991. The sponsor provided lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated on Dec. 13, 1990, and completed Jul. 31, 1991. 6. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $134,952 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1992, was $1,866,694. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 7. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). 13-2 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT During this period $184 was expended on Crow Creek, Forrest City, AR; $7,457 on Raft Creek, AR; $5,111 on Obion, TN; $4,888, North Fork, Obion River, Rivers, TN; $662,815 on Mayfield Creek Tributaries; and $49,996 on Bono, AR. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 1992, $29 was expended on Harrington Creek; $20,126 on Wolf River at U.S. Highway 51, Memphis, TN; $16,274 on Ward Road over Big Creek, Shelby County, TN; $11,204 on Oakland, TN; $18,267 on Bart Road Harrington Creek; $1,746 on Highway 79 at Obion; and $14,846 at Royster Creek. Emergency flood control activities, Public Law 99, 84th Cong. Federal cost was $210,789 for disaster preparedness in FY 92. Also, $100,684 was spent for private levee rehabilitation; and $12,401 for Emergency Operations. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., as amended. No work was accomplished this period under this authority. Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $49,944 was expended on Tunica Cutoff Weir, Tunica County, MS, and Lee County, AR. 13-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 1992 2. Fletcher Creek New Work Memphis, TN Approp. $ 6,000 $ 54,000 $310,000 39,200 $423,200 Cost 14,982 21,266 340,372 41,318 421,892 3. Millington, TN New Work Approp. 105,000 607,000 22,500 0 809,500 Cost 116,203 108,020 513,840 1,074 802,876 4. Nonconnah Creek New Work at Perkins, Approp. 292,000 0 0 0 357,000 Memphis, TN Cost 259,385 3,784 3,042 51,449 342,245 5. Quince Road New Work Bridge Approp. 5,000 10,000 121,000 0 160,000 Memphis, TN Cost 10,898 13,507 106,693 14,902 160,000 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Fletcher Creek, Memphis, TN (See Sec. 2 as amended of Text) Streambank protection Approved Apr. 4, 19912 Jun. 30, 1948 Millington, TN (See Sec. 3 of Text), Levee in City as amended of Millington. Approved May 14, 19901 Jul. 24, 1946 Nonconnah Creek at Perkins Street, Memphis, TN as amended (See Sec. 4 of Text), Streambank protection Approved Oct. 28, 19882 Jul. 24, 1946 North Second Street at Wolf River, Memphis, TN as amended Streambank protection. Approved Oct. 18, 19882 Jul. 24, 1946 Plainview Road Bridge, Chester Co., TN as amended Streambank protection. Approved Jul. 26, 19902 Jul. 24, 1946 Quince Road Bridge Memphis, TN (See Sec. 5 of Text), as amended Streambank protection Approved May 16, 19912 13-4 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 2. Authorized under authority of Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Caruthersville Harbor, MO 1984 $768,992 $3,201,208 Dec. 1980 Forked Deer River, TN, including South Fork"2 1912 25,000 425,857 -- Helena Harbor, AR 1984 90,847 6,135,084 Sep. 1963 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY 1984 149,827 5,755,866 Jan. 1963 New Madrid Harbor, MO6 1984 196,373 395,493 Oct. 1970 Obion River, TN1'3 1911 28,716 -- -- Osceola Harbor, AR 1984 269,115 7,090,029 Nov. 1974 Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers4'* 1948 -- 318,833 4 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, AR 1'2 1942 92,000 300,449 -- White River, AR (below Newport) 1984 169,994 27,859,983 -- Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN 1984 586,500 11,721,299 1959 1. No commerce. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 4. Completion date not available. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries." 6. WRDA 92 (Section 102) modified authorization by directing the Secretary to assume responsibility for maintenance of New Madrid County Harbor constructed by non-Federal interest. 13-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN 1977 $ 70,363 $ -- -- Bradford, TN 1984 95,061 -- Dec. 1983 Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL1 1964 147,000 -- Feb. 1964 Drinkwater Sewer, MO 1984 1,494,828 -- Jun. 1980 Dyersburg, TN 1 1962 229,6492 -- Jun. 1962 Dyersburg, TN (SW) 1981 1,820,869 -- Oct. 1976 Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN 1985 155,280 -- Aug. 1985 Hatchie River, Alcorn Co., MS 1987 85,200 -- Feb. 1986 Humboldt, TN 1989 1,141,407 -- Apr. 1988 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN 1960 11,141,199 -- May 1959 Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL3 1955 1,132,704 -- Oct. 19594 Nixon Creek, TN1 1952 62,821 -- Dec. 1951 Nonconnah Blvd. Nonconnah Creek, TN 1983 249,999 -- Nov. 1981 Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN 1987 259,000 -- Dec. 1986 N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) 1983 249,999 -- Sep. 1980 N. Second St. at Wolf River, Memphis, TN 1991 367,012 -- Jan. 1990 Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN 1991 124,954 -- Sep. 1990 Sandy Creek Jackson, TN 1985 238,000 -- Dec. 1984 St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR 1985 161,000 -- Sep. 1985 Treasure Island, MO 1981 861,528 -- Mar. 1978 Turner Creek, Corinth, MS 1987 100,600 -- Mar. 1987 US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN 1984 369,200 -- Mar. 1983 W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY 1983 1,674,180 -- Oct. 1976 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 2. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 3. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 4. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. 13-6 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For: Deauthorized Expended Expended Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR 1977 May 6, 81 -- -- Clarendon to Laconia Circle White River Basin, AR 1937 May 6, 81 -- -- Huntingdon, TN 1983 Sep 80 2,900,281 -- Long Lake Area, Helena, AR 1983 Jul 83 61,281 -- 13-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 13-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 92 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Hickman Bluff, KY 77067 $178,699 $178,699 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 $23,279 Dam Safety Criteria Studies (173) 11,841 North American Waterfowl Mgmt (176) - 539043,627 38,747 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. of Agriculture (181) - 77067 $1,535 Planning Assistance to States (186) 47 $1,582 TOTAL (Category (100) $219,028 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 176,562 TOTAL (Category 200) $176,562 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $395,590 13-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT* This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. The St. Louis District territory encompasses 27,000 square miles. District also includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. Report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. Report on the portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (cont) 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.) ................... 14-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes Melvin Price Locks & Dam) ............... 14-2 3. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL ..................... . 14-2 4. Southeast Missouri Port, MO ....... .14-2 5. St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL ........ 14-3 6. Navigation work under special authorization .............. 14-3 Flood Control 7. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO ........... 14-3 8. Cape Girardeau-Jackson,MO ........ 14-4 9. Coldwater Creek, MO .............. 14-4 10. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL ....... 14-4 11. Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL ................ 14-5 12. Maline Creek, MO ................ 14-5 13. Meramec River Basin Valley Park, MO .................. 14-5 14. Pine Ford Lake, MO ............... 14-6 15. River des Peres, MO .............. 16. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. 17. Flood control work under special authorization ............. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 18. Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Salt River, MO ............. 19. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program ........................ Tables Table 14-A Table 14-B Table 14-C Table 14-D Table 14-E Table 14-F Page 14-6 14-6 14-7 14-7 14-7 Cost and Financial Statement ............... .14-9 Authorizing Legislation ... 14-11 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...... 14-15 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......... 14-16 Deauthorized Projects .... 14-18 Active General Investigations (96X3121) .. 14-19 14-1 Navigation ] REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Rock Island District. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN (ST. LOUIS DIST.) (INCLUDES MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO AND IL Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as middle Mississippi, between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN. Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existingproject. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (Oct 1992 price level) of $211,000,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. Estimated total Federal project cost (1992) is $275,073,600. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3rd sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: contracts continue on stone dike and revetment construction as is engineering and design and supervision and administration. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 82 percent complete. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. During FY 1988 through FY 1990 low water conditions (drought) increased maintenance dredging. To improve navigation depths a rock removal contract began Oct. 1988 and was completed in July 1991. Maintenance. Work consists of approximately 2,000 feet of dike repair and 5,000 feet of revetment repair yearly. U.S. plant and hired labor plus contract dredging perform channel dredging removing 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 cubic yards of material from main channel. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. 4. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MISSOURI Location. The project is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River between river mile 47.5 to 48.8 above the Ohio River in the counties of Scott and Cape Girardeau in Southeast Missouri. Existing project. Pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended, a slackwater channel, 2,000 feet long, 230 feet wide, and 9 feet deep is being constructed. This project will provide a navigation channel for development of a port and related facilities 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT at this location. Total estimated cost is $5,405,600 ($2,139,000 non-Federal). Location cooperation. On May 22, 1987, a Local Cooperation Agreement was signed between the Port District and the St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers. Results during fiscal year. Construction of the harbor project is complete. The local sponsor has completed construction of and is currently operating docking facilities. Maintenance dredging of the harbor is being performed by the St. Louis District in accordance with the terms of the Local Cooperation Agreement. 5. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO AND IL Location. The project area includes both sides of the Mississippi River from miles 138.8 to 208.8 above the Ohio River (generally, the limits of the Port of Metropolitan St. Louis). Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized project includes improvements in two areas: the North Riverfront area in Missouri (which is served by the St. Louis Municipal Docks) and the Tri-City Port area along the east bank of the Chain of Rocks Canal in Illinois. The principal project at the St. Louis Municipal Docks is an L-dike sediment control structure in the river to provide reliable water access to the dock when the river is low. The principal project at the Tri-City Port area is a 210 ft. wide harbor along 6,900 ft. of the Chain of Rocks Canal. The North Riverfront project and half the Tri-City harbor (3.450 ft.) would be constructed in Phase 1, and the second half of the Tri-City harbor in Phase 2 approximately 10 years later. Estimated cost of the project (1992) is $12,900,000 Federal and $25,474,000 Non-Federal. A March 1986 Reevaluation Report described model tests which showed that the L-dike sediment control structure recommended for the St. Louis Municipal Docks would not be effective but that appropriate configuration of a new outer wall for the docks, referred to as the Prototype River Access Improvement Structure (PRAIS), would divert currents so as to control scour and sedimentation and maintain sufficient water depths for the needs of the harbor. Local cooperation. The District coordinated with the two local sponsors and found that (1) the city of St. Louis Port Authority supports the PRAIS project and (2) the Tri-City Regional Port Authority wants the Corps to consider the possibility of reducing the length of their Phase I harbor to 1,800 ft. and shifting its location so that it is a northern extension of the existing Tri-City harbor (the authorized project length of 6,900 ft. would be maintained by increasing the length of the Phase 2 harbor to 5,100 ft.). Operations and results during the fiscal year. In January 1992 District completed a letter report that documented a preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the PRAIS and the Tri-City harbor projects. Headquarters reviewed the letter report and directed that new economic studies and other work be accomplished and documented in a General Reevaluation Report with an Engineering Project Management Plan which will describe how the reevaluation studies will be accomplished. The District also prepared the storage site for sheet pile from the third stage cofferdam at Melvin Price Locks and Dam, which may be used in the PRAIS as described in a January 1987 value engineering study and the January 1987 value engineering study and in the January 1992 letter report. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Initial appraisal study cost for Jackson-Union Counties Port, IL, was $5,732. The report was negative. Flood Control 7. ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO Location. The levee system is located adjacent to the Mississippi River between Alton and Gale, Illinois. Existing Project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1946. Construction of the Alton to Gale levee system was completed in 1977. Some reaches of this levee system have, for many years, been experiencing a significant number of slides associated with design deficiencies increasing the probability of levee failure during flood events. The recommended plan will correct these slides by a lime stabilization procedure. Estimated cost (1992) is $18,030,000 Federal and $3,848,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The cost sharing applicable for the Alton to Gale Levee Slide repairs is in accordance with policies established for the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, the Local sponsor is required to operate and maintain all works after completion. Supplemental assurances have been executed for the portion of the remedial work that is 100% federally funded. 14-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Operations and results during fiscal year. Repair of levee slides on the Federally funded reaches was completed. 8. Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO Location. The project is located in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, along the right bank of the Mississippi River between River Miles 50 and 55 above the Ohio River. Existing Project. The project includes a 157 acre dry detention reservoir; approximately one mile of channel improvements on Cape La Croix Creek and two miles of channel improvements on Walker Branch, eight bridge replacements; recreational/environmental features and non structural features which are not going to be implemented at this time. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal project cost (1992) is $29,300,000. Non-Federal cost is $11,800,000. Local Cooperation. The city of Cape Girardeau, MO, local sponsor, is strongly supportive of the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on May 25, 1990 with a modification to the LCA executed on Oct. 27, 1992. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described in the FY 1991 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract was awarded in Sep. 1991 for Cape La Croix segment of the project, design continued on the remainder. A problem with gasoline contaminated soil at one location has delayed the Walker Branch #1 Channel construction contract. 9. COLDWATER CREEK, MO Location. The 47 square mile Coldwater Creek watershed is located in St. Louis County, Missouri, and had a 1980 population of 158,000 residents. The stream flows through Overland, Breckenridge Hills, and St. Ann; under Lambert-St. Louis International Airport; and through Hazelwood, Florissant, and other communities and empties into the Missouri River. Existing Project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 and would afford protection to the area. About 1,400 structures or units would be flooded by a 100-year flood. Significant flood damages occurred in the area in 1957, 1978, 1979, 1982, and 1986. The problems addressed by the Feasibility Study included flood damages, outdoor recreation needs, and environmental degradation. The authorized project includes ten miles of channel widening, five tunnels through a downstream railroad embankment, two small levees, a flood forecasting and warning system, and recreation features along the channel widening project. Estimated cost of the project (1992) is $18,300,000 Federal and $7,868,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. A letter of intent was received from the Metropolitan Sewer District on Jun. 25, 1987, expressing willingness to be local sponsor of the project. The most recent Schedule and Cost Change Request was signed by the sponsor on Oct. 20, 1992. Operation and results during fiscal year. The Feasibility Report was completed in 1987, the Chief of Engineers Report was issued in 1988. Because of radioactive material in channel sediments downstream from a Superfund site at Lambert Airport, the Corps of Engineers and the Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD), divided the Coldwater Creek project into two parts and will implement it in two phases. The first phase is channel widening upstream of Lambert Airport in St. Ann and Breckenridge Hills. The St. Louis Airport Authority is studying major expansion plans which could effect the project design. 10. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottom lands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood of about 200-year frequency. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Post authorization studies have indicated that flood plain detention areas, the reservoir on Little Canteen Creek and other related flood control measures in the Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area are not economically feasible. Also, further studies of the channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel have been deferred due to lack of support from the local sponsor of the project. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $33,600,000 (1985), $22,020,000 for Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area, and $11,580,000 for Blue Waters Ditch. Non-Federal cost is $20,770,000. The 1988 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act authorized repair and rehabilitation of pump stations and appurtenant works, channels and bridge structures. The estimated total cost of this work (1992) is $25,400,000 Federal and $11,100,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. For work under the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988, PL 100-202, local interests have entered into three Local Cooperation Agreements (LCA) which cover all of the work in the Flood Protection Rehabilitation project. Construction work under the first LCA is complete, and construction work under the remaining two LCA's is under way. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts for rehabilitation of gravity drains and some of the closure structures and pump stations have been awarded. Contracts for rehabilitation of relief wells and additional pump stations are scheduled for award in the near future. 11. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between miles 111 and 116 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published byArmy Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 1375 of Annual Report for 1950. Existing project. Project area contains about 9,460 acres only partially protected against flood stage of 38.5 feet on the Chester, IL, gage. Flooding occurs about once in every 7.3 years with an average duration of 26 days, causing substantial damage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.) provides for enlarging and raising the existing levee about 8 feet to provide protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 50 years. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $14,100,000. Non-Federal cost is $2,100,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances from the Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 23, 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. All construction of gravity drains, levee embankment and installation of wildlife plantings is complete. Project is complete. 12. MALINE CREEK, MO Location. Maline Creek is located in a small northern part of the City of St. Louis, portions of incorporated St. Louis County and all or part of 22 municipalities. The 25 square mile Maline Creek watershed originates near Lambert Airport and flows in an easterly direction through Berkeley, Kinloch, Ferguson, Moline Acres, Bellefontaine Neighbors, and other communities and empties into the Mississippi River. The Maline Creek flood plain encompasses approximately 1600 acres of mostly urban development. This highly urbanized area had a population of 126,000 people in 1980. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and would afford protection to the area. The present plan includes approximately 2.95 miles of channel widening, 3.35 miles of clearing, replacement or modification of 7 bridges, 14.4 acres of open space, a flood forecasting and warning plan and 2.64 miles of recreation trails. At October 1992 price levels, including an allowance for inflation, estimated cost of the project is $7,700,000 Federal and $2,727,000 Non- Federal. (Authorized but not funded for construction.) Local cooperation. The Metropolitan Sewer District of St. Louis is the present local sponsor of the project. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funding will be requested to advance Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) when the Metropolitan Sewer District, local sponsor, indicates financial capability to proceed. 13. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN (VALLEY PARK), MISSOURI Location. The project is located in St. Louis County, Missouri, adjacent to the left bank of the 14-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Meramec River between miles 20.7 and 22.1 above the confluence with the Mississippi River. Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 2(h), Public Law 97-128, Dec. 29, 1981, and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and would afford partial flood protection to the area. The project provides for construction of 3.1 miles of earthen levee with four gravity drains, three closure structures interior ponding areas, 36 relief wells would be required for under seepage control, recreational a features consisting of standard play equipment, multi-user courts, play field areas, picnic tables, comfort stations, parking, hiking/biking trails, and lands, easements and rights-of-way required for public access, health and safety. Estimated total project cost is $15,400,000; $11,420,000 Federal, and $3,980,000 non-Federal. The LCA for this project was executed on Aug. 12, 1992. Local cooperation. The Board of Alderman for the City of Valley Park, Missouri, authorized the mayor to issue a Letter of Intent to sponsor the project. The letter dated Feb. 18, 1987, acknowledged that city officials were aware of cost sharing requirements and of the items of local cooperation and favored construction of the project. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 12, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. A Plan Formulation Report and General Design Memorandum was issued in March 1987. A feature design memorandum is scheduled for submittal in January 1993. 14. PINE FORD LAKE, MO Location. Proposed dam is on Big River at mile 43.8, about 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. The Big River is a tributary of the Meramec. Lake would extend about 34 miles up Big River. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existingproject. Project provides for construction of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete chute spillway. Dam will be 141 feet high and 2,070 feet long. Construction of new roads, improvements of existing roads, alterations to pipeline, power and telephone lines, and construction of recreational facilities are included. Maximum storage capacity will be 285,000 acre-feet. Estimated total project cost (1984) is $147,000,000, of which $8,173,200 and $22,900,000 are local reimbursements for water supply and recreation and fish and wildlife respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocation to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planningpreviously funded but not completed. 15. RIVER DES PERES, MISSOURI Location. The 111 square mile River des Peres watershed includes all or part of 42 municipalities within St. Louis County plus the city of St. Louis, Missouri. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 and would afford protection to the area. The authorized project includes channel modifications in the Deer Creek and University City Branch of River des Peres. The Deer Creek segment of the project would reduce flood damages in the cities of Rock Hill, Brentwood, Webster Groves and Maplewood, Missouri, by providing channel enlargement and stabilization along approximately 2.5 miles of Deer Creek. The University City Branch segment of the project would reduce flood damages in the city of University City, Missouri, by providing channel enlargement and bank stabilization. The authorized project also includes: flood proofing along the Kirkwood Branch of Gravois Creek; a flood forecasting/warning plan; and complementary outdoor recreation features. At October 1992 price levels, the estimated cost of the project is $17,400,000 Federal and $6,100,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (MSD) is the local sponsor. Operation and results during fiscal year. The Preconstruction Engineering Design (PED) work was initiated in FY 89 and is scheduled for completion in FY 94. The local sponsor has indicated that it will be able to finance initiation of this project beginning in FY 94 through project completion. No requests for funding were made for fiscal years 1992 or 1993 due to the MSD's funding shortages. 16. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $506,933 for the Fiscal Year 1992. Total cost as of end of fiscal year is $8,003,740. 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization study costs for Fiscal Year 1992 were $143,108 for St. Peters, MO; $12,590 for Boise Brule Levee and Drainage District, MO; and $43,177 on Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 1992, $4,320 was expended on Pomme Creek, Arnold, MO. Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $310,490 for Disaster Preparedness, $146,195 for Emergency Operations, and $11,739 for Rehabilitation. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 18. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO Location. Salt River rises in Schuyler County, about 12 miles south of Missouri-Iowa State line. It flows southeasterly about 192 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 2 miles above Louisiana, MO, or about 284 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Kansas City and Quincy sheets of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 645 of Annual Report for 1968. Existingproject. Project provides for construction of a multiple-purpose reservoir, including power, flood control, water supply, navigation storage, pollution abatement, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation. Dam consists of a compacted earth embankment with a concrete spillway controlled by tainter gates. Dam and spillway are about 1,700 feet long. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 50- by 30-foot tainter gates. Reservoir will have a storage capacity of 1,428,000 acrefeet for use of flood control, future domestic and industrial water supply, sediment storage, and power generation. Project plan provides for installation of one 27,000 KW conventional unit and one 31,000 KW reversible unit for pumped storage operations. Total Federal project cost estimate (1984) is $330,000,000 of which $22,420,000 is for lands and damages; $14,300,000 for water supply; $76,000,000 for hydropower. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-13 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances have been received from the state of Missouri and approved by the Chief of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work is complete on all major items. Lands acquired to date are 55,277 acres in fee and 10,068 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. 19. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Location. The portion of the Upper Mississippi River within the boundaries of the St. Louis District extends from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0) to river mile 300, downstream of Lock and Dam 22. Existing project. The project is composed of five elements: Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects, Long-term Resource Monitoring, Recreation Projects, Studies of Recreation Impacts and Navigation Traffic Monitoring. (The St. Louis District's involvement has been limited to Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects and Long Term Resource Monitoring.) The overall program, involving five states, three engineer districts and two Corps of Engineers Divisions, is administered by the North Central Division. In the St. Louis District, three habitat rehabilitation projects have been constructed. These are Clarksville Management Area, Missouri, Dresser Island, Missouri, and Pharrs Island, Missouri. All projects are being operated and maintained by the state of Missouri. Through FY 1992, funds allocated to the St. Louis District have amounted to $7,424,000 for design and construction of Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects (HREP), $432,000 for Long Term Resource Monitoring (LTRM) and $670,000 for Program Management. The authorization limit for the overall program projected over a 10-year period is $191,415,000. Local cooperation. The terms of local cooperation, as established by Public Law 99-662, will vary according to the nature of the project, land ownership and pre-existing management responsibilities. The Local Sponsor for Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement projects is usually the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in coordination with the state of Missouri or the state of Illinois. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The Dresser Island, Missouri, HREP construction contract was completed ahead of schedule and the project 14-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 was turned over to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and state of Missouri for operation and maintenance. The construction contract for the Pharrs Island, Missouri, HREP was completed in May 1992. The Definite Project Report (DPR) for Stump Lake, Illinois, HREP was approved and preparation of plans and specifications was initiated. The DPR for the Swan Lake, Illinois, HREP, is approved pending minor changes and plans and specifications will be initiated this year. Planning and design (DPR level) continued on four additional HREP projects. 14-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY92 1992 3. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) 4. Southeast Missouri Port, MO (Contrib. Funds) 6. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO 7. Cape Girardeau Jackson, MO (Contrib. Funds) 9. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (Contrib. Funds) 10. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee District, IL 12. Meramee R. Basin Valley Park, MO 13. Pine Ford Lake, MO New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $ 3,948,000 $ 9,021,000 $ 6,729,000 17,569,473 9,268,135 8,733,282 22,520,500 20,395,596 22,533,237 20,168,279 1,180,000 1,155,537 0 267 $5,949,000 $159,127,0001 4,233,884 157,103,537' 15,091,000 10,480,600 309,232,8292 15,405,737 8,932,078 307,482,9862 0 12,048 0 3,465,000 11,891 3,459,697 201,403 225,000 76,000 201,000 225,330 75,777 178,894 241,387 502,403 502,107 0 0 1,879,105 0 5,600 1,874,885 901,000 1,211,000 3,170,000 1,235,000 8,471,000 208,758 1,410,532 3,493,997 1,208,634 8,275,921 493,000 2,423,000 5,149,000 8,065,000 450,851 1,052,621 6,327,460 7,830,932 210,000 241,200 831,200 1,282,400 190,506 20,241 774,685 985,431 150,000 2,226,000 1,547,000 1,999,000 23,270,3263 596,594 2,006,525 1,661,279 1,815,004 22,955,5984 0 0 -500,000 143,107 0 0 97,600 0 4,326 0 0 0 510,000 85,700 409,999 0 4,007 607,600 495,699 0 16,188,000 0 16,188,000 456,000 650,000 1,106,000 392,606 664,921 1,057,527 3,644,000 3,644,000 14-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 14-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 1992 18. Clarence Cannon New Work Dam and Approp. 0 34,000 50,000 141,000 312,917,028 s Reservoir, Salt Cost 325,533 384,441 39,034 129,094 312,846,3175 River, MO Maint. Approp. 4,727,000 3,867,796 5,171,750 4,807,600 43,465,128 Cost 5,126,986 3,834,524 4,967,641 4,653,410 43,007,252 1. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 2. In addition $3,109 was expended for rehabilitation. 3. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 4. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 5. Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. 14-10 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 19071 Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19542 Jul. 3, 19583 Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Aug. 15, 1985 and Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 1960 River and Harbor Act as amended. Section 107 Nov 26, 1986 KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 3 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM (FORMERLY LOCK AND DAM NO. 26 (REPLACEMENT)) Construct new dam and a 1,200-foot lock approximately 2 miles downstream of the existing structure. Change name from "Lock and Dam No. 26" to "Melvin Price Lock and Dam" upon termination of service in U.S. Congress. Construct a second lock, 600 feet long at the Lock and Dam No. 26. (Replacement) Project. Modified to provide construction of cost-shared recreation facilities within the state of Illinois SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO (See Section 4 of Text) Construct harbor channel with adjacent landfill. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO & IL (See Section 5 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Apr. 30, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes navigation improvements. S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 95-502, 95th Cong. Public Law 97-118, 97th Cong. Public Law 99-88 and Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Public Law 101-640, 101st Cong. Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. 14-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 14-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 28, 1938 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO (See Section 7 of Text) Authorized construction of levees to protect area from flooding from the Mississippi River. CAPE GIRARDEAU, JACKSON METROPOLITAN AREA, MO (See Section 8 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Dec. 8, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control and related recreational improvements in the Cape La Croix Creek Watershed. COLDWATER CREEK, MO (See Section 9 of Text) As outlined in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated Aug 9, 1988, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 10 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. Repair and rehabilitate pump stations and appurtenant works, channels, and bridges. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 11 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. MALINE CREEK, MO (See Section 12 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 2, 1982, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control, recreation, and environmental improvements. Special report on record in OCE Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. Public Law 100-202, 100th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1984 Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 Dec. 29, 1981 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 28, 1938 MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 13 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. (See Section 14 of Text) Undertake structural and nonstructural flood control measures. RIVER DES PERES, MO (See Section 15 of Text) As outlined in the report of the Chief Engineers dated May 23, 1989, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Construct dam at Benton, IL, and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO As outlined in the Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors dated Apr. 16, 1985, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes construction of a levee and a pumping plant to protect the city from Mississippi River and Gabouri Creek floods. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. Energy and Water Development Approp. Act of 1985, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 97-128, 97th Cong. Amended Section 1128, Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 14-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 14-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO (See Section 18 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Modified act of Jun. 28, 1938 by deleting the reservoir H. Doc. 507, therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate multiple- 87th Cong., 2d sess. purpose project. Oct. 27, 1965 Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present Public Law 89-298, designation. 89th Cong. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 2. Inactive. 3. All work completed. 14-14 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO' 1883 $ 12,000 $ -- -- Moccasin Springs, MO 1969 76,4362 -- Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL 1961 2,653,194 1961 -- 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 23, 1900. 2. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. 14-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 14-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cache River Diversion, IL 1953 2,837,114 -- 1953 Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 1965 5,157,805 -- 1964 Carlyle Lake, IL 1981 42,819,400 58,974,202 Oct. 1976 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 185,700 -- 1955 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL 1981 2,818,000 -- Aug. 1981 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL 1959 5,889,500 -- 1959 Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL 1976 1,720,000 -- 1976 Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944)1 1950 55,415 -- Oct. 1949 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)' 1953 -- -- 1951 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1952 50,000 -- Jan. 1952 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1946 25,000 -- Aug. 1945 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL 1970 1,154,800 -- 1958 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 4,677,900 -- 1959 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, IL 1981 6,829,069 -- Mar. 1981 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 297,460 -- 1949 Kaskaskia River, IL2 1989 147,387,000 18,941,196 1988 Lake Shelbyville, IL 1981 44,000,000 61,474,923 Sep. 1978 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 589,000 -- 1988 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 25,043,300 -- 1989 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1944 249,738 -- 1944 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL 1955 164,183 -- 1955 Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO 1987 2,137,000 -- -- Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO 1980 79,265,166 -- Jan. 1980 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO 1967 -- -- -- Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures -- 85,422 -- Oct. 1962 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL 1957 939,569 -- 1957 14-16 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-D (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1992 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 670,000 -- 1984 Perry County Drainage and Levee3 District Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO 1987 7,968,700 -- 1986 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL4 1970 6,005,127 -- 1970 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL 1959 3,882,600 -- 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 1,866,910 -- 1959 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL5'6 1989 43,700,900 45,155,575 1988 Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL 1957 2,123,700 -- Aug. 1956 Urban areas at Alton, IL 1960 192,000 -- -- Village of New Athens, IL 1981 1,983,000 -- Sep. 1981 Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL7 1967 91,952 -- 1967 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL' 1989 17,163,821 -- 1988 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 14-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ALA. .... - CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 14-E For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Extended Exp Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO Big Swan D&L District Illinois River, IL Cape Girardeau, MO Reaches Nos 1, 3, and 4 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek D&L District, IL Eldred, IL Fort Chartres & Ivy Landing D&L District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL 1-38 Lake, MO 1967 1959 1964 1963 1962 1971 19621 Indian Creek Area Illinois River, IL Irondale Lake, MO Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6 and 7 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10 and 13 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL Meramec Park Lake, MO Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL Richland Creek, IL Riverland Levee District, MO Scott County D&L District Illinois River, IL Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Union Lake, MO Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO 1979 1979 1978 1967 19581 1959 1969 1936 19541 19501 1936 1936 1979 1936 1 Year authorized. 14-18 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Oct 86 Oct 86 Oct 78 PL100-676 Jan 90 PL100-676 Jan 90 Nov 79 Oct 86 Nov 77 PL100-676 1 Jan 1990 Nov 81 PL100-676 1 Jan 1990 Oct 86 Nov 79 Nov 79 Oct 78 Dec 81 Nov 79 Nov 77 PL100-676 1 Jan 1990 PL100-676 10 Aug 89 Aug 77 Oct 86 Nov 77 Nov 77 Nov 77 Nov 77 Jan 90 Nov 77 $ 22,000 4,984,500 1,920,600 -- 496,000 35,784,122 -- 1,866,910 401,000 4,931,154 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 92 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) Alexander and Pulaski Counties, IL-12217 $ 4 Apple Creek, MO-12869 282,345 Cuivre River, MO-12744 24,490 Dardenne Creek, MO-12452 21,563 Kaskaskia River Basin, IL-99192 204,355 Plattin Creek, MO-12785 1,711 St. Louis County, MO-12866 38,995 St. Louis Metropolitan Area, MO and IL-55040 71,284 Subtotal 644,747 Special Studies (140) Jefferson County, MO-12865 149,002 Miscellaneous Activities(170) Dam Safety Criteria Studies-14713 18,994 Review of FERC Licenses 2,064 Special Investigations-17250 29,195 Waterfowl Management Plan-53904688 Subtotal 54,941 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies(180) Plan Assist to State of IL-14817 6 Plan Assist to State of MO-1482913423 Subtotal 13,429 TOTAL (Category 100) $655,700 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250)-82030, and -82040 172,879 Hydrology Studies (260)-538209227 TOTAL (Category 200) 182,106 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Coldwater Creek, MO-12252 159,647 Maline Creek, MO-12297 6,240 River Des Peres, MO-12638 111,921 St. Louis Harbor, MO & IL-10184 89,668 Ste. Genevieve, MO-75453 13644 TOTAL (Category 600) 381,120 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,918,614 14-19 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT* This district comprises portions of southern Kentucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Carolina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except western portion, and embraces drainage basins of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tributaries. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY.....................15-2 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY.................15-3 3. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and M S ........................................................... 15-3 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................................................. 15-4 Alteration of Bridges 5. Authorized Alteration of Bridges .................. 15-4 Flood Control 6. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN.........................15-4 7. Martins Fork Lake, KY ................................. 15-4 8. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY..15-5 9. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, VA and KY ...................................................... 15-5 10. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.)................15-5 11. Inspection of completed flood control projects ........................................................... 15-5 12. Flood control work under special authorization..................................................15-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN ....... 15-6 14. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY ..................................................... 15-6 15. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN ............................................. 15-6 16. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY.....15-7 17. Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY ............................................. 15-7 18. Dam Safety Program ..................................... 15-7 General Investigations 19. Surveys...........................................................15-7 20. Collection and study of basic data ................ 15-8 Tables Page Table 15-A Cost & Financial Statement.............15-9 Table 15-B Authorizing Legislation..................15-11 Table 15-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects............................................15-13 Table 15-D Not Applicable........................................... Table 15-E Table 15-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............................................15-13 Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power...............15-14 Table 15-G Deauthorized Projects ..................... 15-14 Table 15-H Cumberland River, TN & KY, Principal Features...........................15-15 Table 15-I Tennessee River Lock Dimensions .15-16 Table 15-J Table 15-K Tennessee River Total Cost of Existing Project...............................15-17 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) Local Protection ............... 15-17 Table 15-L Reservoirs........................................15-17 Table 15-M Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................... 15-18 Table 15-N Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................................. 15-18 15-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1992 Navigation 1. CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, KY, about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, KY, from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, KY (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provide for construction of hydroelectric power-generating facilities at Cheatham Dam, rivermile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, TN and KY, to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternatives routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $178,181,406 Federal funds and $102,966 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. (See table 15-H for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, TN, varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 15-B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, TN, has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is $132,140,900. Estimated cost of Celina Dam (1985) is $213,000,000. (See table 15-H at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, TN, (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, TN (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tail water at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville as shown on Table 15-B. Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9- foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 42 terminals on the Cumberland River (5 Municipally owned and open for public use; 4 government owned facilities and 33 privately owned facilities). A total of 19 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sands, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals and grain. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory locks and dams were operated as required. Operation and Maintenance improvements included completion of a contract to design and instal of self-cleaning trash rack system at Cheatham. Removal and disposal of the debris began this fiscal year. This system will serve as a demonstration project for other sites. Contracts were awarded for fishing access improvements at the Old Hickory Dam site and 15-2 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT construction of a comfort station at the Old Hickory Beach. At Barkley a contract was awarded for toe drainage improvements, and one for ceiling and air conditioning replacement. A contract for roofing the powerhouse at Cheatham was awarded, and at Cheatham and Old Hickory work began to remove paint containing lead. Total net energy generated at Barkley Dam (774,831,914 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indiana a Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc, Hosier energy Division. Total net energy generated at Cheatham Dam (197,446,027 kw-hr), Cordell Hull (368,605,025 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (467,250,140 kwhr) was made available for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 2. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902- 1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196- 1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, TN. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 15-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by the TVA of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, TN. (See table 15-I on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 143 terminals on the Tennessee River (16 municipally owned, 15 government owned facilities and 112 privately owned facilities). A total of 79 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, and steel. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $991,246. Maintenance: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major maintenance included unwatering and repairs to Pickwick Main and Auxiliary locks, Wheeler, Nickajack, and Kentucky Main locks, replacement of lock operating machinery at Wheeler Auxiliary and valves and two gates at Wheeler Main Lock. Culvert bulkheads and valves were replaced at Fort Loudon, Watts Bar and Chickamauga. Dredging of the navigation channel at several sites was performed. Approximately 44 million tons of commodities were locked through the Tennessee River locks. 3. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110 x 600 feet. Construction for the 15-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1992 divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $751,000,000. (See 15-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. Construction continued at the Crow's Neck Environmental Education Center at Bay Springs. Construction at the Holcut Park, Divide Overlook & Natchez Trace Site, and the Damsite West Bank Recreation site was completed. The Environmental Education Center represents the final scheduled recreation construction. The project is more than 99% complete. Navigation features are 100% complete. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During the period $5,237 was expended for a design of an access channel to Port of Florence, AL. Alteration of Bridges 5. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman- Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 6. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATIONAL AREA, KY AND TN Location. The project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area was established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage was not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically established the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The project was authorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1974, 1976 and Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See table 15B for authorizing legislation). The authorized cost (ceiling) for the project was $156,122,000. $112,123,900 was appropriated to The Corp of Engineers for design and construction of park facilities. The first construction contract was awarded in June 1981. 71% of the authorized project is complete. By Memorandum of Agreement dated 1 October 1990 jurisdiction of the area was transferred to The Department of Interior. Local cooperation. None required. Operation during fiscal year. The Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Department of Interior, transferring jurisdiction of the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, itemized activities to be completed by the Army. The Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Department of Interior, transferring jurisdiction of the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, itemized activities to be completed by the Army. In accordance with this agreement, miscellaneous minor construction items were completed. An outstanding real estate claim will be the responsibility of the Corps. 7. MARTINS FORK LAKE,KY Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam is concrete type, 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acre-feet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acrefeet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life 15-4 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, is available during the potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project prevents a major portion of average annual flood losses at Harlan and results in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and to other urban areas downstream. Actual cost of project including $95,000 code 710 funds is $20,479,911. First construction contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed for beneficial use in September 1978. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing contract with Harlan County was approved and certain recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures operated as required. 8. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away form present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. 9. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY Location. The project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $306,400,000. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation requires that non-Federal interests shall hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works and maintain and operate all such works after their completion in accordance with regulations by the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Acquired 6.27 acres fee and 1.53 acres easement. At Harlan construction of the diversion tunnels continued, and a contract was awarded for a levee/floodwall. Real estate acquisition and design of future phases of work continued. At Barbourville a contract for construction of the levee, and a contract for the floodwall and closure structures continued. Real estate acquisition continued. Non-structural evacuations continued at Pineville, Harlan and Barbourville, and floodproofing was initiated at Barbourville and Harlan. 10. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 15- B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 15-K 11. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures 15-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1992 required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $11,699. Total cost to September 30, 1992 was $376,743. For project inspection data see table 15-M. An additional $206,789 was expended under authority of Section 216 of 1970 Flood Control Act (PL 91-611) for an Initial Appraisal Report of The Cross Creeks National Wildlife Refuge. 12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal cost for the fiscal year was $228,225 for disaster preparedness. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, TN. It is in DeKalb County, TN., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, TN. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Actual cost of project including $8,940,642 code 710 funds is $53,412,022. Local cooperation. None required on completed project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenance maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (792,306,800 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. 14. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, TN. It is in Clay County, TN, and about 80 miles northeast of Nashville, TN 28 miles north of Cookeville, TN, and 3 miles east of Celina, TN. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, KY, and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, TN. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use an conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project including $2,195,600 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $28,317,746. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (103,793,300 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, and management and maintenance of public-use facilities. A contract was awarded for construction of a comfort station at Pleasant Grove Beach. 15. J.PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO, RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, TN.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, TN. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Cost of project including $3,260,400 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non- Federal funds for recreation facilities under the com- 15-6 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT pleted projects program is $56,914,039. Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (71,213,500 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management,and maintenance of public-use facilities. Paving of roads and parking areas were completed. 16. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, KY water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Lake for power. The power plant is complete. Recreation was completed in FY 1986. Total cost is $56,741,232. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (58,196,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. 17. WOLF CREEK DAM - LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.0 (above mouth) in Russell County, KY, about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, KY. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, KY. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public-use and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project is $188,267,195. This cost includes $3,259,3472 code 710 funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $104,999,237 for major rehabilitation. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. The major rehab embankment contract was physically completed in September 1982. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Major maintenance work items included switchyard repairs and replacement of intake gate cables. Total net energy generated (810,521,024 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of publicuse facilities. 18. DAM SAFETY PROGRAM $549,503 was expended in FY 92 to design remedial measures for the main dam and increased spillway capacity at Center Hill Dam. Proposed modifications will prevent sudden failure of the dam in the event of catastrophic flooding on The Caney Fork and Cumberland Rivers. General Investigations 19. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $1,131,078 for which $522,390 was for navigation $496,885 for flood damage prevention studies, $56,585 for special investigations, $30,413 for coordination studies with other agencies, $22,637 for interagency water resource development, and $2,168 for American Waterfowl Management Plan. 15-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1992 20.COLLECTION AND STUDY OF vices to others, $19,723 for floodplain management ser- BASIC DATA vices, $4,688 for quick responses, and $9,988 for services to Jackson County, Sumner County and Costs for this period were $37,917 for technical ser- Hendersonville, TN. 15-8 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project 1. Cumberland River TN and KY 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL, and KY 3. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 5. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area, KY and TN 6. Martins Fork Lake, KY 7. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY 8. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 11. Cumberland, KY 12. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN 13. Dale Hollow Lake Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 14. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN 15. Laurel RiverLake, Ohio River Basin, KY Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 89 FY90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep30,1992 c 4 4 15-9 - - - - 320,252,240 1,2,3 - - - - 320,252,240 1,2,3 23,167,200 24,829,886 21,669,000 23,482,000 310,630,262 4 23,648,733 24,363,546 22,003,257 22,865,774 309,337,254 5 - - - - 16,251,428 6 - - - - 16,251,428 6 17,036,700 11,486,397 11,843,000 12,110,000 201,749,048 7 17,383,402 11,567,723 11,929,274 11,407,949 200,840,863 8 - - - - 400,000 - - - - 400,000 300,000 1,580,000 7,838,000 -500,000 749,813,050 2,030,026 1,510,465 1,999,758 5,997,359 748,395,013 7,969,000 300,000 0 0 112,123,920 9 6,158,684 1,557,103 1,322,452 204,073 111,744,837 10 - - - - 20,479,911 - - - - 20,479,911 598,500 591,840 542,000 575,000 6,829,340 619,139 524,979 560,045 597,510 6,788,745 - - - - 817,830 11 - - - - 817,830 11 66,000 159,322 -30,000 60,000 2,099,166 61,772 47,039 72,515 69,123 2,087,053 12,312,000 27,210,000 29,303,500 22,387,000 173,654,500 12 17,561,130 20,104,313 24,997,924 22,129,538 159,307,524 13 - - - - 66,642 - - - - 66,642 - - - - 53,412,022 14 - - - - 53,412,022 15 3,615,000 3,961,809 3,502,000 5,174,000 63,429,976 16 3,750,028 3,951,194 3,446,491 4,570,127 62,690,549 17 - - - - 28,317,746 18 - - - - 28,317,746 19 3,350,100 3,560,720 3,238,000 4,078,000 59,746,627 20 3,413,865 3,430,747 3,251,233 4,017,319 59,467,427 21 - - - - 56,914,039 22 - - - - 56,914,039 23 3,324,800 2,946,865 2,984,000 3,253,000 43,313,251 24 3,341,459 3,116,459 2,865,245 3,241,627 43,138,444 25 - - - - 56,741,232 - - - - 56,741,232 1,406,100 1,102,343 1,079,000 1,210,000 12,695,443 26 1,422,959 1,068,074 1,076,441 1,212,062 12,636,477 26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1992 TABLE 15-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep 30, 1992 16. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work Lake Cumberland, Approp. - - - - 83,267,958 27 Ohio River Basin, KY Cost - - - - 83,267,958 27 Maint. Approp. 5,085,400 4,154,392 3,582,000 5,268,000 83,231,233 28 Cost 5,271,224 4,003,632 3,703,287 4,910,334 82,775,462 29 Rehab. Approp. - - - - 104,999,237 30 Cost - - - - 104,999,237 30 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous project.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contributed by the State of Kentucky and $6,750 contributed by metropolitan Nashville, TN. 3. Includes $298,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,236,657 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 5. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,236,657 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and $4,005,175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 8. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 9. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 10. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 11. Includes $33,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 12. Includes $19,043,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 13. Includes $18,626,638 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 14. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 16. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $692,078 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 17. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $692,078 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 18. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 8) of 1983. 19. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 8) of 1983. 20. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $692,078 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 8) of 1983. 21. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $692,078 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 8) of 1983. 22. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 24. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $635,378 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 25. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $635,378 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 26. Includes $66,678 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 27. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 28. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 fund provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 29. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 30. Includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction of switchyard. 15-10 NASHVILILE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized Project and Work Authorized Documents in Text Act CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Jul 13, 1892 Provision made for lock A Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 19, 1952 Sep. 3, 1954 Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville, via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Jul 14, 1960 Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Aug. 5, 1886 Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 Jun 5, 1920 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 26, 19342 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 1, 1980 Jul 3, 1930 May 18, 1933 Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Does. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1884, p. 1663 Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 15-11 L REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1992 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 761, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIG WATERWAY Jul 24, 1946 Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong. 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 15-12 TABLE 15-B (continued) 9. Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jun 18, 1965 Aug 13, 1968 Mar 7, 1974 Mar 7, 1974 3. NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Ca~t to Sept, 1992 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Caney Fork River, TN abandoned 1895 $ 27,828- Clinch River, TN and VA abandoned 1923 53,949 $ 7,873 Duck River, TN abandoned 1887 13,000 - Elk River, AL and TN abandoned 1904 4,000- French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN abandoned 1931 249,605 33,554 Holston River, TN abandoned 1911 5,714- Little Tennessee River, TN abandoned 1888 5,510- Obey River, TN abandoned 1887 11,500- Red River, TN abandoned 1884 5,000- South Fork of Cumberland River, KY abandoned 1892 11,967- TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cost to Sept, 1992 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barbourville, KY completed 1963 $2,088,147 - Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN completed 1962 460,134- Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY completed 1969 567,703- Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY completed 1949 26,309- Paint Rock River, AL completed 1967 544,173- Pineville, KY completed 1963 1,679,126- 1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. 15-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1992 TABLE 15-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS (Including Power) For last Full Cost to Sept. 1992 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barkley Dam and Lake beneficial use - $146,498,644 99,704,016 1 Barkley, KY and TN Celina Dam, KY inactive 222,575 - Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 31,682,762 75,924,974 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 79,874,492 48,447,281 1 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 52,266,412 85,260,983 1 1. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY" See Table 15-H TABLE 15-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For last Full Federal Contributed Report see Funds Funds Project Annual Report Date and Authority Expended Expended Three Islands Reservoir, 1970 Authorized: FC Act 1938, PL 761, $111,855 Ohio River Basin, TN 75 Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. Middlesboro, Yellow Creek - Authorized: FC Act, Dec 22, Bell County, KY 1944, PL 534, 78th Congress. - - Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Cumberland River above - Authorized: River & Harbor Act, - - Nashville, TN Aug 5, 1886. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Hiwassee River, Polk and 1923 Authorized: River & Harbor Act 123,065- Bradley Counties, TN Aug 14, 1876. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Ressview Lake, Tennessee - Authorized: FC Act, Jan 28, 1938, 6,779- and Kentucky PL 761, 75th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 15-14 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPAL FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hull Celina Nearest town Miles above mouth of rjver Lock dimensions (feet) Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guard-sills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level): Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet): Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canel: Length (mile) Bottom width (feet) Depth a minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Percent of project completion Year9opened to navigation Cost 9 Kuttawa, KY 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthflll 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 60 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,0003, 4 259,000 610,000 2,082,00 1.75 400 11 4 32,500 130,000 8 1964 $146,5000,000 Ashland City, TN, 9 miles 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 Old Hickory TN, 3 miles 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 98 3,6052 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 4503 385 382 442 7,450 27,450 19,8007 84,200 104,000 3 12,000 36,000 $213,000,000 125,0005 63,000 357,000 545,000 4 25,000 100,000 8 1952 $31,700,000 Carthage, TN 5 miles 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,1382 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 5083 508 501 499 13,920 85,6005,6 20,500 204,800 310,900 3 33,333 100,000 8 1973 $79,874,500 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acre-feet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acre-feet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during non-flood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 15-15 Celina, TN 5 miles 385.4 Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 86 2,298 290 250 Tainter 5 50 by 37 5643 560 559 559 16,960 55,9505 14,700 287,300 357,950 3 36,000 108,000 8 1954 $52,266,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY OF CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1992 TABLE 15-I Project1 Miles Above Mouth Miles from Nearest Town Kentucky 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, K Pickwick Landing: Auxiliary lock 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN Main lock 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN Wilson: Auxiliary lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL Main lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL Main lock 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL Guntersville: Auxiliary lock Main lock TENNESSEE RIVER (SEE SECTION 2 OF TEXT) Lock Dimension Length Minimum Depth Width Avail- Lift on Guard Sills of able for Year Cham- Full Nor- Maxi- Opened ber Width mal mum Lower Upper Character of Navi- (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation gation Y 110 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Limestone 1942 110 600 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 1937 110 1000 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 1984 60 292 94 100.0 11.04 11.2 Limestone 1927 300 110 600 94 100.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1959 60 400 110 600 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 60 360 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 110 600 Nickajack: Auxiliary lock 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 110 600 Main lock 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 110 800 Chickamauga 471.0 6.9 above Chattanooga, TN 60 360 Watts Bar 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, TN 60 360 Fort Loudon Melton Hill (Clinch R.) 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, TN 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, TN 48 51.5 13.2 14.7 Limestone 1934 48 51.5 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 39 45.0 11.8 13.0 Limestone 1937 39 45.0 12.7 13.0 Limestone 1965 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1967 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 49 53.0 13.0 10.0 Limestone 1939 58 70.0 11.8 12.0 Shale 1941 60 360 72 80.0 11.8 12.0 Limestone 1943 75 400 54 60.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 Kind of Dam Fixed Cost of Type of Each Lock Construction and Dam Concrete and 2 earthfill Fixed Concrete and earthfill Fixed Concrete and 3 earthfill Fixed Concrete and $46,973,5405 earthfill7 Fixed Fixed Concrete and 1,796,2956 earthfill Concrete and 7 earthfill Fixed Fixed Concrete and earthfill Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Concrete Concrete Concrete and earthfill Fixed Concrete and earthfill Fixed Concrete 3&7 7 7 7 3&7 3 Cong., 1st 15-16 1. H. Doc. 328, 71 Cong., 2d sess, contains table, pp. 98 and 99, giving pertinent information concerning low dams contemplated 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, National Defense Act of June 3, 1916, (H. Doc. 1262, 64th under 1930 project. Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low dams in addition to sess.). Actual cost of lock and dam. exiting locks and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams constructed by Tennessee Valey Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. Design for lock prepared with Corps forces and funds. 4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-4 TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEP 30, 1992 (See Section 2 of Text) Channel Operation & Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,236 $10,747,026 $186,076,992 $199,068,254 1,2 Maintenance - - 11,665 11,665 Increase of compen- 5 - 5 sation, rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,236 $10,747,031 $186,088,657 $199,079,9241,2 1. In addition, surplus property valued at $54,336 was ation and care of works of improvement under provisions of transferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes appropriation for such purposes. $4,005,175 expended betweenl890 and June 30, 1935, on oper- 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. TABLE 15-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Type of Estimated Cost Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Cumberland, KY Channel Improvement 520,000 240,000 760,0001 1. Deferred TABLE 15-L RESERVOIRS Tributary Basin and Reservoir Center Hill Lake, TN Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Laurel River Lake, KY Martins Fork Lake, KY 1. Details of this project are in individual report. 2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. Total Federal Steam Cost Caney Fork River $53,412,0221 Obey River 28,167,7461 Stones River 56,868,0391,2 Laurel River 56,741,232 3 Martins Fork 20,479,911 3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." 15-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1992 TABLE 15-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, KY Apr 1992 and Oct 1992 Corbin, KY Apr 1992 and Oct 1992 Lake City, TN Apr 1992 and Oct 1992 Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) Apr 1992 and Oct 1992 Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) Apr 1992 and Oct 1992 Paint Rock River, AL Pineville, KY Apr 1992 and Oct 1992 Spring City, TN May 1992 and Oct 1992 Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) Apr 1992 and Oct 1992 TABLE 15-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L. 858, 80th Congress, as amended Project FY 92 Cost Browns Creek, Nashville, TN $ 2,485 Dry Creek, Goodlettsbille, TN 21,256 Lytle Creek, Murfreesboro, TN 4,300 Rock Creek, Unicoi County, TN 9,379 Whites and Ewing Creeks, TN 477 Doe & Watanga River, Elizabethtown, TN 4,196 Little Harpeth River, Brentwood, TN 7,618 Beaver Dam Creek, Damascus, VA 16,943 East Fork of Clarks River, KY 6,505 Harpeth River, Williamson Co., TN 10,013 Martins Creek, Unicoi Co., TN 5,466 Piney Creek, Spring City, TN 206 Reedy Creek, Sullivan County, TN 31,926 Caney Fork River, Carthage, TN 1,158 Gibson Creek, TN 51 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L 526, 79th Congress Project FY 92 Cost Emory River, Harriman, TN $ 3,672 Sheffield Water Intake, AL 37,944 Duck River, Hickman Co., TN 23,138 Pond Creek,Cheatham Co., TN - 1,533 Whitesburg Br., Morgan County, AL 2,872 Cumberland River Metro Nashville Landfill 45,397 Duck Island Water Refuge, Lake Barkley, KY 902 Fair Grounds Park, Clarksville, TN 1,266 Savannah City Park, TN 11,270 Sequoyah Hills Park, Knoxville, TN 61,060 Tennessee River, Chattanooga, TN 8,061 McGregor Park, Montgomery Co., TN 19,628 South HolstonRiver, Kingsport, TN 20,572 15-18 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southwestern Ohio, west central Kentucky, a small portion of north central Tennessee, Indiana except northern part, and southeastern Illinois except Cairo-Mounds-Mound City area, all included in drainage basin of Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately upstream from Foster, KY., to mouth. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Channels and Habors Page 1. Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY..... 16-2 Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio R iver ........................................................... 16-2 3. Green and Barran Rivers, KY: .................... 16-2 4. Kentucky River, KY .................................... 16-2 5. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ................ 16-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 16-3 7. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.............................................. 16-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 8. Evansville, IN ............................................. 16-3 9. M ill Creek, OH ........................................... 16-4 10. Salyersville, KY ........................................... 16-4 11. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY.......... 16-4 Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. Barren River Lake, KY ............................... 16-5 13. Brookville Lake, KY .................................... 16-5 14. Buckhorn Lake, KY ..................................... 16-6 15. Caesar Creek Lake, OH .............................. 16-6 16. Cagles Mill Lake, IN ................................... 16-6 17. Carr Fork Lake, KY .................................... 16-7 18. Cave Run Lake, KY ..................................... 16-7 19. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN ........................... 16-7 20. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH.. 16-8 21. Green River Lake, KY .................................. 16-8 22. Huntington Lake, IN ................................... 16-8 23. Mississinewa Lake, IN ............................... 16-9 24. Monroe Lake, IN ......................................... 16-9 25. Nolin Lake, KY ........................................... 16-9 26. Ohio River Basin (Louisville District)....... 16-10 27. Patoka Lake, IN ....................................... 16-10 28. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY ...................................... 16-10 Page 29. Salamonie Lake, IN .................................... 16-11 30. Taylorsville Lake, KY ............................... 16-11 31. W abash River Basin .................................. 16-12 32. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH ........... 16-12 33. William H. Harsha Lake, OH ................... 16-12 34. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................... 16-13 35. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 16-13 36. Flood Control Works Under Special Authorization ............................................ 16-13 General Investigations 37. Surveys ...................................................... 16-13 38. Collection and Study of Basic Data............ 16-13 39. Precontruction Engineering and Design ... 16-13 Tables Table 16-A Cost and Financial Statement .... 16-14 Table 16-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 16-19 Table 16-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................................... 16-22 Table 16-D Not applicable Table 16-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................................... 16-23 Table 16-F Not applicable Table 16-G Deauthorized Projects ................ 16-26 Table 16-H Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and Kentucky River Navigation Systems .......... 16-28 Table 16-I Ohio River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan .............................. 16-29 Table 16-J Wabash River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan ..................... 16-33 Table 16-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................... 16-34 Table 16-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .............................. 16-37 16-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation - Channels and Harbors 1. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, LICKING RIVER, KY Location. The Licking River originates in southeast ern Kentucky and flows generally northwesterly to its confluence with the Ohio River at Covington, KY, mile 470.2 below Pittsburgh, PA. The Licking River Basin includes the drainage area of the Licking River, and all other left bank tributaries of the Ohio River from Markland Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 531.5) upstream to Meldahl Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 436.2). Existing project. There are no locks and dams on the Licking River. However, a navigable depth of 9 feet is maintained up to mile 7.0 on the Licking River. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities, oil products, and coal are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel. Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see the heading under Ohio River. 3. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY Location. Green River rises in Casey County,'KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to give, with channel work in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY; a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1, Barren River. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16- H for principal features of the locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and Rochester, Kentucky, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of Green River and Dam 3 at mile 103 Green River. Routine maintenance was performed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, are in good condition. Lock and Dam 3, Green River, and Lock and Dam 1, Barren River are in fair condition, and Lock 4, Green River, is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs were deferred pending completion of survey report for navigation on Green River. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 1981. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Under permit issued by District Engineer on August 20, 1963, private interests dredged channel of Green River to extend 9-foot-depth to coal loading terminal at mile 108.1. Channel of Green River above Lock 3 is no longer maintained. 4. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6-footdepth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks 16-2 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45th Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26,1934. (See Table 16-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) On December 19, 1976, the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River System were reduced from continuous 24-hour year-round operation to two-shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10, and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 through 14 have been reduced in several increments. On October 1, 1981, Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. Locks 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 were in operation for 15 weekends during fiscal year 1982 and was again closed at the end of this period. Locks 5 through 14 were leased to the State of Kentucky on May 21, 1985. The State of Kentucky operated these locks on weekends during the summer boating seasons through the Fiscal Year. The lease expired on October 15, 1989, and Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. During the fiscal year Locks 1 through 4 continued a two-shift, year-round operation. Licenses. Federal Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,400; total collections through September 30, 1989, $293,205. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities and gasoline are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 through 4 and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Dam 5 at mile 82.2 Kentucky River. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of the five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and miaintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963, 1964, and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to provide for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 5. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 16-C. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 8. EVANSVILLE, IN Location. In Vanderburgh County, IN,. on right bank of Ohio River, 792.2 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Evansville-South, IN.) Existing project. Construction of a system of levees and concrete floodwalls, together with pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, at Evansville. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1127. Project will provide protection for City of Evansville, IN, against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood (maximum of record), with a 3-foot freeboard. Estimated total cost ofnewwork(1992)is $44,654,000 Federal, and $5,500,000 non-Federal. Existing project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin 1937 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Section 3 of Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for Howell Unit 1 and Knight Township sections. Assurances for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, Parts 1,2, and 3 have been furnished. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design studies continued. Construction of Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, was started in April 1974 is complete except for Unit 2, Part 4. US Highway 41W Pump Plant construction contract advanced to 100 percent completion. Contract for Diamond Avenue, North 1stAvenue, and Stringtown Road pumping plants and associated levee and floodwall advanced to 100 percent completion. Maintenance: During the 1992 flood season no benefits were accomplished. Condition at end of fiscal year. Knight Township, Howell, Unit 1 and Pigeon Creek, Unit 1, and Levee Unit 2 Part 3 Sections are complete. Howell Section, Unit 2, was reclassified from the "active" category to the "inactive" category July 7, 1977 based on studies that indicated this part of the project is not economically justified. Project is about 99 percent complete overall. 16-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 9. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Fork in Hamilton County, OH. Lower Mill Creek is in the commercial and industrial heart of the Cincinnati metropolitan area in the southwestern portion of the State. Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, two pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for high-density urban oriented recreational use. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all modifications and relocations of buildings, utilities, street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent encroachment on improved channels and on ponding areas which would impair capacities; at least annually inform interests affected as to degree of protection afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical development of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses. Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the project, local interests are required to furnish assurances that they will, if necessary, pay or contribute in kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would amount to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975, and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of Section 1 advanced to 95 percent completion. At the direction of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, the Corps has initiated a study that will lead to a termination of further Federal activity on the project. This study will determine the best method to accomplish this termination. No further design or construction activities are anticipated. Maintenance: Flood damages estimated at $67,000 were prevented during the 1992 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. DM #1, Hydrology & Hydraulics; DM #2, Phase 1, Plan Formulation; DM #3, Phase II, General Project; DM #4, Construction Materials; DM #5, Railroad Relocations, and DM #6, Barrier Dam Pumps are complete. DM#7, Public Use is scheduled for completion in FY 1992. Construction channel and levee-Sections 2,3,4A, and 7A, Phase 1, are complete. Project is about 44 percent complete overall. 10. SALYERSVILLE, KY Location. Project is located along the banks of the Licking River from approximately mile 269 and 271 in Magoffin County, Kentucky along the Mountain Parkway about 75 miles southeast of Lexington, Kentucky. Existing project. The most cost-effective and feasible plan to provide the authorized level of protection (1978 flood protection) is called the "Cut-Thru Plan" and includes two channel cut-thrus, a barrier dam at the upstream cut-thru, an 0.8 mile reach of channel improvement connecting the two cut-thrus, and 4.7 miles of clearing and snagging. Estimated total cost of new work (1992) is $10,400,000 of which $8,730,000 is Federal and $1,670,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. The recommended plan is strongly supported by the local sponsors, the City of Salyersville and Magoffin County. This support is documented in letter of intent dated April 26, 1988, which provided the initial financial capability statement and acknowledge receipt of the draft LCA. It is anticipated that the LCA will be executed in October 1993, with physical construction initiating FY 1994. The local sponsor will be required to provide all lands, easement, and rights of way, pay a percentage of the costs allocated to flood control to bring the total non- Federal share of flood control cost to 25 percent, and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of flood control facilities which is partially offset by a credit allowed based on the non- Federal sponsor's ability to pay, Section 103 (m) of the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Operations during the fiscal year. Engineering studies and the development of the LCA continue. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. Project is about 5 percent complete overall. 11. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. Existing project. Construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project provides protection for 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Estimated cost of new work (1992) is $69,776,183, of which $59,917,183 is Federal, and $9,859,000 is non- 16-4 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred until such time as a water quality problem on Pond Creek is corrected. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirements by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances oflocal cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project was executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1,2,3,4,4A,5 and Pond Creek Pump Plant have been furnished. Project was transferred to local interest on September 8, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract to construct the Pond Creek Pumping Station was completed. A contract to make repairs to the levee was completed. A contract to repair deficient pumps and motors at the Pond Creek Pumping Station continued. Project is 99 percent complete overall. During the 1992 flood season no benefits were accomplished. Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast of Scottsville, KY. At flood control pool reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,000 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 ofAnnual Report for 1962. Cost of the completed project is $27,479,717 including $2,335,055 Federal funds and $108,418 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract, with the Common wealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1992 flood season prevented damages of $2,002,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completedin October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition is complete. 13. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply, and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum pool of 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Cost of completed new work is $45,402,565 of which $37,905,073 is Federal cost and $7,497,492 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A stilling basin floor contract to repair erosion problems and exposed rebar advanced to 100 percent completion. A tailwater area contract to pave 2" bituminous concrete surface to eliminate cracks and potholes advanced to 100 percent completion. A control tower contract to replace roof because of interior leaks and damage was advanced to 100 percent completion. During 1992 flood season no benefits were accomplished. Routine maintenance was performed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in November 1965 and project was placed in 16-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 operation January 1974. Construction and land acquisition are complete. 14. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outletworks. Total storage capacityis 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 is for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 ofAnnual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A contract to make repairs to the stilling basin advanced to 100 percent completion. A contract to remove talus build-up in the spillway was awarded and advanced to 70 percent completion. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1992 flood season prevented damages of $1,205,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 15. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, OH, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, OH, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, OH. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost ofnew work (1992) is $62,893,882 and $5,037,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1983 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions ofWater Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages estimated at $531,000 were prevented during the 1992 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in January 1968 and the project was placed in operation January 1978. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. Project is about 99 percent complete overall. 16. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Estimated project cost ofnew work (1992) is $4,376,278 including $155,416 Federal funds, $113,094 contributed funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park, under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was signed by the State of Indiana on August 26,1981 and approved bythe Deputy Chief of Engineers on March 26, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1992 flood season prevented damages of $3,417,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. Recreation facilities constructed under the cost sharing 16-6 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT category of the completed projects program are completed except for administrative action to financially closeout the project. 17. CARR FORK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, KY. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8-foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Cost of completed work is $50,854,826 including $76,724 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A contract to pave 2" bituminous concrete surface to eliminate cracks and potholes at Irishman Creek site was awarded and advanced to 99 percent complete. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1992 flood season prevented damages of $728,000. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was placed in operation January 1976. Construction started in January 1966 is complete. 18. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U.S. Highway 60 near Farmers, KY, and 7 miles southwest of Morehead, KY. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,700 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Estimated Federal cost of new work (1992) is $109,475,282 of which $35,213,000 is U.S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: An audit to close out the project continued. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1992 flood season prevented damages of $2,026,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been in operation since February 1974. Construction was started in June 1965 and is about 99 percent complete. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. Administrative procedures to financially closeout the project are in progress. 19. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet area for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Cost of completed new work is $6,987,807 made up of $6,260,134 for the initial project and $373,678 Federal cost and $353,995 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Harden Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $962,000 were prevented during the 1992 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in October 1956 and all major items ofwork were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been in operation since August 1960. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are completed. 16-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 20. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, OH, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acrefeet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Federal cost of completed project is $22,083,660. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $80,000 were prevented during the 1992 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 21. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rockfill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Cost of completed new work is $33,462,330, consisting of $33,105,184 initial project funds, $40,001 for water supply, and $317,145 Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15, 1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance and operation of 99 percent of the site to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments receivedthrough fiscal year 1984 was $21,504. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management ofthe Lone Valley public access area. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A contract to pave 2" bituminous concrete surface to eliminate cracks and potholes at Smith Ridge site was awarded and advanced to 99 percent complete. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $1,423,000 during 1992 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. Construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site is complete. 22. HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost for new work (1992) is $19,622,509 made up of $19,273,252 Federal cost for the initial project and $193,903 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage, and $155,354 non-Federal contribution in kind for ties recreation facili- under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain 16-8 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A contract to pave 2" bituminous concrete surface to eliminate cracks and potholes at the Observation Mound site was advanced to 100 percent completion. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $2,990,000 during 1992 flood control season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 23. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gate-controlled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acre-feet are reserved for flood control storage. Cost for completed new work is $24,381,129 made up of $23,793,145 Federal cost forthe initial project, $239,200 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage. $174,392 Federal cost and $174,392 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category ofthe completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A control tower contract to replace roof because of interior leaks and damage was advanced to 100 percent completion. A contract was awarded at the end of the fiscal year to correct erosion problems in the stilling basin outlet channel. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $8,103,000 during 1992 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 24. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles each of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation.) Cost of completed new work is $16,570,774 consisting of $7,032,484 Federal funds, $7,797,604 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow regulation storage and $870,343 Federal cost and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to low-flowregulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $167,000 during 1992 flood season. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 25. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) 16-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details of project, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1992) is $17,193,381 including $2,594,377 for construction of recreation facilities. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contracts to repair cathodic protection and to pave Wax and Dog Creek sites were awarded at the end of the fiscal year. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1992 flood season prevented damages estimated $562,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 26. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16-I for cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred except for these projects for which individual reports are given. 27. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange, and Crawford Counties. (See Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and P5 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Estimated cost of new work (1992) is $73,664,159 of which $53,095,790 is Federal cost for other construction, and $20,568,369 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to ensure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent of the joint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control duringthe 1992 flood season prevented damage estimated at $233,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are complete. Real Estate relocation work is about 99 percent complete. All major features are complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. The project is about 99 percent complete overall. 28. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River, 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acre-feet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details, see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $10,643,001 including $890,008 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of rec- 16-10 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT reation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances were obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18,1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1992 flood season prevented damages estimated at $1,161,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 29. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot-diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acre-feet is for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1992)is $17,046,151 made up of $16,244,356 Federal cost for the initial project and $170,697 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow augmentation storage and $315,549 Federal cost and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A contract to replace the emergency generator system located at the spillway structure was awarded at the end of the fiscal year. A contract to replace to control tower roof was awarded and advanced to 99 percent completion. Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1992 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $3,565,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation- in spring 1967. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 30. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works will be slide gate controlled and spillway will be uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Estimated cost of new work (1992) is $122,090,000 made up of $92,980,000 Federal cost for the initial project and $17,020,000 non-Federal contributed funds for initial recreation facilities and $6,045,000 Federal cost and $6,045,000 non-Federal contributed funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April 16-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provided for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contractor's claim for damages to the Dam and Spillway construction contract were settled. Maintenance: A contract to reseal and restrip the shop and office parking lots and access roads was awarded and advanced to 99 percent complete. Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1992 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $1,351,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering and design studies are complete except for design of a comfort station. Land acquisition is 100 percent complete. Construction was started in June 1974. All major construction items are complete except recreation facilities. The dam gates were closed in January 1983 for permanent impoundment. Dedication ceremony was May 28, 1983. The project is about 99 percent complete overall. 31. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio. Existing project. One local protection project and five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin plan. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16-J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) 32. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Health, OH, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details, see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $4,722,463 made up of $3,092,941 Federal cost for the initial project, $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization and $529,361 Federal cost and $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute onehalf additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid one-half cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with the license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1992 flood season prevented damages estimated at $2,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. Cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program is complete. 33. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, OH, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Batavia,OH.) 16-12 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway, and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acrefeet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost of completenew workis $52,023,157 and a estimated $3,485,840 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981, by Public Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions ofWater SupplyAct of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance, and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A contract to replace the control tower roof because of interior leaks advanced to 100 percent completion. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1992 flood season prevented damages estimated at $366,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in May 1970. Project is complete and reservoir was placed in operation in February 1978. 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise interests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 16-K for the latest dates of inspection performed on the local protection projects, channel improvements, and bank revetments). Fiscal year costs were $169,529. Total costs to September 30, 1992, were $3,589,035. 35. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 16-E. 36. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for fiscal year were $304,589 for disaster preparedness. In addition, $211,735 was expended on emergency repairs on one federally-authorized and completion ofthree non-federal flood protection projects damaged during flooding events. Small navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor and Flood Control Act, Public Law 86-645, 86th Congress, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $19,324 for two reconnaissance studies. See Table 16-L. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $151,451 for preparation of thirteen Reconnaissance Studies, $99,999 for five Detailed Project Reports, $9,634 for Plans and Specifications on one project and $89,662 for two construction projects. See Table 16-L. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $1,932 for construction on one project. See Table 16-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress. Costs for fiscal year were $197,788 for preparation of three Reconnaissance Studies, eight Detailed Project Reports, start of Plans and Specifications on four projects, and construction of one projects. See Table 16-L. General Investigations 37. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $3,666,800 consisting of $1,204,148 for three Navigation Studies at Green River, Ky, Louisville, Ky, and Uniontown, KY, IN; $2,242,348 for thirteen Flood Damage Prevention Studies; $84,919 for Special Investigations; $22,463 for Review of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses; $31,880 for Intra-Agency Water Resource Development; $5,350 for a North American Waterfowl Management Plan; $9,018 for Coordination with other Federal Agencies; and $66,674 for Planning Assistance to States. 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $126,778 for Floor Plain Management Services and $6,248 for Hydrologic Studies. 39. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year costs were $1,941,399 consisting of $1,093,802 for navigation studies at Olmsted, IL and Louisville, KY; $847,597 for local protection studies at Fairfield, OH, Frankfort, KY, and Hazard, KY Holes Creek, OH; and West Fork Mill Creek, OH. 16-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 16-A See Section in Text COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Project Funding 1989 1990 1991 Total to 1992 Sept. 30, 1992 Navigation - Channels and Harbors 1 Open Channel Work, New Work Licking River Approp. $ Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Navigation - Locks and Dams 3 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - $ 12,000 12,000 12,311 12,311 13,000 14,700 13,000 14,700 1,440,900 1,466,171 1,152,000 1,088,367 1,297,228 1,544,346 1,105,338 1,246,490 83,011 83,011 13,808,222 1 13,808,222 1 35,566,750 2,3 35,555,381 4 Kentucky River, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Flood Control, Local Protection 8 Evansville, IN New Work Approp. Cost -- - - 4,176,749 -- - - 4,176,749 1,565,200 1,100,852 931,500 725,500 56,017,341 4. 1,479,695 1,231,846 800,341 873,149 56,000,709 4ss -- - - 556,956 -- - 556,956 5,002,000 6,523,000 2,263,000 305,000 43,494,043 6 2,864,214 5,382,915 4,938,572 652,605 43,069,238 ' 9 Mill Creek, OH 10 Salyersville, KY 11 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Flood Control - Reservoirs 12 Barren River Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10,865,000 2,456,000 6,140,000 6,396,000 6,350,916 8,129,179 8,933,891 6,715,773 -_ 400,000 280,000 - - 197,484 317,890 1,777,000 570,000 1,350,000 1,300,000 1,739,587 943,109 540,274 2,293,877 1,269,700 1,424,926 1,150,838 1,118,208 1,295,000 1,263,645 1,284,757 1,302,491 93,844,742 93,748,114 680,000 515,374 59,917,183 59,532,423 27,479,717 8 27,479,717 8 21,623,721 q io, 1 21,521,914 9, o1101, 16-14 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1989 1990 1991 1992 Sept. 30, 1992 13 Brookville Lake, IN New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14 Buckhorn Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 15 Caesar Creek Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 16 Cagles Mill Lake, IN New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 17 Carr Fork Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 18 Cave Run Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 19 Cecil M. Hardin Lake, New Work IN Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - $ - $ (13,815) - $ 45,402,56512 - - - - 45,402,565 12 533,100 504,108 682,000 599,227 7,024,524 567,567 453,527 514,106 815,199 7,007,324 - - - - 11,766,206 13 - - - - 11,766,206 13 675,100 874,833 703,000 972,780 13,404,323 14 724,265 801,127 738,810 966,271 13,329,205 14 (3,725) 650,900 666,348 - - - 62,893,882 (1,549) (2,229) - 62,881,010 734,271 644,000 736,474 8,153,408 710,737 669,046 713,160 8,098,805 - - - 4,376,278 15 - - - - 4,369,997 16 343,900 398,111 459,000 400,200 7,358,017 377,443 397,439 421,615 440,382 7,350,848 772 2,638 882,400 912,067 915,926 880,911 17,417 517,800 515,762 17,879 566,087 557,766 - - 50,854,826 17 15 - 50,854,826 17 859,000 928,118 11,881,785 18 789,973 998,174 11,831,201 18 - - 74,262,282 33,794 7,885 74,259,541 507,000 612,188 7,549,921 528,062 616,762 7,536,660 - - - 6,987,807 19 - - - - 6,987,807 19 683,800 510,044 656,000 609,800 9,183,840 706,592 528,545 648,587 633,745 9,179,275 16-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Project 20 Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH 21 Green River Lake, KY 22 Huntington Lake, IN 23 Mississinewa Lake, IN 24 Monroe Lake, IN 25 Nolin Lake, KY 26 Ohio River Basin Louisville District Funding New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1989 1990 1991 $ - $ Total to 1992 Sept. 30, 1992 - $ 22,083,660 - 22,083,660 425,400 460,567 488,000 425,331 6,287,645 449,834 445,390 477,582 448,396 6,268,952 -- - - 33,462,330 20 -- - - 33,462,330 20 962,397 1,069,965 1,171,000 1,105,383 17,939,294 21 1,018,736 998,018 1,127,966 1,161,530 17,847,465 21 19,622,509 22 13 19,621,777 23 453,100 486,128 441,100 445,848 7,986,388 495,401 477,245 435,631 462,027 7,968,349 - - - - 24,381,129 24 - - - - 24,379,800 25 446,700 453,811 430,000 635,777 7,275,293 456,896 408,100 436,517 644,908 7,233,373 - - - - 16,570,774 26 - - - - 16,570,774 26 629,700 608,143 837,000 688,250 8,772,418 27 624,204 585,632 843,847 662,999 8,713,061 27 - - 1,836 - 1,291,100 1,244,859 1,466,000 1,614,400 1,297,261 1,207,782 1,402,619 1,678,145 17,193,381 28 17,193,277 29 25,269,574 30 25,159,150 30 1,526,142 1,526,142 16-16 See Section in Text LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total to 1992 Sept. 30,1992 27 Patoka Lake, IN 27 Rough River Lake & Channel Improvment, KY 28 Salamonie Lake, IN 29 Taylorsville Lake, KY 31 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 32 William H. Harsha Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,480 431,600 432,867 1,575,300 1,602,455 "- - 73,664,159 31 - - 148 73,316,892 32 469,885 436,000 398,861 4,950,377 449,317 419,228 443,840 4,932,929 1,170,502 1,650,000 1,090,955 1,177,644 1,489,621 1,284,058 10,643,001 33 10,643,001 3 23,313,667 34 23,263,394 34 - - - - 17,046,151 3 S. . 17,039,321 36 408,768 415,839 424,000 497,300 7,180,320 421,912 404,919 414,595 515,770 7,160,780 486,000 497,000 904,636 526,392 500 160,000 86,754,809 37 331,528 634,371 86,482,765 38 626,800 712,271 578,000 664,903 5,332,874 626,165 681,542 606,915 672,843 5,300,435 - - 4,722,463 39 - - - - 4,722,463 3s 280,000 379,747 271,000 292,967 5,671,403 305,440 339,931 289,742 311,550 5,652,440 - - 52,023,157 40 885 " " " 52,023,157 40 453,335 521,836 492,000 592,500 6,126,437 473,034 503,165 473,388 604,544 6,082,859 1 Includes $85,000 public works funds 2 Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $204,444 "maintenance and operation of dams and improvements of navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to 30 June 1936, for operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 3 Includes $725,715 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4 Includes $316,871 under"maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters", and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30,1937 on operation andcare from permanentindefinite appropriation. 6 Includes $149,700 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6 Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds and $63,187 contributed funds. 7 Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds and $63,169 contributed funds. 8 Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds, $110,107 Code 713 Federal funds and $108,418 Code 713 non-Federal funds. 16-17 See Section in Text Project Funding 1989 1990 1991 I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 9 Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 10 Includes $326,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 11 Includes $365,925 "maintenance & operation of dams anid other improvements of navigable water". 12 Includes $7,497,492 contributed funds and $100,706 Code 711 funds. 13 Includes $61,451 public work acceleraton executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and$243,619 Code 712 funds. 14 Includes $52,240 Special Recreation Use Fees. 15 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $119,602 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 16 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $119,602 Code 713 funds, and $106,813 contributed funds. 17 Includes $76,724 Code 711 funds. 18 Includes $51,854 Special Recreation Use Fees. 19 Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds, $353,995 Code 713 funds, & $353,995 non-Federal contributions in kind for recreation facilities. 20 Includes $133,413 Code 711 funds, $183,732 Code 713 funds, and $40,001 contributed funds. 21 Includes $114,280 Special Recreation Use Fees and $365,925 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 22 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,903 contributed funds. 23 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,812 contributed funds. 24 Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 713 funds, $239,200 contributed funds and $174,392 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 25 Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 713 funds, $237,871 contributed funds and $174,392 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 26 Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds, $869,158 Code 713 funds, $7,797,604contributedfunds and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 27 Includes $54,460 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 28 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,377 Code 711 funds. 29 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,592,274 Code 711 funds. 30 Includes $204,920 Special Recreation Use Fees, $52,000 Supplement Funds, and $292,925 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 31 Includes $20,568,369 contributed funds. 32 Includes $20,221,129 contributed funds. 33 Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $867,396 Code 711 funds, $22,612 Code 713 funds, and $22,612 contributed funds. 34 Includes $236,640 Special Recreation Use Fees and $365,925 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 35 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $170,697 contributed funds and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 36 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 37 Includes $4,128,831 contributed funds. 38 Includes $4,006,484 contributed funds. 39 Includes $529,361 Code 713 funds, $50,000 contributed funds, $529,361 non-Federal contribution inkindfor recreation facilities, and $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam. 40 Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning, engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 16-18 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Aug 11, 1888 Mar 3, 18931 Jul 13, 1892 Jul 13, 1902 Mar 3, 19052 Mar 3, 1909 Jul 3, 19302 Jun 26, 1934 3 Aug 30, 1935 2 Sep 3, 1954 Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul 3, 1958 GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Purchase of original improvement H. Doc 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Ann. Rept. 1887, p.1903 Construction of Lock 2, Green River Annual Report, 1891, p. 2439 Construction of Lock 5, Green River Construction of Lock 6, Green River Annual Report, 1891, p. 2478 Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River." Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Rivers and Harbors Committee Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Sess.,and widens bends in Bear Creek, KY H. Doc. 685, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors Improvement of Nolin River H.D. 480, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River revocation of S.D. 82, 83d Congress, 2d Sess. authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 26 of Text) Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection Flood Control Committee of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected Document 1, 75th Congress, by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost 1st Session not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Flood Control Committee in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary Document 1, 75th Congress, of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial 1st Session accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers, subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan H. Doc. 504, 78th Congress, for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control 2d Session and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, KY at an estimated cost of $129,350 S.D. 105, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at an H.D. 535, 78th Congress estimated cost of $360,000 2d Session Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, H.D. 197, 80th Congress including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River 1st Session Basin, Illinois, and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000. H.D. 198, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000. Flood control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for H.D. 192, 85th Congress, Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an 1st Session estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000. 16-19 Acts Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 16-B CONTINUED AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct 23, 1962 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin May 12, 1967 Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Fifty-four local protection projects and one reservoir project in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Aug 13, 1968 Dec 29, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1988 Nov 28, 1990 WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 31of Text) Construction of five multipurpose reservoirs and one local protection project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with provision that construction of Big Walnut Lake, IN, project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation of partial accomplishment of project Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River were deauthorized. MIAMI RIVER BASIN, PLEASANT RUN, VICINITY FAIRFIELD, OH Three dry bed reservoirs and a channel improvement were authorized in Section 401 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. HAZARD, KENTUCKY Approximately 6 miles of channel improvement were authorized in Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Flood control measures to prevent a January 1957 flood reoccurrance in the vicinity of Hazard, Kentucky at a total cost of $30,000,000 was authorized for design and construction in Section 108 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1990. H.D. 423, 87th Congress, 2d Session Pub. Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 89-42, 89th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Session Public Law 91-282, 91st Cong., 2d Session Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, 2d Session S.D. 96, 90th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 100-676, 100th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 101-640, 101st 2nd Session 16-20 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-B CONTINUED AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents SALYERSVILLE, KENTUCKY Flood control measures to prevent a December 1978 flood reoccurrence in the vicinity of Salyersville, Kentucky at a total project cost of $7,000,000 was authorized for design and construction in section 401(e)(1) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. With respect to the project, Congress has determined that the benefits exceed the cost of such flood control measures. Provided $400,000 to construct the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 401(e)(1) in accordance with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. Provided $600,000 to continue construction of the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 section 401(e)(1) in accordance with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. SOUTH FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY Flood protection in accordance with Plan R-1 of the Louisville District Commander's Re-evaluation Report, dated June 1990 and a executed LCA no later than October 1991 was authorized in Section 102 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1990. Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 101-514, 101st Congress, 2d Session Public Law 102-104, 102nd Congress, 1st Session Public Law 101-640, 101th Congress, 2nd Session 1Deficiency act. Act of Sep. 3, 1954 2Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by 3Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 16-21 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 5, 1990 Aug 17, 1991 Nov 28, 1990 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 16-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6) Name of Project Status For Last Full Report See Annual Report Cost to Sep 30, 1992 Operation and Construction Maintenance Licking River Completed 1901 $ 13,045 Rough River, KY Completed 1951 105,500 Tradewater River, KY Completed 1858 18,568 White River, IN Completed 1909 119,312 16-22 $- 101,196 33,331 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status1 Report Construction Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) Brookport, IL Cannelton, IN Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY2 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY2 Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) English, IN (Little Blue River)2 Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort) (Kentucky River) 3 8 Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River)2 Harrisburg, IL Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN2 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River) 2 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Levee Unit No. 8, White River, IN Louisville, KY4 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River)5 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY2 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) Muncie, IN (White River) Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) New Albany, IN New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 2 7 Newburgh, IN (Ohio River)6 Newport, KY Paducah, KY Panther Creek, KY (Green River) 2 Portland, IN (Salamonie River)2 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) Rosiclaire, IL Saline River & Tributaries, IL Shawneetown, IL7 Sturgis, KY Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) Tell City, IN Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) 7 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY 2 1977 1954 1958 1959 1957 1965 1987 1953 1972 1965 1979 1948 1960 1953 1959 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 1953 1967 1987 1952 1975 1944 1987 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1959 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1981 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 $ 392,443 1,240,299 597,493 2,068,391 1,206,852 832,700 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,177,345 144,563 734,498 372,353 2,960,970 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,788,840 300,143 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,414 130,417 7,440,987 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 5,892,329 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 297,624 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,551 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 7,826,219 91,000 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 16-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CONTINUED For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status' Report Construction Maintenance Local Protection, Completed (Cont'd) Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River) 2 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) 7 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort) (Kentucky River) 89 Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) Hazard, KY' Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio (Great Miami River) 9 Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (White River) Louisville, KY9' Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH' (Great Miami River) Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River). West Fork Mill Creek, OH (Winton Road) 9 Inactive: Blue River, Salem, IN Cache River, Upper Basin, Ill Columbus, IN Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) Kentucky River National Recreation Area Licking River, KY Mount Vernon, IN New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 2 Southwest Ohio Urban Waterfront Development Tell City, IN Vincennes, IL (Wabash River) Wabash River, York Township, Clark County, IL West Fork Drakes Creek, TN & KY Westpoint, KY Whitewater River & Tributaries, IN & OH Deferred: Grayville, IL Reservoirs: Active: Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) Downyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) Eagle Creek Lake, KY Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 16-24 1972 1956 1964 1977 1979 1976 1979 1959 1964 1983 1977 1980 1976 1975 1981 1977 1983 1976 $ 893,094 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 1,068,606 157,935 491,768 493,846 153,410 415,000 514,964 52,088 477,649 15,000 44,000 283,000 355,963 30,000 50,000 58,000 4,490 112,000 235,615 1,270,590 1,009,188 1,038,595 702,471 944,386 1,200,920 2,355,395 350,474 1,794,308 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CONTINUED For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status" Report Construction Maintenance 1All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1984 Flood Control Act, as amended. s Cost includes $161,098 cash contribution consisting of $105,118 from the City ofFrankfort, KY and $55,980 from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. 4Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contributions from the City of Louisville, KY. b Cost shown are for levee and pump plants. 6 The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. ' Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project inactive. 8 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project are active and inactive. 9 Advance Engineering and Design funded with General Investigations Appropriation. 16-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 16-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) - 1978 $ - - Alton, IN - 1977 - - Anderson, IN (White River) 1940 1986 5,724 - Aurora, IN - 1977 35,420 - Bellevue, KY - 1977 19,023 - Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) - 1981 - - Bromley, KY - 1977 - - California (Cincinnati), OH - 1977 16,465 - Carrollton, KY - 1977 9,713 - Caseyville, KY - 1986 - - Cave-in-Rock, IL - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) - 1977 - - Cleves, OH - 1977 6,343 - Clinton, IN - 1977 6,848 - Cloverport, KY - 1986 - - Concordia, KY - 1986 - Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN - 1977 - - Derby, IN - 1977 - - Elizabethtown, IL - 1977 - - Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN - 1977 3,361 - Grandview, IN - 1977 8,497 - Honey Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Leavenworth, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN 1938 1977 275 - Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) 1973 1986 60,000 - Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977- Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL 1938 1977 216 - Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL - 1977 9,922 - Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 7, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 9, White River, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 10, White River, IN - 1977 Lewisport, KY - 1990 Louisville, KY (Partial) - 1986 Ludlow, KY - 1977 14,503 - Madison, IN - 1977 - - Mauckport, IN - 1977 Marion, IN (Wabash River) 1979 1986 209,975 - McGinnis Levee, IN 1950 1977 71,049 - Metropolis, IL - 1986 10,575 - Milton, KY - 1977 - - 16-26 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-G CONTINUED DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection (Cont'd.) Moscow, OH - 1977 $ - - New Amsterdam, IN - 1977 - - New Harmony, IN - 1977 - - New Richmond, OH - 1977 7,104 - Newport-Wilder, KY - 1990 -- Orleans, IN 1972 1977 13,158 - Owensboro, KY - 1990 - - Patriot, IN - 1977 -- Prestonville, KY - 1977 - - Raccoon Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Rising Sun, IN - 1977 -- Rockport, IN - 1977 - - Rome, IN - 1977 - - Shawneetown, IL - 1986 25,367 - Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) 1938 1977 - - Shufflebarger Levee, IN 1950 1977 64,487 - Smithland, KY - 1990- Sugar Creek Levee, IN 1961 1977 28,061 - Terre Haute, IN - 1977 - - Tolu, KY - 1986 - - Tri Pond Levee, IL 1972 1977 65,510 - Troy, IN - 1977 - - Utica, IN - 1978 -- Vevay, IN - 1977 -- Vincennes, IN (Partial) 1964 1986 - - Westport, KY - 1977 - - Flood Control - Reservoirs Big Blue Lake, IN 1980 1981 1,079,867 - Clifty Creek Lake, IN 1979 1981 1,016,358 - Helm Lake, IL 1976 1981 41,616 - Lincoln Lake, IL 1979 1981 1,331,844 - Metamora Lake, IN - 1977 - - 16-27 TABLE 16-H Miles Lock above and Mouth of Distance from Dam River Nearest Town NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Length Available Width of For Full Chamber Width (feet) Upper Depth of Year Normal Pool Miter Sills Character of Percent Opened to Cost of Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock and Dam (feet) (feet msl) (feet) (feet) CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER - For report on this improvement see this heading under Ohio River. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Green River New 1 9.1 Spottsville, KY 84.0 New 2 63.1 0.3 miles below Calhoun, KY 84.0 3 108.5 0.3 miles below Rochester, KY 35.8 4 149.0 Woodbury, KY 35.8 5 168.1 0.3 miles below Glenmore, KY 56.0 6 181.7 2.8 miles above Brownsville, KY 36.0 Barren River 1 15.0 1 0.3 miles above Greencastle, KY 56.0 . KENTUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 4 of Text) Kentucky River ) 1 4.0 3.8 miles above Carrolton, KY 38.0 2 31.0 Lockport, KY 38.0 3 42.0 Gest, KY 38.0 4 65.0 1.0 mile below Frankfort, KY 38.0 5 82.2 2.8 miles below Tyrone, KY 38.0 6 96.2 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY 52.0 7 117.0 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY 52.0 8 139.9 4.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY 52.0 9 157.5 Valley View, KY 52.0 10 176.4 1.0 mile below Ford, KY 52.0 11 201.0 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY 52.0 12 220.0 Ravenna, KY 52.0 13 239.9 2.2 miles below Willow, KY 52.0 14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 52.0 600.0 600.0 137.5 138.0 360.0 145.0 360.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 147.0 147.0 146.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 11.8 1 14.3 17.0 16.4 15.2 92 349.1 363.4 380.4 396.8 412.0 e 421.1 15.2 412.0 8.2 14 13.9 13.2 13.2 15.0 14.0 15.3 18.7 17.3 17.0 18.0 17.0 18.0 17.0 430.0 443.9 457.1 470.3 485.3 499.3 514.6 533.6 550.6 567.6 585.6 602.6 620.6 637.6 12.1 11.3 15.0 11.7 7.3 5.6 7.1 6.5 12.0 9.3 8.0 8.8 Shale and Coal 100 Shale 100 Rock 100 Rock 100 Piles and Rock 100 Gravel 100 12.0 9.3 Gravel 8.2 4.8 7.6 6.1 8.6 6.5 6.4 6.3 10.0 6.4 9.4 6.4 9.1 6.8 10.6 6.0 10.0 6.6 9.0 6.0 10.0 6.0 9.6 6.0 9.6 6.0 8.6 6.0 1956 2 $5,101,978 s 1956 a 4,799,271 b 1836 6 121,377 1839 ' 125,718 1934 9 1,020,868 to 1905 9 168,415 100 1841 12 871,565 13 Rock and Clay 100 Rock 100 Rock 100 Rock 100 Rock 100 Rock and Piles 100 Rock 100 Rock 100 Rock 100 Rock 100 Rock 100 Rock 100 Rock 100 Rock 100 1839 15- 1839 15- 1844 15 1,350,385 16 1844 15- 1844 15 17 - 1894 "17 314,847 1897 17 290,788 1900 17 275,463 1907 17 237,646 1907 17 221,500 1906 17 296,593 1910 1 425,693 1915 17 461,476 1971 "17 392,902 'At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3, Green River datum (Elev. 9 Operation discontinued August 1, 1951. 338.0 Ohio River datum) o Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. 2New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25, 1956, old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, nDistance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation replaced with new cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970-71 with as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. O&M funds at cost of $822,000. 12 Piles in old gravel dam completed in 1934. 'Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. 13Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. 4 New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956. 14At normalpool McAlpine Dam, Ohio River Elev. 421.8 KentuckyRiver datum e (Elev. 420 Ohio River datum). 6 Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. (Reconstruction completed by United States in 1882. Operationdiscontinued September 30,1981. 1 7 Built by State ofKentucky. Cost given is for repairs by United States to Locks BreachingofdamonMay24,1965, stopped throughtraffic toBowlingGreen, and Dams 1 through 5. Original construction costs to State were: L&D 1, KY. $220,300; L&D 2, $151,983; L&D 3, $135,857; L&D 4, $131,607; and L&D 5, SWith moveable A-frame crest 3 feet high. $137,436. S7Lock was closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status in September 1982. LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 26 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Project and Status 1 Type of Construction Federal Estimated Cost Non-Federal 2 Completed: Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River) 3 4 Brookport, IL 5 6 Cannelton, IN5 ' Cincinnati, OH 5 s Covington, KY 5 9 Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) 5 10to England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Frankfort, KY,North Frankfort (Kentucky River) 5 Golconda, IL 5 12 Harrisburg, IL 5 to10 Hawesville, KY 5 13 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) 5 8 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN 7 Lawrenceburg, IN 0 Louisville, KY 5 14 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River) 5 New Albany, IN 5 8 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 5 7 Newport, KY 5 7 Paducah, KY 5 7 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) 5 15 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Rough River, KY 3 4 Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River) 11 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) 5 16 Tell City, IN 5 14 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN 5 17 (Wabash River)(completed portion) 5 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Evansville, IN 4 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) South Frankfort 5 Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) 9 Inactive: Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) Benson Creek 5 New Harmony Bridge, IL and IN (Wabash River) 5 7 Channel improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and barrier dam Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Cutoff channel Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee and pump plants Wall and levee Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Channel improvement Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Wall and levee Bank protection 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,117,345 144,563 734,498 2,960,970 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,414 25,005,137 4,337,617 5,375,471 297,624 7,512,987 4,761,551 600,300 1,079,236 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 44,654,000 8,630,000 19,400,000 3,340,000 664,376 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 2,013,000 17,164 107,000 272,100 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 1,716,301 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,914,039 15,130,345 161,727 841,498 3,233,070 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,758,139 26,721,438 109,200 4,446,817 740,000 6,115,471 298,506 232,000 40,000 100,000 93,000 63,309 32,707 72,153 285,000 150,000 297,624 7,811,493 4,993,551 640,300 1,179,236 1,919,778 441,359 964,936 1,143,079 3,593,941 1,245,704 5,500,000 50,164,000 36 2,880,000 11,510,000 36 2,340,000 21,740,000 21 1,150,000 4,490,000 22 99,000 763,376 25 16-29 TABLE 16-I Total REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 26 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Project and Status1 Deauthorized: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) 32 Alton, IN 30 Aurora, IN 31 Bellevue, KY 30 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) 5 33 Bromley, KY 30 California (Cincinnati), OH 31 Carrollton, KY 30 Caseyville, KY 6 34 Cave-in-Rock, IL 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) 30 Cleves, OH 30 Clinton, IN (Wabash River) 30 Cloverport, KY 5 34 Concordia, KY 5 34 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Derby, IN 30 Elizabethtown, IL 30 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Grandview, IN 30 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) 53 5 Honey Creek Levee, IN 30 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 63s Leavenworth, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River,IL 30 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 17, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL so30 Levee Unit 2, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN 30 Lewisport, KY 35 Ludlow, KY 30 Madison, IN 30 Mauckport, IN so30 McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Metropolis, IL 5 34 Milton, KY 30 Moscow, OH 30 New Amsterdam, IN 30 New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) 30 New Richmond, OH 30 Owensboro, KY 5 35 Patriot, IN 30 Type of Construction Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Estimated Cost 2 Federal $ 292,000 255,000 4,300,000 1,570,000 1,080,000 1,250,000 1,750,000 2,220,000 396,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000 728,000 590,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 580,000 4,600,000 653,000 4,630,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,850,000 2,180,000 1,580,000 2,090,000 3,410,000 724,000 1,160,000 1,490,000 610,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 3,070,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 616,000 3,200,000 886,000 753,000 Non-Federal $ 14,000 $ 40,000 1,190,000 400,000 630,000 925,000 720,000 97,000 35,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 9,000 193,000 55,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 133,000 1,087,000 32,000 528,000 266,000 40,000 164,000 116,000 118,000 715,000 136,000 73,000 56,000 88,000 243,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 431,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 25,000 720,000 195,000 372,000 Total 306,000 27 295,000 5,490,000 1,970,000 1,710,000 28 2,175,000 2,470,000 2,317,000 431,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 921,000 645,000 223,000 24 620,000 712,000 574,000 24 713,000 5,687,000 23 685,000 5,158,000 23 1,736,000 244,000 3,014,000 27 2,296,000 27 1,698,000 28 2,805,000 3,546,000 28 797,000 27 1,216,000 1,578,000 27 853,000 24 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 3,501,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 641,000 3,920,000 1,081,000 1,125,000 16-30 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section. 26 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost2 Type of Project and Status1 Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Prestonville, KY 30 Wall and levee $ 1,710,000 $ 55,000 $ 1,765,000 Raccoon Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 426,000 37,000 463,000 24 Rising Sun, IN 30 Wall and levee 896,000 280,000 1,176,000 Rockport, IN 3o Wall and levee 466,000 133,000 599,000 Rome, IN 30 Levee 359,000 67,000 426,000 Shawneetown, IL 5 34 Wall and levee 1,810,000 361,000 2,171,000 Shufflebarger Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,380,000 90,000 2,470,000 Smithland, KY5 3 Wall and levee 864,000 414,000 1,278,000 Sugar Creek Levee, IN (Wabash River) 3s0o Levee 418,000 29,000 447,000 24 Tolu, KY 5 34 Levee 303,000 35,000 338,000 Tri-Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,050,000 191,000 2,241,000 25 Troy, IN 30 Wall and levee 502,000 133,000 635,000 Utica, IN 5 32 Levee 1,570,000 120,000 1,690,000 Vevay, IN 30 Levee 1,170,000 146,000 1,316,000 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) (Uncompleted Portion) 5 34 Wall and levee 3,340,000 - 3,340,000 28 West Point, KY 634 Wall and levee 3,283,000 400,000 3,683,000 24 Westport, KY 30 Wall 1,610,000 41,000 1,651,000 Wilders, KY 35 Wall and levee 10,800,000 959,000 11,759,000 26 1 All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. 3 Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4 Details of this project are in individual report. s Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6 See Annual Report for 1958 for details. ? See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 8 See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 9 See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 10 See Annual Report for 1953 for details. 11 See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12 See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 13 See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14 See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 15 Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16 See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 17 See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 18 Latest cost estimate revision 1988. 19 Latest cost estimate revision 1986. 20 Latest cost estimate revision 1984. 21 Latest cost estimate revision 1983. 22 Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 23 Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 24 Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 25 Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 26 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 27 Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 28 Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 29 Latest cost estimate revision 1989. o3D0e authorized Aug 05, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1971 (P.L. 93-251). 31 Deauthorized Nov 06, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 32 Deauthorized Oct 03, 1978 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 33 Deauthorized May 06, 1981 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 34 Deauthorized Nov 17, 1986 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 35 Deauthorized Jan 01, 1990 under Section 1001 (b)(1), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 36 Latest cost estimate revision 1992. 16-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 26 of Text) RESERVOIRS Tributary Basin Reservoirs Great Miami River: Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN 2 Metamora Lake, IN Green River: Barren River Lake, KY 2 Green River Lake, KY 2 Mining City Lake, KY Nolin Lake, KY 2 Rough River Kentucky 2 Kentucky River: Booneville Lake, KY Buckhorn Lake, KY 2 Carr Fork Lake, KY 2 Licking River: Cave Run Lake, KY 2 Falmouth Lake, KY Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH 2 William H. Harsha Lake, OH 2 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 2 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake, IN 2 Cecil M. Harden Lake. IN 2 Monroe Lake, IN 2 Patoka Lake, IN 2 Estimated Cost 1 Status Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Stream East Fork of Whitewater River West Fork of Whitewater River Barren River Green River Green River Nolin River Rough River South Fork of Kentucky River Middle Fork of Kentucky River North Fork of Kentucky River Licking River Licking River Caesar Creek East Fork of Little Miami River West Fork of Mill Creek Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Salt Creek Patoka River Federal Non-Federal $ 37,905,073 35,300,000 27,371,299 33,238,597 69,100,000 17,193,381 10,620,389 60,700,000 11,766,206 50,854,826 109,475,282 125,000,000 Total $ 7,497,492 3 $ 45,402,565 108,418 8 223,733 13is 22,612 35,300,000 4 27,479,717 33,462,330 69,100,000 4 17,193,381 10,643,001 - 60,700,000 8 - 11,766,206 - 50,854,826 - 109,475,282 7 - 125,000,000 8 62,893,882 5,037,000 9 67,930,882 52,023,157 3,485,840 9 55,508,997 3,622,302 1,100,161 o10 4,722,463 4,263,184 6,633,812 7,902,827 113,094 353,995 8,666,762 4,376,278 6,987,807 16,569,589 53,095,790 20,568,369 73,664,159 1Latest cost estimate revision 1989 unless otherwise noted. 2Details of this project given in individual report. 3Cash contributions for water supply storage. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 5For Code 713 recreaton development. 6Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 'Includes $35,213,000 United States Forest Service cost. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 9Reimbursement for water supply storage. 10 Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment ofproject authorization, and $529,361for Code 713 recreation development. 11 Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $869,158 for Code 713 recreation development. 12 Includes $14,180,677 cashcontributionforwater supply storage, and $6,387,692 for initial recreation development. 13 For $183,732 Code 713 recreation development and $40,001 contributed funds. 16-32 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-J WABASH RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 31 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost Construction Project or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total LOCAL PROTECTION Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,000 2 RESERVOIRS Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,836,000 3 141,036,000 4 Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,000 5 126,869,000 4 Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little Flatrock Rivers Inactive 74,200,000 64,448,000 6 138,648,000 1 Helm Lake, IN Skillet Fork Deauthorized 25,171,000 14,829,000 ' 40,000,000 8 Louisville Lake, IL Little Wabash River Inactive 113,000,000 14,435,000 9 127,435,000 10 1Latest cost revision 1984 unless otherwise noted. 2Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 3Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 5Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 6Includes $53,084,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply, $8,749,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 7Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $2,133,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 9Includes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $6,033,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 10 Latest cost estimate revision 1982. 16-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 34 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Local Protection Projects Brevoort Levee, IN Aug 1992 Brookport, IL Sep 1992 Cache River Levee, IL Sep 1992 Cannelton, IN Feb 1991 Cincinnati, OH May 1992 Covington, KY Nov 1991 Dayton, KY Apr 1992 Delphi, IN Mar 1992 England Pond Levee, IL Aug 1992 Evansville, IN Sep 1992 Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort Feb 1991 Gill Township Levee, IN Jun 1992 Golconda, IL Nov 1991 Harrisburg, IL Nov 1991 Hawesville, KY Feb 1991 Indianapolis, IN Mar 1992 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Feb 1991 Lawrenceburg, IN Apr 1992 Lebanon Junction, KY Feb 1991 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Apr 1992 Levee Unit No. 8, Wabash River, IN Jun 1992 Louisville, KY Sep 1992 Lyford Levee, IN Mar 1992 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN Aug 1992 Mount Carmel, IL Aug 1992 Muncie, IN Apr 1992 Perryville, KY Aug 1992 New Albany, IN Feb 1991 Newport, KY Nov 1991 Paducah, KY Sep 1992 Reevesville, IL Dec 1991 Rochester-McClearys Bluff Levee, IL Nov 1991 Rosiclare, IL Nov 1991 Shawneetown, IL Nov 1991 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY Sep 1992 Sturgis, KY Apr 1992 Taylorsville, KY Feb 1991 Tell City, IN Feb 1991 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN Jun 1992 Uniontown, KY Apr 1992 Vincennes, IN Aug 1992 West Terre Haute, IN Mar 1992 Channel Improvements (Cont'd.) Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY Apr 1992 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY Jun 1992 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN Mar 1992 English, IN (Little Blue River) Jul 1990 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN Jul 1990 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) Aug 1992 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN Aug 1991 Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) May 1992 16-34 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 34 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County), IN Mar 1992 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1988 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Jul 1990 Neon-Fleming, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) May 1992 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Aug 1992 Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Jun 1992 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Aug 1992 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Mar 1992 Rough River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY Jun 1992 Salamonie River, Wells County, IN Apr 1992 Saline River and Tributaries, IL Oct 1989 Tripplett Creek, Morehead, KY May 1992 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY May 1992 Wabash River, Adams County, IN Apr 1992 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) May 1992 Bank Revetments East Fork White River, Brownstown (Jackson County), IN Jun 1992 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY Mar 1992 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH Apr 1992 Green River, Calhoun, KY Jun 1992 Licking River, Butler, KY Dec 1990 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL Nov 1991 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH Apr 1992 Little Miami River, Milford, OH Apr 1992 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY Aug 1992 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY Jun 1992 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY Jun 1992 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL Dec 1991 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY Jun 1992 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY Jun 1992 Ohio River, Madison, IN Aug 1989 Ohio River, Moscow, OH Dec 1990 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN Apr 1992 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN May 1992 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN May 1992 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY Aug 1991 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY Jun 1992 Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY Jun 1989 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY Apr 1992 Ohio River, Rockport/Rockport Landing, IN Apr 1992 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN Oct 1991 Ohio River, Troy, IN Apr 1992 Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1991 Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN May 1992 Patoka River, Jasper, IN Sep 1992 Patoka River, Winslow, IN Aug 1992 South Fork of Wildcat Creek, County Road 7 East, Tippecanoe County, IN Mar 1992 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY May 1992 Wabash River, near Merom, IN Jun 1992 16-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 16-K CONTINUED Projects Wabash River, New Harmony, IN Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN Wastewater Treatment Plant, Great Miami River, Ross, OH INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 34 of Text) Date of Inspection Sep 1992 Mar 1992 Mar 1992 Aug 1992 Apr 1992 Apr 1992 16-36 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 16-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 36 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Federal Non-Fed Total Small Navigation (Section 107) Clark Maritime Center, Jeffersonville, IN' 17,760 17,760 Southwind Maritime Center, Mt. Vernon, IN ' 1,564 1,564 Flood Control (Section 205) Bailey Creek, Indianapolis, IN 2 23,179 4,145 27,324 Cilley Creek, Cincinnati, OH' 13,754 13,754 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN 2 27,196 27,196 East Fork, Deer Creek, Slaughters, KY' 15,000 15,000 Falcon/Little Eagle Creeks, IN' 6,765 6,765 Great Miami River, Port Jefferson, OH5 89,107 11,776 100,883 Hutto Creek, Austin, IN' 6,605 6,605 Kentucky River, Frankfort, KY 1 14,495 14,495 Lancassange Creek, Clark Co., IN 3 9,634 9,634 Little Miami River, South Lebanon, OH 14,977 14,977 Lost River, Orleans & Orange Counties, IN ' 5,730 5,730 Owl Creek, West Carrolton, OH ' 15,000 15,000 Penitentiary Jones Run, KY 2 47,148 8,055 55,203 Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN 4,034 4,034 Pogues Run, Indianapolis, IN ' 14,576 14,576 Rolling Fork, Lebanon Junction, KY 2 2,435 2,435 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH 2 41 41 West Fork, Blue River, Salem, IN' 6,198 6,198 White River, Elnora, IN' 8,262 8,262 White River, Hagerstown, IN 4 555 3,148 3,703 White River, Hazleton, IN ' 3,730 3,730 White River, Petersburg, IN1 22,325 22,325 Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control (Section 208) Salamonie River, Montpelier, IN 5 1,932 1,932 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) Big Walnut Creek, 500 W, Putnam Co., IN3 1,627 1,627 Blue Bluff Rd., Morgan Co., IN 5 18,416 13,140 31,556 Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN 2 11,924 11,924 Crooked Creek, J. Paul Park, Madison, IN 2 12,039 12,039 Indian Creek, Burton Road, Morgan Co., IN3 9,742 9,742 Little Wabash River, Carmi, IL'1 11,055 11,055 Nameless Creek, County Road 850 N, IN 3 17,241 17,241 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY 2 12,078 12,078 Ohio River, City Park, West Point, KY2 3,133 3,133 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY2 12,244 12,244 Ohio River, Ohio County, IN 2 8,482 8,482 Ohio River, Switzerland County, IN2 8,195 8,195 Sugar Creek, Watermelon Hollow Road, Montgomery Co., IN 2 5,070 5,070 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN' 26,500 26,500 Wabash River, Terre Haute, IN 3 36,402 36,402 White River, Franklin County, IN 1 3,252 3,252 White River, Road 400W, Pike Co., IN2 388 388 1 Reconnaisance Study 2 Detail Project Report 3 Plans and Specification 4 Construction Funds Received 5 Construction Completed 16-37 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT* All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in the text and also appear at the end of this chapter. The Huntington District includes central and southeastern Ohio, allofWest Virginia except the northern panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion ofmidwestern Virginia, a very small portion ofnorthwesternNorthCarolina, embracedinthe drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, PA) to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, KY. The drainage area ofthe Huntington District is approximately 44,914 square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River................................................ 17-2 2. Kanawha River, WV ..................................... 17-2 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River .................. 17-2 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... 17-2 Flood Control 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH .................................. 17-2 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV .................................... 17-3 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ........ 17-3 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ....... 17-3 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ...... 17-3 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ......... 17-4 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ............. 17-4 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .............. 17-4 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ....... 17-5 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY .......... 17-5 15. Grayson Lake, KY ........................................ 17-5 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA ................................... 17-6 17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA .......... 17-6 18. M assillon, OH ............................................... 17-6 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH.......................17-7 20. Newark, OH .................................................. 17-7 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH ............................................. 17-8 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA............ 17-8 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District)........ 17-8 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ..... 17-8 25. Paintsville Lake, KY ..................................... 17-8 26. R.D. Bailey Lake, WV ................................... 17-9 27. Roseville, OH ................................................. 17-9 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV .................................... 17-9 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV .............. 17-10 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH .... 17-10 31. Yatesville Lake, KY ...................................... 17-10 32. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects..................................17-10 33. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................................... 17-11 General Investigations 34. Surveys ......................................................... 17-11 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data .............. 17-11 Tables Table 17-A Table 17-B Table 17-C Table 17-D Table 17-E Table 17-F Table 17-G Table 17-H Cost & Financial Statement ............ 17-12 Authorization Legislation ................ 17-17 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 17-20 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................................ 17-21 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ..................... 17-22 Inspection of Flood Control Projects ............................... 17-24 17-1 Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON THE OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 19- Ohio River. 2. KANAWHA RIVER, WV Location. The Kanawha River is approximately 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers, a short distance above Kanawha Falls, WV, and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, WV. Previous projects. For details ofprevious projects see the Annual Reports for 1875, 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation structures on the Kanawha River. London Locks and Dam are located approximately 83 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River and approximately two miles downstream from Montgomery, WV. Marmet Locks and Dam are located approximately 68 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Marmet, WV. Winfield Locks and Dam are located approximately 31 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Winfield, WV. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. Another structure is located on the Ohio River at approximate river mile 279 and approximately nine miles below Gallipolis, OH. This structure has two parallel locks, the main lock is 110 feet by 360 feet. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of nine feet from the mouth of the Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles upstream. The existing project was completed at a cost of $23,403,201. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completed in 1937. For further cost details see Table 17-B, see also, Appendix C. Public Law 99-88 authorized the initiation of Engineering and Design and Real Estate Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam Replacement. Feasibilitystudiesformodernizationhavebeencompleted. The plan includes construction of an additional lock chamber (800'x110') adjacent to the existing locks and continued use of the riverward lock chamber and the navigation dam. The contract for Lock Replacement - Phase I was awarded in April 1990 and is 98% complete. The full funding estimate for new work is $236,000,000, which is 50 percent Federal cost and 50 percent Inland Water Ways Trust Fund cost. Local cooperation. None required. 30 miles east of Charleston, WV. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steelpilemooringcells. Seventeenoftheseterminals have railroad connections. One terminal, a paved wharf, is owned by the City of Charleston, WV. The remaining terminals areprivatelyowned. Theprincipalcommodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further details seethe 1962 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. The Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as to the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. 3. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 19- Ohio River. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 17-C. 5. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, OH, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, OH, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 93 feet in height and 10,000 feet in length with agate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 123 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1970 and completed in July 1974. The 405 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. TheFederalcostoftheprojectwas $56,267,422. The Sponsorwillreimbursethe Government anestimated $27,880,000, exclusive of interest, for cost allocated to water supply. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 79 terminals along Operations and Maintenance. The entire project the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to is complete. The project was operated for the benefit of 17-2 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $505,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $61,046,000 in flood damages. 6. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Location. The damsite is locatedin Wayne County, WV, on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole Creek, approximately four miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 86 feet in height and 1,080 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in December 1972 and completed in February 1977. See also Appendix A. A total of 485 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project was $41,987,500. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for flood control as requiredandnecessaryrepairsweremadetothe structure and appurtenances. To date the project has prevented an estimated $3,666,000 in flood damages. 7. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the New River in Summers County, WV, approximately three miles above Hinton, WV, and one mile from the confluence of the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, WV, and Giles County, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam 180 feet in height and 2,048 feet in length. Appurtenant structures consist of a gated spillway 790 feet in length located in the channel section of the dam. The stilling pool is formed by a 23-foot-high weir located 364 feet downstream of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed at the time of construction to permit the future installation of hydropower. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 631,000 acre-feet. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. A total of 338 tracts of land was acquired for the project. The Federal cost of the project was $29,458,652, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. For further details see the 1939 and 1962 Annual Reports. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $746,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $588,154,000 in flood damages. 8. BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. ThedamsiteislocatedinBraxtonCounty, WV, on the Little Kanawha River, approximately two miles above Burnsville, WV, and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha River and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam 80 feet in height and 1,000 feet in length with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one low flow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 65,400 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 165 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1973 and completed in February 1976. See also Appendix A. The 357 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost ofthe project to date has been $57,163,138. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. The project is completed. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project preventedflood damages estimatedtobe $492,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $28,916,000 in flood damage. 9. DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, approximately seven miles south of Mount Sterling, OH, on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer 17-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741-foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works consistingoffivegated sluicesthrough a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately four miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. Construction ofthe dam was completed in May 1968. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. For further project details seethe 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the project is $20,406,545, including expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. Theprojectpreventedanestimated$35,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $21,618,000 in flood damages. 10. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Olentangy River, approximately six miles above and north of Delaware, OH, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, OH. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion and Morrow Counties, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled ogee type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and completed in July 1948. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. The Federal cost for the project was $7,631,821. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $174,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $63,868,000 in flood damages. 11. DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located on Johns Creek, approximately seven miles southeast of Paintsville, KY, and approximately six miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a channel excavatedinthe left abutment, and a rolled earth-fill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and the Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides a total storage of 93,300 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and completed in July 1949. For further project detail seethe l965AnnualReport. See alsoAppendix A. Total real estate requirements for the project were 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. The Federal cost of the project was $7,845,547, including expendituresfrrecreatiundercompletedprojectprogran Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction activities are complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $163,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $53,590,000 in flood damages. 12. DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, approximately six miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 118 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20- foot conduit in the right abutment, and an ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment ofthe dam, and two 17-4 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 748 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1959. For further project details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also AppendixA. Total real estate required for the project consists of 8,232 acres in fee and 5,380 acres of flowage easements. See also Appendix A. Federal cost of the project was $30,218,135. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $185,690,000 in flood damages. 13. EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsiteis locatedin Wayne County, WV, approximately six miles southeast ofWayne, WV, 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth-fill dam 113 feet in height and 638 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment of the dam, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 133 square miles. The required 552 tracts of land have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs of the project was $85,872,963. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated forflood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $37,770,000 in flood damages. 14. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located in Pike County, KY, on the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately 15 miles upstream from Pikeville, KY, approximately three miles above the confluence of Levisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of the Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 195 feet in height and 1,100 feet in length, a controlled spillway containing four tainter gateslocated in the valley wall adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, the outletworks consists of anintake structure with three conduits controlled by slide gates and discharging into a horseshoe shaped tunnel. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 395 square miles. The dam was completed in February 1969. The 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $54,670,126, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $5,844,000. To date, the projecthas preventedanestimated $273,591,000 in flood damages. 15. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Location. The damsiteis locatedin Carter County, KY, on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River, and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam 120 feet in height and 1,460 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging though a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 196 square miles. The dam was completed in January 1968. The 484 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $19,162,741, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $21,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $44,110,000 in flood damages. 17-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 16. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Location. The damsite is located in Dickenson County, VA, approximately four miles northwest ofHaysi, VA, on the Pound River approximately two miles above the confluence of the Pound River and Russell Fork and approximately 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 252 feet in height and 970 feet in length, an outlet tunnel located near the left abutment ofthe dam with a control structure at the upstream end, a spillway controlled by six tainter gates located in a saddle just upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 222 square miles. The project was modified to include water quality control by adding control gates to the previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acrefeet. The dam was completed in December 1963. The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $20,444,383, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and apputenances. Duringthe fiscalyear the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $28,000. To date, the project haspreventedanestimated$139,177,000inflooddamages. 17. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY AND CUMBERLAND RIVERS, WV, VA, AND KY Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big Sandy River at Louisa, KY. The Cumberland portion is the Upper Cumberland River Basin above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width above Harlan, KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basin is within the Nashville District. This report covers that portion of the project located in the Huntington District. Existingproject. Theauthorizationlanguagedirects the Corps of Engineers to design and construct, at full Federal expense, such flood control measures as are determined to be necesssary and advisable for the communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River basins. The authorization further states that such flood control measures wouldbe located at orinthevicinityofPikeville, KY; and Grundy, VA, on the Levisa Fork; Pineville, KY, on the Cumberland River; and Williamson and Matewan ontheTugFork, in orderto affordthe namedcommunities and other flood damaged locations and their immediate environs a level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to prevent any future losses from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in April 1977. The full funding estimate for the project is $1,011,400,000, which includes $54,100,000 non-Federal contributions. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Additional engineering studies are now underway to determine what isnecessaryandadvisabletoaddressthefloodingproblems inboththeLevisaForkBasinandintheTugForktributary stream areas. The contract for construction of the Pump Station at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in April 1983 and is complete. The contract for construction of the floodwall at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in July 1986 andis complete. The contract forthe WilliamsonArea Clearing was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Housing Development, Valley View Site, was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Floodwall and Pump Stations for the Williamson Central Business District was awarded in June 1988 and is complete. The contract for South Williamson Housing Development, Pond Creek Site, was awarded in September 1990 and is complete. The contract for Replacement Cafeteria, South Williamson, was awarded in June 1991 and is complete. The contract for Construction of Local Protection Project, South Williamson, Kentucky, was awarded in December 1991 and is 45% complete. The contract for Construction of Local Protection Project, Matewan, West Virginia, was awarded in August 1992. 18. MASSILLON, OH Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, approximately 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with the construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. 17-6 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. See the 1962 Annual Report for details of local contribution of work beyond the scope of the project. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 19. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Location. The Muskingum River lies in Southeast Ohio and including tributaries, drains approximately 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, OH, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. Construction of the system was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. The system was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further project details, see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The cost of the project was $41,247,815, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed project program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the integrity of the existing 14 structures under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. Underseepage and abutment seepage problems are being correctedthroughtheinstallationofdownstreamblankets and/or relief wells and grouting. The estimated full funding cost of the rehabilitation program is $39,100,000 intotal, with $25,500,000 from the Construction, General Appropriation and $13,600,000 from the Operations and Maintenance, General Appropriation. A related but separate program entitled Dam Safety Assurance has been initiated. Under current hydrologic design standards, deficiencies exist in the spillways at all the 14 projects in the system. Corrective measures include widening present spillways, constructing new spillways and installing parapet walls on top of the dams. The full funding estimate for the Dam Safety Assurance Program is $60,870,000. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been met. For further details see the 1942 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The Major Rehabilitation is continuing as scheduled. Thus far, twenty-one contracts have been awarded and the program is 65% complete. The Dam SafetyAssurance program was initiated during FY 1982. Thus far ten contracts have been awarded and the Dam Safety Assurance program is 48% complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The system prevented an estimated $1,930,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $1,378,649,000 in flood damages. 20. NEWARK, OHIO Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking River, approximately 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH. Existing project. For details ofthe existing project see the 1981 Annual Report. Construction of the existing project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in November 1941. As a result ofthe 1968 Flood ControlAct the existing project was modifiedto include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion channel and modification of the North Fork Channel. Construction of the Log Pond Run diversion channel was awarded in September 1980 and completed in December 1981. The full funding estimate for the project is $11,100,000 Federal cost and $4,215,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For details of required and completed local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: North Fork Channel- As a result of withdrawal of State support for the Utica Lake project (now inactive) and the interdependency of the operation of Utica with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel portion of the projectrequired re-formulation. Areanalysis is complete. Engineering studies continued. The contract for construction ofNorth Fork Channel (Phase I) was awarded in September 1986 and is complete. The contract for construction of the remaining portion of North Fork Channel was awarded in February 1988 is complete. The contract for Remedial Treatment for Erosion was awarded in September 1991 and is 87% complete. Operations and Maintenance: Routine inspectionswereconductedtodeterminethattheimproved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 17-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 21. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, OH, ontheNorthBranchofKokosingRiver, approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North Branch Rivers, and two miles northwest of Fredericktown, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length with an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment, and an uncontrolled, reinforced concrete outlet work located in the right abutment of the dam. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 45 square miles. The 56 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction ofthe dam was completed in May 1972. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,665,985, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. 22. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, VA, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River and approximately three miles upstream from Pound, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, 130 feet in height and 600 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 17 square miles. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in January 1966. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $6,186,901, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $129,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $4,883,000 in flood damages. 23. OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The work coveredby this project consists of a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. Existing project. The existing project consists of the individual projects considered in the Ohio River BasincomprehensiveplanwithintheHuntingtonDistrict. Operations during the fiscal year. The completed local protection projects, which are operated and maintained by local interest, except for those local protection projects for which individual reports have been included. To date the project has prevented flood damages ofan estimated cumulative totalof$645,195,000. 24. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, OH, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River and approximately four miles east of New Parkersburg, OH. Existing project. The existing project cansistsofa rock and random earth fill dam, 118 feet in height and 700 feet in length,agalecontroledspillwaylocatedneartheightabutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfill dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir provides foratotal storage of 145,000 acre-feet andcontrols adrainageareaofapproximately576squaremiles.Construction ofthe dam was completed in July 1973. The 257 tracts ofland requiredfortheprjecthavebeenacquired. See alsoAppendix A. Federalcostsfor theprojectwas$26,969,962,whichincludes expendituresundertherecreationatcompletedprojectspmgram. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During thefiscalyeartheprojectprevented an estimated $76,000 in flood damages. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $41067,000. 25. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsiteislocatedin Johnson County, KY, on Paint Creek, a tributary ofthe Levisa Fork of the 17-8 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT BigSandyRiver,approximatelyeightmilesabovethemouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 76,642 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 93 square miles. The 635 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1976 and was completed in September 1980. See also Appendix A. The full funding estimate for new work is $66,478,000, which includes $3,028,000 non-Federal Costs. The local sponsor has reimbursedthe Government $377,000 forthe cost sharing portion of recreation development. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Construction ofthe project is well advanced. The remaining work items include landscaping and final cleanup. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $110,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $5,976,000. 26. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Existing project. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, WV, on the Guyandotte River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and one mile east of Justice, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled rockfill dam with a concrete face, 305 feet in height and 1,330 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment ofthe dam, and anoutlet tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of203,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 540 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in November 1973 and completed in December 1979. See also Appendix A. A total of 2,109 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project to date has been $261,310,398. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. Todate,theprojecthaspreventedflooddamages estimated to be $68,261,000. 27. ROSEVILLE, OH Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Perry Counties, on Moxahala Creek, approximately six miles the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,291 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargements; and the necessary appurtenances for interior drainage. Total Federal cost of the project was $910,785. Construction was initiated in August 1959 and completed in October 1960. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been completed. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Total costs of local requirements were $62,000. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections of the improved portion of the project were conducted to determine that the project was maintained in satisfactory condition. 28. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New River at Gauley Bridge, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam having a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end, an uncontrolled spilway located west of the right abutment and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1960 and completed in March 1966. A total of 9,346 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project was $48,375,884, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necesssary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $20,281,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $280,905,000 in flood damages. 17-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 29. SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton, WV, and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel sectionofthedam, comprisedofsixtaintergates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised of five gate sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. See also Appendix A. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1981 Annual Report for contributed funds. Operations duringthe fiscalyear. Allconstruction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control asrequiredandnecessaryrepairsweremadetothestructure andappurtenances. Duringthefiscalyeartheprojectprevented flooddamagesestimatedtobe$11,711,000. Todatetheproject haspreventedanestimated$194,793,000inflooddamages. 30. TOM JENKINS RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsiteis locatedinAthens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles northofGlouster, OH, and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length, a controlled works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The reservoir, known as Burr Oak Lake, provides for a total storage of 26,900 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 33 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. A total of 100 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project were $2,086,503, which includes expenditure for recreation at completed project. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Contributed funds in the amount of $575,000 have been received from the State of Ohio. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $11,233,000 in flood damages. 31. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, KY, and 18 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. Existing project. The existingproject provides for the construction of an earthfill dam, 104 feet in height and 770 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located approximately one-halfmile east ofthe right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel through the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 86,951 acrefeet and control a drainage area of 208 square miles. The full funding estimate for new work is $115,700,000, which will be allocated and expended by the Federal Government. The sponsorwillreimbursetheGovernment an estimated $6,615,000 for the cost sharing portion of the recreation development. The local sponsor has reimbursed the Government $580,000forthecost sharing portion of recreation development. To date, 775 of the required 778 real estate tracts have been acquired. A contract for construction of the dam was awarded in January 1977 and was terminated for the convenience of the Government in August 1977. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The contract for Construction of Dam and Appurtenant Works, Phase I, was awarded in March 1984 and is complete. Contracts with the Commonwealth and the County for relocation and/or abandonment of roads affected by the project are complete. The contract for construction of Dam and Appurtenances (Phase II) was awarded in April 1986 and is complete. The contract for Relocation of SR 32-2 was awarded in February 1986 and is complete. The contract for Reservoir Clearing was awarded in June 1989 is complete. The contract for Relocating Remaining Highways was awarded in October 1988 is complete. The contract for Cemetery Relocation, Part III, was awarded in February 1989 is complete. The contract for Barker Boat Launch Area and Spillway Concrete Wall Linings was awarded in July 1990 and is complete. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interest to furnish 17-10 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible forthe administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during the fiscal yearofthose completedunits transferredtolocalinterests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in accordance with the standards prescribed by regulations. Total costs for fiscal year 1991 were $81,950. Total costto September 30,1991, were $1,707,326. The flood control works inspected and the dates of inspection are tabulated in Table H. 33. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 1992 Cost Apple Creek, Apple Creek, OH $ 58 Big Sandy River, Kenova, WV 7,348 Cheshire, OH 414 Jardin Manor, Licking County, OH -6,290 Kanawha River, Rt. 60, South Charleston, WV 19,610 Kanawha River, Saint Albans, WV 12,932 Mud River, Barboursville, WV 16,917 Nimishillen Creek, East Sparta, OH 10,176 Ohio River, Gallipolis, OH 238 Ohio River, Route 2, Near Pt. Pleasant, WV 13,618 Ohio River, Village of Middleport, OH 399,195 Point Pleasant State Park, WV 1,086 Riverside Drive, Saint Marys, WV 704 Russell, KY 807 Sewerline, Sistersville, WV 1,112 State Route 62, Buffalo, WV 7,992 Storm Sewers, Sistersville, WV 939 WaterStreet, Barboursville, WV 2,475 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood ControlAct, Public Law 853, 80th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location Big Horse Creek, Lansing, NC Blackfork Mohican River, Shelby, OH Blacklick Creek, Franklin Co., OH Buffalo Creek, Lawrence Co., OH Elk River at Addison, Webster Springs, WV Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH FY 1992 Cost $ 1,162 32 84,338 21,358 1,879 43,791 Hocking River, Chauncey, OH 4,136 Horse Creek, Jackson, OH 5,867 Krouts Creek, Huntington, WV 65 Licking River, Utica, OH 23,392 Murry City, OH 5,800 Muskingum River, Mansfield, OH 14,142 Olentangy River, Galion, OH 23 Scippo Creek, Pickaway Co., OH 844 Soldia Creek, Lawrence Co., OH 27,699 Spring Creek, Spencer, WV 3,059 White Oak Creek, Russell, KY 107 SnaggingandclearingactivitiespursuanttoSection 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress are tabulated as follows: Location Hocking River, Rockbridge, OH Shope Creek, Ashland, KY Whetstone Creek, Mt. Giledd, OH FY 1992 Cost $ 20 497 32 Work performed under special legislation pursuant to Water Resources Development Act of 1986 as follows: Location FY 1992 Cost Bridges, Massillon, OH $ 96 Kanawha River, Charleston, WV 5,694 Kanawha River, St. Albans, WV 17,217 Flood control and coastal emergency activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress were conducted as required during FY 1992 at a cost of $229,791. National emergency management activities were accomplished by the district as required. The costs for these activities during FY 1992 were $151,314. 34. SURVEYS Fiscal year 1992 costs were $1,696,334 itemized as follows: Location FY 1992 Cost Navigation Studies $1,120,922 Flood Damage Prevention Studies 102,804 Special Studies 333,117 Comprehensive Basin Studies 6,301 Miscellaneous Activities 89,016 Coordination Studies 44,174 Advance Engineering and Design 3,478,054 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $109,988. 17-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 TABLE 17-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 2. Kanawha River, New Work WV Approp. - - - - (Existing Project) Cost - - - - Maint. Approp. 5,045,900 6,836,284 5,981,600 9,277,000 Cost 4,956,717 6,640,967 6,310,071 9,265,713 Rehab. Approp. - - - - Cost - - - - 2. Winfield L&D New Work Approp. Cost 5. Alum Creek Lake, New Work OH Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Beech Fork Lake, New Work WV Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7. Bluestone Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. Burnsville Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Deer Creek Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10. Delaware Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,860,000 17,984,000 14,634,000 8,214,000 5,257,766 14,967,287 16,683,556 8,014,027 496,800 523,808 492,537 514,157 732,200 628,410 748,714 638,370 990,700 940,038 1,027,535 919,671 1,279,100 1,204,142 1,225,891 1,265,398 378,800 384,557 362,294 397,027 527,600 511,939 527,210 490,649 517,800 617,000 529,708 630,933 758,700 791,200 766,030 810,092 971,200 1,189,700 957,153 1,204,816 971,000 - 951,386 15,913 1,298,800 1,392,700 1,339,379 1,377,257 493,500 510,100 502,821 502,300 669,700 921,800 588,469 1,007,063 27,853,6991 27,853,6991 101,872,4682 101,806,4382 130,984$ 130,984$ 50,782,000' 48,760,731s 56,267,422 56,267,422 7,657,973 6,630,330 41,987,500 41,987,500 9,004,049 8,993,364 29,458,6526 29,450,6526 17,599,716 17,570,659 57,166,839 57,163,138 13,158,947? 13,120,332? 20,406,5458 20,406,5458 8,321,182' 8,302,6069 7,631,821 7,631,821 11,150,25810 11,116,25010 17-12 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-A (cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 11. Dewey Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. KY Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12. Dillon Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13. East Lynn Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,028,200 1,146,347 1,615,900 1,242,000 1,076,456 1,141,740 1,605,739 1,277,492 426,300 340,712 365,800 404,300 463,478 347,484 358,463 393,360 775,000 84,995 - 47,987,000 774,512 - 33,005 112,140 47,993,348 995,100 884,144 1,150,800 1,344,800 1,123,898 877,552 1,150,555 1,311,440 14. Fishtrap Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. - - - 50,000 KY Cost - - - - Maint. Approp. 1,039,300 956,962 1,109,600 1,201,200 Cost 1,076,769 948,010 1,100,529 1,202,034 15. Grayson Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 16. John W. Flannagan New Work Dam & Reservoir, Approp. Ohio River Basin, Cost VA Maint. Approp. Cost 628,800 624,072 779,400 894,600 639,720 642,060 768,001 901,028 935,600 1,012,470 1,198,700 1,419,000 979,894 987,086 1,210,025 1,413,607 17. Levisa & Tug Forks New Work of the Big Sandy & Approp. 41,100,000 34,566,000 22,123,000 17,654,000 Cumberland Rivers, Cost 43,081,654 30,563,339 22,808,014 14,736,411 KY, WV, & VA 18. Massillon, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10,000 9,587 12,940 9,359 19,800 19,895 800 2,984 7,845,54711 7,845,54711 18,824,423" 18,821,092 2 30,218,135 30,218,135 7,203,1558 7,175,78418 85,872,963 85,872,963 15,886,55114 15,827,01514 54,720,12615 54,670,1261s 12,110,26016 12,060,85516 19,162,74117 19,162,74117 12,121,442 12,095,321 20,444,3831 20,444,38318 15,722,43219 15,666,97519 214,256,000" 204,938,8830 8,139,40621 8,139,40621 346,248 343,849 17-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 TABLE 17-A (cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 19. Muskingum River Dams & Lakes, OH 20. Newark, OH (Previous Project) (Existing Project) 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Ohio River Basin, VA 23. Ohio River Basin 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. (Rehab.) Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4,222,500 3,835,753 4,380,000 5,003,800 4,354,381 3,832,053 4,365,582 4,925,831 200,000 209,502 50,000 375,383 2,410,000 3,921,597 -900 550,000 1,638,974 5,000 79,459 1,211,000 668,997 -69 -5,000 30,334 -10,000 2,081 783,000 1,591,722 145 -42,000 11,683 849,000 1,639,648 300,000 -90,000 60,599 271,308 154,000 128,225 394,900 265,000 157,555 130,644 171,338 492,144 265,700 241,487 290,400 342,200 275,188 245,709 288,030 338,307 504,700 474,528 505,300 598,100 503,067 452,429 513,638 600,810 17-14 41,247,815" 41,247,815 82,098,4033 81,871,156 S982,300 982,300 22,172,94524 22,171,0683 27,258,000 27,037,992 845,916 845,916 758,673 758,673 10,879,512 10,772,565 6,665,985w 6,665,985" 2,598,042 2,594,712 6,186,901" 6,186,901" 6,530,0463 6,517,2233 355,861" 355,861" 26,969,9622 26,969,9623 7,984,7843 7,954,047" HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-A (cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 25. Paintsville Lake, New Work KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 26. R. D. Bailey Lake, New Work WV Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 635,000 1,247,000 -500,000 10,000 182,694 1,104,675 31,793 137,508 626,600 553,332 669,296 763,300 629,138 559,467 679,296 757,973 - 100,000 - 225,000 - -61,408 153,504 1,069 1,178,000 1,244,693 1,252,900 1,289,800 1,236,457 1,232,038 1,253,244 1,310,489 60,201,147 60,186,972 6,654,632 6,634,555 261,542,23381 261,310,39881 16,116,00788 16,066,1898 27. Roseville, OH 28. Summersville Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 29. Sutton Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, New Work OH Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,040,100 966,752 1,144,200 1,310,200 1,086,289 968,860 1,158,242 1,312,501 1,293,900 1,158,258 1,335,100 1,465,100 1,356,331 1,180,160 1,323,179 1,440,660 242,500 300,864 247,100 218,000 226,493 302,982 249,453 226,249 31. Yatesville Lake, New Work KY Approp. 17,627,000 6,799,000 2,070,000 1,749,000 Cost 18,798,052 5,313,333 4,752,263 1,442,034 Maint. Approp. - 7,050 623,100 906,300 Cost - 4,739 618,770 898,495 48,375,884" 48,375,884u 22,264,166k 22,238,612k 37,029,585" 37,029,585u 25,431,145" 25,371,842" 2,086,503$' 2,086,503$' 5,107,339 5,098,859 96,628,500 95,519,466 1,536,450 1,522,004 See page 17-17 for footnotes. 17-15 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22,700 25,009 40,653 19,800 20,210 -1,200 4,419 910,785 910,785 236,277 234,878 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 'Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 Emergency Relief funds, $9,004,800 Public Works funds and $686,317 Code 713 funds. 2Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects and $546,090 Maintenance and Operation funds. $Public Works Acceleration funds. 'Includes $25,391,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. $Includes $34,352,114 Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 6Includes $543,960 Emergency Relief funds, $9,698 Public Works Acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 Code 713 funds. 'Includes $444,928 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 8Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,000 Code 711 funds. 9l'Includes $130,000providedbytheProductiveEmployment Act of 1983. 'l�Includes $240,000 providedbythe Productive Employment Act of 1983. "Includes $23,087 Public Works Acceleration funds, $1,089,940 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. 12Includes $82,900 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $444,928 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 'sIncludes $100,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983. "Includes $209,918 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $444,928 Maintenance and Operations Funds. '5Includes $362,649 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. '6Includes $38,000 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $445,029 Maintenance and Operations Funds. '?Includes $406,919 Code 711 funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. 8sIncludes $422,983 Code 711 funds. 19'Includes $88,710 special recreation use fees. "Includes Cost from Ohio River Division of $696,000. 21Includes $477,813 contributed funds. Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery funds and $528,288 Code 711 funds. "Includes $198,578 Maintenance and Operations funds. "Includes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. TIncludes $45,177 Code 711 funds. TIncludes $64,233 Code 711 funds. "Includes $68,200 special recreation use fees. "Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. "Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. S"Includes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. 1lncludes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. 32Includes $60,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. "Includes $300,062 Code 711 funds. "'Includes $214,112 special recreation use fee funds, $300,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and Operation Funds. "Includes $1,837,337 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed funds. T Includes $267,634 special recreation use fee funds, $215,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $142,078 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 87Includes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds. Excludes $575,000 contributed funds. 17-16 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 15, 1985 5. Oct. 23, 1962 6. Oct. 23, 1962 7. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 8. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 9. Jun. 28, 1938 10. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 11. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 12. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV Construction of three locks and dams on the Kanawha River and one on the Ohio River. Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation Deleted Power BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 88, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 520, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 91, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 17-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 TABLE 17-B (cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 14. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 15. Jul. 14, 1960 16. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 17. Oct. 1, 1980 18. Jun. 28, 1938 19. Feb. 20, 1934 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 20. Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 13, 1968 21. Oct. 23, 1962 EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV Construction of such Flood Control Measures as deemed Necessary and Advisable. MASSILLON, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. Reimbursement to the Muskingum Conservancy District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures for project construction. Operations and Maintenance assigned to the Corps of Engineers. NEWARK, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Modification to Existing Project and Additional Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sect. 202, P.L. 367, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Ses. Public Works Admin. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Ses. H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 17-18 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-B (cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 22. Jul. 14, 1960 24. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 25. Oct. 27, 1965 26. Oct. 23, 1962 27. Jun. 28, 1938 28. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 29. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 30. Dec. 22, 1944 31. Oct. 27, 1965 32. Jun. 22, 1936 NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. ROSEVILLE, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation TOM JENKINS DAM, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of Local Maintenance of Federally Constructed Local Protection Projects. H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 17-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 TABLE 17-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Big Sandy River WV and KY including Levisa and Tug Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,8111 131,473 Elk River, WV' 1903 30,259 Gauley River, WV' 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, WV5 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River, WV6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, OW 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 New River, WA and VA5 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH8 1953 10,951 16,593 1In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, KY. 'Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30,1952. 'Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 'WorkclosedSeptember 1902.Abandonmentrecommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 'Work suspended. 6Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 'Collections fromlicense non-Federalhydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. Private Law 954, August 31,1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth Sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in 17-20 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Local Protection Projects Ashland, KY 1954 3,718,839 ----- Athens, OH 1979 5,313,700 ----- Cattletsburg, KY 1963 3,854,361 ----- Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 2,753,551 ---- Chillicothe, OH 1986 20,373,314 --.-- East Rainelle, WV 1962 614,598 ------ Galax, VA 1953 480,536 ----- Huntington, WV 1956 7,172,840 ----- Ironton, OH 1952 2,604,646 ----- Maysville, KY 1959 6,493,747 --- Parkersburg, WV 1955 6,652,827 ----- Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 2,919,578 ----- Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 9,806,424 --- Princeton, WV 1962 808,750 --- Russell, KY 1953 552,493 --- Williamson, WV 1964 1,056,166 ----- Inactive Local Protection Projects Augusta, KY --- 11,577 ----- Coal River, WV 1979 472,229 --- --- Vanceburg, KY --- --- -- Deferred Local Protection Projects Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) 1983 --- ----- Oceana, WV 1981 611,000 ----- Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes Haysi, VA --- 2,656 -- Deferred Reservoir and Lakes Kehoe Lake, KY 1981 1,272,740 -- Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. Martin, KY 1983 212,048 ----- 17-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 TABLE 17-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Aberdeen, OH --- May 1981 1,334 -- Athalia, OH --- Aug 1977 --- Belpre, OH --- Nov 1977 --- Brooklyn, WV --- Nov 1979 ----- Buena Vista, OH --- Aug 1977 -- -- Chambersburg, OH --- Aug 1977 ---- Chesapeake, OH --- Nov 1986 --- Cheshire, OH--- Nov 1977 --- Chilo, OH --- Aug 1977 -- -- Clifton, WV --- Aug 1977 11,237 -- Coal Grove, OH --- Jan 1990 3,389 -- Columbus, OH --- Aug 1977 ---- Dover, KY --- Jan 1990 -- -- Friendly, WV --- Aug 1977 ---- Fullerton, KY --- Jan 1990 -- Gallipolis, OH --- Aug 1977 ---- Greenup, KY --- Jan 1990 4,962 -- Hanging Rock, OH --- Aug 1977 ---- Hartford, WV --- Aug 1977 ---- Henderson, WV --- Aug 1977 ---- Higginsport, OH --- Oct 1978 ----- Hockingport, OH --- Aug 1977 -- -- Letart, WV --- Aug 1977 -- -- Letart Falls, OH --- Aug 1977 -- Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV --- Nov 1986 17,721 -- Manchester, OH --- May 1981 -- -- Mapleshade, OH --- Oct 1978 --- Marietta, OH --- Nov 1981 -- -- Mason, WV --- Aug 1977 -- -- Middleport, OH --- May 1981 9,783 -- Miller, OH --- Aug 1977 --.-- Millwood, WV --- Aug 1977 -- -- New Martinsville, WV -- Nov 1979 -- -- New Matamoras, OH --- Aug 1977 ----- Newport, OH --- Aug 1977 -- --. Normal, KY --- Jan 1990 -- -- Pomeroy, OH --- Aug 1977 --- Portland, OH --- Aug 1977 -- -- Proctorville, OH --- Nov 1986 -- -- Racine, OH --- Aug 1977 --- -- Ripley, OH --- Oct 1978 7,523 --- Riverview, WV --- Aug 1977 ---- St. Mary's, WV --- Aug 1977 ----- Sardis, OH --- Aug 1977 -- -- Sciotoville, OH --- Aug 1977 -- -- Sistersville, OH --- Aug 1977 ---- South Point, OH--- Nov 1986 ---- South Portsmouth, KY --- Jan 1990 .--- Syracuse, OH --- Aug 1977 ----- Waverley, WV --- Aug 1977 -- -- Williamstown, WV --- Nov 1979 -- -- Zanesville, OH --- May 1981 -.--- 17-22 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-G (cont'd) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Reservoirs and Lakes Big Bend, WV --- Aug 1977 --- Big Darby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 -- Birch, WV --- Nov 1986 ----- Frazeysburg, OH --- May 1981 5,000 -- Leading Creek, WV 1974 Jan 1990 272,880 -- Logan, OH -- Oct 1985 ----- Millersburg, OH --- May 1981 -- -- Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 - Moores Ferry, VA --- Nov 1986 22,879 -- Mud River, WV --- Nov 1979 -- -- Panther Creek, WV 1976 Nov 1986 -- -- Poca, WV --- May 1981 -- -- Rocy Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 -- Salt Creek, OH 1975 Nov 1986 1,089,943 --- Utica, OH 1975 Jan 1990 757,550 -- West Fork, WV 1974 Jan 1990 663,192 -- White Oak Creek, OH --- Nov 1981 --- --- 17-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1992 TABLE 17-H INSPECTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS - See Section 32 of Text Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, KY May 92 Nov 92 Athens, OH May 92 Bramwell, WV Oct 92 Cairo, WV Sep 92 Canton (Nimishillen), OH Aug 92 Cattletsburg, KY Apr 92 Oct 92 Ceredo-Kenova, WV Apr 92 Sep 92 Chillicothe, OH May 92 Oct 92 East Rainelle, WV Oct 92 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Sep 92 Fourpole Creek, WV Oct 92 Galax, VA Oct 92 Grahn, KY Sep 92 Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Hutchins, KY Huntington, WV May 92 Sep 92 Inez, KY May 92 Ironton, OH Apr 92 Sep 92 Jacksonsburg, Fishing Creek, WV Sep 92 Maysville, KY May 92 Dec 92 Montcalm, WV Oct 92 Newark, OH Jun 92 Nov 92 Olive Hill, KY Sep 92 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Nov 92 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Nov 92 Parkersburg, WV May 92 Dec 92 Pax, WV Oct 92 Point Pleasant, WV May 92 Dec 92 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH Jul 92 Nov 92 Prestonsburg, KY Jun 92 Princeton, WV Dec 92 Richwood and Fenwick, WV Sep 92 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Ripley, WV Sep 92 Roseville, OH May 92 Nov 92 Russel, KY Apr 92 Sep 92 Smithfield, WV Sep 92 South Williamson, KY Jun 92 Oct 92 Utica, OH Aug 92 West Union, Middle Island, WV Sep 92 Williamson, WV Jun 92 Oct 92 17-24 PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT* This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and Tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams .......... Page 1. Allegheny River, PA.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-2 2. Construction of locks and dams,Ohio River... . 18-2 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV... . . . . . . . 18-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River... . . . . . . . 18-3 5. Tygart Lake, WV... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects . . . . . 18-4 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, PA... . . . . . . . . . 8. Elkins, WV... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. Johnstown, PA............... 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA... 11. Turtle Creek, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 18-4 . . . . 18-4 .... 18-4 .... 18-5 .... 18-5 Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH... . . . .. 18-6 13. Conemaugh River Lake,Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-6 14. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.. . 18-6 15. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA................18-6 16. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY . . . . . . . . . 18-7 17. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA...... 18-7 18. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 18-7 19. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH.. . . . . . . . . . . . 18-8 20. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH . 18-8 21. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) . . . .. 18-9 22. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH ............... ..... 18-9 23. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV................18-9 24. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ..... 18-10 25. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA. . . . 18-10 26. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-10 27. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD . .. .. . . . . . . ..... .... . 18-11 28. Inspection of completed flood control projects. 18-11 29. Other authorized flood control projects . . . . 18-11 30. Flood control work under special authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-11 General Investigations 31. Surveys..................... 32. Collection and study of basic data... . . . . 33. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design... 34. Research and development... . . . . . . . . Tables Table 18-A Cost & Financial Statement. . . Table 18-B Authorizing Legislation . . . . . . Table 18-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............... Table 18-D Not Applicable. Table 18-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 18-F Not Applicable. Table 18-G Deauthorized Projects . . . . . . . Table 18-H Allegheny River Statistics ...... Table 18-I Monongahela River Statistics. . . . Table 18-J Monongahela River Total Costs. . Table 18-K Ohio River Basin Reservoirs . . . Table 18-L Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects. ........... Table 18-M Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.............. 18-12 18-12 18-12 18-12 S18-13 S18-17 18-21 S18-22 S18-24 . 18-25 . 18-26 . 18-28 . 18-28 . 18-29 . 18-30 18-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Location. The Allegheny River is 325 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-to-rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations during fiscal year. Operations & Maintenance, General: The 8 locks on the Allegheny River have had no major additions or rehabilitation efforts since being put into service. A program to provide for needed repairs to Locks and Dams 2 through 9 for the continuation of safe and reliable navigation has been initiated. The required work will generally consist of the following: Replace deteriorated concrete on an as needed basis; provide necessary stabilization for the lock walls; replace filling and emptying valves and anchorages; replace hydraulic and electrical systems; replace gate operating machinery and anchorages; furnish and install tow haulage units and appurtenant items of work. Major work that was physically completed during the fiscal year included renovation of the 7' x 8' penstock valve in the turbine raceway at L/D 4 for $356,865; dewatering the 56' x 360' lock chamber to repair quoin seals, miter sills, hydraulic crossovers, install new downstream lock gates, and install an air bubbler system at L/D 6 for $1,115,932; installation and alignment of renovated downstream lock gates at L/D 3 for $275,232; renovation of the 8' x 10' river wall filling valve and 8' x 10' land wall emptying valve and operating machinery at L/D 9 for $318,811; rewiring of the electrical system and installation of new lock wall lighting at L/D 8 for $126,892; and the completion of concrete repair work at L/D 5 for a total contract cost of $1,383,879. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. Original locks and dams 7,8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the replacement of Lock and Dam 7 with Grays Landing Lock and Dam and the construction of a new lock landward of the existing lock at Lock and Dam 8 (to be renamed Point Marion Lock and Dam). In accordance with the provisions of this act, 50% of the total cost of construction for the Grays Landing and Point Marion projects will be derived from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 18-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. These are also several terminals for rail-to-river and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: The right bank excavation at Grays Landing Lock and Dam was completed in November, 1989 at a cost of $12,400,000. All land for the lock site has been acquired. Work continues on cultural resources and the acquisition of real estate for the remainder of the project. A contract for the construction of the lock was awarded on March 1, 1990 for $78,600,000 and is approximately 90% complete. The estimated total cost of the project, which is scheduled to be complete in August, 1995 is $171,800,000. A contract for the construction of the new lock for the Point Marion Project was awarded on March 26, 1990 for $78,800,000 and is approximately 83% complete. All real estate for the project has been acquired. The estimated total cost of the Point Marion project, which is scheduled to be complete in September, 1994 is $101,500,000. The Chief of Engineers report of the structural problems and future traffic conditions at Locks and Dams 2, 3 and 4 was sent to the Secretary of the Army in June 1992 recommending the most economical replacement plan, known as the National Economic Development (NED) plan. The NED plan would consist of the replacement of the fixed-crest dam at L/D 2 with a gated dam having 5 - 110' tainter gates, rehabilitation of the locks in the year 2020 and the replacement of the floodway bulkhead structure for the small lock chamber; raising existing Pool 2 by 5 feet; major adjustments or possible reconstruction of a major railroad bridge; the construction of new twin 84' x 720' locks at L/D 4; the removal of L/D 3; lowering existing Pool 3 by 3.2 feet; associated miscellaneous federal and non-federal private relocations and channel dredging; and the establishment by the Coast Guard of a reduced bridge clearance height of 42.5 feet for the Monongahela River. The project has a first cost of approximately $750 million. Operations and Maintenance, General: Major work that was completed during the fiscal year includes: renovation and replacement of a tainter valve, dewatering and renovation of upper lock gates at Hildebrand L/D for $1,452,391; renovation and replacement of a culvert valve at L/D 4 for $234,406; renovation of upstream gate operating machinery on the auxiliary chamber at L/D 3 for $129,718; repair of the damaged guardwall at Maxwell L/D for $221,872; repair and replacement of upstream mooring cells at L/D 2, 4 and Maxwell L/D for $657,261; fabrication of 56' chamber lock gates for $1,064,112; enlargement of railroad grade crossing at Morgantown for $114,000; purchase of new air compressor and dryer for LID 2 for $24,299; renovation of dam machinery housings at Opekiska L/D for $36,120; and renovation of concrete surfaces on abutment wall at Morgantown L/D for $110,958. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, WV Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, WV.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Land acquired for project consists of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extent feasible. No local cooperation is required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 92 were $42,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1992 are $554,384,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of publicuse facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. Tygart Dam is a priority candidate for a major rehabilitation effort which will provide for repair and restora- 18-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 tion of the 51 year old structure. In addition to deteriorated concrete repairs, other major project components identified to date for study include: replacement of sluice liners, follower legs and gates; replacement of the 42-inch gate valve; modernization of the hydraulic gate operating system; redesign of the maintenance bulkhead system; upgrading the electrical system and installation of a service bridge. A stability analysis of the structure will also be undertaken to assure that all major structural issues will be addressed. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-C on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. CHARTIERS CREEK, PA Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, PA) Existing project. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 and provides for channel widening, deepening and realignment, construction of a major channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent reaches. James G. Fulton project in Allegheny County would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg- Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles long. Completed improvements would contain within banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. James G. Fulton Flood Control Project-Construction of Unit 1 was started in July 1968, completed in September 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and turned over to local interests on November 22, 1974. Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was started in June 1972 and was completed in December 1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel improvement was started in July 1978, completed in June 1981 and turned over to local interests on 18 November 1981. A contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, was awarded in Sep 1981 and completed in Dec 1981. Canonsburg-Houston Reach-Construction of Unit 1 was started in December of 1968, completed in March 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 10, 1970. Construction of Unit 2A was started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of the reach, are 99% complete. Remaining work on project has been delayed due to the inability of local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rightsof- way. Major flooding in Houston, PA in September, 1990 has generated renewed interest in completion of the project. Estimated cost for new work (1985) is $41,850,000 of which $32,750,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperating agency (Washington County) has been unable to provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining Unit 2B. Direct non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $4,225,188. Operations during fiscal year. Regular inspections were made at completed units. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by the Chartiers Creek project for this period were $300,000. Total benefits achieved through September 30, 1992 were estimated to be $20,407,000. 8. ELKINS, WV Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV). Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started in May 1946 and completed in May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of.channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Land acquired for project consists of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Routine investigations and inspections were made. Project was last inspected in September 1992. Cumulative total flood damages prevented to September 30, 1992, totaled $14,311,000. 9. JOHNSTOWN, PA Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, PA.) Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed in November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. Land acquired for project consists of easements over 192 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. 18-4 Local cooperation. The rules of local cooperation for the rehabilitation of the existing project are governed by the FY 91 Energy and Water Resources Appropriations Act. Pursuant to this Act, the City of Johnstown will have a limited role in securing the needed rights of access to non-federal structures included in the line of protection and will hold and save the United States from damages due to construction or operation and maintenance of the work on the non-federal structures, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The FY 1991 Energy and Water Resources Appropriations Act authorized and directed the Corps to undertake a major rehabilitation of the existing project. Work was initiated on a Rehabilitation Evaluation Report on the rehabilitation measures required to ensure the project's capability of providing the degree of protection for which it was originally constructed. During FY 92, the City of Johnstown secured the needed rights of entry for investigative work required for the preparation of the Rehabilitation Evaluation Report, which is scheduled for completion in November of 1993. A contract was awarded in November, 1991 for miscellaneous repairs of the concrete slope lining. The work was essentially complete on 30 September 1992; the estimated final cost is $689,322. Cumulative flood damages prevented by the project were estimated to be $418,010,000 through September, 1992. 10. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Construction was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started May 1946 and was completed June 1950. Land acquired for project consists of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: operation activities continued and routine investigations and inspections were made. A contract was awarded in December 1991 for removal of bar deposits and clearing. Work was essentially completed in July 1992, estimated final cost is $168,000. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Cumulative flood damages prevented by project were estimated to be $29,561,000 to end of September 1992. 11. TURTLE CREEK, PA Location. In Allegheny and Westmoreland Counties, adjacent to Pittsburgh, PA, along lower reaches of Turtle Creek and Thompson Run, a tributary of Turtle Creek. (See Geological Survey Chart for Pittsburgh, PA). Existing project. The existing channel improvement project was constructed during the period 1962-1967 and provided for flood protection by widening, deepening, and streamlining channel of lower Turtle Creek for about 6.3 miles and channel of Thompson Run for about 1 mile above its mouth. Appurtenant work consists of channel streambed and side slope protection where required, retaining walls, drop structures, floodgates, alteration, removal or reconstruction of restrictive structures and adjustments of affected utilities. Project was designed to accommodate a design flood corresponding to an estimated 100 year frequency. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Federal cost for completed project was $15,350,000; non-Federal cost was $1,840,000. The Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act specified that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized and directed to repair and restore the Turtle Creek, Pennsylvania, local protection project. Estimated Federal cost for repair and restoration work is $6,600,000; non-federal cost is $1,650,000. Local Cooperation. The Turtle Creek Flood Control Authority was the local sponsor for the existing project. However, they are not financially able to sponsor the project restoration, nor to subsequently perform any required project maintenance. Allegheny County is the local sponsor for the project rehabilitation and 11 other requirements for local cooperation for the future maintenance of the project. A local cooperation agreement was executed with the county on August 4, 1992. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The proposed project consists of debris and sediment removal from the Turtle Creek and Thompson Run channels and debris basin; clearing trees and brush from channel side slopes, restoration of channel side slopes, repairs to concrete retaining walls, debris dams, trashracks, spalled concrete joints and drainage appurtenances; and removal of vegetative growth from weepholes. During FY 92, a directed economic analysis was initiated to determine if the project was still economically justified. The analysis was completed and resulted in a favorable benefit-to-cost ratio of 1.9 with future growth. The favorable benefit-tocost ratio resulted in the release of the local cooperation agreement to the district for final execution. The local cooperation agreement was fully executed by the ASA(CW) in August 1992. Real estate acquisition is continuing and is currently scheduled for completion in May 1993. Contract award is scheduled for August/September 1993. Estimated total flood damages prevented through September 1992 were $83,659,000. 18-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started in January 1942 and completed in June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres in easements. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: A contract for paving, resurfacing and reconditioning of existing roads, awarded in July 1992 for $319,640, was 33% complete at end of FY 92. Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved in FY 92 were $957,000; total through FY 92 were $245,163,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 13. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system is designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Land acquired for dam, reservoir and railroad relocation consists of 7608.7 acres in fee and 522.8 acres in easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. Local cooperation. None required by law. 18-6 Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing Conemaugh Lake was constructed downstream of the dam under FERC Licenses 3207. The 15-megawatt project began commercial operation on February 6, 1989. It is owned by Pennsylvania Renewable Resources, Inc. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $15,000; total flood control benefits through September 30, 1992 were $581,515,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities were continued. 14. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth-fill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed in October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,561.7 acres in fee and 100.22 acres in easements. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: A contract for construction of new main access roadway, awarded in January 1992 for $262,263, was 95% complete at end of FY 92. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $6,000; total benefits achieved through September 30, 1992 were $130,044,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 15. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and low-water regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gate-controlled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir during this fiscal year were $331,000; total benefits through September 30, 1992 were $33,740,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public-use facilities. Work was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 16. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN PA AND NY Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA-NY, and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaragus County was completed in June 1978. Land acquired for project consists of 2,651.5 acres in fee and easements over 22,159.1 acres. For further details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operation during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $4,000; total to end of this fiscal year, $350,317,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 17. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburg, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Land acquired for project consists of 3,331.7 acres in fee and easements over 86.7 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $10,000; total benefits to September 30, 1992; $170,924,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 18. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, PA, 21.6 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam started in February 1939 and was completed in June 18-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 1941. Land acquired for projects consists of 2,519.36 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. Local cooperation. None required at completed project. On November 4, 1977 a contract for Wildlife development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first cost of initial wildlife development. Cost-sharing for construction of fishing access area awarded in September 1980 was completed in July 1981 for $335,405.75. On June 7, 1979, a contract for fishing and boating development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and Pennsylvania Fish Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial fishing and boating development. On September 9, 1980, a contract for camping and dayuse recreational development was executed between the U.S. Government and the County of Armstrong. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial camping and day-use recreational development and 50% of the costs for future development. Each cooperation authority is responsible for operation, maintenance and replacement without cost to the Government of all facilities developed with their support. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated total flood damages prevented by this project through September 30, 1992 were $163,265,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. 19. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low-water regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled-earth embankment structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. Authorized project is completed and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Land acquired for project consists of 6,298.9 acres fee and easements over 27.9 acres. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal costs of completed project is $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of construction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest, and has paid $671,571.02 toward principal to date. Local interests have now contributed $4,559,626.74 towards total of $5,200,000 non-Federal costs. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this fiscal year are $320,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1992 were $90,199,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 20. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 9 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, OH, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowwater regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 11,180.4 acres in fees and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and 18-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this fiscal year were $48,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1992 were $71,257,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 21. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 18-B, 18-E and 18-K on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated $4,944,000 during this fiscal year. Total flood damages prevented through September 30, 1992 are $743,975,000. 22. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, PA and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowflow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed in May 1965. Land acquired for project consists of 14,221.06 acres in fee and easements over 239.88 acres. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: A contract for maintenance area improvements and new stacking lane, awarded in June 1992, was 15% complete at end of FY 92. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved in FY 92 were $235,000; total benefits achieved through September 30, 1992 were $26,022,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance continued. 23. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam is concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway is uncontrolled. Storage capacity is 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1991) is $231,000,000 (includes an estimated $24,900,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) Surface land acquired for project consists of 20,451 acres. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,350,000 for construction; and $15,000 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first costs of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $24,810,000, bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $457,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the city of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation cost-sharing contract, in accordance with 18-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The 1992 Energy and Water Appropriations Act amends the 1977 cost-sharing contract to include all of the facilities requested by the State (lodge, cabins) except the golf course. The District and the State completed revisions to the project Master Plan to include these additional facilities. A contract for bridge repairs at the dam access road, awarded in FY 1990 for $139,366 was completed in FY 92. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 92 were $4,297,000. Total flood control benefits for the reservoir through September 30, 1992 were $45,702,000. 24. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed in January 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,797.3 acres in fee and easements over 13.1 acres. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1992 were $178,998,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 18-10 25. UNION CITY DAM, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment nongated type with uncontrolled side-channel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Land acquired for project consists of 161.4 acres in fee and easements over 2,410.3 acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. On November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $10,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1992 were $18,249,000. 26. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolled-earth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth. Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1,731.5 acres in fee and easements over .56 acres. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for FY 92 were $2,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1992 were $2,600,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 27. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 and completed in May 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements over 0.62 acre. A license was issued to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania covering fish conservation and management in Pennsylvania portion of reservoir. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational and sanitary facilities as required to serve the public needs. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. Local cooperation. None required. Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing releases from Youghiogheny River Lake was constructed in accordance with FERC License 3623. D/R Hydro Company is the authorized representative of the Licensee, Youghiogheny Hydroelectric Authority, and is responsible for operation of the plant. It has a 10-megawatt capacity. The plant began commercial operation on December 7, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $9,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1992 were $160,717,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 18-L for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $92,015. Total cost to September 30, 1992 was $1,407,562. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-E on other authorized flood control projects. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 18-M. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 18-M. 18-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) OF BASIC DATA Corps Statutory Authorities Activities in Support of Others Facilities Inspections Total Cost for Fiscal Year: General Investigations 3L SURVEYS Navigation studies Flood control studies Coordination Studies with other agencies Interagency Water Resource Development Special investigations Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Special Studies Total cost for fiscal year $249,730 48,827 5,456 $$332211,,99747641 $ 0 1,165,588 67,904 31,994 128,008 34,967 560 $1,429,021 Costs this fiscal year were $133,130 for flood plain management services and $19 for related hydrologic studies. 33. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Locks and Dams 2, 3 and 4, Monongahela River Rochester, PA Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA Total cost for fiscal year $1,346,910 10,974 315,453 $1,673,337 34. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 18-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A C See Section In Text Project Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River PA 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV 5. Tart Lake, Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, PA (Federal Funds) Contributed unds) 8. Elkins, WV 9. Johnstown, PA 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA 11. Turtle Creek, PA Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, OH COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. (O&M) Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. (O&M) Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 89 7,375,589 7,318,418 17,218,000 17,718,346 11,866,029 11,873,521 FY 90 5,976,672 6,006,794 34,410,000 32,750,727 11,592,422 11,590,143 FY91 8,827,600 8,778,797 54,996,000 58,104,503 11,638,300 11,711,453 699,244 755,668 755,900 688,409 766,703 763,615 -- -3,000 -- -- -- 12,561 -- -- -5,221 5,000 3,704 236,533 211,155 4,000 1,247 130,000 254,486 1,517,900 1,498,246 -795 161 -- 2,200 3,223 50,152 26,000 74,649 28,798 -- 900,000 -- 497,516 38,909 25,000 37,485 29,237 222,000 345,000 290,489 344,075 FY92 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 -- 18,157,8601 -- 18,157,860 7,902,900 101,982,5232 7,982,512 101,953,665 2 72,408,000 321,394,085 3 72,331,548 320,733,4914 12,298,200 216,715,5576 12,195,303 216,583,533 -- 15,857,000 -- 15,857,000 -- 19,077,9327 -- 19,077,932 784,100 13,342,4518 777,643 13,332,280 60,000 60,000 19,820 19,820 u 2 2 2 2 -- 26,583,186 10,329 26,583,077 -- 4,219,967 -- 4,204,498 -- 1,772,627 -- 1,772,627 4,800 269,192 944 265,286 -- 8,865,388 -- 8,865,388 780,800 5,440,190 741,749 5,400,688 552,000 1,452,000 925,729 1,423,245 -- 3,586,10710 -- 3,586,10710 209,800 1,312,59711 203,412 1,306,09411 z1142,,102010 1166,,552265,,365124338 1,613,532 1,347,400 1,829,500 1,669,700 1,348,713 1,734,360 8,739,98712 8,739,987 24,091,11513 23,980,303 18-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project 13. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 14. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 15. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 16. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 17. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 18. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 19. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH 20. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 21. Ohio River Basin Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated 22. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 23. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11 1 1 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY92 1992 --- -- -- 46,012,41114 -- -- -- -- 46,012,411 868,671 1,037,626 982,600 1,147,700 13,176,176 847,810 1,038,306 1,013,042 1,144,476 13,162,266 -- -- 8,409 -- 4,482,93315 -- -- 41,226 10,184 4,482,9331 ,383,449 1,346,788 1,167,600 1,621,400 22,498,75816 ,391,136 1,331,971 1,190,264 1,597,259 22,446,04916 -- -- -- -- 9,539,58617 -- -- -- -- 9,539,586 804,600 1,046,827 1,010,500 860,900 12,506,28418 819,123 1,051,905 997,041 854,531 12,473,64618 -- -- -- -4,000 109,305,07619 -- -- 6,184 686 109,305,07619 ,133,200 1,197,365 1,290,700 1,384,500 21,817,143 ,111,672 1,196,098 1,284,595 1,397,443 21,793,898 -- -19,000 0 -- 2,921,000 279 -- 442 -- 2,921,000 -- -- -- -- 5,727,53120 -- -- -- -- 5,727,531 880,449 1,003,288 832,400 1,041,700 16,118,39321 872,417 979,047 9788977,0224,,711 9977 11,,003311,,225555 116,0,09977,,666688 1872,417 55 720,708 733,871 --- 686,538 691,431 617,100 619,118 -- -- 735,300 653,238 807,900 710,880 678,474 795,169 824,400 794,907 882,200 815,786 805,845 887,672 1,812,800 1,872,160 2,428,000 12,400,043 749,800 758,230 21 1,810,730 1,800,274 8,539,434 6,413,720 800,213 770,106 5,624 1,811,000 1,812,040 -1,700,000 1,120,438 773,400 805,547 1, -. 7,144,97322 -- 7,144,97323 -- 7,144,973 782,000 11,808,962 775,977 11,801,186 -- 47,033 -- 47,033 -- 17,376,09724 --. 17,376,09724 745,700 11,101,23425 756,177 11,086,154 25 ---- 44,,225533,,002299 2266 2 121,400 11,622,571 985,943 11,482,007 -- 985,19727 -- 985,1972 -10,000 1,662 2,163,300 1,999,087 14,000 432,797 909,900 882,370 40,217,20128 40,217,20128 28,302,64729 28,099,91929 209,169,634 208,608,154 3,889,813 3,859,782 18-14 PITTSBURGH, Pk, DISTRICT TARTBE 18-A See Section In Text Project 24. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 25. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) Funding New Work Aprop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 26. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 27. Youghiogheny River Lake Ohio River Basin, PA and MD FY 89 230 FY 90 FY 91 FY92 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 -- 7,792,37830 -- 7,792,37831 1,308,979 1,113,296 1,017,500 1,106,900 18,084,92832 1,316,393 1,123,154 1,000,711 1,137,445 18,076,49032 -- -- -- -- 14,559,800 -- -- -- -- 14,559,800 244,547 221,904 213,400 260,000 4,673,668 262,236 221,268 218,242 254,276 4,665,230 -- -8,409 -- 20,545,06533 -- 20,545,0654 775,600 675,988 754,100 655,100 9,287,157s 769,170 686,627 754,720 647,790 9,274,85135 ---- -- -- 12,521,16736 -- -- -- --. 12,521,16736 2,271,800 1,348,398 1,485,300 1,696,700 26,484,16337 2,287,890 1,372,982 1,484,772 1,671,995 26,437,296 3 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $995,000 appropriated through FY 92 and $987,603 expended through FY 92 for major maintenance at L/D 2, 3 and 4. 3. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects, $77,627,400 appropriated to date for Point Marion, I/D 8, PA ($38,677,400 - CG funds, $38,950,000 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund), and $110,563,600 appropriated to date for Gray's Landing, L/D 7, PA ($56,818,600- CG funds, $53,745,000 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). Also includes AE & D costs for Gray's Landing ($803,000) and Point Marion ($618,758). 4. Includes $77,362,465 expended to date on Point Marion, L/D 8, PA ($38,433,779- CG funds, $38,928,686 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund), and $114,167,943 expended to date for Gray's Landing, LID 7, PA ($56,428,223- CG funds, $57,739,720 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). Also includes AE & D costs for Gray's Landing ($803,000) and Point Marion ($618,758). 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 6. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $464,508 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public work funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and $412,088 Code 713 funds; excludes $409,622 contributed by local interest. 8. Includes $89,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations, Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 9. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 10. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $283,988 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 12. Includes $1,542,500 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 13. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 14. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $328,000 Code 711 funds. 15. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds. Also includes $278,044 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 17. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $322,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 19. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 20. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $274,669 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $256,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 22. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $500,086 contributed by local interests. 23. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 contributed by local interests. 24. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,532,929.02 for new work contributed by local interest. 25. Includes $315,500 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 18-15 i L i/i/ iV-L i i v; ir v r s s a yi vi a -'s Y Y i i Y REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) 28. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 29. Includes $152,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 30. Includes $2,303,076 Code 711 funds ($256,760 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $2,303,077 Code 711 funds, ($256,531 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 32. Includes $203,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 33. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 36. Includes $2,846,263 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 37. Includes $591,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 38. Includes $15,350,352 original construction cost. 18-16 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 19 3 51 Aug 30, 19 3 51 June 26, 19342 3. Mar 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 4, 1913 Sep 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Jan 31, 19313 June 26, 19342 ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a moveable dam.) For locks and dams 2 and 3. For locks and dams 4 to 8 inclusive. For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruction dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Annual Report 1886, . 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27,73d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 22, 70th Cong., 2d Sess. 18-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15 inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. Construct new lock and dam 7 (Grays Landing Lock and Dam) as follows: The Grays Landing Lock and Dam will be located 3.0 miles downriver from existing Lock and Dam 7. It will consist of a single lock chamber, 84 feet wide by 720 feet long, with a fixed crest dam 576 feet in length. The existing Maxwell Pool at elevation 763.0 will be shortened three miles and the existing Pool 7 at elevation 778.0 will be extended downriver to the new dam. There will be no change in pool elevation above existing Dam 7. Upon completion of the new replacement lock and dam, existing Lock and Dam 7 will be removed. Total authorized cost is $123,000,000. Replace existing 56'x360' lock chamber at Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8) with new 84'x720' chamber. Existing movable crest dam to remain; no change in pool elevations. Total authorized cost is $82,900,000. TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for low water regulation and flood control ELKINS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 3. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 18-18 5. 8. 9. 10. 12. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 13. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. 18-19 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No.1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No.1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Oct 22, 1976 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 7, 1966 20. 21 18-20 MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 90th Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 90-17. 90th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. 2nd Sess. 22. 23. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 24. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Jun 22, 1936 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. amended by water regulation. 1st Sess. Jun 28, 1938 FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of as amended 1944 25. UNION CITY DAM, PA Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. S. Dec. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. 26. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recrea- S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. tion and storage for water quality control. 2nd Sess. 27. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Jun 28, 1938 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. augmentation, and pollution abatement, purposes. 1st Sess. FCC Dec. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of as amended 1944 1. Included in the Emergency Relief program April 8, 1935. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Public Res. 117, 71st. Cong., 3d Sess. TABLE 18-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allegheny River, PA, opl-channel work Completed 1934 197,000 133,940 Buckhannon River,2WV Completed 1893 5,500 -- Cheat River, WV Completed 1895 12,997 -- Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Completed 1922 110,663 81,613 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2. No Commerce reported. 18-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance Flood Protection Specifically Authorized Projects Completed: Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Butler, PA DuBois, PA Elkins, WV4 Johnsonburg, PfA Johnstown, PA Kittanning, PA, Part I Latrobe, PA Latrobe, PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Punxsutawney, PA4 Reynoldsville, PA Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) Salamanca, NY Turtle Creek, PA3 Washington, PA Wellsville, OH, Section I Wellsville, OH, Section II Youngstown, OH Active: Saw Mill Run, PA Deferred: Benwood, WV Authorized by Chief of Engineers Completed: Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Burgettstown, PA Friendsville, MD Girty's Run, Millvale, PA Granville, PA Leetonia, OH Oil City, PA Oil City Ice Control Structures Root Creek, Bolivar, NY Slovan, PA Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA Wilmore, PA 7,601,763 964,976 1,568,661 1,556,181 4,464,607 1,772,627 674,664 8,865,388 130,317 207,659 2,556,652 3,217,531 150,386 2,070,484 3,586,107 385,494 628,888 2,880,535 16,525,614 789,093 483,910 157,633 3,621,134 1,895,000 289,000 75,000 534,000 910,000 40,000 130,000 -- 2,000 44,400 698,000 597,000 14,900 353,000 180,485 26,000 72,000 465,000 -- 323,000 113,000 152,1522,02000 1962 1963 1972 1970 1979 1958 1949 1951 1970 1954 1965 1954 1959 1964 1972 1972 1964 1956 1956 1976 1954 1964 1965 1986 1987 1986 1964 1981 -- -- 81,028 183,072 364,208 83,129 41,529 2,655,934 75,908 89,299 43,595 3,927,792 1,591,436 57,811 184,246 136,591 1,554,428 2,021,852 96,853 22,500 35,900 -- 2,200 701,722 3,000 17,200 -- 25,000 -- 9,000 24,600 -- 86,200 1,300 18-22 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance Active: Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River)2 1979 132,464 -- -- Inactive: Black Fork at Hendricks, WV 1972 6,800 - -. Oakdale, PA -- 14,127 -- -. Rouseville, P -- 1,642 -- -- Wallace, WV -- 11,035 --. -- Weston Mills, Olean, NY -- 50,100 -- -- Weston Mills, Portville, NY -- 52,100 -- -- Reservoirs Other: Rowlesburg Lake, WV 1977 2,857,575 -- -- 1. Lacks local support. 2. No longer economically justified. 3. Includes $15,350,352 original construction cost. 4. Reported in detail in an individual report. 18-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 18-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adena, OH Short Creek) Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River) 1 Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) Bellaire, OH Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA1 Brilliant, OH Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Clarington, OH Coraopolis, PA Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH Empire-Stratton, OH Follansbee, WV Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) Industry, PA Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY Lake Erie-Ohip Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act Leetsdale, PA 1 Martins Ferry, OH' McKees Rocks, PA Mingo Junction, OH Moundsville, WV" Muddy Creek Dan, PA' Neville Island, PA New Cumberland, WV New Kensington and Parnassus, PA' Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) Powhaten Pqint, OH Proctor, WV Redbank Creel Lake, PA Rochester, PA St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Smith Ferry, PA Uniontown, P4 Warwood, WV Wellsburg, WV West Bridgewater, PA Wheeling, WV Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)'1 Wheeling, VV (Wheeling Island)1 Wilcox, PA Woodlands, WV' Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization)' 1975 1965 1972 1941 1977 1956 1954 1971 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 6, 1977 Mar 2, 1970 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 3, 1978 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17,1986 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Nov 17 ,1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17,1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 5, 1955 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 1. Deauthorized under Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99-662). 2. Local Interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 4. Includes $47,195 construction costs expended under previous project and $1,700 O&M costs expended under previous project. 18-24 13,452 4,100 64,851 76,487 -- -- 194 -- -- 16,884 100,000 33,031 -- 190,722 1,342,000 25,164 402,459 -- -- -- -- -- 156,377 -- 13,529 -- -- -- 6,387 -- 189,067 -- 21,700 16,761 2322,3826,8363 TABLE 18-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Depths on Mi- Avail- Normal ter Sills Width able Lift at Pool Ele- at Normal Character of Type of Year of LengthNormal vation Pool Level1 Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Coin- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level). (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 3 14.5 Cheswick, PA 4 24.2 Natrona, PA 5 30.4 Freeport, PA 6 36.3 Clinton, PA 7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 9 62.2 Rimer, PA Total Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 2 Abandoned lock and dam 3 0 Demolishing old dam 1 S Dredging channel mTotal 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 360 13.5 734.5 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 360 10.5 745.0 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 360 11.8 756.8 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 360 12.2 769.0 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 360 13.1 782.1 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 Piling 360 17.9 800.0 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 360 22.0 822.0 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. $ 1,763,485 $ 1,875,665 1,707,690 1,940,537 1,523,959 1,460,008 2,848,920 2,510,373 $15,630,637 591,187 544,929 310,103 26,001 1,055,003 $18,157,860 0 TABLE 18-I Miles Above Nearest No Mouth Town 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 56 1103 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 56 4 41.5 Monessen, PA 563 -- 61.2 Maxwell locks 843 and dam, Maxwell, PA -- 82.2 Grays Landing 84 lock and dam, Grays Landing, PA 7 85.0 Greensboro,PA 56 8 90.8 Point Marion, PA 56 -- 102.0 Morgantown lock 84 and dam, Morgantown, WV -- 108.0 Hildebrand lock 84 and dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV -- 115.4 Opekiska lock 842 and dam, 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (see Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Normal Pool Avail- Eleva- Depths on Miable Lift at tion ter Sills at Width Length Normal (feet, Normal Pool Character of Type of Perof Cham- to Full Pool mean Level Foundation Construction cent Year ber Width Level sea Lower Upper Kind Corn- Opened to Actual (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete Navigation Cost 360 8.7 718.7 720 360 8.2 726.9 720 360 16.6 743.5 720 720 19.5 763.0 720 15.0 778.0 360 15.0 778.0 360 19.0 797.0 600 17.0 814.0 600 21.0 835.0 600 22.0 857.0 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles Movable Concrete Concrete 100 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 15.0 26.0 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete -- 10.0 10.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 10.0 14.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 Marine ways, etc Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 4 Abandoned lock and dam 5 Abandoned lock and dam 6 Abandoned lock and dam 7 Abandoned lock and dam 8 Abandoned lock and dam 9 Abandoned lock and dam 10 Abandoned lock and dam 11 Abandoned lock and dam 12 Abandoned lock and dam 13 Abandoned lock and dam 14 Abandoned lock and dam 15 Dredging Total 0 19532 $17,872,212s H 2 58 19532 17,538,536s 19322 17,254,0715 6 19642 30,110,8895 y -- 114,970,9419' 0 19252 2,639,804. 1925 83,389,718 19502 8,778,0005 19592 12,506,8295 Oz 19642 25,179,6225 r 0 250,0005 1,019,9075 780,816s 1,074,812 770,449 213,7765 245,900 191,000 C 210,445s O 227,6685 200,550 190,691 210,1275 175,829 C 587,899 t $336,590,4915 TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (see Section 3 of Text) 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depths. 5. Actual cost: may include estimated costs which have been footnoted a 2. Dates shown for locks and dams No. 2 to 8 inclusive, represent reconstruc- necessary. tion. 6. Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,30 3. 2 Chambers for reconstruction of dam (1963-1967). 4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, (1958-9), $2,086,438 for 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. original reconstruction (1923-1926), $618,758 AE&D costs for replacement of 8. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation. lock, and $38,928,686 expended from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 9. Includes AE&D costs for proposed lock ($803,000) and $57,739,718 ex pended from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. l8 4 - b== y REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 18-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Total Regular $331,169,95013 $195,661,0022 $526,830,952 12 3 Maintenance and operation 452,623 452,623 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) -- 22,549 22,549 Total $331,169,950 $196,136,1742 $527,306,12412 3 1. Excludes $5,420,541 for new work for previous pro- 3. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation of IUD jects. 3, $114,167,941 for replacement of LID 7 ($57,739,718 pro- 2. Excludes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 vided by the Inland Waterways Trust Fund), and $77,362,465 and June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improve- for replacement of lock at Point Marion Lock and Dam ment under provisions of permanent appropriation for such ($38,928,686 provided by the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. TABLE 18-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 21 of Text) Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA Conemaugh River $46,012,411 Crooked Creek, PA Crooked Creek 4,482,933 East Branch Clarion River, PA Clarion River 9,539,586 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY Allegheny River 112,226,0761 Loyalhanna, PA Loyalhanna Creek 5,727,531 Mahoning Creek, PA Mahoning Creek 7,144,973 Tionesta, PA Tionesta Creek 7,792,378 Union City, PA French Creek 14,559,800 Woodcock Creek, PA Woodcock Creek 20,545,065 Beaver: Berlin, OH Mahoning River 8,739,987 Michael J. Kirwan, OH Mahoning River 17,376,097 Mosquito Creek, OH Mosquito Creek 4,253,029 Shenango River, PA and OH Shenango River 40,217,201 Monongahela: Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV West Fork River $208,608,1542 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD Youghiogheny River 12,521,167 1. Includes $2,921,000 actual cost for dam rehabilitation. 2. Actual cost. Latest cost estimate (1991) is $231,000,000. 18-28 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-L INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) Project Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Bolivar, NY Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Burgettstown-Slovan, PA Butler, PA Chartiers Creek, PA Cannonsburg-Houston Reach James G. Fulton Reach Colliers, WV DuBois, PA Eldred, PA Etna, PA Friendsville, MD Granville, PA Johnsonburg, PA Kittaning, PA Latrobe, PA Leetonia, OH Dates of Inspection Aug 1991 Aug 1992 Sep 1992 Aug 1991 Sep 1991 Sep 1992 Sep 1986 Apr 1992 Sep 1989 Mar 1992 Apr 1992 Sep 1992 Apr 1987 Sep 1989 Apr 1992 Jun 1990 May 1992 Jul 1991 Sep 1992 Jun 1992 Project Marianna, PA Millvale, PA Oil City Ice Control Structure, Allegheny River, PA Oil City LPP-(Dike), PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Reynoldsville, PA Ridgway, PA Salamanca, NY Stonewood-Nutter Fort, WV Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Turtle Creek, PA Washington, PA Wellsville, OH Weston, WV Wilmore, PA Youngstown, PA Dates of Inspection Apr 1990 Jul 1990 Sep 1991 Sep 1991 Sep 1992 Oct 1990 Sep 1992 Aug 1992 Oct 1991 Sep 1992 Jun 1992 Jul 1992 Nov 1976 Sep 1987 Sep 1986 Jul 1991 Jul 1992 Nov 1991 Jun 1992 18-29 -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 18-M FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 30 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Allegheny River, Oil City, PA (construction completed) Belington, WV (reconnaissance) Charleroi, PA (complete) Clarion River, Ridgeway, PA (reconnaissance) Connellsville, PA (reconnaissance) Connoquenessing Creek, Marion Twp., PA (reconnaissance) Connoquenessing Creek, Sewickley Twp., PA (reconnaissance) Hickman Run, Little Tyrone Twp., PA (reconnaissance) Jackson Township, Butler Co., PA (reconnaissance) Little Yankee Creek, Hubbard, OH (reconnaissance) McGary Hollow Run, Weston, WV (reconnaissance) Oil Creek, Oil City, Venango County, PA (reconnaissance) Parsons, Hambleton, Hendricks, WV (complete) Penn Township, Butler Co., PA (complete) Phillipi, WV (terminated) Short Creek, Connorville, OH (complete) Stoneycreek River, Johnstown, PA (complete) Weegie/Pipe Creeks, Shadyside, Oh (complete) Total cost for current fiscal year: Fiscal Year Costs $40,978 9,558 7,027 21 7,052 1,025 1,491 582 14,469 8,591 5,714 232 136 14,625 6,046 14,958 361,.509536 $170,154 Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 of the 1846 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Brush Creek, Jeannette, PA (plans and specifications) Chadakoin River, Jamestown, NY (plans and specifications) Chubb Run, Franklin, PA (detailed project report underway) Conneaut Lake, PA (detailed project report underway) Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (construction) Downers Run, Fayette City, PA (terminated) French Creek, Wattsburg, PA (detailed project report underway) Mahoning River, Hwy. 139a, Trumbull Co., OH (construction completed) Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (construction) Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (construction) Mill Run, Sinclairville, NY (plans and specifications) Miller Run, Cecil Twp., PA (detailed project report underway) Mon River, Sewage Treatment Plant, Pt. Marion, PA (detailed project report underway) Mon River, Water St., Pt. Marion, PA (detailed project report underway) Nelson Run, Ross Twp., PA (detailed project report completed) Neshannock Creek, New Castle, PA (terminated) Ohio River, Chester, WV (detailed project report completed) Ohio River, Moundsville, WV (detailed project report underway) Orange Road, Mercer Co., PA (terminated) Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (plans and specifications) Saw Mill Run Road, Salamanca, NY (plans and specifications) Sewer Outfall, Glendale, WV (construction completed) Shupe Run, Mt. Pleasant, PA (construction completed) Spruce Run, Ben Avon, PA (detailed project report underway) Walnut Bottom Run, Beaver Falls, PA (detailed project report underway) Water Works, Park and Pool, Wellsburg, WV (construction) West Fork River, Clarksburg, PA (detailed project report underway) Yough, Turkeyfoot Twp., PA (terminated) Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year: Fiscal Year Costs $9,832 1,566 19,658 15,424 24 10,623 19,303 289 (339) 3,598 3,416 13,387 953 1,608 19,530 85 17,471 1,506 69 9,759 7,611 69,498 16,669 1,363 5,337 3,943 15,699 $267$,286978,898 18-30 OHIO RIVER For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed structures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of District Engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington, and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, WV, and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island, and Hannibal Locks and Dams. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, KY, and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Robert C. Byrd, Greenup, and Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine Locks and Dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal), Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland Locks and Dams, and Locks and Dams 52 and 53. Improvements Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on O hio R iver ......................................................... 19-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River ...................... 19-3 Tables Table 19-A Cost and Financial Statement ..... 19-5 Table 19-B Authorizing Legislation ................ 19-6 Table 19-C Not Applicable Table 19-D Not Applicable Table 19-E Not Applicable Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, PA, and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, IL. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous Projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, KY. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine Locks and Dams with an auxiliary lock at Robert C. Byrd being 110 by 360 feet. Dashields is a fixed dam, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Robert C. Byrd are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movable-type dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine Locks and Dam, a canal (Louisville and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to existing Table 19-F Not Applicable Table 19-G Not Applicable Table 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing Project ............................................. 19-7 Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River .................. 19.7 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams Statistics ........................................ 19-8 project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1,200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh, and Uniontown; two locks 110 by 1,200 feet at Smithland; 110- by 1,200-foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at Locks and Dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110- by 1,200-foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two section of movable crest at McAlpine Locks and Dam; widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet at McAlpine Locks and Dam has been inoperative since failure of downstream lock gates in December 1972. Rehabilitation of existing Locks and Dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work (existing project, 1983), is $1,739,921,050; estimated 19-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 non-Federal cost is $14,999,000. Foregoing estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968, for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; Locks and Dams 40 and 42 eliminated; Locks and Dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth Locks and Dam; Lock and Dam 3 replaced by Dashields Locks and Dam; and Locks and Dams 4, 5, and 6 replaced by Montgomery Locks and Dam. Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 were replaced by Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam authorized by August 30, 1935, Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and Dams 7, 8, and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 12, 13, and 14 were replaced by Hannibal Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 15,16, and 17 were replaced by Willow Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 18, 19, and 20 were replaced by Belleville Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 21, 22, and 23 were replaced by Racine Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 27, 28, 29, and 30 were replaced by Greenup Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 31, 32, 33, and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 were replaced by Markland Locks and Dam; the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine Locks and Dam were widened to 500 feet. Locks and Dams 43, 44, and 45 were replaced by Cannelton Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 48 and 49 were replaced by Uniontown Locks and Dam, and Locks and Dams 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland Locks and Dam, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 combined the Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the Newburgh Locks and Dam project. A December 1981 Act established the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks and Dam to protect and preserve existing fossilized coral and a diversity of wildlife. A November 17, 1988 Act authorized a replacement structure for Locks & Dams 52 & 53 at Olmsted, IL. A November 28, 1990 Act authorized an interpretive center at the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks & Dam and a modernization of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks & Dam, IN & KY. Table 19-J contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing project. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 19- I for licenses. Navigation system of 21 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 19-J shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For total cost of existing project, see Table 19-H. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Montgomery Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Major rehabilitation was completed in February 1989. Total cost of rehabilitation work was $32,016,696. Expenditures during fiscal year 1992 for construction, engineering and design of project were $1,801. Dashields Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Major rehabilitation was completed in December 1990 at a cost of $33,914,252. Willow Island Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in January 1967. All work is complete. Belleville Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in May 1962. All work is complete. Racine Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete. Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing locks chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I studies for 1,200-foot locks in a bypass canal. These studies are complete. Initial Construction, General funds for the continuation of Engineering activities were received in September 1985. During the fiscal year real estate acquisition continued. The project was advertised and bids were opened in September 1987. The contract was awarded in October 1987 and is 96 percent complete. The total estimated cost of the project is $384 million, which is 50 percent Federal cost and 50 percent Inland Waterways Trust Fund cost. Greenup Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in October 1954. All work is complete. 19-2 OHIO RIVER Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam: Construction work complete. Markland Locks and Dam: Project is complete including a public highway bridge across the navigation structure, as authorized by the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-606). For details of bridge see page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1978. Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area was authorized by Public Law 97-137 on December 29, 1981 and modified by Public Law 101-640 on November 28, 1990 to design and construct an interpretive center. The Conservation Area will protect 1,000 acres which consists of birdlife and other wildlife. Planning consisted of efforts to define facilities to be cost shared with local interests. All Real Estate tracts have been acquired and condemnation trials continue. $99,631. McAlpine Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland Canal which work is presently deferred. A modernization of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock with a new 110 foot x 1,200 foot lock was authorized by Public Law 101-640. Advanced Engineering and Design was continued. $1,082,519. Cannelton Locks and Dam: Project is complete. Newburgh Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in October 1962 is complete except for financially closing out the project. $148. Uniontown Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for financially closing out the project. $873. Smithland Locks and Dam: All major construction features are complete and the project was advanced to 99 percent completion. Real Estate activity is complete except for audit work and Title Opinions. $1,965. Locks and Dam No. 52 (New Lock): Construction initiated in December 1967 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Temporary Lock): Construction initiated in December 1972 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 52 (Rehabilitation): Construction initiated in June 1979 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Rehabilitation): Constructed initiated in June 1979 is complete. Olmsted Locks & Dam: A replacement structure for Locks and Dams 52 & 53 was authorized by the WRDA of 1988 in Public Law 100-676 on 17 November 1988. Advanced Engineering and Design continued. $4,824,918. Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Costs were $12,786,833 for Huntington District, $16,695,308 for Louisville District, and $10,719,076 for Pittsburgh District. 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, IL). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing Projects. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work; but, in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation, it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of 400-600 feet; also, to permit movement of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, PA, to 80 feet at Cincinnati, OH, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, KY (head of falls, 53.8 feet at Evansville, IN, and 59.5 feet at Cairo, IL (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work (1960) is $16.16 million, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items (1954 is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. See Table 19-B for authorizing legislation. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927, authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvements at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Congr., 2nd Sess.). 19-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Congr., 1st Sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool conditions. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, stream gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $1,489,421. There was no dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River in FY 92. Dredging by contract: Huntington District 4,813,807 cubic yards at $1,073,479 and Louisville District 1,050,380 cubic yards at $2,335,850. 19-4 OHIO RIVER Cost and Financial Statement See Section in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY91 Total Cost To FY 92 Sep 30, 1992 (footnotes) 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Rehab. (O&M Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost $43,833,000 $75,703,005 48,444,774 74,080,673 $58,847,815 $25,770,000 $1,666,162,592 1 3 5 10 17 21 60,229,469 28,822,023 1,664,308,380 1 3 6 11 12 15 16 18 22 34,279,987 35,342,477 36,184,500 39,641,315 802,800,613 2 4 19 34,103,524 34,314,742 36,584,217 40,201,217 801,711,324 2 13 14 19 20 275,000 448,866 -24,434 61,188 14,129,500 3,846,551 14,103,501 3,864,999 0 10,522 -3,500 44,807 0 82,972,138 1,801 82,972,138 0 84 33,914,252 33,914,252 - 15,962,260 8 - 15,962,260 8 4,394,700 4,526,955 4,990,300 4,826,500 4,547,207 4,297,674 5,055,533 4,898,751 79 79 944,649 944,649 1 Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 2 Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care ofworkofimprovement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 3 Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 4 Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 6 Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. 6 Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. 7 Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats under provisions ofpermanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. 8 Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. 9 Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. OI1n0c ludes $100,000 placed in Fiscal Year 1971 Budget Reserve. n1E1 xcludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. 12 Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. 13iEs xcludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. 14 Excludessurpluspropertyvaluedat$73,832transferred to project without reimbursement. 15 Includes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. e1E6x cludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. 17 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $572,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,759,812 Code 713 funds. 18iIsn cludes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $342,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,989,812 Code 713 Funds. 19 Includes $2,158,073 Funds provided from The Productive Employment Appropriations Actof 1983 (PL 98-8). 20 Includes $920,945 cost for operations and care of previous projects. 21 Includes $135,498,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 22 Includes $134,882,764 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 19-5 Table 19-A _ _ ) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Table 19-B Authorizing Legislation See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River March 3, 1827 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1958 December 29, 1981 H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. Project adopted by this act originally covered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. Construct ice piers as a part of allotted from appropriations for general open channel work. Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, and a 200-foot strip along bank and for bank protection, at an estimated cost of $200,000. Act of March 3, 1827, modified to include maintenance of existing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of river slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. Locks and Dams, Ohio River Act of December 29, 1981, established the 1,000-acre Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a cost not to exceed $300,000. Act of November 17, 1988 authorized a replacement structure for Locks and Dams 52 and 53 at Olmsted, Illinois. Act of November 28, 1990, modified PL 97-137 by authorizing an interpretive center at Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a estimated total cost of $3,200,000. Act of November 28, 1990 authorized a modernization of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks and Dam, Indiana and Kentucky at a total cost of $219,600,000 with one-half appropriated from the Treasury and one-half from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 19-6 H.R. 2241, PL97-137, Title II, 95 Stat. 1710 PL 100-676, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess. November 17, 1988 November 28, 1990 November 28, 1990 OHIO RIVER TABLE 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River Total Cost of Existing Project to September 30, 1992 (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Regular Public Works Emergency Relief Maintenance & Operation Public Works Acceleration Executive 1963 Total $1,571,911,205 3,258,368 1,198,837 215,812 $1,576,584,222 3 $760,749,607 0 19,000 3,039,789 38,766 $763,847,162 12 $116,886,390 Total $2,449,547,202 3,258,368 1,217,837 3,039,789 254,578 0 $116,886,390 4 $2,457,317,774 'Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under permanent indefinite appropriation. 2Excludes $920,945 cost for operation and care ofprevious projects. Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulat 3Excludes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 4Includes $33,914,252 cost for O & M Rehabilitation. Note:All other cost variations are listed in the Footnotes of Table 19-A. tory Commission Licenses At Locks and Dams, Ohio River Markland Dam McAlpine Dam Racine Dam Greenup Dam Hannibal Dam F.E.R.C License License Annual Charge Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1991 Public Service Co. of Indiana $ 45,950.00 $1,192,811.64 Louisville Gas and Electric Co. $ 95,000.00 $ 8,625,353.84 Ohio Power Co. $ 64,232.00 $ 671,065.00 City of Vanceburg, City of New Kentucky Martinsville, WV $ 261,103.00 $ 2,527,987.00 -0- $197,589.03 19-7 2,211 289:1,000 2,570 2,614 3,206 $ Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles and Below Distance From Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town Width of Chamber (feet) Lock Dimensions Greatest Length Available For Full Width (feet) Lift (feet) Upper Normal Pool Elevation (feet, mean sea (level) Depth on Miter.Sills Character of Upper Lower Foundation (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Actual Cost Year to Date of Percent Opened to Each Lock Complete Navigation 'and Dam 1 - Replaced 6.2 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Emsworth, PA 2 - Replaced 3 - Replaced 13.3 Dashields Locks and Dam 1.6 miles below Sewickley, PA 4 - Replaced 5 - Replaced 6 - Replaced 31.7 Montgomery Locks and Dam, 1.4 miles above Industry, PA 7 - Replaced 8 - Replaced 54.4 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, OH 9 - Replaced 10 - Replaced 11 - Replaced 84.3 Pike Island Locks and Dam, 2 miles upstream from Warwood, WV 12 - Replaced 13 - Replaced 14 - Replaced 126.4 Hannibal Locks and Dam, 1.6 miles upstream from New Martinsville, WV 15 - Replaced 16 - Replaced 161.7 Willow Island Locks and Dam, 2.7 miles above Waverly, WV 110 56 110 56 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 360 600 360 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 18.0 710.0 17.014 12.9 Rock Rock 15.5 15 12.9 3 - - $ 870,034 100 1921 $ 43,347,635 2 14 and Piles 976,767 1,144,588 10.0 692.0 13.41 17.53 Rock Rock 100 1929 37,447,328 11 1,071,472 1,080,132 1,123,442 17.5 682.0 20.5 664.5 16.01 14.63 Rock Rock and and Piles Piles 7.01 14.83 Rock Rock 100 1936 37,754,307 6 - - 1,075,000 - - 1,167,456 100 1959 39,099,688 1,177,100 1,138,000 1,162,165 21.0 644.0 21.0 623.0 17.01 38.0 18.01 Rock Rock 17.0 Rock Rock 100 1968 56,623,946 - - 1,166,104 - 1,222,389 - - 1,133,371 99 1972 87,840,211 1,180,478 1,275,532 20.0 602.0 35.0 15.0 Rock and Piles Rock 100 1972 78,173,881 00 0 0 0 I 0 l 7 J Table I9-J Table 19-J (Continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Lock Miles and Below Distance From Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town Width of Chamber (feet) Greatest Length Available For Full Width (feet) Lift (feet) Upper Normal Pool Elevation (feet, mean sea (level) Depth on Miter Sills Actual Cost Character of Year to Date of Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation 'and Dam - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 103.9 Belleville Locks and Dam, 0.3 mile below Reedsville, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 237.5 Racine Locks and Dam, 1.5 miles below Letart Falls, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 279.2 Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, 0.7 mile below Hogsett, WV Robert C. Byrd Modernization 110 1,200 110 600 22.0 582.0 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 22.0 560.0 600 360 23.0 538.0 37.0 15.0 3 Rock Rock and Piles 18.0 15.0 Rock Rock and Piles 18.0 15.0 Rock Rock 100 1968 62,591,255 - - 1,484,562 - - 1,218,798 - - 1,851,488 100 1971 64,922,680 100 1937 110 1,200 27 - Rehab Dam and New Lock - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 341.0 Greenup Locks and Dam, 4.9 miles below Greenup, KY - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 436.2 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, 2.2 miles 110 110 110 110 110 600 1,200 600 1,200 23.0 538.0 30.0 515.0 600 30.0 485.0 18.0 18.01 18.01 15.0 13.0 Rock Rock 15.0 Rock Rock 100 1959 57,464,191 1,359,231 2,951,216 1,937,166 3,437,057 100 1962 74,188,216 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 N 24 25 26 $ 1,362,591 927,091 1,213,848 936,696 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 1,187,542 1,925,205 1,307,241 3,452,066 253,416,627 17 1,063,133 1,088,802 1,579,618 Table 19-J (Continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles and Below Distance From Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town above Foster, KY 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 I. I-A 0 42 43 44 45 - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 531.5 Markland Locks and Dam, 1 mile above Markland, IN - Replaced - Eliminated Falls of the Ohio, 1 mile above McAlpine 604.0 McAlpine Locks and Dam (Reconstruction of Locks and Dam 41) - Eliminated - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 720.7 Cannelton Locks and Dam, 3 miles above Cannelton, IN 46 - Replaced 776.1 Newburgh Locks and Dam, 16 miles above Evansville, IN 47 48 49 - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 846.0 Uniontown Locks and Dam, 3.5 miles below Uniontown, KY LockDimensions Greatest Length Width Available of For Full Chamber Width (feet) (feet) Lift (feet) Upper Normal Pool Elevation (feet, mean sea (level) Depth on Miter Sills Actual Cost Character of Year to Date of Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation 'and Dam 1,894,942 3,704,535 1,297,924 2,857,040 110 1,200 110 600 N/A N/A 110 110 56 110 110 200 600 360 1,200 600 110 1,200 110 600 110 110 1,200 600 35.0 455.0 50.0 15.0 Rock Piles 100 1963 63,019,403 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 49.0 37.0 420.0 25.0 383.0 12.0 19.0 19.0 38.0 11.0 Rock Rock 11.0 13.0 Rock Rock 0 N/A 2,222,448 7,658,134 ' 2,069,193 1008 1961 45,726,189 ' - - 2,592,242 - - 2,819,930 - - 3,202,890 99 1972 99,032,866 1o 3,129,028 16.0 358.0 32.0 16.0 Rock Pile 99 1975 104,497,621 4,415,526 3,062,710 3,325,964 22.0 342.0 34.0 12.0 Rock Rock 99 1975 100,326,373 0V 0 y 0 0 0 ~I 0 0 I-a Table 19-J (Continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles and Below Distance From Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town 50 - Replaced 51 - Replaced 918.5 Smithland Locks and Dam, 2 miles above Smithland, KY 52 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, IL 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, IL (New lock) 964.4 Olmsted Locks & Dam at Olmsted, IL 53 962.6 10.8 miles above Mound City, IL 962.6 10.8 miles above Mound City, IL (New lock) 974.2 Mound City Lock and Dam, 1 mile below Mound City, IL Width of Chamber (feet) 110 110 Greatest Length Available For Full Width (feet) 1,200 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 110 1,200 110 600 110 1,200 Lift (feet) 22.0 Upper Normal Pool Elevation (feet, mean sea (level) 324.0 12.0 302.0 12.0 302.0 21.0 300.0 13.4 290.0 13.4 290.0 Depth on MiterSills Character of Upper Lower Foundation (feet) (feet) Lock Dam 34.0 12.0 Rock Actual Cost Year to Date of Percent Opened to Each Lock Complete Navigation 'and Dam - - $ 3,571,762 - - 4,370,566 Rock 99 1980 273,725,471 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1928 13,337,747 n 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1969 10,197,516 18.0 18.0 Pile Pile 1 2006 20,730,539 18 19 15.4 9.69 Pile Pile 100 1929 10,004,240 12 15.4 9.6 Pile 100 1982 38,570,920 1,539,470 " O 0 TOTAL $1,774,200,535 " 'Depths are on emergency dam foundation and recontrolling depths. "SFor preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer conslidered authorized.(See Section 1 of Text.) 2Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938. '4Includes $37,485,870 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 85. 3Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. "Includes $33,914,252 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 91 (O&m funds). 4Land chamber. "Includes $32,016,696 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 89. 'River chamber. "Includes $127,175,225 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 'Roller-gate dam. Cost not included in total. Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. $13,023,000 Preconstructioonn Eclnugdiense ering & Design funds. 'Lock and Dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921. Completed with new dam and raised canal "9I ncludes $7,707,539 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. and lock wallin 1928. Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30. Reconstruction and modernization 20 Exclusive of $6,994,235 details below. began 1956, renamed McAlpine Locks and Dam in 1960. Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971. 8Completed except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge. Additional Features Entering into Cost of Project 9Dam below not yet constructed. Depth on lower miter sill at lower water. Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute $ 5,359,203 �Excludes $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978. (under previous project) "Includes $8,876,000 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 79 is complete. Examinations, survey contingencies, plants, and miscellaneous 966,232 "Includes $4,593,572 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 79 is complete. Recreation facilities, pool area, Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam 668,235 TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 6,994,235 $1,781,194,770 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT* The District comprises Ohio, northwestern Pennsylvania and western and northern New York, embracing U.S. waters of Lake Erie exclusive of small portion of western end, Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins from boundary between the states of Ohio and Michigan to international boundary line east of Frontier, New York. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 3. Buffalo Harbor, NY 4. Buffalo Small Boat Harbor, NY 5. Cattaraugus Harbor, NY 6. Cleveland Harbor, OH 7. Conneaut Harbor, OH 8. Dunkirk Harbor, NY 9. Erie Harbor, PA 10. Fairport Harbor, OH 11. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 12. Huron Harbor, OH 13. Irondequoit Bay, NY 14. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 15. Lorain Harbor, OH 16. Oak Orchard Harbor, NY 17. Olcott Harbor, NY 18. Oswego Harbor, NY 19. Ottawa River Harbor, MI, OH 20. Port Ontario Harbor, NY 21. Rochester Harbor, NY 22. Rocky River, OH 23. Sandusky Harbor, OH 24. Toledo Harbor, OH 25. Vermilion Harbor, OH 26. West Harbor, OH 27. Wilson Harbor, NY 28. Reconnaissance and condition surveys 29. Other authorized navigation projects 30. Navigation work under special authorization Page 20-2 20-2 20-2 20-3 20-3 20-3 20-4 20-5 20-5 20-5 20-6 20-6 20-6 20-6 20-7 20-7 20-7 20-8 20-8 20-8 20-9 20-9 20-49 20-9 20-10 20-10 20-10 20-10 20-11 20-11 Beach Erosion Control 31. Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio 32. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA 33. Other authorized beach erosion control projects 34. Beach erosion work under special authorization Flood Control 35. Ellicott Creek, NY 36. Mount Morris Lake, NY Genesee River 37. Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, OH 38. Inspection of completed flood control projects 39. National Emergency Preparedness 40. Other authorized flood control projects 41. Flood control work under special authorization Deauthorized projects 42. Deauthorized Projects General Investigations 43. Surveys 44. Collection and study of basic data 45. Advance Engineering & Design 20-1 Page 20-11 20-11 20-12 20-12 20-12 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-14 20-14 20-14 20-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Navigation 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1297- 99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal facilities. There are 16 piers and wharves. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on southside of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate activities, project condition sediment surveys, reformulation and economic analysis regarding dredging of toxic materials from upper River, and continuing investigation for Letter Report regarding construction of new Confined Disposal Facility for outer harbor sediment, by Government plant and hired labor cost $301,489. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $65,747. Cultural resources contract in conjunction with new CDF, by contract, cost $15,500. Finalization of FY90 dredging contract resulted in a credit of $3,959. U.S. derrickboat McCauley repaired 45 l.f. of the outer west breakwater at cost of $201,234. Engineering and design effort for dredging upper River cost $19,344. 2. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, NY, to and including Tonawanda Harbor, NY. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, NY, Black Rock Harbor and Channel, NY and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832 .) Previous projects. For details see item 5 and 7, page 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see page 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda Inner Harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by New York State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interest for relocation of utilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Contract for cost-shared recreation development at completed projects (Code 713 program) was executed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY on April 16, 1985, and was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers on May 3, 1985. Terminal facilities. Two facilities are along upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock Lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two State-owned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, NY, and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock which is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 284 days and closed for annual winter maintenance from January 12, 1992 through April 5, 1992. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds was accomplished throughout the year by Government plant and hired labor. Total costs of $3,664,062 were distributed as follows: Operation and care: operation of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair $446,089; maintenance of grounds $39,475; real estate activities, project condition sediment surveys, and support of Water Control Center $63,011. A/E contract for stability analyses of lockwall was finalized at cost of $2,700. Lockwall maintenance by hired labor cost $194,114. Repairs to 60 1.f. of Bird Island Pier by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $65,520. Contract to pressure grout lockwall foundation to fill voids cost $2,177,489. Snagging and clearing at lock cost $65,520. Engineering and design for lockwall maintenance cost $334,401. Supervision and administration cost $275,743. 3. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous projects. For details see page 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1368 of Annual 20-2 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Report for 1963. In addition, on December 15, 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dock-side dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 45 wharves and piers of which 4 piers, owned by Niagara Frontier Port Authority, and 9 privately owned and operated facilities are on outer harbor and along sides of Lackawanna and Union ship canal, 4 along banks of Buffalo ship canal, and 26 along Buffalo River. Coast Guard facilities are at mouth of Buffalo River along left bank. City of Buffalo owns a slip on right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring city fireboat. Thirty-four terminals have railroad connections and 29 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series Nevised 1971, Corps o. 41, rof Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor, water control management, and real estate activities cost $205,077. Environmental testing, by contract, and supervision and review of those contracts cost $223,970. Repairs to about 651.f. of South breakwater by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $273,363. Snagging and clearing cost $29,189. Approximately 120,000 cubic yards of material was dredged from Buffalo River at a cost of $867,441. A demonstration of dredging methods to evaluate the effectiveness of dredge methods in minimizing sediment resuspension was conducted as part of the dredging in Buffalo River. Monitoring activities and sample collection were conducted during the field demonstration. Maintenance at Dike 4 disposal area cost $85,524. Engineering and design effort cost $174,622. Supervision and administration cost $41,572. 4. BUFFALO SMALL BOAT HARBOR, NY Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833). Existing project. For details of the existing project, see page 20-3 of Annual Report for 1991. Construction was completed in May 1992. See Table 20-B for authorizing legialation. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Federal Government and the local sponsor, the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, was executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on July 11, 1991. The local sponsor will provide 50% of project costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Federal costs were $9,680 for in-house engineering effort, $850 for real estate and $216,144 for construction contract, including supervision and administration. Non- Federal costs were $1,696 for in-house engineering effort and $454,008 for construction contract, including suervision and administration. Construction was completed in May 1992. 5. CATARAUGUS HARBOR, NY Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, NY and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. For details of the existing project, see page 32-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in January 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $4,804,060. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $2,566,529, excluding $20,000 for lands. Existing project was authorized by 1968 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. The cash contribution paid was $2,566,529. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys, real estate activities and engineering and design effort cost $10,424. 6. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839). Previous projects. For details see page 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized through the 1966 modification, see page 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements in the interest of commercial navigation and recreational navigation were authorized in the 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88), at a cost not to exceed $36,000,000. The commercial navigation portion of the overall project consists of: (a) enlarging and deepening to 31 feet LWD the east entrance channel; (b) deepening the east basin channel to 27 feet LWD; and (c) expanding the capacity of Dike Site 14 to contain the polluted dredged material resulting from the project. This portion of the project is currently on hold as the local sponsor has assigned this aspect a lower priority. The recreational navigation portion of the overall project consists of: an entrance channel 100 feet by 540 feet in length with a depth 8.0 feet below Low Water Datum (LWD) and the associated 360 feet of rubble mound revetment along the west side of Pier 34; removal of a portion of the east and west dock walls of Pier 34; removal of the south dock wall of Slip 32; construction of a 386 foot breakwater with a 20-foot top width and shore arm connection to Pier 32 and 406 feet of associated bulkheading; construction of a 455 foot breakwater and 640 feet of associated bulkheading along the north end of Pier 34 extending to and along the west end of Pier 36, and 1.8 acres of fill between Pier 34 and Pier 36; a 6.4 acre turning basin, 20-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 anchorage area, and harbor-of-refuge with a dredged depth varying between 7.0 and 8.0 feet below LWD and the 1,223 feet of associated bulkheading; 2,098 feet of walkway 10.0 feet wide along the anchorage area and the west and north face of Pier 34 to include along the north face of the filled portion of the former Slip 34; 1,733 linear feet of suitable handrail along the breakwater and anchorage area; and 875 linear feet of bollards and chain along the north and west face of Pier 34 as generally described in a report entitled "Technical Report, North Coast Harbor/Pier 34, Cleveland Harbor, Ohio" prepared by the District Commander, U.S. Army Engineer District, Buffalo, New York, dated February 1992. A portion of the recreational navigation project has been completed by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. The recreational navigation project was also authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and the FY88 Energy and Water Appropriations Act (PL 100-202). These acts also authorized additional undefined improvements to Cleveland Harbor. A portion of the project was deauthorized by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Estimated total Federal cost of the existing project is $33,852,100 (Oct.1991) exclusive of undefined, inactive and deferred portions of the project. The amount of $29,315,100 is for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is for new work. Estimated non-Federal cost is $13,740,000 (Oct. 1991) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is required for work authorized by PL 99-88, PL 99-662, and PL 100-202. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act, consisting of widening and deepening the right bank of Cuyahoga River at the downstream end of Cut 4, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R&H Act, consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B. & O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels, and remaining work authorized by the 1960 R&H Act, consisting of deepening the remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including the Old River to a depth of 27 feet, has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) is $21,251,000. The 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 101-101) authorized the Corps to begin a Reconnaissance study of the Cuyahoga River, to address the concerns of boat traffic congestion and related risks, accidents and safety of the public. Preliminary plans were studied to alleviate the commercial navigation problem and inadequate width and depth, in the Old and Cuyahoga Rivers. The cost of this Reconnaissance study was $250,000. The Reconnaissance Report recommended a feasibility study for one plan which had the potential for commercial (priority) outputs. The non-Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its share of the cost of the feasibility phase of the study; therefore, this study will be terminated. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation, see page 32-4 of FY 87 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 65 piers and wharves. Fourteen are located in the outer harbor, 11 on banks of Old River, 40 along the deep-draft section of Cuyahoga River. Forty-one terminals have both railroad connections and mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at the foot of East 9th Street. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1981, Corps of Engineers). Operations and Results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 92 costs for North Coast Harbor/Pier 34 for in-house engineering effort were $25,896. Real estate activities cost $9,064. Review of construction contract awarded late in FY 1992 cost $7,225. FY 92 costs for the Cuyahoga River study were $30 for in-house reconnaissance effort. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, letter report on new confined disposal facility (CDF), economics report and real estate activities cost $397,287. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $121,300. Repairs to 125 l.f. of east breakwater and 30 l.f. of CDF by U.S. derrickboat Simonsen cost $628,318. Breakwater repair by contract cost $2,064,032. Removal of approximately 220,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from the Cuyahoga River, by contract, cost $1,687,302. Settlement of claim from FY78 dredging contract cost $303,126. Engineering and design costs for dredging, new CDF, and breakwater repairs were $244,690. Supervision and administration costs were $286,753. 7. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous projects. For details see page 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. For description see page 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. See page 1274, Annual Report for 1967, for complete description of project modification authorized by 1966 R&H Act. Authorization of this modification was continued by the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. Estimated cost (1970) for this modification is $717,000. For completed work, non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. Estimated non-Federal cost of $2,877,000 (1970) includes cash contribution of $717,000 and the remainder is for construction of service facilities for the 1966 project modification. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-6 of Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of local cooperation for project modification as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1966. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six 20-4 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, project condition sediment surveys, real estate activities and economic study by Government plant and hired labor cost $45,255. Finalization of FY91 dredging contract cost $207. Repairs to 70 i.f. of east and west breakwaters by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $301,274. Engineering and design costs for breakwater repair were $39,998. 8. DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. For details see page 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys and real estate activities cost $14,110. Finalization of environmental testing contract cost $4,910. U.S. derrickboat McCauley repaired 120 1.f. of the U.S. breakwater at cost of $112,731. Engineering and design effort cost $866. 9. ERIE HARBOR, PA Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous projects. For details see page 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing projects. For description see pages 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion, authorized by 1899 Act was deauthorized in November 1981. A portion of work authorized by 1960 Act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was deauthorized in August 1982. Non- Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which 12 are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on southside of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two offshore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and result during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous operations services, project condition sediment surveys, and real estate activities by Government plant and hired labor cost $47,403. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $36,023. Engineering and design effort relative to north pier tierod bolts cost $11,253. 10. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized through the 1960 modifications, see page 1526 of Annual Report for 1962; for description of small boat harbor as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1977. Authorization of this modification was continued by the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $4,931,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project and the balance of $2,340,000 is for proposed work authorized by See. 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act, which is deferred. Entire project modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, is classified inactive and is excluded from foregoing cost. This authorization was also continued by the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. Estimated Federal cost of this modification is $7,870,000 (Mar. 1991). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,991,000, of which $101,000 was for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project and $2,560,000 which includes cash contribution of $2,330,000, is for work authorized by Sec. 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act. For the inactive 1960 project modification, estimated non-Federal cost of $26,400,000 (Mar. 1991) is for lands, relocations, utility changes, dock dredging and bulkhead modifications. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Acts of 1927 and 1960 and page 32-11 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. 20-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous operations services, real estate activities, and project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $51,636. Removal of approximately 145,000 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, cost $649,480. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $20,295. Engineering and design effort cost $36,125. Supervision and administration cost $48,454. 11. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Location. On Sodus Bay, which is a nearly land-locked indentation on south shore of Lake Ontario, 29 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14814.) Previous projects. For details see page 1972 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1526 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1380 of Annual Report for 1963. Improvements authorized by 1962 act, consisting of deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel were deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs of new work for completed portion of project were $249,187. Costs incurred by local interests are not available. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate activities by hired labor cost $6,031. U.S. derrickboat McCauley repairs inititated in FY91 were completed at cost of $34,580. 12. HURON HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous project. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H Act was deauthorized January 1, 1990. Non-Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous operations services, project condition sediment surveys, economic study and real estate activities by Government plant and hired labor cost $68,387. Removal of approximately 230,000 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, cost $913,924. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $25,870. Engineering and design effort cost $23,462. Supervision and administration cost $27,943. 13. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, NY at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, NY (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815). Existing project. For details of existing project, see page 32-7 of Annual Report for FY87. Total estimated project cost is $15,363,000 (Oct. 1984) including $3,582,000 Federal (which includes the CoE $3,536,000 and the USCG $46,000) and $11,781,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $2,661,000, lands and damages $290,000 and the cost of a movable highway bridge $8,830,000. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with New York State, executed April 20, 1983. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, real estate activities and project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $2,127. Cost for U.S.derrickboat McCauley passage through Welland Canal to Lake Ontario was $52. Environmental activities cost $13,274. Engineering and design cost for FY93 dredging were $21,658. 14. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1628 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work for completed project cost $69,066. Non-Federal costs of $6,000 were incurred for channel dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Not required. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost 20-6 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT $6,013. Finalization of stone purchase for FY91 derrickboat work cost $1,029. Engineering and design effort for repair to east breakwater cost $4,818. 15. LORAIN HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of new work is $20,475,000. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization, authorized by 1960 Act and modified by 1965 Act was deauthorized January 1, 1990. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15-to-25 foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers was also deauthorized January 1, 1990. Total non-Federal cost is $3,000 contributed by local interests towards construction of west shorearm. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorized construction of commercial navigation improvements consisting of two bend cuts on the Black River to widen and straighten the channel between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and the 21st Street Bridge. These cuts are to be excavated to the existing channel depth of 27 feet. The authorized plan also includes widening the Upper Turning Basin at the existing depth of 21 feet. Estimated costs for this work are $2,290,000 Federal and $1,510,000 non-Federal (Oct. 1989). This portion of the project has been classified deferred. On March 12, 1986, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, authorized construction of a small boat harbor which was completed in July 1987. The project consists of a 225-foot detached rubblemound breakwater and an 800-foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Construction costs for this project, including supervision and administration, were $775,025 Federal and $775,025 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 Act (and modified by 1965 Act) is deauthorized. All other conditions fully complied with. On March 25, 1986, the city of Lorain, Ohio signed the Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA), for the Section 107 project. For details see page 32-7 of Annual Report for 1986. For details of LCA for deferred project authorized by the 1986 WRDA, see page 32-9 of Annual Report for FY 87. Terminal facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considerd adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers .) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 92 costs of $92 were for in-house engineering effort (Advance Engineering and Design Preconstruction Engineering and Design). Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, real estate activities and project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $78,761. A/E contract for monitoring movement of lighthouse on breakwater cost $4,244. Repairs to 100 1.f. of east breakwater by U.S. derrickboat Simonsen cost $792,532. Removal of approximately 170,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from the upper portion and turning basin of Black River by contract cost $463,733. Engineering and design effort for dredging and foundation repair for lighthouse cost $134,818. Supervision and administration cost $13,090. 16. OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) Previous project. For details see page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description of completed existing project see page 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report. Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $270,000 (July 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys and real estate activities cost $1,525. Finalization of FY91 dredging contract cost $947. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $34,687. 17. OLCOTT HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek, about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous project. For details see page 1971 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1621 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1555 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,500 exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The authorized modification to the existing project consists of breakwaters to provide optimum harbor protection, a stone jetty and recreational fishing facilities including a foot bridge, walkways and guardrails, access facilities, sanitary facilities and parking areas. The estimated cost of the authorized modification is $17,000,000 (Oct. 1990) of which $8,500,000 20-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 is Federal and $8,500,000 is non-Federal. Modification of the existing project was authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) (PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project. Local interests contributed $1,500. Modifications authorized by the 1986 WRDA will require local interests to pay 50% of project cost including lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas. They are also responsible for construction of necessary docks and berthing spaces, construction of launching ramp, parking areas, sanitary facilities, and necessary access roads. After construction, non-Federal responsibilities would include fishing facility maintenance, except for the aids to navigation. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In-house engineering effort for Advance Engineering and Design Preconstruction Engineering and Design for FY 92 was $98,719. Real estate activities cost $3,163. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys and real estate activities cost $7,861. 18. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego River, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal wharves, and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 Act, was deauthorized January 1, 1990. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 Act, was deauthorized in May 1981. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Seven piers and wharves in harbor and along river channel. In addition, Port of Oswego Authority owns two public terminals, one of which is west of river and includes a grain elevator and warehouse for miscellaneous freight. Other terminal is east of river and used for handling aluminum and general cargo. State of New York owns a river terminal used for mooring vessels. City of Oswego owns one dock and shore facilities for recreational craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, real estate activities and project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $2,206. Finalization of environmental testing cost $3,159. U.S. derrickboat McCauley completed structure repairs inititated in FY91 at cost of $49,198. Engineering and design effort cost $1,523. 19. OTTAWA RIVER HARBOR, MI & OH Location. At westerly end of Lake Erie, at Toledo, OH, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847). Existing project. A reevaluation study and report investigated the authorized project as described in the 1976 Phase I General Design Memo (GDM) and developed several scaled down alternatives including: (1) No Action, (2) the 1976 GDM plan: (a) a bay channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 16,700 feet long between the Toledo Harbor channel and the mouth of the Ottawa River; (b) A river channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide and 8,260 feet long between the mouth of the river and the Summit Street bridge and 5 feet deep, 80 feet wide and about 7,630 feet long between the Summit Street and Suder Avenue bridges; and (c) A confined diked facility (CDF) for dredged material. (3) Dredging Ottawa River channel from Summit Street to 4 feet deep and the Bay Channel to 5 feet deep with disposal in Island 18. (4) Same as 3 except disposal in a new CDF. (5) Dredging Ottawa River Channel from Summit Street to 5 feet deep and the Bay Channel to 6 feet deep with disposal in Island 18. (6) Same as 5 except disposal in a new CDF. Currently the selected alternative is the No Action plan since there is no letter of intent to cost share in this project and project is not economically justified. The project was originally authorized under provisions of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act (PL 89-298) by the House and Senate Committees on Public Works Resolutions dated December 15 and 17, 1970, respectively. Authorization was continued by the 1990 Water Resources Development Act (PL 101-640). Local cooperation. The potential local sponsor is Lucas County Port Authority, Toledo, OH. The local sponsor must provide 50% of the total project cost which includes lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and a disposal area for dredged material (LERRD). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY92 cost was $47,586 for real estate and $43,479 for in-house engineering effort to write the Reevaluation Report. 20. PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, NY Location. On southeasterly end of Lake Ontario, 19 miles northeasterly of Oswego, NY and 32 miles southerly of Sackets Harbor, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. Adopted by the River and Harbor Act July 4, 1836. Only information available is the index to the report of the Chief of Engineers. Existing project. For description see page 32-17 of Annual Report for 1978 and and page 32-16 of Annual Report for 1976. Non-Federal cost for new work was $1,467,132 including cash contribution of $1,431,507. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). 20-8 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Assurances were received from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. The LCA was executed on June 24, 1986. Terminal facilities. The only commercial navigation at Port Ontario is charter boat fishing. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Actual construction of the project was completed in October 1987. FY92 Federal cost was $4,656 for real estate activities. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys and real estate activities cost $5,607. 21. ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous project. For details see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $2,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 Act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio coal loader. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Terminal facilities. One terminal facility at mouth of Genesee River has been leased to the Great Lakes Division of Pittston Stevedoring Corp. Facilities also consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous operations services, real estate activities, environmental activities, and project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $74,687. Removal of 165,251 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, from the Genesee River and entrance channel cost $527,119. Engineering and design effort cost $28,766. Supervision and administration cost $48,036. 22. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description see page 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343,494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately-owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $7,615. Finalization of FY91 dredging contract cost $22,175. Engineering and design effort cost $2,263. Supervision and administration cost $11,637. 23. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeastern portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous project. For description see pages 1511-12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000, including $325,000 cash contribution and the remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepening channels authorized by 1960 Act. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanicalhandling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $122,941. Environmental activities cost $15,212. Removal of approximately 240,000 cubic yards shoaled material, by contract, cost $749,466. Repairs to rock dike by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $17,131. Engineering and design effort cost $36,747. Supervision and administration cost $16,572. 24. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at the westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous projects. For details see page 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See table 20-B 20-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Maumee River through city of Toledo has been developed extensively for deep-draft navigation. Detailed information on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 44 (revised 1972) prepared and published as Part 2, by board of Engineers for River and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as Part 1 by Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys, real estate activities, and various operations studies, including Long-Term Dredged Disposal Management Plan, cost $560,324. Removal of approximately 1,700,000 total cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, cost $2,332,032. Repairs to existing CDF by hired labor cost $106,904. Construction contract to enlargen CDF was awarded in September 1992. Contract costs were $200,000. Engineering and design cost were $317,455. Supervision and administration cost $75,082. 25. VERMILION HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non- Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of $740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous studies, project condition sediment surveys and real estate activities by Government plant and hired labor cost $17,281. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $44,214. Finalization of FY91 dredging contract cost $8,880. Engineering and design effort cost $1,831. Supervision and administration cost $17,635. 26. WEST HARBOR, OH Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles northwest of Port Clinton, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $3,303,898. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $3,922,000 including cash contribution of $3,795,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. See pages 32-20 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated January 31, 1978, State of Ohio stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation, and executed LCA was received on March 9, 1981. Terminal facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently consists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys, real estate activities, and economic study cost $91,709. Finalization of FY91 environmental testing contract cost $4,066. Engineering and design effort cost $4,670. 27. WILSON HARBOR, NY Location. At mouth of east branch of Twelve Mile Creek, which enters Lake Ontario 12 miles easterly of mouth of Niagara River, and 67 miles westerly of Rochester Harbor, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous project. For details see page 2395 of Annual Report for 1889, and page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description see page 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for completed existing project was $477,904. Estimated non-Federal costs are $774,000 which includes cost of $16,000 for previously completed work. Remainder of non-Federal costs are for work required for 1968 R&H Act including cash contribution of $166,988. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys and real estate activities cost $4,445. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $26,093. Finalization of FY91 dredging contract cost $1,389. 28. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed by the Buffalo District at a cost of $38,918. Real estate activities, to include utilization inspection, cost $1,560. Supervision and administration, to include program management and project map updates, cost $5,740. Environmental activities cost $27,762. Project Barcelona, NY Niagara River, NY Ogdensburg, NY Pt. Clinton, OH Put-in-Bay, OH Date of Survey Jul 1992 Nov 1991 Aug 1992 Sep 1992 May 1992 20-10 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 20-C. 30. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 20-G. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 17 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 22 miles northeast of Dunkirk, NY (See Geological Survey map of Angola, NY.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 20-11 of Annual Report for FY1991. Federal project cost is $1,460,000. Non-Federal project cost is $1,475,000. In addition, the local sponsor provided associated costs for upland development of $1,000,000. Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with the Town of Evans, NY, signed October 26, 1987. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost of study on sand by-passing procedures was $4,775. Reimbursement to Town of Evans, NY, for Federal share of maintenance dredging cost $7,815. TOUSSAINT RIVER, CARROLL TWSP, OH Location. At westerly end of Lake Erie, 8 miles west of Port Clinton and 22 east of Toledo, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 20-12 of Annual Report for 1991. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with Carroll Twsp., OH, signed April 3, 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project is 100% complete. FY92 Federal costs were $45,742 for construction contract, including supervision and administration, and $26,057 for in-house engineering effort. Non-Federal costs were $10,158 for construction contract, including supervision and administration. Navigation work pursuant to Section 1135, Public law 99-662. Sandusky Bay, OH - Cost of $146 were incurred to finalize preauthorization studies. Beach Erosion Control 31. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK, OH Location. Maumee Bay State Park is located in Lucas County, OH approximately 5 miles east of Toledo. The 1,855 acre park has 11,000 feet of shoreline along the southerly end of Maumee Bay (Lake Erie). (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Oregon, OH.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 20-12 of Annual Report for FY 1991. The remaining project cost of $21,044,000 (Oct. 1991) includes $8,317,000 Federal and $12,727,000 non-Federal of which $4,440,000 is non-Federal cost for lands, utilities, and recreation facilities. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see page 32-14 of FY 87 Annual Report. A Local Cooperation Agreement was negotiated with the local sponsor (ONDR) and executed August 8, 1990 by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The plan described in the General Design memorandum was completed September 1991. FY 92 costs were $26,388 Federal and $22,608 non-Federal for completion of "as-built" drawings, operation and maintenance manual, and initiation of project monitoring which will be cost-shared 50% Federal cost and 50% non-Federal cost. 32. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Location. At Erie, Pa., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 102 miles east-northeast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835.) Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. For details of project authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), 1976 WRDA and 1986 WRDA, see page 32-14 of Annual Report for FY 87. Actual Federal cost for the authorized beach nourishment project modifications through FY 92 is $16,879,000 which includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $11,233,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. Actual non-Federal cost for the authorized project and modifications through FY 92 is $8,798,000 which includes $3,983,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $4,815,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRDA was completed in FY91. The estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1992) for the 55 breakwater project is $61,200,000. This estimate includes $13,750,000 for the initial construction and $47,450,000 for 50 years of post-construction beach nourishment. The estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1992) for the breakwater project is also $61,200,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources was entered into on February 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 WRD Act. A 20-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Local Cooperation Agreement between the United Stated of America and the local sponsor for construction of the 58 breakwater project was executed by the Secretary of the Army on June 22, 1989. See page 20-10 of Annual Report for FY89 for details of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRD Act was completed in FY 91. Final balancing of Federal and non-Federal funds resulted in a credit of $13 in Federal funds and a cost of $13 in non-Federal funds. Construction of the breakwater project was continued. The sand replenishment was completed with placement of 328,000 tons, yielding a total of 560,000 tons of sand placed. During the year, 28 breakwaters were constructed for a total of 47 breakwaters completed. FY92 costs were a total of $9,584,001 ($4,794,619 Federal and $4,789,382 non-Federal) was expended for construction of the breakwater project. Of this total, contract costs were $4,664,429 Federal and $4,664,442 non- Federal, including monitoring contract and construction management. Aerial photogrametric contract cost $4,893 in Federal funds and $4,893 in non-Federal funds. In-house engineering effort cost $116,779 Federal and $116,730 non- Federal. A total of $8,518 Federal and $3,318 Non-Federal was expended for real estate activities. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania contributed $3,104,075 in FY 92 toward this project. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION ONTROL PROJECTS See Table 20-D. 34. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION CENTURY PARK, LORAIN, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Existing project. For decription of existing project see page 20- 13 of Annual Report for 1991. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the city of Lorain, OH, in July 1989. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 92 Federal costs were $2,378 for in-house engineering effort. Non- Federal costs resulted in a credit of $848, which was the result of balancing Federal and Non-Federal shares. LAKESHORE PARK, ASHTABULA, OH Location. Lakeshore Park is located in Ashtabula, Ashtabula County, Ohio about 40 miles southwest of Erie, Pennsylvania, and about 50 miles northeast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Ashtabula north, OH.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in July 1983. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 92 Federal cost was $2,105 for supervision and administration of beach nourishment contract. SIMS PARK, EUCLID, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie in the city of Euclid, Cuyahoga County, OH, 10 miles east of downtown Cleveland. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map for East Cleveland, OH). Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbors Act, as amended, on January 10, 1991. The project consists of an approximate 800-foot long by 180-foot wide artificial headlands beach. The project provides approximately 108,000 square feet of improved beach surface area; fronted by three segmented rubblemound breakwaters, typically 125 feet in length with 160 feet spacing between breakwaters, and a crest height at 10 feet above LWD; and, east and west terminal groins. The crest of the west groin is at 10 feet above LWD and the crest height at the east groin is at 11 feet above LWD to minimize sand overtopping. The beach sand berm crest is at 8.5 feet above LWD. Estimated Federal cost is $1,494,000; non-Federal cost is the same. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the city of Euclid, on February 6, 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY92 Federal costs were $1,735 for real estate activities, a credit of $15,181 in-house engineering effort which resulted from balancing of Federal and non-Federal costs, and $526,983 for construction contract including supervision and administration. Non-Federal costs for FY92 were $1,076 for real estate activities, $526,983 for construction contract including supervision and administration, and $39,427 for inhouse engineering. Flood Control 35. ELLICOTT CREEK, NY Location. The channel improvement is located on the downstream portion of Ellicott Creek in the towns of Amherst and Tonawanda, Erie County. (See Geological Survey maps of Tonawanda East and Buffalo Northeast, NY.) Existing project. For detailed description of the original project authorized by Section 201 of the 1970 Flood Control Act, see page 32-24 of Annual report for 1973 and page 20- 14 Annual Report for 1992. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see page 32-22 of Annual Report for 1976 and page 20-14 of Annual Report for 1991. 20-12 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Federal costs for FY 92 were $50 for real estate activities and $717 for "as-built" drawings reproduction. 36. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, NY. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, NY (See Geological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, NY). Existing project. For description of existing project, as authorized by 1944 Flood control Act, see page 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition, $5,000 contributed funds were expended for new work. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of dam, reservoir and service facilities, condition and operation studies, real estate activities and miscellaneous reports, were accomplished by hired labor at a cost of $514,497. Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program accomplished by U.S. Geological Survey and national Weather Service reporting and hydroclimatic network cost $100,762. Operation of the Water Control Center cost $301,444. Initiation of conversion of existing building to Visitor Center cost 2,818. Finalization of debris removal contract cost $4,009. Elevator maintenance cost 1,609. Engineering and design effort cost $102,238. Supervision and administration cost $21,153. 37. RENO BEACH-HOWARD FARMS AREA, OH Location. Area is located in Lucas County, on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of Toledo, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map for Reno Beach and Metzger Marsh, OH.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 20-14 of Annual Report for 1991. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed with the local Sponsor on July 22, 1988 and by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on September 30, 1988. Availability of lands, easements, and rights-of-way was received on June 5, 1990 from the local sponsors. Discussions continue with the local sponsors on credit for LERRD's based on independent appraisals and the amount of cash contribution. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction is 100% complete. FY92 costs were $12,150 for real estate, $1,748,234 for the construction contract including supervision and administration and $9,496 for in-house engineering effort. Non-Federal costs were $105,272 for construction contract, including supervision and administration. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of $123,320. This includes updating the hydraulics and hydrology of various local flood control projects. Total cost to September 30, 1992 was $1,924,765. 39. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FY92 costs were $120,191. 40. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 20-E. 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION CONESUS LAKE, LIVONIA, NY Location. Conesus lake is situated in western New York State about 25 miles south of the city of Rochester. (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Livonia, NY.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see Annual Report of 1991. See Table 20-B for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. On September 25, 1985, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation signed the Local Cooperation Agreement. For details see page 32-16 of Annual Report for FY86. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Balancing of Federal and non-Federal shares of cost resulted in a credit of $5 in Federal funds. EUCLID CREEK, CLEVELAND, OH Location. Euclid Creek has a drainage area of approximately 25 square miles and is located east of Cleveland in Cuyahoga County and a small portion in Lake County, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, East Cleveland, OH.) Existing project. For details of existing project, see page 32-14 of the Annual Report for 1983. Initial construction of project was completed in 1986. Repairs to failed bank were completed in May 1988. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements, see page 32-13 of Annual Report for 1984. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 92 costs were $94 for project administration. KEUKA LAKE, PENN YAN, NY Location. Keuka Lake is located in the southwestern part of New York State in the Oswego River Basin between Canandaigua Lake and Seneca Lake in the village of Penn Yan in Yates County. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Penn Yan, NY.) 20-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Existing Project. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, on January 25, 1991. The recommended plan of improvement consists of removal of an existing earthen and masonry dam located just upstream of the Main Street Bridge. In order to provide additional capacity and to aid in regulating lake levels, additional slide gates will be constructed in its place. The project will consist of a sheetpile structure with three slide gates, each 6 feet high and 6 feet wide. The new control structure will tie into the existing races located on each side of the stream. The operational policy will be to make releases through the dam to 1,000 CFS or the control structure's capacity, whichever is less. This policy will not induce additional adverse downstream flood impacts. Total Federal cost of the project is $369,800. Total non-Federal cost is $123,200. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, on October 11, 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Balancing of Federal and non-Federal shares of cost for preparing plans and specifications resulted in a credit of $15,288 Federal funds and a cost of $17,493 non-Federal funds. SWAN CREEK, TOLEDO, OH Location. Swan Creek is located in the city of Toledo, Lucas County, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847). Existing Project. The project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205 of the FLood Control Act of 1948, as amended, on May 15, 1991. The project is a combination of levees and steel sheetpile floodwalls along 3,100 linear feet of the left bank of Swan Creek, a small ponding area with three outfalls which provides for interior drainage, and relocation of about 500 linear feet of channel bottom. Total estimated cost is $1,486,000 Federal and $392,500 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the city of Toledo, OH, on May 1, 1989. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 92 costs were $150 for real estate activities and $41,644 for in-house engineering efforts. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Law 89, 84th Congress, as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood Control Act of 1962). FY 92 costs for the Disaster Preparedness Program were $283,108. Costs to support Emergency Operations totaled $6,409, which included reconnaissance efforts, liaison activities and providing technical advice to local response agencies in flood flight operations. FY 92 costs for the Emergency Rehabilitation Program totaled $178,268. This includes $174,949 to complete the emergency rehabiitation of concrete slope protection along Euclid Creek in the city of Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Non-Federal cost for that construction in FY 92 was $41,958. FY 92 Federal in-house engineering effort cost $212. Real estate activities cost $100 and contract costs, including supervision and administration were $174,638. Non-Federal cost was $41,958 for construction contract and supervision and administration. This project provides for the repair of 550 feet of damaged concrete slope protection located adjacent to the Section 205 Euclid Creek Flood Control Project completed in 1984. The emergency rehabilitation of flood control levees and streambank protection along Canaseraga Creek, in the town of West Sparta, Livingston County, NY will be terminated due to lack of non-Federal commitment. 42. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Table 20-I. General Investigations 43. SURVEYS During FY 92 costs of $345,987 were incurred as shown below: Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection Studies Special Studies Miscellaneous Investigations Coordination Studies Phase I, GDM Studies Comprehensive Studies Review of Authorized Projects $ 76,919 30,573 0 143,804 91,105 3,587 00 0 44. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the period, costs of $175,034 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $551,945 incurred under the Operations and Maintenance appropriation for a total cost of $726,979. Flood plain managment services were performed during the year at a cost of $190,542. During the year, flood hazard elevation studies were essentially completed for the towns of Greece and Hanover, NY, Cuyahoga Falls, OH, and the counties of Lucas and Geauga, OH. The results of these studies will enable local officials to encourage and enforce prudent use of the identified flood plains. Also hundreds of technical assistance requests regarding flood plain matters were completed during the year responding to individuals, corporations, real estate companies, insurance agents, engineering firms and local agencies. Costs for General Hydrologic Studies were $6,921. 20-14 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT 45. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $193,039 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design Advance Engineering and Design projects. For details of individual projects, see sections 15, 17, and 19 in text. 7 20-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept 30, 1992 1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) 3. Buffalo Harbor, NY 4. Buffalo Small Boat Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) 5. Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New, Work Contrib. Cost 898,500 900,683 574,896 734,621 150 793,383 728,505 247,000 256,262 - 12,805,339 1 - 12,805,339 1 542,500 13,695,329 599,355 13,679,225 - 6,077,000 - 6,077,000 - 11,135,1202 - 11,135,1202 1,073,524 1,638,600 1,070,271 1,538,005 3,567,500 44,573,4853 3,664,062 44,542,4863 - 620,000 - 620,000 - 23,115,1874 - 23,115,1874 768,000 1,555,250 771,923 1,467,633 502,000 619,756 2,089,000 59,527,765 s 1,900,758 59,299,754 s - 295,457 - 295,457 125,000 350,000 124,284 198,457 - 500,000 - 178,386 33,864 41,882 6,754 20,256 23,090 31,121 245,000 226,674 212,500 455,704 9,707 10,424 720,000 549,415 712,500 634,090 4,804,060 4,804,060 183,720 181,760 2,566,529 2,566,529 20-16 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept 30, 1992 6. Cleveland Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Conneaut Harbor, OH 8. Dunkirk Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) 9. Erie Harbor, PA 10. Fairport Harbor, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 127,579 2,986,000 3,440,654 335,000 3,316,000 321,423 3,208,526 4,079,074 4,272,000 4,433,578 3,961,820 250,000 36,047,2996 42,214 35,698,8266 5,678,500 165,678,059' 5,732,808 165,368,370' - 16,404,903 - 16,404,903 - 1,351,000 - 325,676 1,351,000 325,676 - 8,346,6418 - 8,346,641' 126,000 137,871 70,881 71,935 336,000 323,633 375,000 10,487,4839 386,734 10,486,8299 - 651,850 - 651,850 - 3,010,02410 - 3,010,02410 119,460 166,661 296,238 244,500 249,795 283,052 125,793 132,617 2,771,865 2,770,529 - 1,950,000" - 1,950,00011 - 3,597,87312 - 3,597,87312 400,512 404,352 288,129 288,593 82,000 77,754 99,000 94,679 17,063,40313 17,054,83113 1,154 1,154 843,000 895,406 130,047 1,032,000 137,961 999,660 948,917 805,990 2,959,61114 2,959,611's 16,827,636 16,650,944 20-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept 30, 1992 11. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 12. Huron Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Irondequoit Bay, NY (Contrib. Funds) 14. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 15. Lorain Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,629 2,629 8,898 8,891 80,973 80,543 40,212 40,610 610,95915 610,95915 2,600,673 2,600,641 713,544 713,54 -22,000 30,624 815,423 802,901 84,000 92,099 1,070,000 1,059,587 96 18,204 24,760 59,346 62,683 2,491 2,491 12,406 9,642 27,000 26,209 39,356 200,842 34,086 204,220 35,271 37,111 11,500 11,860 5,103,79516 5,103,79516 18,181,349 18,165,429 247,030 247,030 63,079 63,079 3,535,800 3,535,713 465,381 463,666 2,720,186 2,720,039 301,39417 301,39417 3,350,497 3,348,965 742,822 742,822 208,000 281,336 545,000 539,352 23,000 42,957 254 1,195,964 909,000 624,133 1,433,251 - 22,240,07318 92 22,239,77018 1,481,500 1,487,178 29,089,893 29,038,300 20-18 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept 30, 1992 (Contrib. Funds) 16. Oak Orchard Harbor, NY 17. Olcott Harbor, NY 18. Oswego Harbor, NY 19. Ottawa River Harbor, MI & OH 20. Port Ontario Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Rochester Harbor, NY New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp,. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 845,551 845,551 10,440 10,440 400,000 494,360 16,374 16,374 24,240 24,240 12,208 12,208 376,000 430,663 16,465 16,465 343,269 331,713 164,267 142,431 334,000 354,780 23,686 23,577 590,447 562,665 16,316 37,159 425,000 101,882 7,755 7,861 17,196 56,086 1,586,99619 1,586,99619 441,332 440,339 2,025,2100 1,700,0280 625,9582 625,9551 14,477 14,477 8,430,0163 8,430,016m 7,588,237 7,587,789 307,590 - 307,590 16,150 4,893 4,893 556 38,000 77,136 393 3,526 3,526 84,000 83,892 800 9,481 9,481 159,000 91,065 -9,379 4,656 5,607 5,607 342,000 273,957 2,390,621" 2,380,247= 23,866 23,866 - 1,350,000 - 1,335,591 - 2,439,308" - 2,439,308" 1,019,209 1,018,151 941,000 923,684 663,500 21,216,525" 678,609 21,213,243" 20-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept 30, 1992 22. Rocky River Harbor, OH 23. Sandusky Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 24. Toledo Harbor, OH 25. Vermilion Harbor, OH 26. West Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 27. Wilson Harbor, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 343,494 - 343,494 18,301 18,301 446,000 437,085 -4,554 2,894,800 2,779,048 31,941 31,941 210,275 487,428 30,303 28,171 275,038 275,400 41,942 43,690 - 6,727,270 - 6,727,270 1,317,845 1,015,000 1,056,371 1,280,209 973,200 18,241,484 958,069 18,198,179 -4,555 3,794,923 3,495,000 3,309,950 4,116,988 9,238 323,484 9,238 309,863 46,832 46,785 70,771 66,826 4,581,000 3,591,797 78,052 89,841 98,417 100,445 - 535,24632 - 535,24632 20-20 2,599,890 2,598,868 675,606 675,606 15,445 15,445 17,191,8422 17,191,8429 95,272,27630 94,281,27830 1,156,11831 1,156,11831 2,437,614 2,435,782 139,775 139,775 3,303,898 3,303,898 1,244,314 1,242,350 3,795,000 3,795,000 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept 30, 1992 30. Lake Erie Sturgeon Pt., NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30. Toussaint River Carroll Twsp., OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 31. Maumee Bay State Park, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. Century Park, Lorain, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 22,591 22,591 -15,000 -143,915 -108,000 948,684 9,747 9,747 -100,000 26,603 3,000 1,901 1,647 134,278 118,769 19,048 31,928 425 5,000 5,412 334,500 217,578 171,800 94,041 15,000 136,816 100,000 2,269,000 110,260 2,255,609 183,621 169,527 New Work Approp. 3,608,000 Cost 1,264,281 Maint. Approp. - Cost- New Work Contrib. 2,956,429 Cost 593,922 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 174,000 16,618 202,250 12,351 2,870 3,846,000 2,522,000 3,162,578 4,914,497 2,920,000 3,305,571 2,923,894 4,824,766 174,000 16,618 202,250 12,351 2,870 120,000 274,921 189,831 30,000 25,893 13,500 12,590 -40,000 71,799 10,158 39,379 26,388 -34,000 22,608 4,177,047 29,283,609 4,794,605 29,245,092 3,952,000 19,890,284 4,789,383 19,859,776 2,378 -848 2,105 20-21 717,078" 714,449" 1,686,9003 1,662,822" 21,500 19,903 1,356,858 1,354,726 294,500 289,377 171,800 104,199 2,786,379 2,758,850 149,621 192,135 4,978 4,978 418,500 418,255 202,250 202,182 951,844 947,343 249,707 249,707 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept 30, 1992 34. Sims Park, Euclid, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35. Ellicott Creek, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 36. Mt. Morris Lake, NY Genesee River 37. Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 41. Conesus Lake, Livonia, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 41. Euclid Creek, OH 41. Keuka Lake, NY (Federal Funds) 41. Swan Creek, Toledo, OH (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 15,000 3,915 70,000 57,584 547,000 29,421 - 678,700 - 22,001 1,081,000 987,246 253,000 238,554 1,233,500 1,092,381 335,000 163,353 71,785 166 22,167 513,537 567,486 767 759,500 731,957 678,700 589,486 11,193,767 11,191,758 - 653,000 - 638,620 - 23,365,559" - 23,365,5593s 1,392,838 1,209,000 1,519,711 1,205,414 237,093 2,260,000 129,669 2,531,449 250,000 62,500 38,400 47,510 1,000 12,462 35,000 31,260 8,000 11,783 37,253 125,000 292,079 65,000 64,996 1,177,283 17,714,930 1,048,530 17,530,086 1,864,000 1,769,880 57,500 105,272 5,531,560 5,427,228 432,500 397,351 - 2,134,400 -5 2,134,365 36 - 3,456,000 94 3,456,000 35,000 38,571 78,000 46,939 90 102,000 130,215 -15,288 38,000 41,794 187,036 171,632 561,500 561,500 1. Includes $565,192 for contributed funds. previous projects. Excludes $47,000 2. Includes $58,027 for previous projects. 3. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority adminstrative costs tranferred for new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations and costs 20-22 35,000 35,000 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operations and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 4. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projects. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized by Section 107. 5. Includes $1,883,647 for previous projects. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 6. Includes $1,564,154 for previous project and appropriations and costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act. 7. Includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operations and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operations of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 8. Includes $805,272 for previous projects. 9. Includes $39,784 for previous projects. 10. Includes $811,250 for previous projects. Exludes $11,000 contributed funds. 11. Includes $176,520 for previous projects. 12. Includes $736,967 for previous projects. 13. Includes $104,900 for previous projects. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 14. Includes $368,940 for previous projects. 15. Includes $361,772 for previous projects. 16. Includes $269,789 for previous projects. 17. Includes $232,328 for previous projects. 18. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Section 107, 1960 R&H Act. 19. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 20. Includes $140,210 for previous projects. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 21. Includes $38,959 for previous projects. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 22. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act. 23. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projects. 24. Includes $945,684 for previous projects. 25. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 26. Includes $247,794 for previous projects. 27. Includes $617,529 for previous projects and $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 28. Includes $477,149 for previous projects. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 29. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projects. 30. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 31. Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 32. Includes $57,342 for previous projects. Excludes $166,998 contributed funds. 33. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 34. Includes $341,900 study funds under authority Section 107, 1960 R&H Act. 35. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 20-23 __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Aug 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1905 ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH (See Section 1 of Text) Construction of breakwater. Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and constructing new east breakwater pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; and remove part of old east breakwater. Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Remove portion of east breakwater to, extend breakwaters to present dimensions and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater and maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Extend river channel to present project limit. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor 25-foot depth. A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters, thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater, thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard materials in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River, 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Dredging approach, channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY (See Section 2 of Text). Dredging channel through horseshoe reef at outlet of Lake Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor to 16 feet. Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deepwater pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier towpath wall. Annual Report,1895,p.2132 H. Doc. 654. 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 1st sess.Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 486, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 148, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 269, 89th cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1888, p.2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116-3120. H. Doc. 143, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1900 p. 4 15 2 . H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1901, p. 3 3 4 3 . H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2d sess. 20-24 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 June 26, 1934s Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 20, 1826 June 23, 1866 June 23, 1874 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1909 June 6, 1900 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 190710 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance channel. Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island Pier improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project. 7 Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY (See Section 3 of Text) Construction of south pier (extended in 1868)'. Construction of old breakwater.9 Extension of old breakwater. 9 Stony Point and south breakwater.9 North breakwater. 9 Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock shoal therein. Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' South entrance breakwater.9 Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site.9 Deepening areas A, B, D, in outer harbor to 21 feet, C in north entrance to 23 feet. Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2d sess. and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.289,68th Cong., 1st seas. H. Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 423, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. 4'8 Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 and 232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232 and 236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. Specified in acts. Specified in act. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 550, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong. 1st sess. 20-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945"1 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 3, 1875 Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor 21 feet. Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to 21 feet in cooperation with city of Buffalo. Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions. Deepening approach to south entrance channels, and deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of southerly part of outer harbor. Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and ontinuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act, combined within this act as a single improvement. Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan bridge. BUFFALO SMALL BOAT HARBOR, N Y (See Section 4 of Text). Repair dike at small boat harbor. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N Y (See Section 5 of Text). Construction of arrowhead breakwaters at mouth of Creek entrance channel 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep from that depth in lake to point 1,575 feet upstream; channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and recreational fishing facilities at mouth. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH (See Section 6 of Text). West breakwater. H.Doc. 481,68th Cong.,2d seas. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 451, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 15, 1980. Sec. 18, PL 100-676. H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report,1876, p.558. 20-26 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Part of east breakwater.9 Extension of east breakwater. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d sess, and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865.H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 29, 1937 Aug. 30, 193512 Aug. 30, 193511 Mar. 2, 19451' July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 Reconstruction of piers.9 H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor in discretion of Secretary of War. Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater, removal of easterly 150 feet of west breakwater, elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension on west pier, and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit. 5"6 Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges. 2 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie-Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower, 2,000 feet of river.3 H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1899, p. 30 7 5 and 3078. H. Doc. 118, 56th Cong., 2d sess. No printed report. H. Doc. 891, 63d cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 63d Cong., 2d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 477, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 20-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 6, 1966. Sec. 175, PL 94-587 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin. An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater; construction of breakwater extension of east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and, installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. Deepening and widening east entrance and approach channels, channels, deepening the east basin channel and disposing of dredge material in an existing disposal site, as described in the Report to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors January 22, 1985, including bulkheading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient vessels in the area south of Pier 34 and including such modifications as may be recommended by the Chief of Engineers at a cost not to exceed $36,000,000. Bulkheading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient vells in the area south of Pier 34. Appropriates and directs the Secretary of the Army to use the sum of $11,000,000 which is to remain available until expended to carry out the provisions for the harbor modifications contained in PL 99-662. Sec. 202, PL 99-662. PL 100-202. 20-28 Aug. 15, 1985 PL 99-88 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 21, 1987 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935n" Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 19668 Nov. 28, 1990 Mar. 2, 1827 Mar. 2, 1867 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 30, 1948 CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH (See Section 7 of Text) Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater, removal of portion of old west breakwater, and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Realignment of west breakwater, removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal of Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier.17 Removal of portion of west breakwater, extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions, construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier, extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized, but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Recreational small boat harbor provided by: a stone dike about 2,200 feet long; acess channels 6 feet deep, 2,800 feet long and 100 feet wide; closing of 100-foot gap in existing west breakwater, and personnel guardrail on west breakwater. Continuation of 1966 authorization. DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY (See Section 8 of Text). Construction of west pier. 9"8 Breakwater and evacuation of entrance channel to 13 feet. 9 Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth of suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2d seas. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 48, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 89th Cong., 2d sess.4 Sec. 107, PL 101-640. S.Ex.Doc.42, 35th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1866 pt. IV, p.155 Annual Report,1871,p. 214 H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong. 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2d sess. 20-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 15, 1970 (House Public Works Committee) June 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Committee) Sec. 201 of F.C.Act of 1965 May 26, 1824 Mar. 3, 1899 June 15, 1910 Nov. 28, 192020 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 182521 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 Construction of small-boat harbor. ERIE HARBOR, PA (See Section 9 of Text). Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle peninsula.9 Deepening channel and harbor basin too 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection of work on peninsula. Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier, thence 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over 300-foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin. Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH (See Section 10 of Text). Construction of piers. Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H.Doc.70,55th Cong.,1st sess. and Annual Report, 1896,p.3237.19 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 52, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153. H.Doc.347,54th Cong.,1st sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p.2956; 1903, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. 20-30 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 14, 196032 May 10, 1977 (House Public Works Comm.) Oct. 1, 1976 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Nov. 28, 1990 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier, and deepening of to 19 feet. 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the United States of $715,000. Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier, and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Dredging of 8-foot river channel. Depth of 29 feet in the approach channel from the lake; a depth of 28 feet over a width of 800 feet in outer harbor; a depth of 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in Grand River, over a width of 200 feet to upstream limit of the turning basin, with suitable widening at the bends, thence over widths reducing from 200 to 100 feet to the upstream limit of the existing Federal project, except in the 8-foot channel; enlargement of the turning basin, including deepening of the entire basin to 21 feet; and minor modification of the existing project limits in the outer harbor. Construction of a small boat harbor. Continuation of 1960 and 1965 authorizations. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY (See Section 11 of Text). Construction of piers and breakwater. 9 Extension of piers to 15-foot contour in the lake. Deepening and widening of channel to 18-foot depth and 150-foot width. Widening channel lakeward of piers to 250 feet. H. Doc. 206, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2d sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 347, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 627, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, PL 101-640 Annual Report, 1876 pt. II p. 589. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2442. H. Doc. 192, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 70th Cong., 1st sess. 20-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935" Oct. 23, 1962 July 3, 1958 Aug. 30, 1852 June 23, 1866 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 3, 1881 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1899 Dredging channel to present project dimensions. HURON HARBOR, OH (See Section 12 of Text). Extension of west pier, construction of east breakwater, removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier, construction of new spur pier, enlargment of sheltered area; and closure of beach at shore end of west pier. Extension of west pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and contruction pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier, and elimination from project constuction of spur pier and dreding shelterd area outside channel limits. Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin and abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY (See Section 13 of Text). Construction of entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels, a distance of about 1,300 feet; inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet, access channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the west; two stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 750 in length at the natural entrance; and recreational facilities. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY (See Section 14 of Text). West entrance pier.9 Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel to 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide.9 East pier and east breakwater.9 Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. LORAIN HARBOR, OH (See Section 15 of Text). Breakwaters and extension of piers to present dimensions. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 2d sess. H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. 2d sess. 122, 58th Cong., 5, 63d Cong., 1st 478, 72d Cong., H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report,1874, p.256 Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report,1871,p.234 Annual Report, 1881, pp. 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364. H. Doc. 131,55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. 20-32 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 3b, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. Extend breakwaters to present dimensions. Deepen outer harbor and river channel of Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock. Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock.' 2 Approach channel to municipal pier. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr. 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to present project dimensions. Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater, to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project.27 Construction of a 225 foot detached rubblemound breakwater and an 800 foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Two bed cuts on Black River between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and 21st Street Bridge, excavated to existing channel depth of 27 feet. Widening Upper Turning Basin at existing authorized depth of 21 feet.8 OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, NY(See Section 16 of Text) Harbor of refuge. H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 469, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2d seas. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st. sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Mar 12, 1986 H. Doc. 124, 99th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 20-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 4, 1913 Nov. 17, 1986 July 11, 1870 Mar. 2, 1907 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 June 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 17, 1970 Nov. 28, 1990 OLCOTT HARBOR, NY (See Section 17 of Text). Dredging a channel 11 feet deep between parallel piers.9 Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. Construct the project for Navigation, Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 11, 1980. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY (See Section 18 of Text). Construction of outer west breakwater. 9 Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A).3 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer harbor between breakwaters; west outer harbor east of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet."9 Widening channel to harbor line in Oswego River north of Seneca Street. Closing gap in west breakwater, deepening west outer harbor, west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth.3 Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of the inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and basin in east outer harbor.31 Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 24-foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. OTTAWA RIVER HARBOR,MI,OH (See Section 19 of Text). 6-foot deep, 16,500-foot long channel in Ottawa River and 8-foot deep, 15,000-foot channel in Maumee Bay. Continuation of authorization. Annual Report, 1866, pt. III, p. 15 pt. IV, p. 158. H. Doc. 780, 62d Cong., 2d seas. 4 Sec. 601, PL 99-662 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220 and 221. H.Doc.55,58th Cong.2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 722, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 487, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 396, 91st Cong.,2d sess. Sec. 107, PL 101-640. 20-34 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 June 10, 1872 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 19352 PORT ONTARIO, NY (See Section 20 of Text). Construct harbor of refuge. Maintain harbor of refuge. ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY (See Section 21 of Text). Construction of piers.9 Extension of piers to 15-foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers.9 Deepening channel to 20 feet. Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Maintenance of existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. bridge. Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier, a depth of 23 feet beween the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH (See Section 22 of Text). East pier and dredging of channel. Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH (See Section 23 of Text). Construction of channel protection works. Widening of Straight and Dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Extension of east jetty to toal length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of Dock channel to 20 feet. Deepening of Dock Channel to 22 feet. Enlargement of turning basin and construction of rock dike. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 615, PL 99-662. Annual Report,1874,p.247. Annual Report, 1881,p.2437 Annual Report, 1905,p. 2 3 8 3 H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Annual Report 1871, p. 2 1 1 H. Doc. 70, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2708. H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73d Cong, 1st sess. 20-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 4, 1836 Maintenance of Bay Channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Extending Moseley Channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to junction Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from the junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania Coal dock No. 3 to 24 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH (See Section 24 of Text). A channel 400 feet wide and 21 feet deep from 25-foot contour in Maumee Bay to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide and 19 feet deep above that point and a 500 -foot turning basin at Upper End. A stone revetted earth dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Act 1899 modified to insure a navigable channel to 21 feet from Fassett Street Bridge to Lake. Channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 25-foot contour to mouth of Maumee River (300 feet wide on each side of center dike in Bay Channel), thence 400 feet wide to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide above that point and a turning basin at Upper end 18 feet deep. Widening at bend of mouth of River opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Removal of center dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Enlarge widening at bend opposite Chesapeake and Ohio dock and turning basin opposite American Shipbuilding Co. dock. Deepening Bay Channel including widenings to 28 feet, deepen River channels to New York Central Railroad Bridge to 27 feet and construct new turning basin below Anthony Wayne Bridge. 8 VERMILION HARBOR, OH (See Section 25 of Text). Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 144, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 Annual Report, 1880. 20-36 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1875 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1958 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 3, 1968 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Mar. 7, 1974 Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Reconstruction of piers. New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. WEST HARBOR, OH (See Section 26 of Text). Construction of arrowhead breakwaters, entrance channel and access channel. WILSON HARBOR, NY (See Section 27 of Text). Entrance channel 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep; and restore east amd west piers. Extend existing channel 300 feet; and construct new channel 3,800 feet long through Tuscarora Bay. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY (See Section 30 of Text). Rehabilitate existing breakwater, construct rubblemound west breakwater extension, construct rubblemound east breakwater, a shore revetment and dredging. TOUSSAINT RIVER, CARROLL TWSP., OH (See Section 30 of Text). Dredged channel from the mouth of the Toussaint River, 2,100 feet into the Lake Erie, 4 feet below LWD, 150 feet wide in Lake Erie and tapered to 100 feet at the river mouth. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK BAY, OH (See Section 31 of Text). Protective sand beach stabilized by rubblemound offshore breakwaters and jetties alongs the west half of park shoreline and rubblemound revetment at the east end of the park. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA (See Section 32 of Text). Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Periodic nourishment of shores for a 10-year period. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Annual Report,1874,p.219 H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 76th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 112, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 107, PL86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 21, 1987 Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Sept. 29, 1990. Sec. 501, PL 99-662. H. Doc. 231, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 397,86th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 796, 93d Cong., 2d sess. 20-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 as amended Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Dec. 22, 1944 June 30, 1948 June 30, 1948 as amended June 30, 1948 as amended Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced offshore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sandfill. Construct offshore breakwaters and restore beaches. CENTURY PARK, LORAIN, OH (See Section 34 of Text). Construction of two stone groins, removal of a stone deflection wall and placement of clean beach fill material. LAKESHORE PARK, ASHTABULA, OH (See Section 34 of Text). Construction of offshore breakwaters, restoration of an 800-foot long beach, and subsequent periodic nourishment as necessary. SIMS PARK, EUCLID, OH (See Section 34 of Text) Construction of approximately 800-foot long by 180-foot wide artificial headlands beach; approximately 108,000 square feet of improved beach surface area; fronted by three segmented rubblemound breakwaters, and east and west terminal groins. ELLICOTT CREEK, NY (See Section 35 of Text). Widening, straightening and deepening channel in Ellicott Creek Park; construct diversion channels; construct 3 highway bridges; modify utilities and drainage outlets; and construct recreation facilities. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY (See Section 36 of Text). Construction of a concrete gravity dam and reservoir. RENO BEACH-HOWARD FARMS AREA, OH (See Section 37 of Text). Construction of dike and levees. CONESUS LAKE, LIVONIA, NY (See Section 41 of Text). Construction of sheetpiling, concrete control structure, outlet channel, and creek channelization. EUCLID CREEK, CLEVELAND, OH (See Section 41 of Text). Construction of diversion channel, levees, and creek channelization. Sec. 101, PL 94-587 Sec. 501, PL 99-662. Sec. 103, PL 87-874, Authorized by Chief of Engineer July 11, 1989. Sec. 103, PL 87-874. Authorized by Chief of Engineers April 26, 1982. Sec. 103, PL 87-874. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jan. 10, 1991 Sec. 201, PL 91-611 Sec. 14, PL 93-251 H.Doc 615,78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 554, 80th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205, PL 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 22, 1985. Sec. 205, PL 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 9, 1981. 20-38 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Acts Work Authorized Documents June 30, 1948 as amended June 30, 1948 as amended KEUKA LAKE, PENN YAN, NY (See Section 41 of Text). Removal of an existing earthen and masonry dam located just upstream of the Main Street Bridge and replace with additional slide gates tied into existing races located on each side of the stream. SWAN CREEK, TOLEDO, OH (See Section 41 of Text). Construct levees and sheetpile floodwalls along 3,100 linear feet of the left bank, a small ponding area with three outfalls for interior drainage, and relocation of about 500 linear feet of channel bottom. Sec 205, PL 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jan. 25, 1991. Sec 205, PL80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 15, 1991. 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River downstream at end of Cut 4 classfied inactive. 3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 4. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar. 3, 1905. 11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriations Act approved April 1, 1944. 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug. 5, 1927. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification was deauthorized Nov. 1981. 20. Public Law 366. 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22.Partly included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 23. First Supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 1944 approved Dec. 23, 1943. 24. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 to and including Old River, classified deferred. 25. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 26. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Aug. 1982. 27. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel at Cut 1 has been deauthorized. 28. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet an turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 29. Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is deauthorized. 30. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor deauthorized in May 1981. 31. Modification eliminated by River and Harbor Act of Oct. 26, 1962. 32. Modification classfied inactive. 20-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 20-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 29 of Text) Construction Cost to September 30, 1992 Operations and Maintenance Barcelona Harbor, NY Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH' Black River Harbor, NY4 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY Cattaraugus Creek, NY5s Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH Grasse River (Massena),NY Kelleys Island, OH Little River at Cayuga Island, NY Morristown Harbor, NY Niagara Remedial Works, NY' Niagara River, NY'3 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY Port Clinton Harbor, NY Pultneyville Harbor, NY" Put in Bay, OH Sackets Harbor, OH Sandusky River, OH4 Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1989 2 _2 1962 2 1990 1891 197412 1969 1949 1966 1964 1987 1985 1934 195112 1982 1894 $ 1,185,85316 19,763' 42,401 275,082 57,410 3,145,17617 9,0003 129,874 46,804' 6,221 6,069,395 559,4579 1,720,46614 71,950 68,219 51,609 25,010 58,0003 $ 1,934,834 1,565,262 3,249 5,949 12,364 510,819 225,415 1,399,363's 942,532 20,087 14,050 27,955 557 1. No commerce reported. 2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Channel improved by local interests. 7. Includes local interests contribution of $25,742. 8. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. 9. Includes local interest contribution of $27,563. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 11. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 12. Annual Report for Detroit District. 13. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H Act was authorized by Congress in August 1977. 14. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. Excludes $57,000 contributed funds. 15. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 16. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $181,500 contributed funds. 17. Excludes $3,261,375 contributed funds. 20-40 Project Status For Last Full Report See Annual Report For BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Fuall Report See Annual Project Report For Construction Cost to September 30, 1992 Operations and Maintenance Hamlin Beach State Park, NY Completed 1976 $ 1,769,600 - Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH Completed 1987 1,741,1252- Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, NY' Completed 1963 58,978 $ 2,946 1. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. 2. Does not include $739,700 contributed funds. 20-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 20-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) For Last Cost to Full Report September 30, 1992 See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Auburn, NY, Owasco Oulet Completed 1962 $ 371,985- Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, NY Completed 1957 335,385 - Camp Perry, OH Completed 19678 275,000- Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY2 Completed 1984 1,404,500 Cuyahoga River Basin, OH Active 1985 1,117,000 Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, NY Active 1985 490,300- Fremont, OH, Sandusky River Completed 1976 8,589,8246 Ithaca, Cayuga Inlet, NY Completed 1978 3,929,30(0?- Lackawanna, NY, Smokes Creek Completed 1971 3,542,0684 Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY Completed 1954 797,300 Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY Completed - 226,429- Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, NY Completed 1954 1,681,785 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY2 Completed 1964 330,231 Ottawa, OH Deferred 1989 374,000- Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Inactive Brook, NY' Deferred 1950 281,559 Point Place, Toledo, OH Completed 1990 9,885,733" Scajaquada Creek, NY Completed 1985 4,944,852 Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, NY Completed 1954 3,349,248 Warsaw, NY, Oatka Creek2 Completed 1969 558,317- Wellsville, NY, Genesee River Completed 1978 3,145,30310 1. In active portion of work for State Ditch has been done by local interest and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request oflocal intersts. 2. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 88-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropiration, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 4. Includes local intersts contribution of $50,000. 5. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 6. Includes local interests contribution of $,944. Excludes cost of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastol Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 7. Includes local interest contribution of $125,000. 8. Annual Report for Detroit District. 9. Includes local intersts contribution of $99,000. Excludes costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. 11. Excludes $1,871,631 contributed funds. 20-42 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 30 of Text) Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost $ East Harbor State Park, OH 14,187 Henderson Harbor Cut, NY 19,568 Lake Erie, Cooley Canal, Lucas, OH 8,213 North Sandy Pond, Oswego County, NY 12 TABLE 20-H FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 41 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Sec. 205 Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost $ Avon, OH 9,751 Beaver Run/Walnut Creek, Milicreek, PA 5,677 Black Creek, Town of Chili, NY 34,173 Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY 2 Cazenovia Creek, NY 170 Cross Lake, NY 15,907 Cuyahoga River, Tinkers Creek, OH 14,733 Cuyahoga River, Valley View, OH 29,568 Cuyahoga River, West Creek, Independence, OH 9,339 Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY 38,104 Murder-Goose Neck Creek, Corfu, NY 8,104 Murder-Goose Neck Creek, Pembroke, NY 9,648 North Ridgeville, OH 18,705 Oneida Creek, NY 5,098 W. Br. Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY 181,127 20-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1992 TABLE 20-H(Cont.) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 41 of Text) Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1986 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost $ Auburn Water Pump Fac'l, Auburn, NY 3,511 Auglaize River, Paulding County, OH 3,023 Beechwood Girl Scout Camp, Sodus, NY 2,079 Butternut Creek, E. Syracuse, NY 3,688 Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY 8,708 Canaseraga Creek, Dansville, NY 11,894 Cattaraugus Creek, Village of Arcade, NY 34,764' Chagrin River, Solon Rd., OH -4,052 Chagrin River, East Branch, Route 84, OH 18,5222 Cuyahoga River, Akron Peninsula Rd., OH -6,3383 Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Rd., OH 35,9444 Cuyahoga River at Co. Hwy. 10, OH 10,151 Domonakas Library, Sheffield, OH 19,684 Ganargua Creek, Plasermill Rd., NY 17,787 Genesee River, Back River Rd., Amity, NY 4,7694 Lake Erie, Eastlake, OH 3,986 Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY 9 5 ,6 2 6s Lake Erie, Middle Bass Island, Deist Rd., OH -21,4536 Lake Erie, SR 531, Ashtabula, OH 13,650 Lake Sawyer, Camp Miakonda, Toledo, OH 8,854 Maumee River, Providence Metropark, OH 2,815 Maumee River, Wallbridge Park, OH 3,939 Seneca Falls, NY 29,614 Thatcher Brook, Gowanda, NY 60 Warrenville Township, Mill Creek, OH 0' 1. Does not include $11,030 in contributed funds. 4. Does not include $27,063 in contributed funds. 2. Does not include $13,128 in contributed funds. 5. Does not include $25,655 in contributed funds. 3. Does not include $7,781 in contributed funds. 6. Does not include $21,453 in contributed funds. 7. Does not include $2,816 in contributed funds. 20-44 BUFFALO, N Y DISTRICT TABLE 20-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 42 of Text) For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act' 1962 Aug 1977 - - Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1954 R&H Act 1962 May 1981 -- Buffalo Harbor Drift Removal, NY - Dec 1992 - - Buffalo Ship Canal, Buffalo, NY - Dec 1992 - - Caledonia, Genesee River, NY 1950 FC Act 1950 Jan 1990 - - Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1962 Nov 1986 -- Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 FC Act 1948 Jan 1990 $ 12,464 - Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act 19683 Nov 1979 -- Dunkirk Harbor, NY WRDA 1986 Dec 1992- Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC ACt 1976 Jan 1990 506,344 - Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act - Jan 1990 - - Elk Creek Harbor, PA 1966 R&H Act 1978 Dec 1992 101,500 - Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act 1963 Nov 1981- Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977- Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1982 -- Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act - Jan 1990 - - Fort Niagara State Park, NY, Sec. 201 1965 FC Act - Jan 1990 - - Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 Aug 1977 1,524 - Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1941 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 -- Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act 1973 Jan 1990 72,052 - Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC Act 1951 Nov 1983 29,000- Huron Harbor, OH 1962 R&H Act6 1963 Jan 1990 Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 8,159 - Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 12,300 - Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act, modified by 1966 Jan 1990 - 1965 R&H Act5 Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act 19713 Nov 1977 12,000- Niagara River, Compensating Works, 1930 R&H Act 1964 Aug 1977 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act 1986 Nov 1986 Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act 1963 Jan 1990 -- Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act2 1963 May 1981 - Port Bay, NY 1950 R&H Act - Jan 1990 -- Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act 1975 Nov 1986 361,241 - Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 May 1981 19,010 - Selkirk Shores State Park, OH 1954 R&H Acts 1963 Jan 1990 - - Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act - Aug 1977 - Watkins Glenn, NY 1941 FC Act 1958 Aug 1977 43,182- White City Park, OH 1954 R&H Act - Jan 1990 - 1. Extension of guide pier only; other improvements completed. 4. Deepen East Outer Harbor. 2. Deepening of west outer harbor, other improvements completed. 5. Uncompleted portion. 3. Annual Report for Detroit District. 6. Breakwater. 20-45 I DETROIT, MI DISTRICT* The district is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U.S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 601.1 feet; Lake Michigan- Huron, 577.5 feet; Lake Erie, 569.2 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 572.3 feet. These elevations are in feet above the mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec -- International Great Lakes Datum, 1985 (IGLD 1985). The IGLD 1985 is a datum or reference system used to define water levels within the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River system. This datum was implemented in January 1992, officially replacing IGLD 1955. At the time IGLD 1955 was established, it was recognized that this datum would have to be periodically revised due to isostatic rebound. Isosatic rebound is the gradual rising or bouncing back of the earth's crust from the weight of the glaciers that covered the Great Lakes region during the last ice age. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Alpena Harbor, MI.................. 2. Arcadia Harbor, MI ................ 3. Ashland Harbor, WI ................ 4. AuSable Harbor, MI ................ 5. Bayport Harbor, MI ................ 6. Big Bay Harbor, MI ................ 7. Black River, (Port Huron) MI .......... 8. Black River Harbor, (U.P.) MI ......... 9. Bolles Harbor, MI ................. 10. Caseville Harbor, MI ............... 11. Charlevoix Harbor, MI .............. 12. Clinton River, MI ................. 13. Cornucopia Harbor, WI.............. 14. Detroit River, MI ................. 15. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI ..... 16. Fox River, WI .................. 17. Frankfort Harbor, MI .............. 18. Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI. 19. Grand Marais Harbor, MI ........... 20. Grand Marais Harbor, MN .......... 21. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI ....... 22. Green Bay Harbor, WI ............. 23. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI .......... 24. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI ........... 25. Holland Harbor, MI ............... 26. The Inland Route, MI .............. 27. Kenosha Harbor, WI .............. 28. Kewaunee, WI .................. 29. Keweenaw Waterway, MI ........... 30. LaPointe Harbor, WI .............. 31. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels in ....... 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2t 2, Page 21-2 21-3 21-3 21-3 21-4 21-4 21-4 21-5 21-5 21-6 21-6 21-7 21-8 21-8 21-9 21-10 21-11 21-11 21-12 21-13 21-13 21-13 21-14 21-15 21-15 21-16 21-16 21-17 21-17 21-18 21-18 Navigation (Continued) 32. Leland Harbor, MI ...... 33. Lexington Harbor, MI .... 34. Little Lake Harbor, MI .... 35. Ludington Harbor, MI .... 36. Manistee Harbor, MI ..... 37. Manistique Harbor, MI .... 38. Manitowoc Harbor, WI .... 39. Marquette Harbor, MI . . . 40. Menominee Harbor and River, 41. Milwaukee Harbor, WI .... 42. Monroe Harbor, MI ...... 43. Muskegon Harbor, MI .... 44. New Buffalo Harbor, MI .. . 45. Oconto Harbor, WI ...... 46. Ontonagon Harbor, MI .... 47. Pensaukee Harbor, WI .... 48. Pentwater Harbor, MI..... 49. Port Austin Harbor, MI .... 50. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI ... 51. Port Washington Harbor, WI 52. Port Wing Harbor, WI .... 53. Presque Isle Harbor, MI . . . 54. Rouge River, MI ........ 55. Saginaw River, MI ....... 56. St. Clair River, MI ...... 57. St. Joseph Harbor, MI .... 58. St. Marys River, MI ...... 59. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamaz 60. Sebewaing Harbor, MI .... 61. Sheboygan Harbor, WI .... 62. South Haven Harbor, MI . . . Page ......... 21-19 ......... 21-19 ......... 21-20 ......... 21-20 ......... 21-20 ......... 21-21 . . .... ... 21-21 ...... ... 21-22 MI and WI . 21-23 ......... 21-23 ......... 21-24 ......... 21-25 ......... 21-25 ......... 21-26 ......... 21-26 ......... 21-27 ......... 21-27 ......... 21-28 ......... 21-28 ......... 21-28 ......... 21-29 ......... 21-29 ......... 21-29 ......... 21-30 ......... 21-31 ......... 21-31 ......... 21-32 :oo River, MI 21-34 21-35 21-35 21-36 21-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation (Continued) 63. Sturgeon Bay & Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI .... 64. Two Harbors, MN ............. 65. Two Rivers Harbor, WI ......... 66. White Lake Harbor, MI ......... 67. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 68. Other Authorized Navigation Projects . 69. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........... Page ... 21-36 ... 21-37 . . 21-37 ) 1 _3Q Beach Erosion Control 70. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects. 21-38 71. Emergency Shore Protection ......... 21-38 72. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization .............. 21-39 73. Mitigation of Shore Damages ......... 21-39 Flood Control 74. Saginaw River, MI ................ 21-39 75. Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI ....... 21-41 76. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............. 21-41 77. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . . 21-41 Navigation 1. ALPENA HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Thunder Bay River which empties into Thunder Bay, Lake Huron. Harbor is 100 miles southeast of Cheboygan Harbor, MI. River has its source in Montmorency and Alpena Counties, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Previous project. For details see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1548 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a bay channel 200 feet wide and 25 feet deep from deep water in Thunder Bay to a point 300 feet lakeward of the Alpena Light; thence an entrance channel 24 feet deep, narrowing to a width of 100 feet at a point 700 feet upstream from the light; a river channel 100 feet wide, 23 feet deep to Second Avenue Bridge; thence 18.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide for 1,600 feet to upper limit of Federal project; a turning Flood Control (Continued) 78. Flood Control Under Special Authorization ............. 79. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters and International Water Studies ...... . 1 JO- . . 21-38 General Investigations .. 21-38 80. Surveys ..................... 81. Preconstruction Engineering and Design . 21-38 82. Collection and Study of Basic Data .... Page S21-41 . 21-42 S21-46 S21-46 S21-47 Tables Table 21-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... 21-48 Table 21-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 21-67 Table 21-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........... 21-80 Table 21-D Not Applicable ................ Table 21-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............. 21-81 Table 21-F Multiple Purpose Projects, including Power, St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project ............. 21-81 Table 21-G Deauthorized Projects ......... 21-82 Table 21-H Features of Existing Project ..... 21-84 Table 21-I Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams . . . 21-85 Table 21-J Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys 21-86 basin at upstream end of project, basin at river mouth 19 feet deep, trapezoidal in shape, with a maximum width of 700 feet including the channel width and a maximum length of 900 feet along the channel line, including removal of existing rubble breakwater; and a breakwater about 550 feet long paralleling lakeward side of new turning basin. Work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, which consists of the proposed turning basin and breakwater reconfiguration, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986; Public Law (PL) 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several commercial docks along Thunder Bay River used primarily for receipt of coal and petroleum products. Also a municipal marina basin about 0.25 mile southwest of river mouth. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 21-2 . . . DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,582. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging was performed at a cost of $15,825. Existing project was completed in 1939. The modification of existing project at Alpena Harbor, as authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, was reclassified into an inactive status May 22, 1969 based on an unfavorable benefit-cost ratio. In 1975 the modification was recommended and reviewed for deauthorization, which was withdrawn by Congressional Resolution the same year. Subsequently, the work authorized by the 1965 Act was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986. Project features are in good condition. Total costs to end of FY for existing project were $1,326,696 of which $337,394 was for new work and $989,302 for maintenance. 2. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests, for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $26,953. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,955. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $12,182, removing approximately 3,703 cubic yards of shoal material by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, supervision and administration cost $22,973. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Maintenance of the harbor is based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in excellent condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,353,052. 3. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, real estate activities, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $33,788. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $5,014,265, of which $1,695,645 was for new work and $3,318,620 for maintenance. 4. AUSABLE HARBOR AT AUSABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI Location. The AuSable River and village of Oscoda, MI, are on the west shore of Lake Huron, 8 miles north of AuSable Point, northeast limit of Saginaw Bay. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see pages 336 and 2453 of Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. Riprapping outer 200 feet of north pier at mouth of AuSable River, dredging an entrance 21-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 channel 12 feet deep and dredging between piers and upstream to State highway bridge 10 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small timber pile wharves used primarily by commercial fishermen and pleasure craft operators; also a private marina basin east of Highway 23 Bridge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,749. An adjustment of -$18,144 was made in contract cost for maintenance dredging completed last FY. Supervision and administration to close out contract cost $532. Existing project was completed in 1962. Total cost for existing project to the end of FY was $3,033,621, of which $209,776 was for new work (includes $16,400 contributed funds) and $2,823,845 for maintenance. 5. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI Location. On Wild Fowl Bay on east shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Caseville, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14863.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide extending 5,750 feet from 6-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to intersection of private service channels to be dredged by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small wharves used primarily by commercial fishermen. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $916. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging, removing approximately 27,364 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $165,491. Construction of dikes for the disposal area and removal of approximately 4,957 cubic yards of shoal material outside the project limits, a non-federal responsibility, was performed at the request of the State of Michigan at a cost of $88,906. Engineering, design, real estate, supervision and administration of the contract cost $55,424. Of the funds expended $97,117 was contributed by the State of Michigan. Existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $639,505, of which $93,597 was for new work and $545,908 for maintenance (which includes $120,286 contributed funds). 6. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 33 miles northwesterly from Marquette, MI, and 38 miles easterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for two converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. For details see page 1009 of Annual Report for 1965 and page 1261 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A State-owned launching ramp and dock for small craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $4,438. Supervision and administration in connection with close-out of maintenance dredging contract completed last FY cost $665. Project was completed in June 1961 except for protection at inner end of east breakwater, completed in November 1961. Total cost to end of FY was $1,757,093 of which $390,433 was for new work and $1,366,660 for maintenance. 7. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI Location. This river has its source in the northern part of Sanilac County, MI, is about 60 miles long, and flows 21-4 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See NOAA Nautical chart 14852.) Previous project. For details see page 1441 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 1554 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 20 feet deep from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the mouth, decreasing to 100 feet, about 800 feet from the mouth, thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet for a distance of 4,800 feet; widening two bends to 100 feet, one at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet; and then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river channel, 8 feet deep to the 1-94 bridge where it decreases to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. The project modification authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935, is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost for new work. The cost of this modification was last revised in 1954 and was estimated to be $194,000 exclusive of $194,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are docks on both sides of Black River, near its mouth, and between these docks and the upper limit of improvement there are 5 other docks varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are privately owned and are restricted to the use of the owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available, as are privately owned and operated marinas. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,755. Removal of obstructions by the U. S. Derrickbarge HURON was performed at a cost of $7,964. Supervision and administration of the project cost $1,582. An adjustment of -$9,660 was assessed the contractor that performed maintenance dredging last FY. All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 1935, and the latest modification, has been completed. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $2,149,149, of which $830,165 was for new work (includes $349,921 contributed funds) and $1,318,984 for maintenance. 8. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (UPPER PENINSULA), MI Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, MI, and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Existing project. Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Full complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. Terminal facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet; on west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, monitoring, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,243. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 7,295 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $37,829. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $44,326. Project was completed in June 1958. Total costs for existing project to end of FY was $1,185,604 of which $383,350 was for new work and $802,254 was for maintenance. 9. BOLLES HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Erie at mouth of La Plaisance Creek 7 miles southwest of Monroe, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14846.) 21-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel in Lake Erie, 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water to a point opposite the outer end of existing jetty, thence widening to 100 feet at creek mouth; an access channel in La Plaisance Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the mouth widening to 120 feet and extending to the first bend, thence narrowing to 50 feet wide and continuing at that width to the La Plaisance Road bridge; a steel sheet pile revetment, about 200 feet long, located along Michigan State Conservation Department property on west side of channel at creek mouth. Project also provides for inclusion of existing 400-foot long steel sheet pile jetty constructed by Michigan State Waterways Commission at the mouth of La Plaisance Creek. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Monroe Boat Club and three marinas provide facilities adequate for existing recreational boat traffic. There is also a public launching ramp and parking area at the Conservation Department fishing site at creek mouth. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance; Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $16,657. An adjustment of 2,218 cubic yards of shoal material and -$19,847 was made in cost of maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $10,751. The existing project was completed in 1970. Total cost for existing project to the end of FY was $3,601,434, of which $426,413 was for new work (includes $255,000 contributed funds) and $3,175,021 for maintenance. 10. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Pigeon River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 17 miles southwest of Port Austin, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14860.) Existing project. A small craft harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater protected channel extending from the 10-foot contour in Saginaw Bay into Pigeon River. Project depths are 10 and 8 feet. For additional details see page 1320 of Annual Report for 1963. Widening river channel from 50 to 60 feet for about 1,000 feet, with widening to 80 feet in upper 300-foot reach, is considered inactive. Estimated (1963) cost of this portion of project is $30,000 (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Complete public boating facilities constructed by State and local agencies are available in addition to privately owned and operated marinas. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,333. An adjustment of -$8,209 was made in contract cost for maintenance dredging completed last FY. Cost to close out the contract, surveys, supervision and administration were $9,592. The existing project was completed in 1964 except for the inactive portion of the project. Total cost to end of FY was $1,919,671, of which $587,314 was for new work (including $293,657 contributed funds) and $1,332,357 for maintenance. 11. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Section 25 of the WRDA of 1988 provides authorization pertaining to the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor. It states, "The Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to restore recreational uses established prior to May 1, 1988, or provide comparable recreation uses at the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor project, Charlevoix, Michigan in order to mitigate any adverse impact on recreational uses resulting from reconstruction of the South Pier..." Local cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-ways required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of 21-6 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the constructing and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminal commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; if acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-ways for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1971; PL 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction (1975) is estimated at $625,000. Terminal facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $57,110. The U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC performed removal of obstructions along the entrance channel at a cost of $18,679. Location and removal of obstructions was performed by contract at a cost of $7,966. Repairs to safety features were performed by hired labor at a cost of $6,928. Engineering and design for construction of a recreational bridge was completed at a cost of $76,033. A contract was awarded and completed at a cost of $162,919. Engineering and design was initiated on repair of the Pile Cluster, Sections I, J, and B, at a cost of $33,932. Surveys, real estate, engineering and design during construction, supervision and administration cost $31,172. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. Total cost for existing project to the end of FY was $9,955,100, of which $180,623 was for new work, $8,645,081 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization $46,352) and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 12. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its sources in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private wharves along the river below the city. They are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $103,108. The maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY is approximately 84% complete at a cost of $763,113, removing approximately 74,674 cubic yards of shoal material. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed 21-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 by hired labor at a cost of $2,543. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, supervision and administration cost $249,583. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $7,312,965, of which $549,798 was for new work (includes $289,752 contributed funds) and $6,763,167 for maintenance. 13. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Siskiwit River on south shore of Lake Superior, 49 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel between piers; an irregular-shaped turning basin; two inner channels, and reconstruction and Federal maintenance of deflection dike and entrance piers constructed by local interests. Project depths are 10 feet between piers and 8 feet in turning basin and inner channels. For additional details see page 1010 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. About 1,000 linear feet of privately owned docking space is available. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,457. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed at a cost of $38,015, removing approximately 7,848 cubic yards of material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $12,724. Work authorized by earlier Act was completed in 1939. Work authorized in 1954 was completed in 1963. Total costs to end of FY were $1,445,382, of which $462,653 was for new work and $982,729 for maintenance. 14. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long, flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 21-H. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 572.3 and 569.2 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1946 and 1956 R & H Acts, construction of the Compensating Works, with the uncompleted portion of the Trenton Channel modification approved August 13, 1968, were deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Terminal facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $1,461,709. Underground storage tanks removed by contract cost $47,523. Location and removal of obstructions performed by the U. S. Derrickbarge HURON and the U.S. Cranebarge VELER cost $1,750,856. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $155,892. A contract was awarded for dredging the turning basin at Pointe Mouillee channel in the amount of $756,799. The contract was 4% complete at the end of FY, removing 4,113 cubic yards of material at a cost of $28,789. Another contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging East Outer and Lower Livingstone channels removing approximately 471,934 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,181,999. Engineering, design, 21-8 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $313,254. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY are set forth in Table 21-H. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $217,480,163, of which $76,877,357 was for new work ($75,346,669 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Works Funds) and $140,602,806 (includes $361,235 Section 150 contributed funds) for maintenance. 15. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN ANDW Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet deep in inner channels. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West channel was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to the project to deepen the western portions of North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and the Minnesota Channel to 27 feet LWD; widen the Cross Channel to provide a minimum turning basin of 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet; and construct an upland confined disposal facility. Estimated cost (Oct. 90) is $15,200,000; which includes $8,400,000 Federal and $6,800,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 150, 86th Congress, 1st Session and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $2,801,000. The estimated cash contribution of $2,801,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $1,520,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-ways, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction General funds in the amount of $69,902 were utilized in FY 92 for the efforts to resolve the singlebeneficiary and North vs. South Channel issues. The authorized project involves deepening approximately four miles of navigation channels (North, South, Upper and Minnesota Channels) in the St. Louis River to 27 feet, widening the Cross Channel to a minimum of 1,500 feet, widening the bend at the site of the old Arrowhead Bridge a maximum of 500 feet, constructing a 130-acre upland disposal site in the Superior Municipal Forest, and disposal of the Arrowhead material in the Erie Pier CDF 21-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 with disposal of the remainder of the dredged material in the Superior Municipal Forest site. Total project cost is estimated at $15,374,000, of which $8,585,500 and $6,788,500 are the Federal and non-Federal shares, respectively. Rehabilitation: Supervision and administration to close-out FY 85 contract for the rehabilitation of North and South Piers, Sections O, N-i, N and M cost $8,235. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $303,572. Operation and maintenance of the Museum was performed by Government forces at a cost of $412,131. Operation and maintenance of service facilities and pier was performed at a cost of $174,988. Repairs to Duluth and Superior entry breakwaters and seawalls were performed by the U. S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $480,829. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $61,847. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $605. Engineering and design for a contract to be awarded next FY for the expansion of the existing confined disposal facility cost $61,219. An adjustment of -$8,005 was made in contract costs for maintenance dredging of clean material completed last FY. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging of contaminated material was completed this FY at a cost of $1,046,285, removing 149,202 cubic yards of material. A contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging of contaminated material in the amount of $534,575. The contractor was 75% complete at end of FY at a cost of $399,999 removing 42,636 cubic yards of shoal material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $293,989. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work in the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for 21st Avenue West channel portion which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $82,812,602, of which $16,179,160 was for new work, $55,078,081 for maintenance, and $11,555,361 for rehabilitation. 16. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513, 424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1925, was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 21-1 on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports, safety training and plans for flood emergencies were performed at a cost of $72,340. Federal canal banks at various locations were repaired at a cost of $112,032. An archaeological study for disposal was undertaken, totaling $79,991. Real Estate inspections and outgranting were performed at a cost of $61,241. The operation and maintenance of nine (9) dams and ten (10) overflow weirs and caretaker status maintenance of seventeen (17) locks and two (2) guard locks totaled $804,205. Fox River O.S.H.A. Program and major miscellaneous items of 21-10 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT supply totaled $5,044. Water control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $287,351. Supervision and administration costs were $258,800. Existing project is complete except for the inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 21-I for year of completion of each). Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. Existing locks and dams are generally in fair to good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $49,631,430, of which $3,753,334 was for new work and $45,878,096 for operation and maintenance. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 17. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters; thence to maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters and to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $56,780. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $352. Repairs to the North and South Breakwater, Sections A, B, and C, were performed using the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $196,695. Engineering and design was initiated on repair of the South connector, Sections F, G, and H at a cost of $95,333. Supervision and administration cost $2,962. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. Navigation structures are in good condition and programmed for major repair on an as needed basis. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $10,693,971, of which $1,955,159 (includes $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $8,464,036 for maintenance, and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 18. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson 21-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the harbor entrance and river channels to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; and provides for a new and larger turning basin. Estimated cost (Oct 90) is $20,400,000, which includes $11,754,000 Federal and $8,646,000 non- Federal. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 661, 76th Congress, 3d Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing requirements as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $4,246,000. The estimated cash contribution of $4,246,000 to be paid in lump sum, prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $2,040,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution of lands, easements, rights-of-ways, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish, and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $417,601. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $7,133. Maintenance of the disposal area by hired labor cost $2,528. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor, removing 57,018 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $306,587. This contract was also for Section 111 beach nourishment. Another contract was awarded for maintenance dredging contaminated material and dike construction in the amount of $360,640. The contract was 27% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $98,799. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $163,493. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of PL 90-483 was performed at a cost of $26,271. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $54,104. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration for Section 111 cost $1,750. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1982. Structures are generally in good condition; repairs are made on an as needed basis. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $30,088,142, of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $27,816,060 for maintenance (includes $15,585 contributed funds), and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 19. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 93 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) 21-12 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for a channel protected by parallel piers and for closing natural entrance channel with a pile dike. Project depths are 18 feet between piers and 20 feet in lake approach. For additional details see page 1449 of Annual report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small piers, a Coast Guard Station, and a small boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan provide facilities adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,293. Completion of extensive repairs to West Breakwater (outer end) and Section B of the East Pier performed by the U.S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN cost $1,137. Existing project is complete except for widening a portion of channel from 250 to 300 feet. Project now being maintained to 19 and 15 feet below I.G.L.D., in lieu of 20 and 18 feet, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,619,271, of which $1,055,871 was for new work and $2,563,400 for maintenance. 20. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN Location. On north shore of Lake Superior, 106 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14967.) Existing project. Provides breakwater piers to narrow the entrance; concrete seawalls across ledge at southeast corner of harbor; an anchorage area and a small-boat basin protected by a rubblemound breakwater. Project depths are 16 feet in anchorage area increasing to 20 feet near entrance and 8 feet in small-boat basin. For additional details see page 1014 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two inactive pulpwood wharves and several fish wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $24,385. Repairs to the West Breakwater Section D were performed by the U. S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $175,193. Supervision and administration cost $4,540. Existing project is complete. Total costs for existing project to end of FY was $3,877,895, of which $450,972 was for new work, $2,196,923 for maintenance, and $1,230,000 for rehabilitation. 21. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Traverse River on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula about 20 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See. NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. For additional details see page 1015 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. interests furnished easements on 5.1 acres of land. Local Terminal facilities. Several privately owned fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $2,560. Existing project was completed in 1950 except for extension of north pier completed in 1964. Steel cells and piers are in good condition. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $2,154,362, of which $266,037 was for new work and $1,888,325 for maintenance. 22. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI, and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) 21-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Previous projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000 Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C. & N.W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this portion (1990) is $6,130,000; $4,030,000 Federal and $2,100,000 non-Federal which includes $1,970,000 local contribution. Section 601c of the WRDA of 1986 authorized deepening the Fox River Channel, Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $400,457. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $11,874. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging the outer critical shoals was completed removing 111,739 cubic yards of material at a cost of $426,008. A contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor in the amount of $1,784,050. Approximately 37,570 cubic yards of material was removed this FY at a cost of $511,799. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $124,753. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility continued at a cost of $233,418. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973, except for dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge. Dredging of the turning basin above Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $44,297,876, of which $43,357,076 were regular funds and $940,800 Public Works funds; $9,946,395 for new work and $34,351,481 for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $100,000 contributed funds. 23. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On northwest shore of Lake Huron, 35 miles southeast of Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge, protected by breakwater structures, extending to 12-foot depth contour in the lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; and for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public facilities being planned by State and local agencies. Plans and specifications are complete, but construction has not started. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and monitoring were performed by Government forces at a cost of $27,196. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging to be performed next FY cost $21,224. The existing project was completed in 1965. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $1,646,950, of which $1,092,366 was for new work, and $554,584 for maintenance. 21-14 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 24. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition, there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $22,034. Engineering and design for the third phase of repairing the Main Breakwater was completed at a cost of $93,271. A contract in the amount of $2,162,565 was awarded for this work. The contract was approximately 80% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $1,667,300. Supervision and administration of the breakwater contract cost $73,978. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed at a cost of $432,537. Engineering, surveys, supervision and administration of dredging contract cost $66,638. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $15,902,003, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $14,506,901 for maintenance, and $194,504 for rehabilitation. 25. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14932.) Previous project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. The uncompleted portion of the project, widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa, was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662.) (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Terminal facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa, and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $259,177. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $8,873. Repairs to the North Connector were performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $56,592. Maintenance of the disposal area by hired labor cost $5,404. The contract awarded last FY for repairs to the North Connector, Section Q, was completed at a cost this FY of $90,989. Another contract was awarded and completed this FY for repair of South Connector, Section Q, at a cost of $170,169. Engineering and design for repairs to the North and South Connectors, Section Q, was performed at a cost of $74,485. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging of the outer harbor at a cost of $108,329, removing 28,120 cubic yards of dredge material. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $89,355. Monitoring in connection 21-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 with Section 111 of PL 90-483 was performed at a cost of $28,866. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $27,083. Engineering and design for Section 111 cost $2,099. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $26,548,857, of which $1,392,827 was for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $24,653,578 for maintenance, and $502,452 for rehabilitation. 26. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None exist for commercial cargohandling along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was operated and maintained by the State of Michigan at no cost to the Government. In FY 92, the lock was operated from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. April 24- 26, May 2, 3, 9, 10, 16, 17, 26-31, September 16-30. The lock was operated 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. May 23-25, June 1-30, September 1-15. The lock was operated from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. July 1 - August 31. In October, the lock was open on weekends only from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The lock closed at 5:00 p.m. on October 18. Water control activities at the lock and weir performed under contract by the State of Michigan cost $7,000. Winter operation and shut down of Alanson Locks cost $1,955. Condition surveys, real estate, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $36,241. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,838,058, of which $918,222 was for new work (includes $148,000 contributed funds) and $2,919,836 for maintenance. 27. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1986) Federal cost is $455,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, and $195,000 non-Federal which includes $155,000 local contribution. (See Table 21-B for authorization legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act, dredging of 25-foot wide strips adjacent to the north and south piers, was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fish wharves. While these facilities are 21-16 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $19,722. Repairs to Confined Disposal Facility (filter cells) were performed by hired labor at a cost of $597. Real estate, supervision and administration cost $11,143. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25-foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $13,014,399, of which $12,986,741 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief funds; $988,969 being for new work, $10,755,155 for maintenance, and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new cost does not include $3,000 contributed funds. 28. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, page 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021 Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000, July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, real estate activities, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $159,218. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $10,250. Repairs to confined disposal facility, north breakwater and east revetment were performed by the U.S Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $104,260. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed at a cost of $309,710 removing approximately 66,991 cubic yards of shoal material. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $75,818. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24-foot section at outlet end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $10,666,405, of which $758,333 was for new work ($338,333 regular and $420,000 Emergency Relief funds) $9,290,772 regular funds for maintenance and $617,300 regular funds for rehabilitation. 29. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. 21-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project for navigation at Keweenaw Waterway, Houghton County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Aug. 30, 1935, PL 409, 73rd Congress, which consists of extending the lower entrance breakwater by 2,000 feet, including the necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to channel deepening, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $186,837. The U.S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN performed breakwater and revetment repairs at a cost of $253,036. Engineering and design for major repair of East Breakwater Lower Entry was continued at a cost of $97,354. Real estate, supervision and administration cost $19,743. Active portion of the project is complete. Breakwaters are in generally good condition except for a weakness occurring in about 300 feet of substructure of breakwater lower entrance. The flared revetment at the upper entry should be modified to restrict wave action from the stilling basin entrance. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $30,520,952, of which $5,974,141 was for new work, and $24,546,811 for maintenance. 30. LAPOINTE HARBOR, WI Location. At westerly end of Madeline Island in the Apostlelsland group off the south shore of Lake Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing project. Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. Project was authorized by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act (PL 645, 86th Congress), as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A 400-foot L-shaped dock was constructed and rehabilitated by local interests, not as a part of the Federal project. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,079. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging removing approximately 3,806 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $45,303. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $17,850. The existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost of existing project at end of FY was $259,799, of which $139,874 was for new work and $119,925 for maintenance. 31. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS IN Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River Channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, support of Water Control Center, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $159,878. Maintenance of disposal area was performed 21-18 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT by the U. S. Derrickbarge HURON at a cost of $25,074. A contract in the amount of $114,770 was awarded for maintenance dredging. The contract was approximately 36% complete at the end of the FY, removing approximately 5,132 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $41,749. Engineering, design, real estate, supervision and administration cost $24,762. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $20,736,732, of which $7,675,357 was for new work ($6,666,762 regular funds and $1,008,595 Public Works Funds) and $13,061,375 for maintenance. 32. LELAND HARBOR, MI Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at cost of $36,672. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging removing 19,409 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $67,320. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $897. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $28,830. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 authorization which was completed in 1967. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,426,188, of which $1,027,089 was for new work, $2,328,421 for maintenance, and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 33. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost of new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, real estate activities, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,620. An adjustment of 1,118 cubic yards and $4,193 was made in dredging contract completed last FY. Surveys, supervision and administration cost $2,934. Monitoring under Section 111 mitigation was performed by Government forces at a cost of $19,605. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,926,423, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) was for new work and $1,819,231 for maintenance. 21-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 34. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project consists of a public dock built by the State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,517. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed at a cost of $49,506 removing approximately 15,895 cubic yards of shoal material. Repair of the breakwater was performed by the U. S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $123,823. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $47,463. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,453,486, of which $600,478 was for new work and $3,853,008 for maintenance. 35. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwaters, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments, 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total cost for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $72,614. Safety maintenance was performed at a cost of $2,785. Engineering and design for repair of the North and South Breakwaters, Sections A and E, was continued at a cost of $94,172. Real estate activities, surveys, supervision and administration cost $3,018. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $22,021,701, of which $8,532,202 was for new work, $13,131,586 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. 36. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. 21-20 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetment; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $57,845. Repairs to South breakwater, Section B, was performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $243,731. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,852. Engineering and design for repairs to South Connector and South Pier was initiated at a cost of $79,010. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging removing approximately 84,003 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $249,123. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $66,753. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $11,763,123, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, $7,692,437 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 37. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI Location. On the north shore of Lake Michigan, 135 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous project. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected entrance channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, and a pier at river mouth. Project depths are 19 feet in outer portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1451 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and building material wharves, two fishing wharves, and numerous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, real estate activities, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $23,068. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,843,199, of which $1,299,355 was for new work, $2,227,511 for maintenance and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 38. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee and about 106 miles from Green Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The total estimated (Oct. 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal cost is $1,085,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension affirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $14,200; additional assurances require that the sponsor provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the city should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $77,044. Repairs to North Breakwater, South Breakwater, Section F, Section 107 Causeway, and Confined Disposal Facility were performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $178,471. An adjustment of $2,351 was made in contract cost for maintenance dredging completed last FY. Engineering and design for repair of South Breakwater, Section B, was initiated at a cost of $21,330. Supervision and administration cost $12,852. Existing project is complete except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification was deauthorized December 31, 1990. Work on the 1968 modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The Federal modification, adopted July 15, 1985, included the expansion of the new entrance channel to the Section 107 project and extension of the rubblemound breakwater. Dredging a channel through the outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. Cost for existing project to end of FY was $13,725,333, of which $3,960,044 was for new work (includes $1,911,130 contributed funds) and $9,765,289 for maintenance. 39. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 265 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. Provides for a breakwater, and a harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27-foot depth in harbor area. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. Terminal facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves without railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate activities and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,301. Repairs to East Breakwater, Sections C, D, E, and F, were performed by the U. S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $377,684. Supervision and administration cost $6,535. 21-22 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,358,192, of which $1,282,893 was for new work, $2,609,542 for maintenance and $465,757 for rehabilitation. 40. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On Lake Michigan at the mouth of Menominee River on the western shore of Green Bay, 16 miles northwest of the mouth of Sturgeon Bay, and 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. The river forms the boundary between the commercial harbors at Marinette, WI, and Menominee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work, exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects, are $221,053 Federal and $40,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City of Marinette, WI, provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by city of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $29,442. Repairs to the North Pier, Sections A, B, C, and D, were performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $87,004. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,542. Supervision and administration cost $8,934. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945, was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945, to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club, as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968, and completed in October 1968. The cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,059,755, of which $570,238 was for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), $3,137,665 for maintenance and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation. 41. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,934,804 Federal and $478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Uncompleted portion of 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except deauthorized portion of 1945 Act. Act of August 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by city of Milwaukee and city of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, February 23, 1934, after this work was originally 21-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 authorized as part of public, works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal facilities. Four car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $275,007. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,422. Obstruction removal, repairs to North Detached Breakwater, North Revetment, and the Diked Disposal Facility were performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $273,993. Engineering and design for repair of spalling, South Breakwater, Section E, continued at a cost of $50,737. Supervision and administration cost $11,815. An adjustment of $1,043 was made in contract cost for construction of a recreational walkway completed last FY. Supervision and administration for close-out cost $14,593. Includes $2,486 Contributed Funds. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, the city of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for the uncompleted portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humboldt Avenue. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1945 Rivers and Harbors Act was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $58,991,446, of which $8,231,024 was for new work, $38,044,862 for maintenance, and $12,715,560 for rehabilitation. 42. MONROE HARBOR, MI Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to city of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the River Raisin portion of the existing 200-foot navigation channel from 21 to 27 feet between existing turning basin and the river's mouth; deepen the lake channel from 21 to 28 feet, and widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet, for a distance of approximately 47,000 feet from the river's mouth to the Maumee Bay Entrance Channel; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, with a diameter of at least 1,600 feet, at the river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre confined disposal area in Plum Creek Bay behind which would enable the creation of a 700 acre marsh. Estimated total cost (Oct. 88) is $150,200,000; $59,000,000 Federal and $91,200,000 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $19,650,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in the Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 22, 71st Congress, 1st Session; R & H Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Congress, 1st Session, and 45, 75th Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $19,650,000. The estimated cash contribution of $19,650,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by 21-24 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $7,860,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and c. The confined dike area construction is a non-Federal responsibility and is estimated to cost $70,156,000. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $88,142. Maintenance of the disposal facility was performed by hired labor at a cost of $825. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging, removing approximately 222,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $965,999. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $124,962. An adjustment of -$8,027 was made in costs under the dike disposal program. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $58,139,377, of which $987,340 was for new work (includes $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe) and $57,152,037 for maintenance (includes $166,667 contributed funds, $125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company). 43. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical chart 19434.) Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, NO. 48 (revised 1981) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $109,320. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $13,547. An adjustment of -$615 was made in contract cost to maintenance dredging completed last FY. Supervision and administration cost $1,853. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $26,628,191, of which $3,017,110 was for new work, $9,786,781 for maintenance, and $13,824,300 for rehabilitation. 44. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel 21-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club facility. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, monitoring, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $52,124. Repairs to safety features cost $1,752. An adjustment of $21 was made in contract cost for beach nourishment completed last FY. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging, removing approximately 11,931 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $71,231. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, supervision and administration cost $57,222. Existing project is complete. "Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $6,642,342, of which $2,472,183 was for new work (includes $1,186,467 contributed funds) and $4,170,159 for maintenance. 45. OCONTO HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Green Bay, about 31 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and about 25 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI, at mouth of Oconto River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Previous project. For details see page 1187 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1187, Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two municipally owned wharves of 400 and 100 feet frontage, respectively, for miscellaneous freight, open to general public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $48,013. Repairs to the South Pier, Sections B, C, D, and E, performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC cost $170,822. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded this FY in the amount of $433,300. Contractor will begin dredging next FY. Engineering, design, real estate, supervision and administration cost $63,735. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,638,649, of which $130,754 was for new work and $1,507,895 for maintenance. 46. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. About 140 miles east of Duluth, MN, on south shore of Lake Superior, at mouth of Ontonagon River; provides the only refuge for small craft between the Keweenaw Waterway upper entrance and Black River Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17 and 15-foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. (See Table 21-B for authorized legislation.) The turning basin feature of the project for navigation at Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 (Section 1002) Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. The channel modification project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 21-26 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $30,947. Maintenance of lighthouse was performed by hired labor at a cost of $8,387. The lighthouse roof repair contract awarded last FY was completed this FY with adjustments of -$137 in costs. Repairs to the East and West Pier, Sections A and B, were performed by the U. S. Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $114,743. The contract for repair of West Revetment, Section E, awarded in FY 91 was completed at the end of this FY at a cost of $1,334,810. Engineering and design during construction cost $82,889. Engineering and design for repair of East and West Piers, Section A, was initiated at a cost of $111,724. An adjustment of $3,181 was made in contract costs to maintenance dredging completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $214,856 removing 41,619 cubic yards of material. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging to be performed by contract next FY cost $10,695. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $188,614. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $13,874,411, of which $953,903 was for new work and $12,920,508 for maintenance. 47. PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Green Bay, about 22 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, and about 33 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1899, page 2734, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1429. Existing project. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep at low water datum from the depth in Green Bay about 4,300 feet to mouth of Pensaukee River. Fluctuations of water level are seasonal changes of about one-half foot above or below the annual mean stage, and extreme fluctuations of a temporary nature, due to wind and barometric pressure, of about 2 feet above or below mean lake level prevailing at the time. New work for completed project cost $24,851, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Small private wharves along lower half mile of river, used by the local fishing interests. Ample space is available for additional fishing wharves when required. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $78,581. Engineering and design for a maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $55,947. The existing project was complete in 1938. Total costs at the end of FY were $424,216 of which $34,035 was for new work and $390,181 was for maintenance. 48. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stone filled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $39,598. Repairs to safety features cost $7,007. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed removing 24,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $81,500. 21-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $29,417. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200-foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,391,576, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $4,211,677 for maintenance. 49. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron at extreme southeastern limit of Saginaw Bay, and 29 miles south of AuSable River (Oscoda). (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge at the mouth of Bird Creek, consisting of a harbor basin dredged to a depth of 10 feet protected by a breakwater structure, and for dredging an entrance channel to the harbor basin to a depth of 12 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of docks near mouth of Bird Creek and a State-owned dock inside breakwater. Facilities accommodate recreational craft and are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Funds were received from the State of Michigan for its half of the total construction cost for construction of the breakwater completed in FY 90. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $2,957. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $5,296,856, of which $3,363,334 was for new work (includes $1,239,219 contributed funds) and $1,933,522 for maintenance. 50. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12-foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70- foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater addition. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $4,669. Repairs to safety features cost $1,737. Adjustments of -$9,743 were made in costs for maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Supervision and administration to close-out contract cost $2,279. Monitoring under Section 111 mitigation cost $22,216. The project was completed in 1951 except for latest modification which was completed in FY 76. The breakwaters are in good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $5,056,321, of which $1,733,071 was for new work (includes $487,108 contributed funds) and $3,323,250 for maintenance (includes $115,000 contributed funds). 51. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 21-28 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $17,560. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections A, B, C, and D, were performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $181,402. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,711. Supervision and administration cost $6,479. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $7,068,431, of which $4,206,204 was for new work (includes $1,624,000 contributed funds) and $2,862,227 for maintenance. 52. PORT WING HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 34 miles easterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for two parallel piers at entrance, 835 and 1,017 feet long, respectively, 200 feet apart; an entrance channel between piers 150 feet wide with 15-foot depth; an irregular-shaped turning basin 15 feet deep at inner end of piers from which two inner channels with 8-foot depth extend. One of these is 60 feet wide extending southerly for 340 feet and one 70 feet wide extending easterly 1,170 feet. Portion of dredging of entrance channel to complete project width and depth is considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four privately owned fishing wharves which are considered adequate for existing conditions. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,428. Existing project is complete, except channel between piers, and has been dredged to only a 100-foot width. Widening the channel an additional 50 feet was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. That work was classified inactive and deauthorized on August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of PL 93-251. Land owned by the United States totals 7.80 acres. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,054,541, of which $63,393 was for new work and $991,148 for maintenance. 53. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior at Marquette, MI. It is an indentation about 1.5 miles long and one-half mile wide in shore behind Presque Isle Point. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. A breakwater off Presque Isle Point and dredging harbor to depth of 28 feet at inner portion with 30 feet at entrance. For details see page 1021 of 1965 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One merchandise and petroleum receiving wharf and one ore dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Environmental studies, real estate activities, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $26,885. Engineering and design for repair of Breakwater, Section B, continued at a of cost $93,960. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $2,446,887, of which $1,252,192 was for new work, $1,118,195 for maintenance and $76,500 for rehabilitation. 54. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne 21-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of city of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old Channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of August 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of October 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on January 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $101,107. A contract was awarded for dredging the turning basin in the amount of $220,978. Approximately 5,744 cubic yards of shoal material was removed this FY at a cost of $40,209. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $34,542. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $35,936,418, of which $675,251 was for new work and $35,261,167 for maintenance. In addition, $29,563 was expended from Emergency Relief Act Funds for new work. 55. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915; and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 21-30 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $460,775. An adjustment of $127,972 and 46,705 cubic yards was made to the contract for maintenance dredging completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging of the Bay and River Section was awarded this FY in the amount of $2,370,000. The contract was approximately 4% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $86,000, removing 11,509 cubic yards of shoal material. Maintenance of disposal area performed by the U. S. Cranebarge VELER cost $320,457. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $102,578. Engineering, design, and real estate for construction of a diked disposal area for upper Saginaw was continued at a cost of $292,307. Existing project is complete except for small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $80,241,410, of which $14,930,727 was for new work and $65,310,683 for maintenance. 56. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair; 577.5 and 572.3 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Tables 21-B and 21-H for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946, provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel at an estimated cost (1986) of $870,000; $435,000 Federal and $435,000 non-Federal. On June 16, 1969, the Director of Civil Works approved substitution of the middle channel of the St. Clair River for the authorized north channel. Subsequently, however, the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce, between upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, woodpulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $195,934. A contract in the amount of $841,650 was awarded for maintenance dredging. The contract was approximately 67% complete at the end of the FY, removing 68,187 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $566,688. Location and removal of obstructions, and dock repairs performed by the U. S. Derrickbarge HURON and the U. S. Cranebarge VELER, respectively, cost $552,141. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $21,452. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $88,297. Existing project is complete. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $41,165,813, of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $21,952,567 for maintenance. 57. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. 21-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Existing project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor Canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88 declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a non-navigable stream. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several commercial wharves for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $220,728. Hired labor cost for maintenance of disposal area and safety features was $21,204. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the Outer Channel, removing approximately 33,644 cubic yards of material at a cost of $106,501. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Another contract was awarded and completed for emergency maintenance dredging of the Inner Harbor and excavation and landfill disposal. Approximately 21,182 cubic yards of dredged material was removed at a cost of $96,624, and excavation of 23,734 cubic yards of existing material cost $196,473. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $118,632. Engineering, design and real estate for disposal area and polluted dredged material continued at a cost of $79,527. Under the Section 111 PL 90-483 program, $41,297 was expended for monitoring, condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports. An adjustment of $5,067 was made in contract cost for the placement of sand and stone, under Section 111, awarded last FY. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $18,794. Engineering and design to place sand on the beach next FY cost $4,126. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $14,744 for Section 111. Existing project was completed in 1956. The structures are in generally good condition. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $23,719,929, of which $1,804,485 was for new work, $20,953,228 for maintenance and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 58. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Providence of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5 foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing an operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State Locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from June 9, 1881, to November 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from September 1, 1881, to June 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from August 3, 1896, Davis Lock from October 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from September 18, 1919, to end of FY 1935. The 1,200 foot by 110 foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 21-32 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 21-F. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 601.1 feet and at upstream side of locks is 600.6 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. Below locks: When water surface at downstream side of locks is at elevation 578.4 feet and Lake Huron is 577.5 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. Estimated (1974) cost for new work is $163,087,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The WRDA of 1986 authorized construction of a second lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Material removed during construction of the replacement lock will be placed on the Northwest Pier to serve as a windbreak for downbound vessels approaching the lock. Estimated cost (Oct. 90) is $174,200,000 Federal and $93,800,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as follows: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the proposed project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged/demolition material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; (b) Hold and save the United states free from damages due to the implementation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations and relocations of pipelines, powerlines, cables, sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities, structures, and improvements made necessary by the project. (Any such costs of the items on Federal property at the locks, would be part of the total construction cost and not separable local sponsor cost.); (d) Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $67,000,000. The estimated cash contribution of $67,000,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; (e) Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $26,800,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and (f) Any construction needed to prevent/mitigate for erosion or shoaling attributed to the lock would be cost shared in the same proportion as the project. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and village of DeTour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Operations, maintenance, and care of locks: Two canals and three locks were operated (the fourth lock, Davis, was out of service) as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were open to navigation 295 days during the period October 1, 1991 through September 30, 1992. A total of 11,386 vessels, aggregating 86,058,560 21-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 short tons of freight and 231,688 passengers passed through the MacArthur, Poe and Sabin Locks. Cost for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks during the FY was $7,471,880, which includes construction of a building to house the generator at a cost of $93,764, preparation of a reconnaissance report for major rehabilitation of the Davis Lock at $76,350, extended season operation and maintenance at a cost of $299,101, and $118,756 for operation and maintenance of the Gatelifter PAUL BUNYAN. Powerhouse and equipment: A total of 156,300,930 kilowatt-hours of power was generated this FY. Income from the sale of power, sent to the U.S. Treasury, amounted to $1,837,763. Two hydroelectric powerhouses were operated and maintained at a cost of $903,375 during the FY which includes a deduction of $70,096 for interdepartmental electricity sold but not paid for. Total costs also includes supervision and administration to closeout contract completed last FY for the repair and testing of the hydroelectric Unit 10 generator at a cost of $3,080, assistance from the Hydroelectric Design Center continued benchmark testing of the generators and turbines, completion of plans and specifications and award of a contract in the amount of $628,400 (to be performed next FY) for replacement of four (4) main power feeder cables, and completion of a reconnaissance letter report and plans and specifications for generator rewind of Units 1, 2, 3 and 3A all at a cost of $179,242. Other operation and care items: Building and grounds were operated and maintained, condition surveys, operations studies, real estate, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $2,184,479, which includes a custodial, snow removal and grounds upkeep contract for $302,886 and a service contract for security measures for $477,984. Work performed on the Compensating Gates cost $35,959. A contract for construction of a flammable liquid storage building was awarded and completed at a cost of $108,539. Completion of plans and specifications, and engineering and design performed during construction of the flammable liquid storage building was performed at a cost of $6,618. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $20,495. Winter and extended navigation season studies, ice measurements, and weather monitoring cost $388,127. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approach depths were surveyed by sweeping. Removal of shoals in the St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was accomplished by hired labor with U.S. Derrickbarge NICOLET and the U. S. Cranebarge HARVEY at a cost of $1,662,582. Supervision and administration cost $242,387. Other miscellaneous items: Engineering and design for the master plan for the facility was performed at a cost of $29,875. Plans and specifications for various repair contracts to be awarded next FY cost $147,100. Recreational facilities: Information center, comfort stations, park, fountain, observation and overlook platforms were maintained at a cost of $101,398 and a janitorial contract for the Information Center cost $25,874. A contract for the operation of the Visitors Center cost $29,634. A grand total of 862,950 people visited the Soo Locks. Total project costs in FY 92 amounted to $13,358,322. Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956, is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $407,891,319, of which $160,657,070 was for new work and $247,234,249 for maintenance. 59. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21-34 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At village of Saugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At village of Douglas, MI, there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $19,596. Repairs to the North and South Pier Heads were performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $131,401. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $100. Supervision and administration cost $5,544. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,912,255, of which $364,527 was for new work and $3,547,728 for maintenance. 60. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other light-draft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,472. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,530,756, of which $35,573 was for new work and $3,495,183 for maintenance. 61. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230 of Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $55,138. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections G and H, and South Pier, Sections I, G, J, and K, were performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $95,196. Minor safety repairs cost $319. Engineering and design for repair of South Pier, Section N, continued at a cost of $54,869. Engineering and design was initiated for repair of North Pier, Sections A and B, at a cost of $5,063. An adjustment of $5,000 was made in contract cost for maintenance dredging completed last FY. Supervision and administration for close-out cost $12,653. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Piers and breakwaters are in generally good condition. Inner 260 feet of south pier was replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. 21-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $9,150,645, of which $1,136,088 was for new work, $7,405,529 for maintenance and $609,028 for rehabilitation. 62. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, wood-pulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities will have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $48,415. Repair of South Pier, Sections A, and K-M, was performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $81,982. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $3,464. Engineering and design was initiated for repairs to South Pier and Revetment, Sections A, M-1, and N, at a cost of $5,365. Supervision and administration cost $3,382. Condition surveys in connection with Section 111 were performed at a cost of $404. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively (in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized), which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $7,847,335, of which $984,426 was for new work, $5,230,833 for maintenance and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 63. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous project. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in city of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities, and four shipbuilding yards. City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from city of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $143,109. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections A, B, C, and D, South Detached Breakwater, Section E, and South Revetment, Section H, performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC cost $189,780. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $18,110. Engineering and design for construction of offloading disposal facility to be performed by contract continued at a cost of $22,678. Engineering and design was initiated for repair of South Detached Breakwater, Sections D and E, and South Revetment, Section N, at a cost of $9,692. Supervision and administration cost $11,537. 21-36 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $10,806,928, of which $1,059,722 was for new work, $8,862,307 for maintenance and $884,899 for rehabilitation. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 64. TWO HARBORS, MN Location. Harbor is on north shore of Lake Superior, 27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Narrowing natural entrance by construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is provided for public recreational use. For details see page 1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was completed in 1980. This portion of project was reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 1973. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 221 local cooperation agreement was entered into with the city of Two Harbors on August 14, 1978. Terminal facilities. No publicly owned wharves. Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,899. A contract awarded in FY 91 for the repair of the West Pier, Section C, was 99% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $1,211,032. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $154,421. The existing project is complete. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $9,220,286, of which $4,170,710 was for new work and $5,049,576 for maintenance. 65. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous project. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is essentially complete, except for dredging a 10-foot width along each side of the entrance channel between the piers. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 R & H Act was deauthorized December 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $15,021. Repairs to the North Pier, Sections CD and D2, and South Pier, Sections C, D and DlI, were performed by the U. S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $139,248. Minor safety repairs cost $693. Supervision and administration cost $6,660. Existing project is complete except for portion deauthorized in December 1989. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. South Pier was completed in 1883 and is in generally good condition. North Pier was completed in 1908. North Revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was 21-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $7,644,771, of which $360,320 was for new work, $7,226,394 for maintenance, and $58,057 for minor rehabilitation. 66. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical chart 14935.) Existing project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on north side of lake about 3 miles from inner end of reverted entrance channel. Across lake, at village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $17,567. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of PL 90-483 was performed at a cost of $4,315. Supervision and administration for close-out of beach nourishment contract completed last FY cost $512. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. The structures are in generally good condition. Project now being maintained to 14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,975,263, of which $457,562 was for new work and $3,517,701 for maintenance. 67. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 21-J. 68. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 21-C. 69. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to section 107. Public Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) None. Beach Erosion Control 70. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS A beach erosion control project for 9,550 feet of publicly owned shore of Lake Michigan in Manitowoc County, WI, from Two Rivers to Manitowoc, was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1958. The Act authorized Federal participation in the project, which was completed by the Wisconsin State Highway Department in 1963. The total cost of the project was $182,500, of which $60,500 was contributed by the Federal government, including $56,000 in reimbursement to the State of WI in 1964. 71. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit services (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended). Baraga County, MI - Funds in the amount of $1,169 were used in FY 92 for financial close-out of the completed project, which involved the construction of a stone revetment to protect 400 feet of Lake Superior shoreline adjacent to Highway U.S. 41. The project was completed July 31, 1991. Baraga County, Arnheim Bridge, MI - In FY 92, funds in the amount of $25,156 were used toward a feasibility study to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection along three stretches of the Sturgeon River. The study was initiated in FY 91. 21-38 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Bay View, Bear Creek Township, MI - Funds in the amount of $25,709 were used in FY 92 for a feasibility study to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection to approximately 3,000 feet of sanitary sewer adjacent to Lake Michigan. The study was initiated in FY 91. Charlevoix County, East Jordan River, MI - In FY 92, funds in the amount of $2,703 were used to financially close out the project. The project was completed in FY 90. Fair Haven, MI - Due to real estate problems, the project was divided into two contracts. The first contract provided for construction of a stone revetment to protect 222 feet of shoreline adjacent to State Highway M-29. The project was completed and its facilities turned over to the State on April 17, 1992. Costs in FY 92 were $23,516. Lakeshore Drive, Allegan County, MI - A feasibility study to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection to 1,800 feet of Lakeshore Drive was completed. The project was terminated August 4, 1992, due to lack of economic justification. Costs in FY 92 were $6,616. Lake Michigan Shoreline, South Milwaukee, WI - A feasibility study to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection to the outfall pipe of the city's Wastewater Treatment Plant, was completed; however, in addition to the shoreline erosion problems, unstable bluff conditions were identified which would have to be remedied prior to construction of any Federal shoreline protection project. Bluff modification options are being coordinated with the sponsor. Costs in FY 92 were $348. Memorial Drive, McKinley Park, WI - Funds in the amount of $3,228 were used in FY 92 to complete the plans and specifications. The project involves the construction of a stone revetment to protect 825 feet of the Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to Lincoln Memorial Drive. Memorial Drive, Muskegon, MI - In FY 92, funds in the amount of $14,347 were used to complete the feasibility study to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection along the eastern shoreline of Lake Michigan for 850 feet of erosion of Scenic Drive at Memorial Drive, and to initiate the Plans and Specifications for the project. Milwaukee South Shore Park, WI - Construction to protect 430 feet of Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to the County's pavilion/bathhouse complex and its parking lot, was completed in FY 92 at a cost of $108,515. Scenic Drive, Duck Lake, MI - The completed project was turned over to the local sponsor on May 21, 1991. The Operation and Maintenance manual and financial close-out of the project were completed in FY 92. Funds of $2,695 were expended in FY 92. Sheboygan, WI - The plans and specifications for protection of 7,400 feet of Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to the city's sanitary pump station and a 60-inch Sanitary Interceptor Sewer and related manholes were completed in FY 92. Costs in FY 92 were $772. St. Joseph River, Buchanan Township, MI - The feasibility study, to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing streambank erosion protection to 3,600 feet of Red Bud Trail, was continued in FY 92 at a cost of $16,824. 72. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. None. 73. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. None. Flood Control 74. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River Basin including its tributaries, Tittabawasee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867). 21-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Existing project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Sanilac Flats, MI, Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction floodwalls, modifications of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $8,620,000 and non-Federal cost of $579,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $18,251,600 and non-Federal cost of $2,580,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of cost of rights-of-ways; (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work. This features of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99- 662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986, PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Apr. 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was reclassified to the "inactive" category on December 15, 1982; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $23,417,500 Federal and non-Federal cost of $2,705,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,237,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting work for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1984) is $50,700,000 Federal and $1,421,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1984) to local interests is $5,870,000. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completion; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except under pinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by city of Flint and accepted by the United States on November 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished February 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on September 8, 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on June 7, 1982, declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated January 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated August 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. 21-40 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are complete. However, for the Flint River Segment at Flint, MI, for the project originally authorized under the Flood Control Act of 1958 (PL 85-500), FY 92 maintenance repairs were authorized under the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1992 (PL 102-104), with $1 million provided. The flood protection project was completed September 5, 1979. In accordance with the 1962 LCA, the city of Flint is responsible to operate and maintain the project. Due to the lack of maintenance, the project requires extensive repairs. The total cost of repairs is estimated at $7.5 million. The FY 92 authorization was intended to provide a onetime repair and rehabilitation of this project to restore the project to original design dimensions; however, the allocation in FY 92 was only $1 million. Federal FY 92 work included field work, preparing a Letter Report, preparing plans and specifications, and awarding four construction contracts. Total FY 92 costs were $505,883. The Energy and Water Resources Appropriation Act of 1993 provides $2 million under the Operations & Maintenance General appropriation to continue the repair and rehabilitation of this flood control project. Under the current plan, the District can utilize only $500,000 in FY 93, for engineering and design, supervision and inspection, and initiation of construction. The remainder would be used in FY 94 to complete E & D and award construction contracts. 75. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through village of Sebewaing, MI, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $13,872. Total costs to the end of FY were $792,292. 76. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NAME OF PROJECT Battle Creek, Kalamazoo River, MI Burr Oak, Prairie River, MI Fort Wayne, IN Kawkawlin River, MI Mt. Clemens, MI, Clinton Riv Spillway Red Run, Clinton River, MI River Rouge, MI Saginaw River & Tributaries Frankenmuth Flint River Paw Paw Lake & River Watervliet, MI Sebewaing River, MI DATE OF INSPECTION July 1992 August 1992 August 1992 October 1990 er July 1992 July 1992 October 1992 June 1992 January 1990 September 1992 June 1992 Costs in FY 92 were $64,765. Total costs to end of FY were $1,975,561. 77. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 21-E. 78. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting (Public Law 84-99 and PL 93-288 and Antecedent Legislation). 21-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Fiscal Year Costs to September 30. 1992 $ 259,825 $ -0- $ -0- $ 5,025 -0- Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Grand Pointe, Eaton County, MI - The Reconnaissance Report was completed and approved on March 28, 1991, and preliminary discussions were initiated with the Windsor Charter Township, concerning negotiation of a Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement. The local sponsor withdrew on October 4, 1991. The study was terminated December 13, 1992. Costs in FY 92 were $69. Kawkawlin River, MI - Further work to upgrade the completed abbreviated reconnaissance report to a full scale reconnaissance report was delayed pending receipt of additional funds. No funds were expended in FY 92. LaPorte, Pine Lake, IN - The Reconnaissance Report was completed and approved on July 24, 1991, and preliminary discussions were initiated with the city of LaPorte concerning the scope of the Feasibility effort and the related negotiations leading to a Cost Sharing Agreement. Due to the costs associated with the study and implementation of the project, the local sponsor withdrew on September 1, 1992. The study was terminated on September 22, 1992. Costs in FY 92 were $23,265. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. None. Aquatic plant control activities pursuant to Section 302 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (PL 89-298). None. 79. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS Field Operations. The following field operations, which were complemented by office activities, were conducted during the reporting period. Within the realm of support to others, the District conducted current Project and Location Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Advance Measures Advance Measures (Contributed Funds) 21-42 velocity and discharge measurements on the Niagara River for the New York Power Authority (NYPA). These measurements were part of NYPA's program to develop mathematical and physical models, leading to the design of structural and/or operational measures to mitigate the effects of potential ice jamming and flooding in the upper Niagara River. This effort was necessary to satisfy a requirement of the Federal Energy Regulation Commission (FERC) prior to implementation of upgraded plans for the Niagara Power Project. Discharge measurements were also made at the head of the Niagara River and below Niagara Falls, in support of the International Niagara Board of Control. Further field measurement programs are scheduled for the St. Marys, Detroit, St. Clair, and Niagara Rivers during FY 93. During the winter months, the District monitors, as an ongoing mission, the presence and intensity of ice in the St.. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers. Water levels are monitored continuously at key gages in these rivers for automated updating of hydrographs used for detecting possible ice jams and the associated potential for flooding. This information can be used to provide advance warning to area residents and to trigger emergency actions by the Corps and other governmental agencies in support of respective Flood Alert Plans. Currently, data are obtained from water level gages via direct land-line communication with the gages or from a satellite downlink station using portable lap-top personal computers. This provides water level information to the District office within minutes of data collection. During FY 92, several steps were taken to convert the gages to the new International Great Lakes Datum 1985, and to record data in metric units. This process will be completed in early FY 93. International Activities. The Detroit District has successfully supported the International Joint Commission (IJC) for many years. This support has included a myriad of engineering and scientific assignments. The District is associated with several boards of control, working committees, and study boards. The following activities were conducted by the Detroit District specifically for the IJC Boards and Committees: a. Members of the Detroit District staff attended the semi-annual meetings of the Great Lakes boards of control. They also attended the spring appearances of the Boards before the Commission in Washington, D.C. (April 1992). DETROIT, MI DISTRICT b. IJC Water Level Reference Study. As a result of the record high Great Lakes levels in 1985-86, the governments of the United States and Canada issued the UC a Reference on August 1, 1986, requesting a new water level study. Under this study, the IJC was asked to examine and report upon methods of alleviating the adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. The IJC released an interim report in October 1988, which addressed crisis intervention and intermediate measures which could be taken to aid interests harmed or threatened by high water levels. Detroit District personnel were involved in preparing many of the findings and recommendations. The main study has been divided into two phases. Phase I, which was completed in May 1989, identified the major types of measures, which address the problems brought on by lake level fluctuations, and developed a comprehensive framework for the systematic evaluation of these measures. The Detroit District was heavily involved in providing support to several of the study groups under Phase I. Phase II commenced in July 1991 and will lead to specific responses to issues explicitly identified in the Reference. Personnel from the Detroit District were assigned tasks under, and hold positions on, Working Committee 2 - Land Use and Management, and Working Committee 3 - Existing Regulation, System-Wide Regulation and Crises Conditions. Specifically, the Chief of the Geographic Data Resources Section is a member of Working Committee 2, is the U.S. Co-chair of the task group for "Land Use and Management," and is a member of the "Erosion Processes" and "Potential Damages" task groups. Under Working Committee 3, the Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is U.S. Co-chair of the "Crisis Condition Plan" task group; and the Chief of the International Hydrologic Section is U.S. Co-chair of the task group for "Regulation Studies," and a member of the "Climate Change, Lake Level Frequency and Forecasting, and H & H Data" task group. Phase II work started in FY 91 continued into FY 92. These efforts include: identifying possible crises measures for times of extreme water levels and developing these into crises response plans; reviewing the present operating plan for the regulation of Lake Superior and developing and testing modifications; developing and testing regulation plans to manage all or additional parts of the Great Lakes system; assessing and improving water level forecasts and statistics; inventorying land use patterns and trends; and estimating potential damages caused by extreme levels. Phase II of the Reference Study is scheduled for completion in March 1993. c. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative of this Board. In support of the U.S. section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based on the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes using the approved operating rule, Plan 1977-A. Plan 1977-A was accepted by the Commission on a test basis and has been used in operation since June 1990. Further proposed modifications of the regulation plan are being explored by the Detroit District under its association with the IJC Reference Study. During FY 92, the District was involved in the Board's conversion of operations to the new vertical datum, International Great Lakes Datum (IGLD) 1985, and to the metric system. The new Great Lakes datum was instituted in January 1992. At the Board's April 1992 meeting it was agreed that operations should be converted to the metric system within the same time frame as conversion to IGLD 1985. The District's involvement has included determining appropriate conversions for the water level criteria in the IJC Order of Approval, and all numeric values and mathematical relationships used in the Board's operations. Conversion of the computer models of the regulation plans, Plan 1977 and Plan 1977-A, will be initiated in early FY 93. The Board is expected to be fully operational in both metric and the new datum by January 1993. d. International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is a member of the U.S. section of the Working Committee. Under the auspices of the International Niagara Committee, the Detroit District computes, coordinates and publishes, with Canada, the monthly flows in the Niagara River. The District also provides direct technical support and consulting engineering services to the Board and Committee. During FY 92, District personnel conducted, jointly with Water Survey of Canada, a series of discharge measurements in the upper Niagara River at the International Bridge Section for verification of Lake Erie 21-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 outflow equations. Information to date indicates that the existing equations are adequate during average flow ranges, but still require verification at the very high and very low extremes. Future measurements are presently scheduled for this section in FY 95, in accordance with the Board's recommendation to continue making them every three years. Due to the dynamic nature of the Niagara River, the District is involved with the periodic verification of the rating curves for the Ashland Avenue and American Falls gages. The Ashland Avenue relationship measures the total flow over the American and Canadian falls to ensure that the Board operates within the terms of the Niagara Treaty. Discharge measurements for the Ashland Avenue rating curve are scheduled every three years. Measurements were made in FY 92, and continued to show good correlation to the relationship. The next series is scheduled for FY 95. The American Channel relationship provides a measure of the flow over the American Falls. Measurements are taken in the American Channel every five years. The last measurements were made in FY 90 with the next series scheduled for FY 95, or possible FY 93 in order to update the relationship to IGLD 1985. Beginning in FY 93, all future measurement series will be based upon using IGLD 1985 and metric. Also during FY 92, the District was involved in the conversion of Board operations to the new vertical datum, IGLD 1985, and the metric system. This has included review of the proposed conversions of various limits, parameters and flow relationships. The Board expects to be operational in both metric and the new datum by January 1993. e. International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. When requested, the Detroit District conducts flow measurements in the St. Lawrence River for development of mathematical models of critical sections in the river. In FY 96, flow distribution measurements are scheduled to calibrate the existing mathematical model of the river. This Board is also charged to complete both metric and IGLD 1985 conversion by January 1993. f. International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board. The UC submitted its recommendations, based on the Board's report and subsequent public hearings, to the governments of the United States and Canada, in a report dated January 1985. A former Detroit District Engineer was Chairman of the U.S. section of the Working Committee. Until such time as the Board is either dissolved or continued, certain personnel within the District continue to hold membership on the Diversions and Environmental Evaluation Subcommittees and on the Public Involvement Ad Hoc Group. The District expects to continue to provide support to the UC relative to the evaluation of consumptive uses. g. International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board. Although the Board is inactive at this time, the Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch remains the Secretary to the U.S. Section, as well as a member of both the Hydraulics and Hydrology Committees. The Board completed its study and provided a report of its findings and recommendations to the IJC in December 1984. In January 1985, the IJC informed the governments of the United States and Canada of the findings of the Board. One of the recommendations of this Board, to create a modeling group, has since been adopted by the Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is the U.S. Secretary to this Committee, as well as a member of several subcommittees. Other Branch personnel also hold membership on various subcommittees. The District continued its support of Committee operations pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. Following the completion of the IJC's Reference Study, a concerted effort is expected to update and modernize the collection, modelling and presentation of the various data bases and products of the Committee. District efforts continue to more closely coordinate the format of the U.S. and Canadian water level bulletins, in order to avoid confusion and to better inform the public. An update of International Great Lakes Datum (IGLD) was completed in FY 92. The new IGLD was instituted in January 1992 and evolves around the epochal year 1985. During FY 92, the District was involved in the publication and distribution of a brochure on IGLD 1985, and participated in a public workshop on the new datum in November 1991. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch has begun to convert its forecasting and regulation operations to the new datum, and should be fully operational on the new datum early in FY 93. In FY 92, District personnel continued to finalize a Coordinating Committee report which will document all the discharge measurements (U.S. and Canadian) made on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during the period 1860 to the present. It is expected to be 21-44 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT completed in FY 93. Work continued on a program to analyze the current configuration of and design future modifications to hydrometeorological data collection over the Lake Ontario basin. This work is expected to be completed in FY 93. A similar study may be done for the Lake Superior basin. Work on a hydraulics/hydrology modeling inventory is expected to begin in FY 93. North Central Division Master Plan for the Water Control Data System. During FY 92, the District continued to implement the Great Lakes Water Control Data System, using a Harris-800 minicomputer and an extensive system of automated gaging stations. Presently, the Harris-800 computer collects data from the District's data collection platforms (DCP's), from dedicated lines to the National Weather Service's telecommunication network, and from NOAA/NOS and Canadian water level computer systems. The District has 30 active DCP's and plans to install as many as three additional DCP's in the near future. In FY 92, the District continued the work to transfer the Water Control Data System to a network UNIX environment, in accordance with the Master Plan Update. Great Lakes Information Management. The District has continued development of capabilities for processing satellite and aerial photography and encoding of mapped information into a Geographic Information System (GIS) for the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes. The GIS is being generated to contain multiple information layers on the physiographic, economic, sociologic, environmental, and hydrologic characteristics of the Great Lakes region. The GIS is designed to create a "corporate data base" to support various District operations and studies, including improved monitoring of hydrometeorologic conditions over the basin. In FY 91, GIS data layers were completed for a comprehensive lake use inventory of the U.S. Great Lakes shorelines, along with information on public land ownership, and flooding and erosion hazard areas. In FY 92, this base was used to generate information on the social and economic impacts of potential flooding and erosion along the U.S. Great Lakes shorelines and likely benefits from alternative water level regulation scenarios. These activities were carried out in association with the UC Reference Study. Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Water supply forecasts are used routinely by the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch in forecasting water levels and regulating the outflows from Lakes Superior and Ontario. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e., runoff, over water precipitation, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by the staff of the Branch. Some of these activities were carried out in association with the UIJC Reference Study. District personnel, in cooperation with National Weather Service personnel, are continuing to assess water supply conditions over both Lakes Superior and Ontario, through use of airborne snow and soil moisture surveys, and processed satellite imagery. Levels of the Great Lakes. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch continued to make routine short-term (15 days to one month) and long-term (six months) Great Lakes still water level forecasts. These forecasts are distributed in the form of weekly, bimonthly, and monthly news releases and bulletins. The publication of an internationally coordinated (U.S. and Canada) forecast of Great Lakes water levels, under the auspices of the Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data, was continued during the period. The circulation of this publication is about 10,000 copies monthly in the U.S. alone. Branch personnel provided technical information and expertise regarding recorded lake levels and still water lake level forecasts to many interested parties, such as Congressmen, State and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, concerned property owners, and recreational boaters. Upon request, water level information was supplied to the public in the form of direct answers to numerous inquiries, addresses to various civic groups, and interviews with the news media. Currently, daily reports on present water levels, precipitation and significant events on the Great Lakes basin, are being made available on the District's Harris-800. Forecasted and historical water level data are also available on this system. Interested agencies and individuals can retrieve this information at any time via a telecommunication device. As the Branch moves its operations from the Harris-800 machine to the UNIX based network environment, the above noted products will also be moved. Access to this information will continue to be open to interested parties. The total cost for FY 92 under Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters was $2,025,027. Under International Water Studies, $142,009 was expended in FY 92. 21-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 General Investigations 80. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs of $34,001 were expended for a navigation study at Saginaw Bay and Saginaw River, MI, to complete Reconnaissance Report investigations. A Limited Reconnaissance Report was prepared for Bolles Harbor, MI, at a cost of $34,999. Negotiations of a feasibility cost sharing agreement were continued for the commercial navigation study at St. Joseph Harbor, MI, at a cost of $65. Flood Damage Prevention investigations were continued for Milwaukee Metropolitan Area, WI, at a cost of $137 to complete Reconnaissance phase studies, and Federal funds in the amount of $218,912 were expended to initiate the cost shared Feasibility phase. In FY 92, costs of $55,999 were expended for a shoreline protection study at Bay City, MI, to prepare a Limited Reconnaissance Report. A comprehensive study for the Rouge River, MI, was completed in FY 92 at a cost of $118,000, to investigate streamflow enhancement. Coordination Studies with other Agencies include: Special Investigations, $53,000, which includes engineering and technical assistance given to local citizens because of fluctuating lake levels of the Great Lakes; FERC, $6,000; and Interagency Water Resources Development, $17,000; North American Water Fowl Management Planning, $4,000; Soil Conservation Service, $2,000; and Planning Assistance to States (Section 22), $90,680. Studies and tasks under the Planning Assistance to States (PAS) program included: Allen County, IN - $12,000; Decatur, IN - $12,373: Auburn, IN - $6,952; Lake Superior Harbor, MN - $35,169; New Haven, IN - $14,258; PAS-MI - $928; and PAS-General - $9,000. Funds in the amount of $310,906 were expended to continue the Section 216 restudy of Federal interest for Fox River, WI. Funds of $20,001 were also used to continue a Section 216 restudy of Federal interest for Clinton River Spillway, MI. Fiscal year 92 funds of $1,800 were used to complete a reconnaissance restudy of the deferred project at Menominee Harbor, MI. 81. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ECORSE CREEK DRAINAGE BASIN, MI Fiscal year 1992 costs were $99,974 for continuation of preparation of the General Design Memorandum. Due to concerns with the original retention basin site and inability to provide an acceptable alternate site, further work is suspended at request of the non-Federal sponsor. The project, as authorized in the WRDA of 1990, calls for construction of a storm water retention basin along the North Branch of Ecorse Creek. This basin would have a storage capacity of approximately 275 acre-feet and would collect flood waters in excess of the bank capacity. This plan would generally provide 2- to 7-year frequency flood protection upstream of Interstate Highway 94 for the communities of Dearborn Heights, Taylor, and Allen Park. The total (1992) project cost is estimated to be $11,735,000; $8,586,000 Federal and $3,149,000 non- Federal. FORT WAYNE, IN Funds in the amount of $483,054 were expended in FY 92 for the continuation of preparation of the General Design Memorandum, to be completed in FY 93. The project will provide a 100-year level of protection utilizing approximately 50,000 linear feet of floodwall and levee along the St. Marys, St. Joseph, and Maumee Rivers, and Spy Run Creek. In addition, slope protection and interior flood control improvements will be made as necessary. An existing 1.3 miles of hiking/biking trails will be expanded to 4.8 miles. The total fully funded project cost is estimated to be $41,059,000; $30,624,000 Federal and $10,435,000 non- Federal. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI The WRDA of 1986 authorized harbor modifications including construction of a new turning basin and deepening of the navigation channel up to 27 feet. 21-46 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Preconstruction, engineering, and design (PED) efforts were initiated in FY 92, with the expenditure of $274,999. These PED funds were used to reevaluate the economic and environmental feasibility of the project consistent with current and future conditions. Reevaluation efforts incorporated a ship simulation model and the local sponsor's cost-saving interest in downsizing the authorized project, by examining eight alternative scenarios to the authorized project modifications. The PED efforts for FY 92 were presented in a September 1992 report, currently under review, titled, "Preliminary Reevaluation of Authorized Modifications to Grand Haven Harbor, Michigan," recommending no further action at this time due to lack of economic justification. GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS AND HARBORS Funds in the amount of $288,675 were expended in FY 92 to continue the Preconstruction Engineering and Design work activities. The Design Memorandum for the Upper St. Marys River was submitted to North Central Division in FY 92, with approval scheduled for March 1993. The current approved schedule shows a FY 95 Construction New Start. The recommended plan involves the deepening of navigation channels in the Upper St. Marys River and in Duluth Harbor to: (a) permit a maximum safe vessel draft of 26.5 feet below LWD for downbound vessels; (b) dispose of an estimated 341,000 CY of dredged material from the Upper St. Marys River in an environmentallyacceptable manner by creating an island in Izaak Walton Bay to provide habitat for the Federally endangered species, the Piping Plover; (c) deepening in the Cross and South Channels, West and East Gate Basins, Duluth Harbor Basin (North and South Sections) and Duluth Ship Canal; (d) construction of an upland disposal area in the Lakehead area, and (e) dispose of an estimated 286,500 CY of dredged material in the Lakehead upland site. The Superior Harbor portion of the project has not been authorized, since a local sponsor has not been determined. The total fully funded cost of the project is estimated at $15,370,000, with $10,285,000 and $5,085,000 being the Federal and non-Federal shares, respectively. 82. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services. Fiscal year 92 costs in the amount of $162,588 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program; Unit - $35,000; Technical Services - $40,000; National Flood Proofing Committee - $5,000; Quick Responses - $8,000; and Special Studies for Eldorado Marsh, WI, Dam Break Analysis - $15,394; Menominee River, MI, Flood Profile Study - $15,342; HEC I Basic Workshop in Indiana - $18,852; HEC II Basic Workshop in Indiana - $13,000; and the continuation of the Flood Plain Geographical Information System Data Base for Michigan - $12,000. Flood Insurance Studies. One Michigan Flood Insurance Study for the Saginaw River Basin, Bay and Saginaw Counties, was completed in FY 92. The FY 92 costs associated with this study were $69,153. The study was completed at a total cost of $113,190. Michigan Flood Insurance Studies for Farmington Hills, Oakland County and Isabella County (Unincorporated Area) will be completed in FY 93. The FY 92 costs associated with these studies were $1,666 and $2,535, respectively. Final coordination meetings were held on eight completed Michigan Flood Insurance Studies for the communities of Alpena Township, Alpena County; Baldwin Township, losco County; Fraser Township, Bay County; Greenbush Township, Alcona County; Kawkawlin Township, Bay County; Pinconning Township, Bay County; Sims Township, Arenac County; and Tawas City, losco County. The FY 92 costs for these activities were $264, $374, $201, $50, $118, $135, $236, and $306, respectively. Costs in FY 92 in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Community Assistance and Limited Map Maintenance Programs were $31,023 and $82,538, respectively. 21-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 1. Alpena Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 2. Arcadia Harbor, MI 3. Ashland Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 2,134,000 2,158,207 79,170 123,500 84,180 121,443 0 0 87,254 212,227 82,952 213,755 4. Au Sable Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 5. Bayport Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 49,346 49,346 21-48 0 125,000 0 23,169 40,410 28,695 20,000 97,117 76,000 201,000 61,232 213,620 0 0 8,249 8,249 5,137 5,137 12,057 12,057 337,394' 337,394' 991,508 989,302 30,613 28,407 62,000 64,063 4,359,031 4,353,052 1,695,645 1,695,645 3,326,905 3,318,620 600 3,301 42,000 33,788 7,000 61,333 15,039 11,736 247,241 249,407 209,7762 209,7762 2,823,845 2,823,845 (10,000) (8,863) 93,597 93,597 145,000 120,000 438,693 424,830 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 5. Bayport Harbor, MI (Continued) 6. Big Bay Harbor, MI Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 7. Black River Harbor, MI (P.H.) New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 66,435 69,106 0 0 146,301 562,996 80,490 626,892 8. Black River Harbor, MI (U.P.) New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 9. Bolles Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost (1,000) 141,632 0 0 5,997 305,620 5,599 301,551 21-49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 792 792 390,4333 390,4333 1,370,134 1,366,660 15,579 15,579 993 993 152,000 143,424 0 5,103 830,165� 830,165k 1,325,244' 1,318,984 15,000 11,641 0 0 (14,000) (2,480) 1,433 1,463 2,310 2,310 383,350 383,350 819,615 802,254 106,759 89,398 426,4136 426,4136 1,986,426 1,984,471 1,190,550 1,190,550 5,447 7,561 0 0 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 10. Caseville Harbor, MI 11. Charlevoix Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 0 4,873 4,873 290 236,000 290 235,344 11,000 5,716 0 0 1,523,000 111,668 230,000 436,000 1,528,061 110,507 230,972 394,739 0 0 12. Clinton River, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 0 122,935 129,078 493,000 1,208,000 126,559 103,183 491,436 1,118,347 966,100 1,109,377 (98,120) (95,512) (13,000) (7,571) 13. Cornucopia Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 587,314 587,314 1,338,297 1,332,357 180,623 180,623 8,687,568 8,645,081 1,129,396 1,129,396 549,7987 549,7987 3,085,381 2,966,987 3,796,180 3.796,180 0 0 3,748 3,748 4,346 4,346 53,000 46,536 462,653 462,653 986,455 982,729 60,458 63,196 21-50 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 14. Detroit River, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 3,680,100 4,668,085 4,239,000 6,118,390 3,709,048 4,704,968 4,191,494 5,940,222 768,600 301,291 765,570 307,351 76,877,357' 76,877,357' 98,030,899 97,770,986 0 42,470,585 0 42,470,484 361,235 361,235 15. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN & WI 16. Fox River, WI 17. Frankfort Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 69,902 0 69,902 2,665,000 4,054,372 2,340,200 3,188,000 2,684,950 3,965,833 2,394,153 3,227,459 0 0 0 18,330 63,410 535,000 49,547 546,706 0 8,235 1,383,000 1,485,453 1,694,500 1,655,000 1,355,554 1,461,849 1,708,128 1,681,004 16,179,160' 16,179,160' 53,543,942 53,521,832 1,556,249 1,556,249 11,556,410 11,555,361 3,753,33410 3,753,334 t 10 45,904,726"1 45,878,096" 0 1,955,15912 0 1,955,15912 74,449 176,487 205,000 401,000 80,360 175,652 203,471 352,122 7,311,832 7,259,536 21-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 17. Frankfort Harbor, MI (Continued) 18. Grand Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 Contributed Funds Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Approriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 274,776 274,776 0 1,204,500 0 1,204,500 0 0 0 0 979,000 543,454 626,000 1,071,000 993,902 547,850 623,863 996,141 0 0 0 0 65,000 60,379 56,177 55,691 59,000 63,472 87,000 82,125 (11,615) 0 1,283,469 I3 1,283,46913 175,000'a 175,000'a 24,948,909 24,867,468 813,613 813,613 780,400 780,400 2,160,861 2,152,607 15,585 15,585 19. Grand Marais Harbor, MI 20. Grand Marais Harbor, MN New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 1,055,871 0 1,055,871 27,936 161,000 657,000 5,643 175,017 663,290 5,384 6,430 00 2,564,340 2,563,400 21-52 450,972 450,972 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 20. Grand Marais Harbor, MN (Continued) Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 10,409 10,909 674 674 179 209,274 179 204,118 0 0 21. Grand Traverse Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 22. Green Bay Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 2,796,200 1,182,657 1,621,600 1,485,000 2,803,935 1,153,571 1,670,116 1,474,891 0 402 76,940 395,000 187,000 65,238 351,405 233,418 9,946,39515.16 9,946,39515".16 26,909,692" 26,892,512" 7,472,747 7,458,969 23. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 4,056 4,056 0 11,577 0 11,577 0 0 0 0 21-53 2,202,079 2,196,923 1,230,000 1,230,000 23,000 29,756 86,099 76,808 75,295 79,304 266,037 266,037 1,888,325 1,888,325 (2,722) 2,560 1,015,366 1,015,366 77,000 77,000 506,736 504,584 50,000 50,000 50,572 48,420 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 24. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI 25. Holland Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 0 330,900 2,311,649 289,000 2,360,610 363,060 2,300,101 293,271 2,355,758 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,915,000 972,492 1,469,300 898,000 3,961,525 971,391 1,439,060 863,373 22,000 19,829 68,216 65,437 70,000 74,158 0 0 0 0 61,000 58,048 0 0 0 0 26. Inland Route, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 1,200,598 1,200,598 14,278,239 14,263,801 194,504 194,504 243,100 243,100 771,827'8' 9 621,000 621,000 21,253,104 21,184,705 1,810,916 1,805,573 502,452 502,452 1,663,300 1,663,300 46,000 63,861 27,728 29,858 918,22220 918,22220 31,500 29,210 42,000 45,196 2,517,116 2,515,536 21-54 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 26. Inland Route, MI (Continued) 27. Kenosha Harbor, WI 28. Kewaunee Harbor, WI 29. Keweenaw Waterway, MI Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 404,300 404,300 216,200 705,160 931,300 232,834 699,775 934,272 38,000 31,462 6,386,128" 6,376,555m 0 1,270,275 0 1,270,275 0 4,378,600 0 4,378,600 559,500 235,877 204,000 651,000 562.078 251.075 199.753 659.256 758,33324 758,33324 6,330,168" 6,329,3118 617,300 617,300 2,961,461 2,961,461 5,974,141 5,974,141 4,588,700 2,272,831 731,000 531,000 4,564,738 2,285,292 686,394 556,970 15,000 30,149 21-55 23,081,215" 23,023,31126 1,523,500 1,523,500 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 30. La Pointe Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 31. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels 32. Leland Harbor, MI 33. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 7,675,357 0 7,675,357 54,100 100,244 80,686 73,273 43,000 250,000 50,075 251,463 7,941,870" 7,941,5752 5,119,800 5,119,800 0 1,027,089 0 1,027,089' 129,500 127,011 191,500 127,000 128,479 120,917 193,978 133,719 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 19,955 21-56 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,622 174,509 5,622 171,966 20,165 12,747 2,328,522 2,328,421 70,678 70,678 1,646,304 1,646,304 1,088,888 1,088,888 372,000 372,000 577,340 567,379 2,327 2,327 7,128 7,128 50,000 41,238 139,874 139,874 123,709 119,925 64,254 69,232 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 33. Lexington Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 Maintenance Appropriation Cost 294,000 375,817 24,986 21.075 (3,000) 27,000 1,388 19,605 34. Little Lake Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 162,500 158,357 163,102 154,452 154,000 259,000 154,957 232,309 35. Ludington Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 36. Manistee Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,500 544,682 838,000 237,000 132,183 569,842 832,555 172,589 10,000 2,769 454,000 458,202 (7,000) 231 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,958 286,000 746,000 27,391 282,675 699,314 7,912,20231 7,912,20231 620,000 620,000 12,485,74832 12,414,24632 357,913 357,913 717,340 717,340 2,696,52233 2,696,52233 7,742,69134 7,692,4373 0 1,374,164 0 1,374,164 21-57 1,259,986 1,251,852 600,47830 600,4783 3,883,972 3,853,008 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 37. Manistique Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 38. Manitowoc Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 39. Marquette Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 134,000 200,149 637,000 335,000 134,498 197,759 640,472 292,048 2,048,9143 2,048,914" 1,911,130 1,911,130 6,729,6643' 6,683,53337 0 3,081,756 0 3,081,756 0 1,282,893" 0 1,282,893k 6,741 196,901 7,810 194,387 14,000 415,000 13,779 393,520 0 0 2,633,75739 2,609,54239 465,757 465,757 40. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 114,500 136,029 208,800 125,000 115,121 110,088 235,258 126,922 21-58 172,400 168,966 96,820 59,313 27,000 65,935 27,000 23,068 1,299,355"3 1,299,355" 2,233,450 2,227,511 316,333 316,333 533,476 533,476 2,544,669 2,544,005 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 40. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI (Continued) Contributed Funds Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost 41. Milwaukee Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 42. Monroe Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost o 8,231,024� o 8,231,024�0 442,400 878,539 1,531,800 664,000 426,799 889,184 1,531,795 628,124 784,000 901,866 (2,650) 24,914 0 0 275,000 0 514,800 1,071,398 699,862 1,060,591 50,000 271,809 0 0 0 2,486 0 0 60,000 1,177,000 67,155 1,179,928 31,436,314~' 31,389,6420' 12,715,560 12,715,560 6,380,925 6,380,925 325,000 274,295 987,34042 987,3402 18,466,81803 18,462,48203 0 (8,000) 38,606,400 9 (8,027) 38,606,373 83,182 83,182 21-59 0 2,646 1,351,852 1,351,852 593,660 593,660 36,762 36,762 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 43. Muskegon Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 44. New Buffalo Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 245,000 214,326 828,000 112,000 242,196 218,406 814,046 124,105 305,700 337,972 0 804 0 7,312 0 0 10,000 10,573 0 0 0 0 109,800 142,813 359,000 180,000 121.175 140.988 357.202 182.350 0 0 45. Oconto Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 14,254 14,254 50,629 50,629 23,000 308,000 22,180 282,570 21-60 2,912,110" 2,912,110"4 105,000 105,000 7,455,441 s 7,452,081 s 2,334,700 2,334,700 13,824,300 13,824,300 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 3,993,137 3,988,659 181,500 181,500 130,754" 130,754" 1,534,180 1,507,89547 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 46. Ontonagon Harbor, MI 47. Pensaukee Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 8,000 18,525 0 1,733 691,000 795,031 697,000 2,119,000 701,989 810,605 633,707 2,100,709 13,494 13,494 890 890 33,267 147,227 33,267 134,528 12,999,884" 12,899,508"9 21,000 21,000 34,035 34,035 402,880 390,181 48. Pentwater Harbor, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 261,500 115,513 268,761 110.454 0 0 146,000 155,000 149,337 157,522 49. Port Austin Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 1,245,000 800,000 1,272,186 813,539 79,824 140,401 17,519 22,130 0 0 21-61 953,903e 953,903' 179,899 179,899 4,212,268 4,211,677 (12,000) 11,326 4,742 7,879 0 0 0 0 2,439 2,957 0 0 3,363,334" 3,363,33450 1,774,522 1,774,522 159,000 159,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 50. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Contributed Funds Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 87,000 92,717 4,205 163,000 9,291 161,521 (1,000) 21,251 11,545 18,858 51. Port Washington Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 52. Port Wing Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost 106,506 106,506 56,944 53,142 23,460 211,945 27,191 207,152 0 0 0 0 21-62 909,963 909,963 487,108 487,108 336,000 336,000 2,139,490 2,131,322 5,000 (1,058) 115,000 115,000 9,158 9,158 11,000 12,696 28,000 22,216 1,074,251 1,067,770 2.582.204' 2,582,204' 2,856,47052 2,851,60652 10,621 10,621 1,624,000 1,624,000 63,393 63,393 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 52. Port Wing Harbor, WI (Continued) 53. Presque Isle Harbor, MI Section 111 Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 3,598 4,140 52,004 46,102 4,336 4,221 61,500 61,677 0 0 0 0 5,298 6,428 0 0 0 0 77,000 126,000 76,968 120,845 54. Rouge River, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 817,500 145,838 870,000 214,000 827,076 143,626 868,088 175,858 247,000 136,495 246,608 143,493 675,251" 675,251 20,397,941s 20,353,8495 0 14,907,318 0 14,907,318 55. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 1,642,100 2,110,968 3,007,000 1,142,000 1,634,544 2,128,629 2,999,291 1,097,782 21-63 995,920 991,148 1,190,492 1,190,492 61,700 61,700 1,106,997 1,101,695 76,500 76,500 16,500 16,500 14,917,127" 14,917,127" 13,600 13,600 45,136,363 45,073,847 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 55. Saginaw River, MI (Continued) 56. St. Clair River, MI Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 188,000 205,990 180,000 283,000 198,388 182,907 181,910 292,307 573,500 979,596 718,000 1,438,000 605,737 1,001,891 720,792 1,424,512 57. St. Joseph Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 0 0 527,100 682,973 953,500 865,000 633,865 674,010 943,981 839,689 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74,800 162,350 613,000 331,988 158,797 583,781 0 0 0 0 55,000 84,028 58. St. Marys River, MI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost 0 0 10,527,500 11,265,113 12,062,000 13,402,000 10,499,775 11,046,875 12,024,075 13,358,322 0 0 21-64 20,248,896 19,213,246 19,213,246 21,984,109 21,952,567 976,4855' 976,485" 828,000 828,000 15,266,738 15,216,446 962,216 962,216 638,076 638,076 5,102,450 5,098,706 160,657,071 160,657,070" 248,046,421 247,222,149 13,100 13,100 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 59. Saugatuck Harbor & Kalamazoo River, MI 60. Sebewaing River, MI 61. Sheboygan Harbor, WI 62. South Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 134,973 88,532 522,051 670,660 40,126 88,838 28,412 156,950 32,729 156,641 (11,104) 55,754 (10,765) 55,754 17,151 12,472 364,527' 364,527' 3,548,178w 3,547,728b0 35,57361 35,57361 3,499,861 3,495,183 0 1,136,08862 0 1,136,08862 61,500 220,086 668,900 222,000 61,112 215,787 663,412 228,238 116,500 116,801 11,503 11,803 12,107 154,556 12,107 142,608 0 0 0 0 6,501,87863 6,497,7373 609,028 609,028 907,792 907,792 452,426" 452,426" 532,000 532,000" 4,041,467 4,029,519 1,632,076 1,632,076 21-65 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 62. South Haven Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 63. Sturgeon Bay, WI, and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 0 0 13,000 13,725 0 0 0 0 1,933 2,956 0 0 246,000 257,036 271,429 252,213 0 0 0 1,409 0 0 0 0 0 404 0 0 149,000 436,000 151,308 394,906 0 0 0 0 64. Two Harbors, MN New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 0 0 160,722 203,960 75,446 1,361,000 1,371,000 75,806 1,357,434 1,373,352 65. Two Rivers Harbor, WI New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Diked Disposal Appropriation Cost Rehabilitation Appropriation Cost 159,992 283,764 134,581 309,764 16,888 164,000 16,888 161,622 360,320" 360,320" 6,041,300� 6,038,9227� 0 1,187,472 0 1,187,472 0 0 21-66 42,381 42,381 1,158,933 1,158,933 1,059,722" 1,059,722" 8,597,45167 8,551,18867 311,119 311,119 884,899 884,899 4,170,710 4,170,710! 5,054,882 5,049,576 58,057 58,057 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 66. White Lake Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 166,900 170,793 23,000 23,587 9,226 9,526 5,130 5,130 32,615 159,000 34,470 157,962 74. Saginaw River-1958 Act Flint, MI (Contributed Funds) 75. Sebewaing River, MI New Work Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost New Work Appropriation Cost Maintenance Appropriation Cost 207,862 207,862 249,700 249,700 2,591,286 2,591,286 926,415 926,415 17,567 17,567 1,000 4,827 (58,000) 40,269 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 148,628 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,500 7,243 1,000,000 505,883 24,755,359 24,755,359 173,000 173,000 1,000,000 505,883 365,642 365,642 426,455 426,384 0 0 0 0 5,311 4,891 15,000 13,872 (2,000) (266) 21-67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 79. Surveillance of North New Work Boundary Waters Appropriation 0 0 0 0 0 Cost 0 0 0 0 0 Maintenance Appropriation 1,440,000 1,483,500 1,848,000 1,988,000 49,648,8347' Cost 1,458,207 1,440,678 1,853,588 2,025,027 49,571,509" 'Includes $18,889 for previous projects. 21ncludes $114,786 for previous projects. 3Excludes $56,500 contributed funds. 4Includes $85,849 for previous projects. Slncludes $12,008 for maintenance of previous projects. 'Includes $255,000 contributed funds. 7Includes $25,500 for previous projects and $289,752 contributed funds for existing projects. 5Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. 9lncludes $1,547,195 for new work for previous projects. 1llncludes $3,239,910 for previous projects. "Includes $89,309 for previous projects. '2 lncludes $31,709 contributed funds. '3 lncludes $311,329 for previous projects. '4lIncludes $13,437 for previous projects. s5s'lncludes $396,974 for previous projects. 6"Includes $109,463 for previous projects. '7Includes $8,918 for previous projects. "Includes $176,620 for new work, $127,598 for maintenance. 'lncludes $35,705 contributed funds. 2"Includes $148,000 contributed funds for existing project. 2'Ilncludes $453,839 for previous projects. 22Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 23Includes $21,818 for previous projects. 24Includes $149,312 for previous projects. 2SIncludes $88,364 for previous projects. MIncludes $402,242 for previous projects. 27Includes $656,000 for previous projects. 2Includes $235,346 for previous projects. Includes $354,139 contributed funds. 3"Includes $57,670 contributed funds. 3 tlIncludes $491,416 for previous projects. 32Excludes $136,286 contributed funds. "Includes $354,999 for previous projects. "Includes $150,910 for previous projects. "Includes $3,955 for previous projects. 36Includes $400,126 for previous projects. 37"Includes $54,288 for previous projects. 3Includes $312,423 for previous projects. "Includes $36,194 for previous projects. 40Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. 41Includes $459,305 for previous projects. 42Includes contributed funds of $3,000,000 for new work, and x3$166,667 for maintenance contributed by: Port Commission of Monroe, $300,000; Consolidated Paper Co. $125,000; and River Raisin Co., $41,667. "Includes $613,408 for previous projects. 45 Includes $446,183 for previous projects. "46Includes $84,569 for previous projects. 47 ncludes $8,161 for previous projects. "Includes $284,802 for previous projects. 49Includes $113,326 for previous projects. l"Includes $172,100 contributed funds. 51lncludes $188,495 for previous projects. 52Includes $15,123 for previous projects. 53"Includes $50,084 for previous projects. "Includes $56,608 for previous projects. SSIncludes $962,556 for previous projects. "Includes $1,671,660 Public Works funds and $49,419 Emergency Relief funds. 7"Includes $503,113 for previous projects. "Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. 59lncludes $90,232 for previous projects. 60Includes $117,554 for previous projects. 61"Includes $15,000 for previous projects. 62Includes $487,817 for previous projects. 63Includes $87,131 for previous projects. "Includes $187,233 for previous projects. 6SIncludes $131,239 for previous projects. 6"Includes $323,419 for previous projects. 67lIncludes $219,730 for previous projects. "Includes $48,404 National Recovery Act for new work funds. "Includes $212,857 for previous projects. 70lIncludes $33,113 for previous projects. 71 lncludes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 21-68 TABLE 21-B DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 19,1890 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1990 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 May 20, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Sep. 22, 1922 ALPENA HARBOR, MI (See Section 1 of Text) Channel depth of 16 1/2 feet. Rubblemound breakwater for protecting channel on south side and widening entrance channel. 21 and 18 1/2 foot channel depths and turning basin. Present project dimensions. New turning basin. Removal of old breakwater and construction of new breakwater. Deauthorization of the feature authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 2 of Text) Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 3 of Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvements on enlarged project' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extent of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West, extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end. Deepening portions of east basin and west channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. AU SABLE HARBOR AT AU SABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI (See Section 4 of Text) Dredging channels 12 and 10 feet deep and riprapping North Pier. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 6 of Text) Provides for converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and a rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI (See Section 7 of Text) Channel from mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. Consolidation of projects for Black River at Port Huron and Mouth of Black River. Annual Report, 1889, p. 2288. H. Doc. 830, 65th Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 1, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 42, 72d Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 151, 88th Cong., 1st. Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1889, p. 2291. No Printed Report. H. Doc. 436, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-69 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 23, 1970 Settling Basin Deepening channel and settling basin to 20 feet, and widening to 100 feet 2 bends; 1 at the foot of 12th St., the other below the Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Extension of existing channel. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (UPPER PENINSULA) (See Section 8 of Text) Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. BOLLES HARBOR, MI (See Section 9 of Text) Entrance channel in Lake Erie, Access channel in LaPlaisance Creek, Steel sheet pile revetment. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 10 to 8 feet deep protected by Breakwater. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 11 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed by piers and revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project depth increased to 15 feet. Project depth increased to 18 feet. Restore recreational uses or provide comparable recreational uses at the South Pier. Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment upstream of Highway Bridge. CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 12 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI (See Section 13 of Text) Entrance channel 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep between existing piers from bay to a turning basin 200 feet long, 8 feet deep, with maximum width of 180 feet, with 150- and 300-foot inner channels each 50 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Reconstruction and Federal maintenance of east and west entrance piers, a 25-foot extension of west pier and a 300-foot extension of existing westerly inner channel at a depth of 8 feet and a width of 50 feet. 21-70 H. Doc. 162, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Doc. 64, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report 1876, p. 523. No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess., Sec. 25 of the WRDA of 1988. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1880, p. 2062, and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 219. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. S. Committee, 75th Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 434, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 6, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2. 1882 Jun 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 Nov. 17, 1988 Mar. 29, 1977 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 19, 1963 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 3 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 * May 17, 1950 ' Mar. 21, 1956 " Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 32 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 1908 s Jul. 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 30, 1930 3 DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 14 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and removal of Grosse lie Shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide through Middle Ground opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel below Livingstone Channel to 27 feet to provide depths adequate for 24-foot draft navigation when governing Lakes are at Datum, with necessary widening at approaches and bends and construction of necessary compensating works, Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 feet. Dredge through East Draw of lower Grosse Ile Bridge and extend 300-foot width of Channel North of lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 feet throughout downbound and Two-Way Channels, except in upper (27.7-foot depth) and lower (29-foot depth), Livingstone Channel, and in upbound Channel; 27-foot depth in Ballards Reef Channel below junction with Livingstone Channel, 27.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Hackett Beach, with necessary compensation works. Also 28.5-foot depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal, inclusive. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 25 feet, where necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse lie Bridge, about 5.5 miles, deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet below Upper Grosse lie Bridge to and including a Turning Basin 28 feet deep and 15 feet across in area outside project limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet from Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 feet from downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a depth of 28 feet, width of 830 feet, and length of 1,500 feet: Build compensating works to maintain water levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI (See Section 15 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. Dredging additional area of basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st. Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess.; and 322, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st. Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 338, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.Ex. Doc. 59, 53d Cong., 3rd Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. 21-71 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1930 3 Jul. 16, 1952 4 Jul. 14, 1960 .2 Oct. 4, 1961 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 " Jun. 26, 1934 9 Jul. 3, 1958 o10 Jun. 23, 1866 " Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 23, 1866 Jun. 14, 1880 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Deepening and widening channels and basins. Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. Deepen portions of the North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and Minnesota Channel to 27 feet; widen the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet, and construct an upland CDF. FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 16 of Text) Improvement of Fox River. Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River. Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108, that Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 17 of Text) A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, removal of portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the area in Lake Betsie. Deepen approach and entrance channels. Extend Inner Basin and Dredge recreational anchorage area. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 18 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project dimensions of Harbor channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel. Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. Channel to Spring Lake. Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin. Deepen the harbor entrance channel and harbor river channel to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; provide a new and larger turning basin, trapezoidal in shape, 1,200 feet long at the channel, 300 feet long at the shore, 800 feet at a right angle to the channel, and 18 feet deep. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.; H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 (plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886). H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess., S. Doc 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.' 21-72 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 14, 1880 May 17, 1950 Mar. 3, 1879 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 23, 1866 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1871 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 16, 1984 GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI (See Section 19 of Text) Existing Project, except for pile dike. For Pile Dike. 800-foot extension of West Pier. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN (See Section 20 of Text) Breakwaters and dredging of anchorage area of 26 acres to 16 feet. Seawalls across ledge in southeast corner of harbor, enlarging anchorage basin and deepening of entrance. Small-boat basin with breakwater. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 21 of Text) Two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI (See Section 22 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Island. 12 Inner channel. 3 Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western R.R. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. Deepen the Fox River channel at Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 23 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, breakwaters, 10-foot depth in harbor basin, 12-foot depth in entrance channel. HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 24 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. Specified in Act. Annual Report 1881, p. 2050. Annual Report, 1895, p. 351. H. Doc. 751, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 75, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1875, p. 184 . Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 187, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986, Sec. 601c). H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1873, p. 282; H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess.; P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. 21-73 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 22 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 2 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 22 Mar. 3, 1881 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 2.14 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 25 of Text) Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan.'2 Piers and Revetments.' 2 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels at Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Revetted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 26 of Text) Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with suitable jetties. Lock and Dam. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 27 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater.' 2 Extending Breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 28 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 29 of Text) Acquision of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved May 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. S. Ex. Doc. 41, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2176; H. Doc. 588; 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82d Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772; H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3rd Sess.; Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 105, 49th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. 21-74 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 '" Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1933 3 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1867 Sep. 19, 1890 General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. Deauthorization of the uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 Rivers and Harbors Act. LA POINTE HARBOR, WI (See Section 30 of Text) Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS (See Section 31 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and dredging Channel at Grosse Pointe. Second Canal for downbound vessels. 21-foot depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for about 5.25 miles. 25-foot depth through Canals and Channel through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and widening Channel to 700 feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 feet and abandonment of Channel above mouth of Southeast bend cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 32 of Text) Entrance Channel protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Approach Channel and removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 33 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 34 of Text) 12-foot deep Channel from Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 35 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension, Reconstruction and repairs to existing structures and present project dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of outer ends of the two inner piers. Deepen Channels and widen opening between breakwaters. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 36 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 feet to connect with Manistee Lake, and further Pier extension. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act; P.L. 645, 86th Cong., as amended. Annual Report, 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 114."16 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1897, p. 2951. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess."16 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 115. Annual Report, 1891, P. 2678. 21-75 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 '" Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 30 Dec. 31, 1968 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R & H) Jun. 26, 1979 Mar. 2, 1867 Aug. 11, 1888 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935' Jul. 11, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Depth of 20 feet in Outer Harbor 570 feet wide to Outer end of South Pier 18 feet deep in river, South Breakwater with shore connection, and extend North Pier if required. 23-foot depths in entrance channel and 21-foot depths in River Channel. Remove old South Revetment, Construct new South Pier and Revetment, and widen river entrance Channel. Present project dimensions of Channel through Outer Basin and River, and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI (See Section 37 of Text) Breakwaters and Outer Harbor. Present location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Section 38 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th Street, and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. Construct 765-foot long stone Breakwater, and rubblemound bulkhead; construct 360-foot long entrance Breakwater; dredge 16,500 cubic yards for entrance channel. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI (See Section 39 of Text) Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and removing a shoal in northerly part of harbor. Deepening harbor to 25 feet. Deepening harbor to 27 feet. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI (See Section 40 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by Act of May 3, 1905. H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1908, p. 648, and Unpublished Report of Mar. 13, 1908; Approved by Secretary of War, Apr. 3, 1908. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., I1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun. 1967 Detailed Project Report Apr. 1982 Supplement.' Sec. 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d Sess., pts. I and 2; and Annual Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. Annual Report, 1889, pp. 272 and 2021. H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-76 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 (Sec. 107) Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Mar. 2, 1945 1' Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 1835 17 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 14, 1932 21 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 41 of Text) North Pier.12 Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater.'2 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo Street, and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western R.R. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 42 of Text) 9-foot channel, protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-foot channel, dikes and turning basin.2� Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation imposed by Act of Jul. 3, 1930. Deepen portion of existing navigation channel to 27 feet; deepen lake channel to 28 feet; widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, 1,600 feet wide at river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre CDF in Plum Creek Bay to enable creation of a 700 acre marsh behind the CDF. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 43 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 44 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 113, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report, Dec. 1966. S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report, 1906, p. 1752 (No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions). H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1872, p. 237. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.; 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-77 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 30 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 2, 1882 1883 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 Sec. 107 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 16, 1984 Jul. 11, 1987 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 1935 a Jul. 3, 1958 29 OCONTO HARBOR, WI (See Section 45 of Text) Piers, except for inner 300 feet of south pier and 250 feet north pier built by city. Present project dimensions of channel and turning basin. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 46 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. Enlarging and deepening the existing harbor basin. Deauthorization of the turning basin feature of the project authorized by the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act. PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 47 of Text) Construction of slab pier 2,500 feet long on the north side of the channel and dredging a channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. Extending pier to 10-foot contour (2,700 feet) and dredging to 10 feet below Datum. Dredging entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 48 of Text) Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Present project depth of channel. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI (See Section 49 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Basin, Channel Dredging. Construct a breakwater access for recreation purposes. Breakwater. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 50 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 feet deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI (See Section 51 of Text) North pier and south basin.'2 North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2066. H. Doc. 538, 61st Cong., 2d Sess., Plan C.' H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 287, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 153, 42d Cong., 3rd Sess. R & H Act, Aug. 2, 1882 Modified. H. Doc. 478, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 106. P.L. 100-71. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379. H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-78 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 30, 1948 Aug. 5, 1977 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 19352,24. Jul. 3, 1958 2 Oct. 23, 1962 2 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 2 PORT WING HARBOR, WI (See Section 52 of Text) Construction of parallel piers and dredging. Dredging inner channels and abandonment of certain revetments and channels. Deauthorization of 50 feet of entrance channel widening. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 53 of Text) Breakwater, 1,000 feet long. Shore extension, 216 feet long. For dredging and rubblemound extension to breakwater 1,600 feet long; Changed designation of project. Deepening harbor from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. ROUGE RIVER, MI (See Section 54 of Text) 21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal. 25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent to latter; 21-foot channel extending from junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet at 2 bends. 25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Avenue (via Shortcut Canal). SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 55 of Text) Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 feet in Bay and 16.5 feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 feet extended up River to Saginaw. Turning Basin. Present project channel dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 feet wide and 24 feet deep from 24-foot contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 feet in River Channel up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 feet in River Channel up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and elimination of present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-foot project above Sixth Street Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 new Turning Basins. 3 Deepen River Channel to 25 feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 56 of Text) 20-foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 feet. Widen and deepen Southeast Bend and improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. H. Doc. 114, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 668, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 318, 54th Cong., 1st. Sess.; Annual Report, 1903, pp. 474, 1823 H. Doc. 473, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 21, 1956 " Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 1934 9 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 Deepen and further improve Channels in St. Clair River between limits of 27.1 to 30 feet to provide safe navigation by vessels with drafts of 25.5 feet. A cutoff Channel in Canada at Southeast Bend and abandon old Southeast Bend Channels. Deauthorization of the work authorized by the Rivers and harbors Act of Jul. 24, 1946. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI (See Section 57 of Text) Interior Revetments.2 Benton Harbor Canal. s Present project dimensions of piers and a turning basin. Present project dimensions of the channel and turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Abandon easterly 1,000 feet of canal above west line of 9th Street. Turning basin above mouth of Morrison Channel and eliminate turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 58 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by MacArthur Lock), widen and deepen existing State Channel. 6 Poe Lock.' Dredging through shoals above falls and shoals below falls between lower end of Canal and upper entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels work in that section of River below Locks. Davis Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls, Lease entered into with Michigan Northern Power Company provided for construction of remedial and compensating works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen upper approach to Canals through Vidal Shoals, extend anchorage and maneuver area below locks. Remove Round Island, middle ground extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels throughout downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct new (MacArthur) Lock on site of former Weitzel Lock, deepen approach Channels to 27 feet, and reconstruct approach Piers. Name 'MacArthur' Lock and changed name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and construct new Hydroelectric Power Plant. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1875, pt. 1, p. 162. Annual Report, 1880, pp. 2030, 2031, 2049, and 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Report by Maj. O.M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, not published. H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1891, p. 2810. H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H.Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3). H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess., and 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-80 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 3, 1873 Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a new structure 800 feet long, 100 feet wide and 32 feet deep with necessary construction of Nose and Center Piers, and widen and deepen Channel across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to provide wider anchorage and maneuver areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 feet over full width to downbound and 2-way Channels (including anchorage areas) and over Westerly 300-foot width of upbound Middle Neebish Channel, when levels of Lakes Superior and Huron are at their respective LWD's. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a part of Project, authorize alteration with cost to be apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, Jun. 21, 1940. Construct a second large lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI (See Section 59 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening entrance to 16 feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 60 of Text) Entrance Channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 61 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Avenue. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 62 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge. 12 Present dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present project dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIIP CANAL, WI (See Section 63 of Text) Breakwaters. 2 H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' None. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess.; Annual Report, 1896, Vol. 2, Pt. 5, p. 2739. Annual Report, 1907, p. 6416. H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 71, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' and Unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 21, 1934. H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. 21-81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 * Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 17, 1991 Oct. 8, 1992 Aug. 18, 1941 Acquision of the canal. Canal revetments and consolidation of canal and harbor works. Present project dimensions of channels and elimination of turning basin immediately west of revetted canal. Turning basin between city and Bushman wharves. TWO HARBORS, MN (See Section 64 of Text) Breakwater and dredging. Construction of two breakwater piers. Shore connection to east breakwater and dredging maneuvering area. Construct new east breakwater and enlargement of maneuvering basin. Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 65 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment. '2 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22d Street Bridge. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 66 of Text) New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Present project depth of Channel. SAGINAW RIVER, MI, FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 74 of Text) Flood control improvements to Saginaw River and its tributaries including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. One-time O&M repairs at Flint Unit to restore project to original dimensions. Provides funding for continuing O&M repairs at Flint Unit. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 75 of Text) Enlarging present Channel of Sebewaing River, altering Railroad and Highway Bridges, removal of Dike. H. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 117, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 421, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1887, p. 1952. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 805, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 146, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 (as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 17, 1897). H. Do. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. No Prior Survey or Estimate. 27 H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1992, (P.L. 102-104). Energy and Water Resources Appropriation Act of 1993, H.R. 5373, (P.L. 102-377). H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' 21-82 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 'Contains latest published map. 2Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 'Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 4This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. SAdministrative Act, Section 4. 6Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 7Public Law 388, 87th Congress. s'This portion inactive. 9Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. "'Transfer completed June 1962. "Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. 12Completed under previous project. 3"Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. 14 Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. IsLatest published map is in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2974. 6Latest published map in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2914. 'Superseded by Act of October 23, 1962. "Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street Bridge to North Humboldt Avenue Bridge). '9Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 2"Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 2'War Department Appropriations Act. 22Uncompleted portion deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 23Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 24Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth of old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. 2yThis modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 26Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. "72Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 2Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 9Deauthorized in 1977. This modification deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 21-83 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Algoma Harbor, WI Completed 1981 205,010' 1,017,728 Bayfield Harbor, WI Completed 1979 183,855 112,621 Belle River, MI Completed 1980 24,301 92,106 Beaver Bay, MN Active 1982 293,000 2,818 Big Suamico Harbor, WI Completed 1989 20,243 800,070 Black River (Alcona Co), MI Inactive 1907 0 0 Cedar River Harbor, MI Active 1982 215,000 0 Channels in Straits of Mackinac, MI Completed 1991 2,832,629 224,832 Cheboygan Harbor, MI Completed 1988 504,236 924,375 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI Completed 1959 125,629 13,528 Cross Village, MI Active 1983 364,000 0 Detour Harbor, MI Completed 1989 2,559,346 140,024 Eagle Harbor, MI Completed 1990 205,1642 92,548 Grays Reef Passage, MI Completed 1970 190,521 812,424 Greilickville Harbor, MI Completed 1976 366,579 159,639 (Formerly Traverse City Harbor, MI) Harrisville Harbor, MI Completed 1988 2,639,392 1,071,545 Knife River Harbor, MN Active 1986 412,945 291,168 Lac La Belle Harbor, MI Completed 1989 269,270 559,026 Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI Completed 1980 399,478 324,036 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Completed 1966 332,832 105,000 Lutsen Harbor, MN Active 1982 357,000 0 Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Completed 1989 334,089 1,812,044 Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Completed 1986 136,2863 87,640 Northport Harbor, WI Inactive ---- 0 0 Petoskey Harbor, MI Completed 1986 123,839 561,058 Point Lookout Harbor, MI Completed 1991 2,642,584 3,469,5854 Pine River, MI Completed 1980 13,649 58,868 Portage Lake Harbor, MI Completed 1990 256,129 2,001,065 St. James, Beaver Island, MI Completed 1957 49,171s 85,814 St. Joseph River, MI Completed 1975 54,555 19,185 Saxon Harbor, WI Completed 1991 1,094,3776 726,147 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1986 1,955,745 31,520 Washington Island, WI Completed 1950 62,838 77,792 Whitefish Point Harbor, MI Completed 1991 771,639 401,596 'Includes $92,774 for previous projects. 2Excludes $27,800 for previous projects. 3Excludes $136,286 Contributed Funds. 4Includes $9,257 Contributed Funds. SExcludes $7,500 Contributed Funds. 6Excludes $50,193 Contributed Funds. 21-84 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI' Deferred 1975 4,471,235 -- Kawkawlin River, MI Completed 1991 469,663' --- Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MI Completed 1953 1,136,008' --- Paw Paw Lake, MI Completed 1989 3,589,000 --- Upper River Rouge, MI' Inactive 1968 7,935 ---- River Rouge, MI Completed 1981 31,960,332 ---- 'Includes $108,335 Contributed Funds. 'Includes $202,996 Contributed Funds. 'Uncompleted portion deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with 5Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (PL 99-662). local cooperation. 'Includes $113,963 Contributed Funds. TABLE 21-F MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (SEE SECTION 58 OF TEXT) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quoins Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Coat $6,200,000' $3,275,000' $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,0005 $1,750,000' $12,718,806 '" $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sep. 18, 1919 Jul. 11, 1943 Jun. 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost -' $300,000 Type Stel SolgsRecessed Stel SgoplsRecessed Coat Completed -' $169,224' Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 600.6 above and 578.4 below. 'Includes cot of North Canal. 'Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 'Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 'Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 'Excludes cost of canal excavation to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. 'Including engineering office, and inspection. 'Not separate from cost of locks. 21-85 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Berrien County, MI 1963 Nov 1986 0 0 (St. Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, Alcona County, 1971 Dec 1989 0 0 MI (Authorized Dec. 17, 1979, under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1936 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (May 17, 1950 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI 1976 Dec 1989 159,300,000 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 13, 1968 R&H Act) Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, 1990 Dec 1989 14,562,100 0 MN and WI (Jul. 14, 1960 R&H Act) Forestville Harbor, MI (1968 R&H Act) 1969 Nov 1986 0 0 Grand Haven Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI 1966 Nov 1977 0 0 (Oct. 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI' 1990 Dec 1989 93,993,349 0 (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Acts of 1946 and 1956) Harbors of Washington Island, WI 1950 Dec 1989 62,838 0 (R&H Act of 1937) Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI 1962 Dec 1989 0 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Sep. 3, 1954 R&H Act) Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI 1975 Dec 1989 6,656,668 108,332 (Uncompleted portion) (1954 Flood Control Act) Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI 1975 Dec 1989 416,822 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Kenosha Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 552,000 43,000 (Uncompleted portion) (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Kewaunee River, WI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (1960 R&H Act) Lansing (Grand River), MI 1971 Jun 1981 7,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) 21-86 TABLE 21-G DE DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Dal Report For Deauth 1990 Dec 1 990 1990 Project Lower Fox River, WI (Uncompleted portion) (Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act) Manitowoc Harbor, WI (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Act of 1935) Northport Harbor, WI (Authorized in 1972 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Ontonagon Harbor, MI (R&H Act of 1962) Pentwater Harbor, MI (Jul. 13, 1892 R&H Act) Racine Harbor, WI (Mar. 2, 1907; Aug. 26, 1937; and Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Acts, and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI (1970 Flood Control Act) Rogers City Harbor, MI (Jun. 25, 1910 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI (Oct 23, 1962 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI (Jul. 3, 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI (Jul. 3, 1930 R&H Act) South Milwaukee Harbor, WI (1836 Flood Control Act) St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI (Mar. 7, 1942 R&H Act) Two Rivers Harbor, WI (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) te orized 989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Nov 1977 May 1986 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Oct 1978 Dec 1989 21-87 CEoxnFptuernnibddusetded 478,000 'Includes Detroit and St. Clair Rivers. Federal Funds Expended 3,753,334 0 6,937,804 132,000 27,482 0 9,441,554 3,823,000 5,892 22,000 12,000 0 0 0 0 147,463 Contributed Funds Expended 0 0 478,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1990 1976 1963 1983 1926 1976 1976 1976 1976 1906 1977 1990 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-H FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Length Miles Upbound Project of from or Down- Project Project Datum Planes Year Channel River bound Width Depth IGLD 1985 Com- Name of Channel (Feet) Mouth Vessels (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) plete DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 14 OF TEXT) Channel North of Belle Isle' Channel at Head of Detroit River Misc. Shoals and Obstructions Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel North of Junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368 +87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc. Shoals and Obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstberg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Channel (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal 2 38,800 44,500 30 32 25 Both 200 Both 800 Both - 24,800 17 Both 800 12,200 12 Both 600 26,000 10 Down 450 10,887 12,313 42,000 5 Down Both Both Both 450-800 800-1,200 1,200 --- Both --- 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 10 17 14 Up Up Up Down Local Local Local Local 600 600 600 800 300 300 250-300 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 56 OF TEXT) Channel at Foot of Lake Huron Channel North of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island: Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stag Island St. Clair to Russell Island Russell Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend: CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel Outlet 26,500 44 Both 800 4,100 39 Both 800 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8,000 38 31 24 11 5 -- .-- Both Both Both Both Both Both Small Craft 1,000-1,400 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 'This is a side channel. 2Extends from deep water near Windmill Point to a point opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 feet. 'Project depth 29.5 feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 feet over other than Rock Shoals. 'Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 27.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 3Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 28.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 'Project complete except for work authorized by Rivers and Harbors Act of 1950. 21-88 21.0 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 27.7 29.0 29.0 28.5 28.5-29.53 571.9 572.1-571.5 571.5-570.9 570.4 570.4 570.4-569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 570.4-570.1 570.1-569.5 569.5-569.2 569.2 570.3-570.2 570.2-569.4 570.4 29.5 1964 1964 1964 1962 1964 1964 1961 1961 1964 1964 1960 1960 1960 1929 19646 1964 1941 1904 27.5 21-27.5' 21-28.55 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 30.0 30.0 27.4 27.3 27.3 27.2 27.1 27.1 10.0 577.5-577.1 577.1-576.5 577.1-575.3 575.3-574.3 574.3-572.6 572.6-572.3 572.3-572.2 572.2 572.2 1961 1962 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-I FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS (SEE SECTION 16 OF TEXT) Depth at Normal Pool Miles Avail- Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Ye Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall' Sill Character of Kind of Type of Co Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction ple DePere lock' 7.1 DePere --- 36.0 146.0 8.9 10.3 12.0 Rock -- Concrete 193 DePere dam' 7.2 DePere --- --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed3' Concrete 192 Little Kaukauna lock' 13.0 DePere 6 36.0 146.0 7.2 8.0 9.5 Clay -- Concrete 193 Little Kaukauna dam2 13.1 DePere 6 --- --- -- --- --- Clay and gravel Fixed3' Piers and concrete 192 Rapide Croche lock2 19.2 Wrightstown 2 36.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 9.3 Rock -- Concrete 193 Rapide Croche dam2 19.3 Wrightstown 2 .--- --- -- --- - Rock Fixed3' Concrete 193 Kaukauna fifth lock2 22.8 Kaukauna --- 35.6 144.0 9.1 6.7 9.3 Rock -- Composite 189 Kaukauna fourth lock2 23.1 Kaukauna --- 36.6 144.1 10.2 6.9 6.0 Rock -- Stone masonry 187 Kaukauna third lock2 23.3 Kaukauna --- 30.6 144.0 10.2 6.9 6.3 Rock -- Stone masonry 187 Kaukauna second lock 2 23.4 Kaukauna --- 35.0 144.0 9.6 6.0 6.0 Rock -- Stone masonry 190 Kaukauna first lock2 23.6 Kaukauna --- 35.1 144.4 11.0 6.9 6.0 Rock --- Stone masonry 188 Kaukauna dam2 24.0 Kaukauna --- --- --- --- --- - Rock Fixed' Concrete 193 Kaukauna guard lock 24.0 Kaukauna --- 40.0 --- --- 9.4 --- Rock -- Stone masonry 189 Little Chute combined lock: Lower 24.4 Little Chute 1 35.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 8.6 Rock --- Stone masonry 187 Upper 25.4 Little Chute 1 36.3 144.1 10.6 7.6 6.0 Hardpan -- Stone masonry 187 Little Chute second lock2 26.4 Little Chute --- 35.0 144.2 13.8 8.0 6.1 Rock -- Stone masonry 188 Luttle Chute first (guard) lock' 26.5 Little Chute --- 35.4 --- --- 6.6 --- Rock --- Stone masonry 190 Little Chute dam 2 26.6 Little Chute --- --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed' Concrete 193 Cedars lock' 27.3 Little Chute 1 35.0 144.0 9.8 6.8 7.3 Rock --- Stone masonry 188 Cedars dam' 27.4 Little Chute 1 --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed 3' Concrete 193 Appleton fourth lock2 30.7 Appelton 1 35.0 144.0 7.6 8.1 7.9 Rock --- Stone masonry 190 Appleton lower dam2 30.9 Appleton 1 --- --- --- --- --- Rock Fixed3' Concrete 193 Appleton third lock' 31.3 Appleton --- 35.0 144.0 8.7 6.0 8.6 Rock --- Stone masonry 190 Appleton second lock2 31.6 Appleton --- 35.1 144.6 9.6 6.9 6.0 Clay -- Stone masonry 190 Appelton first lock2 31.9 Appleton --- 35.0 144.7 10.0 6.6 6.0 Rock --- Stone masonry 188 Appleton upper dam 32.2 Appleton-.. --- ---- --- - Rock Fixed3 Concrete 194 Menasha lock2 37.0 Menasha --- 35.4 144.0 8.5 7.2 8.0 Clay -- Composite 189 Menasha dam2 37.8 Menasha --- --- --- --- --- --- Hardpan Fixed3 Concrete 193 ar m- Actual te Cost 6 $229,308 9 209,536 8 362,427 6 179,398 4 228,738 0 118,975 8 13,310' 9 37,536 9 39,948 3 24,313 3 38,704 1 123,763 1 12,630 9 102,304 9 --- 1 48,555 4 7,817' 2 82,554 8 34,972 3 84,973 7 40,893 4 73,903 0 32,238 1 22,940 4 36,004 0 151,558 9 19,326' 84,686 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. 2Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 'Provided with sluices. *Flash boards used. 'Partially rebuilt. 21-89 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 21-J RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS 21-90 Name of Project BAYFIELD HARBOR, WI BIG SUAMICO HARBOR, WI CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI EAGLE HARBOR, MI GRAYS REEF PASSAGE, MI GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI MACKINAW CITY HARBOR, MI POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, MI PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI SAXON HARBOR, WI ST. JAMES HARBOR, MI TAWAS BAY HARBOR, MI WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Date Survey Conducted OCTOBER 1991 MAY 1992 MAY 1992 OCTOBER 1991 JULY 1992 APRIL 1992 JUNE 1992 APRIL 1992 AUGUST 1992 JUNE 1992 JUNE 1992 JUNE 1992 JUNE 1992 JULY 1992 JULY 1992 JULY 1992 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT* The district comprises Cook, Mc Henry, Lake, Kane, Du Page, and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana, including a portion of La Porte County along Lake Michigan in Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 4. Chicago Harbor, IL 5. Chicago River, IL 6. Indiana Harbor, IN 7. Michigan City Harbor, IN 8. Waukegan Harbor, IL 9. Lake Michigan Diversion 10. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 11. National Emergency Preparedness Alterations of Bridges 12. Other Authorized Bridge Alteration Beach Erosion Control 13. Casino Beach, IL 14. Illinois Beach State Park, IL 15. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, IN 16. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN 17. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects 18. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization Page 22-2 22-2 22-2 22-3 22-4 22-4 22-5 22-5 22-6 22-6 22-6 22-6 22-6 22-6 22-7 22-7 22-7 22-7 Flood Control 19. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) 20. Lake George, Hobart, IN 21. Little Calumet River, IN 22. Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN 23. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 24. North Branch, Chicago River, IL 25. O'Hare Reservoir, IL 26. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 27. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization General Investigations 28. Surveys 29. Collection and Study of Basic Data Title Cost and Financial Statement Authorizing Legislation Existing Navigation Projects Other Authorized Bridge Alteration Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Deauthorized Projects TABLES Table Numbers 22-A 22-B 22-C 22-D 22-E 22-F 22-G Pages 22-12 Thru 14 22-15 Thru 18 22-19 22-20 22-20 22-20 22-21 22-1 Page 22-7 22-8 22-8 22-8 22-9 22-10 22-10 22-11 22-11 22-11 22-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound north breakwater 4,630 feet long and a rubblemound breakwater west arm 1,200 feet long, for a total breakwater length of 5,830 feet; (b) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (d) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide; and (e) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965 (Public Law 89-298; House Document Number 160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing act also provided the Secretary of the Army with the authority to reimburse the State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of the project as approved by the Chief of Engineers and constructed under supervision of the Chief of Engineers (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Eleven berths are available at the facilities owned and administered by the Indiana Port Commission. One berth, committed to grain, is located on the outer harbor. Four berths on the East Harbor Arm are dedicated to handling dry and liquid bulk commodities. The East Harbor Arm also includes a small-boat harbor designed to accommodate working tugs for vessel assistance and barge movement. On the West Arm there are six berths. Although one berth is available for dry bulk cargoes, these berths are primarily used for the shipment and receipt of general cargo. Additionally, the Indiana Port Commission, through a lease, administers the west side of the West Harbor Arm for barge fleeting. The remaining available harbor berthing on the east side of the East Harbor Arm is privately owned. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Hydrographic surveys and studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $38,147 and by contract at a cost of $43,620. Project management and real estate costs were performed by hired labor at a cost of $49,000 and $2,580, respectively. Major Rehabilitation Evaluation Reports were prepared by other COE at a cost of $98,718 and by hired labor at a cost of $40,519. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 1992 were $19,471,380 of which $13,599,900 was for new work ($13,584,000 federal and $15,900 non-federal) and $5,871,480 for maintenance. 2. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, at the mouth of the Burns Waterway, approximately 35 miles southeast of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. None Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound west breakwater 1,003 feet long; (b) a rubblemound north breakwater 678 feet long; and (c) channel improvements of 5,200 linear feet with 145,000 cubic yards of dredged material used for beach nourishment (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas located along Burns Waterway and Burns Ditch. The commodities handled at this harbor are fresh fish caught as a result of charter boat fishing. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Beach monitoring analysis and surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $89,558 and by contract at a cost of $16,897. Project management and real estate costs were $3,335 and $2,824, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1992 were $4,482,787 of which $3,770,558 was for new work ($2,000,000 federal and $1,770,558 non-federal), and $712,229 for maintenance. 3. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 miles south of Chicago Harbor, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago, except for breakwaters, and approach channel and an anchorage area which are in Illinois and Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) 22-2 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT Previous Projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stonefilled double-row steel sheet pile detached breakwater 5,007 feet long; (c) a north pier 3,460 feet long; (d) a south pier 2,961 feet long; (e) an approach channel 29 feet deep and 3,200 feet wide; (f) an outer harbor anchorage area 28 feet deep and 3,000 feet wide; (g) an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 feet wide; (h) a channel in the Calumet River 27 feet deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 130th Street; (i) three turning basins designated as numbers, 1, 3, and 5; and (j ) a channel extending into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, August 30, 1935, July 14, 1960, October 23, 1962, and October 27, 1965 (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves, and terminals are available. The Chicago Regional Port District owns four wharves, two grain elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United States Government owns one stone dock. The most important cargoes handled are iron ore and concentrates, coal, and lignite. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were performed at a cost of $100,120. Water quality studies were continued at a cost of $77,221. Maintenance of the confined disposal facility and Reach C breakwater was performed by hired labor at a cost of $36,875 and $7,979, respectively. The ERGO project was initiated at a cost of $10,095. FY 1988 dredging contract was completed at a cost of $43,464. Hired labor cost for claims associated with this contract was $15,771. Project management and real estate costs were $249,605 and $18,533, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 100 percent complete pursuant to Section 100 (b), Public Law 99-662, approved January 1990. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1992, were $56,934,532 of which $22,578,567 was for new work ($19,541,964 regular funds and $3,036,603 public works funds), $28,091,297 regular funds for maintenance, $836,667 non-federal funds for maintenance, and $5,428,001 regular funds for rehabilitation. 4. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib shore and extension breakwater 2,250 feet long; (b) a stonefilled timber crib exterior breakwater 5,421 feet long; (c) a rubblemound and stone-filled concrete caisson southerly extension to the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive of a 582foot entrance gap enclosing an outer basin of about 970 acres; (d) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north inner breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 304- foot shore return and a 754-foot gap; (f) a stonefilled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 feet long, enclosing an inner basin of approximately 224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and maneuver area inside the exterior breakwater and southerly extension breakwater 28 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,300 feet; and (i) an entrance channel 21 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of July 11, 1870, June 14, 1880, March 3, 1899, July 25, 1912, March 2, 1919 and October 23, 1962 (See table 22-C). The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The deep-draft lock is 600 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 23 feet deep and is of steel cellular design. Operation and maintenance responsibilities in the interest of navigation were transferred to the Federal Government pursuant to Public Law 90-63 approved July 30, 1983, Section 107 of the Public 97-88, and Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are three docks, two for passenger excursion boats and one for cargo. The most important cargoes handled are sugar and non-metallic minerals. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: The lock operations contract was continued with International Research and Development, Inc. at a cost of $577,038. Other costs associated with the lock operation amounted to $229,372. Surveys and studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $117,809, by other COE at a cost of $84,769, and by contract at a cost of $28,016. E&D and preparation of plans and specs for the southerly breakwater were performed by hired labor at a cost of $270,543. Supervision and administration costs for repairs of the east gate were $23,719. Real estate costs were $22,337, and project management costs were $219,797. 22-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 1992 were $24,407,374 of which $4,788,827 was for new work, $18,291,947 for maintenance and $1,326,600 for rehabilitation. 5. CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927 and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of the North and South Branches (0.7 miles); (b) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles); (c) a channel 21 feet deep on the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles); (d) a 21-foot deep North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; and (e) a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, March 2, 1907, and July 24, 1946 (See table 22-C). The portion of project authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1946 is presently being restudied to confirm economic feasibility. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, which provided the improvement of the channel, is subject to condition that local interests furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of the improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel and crushed rock. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $9,858 and by contract at a cost of $31,768. Water control activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $119,166, by other COE at a cost of $22,204, by contract at a cost of $68,991, and by other federal agencies at a cost of $118,380. Project management and real estate costs were $79,742 and $7,402, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by the 1946 River Harbor Act. Head of navigation for deep-draft vessels is North Avenue, 5.97 miles from the Michigan Avenue bridge. Total costs of the existing project to September 1992 were $15,209,639 of which $1,500,565 was for new work and $13,709,074 was maintenance. 6. INDIANA HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly rubblemound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an easterly concrete capped caisson breakwater 201 feet long with a rubblemound extension 2,324 feet long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 28 feet deep; (e) a main canal entrance channel 27 feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George Branch 22 feet deep; and (j) the Calumet River Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, March 2, 1919, March 20, 1922, July 3, 1930, August 30, 1935, August 28, 1937, and July 14, 1960 (See table 22-C}. Local Cooperation. Substantially complied with. See FY 1986 Annual Report for full requirements. Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves are available. Six docks handle iron ore and limestone. Six docks are for handling petroleum products and three docks for handling gypsum, scrap metal and steel, and bulk products. However, not all docks are presently being used for the shipment or receipt of waterborne commodities. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Environmental studies and surveys were continued by hired labor at a cost of $322,122, by contract at a cost of $1,632, and by other COE at a cost of $22,000. Project management and real estate costs were $43,577 and $4,268, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1992 were $15,565,830 of which $4,909,648 was for new work and $10,656,182 was for maintenance. 22-4 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 7. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in La Porte County, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926. ) Previous Projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1992. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) a stone-filled timber crib, opile and steel sheeting east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stonefilled timber crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a turning basin No. 1, 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) a turning basin No. 2, 18 feetdeep (i) an outer basin 12 feet deep in the northerly portion and 8 feet deep in the southerly portion; and (j) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from turning basin No. 2 to the E Street bridge. The project was authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Acts of March 3, 1899, March 3, 1905, January 21, 1927, August 30, 1935, and Section 107 of July 14, 1960, Rivers and Harbors Acts approved on September 30, 1966 (See table 22- C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies of the Trail Creek basin were continued by hired labor at a cost of $125,694, by federal agencies at a cost of $21,971, by contract at a cost of $33,446 and by other COE at a cost of $136,372. Contract placement and supervision and administration for construction of the east pier were $489,363 and $92,909, respectively. E&D costs during construction were $2,797. Value engineering costs were $14,169. The costs to prepare plans and specs for dredging the outer harbor were $26,831. Contract placement and supervision and administration costs were $387,484 and $22,490, respectively. Real estate costs were $7,518 and program management costs were $120,125. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1992 were $12,478,310 of which $1,574,446 was for new work ($1,543,646 federal and $30,800 non-federal funds), $9,285,194 for maintenance, and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation. 8. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14904 and 14905.) Previous Projects. See page 1392 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly stone-filled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; (b) a stone-filled reinforced concrete caisson shore connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone-filled doublerow steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; (d) a single-row steel sheeting shore connection 398 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 998 feet long; (f) a single-row steel sheet piling north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 632 feet long; (h) a stone-filled timber crib pier 1,399 feet long; (i) a stone-filled double-row pile and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide; (1) an inner basin 13 feet deep; and (m) an anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner basin 8 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of June 3, 1902, July 13, 1930, and March 2, 1945 (See table 22 -C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum and building cement. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Environmental studies and monitoring activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $97,641, by other COE at a cost of $50,126 and by contract at a cost of $16,871. Water quality costs were $63,035 and real estate costs were $11,920. Preparation of a letter report and engineering and design costs associated with resurfacing the South Pier were $146,901. Prior year dredging contract was decreased by $10,000. Contract administration and project management costs were $2,424 and $104,327, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification which is being restudied. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1992 were $9,875,384 of which $823,026 was for new work and $9,052,358 was for maintenance. 22-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 9. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1988. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Studies and preparation of reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $332,109, by other COE at a cost of $14,540, by other federal agencies at a cost of $47,810 and by contract at a cost of $95,043. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Under Section 1142, PL 99-662, the Corps of Engineers assumed responsibility for monitoring the Diversion of Lake Michigan water into the Illinois Waterway. The Corps of Engineers assumed full water diversion accounting responsibility in FY 1988. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1992 were $489,502 for maintenance. 10. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed at a cost of $115,275. 11. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Fiscal Year costs of $135,367 were for: Training and Exercises Management and Mobilization Planning $ 5,315 130,052 Alteration of Bridges 12. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATIONS, See table 22-D. Beach Erosion Control 13. CASINO BEACH, IL Location. Casino Beach is located along the Lake Michigan shoreline at Jackson Park in Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The Casino Beach project was authorized by Section 501 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project consists of rehabilitating 1,800 feet of the Casino jetty by encasing the existing timber pile and stone structure in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap. The estimated cost (1992) for new work is $7,820,000 of which $3,680,000 is federal and $4,140,000 is nonfederal. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Chicago Park District. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; operate and maintain the completed project; and make cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $152,230. Condition at the End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1992 was $246,388. 14. ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan along the 9-mile reach of shoreline immediately south of the Illinois-Wisconsin State line. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14901 and 14904.) Previous Projects. None. Existing Project. Provides for (a) construction of 46 rubblemound, offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long and spaced about 300 feet apart; (b) initial beach nourishment consisting of placement of 100,000 cubic yards of coarse graded beach material; and (c) periodic renourishment of 100,000 cubic yards approximately every five years. The project was conditionally authorized in Section 501 (b) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act subject to a report by the Corps of Engineers and approval by the Secretary of the Army. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor would be required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; accomplish all required relocations; hold and save the United State free from damages; and provide a cash contribution. Operatiops and Results During Period. None. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Work on this project has been terminated. 22-6 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT 15. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE BANK PROTECTION, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, approximately 35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926. ) Existing Project. Provides for placement 13,000 feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of riprap to maintain the full length of beach front at Beverly Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized by Public Law 97-88 and Public Law 98-63. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: E&D and project management costs were $21,193. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1992 were $1,127,000 of which $660,000 was for new work and $467,000 was for maintenance. 16. INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan along a two mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. The project consists of beach nourishment along approximately two miles of beach between Michigan City Harbor and Beverly Shores, Indiana, requiring an initial placement of 264,500 cubic yards of sand. Periodic replenishment of about 264,500 cubic yards of sand at five year intervals would be required throughout the life of the project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 501 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Estimated federal cost (1992) for new work is $183,000,000, including future beach nourishments. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Advance engineering and design was continued at a cost of $1,160. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction planning and engineering was initiated in fiscal year 1984. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1992 is $353,274. 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-E. 18. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1962, as amended. None. Flood Control 19. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (NORTH BRANCH) Location. Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. The project extends from Wolf Point in Chicago, Illinois, to its source just south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 (Section 116) and amended by the River and Harbor Act of March 7, 1974 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction; maintain and operate all works after completion without cost to the United States; and agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for completing construction. The 1974 Act provided that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non-federal interests paying 25 percent of the cost of maintenance. The 1986 Water Resources Development Act changed the cost sharing to require that nonfederal interests pay 50 percent of the cost of maintenance plus cost of disposal. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: FY 91-92 contract costs were $100,447. Supervision and administration costs were $4,901. E&D was performed by hired labor at a cost of $23,410. Real estate cost was decreased by $12,304 and the FY 1990 contract cost was decreased by $3,211. The total federal and non- 22-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 federal expenditures were $113,243 and $118,720, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992 was $3,294,656 of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed funds), and $3,062,772 was for maintenance ($2,150,039 federal funds and $912,733 non-federal contributed funds). 20. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN Location. Lake George in Hobart, Indiana and Deep River watershed upstream of the lake through Lake Station, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of the removal of silt, aquatic growth and other material and the construction of silt traps or other devices to prevent and abate the deposition of sediment. Estimated cost (1992) for new work is $5,710,000 federal and $1,900,000 to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by Section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. Section 602 (b), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By letter dated March 9, 1987 the City of Hobart, Indiana indicated that it was a potential local project sponsor and applied for credit for previous work applicable to the project under the provisions of Section 104 (d) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $98,645. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1992 is $194,497. 21. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN Location. Little Calumet River is located in northwest Indiana between the Illinois-Indiana State line and the Conrail Railroad in east Gary, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of replacing 9.5 miles of existing spoil bank levees with 12.2 miles of new levees, floodwalls, closure and appurtant structures between the Illinois-Indiana State line and Cline Avenue; construction of 9.7 miles of set-back levees in Gary; a diversion structure at Hart Ditch; permanent evacuation of 29 structures in the Black Oak area of Gary; flood proofing 38 residential structures in Gary; modifying 7 miles of channel and 3 accompanying bridge culvert modifications; modifying 1 highway bridge; construction of 16.8 miles of hiking trails and accompanying recreation support facilities; and preservation of 788 acres of wetlands with wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated federal cost (1992) for new work is $110,000,000; $30,700,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission. The local cooperation agreement was signed on August 16, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-ways; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a five percent cash contribution for structural flood control measures, fifty percent for recreation features and twenty-five percent for fish and wildlife enhancements. Operations and Results During Period. The third nonstructural contract was awarded on September 30, 1992. Construction for Stage II-1 levee segment from Harrison Street to Broadway (North) was completed on July 15, 1992. The construction contract for the Stage II-2 levee segment from Grant to Harrison Streets (North) was awarded on August 20, 1992. The construction contract for the Stage III levee segment from Chase to Grant Streets was awarded on September 30, 1992. Real estate management costs were $153,659 ($143,239 federal and $10,420 nonfederal). Engineering and design costs were $2,941,111 ($2,430,780 federal and $510,331 non-federal which includes $2,123,680 hired labor, $252,893 performed by other COE, $1,525 by other agencies and $563,013 by contract. Construction contract costs were $371,740 ($220,789 federal and $150,951 non-federal) . Construction management costs were $129,545 ($116,453 federal and $13,092 non-federal). Total federal and nonfederal costs were $2,911,261 and $684,794, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is in progress. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992 was $10,581,612 for new work. Federal costs total $9,805,712; non- federal costs total $775,900. 22. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN Location. Cady Marsh is located in Lake County, Indiana. The Ditch is a tributary of the Little Calu- 22-8 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT met River system in northwest Indiana and flows through the Towns of Griffith and Highland. Existing Project. The Cady Marsh Ditch flood control project was authorized by Section 401 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project provides for diverting flood flows from Cady Marsh Ditch to the Little Calumet River through a diversion system under Arbogast Avenue in Griffith. Specifically, the project consists of improving 1,290 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch between Colfax and Arbogast Avenues in Griffith, constructing approximately 5,000 feet of large conduct pipes under Arbogast Avenue, excavating an open channel approximately 2,850 feet long from the north end of Arbogast Avenue to the Little Calumet River, and constructing interior drainage improvements. The estimated cost (1992) for new work is $10,300,000 of which $6,830,000 is federal and $3,470,000 is nonfederal. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Town of Griffith, IN. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; complete all required utility relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; provide the required interior drainage improvements; operate and maintain the completed project; and make a cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $160,368. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1992 was $213,307. 23. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL Location. The McCook Reservoir will be located within the communities of McCook and Hodgkins, Illinois at the existing McCook Quarry. The Thornton Reservoir will be located in the community of Thornton, Illinois at the existing Thornton Quarry. Existing Project. The project consists of converting two quarries into flood storage reservoirs. The McCook Reservoir will have a storage volume of 32,100 acre-feet (9.8 billion gallons); the Thornton Reservoir will have a volume of 14,600 acre-feet (4.8 billion gallons). The reservoirs will store floodwater from tunnels constructed or under construction by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago as part of the Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1992) is $636,000,000, including a federal cost for new work of $477,000,000, and $159,000,000 to be contributed by non-federal interests. Project was authorized by Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Local Cooperation. By letter dated 13 November 1986, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago indicated that it would be the local sponsor and provide the required local cooperation. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $2,227,749, including $35,091 for real estate activities, $758,584 for A-E contracts, $438,497 performed by other COE and $995,577 for hired labor. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction planning, engineering and design was in progress. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1992 were $5,127,411. 24. NORTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. The North Branch Chicago River Basin is located north of the City of Chicago in suburban Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. The project consists of constructing two excavated floodwater storage reservoirs on the West Fork and one excavated reservoir on the Middle Fork. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 401, also includes authorization to reimburse non-federal interests 50 percent of the costs of planning and construction for three existing reservoirs on the West Fork, known as Techny Reservoirs, and the existing Mid Fork Reservoir on the Middle Fork. Reservoir 27 in the Village of Bannockburn, is located on the West Fork, 12.7 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. It has a floodwater storage capacity of 525 acre-feet. Approximately 700 feet of the West Fork channel was improved and relocated for construction of the diversion structure. Reservoir 29A is located 9.6 miles above the mouth of the West Fork and 3.1 miles south of Reservoir 27. The reservoir floodwater storage capacity is 575 acre-feet. Two project features, channel relocation and construction of two bridges, are non-federal responsibility. Reservoir 15 is located near the City of Green Oaks on the Middle Fork, 22.1 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. The design floodwater storage capacity is 500 acre-feet.The reservoir is approximately 42 feet deep except in the sedimentation pool area which will be about 15 feet deeper. Estimated federal cost (1992) for new work is 22-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 $19,564,000. An additional $9,980,000 will be the required contribution by local interests. The nonfederal improvements for Reservoir 29A will require a $550,000 cash contribution from local interests. The non-federal clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets at Reservoir 29A may cost between $5.0 and $8.0 million. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total nonfederal share of the flood control improvements to twenty-five percent of the total project cost. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Construction of Reservoir 15 was substantially completed on May 15, 1992. Total costs for Reservoir 15 were $1,126,300 ($868,884 federal and $257,416 non-federal). Costs include $864,120 for construction contract; $130,242 for construction management; $495 for real estate management; $98,743 for engineering and design and $32,700 was provided to the Cook County Forest Preserve for fish and wildlife mitigation. Total costs for Reservoir 27 were $13,705 ($13,582 federal and $123 non-federal). Costs included $124 for construction contract; $10,417 for construction management and $3,164 for engineering and design. Total costs for Reservoir 29A were $1,060,707 ($438,586 federal; $287,586 non-federal cash; $59,491 non-federal improvements; and $275,044 for non- federal clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets). The authorized project costs for Reservoir 29A included $615,345 for construction contract; $90,334 for construction management; $3,031 for real estate management and $17,462 for engineering and design. Nonfederal bridge and channel improvements costs were $59,491 for construction. The lead shot clean-up costs were $87 for the construction. A total of $41,440 for construction management and $233,517 for engineering and design of which $95,473 was for A-E contract and $138,044 was for hired labor. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 85 percent complete. Construction of Reservoir 27 is complete, except for some limited reservoir side slope stabilization which will be completed in Fiscal Year 1993. Reservoir 15 is substantially complete except for some landscaping. Reservoir 29A is approximately 83 percent complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1992 were $21,232,566, of which $19,342,877 was federal and $1,889,689 was non- federal, excluding the $4,493,298 non-federal cost for the Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. A total $469,580 in non-federal funds have been expended on bridge and channel betterments at Reservoir 29A. An additional $688,500 in non-federal funds have been expended on investigations in connection with the clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets at Reservoir 29A. 25. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL Location. The reservoir will be located in an unincorporated portion of Elk Grove Township in northwestern Cook County, Illinois about 1 mile northwest of Chicago O'Hare International Airport. Existing Project. The project consists of a 1,050 acre-foot capacity reservoir, excavated to a depth of 80 feet. The reservoir would be constructed at the terminus of the existing system of 6.6 miles of deep tunnels, constructed under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). estimated project cost (1992) is $25,600,000 including a federal cost for new work of $17,400,000 and $8,200,000 to be contributed by local interests. The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The local cooperation agreement for the first construction contract, creek relocation, was signed on July 31, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a cash contribution of five percent of the total project costs. The local cooperation agreement for the second construction contract, reservoir excavation and lining, was signed July 29, 1991. Operations and Results During Period. Construction was continued at a cost of $1,298,271 ($1,225,770 federal and $72,501 non-federal). The utility relocations were initiated at a nonfederal cost of $848,999. Real estate management activities costs were $38,015 ($37,668 federal and $347 nonfederal). engineering and design costs were $369,858 ($34,337 federal and $335,521 non-federal). Construction management costs were $187,096 ($176,579 federal and $10,517 non-federal). Total federal and non-federal costs were $1,474,354 and $1,267,885, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction planning and engineering is completed. Construction is in progress. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1992 were 22-10 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT $5,877,177 for new work. Federal costs total $4,550,626; nonfederal costs total $1,326,551. 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-F. 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities, repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congressional antecedent legislation). Fiscal Year Costs Program to September 30, 1992 Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Disaster Assistance (FEMA) $ 250,298 18,077 5,928,947 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1965, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $90,088 federal and $24,267 non-federal for flood control activities. The initial appraisals were continued for Kankakee River, Lake and Newton Counties, IN ($2,754); and for Little Calumet River South Holland, IL ($2,625). The initial appraisals were initiated for the City of Oak Forest, Cook County, IL ($5,504) and for the Village of Palos Park, Cook County, IL ($6,852). The reconnaissance report was continued for Tinley Creek ($1,202). The work in developing the Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreements was continued for Monticello Avenue ($5,676) and for McCook Levee ($7,469). The feasibility phase was continued for North Libertyville Estates at a cost of $13,064 federal and $8,537 non-federal, and for the Fox River McHenry County ($6,126). The work on the feasibility phase was initiated for Valley View at a cost of $38,816 federal and $15,730 non-federal. Flood control activities specifically directed in FY 1990 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (Public Law 101-101). Kankakee River Icebreaker, Wilmington, IL $3,740 28. SURVEYS Fiscal Year 1992 costs were $232,771 federal and $74,983 non-federal itemized as follows: Flood Damage Prevention Studies $ Shoreline Protection Studies Miscellaneous Activities Coordination Studies Federal Non-federal 104,587 $ 61,488 13,006 72,625 42,553 0 10,061 3,434 29. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal Year 1992 costs of $160,422 were for: Flood Plain Management Services International Water Studies Hydrologic Studies $ 97,622 59,800 3,000 22-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Burns Waterway Small Boat Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Chicago Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) 5. Chicago River, IL 6. Indiana Harbor, IN New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Maint: Contib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost O 13,584,000 0 13,584,000 1,041,000 12,311 163,000 310,000 1,172,824 62,051 160,792 272,584 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 2,000,000 185,000 199,435 168,500 118,000 173,282 218,288 175,244 112,614 0 0 0 0 446,500 914,963 665,000 710,500 1,458,542 926,474 737,628 559,663 2,185,000 3,612,977 0 0 0 0 0 139,973 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,327,000 1,437,160 1,814,600 1,506,500 1,333,944 1,527,448 1,661,435 1,573,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,076,000 981,657 909,000 480,000 1,347,097 1,042,749 929,254 457,511 0 0 611,000 290,200 322,000 408,000 745,455 299,862 334,762 393,599 22-12 5,911,104 5,871,480 15,900 15,900 720,935 712,229 1,770,558 1,770,558 22,578,5671 22,578,5671 28,276,237 2 28,091,297 2 5,428,001 5,428,001 3 836,667 836,667 4,788,827 4 4,788,827 4 18,530,546 18,291,947 1,326,600 1,326,600 1,500,565 5 1,500,565 6 13,766,394 6 13,709,074 6 4,897,148 ' 4,897,148 ' 10,675,988 8 10,656,1828 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Approp. 0 0 0 0 12,500 Cost 0 0 0 0 12,500 7. Michigan City New Work: Harbor, IN Approp. 0 0 0 0 1,543,646 9 Cost 0 0 0 0 1,543,646 9 Maint: Approp. 270,000 832,542 752,000 1,749,000 9,685,054 Cost 275,935 847,323 623,165 1,481,169 9,285,194 Rehab: Approp. 0 0 0 0 1,618,670 Cost 0 0 0 0 1,618,670 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Contrib. 0 0 0 0 30,800 Cost: 0 0 0 0 30,800 8. Waukegan New Work: Harbor, IL Approp. 0 0 0 0 823,026 10O Cost 0 0 0 0 823,026 10o Maint: Approp. 201,000 616,788 826,000 456,000 9,123,768 11 Cost 173,840 576,487 836,025 483,245 9,052,358 11 9. Lake Michigan Diversion Maint: Approp. 0 0 0 530,000 530,000 Cost 0 0 0 489,502 489,502 13. Casino Beach, IL New Work: Approp. 0 0 220,000 375,000 595,000 Cost 0 0 94,158 152,230 246,388 14. Illinois Beach New Work: State Park, IL Approp. 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 Cost 0 0 10,548 0 10,548 15. Indiana Dunes New Work: Nat'l Lakeshore Approp. 0 0 0 0 660,000 Beverly Shores, Cost 0 0 0 0 660,000 IN Maint: Approp. (10,000) 0 18,500 21,000 467,000 Cost 1,679 915 18,307 21,193 467,000 16. Indiana Shore- New Work: line Erosion, IN Approp. 15,000 90,000 79,000 0 399,000 Cost 49,092 90,000 32,114 1,160 353,274 19. Chicago River, IL New Work: (North Branch) Approp. 0 0 0 0 191,884 (Federal Funds) Cost 0 0 0 0 191,884 Maint: Approp. 33,000 247,350 150,000 145,000 2,223,350 Cost 40,327 228,339 190,755 113,243 2,150,039 (Contributed New Work: 22-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 22-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 Funds) 19. Lake George, Hobart, IN 20. Little Calumet River, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN 22. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 23. North Branch Chicago River, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) (Non-Federal Improvements) (Non-Federal Lead shot Clean-up) 24. O'Hare Reservoir, IL (Contributed Funds) Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 0 350,000 171,681 175,000 11,575 46,898 265,626 118,720 89,000 125,000 330,000 23,534 72,318 98,645 337,000 2,366,000 2,703,000 3,013,000 329,053 2,181,140 2,709,311 2,911,261 160,000 344,000 304,000 0 91,106 684,794 220,000 170,000 52,939 160,369 1,107,000 617,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 599,850 1,065,821 1,179,226 2,227,749 1,476,500 7,097,000 6,497,000 4,094,037 6,960,007 4,884,474 0 1,321,052 183,000 374,000 1,118,250 159,017 185,118 238,159 921,287 545,125 173,752 327,000 21,789 388,300 0 59,491 458,900 1,071,967 413,456 275,044 493,000 1,504,000 4,300,000 4,000,000 545,928 973,620 1,024,652 1,474,354 80,500 220,000 3,640,700 0 58,666 1,267,885 1 Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2 Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to decree (No. 54-C-1608) regarding removal of flue dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3 Includes $689,001 in settlement pursuant to decree regarding removal of flue dust. 4) Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5 Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 6 Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 7 Includes $60,668 for previous projects. 8 Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 9 Includes $287,389 for previous projects. o1In0c ludes $218,233 on previous projects. 11 Includes $15,711 on previous projects. 22-14 40,000 40,000 1,222,079 912,733 214,000 194,497 10,094,000 9,805,712 808,000 775,900 390,000 213,307 5,874,000 5,127,411 20,053,500 9,342,877 2,089,267 1,889,689 500,752 469,580 1,530,867 688,500 10,882,000 4,550,626 3,941,200 1,326,551 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 14, 1960 Section 107 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 19351,2 Aug. 30, 19351,2 Mar. 2, 19453 Jul. 14, 196013 Oct. 23, 196213 Oct. 27, 196513 Jul. 11, 1870 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and depths, a north breakwater, west bulkhead, approach channel and outer harbor, east and west harbor arms. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN (See Section 2 of Text) Provides for a 700-foot north breakwater,a 950-foot west breakwater, an entrance channel 11-feet deep, a harbor-of-refuge area 10 feet deep, and a channel in Burns Waterway 6 feet deep. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN (See Section 3 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins. Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. Consolidated the 2 projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river-entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; 5 turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance channel 300 feet wide and 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge Deepen, widen, and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J. and E. Ry. Bridge, to and including turning basins 1, 3, and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; a channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct. 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad Bridge (Nickle Plate) to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL (See Section 4 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior Breakwater. Present project depth in basin, and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Mar. 3, 1931 Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Public Law, 89-298, H Doc. 160. 88th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report dated February 1983. Annual Report, 1896, pp. 2584 et Seq. and H. Doc 277, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 172. 54thCong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 346, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc.494, 72d Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc., 180. 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc.,149, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.8 H. Doc., 87thCong., 2d Sess.5 H. Report No. 973, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 114,41st Cong.,2d Sess. and Annual Report 1879, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report, 1870 pp 1562-1567 Annual Report, 18 9 7,pp 2790-2791 H.Doc. 710, Cong., 2d Sess. H.Doc.1303,64th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong. 22-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 22-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 4, 1981 Jul. 30, 1983 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 193010 Jul. 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 28, 1937 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 196512 Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; and deepen a channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. Provides for lock operations and maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 5 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of June 3, 1896. Turning basins. Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908 as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION (See Section 9 of Text) Responsible for monitoring of Lake Michigan Diversion INDIANA HARBOR, IN (See Section 6 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly breakwaters. Reduce length of channel to be maintained in extension to Lake George. Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Steel and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks. Authorized Secretary of War to sell Inland Steel Co., about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths of 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel; 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E.J. & E. Ry, Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. 22-16 Public Law 14, 79th Cong. H. Doc.485,87th Cong., 2d Sess 4 Section 107 of Public Law 97-88 Public Law 98-63. Specified in act. Specified in act. H. Doc.95, 56th Cong. 1st Sess. (Annual Report, 1900 p. 3863 and Annual Reportl909, p. 709) H.Doc.,1294,64th Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 767, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.6,7 Section 1142, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 690, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 176, 67th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 219, 72d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc., 195, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 227, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN (See Section 7 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier inclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Mar. 3, 1889 Mar. 3, 1905 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Sec. 107 Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present located. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier inclosing outer basin. Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin, and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Recommendations of a Board of Engineers. Annual Report 1870. p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers. Annual Report 1851, pp 218 7-2189; Annual Report 1882. p. 2264-2266. Annual Report 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint Resolution of Congress approved May 13, 1908. Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 74thCong., 1st Sess. Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning basin Detailed Project Report dated to E. Street Bridge. June 19658 WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Jun. 14, 1880 Parallel piers and basins.9 Aug. 3, 1882 Modified location of harbor entrance. Jun. 13, 1902 Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end of north pier, and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. Jul. 3, 1930 Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north piers Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 17, 1970 Sec. 201 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 and enlarging inner basin. Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer end of north pier to project depth in lake, and dredge an anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to 25 feet and extending to the depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth to 23 feet at a width of 180 feet, and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. CASINO BEACH, IL (See Section 13 of Text) Provides for encasing approximately 1,800 feet of the existing Casino Beach jetty in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap, and replacing beach fill. ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL (See Section 14 of Text) Provides for 46 offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long, inital beach nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards, and periodic nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards at 5-year intervals. Annual Report 1880, p. 142 Annual Report,1882, pp. 277, 2162. H. Doc. 343, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 71st Cong., 2d Sess.. H. Doc. 116, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 368, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. Feasibility Report dated February 1983. Draft Feasibility Report dated June 1982. IINDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, BEVERLY SHORES, IN (See Section 15 of Text) Dec. 4, 1981 Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially Public Law 97-88 constructed in 1973. 22-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 22-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Documents Jul. 30, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Provides for operations and maintenance of the shore protection measures. INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for beach nourishment along a two-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN (See Section 20 of Text) Provides for removal of silt, aquatic growth and construction of silt traps. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN (See Section 21 of Text) Provides for levee construction, a diversion control structure at the mouth of Hart Ditch. Permanent evacuation of a portion of the Black Oak area of Gary and non-structural flood proofing measures in Gary. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARCH DITCH, IN (See Section 22 of Text) Provides for widening and deepening 1,250 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch, installing 4,880 feet of pipe, and excavating 2,850 feet of open channel. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL (See Section 23 of Text) Provides for construction of two floodwater storage reservoirs in the quarries of the same name. NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 19 and 24 of Text) Construction of three reservoirs and reimbursement to locals for 50 percent of the costs of Techny and Mid-Fork Reservoirs. Clearing fallen trees, roots and other debris and objects which contribute flooding. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL (See Section 25 of Text) Provides for a 1,050 acre-foot excavated reservior. Public Law 98-63 Sec. 501, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Sec. 602. Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Sec. 401. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Feasibility Report dated April 1984. Sec. 3 Water Resources Development Act of 1988. H. Doc. 100-72, 100th Cong. 1st Sess., Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. River and Harbor Act.(Sec.116) Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 1. Included in Public Works Administrative Program September 6, 1943, and Dec. 16, 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.) 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (breakwater closure). 4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uncompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is an Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen Lake George Branch). 11. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1933, and July 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen main canal and the Calumet River Branch). 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 13. Project deauthorized in 1989. 22-18 Acts CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-C EXISTING NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth in Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 4. Chicago Harbor, IL 5. Chicago River, IL 6. Indiana Harbor, IN 7. Michigan City Harbor, IN 8. Waukegan Harbor, IL North Breakwater West Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor East Harbor Arm West Harbor Arm North Breakwater West Breakwater Approach Channel Burns Waterway Northerly Crib Breakwater Southerly Steel Breakwater North Pier Chicago Confined Disposal Facility Approach Channel Outer Harbor River Entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning Basin No. 3 to Turning Basin No. 5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension in Lake Calumet Turning Basins 1, 3, and 5 Shore arm extension Exterior breakwater Exterior breakwater southerly ext. North inner breakwater South inner breakwater North Pier Approach Channel Channel and maneuver Lock Inner Basin Entrance Channel Main Branch of Chicago River North Branch of Chicago River North Branch Canal North Branch Turning Basin Northerly Breakwater Easterly Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor Entrance Channel Main Channel Turning Basin Lake George Branch Calumet River Branch Detached Breakwater West Pier East Pier East Breakwater Entrance Channel Main Channel Outer Basin Trail Creek Trail Creek North Breakwater and Shore Connection North Pier and North Revetment South Pier Entrance Channel Channel to Inner Basin Inner Basin Anchorage Area 1Area of about 6 acres. 22-19 4,630 1,200 2,200 3,700 2,100 3,800 678 1,043 1,200 5,593 400 Varies 620 620 200 100 7 0 0 3,200 3 2,000 290 0 200 and variable Variable 3 400 3 1,000 30 28 27 27 11 9 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 6,719 5,007 2,45C 2,97 9,70( 10,500 3,000 21,10( 8,000 4,000 3,000 29 28 23 21 21 21 21 21 21 29 28 27 22 22 22 22 2,250 5,421 4,944 4,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 600 1,270 7,300 3,800 11,100 5,500 1,120 2,525 7,200 4,200 3,600 7,400 3,700 2,500 1,304 835 1,276 1,000 1,900 2,400 900 3,000 2,300 1,896 2,074 3,111 3,250 1,700 1,650 1 800 1,300 80 740 190-470 190-390 91-390 56-210 800 Varies 65-280 61-210 64-160 160-260 150-425 120-150 900 50-100 50 390 200 375-500 1 18 18 8-12 86 22 18 18 8 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 22-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION (See Section 11 of Text) Cost to Septmber 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges' 1967 $ 1,625,068 1Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6(g) of the Act of October 16, 1966, P.L. 89-670 TABLE 22-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS Cost to Septmber 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN 1984 $1,500,000 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL 1982 237,271 Evanston, IL 1979 766,052 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL 1976 244,889 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL' 1975 65,611 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL2 1975 5,200 'Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. 2Uncompleted portion deauthorized in 1977. TABLE 22-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Septmber 30, 1992 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL 1989 $2,062,347 Little Calumet River, IL 1984 583,000 22-20 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN Widening and straightening the Calumet River in the vicinity of 106th Street and closing the gap between breakwaters, and dredging minor shoals in the outer harbor. 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL 1975 1977 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL 1975 1977 Kankakee River, IL and IN Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 Little Calumet River, IL and IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 53,136 Wilmington Ice Control Demonstration Nov. 18, 1991 22-21 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL..............23-2 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN.................. 23-2 3. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN.......................23-3 4. Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study............................ 23-3 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI.......................23-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects......... 23-4 Flood Control 7. Coralville Lake, IA...........................23-4 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA . ........... ................. 23-4 9. Farm Creek, IL ............... ............... 23-4 10. Hannibal, M O ............................... 23-4 11. Loves Park, IL .............................. 23-5 12. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA....... 23-5 13. Saylorville Lake, IA ....................... 23-5 14. West Des Moines, IA.....................23-6 15 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.............................23-6 16. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....... 23-6 17. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization............................23-6 General Investigations 18. Surveys................... .................. 23-6 19. Collection and Study of Basic Data........... 23-6 20. Preconstruction Engineering and Design....... 23-6 Tables Page Table 23-A Cost and Financial Statement......... 23-7 Table 23-B Authorizing Legislation...............23-8 Table 23-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 23-11 Table 23-D Not Applicable Table 23-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.................... 23-11 Table 23-F Not Applicable Table 23-G Deauthorized Projects..............23-13 Table 23-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................... 23-14 Table 23-I Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... . 23-15 Table 23-J Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and D4ms.................... 23-17 Table 23-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost..... 23-17 Table 23-L Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost.......... 23-18 Table 23-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project... 23-19 Table 23-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project...................23-20 23-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. T[his canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modification program was initiated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title to 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. The repair and modification work was underway until a suit was filed by three Illinois counties and their Commissioners of Highway against the Federal Government and the State in 1974 over maintenance of highway bridges crossing the canal. After the lawsuit was filed, further rehabilitation work by the Federal Government on the canal was suspended. On November 4, 1981, the Corp of Engineers deposited $3,722,572 with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Chicago in full satisfaction of the Court's judgment. These funds were used by the counties to complete bridge rehabilitation work as directed in the court order. Rehabilitation work by the Federal Government in coordination with the state was resumed in 1984 with the remaining authorization expended in 1987. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized an additional appropriation of $8,472,000 to accomplish the work described in the 1970 River and Harbor Act. The State of Illinois filed an additional lawsuit against the United States on July 6, 1987 in the U.S. Claims Court in the amount of $8,472,572. In a preliminary decision on September 22, 1988, the court dismissed the claim for $3,722,572. A settlement agreement between the State of Illinois and the United States was signed on November 14, 1991. The agreement provided that Illinois release all claims against the United States as stipulated in the claims court and that the United States provide $4,750,000 to Illinois as reimbursement for previous repair work performed upon the canal bridges by Illinois. On December 16, 1991, the U. S. Claims Court entered a judgment for $4,750,000 in favor of the State of Illinois. This judgment was paid in FY92. Once funds are received, principal work features to restore the canal to acceptable conditions consist of the repair or resonstruction of retaining walls, embankmenets, protions of the lock and dam structures, culverts, drainage ditches, and other related work features which the United States has maintained or has been obligated to maintain under previous agreements. These features are consistent with a Master Management Plan prepared by the Illinois Department of Conservation. NEPA documentation to assess remaining work items must be completed prior to initiation of construction. Local cooperation. A revised Supplemental Agreement with all work items remaining will be coordinated in FY 93. Additional funding is needed prior to the District continuing design and construction on the canal. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design work was performed and the court claim for a total cost of $2,979,556. 2. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles), Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, II, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). Previous projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See table 23-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of new work was $124,041,436 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferredfor- restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non Federal; is excluded from present cost estimate. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. (See Table 23-J through 23-N on existing locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost; additional features entering into cost of project; existing project and total cost of existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Channel dredging by the contract cutterhead pipeline dredge was performed in the Starved Rock, Peoria and LaGrange pools at various locations at a cost of 23-2 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* $1,689,800, with a total of 297,561 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $231,000. Strike removal and snagging and clearing was accomplished in various locations by hired labor at a cost of $401,800. Maintenance of the Lucas-Berg Disposal Facility cost $4,800. Lucas-Berg mitigation costs were $373,100. Structural repairs to locks and dams were performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,024,600. Repairs to Lockport Approach Dike were continued at a cost of $435,600. Construction of protection cells above Marseilles Dam was completed at a cost of $225,900. Construction of stairway access to tainter gate at Peoria and La Grange were completed at a cost of $3,300. Replacement of tow haulage units were initiated at a cost of $395,900. Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging cost $53,800. Real Estate support of maintenance activities cost $28,000. Installation of fuel tanks at locks and dams was continued at a cost of $31,000. Construction of LaGrange maintenance building was completed at a cost of $114,300. Buildings, grounds, and utility maintenance at the locks and dams and Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria totaled $11,200. Permanent operating equipment costs were $115,300. Engineering and design work cost $533,800, and supervision, administration, and inspection for the maintenance features totaled $367,900. Total maintenance costs were $7,041,100. Net credits to the project were $16,800. Operation and Care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at a cost of $6,973,400. Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria was continued at a cost of $648,700. Real Estate management services were provided at a cost of $53,700. Visitor's Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated at a cost of $187,500. OSHA inspections and medical examinations were accomplished at a cost of $15,700. Surveys, studies, and other inspections were performed at a cost of $856,300; natural and cultural resource costs were $52,000; and water control management costs were $688,800. Supervision and administration for the operation features totaled $249,600. Total operation costs were $9,725,700. Total operation and maintenance costs were $16,766,800 for all pools above Alton Pool. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation work at LaGrange, Peoria, Marseilles, and Brandon Road Locks and Dams was continued. Costs at LaGrange were $50,469; Peoria $35,959; Marseilles, $15,817; and Brandon Road, $4,189; for a total of $106,434. Alton Pool Operation: Costs for the year were $33,121 for natural resource management; $699 for recreation management; $126,285 for condition and operation studies; $94,247 for water control management, and $68,771 for supervision and administration. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $151,352 for dredging and $10,668 for supervision and administration. Total cost for work in the Alton Pool was $485,143. Total operation and maintenance costs for all pools above Alton Pool were $16,766,800. Rehabilitation costs were $106,434. Alton Pool operation and maintenance costs were $485,143. Total cost incurred $17,358,377. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement, see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 4. UPPER MISSISSIPPI - ILLINOIS NAVIGATION STUDY Location. The study includes both the Upper Mississippi River and the Illinois Waterway. The study area covers over 600 miles of navigable waterways and 29 locks and dams of the Upper Mississippi River from the headwaters at St. Anthony Falls near Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota; downstream to just above Melvin Price Lock and Dam at Alton, Illinois; and the Illinois Waterway (eight locks and dams) from Lake Michigan in Chicago, Illinois, southwest to where the waterway joins with the Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, 327 miles long. The Upper Mississippi River system meanders through the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri, and over 40 counties. The Illinois Waterway is located entirely within the State of Illinois. Existing project. The project consists of investigating problems associated with navigation on the river system. Undertaken by three Corps Districts (St. Paul, Rock Island, and St. Louis), the purpose of the study is to examine information related to the existing condition of the structures and investigate system congestion (lockage delalys, inadequate capacity, and recreation/commercial locking conflicts). The review of this completed project is authorized by Section 216, Flood Control Act of 1970, PL 91-611. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. The initial Project Management Plan which details the scope of the feasibility study was revised. Total costs incurred were $1,596,549. 5. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Location. The Program is authorized for those river reaches having commercial navigation channels on the Upper Mississippi River, Illinois River, Minnesota River, St. Croix River, and Kaskaskia River in the states of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Millouri, and Wisconsin. Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River system, recognizing its several purposes. The program includes habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects to counteract the effects of backwater sedimentation. Long Term Resource Monitoring will provide the means.for more informed management of the UMRS. Also authorized are a study of the economic impacts of recreation, navigation traffic 23-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 monitoring, and recreation projects (currently unfunded). The program was initiated in 1986 utilizing funds provided by PL 99-88, FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act. PL 99-662, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, further defined the program and provided for a 10 year implementation period. The implementation period was extended to 15 years by PL 101-640, Water Resources Development Act of 1990. Local Cooperation: Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects for such projects not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, within the meaning of Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations During Fiscal Year. Costs during the year totaled $15,476,800. The majority of funds was expended on two program elements: habitat projects and long term resource monitoring. Design was initiated on five projects and continued on 21; construction was initiated on four projects, continued on five, and completed on two projects. Construction has been completed on a total of nine projects since the program was initiated. Funds were also used for economic impacts of recreation study and continuing coordination of the General Plan for the UMRS-EMP. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 23-C Flood Control 7. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and the project has. been in operation since February 1958. About 24,406 acres of land were acquired in fee and flowage easements obtained for 24,427 acres. The project was modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required, except in connection with the Mehaffey Bridge which has been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Additional land acquisition to provide for the present plan of reservoir operation performed at a cost of $5,293. Operation and Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a -cost of $2,665,670. Reservoir maintenance and operation cost $73,200. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees were $189,195. 8. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Location. The greenbelt area is located along both banks of the Des Moines River in central IA and extends from a point at which relocated U.S. Highway 92 crosses the Des Moines River near Harvey, upstream approximately 169 river" miles to U.S. Highway 20 at Fort Dodge, IA. It includes the Corps' operated Lake Red Rock and Sayorville Lake projects. Existing project. The project will include, but not be limited to: (1) the construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational facilities and streambank stabilization structures; (2) maintenance of all structures constructed before the date of authorization of this project (other than any such structure operated and maintained by any person under a permit or agreement with the Secretary); (3) such tree plantings, trails, vegetation, and wildlife protection and development for recreational purposes; and (4) the prohibition or limitation by the Secretary of the killing, wounding, or capturing at any time of any wild bird or animal in such areas as may be directed by the Secretary. In carrying out the project the Secretary may acquire by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise, land and interests therein, as the Secretary determines are necessary to complete the project. The authorization requires that an Advisory Committee be established for consultation with the Department of the Army consisting of 47 members: three Corps of Engineers appointees, one person from the city of Des Moines, and one from each other incorporated municipality within the greenbelt, two from each of the nine counties in the greenbelt, and five from the State of Iowa. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Letters of assurance have been received for nine separable elements. Local cooperation Agreements have been executed for four separable elements. Operations during fiscal year. Coordination was maintained with the Advisory Committee in accordance with Public Law 99-88. Construction of Red Rock Trails Segment I and Lutheran Hospital Trail Improvements were completed. Construction continued on the Red Rock Trails Segment IIA. A construction contract was awarded for Red Rock Trails Segment IIB. Work continued on the Feature Design Memoranda for Dragoon Trail Scenic Road Route, Red Rock Trails Segment III, Downtown Riverfront Plaza/Amphitheater, Red Rock Trails Segment IV, Botanical Center Park; Johnston Trails/Access and the Raccoon River Regional Park. Costs incurred were $1,533,701. 9. FARM CREEK, IL Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, IL, is 60 square miles in extent. Stream empties into Illinois Waterway at mile 162 above mouth. Existing project. See page 28-5, Annual Report for 1983 for description of project. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $218,992. 10. HANNIBAL, MO Existing project. The project provides a 500-year level of 23-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT protection for Hannibal by construction of levees and floodwalls along Front and Collier Street. The project is approximately 0.7 of a mile long with an average levee height of 12.5 feet. Concrete floodwalls are being used in confined areas. There are four street closure structures and six gatewells. Provisions for interior drainage includes a new 3,000 foot interceptor sewer, together with a 1.0 acre ponding area and a 40,000 GPM station. The area to be protected includes 19 blocks of the city's downtown area, including the historic Mark Twain District. The estimated cost is $7,997,000 which includes $1,999,000 non-federal costs. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreement for the project was executed on December 27, 1988. Operations during fiscal year. Work was essentially completed on Stages I, IA, and the Archaeological Mitigation contract. Work was initiated on the Stage II Beautificataion contract. Costs incurred were $2,136,298. 11. LOVES PARK, IL Location. The Loves Park project is located in Winnebago County, IL on the northeast boundary of the city of Rockford, IL. Loves Park is 17 miles south of the Illinois- Wisconsin state line. Existing project. The project provides 100-year level of protection against flooding along Loves Park Creek. Protection measures consist of 17,900 feet of channel improvements, a 16,300 GPM pump plant, and ponding. The estimated project cost is $30,500,000 including $8,900,000 non-federal costs. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was executed on March 26, 1991. Operation during fiscal year. Planning, Engineering and Design were completed at a cost of $419,561. A construction contract for Stage IIA was awarded in September 1992 at a cost of $1,048. Total costs incurred were $420,609. 12. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 49,152 acres in fee and 27,880 acres in flowage easement. Landowner complaints, that lake operation have flooded their lands more frequently than what they were told to expect when flowage easements were initially acquired, led Congress to modify the project authorization. Language in PL 99-190 authorizes acquisition from willing sellers fee simple title in real property, which is subject to periodic flooding in connection with the operation of the project. Potentially there are approximately 1,000 tracts consisting of about 30,000 acres. Estimated Federal cost is $42,000,000. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Land Acquisition costs were $698,111. The REDM 5AA was approved July 1992. REDM 5BB will be forwarded for approval in November 1992. Operation and maintenance activities were continued at a cost $3,388,964. Flood control reservoir maintenance and operation cost $73,200. Expenditures from the return of recreation use fees were $215,530. 13. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at eht toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and huses three gates. A stilling basin is probided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute aand thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment secton, and flow over weir is uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its cres. Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at sownstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Tock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des- Moines River Valley. Reaches along the Mississippi Tiver downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefited. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification included relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Improvements to Highway 415, the main accrss road to existing facilities on the east side of the reservoir, were added to the project by Congress in 1984. Segments A and B of Highway 415 have been completed. Segment C of Highway 415 is scheduled to be completed in 1993. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam was placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The 23-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 land acquisition program involved 26,624 acres acquired in fee and flowage easements for 1,950 acres. The estimated project cost is $116,470,000 including $2,820,000 in non-Federal costs from the State of Iowa and the City of Des Moines, for recreational development. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The principal work item was the continuation of construction (Stages I, II, and III) and continued real estate acquisition for Segment C of Highway 415. Costs incurred were $6,866,504. Operation and Maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $3,458,691. Reservoir maintenance and operation cost $73,200. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees were $116,676. The project is about 97 percent completed, excluding deferred work. 14. WEST DES MOINES, IA Location. The city is located in Polk County in central Iowa. Existing project. The project will provide flood protection from the Raccoon River, Jordan Creek, and Walnut Creek for 927 urban acres. The project will consist of three stages: Stage I - 3,100 feet of levees and floodwalls; Stage II - 9,000 feet of levees with a pump station; and Stage III - 10,300 feet of levees and floodwalls with a pump station. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. The local cooperation agreement was signed August 27, 1992. Operations during fiscal year. Planning and Engineering were completed at a cost of $71,422. Plans and specifications for Stage II was initiated at a cost of $244,051. Total costs incurred were $315,473. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $195,900. (See Table 23-H for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities, Section 205, Public Law 84-685. See Table 23-I Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. See Table 23-I. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526.) See Table 23-I. Emergency Flood Control Activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress. See Table 23-I. General Investigations 18. SURVEYS There were two flood prevention studies (Black Hawk County, IA; Wyaconda River Basin, MO and IA) in progress during FY 92 at a cost of $48,025. Special Investigations, FERC, Dam Safety Criteria Studies, North American Water Fowl Management, SCS Coordination and Planning Assistance to States efforts totaled $161,629. Total cost of surveys was $209,654. 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services cost $180,183. Sedimentation and streamgaging studies were completed during FY 92 at a cost of $6,772. Total cost for collection and study of basic data was $186,995. 20. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Located in Muscatine and Louisa Counties, the Muscatine Island Levee District and the Muscatine-Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, together with the city of Muscatine, Iowa form a joint drainage and flood protection area for 30,700 acres of bottom land. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 subject to a favorable Chief's Report and approval by the Secretary of the Army. The project will provide flood protection by increasing the height of the existing main stem levee and flank levee. Work continued with the approval of the General Design Memorandum in FY 92 at a cost of $69,159. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Total cost for preconstruction engineering and design was $69,159. 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 23-E. 23-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL 2. Illinois Waterway IL and IN 4. Upper Mississippi -Illinois Navigation Study 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 7. Coralville Lake, IA 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 9. Farm Creek, IL 10. Hannibal, MO 11. Loves Park, IL 12. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA 13. Saylorville Lake IA Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 September 1992 115,000 105,286 12,730,200 13,238,903 10,865,000 11,457,670 7,364,000 6,300,372 100,000 180,546 2,774,000 2,990,552 480,000 371,106 145,984 4,916 115,600 148,814 395,000 303,889 193,000 227,046 1,057,000 227,006 2,531,000 2,475,492 1,522,000 1,448,816 4,568,800 4,594,994 168,033 44,640 - 3,000,000 7,884 2,979,556 16,760,000 17,226,000 16,453,396 16,749,997 272,000 (30,000) 291,441 106,434 939,000 1,962,000 966,028 1,596,549 15,177,000 13,672,000 12,685,543 15,476,800 153,880 143,763 14,531,426 14,432,494 3,758,100 3,702,453 976,000 849,217 14,860,000 15,706,110 110,000 173,944 2,210,047 1,968,063 1,802,000 674,166 45,365 150,097 139,209 130,849 1,152,000 862,427 198,000 149,336 296,000 306,481 418,180 2,234,542 2,326,831 850,000 1,588,884 2,987,976 3,209,190 168,033 173,253 5,293 2,727,600 2,665,670 750,000 1,533,701 20,025 148,364 214,000 218,992 1,915,000 2,136,298 15,000 128,499 370,307 420,609 698,111 3,527,800 3,388,964 19,850 18,422 900,000 6,866,504 3,580,800 3,458,691 168,033 39,426 28,395 2,305,000 2,497,808 550,000 841,766 137,342 26,619 252,000 233,382 1,318,000 1,344,286 335,000 253,741 319,000 289,510 2,189,000 240,758 3,097,000 2,948,753 11,968,000 2,794,528 3,187,000 3,121,475 169,269 46,231 23-7 7,605,143' 7,605,143 21,202,248- 21,163,805' 126,707,751 126,706,419 315,425,573� 311,712,038 138,239,925 136,989,696 3,877,000 3,411,794 59,511,000 56,830,586 30,179,488 30,171,153 38,075,674 35,911,616 4,446,000 4,188,623 384,766 364,614 9,859,0206 9,859,020 3,633,541 3,503,305 5,692,993 5,559,693 548,000 531,576 2,394,307 2,371,779 99,049,484 96,978,105 41,523,687 38,875,175 19,850 18,422 127,527,887 123,643,061' 44,052,441 40,780,268 3,258,141 2,666,164 1 I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 23-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 September 1992 14. West Des Moines, IA New Work: Approp. 250,000 376,000 249,000 286,000 1,486,000 Cost 273,269 417,041 190,610 315,473 1,444,051 20. Muscatine Island, IA New Work: Approp. 150,000 72,000 - 55,000 602,000 Cost 68,127 148,264 51,923 69,159 601,813 1. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 5. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 con- 2. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent tributed funds). Indefinite Appropriation." 6. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 3. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 7. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 4. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. TABLE 23-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 1934' August 30, 1935 August 30, 19353 June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 October 23, 1943 March 2, 1945 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL, to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of State for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and I larbors Committee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 23-8 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section in Text Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized March 2, 1945 (Continued) a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funds shall be expended fir removal or alteration of Illinois Central RR. bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. Substitute following work for that authorized by act of March 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement of that canal thence to Sag Junction and of Calumet Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, by construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in October 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Illinois River at Peoria, IL modification of navigation project to include an adjacent downstream water area. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Provide for a 10-year environmental program to include habitat rehabilitation and enhancement; longterm resource monitoring with computerized inventory and analysis; recreational development; assessment of economic benefits from recreational activities; and navigation system traffic monitoring. 23-9 Documents IH. Doc. 677, 79th Cong.. 2nd sess. H. Doe. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. IH. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess.4 Specified in Act. Also H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 857, II.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 August 18, 1968 November 17, 1986 August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act November 17, 1986 7. June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 8. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) November 17, 1986 9. 1944 Flood Control Act 10. October 23, 1962 11. November 17, 1986 12. June 28, 1938 December 19, 1985 13. July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 14. November 17, 1986 20. November 17, 1986 See Section in Text Project and Work Authorized Approves 1982 Upper Mississippi River Master Plan, authorizes interstate agreements between Upper Mississippi River states, directs Secretary to implement GREAT II recommendations for disposal of dredged material and facilitate the productive use of dredge material, directs and interagency agreement with the Department of Interior for its participation in the plan, authorizes second lock at Lock and Dam No. 6. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Recreational development; environmental enhancement; and related streambank stabilization. Defines area of work. FARM CREEK, IL Two flood detention dams and channel improvements. HANNIBAL, MO Levee, floodwall, closure structures, and pumping plant for flood control. LOVES PARK, IL Improved channel, pumping plant and pond storage. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Land Acquisition SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Modification to minimize adverse project impact on Ledges State Park. WEST DES MOINES, IA Construct levees and floodwall. MUSCATINE ISLAND LEVEE DISTRICT AND MUSCATINE-LOUISA COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, NO.13, IA Raise existing levees 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines Rivers. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administrative Program October 31, 1934, and February 28, 1935. 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet - Sag portion. 23-10 Documents Sec. 1103, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 604, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 564, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. PL 99-190 S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hannibal SBH, MO Completed 1958 $ 108,7004 $ 58,000 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,979' 9,345 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL Completed 1985 265,499' 171,000 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel Completed 1970 35,4772 37,700 Muscatine Harbor, IA Completed 1964 353,000 85,999 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $137,869 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $20,300 contributed funds. TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Canton, MO' Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Des Moines, IA Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 1962 1987 1943 1964 1991 1954 1941 1969 1972 1964 1974 1941 $ 247,822 1,679,056 14,930,085 144,910 1,496,555 26,237,690 1,923,145 68,898 1,492,016 4,993,224 1,144,875 10,861,170 207,826 23-11 $ 228,073 839,615 23,323 145,415 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 16 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects East Moline, IL 1984 $ 9,692,097 - - East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 - - Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 - - Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 - - Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 - - Fulton, IL 1984 18,017,200 - - Galena, IL 1952 844,100 - $118,000 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 - - Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 - 20,626 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 - - Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 - - Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 1972 4,772,498 - - Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 - - Iowa River-HFlint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 - - Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL' 1957 123,300 - - Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 - - Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 - - Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 - - Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 - - Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 - - Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 - 252,136 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 - - Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' 1977 1,995,322 - 269,739 Milan, IL 1988 13,437,663 - 213,554 Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA' 1983 1,129,800 - - Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 - 220,000 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 - - - Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 - - Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN' 1957 72,432 - - Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 - - Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 158,383 - - Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 - - Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 - - Rockford, IL 1989 9,993,778 - 514,188 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 - - Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 - - Sangamon River (Mouth), IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 - - Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 - - Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 - - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 - - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 - - 23-12 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1992 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 $ 220,729 - - South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1991 7,150,161 - $ 2,103,886 South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 - - South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 - - Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 - - Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 1967 3,306,695 - - Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 - - Van Meter, IA' 1965 113,842 - - Waterloo, IA 1987 48,620,099 - 83,300 Waterloo, IA (Bridges) 1991 1,122,757 - 1,156,982 Authorized Projects Not Constructed Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA 1987 1,400,800 - - Davenport, IA 1987 - - - Freeport, IL 1979 - - - Moline, IL 2 1987 - - - Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 - - Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 1984 858,000 - - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act). 2. FY 89 funds of $5,639 were expended to close out project. TABLE 23-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Campbells Island Mississippi River, IL Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA Henderson River, IL Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks Illinois Waterway Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1986 1969 1938 1970 1942 1938 1964 1982 1986 1938 1986 1979 1977 1977 1986 1977 1977 1981 1986 1977 $ 76,664 55,664 102,310 23-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 23-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 - - Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI - 1977 - - Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA 1977 - - South Beloit, IL 1979 1986 $ 270,000 - William L. Springer Lake Decatur, IL 1979 1986 - - Illinois Waterway, Marseilles Canal, IL 1989 1990 - - Peoria Levees, IL - 1990 - - TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Burlington, IA Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Moline, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Evansdale, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL Fulton, IL Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL Hergot Drainage and Levee District, IL Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL November 1991 January 1992 November 1991 October 1991 February 1992 December 1991 November 1991 December 1991 January 1992 January 1992 November 1991 December 1991 November 1991 December 1991 October 1991 January 1992 October 1991 December 1991 December 1991 October 1991 October 1991 November 1991 January 1992 November 1991 October 1991 December 1991 November 1991 December 1991 December 1991 January 1992 February 1992 November 1991 November 1991 23-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL (Continued) (See Section 15 of Text) Project Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Marengo, IA Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL Milan, IL Muscatine Island, L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL Rock Island, IL Sabula, IA Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL South River Drainage District, MO Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage District Union No. I and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL The Sny Basin, IL Valley Drainage and Levee District IL Van Meter, IA Volga, IA Waterloo, IA West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL Worthington, MN PROJECTS Date Inspected December 1991 January 1992 January 1992 January 1992 January 1992 February 1992 December 1991 October 1991 November 1991 October 1991 February 1992 November 1991 October 1991 December 1991 December 1991 January 1992 November 1991 October 1991 October 1991 February 1992 January 1992 November 1991 January 1992 November 1991 November 1991 December 1991 December 1991 January 1992 November 1991 October 1991 October 1991 January 1992 September 1991 TABLE 23-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 17 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Blackhawk Creek, Davenport, IA Cedar Falls, Cedar River, IA Duck Creek, Scott County, Davenport, and Bettendorf, IA East Peoria, IL Fourmile Creek, Des Moines, IA Illinois River, Liverpool, IL 23-15 $ 18,032 20,170 3,789 220 4,762 31,239 I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 17 of Text) Study Identification Iowa River, Chelsea, IA Oelwein, Fayette County, IA Ottawa, IL Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, IL Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA Rock Creek, Maxwell, IA S. River Drainage District, Marion County, MO Sny Island Levee and Drainage District, IL Stevens Creek, Decatur, IL Stevens Creek, Macon County, IL Stevens Creek, Village of Forsyth, IL Tama, IA Turkey River, Elkader, IA West Branch, Indian Creek, Neveda, IA Wolf Creek, LaPorte City, IA Fiscal Year Costs $ 39,450 14,870 14,946 24,481 27,699 5,743 12,323 8,806 10,000 10,000 9,117 1,620,679 21,325 9,920 10,093 TABLE 23-I Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (Preauthorization) (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) (See Section 17 of Text) Project and. Location Fiscal Year Costs Henderson Creek, Warren County, IL $ 9,521 South Skunk River Logjam, Keokuk, IA 10,892 TABLE 23-I Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) (See Section 17 of Text) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Bear Creek, County Route 276, Marion County, MO $ 17,101 Clayton County Bridge, Osterdock, IA 2,935 Clayton County, Elkport, Osterdock, IA 12,952 Clayton County Road Creek ClX, Site 1, IA 5,383 Clayton County Road Creek, Site 2, IA 13,413 Clayton County Road, NW, Osterdock, IA 8,451 Farmington, Des Moines River, IA 24 Fox River, Bridge Site #4, Davis Co., IA . 39,908 Fox River, Bridge Site #7, Davis Co., IA 3,481 Fox River, Route J40 Bridge, Davis Co., IA 35,452 Maquoketa River Co. Road 47 Bridge, IA 79,452 Mazon River, Goose Lake, Grundy County, IL 1,464 Mississippi River, First Avenue, Hampton, IL 20,000 Monroe County, IA -1,980 N. Fork, Maquoketa River, Cascade, IA 5,503 Soap Creek, Bridge Site #3, Davenport, IA 33,825 West Fork, Des Moines River, MN 8,940 23-16 TABLE 23-I (Continued) ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (Continued) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation) (See Section 17 of Text) Project and Location Federal Cost Advance Preparation: $ 159,364 Emergency Operations: 61,978 Rehabilitation: 100 TABLE 23-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth on Dimensions Miter Sills at Low Water Available Lift at Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water' Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) LaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 below BUeardstown, IL 110 600 10.0 13.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.02 T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at flat pools. Lockport is due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. TABLE 23-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Illinois River, $ 2,733,499' mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. 23-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 23-K (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project LaGrange Concrete Piles in sand Movable Concrete Piles in sand 1939 $ 2,744,592' Concrete Piles in sand Starved Rock Marseilles Dresden Island Brandon Road Lockport T.J. O'Brien Lock and dam equipment Total locks and dams Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete and sheet piling (wicket with A. frame-crest) Movable (wicket type) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (Bear trap) (Bear trap) Piles in clay Fixed and timber Concrete and timber Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and sheet piling Piles in sand Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Piles in clay 1939 1933 1933 1933 1933 1933 1960 3,381,030' 885,315' 1,853,725' 2,503,376' 2,031,683' 1:1:3,608' 6,954,700' 1,250,304' - $ 24,471,832 1. Actual cost. TABLE 23-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places Starved Rock to Lockport Starved Rock to Grafton Calumet-Sag Channel Peoria small boat harbor Peoria $ 2,135,358' 813,318' 6,007,335 2,917,607 19,238,200 24,937' 23-18 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Protection piers at all locks Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration Rebuild highway bridges Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Recreation Facilities, Code 711 Removal of Blue Island lock Grand Calumet River controlling works 2 St. Louis District Total additional features Total existing project 1. Actual cost. TABLE 23-M 77,613' 5,141,474 5,466,804 19,327,850 20,828,435' 18,362,041' 445,000 288,600' 1,081,600' $100,442,142 $124,913,974 2. Placed in inactive status November 19, 1974. EXISTING PROJECT See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 2. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams - - IL and IN Grafton to Lockport, IL 291.1 miles 300 9 Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9 junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel 4.2 miles 160 9 from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and 22.1 miles 175-300 9 Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL 23-19 TABLE 23-L (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 23-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 (See Section 2 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $120,886,748 $312,757,028 $136,989,696 $570,633,472 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 - - 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 - - 1,858,936 Total $126,706,419 $312,757,028 $136,989,696 $576,453,143' 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on the of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. operation and care of the works of improvement under the provisions 23-20 ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT* District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Minnesota River, MN ................. 24-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ................. 24-2 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN ......................... 24-2 4. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP)........ 24-3 5. Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN... 24-3 Flood Control 6. Bassett Creek, MN.................... 24-4 7. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD ........................... 24-4 8. Chaska, MN........................ 24-5 9. Devils Lake, ND .................... 24-5 10. Eau Galle River, WI................... 24-5 11. Emerson, Manitoba--Noyes, MN .......... 24-6 12. Grand Mound-State Historical Site, MN ...... 24-6 13. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ............. 24-6 14. Houston, MN ....................... 24-7 15. Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN .... 24-7 16. La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI . . 24-8 17. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND ................... 24-8 18. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN ....................... 24-9 19. Mankato and North Mankato, MN ......... 24-9 20. Marshall, MN ....................... 24-9 21. Middle River at Argyle, MN ............ 24-10 22. Minnesota River at Henderson, MN ....... 24-10 23. Portage, WI ....................... 24-10 24. Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater River, MN........................ 24-11 25. Red River of the North at Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN .................... 24-11 26. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN,SD,andND .................... 24-11 27. Rochester, MN ..................... 24-12 28. Root River at Hokah, MN ............. 24-12 29. Roseau, River, MN ................. 24-13 Page 30. Sheyenne River, ND ................... 24-13 31. Souris River Basin, ND ................. 24-13 32. State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI ......... 24-14 33. St. Paul, MN ........................ 24-15 34. Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN .......... 24-15 35. Warner Road at Sibley Street, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ................... 24-15 36. Zumbro River at Genoa, MN ............. 24-16 37. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......................... 24-16 Miscellaneous 38. Other Work Under Special Authority ........ 24-16 General Investigations 39. Surveys .......................... 24-16 40. Collection and Study of Basic Data ......... 24-16 41. Advance Engineering and Design .......... 24-17 Tables Table 24-A Cost and Financial Statement ........ 24-18 Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 24-22 Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .. 24-23 Table 24-D Not Applicable Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 24-24 Table 24-F Not Applicable Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 24-26 Table 24-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River ............... 24-27 Table 24-I Red River of the North Drainage Basin: Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan ......... 24-28 Table 24-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ 24-29 Table 24-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............ 24-30 Table 24-L Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment ................ 24-31 Table 24-M General Investigations ............ 24-32 24-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Rises in Big Stone Lake, MN and SD, and flows southeasterly about 224 miles to Mankato, MN, thence northeasterly about 106 miles to join the Mississippi River opposite St. Paul, MN. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1890 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1105 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides 9-foot depth below flat pool level of Mississippi River lock and dam 2 from mouth to mile 14.7, one-half mile above the railway bridge at Savage, MN, and 4-foot depth from mile 14.7 to 25.6 at Shakopee, MN. For details see page 1018 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. See also page 1074 of Annual Report for 1967. Terminal Facilities. There are privately-owned terminals at miles 9, 13.1, 14.5, and two at mile 14.7. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Dredging by hired labor cost $144. Hydrographic surveys cost $7,325. Administrative costs amounted to $3,372. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Work on project for 4-foot depth was completed in 1931. The United States owns 10 acres of land in fee 2 miles east of Savage, MN, and easements on 123.08 acres of land. 46.20 acres have been transferred from the Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force to the project. Navigation from mouth to Shakopee was practicable for drafts not in excess of 3 feet. A contract for work under 1958 authorization for a 9-foot channel started in May 1966 and was terminated in January 1967 when 56 percent complete. A channel dredging contract awarded in June 1967 was completed in August 1968. Total costs for existing project to September 30, 1992, were $4,697,723, of which $1,940,180 was for new work and $2,757,543 for maintenance. In addition, cost from contributed funds was $139,671 for dredging to 9-foot depth under provisions of Section 4, River and Harbor Act of 1915, and $219,531 for work done for the State of Minnesota relative to modification of the project. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See Table 24-H on reservoirs.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. None. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities and equipment maintained, and surveys, repairs, and reports were made by hired labor at a cost of $1,369,175. Reservoirs were operated by contract at a cost of $303,189. Physical security cost $327 by hired labor. Periodic inspection and dam safety costs were $120,634 by hired labor, $46 by contract and $-6,470 by other Corps. A bridge replacement construction contract at Winnibigoshish cost $1,010. Cultural resource investigation cost $11,669 by contract and $34,363 by hired labor. Environmental review and survey analysis cost $22,494 by hired labor. Data collection, water analysis, structural inventory for drought planning and maintenance of stream gauging cost $200,542 24-2 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT by hired labor, $4,188 by contract, $4 by other Corps, and $27,630 by U.S. Geological Survey. Miscellaneous engineering and design cost $82,063 by hired labor, and $450 by contract. Real estate was managed at a cost of $43,923. Lands and damages cost $61,653 by hired labor and $29,699 by contract. Supervision and inspection costs were $257,835 by hired labor and $11,729 by contract. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by the United States. The United States has easements, flowage rights, and other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See Table 24-H for capacities and costs by reservoir.) 4. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP) Location. The program is authorized for the commercially navigable portions of the Upper Mississippi River System. In the St. Paul District, this includes the Mississippi, Minnesota, Black, and St. Croix Rivers in the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. Existing Project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River System, recognizing its several purposes. It is intended to protect and/or enhance the river resources and guide future river management. The primary emphasis of the program is on habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects. Long term resource monitoring will provide the means for more informed management of the UMRS. Also authorized, are a study of the economic impacts of recreation, navigation traffic monitoring, and recreation projects (currently unfunded). The program was initiated in FY 1986 utilizing funds provided by the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. The execution of the program is being closely coordinated with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the three affected states in the St. Paul District. See Rock Island District Tables 23-A and 23-B for total program costs and authorizing legislation. In the St. Paul District, five habitat projects have been completed. These are the Guttenberg Waterfowl Ponds (IA), Island 42 (MN), Lake Onalaska (WI), Blackhawk Park (WI), and Pool 8 Islands (WI). The projects are being operated and maintained by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, except for Blackhawk Park which is managed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Through FY 1992, funds allocated to the St. Paul District have amounted to $8,851,000 for design, construction and monitoring of habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects, $421,000 for long term resource monitoring, $740,000 for economic impacts of recreation study, and $791,000 for program management. The allocations for the overall program projected over a 10-year period for the St. Paul District are about $34 million. The Water Resources Development Act of 1990, Section 405, authorized an additional 5 years for the EMP program to the year 2002. Local Cooperation. Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects for such projects not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, within the meaning of Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations During Fiscal Year. Costs during the year totaled $4,083,082. The majority of funds were expended on the planning, design, construction and monitoring of habitat projects. Design was initiated on two projects and continued on ten; construction was initiated on three projects, continued on one, and completed on one project. Funds were also used for the economic impacts of recreation study, program management, and long term resource monitoring elements. 5. ZIPPEL BAY, LAKE OF THE WOODS COUNTY, MN Location. Zippel Bay is a natural harbor located in northwestern Minnesota on the south shore of Lake of the Woods near Williams, Minnesota. The navigation project is located in Zippel Bay State Park. Existing Project. Boats based at a state park, resort, marina, and a number of private residences use Zippel Bay to provide access to the lake. However, the natural channel between the bay and Lake of the Woods varied in depth and width and restricted navigation. The plan of improvement provides a small-boat access channel 50-70 feet wide and approximately 1,800 feet long between Zippel Bay and Lake of the Woods. Jetties have been constructed on both sides of the channel to minimize the amount of maintenance dredging. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in October 1985 under the authority contained in Section 107 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: An adjustment was made on a dredging contract for $-348. Administrative costs were $782. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of the small boat navigation project is completed. Responsibility 24-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 for the project was transferred to the local sponsor, the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, in July 1988. HFlood Control 6. BASSETT CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. The proposed project consists of nonstructural and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural measures include continuation of existing floodplain regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily impound floodwaters and a new tunnel (part of which is being constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the plan are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, and a railroad bridge replacement. Estimated Federal cost (1992) for new work is $29,000,000 and $11,600,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. Under current cost sharing policies, when the costs of lands, easements, and rights- of-way are less than 20 percent of total project costs, local interests are required to furnish the standard local cooperation requirements plus a cash contribution, the total of the two to amount to a minimum of 25 percent of the total project costs. On June 27, 1986, the City of Minneapolis entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Department of the Army. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Miscellaneous real estate costs were $16,694. Railroad relocations, Stage 2C1, and Stage 4 construction contracts cost $16,000, $352,209, and $1,082,582, respectively. Engineering and design cost $4,124 by contract, and $414,760 by hired labor. Construction management cost $8,695 by contract and $203,758 by hired labor. Total Federal costs were $1,841,549 and non-Federal $257,273. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of the first control structures is complete. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has completed construction of the downstream portion of the tunnel including the last 4,800 feet and outlet to the Mississippi River. The amount of $3,642,888 was reimbursed to MnDOT for the Federal share of the work. Construction work was completed on the tunnel segment located in sandstone (Stage 3). Construction work on the tunnel segment in soft ground (Stage 4) and construction on a small upstream embankment and some channel modification work (Stage 2C1) has also been completed. 7. BIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN AND SD Location. On Minnesota River near Ortonville and Odessa, MN, and Big Stone City, SD, at the outlet of Big Stone Lake and in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle Counties, MN, and Grant County, SD. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. Provides for a dam and reservoir on Minnesota River above U.S. Highway 75, modification of Big Stone Lake outlet dam and silt barrier, bank stabilization along lower reach of Whetstone River, channel improvement on Minnesota River for 3 miles below outlet control dam at Big Stone Lake along with necessary relocations and acquisition of lands. These improvements would be made for wildlife conservation and development, flood control, and recreation. For additional details see Annual Report for 1970. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 579, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest map; and H. Doc. 193, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $67,756 by hired labor. Data collection and water control analysis cost $32,142. Data collection by other government agencies cost $33,520. Real estate management cost $628. Supervision and inspection were $10,106. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of the project is complete. A general plan between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior for administrating the use of waters, land, or interests therein has been consummated, and a cooperative agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was approved. On March 31, 1975, the Secretary of the Army transferred lands in the project not required for Corps of Engineers operation and maintenance to the Department of Interior. The transfer of property was 24-4 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT accepted by the Department of the Interior on May 21, 1975. The project was transferred to the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District for operation and maintenance. 8. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River, flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek, and appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 1.5 miles of new levee, and one pumping station on the Minnesota River; 1.1 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek; and 1.0 mile of diversion channel on East Creek. Approximately 2.9 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost (1992) for new work is $29,700,000 and $10,100,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on September 12, 1988. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Real estate activities cost $13,195. Stage 2 construction contract cost $592,961. Engineering and design cost $488,280 by contract, $824,201 by hired labor, $3,000 by the Fish and Wildlife Service, and $31,483 by Missouri River Division. Construction management costs were $90,060. Cultural resources cost $9,008 by contract and $3,562 by hired labor. Total Federal costs were $950,558 and non-Federal, $1,105,192. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. A contract for Stage 2 of the flood control project was awarded in September, 1989 and is substantially complete. Stage 1 construction is complete. Engineering work for remaining stages is underway. 9. DEVILS LAKE, ND Location. In Ramsey County in north central North Dakota about 80 miles west of Grand Forks, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing Project. Involves a system of levees and interior flood control facilities at the head of Creel Bay. The main embankment across Creel Bay is 1,810 feet long and varies from 0 to 27 feet high. The south Creel Bay tieback embankment is 1,030 feet long and varies from 0 to 3 feet high. The north Creel Bay tieback embankment is 2,400 feet long and varies from 0 to 8.5 feet high. The south embankment is 3,100 feet long and varies from 0 to 9.5 feet high. The interior flood control system consists of temporary stormwater retention ponds immediately north and south of the city's sewage lagoons, a 16,000 gallon per minute pumping station and a system of ditches and culverts linking the ponds to the pumping station. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 15, 1983, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Devils Lake in August 1983. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $21,031. Construction management cost $12,245. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is complete. The project was turned over to the local interests by letter dated July 24, 1992. 10. EAU GALLE RIVER, WI Location. At and in vicinity of Spring Valley, WI, on Eau Galle River 30 miles above its mouth at Chippewa River, and its tributary, Mines Creek, which flows through the village. Spring Valley is about 45 miles east of St. Paul, MN, and 36 miles west of Eau Claire, WI. (See Geological Survey map for Wisconsin for general location.) Existing Project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by further studies includes a retarding dam and reservoir on Eau Galle River immediately upstream from Spring Valley, and remedial works on Mines Creek including channel enlargement, a low levee, and a drop structure. Project provides for earth and rock-fill dam, an uncontrolled outlet and an uncontrolled spillway emerging above Mines Creek. See page 1030 of Annual Report for 1965 for further details. Proposed improvements on Burghardt Creek were eliminated. Improvements provide complete protection near Spring Valley for standard project flood, and below that point in decreasing value in proportion to distance from 24-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 reservoir. Permanent conservation pool will serve a local need for a recreational area. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 52, 84th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 1083 of Annual Report for 1967. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Structure and recreation facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations and evaluations were performed at a cost of $360,706 by hired labor and $69,889 by contract. Real estate management cost $2,908. Data collection cost $12,977 by hired labor and $7,150 by other government agencies. Water control analysis and water quality by other Corps of Engineer districts cost $10,997 and $-7,931, respectively. Water quality support for WES cost $7,781. Supervision and inspection costs were $29,521. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Mines Creek improvements were substantially completed in 1964; minor work was accomplished in 1966. A contract for dam, spillway, and discharge channel, started July 1, 1965, was completed in October 1968. Recreational facilities have been provided. Remedial work to repair eroded gutters and road ditches was completed in September 1973. Repair of failing discharge conduit by installing a steel liner was completed in April 1982. 11. EMERSON, MANITOBA--NOYES, MN Location. The unincorporated village of Noyes is located in Kittson County in extreme northwestern Minnesota about 80 miles north of Grand Forks, North Dakota. Noyes is situated on the right overbank of the Red River of the North, approximately one-half mile from the channel. Existing Project. The project consists of a "ring" levee which protects both Noyes and the city of Emerson, Manitoba, Canada. The project comprised three basic components: upgrading the existing Emerson, Manitoba, emergency levee to provide 100-year flood protection; constructing a 3,800-foot-long levee at Noyes, Minnesota, to provide 100-year flood protection; and constructing a 2,000-foot-long International levee in Minnesota parallel to the International boundary. The levees provide a complete and continuous levee system around the two communities. The levees have a 10-foot top width, side slopes of 1 vertical on 3 horizontal, and vary in height from 7 to 12 feet. The interior flood control facilities consist of two ponding areas and two gravity outlets. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction on July 26, 1988, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed by St. Vincent Township, Minnesota, the local sponsor, in August 1988. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $2,101. Federal costs were $-80,643, non-Federal $82,744. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is complete. The project was turned over to local interests by letter dated December 10, 1991. 12. GRAND MOUND, STATE HISTORIC SITE, MN Location. Along the left (south) bank of the Rainy River on the northern boundary of the Grand Mound State Historic Site, about 17 miles west of International Falls, MN, at the confluence of the Rainy and Big Fork Rivers. Existing Project. The Grand Mound site is on the National Register of Historic Places because of its irreplaceable Indian burial mounds and other artifacts from the prehistoric Laurel and Blackduck cultures. Serious erosion is causing loss of skeletal remains and artifacts. A Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment was completed in September 1989 under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. This report recommended riprap protection along 1,500 feet of riverbank with all work taking place from a "bench" constructed along the riverbank to keep equipment from disturbing the Indian mounds. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on March 22, 1990. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1990 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed with the Minnesota Historical Society on June 20, 1990. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $3,028 by hired labor and $202 by contract. Federal costs were $8,940, non-Federal -5,710. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is complete. The project was turned over to the local sponsor by letter dated January 15, 1992. 13. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream 24-6 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing Project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Project restoration of wetland habitat conditions is taking place under the authority contained in Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, as amended. Latest published map is in project document. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. The North Dakota Game and Fish Department has agreed to serve as the non- Federal sponsor for the environment improvement to the project. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $8,939. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $106,578. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. A construction contract for habitat improvement (under Section 1135 authority) was awarded in September 1992. 14. HOUSTON, MN Location. In Houston County in southeastern Minnesota on the Root River in the city of Houston, Minnesota. Existing Project. The plan of protection provides levee flood protection together with appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Main features of the project include 3.1 miles of levee, one-half mile of road raises, channel excavation, interior drainage facilities, a flood warning system, utility modifications and a recreational trail. Estimated Federal cost (1992) for new work is $4,330,000 and $1,540,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The project was approved for construction by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662) and has been reevaluated based on changes since the 1975 Feasibility Report. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. By a resolution dated April 8, 1991, the city of Houston expressed its commitment to the financial requirements of the project. The city reaffirmed its commitment by letter dated May 6, 1992. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design continued at a cost of $338,239. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. engineering and design is in progress. Preconstruction 15. LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Marsh Lake and Lac qui Parle and the Minnesota River between head of Marsh Lake and Granite Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. See Annual Report for 1962. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations were performed at a cost of $234,421 by hired labor and $5,805 by contract. Data collection cost $63,331 by hired labor, $770 by contract, and $43,040 by U.S. Geological Survey. Water control analysis cost $38,003. Water quality analysis cost $30,767 by hired labor, $24,990 by other Corps offices and $485 by contract. Real estate cost $3,643. Engineering and design and supervision and inspection cost $867 and $28,399, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Project has been operated by the Government since transfer from State of Minnesota to the United States in September 1950. The United States owns fee title to 517.62 acres of land and easements on 19,859.47 acres of land. In 1957, 60.1 acres were withdrawn from public lands for use by the Department 24-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 of the Army. Land acquisition is complete. Construction under present plan of improvement was started in September 1941 and completed in December 1951 except for recreational facilities. All structures are in good condition. 16. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. On the Kickapoo River which rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing Project. Provides for a dam and impoundment of the Kickapoo River about 1 mile upstream from village of La Farge, operated for flood control, fish and wildlife conservation, general recreation, and a reduction of aggradation downstream from the dam, and supplemental protection at Soldiers Grove and at Gays Mills by means of levees, supplementary channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. See Annual Report for 1975 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1976) for new work is $55,400,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doe. 557, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local Cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of $81,092. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. General and Real Estate design memorandums and detailed plans for the La Farge Dam and spillway and for relocations have been completed. Land acquisition negotiations began in December 1968. The first land payment was made on January 15, 1969, and the land acquisition program is 80 percent complete. Contracts for excavation of the left abutment, for test wells, and for construction of the outlet works and right abutment have been completed. A study of alternatives has been completed. All further construction has been indefinitely suspended. Work has been accomplished to provide for completion of relocation work left partially completed when construction was suspended. Soldiers Grove has relocated out of the floodplain area after receiving funds from other agencies. A study of a modified dry dam was completed in early FY 1985. On the basis of the study results, it was recommended that no further work be done to establish the economic feasibility of a dry or wet dam at La Farge and that the La Farge Lake and channel improvement project be deauthorized. 17. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing Project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1962. Complied with. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Dam Safety: Engineering and design cost $19,977 by hired labor, and $5 by other Corps and an adjustment of $-29,406 was made on a contract. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations, monitoring and evaluations were performed at a cost of $515,423 by hired labor and $34,124 by contract. Real estate management cost $35,117. Data collection cost $55,166 by hired labor, $60,320 by other government agencies, and $22,005 by contract. A law enforcement contract cost $6,800. Water quality analysis by hired labor cost $4,944. Spurge control cost $16,197 by contract and $10,934 by hired labor. Engineering and design cost $135,983 by hired labor and $174,559 by other Corps offices. Supervision and inspection and other costs were $99,669. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. Baldhill Dam has been classified as a large, high hazard dam under the National Program for the inspection of dams. A risk assessment report prepared in June 1986 indicated a serious spillway discharge capacity 24-8 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT deficiency. A General Design Memorandum which recommended increasing the spillway capacity was approved by OCE in July 1987. 18. LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SIOUX RIVER, SD AND MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River between upper end of Lake Traverse at Browns Valley, MN, and the mouth of Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge, MN. Lake drains through river to Red River of the North, and two waters form a portion of boundary between State of Minnesota and States of North and South Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. See Annual Report for 1962. Existing project was authorized by Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Project and related facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $399,599. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Existing project was completed in June 1948, except for minor recreational facilities. Fee title to 1,144.13 acres and easements on 6,172.25 acres of land have been acquired. White Rock Dam and Reservation control structures are in operation, and structures and appurtenances are in good condition. Remedial work for repair of apron at White Rock Dam was completed in November 1968. Roadways across structure are open to public travel. 19. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, MN Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in south-central Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. As modified as a result of severe 1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, pumping, and interior drainage features have been included in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek improvements were made during detailed studies as a result of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations made necessary by the project have been authorized at Federal expense. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doe. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Miscellaneous contract adjustments were made for $-326,435. Administration, audit and other miscellaneous costs were $4,925. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of the project is complete. 20. MARSHALL, MN Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its confluence with the Minnesota River at the city of Marshall, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Minnesota.) Existing Project. See page 1059 of Annual Report for 1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs amounted to $1,802,866. The existing flood control project was completed in 1963. In response to a need for additional flood control, a feasibility study was completed in 1979. The project recommended in the feasibility report was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Section 401(a) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676. Improvements include 4.7 miles of additional levees, 3.8 miles of bank protection, 0.3 mile of new high-flow diversion channel, an interbasin overflow structure, modifications to the existing diversion and drop structures, and a recreation plan. The recreation plan consists of 2.5 miles of biking/walking trail, five miles of cross-country skiing/hiking trail, and related picnic and rest area facilities. The project would provide protection against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 115 years. Estimated Federal cost (1992) for new work is $6,600,000 and $2,500,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Project was transferred to local interests on December 23, 1963. For new work, see Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. By letter dated June 26, 1989, the city of 24-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Marshall indicated its willingness to participate financially in construction of a project consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $24,292. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of completed work was initiated August 1962 and completed December 1963. Preconstruction engineering and design for the new work is in progress. 21. MIDDLE RIVER AT ARGYLE, MN Location. In Marshall County in northwestern Minnesota on the Middle River within the city limits of Argyle, Minnesota. Existing Project. The plan of protection includes a system of levees, road raises along with interior drainage facilities to provide main developed parts of the city of Argyle with one percent chance flood protection. Also included is the evacuation of 12 residences which are located outside of the line of flood barrier protection. The project was approved for construction on August 1, 1985 by the Chief of Engineers. The project is being constructed under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Argyle in August 1985. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Real estate costs were $1,582. A construction contract cost $2,240. Engineering and design cost $12,558 by hired labor. Construction management costs were $43,163. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is complete. 22. MINNESOTA RIVER AT HENDERSON, MN Location. In Sibley County in southeastern Minnesota about 50 miles southwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. The project at Henderson involves a system of levees to protect the flood prone areas of the city from floods on the Minnesota River. The proposed levee is about 1.6 miles long and has an average height of 12 feet. Appurtenant interior flood control facilities include a system of interceptor stormsewers and ditches, and two ponding areas each with a gravity outlet and a pumping station designed to discharge impounded storm water during flood periods when exterior flood levels would require the gravity outlets to be closed. Provisions for the temporary closure of two state highways and a county highway are also included as project features. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction June 26, 1987, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the City of Henderson, the local sponsor, in May 1988. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Real estate costs were $817. A construction contract cost $47,307. Equipment was purchased for $4,644. Engineering and design cost $8,321 by hired labor. Construction management cost $347. Federal costs were $10,248 while non-Federal were $51,188. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of the project was substantially complete at the end of the fiscal year. 23. PORTAGE, WI Location. In Columbia County in central Wisconsin along the Wisconsin River about 35 miles north of Madison, Wisconsin. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Wisconsin.) Existing Project. The recommended plan provides for improvement to the existing levee system along the left bank of the Wisconsin River at Portage. The plan includes 1.2 miles of existing levee improvement; 1.7 miles of new levee; 2 tie-back levees; one highway and two railroad closures; cultural mitigation; and recreation features. The project would protect against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 500 years. Estimated Federal cost (1992) for new work is $6,400,000 and $2,240,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1989 for requirements. By Council Resolution dated June 25, 1992, the city of Portage indicated a willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation for flood control and recreation, subject to reaching agreement with the state of Wisconsin on cost-sharing responsibilities. A draft local cooperation agreement will be prepared during preconstruction planning and will be negotiated and finalized prior to initiation of construction. 24-10 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $480,801. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. engineering and design is in progress. Preconstruction 24. RED LAKE RIVER, MN, INCLUDING CLEARWATER RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along upper reach of Red Lake River and also along Clearwater River, a tributary of Red Lake River, between a point near Plummer, MN, and a point just above the mouth of Ruffy Brook. Red Lake River, principal tributary of the Red River of the North, has its source at the outlet of Lower Red Lake in northwestern portion of Minnesota and flows westerly about 196 miles to its junction with Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, MN. Clearwater River has a general westerly course from its source near Ebro, MN, about 205 miles to its junction with Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 345, 78th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Structures were operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $85,482. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of major improvements on Red Lake River and the Clearwater River were completed in June 1956. Replacement of rock and brush dam on Red Lake River at Indian boundary with a concrete structure and appurtenant work was completed in June 1959 to restore marshes in the area to better wildlife conditions. Construction of a bridge on Clearwater Road was completed by the Indian Service in July 1965. A contract for improvements on Red Lake River was completed in November 1966, and a contract for restoration of water levels in Red Lake River marshes was completed in November 1968. Operation of Red Lake Dam was assumed by the Corps on April 1, 1951. Channels are in good condition and indicate effectiveness of project as a flood control measure. 25. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT FARGO, ND - MOORHEAD, MN Location. A 9.7-mile reach of the Red River of the North within the Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN metropolitan area. Existing Project. Dutch elm disease is causing an epidemic of dead and dying trees along the riverbanks. When these trees topple into the river, they get hung up at bridges, sharp bends, and sandbars. The resulting increases in channel roughness and number and size of flow blockages raise flood stages and escalate flood damages. The Detailed Project Report dated March 1989 was conducted under the authority of Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, as amended. This report recommended removing fallen trees from the channel and riverbanks and standing, but dead or dying, trees close to the edge of the riverbank to alleviate existing and potential threats. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on December 27, 1989. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1990 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed with the Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Council of Governments on January 9, 1990. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $2,864. Total Federal costs were $4,469, non-Federal $-1,605. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is complete. The project was turned over to the local sponsor by letter dated December 30, 1991. 26. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MN, SD & ND Location. Red River of the North Basin, within the United States, includes northeastern corner of South Dakota and much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Red River of the North, formed by confluence of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) Previous project. See Annual Report for 1962 for navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of this project. Existing Project. Project includes improvements for local protection in interests of flood control and major drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with previously authorized Federal reservoir project at Baldhill site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See Table 27-I for active units in comprehensive basin plan.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, authorized 2- 24-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were beyond legal authority of the city of Grand Forks to acquire. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks project. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1965. Following the flood of 1965, the city of East Grand Forks requested reactivation of the project and furnished a resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April 17, 1975, permitting local interests additional time to furnish assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was passed by the city on March 27, 1975, and accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. In a July 9, 1986 letter, the city of East Grand Forks withdrew support for the project presented in the General Design Memorandum. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at a cost of $289,179 by hired labor, $1,999 by other government, and $12,487 by contract. Real estate management cost $2,595. Data collection cost $17,284 by hired labor and $19,140 by U.S. Geological Survey. Water control cost $15,888 and drought contingency planning $5,750 by hired labor and $6,995 by other Corps. Engineering and design for dam safety cost $35,368 by hired labor. An adjustment for engineering and design for a spillway GDM was made for $-11,964 by other Corps. Supervision and inspection and other miscellaneous costs were $31,462. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Major construction for all active units except for East Grand Forks, MN, is complete. The East Grand Forks project was reclassified from active to inactive status on August 19, 1988. A total of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, ND, started in May 1959, was completed in July 1963. (See Table 24-I at end of chapter for total costs of new work to date.) 27. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmsted County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. Provides for stream channel modifications and levees functioning in combination with a system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, in addition to the reservoirs, include 5.7 miles of riprapped or gabion-lined channels, 0.7 mile of architecturally-treated concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, three drop structures, 1.8 miles of levee, and 6.5 miles of hiking and biking trails. Estimated cost (1992) to the United States for new work is $79,400,000 and $29,000,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed August 27, 1987 by the city of Rochester. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Construction contracts for Stage 1A2A, 1B1, 1B3, 2A and 2B cost $4,414, $7,402, $1,079,375, $111,999, and $5,900,101, respectively. Engineering and design cost $727,080 by contract and $1,833,570 by hired labor. Construction management cost $572,453 by hired labor and $47,218 by contract. Total Federal costs were $9,426,457 and non-Federal costs were $857,155. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is complete on Stages 1A2A, 1A2B, 1A1, 1B1, and 1B3. Construction is underway on Stages 2A and 2B. 28. ROOT RIVER AT HOKAH, MN Location. In Houston County in southeastern Minnesota on the Root River at Hokah about 140 miles southeast of Minneapolis - St. Paul. Existing Project. Provided for erosion control along about 1,500 feet of the south bank of the Root River at the wastewater treatment plant serving Hokah. The project consisted of clearing and snagging, excavation, placing rock fill and extending the concrete pipe outfall at the treatment plant. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on April 27, 1990 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1990 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed by Houston County on May 1, 1990. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Funds in the amount of $4,373 were returned to the U.S. Treasury. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Project was completed and transferred to the local sponsor in January 1991. 24-12 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 29. ROSEAU RIVER, MN Location. In Roseau County on the Roseau River in northwestern Minnesota near the city of Duxby. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing Project. See Annual Report for 1988 for description of project as authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965. The project, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, provided for construction of about 6 miles of flood control levee approximately 3 feet high in the vicinity of Duxby, Minnesota. Estimated cost (1990) to the United States for new work on the modified project is $356,000 and $119,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements of project as authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965. See Annual Report for 1991 for requirements of modified project. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Construction contract costs were $65,795. Engineering and construction management costs were $10,109 and $8,350, respectively. Total Federal costs were $61,799 and non- Federal costs were $22,455. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. A construction contract for the Duxby levee project was awarded in July 1991. Construction is essentially complete. 30. SHEYENNE RIVER, NDI) Location. The Sheyenne River Basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the city of West Fargo. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing Project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act consists of three major components for Federal implementation: 1) 11.9 miles of levee and a 6.7 mile flood diversion channel at West Fargo; 2) 7.5 miles of flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo; and 3) a five-foot raise of the Baldhill Dam flood control pool. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 stipulated that the project shall also include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection on the Maple River. There are several items of local cooperation required to implement the plan, and several components identified for non-Federal implementation which would supplement the recommended plan. Estimated cost (1992) to the United States for new work is $29,580,000 and $15,980,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. Project consists of three separable components each requiring a local cooperation agreement. The Southeast Cass Water Resource District is the local sponsor for the West Fargo Unit and the Horace to West Fargo Unit. The local cooperation agreement for the West Fargo Unit was executed on July 25, 1988, and for the Horace to West Fargo unit on March 6, 1990. The State Water Commission will serve as the quasi-sponsor for the Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise unit until a formal sponsorship is determined by benefiting entities. The Maple River Reservoir Unit has been deleted from the project. Operation and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Construction contracts at West Fargo for railroad relocations, channels, levees, pumping plants and diversion structures cost $4,000, $1,466,775, $70,000, $5,000 and $1,939, respectively. An adjustment was made for the railroad bridge construction contract, which resulted in a decrease of $36,027. Engineering and design cost $100,700 by hired labor and $38,702 by contract. Construction management cost $50,557 by contract and $244,536 by hired labor. Construction contracts at Horace for channels and levees cost $1,132,307 and $290,857, respectively. Engineering and design at Horace cost $57,610. For Baldhill Dam, engineering and design cost $12,978. For the Maple River Reservoir, engineering and design cost $3,274. Total Federal costs were $3,050,299 and non- Federal costs were $392,909. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of both the West Fargo and Horace to West Fargo Units are under way. Evaluation of real estate needs for the raise of the flood pool at Baldhill Dam has been initiated. The Maple River Reservoir unit has been deleted from the project due to lack of economic justification. 31. SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam is located about 20 miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing Project. The current plan of improvement authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 24-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 is the one-time purchase of 377,800 acre-feet of flood storage in Rafferty and Alameda Dams in Saskatchewan, Canada and the operation of these dams with the existing Boundary Dam and Lake Darling Dam to provide 100-year flood protection at Minot, North Dakota. The Act also authorizes those flood control measures upstream and downstream of the dam which are necessary for effective operation of the project. The 4-foot raise of the Lake Darling design pool (authorized by Section III of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1982, PL 97- 88) and the construction of Burlington Dam (authorized by PL 91-611) will no longer be authorized upon completion of the structure(s) in Canada. An International Agreement between Canada and the United States was signed in October 1989. The work under the current plan authorized by PL 99-662, consists of either one or two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada (known as the Rafferty and Alameda projects); a modified outflow structure at Lake Darling Dam; a flood warning system for Minot; levee and channel improvements at Sawyer and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot; levee and diversion channel at Renville County Park; flood proofing of about 90 rural homes in the basin and the purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; and modifications to dams 320, 326, 332, 341 and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. Estimated Federal cost (1992) for new work is $118,400,000 and $8,180,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. Representatives of the water resource districts from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties area agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at Velva was signed in November 1984. A local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project as authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was signed in October 1989. Operation and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for Velva were $17,070. Preconstruction planning for the Souris River basin reservoir continued. Respective costs for the applicable sub-projects are as follows: Miscellaneous contracts and work by others costs were $265,635. Burlington to Minot stages 1, 2, 3, and 4, costs were $217,445 by hired labor and $1,913,190 by contract. Sawyer improvement costs were $26,751 by hired labor and an adjusted decrease of $1,136 by contract. Rural improvement costs were $67,935 by hired labor and $173,198 by contract. Refuge structures costs were $402,007 by hired labor and $5,399,077 by contract. Renville County Park improvement costs were $96,061 by hired labor and $1,074,133 by contract. Cash contributions for the Rafferty and Alameda Dams were $9,178,887 and $6,257,909 respectively. Canadian dams design and construction review costs were $8,459. Lake Darling Dam improvement costs were $933,932 by hired labor and $68,054 by contract. Flood warning systems costs were $42,480 by hired labor. Study and project management costs were $145,610 by hired labor. Rural flowage easements costs were $32,126 by hired labor and $12,773 by contract. Total Federal costs were $22,613,290, non-Federal costs $3,718,306. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of the channel and levee improvement work at Velva, Sawyer, Burlington to Minot Stages 1, 2, and 3 is complete. Construction at Rafferty Dam is complete. Construction at Alameda Dam is nearly complete. Engineering and design is continuing on modifications at Lake Darling Dam and the flood warning system at Minot. Construction on rural improvements Stage 1, road raises and acquisitions, is complete. Construction on improvements to Fish and Wildlife Service refuge dams is substantially complete. Renville County Park construction is nearing completion. 32. STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, WI Location. In La Crosse County in west-central Wisconsin, on the south side of the City of La Crosse. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing Project. The plan of improvement for local protection (flood control) consists of channel deepening and enlarging downstream from Hagen Bridge to the mouth of Pammel Creek and includes 13,600 feet of concrete-lined rectangular channel, a drop chute inlet structure, a side channel inlet structure, a stilling basin, a terminus structure, and three new street bridges. The upper 4,000 feet of rectangular channel is designed for supercritical flow and the remaining 9,600 feet of channel is designed for subcritical flow. When completed, the project will provide Standard Project Flood (SPF) protection. The city replaced a fourth bridge in 1980 that was previously included in the authorized plan. The city also replaced a railroad bridge in 1985 that was also included in the authorized plan. In 1986, the city constructed 450 feet of rectangular channel in the downstream reach to SPF protection. Estimated cost (1992) to the United States for new work, exclusive of the Ebner Coulee portion of the project which was deleted due to lack of economic feasibility, is $21,200,000 and $7,100,000 is to be contributed by local interests including a credit of $1,000,000 for advance construction work. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 360, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) 24-14 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1969 for requirements. The local sponsor withdrew support for the project in 1976 citing increased non-Federal costs and lack of agreement on local cost sharing between three local units of government located within the project area. The project was reclassified as inactive on April 7, 1977, but was reactivated on November 8, 1978, after the La Crosse County Board of Supervisors, the La Crosse City Council, and the Town of Shelby passed separate resolutions on September 17, 1978, July 13, 1978, and July 10, 1978, respectively, which requested continuance of the project. A local cooperation agreement between the Department of the Army and the City of La Crosse, Wisconsin, for the construction of the State Road flood control project was entered into August 11, 1988. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: A stage 2 construction contract cost $2,919,333 and a stage 3 contract cost $3,099,991. Real estate costs were $34,643. Cultural resources cost $37,592 by hired labor and $23,568 by contract. Engineering and design cost $206 by contract, $166,701 by hired labor and $4,500 by other Corps. Construction and management costs were $280,791 by hired labor and $10,309 by contract. Total Federal costs were $4,630,130, non-Federal $1,947,504. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. A construction contract for Stage 1 (outlet structure to Broadview Place) was completed in July 1990. A construction contract for Stage 2 (middle segment) was completed in September 1992. Construction of the last stage is continuing. 33. ST. PAUL, MN Location. In Ramsey County at St. Paul, Minnesota, on the Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous project. For details see page 27-20 of Annual Report for 1974. Existing Project. Since completion of the St. Paul and South St. Paul flood control project in 1964, the protected area has experienced two floods greater than the previous flood of record. The plan of protection provides for a nominal 4-foot barrier raise along the existing project alignment. Estimated cost (1992) to the United States for new work is $10,900,000 and $8,740,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640). Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. The local cooperation agreement was executed on August 22, 1991. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: Real estate activities cost $22,363. Construction contract costs were $792,479. Engineering and construction management costs were $1,460,879 and $234,247, respectively. Total Federal costs were $1,740,367 and non- Federal costs were $769,601. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of Stage 1 is underway. Preconstruction engineering and design is continuing for the remaining two stages. 34. WABASHA, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. The erosion site is located on the eastern edge of the city of Wabasha, Minnesota, in Wabasha County along the right (west) bank of the Mississippi River. Wabasha is located in southeastern Minnesota, approximately 80 miles southeast of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing Project. The project is designed to protect the right bank of the main navigation channel on the Mississippi River where erosion is threatening Lawrence Boulevard, a sewer line located under the street, and a sanitary sewer lift station. The project involves minor excavation and the placement of rock fill along approximately 1,150 feet of eroding riverbank. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in March 1991 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control act, as amended. Local Cooperation. The city of Wabasha has agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for this project. A local cooperation agreement between the Department of the Army and the city of Wabasha was fully executed on April 4, 1991. See Annual Report for 1991 for requirements. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $57,938. Engineering and design by hired labor cost $19. Construction management cost $7,273. Total Federal costs were $36,647, non-Federal $28,583. Condition at the end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was complete in June 1992. 35. WARNER ROAD AND SIBLEY STREET, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, ST. PAUL, MN Location. Along the left bank of the Mississippi River at approximately river mile 839.1 in St. Paul, MN. Existing Project. The project site consisted of a sheetpile wall supporting a 30-foot embankment on which Warner Road is built. This highway is a vital artery serving over 24-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 17,000 vehicles per day entering and leaving downtown St. Paul. The Mississippi River's 9-foot commercial navigation channel is just riverward of this site. About 100 feet of the wall was kicked out at the base, and a 32-foot section had broken away from the top and bowed out into the river. Embankment material was being lost and threatening to undermine the roadway. Sudden catastrophic failure could have resulted in blockage of the 9-foot commercial navigation channel. The Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment dated January 1990 was prepared under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. This report recommended installing an additional sheetpile wall 3-feet riverward of the existing wall, tying the new wall back into the existing structure, filling the space between the two walls with pervious fill, and capping the unit with concrete. Local Cooperation. See Annual Report for 1990 for requirements. The local sponsor, the city of St. Paul, signed a local cooperation agreement on March 15, 1991. Operation and Results During Fiscal Year. New Work: A construction contract cost $51,950. Engineering and design cost $13,888. Construction management cost $22,496 by hired labor and $1,176 by contract. Total Federal costs were $70,375 and non-Federal costs were $19,135. Condition at the end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. The project was turned over to the local sponsor by letter dated June 1, 1992. 36. ZUMBRO RIVER AT GENOA, MN Location. In New Haven Township, Olmsted County in southeastern Minnesota about 60 miles south of Minneapolis- St. Paul. Existing Project. Provided for erosion control along the west bank of the Zumbro River to protect Township Road G. The project involved clearing and shaping the bank and placement of rock protection along 300 feet of riverbank. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in May, 1990 under authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the New Haven Township, Minnesota in July 1990. See Annual Report for 1990 for requirement. Operation and Results During Fiscal Year. Funds of $11,000 were returned to the treasury. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction of the project was completed in January 1991. The project was transferred to the local sponsor in April 1991. 37. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See Table 24-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $86,465. Total cost to September 30, 1992, is $1,250,210. Miscellaneous 38. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Aquatic Plant Control program (Section 302, Public Law 298, 89th Congress) study and program management cost $18,483 by hired labor. A contract for aquatic plant control operations at Buffalo Lake, Wisconsin cost $69,526. Work by other Corps offices cost $142. Condition and operation studies for removal of silt and aquatic growth in Sauk Lake, Minnesota (Section 602, Water Resources Development Act of 1986) cost $8,409 by hired labor. Weed harvesting equipment contract cost $104,485 and aquatic plant removal cost $536. It cost $11,411 to establish a work plan with the sponsor. Supervision and inspection and other miscellaneous costs were $19,989. Total Federal costs for the Sauk Lake project were $135,405 and non-Federal, $9,425. General Investigations 39. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $850,832 which included five flood damage prevention studies, miscellaneous activities, and coordination with both Federal and non-Federal agencies. Table 24-M provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year cost was $217,094 which included the items concerning international water studies, flood plain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 24-M provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 24-16 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 41. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year cost was $843,332 which included three local protection projects. Table 24-M provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. For details of the individual projects see sections 14, 20, and 23. 24-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 1992 1. Minnesota River, MN 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN 5. Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN 6. Bassett Creek, MN 7. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD 8. Chaska, MN 9. Devils Lake, ND 10. Eau Galle River, WI 11. Emerson, Manitoba- Noyes, MN 12. Grand Mound - State Historical Site, MN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost $2,057,722 2,057,722' 35,546 115,700 35,639 114,499 10,965 11,459 24,000 2,747,097 24,312 2,746,702 - - - - 4,398,628 - - - - 4,398,6282 2,413,600 2,406,809 2,358,500 2,536,000 37,485,355 2,538,360 2,400,986 2,355,190 2,576,153 37,426,8923 - - - - 425,000 - - - - 425,000 515,000 - 515,000a -115,000 -59,318 26,000 24,409 -1,100 434 24,900 24,843 1,051,000 5,548,000 7,460,000 1,654,000 26,496,000 2,883,210 3,696,101 9,288,845 1,841,549 26,489,3065 - - - - 12,175,000 - - - - 12,174,9156 197,300 167,354 131,000 157,100 3,078,954 195,915 159,260 130,722 144,152 3,055,818 901,000 6,218,000 3,179,000 916,000 13,274,000 891,512 5,460,941 3,916,715 950,558 13,272,1107 25,000 38,903 30,000 17,455 -9,595 - 2,732,000 33,276 2,732,000 - - - - 9,039,250 - - - - 9,039,250 597,200 475,285 485,000 553,900 7,981,490 591,644 477,131 478,579 493,998 7,899,548 336,071 -30,256 10,000 255,000 9,999 41,653 - -97,000 343,000 27,875 -80,643 343,000' - -23,000 242,000 181,408 8,940 242,000 9 24-18 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 1992 13. Homme Lake and Dam, ND 14. Houston, MN 15. Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN 16. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 17. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND 18. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN 19. Mankato and North Mankato, MN 20. Marshall, MN 21. Middle River at Argyle, MN 22. Minnesota River at Henderson, MN 23. Portage, WI New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 8,000 7,163 77,500 99,435 82,812 85,034 180,000 217,000 222,100 267,028 - - - - 462,200 385,245 520,713 362,954 - - - - 16,300 29,357 16,300 23,598 25,000 1,429,097 8,939 1,412,199 1t0 86,000 105,000 2,720,556 91,107 106,578 2,711,832 367,000 340,000 1,583,000 411,012 338,239 1,581,232 - - 964,873 - - 964,873 497,000 443,000 7,736,908 485,733 474,521 7,727,445 - - 18,642,000 - - 18,642,000 33,000 34,036 79,000 418,457 81,092 415,225 3,325,638 3,325,63811 724,600 792,879 761,998 783,328 401,000 1,200,000 554,671 1,210,664 Maint: Approp. 331,900 Cost 348,094 New Work: Approp. 1,298,000 Cost 2,139,574 New Work: Approp. 25,000 Cost 33,569 New Work: Approp. 990,000 Cost 77,750 New Work: Approp. 350,000 Cost 712,016 New Work: Approp. 300,000 Cost 280,668 332,213 329,426 927,000 1,151,000 18,505,531 886,109 1,171,241 18,462,685 -400,000 100,000 2,381,000 56,666 -9,424 2,268,795 - - 1,339,727 - - 1,339,727 270,500 413,000 5,378,032 284,753 399,599 5,361,049 - -108,000 - 97,270,500 9,089 223,521 -321,510 96,851,6372 25,000 25,156 360,000 1,067,432 100,000 247,526 311,000 311,462 25,000 25,000 2,570,866 25,652 24,292 2,570,1231s - -18,000 2,357,000 151,237 59,543 2,355,331 44,136 - 1,847,500 10,248 1,846,45914 168,000 481,000 1,260,000 185,772 480,801 1,258,703 24-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 1992 24. Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater River, MN 25. Red River of the North at Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN 26. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND 27. Rochester, MN 28. Root River at Hokah, MN 29. Roseau River, MN 30. Sheyenne River, ND 31. Souris River Basin, ND 32. State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI 33. St. Paul, MN 34. Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN 35. Warner Road at Sibley Street, St. Paul, MN 36. Zumbro River at Genoa, MN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 140,400 154,746 59,025 50,846 35,000 165,000 19,898 121,574 54,000 58,603 11,500 80,559 - 3,120,079 - 3,120,07915 93,000 1,437,627 85,482 1,426,443 -5,000 226,500 4,469 226,50016 - - - - 8,138,984 - - - - 8,138,98417 428,900 529,852 252,000 433,000 5,711,386 461,120 529,304 259,272 426,183 5,691,725 5,514,000 7,852,000 8,221,000 9,445,000 38,318,000 6,461,148 9,015,991 8,236,115 9,426,457 38,296,44318 22,000 20,727 222,000 93,213 125,687 - 25,000 172,000 9,193 187,613 102,743 -4,373 239,627 - 239,62719 - 2,325,000 61,799 2,310,008 780,000 4,755,000 8,021,000 3,018,000 20,207,000 759,579 3,808,885 8,889,031 3,050,300 20,138,1432 1,500,000 23,000,000 25,432,000 22,500,000 81,504,000 1,879,501 22,266,870 26,102,157 22,613,290 81,322,05121 4,582,000 1,313,000 4,322,000 4,608,000 17,652,000 5,543,747 993,167 4,624,720 4,630,130 17,585,397" 475,000 513,000 750,000 1,714,000 3,852,000 479,221 511,006 667,125 1,740,367 3,787,527 32,000 6,850 7,574 90,700 71,546 30,000 103,500 366,500 19,179 37,222 373,224 3,371 39,500 9,407 - 122,700 36,647 122,617 - 500,000 70,375 500,00023 -11,000 21,502 34,500 34,5004 24-20 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT lIncludes $117,542 for new work for previous project. Excludes $359,202 contributed funds. 2Includes $681,805 for new work for previous projects. 3Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 4Excludes $307,556 contributed funds. SExcludes $2,434,482 contributed funds. In addition, $409,689 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 6Excludes $152,247 contributed funds. In addition, $486,313 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by the Ottertail Power Company. 7Excludes $2,257,013 contributed funds. SExcludes $201,544 contributed funds. 9Excludes $77,290 contributed funds. 1mExcludes $56,220 contributed funds. Includes $16,102 expended during FY91-FY92 under Section 1135 authority. "Excludes $208,000 contributed funds. n2Excludes $79,537 contributed funds. 3lncludes $1,802,866 for new work for previous project. '4Excludes $244,756 contributed funds. 'sExcludes $30,020 contributed funds.16Excludes $61,895 contributed funds. '7Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit $11,239, which is classed as "deferred" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 18Excludes $4,445,244 contributed funds. In addition, $92,821 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 19Excludes $67,014 contributed funds. 2Excludes $1,150,000 sunk costs for deauthorized Kindred Lake unit (see Table 24-G). Excludes $395,475 contributed funds for Horace to West Fargo unit and $895,756 for West Fargo unit. 21Excludes $4,919,000 sunk costs for deferred Lake Darling Dam unit (see Table 24-E). 22Excludes $225,000 sunk costs for inactive Ebner Coulee unit (see Table 24-E) and $3,576,461 contributed funds. 23Excludes $184,709 contributed funds. 24Excludes $11,066 contributed funds. 24-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN July 13, 1892 Open-channel improvement from mouth to Shakopee to obtain a Annual Report 1891. channel of 4-foot depth to accommodate vessels with 3-foot draft. P. 2209 July 3, 1958 Dredging to provide channel of 9-foot depth from mouth to S. Doc. 144. 84th. mile 14.7 Cong., 2nd sess.l 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Mar. 3, 1899 Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Mar. 2, 1907 Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. June 25, 1910 Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech H. Doc. 363, 61st Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project Cong., 2nd sess. abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) July 27, 1916 Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and H Doc. 413, 64th Gull Lake. Cong., 1 sess.' June 26, 19342 Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. 'Contains latest published map. 2Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 24-22 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $57,768 Black River, WI ' 1950 67,585 - Lake Traverse, MN and SD 3, 1921 92 - Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed3 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MNs 1925 47,794 3,891 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed3 1923 9,070 - Red River of the North, MN and ND 3. 6 1921 293,344 76,209 St. Croix River, MN and WI Completed 1991 150,410 1,183,312 Wisconsin River, WI 2, 3 1888 - - Warroad Harbor and River, MN Completed 1989 86,105 1,221,4497 Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive 1928 27,941 22,180' 1Existing channel adequate for commerce (see Table 24-G for deauthorized portion of project.) 2Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin River, WI'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2nd sess.) Expenditures included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. 3No commerce reported. 4Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong 1st sess.) 5Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 1st sess.) 6Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d ses.) 7Includes $1,662 for condition surveys for FY 1990. 'Includes $11,041 for condition surveys for FY 1990. 24-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Crow Wing Cty, MN2 Completed 1988 $471,000 - Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND' Completed 1985 58,500 - Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND Deferred 1983 5,568,600 4- Cannon River at Faribault, MN' Completed 1991 62,585 s - Dry Run, IA Completed 1966 1,790,759 6 - Elk River, MN Completed 1970 259,700 - Enderlin, Maple River, ND 2 Completed 1990 4,000,0008 - Grafton Pumping Station, ND' Completed 1990 92,865 9- Guttenberg, IA Completed 1974 2,361,915 - Hanover, Hennepin County, MN' Completed 1988 259,500 - Irving Township, Jackson County, WI' Completed 1984 189,600 - Irving Township at Nicols Road, Completed 1986 158,500 - Jackson County, WI' Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI' Completed 1987 33,000 - Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN' Completed 1989 61,326 to - Lake Darling Dam, ND Deferred 1987 4,919,000" - Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN2 Completed 1991 1,187,50012 - Lost River, MN Completed 1967 517,5191 3- Lower Branch Rush River, ND2 Completed 1974 1,000,000 14 - Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN' Completed 1986 250,0 0 0 5 - Minneota, MN2 Completed 1963 161,545 - Minot, ND Completed 1983 21,479,500 16 - Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Completed 1957 1,675,835 - Pembina River, ND Active3 1983 - - Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI' Completed 1989 62,762 - Prairie du Chien, WI Completed 1991 3,529,000 - Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN Completed 1991 311,000' 8 - Red Lake River at Huot, MN' Completed 1984 64,500 - Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN' Completed 1984 131,000 - Red River of the North at Argusville, ND2 Completed 1990 1,534,000 - Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN' Completed 1990 85,665 9 - Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN' Completed - 27,500 - Red River of the North at Halstad, MN2 Completed 1986 2,012,000 - Red River of the North at Oslo, MN2 Completed 1984 1,960,200 - Red River of the North at Pembina, ND2 Completed 1979 2,000,000 - Redwood River below Marshall, MN2 Completed 1960 202,400 - Rushford, MN Completed 1980 3,192,333 - Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN' Completed 1985 250,00020" - Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND Completed 1988 111,000 - Souris River, Velva, ND' Completed 1988 137,500 - St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN Completed 1974 8,476,0122 - State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI Inactive 1987 225,000 - (Ebner Coulee Unit) Twin Valley Lake, MN Inactive 1988 2,115,700 - Upper Iowa River, IA Completed 1964 888,445 - Velva, ND 2 Completed 1970 334,628 - Vermillion River, Hastings, MN2 Completed 1980 999,900 - Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Completed 1985 182,000 - Hastings, MN' Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN' Completed 1987 250,000 - Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN Completed 1989 5,620,700 - Winona, MN Completed 1989 32,741,131- 24-24 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30,. 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 - Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN' Completed 1990 141, 4 40 - 'Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 2Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3Preconstruction planning has not started. Phase I completed under General Investigations. �Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Lake Darling project. Additional authorization required for implementation of recommended plan. The Senate Report 97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 5Excludes $18,362 contributed funds. 'Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 71n addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. 'Excludes $150,191 contributed funds. 9Excludes $27,583 contributed funds. '0Excludes $20,441 contributed funds. "Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Souris River Basin Project (see Section 31 and Table 24-A for costs for active project). 2Excludes $61,540 contributed funds. '3Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see Table 24-G). Excludes $246,911 contributed funds. 14Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. I5Excludes $130,300 contributed funds. "16Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. "Excludes $20,920 contributed funds. '"Excludes $92,402 contributed funds. 19Excludes $26,055 contributed funds. 2Excludes $62,620 contributed funds. 21Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 expended for work done at request of local interests. 22Excludes $589,316 contributed funds. In addition, $717,809 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 23Excludes $38,173 contributed funds. 24-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WI1 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5 1977 - - Grafton, ND 1983 Nov. 18, 1991 - - Hudson Harbor, WI2 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 - - Kindred Lake, ND3 1987 Nov. 17, 1986 $1,150,000 - La Crosse, WI 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 - - Maple River, ND 1981 Oct. 6, 1961 1,241 - Moorhead, MN5 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700 - Pembina River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 50,000 - Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034 - Sheyenne River, ND5 1981 Dec.31, 1970 37,956 - Tongue River Lake, ND 1950 Jan.1, 1990 23,695 - Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN 1974 Nov. 17, 1986 182,000 - Warroad Harbor and River, MN6 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 - - IPortion of project for removal of obstructions at various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to full project width (see Table 24-C for costs for completed portion of the project). 2Part of the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin project. 3Previously part of Sheyenne River, ND project (see Section 30 and Table 24-A for costs for active project). 4Authorized for further study by a House Committee on Public Works Resolution dated March 15, 1988. 5Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see Section 26 in text and Table 24-I for costs for active units of project). 6Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth (see Table 24-C for costs for completed portion of project). 24-26 TABLE 24-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 3 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area (Square miles) Capacity Previous Proiects Existint Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (Square Original Stage Total Reservoir (feet) ' River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) Completed Cost Completed Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1163 173 205.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256,185 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 - - 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights - - - - 160,939 160,939 Recreational facilities - - - - 2,834,838 2,834,838 Total new work - - 681,805 - 3,716,823 4,398,628 Total operating and care - - 100,857 - 36,358,837 36,459,694 Permanent indefinite - - - - 967,197 967,197 appropriation for operation and care, Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 Rehabilitation - - - - 425,000 425,000 Total 2,152,840 - $782,662 - $41,467,857 $42,250,519 'Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. N% vr * M. l REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 24-I RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 26 of Text) Cost to Total September 30, Estimated State Type 1992 Federal Cost Orwell River (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,700' Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,700 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,778 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall 1,698,200 17,500,0002 pumping plants Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement 1,639,924 1,639,9003 Total Cost to Date $8,060,8484 Total Estimate Cost $23,862,000s 'Includes $181,713 for lands and $25,045 for recreation facilities. 2The East Grand Forks unit was reclassified from active to inactive on August 19, 1988. The cost of this unit was last revised in 1987. 3Includes $67,900 for lands. 4Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridgedeferred unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. 5The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'deferred' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $666,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated in Table 24-G. In FY 89, the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit was included as part of the General Investigation program under restudy of deferred projects. 24-28 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Table 24-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) Project Date Inspected Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD ............ ............................ September 1992 Black River, (North Bend), WI ......................... ............................. September 1992 Black River Falls, WI. ............................................................ September 1992 Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, MN .......... . ............................ August 1992 Cannon River, Fairbault, MN .................. ... .............................. September 1992 Cochrane, Mississippi River, WI ............. ........................................ October 1991 Decorah, (Dry Run), IA ............................ . .. .......... ................ December 1991 Devils Lake, ND ................................... ................................ August 1992 Elk River, MN ............... .. .... .............................................. July 1992 Emerson, Manitoba- Noyes, MN ..... ............ ...................................... August 1992 Fargo, ND ....... .................................................................... July 1992 Grafton, ND ................ ... . ......... .... . .................................. August 1992 Grand Forks, ND ............... ......... ......................... ............... August 1992 Grand Mound - State Historic Site, MN ........ ................ .......................... August 1992 Guttenberg, IA ................. .. . ... ........................................ December 1991 Halstad, MN .............. . ........................................ ................... July 1992 Hanover, MN .......... . .... ............................................... September 1992 Hokah, MN .............. . . . ............................................... September 1992 Huot,M N .............. ..................................................... August 1992 Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI .......... ......................................... December 1991 Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN ........... ..................................... August 1992 LeSueur, MN ..................................................................... August 1992 Mahnomen, MN .............. ............... . .. .. ..................... ........ July 1992 Mankato, North Mankato, and LeHillier, MN .......... ................................. September 1992 Maple River, Enderlin, ND .......... .............................................. August 1992 Marshall, MN ........................................................................ September 1992 Mines Creek, Spring Valley, WI ............ ........................................ September 1992 Minneota, MN ......................................................... ............... September 1992 Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN ............ .. ...................................... August 1992 Oslo, MN ............. .. .. .................................................. August 1992 Pembina, ND................. ... ..... . .. . ............................................ August 1992 Pettibone Park, LaCrosse, WI................. .... .... ....................................... July 1992 Plum Creek at New Haven Township, MN ........... .................................. September 1992 Prairie du Chien, WI ................. . .. . ............................... ....... December 1991 Red River of the North at Argusville, ND .................................................. July 1992 Red Lake River, Gentilly, MN ........... . . ......................................... August 1992 Red Lake Falls,MN ........ ....................... .. ................................. August 1992 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN .......... ..................................... July 1992 Rushford, MN ................................................... . .............. October 1991 Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ......................................... September 1992 Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND .............................................................. August 1992 Souris River, Velva, ND ................ .................. July 1992 Trempealeau River, Arcadia, WI ............................. September 1992 Upper Iowa River, New Albin, IA ................................. September 1992 Velva, ND .............. .................. July 1992 Velva (Bonnes Coulee), ND ........... .................................................. July 1992 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN ................... .... ........... July 1992 Veterans Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN .......................................... July 1992 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ............................................. September 1992 Wild Rice River at Mahnomen County, MN ....... ....... ...................................... July 1992 Winona, MN .............................................. .September 1992 Zippel Bay, MN ................................................................... August 1992 Zumbro River at Jarret and Millville, MN ........... ..................................... September 1992 Zumbro River at Genoa, MN ........... ...................... September 1992 Zumbro River, Kellogg, MN ............ .............................................. July 1992 24-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 24-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs BeebeLake, Frankfort, M N .......................................................... $ 11 Chippewa River, Montevideo, MN ...................................................... 685 Crow River, Rockford, M N ......................................................... 7,714 Des Lacs River, Burlington, ND ..................................................... 22,025 Devils Lake, ND .............................................................. 33,276 Duncan Creek, Bloomer, W I ....................................................... 12,017 Elk River, Lake Orono, M N . .................... ................................... 4,334 Emerson, Manitoba - Noyes, MN ..................................................... -80,643 Garvin Brook, Stockton, M N ........................................................ 9,160 Gilmore Creek, W inona, MN ...................................................... 158,742 Kawishiwi River, M N ..... ............................... ....................... 4,741 Lac Qui Parle, M N ............................................................. 59,541 Middle River at Argyle, MN ....................................................... 59,543 Minnesota River, Henderson, MN .................................................... 10,248 M ississippi River, Fridley, M N........................................................ 5,134 M orais River, ND................................................................ 8,251 Pelican Lake, Frankfort, M N .......................... .............................. 5,238 Red Lake River, East Grand Forks, MN ................................................. 16,576 Red River of the North, Grand Forks, ND ................................... ............. 7,714 Red River of the North, Walsh County, ND ........................... ...... .............. 9,636 Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI .......... ............................. .. .............. 41,546 Snake River, Alvarado, MN ............................. ........................... 265,130 Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee, MN .................................................... 2,678 W ild Rice River, Lake Ida, M N .......................... ............................. 6,458 Zumbro River, Lake Zumbro, MN .......................... ............................ 4,993 Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Big Fork River, M N ....... ...................... .............................. $4,828 Black River, Amsterdam, WI ................ . . ...................................... 5,567 Foxholm,ND ............................................ . ... ...... ..... ......... 2,430 Grand Mound, State Historical Site, MN ........... ....... . .................................. 8,940 Little Fork River, Hwy 75, MN .............. ... . ......... ............ 8,809 Minnesota River, Belgrade, MN ..................... ................................ ..... 25,216 Mississippi River, Wabasha, MN...................... .. .................. 36,647 RatRootRiver,MN .................................... . . . ............................ 7,193 Red Lake River, State Hwy 32, MN. ................ ............................. 45,219 Red Lake River, Red Lake County, Hwy 3, MN .......... ............ .................. 20,000 Red River of the North, County Road 2, ND .......... ................................. 4,874 St. Croix River, Stillwater, M N .......... .. ..... .......... .. ... .... .......... 6,313 St. Hilaire, M N ............... ... ... . .. ......... .. ...... .. ......... 25,828 Wabasha County, Hwy 11, MN .................. ...................... ......... 20,986 Warner Road at Sibley, St. Paul, MN .............. .... ..... . .......... 70,376 24-30 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-K (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Big Coulee to Devils Lake, ND............ . ......................... ................ $9,000 Lower Mauvais Coulee / Devils Lake, ND .............................................. 6,000 Red Lake River, East Grand Forks, MN ............ .. ..... .. . . .................................. 2 Red River of the North, Fargo, ND .......... ......... ... .................................. 4,469 Red River of the North, Walsh County, ND .............................................. 3,104 Red River of the North, Grand Forks, ND ...................... ............................ 16 Snake River, Vega / Sandsvile, MN .......... . . ...................................... 4,216 Snake River, Warren, MN.............. ... .... .. ......................................... 20,161 Wild Rice River, Lake Ida, MN ........... .......................................... 1,431 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Disaster Preparedness ........... . ............................................... $171,462 Emergency Operations ......... ...................................................... 74,097 Rehabilitation.................................................................... 8,925 Advance Measures... .......................................................... 2,119 Total emergency flood control activities ................ ............................... $256,603 TABLE 24-L PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Modifications of projects for the purpose of improving the quality of the environment in the public interest (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Homme Lake, ND...................................................................... $8,939 Reservoirs at Headwaters, Mississippi River, MN Leech Lake ................ ... ........... 59,052 Lake Winnibigoshish ................. . . . . . .. ............. 2,145 Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN (Marsh Lake)........... ........ .... ............ 304 Orwell Lake, MN ..................... 6,006 24-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 24-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 39, 40 and 41 of Text) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Crookston, M N ......................... ................................. $23,762 GrandForks, ND ...................... .................................. 65,981 La Crosse, W I ... ...................... ................................... 528 Little Falls, M N .......................................................... 68,451 Red River Basin Technical Resource Service ........................................ 112,849 Red Lake and Clearwater Rivers, MN .............................................. 3,799 Special Studies Devils Lake, ND ....................... ................................... 87,262 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations ..... .................. ............................... 97,169 FERC Licensing Activities ...... ............... .............................. 14,049 Intra Agency Water Resources Development ......................................... 16,827 North American Waterfowl Management Plan ........................................ 10,708 Coordination with Other Agencies Soil Conservation Services ................ .................................... 2,036 Bureau of Reclamation .................... . ................................... 5,349 Planning Assistance to States-MN .... ........... ............................... 224,370 Planning Assistance to States-ND ............... ................................ 117,573 Planning Assistance to States-WI .............. ..................................... 119 TOTAL SURVEYS ........................... ................................ $850,832 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International W ater Studies ............. .......................................... 55,7791 Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services Unit ..... ...................................... 31,797 Technical Services, General ................. .................................. 59,198 Quick Responses ................... ........................................ 7,945 Special Studies ............... ............................................ 59,198 Hydrologic Studies Stream Flow Data .............................. .............................. 3,083 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA ................................... $217,094 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Houston, M N ........... ......................... ......................... 338,239 M arshall, M N .............................................................. 24,292 Portage, W I ................................................................. 480,801 TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ........................ ........... $843,332 'Includes $45,771 for International Water Studies under O&M Appropriation. 24-32 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to Location. Mississippi River rises in northern Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. The latest map and profile showing this section of river are in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in River and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a 2.7 mile basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 25-C, 25-D, 25-E and 25-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. See House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth and development of the harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, was contingent upon the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and Upper Mississippi River mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements have been complied with for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See Table 25-F for license fees collected through the end of the fiscal year.) St. Paul District. New Work: Studies were continued under Section 107, small navigation project authority for establishment of a small boat harbor at Guttenberg, Iowa and Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin at a cost of $5,380, and $9,031, respectively. Maintenance: Channel dredging to remove shoal areas was performed. Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON removed 546,914 cubic yards of material at 11 locations at a cost of $2,607,797. Government derrick barge HAUSER/WADE removed 29,909 cubic yards of material at 8 locations at a cost of $147,095. Mechanical dredging contractors removed 228,048 cubic yards of material at 18 locations at a cost of $1,380,544. A water injection dredging contractor removed 2,941 cubic yards of materials at one site at a cost of $97,037. Dredging surveys cost $590,464. Water quality testing for dredging cost $75,149. Disposal site restoration by hired labor cost $17,122. Dredging work at Weaver Bottoms cost $1,205 by contract and $159,522 by hired labor. Dredge material relocation at Blackhawk Park and Indian Slough cost $183,500 by contract and $547 by hired labor. Dredging at St. Paul small boat harbor cost $100,780 by hired labor. Other dredging and snagging cost $139,221. 25-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 A contract to repair the rock breakwater at Lake Pepin small boat harbor cost $12,604. Painting at locks and dams cost $500,195. Contracts installation of riprap at Lock and Dam 9, dewatering of Lock and Dam 8, general lock maintenance, and boundary surveys at Lock and Dam 3 cost $24,699, $659,100, $55,057, and $18,221, respectively. A herbicide service contract cost $30,889. Contracts for dam machinery installation at Lock and Dam 2, for dam work and for gate hoist machinery at Locks and Dams 2,4 and 5, cost $521,441, $3,924, and $7,007,680, respectively. Contracts for lock work at Lock and Dam 3, for bubbler piping and for recreation road maintenance at Blackhawk Park cost $66,308, $27,497, and $129,362, respectively. Contracts for equipment replacement and for development of data management software cost $76,758 and $87,906. Railroad crossing contracts at Lock and Dam 4 and at Lock and Dam 8 cost $110,373 and $27,191. Contracts for pickup beams for bulkheads at Locks and Dams 2, 4, 5, and 10 cost $151,000. Engineering work and miscellaneous surveys, reports, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $2,589,364 and by contract for $872,754. Project condition surveys cost $4,350. Other miscellaneous hired labor, payments, supplies and equipment cost $3,448,143. The total cost of maintenance was $21,924,799. Rehabilitation: Contracts for electrical work at Lock and Dam 3, electrical controls for Locks and Dams 3, 5A, 7-9 and lock work for Lock and Dam 5A cost $7,667, $697,631, and $1,452,522, respectively. Supply contract for valve machinery at Lock and Dam 1 and for roller gate chains cost $379,999 and $720,733 respectively. Engineering, administration and other work were accomplished by hired labor for $538,460 and by contract for $45,087. Total rehabilitation costs were $3,842,099. Operating and care: Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made thereto. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Total cost of operating and care was $12,999,788. Costs to St. Paul were $14,411 for new work; $34,924,587 for operation and maintenance; and $3,842,099 for rehabilitation, for a total cost of $38,781,097. Rock Island District. New Work: None. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in Pools 11, 13, 14, 16, 18, 21 and 22 at a cost of $1,337,000 with 450,200 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $69,800. Snagging, clearing, and excavation was performed by hired labor at various locations at a cost of $506,400. Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging and channel maintenance activities cost $16,300. Repair of channel regulating works structures was performed at a cost of $2,725,300. Structural repairs, including sandblasting and painting were performed by hired labor at locks and dams at a cost of $3,788,300. Repairs to spillways and dikes cost $99,500. The Stage I contract for major maintenance to the dams at Locks and Dams 17 and 18 continued at a cost of $378,600. The work includes repairs to the structural components of the dams, placement of additional rock fill upstream and downstream of the gated sections of the dams, repairs to the spillways and removal of silt from the auxiliary lock bays. The Stage II major maintenance contract for electrical/ mechanical system replacement at Lock and Dam 17 was completed at a cost of $19,800. The Stage II major maintenance contract to the dam at Lock and Dam 16 was initiated at a cost of $140,000. Installation of fuel tanks at Lock and Dams was continued at a cost of $600. Scour protection at Dam 16 was initiated at a cost of $277,900. The Stage III major maintenance contract for electrical/ mechanical system replacement at Lock and Dam 18 was continued at a cost of $5,736,900. The Stage III major maintenance contract for electrical/mechanical system replacement at Lock and Dam 16 was initiated at a cost of $1,600,000. Bulkhead slots were constructed at Lock and Dam 16 at a cost of $508,600. The hydraulic cylinder replacement at Lock 19 was completed at a cost of $4,700. Modifications to mooring cells at Lock and Dam 22 were completed at a cost of $13,600. Resurfacing access roads at Locks and Dams 17, 18, and 20 were initiated at a cost of $99,300. Construction of Canton Chute and Andalusia Slough boat ramps were completed at a cost of $33,000. Resurfacing of roads at Grant River, Thompson Causeway, Clarks Ferry, and Shady Creek Recreation Areas were accomplished at a cost of $100,000. Septic system at Shady Creek Recreation Area was repaired at a cost of $46,700. The replacement of transformers at Lock 19 was initiated at a cost of $15,500. Construction of restroom facilities at Lock and Dam 21 were initiated at a cost of $15,000. Maintenance of roads and bridges, buildings, grounds and utilities cost $1,500. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $504,200. Maintenance and purchase of permanent operating equipment cost $137,400. Maintenance of levees cost $59,100. Real estate activities relating to maintenance were performed at a cost of $92,900. Engineering and design work was performed at a cost $1,757,800. Supervision, administration, and inspection for maintenance features cost $1,594,800. Total maintenance costs were $21,680,500. Net credits to the project were $272,800, primarily as a result of collection from towboat companies for damages to lock and dam structures. Operating and care: Operation of locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $10,770,200. Real Estate management services were performed at a cost of $159,500. Natural and cultural resource activities were performed at a cost of $338,700. Public use areas and Mississippi River Visitors' Center were operated at a cost of $1,447,100, with contract law enforcement provided at a cost of $56,900. OSHA inspections and medical examinations were accomplished at a cost of $15,800. Surveys, various condition and operation studies and structural inspections cost $1,122,800. Water control management costs were $887,900 and the amount of $25,600 was expended on Master Plans. Supervision and administration for operations features cost $296,000. Total operation costs were $15,120,500. Total operation and maintenance costs were $36,801,000. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation continued at Locks and Dams 20, 21, and 22 at a cost of $1,171,815, $164,895, and $275,039, respectively. Total rehabilitation costs were $1,611,749. 25-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN * Costs to the Rock Island District were $36,801,000 for operations and maintenance and $1,611,749 for major rehabilitation for a total cost of $38,412,749. St. Louis District. New Work: Costs incurred for Melvin Price Locks and Dam, formerly Lock and Dam 26 Replacement, were $170,202 for real estate acquistion, $95,618 for relocations, $53,990 for reservoirs, $10,575,536 for the dam, $2,565,546 for the lock, $27,477 for roads, $4,293 for channels, -$108,077 for recreation facilities, $291,089 for buildings, grounds, and utilities, $52,542 for permanent operating equipment, $1,735,206 for engineering and $1,014,693 for supervision and administration. Costs incurred for 2nd lock were $41,508,677 for the lock, $1,363,379 for engineering and $3,430,255 for supervision and administration. Total cost of new work was $62,780,426. Rehabilitation: None. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made thereto. Other work accomplished was management of natural resources, operation of recreation areas, condition and operation studies, water control management and other studies and reports for a total cost of $6,051,890. Costs to St. Louis District were $62,780,426 for new work on the Melvin Price Locks and Dam; $6,051,890 for operation and care; $7,134,224 for maintenance for a total cost of $75,966,540. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, Lake City and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; and Bay City, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, WI; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition; Approximately 50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,549.63 acres of land are owned or controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by the Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: None. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: construction of small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, IA; and Hanibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of old auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pools 15 and 16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction of visitor center at Lock and Dam 15. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive consisting of 93,601 acres in fee and 10,541 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: None. St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams 24, 25, and Melvin Price Locks and Dam, except for guidewall extensions at Locks 24 and 25, have been completed as have recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification of damages have been completed. Other work remaining consists of construction guidewall extensions at Locks 24 and 25. Melvin Price Locks and Dam are under construction. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of lands in Pools 24, 25, and 26, involving 4,448 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 4,121 acres has been acquired for the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Louis District: Work remaining on the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project includes completion of the third stage, (600 foot lock and 1 V2 gatebays of the dam). Other work includes construction of miscellaneous alterations to the lock, minimum facilities for public health and safety and West Alton Access Area rehabilitation, removal of a lockwall at old Locks and Dam No. 26 and construction of recreation facilities at Alton, IL. Approximately 80 acres remain to be acquired for mitigation purposes for terrestrial wildlife losses and three acres for project navigation purposes. Total Federal Costs of existing project to the end of fiscal year for the three Districts were $154,960,490: $62,794,837 for new work; $86,711,806 regular funds for operation and maintenance; and $5,453,847 regular funds for rehabilitation. 25-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 25-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 September 1992 Mississippi River New Work' between Missouri River Approp.2 $36,641,700 $87,951,000 $90,959,000 $62,790,000 $1,104,911,621 and Minneapolis, Cost3 47,598,654 90,175,203 96,348,541 62,789,022 1,104,889,469 Minnesota (Federal Maint.4 Funds) Approp. 57,726,400 70,295,150 80,693,444 88,146,700 1,139,013,682 Cost 61,399,510 69,715,421 81,122,738 86,711,806 1,116,766,614 Rehab. Approp. 24,729,200 18,519,770 7,332,400 4,981,000 143,188,057 Cost 24,918,657 18,315,662 6,701,105 5,453,847 142,640,369 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 2,041,140 Cost 0 0 0 0 2,041,140 1. Includes $72,426,653 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $871,732,000. 3. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $869,971,942. 4. Includes $10,453,327 for maintenance on previous project. TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 25-B TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $ 60,165,2782 $24,210,071 $9,071,214 $93,446,563 Maintenance3 470,994,521 - - 470,994,521 Rehabilitation 59,613,403 - - 59,613,403 Total 590,773,202 24,210,071 9,071,214 624,054,487 Rock New Work' 71,307,945' 17,403,322 11,338,865 100,050,132 Island Maintenance' 429,265,238 - - 429,265,238 Rehabilitation 83,026,966 - - 83,026,966 Total 583,600,149 17,403,322 11,338,865 612,342,336 St. Louis New Work8 899,076,158' 10,282,566 2,440,266 911,798,990 Maintenance 225,739,684 - - 225,739,684 Total 1,124,815,842 10,282,566 2,440,266 1,137,538,674 1. Excludes $2,041,140 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expended in pool No. 11. 2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. Excludes $797,670 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts covering their pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 6. Costs subsequent to FY 1953 included with operating and care. Includes the sum of $395,442, expended between 1930 and 1934 on the operating and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 7. Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 8. Includes $869,971,942 for Melvin Price Locks and Dam. 25-4 TABLE 25-C LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool St. Anthony 853.9 In city of 56 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 1002 - $ 18,203,000 Falls, upper Lock St. Anthony Falls, lower Lock and dam Lock and dam 1 Lock and dam 2 Lock and dam 3 Lock and dam 4 Lock and dam 5 Lock and dam N 5A S Lock and dam 6 Lock and dam 7 Lock and dam 8 Lock and dam 9 Lock and dam 10 Lock and dam 11 Lock and dam 12 Lock and dam 13 Lock and dam 14 Le Claire Lock tCanal) Lock and dam 15 Lock and dam 16 Minneapolis, MN 853.3 In city of Minneapolis, MN 847.6 Minneapolis- St. Paul, MN 815.2 1.3 above Hastings, MN 796.9 6.1 above Red Wing, MN 752.8 Alma, WI 738.1 Minneiska, MN 728.5 3 above Winona, MN 714.3 Trempealeau, WI 702.5 Dresbach, MN 679.2 Genoa, WI 647.9 3.3 below Lynxville, WI 615.1 Guttenberg, IA 583.0 3.7 above Dubuque, IA 556.7 Bellevue, IA 522.5 4.3 above Clinton. IA 493.3 3.7 below Le Claire. IA 493.1 3.9 below Le Claire. IA 482.9 Foot of Arsenal Island, Rock Island, IL 457.2 1.8 above Muscatine. IA stone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 56 400 26.9� 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone. piles. 56 400 35.94 725.1 13.5� 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel. 56 400 35.9 - 12.5' 7.6 in gravel. 110 500 12.2 - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 1108 6008 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. silt and clay. 110 600 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. silt and clay. 110 600 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. .10 600 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 60) 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and and clay. silt. 110 600 8.0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 110 600 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and and gravel. broken rock. 10 600 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 8.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. gravel and silt. 110 600 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. .10 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand clay and and gravel. gravel. 110 600 11.0 527.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. Rock. 80 320 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. Rock. 110 600 16.0 561.0 24.011 11.0 Rock. Rock. L10 360 16.0 - 17.011 11.0 L10 600 9.0 545.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 100 1959 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 100 92 100 100 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1938 1939 1922 1934 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12,382,0008 CID 2,358,000' 6,492,000' 5,596,000 4,865.000 5,081,000 4,549,000 Z 4.874,000 U, O 5,574,000 6.061,000 z 6,539,000 z z 4,750,000 7,428,000 0 5,580,000 7,502,000 6,284,000 _o 14,201,000 98 1937 9,788,000 TABLE 25-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi. Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Lock and dam 437.1 4.2 above New 110 600 8.0 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 99 1939 $ 5,843,000 17 Boston, IL and gravel. Lock and dam 410.5 6.5 above 110 600 9.8 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 90 1937 10,308,000 18 Burlington, IA Lock and dam 364.2 Keokuk, IA 110 358 19 110 1,200 Lock and dam 343.2 0.9 above 110 600 20 Canton, MO Lock and dam 324.9 2.1 below 110 600 21 Quincy, IL Lock and dam 301.2 1.5 below 110 600 22 Saverton, MO Lock and dam 273.4 Clarksville, MO 110 600 24 Lock and dam 241.4 Cap Au Gris, 110 600 t 25 MO Lock and dam 202.9 Alton, IL 110 600 ' 26 (Henry T. 110 360 Rainey Dam)"' Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 1,200 Locks and Dam Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 600 Locks and Dam (2nd Lock) Total, Locks and dams 38.2 518.2 4.5 9.2 Rock. 5.0 13.0 10.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. Rock. Rock and piles in sand and gravel. 10.5 470.0 16.5 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 10.2 459.5 18.0 13.8 Rock. Rock. 15.0 449.0 19.0 12.0 Rock and piles. Piles in sand. 15.0 434.0 19.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 24.0 419.0 19.0 10.0 Piles in sand. Piles and 24.0 - 16.0 10.0 sand. 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles to bedrock. 24.0 419.0 42.0 18.0 Piles to bedrock. Piles to bedrock. Piles to bedrock. 100 99 97 95 99 1913 1957 1936 1938 1938 9914 1940 9914 1939 100 1938 92 84 1990 0 0 O 1. Elevation of pools 1 to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea level 9. In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. 1912 adjustment: pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 10. Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; previous 2. Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. project cost $540,000. 3. Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 11. Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, at 4. Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool 1 which is crest of dam. Pool lock 15. is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 12. $640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Com- 5. Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower pany, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. rock. (Federal cost only.) (Annual Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate includes 6. In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and $1,349,600 $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. from O & C appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and 13. Includes cash contribution of $4,850,000 dam rehabilitation program. 14. Complete except for guidewall extensions. 7. Old upper guard sill. 15. Lock and Dam 26 has been replaced by the Melvin Price Locks and 8. Landward lock. Dam at which full pool was raised 1 February 1990. Lock and Dam 26 has been removed. 14,813,0002 6,281,000 8,065,000 0 5,275,000 10,337,000 13,694,000 12,824,000 750,850,000 212,600,000 $ 1,188,997,000 0 0 0 N .r C ru O TABLE 25-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Miles above Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name Miles above Location Type depth Percent Estimated (feet) Width Length Complete Cost St. Paul Harbor, MN Hastings Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Bay City Harbor, WI Lake City Harbor, MN Pepin Harbor, WI Wabasha Harbor, MN Alma Harbor, WI Winona Harbors, MN Lansing Harbor, IA Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI Dubuque Harbor, IA Savanna Harbor, IL Clinton Harbor, IA Moline Harbor, IL Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, IL Andalusia Harbor, IL Muscatine Harbor, IA Fort Madison Harbor, IA 836.5-839.2 In city of St. Paul, MN 839.7 Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. 813.2 Lower end of city of Hastings, MN 791.4 In city of Red Wing, MN 791.1 In city of Red Wing, MN 785.9 Upper end of Bay City, WI 773.0 In city of Lake City, MN 767.1 760.0 751.3 726.0 726.2 663.3 635.5 635.0 579.4 537.3 519.0 488.0 484.2 479.8 473.0 455.5 455.6 In city of Pepin, WI Upper end of city of Wabasha, MN Upper end of Alma, WI In city of Winona, MN Latsch Island Crooked Slough Upper end of city of Lansing, IA Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, WI In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. At Dubuque, IA At Savanna, IL At Clinton, IA At Moline, IL At Lindsay Park At Rock Island, IL Andalusia Slough At Muscatine, IA 383.7 At Fort Madison, IA Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial' Small-boat' Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat 9 400-1,000 2.7(mile) 100 S 217,100 5 300 400 100 230,200 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 170 400 500 100 1,200 100 800 100 5,990 100 600 1,000 850 600 800 100 100 100 100 100 500 100 1,000 100 6,000 100 500 100 800 100 1,000 frontage 340 280 400 230 200 100 40 150 200 250 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 100 100 0 78 100 1,100 100 435 100 950 100 1,890 100 74,300 146,800' 8,700 C 39,400'2 cI 93,500 1,077,000' 205,500' 41,700 56,300 89,800 y 84,700 95,300 Z 85,500 93,100 55,200 Z 310,000 101,912 110,328 Z2 262,100 31,000 O 21,000 353,000 .c 2 900 100 184,200 12 5555 Entrance channel small-boat harbor Small-boat Small-boat Freight terminal approach channel Small-boat N Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name Miles above Location Type Depth Percent Estimated Ohio River (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Warsaw Harbor, IL 359.1 At Warsaw, IL Small-boat 5 100 600 100 $ 73,000 Quincy Harbor, IL 327.3 In Quincy Bay, IL Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 Hannibal Harbor, MO 308.8 At Hannibal, MO Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129,000 Total $4,269,640 1. In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 2. In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 3. Commercial harbor converted to small-boat harbor under authority of Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Primary use is small-boat, although some commercial activity exists. 4. In addition, local interests contributed $812,599. 5. In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. 6. Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. N 00 l 6 0 0 0 0 0 cJ nl) 0 7d d TABLE 25-D (Cont'd) HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS TABLE 25-E MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater Regulating works between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation Miscellaneous Total additional features Total existing project (new work) $ 13,040,500 8,580,000' 545,000 193,600 5,936,9002 18,705,9003 $ 516,183,512 1. Includes a lump-sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch Bridge, Minneapolis, MN. (FY 1969) 3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, MO. LICENSE FEES COLLECTED TABLE 25-F THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1992 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1992 St. Anthony Falls Lower Northern States Power $ 3,300 $ 99,877 Lock and Dam Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 6,393,840 Lock and Dam No. 2 City of Hastings, MN. 24,163 108,373 TOTAL $ 6,602,090 25-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 25-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized I)ocuments Sep. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Dl)c. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable. 4 Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN harbor. Determine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, MN harlor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, WI Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, MN channel enlargements, small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s. Winona, MN basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development. Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, MN harbor. Wabasha, MN harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, MN harbor. Lansing, IA harbor. Fort Madison, IA harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA. Davenport, IA harbor. Muscatine, IA harbor. Alma, WI harbor. Hannibal, MO harbor. Prairie du Chien, WI harbors. Opposite Ilamburg, II,ha rbor.' Permits such change in location of Winona, MN small boat basin authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (II. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL.2 None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong. Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and hlarbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None 11. I)oc. 103, 76th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 11. Doc. 4:32, 77th Cong., Isl.t sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2(d ses. H. Doec. 514, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doe. 661, 80th Cong. 2d sess. S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2d seas. H. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., Ist seas. 1l. Doe. 254, 81st Cong., Ist sess. None H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 136, 84th Cong., 1st sess. 25-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 25-G (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. districts caused by operation of navigation pools. July 3, 1958 Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 3, 1959 Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide None adequate facilities for existing navigation. July 14, 1960 Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, MN. H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna2, Moline, H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Andalusia, New Boston5, Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; Bellevue', Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk3, IA; St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN'; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville', WI. Oct. 23, 1962 Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Oct 23, 1962 Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Nov. 7, 1966 Repair of Stone Arch Bridge at Minneapolis, MN. None Oct. 21, 1978 Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Public Law 95-502 Dec. 29, 1981 Change name of Lock and Dam 26 to Melvin Price Locks and Dam Public Law 97-118 effective on the date of Melvin Price's death. (Apr. 22, 1988 - date of death) 1. Deauthorized FY 75. 2. Inactive. 3. Deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 4. Guidewalls at Locks 3, 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9, and 10 deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 5. Deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 6. Guidewall extensions at Locks 16, 18, and 21; construction of mooring facilities at Locks and Dams 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18; upper approach improvement at Lock 19 and Lock and Dam 20; and rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools 14, 18, and 21 deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 25-11 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT* This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyo- drainage basin of Missouri River along main stem and ming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Colo- tributraries to Rulo, NE. rado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, all embraced in IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE ................................. 26-2 2. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 26-2 Flood Control 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO ....................... 26-2 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND .................... 26-2 5. Chatfield Lake, CO ........... ......... 26-2 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO ...................... 26-3 7. Fall River Basin, SD ........................ 26-3 8. Little Sioux River, IA ....................... 26-3 9. Lost Creek at Columbus, NE ................ 26-3 10. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD .................... 26-3 11. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA ..................... 26-4 12. Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE ................. 26-4 13. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE ................................ 26-4 14. Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE ................... 26-4 15. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha Dist) ....................... 26-5 16. Pipestem Lake, ND ........................ 26-5 17. Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE .............. 26-5 18. South Platte River Basin, CO ................ 26-5 19. Westerly Creek, CO ......................... 26-5 20. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works .................... ....... 26-5 21. Scheduling Flood Control Resrvoir Operations ......................... 26-6 22. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ........................ 26-6 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power Page 23. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD ................... 26-6 24. Fort Peck Lake, MT ........................ 26-6 25. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD ................... 26-6 26. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND ................. 26-7 27. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD............26-7 28. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND ................... 26-7 29. Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update.......... 26-7 Miscellaneous 30. National Emergency Preparedness ............ 26-8 General Investigations 31. See Table 26-K ........................... .... 26-8 Tables 26-A Cost and Financial Statement ............ 26-9 26-B Authorizing Legislation ................... 26-12 26-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects......26-15 26-D Not Applicable 26-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects...26-15 26-F Other Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ........................ 26-17 26-G Deauthorized Projects .................... 26-17 26-H Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE ............... 26-18 26-I Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program........ 26-18 26-J Inspection of Completed Local Protection Projects ....................... 26-18 26-K Active General Investigations ............. 26-21 26-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ............. 26-23 26-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in fiscal year 1928, the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979, and the navigation feature was completed in September 1980. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. Total cost was $189,226,000, of which $187,639,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $1,587,000 is the non-Federal cost, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. A complete list of terminal facilities are included in the Missouri River Navigation Maps and can be obtained from the Omaha District for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Local interests operate and maintain the recreation sites. 2. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). No work during the period. Flood Control 3. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,300 feet, and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncon- *trolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake provides storage capacity of 28,831 acre-feet for flood control and 1,979 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, exclusive of recreation facilities. The total cost of the project was $61,518,608. Recreation facilities were developed utilizing cost sharing funds at an additional cost of $500,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-3 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 425,700. 4. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. Damsite is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. Existing project. A dam 79 feet high, with a crest length of 5,730 feet, and reservoir with a storage capacity of about 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 62,700. 5. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. On the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet, a crest length of 12,500 feet, and a reservoir with flood control capacity of 204,737 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 26,692 acre-feet, which will be used for recreation, and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. The Corps participated with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and is essentially complete. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $104,487,700 (1992) of which $95,472,700 is the Federal cost for construction, $6,115,000 local cost in connection with the downstream channel improvement, and $2,900,000 is the local cost for acquisition of water for the recreation pool. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies to the downstream channel improvement. The Colorado Water Conservation Board provided assurances of local cooperation for the downstream improvement on December 13, 1967. Local interests must provide water for filling the sediment reserve pool for recreation use which the state agreed to on April 25, 1967. 26-2 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Continued design by hired labor. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 4,267,100. 6. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and 14,300 feet long. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiple-purpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. Construction began in fiscal year 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $15,220,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 6,934,400. 7. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook; and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing project. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during fiscal year 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in fiscal year 1953 with exception of a road and parking area which were completed in fiscal year 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs unit dam was completed in fiscal year 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities which were completed in fiscal year 1972. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation requirements have been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 663,100. 8. LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IA Location. The project is located in the lower portion of the Little Sioux River Basin in Harrison and Monona Counties, IA, near the confluence of the Little Sioux and Missouri River. Previous project. For details see page 646, Annual Report for 1970. Existing project. Construction of the original project was completed in June 1966. Sill No. 4 was identified as a design deficiency in a June 17, 1981 report by the Omaha District, approved by OCE. Based on that report, design studies for a permanent solution to the problem were completed. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $23,630,000 (1991) of which $20,630,000 is the Federal cost of construction, and $3,000,000 is the local cost for lands, relocations, and associated E&D. Local cooperation. The Little Sioux Inter-County Drainage District was sponsor of that portion of the original project where the remedial work is being accomplished. Remedial work was 100 percent Federally funded. Operations during fiscal year. Project is financially complete. 9. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Location. On Lost Creek just north of the City of Columbus in Platte County, NE. Existing project. This project provides levee and channel improvements on the north side of Columbus and provides protection to commercial and residential areas. The estimated cost of the construction is $4,439,518 (1992) of which $3,579,518 is the Federal cost, and $860,000 is non-Federal contributed funds -other, that provides for all necessary right of way, utility, and bridge relocations. Local cooperation. A contract with the City of Columbus to sponsor the project was approved on February 18, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. A contractor's claim was denied in July 1990 by the contracting officer. Subsequently, the contractor appealed this decision to the U.S. Claims Court, where it is presently being litigated by the Justice Department. 10. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Location. NE and SD. The Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing project. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important 26-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. Erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, will at the same time preserve high bank flood plain lands. Estimated total cost of construction is $21,640,000 (1992) of which $21,000,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $640,000 is the non-Federal contributed funds - other costs. Local cooperation. All construction on this project will be done in accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. A cost-sharing contract with the State of South Dakota for the Myron Grove access site was signed on June 24, 1986 and the Yankton-Riverside Park Section 215 Agreement was signed on April 24, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Efforts to protect Federally listed threatened and endangered species continued. 11. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing project. Construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. (See Table 26-A for total costs.) Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 12. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBRASKA, KANSAS AND MISSOURI (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA to St. Louis, MO. Active portion of the project in Omaha District extends from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Construction was initiated June 1948. (See Table 26-H for status of active units). Cost estimate for active portion of project from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE is $42,582,000 (1991) of which $37,964,000 is Federal cost for construction and $4,618,000 local costs for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units. Local interests have furnished assurances of their willingness and ability to fulfill local cooperation requirements for the remaining active units. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on the O&M manuals. 13. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair, flows southeasterly through metropolitan Omaha area where it is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creek flows along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing project. The active project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs, channel improvement and a flood warning system on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction was initiated in FY 1972. Completed projects include Standing Bear Lake (Site 16), Glenn Cunningham Lake (Site 11), and Wehrspann Lake (Site 20). Remaining work includes construction of recreational facilities, fish and wildlife facilities and channel improvement on the Big Papio Channel and recreational facilities on Ed Zorinsky Lake (Site 18). Estimated total costs for the project are $68,659,000 consisting of $64,325,000 in Federal funds ($5,721,000 to be reimbursed by the non- Federal sponsor) and $4,334,000 non-Federal other costs and cash contributions. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-6 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated construction of Phase II recreation facilities at Ed Zorinsky Lake (Site 18), initiated construction on Phase II B and prepared plans and specifications for Phase II A for the Big Papio Channel. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance activities continued at all four dam sites. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 3,364,100. 14. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Location. Scribner, Nebraska, is located in Dodge County about 47 miles northwest of Omaha, Nebraska. Pebble Creek is a right-bank tributary to the Elkhorn River. Existing project. The plan includes a 3.6-mile-long levee with an average height of about eight feet providing 100-year flood protection plus 3 feet of freeboard from Pebble Creek, a closure structure at U.S. Highway 275 at the northern edge of Scribner, four road ramps over the levee, an automated flood warning system, and appropriate land use zoning and continued flood insurance for unprotected areas. Construction on the Pebble Creek levee was completed in October 1989. In the process of providing FEMA the necessary data to revise the flood insurance rate maps to reflect the Pebble Creek levee, it was determined that Scribner is subject to greater residual flooding from the Elkhorn River than was previously determined. In April 1989 additional studies were began to correct the problem. The studies concluded that it would be feasible to construct the Elkhorn River levee which will be 2.1 miles long with an average height of 4 feet and will provide 100-year level of protection with 3 feet of freeboard. Local cooperation. The city of Scribner is the non- Federal sponsor of the project. The city has obtained costsharing assistance from the Nebraska Natural Resources Commission and the Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District. 26-4 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications for the Elkhorn River levee were completed during FY 1992. Construction is scheduled for initiation in late spring 1993. The total estimated cost of the project is $2,884,000. The non-Federal portion of this estimate is $688,000 which includes $353,000 for lands, easements and rights-of-way. 15. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising Missouri River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and tributaries. See individual reports and Table 26-I for projects in the Omaha District included in the program. 16. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, 3 miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The miltipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 317,200. 17. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alterations. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of Salt Creek survey report, remaining units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were used to determine an effective method of correction for the dispersive clay problem in the completed downstream levees through Lincoln. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual visitation hours to the system of dams were estimated at 12,035,600. 18. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing project. General plan for flood control and other purposes provides for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 26-B for authorizing legislation). 19. WESTERLY CREEK, CO Location. Westerly Creek Dam impounds the Westerly Creek on Lowry Air Force Base, CO. Lowry Air Force Base is just east of Denver, CO. Existing project. The project consists of 2 major phases and a minor follow-on contract. Phase I involved construction of four new buildings and associated utilities. Phase II is the embankment and spillway contract which includes demolishing existing buildings, utility relocations, construction of an embankment, spillway; relocation of four golf course greens, relocation of one tee box, construction of channels adjacent to the golf course, and repair of an existing 48 inch conduit. The follow-on contract (construction physically complete) corrected some erosion to the collector channel system. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor is the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) of the Metropolitan Denver area. UDFCD requested credit for $6,353,000 in downstream channel improvements, which were constructed between 1 January 1978 and 6 August 1984. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on 14 March 1988 approved credit for the construction accomplished by the local sponsor in an amount equivalent to the cost of the relocations and collector channels. Appropriate adjustments have been made to the Federal and non-Federal costs. The local cooperation agreement was executed on 2 August 1988. Operations during fiscal year. All work is complete with the exception of incorporating the final review comments into the O&M manuals. 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. 26-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the fiscal year are set forth in Table 26-J, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. Fiscal year costs were $223,432. 21. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations involving storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1992 were $350,362 and total costs to September 30, 1992 were $6,713,158. 22. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for FY 1992 were $442,825 for disaster preparedness and $7,978 for rehabilitation. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948). Federal costs for FY 1992 were $204,494 for reconnaissance studies, $197,449 for feasibility studies, $121,384 for plans and specifications and construction measures and $15,475 for litigation on a completed project. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946.) Operations under this heading were as follows: Federal costs for FY 1992 were $69,169 for projects in the feasibility phase and $279,007 for projects in the plans and specifications and construction phase. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 23. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River, 987.4 miles above mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall Reservoir. Big Bend Reservoir extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 95 feet high, with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of eight 58,500 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,883,000 acre-feet. Federal cost of the project was $107,498,000. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, power production and other multiple uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. During the period, 647,704,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity were produced. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 5,310,100. 24. FORT PECK LAKE, MT Location. Reservoir is in Missouri River Valley in Mc- Cone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.6 miles above mouth of Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest, and Nashua, 9 miles north. Existing project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 21,026 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,909,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started on original project in October 1933 and on second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The 5 generators have a total output of 185,250 KW, 2 generators at 40,000 KW each, 2 generators at 43,500 KW each and 1 generator at 18,250 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Federal cost of the project was $158,428,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multi-purpose uses. Major Repair Work: Replacement of the penstock system for Power Plant No. 1 was essentially completed during the year at a cost of $19,000,000. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 718,838,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 3,495,400. 25. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River in Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above mouth of Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with a maximun height of 165 feet, a crest length of 10,700 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,574,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $199,066,000. Non-Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. 26-6 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 1,310,548,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 7,014,800. 26. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,389.9 miles above mouth of river and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 24,137,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units, three units rated at 109,250 kilowatts each, and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each, three flood control tunnels and a gated spillway. Federal cost of the project was $299,938,000 including $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development using Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required except cost-sharing with the State of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment and recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 1,777,007,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 9,137,600. 27. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about 4 miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A concrete and rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 504,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 44,099 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $49,617,000. Construction of original project was initiated in March 1952 and was completed in 1964. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 612,824,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity during fiscal year. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 10,525,500. 28. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about 6 miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above mouith of river. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 245 feet, a crest length of 9,300 feet, and reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,337,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 112,290 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $346,521,000. Construction was initiated August 1948 and project placed in operation June 1963. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 1,623,503,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 11,489,900. 29. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE Location. The area being studied is the Missouri River basin, to include the Missouri River main stem system. States included in the study area include Nebraska, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri. Existing Project. During the past six years, the Misssouri River basin has experienced a moderate to severe drought, impacting upon the Missouri River main stem projects for the first time since filled in 1967. The drought has had severe impacts on people and industries who use the Missouri River and the main stem reservoirs for navigation, hydropower, water supply, and recreation. Some of the people impacted by the drought have stated that the current Master Water Control Manual for the Missouri River main stem system of reservoirs does not adequately take into consideration the contemporary needs of the basin. The purpose of the Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update study is to determine the water control plan that best meets the needs of the Missouri River basin. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations/Activities during fiscal year. During FY 92, a Scope-of-EIS document for the Master Manual review 26-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 was completed and distributed. This document is a compilation of the issues brought forth in the scoping meetings held in FY 91, as well as numerous other meetings and communications since that time. The technical studies to determine the value functions for each resource category under study were completed. Computer interface construction and quality control runs were completed and the water control plan alternatives were run through the interface. The first draft of the Initial Evaluation Report and draft supporting technical reports were completed. Miscellaneous 30. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $174,909. 31. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal Year 1992 costs totaled $2,313,572 for all General Investigation activities. See Table 26-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Research and Development, Preconstruction Engineering and Design (projects not fully authorized), Planning and Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and Preconstruction Engineering and Design (fully authorized projects). 26-8 TABLE 26-A See Section in Text Project 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 5. Chatfield Lake, CO (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 7. Fall River Basin, SD 8. Little Sioux River and Tributaries, IA (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 9. Lost Creek, Columbus, NE (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 10. Missouri National Recreational River NE & SD OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total Thru FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep 30, 1992 1,926,284 1,927,227 40,000 11,538 244,000 244,269 177,000 176,890 360,000 341,698 360,000 341,698 502,000 500,802 425,000 501,292 288,000 291,312 16,782 16,782 150,000 67,625 150,000 67,625 68,000 71,561 200,000 345,793 1,532,748 1,466,877 -15,000 3,471 250,609 226,794 161,227 135,848 654,000 513,862 -7,549 37,979 646,451 551,841 642,430 587,374 754,963 591,509 331,860 308,771 6,973 6,973 60,567 60,567 611,000 565,852 100,000 70,662 1,455,000 1,489,134 -9,992 394,000 356,429 191,000 162,001 300,000 386,780 80,302 76,706 380,302 463,486 649,000 711,930 583,000 731,638 403,000 342,799 665 665 18,421 18,421 183,000 173,812 216,000 67,505 26-9 - 189,225,9911 - 189,225,9911 1,600,000 115,318,450 1,590,008 115,268,485 - 62,018,608 - 62,018,608 272,000 3,263,609 313,839 3,243,260 - 4,372,174 - 4,372,174 142,000 2,792,270 169,372 2,763,423 15,000 95,472,700 87,021 95,443,554 - 1,318,924 - 1,302,599 15,000 96,791,624 87,021 96,746,153 1,358,000 7,178,230 1,360,634 7,174,999 - 15,220,364 - 15,220,364 477,000 9,066,474 472,666 9,043,597 - 5,538,432 - 5,538,432 308,200 4,974,201 377,049 4,956,441 - 20,629,920 381 20,629,920 - 8,380 - 8,380 - 20,638,300 381 20,638,300 -40,000 3,579,518 15,475 3,561,651 4,615 151,915 4,615 151,915 -35,385 3,731,433 20,090 3,713,566 - 1,713,800 52,123 1,706,234 193,000 1,461,000 261,733 1,341,058 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru Missouri River Funding New Work: FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep 30, 1992 Kenslers Bend, Approp. - - - - 11,294,414 NE, to Sioux Cost - - - - 11,294,414 City, IA Maint. Approp. 41,000 47,350 47,000 49,000 4,671,419 Cost 41,318 42,504 44,167 51,378 4,665,517 12. Missouri River New Work: Levees, IA Approp. - 33,000 - - 37,964,1776 NE, KS & MO Cost 178,349 63,630 16,404 1,508 37,963,6856 (Required New Work: Contributed Approp. - - - - 38,810 Funds) Cost - - - - 38,810 (Consolidated New Work: Summary) Approp. - 33,000 - - 38,002,987 Cost 178,349 63,630 16,404 1,508 38,002,495 13. Papillion Creek New Work: and Tributaries Approp. 1,671,000 3,055,000 2,323,000 1,802,000 57,606,7625 Lakes, NE Cost 1,511,524 2,516,780 1,591,309 1,716,285 56,045,9045 (Required New Work: Contributed Approp. - - 185,000 - 185,000 Funds) Cost - - - 120,000 120,000 (Consolidated New Work: Summary) Approp. 1,671,000 3,055,000 2,508,000 1,802,000 57,791,762 Cost 1,511,524 2,516,780 1,591,309 1,836,285 56,165,904 Maint. Approp. 710,000 581,444 498,000 598,000 5,444,444 Cost 721,885 487,355 527,621 619,452 5,391,798 14. Pebble Creek New Work: Scribner, NE Approp. 1,067,000 74,487 70,244 30,000 1,938,728 Cost 1,071,987 95,868 110,886 55,408 1,936,603 (Required New Work: Contributed Approp. - - -40,244 - 164,756 Funds) Cost 179,559 20,844 -37,644 - 162,760 (Consolidated New Work: Summary) Approp. 1,067,000 74,487 30,000 30,000 2,103,484 Cost 1,251,546 116,712 73,242 55,408 2,099,363 16. Pipestem Lake, New Work: ND Approp. - - - - 9,277,545 Cost - - - - 9,277,545 Maint. Approp. 267,000 280,404 309,000 429,000 4,813,404 Cost 268,752 263,878 311,015 416,390 4,785,634 17. Salt Creek and New Work: Tributaries, NE Approp. - - - - 12,197,6212 Cost - - - - 12,197,6212 Maint. Approp. 749,000 703,801 600,000 426,000 10,951,276 Cost 690,683 636,656 574,536 568,760 10,941,448 19. Westerly New Work: Creek, CO Approp. 3,480,000 2,852,000 1,652,458 183,000 8,642,458 Cost 1,298,121 4,332,448 1,887,644 647,106 8,619,646 (Required New Work: Contributed Approp. 89,000 358,000 96,000 189,890 799,890 Funds) Cost - 447,000 - 100,059 613,441 (Consolidated New Work: Summary) Approp. 3,569,000 3,210,000 1,748,458 372,890 9,442,348 Cost 1,298,121 4,779,448 1,887,644 747,165 9,233,087 20. Inspections of Maint. Completed Local Approp. 184,000 212,128 209,000 218,000 3,751,476 Protection Projects Cost 183,728 195,159 219,953 223,432 3,750,473 21. Scheduling Flood Maint. Control Reservoir Approp. 274,000 344,708 386,000 353,000 6,739,684 Operations Cost 274,342 331,338 375,595 350,362 6,713,158 26-10 in Text Project 11. OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep 30, 1992 23. Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 24. Fort Peck Lake MT 25. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 26. Garrison Dam- Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 27. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, SD and NE 28. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD & ND 29. Missouri River Master Manual Review & Update New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost Major Rehab Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4,770,000 4,729,117 4,087,000 3,936,406 - - - 107,497,597 - - - 107,497,597 5,130,530 6,605,000 5,822,400 74,089,1043 4,847,516 6,616,064 6,051,036 73,955,7913 - - - 158,428,080 - - - 158,428,080 4,452,469 4,094,921 7,032,000 6,899,147 6,786,599 6,948,032 6,620,000 7,317,057 6,465,668 6,915,221 4,753,000 4,022,805 4,791,142 3,941,812 3,135,000 3,458,000 3,342,107 3,136,266 73,369,4233 72,687,1153 - - 199,065,883 - - 199,065,883 6,416,000 6,822,500 121,153,5993 6,206,030 6,723,347 120,556,2773 6,221,788 6,376,807 5,066,000 4,882,599 - 295,729,613 - 295,729,613 7,466,725 135,371,9703 7,519,345 134,972,5933 5,204,000 5,337,876 4,208,310 4,208,310 686,961 686,961 49,617,239 49,617,239 88,452,2553 88,197,9493 - 346,520,603 - 346,517,696 7,945,000 7,453,851 7,440,000 7,929,133 7,194,099 7,642,307 - 1,060,000 4,900,000 - 776,984 4,721,045 8,365,000 8,369,210 2,939,000 2,946,307 130,018,5963 129,802,1443 8,899,000 8,444,336 1. Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery Act funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and $1,181,125 for previous project. 2. Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that portion of the project which is currently being carried in a deferred status. 3. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 4. Includes $110,000 transferred to inactive portion for planning cost. 5. Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. 6. Does not include $2,228,211.50 cost of inactive sites. 26-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 1. Jan 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 13, 1968 Flood Control Act of 1962 Flood control Act of 1950 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 Aug 18, 1941 Flood Control Act of 1954 June 30, 1948 National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6 foot depth from Quindaro Bend (Kansas City, MO to Sioux City, IA). Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 alloted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. For completion of project from mouth to Sioux City, IA. For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO A flood control reservoir for protection of metropolitan Denver, CO. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Flood control reservoir and water supply. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Flood control reservoir and channel improvements to provide downstream protection for Denver, CO. Modified 1950 Flood Control Act to operate dam and other Federal improvements to achieve authorized level of protection, beginning at dam and ending 82 miles downstream. Reassigns a portion of the storage space in the lake project to joint flood control-conservation purposes. Modified 1974 WRDA to exemp prohibition of encroachments for Mineral Ave/Ken Caryl Rd. ext & transmission line. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Provide flood control to the town of Hot Springs, SD. LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IA Correction of design deficiency. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong. PL 70-560 PL 71-520 PL 73-67 H. Doc 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong. PL 79-14 S. Doc. 87, 90th Cong. PL 90-483 H. Doc. 574, 87th Cong. PL 87-874 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 655, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 341, 80th Cong. PL 83-780 LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Levee and channel improvement for local PL 858, 80th Cong. protection - Section 205. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri PL 95-625 River between the reaches from Gavins Point Dam, NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA Construction of dike, revetments. H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 80-858 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO. Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City, IA to Kansas City, MO. Extended project from Kansas City, MO to mouth and provided for increased protection. H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 475, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. 26-12 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) See Date of AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Section Authorizing in Text Act 13. 14. 15. Flood Control Act of 1968 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 June 30, 1948 June 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 31, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Project and Work Authorized PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Series of flood control reservoirs, providing protection for the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. Authorized additional $4.8 million for channel improvement on Big Papillion Creek, and to Union Pacific RR bridge, rec trail and flood warning system. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000 Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam. Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Changed comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Oahe Dam and Reservoir, ND. Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Documents H. Doc. 349, 90th Cong. PL 90-485 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 PL 858, 80th Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. PL 75-761 H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 PL 79-526 PL 81-516 H. Does. 549 and 642, 81st Cong. PL 83-780 PL 83-776 PL 84-505 H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. PL 85-500 PL 86-645 PL 88-253 PL 89-042 PL 90-17 PL 90-483 H. Doc. 91-748 and S. Doc. 91-895 PL 91-282 S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. PL 91-576 H. Doc. 91-23 and PL 91-611 PL 92-222 PL 93-251 PL 94-347 PL 95-189 26-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Flood Control Act of 27 Oct 1965 July 3, 1958 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Dec 22, 1944 June 16, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 May 18, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 June 3, 1948 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 PWA 1968 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 16. 17. 18. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Provide flood control for Jamestown, ND and downstream areas. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Series of dams and channel improvements for flood control around Lincoln, NE. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. WESTERLY CREEK, CO Provide flood control for metropolitan Denver, CO BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin FORT PECK LAKE, MT Construction of earth dam, as recommended by Chief of Engineers Sep 30, 1933, was approved by Executive Order by the President and included in Public Works Administration program, Oct 14, 1933 as authorized by the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 and adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 (PL 74-409). Completion, maintenance, and operation of a hydroelectric power plant, subject to certain provisions in act respecting transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes installation of additional power-generating facilities by Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of Bureau of Reclamation. Modified authorization to provide for full multiple purpose operation. Payments to be made to school districts serving project as reimbursement for educational facilities (including transportation to and from school) for pupils who are dependents of persons engaged in construction, operation, and maintenance of projects. Modified authorization to include recreation as a project purpose. FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 78th Cong. PL 78-534 GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE & SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 78th Cong. PL 78-534 OAHE DAM - LAKE OAHE, SD & ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 26-14 H. Doc. 266, 89th Cong. PL 89-298 H. Doc. 396, 84th Cong. PL 85-500 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 PL 90-17 PL 90-843 PL 91-282 PL 92-222 PL 93-251 PL 94-347 PL 95-189 PL 99-662 H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 PL 75-529 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 PL 80-586 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 19. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 29. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1992 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582 88,716 TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1992 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD' Complete 1940 37,410 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA Complete 1982 7,458,934 Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE2 Complete 1970 262,479 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE2 Complete 1974 293,016 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND2 Complete 1960 102,980 - Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 - City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO Complete 1955 150,000 - Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Complete 1967 191,282 - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Complete 1939 - - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Complete 1954 2,557,680 - Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD2 Complete 1981 3,000,000 - Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Complete 1964 400,000 - East Nishnabotn River at Red Oak, IA Complete 1986 2,154,016 - Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 11,556,667 - Forsyth, MT Complete 1950 255,177 - Frazer-Wolf Point, MT Complete 1982 435,000 - Gering Valley, NE Complete 1971 5,989,663 - Glasgow, MT Complete 1939 16,832 - Great Falls, MT Complete 1991 11,905,000 - Greybull, WY Complete 1960 248,507 Havre, MT Complete 1958 1,825,881 - Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Complete 1954 50,216 - 26-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 26-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1992 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hooper, NE2 Ida Grove, IA2 Indian Creek at Emerson, IA 2 Jamestown Reservoir, ND Linton, ND 2 Little Papillion Creek, NE Loup River, Columbus, NE2 Lower Big Sioux River, IA and SD Lower Heart River, ND Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND2 Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks 2 Mandan, Heart River, ND Marmarth, ND McCook Lake, SD Miles City, MT Missouri River, Aten, NE Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Mott, ND Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE2 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA Norfolk, NE Omaha, NE Pierce, NE Platte River Near Schuyler, NE2 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE Platte River and Tributaries, NE Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD Saco, MT Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD Sheridan, WY 3 Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MT2 Sioux Falls, SD South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, CO Vaughn, MT, Sun River2 Waterloo, NE West Point, NE Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Deferred Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete 1. Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Includes inactive segment. 26-16 326 522, 333, 3,643, 1,000, 1,961, 1,153, ,667 - ,344 - ,000 - ,111 - ,000 - ,173 - ,430 - 1968 1972 1986 1950 1973 1976 1973 1966 1964 1991 1967 1960 1960 1958 1956 1951 1945 1976 1948 1971 1954 1967 1948 1971 1980 1958 1978 1976 1951 1966 1957 1971 1970 1966 1960 5,633 234,839 676,916 169,498 147,627 578,791 99,370 1,000,000 236,000 3,400,504 5,903,640 296,597 74,940 257,398 1,538,269 1,004,000 67,793 184,380 2,618,809 25,747 5,288,707 457,582 237,883 149,596 230,294 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-F OTHER MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Report See Annual Cost to September 30, 1992 Operation and Project Status Report For Construction lMaintenance Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Relocation of Niobrara, NE Complete 1980 13,516,459 - Springfield, SD Water Intakel Active - - - Williston, ND Water Intake Complete 1981 988,583 - 1. Project was reported to the Speaker of the House and the be deauthorized 30 months from date of that report unless federal President of the Senate by ASA (CW) as meeting the deauthoriza- funds are obligated for planning, design, or construction. tion eligibility criteria of Sec 1001(b) (2) as of 30 Sep 91. Project will TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds Project Report For Document Expended Expended Billings, MT 1976 Sec. 201, FC Act 1950 75,000 - 23 Mar 81 Boulder, CO 1976 FC Act 1950 142,666 - WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Buffalo, Johnson County 1961 FC Act 1950 -- Diversion Channel, WY WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Castlewood Lake, 1943 PL 77-228 - - Douglas County, CO WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Davids Creek Lake, IA 1972 Sec. 203, PL 90-483 - - WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Dayton, WY 1956 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 - - WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE 1952 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 - - WRDA of 1974 6 Nov 77 Indian Creek Lake, IA 1969 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 135,000 - WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Lake Herman N/A Sec 1001(a), PL 89-298 - - (Dredging), SD WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Little Nemaha River, 1973 Sec. 204, PL 89-298 - - Nemaha County, NE WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Milk River, N/A Sec 1001(a), PL 89-298 - - Havre, MT WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Morrison, Bear Creek, CO 1950 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 30,000 - WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Redwater River and 1966 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 1,000 Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Shell Creek, NE 1962 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 71,000 - WRDA of 1974 3 Oct 78 Upper Missouri River, SD N/A Sec 1001(a), PL 89-298 - - Strambank Erosion Control Project WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Vermillion River and Tribs, SD 1968 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 208,000 - WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthorized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86: Aowa & South Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND; James River, ND & SD; Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE; South Dakota Lakes, SD; Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT; South Platte River, Denver-Ft. Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; Lower Big Sioux River, IA & SD; Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Missouri River Basin, ND; Sheridan, WY (Stage III); Missouri River Levee System Units: R531, R540, R553, R555, R577, R589, R603, R610, R623, R644, R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703, R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750. 26-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, IA TABLE 26-H (See Section 12 of Text) TO RULO, NE Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 Mosquito Creek Levee 14.2 Complete 1950 L601 Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees 15.0 Complete 1966 L594 Pleasant Valley Levee 11.4 Complete 1964 R580 Nebraska City Levee 0.2 Complete 1950 L575 Thurman-Hamburg Levee 45.8 Complete 1950 R573 Otto County Drainage District No. 2 5.9 Complete 1950 R562 Peru Dike 7.6 Complete 1950 L561-550 Atchison County Levee District No. 1 41.3 Complete 1952 R548 Brownville-Nemaha Levee 19.5 Complete 1952 L536 Mill Creek Levee 13.6 Complete 1952 R520 Richardson County Drainage Dist. No. 8 6.3 Complete 1960 R613 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee 14.0 Complete 1971 R616 Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees 4.5 Complete 1987 L611-614 Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees 22.0 Complete 1988 L627, L624, Remedial Studies on Completed Units L561-550 Studies Complete Comprehensive Restudy of Levee System Studies Complete PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM TABLE 26-I (See Section 15 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Fort Peck Lake, MTI,2 158,428,000 1,103,000 Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND1I,2 299,938,000 1,516,000 Missouri River Levee System, I, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE) , 37,931,000 4,618,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, SD and NDI,2 346,521,000 2,320,000 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SDI,2 107,498,000 302,000 Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD I,2 199,066,000 1,609,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NEl, 2 49,617,000 137,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Fake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE 13,516,000 - Omaha, NE2 5,904,000 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA 2 2,558,000 146,000 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND2 9,413,000 270,000 Cherry Creek Lake, CO 1 ,2 15,220,000 285,000 1Details presented on individual report. 2Completed. 3 Active portion of project. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (See Section 20 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Glasgow, Milk River Sep 92 Saco, Beaver Creek Sep 92 Havre, Milk River Jun 92 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Jun 92 Clyde Park, Shields River Aug 92 Three Forks, Lower Madison River Sep 92 Forsythe, Yellowstone River Aug 92 West Glendive, Yellowstone River Sep 92 Vaughn, Sun River Sep 92 *Yellowsatone River, Water Plant, Livingston Aug 92 Sun River, Great Falls Sep 92 26-18 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 20 of Text) Location *Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge *Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge *Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge *Yellowstone River, Near Miles City Water Intake & Sewage Lagoon *Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings *Yellowstone River, Yellowstone County Bridge, Near Billings *Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, Near Big Timber *Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, Near Three Forks *Jefferson River, Bank Protection, Near Waterloo *Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges *Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, Near Twin Bridges *Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin *Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton *Yellowstone River, Glendive Madison River, Quake Lake Milk River, Malta Wyoming Greybull, Big Horn River Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks *Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell *Shoshone River, Byron North Dakota Mandan, Lower Heart River Marmarth, Little Missouri River Scranton, Buffalo South Dakota Big Sioux River, Union County Big Sioux River, North Sioux City Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Herreid, Spring Creek *Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood *Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre *Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau *Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau Rapid Creek, Rapid City Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton *Vermillion River, Vermillion *Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh *Big Sioux River, Jefferson Deadman Gulch, Sturgis *Marne Creek, Yankton *White River, Winner Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam *Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora *Cache La Poudre River, Windsor *South Platte River, Kersey *South Platte River, Merino *South Platte River, Iliff *South Platte River, Platteville *Big Thompson River, Johnstown Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant) South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington St. Water and Sanitary District Month Inspected Aug 92 Aug 92 Inactive Inactive Inactive Aug 92 Aug 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Inactive Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Aug 92 Aug 92 Aug 92 Aug 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Aug 92 Aug 92 Aug 92 Sep 92 Sep 91 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Jul 92 Jul 92 Sep 91 Jul 92 Jul 92 Jul 92 Jul 92 Sep 92 Jul 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 Sep 92 26-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 20 of Text) Location Month Inspected Nebraska *Blackbird Creek, Decatur May 92 Omaha, Missouri River Jul 92 Waterloo, Elkhorn River Sep 92 West Point, Elkhorn River Jun 92 Pierce, Elkhorn River Jun 92 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Jan 92 Hooper, Elkhorn River Aug 92 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River Jan 92 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Jun 92 *Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island Feb 92 *Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville Feb 92 *Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna Aug 92 *Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk Mar 92 *North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare Oct 91 *Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft Mar 92 *Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek Feb 92 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Sep 92 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Jun 92 Gering Valley, Gering Drain & Tributaries Sep 92 Macy, Blackbird Creek May 92 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Mar 92 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek May 92 Columbus, Loup River Sep 92 Broken Bow, Mud Creek Sep 92 *Little Nemaha River, Tangeman Mar 92 *Julian, Rock Creek Inactive *Muddy Creek Near Syracuse Mar 92 *Platte River, Hansen-Chris Lakes, Bellevue Feb 92 *Platte River, Brady Apr 92 *Elm Creek, Decatur Mar 92 *Wiggle Creek, Homer Mar 92 *Elk Creek, Jackson Mar 92 *South Creek, Martinburg Apr 92 *Elk Creek, Willis Mar 92 Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus Sep 92 *Shell Creek, County Road Near Columbus Mar 92 *Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder Apr 92 *Elm Creek, Burt County Mar 92 *Redbird Creek, O'Neill Sep 92 *Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln Jan 92 *Platte River, Ashland Mar 92 *West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE Aug 92 *Niobrara River, Bassett, NE Sep 92 *Niobrara River-Cams Bridge, Bassett, NE Sep 92 *Elkhorn River Bridge, Norfolk Jun 92 *West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha Aug 92 *Logan Creek, Near Bancroft Mar 92 *Platte River, Near North Bend Apr 92 *Platte River, Ginger Cove Near Valley Sep 92 *Elkhorn River, Near Beemer Mar 92 *Elkhorn River, Ewing, Holt County Sep 91 Pebble Creek, Scribner Sep 92 Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Sep 92 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek Jul 92 Sioux City, Floyd River Sep 92 Hawarden, Dry Creek May 92 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River May 92 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Aug 92 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 92 26-20 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 20 of Text) Location Month Inspected Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Aug 92 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern Mar 92 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Hastings Mar 92 *East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex Feb 92 *Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City Sep 92 *West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock Jan 92 *East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold Jan 92 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak Mar 92 Big Sioux River, Sioux City Aug 92 * Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA Apr 92 Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County Jan 92 *East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail Feb 92 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County Aug 92 *Little Sioux River, Anthon Feb 92 *Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Jul 92 *Keg Creek, Minden Feb 92 *Waterman Creek, Near Sutherland Mar 92 *Soldier River, Near Ute Mar 92 *West Nishnabotna River, Near Oakland Jan 92 *R.B. West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern Mar 92 *Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Jul 92 Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees Aug 92 L601, Watkins Levee District May 92 L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District Jun 92 L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 Jun 92 L594, Waubansie Drainage District Jun 92 L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District Jun 92 L575, Benton-Washington Levee District Jun 92 L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District Jul 92 L575, McKissock Island Levee District Jul 92 L575, Buchannan Levee District Jul 92 L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District Apr 92 L611-614, M & P Missouri River Levee District May 92 R613, Papio Natural Resources District Aug 92 R562, Peru Levee District May 92 R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District May 92 R548, Little Nemaha Levee District May 92 R520, Richardosn Co. Levee Dist. #8 Apr 92 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 Apr 92 R616, Sarpy County Papio Natural Resources District Aug 92 *Denotes Section 14 Projects ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (See Section 31 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item FY 92 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE 47,122 Big Sioux River, Sioux Falls, SD 37,501 Thurman to Hamburg, IA 36,166 Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD 112,394 Vermillion River Basin, SD 145,146 Ft. Collins, CO 65,786 Goose Creek, Boulder, CO 8,516 Ralston & Leydon Creeks, CO 137,264 Burt-Washington Counties, NE 42,723 Watertown and Vicinity, SD -15,694 Wood River, Grand Island, NE 113,546 Subtotal 730,470 26-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (Continued) (See Section 31 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item FY 92 Categories Special Studies (140) Big Bend Wildlife Restoration 15,862 James River Environmental, SD 99,565 Oahe Wildlife Restoration 45,097 Subtotal 160,524 Review of Authorized Projects (160) None Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations 143,717 FERC Licensing 2,384 Interagency Water Resources Development 8,352 North American Waterfowl Management Plan 3,605 Subtotal 158,058 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) 1,380 Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. Interior (182) 11,208 River Basin & Reg. Plan. Comm. (183) 13,953 Planning Assistance to States (186) 293,861 Subtotal 320,402 TOTAL (Category 100) 1,369,454 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) 47,637 SS - Council Bluffs, IA (250) 18,784 SS - Jefferson Co. (250) 8,969 Newcastle, WY (250) 272 NFPC (250) 4,043 Quick Responses (250) 10,832 Risk Canyon, CO (250) 2,803 SS - Yankton, SD (250) 12,285 Upper Bear Creek, CO (250) 2,075 White Earth, ND (250) 272 Technical Services, General (250) 166,674 Hydrologic Studies (260) 24,132 TOTAL (Category 200) 298,778 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) None PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - PROJECTS NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED (Category 400) None PLANNING AND ENGINEERING UNDER PROPOSED LEGISLATION (Category 500) None PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - FULLY AUTHORIZED PROJECTS (Category 600) Missouri River F&W Mitigation (621) 10,460 Perry Creek, IA (650) 598,534 Platte River Bank Stab., NE (650) 55 Ft. Yates Bridge, ND (660) 36,291 TOTAL (Category 600) 645,340 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 2,313,572 26-22 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (See Section 22 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Disaster Preparedness - 442,825 Flood Flight and Rescue Operations - - Rehabilitation - Emergency Water Supply & Drought Assistance - 7,978 Advance Measures - - Total (FCCE) 450,803 Section 205: Cache La Poudre River, Greeley, CO R 8,481 Cedar Creek at Cedar Lodge, NE R 387 Corporation Gulch, Norfolk, NE R 89 Bluegrass Creek, Audubon, IA R 19,977 Otto Creek, Lashara, NE R 13,914 Unnamed Creek, Tioga, ND R 13,597 West Branch Pebble Creek, Dodge, NE R 27,289 Deadman's Run, NE R 8,818 Logan Creek, Pender, NE R 19,874 Maple Creek East Fork, Howells, NE R 39,859 Maple Creek, Nickerson, NE R 12,841 Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA F 39,630 Beal Slough, NE R 7,915 Hay Creek, Belle Fourche, SD R 256 Indian Creek, Hastings, IA F 465 Salt Creek, Levees, Lincoln, NE F 51,952 Lost Creek at Columbus, NE L 15,475 Medicine Knoll, Blunt, SD R 8,042 Milk River, Malta, MT F 60,770 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE C 55,408 Platte River, Cedar Creek, NE F 823 Powder River, Broadus, MT R 19,186 Lodgepole Creek, Sidney, NE P 65,976 Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO F 43,809 Wet Spottedtail Creek, Mitchell, NE R 3,969 Total (Section 205's) 538,802 Section 14: Big Sioux River/ Dakota Dunes, SD F 4,940 Bldwn, Sqw Crk Lndr Swg Lgn, WY C 8,173 Cannonball River, Shields, ND C 21,762 Cedar Creek, Spaulding, NE C 37,281 East Nishnabotna River, Page Bny Brdg, IA C 7,500 Fort Lupton, CO (Lagoon) C 3,518 Gallatin River, Gallatin County, MT C 25,943 Nine Mile Drain, Scottsbluff, NE C 6,430 Plum Creek, Norden Dam Access Road, NE C 22,014 Powder River, Arvada, WY C 1,353 Shields River, Park County, MT (US 89) C 6,633 South Fork Elkhorn River, Ewing, NE C 54 South Platte River, Logan County Bridge, NE C 38,393 South Platte River/ Merino, Logan City, CO P 7,663 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 28, CO C 4,889 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 61, CO C 5,298 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 87, CO C 3,904 South Table Creek, Nebraska City, NE C 87 Teton RV/Chateau/Teton County, MT F 16,060 26-23 Union Creek/ Stanton Bridge, NE P 10,454 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (Continued) (See Section 22 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost Badger Creek, Glacier City, MT Beaver Creek, Platte County, NE Elkhorn River, Beemer, NE Bridge Dearborn River, Lewis-Clark County, MT East Bow Creek, Cedar County Bridge, WY Little Popo Agie River, Lander, WY Muddy Creek, Cascade, Vaughn, MT Niobrara River (Carns Bridge), NE Road Knife River, Staton, ND Teton River, Teton County, MT Teton River, Chateau/Teton County, CO White River, Tripp County Road, SD Yellowstone River, Route 11, Livingstone, MT Yellowstone River, Highway 89 Bridge, MT Yellowstone River, MT Total (Section 14's) Total Flood Control Activities L = Litigation R = Recon P = Plans & Specs C = Construction F = Feasibility - Does Not Apply 14,274 5,479 53 9,824 17,254 13,523 11,732 7,596 35 6,500 469 2,289 20,333 6,520 1,050 348,176 1,337,781 26-24 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT* The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central, and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth)...... 2. Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, and MO.. ........... 27-2 Flood Control 3. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO ........ 27-2 4. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO...............27-3 5. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS ........... 27-3 6. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE .............. ..... .......... 27-3 7. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS...........27-3 8. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS ........ 27-4 9. Little Blue River Lakes, MO ................ 27-4 10. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO ................... ........ 27-4 11. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygn'es (Osage) River, KS..................... 27-5 12. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS ......... 27-5 13. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) ........... 27-5 14. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS ............. 27-5 15. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) ..................... 27-6 16. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO .. ...... ................... 27-6 17. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS .......... ................. 27-6 18. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA ............ 27-6 19. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO ...... 27-6 20. Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS ........ 27-7 21. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS............... 27-7 Flood Control (cont.) Page 22. Scheduling of Flood Control Reservoir Operations ....................... 27-7 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................... 27-7 24. Disaster Preparedness Program ............. 27-7 25. Flood Control Activities under Special Authorization ........................ 27-7 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ......................... 27-8 27. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO...............27-9 General Investigations 28. General Investigations ...................... 27-9 Tables Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement.......... 27-10 Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 27-13 Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 27-16 Table 27-D Not Applicable Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... ........... 27-17 Table 27-F Not Applicable Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects ............. 27-18 Table 27-H Missouri River Levee System ........ 27-19 Table 27-I Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program ..................... 27-20 Table 27-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 27-20 Table 27-K Active General Investigations ........ 27-21 Table 27-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ............... 27-22 27-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Montana, to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous Projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize the channel, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. The improved reach within the Kansas City District extends from the mouth to Rulo, Nebraska, a distance of 498.4 miles. The Bank Stabilization and Navigation features of the project were completed in September 1980. For the reach from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, the total construction cost was $237,942,190 including $8,665,594 for previous project. River access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary and extreme stage fluctuations are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities may be required where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Tbtal contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $171,816 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. A listing of terminal facilities are included in Missouri River Navigation Charts and can be obtained from Kansas City District Engineer for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. The 1974 Base Line Study of the reach of the Missouri River in the Kansas City District estimated recreation use on the river at 1,250,000 recreation days annually. The projected tonnage on the river for CY 1992 was approximately 1.5 million, excluding sand, gravel, and waterway improvement materials. Maintenance: Repair of dikes and revetments by contract. In addition, following work was accomplished by field hired labor: Construction of environmental gaps, dike and revetment repair. Also, the following work was accomplished by District personnel: real estate management, channel reconnaissance, condition studies, surveys and mapping, stream gauging, engineering and design, surveys and layout of construction, and supervision and administration. One construction contract was awarded in 1992; Miami Bend to Amazon. 2. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, and MO Location. This project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the Mouth near St. Louis, a river distance of 732 miles. This location is coincident with the Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project on the river. Existing project. The project is to mitigate losses of fish and wildlife habitat resulting from construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project. The four major components of the plan are restoration of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands (2,500 acres), preservation of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands subject to the effects of riverbed degradation (700 acres), acquisition and development of existing undeveloped habitat on private lands (28,000 acres), and development of terrestrial wildlife habitat on existing undeveloped public lands (16,900 acres). Estimated fully funded cost of the project (1992) is $67,700,000, all Federal. Both the Kansas City and Omaha Districts are involved in the implementation of the project, with Kansas City District involvement directed mainly to sites in Kansas and Missouri. Local cooperation. There is no non-Federal sponsor for the project. The states of Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri are voluntarily serving on a coordinating team which is actively involved in ongoing project activities. Operations during fiscal year. Initial funding was received for land acquisition and construction of mitigation features. Mitigation work was begun in January 1992 on the Grand Pass Wildlife Area, a site owned by the Missouri Department of Conservation. That work was completed in August 1992. Design was completed for mitigation on another site, Louisville Bend Wildlife Area, Iowa. Negotiations with landowners were initiated preparatory to the purchase of lands in all four states with FY 1993 funds. Flood Control 3. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1992) is $182,000,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $29,500,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. The City of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on December 9, 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. The Section 221 agreement was signed by the Kansas City District Engineer on September 8, 1983. 27-2 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and final designs are underway. The first and second channel contracts are complete. A contract for pile stabilization is complete. Railroad relocations are completed in the reach of Stages 1 and 2, and are being negotiated in the Stage 3 reach. A contract for removal of contaminated sediments is complete. The contract for the Paved Reach was awarded, and construction will be completed in early 1994. The Stage 3 Features Design Memorandum was approved and preparations for the plans and specifications for the 12th-23rd Street contract are underway. 4. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. A major tributary of the Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, and Johnson County, Kansas, draining a highly urbanized 29-square-mile.area in the two states. Existing project. The authorized project consists of improving about 7,500 feet of the channel from near Roanoke Parkway downstream to near Troost Avenue in Kansas City. At the request of the sponsor, Kansas City, Missouri, a modified project will be built which provides identical flood protection, but which also accommodates park and recreation development in the authorized reach. Estimated fully funded Federal cost of the modified project (1992) is $20,070,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, relocations, and cash is $23,330,000. Local cooperation. The City of Kansas City and the Corps of Engineers entered into a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) on the project in March 1991. Operations during fiscal year. The Stage 1 construction contract which consisted of removal of a railroad bridge and the Volker Park conduit was completed in April of 1992. Stage 2 plans and specifications were advertised in August 1992, with contract award being completed on 3 November 1992. Stage 2 includes all remaining structural project features. The sponsor (Kansas City, Missouri) is approximately 80 percent complete on its Oak Street bridge, with opening scheduled for April 1993. Replacement by the sponsor of Main-Brookside bridge is fully designed and will begin construction in 1993. 5. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, in Douglas County, Kansas. Lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a height of about 114 feet with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial waste supply and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $57,415,433. Construction was initiated in January 1972, and the project was placed in operation in November 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $6,768,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 5,528,574 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 6. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, 11/2 miles south of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $1,832,394 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $48,129,549. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1946. Project was placed in operation in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 4,364,516 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and installation of instrumentation system in the spillway structure. Study of future operation. In FY 1991 the study of Future Operation at Harlan County Lake was initiated. Since 1965 inflows to Harlan County Lake have declined due to conservation practices and ground water development in the Republican River basin upstream of the project. The reduced inflow resulted in lake levels below elevation 1,932.8 feet, m.s.l., (bottom of irrigation pool and top of sediment pool) in 1991. The low lake levels resulted in negative impacts to the irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife uses of the lake. It is unlikely that inflows will improve in the future. Therefore, a study is needed to develop a detailed inflow operating plan for Harlan County Lake that is in the best public interest. 7. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 21/2 miles west of Hillsdale, in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). 27-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Construction was initiated in December 1974 and project was placed in operation in October 1981. Federal cost of construction was $64,161,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $23,342,756 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. The Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks has a 50-year lease on 12,880 acres for management of land and water areas for public park, recreational, and fish and wildlife purposes. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 503,675 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and repair of south access road. 8. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on Smoky Hill River about 205 river miles above mouth of stream, and about 11 miles northwest of Marquette, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on the left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Ibtal Federal cost of project, including $249,492, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $12,577,227. Construction was initiated in June 1940, and project was placed in operation in May 1948. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 2,304,587 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 9. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about 1/2 mile south of U.S. Highway 40, and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109th Street. Existing project. The Blue Springs dam is an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam is an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 46,900 acre-feet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 2,000 for sedimentation). Federal cost (1992) for both lakes through construction of the project was $140,809,200. Construction was initiated in September 1977, and the project became operational in September 1988. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on July 5, 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Reimbursement for recreation was $15,047,000 of which $450,000 was accomplished during construction by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Project is complete. Land acquisition is complete. Visitation for FY 1992 was 9,426,138 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 10. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Chariton River in north-central Missouri about 2 miles west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in right abutment.'Ibtal reservoir storage capacity is 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1992) is $20,279,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,626,000. Construction was initiated in March 1973. Project was placed in useful operation for flood control on September 1, 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,567,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,626,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the City of Macon, Missouri, for water supply and recreation development. Missouri state agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of City of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979, and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 18, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 1,190,911 visitor hours. Project is 100 percent complete on scheduled work. The remaining unscheduled work is construction of recreation facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 27-4 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT 11. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 4 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $37;436,530. Construction was initiated in July 1967, and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 6,801,720 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 12. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Republican River near village of Alida about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River; and about 4 miles northwest of Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project at request of Governor of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,297,649 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $49,566,492. Construction was initiated in July 1961. Project was placed in operation in June 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $13,045,576 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 9,679,550 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 13. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. On both banks of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. Portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated cost (1992) for the active portion of the project from Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $116,169,000, including $85,389,000 Federal and $20,412,000 non-Federal contributions. Costs of $10,368,000 for lands and damages are to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending completion of restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Current cost estimate for deferred, inactive, and deauthorized portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $255,259,000 (1964, 1986, and 1987 price levels), of which $231,233,000 is Federal cost for construction and $24,026,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1948. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Local sponsors provide all operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Status of individual units of active portion of project at end of fiscal year is shown in Table 27-H on Missouri River Levee System. Planning on Unit L385 and Unit L142 continued. 14. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Delaware River about 5 miles above mouth in Jefferson County, and about 3 miles northwest of Perry, Kansas Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Tobtal reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acrefeet (480,000 for flood control, including 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project plan at request of State of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $724,212 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,095,918. Construction was initiated in March 1964, and the project was placed in operation in January 1969. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $9,208,342 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 11,359,353 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included award of contract for construction of Slough Creek washhouse, renovation of relief wells, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 27-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 15. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 27-B for authorizing legislation and Table 27-I on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) See individual project reports. 16. POMME DE TERRE LAKE POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Location. Dam is on main stem of Pomme de T'rre River, about 44 miles above mouth of stream in Hickory County, Missouri. The lake extending upstream into Polk County, Missouri. Site is about 4 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multipurpose). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $14,946,784. Tobtal Federal cost of project, including $329,140 area redevelopment and $2,089,529 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $17,365,453. Construction was initiated in January 1957, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1961. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 11,508,593 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 17. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Location. Dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 8 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet workes and an ungated chutetype spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total Federal cost of project, including supplemental recreational development $731,130 (Code 710), was $14,003,238. Construction began in July 1959, and the project was placed in operation in October 1963. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Pomona has water supply reimbursement under Water Supply Act of 1958 totaling $71,018. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 9,318,408 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance 18. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Location. Damsite is on Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acre-feet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total Federal cost of project, including $588,948 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), was $27,622,158. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished; and a supplement to the master plan was approved, which resulted in relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization work to compensate for the higher lake levels. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 5,354,010 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included boundary rectification and ordinary operation and maintenance. 19. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,400 feet long crosses a saddle in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the project was $87,685,314. Construction was initiatedin November 1973, and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958, and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance 27-6 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non-Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $737,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on November 27, 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 6,658,106 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 20. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on main stem of Big Blue River, about 12 miles above the mouth of stream in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 5 miles north of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low-flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total Federal cost of project, including $533,048 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $80,584,079. Construction began in October 1952. Project was placed in operation in July 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 2,807,728 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 21. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low flow regulation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total Federal cost of project, including $448,344 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $20,463,367. Construction began in April 1961 and the project was placed in operation in December 1964. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 3,767,310 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activity included replacement of relief wells and ordinary operation and maintenance. Also, a Congressional add of $900,000 was included in FY 92. Renovation of recreation facilities was completed this fiscal year, and contract was awarded for construction of Lucas Park washhouse to be completed in FY 93. 22. SCHEDULING OF FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See T'Pable 27-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 24. DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM Includes planning, training, inspection, supplies and equipment, and personnel. Inspections of non-Federal flood control projects to assure compliance with eligibility and maintenance requirements were performed during FY 92. Damaged Federal flood control projects are also inspected for eligibility for repair. 25. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). Operations for period 1 October 1991 thru 30 September 1992 were as follows: Disaster Preparedness Program. See paragraph 24, above. Emergency Operations. Flooding during the last quarter of FY 92 resulted in considerable costs incurred under the Emergency Operations feature; however, funds to cover reimbursement activities were not received during this fiscal year. Full reimbursement for those events will be received during FY 93. Rehabilitation of Non-Federal Flood Control Works. Although no costs were incurred for repair of non-Federal levees during the fiscal year, one Federal levee was repaired at a cost of $33,136. In addition, the surplus amount of $1,827 of sponsor's contributed funds were revoked as a result of a rehabilitation done in FY 91 of a non-Federal levee. (See Table 27-L for costs.) 27-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948, as amended). Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $5 million. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rightsof- way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit; and prevent future encroachments on improved channels. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 requires the non-Federal sponsors of Section 205 projects to pay 50 percent of the cost of the feasibility study. For structural flood control projects, the sponsor must pay in cash during the construction at least 5 percent of the construction cost. The sponsor's cash and other contributions must equal 25 percent of the total construction cost, but will not be required to exceed 50 percent. There was one Section 205 project under construction in Fiscal Year 1992. Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS, Indian Creek Channel Modification - Construction was started in May 1992 on approximately 1 mile of channel widening of Indian Creek, a tributary of the Blue River in Overland Park. Construction was approximately 90 percent complete as of September 1992. The City of Overland Park, Kansas, and the Corps of Engineers entered into a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) in May 1991. 'Ital estimated Federal cost is $770,000 and $257,000 non-Federal for lands, relocations, and cash. See Table L for expenditures under Section 205 during Fiscal Year 1992. Emergency Streambank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Each project selected must be complete in itself, engineeringly feasible, economically justifiable, environmentally acceptable, and limited to a Federal statutory cost of not more than $500,000. The local sponsoring entity must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; provide over the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Arrmy free from damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limit. Projects that were physically complete in FY 1991 and financially complete in FY 1992 are as follows (for project description, see FY 91 Annual Report): Big Blue River, Blue Springs, NE, Sewerline and Road Little Blue River, Thayer County, NE, Gilead North Bridge Little Blue River, Washington County, KS, County Road Little Blue River, Washington County, KS, Spence Bridge Projects that were physically and financially complete in FY 1992 are as follows: 102 River, Nodaway County, MO, South Pickering Bridge - Construction was completed in October 1991 to protect a county bridge and road. The project consists of a stone-fill revetment along the left streambank. Tkibutary to Kill Creek, DeSoto, KS, Sewage Treatment Plant - Construction was completed in April 1992 to protect a city sewage treatment plant. The project consists of a stone-fill revetment along the right streambank. Republican River, Clifton, KS, Sewage Lagoons - Construction was completed in February 1992 to protect a city sewage lagoon. The project consists of a stone-fill revetment along the left streambank. See Table 27-L for Emergency Streambank Protection expenditures during FY 1992. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on main stem of Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet above streambed, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway and a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating units with a combined generating capability of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri, to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. Estimated cost (1992) through construction of the project is $547,710,000. Construction of relocated Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964. The embankment has been completed including the paved roadway on top of the dam. The spillway was completed in October 1979. The Southwestern Power Administration powerline needed for final testing and commercial operation of the generators was completed in December 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on December 22, 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearings required remedial design on the bearings. Restricted commercial power production began in April 1982. Through September 1992, power generation totaled 3,185,154,800 kilowatt hours. Of the gross income 27-8 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT From the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $66,043,862 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project power operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operation during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 13,917,693 visitor hours. Work was continued on real estate activities and construction of powerplant features. Project is 99 percent complete. During FY 1992, 138,781,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance activities consisted of continuation of repair of turbine blades, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 27. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with Osage River, and about 1 mile east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri, lake extending into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200-kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,715,300. Cost of the project, including $3,758,000 for downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $79,975,357. Construction was initiated in October 1963, and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000 kilowatt level. Right-of-way for construction of a channel cutoff and bridge at Horseshoe Bend were acquired, and construction completed. Sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills were acquired. Completion assured downstream channel capacity to Caplinger Mills of 8,000 c.f.s. for powerplant operation. Discharge in this range will accommodate power operations at a 39,500-kilowatt level. Through September 1992, power generation totaled 1,160,812,800 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $22,936,835 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1992 was 8,103,433 visitor hours. The project is complete and in operational status. During FY 1992, 40,211,000 kilowatthours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance: Activities consisted of renovation of Ruark Bluff public use area and ordinary operation and maintenance. General Investigations 28. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal year 1992 costs totaled $960,387 for all General Investigations activities. See Table 27-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, and Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 27-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT ii See Section 27-10 TABLE 27-A n Text Project Funding 1. Missouri River, New Work: Sioux City, IA Approp. to Mouth (Rulo, Cost Nebr., to Mouth) Maint. (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Contributed Funds New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Consolidated New Work: Summary Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2. Missouri River Fish New Work: & Wildlife Mitigation, Approp. IA, NE, KS & MO Cost 3. Blue River Channel New Work: Kansas City, MO Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Contributed Funds New Work: Approp. Cost Consolidated New Work: Summary Approp. Cost 4. Brush Creek, New Work: Kansas City, MO Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Contributed Funds New Work: Authorized Project Approp. Cost Expanded Project4 New Work: Approp. Cost Consolidated New Work: Summary Approp. Cost 5. Clinton Lake, New Work: Wakarusa Approp. River, KS Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6. Harlan County New Work: Lake, Republican Approp. River, NE Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 7. Hillsdale Lake, New Work: Big Bull Approp. Creek, KS Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 - - - - 237,942,1901 - - - - 237,942,1901 5,424,000 4,052,460 3,954,000 4,355,000 297,775,7742 5,274,000 4,200,762 3,955,698 4,355,000 297,775,7742 - - - - 816,190 - - - - 816,190 - - - - 22,642 - - - - 22,642 - - - - 238,758,3801 - - - - 238,758,3801 5,424,000 4,052,460 3,954,000 4,355,000 297,798,416 5,274,000 4,200,762 3,955,698 4,355,000 297,798,416 223,000 219,000 572,000 1,014,000 167,395 263,858 580,300 1,011,553 7,031,000 5,141,000 8,154,000 14,703,000 62,949,171 9,982,519 5,170,969 8,158,558 14,703,356 62,948,1733 - - 32,400 - 32,400 - - 20,000 12,381 32,381 - - 8,186,400 14,703,000 62,981,571 - - 8,178,558 14,715,737 62,980,5543 255,000 380,000 695,000 1,078,000 3,973,000 259,530 297,961 777,092 1,077,856 3,972,815 - - 342,000 - 342,000 - - 11,721 328,936 340,657 - - 3,445,000 2,867,000 6,312,000 - - 130,800 536,721 667,5214 - - 4,482,000 3,945,000 10,627,000 - - 919,613 1,943,513 4,980,9934 - - - - 57,415,433 - - - - 57,415,4335 1,300,000 1,291,100 1,557,000 1,342,000 15,720,600 1,301,490 1,291,110 1,524,937 1,374,063 15,720,600 - - - - 47,111,926 - - - - 47,111,9266 1,203,000 1,229,923 1,553,000 1,810,000 25,145,684 1,202,000 1,219,576 1,565,597 1,810,000 25,145,684 - - - - 1,017,623 - - - - 1,017,623 - - 64,161,400 - - - - 64,161,400 807,000 577,670 829,000 1,310,500 7,426,870 817,000 560,739 845,931 1,310,500 7,426,870 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 8. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS 9. Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, MO 10. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, MO Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 11. Melvern Lake Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 12. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 13. Missouri River Levee System IA, NE, KS and MO 14. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 16. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 17. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,: 2,' 1, 222,000 2,681,302 222,000 2,644,205 742,000 -100,000 642,178 1,470,599 838,000 761,084 837,970 743,328 - -70,000 15,371 697 627,000 564,412 627,000 563,110 - 11,554 - 28,393 - -58,446 15,371 29,090 1,205,000 1,242,097 185,000 160,008 951,000 968,787 161 603,000 604,302 1,239,300 1,206,465 -26,000 88,066 793,000 793,000 623,000 623,000 161 - 1,292,000 1,324,694 1,462,000 1,682,000 1,292,000 1,321,419 1,465,275 1,582,000 1,631,000 1,630,995 655,000 809,164 1,829,616 1,818,913 387,000 384,449 1,660,000 1,670,708 400,000 402,316 1,517,800 1,517,800 1,270,000 1,260,993 12,577,227 12,577,2277 24,530,212 24,497,377 140,809,200 140,809,2008 4,260,784 4,260,784 18,216,177 18,216,177 6,618,112 6,618,112 1,108,0759 1,032,717 19,324,252 19,248,894 37,436,530 37,436,530 19,731,054 19,631,054 49,566,492 49,566,492 25,676,940 25,676,940 62,630,851 62,621,560 - - - - 49,095,918 - - - - 49,095,918 1,651,000 1,565,189 1,915,000 2,178,000 27,883,173 1,630,496 1,585,369 1,917,824 1,789,990 27,495,163 - - - - 17,365,452 - - - - 17,365,452 1,346,000 1,345,489 1,537,000 1,710,000 25,258,101 1,347,500 1,333,858 1,548,631 1,684,494 25,232,595 - - - - 14,003,238 - - - - 14,003,238 1,262,000 1,223,287 1,336,000 1,540,000 21,681,420 1,274,229 1,201,462 1,355,418 1,542,407 21,681,420 27-11 i i REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 18. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA 19. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO 20. Tuttle Creek Lake Big Blue River, KS 21. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS 22. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 24. Disaster Preparedness Program- Inspections 26. Harry S. Truman Dam & Reservoir Osage River, MO 27. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost M aint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,535,000 1,408,793 1,811,000 1,923,000 1,535,500 1,367,746 1,852,047 1,923,000 1,246,000 936,848 1,073,000 983,000 1,246,000 932,462 1,077,386 950,500 1,666,000 1,596,153 2,240,000 1,527,000 1,672,600 1,571,371 2,264,782 1,527,000 1,234,000 1,251,658 1,450,000 2,034,000 1,209,540 1,258,428 1,467,690 1,838,084 180,000 225,969 180,000 225,969 338,000 324,616 338,000 324,616 200,25010 200,241 2,660,000 2,359,661 200,000 180,922 243,000 242,000 243,000 242,000 375,000 375,000 180,913 200,000 427,000 427,000 182,000 181,955 27,622,159 27,622,159 25,732,711 25,732,711 87,685,314 87,685,314 10,999,448 10,966,948 80,584,079 80,584,079 27,664,432 27,664,432 20,463,367 20,463,367 20,441,504 20,245,588 55,246,452 55,246,452 6,111,431 6,111,431 1,393,16310 1,393,118 2,746,000 3,552,000 2,526,000 544,441,900 2,873,772 4,278,405 2,724,080 544,431,741 6,012,500 7,822,962 6,172,000 7,810,800 67,113,162 6,026,000 7,659,290 6,329,552 7,464,705 66,760,947 9,756 178 6,737 79,975,357 79,975,357 2,777,500 3,031,371 2,919,000 3,666,800 38,174,671 2,775,794 3,013,528 2,938,376 3,639,973 38,147,671 1. Includes $8,665,594 costs of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Excludes $35,296 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized Blue River Channel project (Blue River Channel Mobay Chemical 1984-1987). 4. Corps is building Brush Creek Expanded Project requested by sponsor, City of Kansas City, MO, with all costs of betterments and enhancements not required by Authorized Project funded by sponsor. Excludes sponsor's contributions of $1,374,829 during Preconstruction and Engineering phase, and $162,459 for Park Features Design during construction. 5. Excludes $118,805 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized Clinton Lake project (1973-1979). 6. Excludes cost of materials furnished Harlan County project without charge in the amount of $24,198. 7. Excludes cost of materials furnished Kanopolis Lake project without charge in the amount of $7,885. 8. Excludes $2,732,554 thru FY 1990 non-Federal contributions not required for authorized Little Blue River Lakes project. 9. Corrected total. Excludes $42,149 interest during construction at Long Branch Lake project. 10. After FY 1988 inspections of non-Federal levees previously funded under O&M are funded under FC&CE, 96X3125 (910-140) Disaster Preparedness Program- Inspections which had a carryover into FY 1989 of $250. 27-12 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 12, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to mouth. Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (374.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. For a mimimum width of 200 feet and depth of 6 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends, mouth to upper end of Quindaro Bend, Kansas City, MO. Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6-foot channel depth between Kansas City, MO, Quindaro bend, and Sioux City, IA. Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, IA. Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. MISSOURI RIVER.FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION MO, KS, IA, & NE Project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project, MO, KS, IA, & NE: April 24, 1984, Report of Chief of Engineers, authorized at estimated cost of $51,900,000. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Project for flood control on Brush Creek, a tributary of the Blue River, Kansas City, MO, authorized at estimated total cost of $16,100,000. Modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct the project substantially in accordance with the Post Authorization Change Report, dated April 1989 (revised January 1990), at a total cost of $26,200,000. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS The project for the Kansas River, KS, NE, and CO is authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 241-62. H. Doc 463, 64th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 585-68. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., P.L. 560-70. P.L. 67-73 H.R.11781 P.L. 520-71 H. Doc 238, 73d Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 409-73 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 14-79. Title VI, Section 601(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong. Sec. 401(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662 Water Resources Development Act of 1990, P.L. 101-640. 1962 Flood Control Act S. Doc 122, H. Doc 578, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. 27-13 2. 3. 5. 6. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 27-B (Continued) See Section in Text Date of Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized 8. Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin. approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as amended and supplemented is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Kansas River and tributaries. It is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Osage River and tributaries. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Chariton and Little Chariton Rivers and tributaries, IA and MO, is authorized at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217.710,000 additional expenditure. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to Kansas City. Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth and provided for increased protection. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 27-14 Documents P.L. 780, 83rd Cong., H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong. H. Does. 642, 549k and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 549k 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Does. 642, 549k and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. r TABLE 27-B (Continued) See Section Date of in Text Act May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 30, 1963 Jun. 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 24, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 16. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 17. 18. 19. Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Additional $116 million for prosecution on general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program. Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,000,000 additional expenditure. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Expanded general comprehenssive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Platte River and tributaries, MO and IA, is authorized at an estimated cost of $26,889,000. 27-15 Documents H. Docs. 642 and 549k 83rd Cong. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., PL. 761. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. H. Does. 642, 5491 and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 5491 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 561, 83rd Cong., PL. 780. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, 89th Cong.) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS 20. Jun. 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Flood Control Committee River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiatiion Doc. 1, 75th Cong., and partial accomplishment. P.L. 761. Aug. 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, P.L. 77-228. NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure. P.L. 534. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS 21. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure. P.L. 534. Jul. 14, 19602 Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong., of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River P.L. 645. Basin. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO 26. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 549 , 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional P.L. 780. expenditure. Oct. 23, 1962 The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby modified in 1962 Flood Control Act, accordance with recommendations of the Chief of H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., Engineers in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., at an P.L. 87-874. estimated additional cost of $43,245,000; provided, that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition of additional lands for the establishment of a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO 27. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 549 , 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional P.L. 780. expenditure. 1. Contains latest published maps of Missouri River. 2. Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last' Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 - Gasconade River, MO '1, 2 Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 Osage River, MO, lock and dam3 Complete 1952 658,076 850,495 1. Improvement adequate for existing needs. Project for maintenance only. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2. Inactive portion of project deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(1) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 3. Operation of lock and dam placed in standby status in July 1952; deauthorized on Jan. 1, 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(1) of WRDA (P.L. 99-662). 27-16 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Abilene, KS Atchison, KS Barnard, KS' Bartley, NE Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA' Big Blue River, Seward, NE' Big Stranger Creek, KS' Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO2 Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO2 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)3 Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) East Muddy Creek, MO2 Elk Creek, Clyde, KS' Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS' Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) Indianola, NE Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS4 Lawrence, Kansas River, KS5 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO Lower Grand River, MO2 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO2 Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 Act) Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO2 ' 6 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Seward, NE' Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS' Topeka, Kansas River, KS Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO2 Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO Upper Grand River, MO2 1. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2. Grand River Basin reconnaissance study (authorized by resolution of Committee on Public Works and Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives on July 3, 1987) reviewed and updated costs for these projects authorized in the Flood Control Act of 1965, and found no economically feasible plan. 3. Inactive units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork were deauthorized 1 Jan. 1990 by Section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Construction cost includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek Unit and $211,600 cost of deauthorized Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork units. 4. Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. 5. Includes $153,377 non-Federal contributions. 6. Pattonsburg Lake Highway Relocation and Town Relocation portions of the project were deauthorized 1 Jan. 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 27-17 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive 1965 1973 1953 1974 1966 1976 1977 1973 1966 1984 1973 1976 1966 1984 1950 1984 1980 1985 1989 1966 1967 1976 1973 1966 1976 1982 1973 1975 1967 1973 1972 1974 1966 1990 1966 1,099,350 4,099,590 127,860 118,269 652,414 126,887 337,131 451,400 692,7063 8,052,990 989,015 726,966 757,500 1,271,025 2,782,793 67,275 25,010,500 42,434,197 8,773,488 25,530,083 2,488,585 432,245 139,883 2,036,624 4,462,661 5,315,168 222,193 700,000 3,878,668 126,887 6,896 246,995 21,174,593 1,570,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Arlington Lake, MO 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, $8,651 - Aug. 5, 1977 Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act) - Inactive Units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork Units only 1 Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO Hays, Big Creek, KS2 Indian Lake, Blue River, KS Kansas River Navigation Marysville, KS Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvements) KS (1974 Act) Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS Mill Lake, Blue River, MO Missouri River Levee System, IA, KS, MO, and NE Deauthorized by Section 1002 Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662, Section 1002: Units R402; R393-395; and R414 Deauthorized in accordance with WRDA Section 1001(b)(1): Units L36; R42; L51; R55-59-61; L68-92; R70; L78; R87; L94; L99; L103; R104; R107; R112; L117; L121; L124; L129; L134; L137-139; L145; R150; L154; L157; R161; L164; R169; L175; R179-184; L191-196; L205; L217; R226; R240; R251; L256; R259; R263-270; R272; R284; R302; R336; L353; L357; R361; L362; L392; L419-426; L435; R512-513, Section III Ona a Lake, Vermillion Creek, Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO3 I-35 Highway Relocation Town Relocation Pioneer Lake, KS 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1974 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 281, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1973 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1977 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong. 2d sess.) - Authorized by Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1974 Flood Control Act of 1965 approved October 27, 1965 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1980 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, Sec. 201 - Flood Control Act of September 3, 1954 - Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Section 17 1970 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1971 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) - Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. - Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. Flood Control Act of 1962, October 23, 1962 (P.L. 87-874) 1976 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 1976 (H. Doc. 241, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1952 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 1965 1977 - May 6, 1981 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Aug. 5, 1977 Jan. 18, 1978 16,317 211,600 51,989 71,466 1,754,019 499,200 127,297 259,900 133,682 39,708 57,500 1,631,700 2,178,261 393,623 91,929 95,692 27-18 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Jan. 1967 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Nov. 27, 1973 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Jan. 1, 1990 - Aug. 5, 1977 TABLE 27-G (Continued) KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Pomme de Terre Lake 1954- Flood Control Act of 1954 - - Nov. 17, 1986 (Power Addition), MO 1974 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.) Richland Lake, MO 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 8,548 - Aug. 5, 1977 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 2, 1944 Tomahawk Lake, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 77,189 - Nov. 17, 1986 Blue River, KS 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road 1977 Sec. 18 of Water Resources 3,000 - Nov. 17, 1986 Improvement - 1974 Mod.) Development Act of 1974 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS - Water Resources Development Act - - Jan. 1, 1990 Road and Bridge (1976 Act) of 1976, Section 189, P.L. 94-587 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 1,095,020 - Nov. 17, 1986 KS 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1. For completed Shoal Creek unit of Chariton-Little 3. Pattonsburg Lake portion of project is inactive. See Chariton Basin, MO, see Table 27-E. Table 27-E. 2. Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS, Section 205 feasibility study terminated in March 1991 due to lack of identifiable project that would meet dam safety concerns. TABLE 27-H MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 13 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R512-513 Richardson Co. Drainage Dist #7' 19.1 Complete-1958 R500 Iowa Point Drainage Dist #4 4.1 Complete-1954 Kimsey Holly Creek 4.4 Complete-1970 L497 Forest City Levee Dist 16.0 Complete-1962 L488 Holt Co. Drainage Dist #7 11.5 Complete-1955 R482 Burr Oak Drainage Dist #3 8.2 Complete-1954 L476 Amazonia Levee Dist 10.8 Complete--1956 R460-471 Elwood-Gladden Levee Dist 13.8 Complete-1968 L455 S. St. Joseph Levee Dist 15.6 Complete-1967 L443-448 Halls Levee Dist 17.3 Complete- 1957 R440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. Drainage Dist 10.7 Complete-1959 L408 Farley-Beverly Drainage Dist 12.2 Complete (Levee raise modification)-1972 L400 Waldron Levee Dist 7.6 Complete-1957 R351 Atherton Levee Dist 15.9 Complete-1966 L246 Brunswick-Dalton Drainage Dist 20.0 Complete-1983 (Restudy initiated Feb 92) 434.5 Atchison, KS, Railroad Bridge Inactive 408.2 Leavenworth, KS, Railroad Bridge Inactive R331 Inactive L330-345 Orrick Levee Dist 43.4 Inactive R328 Inactive L319-325 Henrietta-Crooked River Drainage Dist 35.0 Inactive L100 Inactive R30 Inactive L15 North County Levee Dist 40.0 Inactive L504-512-519 Deferred L294 Wakenda Creek Area Deferred L385 Riverside-Quindaro Drainage Dist 6.5 Recommended for new construction start FY 94 L142 Jefferson City, MO Reclassified to Active May 91, planning continues Remaining units Detailed planning not initiated 1. Section III of R512-513 was not constructed and was deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990. 27-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 27-I KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 15 of Text) Project Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS Bartley, Republican River, NE Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS' Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS" Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS Indianola, Republican River, NE Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS Lawrence, Kansas River, KS Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement). KS (1974 Authorization)4 Milford Lake, Republican River, KS Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth " Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO Topeka, Kansas River, KS Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS Tuttle Creek Lake, KS-Road and Bridge (1976 Act)' Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Modification) ' Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS $1,099,350 118,269 90,500,000 71,466' 48,129,549 548,700,000 64,161,400 67,275 12,577,227 8,620,111 2,488,585 37,436,530 500,000 49,566,492 85,389,000 2,036,624 4,462,661 49,095,918 17,365,453 14,003,238 3,878,668 79,975,357 21,174,593 80,584,079 630,000 500,000 20,463,367 1. Inactive. 2. Deauthorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662 (See Table 27-G). 3. Total Federal funds expended. 4. Deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990. in accordance with WRDA of 1986, Section 1001(b)(1). TABLE 27-J INSPECTION C 5. Active portion of project. Deferred portion of project is currently estimated to cost (1992) $46,753,000 Federal and $4,336,000 non-Federal. Inactive portion of project is currently estimated to cost (1990) $182,791,000 Federal and $19,690,000 non-Federal. Actual cost of deauthorized units (1990) is $1,689,000 Federal. )F COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Missouri River Main Stem Missouri River Levees: R512-513, R500, Kimsey Holly Creek, L497, L488, R482, L476, R460-471, L455, L443-448, R440, L408, L400 and R351, L246 Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas: Argentine, Armourdale, Birmingham, CID (Mo & Kans), East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, North Kansas City Units, and GSA Federal Complex Osage River, Kansas and Missouri Ottawa, Kansas Osawatomie, Kansas Kansas River and Minor Tributaries Topeka, Kansas; Auburndale, North Topeka, Oakland, Soldier Creek, South Topeka, and Waterworks Units Republican River, Nebraska and Kansas Bartley, Nebraska Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers Abilene, Kansas 27-20 Estimated Federal Cost Estimated Non-Federal Cost $287,000 9,500 44,800,000 138,385,000 23,342,756 7,592 2,130,000 265,000 214,300 20,412,000 348,300 876,000 1,960,000 17,458,000 10,383,492 610,000 214,300 Location Month Inspected Mar/Sep 92 May/Sep 92 Mar/Sep 92 Mar/Sep 92 Mar/Sep 92 Mar/Oct 92 Mar/Oct 92 TABLE 27-K KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 28 of Text) Item and CWIS Number SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO - 12563 Dry Fork and East Fork, Fishing River, MO - 12815 Marysville, KS - 12820 Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO - 12381 Subtotal Special Studies (140) Ft. Leonard Wood Solid Waste Mgmt - 14149 Kansas Water Supply - 14149 Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) MRLS, Unit L246, Cutoff Lake, MO - 53899 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations - 17250 FERC Licensing Activities - 53857 Dam Safety Criteria Studies North American Waterfowl Mgmt - 53904 Subtotal Coordinate Studies with Other Agencies (180) Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) - 51840 Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. Interior (182) - 51820 Regional Planning (183) - 53847 Cooperation with States (186) Negotiation Funds, KS - 14800 Negotiation Funds, MO- 14880 Planning Assistance to States, MO Wetlands Inventory - 29001 Planning Assistance to States, Kansas - 14820 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Service Unit - 82030 Overland Park, KS - 83020 Quick Responses - 82045 Special Studies - Kansas City, MO - 83010 Technical Services, General - 82040 Hydrology Studies (260) Hydrology Studies - 53820 TOTAL (Category 200) PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Navigation Projects (620) Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation (621) - 14105 TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 27-21 Federal Cost FY 92 Totals By Categories $39,000 54,395 35,289 319,000 $447,684 $9,073 8,685 $17,758 $132,055 $80,000 5,000 8,000 20,049 $113,049 $5,624 14,000 14,000 5,488 5,283 904 1,413 $46,712 $757,258 $30,000 20,382 7,454 31,338 81,209 22,000 $192,383 $10,746 $10,746 $960,387 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 27-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 25 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Status' Cost Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended Mill Creek, Olathe, KS R $42,649 Blackwater River and Davis Creek, Sweet Springs, MO R 31,756 Eureka Valley Tributary of Seven-Mile Creek, Manhattan/Riley County, KS R 25,920 Cross Creek, Rossville, KS P 439,354 Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS C 531,094 TOTAL FOR 5 ACTIVE PROJECTS: $1,070,773 1 Section 205 study (terminated in FY 1991), financially completed 722 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $1,071,495 Emergency Streambank Protection - Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress July 24, 1946, as Amended Little Blue River, Washington County, KS, Spence Bridge O $1,376 Little Blue River, Washington County, KS, County Road O 1,594 Little Blue River, Thayer County, NE, Gilead North Bridge 0 1,324 Big Blue River, Blue Springs, NE, Sewerline and Road 0 1,045 102 River, Nodaway County, MO, South Pickering Bridge 0 14,201 Tributary of Kill Creek, DeSoto, KS, Sewage Treatment Plant 0 26,009 Republican River, Clifton, KS, Sewage Lagoons 0 90,151 Rock Creek, Pottawatomie County, KS, County Bridge P 3,301 West Nodaway River, Page 1 Rural Water District, Clarinda, IA P 7,133 West Fork Grand River, MO Highway and Transportation Dept., Route 46A P 15,366 Hinkson Creek, Columbia, MO, Sewerline F 9,048 Blackwater River Tributary, Warrensburg, MO, 10-Inch Sewerline F 1,675 Blackwater River Tributary, Warrensburg, MO, 15-Inch Sewerline F 1,202 Blue River, Gregory Boulevard, Kansas City, MO F 9,653 Bear Creek, Warrensburg, MO, 24-Inch Sewerline F 3,140 Bear Creek, Warrensburg, MO, 27-Inch Sewerline F 2,971 West Fork Grand River, Worth County, MO, County Road and Bridge F 1,206 Grand River, Brunswick Levee District, MO, Levee F 530 TOTAL FOR 18 ACTIVE PROJECTS: $190,925 5 Section 14 studies were terminated in FY 1992. total 8,981 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $199,906 Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work - Public Law 99 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (Appropriation 96X3125) Disaster Preparedness Program - 100 Corps Statutory Activities $166,841 Activities in Support of Others 123,355 Facilities 143,350 Inspections 181,956 Total Disaster Preparedness Program $615,502 Emergency Operations - 200 0 Rehabilitation- 300 Federal Flood Control Works $33,136 Non-Federal Flood Control Works -1,827 Total Rehabilitation $31,309 TOTAL ALL ACTIVITIES $646,811 1. Status: R = Recon; F = Feasibility; P = P&S: C = Construction; O = Operational 27-22 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS DISTRICT* The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri within the Arkansas River, Little River, and White River basins. In Arkansas River Basin, the District is responsible for those areas embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above and exclusive of Pine Bluff, AR, and below the mouth of the Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. The District has responsibility for planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance of the navigation portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System in the State of Arkansas (including that portion below Pine Bluff). In Little River Basin, the District is responsible for those portions of the drainage basin of the Arkansas portion of Little River and its tributaries above its mouth near Fulton, AR. In White River Basin, the District is responsible for those portions in southern Missouri and northern and eastern Arkansas embraced in the White River drainage basin and its tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on the White River below Newport, AR, to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. The White River downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is part of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. AR River Basin, AR, OK, and KS .................... 28-2 2. Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No.9), AR ...... 28-2 3. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, AR ... 28-3 4. David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No.6), AR ........... 28-3 5. Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No.4) ........... 28-3 6. James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No.13) .......... 28-3 7. Lock No. 2 and Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No.2), AR.. 28-3 8. Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No.3), AR ................ 28-4 9. Lock and Dam No.5, AR ................................. 28-4 10. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, AR ........................................ 28-4 11. Murray Lock and Dam (No.7), AR ...................... 28-4 12. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..... 28-4 13. Norrell Lock and Dam (No.1) and Entrance Channel, AR ............ ........................ 28-4 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 28-4 15. Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No.8), AR........ 28-4 Flood Control 16. Black River Obstruction Removal, Butler Co., MO ........................................ .. 28-5 17. Blue Mountain Lake, AR ................................. 28-5 18. Clearwater Lake, MO ................................... .. 28-5 19. DeQueen Lake, AR ........................................ 28-6 20. Dierks Lake, AR ..................................... 28-6 21. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................................... 28-6 22. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR ............ 28-6 23. Gillham Lake, AR ........................................... 28-7 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................................... 28-7 25. Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR ...... 28-7 26. Little River Basin, AR ..................................... 28-7 27. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR .............................. 28-7 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. M illwood Lake, AR ............................................... 28-8 Nimrod Lake, AR .................. .............. ..28-8 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects...............28-8 Petit Jean River, Highway 309, AR......................28-8 Red River, 1-30, Little River Co., AR......................28-9 Red River, Hwy 71, Little River Co., AR................28-9 White River Basin (Little Rock Dist, AR & MO)......28-9 White River, Batesville, AR ............................... 28-10 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 36. Beaver Lake, AR .............................................. 28-10 37. Bull Shoals Lake, AR ..................................... 28-10 38. Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No.10), AR................. 28-11 39. Greers Ferry Lake, AR...................................... 28-11 40. Norfork Lake, AR ..................................... 28-12 41. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No.13), AR ...28-12 42. Table Rock Lake, MO ................................... 28-12 General Investigations 43. Surveys ..................................... 28-13 44. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................ 28-13 Tables Table 28-A, Cost and Financial Statement................... 28-14 Table 28-B, Authorizing Legislation............................ 28-18 Table 28-C, Other Authorized Navigation Projects....... 28-21 Table 28-E, Other Authorized Flood Control Projects................................ 28-22 Table 28-G, Deauthorized Projects............................ 28-23 Table 28-H, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation............................ 28-24 Table 28-1, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Lakes.............................. 28-28 Table 28-J, Little River Basin, AR: Lakes ................. 28-29 Table 28-K, White River Basin, AR & Mo: Lakes......... 28-30 28-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND KS Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near Leadville, CO, and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA. (See Geological Survey state maps, 1:24,000, and flood control and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, 1970 edition scale 1:62,500.) Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel 9 feet deep and 444.8 miles long, beginning at mouth of WhiteRiver, which enters Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA, thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 49.8 miles up Verdigris River to head of navigation at Catoosa, OK. The waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark- Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiplepurpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for Verdigris River, 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River Entrance Channel. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and two in Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal cost are summarized in tables 28-H and 28-I, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation and Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Lakes,respectively. See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. For McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear the increased costs of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Pine Bluff (Jefferson County), Little Rock, and Fort Smith, AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa-Rogers County), OK. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark, and Van Buren, AR, and Sallisaw, OK. Terminal facilities are in operation or being built at 35 locations in Arkansas and at 25 locations in Oklahoma along the improved waterways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. (See tables 28-H and 28-I for navigation and lake listings.) For details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, see the Tulsa District report. Flood damages prevented by Little Rock District projects in the Arkansas River Basin during FY 92 are estimated at $6,574,180; flood losses prevented through FY 92 are estimated $478,354,680. Projections on navigation activities in calendar year 1992 indicated that about 9.2 million tons of commerce were to be moved on the Arkansas portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. This represents about the same level of activity reported for calendar year 1991. Details of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Arkansas are shown on the following pages. Condition at end of fiscal year. (See tables 28-H and 28- I, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation/ Lakes, respectively, for status for individual items, navigation project, lakes, and basin plan.) Work continues on the Arkansas River project in this District including construction of a meander cutoff levee between the Arkansas and White Rivers, extension of the stilling basin at Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No. 2) and land acquisition studies. Tow haulage equipment has been added to David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Lock and Dam No. 5, Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4), and Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No. 3); this equipment will be operational in June 1993. The project design for the low-stage water problem on the White River at Montgomery Point is in progress. 2. ARTHUR V. ORMOND LOCK & DAM (NO. 9), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower project, under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, is scheduled to be placed into operation by August 1993 with overall completion scheduled for May 1994. Rockefeller Lake (pool 9) has four developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 3.1 million visitor-hours that resulted in $10,000 fee revenue. 28-2 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. Construction of Holla Bend closure structure (fish and wildlife mitigation) began in July 1986 and was completed in September 1987. 3. McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, AR Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas-White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining Arkansas and White rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. For a complete description of reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project, see the FY 81 Annual Report. Total Federal cost to date is $119,300,184 for existing project in Little Rock District. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) 4. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and lock and dam project was placed in operation in August 1968. Tow haulage equipment has been added and will be operational in June 1993. Currently has two developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 3.6 million visitor-hours that resulted in $12,300 fee revenue. 5. EMMETT SANDERS LOCK AND DAM (NO. 4), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool4 has two developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.3 million visitor-hours that resulted in $1,800 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and lock and dam project was placed in operation in December 1968. Construction of a 40-foot wide, 9,600 long highway bridge crossing the lock and dam began February 1992 and is scheduled for completion in October 1993. The Corps of Engineers, as the Federal agency, has jurisdiction and custody of the dam (23 U.S.C. 320 [Public Law 85-67]). The project is 100 percent funded by the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department and the Federal Highway Administration. Tow haulage equipment has been added and scheduled to be operational in June 1993. 6. JAMES W. TRIMBLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 13), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY 92, the project's three developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 3.6 million visitor-hours which resulted in $26,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and lock and dam were placed in operation in April 1969. Bridge across dam was completed in July 1968. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in November 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 7. LOCK NO. 2 AND WILBUR D. MILLS DAM (NO. 2), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Wilbur D. Mills has four developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.6 million visitor-hours that resulted in $72,300 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. Lock was placed in operation in March 1968. Emergency repairs to the scour protection features and tainter gates at the dam that resulted from a barge accident in December 1982 were completed in FY 85. The barges that clogged the dam gates during the December 1982 flood showed that, with a certain set of circumstances (higher than normal head combined with the clogged gates resulted in high current velocity that caused both upstream and downstream scouring), the structure could fail. This condition exists primarily because the structure was constructed on piling and designed for all of the gates to operate in unison. A model study by the Waterways Experiment Station determined the most feasible solution to this problem is to extend the stilling basin downstream. A contract to extend the stilling basin was awarded in June 1990; completion is scheduled for December 1993. Project costs are estimated at $21.6 million. 28-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 8. JOE HARDIN LOCK AND DAM (NO. 3), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 3 has three developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 2.6 million visitor-hours that resulted in $11,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. Tow haulage equipment has been installed and will be operational in 1993. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operation and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 5 has two developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.2 million visitor-hours that resulted in $26,100 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. Tow haulage equipment has been added and will be operational in June 1993. 10. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of Dardanelle Marine Terminal began June 1968 and was placed in operation in November 1969. 11. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Murray has five developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 6.4 million visitor-hours that resulted in $132,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in May 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies under the small project continuing authorities program, navigation activities, Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. No activity during this fiscal year. 13. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO. 1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Recommended modification. The White River Entrance Channel is the first reach in the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System project. The water surface elevation in the entrance channel is controlled by the elevation of the Mississippi River. Feasibility studies were conducted to determine a solution to a low-stage water problem. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES), Vicksburg, MS, conducted a test model which showed that an additional lock and dam in the entrance channel would relieve restrictions on the navigation system during low flows. WES determined that other alternatives tested would not solve the low-flow problem. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. The project currently has one developed park which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 130,000 visitor-hours; no fee revenue was realized. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963, and lock and dam were placed in operation in June 1967. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See table 28-C for other authorized navigation projects.) 15. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) 28-4 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY 92, the project's five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 4.2 million visitor-hours that resulted in $46,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Conway water supply project was completed and transferred to the city for operation and maintenance in July 1983. Flood Control 16. BLACK RIVER OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL, BUTLER COUNTY, MO Location. The project area begins approximately 6 miles south of Poplar Bluff, MO, and extends to Arkansas State line. This area is about 160 miles south of St. Louis, MO. Existing project. The Detailed Project Report recommends removing all major blockages from the channel just upstream of the Hargrove Bridge (R.M. 198.4) to the Arkansas State line (R.M. 170.9). The plan also involves the cutting of dead, dying or damaged rooted trees which are leaning over the channel at an angle greater than 30 degrees and in danger of falling and creating a blockage to flows. Local cooperation. The local cooperation agreement was signed May 15, 1992, by the Butler County Commission, the project sponsor, in accordance with Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936, and amendments thereto. Operations and results during fiscal year. The feasibility study was completed and Detailed Project Report was prepared and approved in April 1991. Plans and specifications have been completed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project contract is scheduled to be awarded in early 1993, and construction completion is scheduled in late FY 93. Project construction will be accomplished under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 17. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-1: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes.) Existing project. Construction cost was approximately $5.1 million. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of 1962 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 28-B.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 92 are estimated at $1,314,530; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1992, are estimated at $23,693,280. The project's seven developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 2.5 million visitor-hours that resulted in $47,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational sanitary facilities. Construction of the project began in May 1940 and was placed in operation in March 1947. 18. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & MO: Lakes.) Existing project. Construction cost, including the cost of modifying the project, is estimated at $22.4 million. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Major rehabilitation. Construction began in November 1987 on a seepage berm on the upstream face of the dam, a grout curtain on the right abutment, and a parapet wall along the dam. An additional 9 acres of land was acquired to widen the spillway from 190 feet to 370 feet. The widened spillway will pass about 90 percent of the probable maximum flood with water surface at the top of existing dam and parapet wall, preventing waves from overtopping dam. The cost of the modification is estimated at $11 million. Construction was essentially complete in September 1989. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 92 are estimated at $2,775,020; cumulative benefits through September 1992 are estimated at $85,321,680. Releases made from the lake during low-water periods were sufficient to supply municipal water for Piedmont, Poplar Bluff and other usages. Project currently has seven developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.2 million visitor-hours thatresultedin $161,383 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional and improvement to sanitary facilities in recreation areas. Construction of project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. 28-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 19. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR Location. On Rolling Fork River, river mile 22.8, a tributary of Little River, in Sevier County, about 4 miles northwest of DeQueen, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Chapel Hill, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,360 feet long, constructed to 160 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main embankment. Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 12 feet in diameter. The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and provides a total storage of 136,100 acrefeet (101,200 for flood control storage and 34,900 for conservation and sedimentation reserve). Federal cost of project is estimated at $19,623,752. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Actof 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 92 are estimated at $213,630; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1992, are estimated at $5,835,000. In FY 92, the project's seven developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.8 million visitorhours that resulted in $30,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966. Project was placed in useful operation in August 1977. 20. DIERKS LAKE, AR Location. On Saline River, river mile 56.6, a tributary of Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Dierks Dam, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,760 feet long, about 153 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 800 feet wide is in a saddle at west end of dam. Outlet works consisting of a gated 6- by 9-foot oblong conduit, one 24- inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acre-feet for flood control and 29,700 acre-feet for water supply, conservation, and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet. Federal cost of project is estimated at $16,002,781. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Actof 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 92 are estimated at $275,860; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1992, are estimated at $3,864,470. During the year, 276 acre-feet of water supply storage were withdrawn by Tri-Lakes Water District. Currently has four developed parks which in FY 92 experienced 835,000 visitor- hours that resulted in $51,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. In May 1975, the embankment closure was completed and the project placed in useful operation. 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (1) Emergency bank protection, Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: State Hwy. 211, Current River, Clay Co., $6, 381; Hwy 71, Red River, Little River, Co., AR,$67,657 $; Interstate 30, Red River, Little River, Co., AR, $103,239; Jacks Fork River, Shannon Co., MO, $2,230; and, Petit Jean River, Yell Co., AR, $5,621; and Sewage Lagoon, Little Red River, Judsonia, AR, $14,483. (2) Snagging and clearing, Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: Black River, Butler Co., MO, $18,824. (3) Flood control activities, Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: Brown's Creek, Sharp Co., AR, $3,326; Cato Springs Branch, Fayetteville, AR, $32,537; DPR Little Red River, $23,325; Crooked Creek, Harrison, AR, Reconnaissance Report, $85,532; May Branch, Fort Smith, AR, $27,145; Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR, $1,113,425; Rice-Carden Levee, Arkansas River, $36,176; Rock Creek, Pulaski Co., AR, $32,082; White River, Batesville, AR, $47,302; and, White River, Old Grand Glaise, AR, $15,000. 22. FOURCHE BAYOU BASIN, LITTLE ROCK, AR Location. On Fourche, Rock and Grassy Flat Creeks in vicinity of Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR. Existing project. The project, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662), consists of widening, clearing and snagging with alteration of highway and railroad bridges. The estimated project cost is $29 million: Federal, $19.1 million; non-Federal, $9.9 million. Local cooperation. The city of Little Rock, the project sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in August 1987. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Construction continued on the remaining two channel improvement contracts. The final construction contract was awarded on June 28, 1991. Overall project completion is scheduled for October 1993. 28-6 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 23. GILLHAM LAKE, AR Location. Damsite is on Cossatot River, river mile 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham in Sevier County, AR. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map for Gillham Dam, AR, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, see pages 19-12 of Annual Report for 1977 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is estimated at $17,826,703. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Actof 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 92 are estimated at $318,390; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $7,457,330. During the year, Tri-Lakes Water District withdrew 787 acre-feet of water supply storage. In FY 92, the project's five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.7 million visitor-hours that resulted in $27,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was completed in May 1975, and the project was placed in useful operation. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects were made to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Costs for FY 92 were $102,127. Total costs through September 30, 1992, were $1,504,647. 25. LITTLE RED RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CLINTON, AR Location. In Clinton, Van Buren County, AR, along the tributaries of the Little Red River. The city lies between the tributaries of Archey Fork and South Fork and is bisected by Town Branch. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consists of 100-foot bottom-width channel for 1.35 miles on Archey Fork Creek and a 300-foot bottom-width channel for 1.99 miles on South Fork, Little Red River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Mitigation measures to compensate for damages to the walleye pike fishery are being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. Condition at end of fiscal year. Mitigation measures continued. Construction of the project began in 1985 and was transferred to the city of Clinton in August 1986 for operation and maintenance. An operation and maintenance manual was furnished the city of Clinton. 26. LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR Location. Improvements are on Little River and tributaries in Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is shown in table 28-J. Existing project. Part of a six-lake system for flood control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on the Rolling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River; and, two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District boundary change, effective in October 1980, the four projects in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa District to the Little Rock District. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District (DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks) furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. The Southwest Arkansas Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water supply storage at Millwood Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenanceofprojects continued. See individual projects for details. Flood damages prevented by the Little River Basin reservoirs during FY 92 are estimated at $853,900; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1992, are estimated at $26,918,020. Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 27. MILL CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR Location. In southwest Fort Smith, Sebastian County, AR. 28-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Existing project. The project was constructed under Section 205 of the Continuing Authority Program. The project included improvements on 3.9 miles of the Mill Creek channel and modifications on three bridges. The estimated project cost is $8,233,000: $4,291,000, Federal; $3,942,000, non-Federal. Local cooperation. The city of Fort Smith, the local sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in November 1988. Operations during the fiscal year. The contract for channel construction was awarded in August 1990. Project construction was completed in November 1992. Project fiscal completion was initiated. 28. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR Location. On Little River, river mile 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, AR, and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, AR. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map for Red Bluff, AR, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see the 1969 Annual Report (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $46,100,082. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 66,231 acrefeet of water was released from the lake for water supply to Southwest Arkansas Water District. Flood damages prevented during FY 92 are estimated at $46,020; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1992, are estimated at $9,761,220. Millwood Lake has 12 developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 2.0 million visitor-hours that resulted in $17,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full floodcontrol operation in August 1966. Remaining work consists of additional recreational facilities. 29. NIMROD LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-1: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes.) Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,005,627. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. See table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities continued. In FY 92, seven parks experienced public visitation exceeding 2.6 million visitor-hours that resulted in $68,000 fee revenue. During FY 92, flood damages prevented on an average of 1,978 acres of improved land are estimated at $729,940; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1992, are estimated at $15,944,090. Ninety-three acre-feet of water was withdrawn by the city of Plainview, AR. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition of and improvement to sanitary recreation facilities. A vault rest room was converted to waterborne with shower at Sunlight Bay Park. Construction of project began in January 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1942. 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 28-E: Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.) 31. PETIT JEAN RIVER, HIGHWAY 309, AR Location. On the north bank of the Petit Jean River upstream of the Arkansas State Highway 309 bridge and approaches. The bridge is approximately 1.5 miles south of Waveland in Yell County and 0.75 mile downstream from Blue Mountain Dam. Existing project. Project consists of the excavation of a 75-ft. bottom-width channel to provide a straight approach to the bridge and construction of a revetment along the left side of the excavated channel to maintain the alignment. This work extends for 600 feet upstream of the Highway 309 bridge. The lands required for the project are owned by the Federal Government. Local cooperation. The Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department executed a local cooperation agreement on May 6,1991, to construct an emergency stream bank protection project under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Operations during the fiscal year. A feasibility study was completed and a detailed project report prepared in September 1990,recommended construction ofastreambank protection project upstream of the Highway 309 bridge on the Petit Jean River. Plans and specifications were completed in February 1991; a construction contract was awarded in June 1991; and, construction was completed in August 1991. 28-8 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Modification is pending due to some overruns by the contractor for additional clearing and grubbing work required to complete the project. 32. RED RIVER, I-30, LITTLE RIVER CO., AR Location. Red River at Interstate 30 in Hempstead County, located in southwestern Arkansas. Existing project. Plans consisted of construction of two stone-filled baffle dikes from the high top bank to the top of the existing pile revetment, which is capped out with stone. Construction authorized under Continuing Authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended; emergency streambank erosion protection. Local Cooperation. The Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department signed a local cooperative agreement April 3, 1992, and contributed $32,474 to project cost. The Federal share is $87,423. Total project cost estimated at $119,897. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded in July 1992. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in October 1992. 33. RED RIVER, HWY 31, LITTLE RIVER CO., AR Location. Red River at Hwy. 71 in Little River Co., located in southwestern Arkansas. Existing project. Plans consisted of construction of a bankhead around the riverward piers for both the north and south bound bridges of Hwy. 71. The two bankheads have a 100-foot radius turnbacks on the upstream and downstream ends. Construction includes paving the existing drains at both bridges, and the scour holes around the southbound bridge pier. Construction authorized under Continuing Authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended; emergency streambank erosion protection. Local Cooperation. The Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department signed a local cooperative agreement April 3, 1992, and contributed $40,457 to project cost. The Federal share is $104,371. Total project cost estimated at $144,828 Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded in June 1992. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in October 1992. 34. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR & MO Location. Improvements are on White River and tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 28-K: White River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in White River Basin. The plan includes seven lakes; two are flood control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry and Bell Foley lakes were selected and approved for construction by Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on six of these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. The Bell Foley project, the remaining unbuilt authorized project, was reevaluated in FY 89; the project continues to have a favorable benefit-to-cost ratio since its formulation in 1968. The lakes in the plan are listed in Table 28-K: White River Basin. (For authorization see table 28-B. ) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin lakes during FY 92 are estimated at $13,519,840; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1992, are estimated at $358,862,960. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin levees during FY 92 are estimated at $1,754,300; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1992, are estimated at $69,362,200. Electric energy delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing during FY 92 totaled 1,697,099,000 kilowatt-hours. Water releases for fish hatcheries were: 28,960 acre-feet from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery; 14,480 acre-feet from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery; and, 14,480 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: Beaver Water District, AR, 31,460 acre-feet, and Carroll-Boone Water District, AR, 4,972 acre-feet, from Beaver Lake; Marion County Regional Water District, AR, 724 acre-feet from Bull Shoals Lake; Water and Sewer Improvement District No. 3 of Mountain Home, AR, 3,322 acre-feet from Norfork Lake; the city of Clinton, AR, 1,153 acre-feet, and the Community Water Treatment System, Cleburne County, AR, 946 acre-feet, from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, TableRock, Bull 28-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry lakes are complete and in operation. Progress on these lakes is shown in individual reports. Bell Foley lake project is in a deferred status. Water Valley and Lone Rock lakes have been deauthorized. 35. WHITE RIVER, BATESVILLE, AR Location. On White River, within the city of Batesville, Independence County, AR. Existing project. The Definite Project Report, recommending construction of a levee and floodwall to protect the industrial area, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, was approved in June 1988. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, applies. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Revised plans and specifications for the National Economic Development (NED) alignment were initiated and are scheduled for completion in July 1993. Pending the completion of the Local Cooperation Agreement negotiations and acquisition of real estate, the award of a construction contract is scheduled for October 1994. Construction is scheduled for completion in October 1995. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 36. BEAVER LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin.) Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,797,000. For further information see 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 28-B. ) Major rehabilitation. Since the dam was constructed there has been a seepage problem below Dike No. 1. Based on detailed investigation, it was determined that the limestone foundation under dike 1 and 200 feet of the north end of the main dam embankment is the main problem. The plan of improvement was a concrete seepage cutoff in dike 1 and the north end of the main dam. A $16.9-million contract to construct a concrete cutoff wall was awarded in June 1989; the notice to proceed was issued in October 1989. The contract period was estimated to be 760 days. However, the contractor ceased productive work due to inability to excavate rock and was been placed in default. An $18.8 reprocurement contract was awarded in April 1992, and work began in May 1992 to complete the work. Construction completion is scheduled for June 1994. Project cost is estimated at $26.2 million. Water Quality Enhancement. Congress directed the Corps to implement best management practices (BMP's) in the Beaver Lake watershed and monitor the effects of these practices on water quality. A study was completed and a project report was approved in July 1989. The BMP's and water quality monitoring are being concurrently implemented over a 5-year period which began in May 1991 with a project completion date of June 1996. The BMP's are being implemented under the terms of a memorandum of agreement between the Corps and the Soil Conservation Service with the assistance of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service. The local cost sharing for the BMP's are being obtained from the non- Federal participants (farmers) primarily by work-in-kind credit. The water quality monitoring is being implemented under terms of a local cost-sharing agreement with the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission. Water quality monitoring is being performed in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency by a Corps administered contract. Project agreements were signed on May 11, 1991, at Rogers, AR. BMP's are being implemented by SCS and AS&WCC obtained leases of the real estate for the water quality monitoring sites November 6, 1991. The water quality monitoring contract was awarded on January 29, 1992. Water quality sampling began in May 1992. Local Cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act, and Section 301 the 1958 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 92 are estimated at $961,000; cumulative benefits are estimated at$27,497,690. During the year, 139,795,500 kilowatt- hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply storage withdrawn during the year was 36,433 acre-feet. The project has 9 developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 17 million visitor-hours that resulted in $455,200 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for modifications to existing recreation and sanitary facilities. Alterations to existing parks to enhance fee collections, improve efficiency, and reduce the maintenance effort or rehabilitate the 25-year old park operation through operation and maintenance and SRUF funds, as appropriate. Construction of project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. Work on a dam seepage problem is described above. 37. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Estimated cost with eight generating 28-10 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT units is $96,356,000. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. For authorization see table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 92 are estimated at $5,121,480; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $114,078,090. During the year, 721,158,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply storage withdrawn during the year was 724 acre-feet. The project has 18 developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 18.7 million visitor-hours that resulted in $275,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for modifications to existing recreation and sanitary facilities. Alterations are needed to existing parks to enhance fee collections, to improve efficiency, to reduce maintenance effort or to rehabilitate 36-year-old park facilities through operations and maintenance or SRUF funds, as appropriate. Low dissolved oxygen readings in the downstream area of Bull Shoals Dam in October 1990 have resulted in ongoing studies to be undertaken to minimize harmful effects on the trout fishing of the White River. Unguaranteed short-term solutions to the problem, consisting of limiting generation, will sustain the existing fishery, but long-term guaranteed changes will require congressional authorization. Construction of project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, December 1952, June 1953,January 1962,February 1962,August 1963,and September 1963, respectively. 38. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 10), AR Location. (See Table 28-H: Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation.) Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse contains four 31,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acre-feet. Estimated cost is $86,507,000. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool fluctuated within 2-ft. power pondage, elevation 336.0 to 338.0. Power generation continued. During FY 92, 905,820,400 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. In FY 92, the project's 15 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 23.1 million visitor-hours that resulted in $113,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. The hydraulic turbines at the Dardanelle powerplant will require extensive rehabilitation in the near future. Complete disassembly of the turbines will be required to replace the turbine blade bearings and oil seals. Several repair alternatives are being examined including replacement of the turbines to increase the available power output of the generating units. Index testing to determine new turbine design is underway. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line in April, May, and September 1965, and January 1966. Lock became operable in December 1969. Visitors Center and resident office were completed in May 1985. 39. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-K: White River, AR & MO.) Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000. For further information see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, 1938 Flood Control Act and 1988 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 92 are estimated at $889,860; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $24,682,560. In FY 92, 194,027,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. In FY 92, 2,095 acre-feet of water supply storage was withdrawn. The project has 18 developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 27.2 million visitor-hours that resulted in $527,000 fee revenue. The project's operational management plan provides means by which the natural resources, including water quality, aesthetic value, forestry, fish and wildlife are managed and protected for future generations. An all-volunteer environmental program (annual cleanup) has been most successful and serves as a model for the Nation. During the past 23 years the program has won 24 national awards. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction ofprojectbegan in June 1957 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in January 1962. Power units 1 and 2 were operable in March and 28-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 May 1964, and water supply was operable in April 1971. The Visitors Center was completed in June 1983 at a cost of $813,000. 40. NORFORK LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Total estimated cost is $111,624,000, including $38,700,000 for addition of power units 3 and 4, and $40,000,000 for highway bridge construction. For further information see page 896 of 1962 Annual Report. (See table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 92 are estimated at $1,412,130; total cumulative flood damages prevented through September 30, 1992, are estimated at $37,026,990. During the year, 183,993,700 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply withdrawn by the city of Mountain Home, AR, totaled 3,322 acre-feet. The project's 18 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 16.2 million visitor-hours that resulted in $237,000 fee revenue during FY 92. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities, and addition of power units 3 and 4. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. Construction of two highway bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries was completed in November 1982. The bridges were transferred to the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department for operation and maintenance in July 1984. 41. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (No. 12), AR Location. (See Table 28-H: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Navigation.) Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. The dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed; spillway has 15 tainter gates 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acre-feet. In addition, 1 foot of power pondage is provided in pool 13 between elevations 391.0 and 392.0. Estimated cost is $86,167,000. (For authorization see table 28-B.) Local cooperation. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Delivered 540,173,300 kilowatt- hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Ozark Lake has 10 developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.6-million-visitor-hours that resulted in $40,000 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December-1964. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: unit 1, November 1972; unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 1973; and unit 5, May 1974. Remaining work consists principally of modifications to the powerplant. 42. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO Location. (See Table 28-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Estimated cost is $71,233,000. For further information see page 893 of 1962 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 28-B. ) Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 92 are estimated at $2,359,390; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $70,255,950. During the year, 458,126,900 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The District and the Waterways Experiment Station are investigating the possibilities of improving the quality of Table Rock releases with a hypolimnetic oxygenation system. Table Rock Lake has 16 developed parks which in FY 92 experienced public visitation exceeding 38.4 million visitor-hours that resulted in $482,000 fee revenue. This project's operational management plan provides means by which the natural resources, including forestry, fish and wildlife, are managed and protected for future generations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreational sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954. The project was ready for beneficial flood control use in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were 28-12 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT added in April and June 1961. General Investigations 43. SURVEYS Expenditures for surveys in FY 91 totaled $385,898: Navigation studies.White River and Tributaries, AR, $4,381. Flood damage prevention studies. Arkansas River Basin Studies, AR and OK, $46,178; Central Arkansas Study, AR, $8,504; Little River County, AR, $142,024. Review of completed projects. Village Creek Taylor Bay, $73,100. Miscellaneous activities. Special investigations, $35,000; review of FERC licenses, $2,000; interagency water resource development, $17,629. Coordination studies with other agencies. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, $2,000; Planning assistance to states, $42,082. 44. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services (FPMS). The authority for the Flood Plain Management Services program is Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended.Under the authority of Section 321 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, PL 101-640, technical services and planning assistance are (1) provided to states and local governments without charge and (2) offered to Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery basis. Through these technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation of flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Hydrologic studies. During FY 92, 117 stations were operated; 78 cooperatively with USGS and 39 by the Corps. The total cost for streamflow and some sediment data from all sources of funding was $633,430, of which $464,910 was transferred to USGS. The District also participated in a cooperative program with National Weather Service for rainfall and/or river reporting stations for use in forecasting streamflow for flood warning and operation of lake projects. Records were also collected at certain hydroclimate rainfall stations under a cooperative program between the two agencies. For these services, $45,382 was transferred to the National Weather Service. 28-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1'2 See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY91 FY92 Sept.30,1992M 1. Arkansas River Basin, AR OK & KS 3. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, AR 2,4-9, McClellan-Kerr 11,13,15 Arkansas River Navigation Locks & Dams, AR 16. Black River, Obstruc. Removal, Butler Co., MO 17. Blue Mountain Lake, AR New Work Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Maint. Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Special Funds Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $7,481,000 7,481,000 4,256,220 4,256,220 68,731,146 13,230,308 51,500,838 20,319,918 13,699,711 56,620,207 $2,369,690 2,369,690 2,389,514 2,389,514 76,824,993 17,676,594 59,148,399 70,427,194 17,077,747 53,349,447 $13,161,000 $1,492,416,743 13,161,000 163,479,533 4,852,926 1,328,937,210 13,041,996 1,487,904,151 163,321,500 13,041,996 1,324,587,651 56,035,960 11,968,850 44,067,110 59,936,450 12,040,914 47,895,536 63,710,984 15,498,300 48,212,684 62,773,752 15,194,861 47,578,891 988,301,499 2 215,500,245 772,801,254 989,441,467 2 214,407,7632 775,033,704 291,106 291,106 1,609,842 1,609,842 _ -_ 19,926,755 - -. 19,926,755 - -. _ 531,336 _ -. _ 531,336 119,300,184 - -. 119,300,184 - _. 4,561,666 - _. 4,561,666 7,481,000 6,657,000 9,445,000 13,161,000 465,050,472 4,238,604 7,056,291 12,205,094 13,041,996 465,021,597 19,445,600 26,793,291 19,059,039 20,817,284 320,051,604 2 20,251,720 22,855,943 21,710,994 20,269,430 317,581,433 2 161,481 21,256 395,123 193,633 247,625 494,725 2,171,734 3,954,348 997,656 2,670,837 531,336 531,336 40,000 38,024 25,900 14,940 8,000 18,824 73,900 71,788 _ 5,069,974 _ 5,069,974 747,000 750,783 762,082 671,231 880,400 883,204 958,200 14,592,098 2 903,965 14,485,621 2 28-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT1'2 (Continued) See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept.30,19921" . 18. Clearwater Lake, MO 19. DeQueen Lake, Little River Basin, AR 20. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, AR 22. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR 23. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, AR 25. Little Red River & Tributaries, Clinton, AR 26. Little River Basin, (Little Rock Dist.), AR 27. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,590,000 1,483,556 1,768,800 1,654,116 1,418,673 1,806,030 3,660,000 3,674,652 501,910 391,123 779,000 893,713 - 11,073,403 S 11,060,204 1,943,600 30,152,500 1,763,943 30,198,9281 60,000 11,467,910 64,553 11,468,164 - 19,629,753 S 19,623,752 834,000 823,817 798,952 654,521 834,400 956,492 946,300 10,016,201 2 952,856 9,995,468 2 S 16,002,904 S 16,002,781 881,000 919,005 818,159 721,818 793,600 805,733 949,300 10,381,043 2 1,001,592 10,371,9652 2,252,000 5,706,000 5,807,000 2,417,000 18,767,000 3 1,313,562 3,983,326 3,882,948 4,543,525 17,881,903 3 166,900 61,900 847,360 847,710 170,000 200,000 862,837 690,717 9,281 558,200 468,103 887,300 945,719 9,942 400,000 1,731,678 359,064 1,525,645 S 17,827,111 S 17,826,703 904,400 9,701,643 970,716 9,654,0802 3,999,500 23,325 3,932,5383 _ 99,959,850 S- _ 99,544,384 4,129,360 4,317,745 4,218,000 4,468,300 59,236,829 2 4,210,494 3,343,168 4,794,137 4,770,664 58,984,912 2 119,000 60,955 68,400 30,254 3,465,000 354,230 120,000 111,844 435,000 2,408,684 312,892 341,822 - 4,291,000 3 1,113,425 4,116,5123 79,360 580,652 15,055 498,975 28-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT1 ,2 (Continued) See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept.30,19921.2 28. Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, AR 29. Nimrod Lake, AR 31. Petit Jean River, Highway 309, AR 32. Red River, Hwy 71 Little River Co, AR 33. Red River, I-30 Little River Co, AR 34. White River Basin, AR &MO (Little Rock District) 35. White River Batesville, AR 36. Beaver Lake, AR -- Beaver Lake Water Quality New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Appropr. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Appropr. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Appropr. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 46,087,318 46,091,248 1,567,000 1,837,795 1,619,963 1,276,115 1,702,700 2,086,195 1,668,300 28,743,178 2 1,845,500 28,966,403 2 4,092,826 4,005,627 1,085,000 1,062,917 1,122,311 972,960 16,000 15,583 15,000 15,000 1,030,500 1,051,070 78,000 72,796 28,250 25,264 17,000 21,580 10,000 19, 1,285,000 17,869,217 2 1,146,947 17,730,5672 5,621 823 115,000 67,657 56,200 15,621 99,300 103,240 153,700 88,879 94,000 94,000 28,250 26,087 132,000 4 89,237 4 56,200 15,621 124,300 4 103,2404 153,700 88.879 _. 335,651,873 .. 335,378,666 23,919,340 15,807,440 18,573,700 23,286,600 363,113,051 1 24,188,550 14,119,499 19,561,136 22,575,704 363,774,196' 104,200 101,699 48,433 854 3,000,640 3,234,847 3,942,200 3,070,175 2,899,252 4,081,426 221,000 4,362,320 169,363 4,140,246 340,400 17,161 S 100,000 1,256,000 38,877 205,687 85,000 47,302 431,700 394,005 - 46,183,033 46,112,07 3,657,000 51,953,6982 3,841,602 51,169,3632 2,092,000 7,015,720 1,834,472 6,161,242 1,000,000 2,356,000 1,025,263 1,269,828 28-16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT1'2 (Continued) See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept.30,19921o2 37. Bull Shoals Lake, AR 38. Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10) AR 39. Greers Ferry Lake, AR 40. Norfork Lake, AR 41. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock & Dam (No.12), AR 42. Table Rock Lake, MO New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6,227,200 6,219,380 3,909,515 3,780,267 88,858,711 88,858,707 4,287,400 4,299,000 84,084,3092 4,323,288 4,287,539 83,719,746 84,270,124 84,261,240 4,736,000 4,862,558 4,743,000 4,789,616 3,229,000 3,268,163 4,675,000 4,688,530 5,129,500 5,187,103 4,311,019 4,074,968 4,106,295 4,014,869 3,046,931 2,378,574 4,078,320 3,672,220 4,132,592 3,642,737 4,814,200 6,132,000 72,086,687 2 4,668,761 6,021,095 71,651,7122 48,865,512 48,865,512 4,460,500 5,122,000 69,384,195 2 3,909,714 4,920,459 68,374,437 70,701,628 70,701,628 3,507,100 3,094,000 58,003,1042 3,926,314 3,191,017 58,044,0942 85,629,412 85,629,412 3,388,200 3,577,000 58,212,397 3,926,390 3,350,848 57,744,697 67,224,000 67,224,000 5,068,200 5,171,000 78,123,580 2 5,424,081 4,571,144 77,235,5532 1. For more details on project funds, see text for individual projects. 2. Beginning data shown in Table 28-A includes special recreation use fees. 3. Includes funds for plans and specifications. 4. Includes total project cost, including study cost. 28-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, & KS (See Section 1 of text) Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, OK Oologah Lake, OK Canton Lake, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Wister Lake, OK Blue Mountain Lake, AR Nimrod Lake, AR Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK, and Mo, and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, OK Fall River Lake, KS Elk City Lake, KS Toronto Lake, KS Neodosha Lake, KS Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. Approved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, OK Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Blackburn Reservoir, OK Mannford Reservoir, OK Taft Reservoir, OK Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, AR Eufaula Lake, OK Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, AR Short Mountain Lock and Dam, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, OK. Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake for Mannford, Blackburn and Taft Reservoirs. 28-18 Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc 107, 81st Cong., 1st sess. LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all pervious authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. November 17, 1986 June 10, 1948 Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (See Section 21 of text.) Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (See Section 26 of text.) Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662, Sec. 401. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Asst. Sec. of the Army (CW), 10/14/88. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK AND AR (See Section 25 of text) Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization. Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, Dierks Lakes July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., 1st sess. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 30 of text) June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 March 1, 1974 Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Lone Rock Lake, AR, Norfork Lake, AR, Clearwater Lake, MO, Water Valley Lake, AR, Bell Foley Lake, AR, Greers Ferry Lake, AR, and White River emergency. Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals Lake, AR, and MO, Table Rock Lake, MO, and AR, and Norfork Lake, AR, and MO (power). Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added Beaver Lake to the plan. Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. Authorizing highway bridge construction across Norfork Lake. Flood Control Com. Doc 1, 75th Cong.,lst sess. H. Doc. 917, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 290, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 352, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. 28-19 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 30, 1948 October 22, 1976 June 30, 1948 August 28, 1937 Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR (See Section 24 of text.) White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for trout production facilities downstream from Beaver Dam. White River, Batesville, AR. (See Section 31 of text.) White River, St. Paul, AR. (See Section 32 of text.) Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, 10/11/84. Water Resources Development Act of 1976, P.L. 94-587, Sec. 105. Section 205, P.L. 80-858, construction to be approved by ASA (CW). Section 208, P.L. 75-406. Authorized by the Asst. Sec. of the Army (CW), 10/29/88. 28-20 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Federal Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR 1 1988 $736,869 Black River, AR and MO 2 1950 80,000 $ 930,324 Current River, AR and MO 2 1964 17,0003 132,178 Upper White River, AR '4 1952 813,197 1,788,374 1950 785,666 White River, AR (above Peach Orchard Bluff) 2 5 1984 43,110 White River, Jacksonport, AR 6 1. Completed. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R & H Act, as amended, (P.L.86-645). 2. Channel adequate for existing commerce; completion not contemplated. 3. Includes $7,000 for previous project. 4. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 30, 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams Nos. 1,2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in Public Law 996, 84th Congress. 5. Completed. 6. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream from Newport, AR; transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. 28-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR' Inactive 1975 $1,432,116 Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO Completed 1985 44,500 Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR Completed 1958 84,315 Butler County Drainage District 3, MO Completed 1983 42,172 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1951 919,955 Clarksville, AR Completed 1962 271,717 Conway County Drainage and Levee District District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1959 187,440 Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 8, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 1,018,840 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 390,952 Crawford County Levee District, AR Completed 1983 53,506 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1954 2,001,820 Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, AR Completed 1983 117,898 East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO Completed 1958 304,699 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1941 99,511 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1951 1,077,546 From North Little Rock to Gillett, AR (above Plum Bayou) Completed 1954 845,300 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR2 Cancelled 1973 22,890 Jackson Couinty Levee District 2, White River, AR Completed 1986 131,699 Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR Completed 1983 198,096 Little Red River District 1, AR Completed 1988 28,968 Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, AR Completed 1983 63,355 Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Fourche Bayou, AR Completed 1975 1,901,899 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1950 422,549 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1953 198,069 Newport, White River, AR Completed 1941 314,276 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1958 512,001 Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR Completed 1987 162,204 Petit Jean River, AR Completed 1966 84,350 Petit Jean River, AR Completed 1991 88,379 Pine Mountain Lake, AR3 Inactive 1985 1,432,331 Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway County, AR Completed 1983 86,943 Red River, !-30, Little River Co., AR Completed 1992 119,897 Red River, Hwy. 31, Little River Co., AR Completed 1992 144,828 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, Completed 1950 269,907 AR Rolling Fork River, Sevier Coiunty, AR Completed 1983 64,500 28-22 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR Completed 1941 81,023 South Bank, Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), AR Completed 1964 1,404,852 South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, AR, Tucker Lakes Completed 1961 409,115 Swan Creek Bank Stab., Taney County, MO Completed 1986 76,800 Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 438,222 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, AR4 Completed 1972 1,567,156 Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties, ARS Inactive 1977 510,217 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1962 1,269,959 White River, at Hwy 14, 1/4 mile east of Oil Trough, AR Completed 1981 214,308 White River Bank Stab., Batesville, AR Completed 1986 101,100 White River, Jacksonport, AR Completed 1987 277,600 White River, Newport, AR Completed 1989 93,929 White River, St. Paul, AR Completed 1990 22,400 1. Reclassified as inactive in Jun '77; reviewed & deferred in May'85; 3. Reclassified as inactive in Jul '85. funded for reevaluation (draft report dated Sep '89). 4. See H Doc 577,87th Cong for description. 2. Construction of project cancelled because local interests failed to 5. Reclassified in Jun '77; local interests unable to meet local provide right-of-way for construction and maintenance, cooperation requirements; funded for reevaluation in FY 89; recommended to be placed in the inactive status. TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Federal Contributed Project Report For Authority Deauthorized Funds Funds Crooked Creek Lake & Levee, AR 1969 1968 FCA 1990 Lone Rock, Buffalo River, AR 1959 1938 FCA 1977 $130,653 Prosperity Lake, MO PL93-251 1989 864,000 Water Valley, Eleven Point River, AR & MO 1959 1963 FCA 1977 414,011 28-23 TABLE 28-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened stream Lock Pool of to Tot from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Foun- Kind of Type of Naviga- Estim Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) dation Dam Construction tion Co! LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell Lock and Dam No.1 Entrance Channel Lock No. 2 Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No. 2) 00 Joe Hardin Lock and Dam No. 3 10.3 8 east of Arkansas Post, AR First 10.3 miles of system 13.3 6 east of Arkansas Post, AR 40.5 3 southeast Arkansas Post, AR 50.2 5 north of Grady, AR 110 by 600 30max 142 16 15 Piles in Fixed sand overflow Concrete 1967 $22,472,000 43,646,000 110 by 600 20 nom 28 max 162 18 14 Piles in 1967 70,229,000 sand Piles in sand 110 by 600 20 182 18 14 Piles in sand Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) Lock and Dam No. 5 86.3 66.0 7 east of Pine Bluff, AR 4 southeast of Redfield, AR 110 by 600 14 196 110 by 600 17 213 18 14 Piles in Movable Gated concrete sand spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Clay Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 1968 45,105,000 1968 31,603,000 David D. Terry Lock 108.1 12 southeast of Little and Dam (No. 6) Rock, AR 110 by 600 18 231 18 14 Piles in Movable sand Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends al ated st 1968 1968 37,936,000 0O 0 tI 0'T. 0z 0 0 N) o od oC o t,,, to 1968 68,645,000 TABLE 28-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened stream Lock Pool of to To form Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Foun- Kind of Type of Naviga- Estin Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) dation Dam Construction tion Co tal hated )st Murray Lock and Dam 125.4 6 northwest of Little (No.7) Rock, AR Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8) 155.9 6 west of Conway, AR 110 by 600 18 249 110 by 600 16 265 18 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9) Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10) Lock and Dam No. 11 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12) James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) 176.9 3 southwest of Morrilton, AR 205.5 2 northwest of Dardanelle, AR 110 by 600 19 284 110 by 600 54 338 18 14 Shale Movable 18 14 Sandstone Deleted 256.8 1 east of Ozark, AR 292.8 7 east of Fort Smith, AR 110 by 600 110 by 600 34 372 20 392 18 15 Sandstone and shale 18 14 Sandstone and shale Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 1969 38,045,000 1969 84,270,124 1969 85,629,412 1969 56,279,000 1969 $45,878,000 1969 57,828,000 0 >: TABLE 28-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened stream Lock Pool of to To form Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Foun- Kind of Type of Naviga- Esti Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) dation Dam Construction tion Ci TULSA DISTRICT3 James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) (part) W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14) Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (No. 15) Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No. 16) Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17) 1970 $6,858,000 319.6 4 east of Redland, OK 336.2 1 north of Cowlington, OK 366.6 1 northwest of Gore, OK 401.4 4 northwest of Okay, OK Newt Graham Lock 421.6 8 southwest of Inola, and Dam (No. 18) OK 110 by 600 20 110 by 600 48 412 460 110 by 600 30 490 110 by 600 14 15 Rock Movable 18 14 Rock Movable 19 16 Rock Movable 21 511 15 14 Rock Movable 110 by 600 21 532 15 14 Rock Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 1970 32,655,000 1970 94,578,237 1970 83,738,277 1970 31,619,000 1970 44,355,000 )tal nated ost 00 0 O 0 7d O n r 0 r 0 0 ---- TABLE 28-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 percent complete ............ $119,300,184 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete ................................ 7,497,000 Total, Little Rock District ....................... 814,362,720 Navigation aids (U.S. Coast Guard) ....................... 2,268,000 Tulsa District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete ............................. 12,700,038 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete ........................................ 2,750,000 Subtotal ......................................... $309,253,552 Upstream Lakes:2 Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete ......................................... $46,722,329 Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, complete .......................................... 123,170,773 Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, complete ........................................ 124,130,747 Subtotal ....................................... 294,023,849 Total, Tulsa District .......................... 603,277,401 Total Project Cost 96 percent complete ........... $1,419,908,121 1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River, except Dam No. 2, is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas River. 2. Details in Tulsa District report. r O nI v M 1 l3 Table 28-I ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Year or To Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent Estin Lake and State River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete C Blue Mountain, AR Petit Jean 74.4 Paris, AR 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 - 1947 $ 5,06 Canton, OK North Canadian 384.3 Canton, OK 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 1948 11,20 Elk City, KS Elk 8.7 Independence, KS 634 107 Earthfill 284,300 _ 1966 19,05 (Table Mound) Eufaula, OK 1 2 Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 123,35 Fall River, KS Fall 54.2 Fall River, KS 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 1949 10,55 Fort Gibson, OK' Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK 12,492 110 Concrete- 1,284,400 45,000 1953 42,59 Keystone, OK 1 2 3 Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK 74,506 121 gravity 1,836,500 70,000 1964 123,17 Markham Ferry, OK1 I Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, OK 11,533 90 Earthfill 444,500 100,000 1968 6,90 Neodesha, KSS Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 - 0 9 Nimrod, AR Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, AR 680 103 Earthfill 336,010 _ 1942 4,09 Oologah, OK2 Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, OK 4,339 137 Concrete- 1,519,000 - 1974 46,72 Pensacola, OK1 ( Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK 10,298 147 gravity 2,197,000 86,400 1940 5 Tenkiller Ferry, OKi 3 Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK 1,610 197 Earthfill 1.230,800 34,000 1953 24,01 Toronto, KS Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS 730 90 Concrete arch 199,700 1960 13,89 Wister, OK Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 1949 10,50 Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah. 148,0 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK and KS: Navigation (Table 28-H). 1,419,9 Total, Arkansas River Basin, 96 percent complete. 1,567,9 )tal nated ost 9,974 9,834 2,990 0,791 0,873 1,298 1,173 8,756 7,910 2,826 !2,329 2,126 7,724 6,324 11,226 41,861 08,121 49,982 1. Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2. Cost included in navigation project. 3. Details in Tulsa District report. 4. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation 5. Inactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O'The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. No00 00 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 28-J LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR: LAKES (See Section 26 of Text) Project River Sitel Nearest Town DeQueen Lakel Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, AR Gillham Lake' Cossatot River 49.0 Gillham, AR Dierks Lake' Saline River 56.6 Dierks, AR Millwood Lake' Little River 16.0 Millwood, AR 1. Project is reported separately herein. 28-29 WHITE RIVER BASIN; AR, AND MO: LAKES TABLE 28-K (See Section 34 of text) Miles Drainage Reservoir Power Tot; Above Area Height of Dam Above Streambed Capacity Development Estim; Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) and Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Cos Beaver' White 609.0 Eureka Springs, AR 1,186 228 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 $ 52,6 Bell Foley2 Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, AR 519 136 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 518,000 93,7 Bull Shoals White 418.6 Mountain Home, AR 6,036 258 feet concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96,3 Clearwater' Black 257.4 Piedmont, MO 898 154 feet earthfill 413,000 _ 22,4 Greers Ferry' Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs, AR 1,146 243 feet concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55,1 Norfork' North Fork 4.8 Norfork, AR 1,806 216 feet concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 111,6 Table Rock' White 523.8 Branson, MO 4,020 252 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 3.462.000 200.000 71,2 Total 15,580,000 828,550 503,0 1. For details see individual reports. 2. Inactive--placed in a deferred status in May 1985. Estimate based on 1983 price levels. al ated ti 31,472 00,000 56,000 62,553 25,000 i24,000 33,000 )69,472 00 o TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT* The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 160,000 square miles which includes Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within the Arkansas and Red River Basins. The District's responsibilities within the Arkansas River Basin cover southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas Panhandle. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above the mouth of the Poteau River, extending to the Kansas-Colorado State line, exclusive of that portion of the South Canadian River Basin and its tributaries west of the Texas-New Mexico State line. The District's responsibilities within the Red River Basin cover the northern portion of Texas, and the southern portion of Oklahoma. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Red River and its tributaries above Fulton, AR. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK 2. OtherAuthorizedNavigationProj ects Flood Control 3. Arcadia Lake, OK 4. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX 4a. Area V, Estelline Springs 4b. Area VIII 4c. Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK 5. Birch Lake, OK 6. Candy Lake, OK 7. Canton Lake, OK 8. Copan Lake, OK 9. Council Grove Lake, KS 10. El Dorado Lake, KS 11. Elk City Lake, KS 12. Fall River Lake, KS 13. Fort Supply Lake, OK 14. Great Bend, KS 15. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 16. Halstead, KS 17. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK 18. Hugo Lake, OK 19. Hulah Lake, OK 20. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 29-2 29-2 29-2 29-3 29-3 29-3 29-4 29-4 29-4 29-4 29-4 29-5 29-5 29-5 29-5 29-5 29-5 29-6 29-6 29-6 29-6 29-6 29-7 21. Kaw Lake, OK 22. Lake Kemp, TX 23. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 24. Marion Reservoir, KS 25. Mingo Creek, OK 26. Oologah Lake, OK 27. Optima Lake, OK 28. Parker Lake, OK 29. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 30. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 31. Pine Creek Lake, TX 32. Sardis Lake, OK 33. Skiatook Lake, OK 34. Toronto Lake, KS 35. Tulsa & West Tulsa, OK 36. Waurika Lake, OK 37. Wister Lake, OK 38. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 39. Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects 40. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 41. Emergency Flood Control Activities 42. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 29-1 Page 29-7 29-7 29-7 29-7 29-7 29-8 29-8 29-8 29-8 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-9 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-10 29-10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1992 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Tables 43. Broken Bow Lake, OK 44. Eufaula Lake, OK 45. Fort Gibson Lake, OK 46. Keystone Lake, OK 47. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK and TX 48. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK 49. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK 50. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK General Investigations 51. 52. 53. Surveys Collection and Study of Basic Data Preconstruction Engineering and Design 29-10 29-A Cost and Financial Statement 29-11 29-B Authorizing Legislation 29-11 29-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 29-11 29-D Not Applicable 29-11 29-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 29-F Not Applicable 29-11 29-G Deauthorized Projects 29-12 29-H Arkansas River Basin 29-12 Multiple-Purpose Plan 29-I Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects 29-J Flood Control Work Under 29-12 Special Authorization 29-K General Investigations 29-12 Navigation 1. McCLE LL AN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM (Tulsa District Portion), OK. Location. The Tulsa District portion of the McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a navigation route up the Arkansas River from the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK, near Tulsa, OK. The total length of the Tulsa District portion of the system is 137 navigation miles. Descriptions and costs for the entire navigation system can be found in Little Rock District's entry in this Annual Report. Existing projects. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation project is a component of the multiplepurpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin which provides for the improvement of the basin through the construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. The McClellan-Kerr project consists of bank stabilization, channel straightening, and cutoffs as required. The navigation channel has a minimum depth of 9 feet and minimum widths of 250 feet on the Arkansas River and 150 feet on the Verdigris River. The Tulsa District portion of the navigation system consists of Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Chouteau Lock and Dam, Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sans Bois Navigation Channel, W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, and the pool in Oklahoma which was created by Lock and Dam 13 in Arkansas. The other parts of the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin are listed in Table 29-H. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Muskogee and Catoosa, OK, and at Fort Smith, AR. At Sallisaw, OK, a port authority has been active in seeking development of public facilities at that location. Other private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at eight Oklahoma locations. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. See Table 29-C. Flood Control 3. ARCADIA LAKE, OK Location. On the Deep Fork River at river mile 218.3 in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, OK. (See Arcadia, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 29-2 29-13 29-20 29-23 29-24 29-25 29-26 29-27 29-27 29-29 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 102 feet high and 5,250 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of a gated tower and conduit. The lake has a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve), and controls a 105-squaremile drainage area. Construction began in October 1980 and the project became operational for flood control in November 1986. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is 99 percent complete. Estimated cost is $93,100,000 (October 1990 price level base). Funds of $100,000 were transferred to the project in FY 92. Remaining recreation is unscheduled. The United States filed suit February 14, 1989, to seek enforcement of the local cooperation requirements. However, the issue was mutually resolved by a Consent Decree entered into CIV 89-1507-A in United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, on February 10,1992. The Decree was for the City of Edmond and the Edmond Public Works Authority to reimburse the Government $7,207,636 over a period of 40 years for the recreation contract and $16,253,644 for the water supply contract over a period of 43 years. 4. ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECTS, KS, OK, AND TX Location. On certain tributary streams of the Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of the Tulsa District. Existing project. Provided for studies involving the control of water pollution caused by 15 natural salt sources identified in 1957 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The Arkansas and the Red Rivers represent major national and regional water resources severely limited due to poor water quality primarily caused by the natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. The Red River Basin is polluted by ten naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas and southwestern Oklahoma. These studies included the construction and subsequent maintenance of an injection well and a ring dike used for data collection. Preauthorization studies completed in 1966 and 1970 recommended construction of project features at 13 of the 15 sites. For a detailed discussion of the chloride control projects, see the page 19-4 of the Annual Report for 1983. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99- 662) authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966. The Arkansas River portion of the project was deferred in 1982 (not economically justified). 4a. AREA V, ESTELLINE SPRINGS. Location. Chloride Control Area V is located about 0.5 mile east of Estelline,TX, on the Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1987. Construction started in 1963 and the structure was completed in 1964. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. 4b. AREA VIII Location. Chloride Control Area VIII is located at river mile 74.9 of the South Fork of the Wichita River in King County, TX, about 5 miles east of Guthrie, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of two low-flow collection dams with attendant pumping stations and pipeline facilities. These two dams (the Bateman Low Flow Dam and the Ross Ranch Low Flow Dam) would be equipped with an inflatable fabric-type weir located in the spillway section which would be deflated to pass relatively good quality high flows. The collected brine would be pumped to the storage reservoir behind the Truscott Brine Dam. This brine dam, located at river mile 3.6 on Bluff Creek (a tributary of the North Fork of the Wichita River) about 3 miles northwest of Truscott, TX, would contain the collected brine from this area as well as future collections from Area X. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and Truscott Brine Dam in 1976. The first of the two low-flow dams was completed and put into full operation in May 1987. The second was to be constructed after initial operation of the first to determine the effectiveness of the operation. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized construction of the remaining areas of the Red River Chloride Control project pending transmittal of a report of a favorable finding of the effectiveness of the operation of Area VIII. Public Law 99-662 established a panel to assess the improvement in water quality downstream of 29-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1992 Area VIII as a measure of its effectiveness. A favorable report was submitted by the panel to the Secretary of the Army (CW) and to the Public Works Committees of the House and Senate in August 1988. 4c. RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK Location. The project is located in Cottle, Hall and King Counties, Texas and Harmon County, Oklahoma, along the Wichita and Red River. AreaVI is located on the Elm Fork of the Red River in Harmon County, Oklahoma; AreaVII is on the North Fork of the Wichita River, Cottle County, Texas; Crowell Brine Dam is on Canal Creek, a tributary of the Pease River; Area IX is on the Middle Pease River, Cottle County, Texas; Area X is on the Middle Fork of the Wichita River, King County, Texas; and Areas XIII-XIV are on the Jonah and Salt Creeks of Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River, Hall County, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of 1 deep-well injection system, 3 brine storage reservoirs, 4 low-flow brine collection dams, 2 well collection facilities, 6 pumping plants, and 56.3 miles of pipeline. Construction was initiated at Area X, low-flow dam, pump station and access road in 1991. Construction is scheduled to be completed in April 1993. A Limited Reevaluation Report containing a project economic reevaluation has been submitted for review. Construction funds of $6,000,000 were provided by Congress for FY 93. Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act authorized the project at full Federal expense. Operation and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $204,000,000 (October 1992 price level base). The contract for Area X was awarded September 27, 1991. 5. BIRCH LAKE, OK. Location. On Birch Creek at river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall in Osage County, OK. (See Barnsdall, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in November 1973 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 6. CANDY LAKE, OK. Location. On Candy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 1.9. The damsite is about 1.5 miles northeast of Avant in Osage County, OK. (See Avant, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 103 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10-by 11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18-by 24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). The drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in September 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was about 13 percent complete when construction was delayed because the U.S. Justice Department decided to withdraw condemnation proceedings to acquire mineral rights. Estimated cost of the project was $38,300,000 (October 1984 price level base). The project was deferred in January 1984. Project land has been made available for low intensity recreation use. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 7. CANTON LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 394, about 2 miles north of Canton in Blaine County, OK. (See Canton, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 590 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in December 1940 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1948. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 8. COPAN LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little Caney River, a tributary of the Caney River in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 29-4 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 7.4, about 2 miles west of Copan in Washington County, OK. (See Copan, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. Copan Lake is operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in November 1972 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 9. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 450, about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove in Morris County, KS. (See Council Grove Lake, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 519 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1959 and the project was placed in useful operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 10. EL DORADO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Walnut River, a tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 100.2, about 4 miles northeast of El Dorado in Butler County, KS. (See El Dorado, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. El Dorado Lake was authorized as a unit of a threelake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Construction began in October 1973, and impoundment began in June 1981. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 11. ELK CITYLAKE, KS Location. On the Elk River at river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence in Montgomery County, KS. (See Table Mound, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 593 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in February 1962 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 12. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS. Location. On the Fall River at river mile 54.2, about 4 miles northwest of Fall River in Greenwood County, KS. (See Severy, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 953 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and the project was placed in full operation in April 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 13. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK. Location. On Wolf Creek, a tributary of the North Canadian River, at river mile 5.5, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward in Woodward County, OK. (See Fort Supply, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in October 1938 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 14. GREAT BEND, KS. Location. In Barton County, KS, on the north bank of the Arkansas River about 4.5 miles above its confluence with Walnut Creek. (See Great Bend, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, provides for 6.2 miles of leveed channel to divert Walnut Creek flood flow around Great Bend into the Arkansas River upstream from the city; a 1.5-mile leveed channel to divert Little Walnut Creek 29-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1992 flood flow into the Walnut Creek diversio n levees along the Arkansas; a tie-back levee 4.3 miles long on the Arkansas left bank upstream from the junction of the Walnut diversion channel; and appurtenant facilities. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the city of Great Bend, KS, agreed to participate in project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $36,900,000 (October 1992 price level base). The contract for Phase III was awarded July 7, 1991. Project completion is scheduled for August 1993. 15. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK. Location. On the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River at river mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee in Alfalfa County, OK. (See Jet, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the project began in September 1938 and was completed in July 1941. The project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 16. HALSTEAD, KS. Location. In the city of Halstead in Harvey County, KS, along the Arkansas River. (See Halstead, KS, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for channel modification and construction of about 4 miles of levee in combination with clearing and snagging and straightening and widening approximately 3.6 miles of the Little Arkansas River channel to a 50-foot-bottom width in the vicinity of Halstead. Channel modification will be restricted to one side of the channel except in transition areas. Tree planting and revegetation will be done and ten pool riffle areas will be established to minimize environmental impacts. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funds provided in FY 92 were used to continue construction. The Local Cooperation Agreement was signed in October 1989. Estimated project cost is $11,100,000 (October 1992 price level base). 17. HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK, OK. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 48.6, about 11 miles west of Sapulpa in Creek County, OK. (See Lake Heyburn, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 599 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction started in March 1948 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1950. Channel improvements below the lake were completed in September 1952. Local cooperation. The channel improvement project below the lake was never maintained by the sponsor, Joint Drainage District N o. 1, Tulsa and Creek Counties, Oklahoma. For this reason, the channel returned to its pre-project condition and does not provide flood protection for the affected area. The Corps of Engineers discontinued maintenance inspections of the channel project in 1982 due to the condition of the project and lack of cooperation on the part of the sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 18. HUGO LAKE, OK. Location. On the Kiamichi River at river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo in Choctaw County, OK. (See Hugo Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in October 1967 and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 19. HULAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Caney River at river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, in Osage County, OK. (See Bowring, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 595 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1951 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 29-6 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 20. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS. Location. The dam is located on the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington in Coffey County, KS. (See John Redmond Dam, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 581 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction was initiated in July 1959 and was completed in December 1965. The project was placed in flood control operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 21. KAW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City in Kay County, OK. (See Charley Creek West, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-13 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in June 1966 and the project was placed in operation in May 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 22. LAKE KEMP, TX. Location. On the Wichita River at river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Northeast Lake Kemp, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-14 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in May 1970 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 23. LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK, TX. Location. The project is located in Wichita and Archer Counties, TX. The Lake Wichita dam and the Holliday Creek channel are located in the city of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Wichita Falls, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The proposed plan includes the replacement of the existing Lake Wichita dam with an earthen dam approximately 16,000 feet long, a concrete spillway, an auxiliary spillway, and low-flow outlet works. The plan also includes channel improvements along Holliday Creek from the new spillway to the Wichita River, a distance of 9.3 miles. Local cooperation. The city has essentially completed their requirements for local cooperation in accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Phase III contract was awarded in August 1992 and construction was initiated in Nov 1992. Estimated project cost is $48,200,000 (October 1992 price level base). 24. MARION RESERVOIR, KS. Location. On the Cottonwood River at river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion in Marion County, KS. (See Pilson, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 597 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1964 and the project was placed in flood control operation in February 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 25. MINGO CREEK, OK. Location. On the right-bank tributary of Bird Creek in Tulsa County, OK. (See Tulsa, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan will consist of 23 detention sites which would capture peak flows and hold them temporarily until downstream flows subside. There would be about 9.4 miles of channelization in selected locations on the tributaries and main stem of 29-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1992 Mingo Creek. This plan will provide a minimum of 65- year protection in the major damage area. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The local sponsor is the city of Tulsa, OK. On August 26, 1983, the city of Tulsa adopted a Resolution of Assurance to provide a minimum share equal to 35 percent or the traditional lands, easements, and rightsof- way, whichever is greater, and will be required to assist in the actual financing of construction. The city has constructed 4.75 miles of channel and placed two excavated detention facilities into flood control operation prior to initiation of federal construction in September 1988. The project is currently 38% complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. One reimbursement for work completed by the city of Tulsa was made for $8,232,000. Estimated project cost is $143,300,000 (October 1992 price level base). 26. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 90.2, about 2 miles southeast of Oologah in Rogers County, OK. (See Oologah, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-15 of the Annual Report for 1972. Construction began in July 1950, but the project was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction resumed in December 1955 and was completed in May 1963 for initial development. Construction, for ultimate (second stage) development was initiated in July 1967 and was completed in 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 27. OPTIIMA LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty in Texas County, OK. (See Optima Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the existing improvement, see page 19-16 of the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in March 1966 and impoundment began in October 1978. Construction was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 28. PARKER LAKE, OK. Location. On Muddy Boggy Creek, a tributary of the Red River, about 23 miles east of Ada in Coal County, OK. (See Parker, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Parker Lake, when constructed, will be a multipurpose element in a plan of improvement for the Upper Muddy Boggy Creek Basin, OK. The project consists of an earthfill dam about 2,200 feet long, a gated outlet works for flood control and water supply, and a 100-foot-wide spillway. The lake created would have a total storage capacity of 220,240 acre-feet and would yield 42 million gallons per day for municipal and industrial water supply. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board, the sponsor, has agreed to cost share in the flood control portion of the project if enough interested users for the water supply can be identified. Operation and results during fiscal year. Work in FY 92 included continued coordination with the sponsor. Estimated project cost is $71,400,000 (October 1992 price level base). 29. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX. Location. On Sanders Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 4.6, about 12 miles north of Paris in Lamar County, TX. (See Grant, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in March 1965 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 29-8 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 30. PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS. Location. On Big Hill Creek at river mile 33.3, about 4.5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Dennis, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Construction began in April 1974 and impoundment began in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 31. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little River at river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City in McCurtain County, OK. (See Wright City, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in February 1963 and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 32. SARDIS LAKE, OK. Location. On Jackfork Creek, a tributary of the Kiamichi River, at river mile 2.8, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton in Pushmataha County, OK. (See Yanush, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Sardis Lake is operated as a unit of a two-lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin. (The other lake in the system is Hugo Lake). Construction began in August 1975 and the project became operational in January 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 33. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK. Location. On Hominy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 14.3, about 5 miles west of Skiatook in Osage County, OK. (See Avant S.E., OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1;24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see Page19-8 of the Annual Report for 1987. Construction began in January 1974, impoundment began in October 1984, and the project became operational in November 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 34. TORONTO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 271.5, about 4 miles southeast of Toronto in Woodson County, KS. (See Fredonia, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 600 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in November 1954 and the project was placed in full operation in March 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 35. TULSA AND WEST TULSA, OK. Location. On the banks of the Arkansas River near Tulsa, Oklahoma. On the left bank, the levee extends from river mile 531.0 near Sand Springs, Oklahoma, downstream to river mile 521.4 at Tulsa. On the right bank, the levee extends from near river mile 526.7 downstream to river mile 521.3 and is adjacent to the major portion of the business and residential districts in West Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Existing project. The Tulsa and West Tulsa levees were completed by the Tulsa District in 1945. The project was turned over to the Tulsa County Drainage District No. 12 for operations and maintenance. The project consists of 3 levees with a total length of about 20 miles and an average height of 10 feet. The levees provide protection from flooding to property valued at approximately $1.0 billion dollars. Many of the pipes that pass under the levee have deteriorated and levee material has eroded into the pipes leaving small cavities in the embankment. The Tulsa District completed an evaluation 29-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1992 of the levees in September 1989 which determined that rehabilitation would be required for the levees to operate as designed. Local cooperation. The LCA was executed in March 1992 and Tulsa County and Levee District No. 12, the non-Federal sponsors, provided funds of $325,000 in March 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I contract for repair of 23 of the 48 deficient pipes was awarded July 30, 1992. Contract completion is scheduled for May 1993. 36. WAURIKA LAKE, OK. Location. On Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 27.0, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika in Jefferson County, OK. (See Hastings, OKTX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1983. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction began in July 1971 and impoundment began in August 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. 37. WISTER LAKE, OK. Location. On the Poteau River at river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister in LeFlore County, OK. (See Wister, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 601 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in April 1946 and was completed in May 1949. The project was placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. 38. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See Table 29-E. 39. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Inspections of completed, Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are owned, operated, and maintained by local interests are made to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operations and maintenance. The inspections assist the Corps of Engineers in determining if the project provides the flood protection for which it was constructed. See Table29- I for a list of projects inspected in FY 92. Fiscal year cost was $69,805. 40. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. The Tulsa District, Corps of Engineers is responsible for flood control operations at 12 non-Corps projects. These include nine Bureau of Reclamation lakes, two Grand River Dam Authority lakes, and one city-county owned lake. All of these projects were constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. Routine flood control releases were required at several of the projects. Fiscal year costs for scheduling flood control reservoir operations totaled $590,772. 41. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES. Fiscal year cost for national emergency preparedness was $111,127 and for advance preparation was $130,000. 42. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. See Table 29-J for FY 92 expenditures for Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Section 205); Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Projects (Section 14); and Snagging and Clearing. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 43. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Mountain Fork River at river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow in McCurtain County, OK. (See Broken Bow, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements, see page 29-17 of the Annual Report for 1971. Construction began in November 1961 and the 29-10 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT project was placed in useful operation in October 1969. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 44. EUFAULA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Canadian River at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula in McIntosh County, OK. (See Porum, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 588 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in December 1956 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 45. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north of Fort Gibson in Muskogee County, OK. (See Fort Gibson Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 604 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in March 1942 but was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction resumed in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The fourth generator was installed and the project placed in full operation in September 1953. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the construction of hydropower units 5 and 6. Authorization required 100 percent non-Federal financing and will be financed by the Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA). Project design is postponed pending resolution of turbine selection by GRDA. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 46. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, OK. (See Keystone Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 589 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in January 1957 and the project was placed in flood control operation in September 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 47. LAKE TEXOMA (DENISON DAM), OK AND TX. Location. On the Red River at river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Denison Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 603 of the Annual Report for 1969. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction started in August 1939 and was completed in February 1944. Commercial power generation was started in March 1945. Authorized work is complete except for installation of the third, fourth, and fifth power units. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 48. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw in LeFlore County, OK. (See Robert S. Kerr, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-21 of the Annual Report for 1972. The Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in April 1964 and closure was completed in October 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, 3, and 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. 29-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1992 Terminal facilities. Five sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 49. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK. Location. On the Illinois River at river mile 12.8, 7 miles northeast of Gore in Sequoyah County, OK. (See Gore, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1947 and was completed in July 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 50. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls in Muskogee County, OK. (See Webbers Falls, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-23 of the Annual Report for 1977. The Webbers Falls Lock and Dam is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, and 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Facilities at the Port of Muskogee include: A cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built by the Muskogee City-County Port Authority; a liquid cargo loading facility and a steel unloading facility built by Frontier Steel Company; grain holding facilities built by Conagra, Inc.; and a general-purpose private dock built by the Fort Howard Paper Company. Operations and results during fiscal year. tine operation and maintenance continued. Rou- General Investigations 51. SURVEYS. Fiscal year cost was $557,063 which included 11 flood damage prevention studies; 1 special study, 2 restudies of deferred projects; miscellaneous activities-special investigations, review of FERC licenses, and intragency water resources development; and coordination with other Federal agencies, States, and non-Federal interests. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 52. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Fiscal year cost was $259,488 which includes floodplain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 53. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Fiscal year cost was $1,133,384 which includes two navigation projects and five local protection projects. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 29-12 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep 30,19922 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas New Work River Navigation System, Approp OK, (Tulsa District Portion) Cost Maint Approp Cost 3. Arcadia Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 130,936,6382 130,936,6382 130,936,6382 130,936,6382 4,207,100 3,505,573 3,079,178 3,461,500 142,553,312 4,224,784 3,447,239 3,267,423 3,559,308 137,650,691 768,000 1,323,780 0 3,131,000 145,748 3,298,138 417,500 312,182 308,900 392,488 344,939 312,533 1,000,000 169,161 379,000 373,861 85,339,289 85,271,011 1,880,982 1,871,056 4. Arkansas-Red River BasinsChloride Control, KS, OK, and TX New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 4a. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX - 25,705,208 376 - 25,705,068 3,635 4,288 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 3,300 5,288 3,788 2,995 1,200 1,979 3,000 1,987 3,533,506 3,646,832 300,028 300,028 177,099 190,661 4b. Area VIII, TX 189,000 - 46,682,000 23,649 46,679,756 Maint Approp Cost 4C Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK 5. Birch Lake, OK 770,300 638,748 583,300 802,076 632,946 582,900 New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - 2,550,000 - 756,974 759,972 714,177 771,336 701,214 29-13 651,450 676,088 New Work Approp Cost 840,500 823,381 2,450,000 2,650,261 685,000 681,326 4,113,148 4,080,009 5,000,000 3,397,235 13,549,170 13,549,296 9,019,200 12,311,868 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 92 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sep 30,19921 6. Candy Lake, OK 7. Canton Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 19,000 19,242 9,200 18,712 30,400 18,712 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 8 Copan Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 9. Council Grove Lake, KS 1,403,400 1,436,982 1,595,250 1,508,298 1,340,993 1,566,840 353,133 -35,000 36,198 -130,000 10,484 903,200 739,178 759,600 875,777 755,231 812,715 New Work Approp Cost 843,900 761,899 756,800 1,017,000 14,357,643 864,027 740,635 772,331 850,373 14,156,585 10. El Dorado Lake, KS 24,332 72,600 86,971 - 92,505,068 - 92,376,652 Maint Approp Cost 11. Elk City Lake, KS 536,208 411,680 448,900 539,477 424,463 456,288 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 1,005,708 652,118 732,200 1,026,682 671,250 726,541 29-14 33,000 33,431 4,927,922 4,927,714 115,700 115,300 11,209,834 10,918,727 26,757,626 26,814,183 88,509,751 92,035,258 6,133,779 6,099,078 11,810,509 11,810,509 3,825,800 3,934,771 -2,248 873 884,000 878,128 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 131,000 318,066 419,500 422,471 4,207,988 4,204,515 19,052,990 19,052,990 12,888,532 12,835,457 733,400 714,407 Table 29-A (Continued) TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY 89 12. Fall River Lake, KS New Work Approp - Cost - Maint Approp 1,054,600 Cost 1,132,283 13. Fort Supply Lake, OK New Work Approp - Cost - Maint Approp 1,024,500 Cost 970,456 14. Great Bend, KS New Work Approp 1,500,000 Cost 1,247,994 15. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK New Work Approp - Cost - Maint Approp 1,033,200 Cost 1,119,370 16. Halstead, KS New Work Approp 200,000 Cost 203,551 17. Heyburn Lake and New Work Polecat Creek, OK Approp - Cost - Maint Approp 826,000 Cost 787,096 18. Hugo Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost 4,023 Maint Approp 1,328,700 Cost 1,343,855 FY 90 FY 91 - - 720,496 958,400 735,620 872,159 753,624 751,600 820,457 788,347 5,398,000 4,985,400 5,225,004 4,065,797 - - - - 434,679 325,800 399,847 351,078 259,000 262,000 244,356 202,957 601,250 611,300 628,135 680,453 3,456,700 3,748,348 1,219,694 1,250,500 1,245,018 1,323,840 Total to FY 92 Sep 30,1992' - 10,550,873 - 10,550,873 956,800 13,821,691 996,806 13,944,027 - 7,724,134 - 7,723,127 737,500 12,996,698 727,659 12,952,847 4,786,000 18,029,400 5,548,146 17,245,330 - 4,626,270 - 4,626,270 337,000 8,179,786 326,261 8,149,788 2,828,000 4,174,000 2,808,865 4,071,405 - 2,560,572 - 2,560,572 683,000 10,692,473 665,157 10,768,587 - 41,216,442 - 41,180,456 1,410,500 20,627,544 1,307,664 20,444,569 29-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 92 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep 30, 19922 19. Hulah Lake, OK 20. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 595,300 404,921 389,700 597,517 454,003 385,644 1,546,200 1,078,323 961,800 1,562,032 1,050,865 1,049,933 1,022,000 21,863,800 1,021,250 21,969,139 21. Kaw Lake, OK 109,430,750 -390 109,429,274 Maint Approp Cost 22. Lake Kemp, TX 1,772,700 1,562,033 1,515,600 1,884,007 1,488,022 1,703,701 1,775,200 24,175,923 1,724,787 24,069,805 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 23. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 24. Marion Reservoir, KS New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 150,680 122,278 174,700 158,216 110,666 183,575 6,755,000 12,071,000 3,594,000 6,826,669 10,009,893 4,597,273 889,800 894,872 939,900 910,507 958,866 949,944 137,000 125,281 -349,000 24,580,000 890,417 24,277,853 907,600 907,012 29-16 11,388,150 11,182,433 12,195,900 12,165,189 306,000 317,347 Maint Approp Cost 135,718 135,718 28,151,515 28,151,515 New Work Approp- Cost 7,637,702 7,637,702 2,420,892 2,403,871 13,420,817 13,420,817 14,752,718 14,705,820 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep 30, 19922 25. Mingo Creek, OK 26. Oologah Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 4,884,000 5,090,000 6,221,000 12,183,000 30,465,000 2,268,007 7,904,520 6,540,605 12,359,164 29,518,714 46,722,3293 46,721,5563 1,135,100 1,496,487 1,485,800 1,143,974 1,270,804 1,699,766 1,427,500 23,761,213 1,423,709 23,725,890 27. Optima Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 28. Parker Lake, OK 29. Pat Mayse Lake, TX New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 30. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 561,000 443,728 454,700 578,602 441,111 462,093 -654,000 119,194 40,871 2,238 805,100 812,641 906,800 869,122 779,710 903,262 429,500 427,111 2,258 939,400 965,137 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 31. Pine Creek Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 1,025,700 919,818 804,600 1,033,793 851,358 870,861 -202 937,000 925,070 170 1,008,600 924,395 1,051,900 1,162,600 999,405 933,647 1,054,204 1,137,726 29-17 Maint Approp Cost 47,173,438 47,273,438 6,086,350 6,118,928 522,000 509,009 9,310,661 9,310,661 13,817,450 13,792,678 16,879,166 16,879,166 8,362,618 8,345,266 20,628,049 20,627,847 14,195,553 14,126,019 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 92 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep 30, 19922 32. Sardis Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost 1,350,000 1,075,000 -169,000 4,273,156 2,626,250 226,259 888,800 882,840 832,700 887,629 853,845 874,352 - 68,799,479 4,068 68,616,930 926,000 862.618 6,844,390 6,768,125 33. Skiatook Lake, OK 20,000 130,038 471 - 106,201,282 141 106,268,739 987,700 1,191,638 1,127,000 1,256,000 1,002,919 1,215,888 1,160,717 1,076,141 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 35. Tulsa & West Tulsa, OK 36. Waurika Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 211,900 277,303 239,700 233,835 273,670 240,867 135,000 65,703 -8,034 - 2,911,000 - 2,911,338 263,000 264,871 840,000 153,044 6,764,938 6,533,948 13,896,324 13,896,324 6,066,106 6,063,346 975,000 218,747 -323,752 69,740,298 -313,970 69,739,869 Maint Approp Cost 37. Wister Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Major Rehab Approp Cost 1,209,100 1,129,587 1,233,400 1,235,600 1,212,261 1,141,034 1,210,457 1,261,658 802,800 733,693 715,100 805,894 689,495 772,332 940,000 6,195,529 3,996,000 922,683 5,756,325 4,095,199 720,000 716,466 270,394 29-18 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 433,000 2,189,460 Maint Approp Cost 34. Toronto Lake, KS 12,422,553 11,397,783 10,501,226 10,501,226 13,032,653 13,066,574 11,131,529 11,044,601 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep 30, 19922 43. Broken Bow Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 44. Eufaula Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost 1,626,200 1,644,380 1,740,400 1,752,200 1,779,734 1,623,572 1,671,878 1,860,381 17,617 41,222,692 41,222,692 23,653,521 23,629,372 - 123,350,7474 19,824 - 123,051,2034 3,666,000 3,861,000 4,366,794 4,038,400 3,403,633 4,121,612 4,385,849 3,923,005 45. Fort Gibson Lake, OK - 42,591,2986 - 43,497,7916 3,230,500 2,989,814 3,055,000 3,734,000 55,348,002 3,354,424 3,052,430 3,087,214 3,533,649 56,451,929 46. Keystone Lake, OK - 123,171,1736 - 123,170,6756 2,902,200 2,745,433 2,680,100 3,024,825 2,752,389 2,742,665 3,022,685 48,225,685 3,050,124 48,288,977 47. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam),OK and TX New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost 48. Robert S. Kerr Lock and New Work Dam and Reservoir, OK Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 68,168,9607 68,019,1097 5,350,600 7,078,815 5,252,000 6,265,000 100,396,986 5,473,749 5,667,880 6,557,106 6,303,084 100,233,511 46,237 46,237 -- - - 94,578,237 -- - - 94,578,237 4,592,584 4,233,112 2,811,100 2,900,500 52,523,533 4,781,357 3,612,433 3,288,901 3,104,279 52,131,836 29-19 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 63,146,560 59,803,902 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 92 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep 30, 19922 49. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK New Work Approp - - - - 24,017,7208 Cost - - - - 24,057,7188 Maint Approp 2,739,000 2,837,232 2,757,300 3,005,000 49,804,646 Cost 2,831,687 2,906,764 2,835,767 2,965,843 47,751,489 50. Webbers Falls New Work Lock and Dam, OK Approp - 2,369,690 - - 86,107,967 Cost - 2,369,690 - - 86,108,391 Maint Approp 2,433,300 2,152,027 2,382,700 2,809,000 47,098,491 Cost 2,728,735 1,964,705 2,534,989 2,875,685 47,196,511 1. Includes $2,077,900 expended by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8 dated, 6. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 29-M of the FY 85 7. Includes $433,539 Emergency Relief Funds. Annual Report. Exchange $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 2. Includes $12,700,038 for Bank Stabilization and 8. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public Channel Rectification. Works acceleration funds. 3. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 special funds. 9. The cost for Grand Lake 0' the Cherokees has been added to 4. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 special funds. amount reported in paragraph 41, Scheduling Reservoir 5. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 Public Operations. Works acceleration funds. TABLE 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project W.D. Mayo Hydropwer ARCADIA LAKE Changed water quality to water supply 29-20 3. HD 79-758 PL 79-525 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 HD 91-299 PL 94-587 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 October 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 February 15, 1958 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 See Section In Text 4. 4a. 4b.&4c. HULAH LAKE JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR Authorized name change KAW LAKE LAKE KEMP Documents Project and Work Authorized ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL Authorized Area V (Estelline Springs) Authorized Areas VII, VIII, and X P Authorized Areas I, II-III, VI, IX, XIII, XIV, and XV Authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority. BIRCH LAKE CANDY LAKE CANTON LAKE Approved Irrigation Storage Approved Water Supply Storage COPAN LAKE COUNCIL GROVE LAKE EL DORADO LAKE ELK CITY LAKE FALL RIVER LAKE FORT SUPPLY LAKE GREAT BEND GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE HALSTEAD HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK HUGO LAKE HD 74-308 HD 80-442 PL 85-327 HD 87-143 HD 87-144 29-21 SD 87-107 'L 89-789, SD 110 PL 91-611 PL 99-662 HD 87-563 HD 87-563 HD 75-569 HD 87-563 HD 80-442 HD 89-232 HD 76-440 HD 76-440 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 80-290 HD 79-602 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 92 TABLE 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section In Text 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 29-22 37. 43. 44. -- Date of Authorizing Act November 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 March 14, 1990 November 17, 1986 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 10, 1978 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 December 4, 1981 October 23, 1962 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 December 30, 1963 June 28, 1938 July 30, 1983 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 July 24, 1946 Project and Work Authorized LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK MARION RESERVOIR Authorized name change MINGO CREEK OOLOGAH LAKE OPTIMA LAKE PARKER LAKE PAT MAYSE LAKE PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE Authorized name change PINE CREEK LAKE SARDIS LAKE Authorized name change SKIATOOK LAKE TORONTO LAKE TULSA & WEST TULSA, OK WAURIKA LAKE WISTER LAKE Changed conservation pool elevation BROKEN BOW LAKE EUFAULA LAKE Documents PL 99-662 HD 80-442 PL 101-253 PL 99-662 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 88-71 HD 87-472 PL 95-265 HD 85-170 SD 87-145 PL 97-88 HD 87-563 HD 76-440 PL 77-228 PL 101-514 SD 88-33 PL 88-253 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session PL 98-63 HD 85-170 SD 87-137 HD 79-758 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 45. August 18, 1941 FORT GIBSON LAKE HD 76-107 July 24, 1946 Incorporated into the PL 76-228 multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin November 17, 1986 Added hydropower units 5 & 6 PL 99-662 46. May 17, 1950 KEYSTONE LAKE SD 81-07 47. LAKE TEXOMA (Denison Dam) June 28, 1938 Flood control and power HD 75-541 October 17, 1940 Navigation and regulating flows PL 76-868 Sepember 30, 1944 Authorized name PL 78-454 August 14, 1953 Water supply PL 83-273 November 17, 1986 Recreation PL 99-662 48. July 24, 1946 ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND HD 79-758 DAM AND RESERVOIR July 8, 1963 Authorized name change PL 88-62 49. June 28, 1938 TENKILLER FERRY LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. June 24, 1946 Power HD 79-758 50. July 24, 1946 WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM HD 79-758 Table 29-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1992 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Big and Little Sallisaw Inactive Navigation Project Poteau River Navigation Project, Complete 1983 536,952 OK and AR Red River from Fulton, AR, Complete 1924 378,574 182,157 to Mouth of Washita River 29-23 TABLE 29-E REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 92 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1992 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Augusta LPP, KS', 2 1938 - 84,217 Big Pine Lake, TX3 1984 1,701,670 Boswell Lake, OK3 1952 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK2 1970 261,448 Crutcho Creek LPP, OK3 1972 213,016 Dodge City LPP, KS2 Enid LPP, OK2 1963 743,612 14,599 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, 1975 1,741,000 Tulsa, OK2, 4 Florence LPP, KS2 1965 369,782 Hutchinson LPP, KS2 1956 3,497,718 Iola LPP, KS2 1939 22,290 Jenks LPP, OK2 1950 344,797 Joe Creek LPP, OK2 - 308,041 Lamed LPP, KS2 Lukfata Lake, OK3 1983 1,424,685 Marion, KS 1988 5,488,618 McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX5 Oklahoma City LPP, OK2 1960 8,047,512 Red River Bank Stabilization Below Denison, 1953 222,105 OK and TX2 Sand Creek LPP, KS2 1968 545,996 Sand Lake, OK3 1963 Shidler Lake, OK3 1983 568,191 Tulsa and West Tulsa LPP, OK2 1954 2,785,070 Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK3 1975 144,853 Tuskahoma Lake, OK3 1963 West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS2 1965 364,200 Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS2 1960 12,247,379 Winfield LPP, KS', 2 1937 LPP - Local Protection Project. 1. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 2. Complete. 3. Deferred. 4. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. 5. Active with no current year expenditures. 29-24 TABLE 29-G Project Cedar Point Lake, KS Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS El Dorado, West Branch, Walnut River, KS Neodesha Lake, KS Towanda Lake, KS TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Day See Annual and Report For Authority 1980 November 17, 1986 Public Law 99-662 1971 November 17, 1986 Public Law 99-662 1977 November 17, 1986 Public Law 99-662 1952 November 17, 1986 Public Law 99-662 1981 November 17, 1986 Public Law 99-662 29-25 Federal Funds Expended 0 363,720 92,319 97,910 392,361 Contribu Funds Expended 0 0 0 0 0 Cotib - TABLE 29-H REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 92 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PLAN (See Section 1 of Text) Feature River River Mile' Nearest Town LAKES Canton North Canadian 394.3 Canton, OK Elk City Elk River 8.7 Elk City, KS Eufaula Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK Fall River Fall River 54.2 Fall River, KS Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK Grand Lake 0' the Cherokees Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, OK Neodesha Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, OK Tenkiller Ferry Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK (Tulsa District Portion) Bank Stabilization and Verdigris and N/A2 Fort Smith, AR, Channel Rectification Arkansas to Catoosa, OK Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK Verdigris 401.5 Okay, OK Lock and Dam 13, AR Arkansas 292.8 Fort Smith, AR Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK Verdigris 421.6 Inola, OK Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK Arkansas 339.0 Sallisaw, OK Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK Arkansas 336.2 Cowlington, OK Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK Sans Bois Creek 341.0 Keota, OK W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK Arkansas 319.6 Redland, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK Arkansas 366.6 Gore, OK 1. On the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, these are navigation miles. 2. As required for a channel 9 feet deep. 29-26 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Projects Inspected in Fiscal Year Inspection Date South Deer Creek,OK Dodge City, KS Florence, KS Hutchinson, KS Iola, KS Lamed, KS Marion, KS Sand Creek, City of Newton, KS Cherry/Red Fork Creeks, OK Flat Rock/Valley View Cks, OK Haikey Creek, OK Jenks, OK Joe Creek, OK Tulsa/West Tulsa Levees, OK Enid Diversion Channel, OK Oklahoma City Floodway, OK Park City, KS West Branch Chisholm Creek, KS Wichita/Valley Center October 1991 December 1991 November 1991 May 1992 December 1991 December 1991 November 1991 November 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 December 1991 December 1991 May 1992 May 1992 May 1992 TABLE 29-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 42 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS (Section 205) Arkansas River, Moffett, OK Blackboy Creek, Tulsa County, OK Chickasha, OK Chikaskia River, Blackwell, OK Coal Creek, Henryetta, OK Cowskin Creek, Haysville, KS Gordon Creek, Iowa Park, TX Little Arkansas River, Sedgwick, KS Manard Bayou, Muskogee County, OK Merkle Creek, Norman, OK Muskogee, OK North Canadian River Wastewater Plant, Oklahoma City, OK Rock Island Slough, Wellington, KS Sycamore Creek, Coffeyville, KS Walnut Creek, Purcell, OK Whiskey and Rock Creeks, Independence, KS Wichita Falls, TX, Plum Creek Wolf Creek, Lawton, OK TOTAL SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 29-27 TABLE 29-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 39 of Text) 0 215 7,076 0 1,772 4,570 10,418 49 0 0 0 333 42 21,222 0 0 40,639 496 86,832 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 92 TABLE 29-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK (Continued) UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 42 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (Section 14) Camp Facility, Red River, Telephone, TX 13,864 Chikaskia River, Ft Oakland, OK 270 Chikaskia River, Blackwell, OK -21 City Dam, Little Caney River, KS 3,540 County Bridge, Walnut River, Arkansas City, KS 17 County Road (Sec. 2), Deer Creek, KS 7,003 County Road (Sec. 6), Deer Creek, KS 413 County Road, Washita River, Caddo 2,365 County Bridge Elk River, Elk City, KS 2,682 County Road, Washita River, Caddo City, OK 14,627 County Road, North Canadian River, OK 4,651 County Road, Tyner Creek, Adair 0 Cow Creek, Comache, OK 10,032 County Road, Washita River, Carter County (-136) Dam and Bridge, Neosho River, KS 6,216 Fisher Creek, Tulsa County 210 Kiowa Tribe Housing Developement, Andarko, OK 11,439 Levee, Arkansas River, Tulsa, OK 1,111 North Canadian River, Okfuskee County, OK 9,709 Poteau River, LeFlore County, OK 1,899 Section 20 Aqueduct Washita River, Caddo County, OK 6,170 Section 24 Aqueduct Washita River, Caddo County, OK 3,964 Section 24 Road North Canadian River, Pottawatomie County, OK 924 Section 27 Road North Canadian River, Pottawatomie County, OK 2,230 Sewage Lagoon, South Canadian River, New Castle 315 Sewage Lagoons, North Canadian River 6,553 State Highway 156, Kay County, OK 0 Verdigris River City Dam, Independence, KS -522 Walnut River, Cowley County, KS -988 TOTAL EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION 108,537 SNAGGING AND CLEARING Boggy Creek, Bryan County, OK 19,726 Little Deep Fork Creek, OK 1,624 TOTAL SNAGGING AND CLEARING 21,350 29-28 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-K GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 51, 52, and 53 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identificatiorn/Name Cost SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Arkansas River, Great Bend, KS, to Tulsa, OK 397 Arkansas River Basin, AR and OK 5,811 Canadian River, OK, TX, NM 35 Crutcho Creek, OK 43 Grand Neosho River Basin, KS and OK 69 Kaw Dam to Keystone Lake 8,557 Lake Texoma, OK and TX 338 Miami and Vicinity, OK 8 North Canadian Above Lake Overholser 9 North Canadian River, OK 247,995 Pecan Bayou, TX 208,740 Special Studies Fed Strategy America Infrastructure 4,232 Review of Authorized Projects Restudy of Deferred Projects Lukfata Lake, OK 4 Winfield, KS 50 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations 44,538 Review of FERC Licenses 1,713 Intragency Water Resources Development 19,981 North American Water Fowl Management 3,926 Coordination with Other Federal Agencies, States, and Non-Federal Interests Soil Conservation Service 3,006 Bureau of Reclamation 5,715 Planning Assistance to States - Texas 21 Planning Assistance to States - Oklahoma 1,875 TOTAL SURVEYS 557,063 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Claremore OK, FW/P 4,704 Flood Plain Management Services 44,076 Ponca City, OK, Flood Forecast Map 26 Quick Responses 9,946 Chickasha, OK 3,762 Moore, OK 7,873 Sterling, KS 14,963 Wichita, KS 29,946 Shawnee, OK 11,409 Skiatook, OK 19,464 Technical Services General 100,075 Tulsa Forecast Maps 5 Wagoner County, CO 11,111 Hydrologic Studies Storm Studies 2,128 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 259,488 29-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 92 TABLE 29-K (Continued) GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 51, 52, and 53 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation Projects Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Red River Waterway to Denison Dam, TX Flood Control Projects Local Protection Arkansas City, KS Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK McGrath Creek, TX Upper Little Arkansas River Watershed, KS Winfield, KS TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 1,312 179,075 390,333 184,219 151,599 6,768 220,078 1,133,384 29-30 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT* District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffin Bay; coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and south to the northern boundaries of Newton, Jasper, Tyler, Polk, Trinity, Walker, Waller, Austin, Fayette, Gonzales, Karnes, Live Oak, Jim Hogg, Zapata; the northern and western boundaries of McMullan; and the western boundaries of Montgomery and Duval Counties, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. 30-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Trinity River Project, TX ................... 30-2 Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, TX.......................... 30-3 3. Bardwell Lake, TX ...................... 30-3 4. Belton Lake, TX ........................... 30-3 5. Benbrook Lake, TX. ..................... 30-4 6. Boggy Creek, TX .......................... 30-4 7. Canyon Lake,TX ......................... 30-4 8. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX .............. 30-4 9. Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' The Pines, TX .................... 30-6 10. Grapevine Lake, TX ...................... 30-6 11. Hords Creek Lake, TX ..................... 30-6 12. Joe Pool Lake, TX ........................ 30-6 13. Lavon Lake, TX...... .................. 30-7 14. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX ................. 30-7 15. Lewisville Dam, TX ...................... 30-7 16. Navarro Mills Lake, TX ................... 30-8 17. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX .............. 30-8 18. Proctor Lake, TX........................ .30-8 19. Ray Roberts Lake, TX................ . 30-8 20. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX . ..... 30-9 21. San Gabriel River, TX .................... 30-9 22. Somerville Lake, TX ................... .30-10 23. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX ................ 30-10 24. Waco Lake, TX ........................ .30-10 25. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX.......... 30-10 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............................. 30-11 Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Channel to Liberty in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,060,000,000 including $44,000,000 non-Federal cost for land acquisition and relocation required for the local protection features (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). Operations during fiscal year. Channel to Liberty and Tennessee Colony Lake have been dormant for several years due to lack of local support. The Dallas Floodway Extension has advanced to the Preconstruction Flood Control (Cont) Page 27. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............................. 30-11 28. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..... 30-11 29. Work Under Special Authorization .......... 30-11 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 30. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX ..... 30-11 31. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX ....... 30-11 32. Sam Rayburn Spillway (Dam Safety Assurance), TX ............... 30-12 33. Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX ................. 30-12 34. Whitney Lake, TX ....................... 30-12 General Investigations 35. Surveys ........................... 36. Preconstruction Engineering and Design 37. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... ..... 30-12 ..... 30-12 ..... 30-13 Tables Table 30-A Cost and Financial Statement ...... 30-15 Table 30-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 30-19 Table 30-C Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... 30-22 Table 30-D Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................. 30-22 Table 30-E Work Under Special Authorization .................... 30-23 Engineering and Design stage and is described in Preconstruction Engineering and Design section. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: Location. The Channel to Liberty begins at the Houston Ship Channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou Channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston Ship Channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $147,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $44,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $191,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). 30-2 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $34,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $913,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $461,754,000 for water supply and $9,533,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $471,287,000, exclusive of interest. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing Acts see Annual Report for 1984. Construction was started March 1977, and project was ready for beneficial use April 29, 1983. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29, 1976. To date, the Authority has paid $162,272 toward principal and $33,437 to operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. Benefits accrued to Aquilla Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $17,353,051. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. A Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $852,640 toward principal and $1,032,886 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Bardwell Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $25,601,801. 4. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $1,602,822. To date $1,383,547 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $1,605,680 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 2, 1957. Amount of $433,083 paid by authority on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 30-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Benefits accrued to Belton Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $491,982,756. 5. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in Benbrook Lake. Contracts have been negotiated with the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation storage for water supply purposes until such storage is required for Trinity River Navigation. To date $379,685 has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $136,425 by Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost sharing contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 20, 1977. To date, $19,024 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 are estimated at $2,153,991,920. 6. BOGGY CREEK, AUSTIN, TX Location. The project is located on Boggy Creek in southeast portion of the city of Austin, Texas. Existing project. The Boggy Creek Channel Improvement Project consists of approximately 2 miles of concrete and gabion lined channel beginning just upstream of Webberville Road and extending downstream almost to Jain Lane. From there the Channel is about 1.0 mile of grasslined trapezoidal channel to Ed Bluestein (Highway 183) where it transitions back into the natural channel. The project includes a 54 acre tract near the lower end of the project which serves as a mitigation and environmental quality enhancement area. Approximately 1.0 mile of nature trail is included in the mitigation/ enhancement area. The project required the replacement or modification of four bridges. It also included the replacement of two railroad bridges with one bridge. Estimated Federal cost is $16,660 and $8,000,000 non- Federal cost. The flood control channel provides capacities for the 100 year flood. Design provided for containment of flows within the banks of the improved channels. Bottom widths for the concrete channel vary from 60 feet to 90 feet, and top widths from 80 feet to 120 feet. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the City of Austin is required to continue routine operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Specific authorization for construction of Boggy Creek is found in FY 1985 Supplemental Act. Construction of project was started in 1986 and completed in April 1991. 7. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: The Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority (GBRA) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 6,070 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. GBRA has an agreement with the Pedernales Electric Cooperative for sale of power. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1989 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe- Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the water storage contract is about $9,000,000. To date $2,293,469 has been paid. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $1,374,958 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Canyon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $141,941,892. 8. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Location. Cooper Dam is located in northeast Texas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13.0 miles north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.2 on the South Sulphur River. The South Sulphur River rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River to form the Sulphur River. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a multipurpose reservoir with levee and channel improvements on the Sulphur River. The reservoir consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height of about 79 feet, 28,070 feet long at its crest, a single conduit 10.5 feet in diameter, 530 feet 30-4 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT long, two 10.5 foot by 4.75 foot sluices, and a 700 foot wide uncontrolled concrete spillway. The reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres at the top of the flood control pool, 19,305 acres at the top of the water supply pool, and 5,084 acres at the top of the sediment pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acre-feet of flood control storage, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply storage, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Construction of the project began in July 1958 and, to date, approximately 99 percent of the lands required for project construction have been acquired and 100 percent of the levees and 100 percent of the channel work have been completed. Approximately 14.8 miles of the South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of the Middle Sulphur River channels have been excavated. Approximately 3.4 miles of levee embankment on the South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles on the Middle Sulphur River have been constructed upstream of the Cooper Lake. About 10.5 miles of levee on the North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on the Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Cooper Lake. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel work between April 1964 and February 1971. Construction was started again, however, in May 1971. The Texas Committee on Natural Resources, et. al., secured an injunction to halt construction on the project pending preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. A statement was prepared and filed on June 24, 1977. The plan recommended, in the Final EIS, minimized further construction of the authorized channels and provided for construction of the lake and downstream levees. The sufficiency of the Final EIS was challenged in the court and in December 1978 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled the statement inadequate, citing five deficiencies and halting all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with the court's decision was prepared and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency in March 1981. The recommended plan of improvement consists of the multipurpose lake, 48.2 miles of levee, and the acquisition of 24,724 acres of wildlife mitigation lands. All remaining channel and levee work was deleted from the recommended plan. The Supplemental EIS was filed with the court in July 1981 and numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were subsequently filed. After the Supplemental EIS was filed in July 1981, numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were filed through October 1982. On December 30, 1982, the U.S. District Court issued a 95-page order continuing the permanent injunction. On March 22, 1983, the order was revised and Judge William Wayne Justice issued an Amended Memorandum Opinion and a Permanent Injunction against the construction of Cooper Lake. The Government filed a Notice of Appeal with the court in May 1983. On July 16, 1984, litigation was resolved and the injunction was released. The project was transferred to the Fort Worth District at the end of FY 1979. Public Law 101-101, H. R. 101-235, approved September 29, 1989, authorized $5 million for additional recreation. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1992 base price) is $144,000,000, non-Federal cost for land for the levees is $227,000 and in addition $55,100,000 is to be reimbursed by water supply users over a 50-year period. Local cooperation. Local interests (North Texas Municipal Water District, Sulphur River Municipal Water District, City of Irving) will utilize water impounded for present and future water supply. The total cost allocated to water supply to be reimbursed is $55,100,000. North Texas Municipal Water District, NTMWD, has contracted for 36.859 percent of the water supply storage for future use with deferred payments for ten years. Under the contract NTMWD must pay 13.803 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Sulphur River Municipal Water District, SRMWD, has contracted for 6.5 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.78 percent for future use for a total of 26.282 percent of the water supply storage. To date $77,463 has been paid. Under the contract SRMWD must pay 2.435 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. To date $4,581 has been paid. The City of Irving has contracted for 16.923 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.936 for future use for a total of 36.859 of the water supply storage. To date $166,854 has been paid. Under the contract Irving must pay 6.337 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. To date $11,924 has been paid. The Texas Parks and Wildlife and the Corps of Engineers have entered into or have agreed to formal Operation and Maintenance contracts for recreation facilities and wildlife conservation and management. Under the contracts for recreation facilities dated 7 November 1988 and 11 September 1990, Texas Parks and Wildlife will be responsible for 100 percent of the O&M of two state parks that are being constructed with Federal funds. Under the contracts for wildlife conservation and management, currently being finalized, the State will be responsible for 24.14 percent of the operations, maintenance and replacement annual costs for areas totaling approximately 35,500 acres. The remaining balance will be the responsibility of the Project Sponsors and the Government. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1992 the State of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department awarded recreation contracts. Other contracts awarded during the year were project and maintenance buildings. Cooper Lake and Channels is approximately 85 percent complete overall. Major items completed through FY 1992 are Relocations of Railroads, 100 percent; Channels and Canals, 100 percent; Levees and Floodwalls, 100 percent; and Lands and Damages, 99 percent. Land Acquisition, Engineering and Design and construction continues. Deliberate Impoundment began 29 September 1991 and project completion is scheduled for February 1995. Benefits accrued to Cooper Lake and Channels project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 are estimated at $946,258. 30-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 9. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE O' THE PINES, TX Location. Dam is on Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Texas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet, including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,000 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed June 1960. Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and $399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $30,753,763. 10. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. A contract for modification of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 30, 1983 and completed FY 1990. The improvements provided for spillway modification by construction of spillway chute and stilling basin and a berm on the downstream side of the main embankment. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with City of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17, 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with City of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000. To date, $121,478 has been paid. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part is to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities $118,231, Dallas $588,999, and Grapevine $189,573 Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $3,763,097,543. 11. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Texas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $4,825,993. 12. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Location. Dam site is located at River Mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet above the streambed and a total length of 22,360 feet, including 50-foot type spillway, which will control 232 square miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 10,940 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 123,100 acrefeet for flood control, 142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of the project is $226,390,000 (Oct. 1, 1992, base price) including $11,260,000 non-Federal first cost. Project is a unit in the general comprehensive plan for development and control of the water resources of the Trinity River Basin. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority were 30-6 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT approved by the Acting Secretary of the Army, June 15, 1977. The recreation contract with Trinity Valley Authority was modified March 28, 1979, to allow the Corps to participate with the State of Texas and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Recreation development contract with the State of Texas was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $57,150,000 for water supply and $8,660,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $65,810,000 exclusive of interest. To date $40,465 has been paid. Of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, $4,107 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. The project has been under construction since FY 1975 and through FY 1992 is approximately 99 percent complete overall. All major items are complete thru FY 1992 except for the State Park recreation and the Penn Site restoration. Deliberate Impoundment began January 1986. Project completion is scheduled for May 1993. Public Law 97- 400, H.R. 7377, 97th Congress, effective December 31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool Lake. Benefits accrued to Joe Pool Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $342,996,323. 13. LAVON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,261.67. To date North Texas Municipal Water District has paid $3,505,688. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, and to date has paid $743,445. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $305,217,862. 14. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22.0 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Mile 31.8. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1988. Construction of project was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and $220,000 local interests, a total of $69,970,000. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22, 1967, by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $3,492,486 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurance to contract for 57 percent of future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $37,825,004. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal year. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees and total project are 100 percent complete. 15. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. Dam is in Denton County, Texas, on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000, including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: The city of Denton, Texas (COD) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 2,000 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. A contract with City of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage land rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16, 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of 30-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. Local contributions have been paid in full. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denison must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $3,507,626 and Denison $147,600. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $4,615,514,998. 16. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16.0 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Estimated cost of project is $13,154,000, including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date the Authority has paid $995,286 for water supply and $1,055,682 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $95,375,634. 17. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake January 3, 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water-supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water-supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,336 toward operation and maintenance for a 50-year period. The Authority must pay additional contributions of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning January 1, 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $15,646,213. 18. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8.0 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1, 1960, and was modified and approved May 9, 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $445,329 for water supply and $415,517 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Benefits accrued to Proctor Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $50,809,796. 19. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. The Water Resource Development Act of 1990 authorized the Greenbelt Corridor between Lewisville and Ray Roberts Lakes. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $302,800,000 (Oct. 1, 1992, base price). Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8094, effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Hydropower: At the request of the City of Denton and the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum facility for future hydropower. The city of Denton, Texas (COD) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 1,000 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were 30-8 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT approved by the Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. To date the city of Dallas has paid $4,308,632 and the city of Denton has paid $1,513,807 toward principal. Dallas has paid $99,217 and Denton has paid $34,859 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project. Operations during fiscal year. The project is about 97 percent complete overall. Through FY 1992 about 94 percent of the land acquisition, the road and utility relocations and the embankment, spillway and outlet works have been completed. Major work items remaining to be completed are boundary delineation at Lewisville Lake, flood damage repairs, seepage control, recreational facilities, wetlands, and the Greenbelt. Deliberate Impoundment began 30 June 1987 at Ray Roberts Lake, the pool raise at Lewisville Lake was 30 November 1988. The project is scheduled to be completed in July 1996. Benefits accrued to Ray Roberts Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $923,196,379. 20. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, Martinez Creeks, and Espada Aqueduct located in vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Existing project. The project consists of 30.7 miles of channel and associated improvements on six separate streams. Completion of detailed engineering and design studies revealed that the least costly alternative for the remaining channel improvements would consist of two tunnels. The San Pedro Creek tunnel would be 6,040 feet in length and the San Antonio River tunnel would be 16,360 feet in length, and construction and alteration of railroad bridges. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $137,100,000 (Oct. 1, 1992, base price), and estimated cost to local interests is $72,800,000 which includes $3,600,000 cash contributions and $69,200,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $209,900,000. Existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Construction was started in October 1957 and the project is about 93 percent complete. The Federal portion of the project is scheduled to be completed in November 1995. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on April 15, 1957. To date $3,239,000 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio Channel. Operations during fiscal year. FY 1992 funds were used to continue construction and engineering and design studies. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1992 were $192,965,446. 21. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. Project is a system of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin, which consists of Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7.0 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.0 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $181,400,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price) and estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000 for a project total of $272,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $62,062,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acrefeet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $171,173,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H.R. 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $13,315,000 for Granger, $6,295,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $50,563,000 for South Fork, for a total of $70,172,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18, 30-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Through 1983 all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed in preparation of General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. A Draft Reevaluation Report on South Fork Lake was submitted to headquarters in October 1986. The report recommended no Federal action and defer further studies indefinitely. Future water supply needs of the area would be addressed by reallocating storage at Granger Lake. The South Fork Lake project was placed on inactive status and would be eligible for deauthorization in FY 1997 if no funds are obligated by then. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Lake Georgetown: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $38,569,917. 22. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started in June 1962 and project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, has paid $1,632,406 to date. Also under the contract, the authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Somerville Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $90,100,141. 23. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $2,063,969. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $913,056. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Dam Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 1992 is $55,871,623. 24. WACO LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at City of Waco, McLennan County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the City of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. To date, the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $2,209,548. Also under the contract the Authority and the City must pay 14.706 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $1,016,710 and the City has paid $157,681. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, for additional storage for municipal and industrial water supply, was approved by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, September 28, 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Waco Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $266,324,638. 25. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1984. Estimated cost of project is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata share 30-10 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Texarkana, Texas, for reserving water supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 17, 1968. To date, the City has paid $597,708. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $70,524,686. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with Section 208.10, of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local floodprotection works approved by Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. See Table 30-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY from regular funds for maintenance were $65,215. Total costs to September 30, 1992 were $982,939. 27. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944, expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near City of Austin, Texas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near City of San Angelo, Texas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 1992 were $256,108,000 and by Twin Buttes through FY 1992 were $418,000. Twin Buttes Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for operation of both reservoirs were $41,449. 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 30-C.) 29. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 30-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 585, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization); emergency streambank protection under Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended; Snagging and Clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control, Section 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress, as amended. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $117,496 for disaster preparedness; no levee repair. Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 30. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. Installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities at Town Bluff Dam was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-14), March 2, 1945, but deferred in the original construction. Town Bluff Dam was completed and placed in operation in 1951. A Design Analysis Report completed in April 1982 and a Feasibility Report was approved September 9, 1983 indicated that installing hydropower at this project is now economically feasible. The hydropower facilities will include a 6,000 kilowatt power plant (two units at 3,000 kilowatts each), intake and outlet facilities, and necessary switchgear equipment to be located in the main embankment at the old diversion channel and will be operated remotely from the Sam Rayburn project. The installation and operation of hydropower facilities will not result in the altering of the existing operation at Town Bluff. The project will produce an estimated 35,900 megawatt hours of energy per year. There is no Federal cost on this project. It is completely funded by non-Federal funds. The estimated non-Federal cost is $18,900,000. 101st Congress House Report 923, effective February 7, 1989, changed the name of Town Bluff Hydropower to Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower. Local cooperation. A contract with the Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Authority was approved by Secretary of the Army, June 28, 1985, relative to financing, escrow agreement, and power sales agreement. Operation during fiscal year. Construction was initiated July 1986 and completed in December 1991. Project completion date is scheduled for 1993. 31. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10.0 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report 1969. Construction was started August 1956 and project 30-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22, 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $4,400,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the City of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved May 27, 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the City has paid $163,883. Also under the contract the City of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the City has paid $143,672. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $410,195,686. 32. SAM RAYBURN SPILLWAY (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE), TX Location. For location of completed dam see Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The existing 2200-foot wide uncontrolled spillway is constructed through erodible loose sand, shaley clay, and sandstone. Based on experience of significant erosion at other uncontrolled and unlined spillways constructed through less erodible material, the spillway at Sam Rayburn Dam would experience severe erosion damage and probably breach during passage of floods in excess of the 150-year flood frequency (25 percent of Probable Maximum Flood). The modification of the spillway consists of constructing a new reinforced concrete weir, stilling basin and outfall channel at or near the existing spillway structure. The proposed weir would have a width of 640 feet, an overall length of 433 feet, an outfall channel approximately 5,000 feet long and a crest elevation of 176.0 feet NGVD. Estimated Federal cost for the spillway modification is $42,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1992, base price) and $1,000,000 is to be reimbursed by hydropower sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design continues. 33. TOWN BLUFF DAMB. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Texas, and 93.0 river miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2,000,000 contribution by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 34. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Texas, and about 38 miles upstream from City of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started June 1946 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. To date, the authority has paid $241,115. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Whitney Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1992 were $649,729,351. General Investigations 35. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $2,220,488 for flood damage prevention studies; $43,384 for coordination with other agencies; $0 for review of authorized projects; $98,052 for miscellaneous activities; and $0 for preauthorization studies Phase I for a total of $2,361,924. 36. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX: Beals Creek is located in the city of Big Spring, Howard County, Texas. The project includes local protection features including channel improvement and relocations. The channel will be a trapezoidal grass-lined channel with an average depth of about 11 feet and a bottom width of 20 feet. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,160,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1988. Fiscal year costs were $83,882. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TX: Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. The plan of improvement provides for extending the existing Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists of a leveed floodway and flood conveyance improvement (channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the levees and channels would provide Standard Project Flood protection for approximately 7,300 acres of urban lands 30-12 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT currently subject to flooding. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $5,000,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1991. Fiscal year costs were $425,100. FIVE MILE CREEK, DALLAS, TX: Five Mile Creek is located in the southwestern portion of Dallas County, entering the Trinity River just north of Hutchins, Texas. The plan consists of enlarging the channel in the middle portion of the watershed, possible channelization of some major tributaries, and detention ponds in the upper portion of the watershed. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,600,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1989. Fiscal year costs were $48,605. SHOAL CREEK (HANCOCK CREEK), AUSTIN, TX: Hancock Creek, a tributary to Shoal Creek, Austin, Texas, flows through a highly urbanized area of Austin. The authorized project will consist of approximately 4,700 feet of grass-lined channel, concrete-lined channel, and selective clearing along Hancock Creek from Houston Street to its confluence with Shoal Creek with bottom widths varying between 25 and 50 feet. The project will also include alteration to or replacement of three highway bridges, construction of a 10-foot by 10-foot box culvert to divert flows around a shopping center, relocation of utility lines, and acquisition of approximately 4 acres of lands and easements for construction purposes. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $780,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1992. Fiscal year costs were $204,672. 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $226,913. Fiscal year costs were $11,056 for hydrologic studies. 30-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 This page intentionally left blank. 30-14 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT in Text Project 1. Trinity River Project, TX Includes Channel to Liberty, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Dallas Floodway Extension 2. Aquilla Lake, TX 3. Bardwell Lake, TX 4. Belton Lake, TX 5. Benbrook Lake, TX 6. Boggy Creek, TX (Federal Costs) (Contributed Funds) 7. Canyon Lake, TX 8. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX (Contributed Funds) 9. Ferrells Bridge Dam Lake O' The Pines, TX 10. Grapevine Lake, TX Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost To FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992"n - 22,574,865 - 22,574,865 New Work: Approp. - - - - 45,506,300 Cost - - - - 45,506,300 Maint. Approp. 532,500 520,507 516,000 544,000 4,182,107 Cost 529,579 438,501 534,383 600,262 4,154,794 New Work: Approp. - - - - 10,934,505 Cost - - - - 10,934,505 Maint. Approp. 1,194,800 1,632,675 1,156,938 1,964,000 19,415,82218 Cost 1,183,423 1,168,319 1,601,315 1,977,376 18,222,19818 New Work: Approp. - - - - 16,960,549 Cost - - - - 16,960,5491 Maint. Approp. 1,716,300 2,533,345 1,791,000 2,845,000 27,688,10918 Cost 1,761,276 1,638,622 2,638,460 2,398,521 27,070,89218 New Work: Approp. - - - - 13,130,463 Cost - - - - 13,069,9912 Maint. Approp. 1,245,400 2,262,948 1,581,950 1,495,000 25,416,33518 Cost 1,376,992 1,505,796 1,002,687 1,557,277 23,979,34118 New Work: Approp. 4,205,000 6,651,000 1,392,000 (-)75,000 17,338,000 Cost 2,769,539 7,585,800 2,732,816 56,482 17,334,619 New Work: Approp. 35,132 1,215,500 399,321 - 2,589,221 Cost 281,160 1,158,253 756,071 (-)35,792 2,517,193 New Work: Approp. - - - - 19,088,5243 Cost - - - - 19,088,524 Maint. Approp. 1,186,900 1,306,478 1,292,000 1,544,000 19,387,50418 Cost 1,169,578 1,266,674 1,352,930 1,397,919 18,957,00218 New Work: Approp. 20,534,000 23,265,000 12,846,000 9,102,000 116,922,887 Cost 24,757,172 22,945,751 13,279,210 11,132,249 113,820,838 New Work: Approp. - - - - 227,000 Cost - - - - 227,000 Maint. Approp. - - 5,000 541,000 546,000 Cost - - - 520,741 520,741 New Work: Approp. - - - - 14,175,1974 Cost - - - - 14,175,19756 Maint. Approp. 1,680,700 2,780,974 2,180,998 2,276,000 32,690,02518 Cost 1,721,149 2,073,792 2,838,139 2,257,701 32,603,64318 New Work: Approp. - - - - 21,317,790 Cost 6,050 512 - - 21,317,790 Maint. Approp. 1,912,100 2,624,949 1,715,000 1,665,600 29,862,93916 Cost 1,903,328 1,734,685 2,621,486 1,625,900 29,765,22018 30-15 TABLE 30-A See Section SSeeection REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 11. Hords Creek Lake, TX New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 769,600 732,748 Cost 772,873 707,564 12. Joe Pool Lake, TX New Work: Approp. 5,182,000 2,087,000 Cost 10,379,003 2,496,541 Maint. Approp. 529,900 496,620 Cost 532,438 480,658 13. Lavon Lake, TX New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 1,841,300 3,058,296 Cost 1,850,509 1,934,149 14. Lavon Lake Modification New Work: & East Fork Channel Approp. - - Improvement, TX Cost - - 15. Lewisville Dam, TX New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 2,108,300 4,814,960 Cost 2,133,211 3,251,393 16. Navarro Mills Lake, TX New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 1,311,800 1,423,654 Cost 1,286,746 1,223,316 17. O.C. Fisher Dam and New Work: Lake, TX Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 867,400 907,035 Cost 851,790 885,734 18. Proctor Lake, TX New Work: Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 1,401,800 2,111,287 Cost 1,413,347 1,221,199 19. Ray Roberts Lake, TX New Work: Approp. 15,583,000 16,427,000 Cost 13,682,191 18,602,293 Maint. Approp. 449,600 581,002 Cost 456,846 523,614 30. Robert Douglas Willis New Work: Hydropower, TX Contrib. 3,458,000 104,000 (Contributed Funds) Cost 3,385,422 157,592 31. Sam Rayburn Dam and New Work: Reservoir, TX Approp. - - Cost - - Maint. Approp. 2,305,100 2,201,218 Cost 2,288,354 1,956,530 32. Sam Rayburn Spillway New Work: (Dam Safety Assurance), Approp. - 200,000 TX Cost - 101,856 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 199217 809,000 778,039 230,000 925,867 668,988 669,718 2,079,000 3,182,751 3,099,300 4,507,035 981,959 1,187,582 1,495,000 1,540,284 1,193,998 2,034,878 7,964,000 9,360,490 555,000 547,667 50,000 123,828 2,733,000 2,919,386 400,000 177,798 - 2,731,0898 - 2,731,089 928,000 13,844,21718 954,698 13,730,12218 426,000 187,914,000 595,234 187,818,145 555,000 3,162,608 557,343 3,128,282 - 12,864,796 - 12,864,796 2,721,000 32,815,93618 2,138,896 32,141,69618 - 69,796,862 - 69,796,862 - 25,333,988 - 25,333,9889 2,950,600 44,455,08518 2,889,361 41,692,41918 - 9,846,759 - 9,846,75911 1,283,500 18,310,91318 1,246,410 18,199,25718 - 16,027,467 - 16,027,467 1,258,000 16,694,92518 1,230,446 16,623,26918 - 14,469,585 - 14,469,585 1,369,000 19,196,93918 1,294,068 18,834,46618 4,534,000 291,754,700 5,900,903 290,200,514 601,000 2,542,402 635,492 2,498,826 - 18,672,000 1,255 18,628,463 - 60,670,957 - 60,670,95712 4,553,279 49,090,53318 4,502,139 48,598,57118 884,000 1,484,000 1,049,007 1,328,661 30-16 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 199217 20. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. San Gabriel River, TX Granger Lake Georgetown 22. Somerville Lake, TX 23. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX 33. Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX 24. Waco Lake, TX 34. Whitney Lake, TX 25. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 19,891,000 14,698,000 5,713,000 15,000,000 124,176,048 17,605,602 16,386,648 15,692,809 16,762,775 123,645,946 - - 668,955 805,621 3,238,786 - - 668,955 512,911 2,946,076 - - - - 101,796,100 - - - - 101,796,100 1,116,200 1,116,673 998,000 1,774,000 13,186,95118 1,130,161 1,045,321 1,091,454 1,751,570 13,132,25118 1,181,000 1,127,269 1,096,000 1,141,000 12,114,82318 1,180,248 1,096,518 1,094,698 1,134,548 12,043,59418 - - - - 27,790,438 - - - - 27,790,436 1,590,400 1,647,480 2,063,000 2,127,500 29,604,33818 1,637,136 1,497,359 2,170,664 2,006,947 26,907,07718 - - - - 20,522,084'a - - - - 20,522,084 1,405,000 1,269,499 1,192,000 1,352,000 17,918,547 '8 1,452,494 1,083,861 1,334,128 1,278,094 17,736,54918 - - - - 6,602,737 - - - - 6,602,73714 1,158,000 1,578,368 1,249,000 1,055,621 18,018,45718 1,191,374 1,129,621 1,679,080 1,049,431 17,906,98118 - - - - 49,521,12115 - - - - 49,521,121 1,694,700 2,512,419 1,611,990 1,815,000 28,233,51418 1,681,788 1,840,041 2,249,353 1,813,450 28,044,84218 - - - - 42,952,938 - - - - 42,952,93816 2,717,800 4,717,063 3,687,999 2,897,000 48,582,66418 2,713,466 3,551,733 4,592,861 3,158,294 48,162,81318 - - - - 35,731,626 - - - - 35,731,626 1,743,100 1,860,546 1,224,885 1,577,000 30,791,94518 1,751,522 1,390,881 1,460,554 1,728,512 30,650,01118 'Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 2 Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 3 Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. 4 Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. 5 Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 6 Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. 7 Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 30-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 8 Excludes $105,079 expended from contributed funds. 9 Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 which were deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. 10 Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. 11 Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. 12 Excludes $3,000,000 expended from contributed funds. 13 Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds related thereto. 14 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. 15 Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. 16 Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 17 Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98-8, dated March 24, 1983). 18 Beginning Fiscal Year 1985 data shown on Table A includes Special Recreation Use Fees. Data for previous fiscal years have been changed to conform to the new procedure. 30-18 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 13, 1968 3. Mar. 31, 1960 4. Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 5. Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 22, 1936 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 8. Aug. 3, 1955 9. Jul. 24, 1946 10. Mar. 2, 1945 11. Aug. 18, 1941 12. Oct. 27, 1965 AQUILLA LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. BOGGY CREEK, TX Construction of a concrete trapezoidal channel on Boggy Creek beginning just above Webberville Road and extending downstream about 2.2 miles to just below Bolm Road. From there, a grass lined channel would extend further downstream and transition with the natural channel at Ed Bluestein Boulevard, a distance of about 1.7 miles. CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Construction of earth-fill dam and reservoir area; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, miles 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8; channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between miles 1 and 5. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TX Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 535. 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Act of 1936 (PL 738) H. Doc. 247, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 488, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 30-19 TABLE 30-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Mar. 2, 1945 14. Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 15. Mar. 2, 1945 16. Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 17. Aug. 18, 1941 18. Sep. 3, 1954 19. Oct. 27, 1965 31. Mar. 2, 1945 32. Mar. 2, 1945 20. Sep. 3, 1954 21. Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 3, 1975 22. Sep. 3, 1954 23. Sep. 3, 1954 LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Enlarge Lavon Dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAM RAYBURN SPILLWAY (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE), TX Modification of the spillway and embankment. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess., and H. Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 30-20 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents TOWN BLUFF DAM-B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX 33. Mar. 2, 1945 Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., Texas. 1st Sess. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX 30. Mar. 2, 1945 Construction of two units at 3,000 kilowatts each of S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., hydroelectric power generating facilities connected with 1st Sess. Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX 1. Oct. 27, 1965 Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of 1st Sess., and Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a 2nd Sess. distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX 24. Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and 2nd Sess. Middle Bosque Rivers. WHITNEY LAKE, TX 34. Aug. 18, 1941 Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 H. Doc. 390, 76th Cong., miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise the power 1st Sess. pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX 25. Jul. 24, 1946 Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 30-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 30-C OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) Project Belton Lake Modification, TX3 Big Fossil Creek, TX' Big Sandy Lake, TX4 Big Spring, TX2 Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX5 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX4 Dam "A" Lake, TX5 Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX5 Elm Fork Floodway, TX Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX' Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX' Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill)' Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road)' Greenville, TX' Lake Brownwood Modification, TX' Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX5 Millican, TX2 Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX5 Roanoak Lake, TX5 Rockland Lake, TX5 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX' Zacate Creek Channel, TX' Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX' For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1988 1969 1986 1979 1979 1987 1983 1987 1971 1971 1987 1989 1983 1983 1988 1979 1988 1969 1983 1986 Construction Operation and Maintenance - 'Completed 4Recommended for Deauthorization 2Inactive 5Deauthorized "Deferred INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 30-D (See Section 26 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Big Fossil Creek ........................ .............................. Nov. 20, 1991 Calloway Branch, Hurst ....................................................................... AAuugg. .15,1990 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene................................................................. Jun. 4, 1992 Dallas Floodway ................. .............. ................................. Dec. 10, 1991 East Fork .............................................................................. Jun. 24, 1991 Fort Worth Floodway ........................................................................ Oct. 2, 1991 Grand Prairie Landfill ................................................................... Aug. 14, 1990 Grand Prairie Meyers Road ..................................... ........................ Aug. 14, 1990 Greenville ................................................................. Jun. 10, 1992 Munday .................................................................. ............. Jun. 3, 1992 Pleasanton ............................................................................... Jun. 19, 1991 Poteet ................................................................................... Jun. 20, 1991 San Antonio Floodway ............................ .............. ............................ Jun. 17, 1991 Wheeler Creek ........................................................................... May 24, 1990 Zacate Creek ........................................................ .... ........... Dec.4,1991 30-22 Cost to September 30, 1992 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 30-E (See Section 29 of Text) Project Flood Control Activities - Section 205 Cost Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX .............................................................. ... $ 110,612 Beverly Hills, McLennan Cnty, TX.............. ......... ...... ..... ......................... O0 Browder Creek, Springton, TX ......... ......... ...... .... .. ........ ... ....... ......... 857 Calloway Branch, Richland Hills, TX ........................................................... 3,894 Chacon Creek, Laredo, TX ................................................................... 0 Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX .................................................................. 18,629 Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX .......................................................... 105,106 Duck Creek, Garland, TX .................................................................... 108,914 Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX................. ................... ..................... 8,165 Jackson Brand, Dallas, TX .................... ............................. .......... .... (-)4,314 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX ................................................. ........ .... 211,740 Lake Creek, Round Rock, TX ................................................. ............... 6,813 Little Walnut Creek, Austin, TX .............................................................. O0 Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX .................................................................. 62,023 Mary's Creek, Fort Worth & Benbrook, TX ..................................................... 33,754 Plants Creek, Seymour, TX .............................................................. ....... 241 Post Oak Creek, Corsicana, TX ................................... .............. ........ 10,883 Red Arroyo, San Angelo, TX .................. ............................................ ... 1,289 Rush Creek, Arlington, TX ................................................................... 91,913 Seymour Creek, Seymour, TX ........................................................... ............ 27 Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX ......................... ........................... ....... .. 65,592 Stream 5B13, Dallas, TX .................. ................................................... 10,793 Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX .......................................... ......... .......... 111,673 Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX ...................................... ........................... 12,945 Ten Mile Creek, Lancaster, TX ............................................... ........ ....... .. 9,322 Town Branch Creek, Lockhart, TX ..................................................... ....... O0 Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX ............................................................ 138,522 Valley View Branch, Hurst, TX .............................................................. 769 Waco Creek, Waco, TX .............................. ... ............ ........ .. .......... .. 66 Walnut Creek, Mansfield, TX ................. ................................................................... .. (-)11,397 Walnut Creek, Seguin, TX .............. ........ . ... ........... ....... .............. 404 Walnut Creek, Springtown, TX ................................................................ 2,582 Project Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 Cost Little River, Cameron, TX ............................ ........ ............ . ........ .......... 1,416 Beltline Road, Cottonwood Creek, TX ......................................................... $ 30,035 Bridge, Mary Creek, TX .................................................... ................. 20,375 Broadway Street, Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX .......................... .......................... 183 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene, TX ....................... ............. ............... ............ ... O Dice Grove, Lampasas River, Bell Co., TX ....................................................... 2,168 Moss Street, Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX ..................... ...................... . .. ....... 183 Park Row, Arlington, TX............................ ......................... .. .......... .... 21,779 Roaring Springs Rd., Bridge, TX .................................... ................... ....... 28,858 W ashington Street Bridge, Laredo, TX ................ ................... ..................... 21,786 Project Snagging and Clearing of Flood Control - Section 208 Cost Maxwell Creek, Parker County, TX ........................................... $ (-)259 Sulphur RW Red Riv., Franklin City, TX ............... ......................................... 19,922 30-23 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT* Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) .............................. 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX ................ 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX .............. 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX .......... 5. Freeport Harbor, TX ................. 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX ........ 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican Border ............................... 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX ............... 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX ............ 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX .............. 11. Texas City Channel, TX .................. 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX. ........ . 12A. Anahuac Channel, TX ................. 12B. Channel to Liberty, TX ................. 12C. Wallisville Lake, TX................... 13. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................... Beach Erosion Control 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX ............... Flood Control 16. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ........ 16A. Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX ....... 16B. Brays Bayou, TX ...................... 16C. GreensBayou, TX .................... 16D. Halls Bayou, TX ....................... 16E. Hunting Bayou, TX .................... 16F. Little White Oak Bayou, TX ........... . 16G. Carpenters Bayou, TX .................. 17. Clear Creek, TX ...................... 18. Cypress Creek, TX .................. 19. Falfurrias, TX ................ ........ 20. Kirbyville, TX ......................... 21. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX. ........... . Page Flood Control (cont.) Page 21A. Arroyo Colorado, TX.................... 31-14 31-2 21B. South Main Channel, TX................ 31-14 31-2 21C. Raymondville Drain, TX ................ 31-14 31-2 22. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX 31-3 Hurricane-Flood Protection ............. 31-14 31-3 23. SimsBayou,TX ....................... 31-14 31-4 24. State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texana, TX .................. .... 31-15 25. Taylors Bayou, TX ..................... 31-15 31-5 26. Texas City and Vicinity, TX 31-6 Hurricane-Flood Protection .............. 31-15 31-7 27. U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, 31-7 Merryville, LA ........................ 31-16 31-8 28. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX ........ 31-16 31-8 29. Inspection of Completed Flood Control 31-8 W orks ................ .............. 31-16 31-9 30. Flood Control Work Under Special 31-9 Authorization ......................... 31-16 31-10 31. Emergency Stream Bank and Shoreline Erosion Work and Snagging and Clearing 31-10 Under Special Authorization ............ 31-16 32. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment......................... 31-17 31-10 31-10 31-11 31-11 31-11 31-12 31-12 31-12 31-12 31-12 31-13 31-13 31-13 31-13 General Investigations 33. Surveys........................... 34. Planning and Engineering............... 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 31-17 31-17 31-18 Tables 31-A Cost and Financial Statement... 31-19 thru 31-22 31-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 31-23 thru 31-37 31-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... .31-38 31-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ... 31-38 31-E Total Cost of Existing Projects ........... 31-39 31-F Channel Dimensions .......... 31-40 thru 31-42 31-G Channel Dimensions, GIWW Tributary Channels ........... 31-43 thru 31-44 31-H Dredging Operations .......... 31-45 thru 31-46 31-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Control of hydrilla, water-hyacinth and alligatorweed continues in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, Colorado River Basin and Brazos River Basin. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Control work by the State of Texas continued. The contract was renewed for an additional year and has the option to renew for another two years. Monitoring of the biological control nursery areas was maintained and increased with the successful overwintering of the Hydrellia fly at Sheldon reservoir. The fly populations were supplemented with further introductions throughout the summer. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 15F. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $30,024,647, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, and non-Federal $17,340,258, including $7,964,258 contributed funds, $1,099,000 lands, $2,349,000 relocations, and $5,928,000 other costs, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. (October 1, 1992 base price). Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was deauthorized under Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Work remaining consists of enlarging 14.8 miles of the existing Brownsville Channel from 36 feet by 200 feet to 42 feet by 250 feet and by enlarging 2.5 miles of the entrance channel from 38 feet by 300 feet to 44 feet by 300 feet. The turning basin would be enlarged to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) Local cooperation. Complied with for the completed work. For the 42 foot project authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; levees and spillways for disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, during construction, and pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract for dredging the entrance channel, Stations 13+00 to 1+000 was awarded February 4, 1992 and completed at a cost of $1,351,401. Contract for dredging Inshore Reach No. 1, Stations 1+000 to 23+000 was awarded July 16, 1992 and continued through Fiscal Year 1992 at a cost of $1,479,066. Also see Section 34, Planning and Engineering for preconstruction, engineering and design work for Fiscal Year 1992. Maintenance: A contract for jetty repairs was awarded August 9, 1991 and completed June 24, 1992 at a cost of $2,243,766. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 3. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX Location. Port Bolivar is at end of Bolivar Peninsula and 4 miles north of city of Galveston. Channel connects the port with channel in Galveston Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Appendix to Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for channel are shown in Table 31-F. (Also see Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong 31-2 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Enlargement of turning basin from 1,000 to 1,600 feet is inactive. A channel 14 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and approximately 950 feet long is maintained across the east end of the turning basin to accommodate the Galveston- Port Bolivar ferry. Project is complete except for inactive portion. Project dimensions have not been maintained in the completed part since lesser dimensions are adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminals are privately owned and consist of 2 slips and 2 piers. The piers, 400 feet wide by 1,200 feet long and 210 feet wide by 1,200 feet long, are badly deteriorated and not in use. The slips are used as anchorage by shallow-draft vessels. A highway ferry landing owned by the State of Texas is located at south end of turning basin. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. No maintenance required for fiscal year. 4. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 31-F for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $74,938,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects: and non-Federal $18,977,431 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $7,644,435 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (October 1, 1992 base price.) The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Tule Lake Turning Basin through Viola Turning Basin was completed in 1989, and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins has been deferred. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to and through the Chemical Turning Basin at 45- foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in May 1979. Disposal area levees, Area 1 and Rincon were completed in August 1984. First stage disposal area levees, South Shore, were completed in September 1984. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 5. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 31-F on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the 31-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. Work remaining consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin, as authorized by the R&H Act of 1970. The initial contract for the 45 foot project, construction of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty, was awarded in May 1987. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $63,035,000 Federal (Corps); and $31,666,000 non- Federal, including $21,158,303 contributed funds, $360,249 contributed work, $6,587,448 lands, $2,990,000 levees and spillways, and $570,000 relocations. (October 1, 1992 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970, modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation Agreement, executed 26 June 1986, along with Amendments 1, 2 and 3, executed 19 March 1987, 19 June 1991 and 19 June 1991, respectively, require that local interest provide lands, easements, rights-ofway, including land for recreation, and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $9,260,000, modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project, presently estimated at $570,000, contribute in cash one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $420,000; and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the construction costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, presently estimated at $19,100,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980, for additional facilities.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Dredging the Entrance Channel, Station -230+00 to 50+35.91 was continued at a cost of $3,622,045. The contract for dredging Main Channel and Basins was completed at a cost of $6,044,795. The contract to rehabilitate the South Jetty and add 500 feet to the North Jetty continued through the fiscal year at a cost of $7,830,000. Contract for clearing U.S. Coast Guard Station was awarded September 20, 1991 and completed in Fiscal Year 1992 for a cost of $191,756. Construction contract for grading and stone protection of the Public Use Facility at Surfside, Texas was awarded April 10, 1992 and completed at a cost of $436,704. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 6. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966.. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. See Section 12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX regarding work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) Local cooperation. Complied with. 31-4 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1979). A containership terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal containership has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 7. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about one-fourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Texas.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. (See Table 31-G on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been deauthorized. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River was completed in 1986. Construction of a navigation channel from the Gulf to the GIWW and an impoundment basin were fiscally completed in Fiscal Year 1991. Construction of Tiger Island Dam and recreation facilities were also completed in Fiscal Year 1991. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: (1) Mouth of Colorado River, construction of a diversion dam and channel; construction of an oyster cultch; and recreation facilities; (2) Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. 31-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $102,828,000 (excluding $212,000 Department of Transportation cost for Channel to Victoria) Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, $356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous projects; non- Federal $24,991,174 ($395,000 voluntarily expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 contributed funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for channel to Aransas Pass, $3,529,000 contributed funds for Mouth of Colorado River, $2,456,000 contributed funds for Channel to Victoria, $6,022,000 lands for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, $4,242,000 relocations for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, and $5,457,000 other costs for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). (October 1, 1992 base prices.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act and Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Non-Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Texas, $49,665 for Offatts Bayou, Texas, $347,950 for Channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, and $3,529,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, Texas, and $2,093,000 for Channel to Victoria. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1979) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Mouth of Colorado River New Work: Contract for construction of Jetty Park was financially completed at a cost of $3,500. Contract for construction of diversion dam and connecting channel was awarded December 9, 1991 and continued through fiscal year 1992 at a cost of $1,594,246. Channel to Victoria New Work: See Section 34, Planning and Engineering. Sargent Beach New Work: See Section 34, Planning and Engineering. Maintenance: A contract to remove reference line in Cameron, Willacy and Kenedy Counties was awarded September 6, 1991 and was physically completed March 13, 1992 for a fiscal year cost of $615,952. Contract for shoreline protection along the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge was awarded August 19, 1992 and completed in fiscal year 1992 at a cost of $299,780. The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $1,255,698 including engineering and design, supervision and administration, and real estate activities. Contract for rehabilitation of Sector Gates for Brazos River Floodgates and Colorado River Locks was financially completed with a reduction of cost in the amount of $30,411. A contract to replace Guidewalls for the West Gate, Brazos River Floodgates was awarded in August 1990. The 1992 fiscal year costs were $630,501. A contract to replace mooring anchors at Brazos River Floodgates was awarded June 21, 1991 and completed June 30, 1992 with a 1992 fiscal year cost of $304,898. The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $1,328,406 including engineering and design and supervision and administration. A contract to replace guidewalls for the West Lock East Gate, Colorado River Locks was physically completed in July 1992. The 1992 fiscal year costs were $2,627,138. A contract for demolition of abandoned government facilities was awarded in August 1992 and completed in September 1992. The cost at Brazos River Floodgate was $49,765 and at Colorado River Locks, the cost was $31,981. Contract for dredging Port Isabel to Port Mansfield and tributaries was financially completed at a cost of $4,680. Dredging contract for Corpus Christi Bay to Mud Flats was financially completed for a cost of $46,929. Contract for dredging Port Isabel to Port Mansfield and tributaries was completed for $127,363. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 8. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jensen Drive, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, has been deauthorized. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and 1 foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. 31-6 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Houston Ship Channel. Local Cooperation Agreements were being developed for assumption of maintenance on Bayport Ship Channel, Barbour Terminal Channel and Greens Bayou Channel. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for rehabilitation of the Spillman Island disposal area was financially completed at a cost of $800. An erosion protection contract was awarded December 16, 1991, for placing cloth material, blanket stone and riprap along the shoreline of Spillman Island. The contract was completed in May 1992 for a cost of $1,017,292. A dredging contract was awarded September 11, 1992 for dredging Houston Ship Channel, Morgans Point to Carpenters Bayou. The amount of $349,274 has been expended in fiscal year 1992 for mobilization cost. Routine maintenance included mosquito control spraying at a cost of $55,524. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) See Section 34, Planning and Engineering. 9. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 31-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 non- Federal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, $182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 other costs. The project was completed in March 1967. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 10. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 31-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for rehabilitation of East Jetty was completed at a fiscal year cost of $2,250,585. Contract for dredging Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Turning Basin and Junction area was awarded July 10, 1992. A fiscal year cost of $345,000 was expended for levees, spillways and ditches on Disposal areas 8 and 9, and dredging mobilization expenditures. 31-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Routine maintenance included mosquito control spraying at a cost of $28,734. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 11. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. Work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 would modify the project by providing for deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7-mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also proposed. At the request of local sponsor, City of Texas City, the project has been placed in the "deferred" category. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $123,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $74,393,700 non-Federal, including $62,027,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $10,737,000 levees and spillways, $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Shoal Point (formerly known as Snake Island), $561,000 for berthing areas, and $386,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide levees for disposal areas and wetlands; relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide berthing areas; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities, and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation to a depth of 45 feet plus 50 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation deeper than 45 feet; pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rightsof- way, relocations and disposal areas; and pay 50 percent of the costs incurred for operation and maintenance below the 45-foot depth. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for dredging Texas City Channel Turning Basin was awarded September 8, 1992. Funds in the amount of $100,000 have been expended for mobilization costs. 12. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 12A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX Location: Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) 31-8 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. 12B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.) at an estimated total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and rightsof- way and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- by 150- foot channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance including mosquito control spraying for a cost of $6,475. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 12C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to prevent salinity intrusion and create a 3,800 acre reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 2 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. (The reservoir was reduced from 5600 acres with a maximum pool elevation of 4 feet N.G.V.D. by agreement to protect the endangered bald eagle.) Project provides for an 84 foot by 600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project also provides for two recreational areas. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 14,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of authorized project is $77,290,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1992 base price.) A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Final supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement for the modified project authorized in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on September 21, 1983. In March 1986, the Court rendered its Memorandum of order continuing the injunction and directing the Corps to re-commence the administrative process at the time when the first departure from standard NEPA procedures occurred prior to the 1983 legislative action. The Corps and local sponsors perfected an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals and on May 11, 1987, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Corps and dismissed the suit in its entirety. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1991 provided $9,200,000 for the project and directive language for continuation of construction. In the fall of 1989, a pair of bald eagles were discovered nesting at the project site which led to additional consultation under the Endangered Species Act. Solicitation of the contract for the non-overflow dam was postponed to allow for environmental coordination. An Environmental Assessment was prepared with a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) which was signed in September 1991. Environmental documents were approved and construction was resumed. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, onehalf of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated 31-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest reimbursement is estimated at $11,246,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contract for construction of non-overflow dam was awarded September 20, 1991. The contract continued through Fiscal Year 1992 with a cost of $1,757,129. A contract was awarded August 30, 1991 to construct an instrumentation platform. The contract was completed for a total cost of $28,507. Maintenance: Ranger surveillance, administration of project, and administration of duck blind permit program was conducted. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys were conducted on the following projects: Project Galveston Harbor and Channel Freeport Harbor Texas City Channel Clear Creek Channel to Port Bolivar Houston Ship Channel Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Matagorda Ship Channel Trinity River and Trib. Date of Survey Oct 1991 - Jun 1992 Oct 1991 - May 1992 Nov 1991 - Sep 1992 Feb 1992 to Feb 1992 May - Jul 1992 Jun 92 Jun 1992 and Sep 1992 Jul 1992 11,925 $47,141 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Reconnaissance study for navigation channel improvements on Sabine-Neches Waterway, Texas was performed in fiscal year 1992 at a cost of $59,917. The study has been terminated for the lack of sponsorship. Beach Erosion Control 15. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978. Periodic nourishment and construction of sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. Estimated cost of new work is $2,150,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,265,000 non-Federal consisting of $2,150,000 Contributed funds, $43,000 relocations, and $72,000 lands. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Section 934 of Water Resources Development Act of 1986 provides for extension of nourishment period to 50 years for beach nourishment projects. A study to determine the appropriateness of such an extended nourishment period for the Federal beach nourishment project was completed. The study indicated that there was no economic justification for continued Federal participation in the program. The responsibility for beach monitoring and maintenance was transferred to the City of Corpus Christi in July 1990. Flood Control 16. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvements of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Cost of new work is $127,000,000 Federal (Corps) and $86,891,000 non- Federal for lands and relocations. (October 1, 1986 base price.) Channel rectification on Brays Bayou with an improved channel length 25.4 miles was completed in March 1971. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Work remaining consists of 31-10 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required bridge relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston. and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterment. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal costsharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. 16A. ADDICKS AND BARKER RESERVOIRS, TX Location. Reservoirs are located in and west of the City of Houston in Harris, Waller, and Fort Bend Counties, Texas. Existing project. Construction of Barker Dam was complete in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was complete in 1969. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Estimated cost of new work is $11,214,000 Federal (Corps) for Dam Safety Assurance and $11,900,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects (Code 713 funds). Non-Federal funds consist of $11,900,000 contributions for recreational facilities. (October 1991 base price.) Work under the Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Work to be accomplished includes raising approximately 32,400 feet of Addicks Dam 1 to 3 feet and raising approximately 57,600 feet of Barker Dam 3 to 5 feet and armor-plating low ends of both dams. A contract with the city of Houston for cost-sharing in the construction of recreation facilities was entered into in November 1981. The lease for approximately 10,534 acres of land and water areas was approved in February 1983. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: Community Park West (Phase IB) and the velodrome were completed in November 1986. Grading and clearing for an archery range was performed by the City of Houston in March and April 1987. Work has been initiated on a construction contract, awarded for Community Park West (Phase 2) in 1988. Harris County Precinct 3, Cullen- Barker Park, completed Community Park 2 which includes soccer fields and parking lots. The plans for Community Park West, Phase III, were approved in 1989. Construction on Phase III was initiated in 1990. Dam Safety Assurance: Contract for armor plating the ends of the dams, awarded in May 1987, was financially completed at a cost of $1,283,854. Construction contract to raise main dam at Addicks Dam was financially completed at a cost of $45,087. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance at Addicks and Barker Dams. A contract to repair roadway at Addicks Dam was awarded May 29, 1992. The contract was completed at a 1992 fiscal year cost of $241,282. 16B. BRAYS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the south-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $158,251,000 Federal (Corps) and $158,251,000 non-federal consisting of $17,230,000 cash contributions, and $141,021,000 for lands and relocations (October 1992 base price). Location cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $17,230,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 34, Planning and Engineering. 16C. GREENS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the north-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX, and does not include the Halls Bayou tributary. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $153,837,000 Federal (Corps) and $68,499,000 non-Federal consisting of $12,923,000 cash contributions, and $55,576,000 for lands and relocations (October 1992 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is 31-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $12,923,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 34, Planning and Engineering. 16D. HALLS BAYOU, TX Location. Halls Bayou is a major tributary of Greens Bayou, located in the north-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 18 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, boat ramps, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $54,576,000 Federal (Corps) and $44,760,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,696,000 cash contributions, and $38,064,000 for lands and relocations (October 1992 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $6,696,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 16E. HUNTING BAYOU, TX Location. Hunting Bayou is located in Houston, approximately 4 to 5 miles from the central business district. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 14.3 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $54,332,000 Federal (Corps) and $52,251,000 non-Federal consisting of $5,681,000 cash contributions, and $46,570,000 for lands and relocations (October 1992 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $5,681,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 16F. LITTLE WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX Location. Little White Oak Bayou is a tributary of White Oak Bayou in north-central Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 6.0 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $17,958,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,957,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,996,000 cash contributions, and $15,961,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,996,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 16G. CARPENTERS BAYOU, TX Location. Carpenters Bayou is a tributary of Buffalo Bayou in northeastern Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 9.7 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $3,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,950,000 non-Federal consisting of $370,000 cash contributions, and $2,320,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $370,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 17. CLEAR CREEK, TX Location. The project is located about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston, Texas, on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south in Harris and Galveston Counties above and below existing Clear Lake. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of an improved channel from Mile 3.8 to Mile 34.8 to contain within its banks all flood flows up to and including that of a 100-year flood. The selected plan provides channel enlargement and easing of bends within the existing stream from Mile 3.8 to Mile 26.05 to contain at least the 10-year frequency storm, and 31-12 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT additional outlet with gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay, restriction of development in the residual 100-year flood plain and measures to mitigate environmental effects. In 1986, at the request of Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, that portion of the project upstream of the Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximate improved Mile 19.1, was placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $61,255,000 Federal (Corps) and $50,656,000 non-Federal consisting of $5,596,000 cash contributions, $22,600,000 for lands, and $22,460,000 for relocations (October 1, 1992 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Galveston and Harris counties. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed 30 June 1986, requires local interests to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; modify or relocate building, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project; make a cash contribution for mitigation measures consistent with the non-Federal share of total project costs without mitigation measures; pay five percent of the total costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design is underway. 18. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Location. The project is located north of Houston, Texas in Harris County. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the Cypress Creek Channel, incorporating grassed side slopes and channel bottom and appropriate erosion control measures; application of floodplain management techniques in the residual floodplain; construction of project-oriented recreation features, including 11.5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related facilities for health, safety, and public access; and habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of the project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat along the creek, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. Estimated cost for new work is $100,271,000 Federal (Corps) and $34,601,000 non-Federal consisting of $12,471,000 cash contribution, $15,698,000 for lands, and $6,432,000 for relocations (October 1, 1992 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $12,471,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. See Section 34, Planning and Engineering. 19. FALFURRIAS, TX Location. The city of Falfurrias is located near the confluence of Palo Blanco and Cibolo Creeks, intermittent streams that drain a 600-square-mile area in south Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a 5.6 mile long diversion levee; a 1.8 mile long pilot channel; a flowage easement of 11,000 acres of land subject to overflows from the pilot channel; and a 0.8 mile long ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. Estimated cost for new work is $16,870,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,870,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,687,000 cash contribution, $13,013,000 for lands, and $2,170,000 for relocations (October 1, 1991 base price). Local cooperation. The local sponsor would be required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipeline, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,687,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. See Section 34, Planning and Engineering. 20. KIRBYVILLE, TX Location. The project is located in Southeast Texas in the Sabine River basin on Trout Creek and Pin Oak Creek in the vicinity of Kirbyville, Texas, about 45 miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement is a combination channelization and floodplain management plan for Trout and Pin Oak Creeks. The structural element consists of a slightly enlarged channel and clearing and straightening of Trout Creek. The non-structural part consists of controls on future development in the residual 100-year floodplains along Trout and Pin Oak Creeks. Channel improvements in Trout Creek begin about 0.8 mile downstream from the Jasper-Newton County line and end about 0.4 mile upstream from the U.S. Highway 96 bridge. The improved, grass-lined channel will be 2.7 miles long, and generally follow the existing alignment of Trout Creek. A steel sheet pile and riprap drop structure will be constructed on Pin Oak Creek near its confluence with Trout Creek. Drainage culverts will be constructed along the improved channel on Trout Creek to facilitate lateral drainage and control erosion. Work includes some alterations to a Santa Fe Railroad bridge to accommodate the project and a new roadway bridge providing approximately 2,000 square feet of opening for passage of floodwaters. Estimated cost for new work is $1,468,950 Federal (Corps) and $501,050 non-Federal consisting of $98,500 cash contribution, $402,550 for lands and relocations. (1 October 1991 base prices) Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is the City of Kirbyville, Texas. A Local Cooperation Agreement was signed by the sponsor in August 1987. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for channelization of Trout Creek, awarded in August 1989, was financially completed at a 1992 fiscal year cost of $3,800. 21. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Location. The project is located in Willacy, Hidalgo, and Cameron Counties. The basin is bounded on the east by the Gulf of Mexico, on the south by the Rio Grande which forms the international boundary between the 31-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 United States and Mexico, on the west by Starr County, and on the north by Brooks and Kenedy Counties. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. 21A. ARROYO COLORADO, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. The estimated cost for new work is $5,716,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,906,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,803,000 cash and $103,000 for lands and relocations. Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Hidalgo County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,803,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 34, Planning and Engineering. 21B. SOUTH MAIN CHANNEL, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. The estimated cost for new work is $104,460,000 Federal (Corps) and $63,619,000 non-Federal consisting of $8,394,000 cash and $28,107,000 lands and $27,118,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $8,394,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 34, Planning and Engineering funds. 21C. RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX Location. The project is located in northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide a drainage outlet to the Laguna Madres for northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties. The project consists of 43.8 miles of channel work, including enlargement of existing channels and construction of new channels, a 3.88-mile long levee, and diversion ditches along the west side of Raymondville. The estimated cost for new work is $48,665,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,225,000 non-Federal consisting of $3,900,000 cash and $6,142,000 lands and $6,183,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $3,900,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 22. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffin Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; constructing 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants. Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 1980. The project was initiated in March 1966 and the active portion of the project was completed in 1984. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $62,350,000 Federal (Corps) and $27,150,000 non-Federal consisting of $17,342,000 cash contributions, $3,403,000 for lands, $6,405,000 for relocations, and $449,000 for pumping station betterments and levee realignment betterments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. A severe settlement problem exists in the Chevron Sabine Road Tank Farm area. The Galveston District continued to conduct investigations and monitoring of the settlement to help determine appropriate corrective actions of Federal interest. 23. SIMS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in Harris County, in the southern portion of Houston, Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.3 miles 31-14 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT of Sims Bayou to provide 25-year flood protection; environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development to include 27 miles of hike-and-bike trails connecting to existing public parks, together with picnic, playground, and other leisure facilities. Estimated cost for new work is $182,474,000 Federal (Corps) and $85,346,000 non-Federal consisting of $15,703,000 cash contributions, $33,431,000 for lands, $33,618,000 for relocations and $2,594,000 other cost (October 1, 1992 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. The Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control was executed on October 19, 1990. The recreation Local Cooperation Agreement is pending. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Fiscal Year 1992 operations include coordination of real estate requirements with the local sponsor and continuation of design work. 24. STATE HIGHWAY 111 BRIDGE, LAKE TEXANA, TX Location. The project is located 8.5 miles Southeast of Edna, Texas and 31 miles Northeast of Victoria, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement requires placement of granular fill and stone protection along the embankment slope at the southwest end of the East Relief Bridge to form a slope of 1 on 4. Stone protection will consist of an 18-inch layer of riprap placed on a 6-inch layer of graded blanket stone. The work will require placement of 2400 tons of granular fill, 390 tons of blanket stone and 1170 tons of stone riprap. Estimated cost for new work is $276,000 Federal (Corps) and $92,000 non- Federal consisting of $91,600 cash contribution and $400 for land. Local cooperation. The State of Texas is the local sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on July 17, 1992. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were completed in April 1992. 25. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement consists of enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the Outfall Canal. Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of Taylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 miles of Pivitot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 miles of Willow Marsh Bayou. Phase III consists of enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou. The Phase III portion of the project was placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. Initial contract on the "active" portion of the project was awarded in August 1982. Estimated cost for new work, excluding inactive portion, is $38,188,000 Federal (Corps) and $40,318,000 non- Federal, including $13,122,000 cash contribution, $3,648,000 lands, and $23,548,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1992 base price.) Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act, applies. Operation during fiscal year. Contract for construction of Disposal Area 10N-B was completed at a fiscal year cost of $17,805. Contract for channel rectification of Bayou Din and Pivitot Bayou was awarded November 4, 1991 and continued through fiscal year 1992 at a cost of $1,267,814. Channel rectification contract for Hillebrandt Bayou Station 543+50 to Station 751+00 was awarded January 13, 1992 and continued through fiscal year 1992 at a cost of $1,867,597. A contract for channel rectification on Willow Marsh Bayou, Stations 12+00 to 135+00 was awarded December 12, 1991 and incurred a cost of $994,259 in fiscal year 1992. Construction contract for a water control structure at Star Lake was financially completed at a cost of $2,630. 26. TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. On the west and southwest shore of Galveston Bay, about 9 miles northwest of Galveston, Texas. Project fronts on the west side of Galveston Bay and protects a land area of about 36 square miles. Existing project. Plan provides for construction of improvements for control of storm tides. Improvements consist of 15.9 miles of new levees, 1.3 miles of concrete floodwall, related drainage and stoplog structures, one tide control structure, and two pumping plants. The project was initiated in 1962, and physically completed in 1987; however, remedial measures required to approximately 1.7 miles of levee toe to avoid further erosion were made in 1990. Estimated cost for new work is $38,983,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,023,000 non- Federal, including $14,603,000 cash contribution, $1,071,000 work contribution, and $1,349,000 for lands, and $256,000 for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumping capacity for La Marque Pumping Plant. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. None required. 31-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 27. U.S. 190 BRIDGE, SABINE RIVER, MERRYVILLE, LA Location. The project area is located about 52 miles north of Beaumont, Texas on the border between Louisiana and Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement is to place riprap to protect the most eroded bridge piers, the streambed between the piers, and the eastern streambank. Also included was riprap protection 200 feet upstream and 100 feet downstream to protect the streambank from erosion during periods of high velocity flow. The estimated cost for new work is $800,000 which includes $423,000 Federal (Corps) and $377,000 non-Federal cash contribution. Local cooperation. The local sponsor for the project is the State of Louisiana. Coordination is maintained with the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, the Texas Highway Department and the United States Fish and Wildlife Services. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed May 31, 1991. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contract for erosion protection was awarded September 30, 1991 and was completed in July 1992 for a cost of $607,381. 28. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Location. Watershed of Vince Bayou and tributary, Little Vince Bayou, has an area of about 17 square miles and lies entirely within Harris County. Vince Bayou is a minor tributary of Buffalo Bayou in San Jacinto River Basin on upper gulf coast of Texas. Existing project. Project provides for enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 7.3 miles upstream and Little Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 4.2 miles upstream, a total distance in both streams of about 11.5 miles. The project was initiated in 1968. All work on Vince Bayou is complete. Estimated cost for new work is $19,347,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,300,000 non-Federal, consisting of $5,100,000 for lands and $12,200,000 for relocations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. None required. 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on the following projects. Fiscal year cost was $212,788. Date of Project Inspection Brays Bayou, TX - Channel Rectification Freeport and Vicinity, TX - Hurricane Flood Protection White Oak Bayou, TX - Channel Rectification October 1991 October 1991 October 1991 Lavaca and Navidad Rivers, TX - Flood Protection Highland Bayou, TX - Flood Control Vince Bayou, TX - Flood Protection Little Vince Bayou, TX - Flood Protection Big Hog Bayou, TX - Intake Structure Colorado River, TX - Flood Protection at Matagorda Port Arthur Hurricane Flood Protection, TX Texas City Hurricane Flood Protection, TX 30. December 1991 January 1992 January 1992 January 1992 February 1992 May 1992 May 1992 August 1992 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended: Construction of a flood control project at Kirbyville, Texas is discussed in Section 20. Feasibility studies continued at a fiscal year cost of $113,257 on the Lower Guadalupe River at Victoria, Texas. Funds in the amount of $118,726 were spent from contributed funds on the project. The following reconnaissance studies of flood control projects were completed at the fiscal year costs shown: Chiltipin Creek, Sinton, Texas City of Wharton, Texas Timber Lake, Montgomery County, Texas $4,361 $15,000 $1,276 All of the above studies have been terminated. Emergency flood control - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation): Cost was $347,695 for disaster preparedness and $23,919 for emergency operations. National Emergency Preparedness Program fiscal year cost was $89,503. 31. EMERGENCY STREAM BANK AND SHORELINE EROSION WORK AND SNAGGING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Stream bank and shoreline erosion activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 525, as amended: Construction of the erosion control project at State Highway Bridge 111, Lake Texana, Texas is discussed in Section 24. Construction of the erosion control project at U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, Louisiana is discussed in Section 27. 31-16 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Feasibility studies of streambank protection at Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point Village, Texas and Colorado County, Texas were completed at a fiscal year cost of $15,921 and $2,685 respectively. Snagging and clearing activities for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, Public Law 780, as amended: No new feasibility studies of snagging and clearing activities for flood control improvements were performed in fiscal year 1992. 32. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Project modifications for improvement of environment activities pursuant to Section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, as amended: An integrated project modification report and an environmental assessment was completed for Salt Bayou, McFadden Ranch Wetlands, Texas at a fiscal year cost of $150,405. A project modification report and an environmental assessment was completed for the Laguna Madre Seagrass Restoration project, a demonstration project to plant seagrass in Laguna Madre, Texas. A total cost of $24,238 was incurred for fiscal year 1992. General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,367,129 of which $4,920 was for navigation studies; $29,007 was for flood damage prevention studies; $1,513 was for shoreline protection studies; $1,140,048 was for Review of Completed Projects; $3,863 was for coordination with other agencies; $75,138 was for Special Investigations; $21,603 for Interagency Water Resources; $10,665 was for National Estuary Studies; $3,940 for the American Waterfowl Management Plan; and $76,432 was for Planning Assistance to States. Funds in the amount of $2,528 were expended from contributed funds for the Cameron County flood damage prevention study. Contributed funds in the amount of $7,539 were expended for the State of Texas Coastal Management study. 34. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Brazos Island Harbor, Texas (42-Foot Project) - The project will provide for enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre (approximately 2.5 miles) to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 300 feet; enlarging 14.8 miles of the existing Brownsville Channel to a depth of 42 feet and width of 250 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 250 to 300 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,150,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1987. Fiscal year costs were $96,995. Channel to Victoria, Texas - The project will provide for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet, the same dimensions as the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, with disposal of the dredged materials in upland areas. In addition, the project includes creation of additional marsh along the landlocked reach of the channel. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,420,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1989. Fiscal year costs were $505,203. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement of the Houston Ship Channel and Galveston Ship Channel. The recommended plan for the Houston Ship Channel consists of a 50-foot deep by 600-foot wide channel to the vicinity of the Shell Docks at Boggy Bayou in Houston with additional widening to the Clinton Island Turning Basin. The recommended plan for the Galveston Channel consists of a 50-foot deep by 450-foot wide channel within the existing 1,125-foot channel. The 50-foot by 800-foot entrance channel, previously authorized with the Texas City Channel but unconstructed, is also incorporated into this project. The project will be constructed in two phases, with Phase I enlarging the Houston Ship Channel to 45 by 530 feet, the Galveston Ship Channel enlarged to 45 by 450 feet, and deepening the entrance channel to 45 feet. Phase II will deepen both channels to 50 feet and widen the Houston Ship Channel to 600 feet. A locally preferred dredged material disposal plan for Galveston Bay has been incorporated with the plan of improvement. The plan would utilize confined or beneficial uses of dredged material in the bay and/or offshore disposal for Phase I and Phase II construction activities and the operations and maintenance resulting from them. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $13,750,000. Estimated planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $3,674,692, which included a contract for constructing submerged mounds in Galveston and Chambers Counties, Texas, to study experimental benthic recovery. The cost of the contract was $1,035,063. Brays Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $6,010,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $430,265. Greens Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $3,940,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $567,116. 31-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Cypress Creek, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the channel. Project-oriented recreation features include 11.5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related recreation facilities, habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway project land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $7,800,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $216,496. Arroyo Colorado, Texas - The project will provide flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,000,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $495,282. South Main Channel, Texas - The project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,880,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $131,083. Falfurrias, Texas - The project consists of a levee and pilot channel to divert Standard Project Flood flows in Palo Blanco and Cibolo Creeks around the west side of Falfurrias to Baluarte Creek. Major plan elements include water control structures in Palo Blanco and Cibol Creeks, a 5.6-mile long diversion levee, a 1.8-mile long pilot channel, flowage easements on 11,000 acres of land and 0.8 mile of ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $690,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1990. Fiscal year costs were $425. Sargent Beach, Texas - The project consists of construction of approximately 8 miles of concrete-block revetment with two concrete sheetpile wall segments and tow protection on the barrier between a 10-mile reach of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in the vicinity of Sargent, Texas and the Gulf of Mexico. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,260,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1992. Fiscal year costs were $517,373. 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management, technical services and quick responses were performed at a cost of $10,394, $39,797 and $2,976, respectively. Hydrologic studies cost $6,975. 31-18 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SS ee ection in Text Project 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost 31-19 Total Cost To FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992" 280,000 296,000 232,500 235,000 3,681,6001 377,075 301,148 229,030 209,979 3,571,0611 500,000 742,000 315,000 1,971,000 15,978,5022 376,918 831,456 305,088 1,887,976 15,798,2452 1,598,700 2,009,715 1,337,400 2,267,000 47,740,4763 1,711,336 1,961,671 1,077,977 2,571,235 47,737,2383 - - - - 2,170,080 - - - - 2,170,080 - - - - 133,9254 - - - - 133,9254 - - 62,000 (-)10,400 1,225,5015 - (-)180 51,707 - 1,225,4195 6,441,000 - (-)100,000 - 76,535,3596 7,018,984 790,564 56,878 28,046 76,499,8616 2,692,300 1,775,990 2,007,100 5,110,000 97,366,7487 2,704,984 1,759,261 1,642,951 5,481,015 97,347,2267 - - - - 3,576,684 - - - - 3,576,684 948,000 - - - 6,279,088 858,215 66,190 - - 5,959,162 9,758,000 7,924,000 10,140,000 13,534,000 52,432,1528 3,556,541 11,764,019 12,707,229 13,967,880 52,133,6558 3,400,400 49,700 297,000 1,095,000 51,580,4159 3,403,677 44,541 301,318 958,033 51,440,8469 - - - - 8,935 - - - - 8,935 - - - - 29,096,39210 - - - - 29,096,39210 2,515,000 3,229,365 3,846,000 279,000 90,458,088"1 2,540,953 3,130,578 3,933,178 270,875 90,425,43611 - - - - 7,969,329 - - - - 7,969,329 5,339,000 4,636,000 1,279,000 2,557,000 78,195,30312 4,953,438 4,286,153 2,127,947 2,565,623 77,974,63112 15,842,600 10,723,994 25,255,600 23,302,700 295,740,94213 15,954,354 9,852,912 24,499,694 24,079,198 294,661,63214 - - - - 434,638 - - - - 434,638 - - - - 835,873 - - - - 835,873 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 9. Matagorda, Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Regular Funds) 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Includes Wallisville) 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX (Restoration Project) (Contributed Funds) 16. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX 17. Clear Creek, TX (Contributed Funds) Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 19922 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Recreation: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 5,807,400 6,258,038 2,668,600 2,691,027 2,191,200 2,215,722 169,500 193,258 25,900 38,062 78,000 26,757 426,400 395,234 79,360 (-)12,151 1,291,000 1,288,343 1,587,000 725,846 1,700,000 2,394,973 100,000 28,723 31-20 - - - 35,760,38215 - - - 35,760,38215 9,231,155 6,190,000 2,380,500 131,727,77816 9,047,821 6,457,007 2,311,819 131,649,81216 - - - 18,058,77717 - - - 18,058,77717 1,027,350 425,300 2,364,200 46,168,738 1,040,131 399,742 2,393,060 46,166,943 - - - 56,136,81518 - - - 56,136,81518 3,716,320 15,507,600 4,952,000 170,835,54019 3,701,954 14,305,233 5,893,587 170,553,46419 - - - 15,131,97220 2,346 2,761 - 15,131,97220 867,050 - 201,000 24,682,51121 860,271 5,315 166,220 24,644,89921 - - - 726,158 - - - 726,158 3,944,000 - - 33,223,67622 299,842 214,608 2,257,188 31,932,34422 2,030,711 710,000 795,000 15,222,01423 1,865,559 841,233 819,140 15,155,60023 - - - 2,120,641 20,914 - - 2,120,641 - - - 2,038,345 - - - 2,009,710 928,000 756,000 1,249,100 60,139,42424 629,956 713,744 1,018,131 59,568,15524 - - - 377,804 7,605 333 11,500 377,623 1,233,702 1,077,000 1,642,000 24,904,115 1,215,140 1,035,815 1,678,401 24,788,241 - - - 12,475,000 - - - 12,475,000 166,000 193,000 1,450,000 12,773,000 699,348 810,185 1,449,168 12,687,903 3,000,000 1,182,000 460,000 12,862,361 2,801,151 1,954,817 758,300 12,672,721 - 140,000 - 640,000 159,673 120,200 - 618,596 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SE in ee ection Text Project 18. Cypress Creek, TX 19. Falfurrias, TX 20. Kirbyville, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX 22. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane- Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Sims Bayou, TX 24. State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texana, TX 25. Taylors Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 26. Texas City and Vicinity, TX Hurricane- Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 27. U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, LA 28. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost To FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 19922 935,00 123,92 90,00 11,38 150,00 67,47 22,25 605,00 728,07 12,0( 8,74 2,763,0( 2,712,0' 735,0( 870,7( 70,0( 65,5 26,0( 21,4 20,0( 1 9 , 7 61,0( 288,81 214,000 564,000 127,009 473,731 171,000 (-)67,000 95,343 7,686 - 30,000 711,902 200,759 31 64,272 - 175,000 - 167,567 )0 - 73 71,628 56 22,935 )0 1,158,000 79 917,100 D0 - [4 4,056 )0 2,942,000 71 3,314,535 )0 1,275,000 )3 1,316,854 00 930,000 12 863,748 DO 150,000 55 133,823 00 49,000 76 22,491 )O (-)16,000 80 5,645 14,347 341,000 283,803 56,644 2,164 3,047,000 3,193,103 27,000 20,486 750,000 216,496 424 26,198 5,984 726,900 626,365 96,000 77,157 41,000 32,850 1,190,000 1,301,424 9,000 7,131 1,091,000 2,903,000 1,184,924 3,158,775 - 1,491,000 155,027 1,798,713 (-)35,000 (-)56,000 13,607 (-)14,073 5,831 423,000 33,216 (-)24,000 38,127 - 14,401,10027 14,073 14,396,30727 - 492,000 411,638 487,12128 - 19,307,100 - 19,307,100 1 Excludes $1,272,098 credit for contributed work. 2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, $3,971,702 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects. 3 In addition, $1,352,092 expended from contributed funds. 4 Includes $48,711 for previous projects. s Includes $46,101 for previous projects. 6 Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. 7 Includes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $647,922 expended from contributed funds. 8 Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $17,903,141 expended from contributed funds. ($581,615 on 45' project.) s In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. toI0n cludes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 11 Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $2,122,583 expended from contributed funds. 31-21 1,528,000 817,236 104,000 103,453 1,488,000 1,462,615 95,984 90,000 1,242,900 1,077,735 59,998,509 59,968,482 16,332,97525 16,322,63625 7,785,000 7,759,25026 58,000 49,566 31,666,198 31,192,532 9,800,000 9,700,240 38,891,400 38,882,087 )0 I1 -n REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 12 Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); and Mouth of Colorado River ($3,340,601). 13 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $5,513,680. Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600. Chocolate Bayou Channel $1,091,500. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $2,663,150. Channel to Port Mansfield $2,753,785. Starting in fiscal year 1990 includes Channel to Red Bluff $802,700. Also includes $460,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded beginning in fiscal year 1992. 14 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $5,511,143, Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600, Chocolate Bayou Channel $1,091,500. In addition $566,875 was expended from contributed funds for Chocolate Bayou Channel. Also includes amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $2,543,389. Channel to Port Mansfield $2,695,424. Includes funds in the amount of $767,173 expended for Channel to Red Bluff, separately funded in fiscal year 1990. Also includes an expended amount of $344,219 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded in fiscal year 1992. 15 Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. 16 Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $534,641 expended from contributed funds, of which $200,000 was for previous projects. Includes appropriated funds for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $31,000. Barbour Terminal Channel $22,500. Bayport Ship Channel $94,000. Expenditures for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $17,706. Barbour Terminal Channel $6,244. Bayport Ship Channel $60,021. 17 In addition, $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. 18 Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. 19 Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $3,660,026 expended from contributed funds. 20 Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. 21 Includes $195,083 for previous projects. 22 Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. In addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 23 Includes $543,662 for previous projects. 24 Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. 25 Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands, $6,168,360 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 26 Excludes $53,484 expended from contributed funds for real estate acquisition for the local sponsor. 27 Excludes $1,349,069 estimated value of contributed lands and $1,070,959 credit given local sponsor for workin- kind. 28 Excludes $245,382 expended from contributed funds. 29 Includes funds ($12,544,400) provided by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 15-I of Annual Report for 1985. 31-22 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. Amended cost sharing requirements to provide for 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal participation in control operations. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet.27 Enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet; construction of asphalt walkways with handrails on the crown of the North and South Jetties, and construction of park-type public use facilities at the inner end of the North Jetty. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 103(c), PL 99-662 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Sec. 201, PL 99-662 31-23 TABLE 31-B 2. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 3. Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1919 4. Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 19132 Sep. 23, 1922 Jul. 3, 19303 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX A channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Galveston Harbor extending to a turning basin 1,000 feet square and 30 feet deep.31 Enlargement, extension and protection of turning basin.3' CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Acquisition of old curvey portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredge by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Documents H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1122, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Committee Does. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. 31-24 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 19545 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Channel to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deep draft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.' 31-25 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 19256 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 5, 1961 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance of jetties. Repairs to jetties and dredging. Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. Modified local cooperation requirements for the 1970 Act. Sec. 124, PL 94-587 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H, Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 Sec. 101, PL 99-662 31-26 PL 394, 87th Cong. GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 6. Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 19109 Jul. 27, 1916 Jul. 18, 1918 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 4, 1938 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street.8 Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St., and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in inner bar.10 Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Documents H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 31-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section in Text Date Authorizing Act Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 23, 1971 (House Res.) Nov. 18, 1971 (Senate Res.) 7. Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193813 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 19459 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945"1 31-28 Project and Work Authorized --- Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar to 43rd Street. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER'2 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Enlarge waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Texas, in Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Harlingen, Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Documents H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong. H. Doc 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 248, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. (See PL 14, 79th Cong.) . GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Jul. 12, 1952 Sep. 3, 195415 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 9, 1959 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. PL 516, 81st Cong. PL 527, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 31-29 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 196216 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 196517 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Oct. 31, 1992 8. Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri- Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. Modified 1968 authorization to provide that diversion features be constructed at Federal expense and operation and maintenance be shared 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. Enlarge existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. Provide 8 miles of erosion protection for the existing waterway in the vicinity of Sargent, Texas. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike.18 A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou. 19 Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 812, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 101 (20), PL 102-580 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. 31-30 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 195820 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 9. Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin. Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou.21 Maintenance of Greens Bayou, Barbour Terminal Channel, and Bayport Ship Channel to forty-foot depths at Federal expense. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1.000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 819, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. 31-31 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935"11 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine-Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. H. Doc. 773, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 287, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 14, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 60, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-32 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 194623 Jul. 24, 194624 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 195425 Oct. 23, 196226 11. Mar. 4, 1913 Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine-Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine- Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. S. Doc 158, 77th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. 31-33 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 (Senate Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) Nov. 17, 1986 12. Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to '"TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. Deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channels to 52 feet; extending the Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52 foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico; and establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Anahuac Channel. Six-foot channel to Liberty. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) Sec. 201, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-34 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 30, 1983 15. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Senate Res.) 16. Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 28, 1990 17. Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 18. Nov. 17, 1988 Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 5,600 acres and confining the reservoir to east side of Trinity River. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. Flood damage reduction improvements and recreational development for the Houston, Texas urban area, divided into six separable elements - Brays, Greens, Hunting, Halls, Carpenters and Little White Oak Bayous. Flood control improvements consist of 75.3 miles of stream enlargement, 14 miles of stream clearing, 7 flood detention basins, 7 miles of diversion channels and environmental revegetation. Recreation features consist of 14.7 miles of trails, 502 picnic facilities, 12 group pavilions, 2 boat launching ramps, 10 restrooms, playgrounds, exercise stations and parking facilities. CLEAR CREEK, TX Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8.30 Modified local cooperation requirements of the 1968 authorization. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Enlargement and rectification of lower 29.4 miles of Cypress Creek channel and recreational development. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 98-63 H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 101, PL 101-640 H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 1001, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 31-35 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 19. Nov. 17, 1988 21. Nov. 17, 1986 22. Oct. 23, 1962 23. Nov. 17, 1986 25. Oct. 27, 1965 26. Jul. 3, 1958 28. Oct. 23, 1962 FALFURRIAS, TX Construction of a 5.6-mile long diversion levee west of Falfurrias; a 1.8-mile long pilot channel west of Falfurrias; a flowage easement; and a 0.8-mile long ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Channel improvements to provide drainage protection for the area in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and to provide flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Raymondville, Edcouch, La Villa, and Lyford. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees.28 SIMS BAYOU, TX Enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou; environmental measures and riparian habitat along entire alignment, and recreational development. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge.29 TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) Construction of improvements for control of storm tides, consisting of new and enlarged levees and floodwalls approximately 14.1 and 2.1 miles in length; related drainage and stoplog structures; a navigation opening and pumping plants. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou and Little Vince Bayou upstream for a total of 11.5 miles for both streams. Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 206, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 347, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 441, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 ' Contains latest published maps. 2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive. 3 Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. 4 Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. 5 West leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. 6 Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. Dredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933. 8 Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. to0D eepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. " Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12 H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 13 Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 14 Dredging upper 5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 15 Inactive. 16 Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. Relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 17 The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 31-36 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 18 Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. '9 Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 20 Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 22 Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23 Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 25 Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26 The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 27 Jetty extension was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 28 Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. 29 Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou are inactive. 30 Portion of project upstream of Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximately mile 18.5, in inactive category. 31 Turning basin was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 31-37 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-C OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1991 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts)6 1967 38,2521 - Bastrop Bayou, TX2 1931 9,920 27,129 Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington3 1924 216,9894 223,010 Cedar Bayou, TX 1990 681,2638 2,809,8169 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 1982 66,934 537,139 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal Peninsula 1968 1,194,344 26,467 Dickinson Bayou, TX 1954 33,942 57,553 Double Bayou, TX 1987 226,558 1,412,07810 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX5 1922 2,476 847 Johnson Bayou, LA6 1933 2,261 54,042 Little Bay, TX7 1979 - 252,728 Neches River and Trib., Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, TX (Advance Engineering & Design) 1984 1,503,843 - Oyster Creek, TX 1922 6,942 7,556 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (Echo to Morgan Bluff)3 1971 - 1 Excludes $1,672 work contribution. Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport, TX, 2 Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth Acocnt st(rHu.c teDdo cp. ro1je1c4t, a8s1 astu thCoornigze.,d by 1950 River and Harbor 1st Sess.) in 1955 under was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Department of Army permit. 3 Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 8 Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition 4 Includes $123,6n796 for previous projects. $25,000 expInenclduedde sf r$o6m9 ,c7o8n4t rfiobru pteredv ifouunsd sp.rojects. 5 In inactive category for maintenance. '0 In addition, $102,325 expended from contributed 6 Channel adequate for existing commerce. funds. TABLE 31-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1991 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, Texas 1986 201,300 - Baytown, Texas' 1980 245,400 - Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas2 1963 273,757 - Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection 2 1984 29,285,0423 - Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas2 1978 505,749 - Highland Bayou, Texas2 1984 12,254,390 - Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043 - General channel project 1952 21,086 - Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas 6 1971 98,517 - Mill Creek, Texas' 1952 24,753 - Peyton Creek, Texas4 1975 66,377 - San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas2 1963 135,175 - Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas2 1956 130,239 - Three Rivers, Texas5 5 5,835,927 - Upper White Oak Bayou, Texas 1989 972,300 - 1Inactive. 2 Completed. 3 In addition, $8,695,438 expended from contributed funds, $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands, and $2,726,446 for relocations by local interests. 4 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 5 See Annual Report for 1983, Fort Worth District, page 16-12. 6 Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 31-38 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-E TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Sep. 30, 1992 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway betw,een Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project 12,273,830 2,848,560 3,848,341 18,970,731 85,214 85,214 74,803,040 324,287 5,959,930 81,087,257 1,716,695 276,720 83,080,672 51,869,982 116,575 17,898,572 69,885,129 360,249 70,245,378 11,920,187 8,754,209 0 3,648,932 24,323,328 76,801,445 466,477 4,443,085 81,711,007 395,000 139,776 82,245,783 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 14,628,853 136,296 1,023,819 15,788,968 29,966,038 66,000 30,032,038 47,737,238 0 1,352,092 49,089,330 1,179,318 1,179,318 97,284,774 0 647,922 97,932,696 0 0 97,932,696 51,440,845 0 229,311 51,670,156 0 51,670,156 89,814,026 512,163 13,121 2,122,583 92,461,893 293,135,078 0 22,672 293,157,750 0 0 293,157,750 130,352,699 0 334,641 130,687,340 168,173,787 0 3,660,026 171,833,813 0 0 171,833,813 24,449,816 0 0_ 24,449,816 14,611,938 0 14,611,938 12,170,080 0 0 2,170,080 62,181,148 2,848,560 5,200,433 70,230,141 0 1,264,532 0 1,264,532 3,576,684 0 0 3,576,684 0 0 3,576,684 8,935 0 0 8,935 0 8,935 7,373,356 595,973 0 0 7,969,329 1,270,511 0 0 1,270,511 0 0 1,270,511 726,158 0 0 726,158 175,664,498 324,287 6,607,852 182,596,637 1,716,695 276,720 184,590,052 103,319,762 116,575 18,127,883 121,564,220 360,249 121,924,469 109,107,569 9,862,345 13,121 5,771,515 124,754,550 371,207,034 466,477 4,465,757 376,139,268 395,000 139,776 376,674,044 159,394,992 2,612,932 1,717,401 163,725,325 217,766,118 1,363,652 5,763,461 224,893,231 32,000 116,760 225,041,991 39,804,827 136,296 1,023,819 40,964,942 44,577,976 66,000 44,643,976 31-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 2. Brazos Island Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Harbor, TX Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel 4. Corpus Christi Aransas Pass Outer Bar Ship Channel, Channel TX Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewel Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) 5. Freeport Outer Bar Channel Harbor, TX Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel 44-42 400 38-36 300 42 42 42 42 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 45 45 47 45 45 45 45 45 45 30. 30 36 300 300 300 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 270 100. 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,2006 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 150 150 400 400 7504 400 1,0004 375 1,2004 200 500 200 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 40-45 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 45 38 36 36 36 36 36 30 25 30 200 200 200 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 265 100 700 600 Irregular 100 2002 300-400 600-500 500 400 1,000 400 1,000 350 1,0506 200 900 200-250 700-900 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 150 300 200 200-350 744-800 350-375 600 200 500 200 31-40 2.5 2.1 9.6 3.2 1.3 2,670 0.5 1.4 0.8 1,300 0.2 1,470 0.3 1,200 0.2 1,470 0.3 1,230 0.2 770 0.1 1.8 1.0 1,550 0.1 200 900 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 5,423 1.0 1.1 1,150 0.2 0.6 1,690 0.3 3.1 1,000 0.2 1.8 1,000 0.2 5.6 800 0.1 1,250 0.2 - 0.8 400 0.1 - 0.8 - 3.0 - 0.8 - 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 600 0.1 - 1.1 500 0.1 - 0.5 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Basin Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel Bolivar Roads Channel to 43rd St. Bolivar Roads to Morgan Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Bayport Ship Channel Turning Basin Anchorage Area Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 9. Matagorda Ship Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel, TX Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff 10. Sabine-Neches Sabine Bank Channel Waterway, TX Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX 7504 800 800 800 2,8751 800 1,125 36 52 52 50 36 50 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 30 42 42 40 36 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 525-675 800 800 800 2,875 800 1,125 675 0.1 - 4.7 - 1.7 - 3.2 - 1.81 - 1.0 - 3.9 400 - 26.2 400 - 12.8 300 - 2.4 300 - 5.3 948-1,0009 1,375 - 965-1,0709 1,592 - 300 - 0.6 300 - 2.9 400-1,000 3,100 0.6 150 1,000 0.2 60 - 0.9 300 - 3.1 2,000 2,000 0.4 300 - 3.8 1,600 1,000 0.3 150 - - 125 - 1.9 400 400 300 300 900-1,0009 8009 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-200' 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 - 4.1 - 0.8 - 0.3 - 1.3 - 3.2 - 20.9 - 1.1 1,000 0.2 - 4.1 532 0.1 - 1.9 1,682 0.3 1,750 0.3 - 20.2 - 14.7 - 3.4 - 4.1 3,000 - 5.6 - 6.2 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 31-41 Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 5. (Continued) Brazos Harbor Turning 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 10. (Continued) Port Arthur West Turning Basin 40 600 40 350-550 1,610 0.3 Channel connecting Port Arthur West and Taylors Bayou Turning Basins 40 200-250 40 200-250 - 0.6 Taylors Bayou Turning Basin 40 150-1,000 40 90-1,233 3,470 0.7 Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River 40 400 40 400 - 11.2 Turning Point at Mile 19.5 40 9004 40 9004 - 8 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area Beaumont Turning Basin 40 400 40 400 - 18.3 Turning Point, Mile 31.1 40 1,0004 40 1,000 700 8 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 40 1,0004 40 1,000 930 8 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 40 1,0004 40 1,300 1,530 8 Channel Extension, Mile 40.3 36 350 36 350 1,265 0.2 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin 40 Irregular 40 Irregular 1,300 0.2 Beaumont Turning Basin 34 500 34 160-535 1,500 0.3 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension 34 350 34 300 - 0.4 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company 30 200 30 200 - 0.7 Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River 30 200 30 200 - 4.4 Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. 30 200 30 200 - 9.5 Orange Turning Basin 30 Irregular 30 Irregular 1,550 0.3 Orange Municipal Slip 30 200 30 150-200 2,435 0.5 Old Channel Around Harbor Island 25 150-200 25 150-200 - 2.4 Channel to Echo' 12 125 - - - - Adams Bayou 12 100 12 100 - 1.7 Cow Bayou 13 100 13 100 - 7.0 Orangefield Turning Basin 13 300 13 300 500 0.1 1 Average. 2 Includes 100-foot channel width. 3 Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. 4 Diameter. 5 Includes 350-foot channel width. 6 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. 7 Deauthorized. 8 Included in channel length. 9 Includes 300-foot channel width. 31-42 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Projec Depth in Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Tributary Channel Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout West Turnout 9-Foot Channel Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel Colorado River Channel Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning Basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios Turning Basin No. 1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay Channel to Victoria Main Channel via East Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout Channel Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Main Turning Basin Turning Basin Extension Small Craft Basin Shrimp Basin Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Fee 12 12 2 12 3 12 4 99 5 9 6 9 99 15-12 12 8 12 12 12 12 9 12 12 12 99999999 14 14 14 14 to 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 125 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 200-100 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 100 600(AVG) 100 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 12 12 12 12 9 999 12 12 12 12 9 9 9999 99 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 125 125 125 100 100 400 150 125 200 300 130-400 100 500(AVG) 100 100 200 100 - 200 342(AGvo 125-175 300 0.2 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 t Dimensions Length t) Feet Miles 2.3 2,200 0.4 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 500 635 1,130 1 2 1 - 34.8 80 0 iAVG) 0.1 - 0.8 - 2.0 230 -- 0.5 - 2.1 ,225 0.2 - 6.1 ,212 0.4 125 - ,800 0.3 - 0.8 - 0.4 300 0.1 - 7.7 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 1,250 580 860 1,450 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 31-43 TABLE 31-G REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-G GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout from Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 12511 - 25.812 Turning Basin near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 500 0.1 North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 - 0.7 Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 - 0.6 Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 - 0.4 South Leg 12 125 12 125 - 0.2 Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel 7 75 7 75 - 1.4 Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 - 0.3 Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 1,308 0.2 1 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at Mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3 Constructed by local interests. 4 Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 was deauthorized. 6 Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 93-251. 6 Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) 7 Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15- foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. 8 Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9 In the inactive category for maintenance. 10 Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) 11 South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 was deauthorized. 31-44 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Brazos Island Harbor, TX (New Work) Dredging Brazos Island Harbor, TX - Entrance Channel February 20, 1992 to September 30, 1992 575,054 $810,841 Dredging Inshore Reach No. 1, Station 1+000 to 23+000 July 25, 1992 to September 30, 1992 148,750 $181,475 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Beacon 82 through Avery Point Turning Basin October 30, 1991 to March 18, 1992 1,791,652 $2,160,690 Dredging Inner Basin to La Quinta Junction December 6, 1991 to January 26, 1992 850,951 $680,336 Emergency dredging Corpus Christi Entrance Channel (US Hopper Dredge Wheeler) September 4, 1992 to September 30, 1992 866,228 $2,220,000 Freeport Harbor, TX (New Work) Dredging Main Channel, Brazosport Turning Basin & Jetty Channel October 1, 1991 to June 24, 1992 1,280,280 $4,177,161 Freeport Harbor, TX (New Work) (Maintenance) Dredging Entrance Channel - Sta 260+00 to Sta 50+35.91 October 1, 1991 to April 1, 1992 346,757 $2,716,534 Freeport Harbor, TX (New Work) (Maintenance) Dredging Entrance Channel - Sta 260+00 to Sta 50+35.91 October 1, 1991 to April 1, 1992 46,804 $105,309 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Freeport Harbor and Entrance Channel August 28, 1992 to September 30, 1992 802,095 $768,607 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX (New Work) Dredging Mouth of the Colorado and Tiger Island Channel Dam December 9, 1991 to September 30, 1992 935,867 $1,068,166 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Victoria and Channel to Seadrift October 1, 1991 to October 29, 1991 737,639 $355,212 Dredging Port Isabel to Port Mansfield and Tributary Channels October 1, 1991 to November 25, 1991 61,430 $78,395 Dredging Texas City Junction to Galveston Causeway October 1, 1991 to January 7, 1992 977,293 $718,882 Dredging Main Channel in Matagorda Bay September 17, 1992 to September 30, 1992 163,000 $271,900 Dredging Channel to Palacious March 1, 1992 to June 8, 1992 1,826,634 $652,495 Emergency dredging Brazos River crossing and vicinity January 27, 1992 to April 26, 1992 1,228,079 $1,271,852 Emergency dredging Colorado River crossing March 16, 1992 to March 30, 1992 110,347 $243,625 Dredging Galveston Causeway to Bastrop Bayou and West Bay Demo April 7, 1992 to September 27, 1992 639,934 $3,699,980 Dredging Channel to Harlingen March 2, 1992 to September 30, 1992 440,166 $1,400,480 Dredging Colorado River Channel and basins April 5, 1992 to May 13, 1992 210,313 $276,086 Dredging Main Channel across Aransas Bay May 22, 1992 to August 1, 1992 868,017 $458,126 31-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 31-H DREDGING OPERATIONS Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Vicinity FM 467 to Boggy Bayou and Colorado River to Matagorda Bay June 17, 1992 to September 30, 1992 567,190 $1,424,222 Dredging Channel to Port Mansfield to Mud Flats July 1, 1992 to July 10, 1992 416,612 $286,182 Dredging Matagorda Bay to San Antonio Bay July 21, 1992 to September 30, 1992 497,534 $694,180 Dredging Main Channel in Matagorda Bay September 19, 1992 to September 30, 1992 163,000 $271,900 Houston Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Turning Basin and Light Draft Channel and Miscellaneous Work October 1, 1991 to October 1, 1991 1,745 $35,552 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Matagorda Peninsula to Point Comfort October 1, 1991 to May 1, 1992 4,454,331 $1,805,734 Dredging Channel to Port Lavaca and Channel to Harbor of Refuge November 11, 1991 to February 27, 1992 1,256,587 $370,588 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Sabine-Neches Canal (Section B) and Sabine River Channel October 1, 1991 to October 19, 1991 340,236 $426,798 Dredging Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel September 11, 1992 to September 30, 1992 1,056,381 $700,391 Dredging Sabine Bank Channel (US Dredge Wheeler) October 1, 1991 to October 21, 1991 2,026,140 $1,554,000 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Maintenance) Emergency Dredging Anahuac Channel May 10, 1992 to June 18, 1992 332,218 $295,841 Taylors Bayou, TX (New Work) Dredging Bayou Din and Pivitot Bayou December 4, 1991 to September 15, 1992 283,136 $633,907 Dredging Hillebrandt Bayou Sta. 543+50 to 751+00 and Willow Marsh Bayou Sta. 0+00 to 12+00 February 3, 1992 to September 30, 1992 371,446 $1,061,178 31-46 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises the watershed of the Canadian River and its tributaries in New Mexico; the watershed of Arkansas River and its tributaries in Colorado; the watershed of Rio Grande and its tributaries including the Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and the San Juan River Basin in New Mexico; and the watersheds of the Gila, San Francisco and Mimbres Rivers and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in June 1986 to include the portion of New Mexico west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM ......... 2. Alamogordo, NM .................. 3. Alamosa, CO .................... 4. Cochiti Wetfields, NM ............... 5. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM ..... 6. Conchas Lake, NM ................. 7. El Paso, TX ..................... 8. Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO ........... 9. John Martin Reservoir, CO ............ 10. Puerco River, Gallup, NM ............ 11. Rio Grande Basin, NM .............. 11A. Abiquiu Dam, NM ................. 11B. Cochiti Lake, NM ................. 11C. Galisteo Dam, NM ................. 11D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM ............. 11E. Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM ............. 11F. Rio Grande Floodway, NM ............. 11G. Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM ........ Page 32-1 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-3 32-3 32-4 32-4 32-5 32-5 32-5 32-6 32-6 32-7 Flood Control (Continued) 11H. Truth or Consequences Unit, NM ........ 12. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM .......... 13. Trinidad Lake, CO ................... 14. Two Rivers Dam, NM ............... 15. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................... 16. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ................. 17. Other authorized flood control projects .................... 18. Flood control work under special authorizations ................ General Investigations 19. Surveys ............................. 20. Collection and study of basic data ........ 32-7 21. 32-7 22. Continuation of Planning and Engineering . . . Advance Engineering and Design .......... 32-8 Flood Control 1. ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM Location. There are about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico, most of which are located in northcentral New Mexico. Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 1113, the project consists of about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico. These community ditch systems provide irrigation water to about 160,000 acres on an estimated 12,000 farms. *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 32-1 Page 32-8 32-8 32-9 32-10 32-10 32-10 32-11 32-11 32-12 32-12 32-12 32-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Acequias have been in existence since the early Spanish Colonization period of the 17th and 18th Centuries and represent one of the oldest forms of cooperative institutions in the United States. They are an integral part of the culture and heritage of New Mexico. Diversion structures, many of which are constructed of available materials such as rock and brush, are frequently destroyed by flows greater than normal resulting from spring runoff or summer thunderstorms. Disruption of the ditches usually occurs during peak irrigation season and severely impacts crop production. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 directs the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to undertake measures, without regard to economic analysis, as are necessary to protect and restore the river diversion structures and associated canals. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor, the State of New Mexico, has a law whereby the State of New Mexico provides 17.5% of the project costs, and low interest loans to the local Acequias for the remaining 7.5%. The State of New Mexico has appropriated, and will appropriate on an annual basis, the funds necessary to meet the requirements of local sponsorship. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. Construction contracts were awarded in FY 1988, FY 1989, FY 1990, FY 1991, and FY 1993. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed on structures for five projects in FY 1992: Ojo del Gallo, Vadito, Questa South, Reservoir Martinez, and Coyote. 2. ALAMOGORDO, NM Location. The project is located south central New Mexico in Otero County, in and near Alamogordo, NM. The city is situated at the foot of the Sacramento Mountains near the eastern edge of the Tularosa (Closed) Basin. Proposed Project. The authorized project consists of a concrete and rip-rap lined diversion channel with a Standard Project Flood flow capacity, which will intercept flows from the Sacramento Mountains east of the City. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 694 of Annual Report for 1966. Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and Results during fiscal year. An Interim Letter Report, which addressed locally preferred alternatives for the 100-year flood protection, was prepared and submitted. The letter report was approved and a Limited Reevaluation Report will be prepared. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Design efforts will continued through FY 1992. 3. ALAMOSA, CO Location. The project lies in south central Colorado along the Rio Grande, in the community of Alamosa, CO. Proposed Project. The project consists of a levee system which will replace and augment the existing spoil bank levees. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design activities were initiated in FY 1990 and continued through the fiscal year. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. continued during FY 1992. Design efforts 4. COCHITI WETFIELDS, NM Location. Cochiti Dam and Lake is in north-central New Mexico approximately 50 miles north of Albuquerque, New Mexico. The Pueblo de Cochiti is located immediately downstream of the dam. Proposed Project. The project consists of installing an underground drainage system on 625 acres, the establishment of an operation, maintenance, and replacement sinking fund, settlement of past crop losses sustained by Pueblo de Cochiti, and wetland mitigation. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Operation and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance funds were received in FY 91 for design and preparation of plans and specifications of the sub-drain system. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Design efforts continued during FY 1992. 5. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION CHANNELS, NM Location. The project is located in an area which comprises watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15-mile reach of the Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, NM, and vicinity. 32-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* Combined drainage area of the tributaries is about 276 square miles. The Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of the Rio Grande, forms the eastern border of the watersheds. The crest of this mountain range rises more than a mile over the river to an elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Existing project. Improvements consist of north and south diversion channels on high ground east of and parallel to the valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude to standard project flood from all tributaries. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-15 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 17-2 of the Annual Report for FY 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The North Diversion Channel prevented $13,818,000 in flood damages during FY 1991. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented are $134,785,000. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1991 were: North Diversion Channel near Alameda 8,150 c.f.s.; South Diversion Channel 813 c.f.s. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the North and South Diversion Channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. The South Diversion Channel is in good condition and well maintained by the local interests. The North Diversion Channel has experienced severe arching and cracking of the concrete lined portion. Construction to correct this problem was initiated and completed in FY 1987. Additionally, a hydraulic flow problem exists on the North Diversion Channel. A model study, completed in February 1986, identified corrective measures. 6. CONCHAS LAKE, NM Location. The dam is in San Miguel County, NM, on the Canadian River, just below the confluence of the Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map, Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. A concrete gravity main dam section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in the Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side have an overall length of about 3.7 miles. The main section contains conduits in its base for the release of water from the reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. The earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and the north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 513,900 acre-feet (198,170 for flood control, 254,200 for water conservation and irrigation, and 61,530 dead storage). The dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None Required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for storage of floodwater and releases for irrigation purposes. $86,000 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1992 while no flood damages were prevented. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1992 were $3,477,100. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1992 were $113,700. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1992 were $9,868,800. The pool elevation at the start of FY 1992 was 4,196.66 feet with corresponding storage of 276,143 acre-feet. Total releases for this reporting period were 84,745 acre-feet. Releases of 81,818 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,926 acre-feet to Bell Ranch. The pool elevation on September 30, 1992 was 4,197.04 feet with corresponding storage of 279,437 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 759 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was essentially complete in 1939. Irrigation of some lands downstream from the project began in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was completed in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1983. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 7. EL PASO, TX Location. The project is located at El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on the left bank of the Rio Grande in the reach that forms part of the international boundary between the United States and the Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of a single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, conduits and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into the Rio Grande. Runoff from the tributary arroyos on the eastern, southern, and western slopes of the adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of the city and its outlying 32-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 suburban developments. The project is divided into three independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applied for the Northwest and Central areas. The Local Cooperation Agreement for the Southeast area reflects the cost sharing requirements contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1992 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (September 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982); Keystone Dam (September 1983); Keystone Outlet Conduit (March 1984); Highway Diversion Channel (May 1985); Dam Safety Assurance Program to the existing Range and Northgate Dams (May 1986); Borderland Diversion Channel (September 1986); and Phelps Dodge Basin (January 1990). During FY 1992 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal, however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has temporarily ended in the Central Area. The only remaining work is the Pershing Dam, Dam Safety Assurance. The Northwest Area of the project for all practical purposes is 100 percent complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Southeast Area was completed in September 1987. Construction was completed in January 1990 on the Phelps Dodge Basin, and construction was initiated in August 1990 on Phelps Dodge Channel, with an anticipated completion date of May 1992. Construction continued in 1992 on Americas Basin. 8. FOUNTAIN CREEK, PUEBLO, CO Location. The project is located on Fountain Creek approximately 1 mile above the confluence of the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek in the city of Pueblo in southeastern Colorado. Pueblo is approximately 30 miles east of the Wet Mountains of the Rocky Mountains. (See Geological Survey Map, Northeast Pueblo, CO quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, the project comprises 11,500 feet of channel modification and 9,700 feet of levee which will provide a 200-year level of protection at an estimated first cost of $8,880,000 ($6,410,000 Federal and $2,470,000 non-Federal). (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funds for initiation of construction were initially received in fiscal year 1987. A construction contract for recreation was awarded in September 1987. The remaining construction contract for levees and channel work was awarded 21 June 1988. Construction was substantially complete in July 1989. Condition at end of year. Construction on the levees and channel began in July 1988 and the entire project was completed in April 1991. 9. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO Location. The project is located on the Arkansas River, in Bent County, 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, about 18 miles upstream from the city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. The project consists of a concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 106 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Total capacity of the reservoir at the top of flood control is 608,250 acre-feet (259,800 for flood control and 348,450 for conservation and recreation storage). This reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For details of the completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17- 16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of the Arkansas River Compact. $107,300 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1992. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented 32-4 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT by this project through FY 1992 were $92,129,300. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1992 were $232,300. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $25,220,500. Maximum pool elevation of 3,815.99 feet with corresponding storage of 70,800 acre-feet occurred on April 4, 1992. Total releases for FY 1992 were 172,989 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 59,097 acre-feet. Sediment deposition was 958 acre-feet in FY 1992. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of the reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. A contract to rehabilitate the controls on sixteen tainter gates on the main dam was completed in FY 1991. Rehabilitation of the primary and secondary electrical distribution system is scheduled to be done in FY 1992. The project structures are in good condition and operational. 10. PUERCO RIVER, GALLUP, NM Location. The project is located on the Puerco River in the city of Gallup in northwestern New Mexico in McKinley County. Proposed project. This project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662 and the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988. The project consists of improvement of existing levees, construction of new levees and limited channel rectification. The project will provide the 100-year level of protection at an estimated first cost of $6,670,000 ($5,000,000 Federal and $1,670,000 non-Federal) 1 October 1989 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. A construction contract for the I-40 Auxiliary Levee was awarded in September 1988. The remaining construction contracts for the construction of the levees and channel improvement were awarded in June 1989. The entire project was completed in July 1991. Condition at end of year. The construction contract for levee and channel improvement was awarded in June 1989. The project was completed in July 1991. 11. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Location. Improvements are on the Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of development of water resources of the Rio Grande basin in New Mexico (H. Doc 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with the exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Dam. Although recommended, Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from the authorized plan. It was excluded without prejudice from future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by the States of Colorado and Texas, that the project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By the same act, Congress also authorized for the construction irrigation phase of the comprehensive plan as recommended by the Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with a joint agreement approved by the Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement the Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of the unified plan of improvement. Authority for the Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation and Table 32-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects contained in the authorized plan are reflected in individual reports on the following pages. 11A. ABIQUIU DAM, NM Location. The project is one unit of the flood control plan for the Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is on the Rio Chama near the town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from the confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-1, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of the left abutment. The reservoir provides 568,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at the spillway crest is 1,198,500 acre-feet. For a detailed description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September, 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. A non-Federal hydropower plant was completed in 1990 by the County of Los 32-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Alamos. The capacity of this plant is 13.2 MW. Drainage adits were completed in 1990 to alleviate seepage problems in the north and south abutments. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 1960. On October 1, 1991, the pool elevation was 6,205.49 feet. The maximum pool (6,223.12 feet) and storage (202,266 acre-feet) occurred on May 31, 1992. On September 30, 1992, the pool elevation was 6,205.81 feet with a corresponding storage of 135,148 acre-feet. There was 1,455 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1992. There were $7,320,700 in flood damages prevented during FY 1992. Sediment damages prevented were $163,000. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $241,323,200 through FY 1992. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in February 1963. In March 1989 construction was started on two drainage adits to alleviate seepage problems in the North and South abutments. Construction was completed in February 1990. Rehabilitation of the primary electrical distribution system was started in FY 1991 and is scheduled for completion in mid FY 1992. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. Emergency gates were not installed in the outlet conduit of Abiquiu Dam during its construction. A plan for the Abiquiu Dam emergency gates has been prepared in accordance with Section 1112 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Construction of the emergency gates is necessary to increase safety and enhance flood and sediment control. A Design Memorandum was prepared in FY 1991. 1IB. COCHITI LAKE, NM Location. The dam is at river mile 340 on the Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at the intersection of the New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. The project extends generally in an east-west line across the Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of the Rio Grande and then southward across the Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160- foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is part of the embankment on the south side of the Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in the left abutment on the Rio Grande. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 597,000 acre-feet at the spillway crest, of which 155,000 acre-feet is dedicated for recreation and sediment control. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvement details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17- 14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1991, the pool elevation was 5,332.04 feet with a corresponding storage of 49,866 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,360.67 feet with a storage of 93,552 acrefeet on April 19, 1992. On September 30, 1992 the pool elevation was 5,334.71 feet with a corresponding storage of 49,436 acre-feet. There was 1,296 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1992. There were $10,913,400 flood damages prevented during FY 1992. Sediment damages prevented were $145,200. Accumulated total damages prevented are $264,232,200. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completed in 1977. The Tetilla Peak recreation area was completed in 1981. Slope stabilization work on Sile Canal was completed in FY 1991. Rehabilitation of recreation shelters began in FY 1991 and is scheduled to be completed in the first quarter of FY 1992. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 11C. GALISTEO DAM, NM Location. The dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande. The reservoir will extend upstream from the dam for about 4 miles, near the village of Waldo, NM. (See Geological Survey Map,. San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above the streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10-foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with a discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with a pool at the spillway crest elevation. The 32-6 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in the right abutment. The project has 79,600 acre-feet of flood control storage and 9,868 acre-feet of sediment space. For more details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1990. No storage occurred during FY 1992. Peak inflow was 210 c.f.s. and maximum outflow was 210 c.f.s. There was 18 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1992. Sediment damages prevented during the FY were $2,000 totaling $135,400 through FY 1992. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1970. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 11D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM Location. The project is located in Sandoval County, NM, on the Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from the confluence of the Jemez River and the Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, NM. (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 780 feet long with maximum height of 146.6 feet above streambed, and off-channel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13-foot diameter gated outlet in the left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with a pool at spillway crest elevation. The dam was raised 14.1 feet and the spillway widened 28 feet in 1986 and 1987 to provide adequate discharge capability to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir has a capacity of 100,485 acre-feet at spillway crest (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 33,100 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1991, the pool elevation was 5,194.50 feet with a corresponding storage of 26,398 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,208.41 feet with a storage of 45,536 acre-feet on April 23, 1992. On September 30, 1992 the pool elevation was 5,193.87 feet with a corresponding storage of 23,650 acrefeet. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during FY 1992. Sediment deposition during FY 1992 was 905 acrefeet. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1992. Sediment benefits during FY 1992 were $101,400. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1992 were $12,129,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1953. An inspection in FY 1990 revealed some concrete deterioration on the bridge abutment and stilling basin wall. A study to determine structural integrity was recently completed. Repair recommendations have been addressed. Design plans and specifications are currently underway. Construction is planned in FY 1993. All other project structures are in good condition and all structures are in operation. 11E. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM Location. The project is composed of 45 square miles of floodplain lying along the Rio Grande from the vicinity of Corrales to Belen, New Mexico. Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project consists of raising and rehabilitating 51.5 miles of levees to provide the 270- year level of protection, and the creation of 75 acres of wetlands from borrow areas within the bosque, and acquisition of 200 acres to satisfy fish and wildlife mitigation requirements. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $59,300,000 ($44,600,000Federal and $14,700,000non-Federal) 1 Oct 92 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. A Limited Reevaluation Report was completed and draft LCA negotiated. Both will be submitted July 1993. 11F. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Location. This project is one unit of the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of improvement for the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is on the Rio Grande and covers a section of the river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream to Espafiola, NM, about river mile 394. (See Table 32-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) 32-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Existing project. This project consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect the levees. Construction of the project is a joint undertaking by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by the Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, and bank protection work, with channel-rectification and drainage-rehabilitation work being the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist throughout the reach of the river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by the meandering river. (See Table 32-D on existing project and Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to the usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of the project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act, Section 401, 1986 Water Resource Development Act, and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for the completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with the construction of the Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. The Espanola Valley unit is in the deferred category. Neither the city of Espanola nor Santa Clara Pueblo have given any indication that they plan any positive action to solve the flooding problem. For more details see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were $393,300 flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1992. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1992 amounted to $44,977,100. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 6,110 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on April 29, 1992. The peak at San Acacia was 6,170 c.f.s. on May 12, 1992. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Albuquerque unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Bernalillo to Belen unit was completed in June 1986. The General Design Memorandum for the San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit was approved in August 1990. Construction was initiated on the Truth or Consequences Unit in fiscal year 1989. The Espanola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 11G. SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT, NM Location. The project is located along the Rio Grande, extending from the upper end of the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel at the San Acacia diversion works to the head of Elephant Butte Reservoir. Proposed project. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consists of the reconstruction of 55 miles of existing spoil bank levee which separates the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel from the cleared floodway. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $55,600,000 ($48,650,000 Federal and $6,950,000 non- Federal) 1 Oct 92 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 apply. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 modified the Local Sponsor's required contribution. 11H. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Location. This project is located on Cuchillo Negro Creek in the vicinity of the city of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948 and 1950, modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, to provide that the Secretary is authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande in lieu of the originally authorized floodway. The project has been constructed at an estimated total cost of $17,200,000 ($12,910,000 Federal and $3,400,000 Non-Federal) 1 October 1991 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of this unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project was completed in July 1991. 12. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM Location. The project is located on a lake in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 32-8 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM. (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Operation of the project began in November 1979. It consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. The purposes of the project are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipator. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 439,860 acre-feet which includes 72,860 acrefeet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. The surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,594 acres. The contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. For a more detailed report of the authorized project including the modification to existing Sumner Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs is the responsibility of the Federal Government; however, the Carlsbad Irrigation District is required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an equal amount to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. The Carlsbad Irrigation District also agreed to use Sumner Lake for flood control. Because they realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, they will continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks manages the recreation facilities. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974 for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The project was completed in late 1979 and reservoir operation for irrigation was started in March 1980. Pool elevation at the start of the fiscal year was 4,743.83 feet with storage of 92,869 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 74,026 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1992 was 4,745.00 acre-feet with a storage of 97,056 acre-feet. The maximum elevation was 4,745.58 feet with a storage of 99,181 acre-feet on August 21, 1992. There was 1,115 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. No flood damages were prevented in FY 1992. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $124,700. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 9,170 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $32,100 with an accumulative total of $1,953,300 through FY 1992. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the recreation area was completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979 and construction was completed in FY 1982. A contract for replacing the main waterline servicing the project was awarded in FY 1991 and will be completed in the first quarter of FY 1992. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 13. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO Location. This project is located on the Purgatorie River about 161 miles above its junction with the Arkansas River. The Project is about 4 miles upstream from the city of Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map, Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in the left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in the right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,800 c.f.s. with a water surface at top of the flood control pool. In 1985, a 3-foot high parapet wall on top of the upstream face of the dam and a supplemental 700-foot wide rock cut emergency spillway located on the right abutment were constructed to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir provides for storage of 63,698 acre-feet for flood control, 37,325 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet for irrigation, and 4,500 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 125,523 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and is operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatorie River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of the irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. On October 1, 1991 the pool 32-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 elevation was 6,157.21 feet with a corresponding storage of 9,614 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,176.68 feet with a corresponding storage of 19,559 acre-feet on April 27, 1992. On September 30, 1992 the pool elevation was 6,145.00 feet with a corresponding storage of 5,006 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 1992 was 175 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1992 was $41,700. Accrued sediment benefits are $2,224,700. Irrigation benefits for FY 1992 were $92,000. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1992 were $1,516,700. Irrigation benefit releases for the year were 23,408 acre-feet. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was completed in May 1983. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 14. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM Location. The project is located about 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM on the Rio Hondo and the Rocky Arroyo. The Rio Hondo is formed at the confluence of the Rio Ruidoso and the Rio Bonito, near the village of Hondo, NM, in the foothills region east of Sierra Blanca in the southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with the Pecos River near Roswell, NM. (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The Two Rivers project consists of two dams: Diamond "A" and Rocky. The Diamond "A" Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. The Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for water storage, except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled so that flows through Roswell will not exceed the Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 600 c.f.s. The capacity of the Two Rivers Reservoir at its spillway crest is 163,775 acre-feet, of which 13,775 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1991. There were no flood damages prevented during 1992. Sediment damages prevented were $46,400. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1992 were $84,938,800. There were 414 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1992. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 1992 are $1,017,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and was placed in operation July 1963. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. The projects in Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for fiscal year 1992 were $144,019. 16. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, five projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, Sumner, Navajo, and Brantley Dams. Platoro Dam on the Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. The authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Total storage is 59,571 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acre-feet solely for flood control. The 53,571 acre-feet is joint use storage with flood control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by the Interior Appropriation Act of 1941. (See H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of this project was completed by the Bureau of Reclamation in 1952. On October 1, 1991 storage in Platoro Reservoir was 19,187 acre-feet at elevation 9,981.51 feet. Maximum storage of 44,428 acre-feet at elevation 10,017.25 feet occurred on June 30, 1992. On September 30, 1992, storage was 29,898 acre-feet at elevation 9,998.48 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 2,210 c.f.s. on August 24, 1992. There were no flood damages prevented by the project during FY 1992. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $4,507,500. Total cost for activity, by the Corps of Engineers during FY 1992 was $14,266. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Bureau of Reclamation and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County, Colorado. Pueblo Reservoir has 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. 32-10 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1991 was 78,270 acre-feet, elevation 4,824.42 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 168,083 acre-feet at elevation 4,856.47 feet on April 1, 1992. Storage on September 30, 1992 was 103,776 acre-feet at elevation 4,834.95 feet. There were $266,300 flood damages prevented in FY 1992. Total flood damages prevented to date are $3,600,600. Total cost for FY 1992 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $14,391. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Storage on October 1, 1991 was 43,570 acre-feet at elevation 4,260.93 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1992 was 64,038 acre-feet at elevation 4,267.30 feet on February 16, 1992. Storage on September 30, 1992 was 22,130 acre-feet at elevation 4,251.58 feet. Total cost for FY 1992 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $12,913. Navajo Dam and Reservoir is located on the San Juan River at river mile 298.6 in San Juan County, New Mexico. Navajo Dam was authorized as part of a Colorado River Storage Project by an act of 84th Congress, 11 April 1956 (PL 485). The Bureau of Reclamation constructed and is responsible for operation of the project. Construction was initiated in June 1958 and the project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,708,600 acre-feet. The project controls a drainage area of 3,230 square miles. Storage on October 1, 1991 was 1,585,800 acre-feet, elevation 6,077.72 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1992 was 1,644,300 acre-feet, elevation 6,081.62 feet on April 16, 1992. Storage on September 30, 1992 was 1,579,400 acre-feet, elevation 6,077.29 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1992 activity was $22,179. Brantley Dam on the Pecos River above the town of Carlsbad in Eddy County, NM controls runoff from 13,208 square miles of uncontrolled area. The authorized purposes are irrigation, flood control, Fish and Wildlife and Recreation and for the elimination of the hazards of failure of the McMillan and the Avalon Dams. The total storage is 348,544 acre-feet with 189,700 acre-feet for flood control. The Brantley Dam was authorized for construction on 20 October 1972 by Public Law 92-514 with the cost ceiling raised for the project in October 1980 by Public Law 96-375. On September 6, 1988 the conduits were closed and Brantley Dam started its initial filling. On September 30, 1992, the storage was 14,259 acre-feet at elevation 3,240.67 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1992 activity was $44,874. 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-E. 18. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Costs during FY 1992 were: Alamo Canyon, Alamogordo, NM, $5,542; Drake Arroyo, Socorro, NM, $1,589; Hobbs, NM, $32,171; Kistenmacher Arroyo, U.HGTS, SD., Las Cruces, NM, $17,951; Little Puerco River, Gallup, NM, $48,475; Oak Creek, Florence, CO, $23,294; Walnut Creek, San Antonio, NM, $458; Zuni River at Zuni, NM, $19,755. Emergency flood control activities; repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for FY 1990 were $201,258 for advance preparation, none for flood emergency operations, and there were no repair and restoration costs. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Alameda Street, Santa Fe, NM, $32,101; Pifion Bridge, Fountain Creek, CO, $72; Camino Alire Bridge, Santa Fe River, Santa Fe, NM, $20,108; Hampton Arroyo at McCoy Street, Aztec, NM; $220,583; Highway 62 Bridge, Santa Fe River, Santa Fe, NM, $13,764; Highway 75, Embudo Creek, Rio Arriba, NM, $6,104; I-25 Fountain Creek, Security, CO, $4,953; Overton Road, Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO, $14,972; Santa Fe River, NM, $508; State Highway 194, Bents Old Fort, Arkansas Road, La Junta, CO, $13,645; Southern Boulevard, Black's Arroyo, Rio Rancho, NM, $19,821; Southmoor Drive, Fountain Creek, CO, $1,481; and State Road 12, Starkweather Road, Reserve, NM, $15,026. Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control (Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, 83rd Cong.) Costs during FY 1992 were: Gallinas River, City of Las Vegas, NM $5,468. 32-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 General Investigations 19. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $401,081 for flood damage prevention studies, $69,589 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies). 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $232,256 for flood plain management and technical services. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, special study for Pikes Peak flood warning systems, hydrometeorological studies, sedimentation studies, and environmental data studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $4,647. 21. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Continuation of Planning and Engineering costs in FY 1992 were $268,434. 22. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Advance Engineering and Design Costs for FY 1992 were $1,169.00. TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 1. Acequias Irrigation New Work System, NM Alamogordo, NM Alamosa, CO Cochiti Wetfields, NM Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,000,000 200,000 1,972,000 1,142,950 1,323,966 1,403,995 200,000 44,385 291,723 155,641 299,233 364,930 230,000 209,013 259,000 242,776 851,000 1,245,399 6,701,000' 5,595,573' 241,000 2,259,000 250,751 2,227,525 270,000 268,438 - 300,000 15,939 206,200 529,0002 511,2142 1,050,0003 952,8403 32-12 4. ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 Albuquerque Diversion Channels Project, NM (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) Conchas Lake, NM El Paso, TX Fountain Creek Pueblo, CO John Martin Reservoir 10. Puerco River, Gallup, NM 5. 181,000 111,811 95,000 17,845,450 88,537 17,769,798 518,356 518,356 854,664 854,664 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 894,725 942,571 879,000 891,397 - 13,821,4994 - 13,821,4994 1,044,000 17,877,519 901,113 17,714,596 3,206,000 3,483,000 2,138,000 6,095,000 75,266,2945 3,056,377 1,276,426 4,869,596 6,021,890 74,522,394 s 3,032,000 200,000 4,673,143 367,812 160,000 7,463 - 6,570,0006 190,341 6,564,2856 S- - - 15,555,3587 S- - - 15,555,3587 2,010,500 1,297,295 1,687,400 1,527,826 22,119,218 2,176,195 1,259,238 1,738,677 1,460,533 22,117,377 2,792,000 1,434,000 225,000 396,592 3,277,977 758,598 - 4,701,00089 22,745 4,677,1058.9 32-13 TABLE 32-A (Continued) 903,300 886,032 6. 8. 9. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 11. Rio Grande Basin, NM Abiquiu Dam, NM Cochiti Lake, NM Galisteo Dam, NM Jemez Canyon Dam, NM Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM Rio Grande Floodway Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache, NM Rio Grande Floodway T or C Unit, NM 11A. 11B. - - - - 26,745,028 - - - - 26,745,028 3,864,200 2,434,626 1,035,000 1,550,100 27,648,253 3,974,747 2,128,878 1,216,334 1,618,868 27,587,381 - - - - 97,084,559 - - - - 97,084,559 1,266,200 1,159,945 1,587,000 1,791,900 17,937,967 1,454,062 1,065,137 1,540,779 1,699,299 17,702,379 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 179,948 164,243 193,000 209,635 - 14,275,053 - 14,275,053 171,000 2,521,924 162,257 2,512,468 6,293,972 6,293,972 371,800 635,281 370,477 575,245 49,099 10,000 25,631 430,000 489,518 50,000 40,697 723,000 7,983,632 458,915 7,717,407 200,000 1,437,00010 132,037 1,359,73410 4,794,868" 4,794,868" 250,000 317,000 351,000 412,292 359,626 380,527 3,422,000 3,600,000 4,042,000 772,829 4,575,047 5,219,452 450,000 2,108,00012 389,372 2,047.37212 180,000 13,005,000'"'4 573,136 12,880,2691314 32-14 211,600 215,037 11C. 11D. liE. 11F. 11G. 11H. ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sept. 30, 1992 12. Santa Rosa Dam New Work & Lake, NM Approp. - -1,821 - - 41,039,741 Cost -660 - - - 41,039,056 Maint. Approp. 731,600 597,936 787,000 769,000 7,260,136 Cost 750,828 505,525 870,253 754,693 7,236,491 13. Trinidad Lake, CO New Work Approp. - - - - 55,774,758 Cost - - - - 55,774,758 Maint. Approp. 363,500 519,429 465,000 557,000 6,685,529 Cost 374,903 464,825 514,772 523,991 6,645,530 14. Two Rivers Dam, New Work NM Approp. - - - - 4,847,244 Cost - - - - 4,847,244 Maint. Approp. 280,300 246,409 418,000 171,000 3,819,722 Cost 290,782 277,087 363,255 237,213 3,810,772 'Reflects PED funding appropriations beginning in FY 1986. include non-Federal contributions of $1,529,000. 2PED activities were initiated in FY 1991. 3Includes $750,000 FY 88 Construction General Funds and $300,000 O&M funds, added in FY 1992. 4Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs and $869,978 for emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326, cost of initiating project under the authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work performed with funds transferred to the Corps under Public Works acceleration Act of 1962. 5Does not include non-Federal contributions of $1,130,000. 6Does not include non-Federal contributions of $1,295,000. 'Excludes $59,977 emergency relief funds for new work. Includes $30,000 for Code 710. 8Reflects PED funding appropriations beginning in FY 1986. Does not include $1,397,000 non-Federal contribution. 9FY 1986 PED funds were appropriated to and expended by Los Angeles District. '�Includes $1,177,000 PED funds. "Includes funds for preconstruction planning of Espanola Valley unit. Excludes $1,000,011 appropriated funds transferred to Bureau of Reclamation under memorandum of agreement between that agency and the Corps. 12Includes $1,658,000 PED funds. "3Starting in FY 1982, AE&D programs are funded through GI appropriations. 14Does not include non-Federal contributions of $3,425,000. 32-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section TIn Tevt Date Authorizing Act Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 31, 1992 Aug. 26, 1992 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 1. 32-16 3. 4. 8. 10. 111 1 I AI Project and Work Authorized ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM An Irrigation System dating back to the eighteenth century with significant engineering works in the settlement and development of the western portion of the United States. Restoration and preservation of this system has cultural and historic values to the region. Measures are necessary to restore and protect the river division structures and associated canals. ALAMOSA, COLORADO Authorized a flood control project for Alamosa, Colorado. COCHITI WETFIELDS, NEW MEXICO Authorized and directed the construction of an underground drainage system necessary to correct the high ground water problem at the Pueblo de Cochiti. EL PASO, TX A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) FOUNTAIN CREEK, PUEBLO, CO Channel improvements and levee construction on both sides of Fountain Creek approximately 1 mile above the confluence of the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek. PUERCO RIVER, GALLUP, NM Channel rectifications, improvement of existing levees and construction of new levees on both sides of Rio Puerco in the city of Gallup, NM. Documents Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. (Sec. 1113) Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 101) Public Law 102-358 102d Cong, (H.R. 4437) H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' Public Law 662, 99th Cong. 2nd sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948 and May 17, 1950 Oct. 31, 1992 RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Department of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized installation of the Abiquiu Dam Emergency Gates by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM Authorized project for flood control, Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM. Authorized increase of flood protection through the dredging of the bed of the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Albuquerque, NM to an elevation lower than existed on the date of enactment of this Act. The project shall include the establishment of 75 acres of wetlands for fish and wildlife habitat and the acquisition of 200 acres of land for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache Unit.) RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT, NM Modified the cost sharing to more equitably reflect the non-Federal contribution for the project by that percentage of benefits which is attributable to the Federal properties; except that, for purposes of this subsection, Federal property benefits may not exceed 50 percent of the total project benefits. 32-17 H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong.,1st sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. Public Law 662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Cong., 1st sess.' and Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 102(e)) 11lE. 11F. 11G. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11H. Jun. 30, 1948 TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM H. Doc. 243, 81st Approved comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin is set forth Cong., 1st sess. in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 15, 1948, for flood control of Rio Grande Basin. May 17, 1950 In addition to previous authorizations, the completion of the plan H. Doc. 243, 81st approved in the Flood Control Act of 1948, for the Rio Grande Basin, Cong., 1st sess. at an estimated cost of $39,000,000. Nov. 17, 1986 Modify previous authorizations to provide that the Secretary is Public Law 662, authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek 99th Cong., 2nd in lieu of the authorized floodway. sess. (Sec 871) 'Contains latest published maps. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM TABLE 32-C RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8 of Text) Miles Drainage Total Above Nearest Area (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espanola, 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high, 30,397,0963 NM 1,212,000 acre feet capacity Jemez Canyon Jemez Dam 2 Bernalillo, 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 106,100 4,217,206 NM acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Rio Grande 123 - - Channel rectification, levee 25,744,0002 Floodway to 394' enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 340' Cochiti, NM 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 596,300 96,900,000 acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, NM 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 89,000 14,340,280 acre-feet capacity 'River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. 3Includes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities and $3,600,000 for emergency gates. 32-18 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1990 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico 1966 189,356 - Alpine, Texas3 1977 130,488 - Cibolo Creek, Texas' 1983 829,500 Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colorado (Templeton Gap Floodway)' 1959 881,262 - Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)' 1952 219,789 - Highway 12, Colorado' 1985 120,500 - Holly, Colorado' 1985 2,021,400 - Las Animas, Colorado2 1980 4,956,000 - Las Cruces, New Mexico2 1980 4,815,236 - Pecos, Texas3 1977 480,273 - Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec.212)' - 130,678 - Pueblo, Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)' 1954 201,958 - Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico3 1983 1,123,900 - Smith Creek, Colorado' 1985 219,000 - Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico' 1965 2,259,328 - 'Completed. 2Responsibility of local interests. 3 'Inactive. 4Deferred. 32-19 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT* This district (total area about 230,000 square miles) comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean that are in California between the Mexican boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 Miles north of the entrance to the Los Angeles Harbor). The lower Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ.) which is southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California;and the southern Arizona that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA 2. LA-LB Harbor, CA 3. Marina Del Rey, CA 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 5. Oceanside Harbor, CA 6. Oceanside Sand By-pass, CA 7. Port Hueneme, CA 8. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA 9. San Diego Harbor, CA 10 San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA 11. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 12. San Luis Rey River, CA 13. Ventura Harbor, CA 14. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Flood Control 15. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA 16. Gila River Basin, AZ 16A Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ 16B Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (Stage 2) 17. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA 18. Los Coches Creek, CA 19. Lytle & Warm Creeks, Santa Ana Basin, CA 20. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA 21. Pine & Mathews Cnyns Dam, Colo River Basin, NV 22. Santa Ana Mainstem, CA 23. Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA 24. Whitewater River Floodwarning, San Bernadino & Riverside County, CA 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 26. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 27. Flood Control work under Special Authorization Page 33-02 33-02 33-02 33-03 33-03 33-03 33-03 33-04 33-04 33-04 33-04 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-05 33-06 33-06 33-06 33-06 33-06 33-07 33-07 33-07 33-07 33-07 33-08 33-08 General Investigations Page 28. Surveys 33-08 29. Collection and Study of Basic Data 33-08 30. Research and Development 33-08 Preconstruction, Engineering & Design 31. Carneros Creek, CA 33-08 32. Clifton, AZ 33-09 33. Hansen Dam, CA 33-09 34. Holbrook, AZ 33-09 35. Lake Elsinore, CA 33-09 36. Lower Mission Creek 33-09 37. Lower Santa Cruz, AZ 33-10 38. Nogales Wash, AZ 33-10 39. Rillito, AZ 33-10 40. Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA 33-10 41. Santa Paula Creek, CA 33-11 42. Sweetwater River Basin, CA 33-11 43. Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV 33-11 Tables Table 33-A Cost and Financial Statement 33-12 Table 33-B Authorizing Legislation 33-16 Table 33-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 33-28 Table 33-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project 33-29 Table 33-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 33-31 Table 33-F Not Applicable Table 33-G Deauthorized Projects 33-32 33-1 'it . . REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 Navigation 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Location: On the coast of southern California about a mile northwest of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202). Existing project: For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1981. Location cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Began maintenance dredging. 2. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA Location. On coast of southern California in San Pedro bay about 25 miles south of the City of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. Previous projects. For details see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report 1984. Existing project. For Details, see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1984. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development act. The revised recommended project has changed due to the withdraw of the Port of Long Beach. The Port of Los Angeles might receive credit, contingent upon the Secretary of the Army's approval, for advance work performed per WRDA 88 (Sec. 4d). Terminal Facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 82,553 feet of wharves, if which 75,729 feet are owned by the city and 6,824 feet are owned by private interest, In Long Beach Harbor, 58,985 feet of wharves, if which 51,775 feet are owned by the city and 7,210 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, Federal Government owns 19,700 feet of waterfront inside the Navy Mole, exclusive of finger piers. The Final report presented four project increments. Increment No. 2 would deepen the existing Los Angeles Harbor approach and entrance channels to Pier 300 to provide better access to dry bulk facilities. Increment No. 3 would further deepen the Los Angeles approach and entrance channel to Pier 300 and part of Pier 400, and deepen a south channel to provide access to the eastern side of Pier 400 and liquid bulk facilities. Increments No. 4 & 5 would extend Increment No. 3 of Los Angeles to provide access to container terminals that would be located on part of Pier 300 and pier 400. 3. MARINA DEL REY, CA. Location. Marina Del Rey is located on Santa Monica Bay, 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles, 29 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 390 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay . Existing Project. For details see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981. Local Cooperations. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Approximately 5,797 permanent slips and end ties are located in the marina. There are 28 additional transient slips located at Chace Park. A Coast Guard Station with a permanently assigned 82- foot cutter; a firefighting detachment with a fire boat, a pumper, a ladder truck; and a Sheriff's Harbor Patrol with five patrol boats and five auxiliary vessels are on 24-hour duty. A fuel dock is located on the west side of the main channel. A 10-lane public launching ramp with parking for 740 cars and trailers; dry storage for 396 trailer-borne boats; and several commercial hoists are in operation as well as two haul-out yards, one containing a 100-tone and a 60-ton marine travel lift. Six hotels, 14 public parking lots, 26 restaurants, 19 apartment complexes, a ship chandlery, a fisherman's village shopping and tourist center, 26 restaurants, several snack bars, five coffee shops, and eight yacht clubs called the marina home port. Also included are sailing instruction, boat rental, repair and storage, 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT harbor tours, sportfishing, yacht clubs, and retail facilities. Operations during fiscal year. The Corps is completing a study analyzing present and project boat traffic conditions in Marina Del Rey. The study was prepared to evaluate the potential impacts of expansion of additional slips into the existing Federal channel. Sediment analysis preparatory to maintenance dredging was completed. 4. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles south of Monterey Bay 120 miles northwest of Santa Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles. ( see Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5387). Existing Project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. The City of Morro Bay. Terminal facilities. Facilities which are adequate for existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by California Department on Parks and Recreation; 1,396 feet of floating docks constructed by the city of Morro Bay; 1,398 feet of privately owned piers; and 5,435 feet of privately owned floating docks. Operations during the fiscal year. Performed maintenance dredging. 5. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Berthing for 957 boats, single-tie slips, 38 double-tie slips and 136 side-ties, of which 54 are visitors' slips); 12 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center; a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,732 cars; with temporary parking for about 141 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a boatel/motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Operations during the fiscal year. DM completed Aug 92. Draft P&S submitted to SPD Oct 92. Dredging contract scheduled for award Aug 93. 6. OCEANSIDE HARBOR SAND BYPASS, CA Location. On the coast of southern California along Oceanside Beach near Jetty, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. Underwater experimental pumping system with het pumps, fluidizers, and submerged pipeline to remove sand from harbor entrance and deposit it to downcoast beaches, on a continual basis. Phase I and Phase II have both been completed and successfully tested. Phase II evaluation was prepared after data was available from the first full year of Phase II operation (Sept 92). Final completion (Phase III) is scheduled for FY94 and will be designed to maximize the system's production, complete the experiment, and evaluate the ultimate effeteness that the bypassing technology has on maintaining the harbor channel. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. We have currently been asked to further evaluate the compatibility of the Bypass system with the authorized Harbor Improvement Project before finalizing the Evaluation Report. 7. PORT HUENEME, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. about one mile southeast of Channel Islands Harbor, immediately west of the City of Port Hueneme, four miles southwest of the City of Oxnard, and 10 miles southeast of the City of Ventura. Existing project. Authorized in 1968, The harbor serves both military and commercial uses with port facilities consisting of terminals, wharves, and 33-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 warehouses servicing a wide variety of products. The existing Federal project consists of an approach channel, entrance channel, central basin, and two rubblemound jetties. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1976. The Oxnard Harbor District expressed strong support of the study 8 Dec 92. Operations during the fiscal year. None. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 33 to 35 of Annual Report for 1980. Terminal facilities. Consist of 45,070 feet of wharves, exclusive of Government-owned and 24,000 feet are privately owned. Government-owned wharves at North Island are restricted to military use only. Operations during fiscal year. Performed hydrographic condition survey of the Federal navigation channels in September 1992. 8. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR 10. SAN DIEGO RIVER & MISSION (KING HARBOR), CA BAY, CA Location. On the coast of southern California on the southern portion of Santa Monica Bay, about 17 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. WRDA of 86 (H.R. 6) Conference bill, Title VIII - Project Modification, Sec 809 - King Harbor, Redondo Beach, CA Modifies the King Harbor project in order to carry out maintenance dredging & for breakwater construction, & authorized the Secretary to restore the breakwater to a height of 22-ft & maintain breakwater at such height to provide greater protection from heavy wave action. Local cooperation. City of Redondo Beach officials are in full support of the study and have indicated desire to construct improvements to reduce continued storm related damages. Operations during fiscal year. Construction contract for the modifications was completed. 9. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California just north of the Mexican border, about 109 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5107). Previous projects. For details, see page 1976 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1642 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details, see pages 33 and 34 of annual Report for 1980. Location. The San Diego River has its source on the tableland in the Cuyamaca Mountains near Santa Ysabel, CA, and flows southwestward 52 miles to the Pacific Ocean, 6 miles northwest of San Diego. Mission Bay Harbor is adjacent to the outlet of the San Diego River, 77 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. The Bay has a perimeter of about 11 miles and area of about 2,00 acres. Existing project. For details, see page 33-3 of Annual report for 1991. Authorized work consisted of Levied channel, entrance channel, main channel, altered railroad bridge, Anchorage Basins (West Anchorage & Quivira) and three jetties. Re-evaluation of constructing a WEIR in middle jetty. Local cooperation. Letter dated February 1989 from the city of San Diego stated desire to proceed on weir based on cost-sharing requirements of WRDA 86. The City desires Federal assistance for improvements to reduce storm damage potential and shore erosion in Mission Bay area. Operations during the fiscal year. New disposal location for rock removed from middle jetty required supplemental environment assessment & approvals from resource agencies & CA Coastal Commission. 11 SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California, 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor. Existing Project. For details on original, see page 33- 4 Annual Report for 1983. For re-evaluation details see 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT WRDA, 1986. Recommended plan includes acquiring a dredge for the City and they will assume the maintenance of the channel. Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969 for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. The City reaffirmed its support Nov 90. Operations during fiscal year. Performed maintenance dredging. PGM received 4 Mar 92. Revised Dft Rpt submitted 2 Oct 92 Awaiting approval from HQUSACE. 12. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA Location. Along the lower 7.2 miles of the river, in and around the city of Oceanside, San Diego County, about 86 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. A double levee, 5.4 miles long; stone protected channel with a soft bottom; 1,330 feet of parapet walls at the ocean on the north and south levees; six interior drainage ponds; and a five-mile bike trail. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Completed plantings for the forty-two acre mitigation plan for the endangered species, least bell's vireo. 13. VENTURA HARBOR, CA Location. Located 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and 6 miles northwest of Channel Island Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of the Annual Report for 1981. Re-evaluation under WRDA 1990 consists of modification to the exiting harbor by constructing a separate South Beach groin, extending the offshore breakwater, adding a spur groin to the north jetty, and deepening and extending the entrance channel and sand trap. Local cooperation. LCA scheduled to be executed Apr 93. Construction contract scheduled for award in July 93. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is fair; hydro survey performed Apr 92. Plans and Spec completed Jun 92. 14. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Flood Control 15. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. In and near the cities of Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, and Ontario, and the communities of Alta Loma and San Antonio Heights, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, Ca. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of the Annual Report for 1987. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on Annual Report for 1981. 16. GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ 16A. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ. Location. About 20 miles northwest of Gila Bend, and 120 miles southwest of Phoenix, AZ. Existing Project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is good. Releases into the downstream unimproved channel are predicated upon the amount of water in storage and the amount of damages occurring downstream. Downstream interests have made substantial improvements to bridges and crossing, which will allow larger releases than in the past. We still cannot follow the schedule of release without consideration for downstream damages. 1 Recreation Area (downstream at borrow pit area) has been closed due to high levels of pesticide contamination in the Gila River system. 33-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 16B. PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER) (STAGE 2 AND REMAINING WORK) Location: Project located in Maricopa County, AZ, adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, AZ. Existing Project: For details see Annual Report FY91 page 33-7. Map of Modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No.3, General Design Memorandum- Phase I, plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," Prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1981. Local Cooperation: Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 Annual Report for 1981. LCA relating to covered channel executed 8 July 92. Operations during fiscal year. LOA executed with Ariz State University on 15 Jun 92. Heavy rains on 23 Jul 92 caused some damage to ACDC. Most damage occurred on north side between Central Ave and 7th St. Some deflection of wall occurred, and some base of maintenance road washed away with accompanying collapse of asphalt pavement. Cause determined to be due, in part, to a storm drain pipe, flowing full, that disconnected from wall. Investigation is underway, with assistance from independent consulting engineer. Temporary repair completed and road opened to traffic. DRAINAGE AREA, CA Location: Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek, and tributaries thereof in Los Angeles County, CA. Previous Project: For Details, see pages 1768 to 1772 of Annual Report for 1942; page 1602 of Annual Report for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. For details on units see Annual Report for 1962. For details on re-evaluation see Annual Report for 1991. Existing project: Project will consist of channel improvement to Lower Los Angeles & Rio Hondo Rivers & Compton Creek and modification/replacement of as many as 27 Bridges necessitated by the channel improvements. A map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General Design Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation under the Major Rehabilitation Program," dated January 1984 and revised in March 1984. Local cooperation: The Los Angeles County department of Public Works has actively participated in extensive briefings for Rep of Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and most of the affected Congressmen. They reaffirmed support Feb 92. Operations during fiscal year. Model tests are (underway at WES) critical to schedule determining overall plan. 18. LOS COCHES CREEK, CA Location. In the community of Lakeside, San Diego, County, CA Existing Project. Plan provides for a 1.8 mile-long rectangular concrete channel; an inlet structure just downstream from the Los Coches and Ha-Hana Roads; and an outlet structure at the confluence of the San Diego River. Plan also provides for 5 double box culverts and 1 triple box culvert. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1985. 1 IVI ANl WAIARM CREEKS, Location: Near San Bernardino and Colton, San Bernardino County, CA. Existing project: Authorized project was modified by Design Memorandum No. 1, approved in May 1972, which contains a map of modified project plan. Supplement to Design Memorandum No. 1 was approved in August 1985. Local cooperation: Requirements are described on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. 20. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Location: On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from the mouth of Deep Creek and about 33-6 1L. U U I CYl~ WVFEI II V 17. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANTAANABASINCA LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project: For details, see page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation: Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. 21. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Location: In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project: For details, see page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation: Fully complied with. 22. SANTA ANA MAINSTEM, CA Location. Along a 75-mile reach of the Santa Ana River in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties, emptying into the Pacific Ocean between the cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Harbor, 50 miles south of Los Angeles, and 90 miles north of San Diego. Existing project. For details, please see Page 33-9 of the Annual Report for 1987. Local cooperation. Counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange. Operations during fiscal year. The contract for the construction of Mill Creek was completed March 1992. The construction contract for the first reach of the lower Santa Ana River and the Greenville-Banning Channel was completed December 1992. The Intake Structure Excavation contract at Seven Oaks was completed June 1992. Bids were opened in Feb 1992 for the outlet works/diversion contract at Seven Oaks, and awarded Apr 1992. Bids were opened in March 1992 for Reach 2 of the Lower Santa Ana River and was awarded April 1992. 23. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN AND ORANGE COUNTY, CA. Location. On the Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. General plan of improvement. For details, see page 33-14 of Annual Report for 1981. Existing project. For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. For other pertinent information, see Table 33-G, "Deauthorized Projects." Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Orange County Water District advocated an increase in water conservation at Prado Dam up to elevation 505'. Prado Basin includes significant riparian wetlands, including nesting areas of the endangered least Bell's vireo. The Basin is currently under review as proposed critical habitat for the vireo. Operations during fiscal year. The conditions of dams and channels is good. 24. WHITE WATER RIVER BASIN FLOODWARNING SYSTEM, CA Location. The Coachella Valley area of San Bernadino and Riverside Counties, about 100 miles east of the city of Los Angeles. Existing project. Rain and stream gages have been installed in appropriates locations in the Whitewater River tributary basin. Receiving and processing stations are operational at two local emergency agency offices. Local District August cooperation. The Coachella Valley Water signed the local cooperation agreement in 1989. Operations during fiscal year. The local sponsors installed 99 per cent of the equipment. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $557,621. (See table 33-1 on 33-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 inspection of completed flood control project.). 26. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued. Cost for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $252,378. 27. flood prevention studies; $448,157 were for surveys; $13,614 were for special studies involving coordination with other agencies; $140,872 were for review of authorized projects; and $141,519 were for miscellaneous activities. 29. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $00.00 for technical services; and $151,415 for flood plan management FLOOD CONTROL WORK 30. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) See table 33-J on flood control work under special authorization. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $126,989 for Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was $103,476 for advance preparation. Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90- 448, as amended) In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. General Investigations 28. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $4,577,012 regular funds, of which $1,022,483 were for navigation studies; $ 0 were for shore protection studies; $2,810,366 were for Fiscal year cost was $6,266 for hydrologic studies. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 31. CARNEROS CREEK, CA Location. Located in Goleta Valley area, 6 miles west of Santa Barbara, and 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Description. Carneros Creek is one of several streams in the 48-square mile area of Goleta Valley which flow from southern slopes of Santa Ynez Mountains through residential, commercial and industrial areas of the Goleta Valley, converging in the Goleta Slough before flowing into the Pacific Ocean at Goleta Beach property to be protected is primarily industrial. Local Cooperation. Santa Barbara Co. Flood Control & Water Conservation District. Under WRDA of 1992 H.R. 6167, the recommended project consists of an off-line excavated debris basin in combination with a diversion channel connecting to an existing borrow pit that will be modified slightly to become a detention basin north of U.S. Highway 101. Operations during fiscal year. 11 month delay caused by inability to obtain right-of-entries for PED in FY92. Obtaining through sponsor was unsuccessful. Currently obtaining through Federal condemnation process. 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 32. CLIFTON, AZ Location. Clifton is in Greenlee County, AZ, about 170 miles northeast of Tucson. Existing project. The project consists of both structural and nonstructural elements, including an earthfill levee about 3,000 feet long, with floodgates. Implementation will involve flood proofing of 11 businesses, flood plain evacuation plans, and recreation development. Local cooperation. The State of Arizona is the local sponsor. An April 27, 1984 letter from Governor Bruce Babbit asked the Corps to act as lead agency in flood recovery. Governor Evan Mecham sent a letter of intent and support dated January 26, 1987, to provide all local requirements including costs. Governor Rose Mofford included funding for right-of-way acquisition in the State's FY 91 budget. Construction funding is expected in the State's FY93 budget. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design, to finalize levee plans and specifications. 33. HANSEN DAM, CA Location. In the San Fernando Valley area of the city of Los Angeles. 20 miles northwest of Downtown Los Angeles. Recreation lake and facilities lie within Flood Control Basin boundaries. Existing project. Original project authorized under Flood Control Act 1936, and modified by WRDA 1986, Section 847 Energy & Water Development Act 1992 (PL 102-104). Proposed plan is to construct a 15-acre recreation lake, picnic facilities, access roads and parking lots. The lake and recreational facilities will be constructed with full Federal funding with royalties earned from the sale of Debris removal from the basin. The city of Los Angeles will construct remaining facilities. Local cooperation. The City of Los Angeles will be independently funding and constructing portions of the lake development; no LCA needed. An agreement will be needed between the Corps and the City for the City to operate and maintain the facilities. The City will provide remining facilities (water supply & treatment), that will be necessary for the lake to be useable. Operations during fiscal year. Master Plan completed. Feature Design Memorandum and Plans and Specifications are to be prepared and completed FY93. 34. HOLBROOK, AZ Location. In the city of Holbrook, AZ, about 150 miles northeast of Phoenix. Existing project. The plan will provide 100-year-flood protection by raising and extending the existing Corps of Engineers levee on the north side of the Little Colorado River, building a ring levee around the McLaws area, relocating residents of the south bank flood plain east of the Apache Railroad, acquisition of ponding areas and wildlife mitigation. It is the NED plan. Local cooperation. The City of Holbrook agree with the draft Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA). The LCA will be signed on 31 May 92. 35. LAKE ELSINORE, CA Location. In Riverside County, about 70 miles southeast of Downtown Los Angeles, and 30 miles southeast of the city of Corona. Existing project. The plan consists of an earthen-trap outlet channel about 2.5 miles long, with a 30-foot to 80-foot base and IV on 3H side slopes. Will relieve flooding at the 100-year-flood level in the downtown area, as well as around the perimeter of the lake. The final plan includes building six bridges and protecting an endangered species habitat. Local cooperation. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District signed a Local Cooperation Agreement on 27 March 92. Operations during fiscal year. Complete acquisition of Real Estate. Award and initiate construction contract. 36. LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA Location. In Santa Barbara County, about 100 miles northwest of Los Angeles. 33-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 Existing project. The project is designed to prevent 100-year flood damages. The recommended plan, authorized under Water Resources Development Act of 1988, consists of approximately 1.2 miles of rectangular concrete channel improvements from an inlet at Carrillo Street to the ocean. The project will impact eleven street crossings and one railroad bridge crossing. Local cooperation. Local Sponsor is Santa Barbara Co. Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Operations during fiscal year. Completion of PED. Filed FEIS. 37. LOWER SANTA CRUZ, AZ Location. Study area in lower reach of Santa Cruz River in Pinal County about 50 miles south Phoenix, AZ and lies between town of Red Rock and confluence of Gila River. Damage area is experiencing accelerated urbanization as a result of growth pressure from the Phoenix and Tucson metro areas. Local cooperation. Authorized under Flood Control Act 28 June 38 (Gila River & Tribs). Local Sponsor Pinal County Flood Control District and Pinal County Board of Supervisors passed resolution to continue study 7 Jul 92, and we received resolution of support from Tohano-O'odham Community 10 Jul 92. Operations during fiscal year. Serious geotech problems found in much of study area - requires rescoping of study to avoid these areas. SPL developing FCSA amendment, revised scope and schedule. Technical work was halted until decision from locals to continue study resulting in unobligated carryover. 38. NOGALES WASH, AZ Location. At the Mexican Border, in extreme southern Arizona in central and northern portions of the city of Nogales, about 60 miles south of Tucson. Existing project. Plans include a lateral collector channel to capture Overland Street flow and divert it into the existing covered channels; a 3,300-foot-long grouted stone/concrete channel system in the Chula Vista community; and a flood warning system and recreation component associated with Chula Vista channels. Local cooperation. The Santa Cruz Flood Control District has signed a cost-sharing agreement. 39. RILLITO RIVER, AZ Location. The north portions of the Tucson metropolitan area of Pima County, AZ. Existing project. Provide flood protection by building soil cement for bank erosion control and grade-control structures in the channel bottom to prevent degradation along 13.2 miles of the river. Local cooperation. Pima County Transportation and Flood Control District submitted letters of assurance on February 24, 1986 and May 6. 1987. 40. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA Location. Along a 75-mile reach of the Santa Ana River in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties, emptying into the Pacific Ocean between the cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Harbor, 50 miles south of Los Angeles, and 90 miles north of San Diego. Existing project. For details, please see Page 33-9 of the Annual Report for 1987. Local cooperation. Counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange. Operations during fiscal year. The contract for the construction of Mill Creek was awarded on April 30, 1991 and completed on 19 March 1992. Marsh contract completed 29 March 1991, abutment stripping contract completed 30 Nov 1991. The construction contract for the first reach of the lower Santa Ana River and the Greenville-Banning Channel was awarded on April 15, 1991, and is scheduled for completion in December 1992. The Intake Structure Excavation contract at Seven Oaks was awarded on August 14, 1991 and is scheduled for completion on 3 June 1992. Bids were opened on 25 Feb 1992 for the outlet works/diversion contract at Seven Oaks, with award scheduled for 1 Apr 1992. Bids were opened on 26 March 1992 for Reach 2 of the lower Santa Ana River. Award is scheduled for 30 April 1992. 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 41. SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA Location. Santa Paula Creek is a tributary of the Santa Clara River in the vicinity of the city of Santa paula, Ventura County, about 16 miles from the ocean and approximately 60 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. Authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611 (HD 443/80/1), for details see Annual Report FY91, page 33-10. Local cooperation. Ventura County Flood Control District. If a new project authorization is required as a result of the ongoing GRR process, the local sponsor will be required to cost share in accordance with WRDA 1986. Operations during fiscal year. Modified Mupu Plan consisting of 2.9 miles of concrete channel from Santa Clara River to single debris basin located near Mupu School. was locally preferred plan in 1983 report. Awaiting GRR recommendation from Channel Stabilization Committee since channel inspection Aug 92. 42. SWEETWATER RIVER, CA Location. Empties into San Diego Bay in the cities of Chula Vista and National City and unincorporated San Diego County, four miles south of the city of San Diego, and eight miles north of the Mexican Border. Existing project. Construction of 3.2 miles of channel improvements along the Sweetwater River from Interstate 805 to San Diego Bay, in combination with State Route 54 and Interstate 5 construction; and construction of two railroad bridges and 188 acres of preservation and mitigation land. Local cooperation. San Diego County is cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Construction resumed when channel completion contract was awarded in September 1990. 43. TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES, NV Location. West of and through urbanized Las Vegas community along both washes. Existing project. Study structural and nonstructural means of reducing flood damage and provide erosion control, water supply, recreation and enhancement. Local cooperation. The Clark County Regional Flood Control District approved the Feasibility Cost-Sharing Assessment in July 1985. Operations during fiscal year. Formulated tentatively recommended plan; 4 Detention Basins, 4 Debris Basins, 28 miles of Concrete Primary Channel, 32 miles of Earthen Lateral Channels. Estimated cost = $252 Million (Funded) to be cost shared 25% non-Fed, 75% Fed., plus sponsor pays for Laterals ($28 Million Fully Funded). Expect to complete Feasibility Study in January 1992. 33-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 30 Sep 92 1. Channel Islands, CA 2. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) Model Study 3. Marina del Rey, CA (Regular Funds) 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 3,053,480 90,912 2,635,131 3,085,940 74,111 2,635,000 602,296 760,456 - 749,459 1,036,777 243,494 1,150,000 2,000,000 257,000 1,136,664 1,287,455 243,494 394,995 Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 876,615 143,394 785,628 478,901 268,785 409,430 205,937 350,000 53,942 187,987 70,000 Maint.: Approp. Cost 5. Oceanside Harbor, CA 6. Oceanside Sand By-pass 7. Port Hueneme, CA New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 882,806 2,385,889 129,715 1,672,000 96,798 97,731 106,733 23,348 658,000 590,619 10,000 98,937 75,949 143,394 - 292,207 15,510 757,969 - 300 736,834 6,659 1,286,134 1,105,237 2,729,235 1,536,676 6,657,282 22,000 66,307 152 2,002 114,587 69,922 856,184 852,000 2,472 22,000 73,862 33-12 6,539,979 5,795,051 1,786,236 3,995,790 2,260,279 1,674,343 1,180,623 821,609 555,937 346,149 253,497 2,559,684 1,801,715 130,446 1,591,502 778,960 22,000 70,781 992,923 995,784 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 30 Sep 92 8. Redondo Beach, (King Harbor) 9. San Diego Harbor, CA 10. San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA 11. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 12. San Luis Rey River, CA 13. Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), CA 15. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA 16A. 16B. Painted Rock, AZ Phoenix, AZ and Vicinity Maint: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 226,298 873,000 880,854 65,000 91,094 158,806 541,898 - 984,963 185,889 2,926 15,000 24,333 28,410 23,092 837,435 756,948 886,562 132,292 71,369 70,000 87,324 97,000 139,383 130,000 831,034 865,000 136,292 16,212 4,633,000 2,270,000 2,672,999 16,562,010 6,284,196 1,586,807 1,765,000 1,820,000 921,364 936,799 22,734 6,435 681,019 717,117 53,069,000 30,548,322 414,015 264,530 4,462 1,593 751,360 30,054,000 32,288,943 984,963 415,113 1,910,854 1,037,479 71,369 70,000 196,946 211,086 139,383 130,000 1,827,275 2,163,846 26,138,009 11,456,003 950,774 1,888,498 4,174,651 270,668 904,700 2,376,697 10,218 627,459 625,800 33,233,917 29,816,000 37,414 8,028 754,849 25,543,262 2,063,327 2,094,274 116,356,917 118,196,527 33-13 TABLE 33-A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 30 Sep 92 17. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, 18. Los Coches Creek, CA 19. Lytle & Warm Creeks, Santa Ana Basin 20. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin 21. Pine & Mathews Canyons Dam, Colo River Basin, NV 22. Santa Ana River Mainstem 23. Santa Ana River Basin OC 24. Whitewater River Floodwarning System 31. Carneros Creek New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 2,556,319 2,271,931 2,473,742 2,500,897 - 2,174,188 2,327,400 1,812,395 3,539,763 7,778 14,689 758,939 900,000 1,482 2,475 183,000 663,188 206,282 245,819 105,000 98,228 7,614,580 261,643 71,972 20,136 670,769 - 221,800 209,774 117,835 61,000 10,250,887 50,609,693 - 993,347 17,292,000 10,250,887 239,716 93,000 96,138 9,802,889 6,313,983 4,398,702 900,000 9,260 17,164 1,516,957 883,675 390,945 179,364 103,771 68,574,931 64,717,151 1,254,990 78,200 64,717 1,815,061 2,124,199 1,738,763 1,995,217 1,939,254 2,025,348 1,586,000 - 250,000 50,038 25,640 188,013 288,722 - - 334,977 600,000 317,916 17,449,717 10,250,887 7,673,230 5,550,602 1,726,735 75,678 334,977 600,000 33-14 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 30 Sep 92 Clifton, AZ Hansen Dam Holbrook, AZ Lake Elsinore Lower Mission Creek Lower Santa Cruz, AZ Nogales Wash, AZ 39. Rillito River, AZ 41. Santa Paula Creek 42. Sweetwater River Basin 43. Tropicana/ Flamingo, NV 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 813,030 466,484 - - 171,198 645,082 280,412 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp, Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 164,559 92,928 380,340 76,419 463,707 370,285 441,173 366,774 - 798,446 298,378 - 164,510 298,308 50,000 1,125 173,823 200,000 - 2,169,000 6,056,291 364,149 925,668 4,492,000 1,197,676 169,185 318,836 306,613 502,189 72,802 184,785 455,172 900,000 300,000 1,006,469 711 611,667 1,978,690 76,419 474,172 171,198 1,703,906 72,802 835,482 896,345 900,000 834,982 1,096,824 481,695 224,534 813,579 6,456,306 14,681,597 - 5,781,817 97,501 1,197,676 2,652,038 33-15 TABLE 33-A 168,108 317,185 340,880 787 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 June 3, 1896 June 25,1896 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Ferman. Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance channel. For silt-diversion works. Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor entrance channel. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). H.Doc. 362,83d Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 18,55th Cong.,1st sess. H.Doc. 969, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.9, 64th Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 1013, 66th Cong.,3d sess. H. Doc.349, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.33, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 33-16 1. 2. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. Dredge 1,000-foot wide entrance channel to Los Angeles outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet area A and B adjacent to 40-foot-depth entrance channel; construct and maintain a rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. S. Doc.130, 71st Con.,2d sess. S.Committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.843, 76th Cong., 3d sess. 33-17 Do. Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17,1940 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 22, 1976 H.Doc.161, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.401,86th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.94-594, 94th Cong., 2d sess.1 33-18 Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modification of existing project. This act provides that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefor and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents If non-Federal interest carry out any work associated with such project which is later recommended by the Chief of Engineers and approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may credit such non-Federal interest an amount equal to the Federal share of the cost of such work, without interest. In analyzing costs and benefits of such project, the Secretary shall consider the costs and benefits produced by any work which is carried out under the preceding sentence by non-Federal interests and which the Secretary determines is compatible with such project. The feasibility report for such project shall include consideration and evaluation of the following proposed project features: Long Beach Main Channel, Channel to Los Angeles Pier 300, Channels to Los Angeles Pier 400, Long Beach Pier "K" Channel, and Los Angeles Crude Transshipment Terminal Channel. The Secretary is directed to perform maintenance dredging of the existing Federal project at the mouth of the Los Angeles River, CA, to the authorized depth of 20 feet for the purpose of maintaining the flood control basin and navigaton safety. Public Law 100-676 Public Law 100-676- Nov.17, 1988 Sep. 3, 1954 MARINA DEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels. H.Doc.389, 83d Cong., 2d sess. 33-19 Nov. 17, 1988 Nov. 17, 1988 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 8, 1992 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 03, 1875 Sep. 19, 1875 4. H.Doc.283, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.R.6167 MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Adoption and improvement of existing entrance channel to bay, a breakwater extending south by west from Morro Rock, and bay channels and basins at locations and of dimensions substantially as shown on the Navy Department map on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. Is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans and subject to the conditions. This project is for navigation. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. OCEANSIDE SAND BYPASS, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. PORT HUENEME, CA Adoption and maintenance of existing harbor for deep-draft vessels; dredged central basin to 35 feet deep, and extend southern-most interior channel. KING HARBOR, REDONDO BEACH, CA Provides for cost sharing in accordnace with WRDA '86. P ermits construction of breakwater > 22' in accordance with plans approved by Aray. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Diversion dike. Annual Report 1973; p.1142 Sep. 19, 1890. Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. (Annual Report, 1888;p.2114). 33-20 H.Doc.76, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbor Act 1965 (79 Stat. 1092) H.Doc.76, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbor Act 1965 (79 Stat. 1092) H.Doc.362, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.362, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.362, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.177, 50th Cong., 1st sess. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 25,1910 Mar. 4, 1913 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet deep and 600 feet wide, and a channel through middle ground to 30 feet deep. Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet wide and 35 feet deep, and a channel through middle ground 32 feet deep. Widen approach (area B) to San Diego municipal pier by dredging area C (north of area B). Dredging area A (south of area B). Dredge 35-foot channel through middle ground. Dredging areas D and E. Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal pier 1 by dredging an portion of area F (north of area C). Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; along south and north banks, main channel; dredge turning basin, widen area H, and dredge a channel to National City and Chula Vista Widen bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 35 feet from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in lower bay to Naval Air Station opposite turning basin. Dredging areas Q.Q-1, M, N, and 0. H.Doc.961, 60th Cong., 1 st session. H.Doc.1309, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.648, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc.1000, 66th Cong., 3d sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc.2, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc.81, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.223, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.89, 74th Cong., 2d sess. 33-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 July 24, 1946 11. Dec. 17, 1970 3 Nov. 17, 1986 12. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Dredge a seaplane basin (area S.) of about 3,000 acres, 10 feet deep, and fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of basin. Dredge triangular approaches to 26-and 35- foot anchorages, area M. Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, delete uncompleted parts, and extend maintenance. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Modification of existing flood control project for San Diego River, CA, to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Channel and levee, and beautification features. Authorized non-Federal project cost sharing at a minimum of 25 percent and a maximum of 50 percent. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefor; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. H.Doc.844, 3d sess, H.Doc.390, 1st sess. H.Doc.365, 2d sess. 1 H.Doc.760, 2d sess. 1 76th Cong., 77th Cong., 90th Cong., 79th Cong., S.Doc.91-106, 91st Cong., 2d sess. None S.Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 33-22 10. LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 13. Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1988 15. Aug. 13, 1968 16A. 16B. May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 17. June 22, 1936 Modification of existing project. Dredging and maintenance by United States. VENTURA HARBOR (VENTURA MARINA), CA Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. The Harbor commonly known as Ventura Marina, located in Ventura County,CA, and adopted and authorized by section 101 of Public Law 90-483, shall hereafter be known and designated as "Ventura Harbor". CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Debris-collection facilities, with a system of channels, and a diversion system. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. PHOENIX, AZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $70 million. H.Doc.518, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 None H.Doc.356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 100-676 H.Doc.323, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.331, 81st Cong., 1 st sess. H.Doc.216, 89th Cong., 1st sess. None 33-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 15, 1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project Provision of lands, easements, and rightsof- way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000). Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug. 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. None None H.Doc.838, 76th Cong., 3d sess. None None None None None None 33-24 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Feb. 7, 1985 19. Oct. 27, 1965 20. July 14, 1960 21. May 17, 1950 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. c Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. In addition to all previous authorizations, completion of improvements under to comprehensive plan for flood control in the Los Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated cost of $31 million for completion. Authorized modification of Hansen Dam by removing and selling dredged material to facilitate flood control, recreation, and water conservation. The Secretary may convey to the city of South El Monte, CA, approximately 7.778 acres of real property, together with improvements theron, located within the Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin. LOS COCHES CREEK, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA Channel improvement. LYTLE AND WARM CREEKS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Channels and levees. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Dams and flood control basins. None None None None Public Law 100-676 None S.Doc.53, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. 33-25 18. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 22. June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 3, 1958 SANTA ANA MAINSTEM, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. Rescinded provisions of Flood Control Act of 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States. $3,500,000). Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, CA. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million for prosecution of projects approved in above-mentioned flood control acts. None H.Doc.688, 75th Cong., 3d sess. None H.Doc.534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 1 None 33-26 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 28, 1990 Aug. 13, 1968 The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, including Saniago Creek, CA, is modified to authorized the Secretary to develop recreational trails and facilities on lands between Seven Oaks Dam and Prado Dam, including flood plain management areas. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood control and highway project. H.Doc.148, 90th Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended. 3. Final date of approval by House and Senate Public Works Committees resolution under provisions of section 201, Public Law 89-298. 33-27 22. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1991 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Avalon Active 1990 $ 43,960 Dana Point, Harbor, CA Completed 1984 4,737,550 709,908 Harbor office at Morro Bay, CA 1 Newport Bay Harbor, CA Active 1990 796,897 4,497,131 Port San Luis, CA Completed & 1990 1,426,050 5,539,483 Active (mod) Redondo Beach Harbor Completed & 1990 4,766,8982 1,991,550 (King Harbor), CA Active Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), CA 1 1. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986, subject to favorable report. 2. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 10. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY58. Includes $293,167 expended in FY87. 33-28 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1991 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange Completed 1967 $ 89,119 County, CA' Bird Rock area, La Jolla Completed 1967 25,881 San Diego County, CA Cabrillo Beach Active 1990 9,998 Coast of California, Point Mugu, Completed 1972 1,253,594 to San Pedro breakwater, CA Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny Completed 1968 578,717 State Beach), CA Imperial Beach, CA Active 1990 2,629,602 Las Tunas Beach, San Diego Co, CA Active 1976 107,484 Mission Beach Active 1990 971 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA Completed 1960 7,912 Oceanside, San Diego County, CA Completed 1982 4,367,442 Oceanside Sand By-Pass, CA Active 1990 3,440,161 Port San Luis Shore & Bluff Erosion Active 1990 58,235 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Active 1979 365,000 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay Active 1985 9,722,100 (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed (part) 1969 715,819 & Deferred (part) 1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, H.Doc.602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA. 33-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1991 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allenville, AZ C City Creek Levee, San C Bernardino County, CA Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ Coyote and Berryessa Creeks CA Gila River Basin, AZ: C Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Gila and Salt Rivers Levee A and Channel Improvements D Indian Bend Wash C Lower Gila River Levee & Ir Channel Improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Middle Gila River Channel P Improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek Channel Improvements C (Globe) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot C Dam and Lake St. Clair) Tucson Diversion Channel C Goleta, CA, and vicinity Hansen Dam, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (mod) Holbrook Levee Little Colorado C River, Colorado River Basin, AZ Little Colorado River at Holbrook Needles, San Bernardino Co. C Nogales Wash and Tributaries, AZ Oceanside Harbor, CA Oro Grande Wash Channel Improve- C ments, Mojave River Basin, CA Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, C San Bernardino Co. CA Rose Creek Channel Improvements, C San Diego, CA San Diego River (Mission Valley), Ir San Diego River Basin, CA Santa Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm C Creeks Channel Improvements & Lytle Creek Levee :ompleted ;ompleted Active Active )eferred \ctive (part) & )eferred (part) :ompleted nactive \ctive )eferred :ompleted :ompleted Active Active :ompleted .ompleted Active Active .ompleted :ompleted :ompleted nactive .ompleted 1984 1988 1989 1963 1966 1990 1975 1970 1968 1982 1986 1982 1990 1950 1973 1989 1989 1970 1972 1978 1962 $ 3,000,000 400,000 12,510,000 56,300,000 73,201 32,488,487 2,413,051 402,867 121,509 10,218,900 6,922,633 500,000 335,757 335,000 1,000,000 11,100,000 5,100,000 1,000,000 212,745 982,432 1,708,437 7,753,937 33-30 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-E (CONT) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1991 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Mill Creek Levees Riverside Levees San Jacinto River Levee & Bautista Creek Channel Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Santa Clara Rvr Basin, CA Santa Clara Rvr, Fillmore, CA Santa Maria Valley Levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA Santa Paula Creek Channel & Debris Basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara Rvr Basin, CA Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA South Fork of the Santa Clara Rvr, Santa Clarita Valley, CA Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA Tijuana River Basin, CA Ventura Harbor, CA Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon Debris Basin & Channel Ventura River Levee Whitewater River, CA: Banning Levee-San Gorgonio River, Riverside County' Chino Canyon Improvements, Palm Springs' Tahchevah Creek Detention Basin and Channel Improvements Tahquitz Creek Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Active Completed Active Active Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed (part) & Deferred (part) 1961 1959 1985 1961 1989 1984 1983 1984 1985 1985 1979 1990 1964 1950 1966 1973 1967 1974 1973 617,890 2,104,478 9,258,207 2,126,672 2,112 10,079,927 4,790,173 4,000,000 632,158 844,732 1,703,031 6,455,000 939,908 1,349,638 97,868 819,878 1,420,552 1,063,600 1,831,300 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 33-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 92 TABLE 33-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV Aliso Creek Dam San Juan Dam Trabuco Dam Villa Park Dam Sierra Madre Wash Channel, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA 1958 1964 1986 1950 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1977 Sec. 12, Public Law 93,251 Sec. 1002 Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public 1986 University Wash and Spring 1975 Brook, Riverside, CA 33-32 $295,191 67,361 213,313 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT* This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California State line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south, except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benicia- Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Oakland Harbor, CA ................ 34-1 2. Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA ..... 34-2 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ..................... 34-3 4. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA.. 34-3 5. San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA .... .34-4 6. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys... 34-5 7. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ...................... 34-5 8. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization ...................... 34-5 Flood Control 9. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 34-5 10. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ..................... 34-5 Navigation 1. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Location. Oakland Harbor is located in the City of Oakland, California, on the eastern shore of central San Francisco Bay immediately south of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of June 23, 1874, June 25, 1910, September 22, 1922, January 21, 1927, April 28, 1928, July 3, 1930, March 2, 1945 and October 23, 1962. The project was completed February 1975, except for deepening the tidal canal to 35 feet from Fortman Basin to Park Street, and to 25 feet above Park Street which was deauthorized November 1977. Reconstruction of the Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge was completed in December 1973 and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance. Project consists of entrance channel to Oakland Outer Harbor, 35 feet deep from deep water in San Francisco Bay and 800 feet wide across the shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island, narrowing to 600 feet at Oakland Mole; thence, a channel and turning basin 35 feet deep and from 600 to 950 feet wide in outer harbor to the Army 11. Miscellaneous Work under Special Authorization ...................... 34-5 General Investigations Page 12. Surveys ........................... 34-5 13. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 34-6 14. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.. 34-6 Tables Table 34-A Table 34-B Table 34-C Table Table Table Table Table 34-D 34-E 34-F 34-G 34-H Cost and Financial Statement ................ 34-7 Authorizing Legislation .............. 34-11 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 34-13 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ...... 34-13 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......... 34-14 Base. Project also provides entrance channel to Oakland Inner Harbor, 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide to west end of Government Island, with additional widening to within 75 feet of the pierhead line in front of Grove and Market Street (formerly municipal) piers and along the south side of the channel from Harrison Street eastward to harbor line point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Brooklyn Basin; for a triangular area 35 feet deep about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin; a channel along north side of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 1,300 feet, thence 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,700 feet to a turning basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long; a channel in the tidal canal 35 feet deep and 275 feet wide from Brooklyn Basin to Park Street, thence 18 feet deep to San Leandro Bay; a total channel length of 8-1/2 miles from San Francisco Bay to San Leandro Bay. Project also includes parallel rubblemound jetties at entrance to inner harbor, north jetty 9,500 feet long and south jetty 12,000 feet long; three highway bridges across the tidal canal, two of which (at Park Street and High Street) have been replaced by local interests and the 34-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Fruitvale Avenue Bridge constructed by Federal Government has been transferred to Alameda County. The railroad bridge has been transferred to the County for operation and maintenance. The Federal Government will reimburse the County for the cost of operating and maintaining the railroad bridge. Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 authorized deepening the 4 mile Inner and 3.4 mile Outer Harbors channels to 42 feet deep and widening the entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocation of the Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward; and widening the turning basin to 1,800 feet and constructing a 1,200 foot turning basin in the Inner Harbor, 42 feet deep, at mile 3.7. Present estimated total cost for the authorized improvements is $80,200,000 of which $60,150,000 is Federal cost (includes $100,000 Coast Guard cost) and $20,050,000 is non-Federal cost. Under WRDA 1986, the Bar Channel and Inner Harbor were deepened to 38 feet deep up to Howard Terminal as a separable element of the authorized 42-foot deep project. Local cooperation. The Port of Oakland has indicated its intent to sign the Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. The local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; (2) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction; and (3) pay additional 10 percent plus interests of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Terminal facilities. The port occupies 19 miles on the mainland shore of San Francisco Bay. There are 550 acres of marine terminal facilities, 28 deepwater berths and 25 container cranes, including 5 of the post Panamax type. On-dock covered storage space exceeds 600,000 square feet. Three major railroads, Santa Fe, Southern Pacific and Union Pacific serve the port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Sediment testing, ocean site baseline and initial monitoring studies, preparation of SEIS draft and GDM draft. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Fruitvale Avenue R.R. Bridge including engineering and design by hired labor, cost $755,359; and new work dredging removing 517,100 cubic yards of material from the Inner Harbor, cost $665,319. 2. RICHMOND HARBOR (DEEPENING), CA Location. Richmond Harbor is located in central San Francisco Bay, in Contra Costa County in the City of Richmond. Existing project. The existing navigation channel extends from deep water in San Francisco Bay into the Port of Richmond. The Southhampton Shoal Channel and Long Wharf Maneuvering Area, at the entrance to the harbor channels are maintained to -45 feet MLLW. The Entrance Channel, Potrero Reach Channel, Potrero Sharp Turn, Inner Harbor and about half of the Santa Fe Channel, to -35 feet and the remainder of the Santa Fe Channel to -30 feet. The width of the navigation channel is 600 feet for most of its length to Point Richmond with two maneuvering areas: one in front of the Long Wharf and the other at Point Richmond. At Potrero Reach, the 500 foot width flares to about 600 feet at Point Potrero with a turn at the point, 1,150 feet wide and 35 feet deep except for a depth of 30 feet at the southerly apex of the bend. Thence, the channel continues into the inner harbor at a width of 850 feet in a northerly direction to the entrance of the Santa Fe Channel. The Santa Fe Channel extends northwesterly at a width of 200 feet into the upper basin terminus. A turning basin is provided at Point Richmond, and a rubble-mound training wall extending 10,000 feet westerly from Brooks Island is also provided in the Potrero Reach. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Proposed improvements consist of a two-phased construction plan involving four and one-half miles of channel between Richmond Long Wharf and the Santa Fe Channel. Phase I would deepen the existing 35-foot channels to 38 feet, and provide a turning basin of 1,200 feet in diameter near Point Potrero. Approximately 1,500,000 cubic yards of sediment are to be dredged and transported to an aquatic and upland disposal site, depending on the sediment quality. The estimated cost of Phase I is $19,300,000 of which $15,050,000 is Federal cost (includes $50,000 Coast Guard costs) and $4,250,000 is non-Federal cost. Phase II has been deferred and is reclassified to the inactive category. The existing project was authorized on October 27, 1965. Previous projects were authorized by Acts adopted in 1917, 1930, 1935, 1938, 1945 and 1954. The proposed improvements are authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) pay 10 percent of the costs to 20 feet below mean lower low water and 25 percent of costs between 20 and 45 feet below mean lower low water and (2) reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to general navigation facility of the project within a period of 30 years following completion of construction; and (3) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocation and dredged material 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT disposal areas necessary for the projects. The value of lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas can be credited toward the payment required under item (2) above. The agreement is scheduled to be executed in August 1994. Terminal activities. The Port of Richmond encompasses nine privately-owned terminals and seven terminals owned by the Port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued preconstruction planning and engineering. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Richmond Inner, Outer Harbors including engineering and design and U.S. Hopper dredge Essayons. Essayons removed 171,193 cubic yards of shoal material from Inner Harbor and 175,014 cubic yards from the Outer Harbor, cost $2,441,777. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel. Navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Suisun Bay near Martinez through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See National Ocean Service Charts 18649, 18654 and 18656 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of the existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay Channels to the vicinity of Martinez to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to the vicinity of Martinez; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along the channel route. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed in February 1974. The South Hampton Shoal Channel and the Richmond Long Wharf manevering area was completed in December 1986. For the approved cost estimate (1991) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. The local sponsor, Contra Costa County, supports the project. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1991, No. 31, revised 1982, and No. 32, revised 1986, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and the Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued planning engineering and design activities. 4. SAN FRANCISCO BAY-DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA Location. The model, including a Class A regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond the Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay and Tributaries, CA, Study authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81- 516, Section 110). The model was authorized as an operation and maintenance project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the model continues. A contract with U.C. Berkeley was consummated December 1991 for the joint operation and management of the physical Bay Model for a one-year period with two option years available depending on the anticipated cost savings of the program. Historical summary. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957. The addition of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. Annual visitation to the model averages between 100,000 to 125,000 people. The central exhibits were completed in December 1981. Extensive exhibit upgrade for the Visitor Center and development of Cooperative Association completed September 30, 1989. The Cooperative Association provides financial and educational support to visitor center programming. An active volunteer program exists at the Visitor Center providing approximately 80 man-days of effort monthly. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including, but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, 34-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 and other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1992, was $22,413,233, of which $8,504,456 was for the regional visitor center, $1,288,219 for exhibits, and $12,620,558 for maintenance. 5. SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (LTMS), CA Location. The San Francisco Bay Long-Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredged material disposal covers deep and shallow draft navigation channels of the San Francisco Bay region including Central San Francisco Bay, South Bay, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay environs. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay region has an annual disposal requirement of approximately 8 million cubic yards (mcy) to maintain navigation channels. The Bay also has a one-time new civil works requirement of approximately 19 mcy for the Oakland Harbor, Richmond Harbor, and John F. Baldwin Phase III ship channel as well as two Navy deepening projects. In January 1990, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, the San Francisco Bay Water Quality Control Board and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission convened with thirty interested agencies and organizations with concerns regarding dredged material disposal in San Francisco Bay. These four agencies have the responsibility for regulation of the waters of the US and California for disposal of dredged material. The four agencies and the concerned navigation interests formed the LTMS to develop technically feasible, economically prudent and environmentally acceptable long range solutions to the dredging and disposal needs for the San Francisco Bay region over the next fifty years. In determining acceptable dredged material disposal locations, the LTMS evaluated a broad array of potential ocean, in-Bay and non-aquatic disposal alternatives. The combined study and staff cost of the effort is $16,185,000 and is scheduled for completion in August 1994. Local cooperation. Pursuant to their regulatory responsibilities, the Division commander of the South Pacific Division, Corps of Engineers; the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX; the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board and the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission agreed to jointly undertake the development and implementation of a Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredging and disposal of dredged materials from the region, Based on the outputs from the LTMS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Bay Conservation and Development Commission will consider modifications to the dredging elements of their respective Basin and Bay Plans for San Francisco Bay. Terminal facilities. Besides identifying implementable disposal options, the LTMS will: (1) develop coordinated regional disposal policies between federal and state agencies; (2) provide a local decision-making framework for dredging and disposal projects; (3) streamline existing permit and testing procedures; and (4) provide a long term site monitoring apparatus and feedback mechanism. Operations during fiscal year. The LTMS has three work groups investigating disposal options. Their progress and accomplishments for FY 1992 are listed below: (1) In-Bay Studies Work Group - A. A standard methods manual for chemical analyses was developed and scheduled for review in FY 1993. B. Sediment toxicity contract was awarded to look at toxicity test interferences and review approaches for assessing sub-lethal, chronic sediment evaluations. C. Field work necessary to enhance current numerical model predictions of the fate of discharged dredged material was completed. D. Detailed plan for future field and laboratory work to evaluate bioaccumulation potential in Central Bay from Alcatraz disposal was completed. E. Field study to assess contaminant concentrations in salmon traversing San Francisco Bay, currently being conducted by the National Marine Fishery Services (NMFS), was partially funded. (2) Nonaquatic/reuse Studies Work Group - A. A comprehensive list of nonaquatic sites was developed for the region identifying approximately ninety options - the list was narrowed to 3 to 5 sites in the fall. B. Land Use and Engineering Elements contracts were awarded; the first looked at laws (Federal/State) and policies (local land use) influencing upland disposal and the second analyzed the sediment reuse alternatives from rehandling facilities. C. Some portion of material destined for upland disposal may be unsuitable for open water disposal or defined as "contaminated" thus there will be a need to identify public benefits (eg., wetland, levee stabilization, etc.) to offset public concerns. Work was begun on identifying these benefits. (3) Ocean Studies Work Group - A. Ocean study areas and potential sites within these study areas were investigated as well as the proposed Monterey Bay Sanctuary boundary for physical and biological parameters. B. Velocity plots to display current patterns in the study areas were developed at four depths - no stratification was seen but that flow was fairly constant to the North. C. Numerical models to predict depositional patterns were used to generate a 10-mm footprint 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT which in turn was used to delineate potential site boundaries. D. Benthic and trawl samplings were used to characterize the biological communities at the various study areas and these studies indicated that organisms proved to be depth stratified with the richest communities found at shallower depths. E. EPA and its consultants prepared an administrative draft and public draft of the Environmental Impact Statement for the ocean site designation process. 6. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels to be dredged in years other than Fiscal Year 1992 and jetty structures were conducted on the following projects: Bodega Bay; Fisherman's Wharf; Monterey Harbor; Moss Landing Harbor; Napa River; Petaluma River; Pillar Point Harbor; San Francisco Harbor; San Leandro Marina; San Rafael Creek; Santa Cruz Harbor; and Suisun Channel; all in California. Fiscal year costs were $755,796 of which $105,000 was for jetty condition surveys and $650,796 for project condition surveys. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $30,694 for San Leandro Channel, CA. Mitigation of shore damages activities pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $43,122 for Moss Landing Harbor, CA. 8. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $33,675 for Emeryville, Alameda County, CA. 9. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included a requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $124,227. Total cost to September 30, 1992 was $2,776,130. See Table 34-H for inspections made this fiscal year. 10. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $282,409 for preauthorization studies of which $48 was for Las Gallianas Creek, Marin County, CA; $268,955 for Petaluma River, Sonoma County, CA; $152 for Rohner Creek, Fortuna, CA; $9,676 for San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA; and $3,578 for White Slough, CA. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year cost incurred for emergency flood control activities was $402,688 for disaster preparedness. Technical assistance was provided on the East Bay fire to prevent soil erosion using PL-99 funds. FY 1992 costs $17,240; estimated damages prevented $20,000,000. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year total costs were $25,265, of which $23,167 was for Salinas River, San Ardo, CA; and $2,098 for Shelter Cove, CA. 11. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modification for Improvement Environmental (Section 1135, PL 99-662). of Fiscal year total costs were $62,196, of which $1,581 was for Redwood Creek, CA and S60,615 for Sonoma Bay Wetlands, CA. General Investigations 12. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $2,335,548, of which $728,153 was for navigation studies; $1,139,192 for flood damage prevention; $124,155 for miscellaneous activities; $206,878 for special studies; $135,474 for shoreline protection studies; and $1,696 for coordination studies with other agencies. 34-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 13. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $18,255 were incurred, of which $10,966 was for flood plain management service program; $5,414 for hydrologic studies; and $1,875 for environmental data studies. 14. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, modified by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act, authorized up to two breakwaters as necessary to provide protection. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, authorized construction of additional channel improvements. Recommended plans of improvement for the breakwater and channel improvement were previously considered as a single project. Due to significant differences in the time required for planning and construction, each part is now reported separately. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA provides for one detached offshore 400-foot breakwater aligned in a northsouth direction along the southern portion of Noyo Cove, west of the entrance channel in Noyo Harbor. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $4,460,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $238,490 with General Investigation funds. Planning is about 55 percent complete. A Project Management Plan was prepared to outline the work remaining on this project. The breakwater will be ready for construction in February 1996, at an estimated cost of $15,300,000. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Channel Extension), CA provides for a 60-foot wide channel, 7 feet deep, for a distance of about 3,000 feet upstream from the end of the existing Federal project to the Dolphin Isle Marina. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $580,000. This project has been put in an inactive category at the request of the sponsor. 34-6 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 Bodega Bay, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost Crescent City New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp 1 Cost 1 Major rehab. Approp. Cost Fisherman's Wharf New Work Areas, San Francisco Approp. Harbor, CA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Humboldt Harbor New Work and Bay, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Moss Landing New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Napa River, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 1 Cost 1 Noyo River and New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost Oakland Harbor, New Work CA Approp. 1 Cost 2, (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. 2, Cost 2 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost - - - - $1,226,765 1 2 40 - - - - 1,226,765 1 3 40 $34,358 158,835 839,307 155,052 2,343,708 4 40 34,362 158,835 664,823 253,491 2,267,663 4 40 - - - - 397,779 5 - - - - 397,779 5 - - - - 9,454,972 6 40 - - - - 9,454,972 6 40 ,213,875 201,711 725,489 971,927 23,984,354 7 4o ,210,973 207,212 719,206 984,935 23,968,981 7 40 - - - - 525,000 8 - - - - 525,000 8 - - - - 9,199,000 41 48 50 2,057 - - 9,199,000 41 49 50 7,894 17,610 29,376 382,007 436,877 51 7,894 17,610 29,376 269,691 324,571 51 - - - - 9,847,299 9 40 - - - - 9,847,299 9 40 853,000 3,358,159 3,701,945 2,076,040 68,920,785 10 40 814,563 3,287,440 2,973,797 2,917,775 68,910,333 10 40 - - - - 338,215 11 40 - - - - 338,215 11 40 59,018 534,403 83,897 41,472 5,165,574 12 40 65,968 526,338 91,838 41,596 5,165,574 12 40 - - - - 1,021,274 13 40 - - - - 1,021,274 13 40 ,321,300 2,948 253,046 227,360 4,375,288 13 14 40 ,291,094 34,770 253,046 227,360 4,375,288 13 14 40 141,000 109,000 - 354,000 2,705,482 15 16 40 474,448 114,670 8,068 238,490 2,589,972 15 1740 53,875 498,562 219,600 33,000 7,843,691 18 19 40 65,482 496,742 228,602 24,862 7,832,416 18 1940 - - - - 222,810 20 40 - - - - 222,810 20 40 ,976,000 ,836,782 ,009,000 ,053,312 - 3,364,000 3,066,269 2,355,098 2,369,732 5,245,000 1,930,000 5,492,399 1,946,689 1,592,900 1,380,011 1,529,707 1,451,690 - 1,010,000 - 400,000 27,317,684 21 27,154,741 21 40,592,355 22 40,590,246 22 1,010,000 400,000 34-7 1. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 Petaluma River, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Pillar Point New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Redwood City New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost 2. Richmond Harbor, New Work CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost 3. San Francisco Bay New Work to Stockton, CA Approp. (John F. Baldwin Cost and Stockton Ship Channels) 4. San Francisco Bay New Work and Delta Model, Approp. CA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. San Francisco Bay Maint. Long Term Approp. Management Cost Strategy (LTMS), CA San Francisco New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Francisco New Work Harbor and Bay, CA Approp. (Removal of Drift) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost San Leandro New Work Marina, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 297,146 23 40 297,146 23 40 736,454 857,991 4,604 6,159 61,554 61,554 448,576 2,704,180 444,208 2,684,564 437,000 778,000 975,507 635,180 - 1,046,000 11,484,711 24 40 -947 651,685 11,088,867 24 40 - - 6,697,396 4 44 - - 6,697,396 43 44 8,731 8,731 367 2,167,846 44 45 367 2,167,846 44 45 - 1,672,722 25 40 - 1,672,722 25 40 144,629 790,142 116,657 842,097 878,000 831,000 924,710 855,848 11,565,519 26 40 11,565,518 26 40 8,114,527 27 28 8,034,259 27 28 2,589,440 1,195,171 2,187,020 2,392,165 27,357,738 29 40 2,596,465 1,167,042 2,193,492 2,441,777 27,356,989 29 40 - - - - 164,689 - - - - 164,689 1,186,000 2,500,000 835,000 1,142,000 33,488,200 1,759,997 1,262,488 1,983,042 1,277,722 33,451,719 1,880,000 1,668,234 1,750,100 1,820,403 1,590,145 1,555,679 - - 5,134,000 - - 4,161,254 2,622,883 2,623,639 2,623,000 2,408,495 22,833,917 22,413,235 7,757,000 6,569,749 - - - - 2,689,356 283040 - - - - 2,689,356 28 30 40 1,282,785 3,577,625 -737,420 1,184,069 32,001,789 31 40 1,438,119 2,113,134 765,563 1,191,122 32,000,593 31 40 1,317,000 1,740,098 1,666,300 1,948,000 30,522,580 40 1,426,004 1,671,508 1,792,754 1,902,153 30,436,186 40 815,663 303,167 29,349 66,617 2,533,141 32 815,127 303,683 29,369 66,617 2,533,141 32 34-8 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 San Pablo Bay New Work and Mare Island Approp. - - - - 1,369,372 28 33 40 Strait, CA Cost - - - - 1,369,372 28 33 40 Maint. Approp. 994,034 851,430 1,129,300 1,031,000 39,107,943 40 Cost 1,120,892 857,128 1,110,685 1,046,892 39,100,345 34 40 San Rafael, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 32,359 40 47 Cost - - - - 32,359 40 47 Maint. Approp. - - 691,825 104,684 4,613,471 40 4 Cost 4,026 1,047 376,634 420,311 4,613,471 40 48 Santa Cruz New Work Harbor, CA Approp. - - - - 4,126,808 2 (Federal Funds) Cost 755 - - - 4,126,808 s2 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 160,000 36 Cost - - - - 160,000 3 Maint. Approp. - 22,821 - 5,527 9,629,008 40 3 Cost 8,808 22,821 - 5,527 9,629,008 40 5 Suisun Bay New Work Channel, CA Approp. - - - - 200,928 " Cost - - - - 200,928 3 Maint. Approp. 250,717 875,268 402,700 662,917 5,424,162 37 40 Cost 253,884 864,137 407,427 623,374 5,378,014 37 40 Suisun Channel, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 217,677 3 Cost - - - - 217,677 38 Maint. Approp. 88,765 491,711 466,600 78,810 2,717,028 39 Cost 88,765 470,441 481,652 85,028 2,717,028 39 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds and $129,000 General Investigation funds). 3. Includes $585,000 Preconstruction Planning costs ($456,000 Construction General costs and $129,000 General Investigation costs). 4. Includes $497, 158 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. Excludes contribution funds of $245,895. 5. Excludes contribution funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $80,284 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. 8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royalty-free rock. 9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $1,710 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. 11. Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. 12. Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $211,180 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. Excludes contributed funds of $180,200. 13. Excludes previous project costs. 14. Includes $757,862 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. Excludes $492,788 contributed funds. 15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes $2,407,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($1,827,000 for Breakwater of which $500,000 allocated under Construction, General and $1,327,000 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 allocated under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 17. Includes $2,291,490 Preconstruction cost ($1,711,490 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction, General and $1,211,490 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 was under Construction, 34-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 18. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $19,311 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 19. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on existing project. 22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $31,785 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $156,190 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. Excludes contributed funds of $192,424. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes $380,789 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)." 29. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. Includes $3,364 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. Includes $193,000 Public Works Administration funds. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $407,492 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. 32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $245,885 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1992. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. Excludes contributed funds of $879,454. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $32,832 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1992. 35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds on previous project. 36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for detail. 37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $48,735 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1992. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $451,208 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1978-1992. Includes $727,510 for previous project. Excludes $121,386 contributed funds. 40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. 41. Excludes Contributed Funds of $709,624. 42. See Sacramento District FY 1985 Annual Report for full report. 43. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 44. See FY 1979 Annual Report for last full report. 45. Includes $101,046 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1992. 46. Includes $186,699 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1992. Excludes $93,500 contributed funds. 47. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. 48. Includes $9,199,000 funds of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. 49. Includes $9,199,000 costs of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. 50. See FY 1987 Annual Report for last full report. 51. Includes $55,562 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1989-1992. 52. See FY 1988 Annual Report for last full report. 53. Includes $28,348 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1992. 34-10 TABLE 34-B SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. June 23, 1874 June 25, 1910 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 2 Apr. 28, 1928 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 3 Nov. 17, 1986 2. Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 4 OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Jetties. North channel in Brooklyn Basin, 25 feet deep, and tidal canal to 18 feet. Channel across shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island and thence to Webster St.; South channel in Brooklyn Basin; Turning Basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin; and channel in Tidal Canal from Brooklyn Basin to Park St., 30 feet deep. Channel from Webster St. to Brooklyn Basin, maintain area to within 75 feet of pierhead line south of channel from Harrison St. to Harbor Line Point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; dredge a triangular strip about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin, 30 feet deep. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide alteration or replacement of bridges by local interests shall apply only to that feature of project covering deepening tidal canal to 25 feet. Drawbridges across Tidal Canal were required by 1882 Decree of Court in condemnation proceedings whereby title was obtained to rightof- way for tidal canal. Entrance channel to outer harbor, 800 to 600 feet wide. Eliminated requirement that local interests contribute 10 cents per cubic yard toward deepening tidal canal. Maintenance of 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor and in outer harbor channel and turning basin. Deepen inner harbor 35-foot channels and lower 1,300 feet of north channel in Brooklyn Basin to 35 feet. Deepen Inner and Outer Harbor channels to 42 feet. Widen entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocate Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward and widen turning basin to 1800 feet. Construct 1,200 foot turning basin in Inner Harbor. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA Channel 24 feet deep and 600 feet wide from San Francisco Bay to Ellis Slough (Santa Fe Channel); a turning basin at Point Potrero; a training wall. A 30-foot channel with lessened widths; a turning basin at head of navigation. Increase project widths in inner harbor, maintenance of Santa Fe channel to 30 feet; approach areas in outer harbor to 32 feet. Annual Report, Part II, 1874, p. 378. H. Doc. 647, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 144, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 407, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Public Res. 28, 70th Cong. Rivers and Habors Committee Doc. 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 466, 77d Cong., 1st sess. Report on File in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 353, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 1986 WRDA, Public Law 99-662 H. Doc. 515, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 73d Cong., 1st sess., and 10, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 34-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 20, 1938 Widen channel at Point Potrero and north thereof; H. Doc 598, 75th Cong., enlarge and maintain to 30-foot depth turning 3d sess. basin at Terminal No. 1. Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in San Pablo H. Doc. 715, 76th Bay north of Point San Pablo. Cong., 3d sess. Sep. 3, 1954 Channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent H. Doc. 395, 83rd to Southampton Shoal; enlarge and deepen to 35 Cong., 2d sess. 1 feet approach area to Richmond Long Wharf; widen and deepen inner harbor and entrance channels; deepen turning basin at Point Richmond and southerly 2,000 feet of Santa Fe Channel. Eliminate restriction that widening north of Point Potrero will not be undertaken until local interests furnish assurances industries will avail themselves of improved navigation facilities. and reclamation of Reservation Point. Oct. 27, 1965 West Richmond channel 45 feet deep, 600 feet H. Doc. 208, 89th wide; enlarge and deepen to 45 feet maneuvering Cong., 1st sess. 1 area at Richmond Long Wharf (Sacramento Dist. "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockon Ship Channels)"). Nov. 17, 1986 Deepen channel to 38 feet between Richmond 1986 WRDA, Public Long Wharf and Santa Fe Channel. Construct Law 99-662 1,200 feet turning basin. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Included deepening of tidal canal above Park Street Bridge to 25 feet, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 3. Reconstruction of Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge (S. Doc. 75, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 4. Included in part in Public Works Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 34-12 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA 1 Completed 1966 $155,550 2 $6,120 9 Berkeley Marina, CA 1 Completed 1979 505,201 3 - Monterey Harbor, CA Completed 1971 1,108,182 4 126,551 6 San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA 1 Completed 1976 848,227 7 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA Completed 1974 180,472 6 5,114 10 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA 1 Completed 1976 210,390 8a Saucelito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA Inactive 1963 103,095 70,165 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, condition survey for FY 1956-1992. Public Law 86-645). 6. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. excludes contributed funds $153,618. 3. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. 7. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. 4. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administra- 8. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and tion funds and breakwater modifications (1960 Act) excludes contributed funds $138,189. placed inactive 1974. The barrier groin and sandtrap 9. Includes $6,120 for jetty condition surveys for feature of the project was deauthorized November 17, FY 1987-1992. 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 10. Includes $5,114 reconnaissance and condition 5. Includes $40,317 for reconnaissance and survey for FY 1990-1992. TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Humboldt Bay (Buhne Point), CA 1958 Jan. 1, 1990 $ 2,000 - Lower San Francisco Bay, CA 1935 Jan. 1, 1990 - - Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA 1974 Aug. 5, 1977 - Oakland Harbor, CA (Deepen Tidal Canal) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 - Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 - San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) 1962 Nov. 6, 1977 - San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo) 1982 Nov. 6, 1977 - - Santa Cruz County, CA 1966 Jan. 1, 1990 245,639 - 34-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 34-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 9 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Corte Madera Creek Coyote Creek East Weaver Creek Eel River at Sandy Prairie Klamath River Mad River Mad River at Blue Lake Pajaro River Pinole Creek Redwood Creek Rheem Creek Rodeo Creek Russian River Wildcat Creek 34-14 May 1992 June 1992 May 1992 May 1992 May 1992 May 1992 May 1992 June 1992 June 1992 May 1992 June 1992 June 1992 June 1992 June 1992 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT* This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Sacramento River, CA ............... 35-2 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA ................... 35-3 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) .................... 35-3 4. San Joaquin River, CA ................ 35-4 Flood Control 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA ................ 35-5 6. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA ........ 35-6 7. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA ................ 35-6 8. Corte Madera Creek, CA ............. 35-7 9. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA .......... 35-8 10. Guadalupe River, CA ................ 35-9 11. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA ......................... 35-10 12. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA ........ 35-10 13. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA... 35-11 14. Little Dell Lake, UT. ................ 35-13 15. Lower San Joaquin River, CA ......... 35-13 16. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA ....................... 35-14 17. Merced County Streams ............. 35-14 18. Merced County Stream Group, CA ..... 35-15 19. Pajaro River, CA ................... 35-15 20. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA ..... 35-16 21. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA ..... 35-17 22. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA .. 35-18 23. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ........ 35-19 24. Walnut Creek, CA ................. 35-21 25. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA ..... 35-22 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................... 35-22 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 27. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ..................... 35-23 28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............... 35-23 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 29. New Melones Lake, CA.............. 35-23 General Investigations 30. Surveys.. ........................ 35-25 31. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... 35-25 32. Research and Development .......... 35-25 33. Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 35-25 34. Other Work under Special Authority... 35-26 Tables Table 35-A Page Cost and Financial Statement ............... 35-27 Table 35-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 35-35 Table 35-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 35-37 Table 35-D Not Applicable Table 35-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 35-38 Table 35-F Not Applicable Table 35-G Deauthorized Projects ..... 35-40 Table 35-H Sacramento River, CA: Tidal and Flood Conditions Prevailing ............... 35-40 Table 35-I San Joaquin River, CA: Total Cost of New Work for Project .............. 35-41 Table 35-J San Joaquin River, CA: Project Units (1950 Modification) Reclassified and Excluded from Project Cost ............. 35-41 Table 35-K Merced County Stream Group, CA, Maximum Inflow, Storage, and Outflow for Projects ... .35-42 Table 35-L Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated Cost for New Work ....... 35-42 35-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) Tables Page Tables Table 35-M Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs .......... 35-43 Table 35-N Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, Collinsville to Shasta Dam: Project Units Units Reclassified and Excluded from Cost Estimate ....... 35-43 Table 35-0 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, from Collinsville Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provided for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. However, shallow-draft channel feature Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Table 35-P Page to Shasta Dam: Construction Accomplished and Contract Costs .................. 35-44 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as Amended (Preauthorization) ........ 35-44 Table 35-Q Surveys ................ 35-45 Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallow-draft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Stone protection on levees was initiated at contract cost of $150,000. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallow-draft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallow-draft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above 35-2 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. On November 17, 1986, remaining shallow-draft feature, Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662). Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Location. On the Sacramento River between Collinsville and the Port of Sacramento, a distance of about 43 miles, in the counties of Sacramento, Contra Costa, Solano, and Yolo, CA. Existing project. Project provides for deepening to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to the Port of Sacramento, and the Avon to New York Slough reach to 35 feet which will be accomplished under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, and widening the channel as necessary. Current selected plan also provides for a water quality monitoring program, and establishment of wetland habitat and upland habitat to mitigate for losses of such habitat. Project estimate (October 1992) is $45,700,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $22,700,000; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $300,000; and non-Federal cost of $22,700,000 for lands and damages, relocations, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($7,740,000) that local interests must pay. Existing project was adopted by Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985, August 15, 1985 (Public Law 99-88), 99th Cong., 1st sess. and modified by 1986 Water Resources Development Act, November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) 99th Cong., 2d sess. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; and provide retention dikes for dredged material disposal area; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $7,740,000. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) (sec. 221) was executed June 27, 1986. An LCA modification necessitated by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was executed December 6, 1988. Terminal facilities. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering was continued. Historical summary. General Design Memorandum was approved and Record of Decision was signed in May 1987. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) modification was approved and was signed by Port of Sacramento on August 19, 1987. LCA modification was executed December 6, 1988. First construction contract was awarded February 2, 1989 and completed in July 1990; second contract was awarded September 12, 1990 and completed in August 1991. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA, (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel, and San Joaquin River navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming shoreline marshes and inundated or low-lying areas by spoil deposit for public recreation and for industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on some of the reclaimed areas for public use; and placing additional rock revetment on waterside of levees bordering channels. 35-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Project estimate (October 1992) is $174,100,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $145,200,000, including basic recreation facilities; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $1,100,000; and non-Federal cost of $27,800,000 for lands and damages, relocations, berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($20,000) that local interests must make for land enhancement at time of construction. Local interests must also pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including spoil-disposal areas designated by the Chief of Engineers; provide necessary spoil retention dikes, bulkheads, and embankments except as applicable to spoil-disposal areas designated as public recreation areas; make utility modifications and relocations required for construction, including new bridges or bridge alterations (except for railroad bridges), and absorb any increased annual maintenance and operation costs resulting there from; provide and maintain all necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be served by the deepened channels; and in recognition of the local land enhancement benefits to result from landfill during dredging, contribute to the United States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material placed during initial construction for modification of Suisun Bay Channel project on areas not developed for public use. Local interests must also give satisfactory assurances, before starting construction of the affected units, that they will maintain and operate the Federally provided recreation areas and facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards the levees altered, set back or provided revetment protection, and hold the U.S. Government free from damages due to deposition of spoil and construction of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, must, at time of construction, contribute $20,000 in cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation; and maintain and operate basic recreation facilities after construction and install additional basic facilities required as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation within the Avon-Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances for deepening and otherwise improving the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 1970. The Stockton Port District, in August 1980, formally provided their intent to sponsor the Avon to Pittsburg reach (Suisun Bay Channel) and recreational development on Roberts Island. The Port of Stockton, by letter of October 20, 1981, stated that they would furnish the necessary assurances for fish and wildlife mitigation and enhancement, and on April 13, 1982, provided formal updated assurances for the Avon to Stockton portion. A sec. 221 agreement satisfying all requirements of local cooperation for Southampton Shoal and Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area was obtained from Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and signed by District Engineer July 31, 1984. On May 3, 1988, Board passed a resolution of continued support for construction in West Richmond, Pinole Shoal, Carquinez Strait, and Suisun Bay Channels. A Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the Army, San Francisco District and Contra Costa County to sample berthing areas of project was executed September 12, 1989. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1991, and 31, revised 1982, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif." and "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, revised 1986,"The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sacramento District: Engineering continued. A dissolved oxygen mitigation contract was continued at fiscal year cost of $324,498 and contract for modification of Simmons Island, Area C, was initiated at fiscal year cost of $899,850. San Francisco District: planning activities continued including initiation of hydrologic studies at the San Francisco Bay Hydrologic model in Sausalito; continuation of a vessel simulation navigation study; and continuation of sediment quality testing for ocean, upland and wetland disposal. Historical summary. Construction of project was initiated in June 1971 and is about 37 percent complete. 4. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassifed and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif.," revised 1986. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. Stone protection maintenance on Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel was initiated and completed at contract cost of $310,724; and dredging was initiated and completed at contract cost of $569,999. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 3.) Historical Summary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. Flood Control 5. BUCHANAN DAM-H.V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205-foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $28,919,597, of which $27,369,597 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H.V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. When hydrilla was discovered in Madera and Mariposa counties at Eastman Lake and in Chowchilla River in June 1989, Eastman Lake was quarantined. In August 1992, the western shore of the Lake was opened to limited fishing and swimming. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 28,218 acre-feet occurred May 7, 1992. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 2,626 cubic feet per second on February 15, 1992. Maximum release of 408 cubic feet per second on July 23, 1992, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, a total of 17,752 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances was combined under one contract. Project was completed in September 1983, except for installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam 35-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. Solar heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in FY 1984. An hydrilla eradication (spraying) program was initiated in FY 1989. Final land audit was approved on December 3, 1985. 6. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA (CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN) Location. At the mouth of Cache Creek in Yolo County where it enters the Yolo Bypass about 2 miles east of city of Woodland and about 15 miles northwest of city of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for raising the perimeter levees of the existing settling basin an average of 12 feet, extending the levees upstream to County Road 102 to provide 50-year sediment storage capacity, enlarging and reconstructing the cobble weir, and degrading existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to western perimeter levee to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity (340 acre-feet annually.). Estimated cost (October 1992) for existing project is $20,130,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $11,710,000 is Federal and $8,420,000 is non-Federal (which includes $1,010,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986 (HD 98-134, 98th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map.) Project as authorized included development of a national wildlife refuge within the settling basin; however, the Department of the Army determined that such refuge would be more appropriately funded and developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent of which $1,010,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Cache Creek Settling Basin enlargement (multicomponent) contract was initiated at a contract cost of $7,924,339. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Cache Creek Settling Basin enlargement (multicomponent) construction contract was awarded August 5, 1991. 7. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITILEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non-Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; a long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. Local interests paid $3,703,575 through December 31, 1991. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $234,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam-Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During rainflood season, maximum flow of Duck Creek Diversion was 1,546 cubic feet per second on February 15, 1992. Maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was 1,910 cubic feet per second on February 15, 1992. Maximum storage in reservoir was 11,078 acre-feet on February 15, 1992, and maximum estimated inflow to reservoir was 9,515 cubic feet per second on February 15, 1992. Maximum release of 1,384 cubic feet per second on February 17, 1992, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 24,622 acre-feet was released for flood control and 1,562 acre-feet released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $715,000 in damages from the February 1992 rainflood. New Hogan Lake-Maintenance and operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $144,380. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 72,814 acre-feet occurred April 26, 1992. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 10,581 cubic feet per second on February 15, 1992. Maximum release of 322 cubic feet per second on August 8, 1992, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 52,900 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 8. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 28 square miles in Marin County, CA, and flow into west side of San Francisco Bay about 9 miles north of Golden Gate. (See Geological Survey quadrangle San Rafael.) Existing project. Provided for about 11 miles of channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, levees, riprapping, rectangular concrete sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous channel rights-of-way to deep water in San Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in the event of future tideland reclamation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures as necessary to individual properties and other necessary structural measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Portion of project upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard previously classified inactive was modified on November 17, 1986 to eliminate any channel modification. Current project has 3 miles of channel enlargement and levees, about 1.8 miles of rectangular concrete channel improvements, and 450,000 cubic yards of redredging on lower Corte Madera Creek. Approved estimated cost for new work in Unit 4 and previously constructed features (October 1992) is $31,800,000, of which $18,000,000 is Federal cost and $13,800,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $760,000 to be contributed by local interests.) (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for disposal of waste material, modify or relocate all bridges and utilities necessary for construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the 35-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment on flood channels that would result in decreasing the effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of Federal construction cost of Ross Valley unit and tidal areas, an estimated $760,000. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District previously furnished resolution of local assurances dated March 29, 1966, March 28, 1967, August 15, 1967, and July 8, 1969, and Marin County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 1978. Project was authorized by the State of California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. Board of Supervisors of Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements for portion of project below Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation because a Superior Court Judgment ordered that county to take all steps required by law to complete channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging the lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed on June 29, 1985. Marin County also provided support for Ross Valley Unit 4 by resolution on March 24, 1987 and by the resolution on September 13, 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: All work was suspended pending coordination with local communities on selection of a plan to complete the project. Historical summary. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. Project is about 77 percent complete considering the portion being held in abeyance upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. Work remaining: Design construction of the remaining 3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. In lieu of the authorized concrete channel, an alternative plan consisting of wing walls and individual house floodproofing is being recommended in the Significant Post-Authorization Change Report. The portion of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Madera Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack of local support. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed June 29, 1985. Construction on Lower Corte Madera Creek Channel was completed and transferred to Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by letter of May 28, 1987. San Francisco District monitors maintenance and operation of the project. 9. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA Location. On five streams in vicinity of cities of Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA. Existing project. Provides for channel improvement on Ledgewood, Laurel, and McCoy Creeks and diversion of three creeks upstream from Fairfield (Pennsylvania Avenue Creek into Ledgewood Creek, Union Avenue Creek into Laurel Creek, and Laurel Creek into McCoy Creek). Project related recreation facilities such as access roads, parking areas, a boat-launching ramp and hiking, bicycle, and horseback trails would also be constructed. Estimated cost (October 1992) for existing project is $39,400,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $14,770,000 is Federal and $24,630,000 is non-Federal (includes $560,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 201, 1965 Flood Control Act (1970 Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions) and Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), December 19, 1985, and Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1987. (HD 91-159, 91st Cong., 1st sess., contains published map). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project, pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $560,000 (cash contribution); and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities and flood control facilities. Ultimate non-Federal cost for flood control will be reduced by a Federal reimbursement of one-half of the non-Federal costs in excess of the Federal construction costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Project had been in "deferred" status since September 15, 1977, due to lack of local assurances. In April 1982, the cities of Fairfield and Suisun affirmed their support and intent to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation for a modified version of the authorized project from 200-year to 100-year flood protection. On June 23, 1982, project was reclassified from "deferred" to "active" status. The State of California Reclamation Board has provided a letter of intent to the Assistant Secretary of the Army, November 8, 1982, to cooperate with the Federal Government to begin construction of the project. In accordance with FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) and sec. 117 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control and recreation (sec. 221) was executed June 3, 1986. 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Sec. 117 of Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 contained the following authorization language which will be reflected in any future modified agreements: "The Secretary shall include as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project for flood control, Fairfield Vicinity Streams, California, authorized in accordance with sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, the cost of any work carried out by non-Federal interests on the project after December 31, 1973, and before the date of the enactment of this joint resolution if the Secretary determines such work is reasonably compatible with the project. Costs and benefits resulting from such work shall continue to be included for purposes of determining economic feasibility of the project." Prior local expenditures of $6,600,000 have been reported by the sponsor. The Corps is evaluating costs and benefits of all completed works by non-Federal interests after December 31, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. Ledgewood Creek Channel, Phase IV, contract was completed at a fiscal year cost of $429,717 and transferred to local interests in December 1991 for maintenance. Construction of Laurel Creek pedestrian bridge overcrossing was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $73,337. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 3, 1986. Construction was initiated in October 1986. Enlargement of McCoy Creek and construction of Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was transferred to local interests in July 1987; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase II, was transferred to local interests in November 1988; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase III, was transferred to local interests in April 1990; and Laurel Creek Diversion, Phase IIA, was transferred to local interests in December 1990 for maintenance. Channel improvement contract for Ledgewood Creek Channel, Phase IV, was completed and transferred to local interests in December 1991 for maintenance. Construction of Laurel Creek pedestrian bridge overcrossing was initiated. 10. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA Location. On Guadalupe River in downtown area of city of San Jose, Santa Clara County, CA. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for widening and deepening one or more sides of Guadalupe River for 2.5 miles from Interstate Highway 280 to Interstate Highway 880 in downtown San Jose, CA, and channel modifications with provisions for fish and wildlife mitigation, as necessary. Non-Federal sponsor must pay 100 percent of incremental construction cost of locally preferred plan. Project is an integral component of a much larger regional park plan being undertaken by the San Jose Redevelopment Agency. Estimated cost (October 1992) is $133,400,000 (which includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $60,600,000 is Federal and $72,800,000 is non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1990 which directed the Secretary of the Army to construct the project notwithstanding sec. 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 regarding project cost limitations. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, which are partially offset by a credit ($5,700,000) allowed for prior work (sec. 104, Water Resources Development Act of 1986); credit was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Federal reimbursement will be made to non-Federal sponsor for one-half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. On June 2, 1989, the local sponsor, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, expressed intent to provide all needed cost sharing funds. On September 21, 1990, the San Jose Redevelopment Agency requested modification of project to include recreation facilities and confirmed that they intend to participate as local sponsor for recreation. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. The final General Design Memorandum, reflecting the locally preferred plan, was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on March 26, 1992, with comments. Revision of GDM to address comments was initiated and scheduled for completion in April 1993. First construction contract for channel improvement (Highway 880 to Hedding Street) was awarded in August 1992. Historical summary. Final General Design Memorandum (GDM) reflecting locally preferred plan, was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on March 26, 1992, with comments. Revision of GDM to address comments was initiated. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. First construction contract for channel improvement (Highway 880 to Hedding Street) was awarded August 10, 1992. 35-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 11. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163-foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Runoff of Fresno River below Hidden Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 26,884 acre-feet occurred May 30, 1992. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 1,115 cubic feet per second on February 15, 1992. Maximum release of 254 cubic feet per second on July 22, 1992, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 19,880 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. Solar heating was installed at recreation areas in FY 1984. 12. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) In 1991, Isabella Lake and 16,000 acres of surrounding land was transferred to the Forest Service in exchange for about 2,500 acres of Forest Service land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs, based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreation purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps on May 15, 1991, in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. This was accomplished by using a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam for flood control and water conservation purposes. Authority for new concessionaire operating permits to be issued, as well as those previously granted by the Corps, will be transferred to the Forest Service. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $965,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $534,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Between 1962 and 1982, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was revised by Docket No. HB07-75-4-000 (order issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC, paragraph 62052) which modified cumulative use charges after 1974, effective retroactively. Such charges will now vary each year. An adjustment (years 1974 through 1984) was included in 1984 payment of $244,790. The 1985 payment was $52,747; 1986 payment was $51,905. No payment was received in 1987. The 1988 payment was $58,187. No payment was received in 1989. Two payments ($60,894 and $55,443) were received in 1990; $60,983 was received in 1991; and $65,975 was received in October 1991 (FY 1992). Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1992, amounted to $2,010,650. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 153,942 acre-feet occurred June 5, 1992. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 2,027 cubic feet per second on May 5, 1992, and maximum outflow of 904 cubic feet per second occurred July 31, 1992. During the year, 272,416 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. A memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service) was used. The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam for flood control and water conservation purposes. 13. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of 35-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and water-right holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1991: Terminus, $1,990,957 and Success, $946,403. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10, 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdiction of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $199,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council and developed a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($360,000) and the marina concessionaires ($373,000) is about $733,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Success Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 89,484 acre-feet occurred on May 28, 1992. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir on May 7, 1992, was about 1,557 cubic feet per second. Maximum outflow of 1,413 cubic feet per second occurred June 6, 1992. Water released for irrigation and spreading releases totaled 146,744 acre-feet. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $8,391. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above Success Dam was below normal during the year. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 449 cubic feet per second on February 15, 1992, and maximum outflow of 234 cubic feet per second occurred on July 13, 1992. Maximum storage of 27,581 acre-feet occurred on May 14, 1992. Water released for irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 34,326 acre-feet. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968. Final land audit was approved on April 20, 1987. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. Piezometer installation and a cultural resources survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 14. LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT Location. On Dell Creek, a tributary of Parleys Creek, about 8 miles east of Salt Lake City upstream of Mountain Dell Reservoir in Salt Lake County, UT. Existing Project. Project providing for construction of a dam about 253 feet high to create a reservoir with a gross capacity of 30,000 acre-feet for flood control, municipal and industrial water supply, recreation and fish and wildlife was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 53, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map) as modified by sec. 170, Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976. Facility would be operated in conjunction with existing downstream 3,200 acre-foot Mountain Dell Reservoir on Parleys Creek for flood control and water supply. Authorized project has been reexamined and scaled down to reflect local interests' ability to pay. Current plan of improvement includes only flood control and water supply purposes. Recreation was deferred as of May 30, 1986, and Emigration Creek Diversion was deleted and placed in an inactive status. Project includes an earthfill dam 224 feet high, a 20,500 acre-foot reservoir, and 10,035 feet of pipeline to divert water from Parleys Creek. Estimated project cost (October 1992) is $60,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $34,600,000 is Federal and $25,400,000 is non- Federal for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of $19,200,000. Project is included in FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) August 15, 1985. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply; pay 13 percent of costs allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a cash contribution presently estimated at $19,200,000. By letters of January 22, 1986, and January 24, 1986, the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County indicated their support and willingness to proceed with a reduced scale project based on their "ability to pay." A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed on June 10, 1986. Water Revenue Bonds were issued August 27, 1986, and proceeds from the sale in the amount of $14,300,000 have been deposited in the Little Dell Construction Fund Account. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued. Main dam and appurtenances construction contract was continued at contract fiscal year cost of $10,670,447. Historical summary. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed June 10, 1986. Construction was initiated in April 1988. Construction of core trench and test fill was completed in February 1989. Main dam and appurtenances contract was awarded May 12, 1989. 15. LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. On Lower San Joaquin River, CA, from city of Stockton, CA, extending about 225 miles upstream to Friant Dam (about 19 miles northeast of Fresno) and along Kings River North for approximately 25 miles upstream from Mendota Dam. Existing project. This project is a modification and extension of the previous Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries project (see Annual Report for 1976) to provide clearing and snagging on San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, upstream to Friant Dam. Estimated first cost (October 1992) is $29,776,000, of which $22,876,000 is Federal and $6,900,000 is non-Federal for lands and damages (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period as well as $12,976,000, Federal, and $5,000,000, non-Federal, for work completed by 1974). Existing project was included in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 98-63, July 29, 1983, which states that project for flood protection on Lower San Joaquin River, CA, authorized by the Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944, as amended, is modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to perform clearing and snagging on San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, to Friant Dam, at an estimated cost of $5,000,000. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1988, Public Law 100-202, December 22, 1987 (H.J. Res. 395) modifies Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1983 to include: clearing and snagging in area of North Fork of Kings River in Mendota Pool from southerly boundary of James Reclamation District Number 1606 to Mendota Dam; fish and wildlife mitigation; and such riprapping in area of clearing and snagging on such rivers as may be necessary to prevent erosion from such clearing snagging; and increase estimated cost of clearing and snagging on Lower San Joaquin River, including activities above, from $5,000,000 to $8,000,000. Local cooperation. Prior to initiation of construction, a non-Federal entity shall furnish 35-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 adequate assurance for providing all lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in construction of project at no expense to the Federal Government, execute a local cooperation agreement pursuant to sec. 221 Public Law 96-611; agree to operate and maintain the project works upon completion of construction in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Department of the Army; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Non-Federal sponsor, the California State Reclamation Board, has agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor coordination with local interests and pertinent agencies was continued. Lack of consensus of support by Federal, State and local entities led to request for reclassification of the project to deferred status. Historical summary. A Plan of Action, February 1984, has been prepared. Design Memorandum No. 5 for Eastside Bypass at San Joaquin River was prepared in September 1984. First construction contract, dredging Eastside Bypass, was awarded October 12, 1984 and completed in May 1985. 16. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 824 acre-feet occurred on February 21, 1992. Maximum inflow to the reservoir was 67 cubic feet per second on February 22, 1992, and maximum outflow of 43 cubic feet per second occurred February 22, 1992. During the year, 633 acre-feet was released for flood control and 4,167 acre-feet was released for irrigation purposes. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 17. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, CA, on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles; nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 18, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed in FY 1957. Existing project provides for construction of three new reservoirs-Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs-Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby tying the existing project channels into Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects would provide flood control only; Castle and Burns projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa project, all three purposes. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed.) Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Burns reservoir, Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman- Dutchman Creeks. Estimated total project cost (October 1992) is $112,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $76,100,000 is 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Federal and $36,200,000 is non-Federal (which includes a $5,790,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $260,000, of which $220,000 is a cash contribution and $40,000 is for lands; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Total non-Federal share of Castle Dam first cost is $4,290,000 and includes cash contribution of $480,000. The California Reclamation Board and the City of Merced are the local sponsors of the authorized project. The Reclamation Board will serve as sole sponsor for the Castle Dam Unit. Merced County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed their support for the project by letter of April 4, 1986. City of Merced by letter of March 13, 1986, reaffirmed its support for and intent to furnish assurances for recreation aspects of the project. California Reclamation Board reaffirmed its support for total project by letter of April 9, 1986. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 1986. State of California legislation (AB3369) was enacted on September 14, 1986 which enabled the Reclamation Board to financially participate in the project. A new Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army November 30, 1988, in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The California Reclamation Board and the Merced County Board of Supervisors have indicated support for balance of the project by letters of intent dated August 29, 1991 and August 20, 1991, respectively. Operations and results during Engineering activities continued. multicomponent construction was contract cost of $1,617,553. fiscal year. Castle Dam continued at Historical summary. Castle Dam multicomponent construction contract was awarded February 26, 1991, and construction was initiated in April 1991. 18. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas above Merced County stream group reservoirs was below normal for the year. See Table 35-K for maximum inflow storage and outflow for the projects. Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Project prevented an estimated $910,000 in damages from the February 1992 rainflood. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and stream-gaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Bums, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 19. PAJARO RIVER, CA Location. In the Uvas-Camadero and Llagas Creeks watersheds of the upper Pajaro River Basin in south Santa Clara County in vicinity of the city of Gilroy about 75 miles south of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Provides for construction of a 2-mile levee along the north side of Uvas Creek from a point about 2,000 feet downstream of Thomas Road to about 3,500 feet upstream of Miller Avenue. Project will also include a bikeway and hiking trail. Estimated cost (October 1992) for existing project is $13,814,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $6,907,000 is Federal and $6,907,000 is non-Federal (which includes $565,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Flood Control Act of 1944, December 21, 1944 (HD 505-78, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, right-of-way, and 35-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay one-half of separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests will receive an estimated Federal reimbursement of $5,649,000 for one half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. The third and final construction contract (landscaping) was completed. Final accounting is underway. Historical summary. Responsibility for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications, and construction was transferred to Sacramento District in April 1982. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for flood control was executed with the Santa Clara Valley Water District on June 25, 1987, and LCA for recreation was executed with the City of Gilroy on July 27, 1987. Construction began in October 1987. Construction for the first contract (levee work and bike path upstream of Thomas Road Bridge), second contract (levee work and hiking trails), and third and final contract (landscaping) has been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Total reimbursement of $5,068,994 has been made to the local sponsor as of September 30, 1992. 20. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Project also includes 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its distributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law as amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations under the early reclamation laws as being applicable to projects constructed by the Corps with two exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $13,464,130 for irrigation services through December 31, 1991. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Pine Flat Marina and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $1,727,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost to date of $476,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Installation of a hydroelectric powerplant, located at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam, was completed in January 1984 by Kings River Conservation District. Project consists of an outdoor-type powerhouse containing three generating units with capacities of 55 megawatts each for a total of 165 megawatts. Conservation District would make use of the three existing 13.5-foot diameter penstocks that were installed in Pine Flat Dam when constructed in 1954. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds were paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2741, effective September 25, 1979, was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Kings River Conservation District for hydropower development at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam. Payment to the Department of the Army for construction and installation of the penstocks in the amount of $1,044,685 was made to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury in November 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Contract for paving of recreation roads and parking areas at Island Park recreation area was completed at fiscal year cost of $16,359. ($255,678 payment in FY 1991). Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 357,024 acre-feet occurred on May 31, 1992. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 5,357 cubic feet per second on May 6, 1992, and maximum outflow of 5,377 cubic feet per second occurred on June 7, 1992. During the year, 758,484 acre-feet was released for irrigation and spreading. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Pine Flat Lake acquired additional acreage as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The Corps exchanged Isabella Lake and the 16,000 acres around that lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. 21. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Location. Northeast and adjacent to the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan Area in Fresno County about 170 miles southeast of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a dam 45.5 feet high to create a reservoir with gross capacity of 10,300 acre-feet for flood control on Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recreational development. Since the local sponsor does not support recreational development at this time, the recreation feature of the project is considered to be inactive. The authorization Act states "measures determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Army to minimize benefits to groundwater recharge" shall be included in the project. Estimated cost (October 1992) for existing project is $66,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $48,600,000 is Federal and $17,400,000 is non-Federal (which includes $3,290,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public 35-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. (HD 98-147, 98th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, of which $3,290,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Construction contract for Fancher Creek Dam was completed at fiscal year cost of $1,793,526 and was transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on March 13, 1992. Construction contract for Big Dry Dam, Pup and Alluvial detention basins was awarded March 18, 1992. Construction was initiated at contract cost of $6,614,313. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 1, 1987. Project construction was begun in September 1987 with initiation of archaeological work on Cultural Resources Preservation. Construction contract for Dry Creek Crossing was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on January 10, 1989. Construction at Redbank Creek Detention Basin was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 23, 1990. Construction contract for Fancher Creek Dam awarded May 23, 1990, was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on March 13, 1992. Construction contract for Big Dry Dam, Pup and Alluvial detention basins was awarded March 18, 1992. 22. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Project also provides for expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, Warm Springs, to compensate for fish losses on Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-L and 35-M for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the joint-use construction cost, (30.2 percent currently estimated at $103,100,000) and an ultimate 32.5 percent of the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement joint-use costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $80,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. Major items of contract work included: Initiation of fish hatchery emergency water supply at fiscal year cost of $847,978, and completion of the fish hatchery expansion including roofing, at fiscal year cost of $268,160. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian River at Coyote Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 93,272 acre-feet occurred on April 20, 1992. 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 4,626 cubic feet per second on February 12, 1992. Maximum release of 2,525 cubic feet per second occurred on February 15, 1992. During the year, 83,194 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 91,347 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $60,000 in damages from the February 1992 rainflood. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 242,151 acre-feet occurred April 19, 1992. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 6,216 cubic feet per second on February 12, 1992. Maximum release of 257 cubic feet per second occurred March 12, 1992. During the year, 63,087 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $50,000 in damages from the February 1992 rainflood. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 99 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Warm Springs construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, reservoir clearing in July 1981, project overlook in May 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985 and Rockpile Road Upgrade, Yorty Creek Beach, and remedial work at Liberty Glen camping area in September 1990, and fish hatchery expansion in September 1992. Initial filling of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Major items of work remaining include emergency water supply, control tower grout, spillway stabilization, paving of dam access road and Liberty Glen sewer treatment repairs. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 23. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1988), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-N on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1987) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $31,000,000, of which $25,700,000 is Federal cost and $5,300,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations and cash contribution of $3,435,000. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood 35-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 control purposes. Total estimated (October 1992) first cost for project is $155,000,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $109,100,000 is Federal (including $2,670,000 for recreation facilities) and $45,900,000 non-Federal comprising for lands and damages including relocations and $23,100,000 required cash contribution toward first cost. Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported on page 35-3A under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $87,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 36 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1992) at $23,100,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution indicated above. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries-None. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project-Engineering and design activities continued. (See table 35-0 for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. None. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Paving of recreation roads and parking areas at Buckhorn recreation area, Black Butte Lake, was completed at contract cost of $11,734. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 127,030 acre-feet occurred February 27, 1992. Maximum hourly inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 8,926 cubic feet per second on March 15, 1992, and maximum outflow of 2,144 cubic feet per second occurred on March 16, 1992. During the year, 46,735 acre-feet was released for flood control and 142,899 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 99 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required, which will accomplished under Sacramento River Bank Protection project. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 90 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in 35-20 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 36 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1985 and transferred to State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento River, Tehama County-one site, mile 215, (Unit 5), was completed November 1982, two sites, mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), were completed in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0, 237.9, 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were completed in February 1985. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980 and completed in FY 1986. Piezometer installation and slope for protection at the dam were completed in FY 1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 24. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (October 1992) is $98,100,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $71,630,000 is Federal cost and $26,470,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $20,945,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,840,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about $3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including the concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project. In addition, local developers have made channel improvements for Upper Pine Creek valued at $5,050,000. The cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1992) at $5,840,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District will arrange for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. Flood Control District and city of Walnut Creek have requested that recreation be added as a project purpose and will share costs in accordance with Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Post Authorization Change was approved July 27, 1987. To date, $5,612,681 has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering, design, and coordination for the recreation and erosion control mitigation and channel cover retrofit is continuing. Construction on San Ramon Bypass Channel was split into three contracts. The last contract, Contract No. 3, was completed in October 1991 at fiscal year contract cost of $3,714. Contract No. 2 was constructed with a channel cover at 100 percent local cost. The sponsor requested an investigation into the excessive deflection and roadway noise after the cover was constructed. The Corps investigated the problem and initiated design of a channel cover retrofit. Contract No. 1 had an outstanding claim with Liongate Corporation, which was essentially settled at a fiscal year cost of $600,632. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 98 percent complete. Total of 17.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, Drop Structures No. 1 and 2 and construction under San Ramon Bypass Contract No. 1, Contract No. 2 and Contract No. 3 and Upper Pine Creek Channel contact have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Due to contractor difficulties with Contract No. 1 (Lionsgate claims and court action) part of the contract work was completed under Contract No. 1A with a different contractor. Work 35-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 remaining consists of recreation, and erosion control mitigation. Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 25. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA Location. Project is located in vicinity of San Pablo and Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA, about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Current plan of improvement reflects only Reach 1, which is from San Pablo Bay to AT&SF Railroad tracks on both Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks; Reach 1 consists of 9,900 lineal feet of channel improvements on Wildcat Creek and 10,000 lineal feet of channel improvements on San Pablo Creek. Improvements include channel deepening, levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. Additionally, about 20 acres will be planted for mitigation of fish and wildlife. Reach 2, which is upstream of AT&SF Railroad tracks and consists of 9,400 lineal feet of channel and levee work on Wildcat Creek, 1,800 lineal feet of channel and levee work on San Pablo Creek, and mitigation for fish and wildlife on 8 acres, was determined to be economically infeasible, excluded from total project cost, and reclassified as inactive. Project also includes recreation features on Wildcat Creek. Approved estimated cost of new work (1992) is $29,400,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $16,200,000 is Federal cost, and $13,200,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,320,000 cash contribution). Improvements adopted by House and Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 and 15, 1976, respectively, under provisions of sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511, 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map).For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights of way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of project; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 73-466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations of local cooperation. On November 9, 1976, the Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which assures availability of funds for local share of non-Federal portion of flood control project costs for a modified plan of improvement. A flood control Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying all requirements of sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-661) and consistent with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662), was executed on June 20, 1986 between the Department of the Army and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. By Resolution No. 1985-12-351, adopted December 17, 1985, the East Bay Regional Park and Recreation District stated support for development of trail and recreational improvements for the project and indicated its intent to share in 50 percent of the cost of such improvements and perform operation and maintenance responsibility. A recreation Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction on Reach 1, Contract 2, of channel improvement on Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks was completed. Mitigation on Reach 1 was continued at a fiscal year contract cost of $14,921. Historical summary. Local interests withdrew support of project in 1979. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. After 1982-1983 floods, local interests again indicated support of the project, and in October 1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento District. A revised final environmental impact statement was filed March 28, 1986, and a General Design Memorandum was approved May 29, 1986. Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was executed June 20, 1986. Recreation Design Memorandum was approved on February 19, 1992, and the recreation LCA was signed on April 15, 1992. Construction work under Contract No. 1 and Contract No. 2 for Reach No. 1 of Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks has been transferred to local sponsor for operation and maintenance. In March 1990, Reach 2 was declared infeasible and is now inactive. All costs have been deleted from project cost estimate. Overall project is about 80 percent complete. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Fairfield Vicinity Streams; completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Merced County Stream group; Middle Creek (Lake County); Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; completed units of Red Bank and Fancher Creeks including Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, and Fancher Dam and Redbank detention basin, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $1,734,789 included continuation of dam safety assurance program for Folsom Lake, CA ($544,684) and $76,393 for Big Dry Creek, CA. 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were $324,279. See Table 35-P for list of studies. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $370,557, all of which was for disaster preparedness. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $2,044 to complete bank protection on Duchesne River, UT. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). No snagging and clearing activities this fiscal year. Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, two flood insurance studies were continued. Inter- Agency Agreements EMW-E-2226 and 2994, respectively, at a fiscal year cost of $1,284 under Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursable order. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Lost Creek, Pineview, Red Fleet, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; and Blue Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, and Vallecito, CO, were prepared. Water control manual revisions were continued for Big Dry Creek, CA, and McPhee, CO, reservoirs. Work was continued on the Little Dell, UT, water control manual. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $944,144. Total cost to September 30, 1992, was $6,692,829. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 29. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.). Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. 35-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Approved estimated (October 1992) Federal cost is $400,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91-282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do so. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. On January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering activities continued. Fiscal year costs for major items of work included: Continuation of land activities, $304,102; completion of administration building contract, $947,871; completion of Glory Hole recreation area force main contract, $594,777, and award of Parrotts Ferry Bridge modification contract on August 19, 1992. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation, water intake facilities, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification, reservoir area clearing, Tuttletown Phase I recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole Phase I and Phase II recreation area, and operations access road contracts have all been completed. Glory Hole minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. Boundary fencing, Lower Stanislaus Phase I and Phase II minimal recreation facilities, Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard, and Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contracts have been completed. Tuttletown minimal recreation facilities, McHenry recreation area, Tuttletown wastewater treatment, Knights Ferry recreation area,Knights Ferry Covered Bridge, Glory Hole recreation area sanitary system, Two-Mile Bar recreation, administration building, and Glory Hole recreation area force main contracts have been completed. Overall project is nearing completion except for Lower Stanislaus River recreation facilities. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements and/or specific Congressional appropriation of funds. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, CA. On December 20, 1982, the Court upheld all 25 requirements placed on the Federal Government by the State Water Resources Control Board. The 35-24 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. The Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The Bureau had originally started generating power on a limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power generating benefits have been attained. Project is about 99 percent complete. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS See Table 35-Q. 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year costs of $256,000. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $6,000. 32. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10, 1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $1,507,494, of which $18,128 was for collection and study of basic data (including flood plain management service), $1,457,925 was for research and development, and $31,441 was for automatic data processing. 33. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA Project is located on eastern slope of the Coast Range. Clear Lake unit is about 110 miles north of San Francisco and Settling unit is about 15 miles northwest of Sacramento. Plan of improvement consists of two project units: Upper basin at Clear Lake (selected plan)-widening and/or deepening 4.5 miles of existing 5 mile long Clear Lake outlet channel to a capacity of 8,000 cubic feet per second, and nonstructural measures; and lower basin at the mouth of Cache Creek-enlarging existing perimeter levees of Cache Creek Settling Basin an average of 12 feet to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity and enlarging existing project levees from settling basin mouth upstream to County Road 102, reconstructing and enlarging existing Cobble weir, degrading the existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to the western perimeter levee to allow utilization of entire basin for sediment deposition, acquiring easements for 3,600 acres of existing settling basin and establishing a wildlife refuge; however, the refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988. The second project unit--Cache Creek Settling Basin-is reported under Improvement No. 6. General Design Memorandum for the Clear Lake Outlet Channel (Upper Basin) indicated that project was not economically feasible and preconstruction planning was terminated. Studies for possible solutions to Clear Lake flooding are being pursued in the Cache Creek Basin reconnaissance study. COYOTE CREEK, CA (KNOWN AS COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS) Project is located in the cities of San Jose and Milpitas immediately south of San Francisco Bay in Santa Clara County, CA. Plan of improvement on Coyote Creek consists of overflow channels and offset levees. Improvement on Berryessa Creek includes two sedimentation basins at the upstream end of the concrete lined trapezoidal channel and offset levees. Combined plan would provide flood protection from Coyote and Berryessa Creeks to cities of San Jose and Milpitas, which include large industrial complexes and some residential development. Separate General Design Memorandums were continued on Coyote and Berryessa Creeks. Draft of General Design Memorandum for Coyote was completed. Local interests have initiated construction, which is integral project work, under sec. 26 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $4,000,000. TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV Project is located in metropolitan area of Reno and Sparks in Washoe County, NV. Current plan of improvement consists of about 7 miles of levees, 5 miles of floodwalls, 3 bridge replacements along Truckee River and includes limited channel excavation, a detention dam on Steamboat Creek at Huffaker Narrows, and backwater levees along Steamboat Creek, Boynton Slough, and the North Truckee Drain just north of the Interstate Highway 80 crossing. Plan also includes recreation facilities with bicycle and pedestrian paths, river overlooks, and picnic sites; mitigation measures (31 acres of riparian plantings to 35-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 replace vegetation losses); and fish and wildlife features. Project will provide flood protection from Truckee River to cities of Reno and Sparks and Truckee Meadows urban areas. Project has been deferred and preconstruction planning has been terminated as project is economically infeasible. Coordination with local agencies and sponsors was continued and curation of cultural resource materials at the Nevada State Museum was initiated. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $4,300,000. NAPA RIVER, CA Project is located in city and county of Napa, CA. Current plan of improvement consists of channel excavation, floodwalls, set-back levees, bypass channels, and related environmental mitigation measures. The improvements on Napa River would extend about 5.7 miles, from Trancas Street to Kennedy Park. Approximately 4,200 feet of Napa Creek, from its mouth to Jefferson Street, would also be improved. Project will provide 100-year level of flood protection from Napa River and Napa Creek to city of Napa. A hazard and toxic waste investigation is a new requirement and is being included in the current General Design Memorandum. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $9,200,000. 34. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Under the Aquatic Plant Control Program (River and Harbor Act of 1958, sec. 104, Public Law 500, 85th Congress) a reconnaissance report regarding the hydrilla problem in Sacramento District was initiated in October 1989. On December 16, 1991, a policy decision regarding benefit evaluations was received. Decision was that benefits other than recreation must be the primary benefits for aquatic plant control programs. Previous recommendations for Federal involvement in these programs were based primarily on recreation benefits. A request for necessary additional funds was denied and reconnaissance report was terminated in FY 1992 at a fiscal year cost of $753. (For detailed description of study, see Annual Report for FY 1991). YOLO BASIN WETLANDS, SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment The Yolo Basin Wetlands area is primarily located within the boundaries of the Yolo Bypass, an operative feature of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Yolo Bypass extends 43 miles from Fremont Weir on the Sacramento River, south to the town of Rio Vista where it rejoins the river. Project will include restoration of wetlands, and contribute to a larger program now in the planning stage, proposed by an interagency group of state and local governments and organizations. Proposed work will include physical improvements to help create a mixture of native marsh, permanent and seasonal wetlands, and riparian forest through modification of existing drainage canals or construction of small dikes and weirs to redirect available water sources to proposed wetland areas. Also to be included is preparation of a flood plain hydraulic management model to assess hydraulic impacts of furture wetland projects proposed in the Yolo Bypass. Estimated project cost is $6,820,000. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986, Public Law 99-662, sec. 1135(b), as amended by sec. 304 of WRDA 1990. The California State Department of Fish and Game is the project sponsor for 3,480 acres located within the Yolo Bypass. A Project Modification Report and an Environmental Assessment/Initial Study was completed in April 1992. Three existing sites have been identified for possible wetlands restoration: Putah Creek Sink (3,000 acres), Yolo Causeway (480 acres) and Willow Slough Bypass (345 acres). Willow Slough Bypass site was later withdrawn due to difficulty in acquiring lands. Fiscal year costs were $303,598. 35-26 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 1. Sacramento River New Work CA (Federal Approp. Funds) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds, Maint. Other) Contrib. Cost 2. Sacramento River New Work Deep Water Ship Approp. Channel, CA Cost (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 3. San Francisco Bay New Work to Stockton, CA Approp. (John F. Baldwin Cost and Stockton Ship Channels) 4. San Joaquin New Work River, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Buchanan Dam- New Work H.V. Eastman Lake, Approp. Chowchilla River, Cost CA (Federal Maint. Funds) Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost - - - - $40,331,192 1 - - - - 40,331,192 1 $150,700 $851,029 $964,200 526,400 45,637,960 2 188,435 435,174 1,353,399 443,966 45,510,023 s - - - - 85,000 4 1,400,000 1,520,808 750,000 600,803 509,000 -6,476 700,000 631,142 3,269,000 3,799,847 1,500,000 1,266,274 119,443 -15,000 39,815 7,631,474 5 7,524,433 5 2,935,000 2,538,034 1,676,000 2,901,000 1,635,000 2,136,000 61,488,000 6 2,635,686 1,645,007 2,311,808 2,770,443 61,272,911 7 48,500 54,591 - - - 5,833,117 8 - - - 5,833,117 8 109,661 450,000 1,096,000 14,522,137 s 105,669 442,440 1,098,445 14,502,816 s - - - - 27,369,597 - - - - 27,369,597 1,224,800 1,031,893 938,700 1,196,000 13,574,393 1,238,494 988,885 1,073,433 1,224,513 13,556,387 - - - - 111,187 10 - - - - 111,187 10 6. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 7. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries including New Hogan Lake & Farmington Dam, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 486,000 438,000 3,900,000 294,407 493,798 426,525 - - 400,000 - - 40,335 - - 400,000 5,379,000 7,320,728 415,000 622,305 353,000 557,361 9,946,000 8,082,854 815,000 662,640 753,000 11 557,361 12 - - - - 23,723,144 13 - - - - 23,723,144 13 1,779,600 1,542,127 1,576,315 1,613,000 22,908,711 14 1,715,926 1,409,970 1,824,621 1,632,124 22,867,079 14 - - - - 1,398,251 15 16 17 - - - 1,398,251 15 16 17 35-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 -80,0 307000 17000 8. Corte Madera Creek, CA (Federal Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 9. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (Federal Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 10. Guadalupe River, CA (Required Contrib. Funds) 11. Hidden Dam - Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 12. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 13. Kaweah and Tule Rivers including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 14. Little Dell Lake, UT (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost -800,000 414,832 7,888 2,939,000 4,260,133 9,000 13,115 1,886,000 961,970 307,000 170,000 230,864 217,142 - - 3,510 10,814 - 24,700 2,135,000 2,556,001 22,000 15,211 525,000 1,354,036 2,447,000 2,001,354 18,605 463,000 576,362 - 12,483,725 18 82,507 12,434,030 18 - 186,095 19 - 185,831 19 786,921 20 786,921 20 771,000 871,404 475,370 99,416 85,000 119,004 661,000 1,081,000 1,200,000 1,798,000 717,234 877,152 1,138,152 1,933,535 - - - 430,000 14,833,000 14,382,942 533,370 155,965 3,779,000 21 3,619,810 22 6,129,000 5,939,819 430,000 - - - - 30,555,426 - - - - 30,555,426 1,126,100 1,130,718 1,035,700 1,306,000 14,477,818 1,096,138 1,085,236 1,124,821 1,318,900 14,451,617 - - - - 165,112 23 - - - - 165,112 23 2,145,000 2,027,598 105,000 109,422 2,125,600 2,053,516 51,000 107,190 1,962,566 1,874,165 60,000 74,314 2,266,701 2,113,057 64,000 62,501 2,216,900 2,548,784 40,000 39,911 2,252,500 2,452,863 26,000 27,518 - 24,450,537 24 - 24,450,537 24 673,000 36,130,062 25 26 683,359 36,113,974 25 26 2,500 745,500 27 2,575 744,427 28 - 34,997,230 * - 34,997,230 29 2,583,853 34,546,879 3 2,629,169 34,478,781 3 - 628,420 31 32 34 3,135 625,598 31 33 35 7,025,000 9,770,000 2,985,000 5,884,000 34,058,900 4,213,530 8,566,097 4,731,928 8,121,629 33,490,515 35-28 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 15. Lower San Joaquin River, CA 16. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV, and CA 17. Merced County Streams, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 18. Merced County Stream Group, CA 19. Pajaro River Basin, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 20. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 21. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 2,840,000 1,762,627 50,465 25,546 -49,000 450,299 6,100,000 2,050,000 4,400,000 16,050,000 4,138,434 4,027,430 5,009,731 15,434,462 - - - 4,320,465 " 24,528 14,724 1,259 4,300,147 s7 - - -13,000 4,036,000 249,048 16,417 3,335 4,036,000 - - - - 8,504,989 " - - - - 8,504,989 M 266,100 306,033 326,400 291,500 5,443,383 273,026 293,537 325,688 313,889 5,428,781 3,602,000 333,016 2,582,500 615,811 117,000 122,833 2,713,000 237,189 -469,000 1,612,000 2,100,000 461,860 2,996,121 3,034,139 - - 430,000 - - 291,000 - 270,000 707,125 285,153 582,769 969,395 13,945,000 13,737,581 430,000 291,000 3,559,625 39 2,453,127 39 - - - 2,751,259 40 - - - 2,751,259 40 100,534 134,800 117,000 2,129,840 98,652 123,702 135,193 2,120,015 - 1,122,000 3,709,447 1,184,685 127,268 325,214 127,268 325,214 6,007 5,663 - 8,206,968 41 18,798 8,184,698 41 - 610,000 989 562,363 - 37,250 42 - 31,553 42 - - - - 43,356,265 44 - - - - 43,356,265 44 1,387,000 1,393,797 2,324,800 1,916,000 28,679,382 45 1,450,874 1,337,111 2,398,853 1,943,666 28,632,928 45 - - - - 110,000 46 - - - - 110,000 46 4,053,000 1,101,483 202,500 124,396 10,270,000 12,714,707 1,340,000 1,121,482 11,500,000 10,746,289 785,000 1,060,100 10,471,000 9,844,812 425,000 449,417 38,928,065 47 36,598,574 47 3,012,500 2,893,468 35-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 (Contrib. Funds, Other) 22. Russian River Basin, CA, Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 23. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 24. Walnut Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 25. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 28. Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 620,000 - 135,000 755,000 4 - 95,000 392,298 156,516 643,814 4 - - - - 14,435,869 49 - - - - 14,435,869 49 1,646,600 1,566,640 1,693,000 2,175,000 35,015,424 50 51 1,614,367 1,540,757 1,879,266 2,158,612 34,969,261 5so s 2,000 430 1,900,000 2,701,746 2,244,700 2,254,939 20,000 31,714 4,450,000 5,634,386 1,242,100 1,183,415 1,210,000 1,921,720 15,000 17,604 4,400,000 2,544,540 260,000 238,792 1,958,714 1,513,579 1,621,000 2,515,019 -190,000 150,107 465,000 528,470 2,500,000 2,039,696 1,500 3,720 5,035,000 3,111,000 3,732,002 5,226,418 2,279,643 2,701,800 1,959,296 3,013,313 - 10,174 1,555 20,658 3,550,000 2,294,494 1,217,694 1,178,635 277,500 456,274 9,000 7,439 8,324,000 8,456,104 410,000 529,722 2,285,886 2,983,724 865,000 2,072,816 74,000 96,745 516,000 550,355 1,101,000 2,677,698 1,217,300 1,331,790 275,800 622,674 31,500 3,049 1,936,000 3,561,848 422,600 379,198 1,477,100 1,703,646 -609,000 1,253,364 235,504 68,112 16,951 1,500 12,386 260,797 52 1,968 12,444 260,744 sa 5,217,000 3,291,802 2,579,000 2,705,031 12,400 1,234,000 1,750,674 1,402,000 1,452,100 -29,434 156,109 39,434 62,949 300,000 839,262 25,000 52,958 259,457 31,614 327,982,645 54 325,041,281 54 21,275,143 ss 21,221,598 58 230,574 57 228,732 58 119,769,008 so so 119,322,388 s so80 21,137,928 81 21,098,407 e1 23,165,404 22,520,071 2,886,296 82 63 2,879,761 82 63 84 70,042,430 85 69,999,834 88 5,612,681 87 5,546,827 88 14,854,344 89 14,552,541 89 1,067,000 12,861,000 893,311 12,632,976 - 859,662 43,293 570,088 - 1,666,000 70 - 1,582,383 71 - 5,223,000 3,651,000 370,024,996 72 73 1,352,753 5,400,459 2,669,051 366,373,026 73 35-30 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 CA including Maint. Tuolumne and Approp. 602,400 689,716 692,000 798,000 6,922,316 Stanislaus Rivers, Cost 600,157 579,537 808,000 827,141 6,902,493 CA, New Melones Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. - - - - 80,000 74 Cost - - - 67,415 80,000 74 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular Funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $16,141,432 for shallow-draft and $28,872,808 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $552,720; existing project, $16,138,185 for shallow-draft and $28,748,118 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 4. Includes $85,000 contributed funds, other, from Sacramento-Yolo Port District for clearing and grubbing on dredged material deposit areas to be used on ship channel maintenance dredging work. 5. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($33,474) for Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 6. Includes $27,999,800 funds for Sacramento District and $33,488,200 for San Francisco District. 7. Includes $27,821,192 costs for Sacramento District and $33,451,719 for San Francisco District. 8. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 was expended from required contributed funds; 9. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required contributed funds for maintenance. 10. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berendo Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 11. Includes $753,000 contributed funds, other, from State of California for relocation activities including demolition or salvage of various pipes and facilities, construction of ramps, turnouts, pipe gates and bank protection at Cache Creek Settling Basin. 12. Includes $557,361 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation activities for State of California. 13. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: total to date $897,742. 14. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees and costs at New Hogan Lake, and $491,000 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at New Hogan Lake beginning in FY 1988. 15. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily for Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes $10,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 16. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 17. Includes $104,000 contributed funds, other, and costs from Calaveras County Water District for New Hogan hydropower studies. 18. Includes $6,999,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 19. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 20. Contributed funds, other, and costs, from Marin County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $250,000 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 21. Includes $3,643,000 contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocations (automotive type bridges) at Laurel Creek Diversion near Fairfield, $23,000 from City of Fairfield for Phase III contract for channel development on Laurel Creek, and $113,000 from City of Suisun for Phase IIA contract for widening of Railroad Avenue. 22. Includes $2,880,231 contributed funds, other, costs for relocations at Laurel Creek Diversion, $18,454 contributed funds, other costs for Phase III contract, and $112,687 for Phase IIA contract. 23. Contributed funds, other from the State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 24. Includes $2,199,085 Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake and $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 35-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 25. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees and costs at Isabella Lake. 26. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at Isabella Lake beginning in FY 1985. 27. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula and $330,000 for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 28. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, costs for boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula, and $306,516 costs for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 29. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date: $704,000. 30. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees and costs at Success Lake. 31. Contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and cost for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, $30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 32. Includes $418,000 contributed funds, other, from the Kaweah River Power Authority, Visalia, California, for Terminus Dam hydropower studies. 33. Includes $416,844 contributed funds, other, costs for Terminus Dam hydropower studies. 34. Includes $168,000 contributed funds, other, from DITT, Inc., Paris, France, for hydropower studies at Success Lake. 35. Includes $166,334 contributed funds, other, costs for Success Lake hydropower studies. 36. Includes $4,320,465 contributed funds, other from the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 37. Includes $4,300,147 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 38. Includes $1,200 initiation of plans and specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 1978. construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 720 was determined to be infeasible. 39. Includes contributed finds, other, for lands, easements and rights-of-way for Castle Dam from State of California. 40. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of right-of-way and utility alterations for Merced County Stream Group. 41. Include $1,949,968 San Francisco construction funds and costs and $260,000 Sacramento general investigation funds and costs for Pajaro River. 42. Includes contributed funds, other, from Santa Clara Valley Water District for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 43. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date: $1,595,100. 44. Includes Public Work Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds and costs ($239,235) for recreation facilities and $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 45. Includes $158,300 special recreation fees and costs at Pine Flat Lake and $364,185 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Pine Flat Dam. 46. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 47. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($29,065) and FY 1986 allocation for Redbank and Fancher Creeks to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 48. Includes contributed funds, other, from Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District for road relocation (Nees Avenue) at Fancher Dam. 49. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds; $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 50. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and cost for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 51. Includes $1,289,680 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino for FY 1985 through FY 1992. 52. Includes $248,411 contributed funds, other from City of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $12,386 from California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 53. Includes $248,358 contributed funds, other, costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies. 54. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 55. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 56. Includes $75,400 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 57. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, from Sonoma County for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies; and $22,500 from City of Ukiah for hatchery pump design at Lake Mendocino. 58. Includes $195,674 contributed funds, other, costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies; and $20,658 cost for hatchery pump design. 59. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 35-32 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 60. Includes Code 710 funds and cost for recreation facilities at Black Butte lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 61. Includes $104,100 special recreation use fees and costs at Black Butte Lake. 62. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries project). Includes State Highway Commission payment, $789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment through city of Chico. 63. Includes $41,984 contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities and salmon rearing habitat, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; $15,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; $350,500 contributed funds, other, from the City of Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte Lake; and $59,334 contributed funds, other from State of California for relocations. 64. Includes $343,965 contributed funds, other, costs for Black Butte hydropower studies; and $59,334 costs for relocations. 65. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction funds for Walnut Creek. 66. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction costs for Walnut Creek. 67. Includes $450,268 San Francisco required funds for Walnut Creek. 68. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required costs for Walnut Creek. 69. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed funds, other, and contributed funds costs for Walnut Creek. 70. Includes $1,666,000 contributed funds, other, from Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 71. Include $1,582,383 contributed funds, other, costs for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 72. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, and Tuolomne River Basin, California). (See Table 35-E). 73. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 74. Includes $80,000 contributed funds, other, and costs, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 35-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep 30, 1992 1 2 American and New Work Sacramento Rivers, Approp. - - - $1,600,000 $1,600,000 CA Cost - - - 1,177,627 1,177,627 Cache Creek Basin, New Work CA Approp. 293,000 269,000 - -13,000 2,067,336 Cost 356,775 309,365 11,842 -7,588 2,063,790 Caliente Creek, CA New Work Approp. 60,000 - - - 60,000 Cost 58,303 1,688 - 9 60,000 Coyote and Berryessa New Work Creeks, CA Approp. 714,000 535,000 1,160,000 885,000 3,394,000 Cost 357,290 695,054 1,066,409 835,620 3,018,658 Napa River, CA New Work Approp. 750,000 1,313,000 560,000 2,000,000 4,623,000 3 Cost 455,470 1,399,940 532,776 1,933,885 4,322,071 a Truckee Meadows, New Work NV Approp. 1,528,000 1,356,000 786,000 -307,000 3,803,000 Cost 1,105,270 1,600,783 818,804 67,736 3,772,970 Upper Jordan New Work River, CA Approp. - 200,000 525,000 375,000 1,100,000 Cost - 177,236 352,887 346,138 876,262 1. Beginning in FY 1982, Advance Engineering and Design (Preconstruction, Engineering and Design) programs are funded under General Investigations Appropriations. 2. Includes FY 1985 unobligated carryover and FY 1986 allocation for CP&E funds and all AE&D funds to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 3. Excludes $2,639,955 funds and costs for a previous flood control project on Napa River. (See Table 35-E.) 35-34 TABLE 35-B SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1987 8. Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 17, 1986 22. May 17, 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento. H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., works. 2d sess., and 48, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). For work above Sacramento. H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess. 1 The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento. H. Doc. 123, 69th Cong., 1st sess. A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa Rivers and Harbors and 5 feet between Colusa and Chico Landing Committee Doc. 35, at a cost of $390,000 provided flow of rivers 73d Cong., 2d sess. is increased to minimum flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Rivers and Harbors Federal Government of $12 million in cost Committee Doc. 35, of Shasta Reservoir. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., River, CA, to provide for construction of a ship 2d sess. channel 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. Deauthorization of shallow-draft channel, Colusa Sec. 1002, 1986 WRDA to Red Bluff, feature of project for navigation, Sacramento River, California. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as 2d sess. modified by Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to Sec. 204, 1966 Flood provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward Control Act. cost of Ross Valley unit. Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit Sec. 823, 1986 WRDA 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Further modify project to eliminate any channel modifications upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River 2d sess. and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial PL 404, 84th Cong., stage of project development. 2d sess. 35-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA 23. Dec. 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 May 12, 1967 Mar. 7, 1974 June 19, 1975 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., to provide for extensions in levees and other 2d sess. 2 structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct low-level Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. Improvements for protection of Upper Butte Basin H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., (included full monetary authorization). 1st sess. 2 Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning 2d sess. 2 area below dam and modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. Further modification of Sacramento River Flood S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., Control Project by construction of initial 10- year phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. Additional authorization of $7 million for bank PL 90-17 protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. Initiation of construction of second phase of bank PL 93-251 erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose. 3 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Reservoir. 4 Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see H. Doc. 1123, 60th Cong., 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 35-36 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, CA 1951 - $ 5,7521 2 Middle River and Connecting Channels, CA Completed 1974 $ 8,354 93,4944 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,1325 s6 Old River, CA Completed 1970 23,185 7 631,128 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA Completed 1970 253,151 8 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 200,928 10 11 3,316,62212 13 Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 217,677 733,48913 14 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 191,728 15 - 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for lands, damages and public landings. Remaining portion of project, consisting of side channel at Orwood and completion of project channels from mouth of Old River to Lammers Ferry road and from Crocker Cut to Holly Sugar Factory was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveras River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58,901 for previous project. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal year 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 35-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA Completed American River, CA Completed Aquatic Plant Control, CA Completed Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA Completed Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT Completed Burch Creek, Weber County, UT Chester, CA Active/no FY 92 expenditure Cottonwood Creek, CA Active/no FY 92 expenditure Coyote Creek, CA Completed Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA Completed East Weaver Creek, CA Completed Folsom Lake, American River, CA Completed Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA Completed Kays Creek, UT Completed Kern River-California Adqueduct Intertie, CA Completed Klamath River, CA Completed Lake Camanche, CA Completed Lake Oroville, CA Completed Lakeport Lake, CA Active/no FY 92 expenditure Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Completed Marysville Lake, CA Active/no FY 92 expenditure Merced River, CA Completed Middle Creek, CA Completed Mormon Slough, CA Completed Napa River Basin, CA Active/no FY 92 expenditure New Bullards Bar, CA Completed North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA Completed Pinole Creek, CA Completed Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Completed Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV Completed Rheem Creek, CA Completed Rodeo Creek, CA Completed Salinas River, CA Inactive Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT Completed San Leandro Creek, CA Completed San Lorenzo Creek, CA Completed San Lorenzo River, CA Completed Sevier River near Redmond, UT Completed Sonoma Creek, CA Inactive Truckee River and tributaries, Active/no FY 92 CA and NV expenditure 1978 1959 1967 1955 1961 1964 1981 1991 1968 1967 1965 1957 1963 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1976 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1974 1968 1970 1969 1962 1966 1952 1961 1973 1962 1966 1952 1973 1968 $26,995,350 2, 125,818 3 1,000 1,369,931 4 217,879 5 6 26,049 5 3,570,000 7 15,765,000 705,6221 5 664,825 5 220, 6361 59 63,014,81010 136,026 5 11 407,9895 12 1,503,073 5 13 4,838,000 1 10,252,950 14 70,425,470 15 2,353,003 18 27,835,263 17 - 18 10,918,796 19 2,643,49920 2,965,402 21 2,639,955 1 22 12,890,625 23 904,278 5 24 25 885,7501 5 4,620,070 1 28 133,339 5 27 400,000 1 5 28 974,100 1 5 94,213 1 29 1,227,57030 1,000,000 1 31 5,130,821 1 32 4,314,406 1 33 919,00034 781,500 1 35 1,038,960 35-38 $54,778 1 2 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 1. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 3. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 4. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 6. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. A fish ladder modification study was continued under sec. 1135 in FY 1992 at fiscal year cost of $40,624. 8. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 9. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 10. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 11. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 12. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocations. 13. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non-Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). 14. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $34,988,536. 15. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,105) for flood control reservation. 16. Lakeport Lake was deauthorized November 17, 1986, and was reauthorized November 17, 1988. 17.Cherry Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New Don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (nonproject) at local interest expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-of-way for levee and channel improvements on Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries. 18. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of Marysville project. 19. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District, Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 20. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 21. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (FY 1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 22. This project was reclassified as "active" on August 3, 1987. 23. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 24. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 25. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, and utility alterations. 26. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 27. Includes $19,000 for preauthorization studies. 28. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 29. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 (FY 1962 - 1963) to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 30. Estimated costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. Project prevented $370,000 in damages from the April-May 1992 snowmelt runoff. 31. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 32. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 33. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 (1951). Project prevented $372,000 in damages from the April-May 1992 snowmelt runoff. 35. Placed inactive 1974. 35-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 35-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Alhambra Creek, CA 1981 1986 $300,000 - Bear River, CA 1980 1986 - - Eel River, CA 1971 1986 1,272,816 - Gleason Creek, NV 1977 1986 215,826 - Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV 1982 1986 1,532,932 - Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 - - Mad River Basin, CA 1973 1986 4,243,750 - Spanish Fork River, UT 1955 1977 20,000 - Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 - (Morgan County) TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Range in Feet Miles from Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Mouth of Tidal 1 Tidal 2 Flood a Flood 4 Place River Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.0 2 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 2. Tide at low water season only. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. 35-40 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT 1 (See Section 4 of Text) Federal Non-Federal 2 Modification Corps of Engineers (Construction) Coast Guard (Construction) Required Cash Contribution Lands and Damages (including Relocations) Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,000 170,000 1,993,170 Total $5,833,117 $80,000 $1,342,500 $1,177,000 $2,519,500 $8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST (See Section 4 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineer Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff 1 $1,073,000 $30,000 $200,000 $230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel 2 5 7,882,0003 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement 4 5 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. 3. For lands and construction. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. 5. Deauthorized November 17, 1986. 35-41 Total Total Project REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 35-K MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA, MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 18 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c. f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (hourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns 1,830 120 1,260 Bear 2,530 230 1,060 Owens 440 130 90 Mariposa 2,530 1,890 650 TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 22 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $14,436,000 $5,598,000 $20,034,000 1 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake: Channel Improvements below Dam 259,500,000 103,117,0002 362,617,000 Total $273,936,000 $108,715,000 $382,651,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage to be paid over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of storage is initiated and exclusive of lands and damages. 35-42 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-M RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 22 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet- 122,500 $17,550,000 1 Mendocino) of Russian River Earthfill Channel Improvements (East Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 Fork) Fork below Coyote Valley Dam Guerneville Mile 0 to 98, Russian - - - and lower 98 miles of River Russian River) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet- 381,000 359,770,000 Earthfill Channel Improvements (Dry Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - 2,847,000 Creek) below Dry Creek Creek (Warm Springs Dam) 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 23 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal 1 Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek 2 Inactive $1,400,000 $340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin 3 Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomas Creek 2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek 2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees 4 Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees 4 Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin 2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). 4. July 1961 price level. 35-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 35-0 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 23 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total No major construction contracts in FY 92 TABLE 35-P FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 27 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Stage Cost (Federal) Antelope and Blackburn Creeks, CA 1 Reconnaissance 18,837 Bitter Creek at Rock Springs, WY 1 Feasibility 21 Burch and Jewett Creeks near Corning, CA Reconnaissance 17,897 Carson River below Lahontan Dam, Fallon, NV 1 Reconnaissance 545 City of Isleton, CA Reconnaissance 14,897 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO Feasibility 2,377 Colorado River at Riverside, CO 1 Reconnaissance 9,720 Cottonwood Creek near Walker Lake Community, NV 1 Reconnaissance 23,115 Elder and Unionhouse Creeks, CA 1 Reconnaissance 12,523 Henson Creek, Lake City, CO 1 Reconnaissance 4,359 Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA Reconnaissance 45,222 Mill Creek, City of Moab, UT Reconnaissance 57,982 Sacramento River, Tehama, CA 1 Reconnaissance 16,487 Salado Creek near Patterson, CA 1 Reconnaissance 8,769 Smithneck Creek, Loyalton, CA Reconnaissance 40,494 Thomas Creek, Reno, NV 1 Reconnaissance 48,034 West Antioch Creek, CA 1 Reconnaissance 3,000 $324,279 1. No further studies recommended. 35-44 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-Q SURVEYS (See Section 30 of Text) Fiscal year costs were as follows: Flood damage prevention studies $3,956,943 Required cost contributions 553,686 Non-Federal contributions (not required) 30,248 Sacramento-San Joaquin Rivers special study 512,004 Special investigations 115,000 Review of FERC licenses 39,906 Interagency Water Resources Development 51,000 American Waterfowl Management Plan 11,999 Coordination with Soil Conservation Service 3,000 Coordination with Bureau of Reclamation 9,000 Planning assistance to states 90,655 (California - $33,000, including Delta Water Stage study - $28,000)) (Colorado - $57,655) Total $5,373,441 35-45 PROJECTS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED UNDER THE FORMER CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION The California Debris Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into the Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. On November 19, 1986, the Commission was abolished by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and all authorities, powers, functions, and duties were transferred to the Secretary of the Army. All acquired lands and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission were authorized to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans ................ 35-1A 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA (debris control) ................... 35-2A 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA ...... 35-2A Flood Control 4. Sacramento River, CA .............. 35-3A Tables Table 35-AA Cost and Financial Page Statement ............... 35-5A Table 35-BB Authorizing Table 35-CC Table 35-DD Legislation .............. 35-7A Sacramento River, CA: Total Cost of Existing Project .... 35-8A Sacramento Urban Area Levee Restoration, CA New Work: Major Contracts and Fiscal Year Costs ... . 35-9A Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING' AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provided for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners were fully investigated by the former California Debris Commission and permits to operate were issued to those who provide satisfactory debris-restraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Government-constructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners bore all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the former 35-1A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The former Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L. Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. On March 1, 1984, Permit No. DACW05-4-79-527 was renewed for 5 years, was again renewed for 5 years on March 1, 1989, and will be effective until February 28, 1994. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105-eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $18,000 per year for the first 30 years (December 29, 1942 through December 28, 1972) and $48,000 per year between December 29, 1972, and December 28, 1992, in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1992, amounts to $1,470,393; these funds are now paid to the Secretary of the Army and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant was put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENC- 66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1992, amounts to $2,173,151. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $677,921, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies at Englebright Dam have been completed. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debris-control structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981 and were completed in FY 1987. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATION-RESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details 35-2A SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year,") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations consisted of condition and operation studies by hired labor; and bank protection, Yuba River, various locations upstream from Marysville completed by contract, $9,845. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic feet, are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 35-BB for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1987) cost for original project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $163,925,000 of which $68,925,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non-Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Estimated October 1992 total project cost is $250,639,000, of which $123,129,000 is Federal and $127,510,000 is non-Federal. Total estimate now includes remedial levee work for Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109); Colusa Basin Drain (Unit 132); Knights Landing Ridge Cut (Unit 127); Marysville/Yuba City Area levees; Mid-Valley Area; and Lower Sacramento Area (engineering and design only), but excludes Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 35-3A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Phase I - Sacramento River Flood Control System Evaluation recommended reconstruction of 32 miles of Sacramento area levees. Report was approved and in March 1989, Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. New project is located within boundaries of Sacramento River Flood Control System in highly urbanized area around city of Sacramento, near confluence of Sacramento and American Rivers. It includes Natomas area levees from Natomas Cross Canal Bypass through Reclamation District 900 and portions of the Yolo Bypass east levee in West Sacramento; and, in South Sacramento, the east bank of Sacramento River from Miller Park to town of Freeport. Estimated (October 1992) cost for Sacramento Urban project is $38,600,000 of which $22,700,000 is Federal and $15,900,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $1,920,000). Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District) (G.C.I.D.) is part of the fishery/irrigation enhancement project being developed by G.C.I.D. Project is located between River Mile 202 and 206 on Sacramento River near the Glenn-Tehama county line. The Corps riffle restoration project includes multiple weir structures in the river to restore river hydraulic gradient to pre-1970 conditions. This will stabilize river hydraulics. Estimated (October 1992) project cost is $8,200,000, of which $6,150,000 is Federal and $2,050,000 is non-Federal. Project was established under authority of the 1917 Sacramento River Flood Control Project (see Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1990). Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work. Local interest costs from required contributed funds for project work total $4,949,438 for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction: For major contracts and fiscal year costs, see Table 35-DD. (b) Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.): Engineering was initiated on riffle restoration on Sacramento River including building of multiple weir structures to restore river hydraulic gradient to pre-1970 conditions. Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947, 1948, 1949, and 1951. Yolo Bypass and Cache Slouth (Unit 109) was completed in 1990. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction, Colusa Basin Drain (Unit 132); Knights Landing Ridge Cut (Unit 127); Marysville/Yuba City Area levees; Mid-Valley Area; and Lower Sacramento Area. (See Table 35-CC for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1992.) 35-4A TABLE 35-AA SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (Debris Control) (Contributed Funds, Other) 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barriers, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 4. Sacramento River, CA including Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $821,325 821,325 - - - - 5,093,999 1 2 - - - - 5,093,999 1 2 $706,300 571,490 681,300 700,000 11,088,933 3 691,157 582,877 695,998 725,921 11,070,022 4 - - - - 12,420 - - - - 12,420 6 361,482 361,482 20,000 36,360 -16,325 5,257 14,700 2,000 1,813,0316 347 18,634 1,805,072 8 1,053,904 1,053,904 361,777 361,777 43,163 5,257 12,000 1,813,838 347 8,790 1,783,453 1,053,904 1,053,904 34,000 7 34,000 7 2,285,000 425,000 950,000 1,221,000 75,691,835 8 3,536,455 1,026,885 1,221,226 1,515,322 75,684,4538 - - - - 1,979,104 - - - - 1,979,104 - - - - 10,724,085 - - - - 10,724,085 9 - - - - 9,686 10 - - - - 9,686 10 1,200,000 3,600,000 10,663,000 3,371,000 18,834,000 - 2,478,099 5,005,372 8,823,196 16,306,668 35-5A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 35-AA (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 (Required New Work Contributed Contrib. - 390,000 1,000,300 514,900 1,905,200 Funds) Cost - 54,411 395,330 634,064 1,083,805 (Contributed New Work Funds, Other) Contrib. - 510,000 2,615,000 2,196,712 5,321,712 11 Cost - 10,559 929,456 2,227,152 3,167,168 11 Sacramento New Work River Flood Approp. - 493,000 500,000 300,000 1,293,000 12 Control Cost - 107,838 329,783 662,724 1,100,355 12 (G.C.I.D.), CA (Federal Funds) 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $477,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 appropriations and costs. 3. Includes $1,416,082 from regular funds and $9,672,851 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 4. Includes $9,653,940 from regular costs and $1,416,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 5. Funds from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float at Englebright Dam. 6. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 7. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 8. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 9. Includes $680,000 required contribution funds for previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 10. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 11. Includes contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocation of utilities, irrigation ditch, access ramps, and miscellaneous small structures in the Natomas, Greenhaven Pocket and West Sacramento areas. 12. Construction funds received in FY 1991, but no costs were incurred. Includes $493,000 total funds and costs under General Investigations for Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 35-6A TABLE 35-BB SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, 47th Cong., 1st sess. 1 (Amendment of sec. 13, Act of Mar. 1, 1893.)1 Mar. 1, 1893 Feb. 27, 1907 35-7A REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit hydraulic mining without construction of impounding works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rightsof- way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. Abolished the California Debris Commission and transferred all authorities, powers, functions, and duties to the Secretary of the Army. Authorized all acquired land and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. Sec. 1001, 1986 WRDA June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 35-BB (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Dec. 22, 1944 Additional levee construction and reconstruction, H. Doc. 649, 78th and May 17, 1950 including levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, Cong., 2d sess., and and multipurpose reservoirs. 2 367, 81st Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Bank protection and incidental channel improve- H. Doc. 272, 84th ments, Sacramento River from Chico Landing Cong., 2d sess. to Red Bluff, and local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing. 2 July 14, 1960 Bank protection works at critical locations, S. Doc. 103, 86th Sacramento River. 2 Cong., 2d sess. 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 23. Document 50, 74th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 35-CC SACRAMENTO RIVER CA: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $73,517,984 $1,979,104 $75,497,088 1 Public Works 1,486,469 - 1,486,469 Total U.S. 75,004,453 1,979,104 76,983,557 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 -- 5,104,333 Total All Funds 85,048,538 1,988,790 87,037,328 2 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plant purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 2. Excludes financial information for Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction and Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.) projects, both authorized under the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. (See Table 35-AA). 35-8A SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-DD SACRAMENTO URBAN AREA LEVEE RECONSTRUCTION, CA NEW WORK: MAJOR CONTRACTS AND FISCAL YEAR COSTS (See Section 4 of Text) Required Contributed Contributed Funds Item Federal Funds Other Total Greenhaven Pocket Phase II $2,050,488 $122,423 $ 551,442 $2,724,353 Repair Boil - Greenhaven Pocket Phase II 484,886 32,069 - 516,955 Natomas South 548,074 40,735 173,878 762,687 Natomas North 2,171,472 213,687 1,363,174 3,748,333 West Sacramento 522,380 280,158 53,790 856,328 Greenhaven Pocket Phase I 916,546 51,852 67,148 1,035,546 35-9A PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION The Pacific Ocean Division is an operating division with both district and division functions. Its civil works responsibilities encompass the State of Hawaii, the Territory of Guam, the Territory of American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The division is unique in that the area of responsibility is totally comprised of islands dispersed over an ocean environment exceeding 6 million square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii ....................... 2. Maalaea Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ........... 3. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... Erosion Control 5. Saipan Beach Road, CNMI, .............. 6. Sand Island Shore Protection Oahu, Hawaii ....................... . 7. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization .......................... Flood Control 8. 9. Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii .......... Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 10. Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia ........... Page General Investigations 11. Surveys ............................. 36-2 12. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 36-2 36-2 Tables Table 36-A 36-2 Table 36-B Table 36-C 36-2 Table 36-D 36-2 Table 36-E 36-3 Table 36-F Table 36-G Table 36-H 36-3 Table 36-I 36-3 Table 36-J Table 36-K 36-3 Page 36-4 36-4 Cost and Financial Statement .... 36-5 Authorizing Legislation .......... 36-6 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 36-7 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ......... 36-8 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 36-9 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ........... 36-10 Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 ................. 36-11 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 .......... 36-11 Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103 ......... 36-12 Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 .................. 36-12 36-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Navigation 1. KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. Kawaihae Harbor is located on the west coast of the island of Hawaii, approximately 85 nautical miles northeast of Hilo, County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-2 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) will be prepared during the plans and specifications phase. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. The estimated cost of preconstruction engineering and design (PED) is $408,000. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $153,136. Work included drafting of a limited reevaluation report to document the project rescoping process to reduce the harbor capacity from 300 to a 90-boat facility. A draft environmental assessment was completed in FY92 and submitted for public review. Plans and specifications were approximately 89% complete as of September 30, 1992. 2. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Maalaea Bay is situated on the southwest coast of Maui, approximately 7 miles south of Wailuku, the county seat of Maui. (See NOAA Chart 19350) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) will be prepared during the plans and specifications phase. Terminal facilities. There is an existing 1,000-foot long south breakwater, a 870-foot long east breakwater, 300-foot long wharf, 90-foot wide entrance channel, and a single lane launch ramp, all constructed by the State of Hawaii. Operations during fiscal year. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $233,505. Work continued on the Environmental Impact Statement currently scheduled for completion in early FY93. The plans and specifications phase was approximately 90% complete as of September 30, 1992. 3. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were conducted by the Portland District at Barbers Point Deep Draft Harbor, Oahu; Kaulapapa Landing, Molokai; Nawiliwili Deep Draft and Small Boat Harbors, Kauai; and Port Allen Harbor, Kauai; during March and April 1992 for $28,265. Surveys were also conducted in February 1992 at Aunuu and Ofu Harbors in American Samoa by the Portland District for $16,681. In addition, a contract survey was completed in August 1992 for $15,127 at Port Allen Harbor, Kauai. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). See Table 36-H. Beach Erosion Control 5. SAIPAN BEACH ROAD, CNMI Location. The study area is located on the western coast along the southern half of Saipan Island, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). See U.S. Defense Mapping Agency Hydrographic Map No. 81067) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY91 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-3 of the FY91 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in August 1991 and completed in May 1992 at a total cost of $176,000, all Federal funds. 6. SAND ISLAND SHORE PROTECTION, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Sand Island is located on the southern coast of Oahu. Sand Island is approximately 520 acres in area and shelters Honolulu Harbor from the open sea. It is connected to the Kapalama peninsula by a bascule bridge at its western end. There is approximately 4,700 feet of shoreline on the south side of the island adjacent to the State park. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4109) 36-2 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY89 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-4 of the FY88 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in September 1990 and completed in October 1991 at a total cost of $1,313,400 of which $1,226,486 were Federal funds and $726,532 were non-Federal funds. 7. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 (Preauthorization). See Table 36-I. Beach Erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). See Table 36-J. Flood Control 8. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. The Alenaio watershed is located in the South Hilo District on the island of Hawaii. Hilo is the principal urban center in the South Hilo district and the County seat for the County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 81408) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36--4 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on April 27, 1992. The local sponsor has agreed to: (a) provide during the period of construction, a cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs; (b) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations (excluding railroad bridges and approaches thereto) determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the Project; (c) provide during the period of construction, an additional cash contribution in the amount necessary to make its total contribution equal to 25 percent of the total project costs if the value of the contributions provided represents less than 25 percent of total project costs; (d) participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; (e) inform affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project no less than once each year; (f) publicize flood plain information in the area concerned and provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the flood plain and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary to prevent unwise future development and to ensure compatibility with protection levels provided by the project; (g) accept the project or functional portion and be solely responsible for operating, maintaining, repairing, replacing, and rehabilitating the project or functional portion. Terminal facilities. None Operations during fiscal year. Work in FY92 included continuing coordination with the local sponsor for land acquisition required for construction of the project. Work was also initiated for the investigation of possible Hazardous and Toxic Waste materials in an area of the project location. Plans and specifications were approximately 91% complete as of September 30, 1992. 9. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. (Preauthorization). See Table 36-K. Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 84-99. Federal cost during the fiscal year for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriation was $303,300 ofwhich $227,455 was for disaster preparedness, $68,634 for rehabilitation and $7,211 for emergency operations. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 10. NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA Location. Nanpil River is located on the island of Pohnpei in the Federated States of Micronesia (See State of Hawaii, the New Pacific map). Existing project. For a description of the existing project see page 36-4 of the FY85 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-5 of the FY85 Annual Report. Terminal Facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Modifications to the existing facility were completed, which included installation ofguardrails on the access road, construction of a sound suppression wall, and creation of additional storage space. A self cleaning trash rack at the intake structure will be constructed once installation of the necessary transmission lines are completed by the local government. A contract to provide training for the operation and maintenance of the project will continue through FY93. 36-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 General Investigations 11. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $534,601 of which $267,962 was for flood damage prevention studies; $2,486 for restudy of deferred projects; $100,003 for miscellaneous activities; and $164,150 for coordination with other agencies. 12. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206, PL 86-645,1960 Flood Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Non-Federal agencies are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas without charge. Beginning November 21, 1991, Federal agencies and private entities were also offered these services on a cost recovery basis. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance requirements, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and timing, floodwater velocity, extent of flooding, duration of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. Requests and responses for technical services and planning assistance totaled 3,560, which included services to Federal and non-Federal agencies, individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects and others. Costs for providing these services during the fiscal year were $200,139. Hydrologic Studies. Storm studies cost was $5,005. Total costs for collection and study of basic data during the fiscal year were $205,144. 36-4 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To In Text Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 Sept. 30, 1992 1. Kawaihae Small New Work: Boat Harbor, Approp. 170,000 156,000 260,000 130,000 716,000 Hawaii, HI Cost 149,759 175,904 237,196 153,136 715,995 (Federal Funds) 2. Maalaea Harbor New Work: Maui, HI Approp. 200,000 88,000 250,000 119,000 852,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 125,660 151,254 126,373 233,505 831,792 6. Sand Island Shore New Work: Protection, HI Approp. --- 10,000 1,110,900 20,000 1,313,400 (Federal Funds) Cost 177 -55 1,100,083 42,044 1,313,400 (Contributed Contrib. --- --- 1,219,833 6,653 1,226,486 Funds) Cost --- --- 1,199,735 26,751 1,226,486 8. Alenaio Stream, New Work: Hawaii, HI Approp. 96,000 358,000 265,000 256,000 1,275,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 261,384 259,599 276,943 344,714 1,250,028 10. Nanpil River New Work: Hydropower, Approp. --- 120,000 412,000 126,000 7,862,000 Pohnpei, FSM Cost 290,511 183,039 293,310 205,628 7,706,901 (Federal Funds) 36-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 2. Aug. 3, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Mar. 20, 1980 Dec. 8, 1983 KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII An 850-foot long, 120-foot wide, and 12-foot deep entrance channel; a 1.2 acre and 12-foot deep existing turning basin; a 640-foot long, 80-foot wide, and 8-foot deep access channel; a 1,225-foot long west protective revetstructure; a 1,050-foot long east protective revetted structure a 400-foot long wave absorber; and a 2.5 acre, 650-foot long revetted offshore island. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII A 620-foot long extension of the south breakwater, a new 610-foot length, 150 to 180-foot width, 12 to 15-foot depth entrance channel, a 1.7 acre and 12-foot depth turning basin and a 720-foot length, 80-foot width and an 8-foot deep access channel. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Project consists of approximately 1,640-feet of concrete-lined channel; floodproofing five individual structures, relocation of one public and six residential structures and incorporating floodplain management regulations for undeveloped areas. Modified by the General Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment dated March 1990, at a total cost of $12,060,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $7,730,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $4,330,000. NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, FSM Construction of a hydroelectric power facility. Appropriation of funds for a feasibility study and construction of a hydroelectric project. Sec 301, PL 89-298 Cong., 1st sess. Sec 101, PL 90-438 Cong., 2nd sess. Sec 401, PL 99-662 Sec 102, PL 101-640 Sec. 101, PL 96-205 Sec. 2, PL 98-213 36-6 8. 10. PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam Completed 1978 $ 937,7981 $ 52,555 Agat Harbor, Guam Completed 1989 2,000,000 2 Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,033,015 3 21,868 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,783,129' 278,007 Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1990 53,508,709 6 485,551 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1978 527,047 6 208,902 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1991 5,512,440 4,091,308 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1971 781,036 7 63,693 Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 16,044,095 8 2,777,972 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1976 751,867 g --- Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1984 7,203,22110 7,287,654 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1968 157,997 9 3,127 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Active 1990 171,400 --- Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1981 5,983,50111 61,800 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1956 3,348,00012 41,857 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Active 1981 193,000 --- Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1990 3,623,45013 Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Completed 1986 372,00014 495,256 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1987 2,127,72415 10,116,779 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1976 584,51316 30,707 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1976 980,01817 800,760 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1979 432,523 9--- Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1984 752,645 18 1,648,057 Rota Harbor, CNMI Completed 1985 2,000,00019 436,200 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI Active 1982 194,000 --- Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1985 1,991,569 20 546,600 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1979 1,940,01121 92,900 Welles Harbor, Midway Island Completed 1950 2,448,056 22 2,111 1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $282,474 for Construction. 2In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,239,364 for Construction. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $86,563 for Construction. 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $231,437 for Construction. 5In addition, Contributed Funds of $2,400,003 for Construction. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and Maintenance. 7In addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. 8In addition, Contributed Funds of $201,282 for Construction. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 10In addition, Contributed Funds of $30,200 for Construction. 11In addition, Contributed Funds of $62,102 for Construction. 12Abandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HI) 98, 89th Congress, 1st Session). 13Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $364,757 for Construction. 14In addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. 15In addition, Contributed Funds of $223,261 for Construction. 16Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction. "1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 for Construction. isIn addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construction. 1"Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $774,373 for Construction. 2 0Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $54,034 for Construction. 2 1In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. 2 2Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 36-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 $ 254,0151 $--- Asquiroga Bay, Guam Completed 1986 227,1812 --- Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 240,148 -- Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1976 176,488 4 --- Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1977 158,916 --- Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1981 999,996 --- Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1972 154,313' --- Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii Terminated 1982 355,4728 -- Lepua Area, American Samoa Completed 1992 1,513,678 g --- Masefau Bay, American Samoa Completed 1992 436,252 2 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa Completed 1984 225,000 2 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa Completed 1987 189,500 --- Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa Completed 1984 174,9412 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa Deferred 1978 394,18710 Poloa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 136,040 11--- Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1981 301,87912 Vatia Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 154,309 13 Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1979 729,08714 183,000 1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $209,549 in Contributed Funds. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3In addition, $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $97,075 in Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $56,916 in Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed funds. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. 8Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. In addition, $177,300 in Contributed Funds. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $381,727 in Constibuted Funds. 10Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $312,480 in Contributed Funds. 11Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $101,547 in Contributed Funds. 1 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $255,728 in Contributed Funds. 13Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $132,075 in Contributed Funds 14In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Contributed Funds. 36-8 TABLE 36-E PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana River, Guam Inactive 1989 $ 250,000 $ --- Asan Village, Guam Completed 1986 1,275,500 --- Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 784,8671 _ Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1985 12,285,000 28,239 Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1990 3,910,0002 --- Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1990 10,665,758 s --- Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 25,552,400 --- Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1950 73,478 s Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,567 --- Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,000 --- Namo River, Guam Completed 1982 2,416,314 5 --- Paauau Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1985 1,978,514 --- Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1966 1,044,888 --- lIn addition, $11,953 in Contributed Funds. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $459,001 in Contributed Funds. 3In addition, $518,272 in Contributed Funds. 4 Includes Non-Federal reimbursement of recreation construction cost of $5,668,300. In addition, $8,175 in Contributed Funds. sAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $540,335 in Contributed Funds. 36-9 36-10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 36-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 November 1986 $ 40,117 PL 99-662 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1967 November 1977 HD #94-413 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1967 November 1981 HD #97-59 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii 1965 November 1986 PL 99-662 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1972 January 1990 1,481 PL 99-662 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1967 January 1990 PL 99-662 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii 1975 July 1981 86,235- Director of Civil Works Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, 1979 July 1981 221,500 Molokai, Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, 1966 January 1990 133,188 292,441 Molokai, Hawaii PL 99-662 Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor, --- January 1990 Molokai, Hawaii PL 99-662 Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 September 1975 98,800 Director of Civil Works Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1977 January 1990 186,937 PL 99-662 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, 1972 January 1990 30,378 Oahu, Hawaii PL 99-662 Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii --- January 1990 PL 99-662 Rainmaker Hotel, American Samoa --- November 1991 PL 99-662 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii 1967 January 1990 PL 99-662 Saipan Harbor, Northern Marianas --- November 1991 PL 99-662 1J J i TABLE 36-G (Cont'd) PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for:. Authority Expended Expended Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam --- August 1981 80,764 Director of Civil Works Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii --- November 1986 PL 99-662 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island 1950 November 1986 PL 99-662 TABLE 36-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Apra Harbor, Guam $ 649 Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 30,574 Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii 20,000 Mahukona (North Kohala), Hawaii, Hawaii 91,004 TOTAL $142,227 TABLE 36-I EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Alii Drive, Hawaii, Hawaii $ 39,568 Haaula Highway, Oahu, Hawaii 31,947 Inarajan Shoreline, Guam 1,862 Kaaawa Highway, Oahu, Hawaii 31,136 Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa 30,670 Launiupoko, Maui, Hawaii 51,130 Ofu Airstrip (West End) American Samoa 14,573 Punaluu Highway, Oahu, Hawaii 27,990 South Agat (Route 2), Guam 5,340 Umatac Shoreline, Guam 3,106 TOTAL $237,322 36-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 364J BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Canneries to Breakers Point, American Samoa $ 3,027 Lauliituai-Aumi, American Samoa 3,027 Nua-Amaluia, American Samoa 3,027 TOTAL $9,081 TABLE 36-K FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Agana Bayfront, Guam $ 34,865 Commercial Port Road, Guam 68,002 East Agana, Guam 110,852 Kaelepulu Stream, Oahu, Hawaii 12,356 Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii 393 Wailele Stream, Oahu, Hawaii 27,596 Waihanau Stream, Molokai, Hawaii 5,005 Total $259,069 36-12 PORTLAND, OR DISTRICT* The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA ............................. 37-2 2. Chetco River, OR ........................ 37-2 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ........... 37-2 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA ........... 37-3 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island ....................... 37-4 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA ... 37-4 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR ................... 37-4 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR ............................ 37-5 9. Coos Bay, OR ............................ 37-5 10. Coquille River, OR ....................... 37-6 11. Depoe Bay, OR .......................... 37-6 12. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization . 37-6 13. Port Orfor d, OR ......................... 37-6 14. Project Condition Surveys ................... 37-7 15. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR ...... 37-7 16. Siuslaw River, OR ......................... 37-7 17. Skipanon Channel, OR ................... 37-8 18. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR ................ 37-8 19. Tongue Point, OR ......................... 37-8 20. Umpqua River, OR ....................... 37-9 21. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR ..... 37-9 22. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR .............. 37-10 Flood Control 23. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ..... 37-10 24. Blue River Lake, OR .................... 37-11 25. Cottage Grove Lake, OR ............... 37-11 26. Dorena Lake, OR ..................... 37-11 27. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ..... 37-11 28. Fall Creek Lake, OR ...................... 37-12 29. Fern Ridge Lake, OR .................. .. 37-13 30. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... 37-13 31. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 37-13 32. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA. .......................... 37-13 33. Mill Creek, Salem, OR ................... .37-14 34. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA ....... 37-14 Page 35. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 37-14 36. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR . 37-14 37. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR .......... 37-15 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 38. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and WA. ............. 37-15 39. Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Dredging, OR and WA ............................. 37-16 40. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (The Dalles Project), OR and WA... 37-16 41. Cougar Lake, OR ...................... 37-17 42. Detroit Lake- Big Cliff, OR .............. 37-17 43. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ........... 37-17 44. Hills Creek Lake, OR ................... 37-18 45. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA ................ 37-18 46. Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR ......... 37-19 47. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR .... 37-19 48. The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lake Celilo, WA and OR ................ 37-20 General Investigations 49. Surveys ............................... 50. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 51. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ..... 37-21 37-21 37-21 Tables Table 37-A Cost & Financial Statement ....... 37-22 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 37-29 Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 37-36 Table 37-D Not Applicable Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 37-37 Table 37-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ......... 37-39 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects ........... 37-40 Table 37-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ................. 37-41 Table 37-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................... 37-41 37-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Table 37-J Project Condition Surveys ......... 37-41 Table 37-K Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks ................. 37-42 Table 37-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. 37-42 Table 37-M Flood Control Reservoir Operations 37-43 Table 37-N Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock Spillway Dam and Powerplant 37-43 Navigation 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 40 miles east of Portland, OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over the sill. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88, August 15, 1985. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent of the project cost in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. The new lock chamber will be 86 feet wide and 675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. Estimated cost for construction of the new navigation lock is $341,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the lock structure, electrical control systems and switchgear continued. Contract for fabrication of the floating guidewall was awarded. 2. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification of 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction of jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was completed in March 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 27,802 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina. The channel flusher Sandwick spent 5 days working at the project. 3. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, and 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington.) Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 41 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from the mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens, (Oregon); and 30 feet deep and 500 37-2 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended to its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth of Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver, about 3 feet at low stage of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver, they average about 12 feet, while highest know reached a stage of 33 feet above water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May- June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette river and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift-on-liftoff and roll-on-roll-off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the West Coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement, and steel products. At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll-on-roll-off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details, see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance continued through the year. A total of 4,876,355 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 2,170,551 cubic yards, the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 414,114 cubic yards, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed 2,211,150 cubic yards, and the contract dredge Newport removed 80,540 cubic yards. The channel flusher Sandwick spent 34 days working at the project. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948, Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, was finished December 1957, and again, deepening of the west channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 107, finished the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fish- 37-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 ing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing Project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook; a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract clamshell dredge DB Hawk removed 91,000 cubic yards. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Section 4. Existing project. Provides for a one-half- mile-wide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A" is about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A") was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 1984. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 5,129,304 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 4,229,959 cubic yards of material, and the contract dredge Newport removed 899,345 cubic yards. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, See Section 4, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present 37-4 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 16 feet, which is adequate for using traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government Island completed 1985 under section 107. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, Wa, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of papermill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There is a one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800- bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about threefourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and barges. At numerous locations along the entire waterway there are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 48,963 cubic yards of material. 8. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Location. The memorial will be located at Point Adams, in the City of Warrenton, OR, at River Mile 8.5 on the Columbia River approximately 50 yards off shore and adjacent to an existing Corps of Engineers pile dike. Existing project. None. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) with the local sponsor, City of Warrenton, OR, is being developed. This LCA will require the sponsor to pay for all costs above the authorized $150,000 for engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a support structure to serve as the foundation for the Seafarers Memorial. In addition, the sponsor is providing the statue for which the foundation structure is being built. Operations during fiscal year. All work has been suspended until the LCA has been approved by all parties and the local sponsor has raised sufficient funds for purchase of the statue and any costs above the $150,000 limit for the support structure. 9. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high- tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance of Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and smallboat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1989. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 to Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300,576, and 500-foot frontages, respectively. In the North Spit industrial area, there is one woodchip loading facility having a frontage of 1200 feet and a smaller T-dock operated by the Port of Coos Bay. 37-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. A barge slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat basins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port series No. 33, Corps of Engineers, published in 1975.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 1,394,391 cubic yards of material was removed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 322,890 cubic yards, the U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 571,501 cubic yards, and the contract clamshell dredge Super Scoop removed 500,000 cubic yards. The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced sand from shoal areas in Charleston entrance channel. 10. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high- tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. Port of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction with protective breakwater and entrance channel construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) A plan to deepen the entrance channel of the Coquille River from 13 feet to 18 feet was approved in May 1988. Construction is planned for FY 93. Local cooperation. None required. However, restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwise vessels, a publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 93,732 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. 11. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modifications, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, was accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Monitored the concrete retaining wall for deterioration. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization): Construction of a channel and turning basin at Tongue Point, OR is discussed in Section 19. Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See Table 37-I for expenditures under Section 107 during the fiscal year. Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-433 (preauthorization): Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See Table 37-I for expenditures under Section 111 during the fiscal year. 13. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR) 37-6 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 55-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October, 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. Expansion of the dock structure to 210 x 220 feet is complete. The installation of the second hydraulic crane was completed in FY 1986. About 150 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During the summer months the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 41 days, and the contract dredge Kerr removed 587 cubic yards. 14. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted during the fiscal year at a cost of $121,024; (See Table 37-J). 15. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon; flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water nd mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered Unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. In 1985, three pile dikes, located on the south side of channel oceanward of the boat basin entrance, were completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 111,188 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 32,747 cubic yards, and the contract dredge Nehalem removed 78,441 cubic yards. The channel flusher Sandwick spent 20 days working at the project. 16. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 19583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 17 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. (For details relating to previous project, see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty modifications were completed in FY 85. Modifications provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originate approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. Work on the extension of the north and south jetties was completed on 31 December 1986. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing 37-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Modern docks for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by the Davison Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 244,344 cubic yards of material. 17. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 7 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to pubic on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use by a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility for chips and lumber. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A condition survey was performed. 18. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alignment extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956 and small-boat basin in 1958. Rehabilitation of the north jetty was completed in 1965. South jetty construction was initiated in 1969, extended in 1974, and completed to the authorized 8,000 feet in 1978. 18 foot channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections performed. 19. TONGUE POINT, OR Location. The northwest corner of Oregon at river mile 18 on the Columbia River, five miles east of the city of Astoria, OR. Existing Project. Tongue Point is located adjacent to the congressionally authorized Columbia River 40-foot deepdraft navigation channel. The harbor and port facilities were first developed in the 1930's as a U.S. naval base. After World War II, the site served as a temporary berthing area. The improvements, however, have not been actively maintained for 25 years. The State of Oregon obtained the majority of the port development in 1980 from the Federal Government, including five finger piers. The remaining acres and three finger piers are still Federally owned and used by the U.S. Department of Commerce as a Job Corps Center and the U.S. Coast Guard as a lifeboat station. Construction of a 34-foot deep by 350-foot wide channel 1.75 miles long from the existing Columbia River channel to Tongue Point docks was authorized in July 1989 under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. A 25-foot deep (mllw)by 37-8 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 1,050-foot wide turning basin was also constructed and is located near the piers.The cost for preparation of the plans and specifications and construction of the project was $4,293,103, of which $2,576,117 was Federal and $1,716,986 non-federal. The non-federal cost includes $19,159 for inkind services. Local cooperation. The State of Oregon, acting through the Division of State Lands, was the non-federal sponsor. Terminal facilities. The State of Oregon owns five 30-foot wide concrete finger piers between 1,300 and 1,500 feet long. The site is served by a 12-inch water main, and electricity and sewage lines also exist at the site. Additional development of these existing port facilities, which will facilitate the movement of an estimated 225,000 automobiles annually, is the responsibility of the local sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was fiscally completed. 20. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed in 1984. Project was modified in 1951 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August, 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 285,043 cubic yards of material. The channel flusher Sandwick worked 12 days at the entrance channel to Winchester Bay. 21. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETITE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Canal and locks were originally constructed by private interest in 1873 and were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in the Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. The project includes four locks a canal basin and an extra guard lock used to prevent flooding when river levels are high. The system acts as a fluid staircase between the upper and lower reaches of the Willamette River. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 37-K. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Until the 1940's, the gates were opened manually. Now, the gates are operated by hydraulic pumps controlled by switches in two control stations with the aid of closed-circuit television and radio communication. All the gates have been replaced under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in good condition and in continuous operation. New service building was completed in 1988 costing $523,000. The project was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1974, and was established as an Oregon Civil Engineering Landmark in 1991. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. James River Paper has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and shipping paper and paper products. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance performed. 37-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 22. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Yaquina Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1978 and again in 1988. (For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annul Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage of 120 boats, is completed. A swing hoist with 3- ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 321,652 cubic yards, and the contract dredge Nehalem removed 21,104 cubic yards of material. Monitored the north jetty for deterioration. 23. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate- controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities were provided by the Corps of Engineers with operation and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of agreement. Project is complete and operating. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. 37-10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 24. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chutetype spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-and-gravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board made an application on April 1982 for permit to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 37-M. 25. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. ON Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate- controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at five sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work continued. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 26. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigational and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since Sept. 1976. It includes 4 projects and 14 parks. At Dorena Lake, 6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane County under a lease agreement. Future recreation development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 37-M. 27. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Construction work for the 249-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam has been stopped due to a court injunction. The project would control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles, and provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of roads and 37-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 the main dam structure and outlet works to elevation 1563 (approximately 1/3 proposed height). All lands for the project have been acquired with the exception of the clearing of water rights for a seemingly abandoned irrigation canal which originates within the project boundaries. Environmental statements were filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement No. 1 addressing water quality and social/demographic information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. Estimated federal cost of project is $174,000,000. In October 1985, the Corps was advised by Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC), an environmental group, they intended to file suit against the government to halt construction of Elk Creek, on specific environmental issues. A hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction was scheduled before Oregon Federal District Court December 16, 1986. On that date, the Court refused to grant the injunction to halt construction and bids were opened and the contract subsequently awarded to Ohbayashi Corp. An appeal was filed by ONRC in March, 1986 and heard by the 9th Circuit Court in July, 1986. On June 23, 1987, the Circuit Court reversed the decision of the District Court and returned the case to the District Court for appropriate injunctive relief. The resulting District court order issued in August and September 1987 allowed construction of the dam to El. 1563 ft. (approximately 1/3 the height of the dam), backfilling of the foundation key trench, aggregate processing, quarry restoration, and other miscellaneous work. The construction of the main dam to elevation 1563 was reached in mid-January 1988. The Department of Justice petitioned the 9th Circuit Court for a rehearing. On December 10, 1987 the 9th Circuit Court rejected the petition for a rehearing, requiring the termination of the existing main dam and reservoir clearing contracts. The Department of Justice petitioned with the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of the decisions made by the 9th Circuit Court. The hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court was held May 1, 1989. The U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case back for injunctive relief. In September 1989, the District Court was requested by the Corps to remand the case back to the Corps for preparation of a supplemental EIS. To lift the injunction against the dam a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EISS) has been prepared to address cumulative effects. Additional studies have been conducted in water temperature and turbidity, and fish and wildlife. The EISS identified a preferred interim operating alternative of operating the project without a conservation pool. The reservoir would only temporarily store water during flood control operations. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain a minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities require a local sponsor willing to cost share in recreation development and assume operations and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance during the construction phase of the project, fishery evaluation studies, and water quality analysis. 28. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Bethel School District. Bethel School District has a subagreement with the Springfield Kiwanis Club for management of this facility. The Corps manages one park at the project. Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork, Willamette River, are shown in Table 37-M. 29. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane county, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was 37-12 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane county, and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Three parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreements. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water for migratory water fowl under a lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 37-M. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization): Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See Table 37-L for expenditures under Section 205 during the fiscal year. Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended (preauthorization): Construction of a bank protection project at Mill Creek, OR is discussed in Section 34. Feasibility and reconnaissance studies continued. See Table 37-L for expenditures under Section 14 during the fiscal year. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation: Federal costs for the fiscal year were: $343,828 for disaster preparedness; $3,513 for emergency operations; $33,626 for rehabilitation of non-federal flood control works and field investigations; and $7,906 for advance measures associated with the Mt. St. Helens recovery effort. National Emergency Preparedness Program fiscal year costs were $193,813. Project modification for the improvement of the environment pursuant to Section 1135 (b), Public Law 99-362 as amended: A feasibility study continued at Fern Ridge Lake, OR. See Table 37-L for expenditures under Section 1135 during the fiscal year. 31. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. A total of 68 leveed areas and 262 bank protection works are inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin are supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Of the 68 levee areas inspected during the fiscal year, one was reported deficient in maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $154,787. 32. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. A total of 191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $25,600,000. Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Local Interests will also be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each site. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $1,500,000. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of coordination with sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. 37-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 33. MILL CREEK, SALEM, OR Location. On the right bank of Mill Creek at the southeast fringe of the city of Salem, Oregon, near the junction of Interstate Highway 5 and State Highway 22. Mill Creek confluence with Willamette River is about 3.7 miles downstream of the project. Existing project. Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. This authority allows construction of emergency bank protection to prevent flood damage to public works. Project consists of construction of three riprap groins along the upstream and middle portion of the eroding bankline, excavation of a portion of land area downstream of the groins, and extending the existing riprap revetment 250 linear feet upstream to the groins. This action will prevent the outflanking of the right abutment of Hawthorne Avenue Bridge and provide acceptable flow alignment to the bridge. The cost for preparation of the plans and specifications and construction of the project was $205,471, of which $154,103 was Federal and $51,368 non-federal. The non-federal cost includes cash contributions of $31,031 and the value of $20,337 for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRD). Local cooperation. The City of Salem, Oregon, the nonfederal sponsor, provided lands, easements and rights-ofway. In addition, the City of Salem participated financially in accordance with the cost sharing requirements of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Final project costs and non-federal credit for the value of the LERRD was determined. 34. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems impacted by the project include Toutle, Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the problems reside in the communities of Longview, Kelso, Lexington, and Castle Rock, Washington. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88, 99th Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization "..to. construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention structure near the confluence of the Toutle and Green River, Washington, with such design features and associated downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 1984." The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Decision document recommended construction of a single sediment retention structure (SRS) with a 125- foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. Local cooperation. Local interests were responsible for provision of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, and levee improvements. Local interests were also responsible for all alterations and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites are the responsibility of local interests. Cowlitz County offers visitor services in their viewpoint area. Non-federal cash contribution is $3,690,000 and the estimated non-federal land, easements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are $21,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work on the Sediment Retention Structure was substantially completed with some follow-on work remaining. The fish collection facility is completed and is operated by the State of Washington. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. 35. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at five Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, Scoggins, and Galesville) and one municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light (Mossyrock). The Bureau of Reclamation projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. Monitoring of Mossyrock flood control operation is assigned to the Corps by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the Mossyrock license calls for specific flood control regulation. The five Bureau of Reclamation projects and Mossyrock project were operated during the fiscal year within the flood control regulations specified for each project. Total cost of monitoring the six projects during the fiscal year was $6,770. 36. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $30,700,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of 489,795 linear feet of bank protection 37-14 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 and Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $2,300,000. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: continued coordination and evaluation of local erosion problems. 37. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs (cubic feet per second), an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acrefeet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre- feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has leased recreation facilities at Willow Creek Lake. A courtesy handling dock was constructed by the Recreation District utilizing Oregon State Marine Board funds. A playfield area below the dam has been leased to the City of Heppner. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provisions of the Clear Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. A Local Cost Agreement (LCA) is being developed for construction of recreation facilities with the Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District. Operations during fiscal year. New work: LCA development and plans and specifications preparation by local sponsor for recreation facilities. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 38. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River, see Section 4. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Cascade island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 verticallift steel gates, 10 with remote control hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway provides access, and two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of one unit of 48,000 kilowatts, one unit of 59,500 kilowatts, and eight units of 60,000 kilowatts each, totaling 587,500 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough Channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and powerhouses are founded on andesite, and main dam rests on solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 27 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock, spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-N. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest-Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provided for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,145.7 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Admini- 37-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 stration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1943. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse is near completion. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 1,500,000 project wide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) is an integral part of that structure. The total cost for construction of the second powerhouse is $681,000,000. The first powerhouse, spillway, navigation lock and associated facilities have been designated as a National Historic District. A cost sharing agreement between The Corps and Skamania County has been finalized. Development of recreation facilities at Home Valley was completed in FY 89. Through September 1992, power generation totaled 220.6 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $462,365,155 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for non-Federal cost-sharing for development of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Development of a design continued for correction of deficiencies of juvenile fish guidance efficiency at the second powerhouse to reduce fingerling mortality incurred during annual downstream migration. Development of a portion of Steigerwald Lake for mitigation continued. Additional investigations to determine the scope of necessary environmental cleanup actions for Hamilton Island were conducted. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Evaluation Reports for the first powerhouse transformers, switchgear, and main units rehabilitation were completed. Routine operation and maintenance was performed with enhanced maintenance on the turbines. During the fiscal year 4,147,170,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 4,116,043,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. 39. COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVERS PORTS DREDGING, OR & WA Location. On the Columbia River from Bonneville Dam to McNary Dam Existing project. On a one-time basis, at full Federal expense, and without requirement of local sponsorship, maintain navigation access to, and berthing areas at, all currently operating public and private commercial dock facilities associated with the Federal navigation project on the Columbia River from Bonneville Dam to Umatilla, Oregon, at a depth commensurate with the Federal navigation project, and the Federal Government is exempted from any liability due to public and private facilities including docks adjacent to the access channels and berthing areas resulting from this maintenance. Sites identified for dredging under this authorization included recreational channels at Wind River, Mayer State Park, and Rock Creek State Park; recreational boat basins at The Dalles, Cascade Locks, and Bingen; commercial docks at Port of Morrow, Stevenson Co-Ply, Mt. Adams, Hood River Inn, Rock Creek Cove, SD&S, Mountain Fir, Bernert, Cargill, Biggs, and Roosevelt; commercial log storage facilities at Wind River, SD&S, and Government Cove; commercial channels at Hood River, McNary, Port of Skamania, Herman Creek, and Little White Salmon. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Four dredging contracts were awarded and the U.S. channel flusher Sandwick utilized for 10 days to perform the required work. A total of 419,000 cubic yards of material was removed from 25 sites. 40. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM (The Dalles Project), OR AND WA Location. The Dalles Dam on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. This program encompasses work at five other locations within Walla Walla District as well as The Dalles Dam within the Portland District. Existing Project. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 89 Energy and Water Development Act (P. L. 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of approximately $25 million for the design, testing, and construction of fish bypass facilities. Funds for FY 88, 89, and 90 were expended on a project by project basis. However, the mitigation program starting in FY 91 is to be considered one project and funds will be appropriated and expended as such. The program will consist of juvenile fish mitigation facilities and a detailed mitigation study to be prepared in cooperation with regional interests, for juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the fish mitigation facilities for the Columbia and Snake River dams in the Portland and Walla Walla Districts. The plan of improvement at The Dalles Dam includes submerged extended fish screens and bypass system and a crane and maintenance facility. The total estimated Federal cost for work at The Dalles Dam is $101,500,000. 37-16 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Local Cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on the General Design Memorandum for the juvenile bypass system and for design and procurement of prototype extended length fish screens and other testing equipment. 41. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1992 power generation totaled 3.7 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville power Administration, $20,731,873 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of Strube lake and Cougar Additional Unit is $114,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 118,830,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 118,057,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-M. 42. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 40 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate- controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed online June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1992 power generation totaled 19.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $66,011,950 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 362,501,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 359,484,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 43. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gatecontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y- shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. 37-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power- generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1992 power generation totaled 8.6 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $51,133,988 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Future recreation development at Foster or Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation facilities at Foster Lake includes 4 parks and 2 parks at Green Peter Lake. Five of these parks were developed by the Corps and are operated by Linn county under lease agreement. One park is operated by the Corps. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During the fiscal year 271,991,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 269,581,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 44. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from Lookout Point. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Through September 1992, power generation totaled 4.7 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $20,409,081 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 119,529,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 118,944,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 45. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acrefeet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acre-feet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 37-N. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete. Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 was completed in FY 1986. Entire project is estimated to be 99 percent complete. Through September 1992 power generation totaled 249.0 billion kilowatt-hour. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $337,591,745 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. 37-18 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Estimated Federal cost of new work is $513,168,000, consisting of $512,835,000 Corps of Engineers and $333,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids. Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 5 parks are operated and maintained by local agencies under lease agreement with the Corps. Six developed recreation areas are operated and maintained by the Corps of Engineers. Any future recreation development will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work continued on modifications to the fish bypass system. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 8,792,280,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 8,774,750,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Rehabilitation: Work continued on refurbishment of one generator winding and rebuilding (to strengthen) one turbine, installation of the new control system to increase reliability and ease of operation of the powerhouse, and on the station service improvement contract which will allow black start up of the powerhouse. Final major contract for rewinding of 5 generators was awarded. 46. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of mainstem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel- fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide- gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the costsharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1,2, and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on- line May 1955. Dexter was placed in operation for reregulation in December 1954. Through September 1992 power generation totaled 15.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $70,881,547 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All these parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Recreation opportunities are provided at 2 parks on Dexter Lake which are operated by Lane County via the multi-project cost-sharing agreement and lease instruments. The north shore of Lookout Point Lake is also:leased to Lane County for recreation purposes; there is essentially no development. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Studies to rewind/uprate the generators continued. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 285,046,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 283,217,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 47. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On Upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gate-controlled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility was provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. 37-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Recreation opportunities are provided by 4 parks at the project. The State of Oregon operates 2 parks, including a 200 unit campground, part of Stewart State Park. Through September 1992, power generation totaled 4.2 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $25,165,074 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Cole M. Rivers Fish Hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides full funding for the operation and maintenance of the hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 193,193,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated by the project of which 190,414,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. 48. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially with substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fish-water units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. The total generating capacity is 1,806,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 37-N. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks on Lake Celilo. These parks were further expanded with code 710 funds in the late 60's and early 70's. Two parks are operated by Washington State Park Commission under a lease agreement. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. However, it was determined that it was not within the Chief of Engineer's authority to add these power facilities. A local interest, North Wasco County Public Utility District pursued the construction of these power facilities through the FERC license processes and awarded a construction contract in September 1989. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. Through September 1992, power generation totaled 250.0 billion kilowatthours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $329,601,002 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Further recreation development will require cost sharing and assumption of operation and maintenance by local, non-federal sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design activities associated with preparation of a general design memorandum for juvenile fish bypass facilities continued. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Studies to rehabilitate the fishwater generators and generating units 1-22 are continuing. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 6,901,235,000 kilowatthours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 6,883,894,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. 37-20 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT General Investigations 49. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $919,005 of which $180,526 was for navigation studies, $578,460 for flood damage prevention studies, $0 for comprehensive studies, $131,639 for miscellaneous activities, and $28,380 for coordination with other agencies. Contributed funds in the amount of $28,485 were expended of which $27,419 was contributed by the International Port of Coos Bay for the Coos Bay navigation study and $1,066 was contributed by the State of Oregon for a dredged material disposal study. 50. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non- Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished totaled 724. Fiscal year costs totaling $110,443 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program: FPMS Unit $20,425; Technical Services $75,248; Quick Responses $4,834; and a special study for Portland Metro $9,936. Contributed funds in the amount of $4,198 were expended for technical services. 51. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Columbia River Treaty Fishing Access Sites, OR and WA The authorized plan includes land management, acquisition, and river access facility development for Indian tribes who exercise treaty fishing rights on the Columbia River, Oregon and Washington. Public Law 100-581 Title IV designates 21 sites on Bonneville, The Dalles, and John Day pools for treaty fishing use and authorizes the acquisition of 6 additional sites on Bonneville pool from willing sellers. The law specifies the construction of access roads, boat ramps, dock sanitation, fish cleaning facilities, and others at these locations and provides additional authority for facility improvements at five sites currently administered for treaty fishing access resulting from construction of Bonneville Dam. Fiscal year work consisted of completion of the Phase I Evaluation Report. Fiscal year expenditures were $505,981. 37-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 to In Text Sep.30, 1992 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (Federal Funds) (Inland Waterway Trust Fund) 2. Chetco River, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles OR 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 24,150,000 19,298,000 38,949,000 32,440,000 14,050,665 29,331,438 38,867,937 32,423,462 24,150,000 19,298,000 38,949,000 32,440,000 12,732,518 30,987,600 38,864,327 32,417,676 132,000 382,047 489,000 342,000 129,856 373,100 500,675 341,065 12,630,000 8,928,540 10,496,000 10,887,000 13,065,333 8,844,097 10,588,846 10,888,793 515,000 60,902 516,034 54,872 34,000 38,263 16,000 16,528 554,000 53,064 250,000 256,000 631,348 51,247 249,278 258,564 8,201,000 6,386,150 6,410,000 7,774,000 8,207,278 6,183,847 6,571,092 7,761,894 201,000 281,411 315,000 208,000 201,199 256,750 335,274 206,931 50,000 36,226 16,000 15,798 37-22 149,389,30761 149,036,053'1 149,389,000 149,133,327 2,043,713' 2,043,713' 7,095,673 7,094,652 28,349,3042 28,349,3042 303,222,2963 303,204,4643 665,9544 665,9544 941,252 941,252 3,991,087 3,989,607 220,2836 220,2836 5,916,877 5,916,861 24,913,661 24,913,6616 127,317,6497 127,252,3387 7,322,878 7,322,878 5,989,509* 5,989,509* 12,952,3599 12,941,253* 66,000 52,024 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 to In Text Sep.30, 1992 9. Coos Bay, OR New Work (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Coquille River, OR 11. Depoe Bay, OR 13. Port Orford, OR 15. Rogue River Harbor At Gold Beach, OR 16. Siuslaw River, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 10,584,000 2,990,266 4,776,500 3,595,000 10,573,892 2,934,530 4,777,143 3,630,859 114,000 204,043 129,841 188,056 140,000 7,841 134,729 11,114 189,000 227,888 188,579 227,326 511,000 638,000 525,445 636,419 7,000 7,743 7,000 5,418 237,000 290,000 235,425 281,764 705,000 592,874 1,025,000 944,000 708,632 565,743 1,050,034 929,545 353,000 473,285 884,000 781,000 374,215 452,345 896,203 789,737 29,750,0920 29,750,09210 88,843,718" 88,791,12211 2,335,966 2,335,966 486,680 486,680 693,366'13 693,366'13 7,047,98714 7,043,97014 367,364 367,364 954,717 949,582 758,692' 758,6921' 3,890,217 3,878,690 4,156,252'* 4,156,252' 13,127,39417 13,110,3447 635,783 635,783 29,502,21218 29,502,21218 14,137,3841* 14,135,433' 879,285 879,285 493,611 493,611 37-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 to In Text Sep.30, 1992 17. Skipanon Channel, New Work 18. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR 19. Tongue Point, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Umpqua River, OR 21. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 22. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 23. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin OR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 224,000 120,050 224,676 119,727 9,000 3,149 57.500 143,792 3,596,000 59,942 132,773 3,535,492 2,030,000 2,123,166 1,779,100 261,787 500,000 463,585 1,578,138 19,000 21,311 -45,000 15,405 - 26,376 8,902 64,363 - -92,592 392 -64,309 661,000 677,204 1,291,000 869,000 662,499 642,729 1,317,613 874,091 610,000 571,995 620,000 664,000 619,085 539,137 624,494 684,759 686,000 692,556 1,601,500 1,603,000 713,859 644,105 1,648,282 1,602,679 11,238 437,000 460,289 441,415 425,000 519,000 435,982 425,054 511,520 OR 37-24 280,854 280,854 3,505,064 3,501,056 22,434,82720 22,434,82720 6,718,08221 6,706,50621 2,839,799 2,839,799 2,807,876 2,807,876 1,776,008 '2 1,776,00812 17,718,87722 17,718,877 27,771,093 27,767,423 2,500,677 2,500,677 520,00523 520,00523 18,332,81824 18,323,30524 234,794 234,794 19,242,04620 19,242,04620 32,491,7582 32,489,509 12,005 12,005 91,642,489 91,642,489 5,603,1154* 5,588,7904* PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 to In Text Sep.30, 1992 24. Blue River Lake, OR 25. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 26. Dorena Lake, OR 27. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 28. Fall Creek Lake, OR 29. Fern Ridge Lake, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 32. Lower Columbia River New Work Basin Bank Protection Approp. OR & WA Cost 33. Mill Creek, Salem, OR New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost New Work (Contributed Funds) Contrib. Cost 34. Mt. St. Helens New Work Sediment Control, WA Approp (Federal Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 135,000 145,308 147,000 182,000 135,957 139,048 144,629 178,433 663,000 731,610 622,000 434,000 690,448 723,552 575,680 487,367 705,115 512,171 418,000 711,406 513,852 380,554 5,911,000 1,190,000 2,054,000 6,361,434 1,445,595 1,732,568 361,000 434,256 510,000 359,851 419,192 470,766 61,000 60,840 747,000 719,564 744,000 755,964 701,482 750,600 76,000 86,000 74,921 24,832 27,000 137,000 14,238 140,393 18,900 16,000 25,000 38,684 1,531 411,000 418,433 1,110,000 1,226,541 616,000 663,086 6,000 4,823 912,000 919,406 23,000 45,084 -9,600 1,203 -100 12,195,000 11,567,000 1,824,000 27,743,424 12,507,990 1,695,82 536,658 149,240 3,500,000 149,240 389,000 396,000 383,937 389,294 37-25 32,038,22527 32,038,22527 2,970,299 2,957,338 4,013,1232 4,013,1232 11,960,2882 11,935,694@ 14,568,26230 14,568,26230 7,557,460 7,506,733 103,894,579 103,645,480 22,118,2643' 22,118,2643' 6,706,671 6,683,141 8,593,9353 8,592,5983 16.379,1983 16,355,7853 21,005,745 20,978,465 190,900 190,892 18,900 15,900 111,719,000 111,548,694 3,649,240 3,649,240 785,000 773,231 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 to In Text Sep.30, 1992 36. Willamette River New Work Basin Bank Protection, OR 37. Willow Creek Lake, OR 38. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville OR and WA 39. Columbia and Snake Rivers, Ports Dredging, OR and WA 40. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (The Dalles Project), OR and WA 41. Cougar Lake, OR 42. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR Approp. Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 43. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR 44. Hills Creek Lake, OR 30,000 25,308 65,000 62,717 86,000 34,897 27,965 35,039 -25,000 30,800 82,000 67,732 30,000 14,332 687,000 490,051 432,000 685,094 470,052 457,792 1,152,000 2,405,289 10,727,000 10,813,072 4,115,000 3,851,145 12,090,262 11,967,851 3,911,000 3,888,349 12,153,300 12,417,302 56,000 61,566 25,000 40,420 420,000 412,532 2,716,000 2,888,142 13,393,000 13,161,143 5,630,000 5,587,370 1,343,000 3,804,000 1,114,175 3,434,045 786,000 795,480 913,000 920,000 818,440 743,983 860,144 989,556 1,539,000 1,569,935 1,720,000 1,699,000 1,530,767 1,575,262 1,597,219 1,811,308 1,773,000 1,932,671 2,118,000 1,981,000 1,822,417 1,926,322 2,072,319 2,038,785 595,000 524,108 627,000 601,000 592,142 529,110 612,945 606,010 37-26 TABLE 37-A (Continued) 24,843,816M 24,843,816# 3,922,709 3,913,109 37,223,114 37,222,866 3,899,051 3,878,067 776,138,6043@ 775,817,4783 200,899,66336 200,423,88438 5,630,000 5,587,370 5,147,000 4,548,220 58,636,393** 58,636,39337 14,901,29660 14,866,1386 62,729,698 62,729,698 33,239,707* 33,209,547 363,086 363,086 84,005,7883 84,005,7883 31,606,8033 31,595,9853 45,700,619 45,700,619 10,542,37540 10,532,09640 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 to In Text Sep.30, 1992 45. John Day Lock and New Work Dam - Lake Umatilla, Approp. 39,000 145,000 - 512,400,24641 OR and WA Cost 55,598 100,501 123,266 51,754 512,388,44341 Maint. Approp. 8,019,500 10,113,768 11,045,300 10,719,000 145,622,72742 Cost 7,983,895 10,019,973 10,985,601 10,906,494 145,390,49442 Major Rehab. Approp. 2,725,000 3,328,128 735,000 2,134,000 28,405,128 Cost 2,702,857 3,455,386 761,975 2,073,299 28,332,732 46. Lookout Point - Dexter New Work Lakes, OR Approp. 88,238,39543 Cost 88,238,39543 Maint. Approp. 3,085,000 2,991,027 3,468,000 3,265,000 51,564,632" Cost 3,144,995 2,976,150 3,333,658 3,399,006 51,493,938" 47. Lost Creek Lake, New Work Rogue River Approp. 136,408,150 Basin, OR Cost 7,688 136,408,150 Maint Approp. 2,657,000 2,888,918 2,996,000 3,149,000 33,776,718 4 Cost 2,646,763 2,957,551 3,039,651 3,114,685 33,732,0584" 48. The Dalles Lock and New Work Dam - Lake Celilo, Approp. 1,210,000 986,000 - 303,260,28848 WA and OR Cost 488,415 1,477,796 229,789 303,260,28848 Maint. Approp. 7,695,000 8,114,362 8,214,300 9,700,000 131,519,67047 Cost 7,721,519 8,154,857 7,921,077 10,024,491 131,311,66347 1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project. Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, OR (not part of regular project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 8. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393. Entrance to Oregon slough; $161,897, Camas-Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908, Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470, Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9. Includes $2,033,408 under code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 10. Includes $802,096 for previous project, Excludes contributed funds. 11.Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 12. Excludes $97,339 in-kind services. 13. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. includes $36,000 under Code 711. 14. Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 15. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 17. Includes $21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. 18. Includes $1,159,357 for previous project. 19. Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 20. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 21. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 22. Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 24. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 25. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 26. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 27. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 28. Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 29. Includes $167,878 special recreation use fees. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 37-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 30. Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 31. Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 32. Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 other funds contributed). 33. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 00, deferred maintenance. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 34. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 35. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recover Act Funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $136,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $627,593,352 allotted and $642,322,501 expended second powerhouse funds, $6,000 allotted, $6,000 expended power units funds. 36. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 37. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs.in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 38. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 39. Includes $587,078 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 40. Includes $75,400 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 41. Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 42. Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 43. Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 44. Includes $592,078 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 45. Includes $586,878 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 46. Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15 - 22 funds. 47. Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 48. Includes $535,578 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 49. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 50. Includes $460,178 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 51. Includes $24,307 under code 422 General Investigation. 37-28 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Construction of a new navigation lock just south P. L 99-88 of existing lock. Construction to be funded 50% from fuel taxes paid P.L 99-662 into Inland Waterways Trust Fund. CHETCO RIVER, OR To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. 3. Feb 27, 1911 Jul 25, 1912 Jul 27, 1916 Aug 08, 1917 Sep 22, 1922 Mar 04, 1923 2 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 03, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Sep 06, 19333 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.1 Increasing main channel to 30 feet. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.1 Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and No Prior Report between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess.1 Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of H. Doc 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Willamette River to Vancouver, WA Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River Rivers and Harbors on condition that main channel to be opened to project Committee Doc. 10 dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland 69th Cong., 2d Sess. For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., the sea. 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. 1 A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. ' Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette Rivers and Harbors to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, Committee Doc. 1, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning 74th Cong., 1st Sess. basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35 foot depth at low water Rivers and Harbors in Portland Harthr and Willamette River between its Committee Doc. 6, mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. 73d Cong., 1st Sess. ' Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. ' feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, Rivers and Harbors 1,000 feet downstream. Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.1 along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess.1 An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. H. Doc. 630. 77th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong.,2d Sess. 1 37-29 TABLE 37-B Aug 15, 1985 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 02 , 1945 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 04, 1981 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2 turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA East Channel Main channel West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Channel 8 feet deep. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50,75th Cong., 2d Sess. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong., 1st Sess.1 COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore.9 Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel cross section to 55 feet. H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 1 P.L 98-63 Dec 11, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 02, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jun 20, 1938 Sep 03, 1954 Mar 03, 1905 Dec 22, 1944 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 30, 1983 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Nov 5. 1990 COOS BAY, OR Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong.,lst Sess. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. 37-30 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 6. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from H. Committee Doc. 94, Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. 74th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 by 800 feet long. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a P. L 101-514; H. R. 101-889, 101st support structure to serve as the foundation for the Cong, 2d Sess. Seafarer's Memorial in the Columbia River, in cooperation with the City of Hammond, Oregon. 8. Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Sep 22, 1922 TABLE 37-B (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 30, 1948 Dec 31, 1970 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 02, 1945 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 31, 1970 Sep 03, 1954 Sep 19, 1890 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 03, 1925 Jul 03, 1958 Oct 22, 1976 Oct 01, 1980 Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable H. within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through H. Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to S. Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. 73 Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to S. Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. H. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, H. inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and H. removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. H. Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end H. of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of S. North Jetty. 741 Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec recreation facilities. Ac For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille H. River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. DEPOE BAY, OR Construction of an inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide H. and 5 feet deep, with an entrance channel of same depth and 1st 50 feet wide. Construction of an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide H. and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 1st feet wide. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong., 2d Sess H. Doc 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong.,lst Sess. Final Report of Chief of Engineers P.L 96-367 37-31 Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 Committee Print, d Cong., 2d Sess.1 Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. Doc 646, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. doc. 207, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Committee Print, th Cong., 1st Sess. c. 4, Food Control :t of 1944 as amended Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 Doc. 202, 75th Cong. Sess. Doc. 350, 77th Cong. Sess. 10. 11. PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Build two high-tide stone jetties. Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot south jetty. 12-foot deep channel. 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of north Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 2,500 feet, respectively. 13. 15. 16. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 17. Jul 03, 1930 18. Aug 26, 1937 Jun 30, 1948 Jul 26, 1912 Mar 04, 1913 Mar 02, 1919 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 27, 1965 Jul 18, 1989 19. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge, 30 feet deep. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay city. Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula caused by storm Jan. 1939. Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula Construct South Jetty, 80,000 feet long. TONGUE POINT, OR Channel 34 feet deep and 350 feet wide from Columbia River channel to Tongue Point docks, and a turning basin located near the piers. H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. ' H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 93, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. ' H. Doc. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.4 H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. UMPQUA RIVER, OR North Jetty, 7,500 feet long H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. ocean bar. A short south jetty H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging Rivers and Harbors Committee to a 26-foot depth. Doc. 9, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel S. Doc. 86, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide , and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess.' dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River. a S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.' WILIAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. construction of concrete division wall. and Annual Report, 1900, P. 4374 Deepening of locks. H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess.' Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and 1st Sess. dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 37-32 20. Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 20, 1938 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 08, 1917 Jun 26, 19348 Mar 02, 19458 Mar 02, 1919 Aug 26, 1937 21. 22. TABLE 37-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 03, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 07, 1974 May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 07, 1970 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 Jul 9, 1990 Aug 15, 1985 Jun 22, 1936 Jun 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct 27, 1965 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, as far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. Authorizes Construction of hydroelectric power facilities COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DORENA LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Roller compacted concrete dam. Authorized construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Earthfill embankment dam Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Provides bank protection on Columbia River below H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. MILL CREEK, SALEM, OR Construction of three riprap groins and 250 feet of riprap bank protection. Sec 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. P.L. 99-88 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doec. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 37-33 Documents 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, P.L 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 93-251 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 99-662 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 91-439 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc 403, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. 28. 29. 32. 33. 34. 36. 37. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 38. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE. OR AND WA Aug 30, 1935 Aug 20, 1937 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 07, 1974 Aug 22, 1984 Aug. 17,1991 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. Jun, 1988 May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 Jun 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 24, 1965 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 May 17, 1950 Sep 21, 1962 Oct 15, 1966 46. 47. Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergengy Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by congress S. Committeee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug 21, 1933) Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions herein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities as amended Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville P.L 93-251 to new town site. Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area P.L 98-396 COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVERS PORTS DREDGING, OR AND WA Maintain navigation access to commercial dock facilities P.L 102-104, 102d Cong., 1st Sess. from Bonneville Dam to McNary Dam COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM (The Dalles), OR and WA Design, test, and construct fish bypass facilities P. L 100-371 COUGAR LAKE, OR Rockfill dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Addition of power P.L 83-780 Strube Lake reregulating dam. P.L. 87-874 DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam with power. P.L 858, 80th Cong. 2d Sess. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Authorized Green Peter Dam in lieu of originally H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938) Addition of power at Green Peter and White Bridge P.L 83-780 F. C. Act 1954 Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. Bridge location to Foster. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities. as amended John Day waterfowl management area. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Earth-and-gravel filled dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake as reregulating dam. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. Authorizes construction of project but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 89-689, Public Works Approp. Act, 1967 37-34 TABLE 37-B (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 48. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3. Public Works Administration 4. Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 5. Inactive. 6. Permanent appropriations Repeal Act. 7. Flood Control Act 8. Classified Deferred 9. Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 37-35 TABLE 37-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 37-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alsea River, OR AstoriaTurning Basin, OR 1 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR 1 Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA 1 Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR 1 Clatskanie River, OR 2 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA 1 Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR Cowlitz River, WA Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR 1 Deep River, WA 2 Depoe Bay, OR 1 Elochoman Slough, WA 2 Grays River, WA 2 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR 1 Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge(Barge Channel), OR 1 Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA 1 Lake River, WA Lewis River, WA Long Tom River, OR Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Multnomah Channel, OR 2 Nehalem Bay, OR Nestucca River, OR Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR 2 Salmon River, OR 2 Smith River, OR 2 Skamokawa Creek, WA South Channel, Government Island, OR 1 South Slough (Charleston), OR 1 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, Or 12 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Or and WA13 Umatilla Harbor, OR14 Westport Slough, OR 2 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Or 1 Yaquina River, OR 1 Yaquina River, OR Youngs and Claskanie River, Or Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR 2 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Abandoned Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1985 1944 1971 1985 1969 1986 1991 1985 1975 1963 1971 1990 1941 1977 1961 1963 1986 1983 1985 1982 1987 1963 1949 1974 1991 1985 1970 1939 1957 1952 1966 1985 1985 1979 1971 1984 1979 2,000 870,139 1,173,524 1,081,806 171,467 1,197,300 19,2403 1,589,231 350,23819 277,436 6 329,423 15,384 145,588 6 18,6411' 2,500 519,0907 1,154,1628 15,281 302,000 2,700 58,132 437,669 * 302,00610 16,881 2,145 143,120 2,400 119,80011 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 16,276 862,918 1,616,369 891,695'1 195,31316 28,800 2,000 9,348 26,237 16,648 194,896^ 2,152,914 1,474,036 32,768 196,864 35,670 58,127 685,677 4,000 25,000 55,195 6,000 90,514 205,130 436,185 559,858 2,833,888 171,909 17,900,293 749,694 '1 34,449 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 107). 2. Channel adequate for present commerce. 3. Includes $15,537 for previous project 4. Includes $23,489 for previous project. 5. Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. 6. Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. 7. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 8. Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 9. Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. 10. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $102,000 contributed funds. 12. Project abondoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 13. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool 14. Project transferred to Portland Distrct from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 15. Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds 17. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $86,586 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds; includes $8,000 for previous project. 37-36 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 163,397 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1941 163,291 Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1942 69,724 Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Completed 1943 574,123 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 161,381 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1941 258,795 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County WA Completed 1941 26,810 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR Completed 1951 169,542 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 240,939 John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 33,080 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1941 25,773 Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 18,789 Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 158,419 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1961 91,652 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 61,186 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 39,475 Midland Drainage District Columbia County, OR Completed 1939 77,7743 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1951 593,0344 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1942 241,148 Port of Kalama, WA1 Completed 99,844 Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1942 47,662 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1951 1,623,505 Scappoose Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,991,558 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1946 178,885 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA Completed 1985 5,289,833 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 133,778 Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed 1947 61,263 State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA' Completed 1985 504,642's Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932 Warrenton Diking District, 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596 Webb District Improvement Co.,Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 Total Columbia River Basin 16,399,775 LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA Completed 1939 42,978 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA' Completed 1985 250,000 Total Cowlitz River Basin 442,735 37-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep, 30, 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,131,944 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA1 Completed 236,860 Hayden Island, OR Inactive Midland Drainage District, OR Completed 1971 304,511 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1964 1,499,186 Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Active 1961 35,265 Rainier Drainage District, OR Completed 1967 593,945 Sandy Drainage District, OR Completed 1954 154,0126 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Completed 1966 674,137 Vancouver Lake Area, WA Deferred 1981 889,391 Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Inactive 1971 48,619 Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR Completed 1973 1,803,488 Woodson Drainage District, OR Completed 1964 162,500 Total Lower Columbia River Basin 11,928,364 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Completed 1960 1,214,3006 Cascadia Lake, OR Deferred 1976 i,U66,l1iA1 7 Gate Creek Lake, OR Deferred 1972 840,0006 Holley Lake, OR Deferred 1963 241,992 Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR1 Completed 276,700 Whelton Ditch, OR Inactive 1967 39,624 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging Inactive Total Willamette River Basin 3,678,731 ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR9 Abandoned 1950 23,439 Bear Creek, Medford, OR1 Completed 23,050 Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 Completed 1967 106,198 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Completed 1957 104,921 Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 Completed 1959 182,655 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR1 Completed 42,761 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR Completed 1952 70,84510 Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) Deferred 1982 1,307,216 Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR1 Completed 22,963 Deschutes River, Bend, OR2 Completed 1988 106,25015 John Day River (West), OR1 Completed 1986 127,800 Johnson Creek, OR Active 1981 170,245 McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR' Completed 1985 29,500 McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Completed 1966 148,358 Miami River, OR1 Completed 15,321 Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Completed 1948 118,433 Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR2 Completed 1955 55,007 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Completed 1952 55,189 Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, WA Completed 1989 42,158,000 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR1 Completed 11,690 Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR' Completed 16,000 37-38 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR 11 (a) Riverside Area Units Deferred 1960 9,100 (b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) Completed 1959 267,748 (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Completed 1960 161,540 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR 10 Completed 1939 143,263 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 Completed 1971 968,71612 Rogue River, OR1 Completed 86,230 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Completed 1960 288,447 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA1 Completed 1985 435,000'14 Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR 1 Completed 215,939 Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Completed 1961 176,351 Sumner Parker Airport, OR1 Completed 92,500 Trask River, Tillamook County, OR1 Completed 1984 121,273 Tualatin, OR Completed 1985 1,803,094 Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR1 Completed 33,835 Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR' Completed 1985 154,600 Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR Completed 1952 428,881 Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR Completed 1952 45,677 West Makinster Rd., Wilson River, OR 1 Completed 1986 176,000 Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR1 Completed 30,000 Total All Other Flood Control 7,965,985 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 9. Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes 3. Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act Funds $3,328 FY 1960 preauthonzation costs, Sec. 205, P.L 80-85. See 4. Excludes $25,000 contributed funds FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887 5. Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs 10. Excludes $2,520 contributed funds project constructed by local interests. 11. Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974 6. Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 12. Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 7. Includes $112,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Government furnished sheet steel pile. Sweet Home. 13. Includes $254,642 contributed funds. 8. Includes $95,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of 14. Includes $185,000 contributed funds. Quartz Creek Lake. 15. Excludes $5,822 contributed funds. TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep,. 30, 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, OR Completed 1969 185,000 37-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 37-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR 1977 Bachelor Island, WA 1977 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 11,595 Cascadia Lake, OR 1987 954,114' Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 4,472 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR 1978 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR 1987 Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 21,352 Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR 1977 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, Or 1960 1970 6,819 Deer Island Drainage District, OR 1987 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 Ferguson Creek Long Tom River, Or 1978 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1977 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR 1977 Gate Creek Lake, OR 1987 745,0012 Holley Lake, OR 1963 1987 241,9923 John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 John Day River, OR 1974 1974 210,220 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 Lake River Delta Area, WA 1977 Lewis River Area, WA 1978 Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR 1977 Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR 1987 9,000 Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, Or 1967 1987 39,624 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 Soap Creek, WA 1977 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR 1978 Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24,145 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR 1987 4,000 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR 1958 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 Wiley Creek Lake, OR 1960 112,000 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portions) 1987 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR 1961 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 1948 1987 142,883 1. Excludes Pro-rata share of $112,000 for Sweet Home Reservoir. 2. Excludes Pro-rata share of $95,000 for Quartz Creek Reservoir 3. Excludes $100,000 preauthorization study costs. 37-40 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1992 (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 28,349,304 303,204,464 331,553,768 Public Works 446,296 14,414 460,710 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 28,934,049 303,317,546 332,251,595 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 442,928 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 29,600,003 303,341,866 332,941,869 TABLE 37-I NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (SEE SECTION 12 OF TEXT) Fiscal Year Costs Federal Non-Federal Total Channels and Harbors (Section 107) Charleston Harbor, Coos Bay, OR ' 6,366 6,366 Coquille River, Bandon, OR 3 7,286 7,286 Columbia River, Vancouver, WA 3 72,848 72,848 Newport, OR 1 18,184 18,184 Port of Gold Beach, OR 1 13,075 13,075 Port of Morrow, Morrow, OR ' 620 620 Tongue Point, OR 8 64,363 (64,309) 54 Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA 2 4,382 4,382 Yaquina River, Port of Toledo, OR ' 6.078 6,078 TOTAL Channels and Harbors 193,202 (64,309) 128,893 Mitigation of Shore Damages (Section 111) Siuslaw River Near Florence, OR 1 2.687 2.687 TOTAL Mitigation of Shore Damages 2,687 2,687 1. Reconnaissance Study 4. Construction Funds 2. Feasibility Report 5. Construction Completed 3. Plans and Specifications TABLE 37-J PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 14 OF TEXT) Project Date Survey Conducted Columbia River between The Dalles and Umatilla, OR JuV/Aug/Sep 1992 Elochoman Slough, WA Sep 1992 Nehalem Bay. OR May/Sep 1992 Skamokawa Creek, WA Sep 1992 Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR Oct 1991/May 1992 37-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 37-K WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (See Section 21 of Text) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet 1 Lift of each lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22,5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet2 Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price $375,000 1. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland of water, is at upper end of canal basin. Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland 2. A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 General Electric Co. to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, 3. The dam is owned by private parties. which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for TABLE 37-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (SEE SECTION 30 OF TEXT) Fiscal Year Costs Federal Non-Federal Total Flood Control (Section 205) Bear Creek, Vernonia, OR 1 10,000 10,000 Lakeside, OR 1 11,685 11,685 Nehalem River, Sunset Drainage District, OR 1 3,401 3,401 Pringle Creek, Salem, OR ' 407 407 Peninsula Drainage District 11, OR ' 13,483 13,483 Scappoose, OR 1 3,076 3,076 Seaside, OR ' 14,000 14,000 Sheridan, OR ' 20,307 20,307 Springfield Millrace, OR 1 6,074 6,074 Tillamook River, OR ' 8,476 8,476 Umatilla River Water District, OR ' 7,740 7,740 Warrenton Diking District, OR 2 19,093 19,093 Willamette River, OR ' 7 134 7.134 TOTAL Flood Control 124,876 124,876 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) Antelope - Little Bear Creek, Eagle Pt., OR 2 6,310 6,310 Beaver Creek, Troutdale, OR 2 4,958 4,958 Mill Creek, Salem, OR 6 1,204 1,204 Sporthaven Beach, Brookings, OR 2 5,309 5,309 Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR 2 32,311 32,311 Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR 2 10.458 10,458 TOTAL Emergency Bank Protection 60,550 60,550 Project Modification for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135) Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River, OR 2 4.823 4.823 TOTAL Project Modification for Improvement of Environment 4,823 4,823 1. Reconnaissance Study 2. Feasibility Report 3. Plans and Specifications 4. Construction Funds 5. Construction Completed 37-42 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-M FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Date of Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Peak Inflow Cu. Ft./Sec. Acre/feet 23. Applegate Lake, OR January 21, 1992 2,000 7,110 24. Blue River Lake, OR December 6, 1991 6,200 11,470 25. Cottage Grove Lake, OR December 7, 1991 2,300 280 41. Cougar Lake, OR December 6, 1991 7,500 15,230 42. Detroit Lake, OR December 6, 1991 13,780 39,040 26. Dorena Lake, OR December 7, 1991 4,020 1,230 28. Fall Creek Lake, OR December 7, 1991 7,550 10,600 29. Fern Ridge Lake, OR December 7, 1991 2,600 3,130 43. Foster Lake, OR December 6, 1991 13,130 3,220 43. Green Peter Lake, OR December 6, 1991 12,370 36,930 44. Hills Creek Lake, Or December 6, 1991 7,750 19,520 46. Lookout Point Lake, OR December 6, 1991 13,890 21,300 47. Lost Creek Lake, Or April 10, 1992 4,100 6,270 TABLE 37-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam OR and WA - Lake Bonneville (See Section 38 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Open to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Elevation(NormalXAbove Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length (First Powerhouse) Length (Second Powerhouse) Width (First Powerhouse) Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) (First Powerhouse) Height (Roof to BedrockXSecond Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators (First Powerhouse) 76 Feet 500 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 24.2 Feet Andesite January 1938 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 CFS 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet Pool 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 Feet 190 Feet 235 Feet 190 Feet 200 Feet 1 @ 5,000 kw 1 @ 48,000 kw 1 @ 59,500 kw 8 @ 60,000 kw each 37-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 37-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA - Lake Umatilla (See Section 45 of Text) The Dalles Lock and Dam, OR and WA - Lake Celilo (See Section 48 of Text) Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area At Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened To Navigation 8 @ 66,500 kw each 2 @ 13,100 kw each 1,145,700 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute 86 Feet 669 feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Feet Tainter 50 ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 268-257 Feet 276 Feet 500,000 Ac.-ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 37-44 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-N (Continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units 37-45 Project SEATILE, WA, DISTRICT* This District comprises Washington State except southern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointment, and to the Columbia River above Yakima River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA ................... 38-1 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA ............... . 38-2 3. Ediz Hook, WA .......................... 38-2 4. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA .... 38-3 5. Friday Harbor, WA ........................ 38-3 6. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA ........ 38-3 7. Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA ........... 38-4 8. Lake Crockett, WA ....................... 38-4 9. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA ........... 38-5 10. Navigation Work under Special Authorization.. 38-5 11. Olympia Harbor, WA ..................... 38-5 12. Project Condition Surveys ................. 38-5 13. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA .... 38-6 14. Quillayute River, WA ..................... 38-6 15. Seattle Harbor, WA ...................... 38-6 16. Swinomish Channel, WA ........................ 38-7 17. Tacoma Harbor, WA .................. ... 38-7 18. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA38-7 Beach Erosion Control 19. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA ........... 38-8 Flood Control 20. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization 38-8 21. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA ............ 38-9 22. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 38-9 23. Lower Green River, King County, WA ........ 38-9 24. Mud Mountain Dam, WA ...... ............. 38-9 25. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 38-10 26. Stillaguamish, River, WA ............. .. 38-10 27. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA ............... 38-10 28. Wynoochee Lake, WA .................... 38-10 Multiple Purpose Power 29. Albeni Falls Dam, ID ..................... 30. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA. 31. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT .......... 38-11 38-11 38-11 Miscellaneous 32. Miscellaneous Work under Special Authorization General Investigations 33. Surveys ................................. 34. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 35. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ..... Tables 38-12 38-12 38-12 Table 38-A Cost & Financial Statement ....... 38-14 Table 38-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 38-20 Table 38-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects38-25 Table 38-D Not Applicable Table 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 38-26 Table 38-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Power .................. 38-29 Table 38-G Deauthorized Projects .......... 38-29 Table 38-H Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA Principal Features of Double Lock and Dam ..................... 38-30 Table 38-I Project Conditions Surveys ........ 38-30 Table 38-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 .... 38-30 Table 38-K Emergency Flood Control Activities - Public Law 99, 84th Congress ...... 38-31 Navigation 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Location. On northern point of Fidalgo Island in Puget Sound, 17 miles south of Bellingham, WA, and 64 miles north of Seattle. The main harbor is on Guemes Channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18427.) Existing project. Channel in Capsante Waterway, 12 feet deep and 150 to 250 feet wide, between east side of Q Avenue and deep water in Fidalgo Bay, a distance of 2,850 feet; a mooring basin 12 feet deep, 570 feet wide, and 960 feet long - 38-1 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 adjacent to north side of Capsante Waterway, protected by two pile breakwaters, each 470 feet long, east and southeast of basin; and a navigation channel 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide, extending 5,180 feet from deep water in Guemes Channel to the west shore of Fidalgo Bay (construction under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C). Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is about 15.5 feet. Project was completed in January 1977. Extensions completed in December 1964 increased lengths of both breakwaters to 470'. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1977.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 piers and wharves in the Port of Anacortes; 15 on Guemes Channel, 3 on Capsante Waterway, and 7 on Fidalgo Bay. Three wharves on Guemes Channel are open for public use; of these, one is publicly owned and operated and used for handling general cargo in foreign and domestic trade. In addition, two wharves are used for ferries plying to the San Juan Islands and to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Both are publicly owned and operated. Two of the wharves on Capsante Waterway and basin are publicly owned and operated and used for receiving petroleum products, and as a moorage for fishing and pleasure craft. All other wharves are used for general industrial purposes. In addition, there are two oil-refinery wharves located to the south of Capsante Waterway that are privately owned and operated and used for handling petroleum products in foreign and domestic trade. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with Port of Anacortes and navigation users. Dredged material management program costs resulted in an expenditure of $6,000. 2. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep for inner 750 feet; I & J Street Waterway, a channel 100 feet wide and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water for a distance of 3,200 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek basin to 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway by construction and maintenance of two sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length of 5,400 feet, including maintenance of minimum depths of 12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 16 feet.The small-boat basin expansion from 3,900 feet to 5,400 feet at Squalicum Creek Waterway and channel at I & J Street Waterway were constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction costs for these features are recorded in Table 38-C. Project was completed in October 1980. (For further details see Annual Report for 1981. For details relating to previous project see page 797 of Annual Report for 1907.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-2 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Of the forty wharves and piers in Bellingham Harbor, 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway; 3 on Squalicum Creek Waterway; 3 on I&J Street Waterway; and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly owned and operated and is suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. There is one publicly owned terminal and small-boat harbor with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Dredged material management program costs resulted in an expenditure of $20,000. Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging contract for Squalicum Creek Waterway resulted in clamshell dredging of 109,800 cy of shoal material with open-water disposal at a cost of $296,400. Maintenance dredging of berthing areas on Squalicum Creek Waterway was performed by others in conjunction with Federal maintenance. Litigation with the Lummi Indian Tribe resulted in a delay in the completion of maintenance. A second maintenance dredging contract was awarded in September 1992 to complete Squalicum Creek Waterway maintenance and perform I & J Street Waterway dredging. Estimated cost is $95,100. 3. EDIZ HOOK, WA Location. Ediz Hook and the city of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, WA, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18468.) Existing project. Provides for about 16,400 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and periodic nourishment. Project was completed in October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Of the 27 waterfront facilities at Port Angeles Harbor, 3 are located along the inner side ofEdiz Hook. Functional uses of the piers include placing logs into water from trucks for shipment by rafting; mooring harbor pilot boats; mooring U. S. Coast Guard vessels, Naval Reserve vessels, and occasionally, oceanographic research vessels; and fueling government vessels. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) - 38-2 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT * Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Inspection and coordination with local sponsor. 4. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18443.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23d Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. Project was completed in April 1963. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with four berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. A portion of the East Waterway has been deepened and modified by the U.S. Navy for a Homeport. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Dredged material management program costs resulted in an expenditure of $139,000. Maintenance, contract: A FY 1991 maintenance dredging contract for the Upper Snohomish River channel and upstream settling basin was completed in March 1992. 275,200 cy of shoal material were removed by pipeline dredge with upland disposal at a cost of $614,275. A FY 1992 maintenance dredging contract for the upstream settling basin was awarded in September 1992. Estimated cost is $442,000. 5. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. San Juan Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan Island County seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) Existing project. 1,600-foot concrete breakwater to protect the existing port facilities and to allow the Port of Friday Harbor to provide 294 additional permanent moorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. Construction was completed in March 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Repairs to the concrete floating breakwater anchor system were completed in September 1992. The Corps crane barge PUGET was used to replace worn anchor chain and hardware. An underwater dive team rigged the worn portions of breakwater anchorage system for replacement. Repairs cost about $30,000. 6. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project (including navigation improvenemnts to date). Provides for an entrance channel across the bar and through entrance 600 to 1000 feet wide and 38 to 46 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, both at an elevation of 16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 36 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet; and removal of 350-foot southwestern extension of the breakwater, replacing it with an 865-foot northeastern extension, and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the southerly entrance, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). Project was completed in 1981. Rehabilitation of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in October 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1981. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of - 38-3 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Improved project. Authorized by Section 202 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Project construction was started in April 1990. Completed project features are: deepen and widen 20 miles of existing 30-foot channel across ocean bar (46 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide), through the harbor entrance (46-38 feet deep and 1,000-600 feet wide), through South to Cow Point Reaches (36 feet deep and 350 feet wide); expand and deepen Cow Point turning basin; deepen two downstream local berths; and construct fish and crab mitigation. Remaining project features are: deepen and widen 3.5 miles of existing 30-foot river channel (36 feet deep and 300-250 feet wide); expand Elliott Slough turning basin; deepen two upstream local berths; improve navigation aids; modify Union Pacific Railroad bridge; modify highway bridge fendering; remove two old highway bridge piers; and relocate utility lines. Construction is scheduled for completion in 1994. Estimated project cost is $64,000,000 ($41,900,000 Federal; $22,100,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation Agreement with Port of Grays Harbor, local sponsor for improvement project, was executed on February 16, 1990. The Port is contributing 25-35 percent of project cost. In complying with terms of local cooperation, the Port is required to furnish lands and diked disposal areas and assure relocation of utility lines. Terminal facilities. There are 23 waterfront facilities (piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which five are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, woodchips, conventional and containerized general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring company-owned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government-owned vessels. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Grays Harbor and Olympia, WA, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Supervised crab mitigation construction and monitoring. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for railroad bridge modification. Coordinated with local sponsor, resource agencies, and Union Pacific Railroad Company. New work, contract: Purchased and placed oyster shell on two crab mitigation construction sites. A-E contracts covered crab utilization of mitigation sites and review of railroad bridge plans and specifications. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredge Yaquina dredged in the entrance and South Reach channels in August/September 1992, removing 65,884 and 40,558 cy of material, respectively, at a cost of $376,250. The Corps hopper dredge Essayons dredged in Crossover and Cow Point Reaches in March 1992, removing 16,188 and 228,197 cy, respectively, at a cost of $948,260. The Essayons also dredged in the South Reach, entrance and bar channels in September 1992, removing 55,562, 273,075 and 372,121 cy, respectively, at a cost of $1,270,500. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the inner harbor was completed in July 1992, at a cost of $4,011,382 with 2,350,442 cy of material being removed. An offshore erosion control berm using 200,000 cy of maintenancedredged sand was constructed in the vicinity of Westport to break larger waves eroding the shoreline and to nourish the beach at no increase in cost. 7. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Location. The Kenmore Navigation Channel lies at the northern end of Lake Washington adjacent to the Sammamish River. Kenmore, an unincorporated industrial and business center in King County just north of Seattle, WA, encompasses the lands to the north of the channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. The construction of a navigation channel to serve the Kenmore industrial area, King County, WA, involves a 15-foot deep channel which consists of a 100-foot wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot-long transition channel with a 24 o 30-foot bend and a maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot-wide outer channel, 1,200 feet long. The project also consists of the installation of a goose nesting area on property adjacent to the new channel as mitigation for the removal of goose nests during construction. Project was completed in March 1981. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with navigation users. Dredged material management program costs resulted in an expenditure of $6,000. 8. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. The lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett with an area of about 6 acres and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water, connected with Admiralty Bay by a channel of the same depth and 150 feet wide, protected by a breakwater. The diurnal tidal range in Admiralty Bay is 8.4 feet and the extreme range is about 16.5 feet. Project was completed in January 1948. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1948.) Recreational facilities at project under cost-sharing agreement with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission include the following construction and improvements: construct a 35-unit camping loop and restroom, new boat ramp handling facility, breakwater, a restroom in the day-use area and porto-potti dumps for boats; and expand day-use facility and add riprap at the construction site. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and privately owned passenger and automobile ferry landing within the dredged basin is open for public use, and is adequate for - 38-4 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT existing commercial traffic. The basin contains two publicly owned boat ramps open for public use. The ramps are adequate for recreational craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted during the year. Performed environmental coordination and prepared plans and specifications for 1992/1993 maintenance dredging. 9. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam from gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is 24 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, WA) are set forth in Table 38-H. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The eight waterfront facilities at Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, marine repair, drydocking, outfitting, mooring fishing vessels and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, passing 15,109 commercial and 52,340 pleasure vessels, and 2,945,253 tons of commerce. Fishladder passed more than 500,000 fish and there were more than 996,000 project visitors. Maintenance, contract: Contract for repair of the large lock upstream service and guard gates continued. Contracts were awarded in August and September 1992 to reroof the Cavanaugh House and three project buildings in the total amount of $100,450. 10. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Anacortes Harbor, WA, $20,269; Friday Harbor, WA, $8,932 (terminated); Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA, $45,333; Neah Bay, WA, $82,255; Port Townsend, WA, $252 (terminated); Seabeck Marina, Hood Canal, WA, $9,809; Whatcom Creek Waterway, WA, $2,089 (terminated), a total of $168,939. In addition, $6,465 contributed funds were expended for Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA. Navigation activities prusuant to Section III, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $16,204 at Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA. 11. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Location. Near southern end of Puget Sound at head of Budd Inlet, about 45 miles southwest of Tacoma. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6462.) Existing project. Provides for a channel between deep water in Budd Inlet and port terminal, 30 feet deep at mean lower low water and 500 feet wide, with suitable additional width at bend; a turning basin adjacent to port terminal 30 feet deep, 3,350 feet long, and 500 to 960 feet wide; and construction of a 656-foot concrete floating breakwater and dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C (East Bay Small Boat Basin). Extreme tidal range is 22.5 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.4 feet. Existing project was completed in 1985. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1369 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1873 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five port facilities are located in Olympia at Budd Inlet, exclusive of the numerous waterfront facilities in the ports used by recreational craft. The industrial docks are used for conventional general cargo, logs, timber products and miscellaneous mooring. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Grays Harbor and Olympia, WA, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination. Performed continuous water quality monitoring at East Bay Marina during the seasonal periods of poor water quality. An underwater dive inspection of the floating concrete breakwater confirmed the breakwater and anchor pile system to be in good condition. 12. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Hydrographic surveys and inspections to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, and - 38-5 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 channels, not funded on a project basis for the current fiscal year. Soundings and visual inspections in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Hydrographic charts are prepared and distributed. Costs for the fiscal year were $66,457. Total costs to date are $3,121,473. (See Table 38-I.) 13. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Location. Puget Sound is in the western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18441, and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with the U.S. Coast Guard and city of Seattle, of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting large pieces of drift, waterlogged pilings, logs and other debris considered hazardous to navigation from Puget Sound and Federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett and Bellingham are cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in their harbors and setting up collection sites for our debris vessel. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The debris vessel Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters and removed approximately 1900 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. (Debris tonnage was down due to shipyard maintenance.) Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Snohomish River (upstream to town of Snohomish), Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. Maintenance, contract: 500 tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $58,000. Contractor continues to recycle much of the debris, reducing the cost of disposal by contract. Remainder of debris is placed in a demolition landfill. 14. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth, and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; (b) channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; (c) basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel; and (d) maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The spit is nourished with dredged material in conjunction with channel dredging. The spit was rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, and in 1982. In addition, a 500-foot breakwater section paralleling the channel and extending the spit was constructed. Project was completed in February 1960. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Project sponsorship was transferred from the Port of Port Angeles to the Quileute Tribe Port Authority in 1983. Terminal facilities. There are 3 privately-owned docks at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. In addition, there is a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of the river channel. 15. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay, the 30-foot by 200-foot wide channel from West Waterway to 1st Avenue South Bridge, and the 20-foot by 150-foot-wide channel from 1st Avenue South Bridge to 8th Avenue; dredging Duwamish Waterway 150 feet by 15 feet from 8th Avenue to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep at the upper end of the waterway; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions. Total length of all waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding maintenance of East Waterway above the 750-foot section. Turning basin, constructed under authority of R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925, in 20-foot deep waterway was deauthorized by P.L. 99-662 dated Nov. 17, 1986 (see Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 31, 1985). (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local sponsor has no maintenance responsibility. Terminal facilities. There are 196 piers, wharves, and docks located on the inner and outer harbors at Seattle, WA. Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and - 38-6 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine repair/ outfitting/drydocking/conversion, shipbuilding, handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company-owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft are not included. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys made of channels. Sediment sampling and testing was performed to characterize sediments proposed for open water disposal. Dredged material management program costs resulted in an expenditure of $86,000. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the upstream turning basin and channel was completed in February/ March 1992 at a cost of $410,000 with 221,646 cy of material being removed. In a cooperative beneficial use project with the city of Seattle, 4.5 acres of contaminated Elliott Bay sediment was capped with 22,285 cy of clean sand from the maintenance. Seattle District has been a leader in development and use of economic capping technology since 1984. 16. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the- Wall". Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are privately owned. Of these, 1 is used for handling general cargo, 5 are used exclusively for moorage, unloading and servicing of fishing vessels; 2 are used for handling petroleum products; 3 facilities are used for log dumps; and 2 for handling non-metallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination. Dredged material management program costs resulted in an expenditure of $31,000. 17. TACOMA HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor includes Commencement Bay and tributary waterways at Tacoma, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel in City Waterway 500 feet wide and 29 feet deep from deep water in Commencement Bay to 11th Street Bridge, 500 feet wide and 22 feet deep to 14th Street Bridge, and varying from 500 to 250 feet wide and 19 feet deep from 14th Street Bridge to end of this waterway, a total length of 8,500 feet; (b) channel in Hylebos Waterway 30 feet deep, 3.1 miles long, and 200 feet wide except where width is increased to 250 feet at the bend below East 11th Street, to 300 feet at Lincoln Avenue bend, and to 510 feet and 770 feet, respectively, at the channel widening above Lincoln Avenue and the turning basin at the head of the waterway; (c) construction of two training walls, each about 700 feet long at mouth of Puyallup River; and (d) channel in Blair Waterway 2.6 miles long, including a portion seaward of East 11th Street, 650 feet wide and 30 feet deep over southerly 350 feet, and 35 feet deep over northerly 300 feet; and remaining portion, 35 feet deep and 150 feet wide at East 11th Street, 600 feet wide between East 11th Street and Lincoln Avenue, and 300 feet wide between Lincoln Avenue and a 1,200-foot wide turning basin at head of waterway. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.8 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 20 feet. Project was completed in December 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 1372 to 1376 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1875 of Annual Report for 1938 for Puyallup Waterway, and page 1702 of Annual Report for 1944 and page 1502 of Annual Report for 1954 for Blair (formerly Wapato and Port Industrial) Waterway.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 81 terminal facilities, exclusive of those available to recreational craft, located in Tacoma Harbor which is comprised of Commencement Bay and its many waterways. These facilities serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, fueling small vessels, ferry traffic, marine repair, conversion/outfitting, dry-docking, mooring, bunkering, ship-building and shipbreaking. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Grays Harbor, and Olympia, WA, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Dredged material management program costs resulted in an expenditure of $6,000. 18. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; - 38-7 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 (b) channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; (c) channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram Lumber Mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; (d) channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; (e) mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; (f) entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and (g) removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay Center, and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels. One of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 that are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various segments of the project. Maintenance, contract: The Port of Willapa Harbor performed Toke Point Marina berthing area clamshell maintenance dredging. Beach Erosion Beach Erosion Control 19. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA Location. Project is located within the city of Seattle, at Williams Point, and adjacent to the East Passage of Puget Sound. Existing project. Initial beach nourishment consisted of the placement of 34,000 tons of sand, gravel, and cobble fill seaward of the existing seawall, a distance of 2,300' along the southwest beach. The fill extended horizontally 10' seaward of the wall, then sloped downward on a 1V to 5H gradient to intersect the existing groundline 65' seaward of the wall. 250' of rock revetment, at Williams Point, consisting of 2 layers of 1,500- to 4,000-pound armor rock were placed on a 2'-thick filter bed of quarry spalls, constructed with a 1V to 1.5H slope, a 10'-top width, and a top elevation approximately 1' above the existing seawall. The revetment is fronted by 2,000 tons of gravel and cobble fill, with the same top elevation, slope and seaward extent as the beach nourishment on the southwest beach. Periodic beach nourishment, consisting of placement of beach material to replenish the erosion loss, is required approximately every 5 years. Monitoring of beach nourishment consists of initial and periodic profile surveys, estimate alongshore/offshore volumes of material, periodic beach sediment sampling, and evnironment re-establishment. Initial construction was completed in December 1988. Re-nourishment is being studied for placement in fall of 1993. Studies will include rate of material loss, re-nourishment required, and environmental considerations. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (city of Seattle) provided 35% of total project cost. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 15, 1988. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Continued post-construction monitoring and initiated re-nourishment study. Flood Control 20. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Clark Fork River, MT, $13,591 and Half Moon Bay, WA, $3,553 (terminated), a total of $17,144. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See Table 38-J. - 38-8 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Emergency flood-control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation.) See Table 38-K. 21. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, WA.") Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Improvement is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, ditches, powerline, and other project features. Additional anchorage was provided for the 36" by-pass pipeline. Work continued on water quality surveys. Maintenance, contract: Contract was awarded for installation of additional right abutment piezometers. 22. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests, and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year, inspections were made on American Lake at Tacoma, Dungeness River at Sequim, Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville and Sammamish River in Washington state; Lightning Creek, Coeur d'Alene, St. Maries and Placer Creek projects in Idaho; and, Clark Fork River at Missoula in Montana. Fiscal year costs were $74,928. Costs to date have been $1,057,711. 23. LOWER GREEN RIVER, KING COUNTY, WA Location. The project lies wholly within the city limits of Tukwila in King County, WA. Existing Project. The project involves a Standard Project Flood (SPF) levee approximately 3.5 miles long. The downstream one third of the levee was constructed in an existing strip park along the levee alignment and the upstream two thirds is a conventional levee. Close coordination with the city of Tukwila was necessary during construction to insure that the use of the strip park for recreation would not be affected by the levee construction. Construction was completed in May 1992. Completion of an operation and maintenance manual and final fiscal requirements remain. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (The City of Tukwila) will pay a minimum of 25% of project costs. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed. The local sponsor will provide operation and maintenance of the project. Operations during the fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Initiated preparation of operation and maintenance manual. New work, contract: Completed construction contract. 24. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, Washington.") Existing project. Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 432 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled discharge of 17,700 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels with uncontrolled discharge over spillway having maximum capacity of 139,000 cubic feet per second. Improvement affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Project was completed in June 1953, except for recreational facilities. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1953.) To date the Corps has constructed two vistas, a picnic area, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, vista observation deck, recreation area, and fish facilities. Approximately 2,054 fish were transported from the fish collection facility. Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: Supervision and inspection of construction contracts. Initiated engineering during construction support for the new reservoir outlet tower. New work, contract: Contract for construction of a new reservoir outlet tower was awarded. Major Rehabilitation. Major rehabilitation work which commenced in FY 1987 was completed in FY 1992. New work, hired labor: Supervision and inspection of installation contract. - 38-9 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 New work, contract: Contract for installation of dam instrumentation, piezometers, and inclinometers was completed. 25. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee project, WA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. No Lost Valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $206,399. Total costs to date have been $2,738,107. 26. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey Quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: Revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir (including a fishway) 275 feet long between steel-sheet-pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor and equipment to replace rock riprap bank protection along segments 10, 23, and 24. 27. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA. Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, WA, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Improvement was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. A real estate design memorandum, approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers on October 2, 1985, changed the project boundary to allow the Port of Tacoma to create a wetland adjacent to the project. This action resulted in the Corps acquiring approximately 2,450 linear feet of setback levee in fee simple. Maintenance funds to cover the increased length of the project have been provided by the Port of Tacoma for the project life. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Removed brush and noxious weeds from the entire project along slopes of levee. 28. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Location. On Wynoochee River, a tributary of Chehalis River, about 28 miles north of Montesano, Grays Harbor County, WA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Grisdale, Wynoochee Valley, and Montesano.) Existing project. Provides for a concrete and earthfill dam, 177 feet high, and reservoir of 70,000 acre-feet of total storage for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and fish and wildlife. Upstream fish facilities were operational in the fall of 1970. The project was completed and became operational in December 1972. Installation of power-generating facilities was not authorized, pending a reexamination report by the Chief of Engineers. In February 1966, the Federal Power Commission asserted that power production as part of the Wynoochee project was not feasible at that time. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1972.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-12 of FY 1981 Annual Report. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 authorized the Secretary of the Army to transfer the Operations, Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation (OMR&R) of the Wynoochee project to the city of Aberdeen. The dam was built on a cost-share basis with the city which paid approximately 46% of the investment and the O&M costs. The legislation relieved the city of the O&M payment when it assumed the OMR&R, to the extent the city personnel does the work. The OMR&R was assumed by city of Aberdeen on July 1, 1990. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Beginning July 1, 1990 the Corps' effort has been limited to quality assurance monitoring and water control assistance in flood control operations. Legislation has been enacted which allows fee title transfer of the Wynoochee Lake project to the city of Aberdeen. - 38-10 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Multiple-Purpose Power 29. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. Dam is on Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple-purpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, the river channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acre-feet. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillways, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Contracts were awarded for 4 gate houses ($42,300), debris removal ($140,200), annunciator system ($42,600), station service transformers ($27,500), and restroom rehabilitation ($96,000). 30. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at River Mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from Town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet, Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 88,274 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,457,384 kilowatts. Work continued to bring turbine efficiency for units 17-27 up to design standards. Estimated cost of current construction project is $397,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Continued real estate acquisition. New work, contract: Contracts continuing through the fiscal year included project security, data acquisition and control system, project final completion, station service governors, repaint powerhouse interior, and turbine deficiency correction (units 17-27). Contracts completed during the fiscal year included circuit breaker sound suppressors (units 1-16) and replacement of generator brakes (units 17-27). Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Maintenance, contract: Major contracts awarded during the fiscal year included seal spillway pier cracks, and Brown Boveri replacement parts. Contracts continuing through the fiscal year included wildlife mitigation and security implementation. 31. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai and Columbia Rivers. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation at-site and at downstream plants through storage release. Project is operated as a unit of comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units.A fifth unit was completed in 1984 with capacity of 105,000 kilowatts, and there is a provision for three additional units. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acrefeet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water-resource development of the Columbia River basin. Construction is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Contracts were awarded for power house HVAC renovation ($179,000), removal of underground storage tanks ($61,400), and purchase of aboveground storage tanks ($23,200). Libby Additional Units Project. Provides for installation of 4 additional units at the Libby Dam powerhouse. Fabrication of generators for units 5 through 8 is complete; however, only the unit 5 generator was installed. Installation of the electrical equipment was limited to unit 5. Parts for units 6 through 8 have been stored at the site. Project is complete with units 1 through 5 operational. Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. - 38-11 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 Operations during fiscal year. None. Libby Reregulating Dam Project. Provides for construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam and associated relocation of about 9 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log haul road, 0.5 mile of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 miles of Montana State Highway. Funds were provided for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Congress did not authorize construction of the reregulating dam. Operations during fiscal year. In FY 1982, all work was terminated due to court direction. Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. Provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary Design Report was approved by the Office, Chief of Engineers on March 3, 1981. Miscellaneous 32. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662). Fiscal year costs were: Sammamaish River Restoration, WA, $29,822. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298). The program consists of control measures for selected water bodies currently infested with Eurasian watermilfoil and measures to prevent its spread into uninfested waters. Major operations under the cost-share program included mechanical harvesting of 27 acres, maintaining 6 acres of fiberglass bottom screens at Lake Washington, Lake Union and Lake Sammamish, WA; follow up to the chemical treatment of 82 acres with the aquatic herbicide fluridon in Long Lake, WA (inspection, diver-operated dredge, bottom barriers); rotovating 100 acres at Pend Oreille River, WA; lake drawdown and inspection in Lake Chelan, WA; and, chemically treating 40 acres with the aquatic herbicide fluridon at Columbia River, WA. The FY 1992 work also included treatment effectiveness and carryover studies, final write-up by the University of Washington on a grass carp study, aquatic plant surveys, and public information efforts. Total costs for the fiscal year were $305,179. General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were -$18,630 for navigation studies, $207,874 for flood damage prevention studies, $259,607 for special studies, $373,316 for review of authorized projects, $166,536 for miscellaneous activities, and $129,323 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $1,118,026. In addition, $19,028 contributed funds were expended for the navigation study, Olympia Harbor, WA, and $209,796 contributed funds were expended for review of authorized projects, Howard Hanson Dam Water Storage, WA, and $20,556 contributed funds were expended for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $249,380. 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake and Osoyoos Lake Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies in flood hazard evaluation and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $2,571 for international water studies, $116,327 for flood plain management services, and $4,241 for hydrologic studies, a total of $123,139. In addition, $9,741 contributed funds were expended for flood plain management services. 35. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Centralia, WA The city of Centralia lies in west central Washington at the confluence of the Chehalis and Skookumchuck Rivers, about midway along the Chehalis River from its source in the Willapa Hills to its mouth at Aberdeen at Grays Harbor. Floods of record on Skookumchuck and Chehalis Rivers occurred in January 1990. The plan of improvement authorized in P.L. 99-662 would reduce flooding in the Skookumchuck River valley for the 22 miles between Skookumchuck Dam and the river mouth and along the Chehalis River downstream from Centralia for about 20 miles to Oakville. The improvement, as recommended in the feasibility report, consists of structural modifications (flood control outlet tunnel and spillway gate) which would enable the existing, private water supply dam to provide flood control storage during winter months. The 200-year flood on the Skookumchuck River at Centralia would be reduced from 13,300 cubic feet per second to 6,700 cubic feet per second (about a current 4-year flow). The 200-year flood plain would be reduced by 1,500 acres with water surface reductions of between 2 and 5 feet. Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) was started in FY1988 to refine the project design recommended in the feasibility report. In FY 1990, refinement of project design to less costly gated spillway sluice and reevaluation of hydrology, existing local levees and embankments, estimated flood damages, and potential flood reduction benefits were completed. Studies determined that the Skookumchuck Dam modification was no longer economically justifiable and thus lacked Federal interest. However, structural and non- - 38-12 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT structural alternatives appeared to be economically justified. Since these potential projects were small enough, it was determined that further work should be pursued under the small flood control project program and that deauthorization of the Skookumchuck Dam modification should be recommended. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included completion of a letter report which recommended deauthorization, and completion of a wrap-up report which presented results of the technical analyses that had been completed at the time work was terminated. The report was provided to the local sponsor. Fiscal year costs were $16,692. Total costs to date have been $1,538,347. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA The cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis are located at the mouth of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County. The Chehalis River, about 125 miles in length, rises in the Willapa Hills in west central Washington. Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) was started in FY 1984. General Design Memorandum studies resulted in design changes providing a significant reduction in project costs while retaining essentially the same flood damage reduction benefits. The plan of improvement, authorized in P.L. 99-662, as refined by the General Design Memorandum, would protect most of the left bank flood plain at the mouth of the Chehalis River in the cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. The improvement would include segments of earthen embankment levee (2.2 miles) and steel sheetpile floodwall (0.9 mile), joining areas of high ground (1.1 miles). The project roughly follows the left bank of the Chehalis River from Devonshire Slough to Cosmopolis. The levee would protect 1,176 acres of the cities from inundation by the standard project flood. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included initiation of work on plans and specifications following completion of higher authority review of the General Design Memorandum and EISS and passage of a bond issue to fund the local share of project costs by the local sponsor. Estimated PED cost is $2,555,000. Fiscal year costs were $392,502. Total costs to date have been $1,869,535. La Conner, WA The town of La Conner is located on the eastern bank of Swinomish Slough, about 64 miles north of Seattle, WA. The La Conner Historical District is suffering from bank erosion and deterioration of wood pilings supporting overwater buildings. Erosion control and repair or replacement of the damaged pilings are required to maintain the structural integrity of the overwater buildings and prevent loss of the historic area. Construction of streambank erosion control measures necessary to prevent damages to structures in the La Conner Historical District was authorized by Section 603f, P.L. 99-662 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, subject to the Secretary of the Army determining such work to be economically justified and environmentally acceptable. The improvement, as recommended in the Design Memorandum, involves placement of rock riprap along 1,660 feet of the Swinomish Channel bank at the La Conner Historical District, plus repair of about 200 piles using concrete jackets. Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) was started in FY 1991 to resolve environmental concerns raised during review of the 1989 Decision Document, primarily regarding project impacts on juvenile salmonids. The Draft Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment for the project was submitted in 1991. The project design was modified to include benches in the rock slope to assist fish passage as well as creation of a strip marsh along a portion of the project. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included continuation of work on the final Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment, and continuing coordination with the local sponsor on his financial plan and obligations. Estimated PED cost is $183,000. Fiscal year costs were $47,209. Total costs to date have been $135,308. Other Preconstruction Engineering and Design Projects Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA Total costs to date have been $1,310,000, including $300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 101(c). For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1989. East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, WA Total costs to date have been $663,000. Project has been deferred. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1988. Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA Total costs to date have been $5,670,000, $3,530,000 of which is now included in Cost and Financial Statement of this report. Project improvement by construction commenced in FY 1990. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1989. Yakima River at Union Gap, WA Total costs to date have been $502,000. Project has been deferred. For last full report see Annual Report for FY 1988. - 38-13 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY91 FY 92 Sep.30, 1992 1. Anacortes Harbor, New Work WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Ediz Hook, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 5. Friday Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work. Contrib. Cost Maint Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost -5000 7,472 - 260 - 286 7,000 6,482 222,345 222,3451 1,156,499 1,155,980 59,524 59,524 5,000 5,000 - 1,566,839 - 1,566,8392 13,000 129,887 193,300 12,859 35,927 282,485 7,000 16,773 - 334,000 2,873 330,850 - 1,362 -1,362 617,000 432,040 35,1 5, 31,800 29,272 -1, 970,600 480,129 708,500 816, 1,083,617 486,811 606,592 669, 13,800 15,152 13,649 14,749 - 45,1 - 32,E 2,273,256 2,083,3703 29,421 29,421 9,103 9,103 - 5,878,740 - 5,878,740 000 1,531,860 182 1,498,404 - 385,850 - 385,850 - 163,765 831 159,388 - 1,723,745 - 1,723,7454 000 11,439,807 147 11,190,9676 - 116,618 - 116,618 - 584,090 584,090 - 1,575,500 - 1,575,5006 000 73,952 643 61,041 - 1,267,881 - 1,267,881 - 38-14 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY91 FY 92 Sep.30, 1992 6. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 7. Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA 8. Lake Crockett, WA 9. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Olympia Harbor, WA 13. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 14,030,000 - 10,551,615 2,941,480 3,041,014 2,889,250 3,045,373 3,198,291 5,156,476 5,092,707 2,318,000 21,467,962 1,622,158 20,492,0248 7,754,000 103,249,341 7,802,000 103,180,7939 -- 9,592 - 9,59210 - 4,606,145 - 4,606,145 -- 4,561,000 396,000 571,000 - 3,753,379 1,202,468 502,831 - 344 344 -6,800 134 - 7,500 - 7,371 7,000 6,000 69,614 15,674 5,528,000 5,458,67911 55,889 55,889 946,000 946,000 444,344 443,344 377,990 377,99012 774,754 720,684 - - - - 4,611,436 - - - - 4,611,43613 4,715,000 4,353,835 7,239,400 6,393,000 93,652,095 4,627,269 4,398,158 7,220,250 6,135,650 93,119,566'4 -- -- - - 7,465,230 - -- - - 7,465,230 -- -- - - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 2,133 - 9,400 -- 9,397 10,400 6,633 560,000 590,928 695,520 890,000 548,423 580,994 697,751 857,511 337,709 337,709 '5 759,177 755,37118 43,337 43,337 20,310,750 20,247,527' 7 - 38-15 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY91 FY 92 Sep.30, 1992 14. Quillayute River, WA New Work (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Seattle Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Swinomish Channel, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 17. Tacoma Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 902,000 901,651 - 525,236 402 524,627 -325 144,900 647,227 237,000 681,000 108,357 685,066 231,022 684,210 - - - 41,595 - - - 41,595 83,100 206,820 331,700 91,253 81,218 459,582 - 88,071 - 88,015 - - - - 361,100 2,300 354,726 5,863 177,000 358,921 57,411 52,400 51,522 160,600 163,948 -18,891 34,412 34,450 521,850 521,850'* 11,019,308 11,018,351 20,000 20,000 170,335 170,335 9,356,873 9,350,330 69,333 69,333 61,595 61,595 808,332 808,332' 7,422,972 7,422,926 32,000 32,000 - 2,383,891 - 2,383,89120 5,934 1,537,150 6,868 1,537,14921 - 1,147,208 - 1,147,208 - 222,500 - 222,500 - 1,386,955 - 1,386,95522 52,640 13,854,736 48,240 13,850,21823 - 78,372 - 78,372 17,724 722,500 720,754 - 38-16 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY91 FY 92 Sep.30, 1992 (Contrib. Funds) 21. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23. Lower Green River, King County, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 24. Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 26. Stillaguamish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 27. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Wynoochee Lake,WA New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 199,303 42,036 -26 15,170 269,474 269,474 - - - - 37,048,061 - - - - 37,048,061 713,000 685,628 720,900 842,000 14,026,329 597,463 788,180 645,685 717,555 13,806,81424 - - - - 2,000,000 - -- - - 2,000,000 -- 204,000 430,000 15,462 176,250 61,009 - - 84,250 1,420,000 1,429,669 965,000 990,238 4,223,000 3,343,165 1,066,322 1,141,473 10,800,000 11,550,063 1,247,200 1,175,095 240,000 634,574 43,750 107,067 6,913,000 6,841,950 1,384,000 1,390,453 13,400,000 13,743,500 1,000,000 274,000 13,366,684 13,311,323 1,343,118 409,294 97,600 86,177 283,900 317,000 38,459 149,583 276,385 325,245 30,000 35,986 29,686 33,919 - 843 1,646,000 1,378,902 1,615,314 1,264,215 21,600 22,000 921,500 919,328 128,000 107,067 41,439,84825 41,214,47526 25,124,997 25,026,82027 285,908 285,908 30,437,500 30,425,032 3,928 3,928 134,595 134,595" 2,559,524 2,559,165 21,000 21,000 - 3,947,853 - 3,947,853" 33,000 702,367 35,646 702,107 - 54,405 - 7,007 - - 23,494,445 -- - 23,494,44530 72,000 369,000 17,052,348 253,823 275,940 16,957,81431 - 38-17 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY91 FY 92 Sep.30, 1992 29. Albeni Falls Dam, ID New Work Approp. - - - - 31,741,561 Cost - - - - 31,741,5612 Maint. Approp. 3,524,200 3,921,663 3,319,700 3,728,000 49,188,769 Cost 3,448,526 3,970,757 3,294,401 3,642,283 48,995,404M 30. Chief Joseph Dam- New Work Rufus Woods Lake, WA Approp. 4,370,000 9,701,000 3,400,000 1,570,000 536,419,235" Cost 4,344,812 8,576,556 3,857,685 2,031,600 536,176,357" Maint. Approp. 9,134,400 9,479,470 9,947,156 10,009,000 126,508,538 Cost 8,840,800 9,670,106 9,872,186 10,010,518 126,184,872* Major Rehab. Approp. - - - - 297,630 Cost - - - - 297,630 31. Libby Dam - Lake New Work Koocanusa,MT Approp. - -- - - 543,858,440 (Federal Funds) Cost 791 312 1,089 60 543,858,440 Maint. Approp. 4,084,000 4,081,223 3,851,200 4,405,000 49,327,002 Cost 4,100,378 3,999,702 3,851,003 4,318,921 49,029,3553 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 1,458,252 Cost - - - - 1,458,252" 1. Excludes $2,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 2. Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 3. Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous project. 4. Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 5. Includes $5,869 appropriated and expended for previous project. 6. Includes $1,180,500 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L98-8). 7. Includes $3,530,000 appropriated for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $113,134 for previous project. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds. 8. Includes $3,529,998 expended for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $113,134 for previous project. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 9. Includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $409,660 Emergency Relief funds and $57,000 Public Works Administration funds expended. 10. Excludes $111,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 11. Excludes $3,418,000 contributed by Port of Grays Harbor in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 12. Includes $117,750 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 13. Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $485,002 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $246,567 expended by State of Washington and $742,071 expended by King County. Excludes $192,516 Public Works Administration funds expended. 14. Includes $1,631,195 (1916 to 1936) and $338,163 subsequently appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $32,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 15. Includes $183,257 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $105,467 Public Works Administration funds expended. 16. Includes $14,418 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 17. Includes $64,996 appropriated and expended for previous project. 18. Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. 19. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 20. Includes $159,585 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $51,609 Public Works Administration funds expended. 21. Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 22. Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,314 Emergency Relief funds expended. 23. Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration funds expended. 24. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $8,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 25. Includes $13,182,063 appropriated for original project, $87,785 appropriated for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $28,170,000 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds. 26. Includes $13,182,063 expended for original project,$87,785 expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $27,944,627 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds expended. 27. Includes $198,578 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $378,162 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). - 38-18 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 28. Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration funds and $85,999 Emergency Relief funds expended. 29. Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 30. Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 31. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $27,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 32 Includes $971,947 appropriated and expended or recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 33. Includes $174,776 Special Recreation Use Fees, appropriated and expended. Includes $739,920 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $188,475 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 34. Includes $144,338,252 appropriated for original project, $391,933,000 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 35. Includes $144,338,252 expended for original project, $391,690,122 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 36. Includes $774,561 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $530,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 37. Includes $484,753,143 appropriated and expended for original project, $42,221,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, $475,000 for power planning, and $132,300 for Kelley Flats Airport. 38. Includes $987,224 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters and $219,900 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). 39. Excludes $161,849 expended by Federal Aviation Agency, $32,000 expended by Lincoln County- City of Libby Joint Airport Board, $8,000 expended by Bonneville Power Administration, and $379,555 expended by U.S. Forest Service. - 38-19 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. ANACORTES HARBOR. WA 3. 5. Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Channel in Capsante Waterway. Mooring basin. Navigation Channel. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels. Entrance channel in Squalicum Creek Waterway. Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek Basin. Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-foot channel. Channel 3,200 feet long, 100 feet wide, and 18 feet deep in I&J Street Waterway. EDIZ HOOK, WA Construction of 10,000 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment.Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling basin near 14th Street. Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Construction of 1,600 feet of concrete floating breakwater. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel. Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. H. Doc. 1117, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 31, 1974. H. Doc. 1161, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 187, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 70, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 10, 1976. S. Doc. 46, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, P.L 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 5, 1965. H. Doc. 101, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L 93-251 H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 9, 1981. Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 53, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.; Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. - 38-20 - TABLE 38-B TABLE 38-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 June 26, 19341 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1956 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 as amended SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 facilities. Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Report in Office, Chief of Engineers Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. Breakwater at Westhaven; H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. protection of Point Chehalis; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel. Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and H. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Westhaven Cove small boat basin. Sec. 107, P.L86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 7, 1979. Improve project features with accompanying fish mitigation. P.L. 99-662 Modify existing railroad bridge. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Construction of navigtion channel 15 feet deep consisting Sec. 107, P.L86-645. of a 100-foot-wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800- Authorized by Chief of Engineers foot-long transition channel with 240 30-foot bend and Oct. 7, 1980. maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot-wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Small-boat basin. H. Doc. 303, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. Government Locks to be known as P.L 84-779 Hiram M. Chittenden Locks. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Channel 22-feet deep and 150-feet wide. H. Doc. 244, 69th Cong. 1st Sess. Increase channel to 26-foot depth on east side of harbor. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Elimination from project of 12-foot channel on east Rivers and Harbors Committee and west sides of harbor, and for a channel 30 feet deep Doc. 21, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. and 300 feet wide between Budd Inlet and port terminal, with turning basin of same depth. Widen outer portion of channel to 500 feet, and Rivers and Harbors Committee widen entrance to turning basin. Doc. 75, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 656-foot concrete floating floating breakwater and dredging Sec. 107, P.L86-645. of entrance and access channels and turning basin. Authorized byChief of Engineers May 13, 1981. - 38-21 - 8. 11. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. Annual Report for 1893, page 3425 QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. dike on westerly side, to stabilize entrance. Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess long; moorage basin.3 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 30, 19354 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 as amended May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". TACOMA HARBOR, WA City Waterway Hylebos Waterway Training walls at mouth of Puyallup River (previously authorized by Public Works Administration Sep. 6, 1933) Blair Waterway extension. Blair and Hylebos Waterways extension. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet and minimum width of 500 feet. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Channel from deep water in Palix River to BayCenter dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA 250-foot rock revetment and 2,550 feet of sand and gravel nourishment. Periodic monitoring and replenishing beach nourishment. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report for 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 76, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 25, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and 91, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 55, 72nd Cong.,2d Sess. H. Doc. 271, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 101, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. WA H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 103, P.L 87-874. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 18, 1983 H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. P.L 85-592 - 38-22 - TABLE 38-B (Continued) 13. July 13, 1892 14. 15. July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 16. 17. 18. 19. 21. . TABLE 38-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 24. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized LOWER GREEN RIVER, KING COUNTY, WA Construct 3.5 miles of levees. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Flood control dam on White River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Documents Sec. 205, P.L80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Sep. 12, 1991. S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 June 30, 1948 as amended June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Nov. 17, 1988 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 as amended on May 4, 1977 WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Dam and reservoir for water supply, flood control, irrigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Transfer to State of Washington as a part of project costs, $696,000 for construction of fish hatchery facilities. Amend contract between city of Aberdeen and United States for use of storage space, permitting deferral of the major portion of the first 10-year payments. Transfer operation, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (OMR&R) to the city of Aberdeen, WA. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. H. Doc. 601, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L 93-251 P.L 93-251 H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 100-676 S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 469, 82d Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L 94-587 P.L 95-26 - 38-23 - 23. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. revetment at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. P.L 75-761 TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Channel improvement to protect people and industrial S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, section of city of Tacoma. WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 31. May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1988 LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating H. Doc. 531, 81 facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction P.L 89-789 personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. P.L 90-2395 Design standards for relocation of Montana State P.L 90-4836 Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, P.L 91-2827 operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded P.L. 91-625 by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Design and construction of sewage collection and P.L 91-611 sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering long-term economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation S. Doc. 29, 93d of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. P.L 93-251 Construction of fish production measures to P.L 93-251 compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (amends P.L 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Acquisition of land (not to exceed $2,000,000) for P.L 93-251 prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary P.L 93-251 County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Compensation (not to exceed $1,500,000) to Drainage P.L 93-251 Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Amends P.L 93-251 by increasing limitation from $350,000 P.L 94-587 to $380,000 for reimbursement to Boundary County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge. Alleviate low water impact on existing facilities and protect H. Doc. 1098, 11 Indian archeological sites exposed during course of P.L 100-676 operations, at an estimated cost of $750,000. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 2. Included in Public Works Administration program. 3. Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of James Island, is included in this modification. 4. Included in Emergency Relief program, May 28, 1935. 5. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section 502. 6. Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. 7. River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. - 38-24 - st Cong., 2d Sess. Cong., 1st Sess., 00th Cong., 2d Sess. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and PROJECT Status Report for Construction Maintenance Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA 1 Completed 1977 825,2635 - Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway) 1 Completed 1966 125,6348 - Blaine Harbor, WA Completed 1958 346,650 - Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA Completed 1923 274,397 7,693 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA1 Completed 1985 1,619,956- Edmonds Harbor, WA2 Completed 1987 - 224,756 Flathead River, MT Completed 1901 9,811 - Hammersley Inlet, WA Completed 1950 9,000 10,683 Hoquiam River, WA Completed 1950 18,921* 5,316 Kingston Harbor, WA Completed 1967 262,5701� 5,0001' Kootenai River, ID and MT Completed 1933 9,255 5,643 Mats Mats Bay, WA 1 Completed 1970 137,67912- Neah Bay, WA Completed 1982 2,057,266 1,854,058 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Abandoned 1913 63,879 7,634 Poison Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Completed 1918 4,491 259 Port Angeles Harbor, WA3 Completed 1960 470,873 - Port Gamble Harbor, WA Completed 1953 11,91113 13,337 Port Orchard Bay, WA4 Completed 1928 42,804 - Port Townsend, WA Completed 1987 480,89914 78,787 Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA1 Completed 1985 1,461,590 - Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA Completed 1962 2,575,09115- Skagit River, WA Completed 1950 102,3301' 36,258 Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA ' Completed 1981 1,744,02517 - Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA Completed 1987 73,322 378,378 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA1 Completed 1981 2,000,00018 - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 2. Constructed by local interests at a cost of $415,000. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended for new work. Corps of Engineers is responsible for maintenance. 3. Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 4. No maintenance required. 5. Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. 6. Excludes $2,500 Coast Guard funds expended. 7. Includes $8,005 appropriated and expended for previous project. 8. Excludes $2,184,766 contributed funds expended. 9. Excludes $32,373 Emergency Relief funds expended. 10. Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 11. Mitigation of shore damages study. 12. Excludes $28,288 contributed funds and $9,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 13. Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 14. Excludes $92,423 contributed funds expended. 15. Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 16. Includes $2,500 appropriated and expended for previous project. 17. Excludes $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. 18. Excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. - 38-25 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report for Construction Funds American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA1 Completed 1957 59,582 10,000 Bear Creek, Flathead CountyBridge, near Essex, MT2 Completed 1971 1,424 - Bitterroot River, Florence, MT2 Completed 1990 180,950 49,759 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT2 Completed 1964 17,836 - Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 156,000 - Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 57,000 - Cedar River, King County, WA3 Completed 1953 3,229 Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Completed 1949 32,264 Chehalis River, City of ChehalisRaw Water Pumphouse, WA2 Completed 1966 35,454 Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1965 47,916 Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Completed 1977 140,080 Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 48,698 Clallam County, WA (Various Locations)" Completed 1936 67,835 17,700 Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Completed 1981 43,500 - Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT2 Completed 1978 18,660 Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 Completed 1978 31,548 Clark Fork River, Superior, MT2 Completed 1971 28,357 Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Completed 1950 27,947 Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Completed 1968 50,000 24,728 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1950 49,165 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Completed 1941 152,872 Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Completed 1950 25,452 - Coffee Creek, WA3 Completed 1966 15,000 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Completed 1983 384,8628 13,500 Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Completed 1959 42,726 Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge near Tumwater, WA2 Completed 1965 26,292 Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Completed 1967 22,956 - Dungeness River, Area #5, WA2 Completed 1950 2,155 2,155 Dungeness River, Area #8, WA2 Completed 1950 2,895 2,895 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA1 Completed 1964 52,040- Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Completed 1981 99,000 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1986 47,500 Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Completed 1961 14,093 3,314 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA1 Completed 1991 1,455,023 119,449 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1951 17,303 Entiat River, WA3 Completed 1971 49,300 Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Completed 1978 38,000 Flathead River, MT2 Completed 1972 20,940 Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT2 Completed 1955 26,265 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1948 33,347 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT Deferred 1981 300,000. Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1964 13,438 Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT 3 Completed 1950 2,320 Foster Creek, West Fork, WA 2 Completed 1958 19,513 Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA2 Completed 1962 50,000 Grays Harbor County, WA (Various Locations) 4 Completed 1936 297,020 24,059 Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Completed 1972 24,605 Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Completed 1976 27,001 Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Completed 1977 37,359 Hoh River, County Road 216, WA2 Completed 1980 143,000 - 38-26 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1992 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report for Construction Funds Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 Completed 1980 194,000 - Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Completed 1956 22,082 21,807 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 Completed 1961 11,916 - Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Completed 1964 41,622 - Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1983 173,000� - Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 21,083 - Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Completed 1977 59,812 - Hoquiam River, WA2 Completed 1977 52,600 - Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA 3 Completed 1962 24,000 - Jefferson County, WA (Various Locations) 4 Completed 1936 58,996 8,411 King County, WA (Various Locations) 4 Completed 1936 335,947 173,073 Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Completed 1950 42,325 - Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID2 Completed 1965 14,885 - La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Completed 1979 40,525 - Mason County, WA (Various Locations) 4 Completed 1936 36,642 1,407 Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Completed 1974 15,700 - Methow River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Completed 1974 11,200 - Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Completed 1974 13,450 - Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Completed 1976 19,810 - Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA2 Completed 1949 31,783 Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA2 Completed 1951 33,300 6,786 Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Completed 1951 11,726 11,726 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Completed 1972 11,836 - Missoula, MT (Sewage Treatment Plant) 2 Completed 1965 50,000 5,339 Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Completed 1977 17,608 - Naches River, Naches, WA2 Completed 1982 59,000 - Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1991 253,995 78,433 Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Completed 1972 24,792 - Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Completed 1948 37,636 - Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1960 26,790 - Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA2 Completed 1952 19,345 - Nooksack River, WA3 Completed 1948 24,006 - Nooksack River, Acme, WA2 Completed 1985 77,300 - Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Completed 1950 6,075 6,075 Nooksack River, Middle Fork,Deming, WA2 Completed 1986 79,000 - Nooksack River, above Highway 1Z Bridge, WA2 Completed 1960 10,807 - Okanogan River, WA2 Completed 1974 10,100 - Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed 1949 52,100 - Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed 1953 7.987 - Okanogan River, Omak, WA1 Completed 1981 2,231,030 - Okanogan River, Oroville, WA1 Completed 1982 1,787,630 - Pierce County, WA (Various Locations) 4 Completed 1936 153,417 21,943 Pilchuck River, WA3 Completed 1948 25,401 Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1985 81,000 - Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1971 10,713 - Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Completed 1980 54,000 - Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Completed 1971 30,973 - Placer Creek, ID Completed 1986 5,865,000 - Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Completed 1964 11,291 - Puyallup River, WA Completed 1937 50,00010 Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 86,160 - Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Completed 1981 125,000 - - 38-27 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report for Construction Funds Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA2 Completed 1972 39,300 - Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Completed 1981 208,000 - Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Completed 1961 15,928 4,843 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 Completed 1974 49,657 - Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT2 Completed 1973 31,565 - Rock Creek Road, MT2 Completed 1980 50,000 Rye Creek, MT2 Completed 1973 22,819 - St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID Completed 1942 357,698 St. Regis River, MT 3 Completed 1942 7,234 - St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT 3 Completed 1951 2,983 - Sammamish River, WA Completed 1967 2,582,53612 696,923 Sauk River, WA2 Completed 1974 20,860 - Sauk River, Skagit County, WA2 Completed 1989 119,60024 32,778 Shelton Creek, WA1 Completed 1979 872,021 - Skagit County, WA (Various Locations) 4 Completed 1936 390,150 44,966 Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements) Inactive 1982 1,934,792 Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA2 Completed 1949 50,000 - Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 Completed 1966 46,489 - Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Completed 1980 93,000 - Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Completed 1980 137,000 - Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Completed 1963 40,753 - Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1)2 Completed 1966 17,719 - Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1)2 Completed 1967 50,000 24,488 Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA2 Completed 1981 222,500 - Snohomish County, WA (Various Locations)' Completed 1936 1,160,311 191,262 Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA2 Completed 1969 44,227 - Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA2 Completed 1970 60,900 14,307 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA2 Completed 1977 15,565 - Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1961 16,437 1,960 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Completed 1963 11,433 Spokane River, Spokane, WA 2 Completed 1989 122,138 79,311 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA1 Completed 1970 271,713 - Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Completed 1964 50,000 46,182 Stillwater River, MT2 Completed 1973 17,457 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT2 Completed 1977 34,513 Strong Creek, Hope, ID2 Completed 1970 8,442 Tahola, WA2 Completed 1979 223,893 Thurston County, WA (Various Locations) 4 Completed 1936 62,943 425 Upper Puyallup River, WA5 Completed 1938 71,495'3 13,704 Whatcom County, WA (Nooksack River) 4 Completed 1936 298,942 72,124 Willapa River at Raymond, WA Inactive 1982 508,130' - Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Completed 1976 111,072 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Completed 1969 50,000 21,311 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-722 Completed 1972 50,000'5 - Yakima County, WA (Yakima River) 4 Completed 1936 84,303 13,132 Yakima, Yakima River, WA Completed 1948 381,961 - Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Completed 1949 8,047 - Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA2 Completed 1947 48,272 - Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 Completed 1977 36,768 - Yakima River, Yakima WA2 Completed 1983 125,500'8 - 38-28 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report See Annual Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 2, Public Law 406, 75th Congress, as amended 4. Authorized under the provisions of the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 (Works Progress Administration). 5. Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. OP 65-93-917. 6. Includes $7,850 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 7. Excludes $340,066 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. TABLE 38-F For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report for 8. Preconstruction planning only. 9. Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration funds expended. 10. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 11. Excludes amount expended by Works Progress Administration which is not available. 12. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 13. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 14. Includes $8,888 expended for restudy, FY 1967- 1972. 15. Excludes $17,988 Office of Emergency Preparedness funds expended. 16. Includes $118,000 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L 98-8). Cost to Sep. 30. 19912 Construction Operation and Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,0001 1. For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquisition of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Congress. Project constructed by Grant County Public Utility District. - 38-29 - OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Calispell Creek, WA ' 1968 1968 $25,000 -- Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA 2 1958 1964 9,0007 - Entiat River, WA 3 1958 1986 -- Methow River, WA 3 1958 1986 - - Okanogan River, WA 3 1958 1986 1,100' - St. Regis River, MT 4 1958 1978 1,400- Wenatchee River, WA 4 1958 1978 -- -- Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA 3 1980 1986 44,30078 - Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (RH 68)3 1973 1989 52,000' - Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 48) (Uncompleted Portion) 3 1962 1989 -- -- Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 30) 1933 1989 35,834 $35,834 Hammersley Inlet, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 4 1950 1978 -- -- Hoquiam,Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WA 5 1948 1952 83,6317- Olympia Harbor, WA (RH 45)3 1973 1989 21,6067 10 Port Angeles Harbor, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 4 1960 1977 - - Port Gamble Harbor, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 4 1953 1977 -- -- Quillayute River, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 3 1986 1986 -- -- Seattle Harbor, WA (RH 25) (A Completed Portion)6 1986 1986 -- -- Seattle Harbor, WA (RH 30) (Uncompleted Portion) a 1986 1986 -- -- Skagit River, WA (Uncompleted Portion)" 1950 1978 -- -- Skagit River, WA (Avon Pass) 3 1968 1989 54,4687 - Spokane River, Spokane, WA 3 1939 1986 2,9447 Stillaguamish River, WA 3 1946 1986 4,234- Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, WA 3 1978 1989 544,331? - 1. Authority for project expired October 27, 1968. 6. Turning basin constructed under authority of R&H Act of March 2. Authority for project expired July 1964. 3,1925, was deauthorized under authority of Section 202, P.L 99-662 3. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1002, P.L 99-662 dated dated November 17, 1986. Cost of turning basin is not available. November 17, 1986. 7. Preconstruction planning only. 4. Deauthorized under authority of Section 12, P.L. 93-251 dated 8. Includes $14,300 expended for restudy, FY 1970. March 7, 1974. 9. Economic study only. 5. Authority for project expired in October 1952. 10. Includes $18,700 expended for restudy, FY 1968-1973. TABLE 38-H LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (SEE SECTION 9) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 11/4 11/4 Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter sill1 Feet 331/2 16 Depth on intermediate miter sill2 Feet 29 - Depth on lower miter sill2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway. gated spillway. Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 1. Low water in upper pool. 2. Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. 3. Cost of double lock and dam was $2,382,200 and the emergency gates, completed in 1923, $262,300. - 38-30 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 12) TABLE 38-I Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Blaine Harbor Everett Harbor Lake Crockett Mats Mats Bay Port Townsend Quillayute River Swinomish Channel Waterway connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay May 1992 October, November 1991 July, September 1992 May 1992 May 1992 May 1992 June 1992 August 1992 June 1992 TABLE 38-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1992) Cataldo, ID 1,927' Cedar River, WA 136' 2 Centralia-Chehalis Flood Warning System, WA 2,704' Chehalis River, Salzer Creek, WA 193 Coeur d'Alene River, (North Fork), ID 13,813 Flathead River, Kalispell, MT 12,620 Horseshoe Bend, WA 25,832 Nooksack River, Everson, WA 36,106 Nooksack River, Marietta, WA 1,522' Nooksack River, Sumas, WA 13,328 Nooksack River, Whatcom County, WA 11,076 Quinault River, WA 231 Snoqualmie River, WA 73' Stillaguamish River, Snohomish County, WA 0' Trumbell Creek, MT 11,959 Yakima River, Easton, WA 15,000' TOTAL $146,312 1. Terminated. 2. Excludes -$136 contributed funds expended. TABLE 38-K EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES REPAIR, FLOOD FIGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK (PUBLIC LAW 99, 84TH CONG., AND ANTECEDENT LEGISLATION) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1992) Disaster Preparedness $473,524 Emergency Operations 10,330 Rehabilitation 531,535 ' TOTAL $1,015,389 1. Excludes $264,074 contributed funds expended. - 38-31 - Washington: WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT* This District consists of all Columbia River drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary pool (River Mile 345.4) and the Umatilla Bridge (River Mile 290.5) below McNary Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen Street Bridge (River Mile 8.4) near Richland, WA. The primary tributary drainage area is the Snake River which includes more than 107,000 square miles in six states: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, and small portions of Nevada and Utah. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .. 39-1 Flood Control 2. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects .................................. 39-1 3. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization39-2 4. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 39-2 5. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works ....... 39-2 6. Jackson Hole, WY ........................ 39-2 7. Lucky Peak Lake, ID ....................... 39-2 8. Mill Creek Lake, WA ...................... 39-3 9. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 39-3 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 10. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program ..................... 39-3 11. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID ............ 39-4 12. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam -- Lake Sacajawea, WA ....................... 39-5 13. Little Goose Lock and Dam -- Lake Bryan, WA 39-5 14. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA .......... 39-5 15. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. West,WA ................ 39--6 16. Lower Snake River Fish & Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA,OR, ID ......................... 39-7 17. McNary Lock and Dam - Lake Wallula, OR and WA .............................. 39-7 Navigation 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 18. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID ................ 39-7 General Investigations 19. Surveys ................................. 39-8 20. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 39-8 21. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ...... 39-8 Tables Tables 39-A Tables 39-B Tables 39-C Tables 39-D Tables 39-E Tables 39-F Tables 39-G Tables 39-H Tables 39-I Tables 39-J Tables 39-K Cost & Financial Statement ....... 39-10 Authorizing Legislation ........... 39-12 Other Authorized Navigation Projects39-15 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ 39-15 Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ......... 39-17 Deauthorized Projects ............ 39-17 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Control Projects ................ 39-18 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... 39-18 Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, Powerplant and Impoundment ................... 39-18 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA, and ID .... 39-23 new barge slip at Port of Walla Walla, Snake River, near Burbank, Washington. FY 92 costs were $4,620. Flood Control 2. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law Location. Improvements included in this project are along 86-645. A reconnaissance study was initiated for adding a Columbia River and its tributaries. - 39-1 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. Of that authorization, an amount not to exceed $15 million was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization would be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, should be required. (See Tables 39-B and 39-H for projects in Walla Walla District.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. No projects were deauthorized during FY 92. 3. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $204,629 for continued ice jam testing studies on the Salmon River near Salmon, ID. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antece. dent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $199,331 for disaster preparedness, and $0 for flood fight and rescue operations. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs were $21,055 including terminating the reconnaissance study on the Big Lost River at Moore, ID ($1,089), and Pataha Creek at Pomeroy, WA ($19.966). Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). No activities were conducted this year. Project modification for the Improvement of the Environment pursuant to Section 1135 (b), Public Law 99-362 as amended. Fiscal year costs were $34,120 for Jackson Hole Project, WY. 4. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise local interests as necessary of measures required to correct deficiencies. An appraisal report was completed for the existing Portneuf River Flood Control project at Pocatello, Idaho. The study evaluated the Federal interest in further studies regarding environmental restoration and ice jam flooding. See Table 39-I for inspections made during FY 92. Fiscal year costs were $76,661. Total costs to September 30, 1992 were $2,682,996. 5. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PL-99 WORKS FY 89 was the last year for expenditures on this program. The program is carried under the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriations. 6. JACKSON HOLE, WY Location. On both banks of the Snake River, Teton County, west of Jackson, Wyoming. Existing project. 23.5 miles of levees consisting of: Right bank - a levee with full riprap protection from 10 miles upstream of the Jackson-Wilson Highway Bridge, to 3.5 miles below, a total of 13.5 miles. Left bank - a levee with full riprap protection extending from 10 miles upstream of Jackson- Wilson Highway Bridge to 5 miles upstream and extending 1.5 miles immediately upstream from the same bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge, for a 10-mile total length. Project authorized by Public Law 516, Flood Control Act of 1950 for flood control protection by channel improvements consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetment along Snake River in the vicinity of Wilson, Wyoming. Public Law 99-662 modified the original Public Law 516 to provide that the operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions to the project become Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors shall pay the initial $35,000 in cash or materials of any such costs expended in any one year, plus inflation as of the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations during fiscal year. A claim following last years riprap contract was settled. Levee maintenance was performed by Teton County under the Local Cooperative agreement. Monitoring for the Bald Eagle Management Plan was done by the Wyoming Dept. of Game and Fish. Preliminary studies for Environmental Assessments on substandard bridges and access ways were incorporated into a Supplemental Environmental impact statement for an alternate quarry site and improvement of local access roads were initiated this year. Alternate quarry investigations continued with drilling and rock testing of four possible sites. Efforts continued in mapping owner boundaries, real-estate right-of ways, and easements. Mosaics were made of aerial photographs over the Jackson Levees. Plans and specifications were begun for providing additional 5,000 cubic yards of riprap. A preliminary survey of alternate levee construction methods was begun. Total costs during fiscal year were $713,204. 7. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Location. On Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of city of Boise, ID. Existing project. The project includes a rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feet high above streambed and 1,700 feet long - 39-2 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT at crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. Project provides for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. (For details, see page 2000 of Annual Report for 1962.) Construction of existing project was initiated November 1949 and completed June 1961. Since 1961, $138,532,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. During the detailed investigation of outlet capacity and the potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976. In FY 78, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget in February 1982. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980 and modified on October 9, 1980 and 1982. Construction of the auxiliary outlet facility began in May 1984 and was completed in August 1986. Construction of modifications to the existing outlet tunnel and powerhouse excavation began in August 1986 and was completed January 1987. Powerhouse general contract construction began in April 1986. The project was completed and dedicated on October 7, 1988. Power on line for all units was August 18, 1988. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Contract for office remodeling awarded. Normal operation and maintenance continued, which included the dam structures and recreation areas. Federally authorized 2nd outlet was deauthorized FY 90. 8. MILL CREEK LAKE, WA Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of Walla Walla River. Existing project. The project includes an off-stream earthfill storage dam about 125 feet high above streambed and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and division structures. Project provides for flood control and recreation. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel through the City of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Recreation was added to the project purposes through the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of the channel through City of Walla Walla was completed in 1948. Recreation facilities were completed in 1966. (For details, see page 2005 of Annual Report of 1962.) Since 1942, $10,818,412 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. The rehabilitation of the existing project was to correct the seepage and internal erosion by constructing a cutoff wall. The construction of the cutoff wall did not alleviate the seepage problem, thus requiring limited flood control use of the project. The seepage and internal erosion create a high vulnerability for dam failure. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. (For details, see page 2006 of Annual Report of 1962.) Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation areas. 9. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulation of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, Idaho, for flood control were accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $263,190. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 10. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM (Walla Walla Projects) Location. At Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Dams on the Snake River in the state of Washington and McNary Dam on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. Existing project. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 89 Energy & Water Development Act (P.L. 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of $8.7 million in FY 88 and $9.6 million in FY 89 for the design, testing, and construction of fish bypass facilities. Funds for FY 88, 89 and 90 were expended on a project by project basis. However,the mitigation program starting in FY 91 is considered as one project and funds will be appropriated and expended as such. The program will consist of juvenile fish mitigation facilities which includes construction of juvenile fish passage facilities and a detailed mitigation study to be prepared in cooperation with regional interest, for juvenile fish losses at Corps dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. Completion of the bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival - 39-3 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the fish mitigation facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The plan of improvement includes the following facilities: (a) Ice Harbor - submerged standard traveling fish screens, intake gate raise, new gantry crane, collection bypass facility; (b) Lower Monumental - submerged standard traveling fish screens, gate raise modification, gantry crane, collection bypass facility, and holding and loading facility; (c) Little Goose - gantry crane modification,, gate raise modification, submerged extended fish screens, and holding and loading facilities Phase I and II; (d) Lower Granite - submerged extended fish screens, two fish transport barges, gate raise modification, fish support facility, wet separator, barge moorage facility expansion, and gantry crane modification; (e) McNary - submerged extended fish screens, gantry crane modifications, collection and bypass facilities; transport holding and loading facility, gate raise modification, and extended screen rehab facility; (f) A mitigation study that analyzes long-term alternatives to mitigation for fish losses at Corps dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. The total estimated Federal project cost is $217,500,000. Ice Harbor bypass facilities were not initially authorized for construction under the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. However in FY 89, Congress authorized expenditures to proceed with design of a bypass system. The mitigation study project was added to the President's FY 91 budget. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Conservation groups, represented by the State of Idaho, requested that the lower Snake River reservoirs be drawn below minimum authorized operating pool in an effort to improve migration conditions for juvenile salmon. In 1992, a test was conducted during the month of March to evaluate the effect of drawdown on project structures and the operation of project features. It was ascertained that drawing Lower Granite Reservoir down 52 feet and Little Goose Reservoir down 20 feet below normal minimum pool affected the operation of turbine units at Lower Granite Dam, eliminated commercial navigation on both reservoirs, affected shoreline fills, embankments, railroad fills, and highway fills. In addition to damage to facilities, loss of business occurred at marinas and port facilities. Adult and juvenile fish passage facilities were not operational, and spill caused excessive gas supersaturation below the spillway and downstream through several reservoirs. No biological data on juvenile fish migration timing was gathered because the test was done before the outmigration to minimize effects on Snake River salmon. Construction was completed on submerged fish screens and collection/bypass facilities at Lower Monumental. Construction was initiated for a holding/loading facility at Lower Monumental. Design was completed and construction was initiated on the collection/bypass/holding and loading facilities at McNary. Design was continued on a new gantry crane at Ice Harbor. FY 92 costs were $27,723,497. Total project costs through FY 92 are $75,530,038. 11. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. Dam is on North Fork Clearwater River 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and area redevelopment. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 1600 and 1445 Mean Sea Level (MSL). The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acre-feet, of which 2,000,000 acre-feet are effective for both local and regional flood control and for at-site and downstream power generation. In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs. The reservoir is habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. Dam structure is about 3,300 feet long and about 717 feet high above streambed. Fish passage is not feasible due to the height of the dam. A hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of anadromous fish runs. Powerhouse has two 90,000 kilowatt and one 220,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 400,000 kilowatts. Provisions have been made for three additional 220,000 kilowatt generating units for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kilowatts. A reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 200,000 kilowatt fourth generating unit was completed in FY 78. Environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public opposition. Unit 4 is undeveloped. Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized FY 90. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the project started in April 1963 and was completed in 1986. Since the project became operational in June 1972, it has prevented about $737,000 of potential flood damages. Power generation through September 1992 was 34.17 billion kilowatt hours. Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a picnic table, U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic tables. Dent Acres and Freeman Creek recreation sites are open to the public. Facilities consist of a boat launching ramp, boat docks, cartrailer parking, comfort stations, and fully-developed overnight camping. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract completed for purchase of generator excitation equipment. Contract completed for visitor center and asbestos removal. Operation and Maintenance: Wildlife habitat browse continued on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. During fiscal year 1.23 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the three generating units. Dworshak National Fish hatchery Dworshak National Fish Hatchery (DNFH) operations were less affected by the IHNV disease than in past years due to the completion of the hatchery water supply line from - 39-4 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Dworshak Reservoir. Although DNFH receives only 6,500 gpm from the water line, this was sufficient to allow eggs and fry to be raised in IHNV free water. Numbers of eggs transferred to Kooskia (KNFH) and Hagerman (HNFH) national fish hatcheries were reduced, with 337,000 and 540,000 smolts produced by early rearing at these sites, respectively. Another 1,433,000 smolts were produced at DNFH, so the mitigation goal of 2,300,000 steelhead was exceeded by some 9,000 fish. The average size of fish was larger with 450,785 pounds produced in 1992 compared with 396,751 in 1991. DNFH also released 1,670,000 spring chinook weighing 42,958 pounds. For 1992, nearly 8 million eggs were collected from a return of 3700 steelhead. A total of 1.8 million eyed eggs were shipped to Magic Valley and Clearwater fish hatcheries. Spring chinook returns were low again in 1992 with 675 adults collected at DNFH and KNFH. Some 800,000 eggs were taken with an estimated smolt release of 600,000. This is well below the 1.9 million capacity of the hatchery. The steelhead return to the Columbia River was the fourth highest run of record with over 310,000 going over Bonneville Dam, and over 160,000 entering the Snake River. A new record of over 135,000 was counted over Lower Granite Dam. 12. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM - LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. On Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula (McNary Reservoir) and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 440 and 435 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Sacajawea extends upstream about 31.9 miles and provides slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. Powerhouse has three 90,000 kilowatt units and three 111,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 603,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 610 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 391 MSL is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provides the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 453 MSL and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 41.6 miles long is provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam and from the dam to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in December 1955 and was completed in 1971. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1971 and completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1992 was 67.51 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract completed for cavitation repair on Units 4, 5, and 6. Contract awarded for navlock control valve replacement. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 1.39 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 3,508,987 tons during calendar year 1991. 13. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BRYAN, WA Location. Dam is 70.3 miles above mouth of Snake River at head of Lake Herbert G. West (Lower Monumental Reservoir), about 40 airline miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 638 and 633 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 2,655 feet long and about 165 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 498 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 581 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 feet by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 37.2 miles long is provided from the dam to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 6.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry Bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in 1963 and was completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1974 and was completed in 1984. Power generation through September 1992 was 55.52 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract continuing for turbine repair Unit 1. Contracts awarded for unit 2 and 3 turbine repair, fish pump turbine repair and asbestos removal. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 1.63 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 2,921,135 tons during calendar year 1991. - 39-5 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 14. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Location. At River Mile 107.5 on Snake River at head of Lake Bryan (Little Goose Reservoir) and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, appurtenant facilities, and required about 8 miles of backwater levees along the Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. Project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 738 and 733 Mean Sea Level (MSL) in Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area. Lower Granite pool extends upstream about 38 miles and provides slackwater to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 512 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 581 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 60 feet wide and 60.5 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 38.0 miles long is provided from the dam to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in July 1965 and was completed in 1984. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1974 and completed in 1979. Power generation through September 1992 was 46.74 billion kilowatt hours. Approximately $4,119,300 in potential flood damages have been prevented since the levees became functional. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts completed on confluence dredging, forebay debris boom, and raceway shading. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 1.65 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 1,861,347 tons during calendar year 1991. As the first collection point on the Snake River, Lower Granite Dam is a primary component of the District's Juvenile Fish Transport Program. Transport began in the 1960's as a study of methods of bypassing juvenile steelhead and salmon around turbines of the Corps' Snake and Columbia River dams. Transport became a routine operation in 1980 while other structural modifications, installation of screens, and development of bypass systems continue. The 1992 transport season was marked by below normal flows in the Snake River for the seventh consecutive year. The spring/summer chinook outmigration was fairly normal, but many steelhead smolts refused to move downstream resulting in below normal survival to Lower Granite Dam. Collection totaled 6,911,174 at Lower Granite Dam compared with 9,356,391 in 1990 and 8,616,516 in 1992. After four days of over 400,000 fish collected per day and a peak collection of 464,253 on May 5, over 118,000 fish were bypassed on May 6 when holding and barge capacities were exceeded. At Little Goose Dam, 1,795,834 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected, down from previous years. Movement peaked at 145,848 on 3 May. Because flows did not exceed 100 thousand cubic feet per second (cfs) until the spring/summer chinook outmigration was past Little Goose Dam, no fish were bypassed back to the river. At McNary Dam, 9,551,616 fish were collected. Peak collection was 140,571 on 13 May when yearling fish dominated collection, and 572,200 fish on 28 June when sub-yearling fish comprised 99.9 percent of the collection. With flows below 220 kcfs, fish were not bypassed at Mc- Nary Dam except for research. In contrast with 1991 with over 80 consecutive days of spill, spill occurred on three days in 1992. A grand total of 18,259,554 fish were collected, well below the record 22,261,661 fish collected in 1990. A total of 17,561,019 fish were transported, 96.2% of those collected. Of those transported, 970,289 (5.5%) were by truck, and 16,590,730 (94.5%) were by barge. Because of the listing of Snake River sockeye as endangered, and Snake River chinook as threatened, the transport season was extended from mid-July to the end of October at Lower Granite and Little Goose Dams, and from the end of September through December at McNary Dam. Transport ceased on schedule at Lower Granite and Little Goose dams, but was terminated early (December 7) at McNary Dam because of icy road conditions and dangerous conditions at the release area below Bonneville Dam.The first phase of construction of a new collection/ bypass system at Lower Monumental Dam was operational by the beginning of the outmigration providing full screening and bypass capability. Construction of holding, loaking, and fish handling facilities continued through December 1992, with completion expected before the 1993 outmigration. A Biological Assessment was completed recommending full transport from Lower Monumental, as well as the other three collector dams. A Biological Opinion is pending from the National Marine Fisheries Service. An Endangered Species Act Section 10 permit was received for the 1992 fish transport program, and an application has been submitted for 1993 activities including research at Corps dams funded by the Corps. Additional facility modifications in 1992 included installation of a roof over the west raceways and installation of a new trash shear boom at Lower Granite Dam, further modification and improvement of the Little Goose juvenile fish collection system, and initiation of construction of a new fish collection facility at McNary Dam. 15. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM - LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA. Location. On Snake River at head of Lake Sacajawea (Ice Harbor Reservoir), about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power genera- - 39-6 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT tion, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 540 and 537 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Herbert G. West extends upstream about 28.7 miles and provides slack water to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 3,800 feet long and about 135 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 508 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 483 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 61 feet high, which provide capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 553 MSL and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep and 28.1 miles long is provided from the dam to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included railroads and highways. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in June 1961 and was completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1975 and was completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1992 was 68.60 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract awarded for unit 3 repair, fish pump turbine repair and naylock control valve replacements. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 1.53 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 2,419,668 tons during calendar year 1991. 16. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, ID Location. At various locations within the Columbia Snake River drainage in the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Existing project. The project consists of a series of fish hatcheries, wildlife development areas and purchase of offsite project lands for fishing and hunting access. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple-purpose dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite). The real estate design memorandum, and feature design memorandums on all hatcheries and satellites, the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The Dworshak National Fish Hatchery Expansion, the Irrigon Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, McCall Hatchery, Sawtooth Hatchery and Magic Valley Hatchery are in operation. The compensation plan is 89 percent complete. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $219,000,000. Local cooperation. None required Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work was completed Clearwater Hatchery Water Supply and Clearwater Hatchery. Off-project land acquisition is being pursued. 17. McNARY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, OR, and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and a system of levees and pumping plants. Project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 340 and 335 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Wallula extends upstream about 64 miles and provides slack water to Ice Harbor Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 7,365 feet long and about 183 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. Powerhouse has fourteen 70,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 980,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 1,310 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 291 MSL is surmounted by 22 vertical lift gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 2,200,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250-feet wide, 14-feet deep and 32 miles long is provided from the dam to the mouth of the Snake River. Relocations along the lake included railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started May 1947 and was completed in 1982. Power generation through September 1992 was 235.29 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract awarded for machine shop roof repair. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 5.82 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 14 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 6,151,333 tons during calendar year 1991. 18. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID Location. On Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, River Mile 230 Snake River, which is largest tributary of Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western part of Wyoming, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into Columbia River near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from Pacific Ocean. Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams as necessary for power, incidental - 39-7 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 irrigation, and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slack-water navigation and irrigation between mouth of Snake River and Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for the portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of existing project. Improvements included in existing project are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam - Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam - Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Table 39-A and 39-K. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite are in full operation. (See individual reports for details.) (For further details see Annual Reports, page 2246 for 1903; page 1986 for 1906; page 1991 for 1915; and page 1981 for 1962.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 18 privately-owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, wood products, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to public use. The facilities serve slack-water navigation to Snake River Mile 140, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slackwater reaches the Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during fiscal year. See individual report for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and survey markers were maintained. Fiscal year costs were $7,056. General Investigations 19. SURVEYS The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the Corps to operate and maintain a system of non-federal levees along the Snake River in the vicinity of Jackson Hole, WY. A draft reconnaissance study of the potential for improving the system with levee raises, extensions, or relocations was completed in FY 90. The final reconnaissance study was combined with the Jackson Hole Restoration study which will be completed in FY93. A combined flood protection and restoration feasibility study is expected to start in FY93. A reconnaissance study of a proposal to lower the Tri-Cities Levees at Kennewick, Pasco and Richland, WA was completed. The levees were built by the Corps as part of the Mc- Nary Lock and Dam in the 1950's. Consequent upstream storage development may provide an opportunity to reduce levee heights for the purpose of land enhancement and recreation. It was determined that there was not presently a Federal interest in lowering levees. However, locals may do so at their cost. A reconnaissance study of the Walla Walla River Basin, Washington and Oregon was completed in April 1992. The study focused primarily on flood damage and prevention. However, local interests requested consideration be given to other water resource needs including M&I water supply, irrigation, water-based recreation, and restoration of spring chinook salmon and steelhead trout runs. Future studies of water respource development in the Walla Walla basin were not recommended at this time. Jackson Hole River and Wetland Restoration and Flood Control reconnaissance study was initiated to restore fish and wildlife habitat in the 500-year floodplain of the leveed reach of the Snake and Gros Ventre Rivers at Jackson Hole, WY. The study will evaluate losses resulting from levee construction over the past 30 years and determine restoration measures to compensate for these losses. The Energy and Water Development Act, Public Law 102-104 authorized a study in cooperation with the Port of Walla Walla, Washington, for disposition of the current Walla Walla District Headquarters. The study was completed in September and forwarded to North Pacific Division for comments and review.We participated in the Columbia River and Tributary Study, a survey directed by the North Pacific Division. Total cost of surveys was $926,685 for FY 92, including: flood control studies ($698,676); special studies including Soil Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, River Basin and Regional Planning Commissions, and Cooperation with States, ($24,229), Special Investigations, Inter Agency Water Resource Development and FERC Licensing Activities, and North American Waterfowl Management Plan, ($111,014) and District Disposition Study ($92,766).. 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies, to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $108,477 which included: flood plain management services ($20,585), flood warning system ($6,403), technical services, ($76,874), and quick responses ($4,615). 21. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Little Wood River Project, Vicinity Gooding and Shoshone, ID. The Little Wood River Project was authorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. The proposed project would have consisted of a diversion channel and two ponding facilities to divert floodflows from the Little Wood - 39-8 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT River into adjacent lava fields via the Dietrich and Milner- Gooding Canals for the purpose of reducing flood damages in the Gooding and Shoshone, ID vicinities. As a result of lack of local sponsorship, the project is being terminated. A limited reevaluation paper was prepared and submitted to higher authority.. Preconstruction engineering and design activities were initiated in FY 1990 to review and update the project formulation development for the 1976 feasibility report. A coordination meeting was held in Gooding, ID, on 29 May 1991 with the project sponsor. At that meeting, the sponsor indicated that they no longer have financial capability to act as project sponsor. As a result, the project is being terminated pending completion of a reevaluation report documenting the reformation studies completed to date. FY 92 costs were $24,994.06. McNary Lock and Dam (Second Powerhouse), OR and WA The McNary Second Powerhouse project, with the exception of levee beautification of the existing levees adjacent to Richland, Pasco, and Kennewick, WA, was automatically deauthorized on 16 November 1991, under Section 1001, PL99-362. The levee beautification portion of the project was reauthorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1990. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA The project consists of a roller compacted concrete dam 90 feet high with uncontrolled spillway and a fixed release outlet works that will create a detention reservoir of 1,260 acre-feet of capacity. The storage comprises 860 acre-feet for flood control and 400 acre-feet for sediment. In addition, the project also includes a conduit with a capacity of 400 cfs and a dike plug will be installed across the Union Pacific Railroad to protect downtown Kennewick, WA, when major floods occur. The plan of improvement will provide protection against heavy rainfall, snowmelt, and thunderstorm floods to the city of Kennewick, WA. Reevaluation of the project economics due to hydrology modifications resulted in a revised General Design Memo No. 2 and a Post-Authorization Change Report. The GDM was approved by the Washington Level Review Board on January 24, 1990. The Post-Authorization Change Report which reduced the flood control storage of the authorized project was approved March 5, 1990. FY 92 costs were $4,860,000 for construction of the dam and channel contracts.. The current total estimated Federal and Non-Federal project cost is $9,700,000. The estimated Federal cost is $7,275,000. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors, city of Kennewick, Washington, shall pay 25 percent of the total project cost or an estimated $2,425,000. - 39-9 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Total to Text Project Funding FY89 FY 90 FY91 FY 92 Sep. 30,1992 6. Jackson Hole, WY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 7. Lucky Peak Lake, ID New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8. Mill Creek Lake, WA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab Approp. Cost 10. Columbia River Juvenile Fish New Work Mitigation Program Approp. Cost 11. Dworshak Dam & New Work Reservoir, ID Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 12. Ice Harbor Lock New Work & Dam,WA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13. Little Goose Lock New Work & Dam, WA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14. Lower Granite Lock New Work & Dam, WA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint Contrib. Cost - 45,000 50,000 - 41,075 34,120 20,000 379,000 50,833 139,306 777,500 493,000 668,270 713,204 -- 77,205 --- 77,205 852,000 784,014 1,068,450 761,029 1,047,550 853,797 1,046,431 799,866 1,974 24 42,661 42,660 634,800 1,221,500 734,478 1,128,878 511,700 531,000 553,930 538,305 2,483,270 2,463,390 1,849,500 1,720,780 ' 119,866 ' 119,865 19,652,081 2 19,652,081 2 16,336,865 * 16,237,845 3 2,258,495 4 2,258,495 4 10,533,940 10,511,009 8,500 17,714,107 -1 8,500 17,714,102 - 21,136,000 28,1 - - 20,617,366 27,7 399 - - 6,178,520 6,408,122 6,507,158 6,102,810 690,000 99,000 248,487 387,310 7,346,305 5,358,025 7,876,699 5,169,866 4,963,000 4,043,000 6,391,061 5,071,935 3,704,800 3,711,324 4,257,639 3,572,515 -563,000 1,958,000 3,781,755 1,997,535 7,770,300 5,547,966 8,177,073 5,310,080 6,365,300 7,8( 6,534,885 7,74 153,202 6,806,900 8,0 6,474,349 8,33 543,004 4,290,400 5,65 3,883,098 5,19 1,257,307 5,330,900 8,42 5,436,731 8,46 52,000 23,497 49,288,000 48,349,863 5,000 329,528,296 6 5,000 329,528,296 D2,200 80,080,8576 48,991 87,758,198 6 - 168,029,757w 168,029,757w 19,500 89,026,4048 30,550 88,690,091 " - 233,361,022 ' - 233,361,022 55,000 66,973,129 10 P1,554 65,951,172 10 - 374,836,315 11 - 374,836,315 " !1,000 89,302,468 12 14,239 89,109,068 12 -20,000 - 20,000 - 39-10 - TABLE 39-A (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Total to Text Project Funding FY89 FY 90 FY91 FY 92 Sep. 30,1992 15. Lower Monumental New Work Lock & Dam, WA Approp. 2,120,00019 99,000 -- - 238,612,73213 Cost 363,114 1,335,148 540,738 - 238,612,732 13 Maint Approp. 5,837,300 3,961,605 3,930,300 6,380,000 66,965,437 14 Cost 7,270,127 3,760,855 4,001,616 4,522,986 64,938,561 14 16. Lower Snake Fish & Wildlife New work Compensation, ID, OR & WA Approp. 8,687,000 11,472,832 27,902,000 6,813,500 195,425,241 Cost 8,567,973 9,877,498 28,988,737 7,094,430 195,029,651 (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 223,965 Cost - - - - 223,965 17. McNary Lock & Dam, - New Work Lake Wallula, OR & WA Approp. 1,180,000 2,578,000 - - 326,293,105 16 Cost 1,022,277 2,231,198 505,723 - 326,293,105 '1 Maint. Approp 8,865,480 9,351,148 8,781,700 9,479,000 186,648,963 16 Cost 9,331,470 8,897,860 9,076,330 9,501,861 186,277,692 18 (Contributed Funds) Maint. Contrib. - - - - 43,707 Cost - - - - 43,707 18. Snake RiverDownstream New Work from Johnson Bar Landing Approp. 7,210,000'1 6,199,000 13,333,000 16,110,000 2 1,044,717,589 17 OR, WA & ID Cost 10,784,417 8,791,928 15,630,347 15,893,070 20 1,044,303,754 17 Maint. Approp. 24,662,405 18,590,284 20,358,500 28,494,500 312,866,377 18 Cost 27,588,435 17,815,413 19,799,683 26,516,385 309,270,43118 1. $39,000 of cost sharing funds from county were received in FY 90, but were not expended until FY 91. 2. Includes $570,831 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 3. Includes $66,700 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 4. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $96,340 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 5. Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior in Fiscal Years 1969 through 1972 for hatchery operations. Includes $655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. 6.Includes $20,137,847 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior starting FY 1972 for hatchery operations. FY 72-78 funds of $6,097,000 were charged to project as a cost, but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. Includes allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. Includes funds allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 7. Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36,748,021 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $914,256 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $789,000 appropriated and $788,999 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 8. Includes $48,919 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees; $641,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 9. Includes $60,941,807 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $12,006,000 appropriated and $12,006,000 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 10. Includes $621,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 11. Includes $46,212,534 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. Includes $63,800 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at completed projects. Includes $10,645,966 appropriated and $7,056,001 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 12. Includes $338,163 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 13. Includes $51,661,371 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $2,239,000 appropriated and $2,239,000 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 14. Includes $372,376 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 15. Includes $1,976,586 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $3,778,000 appropriated and $3,778,000 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. 16. Includes $28,851 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees and $1,035,860 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 17. Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $167,500 contributed funds - 39-11 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 for new work consisting of $85,000 for new work on existing projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. 18. Includes $186,570 appropriated and expended for maintenance of previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $408,019 appropriated and $390,619 expended open river Pasco to TABLE 39-B Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 19. Adjusted to correct FY89 appropriation from 2,140,000 to 2,120,000. 20. This does not include the appropriations and cost from the mitigation analysis under the Columbia River juvenile fish program which will be allocated at the conclusion of the analysis. See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID. Levee left bank. H. Doc 531, Blackfoot River, ID. Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, ID. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Ada County unit was deauthorized in 1986. Camas Creek, ID. Channel deepening and rectification of a 20-mile reach of Camas Creek. Deauthorized in 1965. Gooding Area, Little Wood River, ID. Channel improvement. Grande Ronde Valley, OR. Levees and channel clearing, straightening and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Deauthorized in 1986. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Henrys Fork Unit deauthorized in 1986. Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY. Flood protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID. Revetted levee. Little Wood River, ID. Flood protection in immediate area. Deauthorized in 1965. Malheur River, OR. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Mud Lake, ID, Idaho Falls Area. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1990. Palouse River, WA. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Deauthorized in 1986. Payette Valley, ID. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized October 3, 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, ID. Bank protection. South Fork Clearwater River, ID. Emergency construction of levees and revetments. Deauthorized in 1986. Teton River, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Tomanovich-Salmon City, Salmon, ID. Channel improvement. Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. Project deauthorized in 1990. Whitebird Creek, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. CATHERINE CREEK LAKE, OR Flood control and multipurpose dam on Catherine Creek H. Doc. 280, near Union, OR. Project deauthorized 1990. Oct 27, 1965 CATHERINE CREEK, OR Organic debris removal along Catherine Creek. Sec 208, P.LI by Chief Eng - 39-12 - May 17, 1950 Oct 27, 1965 Sep 24, 1954 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 89th Cong. 1st Sess. 83-780 Authorized ineers Sep. 3, 1985 2. 3. TABLE 39-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents CLEAR & BURNT RIVER, OR Construction of riprap bank protection at city of Huntington Waste Water Lagoon. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Provides for flood control works in vicinity of and through Colfax, WA, by channel enlargement and modification, levees, floodwalls, revetments, and modification of railroad bridges. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. Deauthorized in 1990. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WA Off-stream storage project upstream fromWalla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concretelined channel. Redesignation of reservoir to the Virgil B. Bennington Lake OWYHEE RIVER, OR Gravel, brush and small tree removal from 12 miles of Owyhee River. Sec. 14, P.L 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jul 10, 1985 Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc 888, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L 79-526, Chief of Engineers Report dated May 13, 1946 P.L 94-587 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 578, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong. Sec. 377, P.L. 77-228, Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 118. P.L. 102-580 102nd Cong. Sec. 208, P.L. 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 11, 1985. Jul 24, 1946 Oct 22, 1976 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 as amended Aug 18, 1941 Oct 31, 1992 Sep 24, 1954 as amended Jul. 19, 1988 Jul 3, 1958 Oct 23, 1958 Aug 15, 1963 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 2, 1945 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Oct 22, 1976 Dec 29, 1981 Jul 30, 1983 Mar 2, 1945 Dec 31, 1970 Mar 2, 1945 - 39-13 - Jul 24, 1946 Dec 22, 1944 10. 11. 12. 14. 15. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM Design, test and construction of fish bypass facilities at P.L. 100-371 Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite and McNary dams. (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Preparation of detailed plans. S. Doc 51, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Bruces Eddy dam and reservoir for flood control, H. Doc. 403, 87th. P.L 87-874 navigation, power, recreation, and area redevelopment. Cong., 2nd Sess. Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. P.L. 88-96 Dworshak Added Units 4, 5 and 6, ID. Units 5 and 6 were P.L. 87-874 deauthorized in FY 90. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM - LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doc. 704, 75th navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Cong., 3rd Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec. 4, Flood Control of 1944 facilities. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Four-lane highway bridge and approaches. P.L 94-587 Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000. P.L 97-140 Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in P.L 98-63 Clarkston, WA. Increase of authorized amount to $24,000,000. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BRYAN, WA Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. P. L 91-638 LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. 16. 17. 18. 19. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 39-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 20. 21. Mar 2, 1945 May 25, 1978 Oct 22, 1976 as ammended Nov. 17, 1986 2. Mar 2, 1945 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 17, 1986 23. Jun 13, 1902 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Table E Aug 18, 1941 Table E Dec 22, 1944 Table E Jul 11, 1956 Table E Oct 23, 1962 Table E Nov 7, 1966 LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM - LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Herbert G. West. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, AND ID Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. Changes to land acquisition authority. McNARY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Construction, operation and maintenance of a second powerhouse. NcMary Second Powerhouse automatically deauthorized Nov. 16, 1991 SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, OR, WA, AND ID Open-river navigation Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. Mouth to Riparia. Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. P. L 95-285 P.L 94-587 H.R. 6-P.L99-662 H. Doc. 704., 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H.R. 6- P.L 99-662 Sec. 1001, P.L 99-362 H. Doc. 127, 56th Cong., 2nd. Sess. H. Doc. 411, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Supercedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, ID only. H. Doc. 704, 75th See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Cong., 2d Sess. Lower Granite Locks and Dams. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Dayton, Touchet River, WA. Flood protection. H. Doc. 662, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR.Flood Protection. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID. H. Doc 452, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Channel improvement. Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR. Flood protection. Pullman, Palouse River, WA. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA. Levees and protective work P.L. 84-685 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA. Channel improvement. Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID. Construction of levee. Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID. Channel improvement. P.L 87-874 Lapwai Creek Culdesac, ID. Construct left bank levee. Lyman Creek near Rexburg, ID. Channelization. Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, WA. Levee and channel work. Blackfoot Reservoir, Blackfoot River, ID. Modification to increase spillway capacity. Deauthorized in 1986. Ririe Lake, Willow Creek, ID. Storage for flood control. Grande Ronde Lake, OR. Flood control, irrigation, water P.L 89-298 supply, anadromous fish, downstream and resident trout fishery, recreation and downstream power. Deauthorized in 1986. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA. Local protection reservoir to provide flood protection to portions of the city of Kennewick, WA. Cottonwood Creek Dam, ID. Protection to highly- P.L. 89-789 developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Deauthorized in 1986. - 39-14 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Stuart Gulch Dam, ID. Protection to highly-developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Deauthorized in 1979. 9. & Table E Nov 17, 1986 Jackson Hole, WY. Flood control protection by channel P.L 99-662 improvement consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetment along Snake River in vicinity of Wilson, Wyoming. Also operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions are Federal responsibility. Little Wood River, ID. Flood protection TABLE 39-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Columbia River and Tributaries Completed 1968 1,851,195 - above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA1 1. Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary projects. TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID 1 Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID 1 Big Wood River, IDs Boise River, IDs Catherine Creek, OR Catherine Creek Lake, OR Clear and Blurnt River, OR Colfax, Palouse River, WA Connell, WA 1 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, ID2 Dayton, Touchet River, WA Dry Creek, WA1 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA1 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1951 1970 1985 1985 1990 1978 1990 1990 1967 1984 1966 1961 1967 12,019 133,518 170,000 236,500 28,800 1,552,000 99,500 5,810,240 60,000 23,400 380,617 384,426 232,792 - 39-15 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 39-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, WA1 Gooding Area, ID 1 Graves Creek, ID1 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID1 Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID' Little Wood River, ID 6 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA1 Lyman Creek, ID1 Malheur Lake Project, OR Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR3 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID1 Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID2 Owyhee River, OR Rapid Creek, IDs Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA2 Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID2 Riverside Area, Pasco, WA1 Ririe Lake, ID Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR2 Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR1 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID' Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID2 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID 1 South Fork, Boise River, ID5 South Fork Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID 1 Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA 1 Tucannon River, Wooten, WA1 Umatilla River, OR1 Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, OR2 Weiser River, IDs Willow Creek, ID1 Willow Creek Lake, OR Yakima River, West Richland, WA1 ,4 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1969 1954 1953 1955 1978 1972 1973 1990 1972 1971 1990 1957 1968 1965 1949 1990 1985 1977 1967 1972 1983 1985 1970 1980 1952 1968 1985 1973 1955 1973 1971 1961 1960 1985 1963 1985 1964 2,665 59,167 75,469 1,575,838 2,388,270 176,833 113,296 235,025 17,592 230,315 2,561,136 55,894 1,786,753 54,538 23,050 69,316 19,500 110,815 39,172 28,839 39,677,448 75,000 5,000 131,700 8,501 32,425 44,400 61,055 128,635 72,140 73,932 161,540 16,118 106,900 976 37,168,114 229,890 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, PL 80-858. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14, PL 79-526. 3. Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. 4. Exclusive of $9,000 contributed funds. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 208, PL 83-780. 6. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL99-662. No funds authorized until FY90. 7. Exclusive of $853,712 contributed funds. -39-16 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep,. 30, 1992 Full report Operation See Annual and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge. ID 1990 23,085,832 TABLE 39-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID & WA 1964 1975 - Blackfoot Reservoir, ID 1980 1986 267,626 Boise Valley, ID Ada County Unit 1963 1986 46,084 - Canyon County Unit 1963 1967 10,600 - Camas Creek, ID 1960 1965 9,080 - Catherine Creek Lake, OR 1978 1990 1,552,000 - Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID 1972 1986 183,100 - Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID 1990 1990 655,000 - Grande Ronde Lake, OR 1966 1986 - - Grande Ronde Valley, OR 1958 1986 102,458 - Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Henrys Fork Unit 1968 1986 27,800 - Little Wood River, ID 1960 1965 21,334 - Lower Walla Walla River, WA 1953 1986 4,000 - Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet, ID 1988 1990 - - Malheur River, OR Willow Creek Unit 1961 1969 13,000 - McNary Second Powerhouse, OR & WA 1991 1991 - - Mill Creek, WA 1958 1977 3,537 - Mud Lake Area, ID 1957 1990 5,994 - Palouse River, WA 1958 1986 2,000 - Payette Valley, ID 1960 1978 23,178 - Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID 1969 1969 - - Pullman, Palouse River, WA 1964 1986 99,540 - S.Fork Clearwater River, ID 1973 1986 3,899 - Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID 1974 1979 234,100 - Teton River, ID 1955 1986 10,387 - Touchet River, WA 1957 1977 11,198 - Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID 1960 1990 112,757 - Whitebird Creek, ID 1957 1986 1,896 - - 39-17 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 39-H COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Federal Cost to Project Status Cost Sep. 30, 1992 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 42,796 Blackfoot River, ID Completed - 391,143 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Snake River Unit Completed - 3,375,158 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Completed - 59,942 Malheur River, OR Vale Unit Completed - 325,581 Mud Lake, ID Inactive 1,187,000 5,996 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit Completed - 6,456,032' Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 32,335 Weiser River, ID Deferred 1,565,000 37,757 Weiser River, ID Cambridge-Midvale Deferred - 75,000 TOTAL 10,801,740 1. Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. TABLE 39-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 7 of Text) Clearwater River, ID July 1992 Lyman Creek, ID August 1992 Mill Creek, WA October 1992 Palouse River, WA June 1992 Portneuf River, ID August 1992 Potlatch River, ID July1992 Snake River, ID August 1992 Touchet River, WA August 1992 Tucannon River, WA July 1992 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (See Section 15 of Text) SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 cfs 1613 feet Tainter 50 ft. by 55 ft. 2 428 feet 3 2 @ 90,000 kw 1 @ 220,000 kw 400,000 kw - 39-18 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT (Continued) Project Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 16 of Text) Space for additional Rating, Each Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1600 Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 3 3 @ 220,000 kw 1,060,000 kw 150 feet March 1973 1600-1445 feet 1605 feet 2,000,000 ac.-ft. 53 miles 17,090 acres 175 miles 86 feet 675 feet 97 feet 100 feet 103 feet 15 feet May 1962 Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 feet Radial 50 ft. by 51 ft. 10 671 feet 6 3 @ 90,000 kw 3 @ 111,000 kw 603,000 kw 226 feet December 1961 440-437 feet 446 feet 31.9 miles 9,200 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 80 miles - 39-19 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT (Continued) Project Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 18 of Text) Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 19 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation 86 feet 675 feet 93 feet 98 feet 101 feet 15 feet May 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 feet Radial 50 ft. by 60 ft. 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 244 feet March 1970 638-633 feet 646.5 feet 37.2 miles 10,025 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 92 miles 86 feet 675 feet 95 feet 100 feet 105 feet 15 feet May 1975 SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 581 feet Radial 50 ft. by 60.5 ft. 8 - 39-20 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT (Continued) Project POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 20 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 738-733 feet 746.5 feet 38 miles 8,900 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 91 miles 86 feet 675 feet 97 feet 98 feet 103 feet 15 feet April 1969 Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 feet Radial 50 ft. by 61 ft. 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 242 feet May 1969 540-537 feet 548 feet 28.7 miles 6,590 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 78 miles - 39-21 - 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 246 feet April 1975 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT (Continued) Project McNary Lock and Dam, OR and WA (See Section 22 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed. Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Acres Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 86 feet 675 feet 67 feet 75 feet 83 feet 15 feet November 1953 Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 feet Vertical Lift 50 ft. by 51 ft. 22 1,348 feet 14 70,000 kw 980,000 kw 193 feet November 1953 340-335 feet 356.5 feet 64 miles 38,800 14 ft. by 250 ft. 242 miles - 39-22 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-K SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING OR, WA, AND ID (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance Percent of Engineers to Sep. 30 1992 to Sep. 30, 1992 Com- Constr. Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost pleted Started Ice Harbor Lock & Dam Initial Project 129,578,480 129,578,480' 129,578,4804 89,026,404 88,690,091 100 FY 57 Code 710 Recreation Facilities 914,256 914,256 914,256 0 0 100 FY 57 Power Units 4-6 36,748,021 36,748,021 36,748,021 0 0 100 FY 71 Fish Bypass Program 27.800.0003 6.392.000 6.204.000 0 0 22 FY 91 Totals 195,040,757 173,632,7574 173,444,7574 89,026,404 88,690,091 88 Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project 160,413,215 160,413,2155 160,413,2156 66,973,129 65,951,172 100 FY 63 Power Units 4-6 60,941,807 60,941,807 60,941,807 0 0 100 FY 74 Fish Bypass Program 33.000.0003 14.944.000 14.937.589 0 0 45 FY 89 Totals 254,355,022 236,299,0225 236,292,6115 66,973,129 65,951,172 92 Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project 321,503,981 321,503,9818 321,503,9796 89,302,468 89,109,068 100 FY 65 Code 710 Recreation Facilities 63,800 63,800 63,800 0 0 100 FY 84 Power Units 4-6 46,212,534 46,212,534 46,212,534 0 0 100 FY 74 Fish Bypass Program 28.200.0003 9.370.000 9.348,085 0 0 33 FY 88 Totals 395,980,315 377,150,3156 377,128,3986 89,302,468 89,109,068 95 Lower Monumental Lock & Dam Initial Project 184,712,361 184,712,3617 184,712,3617 66,965,437 64,938,561 100 FY 61 Power Units 4-6 51,661,371 51,661,371 51,661,371 0 0 100 FY 75 Fish Bypass Program 34.700.0003 20.827.000' 20,629.493 0 0 59 FY 90 Totals 271,073,732 257,200,7327 257,003,2257 66,965,437 64,938,561 94 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing 34,613 34,6131 34,613 408,0192 390,6192 Open River Pasco to Lewiston 0 0 0 4,350 4,350 Totals Existing Project 1,116,484,439 1,044,317,439 1,043,903,604 312,679,807 309,083,861 100 Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston 400,150 400,150 400,150 186,570 186,570 Totals Authorized Project 1,116,884,589 1,044,717,5896 1,044,303,7548 312,866,377 309,270,431 1. New work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. 2. Includes $19,000 appropriated and $7,056 expended in FY 1992 for project condition survey cost. 3. Does not include mitigation analysis. 4. Includes $203,000 appropriated and $201,931 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 5. Includes $370,000 appropriated and $358,589 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 6. Includes $1,628,000 appropriated and $1,626,084 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 7. Includes $11,132,000 appropriated and $10,949,493 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 8. Includes $13,333,000 appropriated and $13,136,097 expended for Columbia River Juvenile Mitigation Program. 9. Adjusted to correct FY91 appropriations from $2,259,000 to $2,239,000. - 39-23 - ALASKA DISTRICT* This District consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK ..................... 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK .............. 3. Cordova Harbor, AK ...................... 4. Craig Harbor, AK ......................... 5. Dillingham Harbor, AK ................... 6. Homer Harbor, AK ....................... 7. Metlakatla Harbor, AK ................... .. 8. Mountain Point, AK ....................... 9. Ninilchik Harbor, AK ...................... 10. Nome Harbor, AK ......................... 11. Project Condition Surveys ................... 12. St. George, AK ........................... 13. St. Paul Island Harbor ..................... 14. Wrangell Harbor, AK .................... 40-1 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-4 40-4 40-4 40-4 Flood Control 15. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK ............... 40-5 16. Chena River Lakes, AK .................... 40-5 17. Homer Spit Erosion, AK ................... 40-5 18. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 40-5 19. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Project ........................... 40-5 Navigation 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along a 3,300-foot baseline adjacent to the Port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 36 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29.0 feet and the extreme range is 42.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 20. Snettisham, AK.......................... 40-6 General Investigations 21. Survey .................................. 40-6 22. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 40-6 23. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ..... 40-6 Tables Table 40-A Table 40-B Table 40-C Table 40-D Table 40-E Table 40-F Table 40-G Table 40-H Table 40-I Table 40-J Table 40-K Cost & Financial Statement ........ 40-7 Authorizing Legislation ............ 40-9 Other Authorized Navigation Projects 40-11 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 40-12 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ............. 40-12 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................... 40-13 Project Condition Surveys .......... 40-13 Not Applicable Not Applicable Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977, was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of the limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was accomplished across the entire project during July and August 1991. The Municipality of Anchorage contributed funding for dredging in front of the POL terminal. Controlling depth at the harbor was at a project depth of -36 feet MLLW. Regular maintenance dredging was accomplished by contract with Manson Construction and Engineering of Seattle, WA. A total of 227,559 cubic yards was dredged in 1992. - 40-1 - I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 Of that amount, 123,517 cubic yards were for the Municipality of Anchorage. 2. Bethel Harbor, AK Location. The City of Bethel is located about 85 miles inland from the Bering Sea and adjacent to the Kuskokwimn River. (See NOAA Chart 16006.) Existing project. Bethel Small Boat Harbor was authorized by Section 107 of the Rivers and Harbors Act enacted 14 July 1960 (Public Law 86-645) as amended. The project consists of a small boat basin of approximately 6 acres dredged to a depth of 4 feet below mean lower low water, a maneuvering and turning basin, and an access channel connecting the channel to the Kuskokwim River. The project originally included four finger-type berthing areas providing beach moorage for 1,200 small river boats and a future mediumdraft moorage basin. The fingers were removed by local interests in 1986 and replaced with floating docks in 1989. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling deep-draft vessels serves for general cargo. Small boat facilities in the basin area include publicly owned mooring floats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 18,411 yards of material removed from the end of March to the end of April 1992. 3. Cordova Harbor, AK Location. Cordova is on the Gulf of Alaska near the mouth of the Copper River, about 150 miles southeast of Anchorage. (See NOAA Chart 16710, 16709, 16700, and 16013.) Existing project. Adopted 30 August 1935 and 30 August 1964, provides for construction of two breakwaters 1,100 and 1,400 feet in length protecting a 23 acre area, with an initial 8.27 acre basin by 10.4 acres to a depth of -14 feet MLLW; and construction of an entrance breakwater 183 feet in length. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include two docks for deep-draft vessels, the small boat harbor, and a few piers associated with fish processing plants which are used by fishing vessels. Both municipal and city docks are owned by the city of Cordova, with the small boat inner harbor facilities being owned by the State but operated by the city. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with an estimated 8,500 cubic yards of material removed by the end of November 1992. 4. CRAIG HARBOR, AK Location. Craig is on the west side of Prince of Wales Island about 200 miles south of Juneau in Southeast Alaska. (See NOAA Charts 17405, 17400, and 16016) Existing Project. Adopted 2 March 1945, the harbor project includes a 3.6-acre mooring basin 225 feet wide and 700 feet long plus a 100 foot wide entrance channel in South Cove dredged to -11 feet MLLW. Construction of two City owned and maintained rubblemound breakwaters to protect the expanded float system was authorized in 1979. The north breakwater is 160 feet long and the south breakwater is 300 feet long. Contstruction began in 1981 and was completed in 1983. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Existing facilities include a City owned dock, publicly owned docks for deep draft vessels, two small boat harbors, and several piers which support commercial fishing. Operations during fiscal year. A contract was awarded in late September 1992 for maintenance dredging of approximately 6300 cubic yards of material from the basin and entrance channel. Work is scheduled for completion in late December 1992. 5. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. At the head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on the right bank of Nushagak River, just below its confluence of Wood River; about 470 miles northeasterly of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of + 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek; with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek; and a sill across the basin outlet. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four docks at the city of Dillingham; three privately owned, one owned by the city, and four publicly owned small boat floats are located in the project basin. Two docks are used by the city to unload barges which come into Dillingham. New floats for the harbor were installed in June 1982, they are removed before fall freezeup and replaced each spring. Cargo and passengers from ocean vessels are unloaded at the docks or in the small-boat basin. Facilities are inadequate for the number of boats using the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance was accomplished by dredging from the middle of May to the middle of June 1992. A total of 89,148 cubic yards of material was removed. 6. HOMER HARBOR, AK Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water southwest of Anchorage. The harbor site is land based near the extremity of Homer Spit, which varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16645.) - 40-2 - ALASKA DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for a sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit about 50 acres in area. Project depth varies from 10 feet mean lower low water in the most western segment of the harbor to 20 feet below mean lower low water in the entrance channel and the most eastern segment of the harbor; a north entrance channel; protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels serves for passengers and general cargo. Small boat facilities in basin area include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. Construction has tripled size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance dredging was accomplished by contract during the middle of July to the middle of August 1992. A total of 9,468 cubic yards was removed. 7. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small boat basins. Existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. New basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are one general cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. Existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Project physically complete, contractor claims pending. 8. MOUNTAIN POINT BREAKWATER, AK Location. The project is located within the Ketchikan Gateway Borough on Revillagigedo Island in Southeast Alaska. The city of Ketchikan is located approximately 250 air miles south of Juneau. Mountain Point is a residential area about 6 miles south of Ketchikan on the Tongass Highway. Existing project. The authorized Section 107 project consists of a 424-foot L-shaped rubblemound breakwater and a timber float. The existing local project consists of two ramps: a cast-in-place concrete slab extending 190 feet seaward from a parking lot to the -2 feet mean lower low water level, and precast reinforced concrete planks extending 194 feet to the -5 feet mean lower low water level. Local coorperation. Local sponsor has provided funds for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed. A Local Cooperation Agreement detailing cost sharing of the project was signed with the Ketchikan Gateway Borough. Funds were received for construction. 9. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the community of Ninilchik, AK about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/ NOS Chart #16640.) Existing project. A small boat basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by a pile jetty 410 feet long. The project was modified in the design stage to delete the pile jetty and revise the harbor dimensions to 400 feet long by 125 feet wide, and was completed in November 1961. Modification, including river channel diversion, two armor rock jetties, and beach protection, were accomplished in 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are limited to shallowdraft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small boat floats in the project basin, provided by State of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using the harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 9,319 cubicyards of material removed from the end of April to the middle of May 1992. 10. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of the Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16206.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly 951 and the westerly not exceeding 676 feet long, at the mouth of - 40-3 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 Snake River; a channel 8 feet at mean lower low water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, ending in a turning basin of the same depth, 250 feet wide and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting all existing waterfront improvements on easterly beach by means of rock mount seawall 3,350 feet long extending easterly from east jetty. The project has been completed except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore, a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters the dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where a lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome received Department of Army authorization (permit) to construct a 3,600 foot gravel filled causeway. Construction of the causeway began in July 1985. Due to lack of complete funding, the length of the causeway was shortened to 2,700 feet. Construction was completed in May 1987. Use of this causeway for offloading petroleum products was delayed until the September 1987 arrival of a required berthing barge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 9,524 cubic yards of material removed from the end of June to the end of August 1992. 11. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Preliminary and detailed surveys were completed to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, channels and tributaries of major rivers not within major project boundaries. Total costs for fiscal year were $493,957. (See Table 40-I) 12. ST. GEORGE, AK Location. The city of St. George is located on St. George Island, the southernmost island of the Pribilof Islands, near the edge of the southwest Bering Sea shelf. Existing project. The project was authorized in Section 107 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, PL 86-845, as amended. The work consists of dredging approximately 176,000 cubic yards of material in the maneuvering area from an average depth of + 3 feet mean lower low water to -18 feet mean lower low water and the entrance channel from an average depth of -14 feet mean lower low water to -20 feet below mean lower low water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during the fiscal year. Local sponsor's funds were used to pay the contractor's last pay estimate for the prior year. The project is physically complete, contractor claims pending. 13. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Location. St. Paul Island Harbor is located on the shore of Village Cove on the southern side of St. Paul Island, the largest and most populated island of the Pribilof group in the central southeast Bering Sea. Existing Project. A St. Paul Harbor project was authorized by Congress in Section 202 of Public Law 99-662, based on a 1982 Corps of Engineers feasibility report. Since that report was published, new wave and climatic information was gained through field measurement and through a November 1984 storm that severely damaged a city built breakwater at St. Paul. American vessels have also assumed control of the groundfish harvest in the area more rapidly than expected, while crab stocks and catches have declined markedly. St. Paul also constructed 750 feet of breakwater and a 200-foot dock at the harbor site. On 31 March 1989, Assistant Secretary of the Army signed an Agreement under Section 204(e) of PL 99-662 which states that the government would pay 80 percent of the costs of general navigation features of the Authorized Project. The agreement was unique in that the city had to successfully build the harbor with their own funds and the government would reimburse them upon acceptance by the Corps of Engineers. The general navigation features consist of: (1) 1,050 feet of rubblemound breakwater with a finished elevation of + 37 feet MLLW; (2) 1,000 feet of rubblemound detached breakwater with a crest elevation of + 18 feet MLLW; and (3) a 200 foot wide maneuvering area at a depth of -18 feet MLLW. Construction commenced in May 1989 and was completed in December 1989. The city was reimbursed in March 1990 in the amount of $18,150,000. Local Cooperation. A 204(e) agreement was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on 30 March 1989. One minor item remains incomplete. The agreement was amended on 30 April 1992 to allow the local sponsor an additional 5 years to complete the inner harbor facility. Operations during fiscal year. The general navigation features were completed in 1989 and accepted by the government. Coordination was performed with the city for compliance with the LCA. A condition survey was completed in fiscal year 1992. 14. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Location. Wrangell Harbor is located on the west side of the northern end of Wrangell Island, 824 miles from Seattle and 160 miles from Juneau. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 8164, 8161, and 8201.) Existing project. Consists of a rubblemound breakwater 300 feet long to protect the southern portion of the outer harbor; a mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep below mean lower low water within the protected area; an inner basin in the tide flat area east of Shakes Island, 325 feet wide and 550 feet long; a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long; a connecting channel - 40-4 - ALASKA DISTRICT 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long from the outer mooring basin all at a depth of 10 feet at mean lower low water; and construction of a rock mound breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Shakes Island. The range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.7 feet. The extreme tidal range is 26 feet. Heavy swells, dangerous to small fishing boats, are caused by the wind, which causes an additional rise of about 1 foot. Construction of the breakwater north of Shakes Island was placed on inactive status as material to be used from the inner basin was unsuitable and the breakwater considered unnecessary for safe moorage of vessels. The cost of this portion was last revised in 1956 and estimated to be $6,500. (See table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves and floats in Wrangell Harbor. Two privately owned wharves serving general cargo and passenger terminals, one of which includes a cold storage facility, are open for public use. The remaining wharves serve various industrial purposes. One of the floats is publicly owned and is open for public use for mooring and servicing small craft, and two privately owned floats serve oil handling facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A revised letter report on the repair of the concrete parapet wall on the breakwater was prepared during the spring and summer of FY 90. Repair was accomplished in September 1992. The recommended method of repair used was shotcrete, a high quality wet-mix concrete containing steel fibers and silica powder. Shotcrete was applied to both the harbor and seaward sides at the rubblemound's intersection with the walls' foundation, included rebuilding of all the construction joints and major fractures along the parapet structure. Flood Control 15. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK Location. In southwestern Alaska on the north bank of the Kuskokwim River 400 miles west of Anchorage. Existing project. The project consists of rock riprap toe protection to be installed on the unprotected river bank and at locations where existing city construction bulkheads are threatened by erosion. This includes 3,500 feet of unprotected riverbank and 3000 feet of previously installed bulkheads. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement detailing the cost sharing requirements will be required. Terminal facilities. The POL tank farm is situated at the downstream end of the project and the city's general cargo dock is at the upstream end of the project. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were initiated with surveys and design review by the Corps of Engineers Channel Stabilization Committee. 16. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. In the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, C1, D1, D2, and Big Delta D6.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek Dam has been constructed 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on the Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22 mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana river to a point south and west of Fairbanks. Estimated Federal cost is $210,000,000, Little Chena Dam was submitted for deauthorization in September 1990. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Modification of gates and installation of a curbwall were completed by contract at a total cost, during 1992, of $264,262. Major surface flooding at Fairbanks was avoided due to flood control operations at the Moose Creek Dam, during May and June 1992. 17. HOMER SPIT, AK Location. Located near the town of Homer, Alaska, 120 miles southwest of Anchorage. It is a 4.5 mile long finger of land that varies in width from 30 to 500 yards wide extending into Kachemak Bay. Existing project. The authorized project, which is being designed, consists of rock revetment along 1,100 feet of sheetpile beachfront for the initial phase and periodic beach nourishment as needed. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was signed detailing cost sharing of the project. The local share of project cost was received. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications for construction of the project were completed and the contract has been awarded. No placement has been made. 18. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $561,330 for disaster preparedness, emergency operations, and rehabilitation. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). 19. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of flood control works at Fairbanks, Bethel, Galena, Gold Creek, Lowell Creek, Salmon River, Skagway River, and Talkeetna River, Alaska. - 40-5 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 20. SNETTISHAM, AK Location. At the mouth of the Speel River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the north, 29 nautical miles southeast of Juneau. (See Coast Geodetic Survey chart 8227.) Existing project. Snettisham is a multi-stage power project. The initial stage, which was completed in 1977, tapped Long Lake and included an underground powerhouse with two 23.4 megawatt units and a transmission line to Juneau, AK. The project was turned over to the Alaska Power Administration for operation and maintenance. The second stage, which is nearly completed, provided a tunnel to Crater Lake and added a third unit. The final phase will provide a dam on Long Lake to increase storage and the energy capability of Long Lake. The Long Lake Dam is currently unscheduled. The existing Long Lake (elevation 815 feet) water is transported through an approximately horizontal 13 foot diameter tunnel 8,400 feet long and a 1,400 foot penstock dropping at a 46 degree angle to the underground powerhouse at tidewater to drive two turbines with a combined generating capacity of 47,600 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to Juneau by a 13.8 kilovolt overhead transmission line and a submarine cable traversing Taku Inlet. The Crater Lake stage of construction tapped Crater Lake (elevation 1,002 feet) to drive a third turbine installed in the existing underground powerhouse. An additional nameplated-rated generating capacity of 34,500 kilowatts was added. Estimated cost of Stage 1 and Stage 2 construction is $148,284,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. The Remote Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Contract was awarded in September 1990. The contract is substantially behind schedule. A July 1993 completion is anticipated. A successful lake tap occurred on 21 October 1988. Power-online initially occurred in May 1989, but was shut down for repairs to the turbine and generator. It has since been brought back on line. General Investigations 21. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys include $325,480 for flood control studies, $256,714 for coordination studies and $107,974 for miscellaneous activities. 22. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain management guidance, and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, State agencies, Architectural/Engineering firms, lending institutions, and private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $124,124. Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $17,901. 23. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN KODIAK HARBOR, AK Location. The port of Kodiak is located 242 and 175 nautical miles south of Anchorage and Seward, respectively, and approximately 1,258 nautical miles northwest of Seattle. St. Herman Harbor is located at Near Island across Near Island Channel from Kodiak. Existing project. The recommended plan has a 1,865 foot rubblemound split breakwater with a crest elevation of + 22 feet MLLW. The main entrance channel is located in the split breakwater and has a design width of 200 feet and design depth of -20 MLLW. Since the natural water depth at the main entrance channel is -55 feet MLLW, no dredging is required in this channel. A 100 foot rubblemound stub breakwater is recommended next to a secondary entrance channel at the north end of the harbor. This secondary entrance channel is to be 100 feet wide with a design depth of -12 feet MLLW, and will require 4,400 square yards of rock excavation. The current estimated cost of $26,243,000, of which $23,478,000 would be the Federal first cost and $2,687,000 is the non-Federal first cost (cash and land easement rights of way). Local interests will pay 10 percent initially plus 10 percent during a period of up to 30 years, resulting in an ultimate non-Federal cost of $5,218,000. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement will be required with the city of Kodiak. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers, wharves, and docks are located in the port of Kodiak. Four are located in Womens Bay and two in Gibson Cove, west of the main part of the city. Twenty-four facilities are along the main waterfront of Kodiak, with thirteen on St. Paul Harbor and eleven on Kodiak Harbor, west and east of the Kodiak Small Boat Harbor, respectively. The remaining facility is the St. Herman Small Boat Harbor between Uski and Near Islands, directly south of the Kodiak Small Boat Harbor. Operations during fiscal year. All efforts were toward completing the GDM and advancing plans and specifications and all other activities leading to construction. - 40-6 - ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep.30, 1992 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) Maint. Contrib. Cost 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK 3. Cordova Harbor, AK 4. Craig Harbor, AK Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Dillingham Harbor, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) Maint. Contrib. Cost 1,433,100 1,636,355 994,680 1,479,384 1,636,750 1,069,549 - - 585,647 - - 560,618 -447,000 -- 83,664 - - 471,000 - - 79,798 1,107,100 1,127,641 52,433 77,462 329,161 75,500 314,748 - 356,000 -- 76,303 95,934 31,419 - - 720,600 550,061 480,500 396,200 714,936 535,593 516,326 388,230 6. Homer Harbor, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 7. Metlakatla Harbor, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 8. Mountain Point Boat Launch, AK 323,000 345,002 221,000 239,700 333,942 338,376 221,148 239,829 20,000 50,258 - 5,077,470 Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Ninilchik Harbor, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 229,200 161,063 198,740 159,540 69,000 54,883 72,900 207,300 100,642 159,601 - 40-7 - 533,235 533,235 25,390,707 25,247,409 638,080 638,080 447,000 412,825 395,500 394,546 356,000 76,303 548,790 580,209 8,124,282 8,126,784 1,700 1,700 3,512,350 3,512,350 4,768,113 4,462,051 67,974 67,974 5,077,470 5,074,730 148,520 148,520 830,644 722,096 69,000 54,883 428,720 428,720 4,347,039 4,293,844 TABLE 40-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep.30, 1992 10. Nome Harbor, AK New Work (Contrib. Funds) 12. St. George, AK (Contrib. Funds) 13. St. Paul Harbor, AK 14. Wrangell Harbor, AK 15. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK 16. Chena River Lakes, AK (Contrib. Funds) 17. Homer Spit Erosion, AK 20. Snettisham, AK 23. Kodiak Harbor, AK Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - - 236,700 330,628 443,745 158,884 2,500 5,000 2,500 5,000 3,710,000 3,204,451 531,360 633,828 2,366,172 -- 2,823,937 450,000 18,141,200 248,714 18,304,806 52,500 44,888 21,787 61,039 1,157,000 1,160,900 76 1,268,000 114,000 3,477,192 474,789 962,300 994,754 962,828 947,827 48,000 110,000 54,529 74,267 4,715,113 2,986,000 6,782,000 2,457,450 560,000 509,000 528,250 495,000 -- 99,100 275,678 --- 271,300 241,890 2,500 2,500 130 30,683 125 8,163 358,671 1,312,200 1,182,576 46,000 90,000 -800,000 2,063,559 375,000 403,840 340,000 334,021 424,854 312,456 -100,000 -129,571 1,657,800 1,582,178 110,000 110,423 4,787,000 5,571,354 250,000 223,394 1,348,240 1,348,240 9,920,080 9,884,069 175,000 175,000 4,000,000 3,923,400 3,004,000 2,823,937 19,635,200 19,593,562 537,020 537,020 882,240 6,273,224 1,581,854 1,473,557 214,013,928 213,974,046 2,970,000 2,764,754 2,182,300 2,145,929 1,070,000 1,078,583 143,209,550 142,515,669 1,769,000 1,724,669 - 40-8 - ALASKA DISTRICT Table 40-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Deep winter harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties. 1 Extension of project limits. H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 P.L 94- 587 BETHEL HARBOR, AK Basin of 6 acres dredged to -4 feet mean lower low water, Section 107, 1960 Rivers and manuvering and turning basin, and access channel. Floating Harbors Act, P.L 86- 645 docks constructed by locals in 1989. H.R. 7634, 86th Cong. CORDOVA HARBOR, AK Two breakwaters, 1,000 and 1,400 feet in length protecting an 18.67 acre area dredged to a depth of -14 feet mean lower low water. Harbor expansion from 8.26 acres to 20 acres by removal of 1400 foot breakwater and construction of a new 2000 foot long breakwater. The entrance channel dredged to -16 feet mean lower low water and turning basin dredged from -10 to -12 feet mean lower low water. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. HOMER HARBOR, AK Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. Doc. 33, Committee on Rivers and Harbors, House of Representatives 73rd Cong. Sec. 55, P.L 88-451, Senate Doc. 2881, 88th Cong. Sec. 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, P.L 86-645 H.R. 7634, 86th Cong. H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st, Sess. 2 P.L 88- 451 Section 107, P.L 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 13, 1981 METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acre in extent to a depth H. Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters Section 201, P.L 89- 298 inclosing a 7.0 acre basin. S. Doc. 92- 64, 92d Cong., 2d Sess.2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410 foot jetty. NOME HARBOR, AK Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long H. Doc. 1932, 64th Cong., 2d Sess.2 revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet H. Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., wide and 600 feet long. 3 and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Seawall Reports of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948 - 40-9 - July 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 July 14, 1960 Documents Apr. 20, 1933 Aug. 19, 1964 Ju.ly 14, 1964 July 3, 1958 5. July 2, 1958 Aug. 19, 1964 July 14, 1960 7. Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 9. July 3, 1958 10. Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 June 16, 1948 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 Table 40-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 12. Nov. 17, 1986 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 20. 23. Nov. 17, 1986 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 ST. GEORGE, AK Dredging the maneuvering area from an average depth of + 3 feet MLLW to 18 feet below MLLW and dredging the entrance channel from an average depth of 14 feet MLLW to 20 feet below MLLW. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Add 1,050 feet of breakwater at existing crest height, 37 feet mean lower low water and 1,000 feet long with a crest height of + 18 mean low low water. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Breakwater 300 feet long to protect southern portion of harbor. Mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep. Inner basin and connecting channel from the existing mooring basin, both 10 feet deep at mean lower low water, and breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Snakes Island. BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK Streambank protection by placing riprap along 8,500 feet of riverbank. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Dam and reservoir on the main Chena River, a dam and detention reservoir on the Little Chena River, and a levee along the north side of the Tanana River.4 Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, Public Law 86-645, as amended. Section 202, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 161, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 202, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 284, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Section 202, PL 99-662 S. Doc. 89, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.2 HOMER SPIT, AK Extension of an existing rubblemound revetment along an Sec. 101, Water Resource existing sheetpile wall to provide protection and nourishment Development Act of 1990, along a 1000 foot portion of State highway. P.L. 101-640, 101st Cong. SNETTISHAM, AK Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission H. Doc. 40, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.2 facilities. KODIAK HARBOR, AK Breakwater 1,900 feet long with an entrance channel 930 feet long and 20 feet deep to serve 45 acres of moorage in St. Herman's Bay. Section 202, PL 99-662 S. Doc. 6, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. Section 102, Water Resource Development Act of 1990, P.L101-640, 101st Cong. 1. Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized November 6, 1977 under section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 4. Little Chena Dam deauthorized in 1991. - 40-10 - ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK1 Bar Point Harbor, AK2 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Cordova Harbor, AK2 Cordova, AK Craig Harbor, AK Douglas Harbor, AK Dry Pass, AK Egegik River, AK Elfin Cove, AK Gastineau Channel, AK Haines Harbor, AK2 Homer Harbor, AK2 Hoonah Harbor, AK Humboldt Harbor, AK Iliuliuk Harbor, AK Juneau Harbor, AK Kake Harbor, AK Kasilof Harbor, AK2 Ketchikan Harbor, AK Kodiak Harbor, AK Mekorykuk, AK Myers Chuck Harbor, AK Naknek River, AK Neva and Olga Straits, AK Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK2 Pelican Harbor, AK Petersburg Harbor, AK Port Alexander, AK Port Lions, AK2 Rocky Pass, AK St. Michael Canal, AK Seldovia Harbor, AK Sergius Whitestone, AK Seward Harbor, AK Sitka Harbor, AK Skagway Harbor, AK Stikine River, AK Valdez Harbor, AK Wrangell Narrows, AK Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1920 1983 1985 1977 1978 1986 1983 1963 1983 1972 1959 1964 1977 1987 1983 1977 1941 1974 1991 1975 1979 1973 1986 1970 1961 1960 1972 1964 1972 1949 1986 1960 1916 1974 1973 1973 1973 1972 1987 1968 1979 128,896 2,000,0003 1,520,272 1,220,000 843,534 9,642,000 1,033,5004 282,019 943,351 4,441 154,191 789,461 1,000,000 5 2,000,000 4,255,0008 3,679,6837 66,037 1,381,150 870,700 109,848 1,602,417 1,891,212 e 1,372,139 9,700 20,789 155,009 370,415 369,683 252,932 17,000 1,825,311 337,668 377,062 1,051,883s 1,798,010 712,369 o0 1,611,009 133,180 649,740"1 3,562,343 2,154 5,000 488,156 72,500 23,466 3,107 102,701 260,991 331,256 37,946 132,946 18,973 26,800 560 5,518 1,934 219,789 15,400 32,665 8,804 221,498 309,260 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 3. In addition, $272,779 of State funds. 4. Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. 5. In addition, $925,500 of State funds. 6. In addition, $973,875 of State funds. 7. In addition, $857,000 of State funds. 8. Includes $594,163 for rehabilitation. 9. Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710. Recreation facilities at Completed projects. 11. Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710, Recreation facilities at Completed projects. - 40-11 - TABLE 40-E REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1992 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1992 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River' Completed 1985 553,970 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,0062 4,301 Klutina River, Cooper Center, AK 3 Completed 1973 260,681 Lowell Creek, AK^ Completed 1945 416,382s 30,771 Salmon River, AK Completed 1963 37,7706 7 162,925 8 Talkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 1. Section 14. 5. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 2. In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 7. In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 4. During FY 88, $551,690 was expended from FC and CE. 8. In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. TABLE 40-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Allison Lake, AK (Valdez Hydropower) 1992 Anchorage Harbor, AK (Uncompleted Portion) 1967 1977 Bradley Lake, AK 1983 1983 1982 46,701,000 Ketchikan Harbor, AK (West Breakwater) 1979 1979 Port Alexander, AK (Inner Harbor) 1949 1977 Tolovana River, AK (Snagging) 1931 1977 Little Chena River Dam 1983 1990 Long Lake Dam 1975 1990 Myers Chuck Harbor, AK 1970 1991 9,700 Scammon Bay, AK 1992 Skagway River, AK 1966 1991 26,385 - 40-12 - ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86- 645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Anchor Point, AK Atka, AK Akutan, AK Barrow, AK Chignik, AK Cordova, AK Craig, AK Ketchikan, AK Klawock, AK Koyuk, AK Larsen Bay, AK Little Diomede, AK Mountain Point, AK Port Lions, AK St. Mary's, AK Seward Expansion, AK Wainwright, AK Whittier, AK Williamsport, AK Wrangell Narrows, AK Fiscal Year Costs $ 44,971 13,125 7,891 6,735 2,000 8,500 34,983 15,555 6,755 4,806 32,997 27,815 54,883 174,689 9,751 6,758 4,860 25,307 10,000 219 TOTAL 492,600 TABLE 40-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted King Cove Harbor August 1992 Kodiak Harbor (Near Island Channel ) June 1992 Port Lions Harbor June 1992 St. Paul Harbor June 1992 Dry Pass Channel June 1992 Elfin Cove Channel July 1992 New Metlakatla Harbor February 1992 Old Metlakatla Harbor February 1992 Port Alexander Channel July 1992 Sitka (Crescent Bay) Harbor July 1992 Wrangell Narrows Channel (Mile 20) February 1992 - 40-13 - BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR RIVERS AND HARBORS The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is a continuing body created by Section 3 of the 1902 River and Harbor Act. The board is selected by the Chief of Engineers and consists of seven senior engineer officers. The Deputy Chief of Engineers normally serves as chairman. The seven members are division engineers with membership rotated among divisions having civil works missions. The civilian staff members of the board consists of four senior advisors, one of which serves as Acting Resident Member. The board meets quarterly or on call of the chairman. The board under the direction of the Chief of Engineers: a. Conducts independent review of reports covering a wide range of project purposes as requested by Acts of Congress or resolutions of Congressional Committees, or as directed by the Chief of Engineers, concerning proposed works for development of the water resources of the United States; prepares reports and recommendations theron in compliance with study directives, with regard to formulation of project scope, suitability of engineering plans, adequacy of costs, economic justification, and requirements of local cooperation including cost sharing and propriety of proposed construction by the Federal government. b. Reviews reports and makes recommendations for major modification or reconstruction of existing navigation improvements to ensure conformity with existing authorized improvements and essentially for efficient and economical maintenance and operation. c. Provides independent evaluation and counsel with respect to the environmental quality aspects of water resources development. d. Provides assistance, as required, to HQUSACE in the development of policy and related procedures for the uniform application of standards in the project formulation process. e. Provides advice on potential issues related to ongoing planning studies, as discussed during Feasibility Review Conferences. Total membership of the board is fixed by law at seven. In December 1982, the Chief of Engineers instituted a mechanism for predesignating future members, based on their time of service as division engineers, geographical factors, and other criteria. This procedure achieves a wider involvement of division engineers and their staffs with the proceedings of the board. Members Designate attend and participate in the meetings of the board, but are not permitted to vote on board actions. The membership of the board as of September 30, 1992 was: Members Major General Peter J. Offringa, Deputy Chief of Engineers, Washington, DC Brigadier General Roger F. Yankoupe, Division Engineer, South Atlantic, Atlanta, GA Brigadier General Albert J. Genetti, Jr., Division Engineer, Ohio River, Cincinnati, OH Brigadier General Robert L. Herndon, Division Engineer, Southwestern, Dallas, TX Member Designate: Major General Ernest J. Harrell, Division Engineer, North Pacific, Portland, OR Official Board Actions. In compliance with resolutions of Congress and instructions from the Chief of Engineers, the board approved 24 official report reviews during Fiscal Year (FY) 1992. The favorable reports category includes favorable recommended projects for Federal construction as well as projects for solving water resources problems for major metropolitan areas, even though they may not include recommendations for construction by any agency of the Federal government. Reports Recommending Favorable for Federal Construction. The board approved 16 projects at an estimated total first cost of $3,462,777,000, of which $1,779,988,000 is the first cost to the United States. A listing of the projects follows: American River Watershed Investigation, CA Delaware River Comprehensive Navigation Study, Main Channel Deepening, NJ, PA, and DE Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Sargent beach, TX Kissimmee River Restoration, FL Lackawanna River Near Scranton, PA Lackawanna River at Olyphant, PA Las Vegas Wash and Tributaries (Tropicana), NV Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA Lower-Cumberland-Tennessee Rivers, KY Monongahela-Youghiogheny River Basin, MD, PA and WV Morro Bay Harbor, CA Rio Grande De Loiza, PR Sacramento Metropolitan Area, CA Savannah Harbor, GA Shoal Creek, TX Southeast Alaska Harbors, AK Recommending Unfavorable for Federal Construction: During FY 1992, the board concurred in the unfavorable recommendations of the reporting officers for Federal construction in eight projects: Black Hawk County, IA (Cedar Run and Tributaries) Connecticut River, Turns Falls to State Line, MA Eastern North Carolina Above Cape Lookout, NC Frog Pond, FL Lower Hillsborough River and Curiosity Creek, Mississippi Gulf Coastal Areas, MS Savannah River Basin, GA, SC, and NC Wrightsville Beach-North Portion, NC During FY 1992, the board held meetings on 2 December 1991, 10 March 1992, 5 May 1992, 27 May 1992, and 23-24 June 1992. Since 1902, the board has acted on 8,900 reports, recommending favorably on 3,966 and unfavorably on 4,934. 41-1 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: BG Pat M. Stevens IV, President Designee, Mr. Sam E. Angel, appointed Sep. 25, 1979; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; Mr. Frank H. Walk, appointed Oct. 22, 1987; BG Albert J. Genetti, Jr., Member Designee, Commander, Ohio River Division; RADM J. Austin Yeager, Member Designee, NOAA: COL Gerald E. Galloway, U.S. Army, appointed Oct. 28, 1989; COL Jack B. Avant, appointed Jun. 20, 1991 served as Secretary of the Commission. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefor. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction of five salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement, four in lower Mississippi River Delta region, and one in the Mississippi - Louisiana Estuarine Area; Bonnet Carre' and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a demonstration erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portions east and west of Black River and south * Authorizing legislation (Tables 42-D and 42-E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 42-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds- Mound City area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L'Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo- Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Channel improvements to Eight Mile Creek, Arkansas; Ten Mile and Fifteen Mile Bayous in West Memphis, and vicinity Arkansas; Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, Mississippi; and Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and Mississippi. Navigation channel and harbor improvements to Helena Harbor and vicinity, Arkansas at Mississippi River, mile 652 AHP. Channel improvements and pumping station for Helena, Phillips County,and vicinity, Arkansas and St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Missouri. Field operations of the commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction- St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N. page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time high in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 61 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existingproject. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides 42-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realinement and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 42-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 42-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 42-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 42-D and 42-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 42-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Based on the estimated cost of $11,403,428,000 (cost projected through the construction period), and actual expenditures through Sep. 30, 1992, of $5,373,205,868, the entire project is about 82.6 percent complete. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 21, 1990, for Ports of Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1990, for Port of New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (59th edition), 1992. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, excluding maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1992, was $5,408,357,337. (See Table 42-V.) (See also Tables 42-U, 42-W, and 42-X for additional financial statements. Operations and results duringfiscalyear. The 339th Session was held Apr. 6-10, 1992, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to Baton Rouge, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed enroute. On Apr. 4-5, 1992, the Commission traveled from Paducah, KY, on the Ohio River, up the Cumberland River, through the Barkley and Kentucy Locks, and Tennessee River and Ohio River before arriving at Cairo. Public meetings were held at Cairo, IL; Helena, AR; Greenville, MS; and New Orleans, LA, with approximately 240 people in attendance. This session adjourned at New Orleans, LA, at 9:50 a.m. on Apr. 10, 1992. The 340th Session was held on Jun. 16, 1992, at its headquarters in Vicksburg, MS, for the purpose of considering the Memphis District project report entitled "Whitman's Creek, Arkansas, Final Feasibility Report." After a briefing and discussions, the members approved and signed the document, authorizing its transmittal to the Chiefs office. This meeting adjourned at 10:10 a.m. on Jun. 16, 1992. The 341st Session was held Aug. 31 - Sep. 4, 1992, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI. The Commission inspected the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to Morgan City, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed enroute. Public meetings were held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Vicksburg, MS; and Morgan City, LA; with approximately 160 people in attendance. This 341st Session of the Commission adjourned at Morgan City, LA, at 10:30 a.m., on Sep. 4, 1992. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Roadmap-type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1992 (59th) edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:62,500) covering the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico was revised and printed. Approximately 4,097 flight-line miles of black-andwhite aerial photography (various scales); 1292 flightline miles of color photography; and about 54.3 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District: The revision of 1:62,500 scale quadrangle maps Artonish, LA; Batchelor, LA; Grosse Tette, LA; and Hahnville, LA, were completed and printed in 1992. Memphis District--Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quads of Jackson, TN; Como, MS; Luray, TN; Mayfield, KY; 42-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Water Valley, KY; Corinth, MS; Zelma, MO; Lonoke, AR; Guys, TN; and Mt. Peter, TN are complete. Vicksburg District--Series Conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 - scale quadrangles to 1:62,500 - scale quadrangles of Crosby, MS; Gloster, MS; Union Church, MS; Bude, MS; Canton, MS; Sharon, MS; Carthage, MS; Thomastown, MS; Edinburg, MS; Liberty, MS; Hodge, LA; Jonesboro, LA; Goldonna, LA; and Franklinton, LA are in progress. Woodville, MS; Morton, MS; Forest, MS; Pelahatchie, MS; Fayette, MS; Yazoo City, MS; Flora, MS; Poplarville, MS; Bernice, LA; Ruston, LA; Sarepta, LA; and England, AR, were published. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District--Mississippi River crest stage of 41.7 feet at Cairo gage on Dec. 9, 1991, and maximum discharge of 898,000 cubic feet per second occurred at Hickman, KY and crest stage of 25.7 feet at Memphis on Dec. 13, 1991, with maximum discharge of 936,000 cubic feet per second on Dec. 13, 1991. Vicksburg District--No significant flooding in the Vicksburg District during FY 92. Peak stages and discharges on the Vicksburg Districts reach of the Mississippi River were as follows: Arkansas City, 25.8 feet on Mar. 29, 1992, and maximum discharge of 940,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg, 32.1 feet on Mar. 30, 1992, and maximum discharge of 956,000 cubic feet per second. New Orleans District--On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 47.0 feet NGVD on Dec. 19, 1991, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 12.3 feet NGVD on Dec. 20, 1991. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 28.75 feet NGVD on Dec. 20, 1991. Hurricane Andrew, which hit south central Louisiana on Aug. 26, 1992, set several new highwater records in that area including 7.60 feet NGVD at the Atchafalaya Bay near Eugene Island gage and 7.65 feet NGVD at the Round Bayou at Deer Island gage. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill of 1990 directed the Corps to develop the most cost-effective flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without regard to frequency offlooding, drainage area, and the amount of runoff. It also directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate existing flood control features of the Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. Engineering studies. A research program was continued for development of materials and more effective and economical design of regulation features for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi River in a suitable alinement. Potamology investigations of river behavior continue to be made. Investigations into the major cause-and-effect relationships attributable to major changes in stage-discharge relationships on the Mississippi River as a result of both natural and man-made modifications are continuing. Mississippi River and Tributaries--Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 42-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Enlarged 22.7 miles of levees and surfaced 4.0 miles of roads on levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-K. Vicksburg District-Surfaced 5.8 miles of roads on levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-L. Memphis District--Completed 1.4 miles of berms in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 42-K, 42-L, 42-M, and 42- N.) There are 1,608.7 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,601.9 are in place with 1,245.6 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,202.5 miles, of which 2,195.7 are in place with 1,731.9 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are additional levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River (85.4 miles); along the south bank of Red River (59.2 miles, with 59.2 completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 in place and 341.7 completed to grade and section (see Table 42-N). Of the authorized 681.5 miles of berms, 525.5 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 2,087.0 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,511.0 miles of authorized tributary levees in the MR&T Project, of which 1,125.3, are in place with 974.8 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 15.3 miles and 858.4 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For summary of levee work Table 42-N. 42-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Mississippi River and Tributaries-- Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem--(See Table 42-G.) Work included dredging 34,390,600 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: New Orleans District, channel maintenance was performed by Government-owned dustpan dredge Jadwin at Wilkerson Point Crossing. Vicksburg District, channel maintenance was performed by government- owned dredge Jadwin. The MR&T harbors, in the Vicksburg District, maintained were Greenville and Vicksburg. Memphis District channel maintenance dredging was performed by Government-owned dustpan dredge Burgess, and leased dustpan dredge Lenel Bean. The MR&T Harbor maintained in Memphis District was Memphis Harbor (McKellar Lake), by leased cutterhead dredges Natchez. Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J.) Construction of 19.45 miles of new bank revetment and 141,132 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 14.98 miles of new dikes were constructed and required maintenance was performed. Approximately 0.3 mile of new bank revetment was constructed on the Atchafalaya River. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 42-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alignment improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 973.11 miles of operative bank revetment and 256.1 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9 by 300 feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low- water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 128.5 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 70.2 miles of revetment and 5.2 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. Construction of levee enlargements and floodwalls continued on the east and west protection levees. There were three levee enlargement and floodwall contracts completed along the east protection levee over a distance of 3.3 miles with a placement of 35,000 cubic yards during the period. Another contract was completed in the area west of Berwick, LA, to enlarge 4.1 miles of levee with a placement of 37,300 cubic yards during the period. Another contract completed for the placement of 1.3 miles of foreshore protection along the east protection levee. A contract for the repair of slides at two locations along the east protection levee was completed with the placement of 35,000 cubic yards. There are 4.0 miles of levee enlargement under construction on the east protection levee with 94,300 cubic yards of placement during the period. Two other other ongoing contracts during this period provided 9.1 miles of levee enlargement and floodwall work on the west protection levee with the placement of 238,200 cubic yards. Another contract for 3.4 miles of levee enlargement west of Berwick, LA, is ongoing with the placement of 45,400 cubic yards during the period. Two channel training contracts were completed in FY 92. Another contract continued from FY 1990. The contract initiated in FY 1990 for training works, consisted of 22 miles of channel embankment amounting to 335,000 cubic yards of material along the banks of the Atchafalaya River above Morgan City, Louisiana was completed. Construction of the Interior Circulation Channel and Closure/Weir was completed. The contract consisted of the removal of 477,300 cubic yards of material to construct a circulation channel in the basin near Grand Lake and a closure and weir 42-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 near Lake Chicot. The closure consisted of 9,100 cubic yards of fill and the weir was constructed with 3,800 tons of rock. Another contract for closure Phase 1 was initiated and completed during the period. It consisted of 50,600 cubic yards for eight earthen closures where small pipeline canals or bayous intersected the Atchafalaya main channel. One channel realignment contract was completed during the period. The East Freshwater Distribution Channel and Little Tensas Bayou Closure provides a channel between the Atachafalaya River and Upper Grand River and an earthen closure at Little Tensas Bayou. Channel construction removed 2,000,000 cubic yards and the closure was constructed of 90,000 cubic yards of fill material. Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrel Locks, Morganza Control Structure, Dewatering and major repairs were accomplished on two gates at both Bayou Boeuf and at Bayou Sorrel Locks, along with numerous drainage structures as required, condition and operation studies, and water control management. One levee enlargement was completed during the period. Two of three gap closures were ongoing at one location and three of seven were completed at another location. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 2,500,000 cubic yards by two leased cutterhead dredges from Berwick Bay harbor in February and June 1992. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. The project is 86 percent complete. The current estimated Federal cost is $1,540,000,000 and non-Federal cost is $8,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 341.7 miles are built to grade. See Table 42-K for status of levees. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel training works in the lower basin, realignment of the two principal distributaries of the Atchafalaya River, and construction of two freshwater distribution structures. Approximately 38.4 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 42-H. BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS SWAMP), LA Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. Maintenance dredging was not performed in FY 1992. The remaining 2.5 miles were to be constructed when development of the initially constructed portion warrants expansion. Project expansion has not been necessary. Therefore this feature was deauthorized on Nov. 2, 1979, under the provisions of Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74), as amended. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $20,400,000 and non-Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. With the termination of the Eastern Rapides and South Central Avoyelles project, it has become necessary to provide an adequate outlet structure solely for the Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries project. The economic effects of this change along with current benefits estimates have caused the benefit-cost ratio for the project to be less than unity. As a result, the project has now been classified as "inactive." If economic conditions change, the project could be reactivated. BONNET CARRE SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in FY 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 1979, and 1983. 42-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION A new office building was completed in FY 1990 at a cost of $245,500. OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, water control management, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, and engineering studies. A picket boat was previously used at the inflow channels to the low sill and auxiliary control structures. It was removed from operation in FY 1988. Maintenance by contract: Maintenance dredging was not performed in FY 1992. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is complete at a Federal cost of $292,273,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; auxiliary structure, September 1986; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels for the low-sill structure, February 1961; inflow and outflow channels for the auxiliary structure, August 1987; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 9.4 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 42-H for details of bank protection.) Vicksburg District TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Planning and design on project features are complete. The Lake Chicot Pumping Plant and related features are complete and in operation. The riverside gate repair contract awarded Aug. 26, 1988, and the contract for the bulkhead gate repairs awarded Aug. 18, 1989, and the contract for pump repairs awarded Jan. 24, 1990. No further work on the Tensas River Project (Separable Element) will be initiated due to lack of commitment from a local sponsor to cost share remaining E&D and construction. This project has been placed in the "inactive" category. (b) Red River backwater area. Planning and design continued on project features. All channel work required to get flows to the Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant and gravity structure is complete. The gravity structure and the pumping plant are complete and are being operated and maintained by contract. One mitigation item, the construction of two water control weirs, was completed in May 1988. Contracts for three additional mitigation features were awarded in December 1988 and February 1989. Planning and design has been deferred on the two remaining mitigation features. Tensas-Cocodrie, Item 4-A, levee enlargement, 6.3 miles in length, was completed in September 1988, and Item 4-B, 2.4 miles of levee enlargement, was completed in October 1990. A contract for Item 2 was awarded in January 1991 and is substantially complete. These contracts will complete the levee enlargement for all of the levee system, except 0.8 miles. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM has been deferred pending economic justification. A contract for Sicily Island Item 5-B, is substanially complete and the contract for Sicily Island Item 5A-R was awarded Jun. 16, 1992. Condition as of Sep. 30. (c) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 741.7 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additionally, 61.0 miles of the Tensas River has been cleared and snagged. The GDM for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61, including Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal is complete. However, no further work will be initiated due to lack of a local sponsor. (d) Red River backwater area. Levees in Tensas- Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising of 0.8 miles. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 63.4 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. A levee grade reevaluation study for all levee systems in the Red River Backwater area was completed in Mar. 1985. Based on results of that study, work is underway to complete enlargement of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee system. Levee Item 4-A and levee Item 4-B have been completed. Levee work on Sicily Island area consists of 56 miles of new levee, 8.7 miles of which have been completed. LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bankprotection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. Little Bayou Meto gates and lifting mechanism were replaced during FY 88. 42-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 YAZOO BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (b) Greenwood protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of pumping plant, levees, and drainage facilities. (c) Main stem. Remaining unconstructed features are subject to Yazoo Basin Reformulation Study. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (d) Big Sunflower River, etc. Weir A on the National Wildlife Refuge and the instream weir at Mile 56.0 in Steele Bayou have been completed. Work continued throughout FY 92 on Steele Bayou, Item 66-B, and it is now 87 percent complete. The contract for selective clearing and snagging on Black Bayou, Item 1-A, was awarded on Sep. 22, 1992. The Draft Reformulation Report for the Upper Steele Bayou Project was published during the past FY, and the final report is scheduled for completion in early FY 93. (e) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Levees. Levee work associated with the last item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Levee work associated with Item 1 and Item 1-A Pelucia Creek is complete. Construction contracts are underway and scheduled for FY 93 completion on Pelucia Creek, Item 2, Item 3, Rising Sun Pumps 1 and 2 and Pelucia Creek Pump. Pelucia Creek Levee Item 4 construction contract is scheduled for award in FY 93. (2) Channels. Construction of the Alligator-Catfish, Round Lake Water Control Structure was completed Nov. 28, 1989. Construction on the remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (f) Enid Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 257.0 feet NGVD on Dec 16, 1991, when storage in the flood control pool was 397,200 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 29,600 cubic feet per second on Dec. 21, 1991. On Sep. 30, 1992, pool elevation was 245.9 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 209,200 acre-feet. (g) Grenada Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of remaining public-use facilities has been deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements with local interests for construction and non- Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with projects for which recreation facilities are being constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 213.1 feet NGVD on Dec. 16, 1991, when storage in the flood control pool was 484,000 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 63,000 cubic feet per second on Dec. 31, 1991. On Sep. 30, 1992, the pool elevation was 207.8 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 330,100 acre-feet. (h) Sardis Lake (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 270.2 feet NGVD on Dec. 16, 1991, when storage in the flood control pool was 996,900 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 76,300 cubic feet per second on Dec. 3, 1991. On Sep. 30, 1991, the pool elevation was 255.6 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 478,900 acre-feet. (i) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 229.3 feet NGVD on Dec. 15, 1991, and storage in flood control pool was 279,500 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 26,300 cubic feet per second on Dec. 3, 1991. On Sep. 30, 1992, the pool elevation was 217.3 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 91,500 acre-feet. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. A Phase I GDM was completed in FY 82 which addresses rural flooding from ponded runoff inside the backwater levee. A GDM for a pumping station of 17,500 cfs to reduce this ponding was approved Jul. 12, 1985. Later budgetary guidance reduced the pumping plant capacity to 10,000 cubic feet per second. A contract for portions of the inlet and outlet channel excavation for the pumping plant has been completed. A construction schedule for the remaining project features is dependent upon the local sponsor meeting the cost sharing requirements specified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. Rocky Bayou area levee Items lA and lB have been completed. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. 42-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Four Greentree Reservoirs and pumping stations are now complete. A decision on construction of the three remaining reservoirs will be made in the future. Mitigation of the Yazoo Backwater is now underway. Approximately 8,800 acres of cleared, frequently flooded, agricultural lands have been obtained in the Yazoo Backwater area of Mississippi to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the Yazoo Area and Satartia Area levees projects. This land is now being reforested and will be managed for terrestrial wildlife. The reformulation of the backwater project is scheduled to begin in FY 93. (k) Upper Yazoo Projects. The first eight items of channel improvement, approximately 56 miles, and four drainage structures have been completed. This work extends from Yazoo City, Mississippi, to about 15 miles upstream of Belzoni, Mississippi. The Fort Pemberton Flood Control Structure was completed on Apr. 29, 1991. Contracts scheduled for award after FY 90 are subject to Yazoo Basin Reformulation Study. (1) A contract for bank stabilization on Upper Yazoo Projects, Item 2-B-R, was completed. (2) Construction contracts for Levee Item 3A-2 and Roebuck Lake Water Control Structure were awarded Jul. 29, 1992, and Sep. 25, 1992, respectively. Construction is scheduled for completion in FY 93. (3) Contracts for Fort Loring Water Control Structure and Tchula Lake Weirs are scheduled for award in FY 93 pending completion of right-of-way acquisition. (1) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2; Hunter Creek, Item IA; South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 5A and 5B; North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A; Batupan Bogue, Items 4A, 4A-1, and 4A-2; Perry Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek, Item 7. All construction under this feature is complete, and a final report was submitted to the Secretary of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed has been turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance except for the instrumented system on Goodwin Creek where the structures were retained for possible future studies. The Demonstration Erosion Control Project (DEC), a joint project with the USDA Soil Conservation Service was initiated by FY 85 appropriations as a continuation on streambank erosion control efforts. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the applicability of a systems approach to the design of erosion, sedimentation, and flood control works by applying this approach to 15 demonstration watersheds in the Yazoo Basin hill area. During FY 92, work continued in the DEC toward development of the systems plans and implementation of a monitoring program. The District completed the construction of 17 grade control structures; 32,720 linear feet of bank stabilization; and 58 riser pipe grade control structures. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 65 percent complete. A total of 50.9 miles of backwater levee has been completed to the interim grade. (m) Reformulation Study. Investigations of engineering, economic, and environmental aspects of the uncompleted segments of the upper Steele Bayou and Upper Yazoo Projects continued. The reformulation study evaluates reasonable arrays of alternatives to the project features remaining after construction of items budgeted and scheduled for award in FY 90. This effort is being conducted in phases, with the final upper Steele Bayou report scheduled for completion in December 1992 and the final Upper Yazoo Projects report scheduled for completion in December 1993. Studies of the uncompleted portions of the projects include acquisition of new land use, survey, mapping, real estate, and environmental data. Among the findings of the completed Yazoo River Basin Study were preliminary indications that a conceptual multipurpose flood control/water supply plan for the Yazoo Delta Area was potentially feasible. However, further studies of the primarily agricultural water supply plan are not in consonance with policy. LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. The engineering studies included preparation of a report on incorporation of the Bayou Rapides outlet into the project. This report was submitted to higher authority. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY 29 and is complete. All of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized are completed to approved grade and section. 42-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Memphis District ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Little River Drainage. Alteration of New Madrid County Route 282 for Ditch 281-9, awarded Apr. 18, 1988, Oct. 1, 1991, completed. (b) Upper St. Francis River. Alteration of seven powerlines Ditches 10 and 12 awarded Feb. 24, 1987, Oct. 1, 1991, completed. Belle Fountain, Channel Enlargement, awarded Jul. 28, 1989, Oct. 1, 1991 completed. Main Ditch 9 Bridge, Miles 1.85 and 3.92, awarded Mar. 30, 1990, Apr. 25, 1991 completed. Main/New Franklin Bridge, Miles .54 and 3.03, awarded Sep. 28, 1990, Oct. 12, 1991 completed. Below Locust Creek, awarded Jun. 26, 1990, Oct. 3, 1991 completed. Alteration Highway E Bridge, awarded Sep. 28, 1989, 20 percent complete. Main/N. Franklin Br. 2.35 awarded, Sep. 30, 1992. Lake County Levee Surfacing awarded Sep. 26, 1992. Ditch I-1 Excan., awarded Jul. 31, 1992. Mud Lake Floodgate awarded, Jun. 30, 1992, 10 percent completed. Main/N. Franklin Ditch, awarded Jul. 2, 1992, 20 percent completed. Castor/River I-2 awarded, Jun. 25, 1992, 90 percent completed. Riprap Protection Hwy 'U' Missouri, awarded, Jun. 30, 1992, completed Aug. 20, 1992. DD17 Trash Barrier awarded, Jun. 30, 1992, 50 percent completed, Bypass Steel Bridge, mile 1.00, awarrded, Jan. 9, 1992, completed Aug. 8, 1992. Big Slough Ditch I-2M-3M, awarded Dec. 12, 1992, completed May 15, 1992. Mat Casting at Richardson awarded, Oct. 8, 1991, 85 percent completed. Culvert Replacement Blue Bayou, awarded, Sep. 30, 1991, 35 percent completed. Elk Chute W. Ditch Resurfacing, awarded Aug. 26, 1991, completed Apr. 11, 1992. Item 2A Halls Br., awarded Mar. 22, 1991, completed May 13, 1992. Main Ditch Channel Enlargement, awarded Jan. 31, 1991,completedMay 21, 1992. Canoe Lake Floodgate, awarded Jul. 31, completed Sep. 24, 1991. St. Francis River and Tributaries Cleaning and Painting DD17 Pumping Station awarded Apr. 30. 1991, Sep. 23, 1991 completed. Ditch 9 Channel Enlargement awarded Jun. 28, 1991, 85 percent complete. Ditch 10 Channel Excavation awarded May 30, 1991, Dec. 11, 1991 completed. 10th/28th Pump Plant awarded Jul. 28, 1990, Oct. 3, 1991 completed. 10th/28th pump repairs awarded Jul. 20, 1989, 90 percent completed. Main Ditch Channel Enlargement awarded Jan. 31, 1991, Apr. 11, 1992 completed. Lower Buffalo Creek Channel Clearing, awarded Sep. 28, 1990, Oct. 3, 1991 completed. (c) Lower St. Francis River. Channel Cleanout, Madison to Highway 64, awarded Sep. 30, 1988, Dec. 4, 1991 completed. Slope Restoration below Marked Tree, Item 2, awarded Sep. 23, 1991 completed. W. G. Huxtable Gravel Restoration Hwy 79, awarded July 18, 1991 completed. Madison-Hwy 64 Channel Cleanout I-3 awarded Sep. 25, 1990, completed Dec. 10, 1991. State Bridge, Main-New Franklin, Mile 3.64, awarded Sep. 29, 1989, 15 percent complete. State Bridges, I-2, Ditch 1, Miles 14.32 and 15.00, awarded Jun. 13, 1989, 15 percent complete. State Bridges, I-3, Ditch 1, Miles 22.80 and 27.63 awarded Oct. 23, 1990, 50 percent complete. Princedale/Birdeye Levee, awarded Sep. 11, 1992. Scour Repair Madison - Marianna, awarded Jul. 30, 1992. Levee Madison - Hwy 64, awarded Jul. 31, 1992, 50 percent complete. County Bridges, Mile 20.50, 21.60 - Ditch 1, I-3 awarded May 29, 1992, 35 percent complete. Tyronza Slide/Culvert, awarded Apr. 27, 1992, completed Aug. 2, 1992. County Bridge, mile 19.55 awarded, Feb. 4, 1992, completed Sep. 26, 1992. Horseshoe Lake Levee Resurfacing, awarded Nov. 21, 1991, completed Apr. 18, 1992. Casting at Helena, awarded Oct. 18, 1991, 98 percent complete. Channel Excav, Cockle Burr Slough, awarded Sep. 12, 1991, completed May 30, 1992. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Little River Drainage. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 90 percent complete. (b) St. Francis River and Tributaries. Project was initiated during 1937 and is 81 percent complete. WHITE RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. Item 1, Harbor Construction, awarded Aug. 31, 1989, completed Jul. 10, 1991. Item 1-2, Harbor Construction, awarded Dec. 31, 1990, completed Sep. 23, 1991. Item 2-1, Harbor Construction, awarded Apr. 23, 1991, completed Sep. 14, 1991. Item 3-1 Harbor construction, awarded May 26, 1992 and is 90 percent complete. Item 3-2, Harbor Construction aawarded Sep. 10, 1992, construction not yet underway. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1989 and is 38 percent complete. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. 42-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 36 percent complete. CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1971 and is 4 percent complete. REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during this fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 89 percent complete. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Obion River and principal tributaries, TN. Obion Rivers channel improvement is 66 percent complete. (b) Forked Deer River and principal tributaries, TN. Forked Deer River channel improvement is 13 percent complete. (c) Halls, TN, I-2A County Bridge. Mile 11.85 awarded Mar. 22, 1991, 10 percent complete. (d) Sharon, TN, I-1A Gas Pipeline. Mile 7.4 awarded Aug. 18, 1992, 10 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. West Tennessee Tributaries Project is 41 percent complete. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contract awarded or completed during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN Operations and results during fiscal year. Item 1-A, bridge protection, awarded Oct. 26, 1990, 61 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1990 and is 8 percent complete. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. Modifications to 10th and 28th Streets Pumping Stations Pumps, Cairo, IL, awarded Jul 28, 1989, 50 percent complete. Item R-735 West Memphis, AR, Landside Berm and Drainage Improvements, West Memphis, AR, awarded May 28, 1991, 90 percent complete. In addition minor maintenance on levees is performed as required by the local interests and major maintenance is performed as required for slide repairs, road rehabilitation, and other similar work by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Levee Roadway Resurfacing, St. John Setback Levee, MO, awarded Jul. 30, 1991, completed Nov. 26, 1991. MEMPHIS HARBOR Operations and results during fiscal year. Item No. 6-717.5, Ensley, TN Berm, awarded Jun. 27, 1990, 97 percent complete. CONSTRUCTION GENERAL Ensley Main Access Bridge Repairs awarded Jun. 28, 1991, completed Nov. 25, 1991. Replacement Bldg. at Richardson landing awarded May 31, 1991, completed Dec. 3, 1991. Nonconnah Erosion Protection awarded, Oct. 26, 1990, 95 percent complete. Fletcher Creek-Nonconnah Bank Protection awarded Jul. 25, 1991, completed Oct. 2, 1991. Nonconnah Erosion Protection I-B, awarded, Jun. 25, 1992, 80 percent completed. 42-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 0-9571 10-81 11-25 38 45 118 81 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 104-234 127-129 129 129-234 235 279-287 287-303 Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL The Jump-New Orleans, LA Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA Homeplace, LA Bohemia, LA Davis Pond, LA (formerly Myrtle Grove, LA) Caernarvon, LA Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans-Morganza, LA New Orleans-Baton Rouge, LA Bonnet Carre' Floodway, LA Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Areas, LA/MS (Bonnet Carre') Bonnet Carre'-Baton Rouge, LA Baton Rouge Harbor Morganza Floodway, LA Morganza-Old River, LA Dredging, revetment, and contract work Main line levee, right bank Local levees, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank 42-12 Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Postauthorization change report, approved June 1987. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Public Law 100-676 Modified by Public Law 87-874. -- Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-A (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 303-314 Old River, LA control 314-572 Old River-Cypress Creek, AR 437 Vicksburg Harbor, MS 437-721 Vicksburg-Lake View, MS 490 Wilson Point, LA 537 Greenville Harbor, MS 646 Long Lake, Helena, AR 605-666 Henrico-Helena, AR 672-993 St. Francis River-Commerce, MO3 722-725 Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) 721-734 Memphis Harbor, TN 803-873 Tiptonville-Obion River 857 Near Mud Lake, TN 890 St. Johns Bayou, MO 890 New Madrid Floodway, MO 890-954 New Madrid-Birds Point, MO 902-922 Slough Bend, Hickman, KY 922 Hickman, KY 946 Peafield, MO 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. Main line levee, left bank, levee extension, and diversion Obion River Pumping station and adjacent channel improvements Drainage floodgate and levee closure Drainage floodgate and levee closure Floodway, right bank Main line levee, left bank Floodwall, left bank Drainage floodgate Floodwalls and levees Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83-780. -- Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966.2 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 Act. Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. -- -- Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. 42-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-A (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage Floodwalls, levees, and pumping -- district, Mounds, Mound plant City, and vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL Levees, both banks Intermittent (Sec. 6). Cape Girardeau, MO, to Rock Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). Island, IL 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Commerce, MO, is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. 42-14 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 117 117-129 117-129 105 105-120 115 116 5 5-105 29 Floodway Floodway Floodway ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA1 Atchafalaya Basin, Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Floodways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrel1 Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City Morgan City Below Morgan City Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee Calumet Below Morgan City Berwick1 Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Floodways) Simmesport-Hamburg Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 42-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. 42-15 Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeufl Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 29 40 40 40 41 41 41 94 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 0-8 50-133 96 133 Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. -- -- Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges East bank, levee Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement Washington to west protection levee. 42-16 Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf Intercepting drainage channel. 0-17 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 17-40 40-51 51-60 17-42 87-107 40 60 87 New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing, and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing Flood protection Bayous Cocodrie-Boeuf diversion Bayou Boeuf Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boeuf Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Bayou Rapides Pumping plant and gravity structure Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Flood protection and drainage improvement Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures (2,3) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. -- Senate Doc. (Public Law 84-99) Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. (4) (4) 42-17 Bank protection Levee, south bank Levee, south bank Levees 82-145 3-56 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks Sicily Island area 3-56 5 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot 0-6 0-165 0-22 0-0.2 Below Red River area Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR and LA Boeuf River, AR and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou La Fourche Boeuf River, AR and LA above Bayou La Fourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks Tributaries of Boeuf River-- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary of Bayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, LA Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Clearing Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal Levee, south bank 42-18 (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977, MR&T authority. 2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526.2,3 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) See Table 42-E (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. 23-98 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 35-98 48-102 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 Revetment Levee, north bank Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank Levees, left bank (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Fletcher Bend, AR, to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocono River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and enlargement of pumping plant. Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 42-19 Floodway channel REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 Tallahatchie River, MS Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries Clarendon levee Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Des Arc, AR CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS, and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and structures Levee and outlet structures Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement 42-20 Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 -- Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 42-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 42-D. See Table 42-C. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-17 0-12 0-108 0-25 0-20 0-15 0-47 Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Porter Gap, TN REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Obion Creek, KY LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO MISSOURI RIVER, MO Mouth to St. Charles, MO ILLINOIS RIVER, IL Mouth to Havana, IL Levees Levees Levees Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtenant structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station Channel improvement Mile 49 above Cairo. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). 42-21 Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 1970.2 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. 0-28 0-120 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Floodwall, levee, revetment, and Mounds, IL pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA, and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Tech Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans District. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526.3 See Table 42-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 42-22 TABLE 42-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Namel Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Nearest town to damsite Drainage area, square miles Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Elevation, feet, NGVD Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Outlet gates: Number Size, feet Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Length, feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Elevation, feet, NGVD Dam: Type, earthfill Length, thousand feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Yalobusha Grenada 1,320 10 86 193.0 65 1.252 17.8 3 7.5 by 14 10.7 Chute 200 231.0 52 106 1,385 19.7 247.5 Rolled 13.9 256.0 Yocona Enid 560 6 58 230.0 28 602 20.2 Little Tallahatchie Sardis 1,545 11 108 236.0 58.5 1,462 17.7 2 4 8 by 16 6 by 12 9.4 Chute 200 268.0 50 41 554 18.5 284.0 Rolled 8.4 293.0 10.0 Chute 400 281.4 132 90 1,447 17.6 301.0 Hydraulic 15.3 311.4 42-23 Coldwater Arkabutla 1,000 5 31 209.3 33 494 9.3 3 8.5 by 19 10.0 Chute 300 238.3 89 63 858 16.1 256.3 Rolled 11.5 264.3 St. Francis Wappapello 1,310 4 31 354.7 23 582 8.4 3 10 by 20 18.0 Gravity 740 394.7 229 32 521 7.5 413.7 Rolled 2.7 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis, and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carre' Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands. Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for floodcontrol work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title). Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN. Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR. Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River: construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN. Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, IL. Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood-control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Beouf, and Cocodrie, LA. Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS. Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 42-24 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 351, 72d Cong. Public Law 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS. 1 Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR.1 Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA. Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees(below Plum Bayou).1 Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).1 Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA. 1 Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.1 Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO. Big Sunflower River, etc.1 Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO, with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR. Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA.1 Flood protection at Des Arc, AR. Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO. Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO. Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Mete Basin, AR. Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA. 1 Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA. 42-25 TABLE 42-D (Continued) Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516,78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d seas. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA. Bank protection, Amite River, LA. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA, levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.1 Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR. Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA. Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS. Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN. Improve Greenville Harbor, MS. Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-- $50 million. Modification--Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA. Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS. Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874 Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 42-26 Oct. 30, 1951 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 18, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA, project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR. Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA. Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS. Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR. Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR. Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS. Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS. Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA. Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report. Approved Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. 42-27 TABLE 42-D (Continued) Apr. 14, 19662 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 Apr. 29, 19703 Jun. 4, 19703 Dec. 31, 1970 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970 respectively. River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and TN. b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million. Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR. Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS. b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251, Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. 42-28 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1-Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda-On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26,1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, project: Report of OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. 42-29 TABLE 42-D (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Ind. on VXD May 31, 1977, Letter Report.2 Jun. 28, 1980 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act. 1981 Supplemental Appropriations Bill for FY Ending Sep. 30, 1985 (PL 99-88), and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA. The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for the preservation and development of environmental resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc., for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. Unpublished Vicksburg District report dated May 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Six Mile Bayous, LA. Public Law 96-285, Jun. 28, 1980. Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, 1980. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Bill (PL 99-88), and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). 42-30 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 42-31 TABLE 42-D (Continued) Sec. 104(a), Authorization of Projects - Authorization of Construction: Incorporation of the project for flood control, Louisiana State Penitentiary levee, Mississippi River, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 10, 1982, at a total cost of $23,400,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $17,600,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $5,800,000. No acquisition of land for or actual construction of the project may commence until appropriate non-Federal interests shall agree to undertake measures to minimize the loss of fish and wildlife habitat lands in the project area. a. Bushley Bayou, LA. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project for flood control, Bushley Bayou, LA. b. Eight Mile Creek, Paragould, AR. Project entails channel improvement along the creek with miniparks and hiking/ biking trails. c. Helena and Vicinity, AR. The Helena Basin is an urban basin containing approximately 3,500 acres which frequently and severely floods the city of Helena. A pumping station and sump with channel enlargement and a gated culvert was recommended. d. West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Channel improvements along Ten Mile Bayou and Fifteen Mile Bayou for a total of 23.86 miles, with limited revegetation of right-of-way to maintain environmental stability. e. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO. Flood control for urban and rural land. f. Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, TN and MS. Channel enlargement, recreation features with channel construction and environmental enhancement. g. Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS. This is an urban flood control project located in extreme northwest Mississippi and southwest Tennessee. The plan of improvement consists of 3.5 miles of selective drift removal on lower Horn Lake Creek and 2.6 miles of vegetative clearing on Horn Lake Creek, 2.1 miles on Rocky Creek and 0.6 miles of vegetative clearing and 1.8 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. Hike/bike trails are included along Rocky Creek and Cow Pen Creek. Sec. 601(a) Authorization of Projects. Authorization of Construction: a. Yazoo Backwater Area, MS. Authorized the project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at the Yazoo Backwater Project, MS. The project shall include acquisition of 40,000 acres for mitigation of project-induced fish and wildlife losses. b. Greenville Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, MS, as contained in the reports of Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1977 and Feb. 2, 1982, at a total cost of $43,700,000 with an estimated first Federal tost of $28,000,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $15,700,000. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document c. Vicksburg Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Vicksburg Harbor, as contained in the report of the Chief of Engineers, Aug. 13, 1979, at a total estimated first Federal cost of $55,900,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $23,300,000. d. Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR. The recommended plan consists of dredging a navigation channel to provide access to 685 acres of landfill; construction of an overlook park; implementing landscaping and erosion control measures; and mitigation fish and wildlife losses. The project is scheduled to be constructed in two phases. e. White River Navigation to Batesville, AR. The plan of improvement recommended in the Feasibility Report provides for construction and maintenance to provide a 200-foot wide, 9-foot deep channel available 95 percent of the time from mile 10 (Arkansas Post Canal) to mile 254, two scenic overlooks, a primitive camping area, and acquisition of about 1,865 acres of woodlands for mitigation. However, section 52 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 deauthorized this project. f. Obion Creek, KY. To prevent headwater flooding along tributary streams and backwater flooding of alluvial lands. g. Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN. This is a navigation project in the vicinity of Memphis, TN, which would consist of dredging and maintaining a 4.9 mile long, 500-foot minimum width, 9-foot deep general navigation channel with additional dredging as required and strategic placement of dredged material to create and provide navigation access to 1,000 acres to be developed as a waterfront industrial complex. Sec. 806. Reelfoot Lake, KY. This project is modified to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operating the pumping plant feature of such project shall be 50 percent. Sec. 836. Mud Lake, Western Tennessee Tributaries. This project is modified to provide that the requirements of local cooperation shall be (1) 50 percent of the value of the lands, easements, and rights-of-way, (2) to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, and (3) to maintain and operate all the works after completion. Jun. 4, 1987 Modification of Mississippi Delta Region project to construct Unpublished New Orleans salinity control structure at Davis Pond (mile 118) rather than District report, at Myrtle Grove (mile 59). Nov. 1, 1984. Water Sec. 3(a), Project Authorizations - Authorization of Public Law 100-676 Resources Construction: Nov. 17, 1988 Development a. Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Area, MS and LA. Act, 1988 Authorized the project for environmental enhancement, as contained in the report of Chief of Engineers, dated May 19, 1986, at a total cost of $59,300,000. 42-32 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Water Section 4(b) Public Law 100-676, Resources West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Modified the project Nov. 17, 1988 Development by allowing that non-Federal cooperation may be Act, 1988 provided by levee districts, drainage districts, or any unit of a state, county, or local government. Energy and West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Public Law 101-83, Water Directed the Corps to develop the most cost-effective Jul. 25, 1989 Development flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without Appropriation regard to frequency of flooding, drainage area, and the Bill, 1990 amount of runoff. Energy and Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant Public Law 101-514, Water Directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate Nov. 5, 1990 Development existing flood control features for the Bayou Rapides Appropriation Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red Bill, 1990 River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. Water Resource Whiteman's Creek, Arkansas. Public Law 102-580 Development Directed the Secretary of the Army to implement flood control Oct. 31, 1992 Act, 1992 improvement, which essentially consist of 6.1 miles of channel enlargement along streams within the city limits of Jonesboro, Arkansas. 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 42-E. 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 42-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Public Full Report Act of Law Authorizing See Annual Incorporation No. Act Description Report for Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage 1941, p. 943 improvements, TN Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA 1946, p. 1029 Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, 1946, p. 1053 AR, on north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou) Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Aug. 18, 1941 White River levees, Augusta to 1946, p. 1083 Clarendon and De Valls Bluff, AR Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou 1945, p. 982 Macon, LA Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Big Sunflower River, etc. 1946, p. 1061 Jun. 30, 1948 80-858 Jul. 24, 1946 Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton 1948, p. 1059 Rouge, LA (Baton Rouge Harbor) May 17, 1950 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jonesville, LA 1953, p. 773 May 17, 1950 81-516 Jul. 24, 1946 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA 1953, p. 737 42-34 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost 1 Project Title Fiscal Year 1992 Completed features 2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River--South Bank Red River levees, LA Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control & Water Supply) Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR (All except Big Creek & Tribs.) Lower White River (Big Creek & Tribs.) Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO Eight Mile Creek, AR L'Anguille Basin, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake, TN and KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance) St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway Nonconnah Creek Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries Greenville Harbor Memphis Harbor (Ensley Berm) Helena Harbor Helena, AR, and Vicinity West Memphis, AR, and Vicinity Vicksburg Harbor, MS Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee $ 199,238,000 1,370,000,000 5,270,0003 4,000,0003 3,570,000,000 1,550,000,000 142,700,000 20,400,0003 292,273,000 23,200,0003 50,000,000 3 84,300,000 522,000,000 29,680,0003 130,900,0003 1,997,000,000 16,802,0003 49,800,0003 141,000,000 381,000,000 9,100,0003 14,000,0003 124,000,000 14,300,0003 (10,700,000) 3 440,000 10,266,000 24,800,0003 40,000,0003 29,400,000 46,600,0004 18,400,0004 2,290,0004 32,400,0003,4 23,100,0004 32,156,0004 7,365,0003,4 11,600,0004,6 63,500,0004 18,800,0004 42-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-F (Continued) SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost1 Project Title Fiscal Year 1992 Teche Vermilion Basin 35,700,0004 Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas 3,340,0005 Whiteman's Creek, AR 3,340,000 Eastern Arkansas 114,0003 Jackson and Trenton, AR 8,800,0003 Mississippi Delta, MS 157,300,0003 Bushley Bayou 37,000,000 TOTAL $11,403,428,000 1. Inflation projected through the construction period. Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads. 2. Includes Bonnet Carre', Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features; Teche-Vermilion Basins, LA. 3. Incremental (not projected through the construction period). 4. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 5. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676, Nov. 18, 1988. 6. Locals are building their own project. 42-36 TABLE 42-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Location Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Mileage Fiscal Year 1992 Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 -- -- -- Main stem channel 234-320 -- 721.3 721.3 Vicksburg Main stem channel 322-600 -- 2,476.1 2,476.1 Vicksburg Harbor 437 -- 86.7 86.7 Greenville Harbor 537 -- 70.2 70.2 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 -- 29,982.6 29,982.6 Memphis Harbor, McKellar Lake 725 -- 1,053.7 1,053.7 TOTAL -- 34,390.6 34,390.6 42-37 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Venice, LA .............. Olga, LA ................ Lower Childress- Fort Jackson, LA ........ Buras, LA .............. Tropical Bend, LA ........ Bayou Lamoque, LA ...... Port Sulphur, LA ......... Point Michel, LA ......... Bohemia, LA ............ Diamond, LA ............ Gravolet, LA ............ Junior, LA .............. Harlem, LA ............. Myrtle Grove, LA ........ Monsecour, LA .......... Alliance, LA ............ Belair, LA .............. Jesuit Bend, LA .......... Linwood, LA ............ Oak Point, LA ........... Scarsdale, LA ........... English Turn, LA ........ Poydras, LA ............. Twelve Mile Point, LA ..... Cutoff, LA .............. Third district reach, LA .... Algiers Point, LA ......... Gouldsboro Bend, LA ...... Gretna Bend, LA ......... Greenville Bend, LA ...... Carrollton Bend, LA ...... Avondale Bend, LA ....... Kenner, LA ............. 12 19 22 25 30 33 39 44 46 49 51 54 56 59 61 62 65 68 71 72 75 78 82 84 88 93 95 96 97 100 104 109 R L R R R L R R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R R L R R R R L R 13,885 2,718 4-,-510 -- - 114 L -- -- 40,126 -- 94,951 -- 13,885 57 --. -- 10,430 15,162 -- -- --. 3,152 569 995 3,295 -- -- -- -- -- 19,442 2,105 6,022 20,360 -- -- -- --.. -- 7,930 -- 10,587 12,901 -- -- -- --. 2,826 -- 41,595 0O H 0 O 0 C, O O x ca m D t 15,430 17,283 25,012 19,537 36,995 22,932 15,441 11,600 23,874 23,599 15,148 17,435 11,571 17,265 26,111 24,978 12,005 12,377 16,570 19,718 45,864 9,979 21,256 27,167 12,238 4,960 9,662 22,045 15,015 28,409 ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,I TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Luling, LA .............. 119 R 5,660 173 26,945 -- -- -- -- 41,948 Destrehan, LA ........... 102 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,409 Good Hope, LA .......... 126 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 24,531 Waterford, LA............ 128 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,386 Montz, LA .............. 132 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,502 Lucy, LA ............... 136 R -- -- -- -- -- - - -- 17,826 Reserve, LA ............. 138 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,947 Willow Bend, LA ......... 141 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,227 Angelina, LA ............ 145 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,727 Vacherie, LA ............ 148 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,025 Belmont, LA ............ 152 L -- -- -- 741 7,122 -- -- 25,575 Rich Bend, LA ........... 157 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 38,498 Romeville, LA ........... 161 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,966 St. Alice, LA ............ 165 R -- -- -- -- -- 8,877 -- 27,052 Burnside, LA ............ 170 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,304 Aben, LA ............... 172 R -- -- -- -- -- 3,690 -- 11,700 St. Elmo, LA ............ 174 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,240 Smoke Bend, LA ......... 177 R 1,147 65 4,656 -- -- -- -- 18,180 Marchand, LA ........... 180 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,583 Philadelphia Point, LA .... 183 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,379 New River Bend, LA ...... 185 L 2,007 56 10,091 -- -- -- -- 45,672 White Castle, LA ......... 193 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 42,658 St. Gabriel, LA .......... 201 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 33,292 Plaquemine Bend, LA ..... 209 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 42,952 Manchac, LA ............ 215 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 38,976 Missouri Bend, LA ........ 222 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 27,498 Arlington, LA ........... .227 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,615 Port Allen, LA ........... 231 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,627 Scotlandville, LA ......... 234 L 1,623 -- 9,119 -- -- -- -- 1,623 Allendale, LA ........... 238 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,502 Springfield Bend, LA ...... 244 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 25,690 Arboth, LA ............. 250 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,190 Faulkner Lake, LA ....... 253 L -- -- -- -- -- 10,540 -- 17,382 Grand Bay, LA .......... 258 R 7,122 110 31,752 -- -- 20,559 -- 12,302 Bayou Sara, LA .......... 265 L -- -- -- 4,720 19,608 -- -- 27,698 MCI CI) CI) C) 0 z TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Red Store, LA ........... Arrow Bend, LA ......... Boies Point, LA .......... Morganza, LA ........... Iowa Point, LA .......... Brunette Point, LA ....... Greenwood Bend, LA ...... Hog Point, LA ........... Carr Point, LA .......... Above Old River, LA ...... Fort Adams, MS ......... Point Breeze, LA ......... Coochie, LA............. 0 Palmetto, MS ........... 269 272 275 279 282 285 289 296 304 305 308 313 317 322 R L R R L R L R R R L R R L 7,149 10,828 5,923 325 245 910 -- -- -- -- --. 30,083 51,033 32,699 -- -- 2,320 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,-0-78 Subtotal New Orleans District, Mississippi River ..... Dikes: Profit Island Chute Closure, LA ............. Hog Point, LA ............ OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard revetment: Inflow channel ........... Inflow channel ........... Outflow channel ......... 252 L 299 L C00 5a 13 H O ra A O Ci H 0 0I 0 0 O d r e0 Cm 62,572 1,941 316,921 15,792 80,737 77,910 -- 1,741,162 (11.85 Miles) (2.99 Miles) (329.76 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,315 6,850 -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,850 6,850 (1.30 Miles) 315 L 315 R 315 L&R 11,165 (2.12 Miles) -- 2,415 -- 4,365 -- 19,891 18,464 13,600 16,094 20,513 11,375 8,038 25,815 21,424 17,120 8,170 24,206 13,565 17,150 30,864 TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) Auxiliary inflow channel ... 312 L&R -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,200 Auxiliary outflow channel .. 312 L&R -- -- -- --- -- -- 5,790 Total standard revetment, Old River ............ -- 49,661 (9.41 Miles) ATCHAFALAYA RIVER Standard revetment: Mile One, LA ............ Coville Bayou, LA ........ Legonier, LA ............ Simmesport, LA ......... Kuhlman Bayou, LA ...... Odenburg, LA ........... Cason, LA .............. McCrea, LA ............. Woodside, LA ........... Provosty, LA ............ Crooked Bayou, LA ....... Mercier, LA............. Barberton, LA ........... Evans Point, LA ......... Goudeau, LA ............ Morris Bayou, LA ........ Goodwood, LA ........... Red Cross, LA ........... Melville LA ............. Cross Bayou, LA ......... Melville South, LA ....... Toles, LA ............... Petite Prairie, LA ........ Below Confluence of Red and Atchafalaya Rivers 1 3 4 6 7 9 12 13 14 17 18 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 35 36 L R L R L R R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R 1,545 .. .- -- .. -- -- .. -- -- .- -- 4O --. - -- -- -- -- --8,456 -- -- 8,456 -- .-- .-- -- --. -- -- U, U, =. 0 9,628 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. -- -- 1,705 1,188 -- -- -- 5,915 4,254 -- -- -- -- -- 4,150 6,550 8,940 10,636 5,565 5,375 10,798 6,572 13,002 7,768 9,600 10,478 3,592 4,898 3,938 3,800 8,505 8,065 4,870 3,815 4,070 6,355 8,381 F F TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)l Feet) Feet) Holloway Lake, LA ....... 37 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,085 Bayou Sherman, LA ...... 38 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,200 Krotz Springs, LA ........ 40 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,925 Sherburne, LA ........... 43 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,035 Bayou Big Graw, LA ...... 46 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,394 Otis Landing, LA ......... 54 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,251 Morgan City ............ 115 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,410 Total standard revetment 1,545 40 8,456 2,893 10,169 9,628 -- 204,023 (.29 miles) (.55 miles) (38.64 Miles) Dikes: None Below Confluence of Old River LOWER RED RIVER Outflow Channel and Red River Standard revetment: Long Lake, LA ........... 10 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,652 Naples, LA ............. 7 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,190 Turnbull Island, LA ....... 9 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,038 Total standard revetment -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,880 (4.52 Miles) Dikes: None 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). t3 ro 0 0 O I O 0 0I 0 A H UO 0 O- 56 b TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares) 1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Bougere Bend, LA ........ Dead Mans Bend, MS ..... Glasscock Cutoff, MS-LA ... Railroad Landing, MS ..... St. Catherine Bend, LA .... Morville, LA ............ Natchez Island, MS ....... Carthage, MS ........... Vidalia Casting Field ...... Natchez Front, MS ....... Giles Cutoff, LA-MS ...... Gibson, LA ............. Ashland, LA-MS ......... Kempe Bend, LA ......... Browns Field, LA ........ Goldbottom, MS .......... Hardscrabble, LA ........ Grand Gulf, MS .......... Point Pleasant, MS-LA .... Togo Island, LA .......... Lake Karnac, LA-MS ...... Diamond Point, LA-MS .... Reid-Bedford, LA ......... Racetrack, MS ........... Barge Line Terminal, MS .. Vicksburg Harbor, MS ..... Delta Point, LA .......... King's Point--Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS ...... False Point, LA .......... Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-MS ............... Milliken Bend, LA ....... Belle Island, LA-MS ..... 329 335 342 346 350 356 357 361 363 364 366 371 374 383 389 392 398 403 413 415 419 423 429 433 437 437 437 R L R L R R R L L L R R L R R L R L R R L R R L L L R 439 L 443 R 446 L 453 R 460 L 4,585 -- .- 2,080 2,540 -- -- -- 195 -- -- --. --. 904 .. .. .. .. -- 5,945 -- -- 5,967 6,855 -- -- -- --. 10,766 -- -- -- -- 26,055 33,220 20,540 12,235 29,108 14,855 2,180 14,700 2,670 6,510 5,270 26,000 29,407 28,285 9,280 30,250 22,530 53,948 32,345 7,080 19,260 14,665 18,392 13,935 3,040 7,350 7,650 -- 19,330 -- 12,860 1,490 -- 165 .-- 3,664 423 -- 19,580 46,140 24,160 U 0 H H M OU, U, 0x TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Goodrich, LA ............ 467 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 39,205 Cottonwood Bar, MS ...... 470 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,580 Filter-Cottonwood, MS ..... 474 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 28,427 Hagaman, LA ........... 481 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 37,756 Ben Lomond, MS ......... 486 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,235 Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS .......... 488 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 52,1242 Lake Providence, LA ...... 489 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,600 Mayersville, MS ......... 497 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 34,992 Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-MS .......... 503 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,815 Carolina, MS ............ 507 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,080 Cracraft, AR ............ 511 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,210 Worthington, MS-AR ...... 514 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,350 Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS ............. 519 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 45,653 American Cutoff, MS-AR ... 526 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,980 Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ... 530 R -- -- -- 5,775 13,553 13,762 -- 33,685 Vancluse, AR ............ 534 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,300 Island 84, AR-MS ........ 535 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,475 Warfield Point, MS ....... 537 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,320 Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS .. 538 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,150 Spanish Moss, AR ........ 539 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,580 Tarpley Island, MS ....... 542 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 Miller Bend, MS ......... 544 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,360 Island 82, AR ........... 546 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,080 Ashbrook Island, MS ...... 549 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,455 Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR .............. 553 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 43,015 Huntington Point, MS ..... 556 L 2,455 1,172 10,728 -- -- 7,168 -- 21,205 Pair O'Dice, AR .......... 561 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,095 Eutaw-Mounds, MS ....... 563 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 40,188 Cypress Bend, AR ........ 568 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,575 Catfish Point, MS ........ .573 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,075 Ozark, AR-MS ........... 578 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,015 Prentiss, AR-MS .......... 582 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 20,315 00 HU, 0 0I 0 U, 0 y O z A O r TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Rosedale Bend, AR ....... Riverton, MS ............ Klondike, AR ............ Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS Lake Concordia, MS ...... Big Island, AR ........... Smith Point, MS ......... Dennis, MS ............. Cessions, MS ........... Total revetment, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ....... 13,150 (2.49 Miles) Dikes: Jackson Point, MS ........ Esperance Point, LA ...... Opposite Warnicott Ldg., MS .................. Natchez Island, LA-MS .... Waterproof Bar, LA ....... Spithead Towhead, MS .... Browns Field, LA ........ Cottage Bend, LA-MS ..... Bondurant Towhead, LA ... Coffee Point, LA ......... Yucatan, MS ........... Togo Island, LA .......... Below Racetrack, MS ...... Racetrack Towhead, MS ... False Point, LA .......... Marshall Cutoff, LA ...... Below Grand Gulf, MS .... Fritz Island, LA .......... 330 L 347 R 352 358 379 386 388 389 394 405 410 416 430 431 441 448 399 338 L R R L R L R R R L L R R R L R 1,532 33,159 5,775 13,553 38,500 (3) 640 -- 750 -- -- .- -- -- 850 9,128 -- -- -- 1,430,475 (270.92 Miles) -- 4,306 -- 640 -- 5,351 -- 12,225 -- 14,330 -- 3,661 -- 10,917 -- 14,049 -- 6,029 -- 8,640 -- 9,010 -- 8,256 -- 12,619 -- 10,880 -- 5,675 -- 5,166 -- 3,575 -- 4,160 585 586 588 593 596 598 601 611 615 L L R L L R L L L 0i 5,477 -- --. 4,820 12,500 23,400 29,245 6,980 16,515 18,185 25,195 10,910 MI, M 1 CI, C C) C,, 0: TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares) 1 Feet) (Squaruesa)r1 es Sares) Feet) Feet) Forest Home Towhead, LA Willow Cutoff, LA ........ Arcadia Point, MS ........ Cottonwood Bar, MS ...... Point Lookout, LA ........ Ajax Bar, MS ............ Ben Lomond, MS ......... Baleshed Ldg., MS ....... Wilson Point, LA ......... Corregidor, MS .......... Carolina, AR ............ Cracraft Lower, AR ....... Cracraft, AR ............ Leota, MS .............. Island 86, AR ........... Seven Oaks, AR .......... Walnut Point, MS ........ Anconia Chute, AR ....... Refuge, MS ............. Island 84, AR ........... Leland Bar, AR-MS ....... Leland Neck, AR-MS ...... Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR .... Island 82-Miller Bend, AR-MS ............... Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS ............... Ashbrook Cutoff, MS ...... Chicot Ldg., AR .......... Catfish Point, MS ........ Below Prentiss, MS ....... Malone Field, AR ......... Terrene, MS ............ White River Landing, AR .. Montgomery Towhead, AR.. Victoria Bend, AR ........ 449 462 470 471 478 482 488 493 500 505 509 510 513 514 520 523 525 527 528 532 538 540 540 L R L R R L L L R L L R R L R R L R L L R L R 6,402 4,673 2,500 4,502 1,905 (-780) -- --. --. --. --. -- 10,976 4,275 9,463 2,406 2,751 28,152 24,667 15,101 6,092 6,730 2,897 9,614 3,809 7,571 17,067 5,754 4,725 4,604 15,125 6,485 16,118 4,315 10,478 544 R&L -- 13,646 547 549 564 571 580 585 590 591 592 596 L&R L R L R R L R R R 13,015 8,728 17,451 5,290 7,813 7,549 7,921 2,201 6,071 5,033 0 O O O O 0 TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maint'nance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) Smith Point, MS ......... Island 70, MS ........... Total dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ....... 600 L 608 L R R R R R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,617 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 21,435 30,570 (5.79 Miles) -- 482,434 (91.37 Miles) Miles Above Mouth ARKANSAS RIVER4 Standard revetment: Menard Bend, AR ........ Como, AR .............. Morgan Bend, AR ........ Yancopin, AR ........... Total standard revetment, Arkansas River ........ Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, AR ...... Morgan Bend, AR ........ Fletcher Bend, AR ........ Total dikes, Arkansas River ................ RED RIVER5 Standard revetment: Dupre, LA .............. Bringol, LA ............. Egg Bend, LA ........... Cologne Bend, LA ........ Roxana, LA............ 31 34 36 24 30 36 39 L R L R R L R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,770 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,720 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,250 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,800 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 31,540 (5.97 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,848 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,658 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,187 H Cl) C) 0 H l1 H -- 7,693 (1.46 Miles) 69 73 75 77 83 2,690 4,000 2,400 650 3,325 TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Ryland, LA ............. 88 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,925 Whittington, LA ......... 89 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,900 Smith, LA .............. 91 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 Latanier, LA ............ 93 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,460 Hudson, LA ............. 99 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,458 Robert, LA ............... 102 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,500 Alexandria Front, LA ..... 105 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,280 Callahan, LA ............ 110 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,000 Cotton, LA .............. 116 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,700 Rapides, LA ............. 119 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,030 Boyce, LA .............. 125 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,548 Total standard revetment, Red River ............-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 61,566 (11.66 Miles) Dikes 6: Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA .. 71 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 Bringol (Egg Bend), LA .... 73 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,477 Egg Bend, LA ........... 75 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 900 Cologne Bend, LA ........ 77 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,850 Echo, LA ............... 78 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,900 Richardson, LA .......... 79 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 Alexandria, LA .......... 105 R -- -- -- -- -- -- (Rock groin) 270 Bertrand, LA ............ 122 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,630 Total dikes, Red River .... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,727 (3.74 Miles) 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). 3. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 4. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. 5. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. . Includes all types of dikes and retards. i o EP h7 0 0 U) O O O L1: O0 0 TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Big Island, AR ........... Scrubgrass Bend, AR ...... Henrico, AR ............. Cessions Towhead, AR ..... Island 67, MS ........... Island 68 Bar-- Knowlton, AR .......... Ludlow, AR ............. Rescue Land, AR-MS ...... Fair Landing, AR ........ Burke Landing, MS ....... Island 62, AR ........... Island 63, MS ........... Island 63 Bar, MS ........ Oldtown Bend, AR ........ Horseshoe, MS .......... Westover, AR ........... Delta-Friars Point, MS .... Helena, AR ............. Trotters Landing, MS ..... Flower Lake, MS ......... St. Francis, AR .......... Harbert Point, MS ........ Walnut Bend, AR ........ Mhoon Bend, MS ......... Peters, AR .............. Commerce, MS .......... Porter Lake, AR ......... Pickett, MS-AR ......... Seyppel, AR............. Norfolk-Star, MS ......... Cow Island Bend, AR ..... 598 600 606 615 621 622 626 629 632 637 638 639 639 644 647 650 665 660 665 667 672 675 680 685 692 695 700 703 709 711 714 R R R L L R R L R L R L L R L R L R L L R L R L R L R R R L R 850 2,910 4,630 4-- 0 0 -- -- 06 -- 06 7,806 06 .. 3,03 .. -- -- -- 3 -- 3,905 -- 7,315 -- 33,310 -- 11,465 -- 9,630 -- 26,710 -- 10,390 -- 27,020 -- 25,690 -- 19,070 -- 9,030 -- 11,514 -- 3,795 -- 26,860 -- 16,385 -- 15,640 -- 30,090 -- 36,460 -- 48,970 -- 16,385 -- 24,663 -- 9,065 -- 31,070 -- 35,828 -- 33,760 -- 29,085 -- 34,155 -- 12,575 -- 4,630 -- 35,582 -- 22,274 H r CI) C M 1 0z TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN............. Coahoma, TN ........... Ensley, TN ............. Dismal Point, AR ......... Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR .... Presidents Island, TN ..... Hopefield Point, AR-TN .... Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN .................. Loosahatchie Bar, TN ..... St. Clair, AR ............ Island 40, TN-AR ........ Brandywine, AR-TN ...... Shelby Forest, TN ........ Dean Island, AR ......... Cedar Point-Densford, TN .................. Chute of Island 35, TN .... Lookout Bar, TN ......... Lookout, TN ............ Sunrise Towhead, TN ..... Lower Bullerton, AR ...... Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN .......... Osceola, AR ............. Osceola, AR ............. Ashport-Keyes Point, TN ... Kate Aubrey, TN ......... Island 26, TN ........... Bend of Island 25, TN ..... Barfield, AR ............ Obion-Tamm, TN ......... Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN ................ Heloise, TN ............. 716 717 723 724 730 733 736 737 740 742 744 750 753 756 759 764 772 774 776 782 786 786 786 791 793 798 803 808 819 R L L R R L R L R R R R L R L R R R R R R R R L R R L R L 6,853 9,270 44,026 7,200 24,530 12,755 10,360 31,293 2,070 2,9302 30,750 18,010 9,550 7,555 5,405 --. 93--5 935 --. 110 -- --. 2,599 826 R 831 L 14,769 --. -- 20,190 -- 30,400 -- 2,9902 -- 5,005 -- 16,995 -- 28,350 -- 30,808 -- 1,3503 -- 5,823 -- 44,232 -- 2,500 -- 15,690 -- 31,565 -- 52,335 -- 51,321 -- 26,984 -- 12,935 o ro O O0 O O y O pA t! O 0 0 O 0d m m6 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Island 18, MO ........... Linwood Bend, TN ........ Blaker Towhead, TN ...... Bells Point, MO .......... Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO .................. Island 15, TN ........... Hathaway Landing, TN .... Robinson Bayou, MO ...... Fritz Landing, TN ........ Lee Towhead, MO ........ Bend of Island 14, TN ..... Above Lee Towhead, TN ... Little Cypress, MO ....... Merriwether-Cherokee, TN .................. Linda, MO............... Below Toney's Towhead, TN .................. Toney's Towhead, KY-TN ............... Kentucky Point, KY ....... New Madrid Bar, KY ...... New Madrid Bend, MO .... La Forge, MO ........... Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY ............... Winchester Towhead, M O .................. Island 9, KY-TN ......... Milton Bell, MO ......... Chute of Island 8, KY ..... Bend of Island 8, MO ..... Island 8, KY ............ Hickman-Reelfoot, KY ..... Beckwith Bend, MO ...... 836 841 845 845 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 864 R L L R R L L R L L L L R 2,070 2,540 -- .- --. 90 5-- 06 -- 6,549 --. -- -- 25 7,237 869 L 876 R 879 L 882 887 888 889 892 L L R R R 4,548 2,550 10 06 899 L 900 905 908 913 914 914 919 924 R L R L R R L R 6,910 --. 10 -- -- 24,240 14,850 18,562 5,420 25,600 3,630 1,000 22,630 15,670 9,640 12,050 4,943 40,140 -- 41,058 -- 11,950 -- 20,895 -- 13,640 -- 7,960 -- 16,825 -- 43,262 -- 24,930 -- 37,520 5,540 33,585 16,600 12,620 18,375 18,515 43,359 14,588 06 -- C,' H Cl) u, CI UI U, IU, TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares) 1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Williams, KY............ Wolf Island, KY .......... Columbus, KY........... Belmont, MO ............ Island 3 and 4, KY ...... . Campbell, KY ........... Pritchard, MO ........... Mayfield Creek, KY ....... Wickliffe, KY ............ Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River) ........... Total revetment, Memphis District, Mississippi River ....... Dikes: Henrico, AR ............. Below Knowlton, AR ...... Island 67, MS ........... Below Ludlow, AR ........ Sunflower, AR ........... Island 64, AR ........... Island 62, AR ........... Island 63 Bar, MS ........ Island 63, MS ........... Kangaroo Point, AR ....... Friars Point, MS ........ . Montezuma Bar, MS ...... Montezuma Towhead, AR .. Prairie Point, AR ......... Flower Lake, MS ......... St. Francis Towhead, MS... Below Walnut Bend, AR ... Bordeaux Point, MS ...... 927 934 937 938 940 943 948 949 953 L R L R R L R L L 958 R 3,570 -- 0-- 16,679 -- 1,903 -- -- 10,015 19,205 7,395 5,785 19,970 6,865 15,045 8,935 8,455 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 26,152 26,965 (5.11 Miles) 603 616 621 624 627 630 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 668 671 676 681 R R L R L R R L L R L L R R L L R L 2,770 ..-- -- -- -- -- -- 310 34,321 470 -- --. --. -- 24,722 (5) 1,625 300 -- (4) -- 1,966,365 (372.42 Miles) -- 9,080 20,670 4,320 5,040 5,520 7,330 23,180 2,600 5,640 5,730 6,870 15,240 3,450 10,391 11,060 3,380 6,420 5,780 03 0n O0 O O IU) OO H Lr 0: 0 0 U) 0 O O d TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)l Feet) Feet) Peters, AR .............. 693 R -- -- -- 970 -- - -- 7,830 Commerce, MS .......... 694 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,745 Basket Bar, AR .......... 696 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,560 Buck Island, MS ......... 700 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,705 Porter Lake, AR ......... 701 R -- -- -- 4,100 - -- - 22,315 Pickett, MS ............. 704 L -- -- -- 1,145 -- -- - 7,180 Seyppel, AR ............. 706 R -- -- -- -- -- - - 12,250 Cat Island, AR .......... 710 R -- - -- -- -- - - 15,590 Coahoma, TN ........... 718 L -- -- -- 1,465 -- - - 4,640 Armstrong, AR-TN ....... 720 R -- -- -- 1,450 -- -- - 18,690 Dismal Point, AR. ........ 724 R -- -- -- 1,500 -- -- - 25,510 Hopefield Point, AR ....... 736 R 4,020 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,350 Memphis Front, TN ....... 736 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,300 cO Robinson Crusoe, TN ...... 738 R -- -- -- 1,200 - -- -- 21,939 Loosahatchie Bar, TN ..... 739 R -- -- -- -- - -- -- 3,950 Above Loosahatchie, TN ... 742 L -- -- -- 300 -- -- -- 8,990 Redman Point, AR ........ 743 R -- -- -- -- - -- -- 7,750 Randolph Point, TN ....... 747 L -- -- -- -- - - -- 16,740 Poker Point, AR .......... 748 R -- -- -- 1,600 -- -- -- 8,050 Corona Bar, TN-AR ....... 755 R -- -- -- 400 -- -- -- 8,430 Densford, TN ............ 757 L -- -- -- 400 -- -- -- 7,780 Cedar Point, TN ......... 759 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,890 Below Richardson Landing, TN........... 767 L -- -- -- -- 5,950 Lookout, TN-AR ......... 771 R 7,327 -- -- -- -- -- - 12,865 Plum Point, TN .......... 784 L -- -- -- 2,000 -- -- -- 9,695 Lake Neark, AR ......... 786 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,545 Island 30 ............... 787 R -- -- -- -- -- -- - 3,010 Kate Aubrey, TN ......... 791 R -- -- -- 600 -- -- -- 11,270 Keyes Point, TN ......... 791 L -- -- -- 1,500 -- -- -- 24,690 Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR ... 795 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,330 Forked Deer, TN ......... 798 L -- -- -- 300 -- -- -- 8,550 Island 25, AR ........... 804 R -- - -- -- -- -- -- 5,450 Nebraska Point, TN ....... 808 L -- -- -- -- - -- -- 12,149 Below Tamm Bend, TN .... 813 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,300 Wrights Point, AR ........ 820 R -- -- -- 600 -- -- -- 34,775 r I I r i C t ) C )) m 1 1 Z ) $ ) TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Island 21, Chute, TN ...... 824 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,170 Head of Island 21, TN ..... 828 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,460 Island 20, MO-TN ......... 831 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,139 Island 18, TN ........... 837 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,670 Tennemo, TN ........... 842 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,240 Blaker Towhead, TN ...... 843 L -- -- -- 4,000 -- -- -- 4,070 Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, MO ............. 844 R -- -- -- 2,000 -- -- -- 28,630 Opposite Carthersville, TN . 846 L 3,300 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,300 Sandy Hook, TN ......... 850 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,350 Island 15, TN ........... 851 L -- -- -- 500 -- -- -- 8,830 Robinson Bayou, MO ...... 853 R -- -- -- 800 -- -- -- 10,768 Hathaway, TN ........... 854 L -- -- -- 850 -- -- -- 27,355 Island 15 Neck, TN ....... 854 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 21,100 Above Lee Towhead, TN ... 859 L -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,300 Below Cherokee, TN ...... 866 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,230 Stewart Towhead, MO ..... 871 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,290 Ruddles Point, MO ....... 874 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,130 Island 11, MO............ 882 R -- -- -- 1,150 -- -- -- 14,330 New Madrid Bend, MO .... 887 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,715 Kentucky Point, KY ....... 887 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,550 Morrison Towhead, MO .... 890 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,070 Hotchkiss Bend, MO ...... 895 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,583 Below Island 9, TN ....... 901 L -- -- -- 1,180 - -- -- 18,859 Donaldson Point, MO ..... 905 R 5,300 -- -- 200 -- -- -- 16,435 Island 9, KY ............ 906 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,0105 Island 7 - Island 8, MO-KY . 917 R 14,795 -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,795 Below Williams, KY ....... 925 L 2,160 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,160 Moore Island, KY-MO ..... 929 R 3,240 4,225 -- -- -- -- -- 7,925 Above Williams, KY ....... 930 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,150 Campbell, KY ........... 942 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,610 i ro 0IO 0 0 I0 0 0 O m m TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) Pritchard, MO ........... 944 R -- -- -- 1,800 -- -- -- 9,390 Island 1, KY ............ 948 L 2,085 2,110 -- -- -- -- -- 17,345 Total dikes Memphis District, Mississippi River ....... 41,697 6,805 -- 37,535 -- -- -- 858,423 (7.90 Miles) (162.58 Miles) Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). Changed to correct previous errors. Lumber mattress revetment. Rock Groins. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. Riprap paving only. O1 C,' C71 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. CI) rI) H CI Cl) M 1 0 TABLE 42-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Cur- In Com- Cu in Total rently System Com- rently System plete ren Authorized Place Thru Under When Built plete Under When Built Thru Un for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Co Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struc Main Stem Levees Mississippi River Levees Fifth Louisiana Levee District .. Levees .............. Old River structures and levees ................... Atchafalaya Basin Levee District .................. Levees ................... Morganza structure and levee ................... ,p Morganza forebay levee ...... Port Allen lock ............ Lafourche Basin Levee District Levees ................... Plaquemines West Levee District Levees ............ Buras Levee District ......... Levees ................... Empire lock .............. Baton Rouge front levees ...... Pontchartrain Levee (16.8) (16.8) (-) (10.7) 15.5 15.5 -- 9.4 1.3 1.3 - 1.3 (126.3) (126.3) (1.8) (102.2) 118.7 118.7 1.8 94.6 0.8 6.7 0.1 0.8 -- 6.7 -- 0.1 -- 31.7 61.7 6.1 30.2 37.9 37.9 -- 28.7 34.1) (34.1) (5.5) (30.2) 34.0 34.0 5.5 30.1 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 2.1 2.1 -- 0.9 District .................. (124.9) (124.9) (-) (91.1) Levees ................... 110.8 110.8 -- 77.0 Bonnet Carre' guide levees ... 11.3 11.3 -- 11.3 Bonnet Carre' forebay levee .. 1.3 1.3 -- 1.3 Bonnet Carre' structure ..... 1.5 1.5 -- 1.5 East Jefferson Levee District Levees ................... West Jefferson Levee District .. Levees .................. Floodwalls ................ Harvey Canal Lock ......... 11.6 (20.0) 19.8 0.1 0.1 11.6 -- 10.8 (20.0) (1.0) (16.9) 19.8 1.0 16.7 0.1 -- 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 (--) (--) (-) (-) (--) (5.3) (--) (1.0) -- 5.3 -- 1.0 (-) (15.5) -- 15.5 -- 18 (--) (118.7) -- 118.7 0.8 -- 6.7 -- 0.1 -- 18.0 2.0 (3.9) 3.9 (3.8) 3.8 (--) --. -- 0.1 -- ) -- -- 0.1 (-) (-) -- 61.7 -- 37.9 (-) (34.0) -- 34.0 rtly der tion tion LA (--) (15.5) (-) -- 15.5 - -- - -- 0 (-) (118.7) (-) -- 118.7 -- - -- I 61.7 (--) -- 37.9 (34.0) 34.0 - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.1 -- 2.1 -- (4.'1 (-) (-) (-) (110.8) (--) (110.8) (-) 4.7 -- -- -- 110.8 -- 110.8 -- -- -- -- -. 11.6 -- 11.6 -- (--) (--) (-) (-) (19.9) (--) (19.9) (-) -- -- - -. 19.8 -- 19.8 -- 4 -- -- -- -- 0.1 -- 0.1 -- O - - 0 0 BJ 6 3 (3 3 TABLE 42-K (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Cur- In Corn- Cu in Total rently System Corn- rently System plete rent Authorized Place Thru Under When Built plete Under When Built Thru Und for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Coi Location System FY FY FY struction pletedl FY FY struction pleted FY FY struct Orleans Levee District........ Left descending, east bank ..... Levees ................... Floodwalls ................ IHNC lock ................ Right descending, west bank . . Levees ................... Algiers Canal lock .......... Lake Borgne Basin Levee District Levees ............ Grand Prairie Levee District P. Levees .................. Total Mississippi River ..... Other Levees Included in Mainstem Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises .......... East Bank Atchafalaya River.. Bayou des Glaises .......... West bank Atchafalaya River.. Simmesport Ring ........... Melville Ring............. Krotz Springs Ring ......... Mansura Hills to Hamburg ... West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet ................. Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal ............ Morganza upper guide levee ... (27.2) (13.3) 4.6 8.6 0.1 (13.9) 13.8 0.1 11.6 (27.2) (0.2) (21.6) (13.3) (0.2) (9.4) 4.6 0.1 0.7 8.6 0.1 8.6 0.1 - 0.1 (13.9) (-) (12.2) 13.8 -- 12.1 0.1 - 0.1 11.6 - (-) (-) ((-)-) -- (--) (--) (-) (--) (--) (--) (--) (-) (--) --.-- --.-- 11.6 37.4 37.4 - 28.4 511.6 511.6 14.6 383.3 (148.4) (148.4) (-) (143.9) 52.5 52.5 - 52.5 7.9 7.9 - 7.9 60.1 60.1 - 55.6 1.6 1.6 - 1.6 4.1 - 1.7 - 20.5 - 36.7 (-) - 1.0 -- - 1.0 -- 1.1- (-) (-) -- -- -- -- (18.4) (4.6) 4.6 (13.8) 13.8 -- -- 11.6 -- 37.4 -- 479.6 (-) -- -- -- -- (-) (-) (-) (148.4) -- -- -- 52.5 -- -- -- 7.9 -- -- -- 60.1 -- -- -- 1.6 -- -- -- 4.1 -- -- -- 1.7 -- -- - 20.5 4.1 1.7 20.5 128.7 0.7 90.9 56.5 4.1 13.7 8.9 - 8.9 9.2 3.4 -- 128.7 -- -- -- -- 56.5 -- -- -- -- 8.9 r- ;ly er 1- tion (--) (18.4) (--) (--) (4.6) (-) -- 4.6 -- (--) (13.8) (--) -- 13.8 -- -- ----.. -- 11.6 -- -- 37.4 -- -- 479.6 -- (-) (148.4) (-) -- 52.5 -- - -- 7.9 -- -- 60.1 -- -- 1.6 -- -- 4.1 -- -- 1.7 -- -- 20.5 -- 0.7 128.4 -- -- 56.5 -- -- 8.9 -- In error last year PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Location East Protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee ................. Total Atchafalaya Basin..... Total-Main Stem Leaves....... Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) O Built to Approved Total Total G etiod Cur- In Cur- In Com- Curin Total rently System Com- rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built plete Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con- Corn- This This Con- System FY FY FY struction pleted1 FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction 106.7 106.7 3.3 84.3 4.0 .- -- -- -- 105.0 3.3 82.0 - 449.2 449.2 8.1 341.7 16.6 -- -- - -- 447.5 4.0 _30 . 960.8 960.8 22.7 725.0 53.3 10.1 - 1.1 -- 927.1 4.0 930.82 O TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA ........ (17.4) (17.4) (-) (17.4) (-) Item A levees .............. 5.0 5.0 - 5.0 -- , Item B levees .............. 10.1 10.1 - 10.1 -- Item C levees .............. 2.3 2.3 - 2.3 -- TPot al Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .................... 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 -- (-) (-) (-) (-) (17.4) -- -- -- -- 5.0 -- -- -- -- 10.1 -- -- - -- 2.3 -- - -. - 17.4 (-) (17.4) (-) -- 5.0 - -- 10.1 - -- 2.3 - - 17.4 - GRAND TOTAL ............. 978.2 978.2 22.7 742.4 53.3 10.1 - 1.1 -- 944.5 1. Figures indicate landside seepage berms only. 2 In error last year TABLE 42-K (Continued) 4.0 921.2-' 0 O 0 m TABLE 42-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Levees and Floodwalls Berm1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Cur- In Com- Cu in Total rently System Com- rently System plete ren Authorized Place Thru Under When Built plete Under When Built Thru Und for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Co Location System FY FY FY2 struction pleted3 FY4 FY struction pleted FY FY struc lrtly ler ntion MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Levees East bank in Mississippi ...... Greenville Harbor dikes ...... West bank in Arkansas ....... West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) .......... Total Mississippi River Levees ................ 178.34 178.3 -- 109.1 7.8 7.8 -- 7.8 75.6 75.6 -- 52.4 -- 156.9 2.6 61.3 198.7 198.7 -- 67.1 4.6 460.4 460.4 -- 236.4 Other Levees Included in Main p Stem Lower Red River-South Bank C Red River levees ........... (59.2) (59.2) (--) (59.2) Hotwells to Moncla, LA, levees .................. 59.2 59.2 -- 59.2 Arkansas River, South Bank .. 85.4 85.4 -- 85.4 Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem ................. 144.6 144.6 -- 144.6 Total--Main Stem Levees .... 605.0 605.0 -- 381.0 TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Arkansas River, North bank .. 61.55 Red River Backwater Levees .. 263.6 56.2 -- 56.2 165.1 4.6 161.86 -- 119.3 -- 53.1 -- 174.2 1.2 75.4 93.3 -- 69.6 2.3 197.8 7.2 311.5 0 242.0 (-) (-) (-) (-) -- 24.7 -- 24.7 -- 24.7 -- 24.7 7.2 336.2 0 266.7 -- 8.3 7.1 -- -- 8.3 -- -- 3.5 447.4 (-) (59.2) - 59.2 -- 84.1 -- 143.3 3.5 590.7 -- 47.4 - 249.0 5.8 174.2 - -- 75.4 - -- 197.8 - 5.8 447.4 - - (--) (59.2) (-) E -- 59.2 - -- 81.1 - 5. 140.3 8 587.7 U, 0 -- 47.4 - 4.6 146.5 7.1 TABLE 42-L (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Levees and Floodwalls Berml Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Cur- In Com- Cu in Total rently System Comrn- rently System plete ren Authorized Place Thru Under When Built plete Under When Built Thru Und for This This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Com- This This Co Location System FY FY FY2 struction pleted3 FY4 FY struction pleted FY FY struc Yazoo River Basin ........... . (624.1) (357.2) (-) (211.8) (18.7) (--) (--) (--) (--) (624.1) (--) (333.6) (4. Headwater................ 527.5 305.6 - 160.2 18.7 -- -- -- -- 527.5 -- 294.6 4. Backwater ................ 96.6 51.6 - 51.6 -- -- -- -- -- 96.6 -- 39.0 - Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ........... . 949.2 578.5 4.6 429.8 25.8 8.3 -- 8.3 -- 920.5 4.6 527.5 11 GRAND TOTAL ............. ... 1,554.2 1,183.5 4.6 810.8 33.0 344.5 0 275 3.5 1,511.2 10.4 1,115.2 11 1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepage berm contracts. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. S b ntt Ihna a l nin Drnt iir nl l dn itinb wn hih d t donrehr. 3 . nu ject to cnange as pianning progresses. oees not inciuue exsung prsw nne etu 04. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 5. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 6. Reflects results of 1985 flowline reanalysis. Is r- 0 r- PTJ tly der ntion 3) .3 y .4 ' . .4 I0 0 0 TABLE 42-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Levees and Floodwalls Berm1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Cur- In Com- Cu in Total rently System Comrn- rently System plete ren Authorized Place Thru Under When Built plete Under When Built Thru Und for This This This Con- Comrn- This This Con- Com- This This Co Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FT FY struc lrtly ler ntion MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Mounds, IL ................ Mound City, IL ............. Cairo Drainage District ....... City of Cairo ............... Little River Drainage District .. Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO .............. Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO .............. St. Johns Levee and Drainage District .................. SSt. Francis Levee District of MO ................... City of Hickman, KY ......... Board of Levee Commissioners Fulton, County, KY ......... Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN ..... Madrid Bend Levee District, Lake Co., TN .............. Lake County Levee and Drainage District .................. Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1 ............. Tipton-Obion levee extension... St. Francis Levee District of AR .................... Helena Improvement District No. 1 .................... Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1 .................... 3.9 3.9 -- 3.9 - 0.5 -- 0.5 -- 3.6 -- 3.6 -- 2.7 2.7 -- 2.7 -- 2.5 -- 2.5 -- 1.1 -- 1.1 -- 13.82 13.8 -- 13.8 -- 1.6 -- -- -- 8.5 -- 8.5 -- 6.2 6.2 -- 6.2 -- 4.4 -- 2.0 -- 4.0 -- 3.5 -- 19.3 19.3 -- 19.3 -- 9.7 -- 4.9 -- 19.3 -- 19.3 -- 13.8 13.8 -- 13.8 -- 4.2 -- -- -- 13.8 -- 13.8 -- 26.0 26.0 -- 26.0 -- 12.9 -- 4.9 -- 26.0 -- 26.0 -- 59.03 58.7 -- 58.7 -- 9.2 -- - - 46.9 -- 46.1 -- 55.7 55.7 -- 55.7 -- 23.0 -- 12.0 -- 55.1 -- 55.1 -- 1.4 1.4 -- 1.4 -- -- -- -- -- 0.5 -- -- -- 16.7 16.7 -- 16.7 -- 15.1 -- 11.4 -- 16.3 -- 16.3 -- 4.5 4.5 -- 4.5 -- 0.6 -- 0.3 -- 4.5 -- 4.3 -- 5.2 5.2 -- 5.2 -- -- -- -- -- 5.2 -- 5.2 -- 15.9 21.3 6.5 15.9 -- 15.9 21.3 -- 21.3 156.7 156.7 -- 153.2 -- 9.1 -- 6.4 -- 15.9 -- 15.9 1.3 -- 0.4 -- 21.3 -- 21.3 -- -- -- -- 6.5 -- -- -- 84.7 1.4 83.2 -- 156.7 -- 156.7 5.3 5.3 -- 5.3 -- 2.4 -- 2.4 -- 4.7 -- 4.2 -- 23.9 23.9 -- 23.9 18.8 -- 18.8 -- 23.9 -- 23.9 TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Laconia Drainage and Levee District Phillips County, AR .. Laconia Levee District No. 1 of Deshna County, AR ......... Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Deshna County, AR ............... Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District .................. Madrid Bend L.D., Fulton Co., KY ..................... F Birds Point-New Madrid setback ts levee .................... S Total Mississippi River ..... TOTAL MAIN STEM LEVEES .. TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT St. Francis River ............. East bank ................. West bank ................ Little River ................. East bank (left) ............. West bank ................. Elk Chute ................. West Basin and middle valley .. Lower White River ............ White River backwater levee ... Augusta to Clarendon ........ Clarendon levee ............. 20.5 18.1 20.5 -- 18.1 -- 6.6 6.6 -- 93.6 93.6 -- 4.8 4.8 35.3 636.7 636.7 (308.2) 159.5 148.7 (130.1) 40.7 35.1 39.9 14.4 (95.6) 40.2 49.2 6.2 20.5 -- 11.5 18.1 -- 12.6 -- 11.5 -- 20.5 -- 9.2 - 16.5 -- 20.5 -- 16.5 6.6 93.6 -- 87.3 -- 87.3 4.8 35.3 -- 35.3 629.9 -- 625.9 629.9 -- 625.9 (302.9) -- (302.9) 156.2 -- 156.2 146.7 -- 146.7 (130.1) -- (130.1) 40.7 -- 40.7 35.1 -- 35.1 39.9 -- 39.9 14.4 -- 14.4 (85.9) -- (84.1) 40.2 -- 40.2 39.5 -- 39.5 6.2 -- 4.4 23.8 -- -- 335.2 1.4 257.7 335.2 1.4 257.7 -- 93.6 -- 4.8 -- 35.3 -- 604.5 -- 604.5 -- (301.0) - 156.7 - 144.3 - (128.9) - 40.7 -- 35.1 -- 39.7 -- 13.4 -- (88.0) -- 38.8 - 49.2 ritly der nation ro 0 0 A -- 0 -- -- -- 93.6 - 4.8 - 5 35.3 -- - 595.5 -" 0 - 595.5 -- z (133.5) 94.7 38.8 (94.5) 40.1 23.7 17.3 13.4 (75.0) 38.8 36.2 -. -a - U -- -- Levees and Floodwalls Berm1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Cur- In Com- Cu in Total rently System Com- rently System plete ren Authorized Place Thru Under When Built plete Under When Built Thru Uni for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Co Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY stru TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Levees and Floodwalls Berm1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Section Total Total Cur- In Cur- In Comin Total rently System Com- rently System plete r Authorized Place Thru Under When Built plete Under When Built Thru U for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Corn- This This Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY str Memphis Harbor ............. 10.5 10.5 -- 10.5 -- 7.0 4.4 7.0 -- 10.5 -- 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ............. 544.4 529.4 - 527.6 -- 7.0 4.4 7.0 528.4 -- 313.5 GRAND TOTAL............... 1,181.1 1,159.3 - 1,153.5 -- 342.2 5.8 264.7 -- 1,132.9 -- 909.0 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 2bv W) Curently nder Conuction -- -- U) UI) U) Cl) n 0 0 TABLE 42-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Cur- In Com- Cu in Total rently System Com- rently System plete ren Authorized Place Thru Under When Built plete Under When Built Thru Un for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Co Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struc MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River New Orleans District, Table 42-K. ............... 511.6 511.6 14.6 383.3. Vicksburg District, Table 42-L .. 460.4 460.4 -- 236.4 Memphis District, Table 42-M .. 636.7 629.9 -- 625.9 Total Mississippi River ...... 1,608.7 1,601.9 14.6 1,245.6 Other Levees Included in Main Stem Atchafalaya Basin Floodway-- p NOD .................... Lower Red River-South Bank-- VXD .................... Arkansas River-South Bank-- VXD .................... Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem........... 449.2 449.2 8.1 341.7 59.2 59.2 -- 36.7 7.2 43.9 10.1 -- 1.1 311.5 -- 242.0 335.2 1.4 257.7 658.8 1.4 500.8 16.6 59.2 85.4 85.4 -- 85.4 593.8 593.8 8.1 486.3 Total Main Stem Levees .... 2,202.5 2,195.7 22.7 1,731.9 -- 24.7 -- 24.7 16.6 60.5 24.7 -- 24.7 681.5 1.4 525.5 -- 479.6 3.5 447.4 -- 604.5 3.5 1,531.5 -- 447.5 -- 59.2 -- 84.1 -- 590.8 3.5 2,122.3 -- 479.6 -- 5.8 447.4 -- -- 595.5 -- 5.8 1,522.5 -- 4.0 424.2 -- -- 59.2 -- 0 -- 81.1 - 4.0 564.5-- - 9.8 2,087.0- -- TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA,--NOD .. Yazoo River Basin--VXD ....... Arkansas River-North Bank-- VXD ..................... Red River Backwater--VXD ..... St. Francis River--MD ......... Little River--MD ............. Lower White River--MD ....... 17.4 624.1 61.5 263.6 308.2 130.1 95.6 17.4 -- 17.4 357.2 -- 211.8 56.2 -- 56.2 165.1 4.6 161.8 302.9 -- 302.9 130.1 -- 130.1 85.9 -- 84.1 -- -- -- -- -- 17.4 18.7 -- -- -- -- 624.1 7.1 8.3 8.3 47.4 249.0 301.0 128.9 88.0 -- 17.4 -- 333.6 -- 47.4 4.6 146.5 -- 133.5 -- 94.5 -- 75.0 v In error last year ro 0 0I M Lrtly der n- ;tion -- y 4.3 -- n 7.1 -- 0 -- -- TABLE 42-N (Continued) RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Cur- In Com- Cu in Totl rently System Com- rently System plete rent Authorized Place Thru Under When Built plete Under When Built Thru Und for This This This Con- Com- This This Con- Com- This This Col Location System FY FY FY structioni pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struc Memphis Harbor--MD ......... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 -- 7.0 4.4 7.0 -- 10.5 -- 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project ............ 1511.0 1125.3 4.6 974.8 25.8 15.3 4.4 15.3 -- 1,463 4.6 858.4 11. Grand Total in Project ....... 3,713.5 3,321.0 27.3 2,706.7 86.3 696.8 5.8 540.8 3.5 3,588.6 14.4 2,945.4! 11. rtly ler ntion 4 4 1 In error last year t3 0i vs. 0 I o ^ 1 O1 Nf iii H rr M 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) Bayou des Glaises diversion channel .............. 1938 6.0 -- 6.0 100 -- Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie .............. 1946 92.6 -- 63.4 75 -- Charenton drainage and navigation canal .......... 1939 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- Wax Lake Outlet ............................. 1938 15.7 -- 15.7 100 -- Atchafalaya Basin Floodway ................... 1933 244.2 -- 186.4 76 -- Morganza Floodway ........................... 1941 3.3 -- 3.3 100 -- Old River outflow channel ...................... 1956 8.3 -- 8.3 100 -- Old River inflow channel ....................... 1960 2.3 -- 2.3 100 -- Old River lock approach channels ................ 1961 2.2 -- 2.2 100 -- Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) .............. 1958 2.5 -- 2.5 100 -- Teche-Vermilion Water Supply .................. 1977 6.3 -- 6.3 100 -- Old River Auxiliary Control Structure inflow channel . 1986 1.9 -- 1.9 100 -- Old River Auxiliary Control Structure outflow channel 1988 0.9 -- 0.9 100 -- Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion channel .......... 1988 1.7 -- 1.7 100 -- 42-66 TABLE 42-P Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MS Big Sunflower River .......................... Quiver River ................................ Deer Creek ................................ Steele Bayou ............................... Steele Bayou 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M ain Canal ...................... .......... Main Canal 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BlackBayou .......................................... Big Sunflower River tributaries .................. Quiver River tributaries ....................... YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ............................. YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS Upper Yazoo Project ......................... Coldwater River ............................ Arkabutla Canal ............................ Tallahatchie Canal .......................... Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway ................... .. Greenwood protection works .................. .. Yacona River ................................ BoboBayou............................................ Cassidy Bayou................................ Cassidy Bayou ............................... Bear Creek Diversion ........................ Lake Cormorant ............................ Hurricane Bayou ............................. Opossum Bayou............................. Abaica Creek ................................ Chicopa Creek ............... .... ....... .. Bear Creek ................................. Rocky Bayou ............ ................. Whiteoak Bayou ............................. Miscellaneous ditches ......................... Yalobusha River ............................ Yazoo River ................................ Whittington Auxiliary Channel .................. Tchula Lake ................................ David-Burrell Bayou .......................... McKinney Bayou ............................. Hillside Floodway ............................ Yazoo City protection works .................... Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous ....................... MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) 2.7 -- -- -- -- 199.1 69.6 7.0 54.9 71.2 21.1 22.2 36.5 227.2 35.4 39.9 179.0 54.6 0.4 74.8 48.0 2.9 1.8 16.1 69.0 26.0 4.8 20.9 2.5 20.8 7.7 7.0 23.3 7.8 55.9 12.3 46.0 160.2 30.8 26.4 40.4 3.5 11.0 1.6 30.2 1947 1947 1947 1947 1965 1959 1957 1960 1960 1976 1941 1948 1940 1939 1971 1952 1944 1934 1939 1940 1956 1964 1957 1960 1964 1953 1975 42-67 -- --. -- 42-67 199.1 69.6 7.0 54.9 68.5 21.1 227.2 35.4 -- 39.9 -- 58.1 -- 54.6 -- 0.4 -- 73.5 -- 48.0 -- 2.9 -- 1.8 -- 16.1 -- 69.0 -- 46.0 -- 160.2 -- 30.8 -- 26.4 -- 40.4 -- 3.5 -- 11.0 -- 1.6 -- 15.1 100 100 100 100 96 100 100 100 100 32 100 100 85 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 50 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- .-- - -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-P (Continued) CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS (Continued) Alligator-Catfish Bayou ................... :.... 1973 8.3 -- 8.2 99 -- Pelucia Creek .............................. 1975 13.7 -- 5.6 40 6.3 BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR Bayou Lafourche ............................. 1949 45.3 -- 45.3 100 -- Bayou Lafourche 4 ,7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1972 43.0 -- 4.4 10 -- Big & Colewa Creeks .......................... 1947 81.4 -- 81.4 100 -- Big & Colewa Creeks 5' 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 86.8 -- 51.5 60 -- Tensas River ................................ 1947 96.5 -- 96.5 100 -- Tensas River6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1968 165.0 -- 61.0 37 -- Boeuf River, AR and LA ....................... 1953 103.9 -- 103.9 100 -- Fleschmans Bayou, AR ........................ 1963 6.6 -- 6.6 100 -- Caney Bayou, AR ............................ 1964 7.4 -- 7.4 100 -- Canal 18, AR ................................ 1963 10.3 -- 10.3 100 -- Big Bayou, AR ............................... 1952 33.3 -- 33.3 100 -- Black Pond Slough, AR ........................ 1962 14.3 -- 14.3 100 -- Bayou Macon, AR and LA ...................... 1959 150.8 -- 150.8 100 -- Rush Bayou, AR ............................... 1964 6.7 -- 6.7 100 -- Canal 19, AR ................................ 1957 50.2 -- 50.2 100 -- Canal 43, AR ................................ 1956 34.5 -- 34.5 100 -- Canal 81, AR ................................ 1957 32.7 -- 32.7 100 -- Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal-Bayou Vidal Cutoff ................................ -- 17.1 -- -- -- -- Kirsch Lake Canal ............ ................. -- 9.3 -- -- -- Canal 19 Extension ............................ 1964 9.4 -- 9.4 100 -- Lake Chicot Pumping Plant .............. ....... -- 2.5 -- 2.5 100 -- Mill Bayou .................................. 1955 4.8 -- 4.8 100 -- RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant ................. . 1976 6.9 -- 6.9 100 -- Six Mile Bayou, LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 1.5 -- 1.5 100 -- GRAND PRAIRIE, AR8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 338.1 -- -- -- -- BAYOU METO, AR8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- 164.9 -- -- -- -- 1. 2. 3. 4. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the project. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. 5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. 6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 68.5 additional miles of channel to the project. 7. Further work on these items has been deferred due to local oppositions and withdrawal of sponsorship by the levee district. 8. Deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989. 42-68 TABLE 42-Q MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1992) Total In Complete System Built Thru Currently Year When This This Percent Under Location Initiated Completed FY FY Complete Construction (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, MO ............................... ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, MO ...................... St. Francis River, MO and AR ................... West Memphis Drainage, AR .................... Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR ................. Tyronza River, AR ............................ L'Anguille River, AR .......................... LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, AR Cache River Basin, AR ........................ Big Creek and tributaries, AR ................... WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES Obion Creek, KY .............................. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES MS River, Western TN tributaries (Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) .................. Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act) .............................. Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN ............. Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN ................... . MS River Below Cape Girardeau: West TN tributaries (1948 Act) ..................... Wolf River and tributaries, TN .................. NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN Nonconnah Creek, MS and TN .................. HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR Helena Harbor, AR (2 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1952 1963 1953 1951 1960 1939 (1) 1972 (1) (1) 1952 (1) 1974 1955 1961 1960 1990 1989 9.6 298.9 638.5 19.8 28.0 12.7 95.0 231.5 103.8 -- 9.5 100 0 9.2 -- -- 283.7 481.2 19.8 28.0 12.7 -- 7.2 -- -- 95 75 100 100 100 3 -- 41.71 34.3 9.3 15.8 19.7 225.0 25.5 18.2 2.25 -- 34.3 -- 3.0 -- 19.7 -- 89.8 -- 25.5 100 19 100 41 100 -- 0.5 38 1. Not started. 2. Data for Stage 1 only. 42-69 19.9 -- -- -- 0.5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-R PUMPING STATIONS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Bayou Yokely 489 100 1955 1990 100 1991(A) Bayou Yokely Enlargement 568 100 1963 1990 100 1991(A) Centerville 332 100 1964 1991 100 1992(A) Ellerslie 136 100 1953 -- -- -- Franklin 144 100 1958 1992 42 1993(S) Franklin Enlargement 144 100 1978 1992 42 1993(S) Gordy 238 100 1964 -- -- -- Maryland 136 100 1957 1991 100 1992(A) North Bend 52 100 1962 -- -- -- Tiger Island 75 100 1955 -- -- -- Wax Lake East 1,008 100 1961 1990 100 1992(A) Wax Lake West 496 100 1965 1990 100 1992(A) Teche Vermilion 1,300 100 1982 -- -- -- PT Coupee 1l500 100 1983 -- -- -- TOTAL 6,618 42-70 TABLE 42-S MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION PUMPING STATIONS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Bawcomville 270 100 1955 19921 5 1993(s ) Jonesville 180 100 1952 -- -- -- Natchez Port 100 -- -- -- -- -- Wilson Point 50 -- -- -- -- -- Greenwood - Lee Street 90 100 1953 1952 -- -- Greenwood - Wilson Street 67 100 1953 1952 -- -- Greenwood - Walker Lake 675 100 1949 1952 -- -- Yazoo City 540 100 1954 1957 -- -- West Monroe 4 488 -- -- -- -- -- Columbia 45 100 1939 -- -- -- Calion 200 100 1959 -- -- -- McKinney Bayou, MS 250 100 1962 1961 -- -- Lake Chicot 6,500 100 1987 -- -- -- Tensas Cocodrie 4,000 100 1986 -- -- -- Yazoo Backwater 10,000 -- -- -- -- -- Natchez Area 300 -- -- -- -- -- Bushley Bayou 300 -- Indef2 - - -- Bushley Bayou 20 -- Indef2 -- -- -- Sicily-HAHA Bayou 750 -- 1966 -- -- -- Sicily - Fool River 300 -- 1995 -- -- -- Pelucia Creek - Rising Sun #1 10 -- 1993 1991 -- -- Pelucia Creek - Rising Sun #2 15 -- 1993 1991 -- -- Pelucia Creek Pump 75 -- 1993 1992 -- -- Below Red River 500 -- Indef -- -- -- Total 25,925 1 Repair of culverts to be accomplished in FY 92. 2 This project has been placed in the inactive category. 3 This project has been deferred indefinitely. 4 Corps did not construct. 42-71 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-T PUMPING STATIONS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT Rehabilitation Status (If Applicable) Percent Percent Complete Year Complete Year Authorized Thru Complete Thru Complete Size This (Schedule/ Year This (Schedule/ Name (CFS) FY Actual) Initiated FY Actual) Devall's Bluff 215 100 1949 1987 100 1989 Des Arc, Ark. 30 100 1954 -- -- -- Ensley 900 100 1966 -- -- -- DD #17, Station #1 375 100 1 -- - Huxtable Pumping Plant 12,000 100 1977 -- -- -- Graham Burke 1,500 100 1964 -- -- -- Finley Street 100 100 1978 -- -- -- Dyersburg 26 100 1961 -- -- -- Cotton Slough 50 100 1964 -- -- -- West Hickman 190 100 1976 -- -- -- Cypress Creek 3,000 100 1944 -- -- -- Fairfax 53.5 100 1950 -- -- -- Goose Pond 110 100 1976 -- -- -- Marble Bayou 220 100 1952 -- -- -- Workhouse Bayou 520 100 1950 -- -- -- Nonconnah 1,620 100 1944 -- -- -- L&DD #3 Peafield 400 100 1 -- - Treasure Island 150 100 1976 -- -- -- Lake No. 9 500 100 1981 -- -- -- Cairo 10th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- -- Cairo 28th Street 65 100 1981 -- -- -- DD #17, Station #2 700 100 1981 -- -- -- Drinkwater Sewer 150 100 1979 -- -- -- May Street 5 100 1948 -- -- -- Cairo 22nd Street 37 100 1-- -- -- Gayoso Bayou 1,500 100 1915 -- -- -- Mud Lake 200 -- -- -- -- -- Madison 25 -- -- -- -- -- Cache River 200 -- -- -- -- New Madrid 1,500 -- -- -- -- St. John's Bayou 1,000-- -- -- -- TOTAL 27,406.5 1 Unknown constructed by local interest. 42-72 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-U COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: St. Louis District: St. Francis Basin-Wappapello Lake Subtotal Memphis District: General investigations Mississippi River levees St. Francis Basin White River Backwater Cache Basin, AR Channel improvement West Tennessee tributaries West Kentucky tributaries Inspection of completed works Mapping Reelfoot Lake No. 9, TN-K Mud Lake, TN Eight Mile Creek Helena Harbor L'Anguille River Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS West Memphis & Vicinity Horn Lake Creek & Tribs Lake #9 Pumping Plant, KY Subtotal Vicksburg District: General investigations Mississippi River levees Lower Arkansas River Tensas Basin Yazoo Basin Channel improvement Mapping Inspection of completed works Lower Red River--South Bank Red River Levee Dam Safety Assurances Subtotal New Orleans District: General investigations Mississippi River levees Mississippi Delta Region Old River Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries Atchafalaya Basin 2,509,800 8,070,990 304,437 39,985,023 1,222,735 10,412 522 522 1,725 1,054,549 8,423 1,219,544 2,548,215 44,189 306,935 $ 4,620,973 4,620,973 4,713,797 9,036,270 680,903 26,942,778 791,518 313,403 3,017,213 --. -- -- 4,566 -- 57,288,022 42,483,235 3,017,213 -- -- 211,008 3,475,126 1,237,009 -- -- 1,081,140 -- 4,212,507 4,158,763 -- 43,799,644 26,330,825 -- 14,395,232 13,778,438 -- -- 332,615 -- -- 178,701 -- -- 35,917 -- 562,252 -- -- 66,444,761 47,133,406 211,008 16,736,441 2,272,992 711 23,755,951 414,511 -- -- 4,028,170 62,757 3,596,901 144,434 12,698,237 42-73 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-U (Continued) COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Item Construction Maintehance Other New Orleans District (Continued): Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System 3,659,853 -- -- Channel improvement 66,608,217 16,393,472 -- Mississippi & LA Estuarine 171,469 -- -- B. R. Harbor Devil Swamp -- 20,728 -- Inspection of completed works -- 148,231 -- Mapping -- 325,647 -- Subtotal 113,205,635 37,418,577 414,511 Total Federal Funds 236,938,418 131,656,191 3,642,732 CONTRIBUTED FUNDS New Orleans District: Atchafalaya Basin -- 6,723 -- Old River -- 164,915 Mississippi Delta Region 2,309 -- -- Total Contributed Funds 2,309 171,638 -- Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 236,940,728 131,827,830 3,642,732 42-74 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1992 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1992 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, AR Contraction works DeValls Bluff, AR Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, LA Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 169,3D 19,~5 ~ -- 1,076,520 1,076,520 -- 178,925 178,925 -- 8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 231,215 231,215 -- 1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 18,736,432 18,736,432 -- 6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 1,723,620 1,723,620 -- 12,426 12,426 -- 1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 39,546,054 39,546,054 -- 2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 125,074 125,074 -- 1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 826,235 826,235 -- 4,664,515 4,664,515 -- 2,864,516 2,864,516 -- 7,070 7,070 -- 1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 172,950 172,950 -- 105,660 105,660 -- 2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 17.384.031 17_384_031 -- New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, LA Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA Bonnet Carre' Spillway, LA Contraction works Mapping 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 699,185 3,375,492 14,212,198 1,258,916 1,112,967 42-75 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1992 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1992 New Orleans District: (Continued) Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Reelfoot Lake Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake St. Francis River and tributaries Big Slough and Mayo ditch Little River drainage 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 540,838 2,701,566 10,098,817 35,992,117 5,513,110 387,917 387,917 -- 75,893,123 75,893,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 18,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 165,432,500 165,432,500 -- 579,462 579,462 -- 1,897,980 1,897,980 -- 2_477_442 2_447442-- 182,640,354 98,000 377,899,369 58,566,439 178,695,900 439,434 7,895,000 9,019,908 245,633,682 965,429 51,766,592 182,463,223 98,000 377,402,972 58,566,439 177,347,224 439,434 7,887,607 9,019,908 243,783,149 965,429 51,759,354 177,131 -- 496,397 -- 1,348,676 -- 7,393 -- 1,850,532 7,238 7,238 42-76 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1992 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1992 Lower White River: Clarendon Levee Augusta to Clarendon, AR White River backwater levee, AR Horn Lake Creek & Tribs Memphis Harbor Ensley Berm Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS West Memphis and Vicinity Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 West Tennessee tributaries Helena Harbor Cache Basin, AR West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN L'Anguille River Eight Mile Creek Subtotal Vicksburg District: Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) Section 6 Levees Lower Arkansas River: North Bank South Bank Tensas Basin: Lake Chicot pumping plant Tensas River Red River Backwater: Below Red River Red River backwater levee, LA Tensas Cocodrie pumping plant Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Ouachita River Levees Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Greenwood Belzoni Yazoo City 505,715 1,788,846 10,624,501 625,000 3,497,000 6,328,000 570,000 108,651 42,516,900 7,671,000 10,450,000 1,440,000 107,000 196,000 1,993,000 1,202,041,720 212,665,990 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 96,172,400 41,507,200 639,400 70,915,046 55,058,900 756,300 39,800,000 440,662,065 23,549,260 127,934,040 958,175 400,000 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,401,494 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 505,703 1,788,174 10,624,501 441,901 3,439,916 5,351,269 537,514 108,651 42,015,917 7,140,067 10,446,038 1,439,545 95,128 180,676 1,692,305 1,195,540,043 211,106,412 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 95,637,407 41,507,200 639,400 70,006,315 55,016,257 756,300 39,800,000 438,012,406 23,549,260 126,602,137 958,175 400,000 26,502,400 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,401,494 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 42-77 12 673 -- 183,099 57,084 976,731 32,486 500,983 530,933 3,962 455 11,872 15,324 300,695 6,501,677 1,559,579 -- 534,993 -- 908,731 42,643 -- -- 2,649,659 1,331,904 -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-V STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND (Continued) ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1992 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1992 Yazoo Basin: (Continued) Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel 10,950,966 10,950,966 -- Big Sunflower, etc. 54,568,000 54,056,499 511,501 Main Stem 34,404,300 34,403,926 374 Upper Yazoo Projects 82,655,036 81,719,034 936,002 Yazoo Basin--Tributaries Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) 90,984,166 89,315,349 1,668,817 Tributaries--Bank Stabilization 612,484 612,484 -- Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous 23,978,100 23,977,200 900 Yazoo Basin Backwater Yazoo Backwater 56,597,200 56,589,321 7,879 Rocky Bayou 3,407,500 3,403,874 3,626 Yazoo Backwater Pumping Plant 9,064,850 9,064,850 -- Muddy Bayou 5,145,200 5,145,200 -- Yazoo Backwater, F&WL Mitigation 4,832,900 4,723,421 109,479 Yazoo Basin Reevaluation 12,533,270 12,163,726 369,544 Streambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. 14,767,000 14,767,000 -- Demonstration Erosion Control 91,744,900 87,476,519 4,268,381 Dam Safety Assurances-Sardis Dam 7,287,000 7,197,533 89,467 Subtotal 1,760,548,610 1,745,555,132 14,993,478 New Orleans District: Teche-Vermilion Basin Water Supply 34,506,000 34,506,000 -- Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries 5,008,008 5,008,008 -- Miss. & LA Estuarine 1,337,000 1,131,845 205,155 Channel Improvement: Dredging 35,945,266 35,945,266 -- Revetments 861,799,117 860,986,871 812,245 Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) 18,056,600 18,056,600 -- Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 200,680 200,680 -- Mississippi River Levees 280,217,000 277,330,221 2,886,779 Mississippi Delta Region 21,736,000 21,223,059 512,941 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway: Atchafalaya Basin 684,196,537 678,686,196 5,510,341 Atchafalaya River Navigation 303,463 303,463 -- Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System 27,527,000 23,798,147 3,728,853 Old River 292,274,000 292,274,000 -- Subtotal TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, AR Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River 2,263,106,671 2,249,450,356 13,656,315 5,228,174,442 5,193,022,973 35,151,469 150,000 150,000 30,000 30,000 420,000 420,000 365,000 365,000 42-78 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1992 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1992 Memphis District: (Continued) Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes Subtotal TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN RECREATION FACILITIES--COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Project Funds St. Louis District: Wappapello Lake, MO Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing Subtotal Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Subtotal Total Eight-Year Program Funds Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies Total maintenance since Aug. 18, 1941 65,000 175,000 350,000 540,000 65,000 175,000 350,000 540,000 2,095,000 2,095,000 -- 29,700 29,700 -- 200,000 200,000 -- 229,700 229,700 -- 69,753 69,753 -- 1,109,000 1,109,000 -- 965,247 965,247 -- 2,144,000 2,144,000 -- 4,468,700 4,468,700 -- 5,398,075,642 5,362,924,173 35,151,469 2,405,300 2,405,300 -- 203,286 203,286 -- 2,608,586 2,608,586 -- 1,584,339 1,584,339 -- 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- 7,673,109 10,281,695 5,408,357,337 2,315,479,855 7,673,109 10,281,695 5,373,205,868 2,306,771,481 35,151,469 8,708,375 42-79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-V (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1992 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1992 Vicksburg District: (Continued) Total rehabilitation 31,113,000 31,113,000 -- Total flood control emergencies 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- Total general investigations 85,033,381 83,930,341 1,103,041 Total flood control, MR&T appropriations 7,854,883,873 7,809,920,989 44,962,885 Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1992 7,886,952,782 7,841,989,897 44,962,885 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been excluded from this report. 42-80 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-W STATEMENTS OF EXPENDITURES FOR LEVEES BY STATE AND LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH DEC. 31, 1991 Engineer District Expenditures St. Louis $ 80,750,859 Memphis 301,832,123 Vicksburg 145,341,089 New Orleans 711,358,390 Total $1,239,282,461 42-81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-X COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Project Funding FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 Mississippi River General investigations: and tributaries Allotted 5,029,000 2,628,500 2,510,000 3,774,000 85,033,381 (Regular Funds)1 Cost 5,286,048 2,903,198 2,610,794 3,642,732 83,930,341 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Allotted 210,139,000 216,161,500 215,162,000 217,256,000 5,228,174,442 Cost 197,370,967 209,946,171 217,709,941 236,938,418 5,193,022,973 Maintenance Allotted 121,878,000 113,768,000 126,690,000 132,439,000 2,315,479,855 Cost 119,586,856 110,049,671 129,231,497 131,656,191 2,306,771,480 Rehabilitations Allotted -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Cost -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Allotted -- -- -- -- 14,885,992 Cost -- -- -- -- 14,885,992 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed 2,028,507 1,845,800 195,910 -- 15,365,680 Cost 1,296,903 2,185,585 726,505 2,309 15,304,026 Maintenance Contributed 83,164 85,742 14,423 -- 2,687,827 Cost 64,994 65,698 7,700 171,638 2,623,991 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1992): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Transferred to revolving fund: Impounded savings: Flood control emergencies: Net total allotted: Impounded savings: Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1992 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: $5,397,655,870 10,281,695 4,995,215 24,944,460 1,593,097 14,885,922 14,378 85,033,381 2,315,479,855 $5,439,470,337 14,900,300 2,400,513,236 32,068,909 7,886,952,782 42-82 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-X (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Project Funding FY 92 Sep. 30, 1992 Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1992 Transferred to revolving fund: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: 7,855,405,632 24,944,460 4,995,215 1,607,475 Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1992: Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 89: $337,046,000 FY 91: $344,362,000 FY 90: $332,558,000 FY 92: $353,469,000 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 1978, teletype. 42-83 7,886,952,782 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 TABLE 42-Y MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 92 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (112) New Orleans District Alexandria, LA-12743 $ 380,740 Atchafalaya Basin Water & Land Res-12026 $ 33,771 Subtotal 414,511 Vicksburg District Boeuf-Tensas Basin, AR & LA-81273 16,912 Natchez, MS-12675 1,784 Southeast Arkansas, AR-12756 132 South Bank Levee, Bayou Rapides, LA-10220 16,116 Subtotal 34,944 Memphis District Jackson & Trenton, TN - 12874 $573,974 Mayfield Creek-10850 757 Newport Harbor, MS-10361 322,703 St. Francis River Below Wappapello (Whiteman's Creek)-22000 288,590 St. Francis River F&WL, AR & MO-79690 51,717 Subtotal 1,237,741 TOTAL (Category 110) $1,687,196 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 120) Vicksburg District 175,064 Memphis District 88891 TOTAL (Category 120) 263,955 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 140) Flood Control Projects (141) Memphis District Eastern Arkansas Regional- Comprehensive Study - 81266 $815,680 Whiteman's Creek, AR - 12738 $930,861 TOTAL (Category 140) 930,861 42-84 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-Y (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 92 Categories PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (Category 160) Flood Control Projects (162) Memphis District Helena AR & Vicinity-81280 432,743 Horn Lake Creek & Tribs/Cowpen Creek-81282 7 Lower White River Big Creek & Trib-12472 320,849 St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Fdwy-77005 205 West Memphis & Vicinity-81281 5,915 TOTAL (Category 160) 759,719 GRAND TOTAL MR&T GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 3,641,731 42-85 US ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORIES The U. S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL)) at Champaign, Illinois conducts research in the planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance and environmental quality for Military and Civil Works facilities. During FY 92, significant accomplishments by USACERL applicable to Civil Works included: (1) Research was completed on new epoxy coating systems for immersion in fresh water and for atmospheric exposure. These coatings will provide cost effective protection and compliance with air pollution regulations. Metallized coating systems and guidance for their use have been developed. These materials have proven to be very cost effective for severely abrasive fresh water exposures on locks and dams. A study of anti fouling and non toxic foul-release coatings for the conrol of zebra mussels at public facilities has been initiated. (2) Six training courses were conducted for Corps of Engineers personnel on the use of Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance and Rehabilitation (REMR) Management Systems for Miter Lock Gates, Steel Sheet Pile Structures, and Concrete Lockwalls. Two new systems have also been completed. These systems include Sector Lock Gate and Filling and Emptying Valves. The REMR Management ;systems provide uniform and objective analysis and development condition assessment and tools for economic analysis and data management. Cost savings are realized through the development of optimal maintenance and repair work plans and optimal budget planning. (3) The Application Distribution System, GAPPL Version 1.04 is complete. It is in use by all Civil Works districts and divisions and is operational in the CEAP environment. HQUSACE electronically distributes five critical Civil Works applications and monitors version control, as required. This product is taught to all Civil Works districts during the annual district training. (4) A prototype of the District Operation and Maintenance Budget System was implemented at Portland District in the spring of 1992. 43-1 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY BACKGROUND The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL), in Hanover, New Hampshire, maintains the finest research and engineering staff and facilities in the world for the study of cold regions science and technology. CRREL's experience spans 50 years, starting with the Boston District's Soils Laboratory work on frozen soils in the early 1940s. The creation of CRREL in 1961 with the merger of the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory (ACFEL) and the Snow, Ice, and Permafrost Research Establishment (SIPRE)-both of which were outgrowths of the Army's World War II experience in Alaska, Iceland, and Greenland-put the Nation's and DoD's principal cold regions expertise in one place. CRREL's traditional program involves the study of the earth's cold regions, focusing on basic and applied scientific research and on expanding the technologies required for both military and civil works development and operations. CRREL was the first organization in the world to recover complete ice cores from the Greenland and Antarctic ice caps to analyze the world's climate over the past 100,000 years. This accomplishment has served as a platform for the present international global change research effort. CRREL provided engineering support for the design and construction of the Alyeska Oil Pipeline in Alaska, early exploration and scientific work in Antarctica, and helped develop engineering testing methods and design criteria for construction in cold regions that are used as national and international standards. CRREL also has developed river ice technology and management systems that allow costeffective use of the Nation's 25,000 miles of inland waterways throughout the winter. CRREL's unique mission strongly supports a changing Corps, a changing Army, and a changing nation. CRREL recognizes its responsibility to use its exceptionally creative scientists and engineers to assist the Corps in its mission as engineer-defender and builder of a new nation. Worn-out and outmoded infrastructure; environmental degradation of land, water, and air; increased awareness of the need to understand and master the complexities of the global environment; the apparent end of the cold war; and increased international economic pressures making long-term investment in research and development difficult-all cry out for innovative and effective action. The Corps has responded decisively and effectively to the challenge of new mission responsibility, and CRREL has been at the leading edge of this effort. Other priority national programs to which CRREL has contributed significantly include work in pavement and transportation systems for the Federal Aviation and Highway Administrations, including participation in the Strategic Highway Research Program. CRREL continues to be a principal consultant to the National Science Foundation in its Arctic, Antarctic, and Greenland Ice Sheet research programs. CRREL works with the Department of the Interior to study the effects of global climate change on water regimes in the North, and has been a significant participant with the Navy to develop DoD initiatives to complement the U.S. Global Climate Change Program. CRREL also provides support to DoE and EPA concerning the environmental characterization and restoration of toxic and hazardous materials in the special conditions of permafrost and high-latitude environments. Private industry also comes to CRREL for assistance not available in the private sector. As the Army's center of expertise, CRREL conducts cold regions scientific and engineering research that addresses problems encountered by the Army and other DoD agencies wherever accomplishment of their mission is affected by winter/cold regions conditions. CRREL's unique and capable research staff and facilities are matched to its equally unique mission. CRREL's 333 employees include many of the world's experts on snow, ice, frozen ground, and cold regions engineering. The dominant in-house execution of programs, coupled with a very rigorous peer review, has maintained the high level of staff expertise and the Laboratory's reputation as the best 44-1 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY92 of its kind in the world. CRREL's national and international reputation has been its most effective recruiting tool and attracts high-quality scientists and engineers to perpetuate the excellence of the technical staff. FACILITIES The combination and variety of specialized research and experimental facilities at CRREL is unequaled in the world. The main laboratory contains 26 coldrooms that can be operated at temperatures as low as -50�F, a computer center, chemistry laboratories, a well-equipped soil physics laboratory, a cleanroom complex, soil chemistry facilities, and a remote sensing analysis center. Specialized equipment includes low-temperature materials testing machines, gas chromatographymass spectrometers, atomic absorption spectrometers, supercritical fluid chromatography, a lowtemperature electron microscope, a dual gamma nondestructive testing device, a Hopkinson pressure- bar impact test device, and nuclear magnetic resonance equipment. The Ice Engineering Facility (IEF) is one of the largest refrigerated hydraulics laboratories in the world. It contains a research area for large-scale refrigerated hydraulic models, a refrigerated flume, and a wind tunnel for simulating drifting snow, and includes the only active low-temperature ice towing tank in the United States. It serves the civil works needs of the Corps, the Navy's needs for testing the ice capability of its surface and submarine hulls, and, when necessary, provides support to private industry. The Frost Effects Research Facility (FERF) is a 29,000-square-foot refrigerated soils laboratory consisting of 12 test cells that are individually temperature controlled. Pavements, base and subbase courses, and buried utilities can be tested here at full scale. Six to eight natural freeze-thaw cycles can be simulated in a single year using refrigeration panels. Unique in the world, the FERF is a facility that supports research needs of the DoD and other Federal agencies, such as FAA and FHWA. Construction has begun on a Technical Information Analysis Center, which will house the Information Management and the DoD Cold Regions Information Analysis Center functions at CRREL. CRREL is recognized as having the world's foremost collection of cold regions scientific and technical literature. More than 2,000 requests for information are filled each year. In addition, the Bibliography on Cold Regions Science and Technology is prepared at the Library of Congress under joint CRREL/NSF sponsorship. It contains more than 140,000 citations of world cold regions literature, including approximately 50,000 Russian items. A building to house the Army Corps of Engineers' Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems Center will be occupied in early 1994. The Center provides a focus for assisting the Corps District offices in exploiting the rapidly expanding capabilities of remote sensing and geographical information systems technologies in the execution of their water resources and environmental regulatory missions. The rebuilt Cold Laboratory Complex at CRREL is the only major low-temperature physical sciences complex in the Nation. It supports work for the three military services as well as other Federal agencies, such as the Geological Survey and the National Science Foundation. The CRREL Sleepers River Experimental Watershed in Danville, Vermont, was named a national site for study of climate change in conjunction with the Department of the Interior. CRREL's Permafrost Research Site at Farmer's Loop, Alaska, and the close association of CRREL's Alaska Projects Office with military units in Alaska provide day-to-day interaction with the user. RESEARCH PROGRAM CRREL's basic and applied research cover a broad spectrum of cold regions studies. Basic research includes work in environmental quality, boundary layer processes, and the physical, mechanical, and chemical properties of snow and other forms of frozen precipitation, freshwater ice, sea ice, and frozen soils. Basic research supports applied research in the major cold regions mission areas of: * ice jam floods * winter navigation * remote sensing for civil works * base support * infrastructure design and construction * combat operations and materiel performance 44-2 Major civil works cold regions research topics include ice engineering, river ice management, river confluence ice, water resources in cold regions, and remote sensing. CRREL has an international reputation and maintains close ties with the international research community and with Federal and state agencies, providing consulting services on a reimbursable basis. As the cold regions scientific and engineering expert for the Corps of Engineers, CRREL supports districts and divisions by publishing field engi-neering reports, conducting demonstrations, sponsoring technical seminars for field engineers, and making field visits to consult on engineering problems. OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FY92 CRREL provides a world-class capability not available in academia or industry through its highly focused mission, one-of-a-kind research and engineering facilities, and renowned technical staff, making it an invaluable and unique resource for the Army, DoD, and the Nation. The synergism of applying these assets to a broad range of military and civilian problems, and the ability to sustain a critical mass of resources in a highly specialized and sophisticated area, contribute significantly to CRREL's effectiveness as an organization. In FY92, CRREL published and distributed 368 scientific and engineering documents (27 CRREL Reports; 3 Monographs; 44 Special Reports; 30 Fact Sheets; 30 technical videotapes; 119 journal articles; 108 conference papers; one Technical Digest; and six miscellaneous CoE, DA, and other government publications). CRREL'S CIVIL WORKS R&D PROGRAM There are four major thrusts and one new initiative in CRREL's civil works R&D program: * The Ice Engineering Program has developed the Nation's principal guidance for winter navigation, river ice management, and ice jam flood control. In severe winters, ice jams are responsible for more than $100 million in damage due to ice-induced flooding. Efforts to control ice jams and ice-induced flooding have helped reduce their cost to the Nation. * CRREL is Program Manager of the Corps of Engineers Civil Works Remote Sensing Research and Development Program: The program emphasizes the exploitation of real-time in-situ sensors and commercially available satellite imagery and integration of these data into a spatial data management system. Development and utilization of remote sensing technology for civil works applications in water and natural resources are urgently needed to provide cost-effective information necessary for many of the Corps engineering, operations, and planning missions. * In the Water Resources of Cold Regions Program, the USGS joined CRREL in conducting research at the Sleepers River Research Watershed. This partnership has filled a significant gap, with the USGS undertaking biogeochemical research in conjunction with our snowmelt research. Work continues on developing an improved snowmelt runoff module for CoE hydrologic models, with additional studies focusing on the partly glacierized basins. A deliberate shift to understand the hydroclimatic regimes in northern wetlands was undertaken because of the lack of and need for knowledge in this technical area. * The Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Program is a cost-shared partnership between the Corps of Engineers, the U.S. construction industry, academia institutions, state and local governments, and other groups. Its purpose is to cooperatively advance research innovation in the U.S. construction industry, thereby enhancing its productivity and competitiveness. This is a cooperative program with WES, CERL, and TEC. ACCOMPLISHMENTS Ice Engineering Program A new concept for installing a low-cost ice control structure during freezeup on small streams was developed, and a model was tested in the hydraulic research area of CRREL's Ice Engineering Facility. A demonstration prototype was installed on the Ompompanoosuc River just above the Corps of Engineers Dam at Union Village, Vermont, to verify the model's performance and to refine design and installation procedures. This relatively inexpensive removable structure, called a tension weir, is designed to control frazil ice production during freezeup in areas where regular ice booms are ineffective 44-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY92 and where traditional permanent structures are unacceptable for environmental or economic reasons. A patent application has been submitted for an economical technique to prevent clogging of water intakes by frazil ice by heating only the edges of trash-rack bars. This technique is much more efficient than heating the whole bar, and it eliminates the risk of damaging the trash racks when the ice is removed manually or mechanically. It has large potential cost savings, not only to the Corps, but also to those industries (such as the power industry and fisheries) and municipalities that may have to reduce or even shut down operations when their water intakes become clogged by frazil ice. In 1992 CRREL continued to provide assistance to Corps districts and divisions and to the Nation in studies on flood protection in areas prone to ice jams. For the Walla Walla District, CRREL concluded a three-year field demonstration program of an experimental modified freezeup control ice boom on the Salmon River in Idaho. The field results proved that this modified ice boom would indeed prevent major flooding of the town of Salmon. An assessment of the feasibility of ice jam control on the Missouri River in the Williston, North Dakota, area was conducted for the Omaha District. Also, personnel from the Ice Engineering Research Branch assisted the New York District and the State of Vermont during the ice jam flood of Montpelier, Vermont, in March 1992. Finally, CRREL conducted a field study for the Detroit District on the effects of ship-induced ice movement, bottom water currents and sediment transport in wetland areas of the St. Marys River, Michigan, as well as potential damages to marinas and shoreline structures, that might result from an early opening of the Soo Locks. Remote Sensing Program An area of emphasis has been the incorporation of geographic information system (GIS) technology coupled to forecast models, such as the Corps water control system. The Remote Sensing/GIS Center recently created at CRREL provides an integrated technical assistance and transfer function to complement the R&D program. The Center managed a major field demonstration with Omaha District, the Oahe Dam Safety Exercise, to demonstrate the utility of remote sensing and GIS technology for emergency operations, and it has coordinated research for detecting oil spills. The Center also provided assistance to the Jacksonville District in configuring, acquiring and staffing a fully operational GIS capability as part of the Hurricane Andrew recovery effort. The system was used to map the location and status of emergency shelters and life support centers, debris removal operations, temporary housing-clearing, infrastructure installation and mobile home placement, location of sunken vessels, and installation of mobile classrooms. The debris volume was estimated and the status of removal operations tracked. In one case, the Federal government saved $3.6 million when, by using the GIS to more accurately estimate the total acreage of Australian pine downed on the south end of Key Biscayne, a bid of $7.0 million for clearing the pine was rejected and a re-bid of $3.4 million was accepted, a savings of more than ten times the $350,000 investment in GIS. Cold Regions Water Resources In the Water Resources of Cold Regions Program, CRREL and the USGS in their WEBB research program continued their cooperative research at the Sleepers River Research Watershed. This partnership has continued to fill a significant gap in our hydrologic research with the USGS focusing on geochemical interactions in the surface and groundwater flows that complement our snowmelt research. Work continues on developing an improved snowmelt runoff module for CoE hydrologic models, with additional studies focusing on the partly glacierized basins. A need to understand the interaction between the surface and groundwater regimes is now recognized as critical to understanding the hydrologic flow paths to the streams. Research continues on understanding the physical and thermal regimes of riparian areas in the winter, and, in particular, the northern sites with snow and ice covers. Two sites, one of which is being monitored in conjunction with the University of New Hampshire, continue to operate, and the information gained from this research will lead to defining the winter influence of these critical areas and the impact on the functions and values during the winter low flow and spring runoff periods. Construction Productivity Advancement Research CRREL played an active role in the continued success of the CPAR program, a civil works research initiative to improve the productivity of the U.S. con- 44-4 struction industry. Severe winter environmental conditions provide significant challenges to construction. CPAR provides an excellent opportunity to our industry counterparts to address the construction challenges presented by winter conditions. During FY92, CRREL was actively involved in seven projects. Three were started in FY90, three in FY91, and one was a new start that required the negotiation of a cooperative research and development agreement with an industry partner. The seven ongoing projects involve cost-shared research on concrete aggregates, cold regions pavements, landfill liner design, treatment of contaminated soils, concrete admixtures and bioremediation technologies. Project partners include three state transportation departments, two engineering design firms, and two construction material suppliers. In addition, two FY92 projects were selected for funding. The National Concrete Masonry Association is CRREL's partner in the area of cold weather masonry construction productivity. Cold weather construction procedures and materials that eliminate excessive cold weather protection requirements for newly installed masonry and that also will improve long-term durability of concrete masonry subjected to freezing will be developed and demonstrated. CRREL's partner in the area of remediation of haztox materials is Sound Environmental Services, Incorporated. This project will examine the dispersion by chemical reaction technology for remediating both organics and heavy metals in soils with special focus on cold regions. Work for Private Industry A major initiative at CRREL for the past three years has been the development of collaborative research efforts with private industry. The thrust of this effort has been to take advantage of existing legislation, such as the Stevenson-Wydler Act of 1980, the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, and Section 318 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 to provide technical support and conduct cooperative research with private industry partners. This legislation allows Federal laboratories to enter cooperative research and development agreements (CRDAs) and technical assistance agreements (TAAs) with private industry partners. In the case of the Water Resources Act, technical assistance can be provided to U.S. firms competing for international work. During FY92, CRREL entered into seven CRDAs with several industry partners. Research topics included a study of seasonal pavement layer response for the Rhode Island Department of Transportation; a study of the use of scrap rubber as a road construction material for the Town of Richmond, Maine; design pavements for freeze-thaw conditions for the University of Alaska-Fairbanks; a study of the frost susceptibility of recycled glass/aggregate for road construction for the New Hampshire Department of Transportation; support of an Interim Barrier Technology workshop for Bovay Northwest, Inc.; support to further the understanding of the freezing process in various soils for Howard University; and evaluation of the performance of shallow tray aeration systems for the removal of volatile organics from groundwater for North East Environmental Products. This research provides an excellent opportunity to expand our customer base and leverage research dollars for increased mission effectiveness, while making our unique facilities and technical expertise available to industry partners. 44-5 U. S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION Organization and fwuctions. The U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (WES) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the staff supervision of the Director, Research and Development Dr. Robert W. Whalin, PE, is Director. COL Leonard G. Hassell, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Deputy Director. Dr. Dennis R. Smith is Associate Technical Director. The U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (WES) is the largest and most diverse civil and environmental engineering R&D complex in the world. It is a unique matrix managed complex of six laboratories with world-renowned expertise and facilities capable of solving a wide range of civil engineering related problems. The Tri-Service Reliance Strategy clearly evidences the significance of WES research capabilities. WES is the designated lead laboratory (category 3 Reliance- to maintain the in-house expertise and facilities for technology base RDTE applicable to all Tri-Service requirements) for Airfields and Pavements, Sustainment Engineering, and Survivability and Protective Structures (major subareas of Civil Engineering Reliance panel). The Survivability and Protective Structures subarea includes assignment to WES of the Tri-Service lead in Fixed (and Semi-fixed) Facility Camouflage, Concealment, and Deception RDTE. WES is the Army lead laboratory in the Environmental Restoration subarea of the Reliance panel on Environmental Quality. WES operates the Army Supercomputer and is one of two regional processing centers under the Corps of Engineers Automation Plan (CEAP). The WES Army Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) Center was designated the Tri-Service CADD/GIS (Geographic Information Systems) Center effective 1 October 1992. The Hydraulics Laboratory, the largest laboratory of its kind in the world, uses a wide range of working models and computer- based numerical models for research and analysis of dams, levees, river and harbor projects, soil and streambank erosion, thermal pollution, etc. The Geotechnical Laboratory conducts research in soil mechanics, structural foundation design, embankment design and slope stability, seepage analysis, military pavements, engineering geology, rock mechanics, expedient surfacing, earthquake engineering, and mobility and trafficability. The Structures Laboratory uses theoretical, analytical, experimental, and modeling approaches to research the effects of nuclear and non-nuclear explosions, the response of structures to natural and explosive disturbances, and various construction materials including the testing, repair, and preservation of existing concrete structures. The Environmental laboratory researches the problems caused by man's activities with respect to the environment. Research programs include Dredged Material, Aquatic Plant Control, Environmental and Water Quality Operational Studies, Environmental Impact, Wetlands, and the Natural Resources Research Program. These and other programs of the Environmental Laboratory range through waste management, environmental regulations, and military aspects of terrain and camouflage. The Coastal Engineering Research Center conceives, plans, and conducts research and data collection in coastal/ocean engineering and nearshore oceanography to: provide a better understanding of waves, winds, water levels, tides, and currents; and provide scientific and engineering data and design criteria for materials as they apply to navigation improvements, flood storm protection, beach erosion control, recreation, and protection of structures in the coastal zone. The Information Technology Laboratory is responsible for all communications, mainframe computer functions for both technical and administrative applications, graphic presentations, and printed media at the station. WES Laboratories are engaged in research and engineering investigations in support of the civil and military missions of the Chief of Engineers. On a reimbursable basis, WES performs basic and applied research, develops state-of-the-art methods and techniques, tests materials and equipment, and provides consulting services for other federal and non federal agencies. WES maintains for the Corps of Engineers not only a scientific and engineering reference library but also an engineering computer programs library. WES operates DoD Informational Analysis Centers in the fields of Pavements and Soils Trafficability, Concrete Technology, Hydraulic Engineering, Soil Mechanics, and Coastal Engineering. During Fiscal year 1992, WES published 538 technical documents in-house including 175 Technical Reports, 17 Contract Reports, 87 Miscellaneous Papers, 18 Instruction Reports, 5 video reports, and 236 special purpose technical documents. In addition to these documents, 45 Information Exchange Bulletins on technical subjects were produced. WES engineers and scientists also submitted 288 technical articles to refereed journals, and presented 75 papers at national and international symposia. Operations and results during the period. Work accomplished at WES is initially financed by the Corps of Engineers Revolving Fund with direct reimbursement from agencies requesting research investigations and related services. The Station's total program during Fiscal Year 1992 was $183,754,120 which included $66,300,270 performed by contract. Of the total program $104,301,370 was oriented toward the civil and $79,452,750 toward the military. The plant replacement and improvement program was $3,502,500 for this period. 45-1 U.S. ARMY TOPOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CENTER ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS The U.S. Army Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) is a world class laboratory whose primary technologies relate to accurate and graphic description of the earth's surface for both military and non-military applications. With new importance placed on construction efficiency and the regulation, recovery, sustenance, and enhancement of the earth's life-support systems, it has become increasingly urgent to develop effective tools for surveying and mapping, and for environmental monitoring and control. To meet this challenge, TEC scientists and engineers have developed faster, and more accurate and cost-effective ways to use remote sensing technologies to describe and characterize the surface of the earth. The tools and technology that TEC provided for the rapid deployment and precise management of forces in Desert Shield and Desert Storm can now be applied to environmental restoration and management. The ultimate success of the nation and the globe to creatively meet the environmental challenges of tomorrow could well depend on the successful adaptation of technologies that TEC has developed, largely for military purposes, to existing and new civil program applications. The extensive development of remote sensing technologies for use in construction, environmental rehabilitation, and resource management will give the nation the research and operational tools that it needs to both do a better and more complete job than would otherwise be possible, as well as to do that job more rapidly, more accurately, and at the lowest possible cost. The ability of TEC to cost-effectively participate in the Corps Civil Works Program is enhanced by its extensive on going efforts in the development of remote sensing technologies for both military and non-military applications. These efforts include multispectral image (MSI) and hyperspectral image (HSI) analysis, change detection, automated image registration techniques, development of advanced image compression techniques, MSI/HSI enhanced software development, development of the world's finest and most extensive spectral signature data base, computer-assisted stereo editing, photogrammetric interfaces with computer vision, research in HSI data processing and classification using neural networks, development of lap-top terrain analysis systems with Global Positioning System (GPS) capability, terrain visualization, and extensive modeling and simulation. TEC, currently developing the world's most complete spectral signature data base, along with the techniques and tools to use it, offers remote sensing exploitation technologies that could form an essential part of a new national approach to environmental management and control. These technologies include advanced and more efficient methods of surveying and mapping, as well as advanced methods of identifying problems and trends on the earth's surface. These tools can already accurately characterize many surface conditions, including certain types and conditions of vegetation and soils. With further development, these tools could be greatly enhanced to provide rapid and accurate determination of change in the biosphere for a wide and yet-to-be determined range of applications, to indicate both the location of point and non-point pollution sources as well as to warn of impending negative or positive environmental change. TEC looks forward to helping the nation increase its survey and mapping capability, improve its construction efficiency, and develop efficient environmental and resource management tools by adapting remote sensing technologies for civil program use. OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FY92 During FY92, TEC concentrated on developing new applications of rapidly advancing technology in the surveying engineering and mapping sciences, as well as to applying digital image processing to the wetland monitoring needs of the Corps districts. Considerable effort was devoted to transferring technology through field demonstrations, technical papers and reports, criteria documentation and formal classroom training. Technologies especially relevant to the Corps of Engineers include the Global Positioning System (GPS), Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and photogrammetry. Global Positioning System (GPS) The GPS is a satellite navigation, timing and ranging system developed by Department of Defense (DOD). Highly efficient measurements of position can be made with GPS using several techniques, with accuracies ranging from meters to millimeters. One of TEC's major thrusts in 1992 was the ongoing development of an extremely accurate threedimensional GPS-based positioning system for use by the Corps' hydrographic surveyors and the U.S. dredging industry. Great technological advances 46- 1 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1992 were made during 1992 that will allow engineers to position marine vessels to an accuracy of 4 inches, in all three dimensions, in real time. Although an operational prototype will not be available until late 1993, Corps districts are already posturing themselves in anticipation of this new technology. TEC has aided the Corps districts and divisions successfully in the implementation of Differential GPS (DGPS) to the extent that they have great confidence in and call frequently upon the expertise of TEC. Assistance ranges from a variety of technical questions and training to helping in the establishment of regional and national implementation plans. A great deal of time, effort and funds have been saved in this manner. Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) Dredge Volumes Study TEC engineers, in coordination with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), performed a detailed analysis of dredge volume computations. The traditional average-end-area technique and the new triangulated irregular network (TIN) techniques were used to compute volumes for several test cases. The TIN technique, which uses surface terrain model comparisons, was found to be more accurate and flexible than the average-end-area technique, and potentially offers a superior method for dredge volume computations. Results from the study were documented in an Engineer Technical Letter, which will provide U.S. Army Corps of Engineers districts with technical information for the effective use of average-end-area and TIN methods in their dredging missions. TEC also used the TIN method in an actual dredge project on an inland waterway. In coordination with the Baltimore District, before- and after-dredge volumes were computed using several different TIN programs. The results closely agreed, and the dredge contractor was paid based on these results. This pilot project confirmed the advantages stated in the Engineer Technical Letter. CADD Conversion Software TEC computer scientists produced a software package for Corps-wide distribution that creates Intergraph Design files from ASCII coordinate data. This software, program CVT-PC, is similar to the previously produced CVTDATA3-D, although the new software is for PC applications. With this program, users can create CADD graphics files from a user's survey data with his/her own descriptors and symbology. This program provides an important link between field survey data and CADD applications. Surveying Engineering Survey System Evaluation TEC engineers investigated new multibeam technology for hydrographic surveying. The Hydrographic Inland Marine Acoustic Platform (HIMAP), a survey system developed by John E. Chance and Associates Inc., uses a phased-array multibeam sounding transducer to provide dense and accurate bathymetric data for inland waterways. The HIMAP also uses real-time differential GPS for horizontal positioning, and an on-board computer system for all post-processing and plotting. TEC engineers conducted a carefully controlled, highly accurate survey, using conventional methods, of a revetment area on the Mississippi. This survey was then compared to one performed by the HI-MAP. The HI-MAP was found to provide accurate results at a coverage far more dense than conventional systems currently used in the Corps. The results have been documented in a TEC report. This evaluation also gave TEC engineers valuable experience in performing highly accurate or "ground truth" surveys for comparison to other systems. Standardized Hydrographic Survey System TEC engineers developed plans and specifications for a standard hydrographic survey system with primary emphasis on new Global Positioning System (GPS) technology. Based on a unanimous preference from Corps districts, TEC specified personal computer platforms for hydrographic data collection. The system is designed to work with or without other input devices such as heave compensators. This is possible through time-tagging all input ports based on the GPS Universal Time Coordinate (UTC). Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) Global Positioning System Controlled Photogrammetry (GCP) This cooperative effort between the Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) and Photo Science Inc. will prove the feasibility and practicability of using a Global Positioning System Control-based Photogrammetry (GCP) system for mapping of civil activities with greatly increased efficiency and reduced cost. This will be accomplished with an airplane-based GPS receiver using differential carrier phase observations to position an aerial photogrammetric camera. The technology transfer effort will produce a fully configured system including software and documented procedures. Fully developed, GCP will reduce or even eliminate currently requisite ground control in the aerial 46 - 2 photogrammetric process, thereby reducing product cost by up to 60 percent, and reducing preparation time for a single operation by weeks or even months. Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Autonomous Construction Vehicle Navigation and Automation (Robotics) This development effort, part of the Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) program, utilizes a technology transfer partnership between the Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) and Caterpillar Inc. to develop a system to position, track, and maneuver mining and other construction equipment during their normal construction activities. This effort will assist Caterpillar Inc. to significantly increase the operational efficiency of its products by providing the ability to precisely position and navigate construction equipment in real time and with a positional accuracy of approximately 4 inches. The positioning system uses the Global Positioning System. Use of this system will increase accuracy and efficiency of construction operations by reducing operator workload and by permitting development of autonomous systems, resulting in greatly increased productivity and 24-hour operational capability. Development of this product to its full potential will give Caterpillar Inc. and the entire U.S. construction industry a considerable competitive and technical advantage in the U.S. and international construction markets. Future uses of this technology outside this CPAR effort may permit integration within a total system that performs autonomous steering, braking, guidance, and vehicle control with little or no human interaction, resulting in an autonomously guided robotic construction vehicle. Extensions of this technology may find application in a wide range of existing and advanced forms of freight and passenger transportation, especially those ground-based systems operating at high speeds, such as Maglev or high-speed rail; those whose safety and reliability might be improved by its use, such as rail, truck, and air systems; and those systems for which autonomous or semi-autonomous operation are envisioned. Assistance to Districts TEC Monitors Wetlands with Digital Image Processing During FY92, TEC continued an important transition of off-the-shelf digital image processing technology from military and commercial to environmental applications through involvement in wetlands protection. The Corps of Engineers is the primary regulatory agency involved in the enforcement of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, which involves protection and permitting activities for wetlands. To support this mission, TEC scientists and engineers are providing field operating activities support in digital image analysis, geographic information systems, and field work. Through use of the Terrain Information Extraction System (TIES), a state-of-the-art soft copy photogrammetric work station and image scanner, and the Global Positioning System, TEC scientists have exploited digitized multi-temporal imagery to identify and map man-made changes to several wetland'sites. Image maps have been produced to show these changes and have been used in the mitigation and litigation of various wetland violations. These projects have clearly shown the value of the analysis of historical imagery for monitoring environmental change. Further, demonstrations of PC-based image processing for wetlands delineation and change assessment have been conducted for the Baltimore, Norfolk, Omaha and Philadelphia District offices, and for other Corps representatives. In one case, TEC worked on a reimbursable basis to provide technical support for the Baltimore District's Regulatory Branch to obtain and install two Map and Image Processing Systems (MIPS). These systems are now being used in support of their Section 404 mission. Criteria Documentation Work has continued on writing and updating criteria documentation for the Corps. Preparation of the following documents are in progress, with many near completion: * EM 1110-1-1004 ...... Control, Precise and Geodetic Surveying and associated Guide Specification * EM 1110-2-1003 ....... Hydrographic Surveying - rewrite and associated Guide Specification " EM 1110-1-1005 ....... Topographic Surveying and associated Guide Specification * ETL 1110-1-152 ....... North American Vertical Datum of 1988 The following reports were published in FY92: * TEC-0008 ............ Evaluation of the Bathyscan Sweep Survey System * TEC-0012 ............ An Evaluation of the Hydrographic Inland Marine Acoustic Platform (HIMAP) Survey System * TEC-0024 ............ "Investigation of the Real-Time Accuracy of the DGPS Method" * DRP-92-1 ............ Feasibility of a Kinematic Differential Global Positioning System * DRP-92-2 ............ Global Positioning System Bibliography 46 - 3 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) is a field operating agency under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works, Headquarters, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Center consists of the Institute for Water Resources, the Navigation Data Center, the Washington Level Review Center and support elements. It is located at the Humphreys Engineer Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, with satellite elements at other locations, including the Hydrologic Engineering Center at Davis, California; and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center, part of the Navigation Data Center, in New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments of WRSC during FY92 are listed by division. HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER The mission ofthe Hydrologic Engineering Center is to support the Corps and the Nation in its water resources management responsibilities. This is accomplished through research, training, and technical assistance programs in hydrologic engineering and planning analysis. HEC makes every effort to be aware of the present needs and upcoming problems of the water resources community. HEC maintains continuous dialogue with universities, private industry, other Federal agencies, and state and local governments to keep abreast of latest developments. In FY92, HEC continued its commitment to move forward on several fronts: develop new generation hydrologic engineering software; document technical methods and guidance for reference by field offices and Corps partners; and continue to work closely with headquarters and field offices on high-priority projects. HEC continues to be convinced that engineering software for the 1990s will use powerful desktop computers. These machines include high-end Intel-chip based personal computers and RISC-chip based engineering workstations. These machines have great processing power and high quality interactive graphics capabilities. HEC's new software products are being developed for these desktop computers running UNIX in the case of workstations and Microsoft Windows for personal computers. HEC is developing the software so that it will perform quite similarly in both environments. HEC made excellent progress on its NexGen software development project, initiated in October 1990. The project is developing successor software packages to the existing family of HEC batch computer programs. Progress was advanced in this second year by teams developing prototype models for catchment analysis and river analysis. Design concepts, program architecture, coding languages and approaches, and graphics and data persistence recommended by the first-year teams were tested in the prototype model efforts. The teams surfaced and resolved a number of critical issues, and functioning prototype models were completed. The prototypes are now providing the basis for developing the beta versions of the models. HEC made important progress on a new reservoir operations analysis program. The program (called HECPRM) is a reservoir system operation optimization model developed for application in studies to update operation plans for existing reservoir systems. The model incorporates engineering, economic, and environmental objectives in an optimization framework. It implements a network-flow programming algorithm for monthly period- of-record operation for an existing reservoir system. The preliminary model, applied to the Missouri River Main Stem Master Water Control Manual Update Study, has been substantially improved and applied to the Columbia River system for the System Operation Review Study. Initial Corps-wide release of the program is targeted for early in calendar year 1993. HEC has made a few enhancements and continues to actively support the mature versions of major batch programs HEC-1, HEC-2, HEC-5, HEC-5Q, HEC-6, UNET, and HEC-FDA, and released two new programs: HEC-IFH for interior flooding analysis; and DSSMATH that replaces MATHPAK and WCCOMP. HEC also released a new version of HEC-FFA for flood frequency analysis and updated the Unsteady Flow Program and user's manual. Progress continues on products for the Corps guidance development project and cost-share partner communications. Several more ERs addressing river hydraulics, catchment analysis, and flood damage reduction studies have either been published or final drafts have been sent to HQUSACE for processing. The new river hydraulics EM is completed and in publication. The new catchment analysis EM is in final processing for approval and publication. Documents describing hydrologic performance of flood control projects, explaining flood risk, and communicating flood facts were completed and were published as pamphlets. Several guidance products are nearing draft status and several new documents were initiated. Next fiscal year will see completion of many guidance products with reduced efforts in followingyears. Seven PROSPECT courses were conducted for a total of nine weeks of training. The courses covered a variety of hydrologic engineering and planning analysis topics. Attendance averaged about 31 students per course. Presentations on the Corps two-phased planning process, partnership arrangements with local agencies, life-cycle project management, and risk-based analysis are now emphasized in courses where appropriate. Eight workshops were also held totaling seven weeks of training. Topics presented included HEC-1, HEC-2, HEC-5, HEC- 5Q, and HEC-DSS. One seminar was held and proceedings will soon be published on Initial Project Management Plans (IPMPs). Reimbursable project work was undertaken for nine Corps offices including districts, divisions, headquar- 47-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 ters, and R&D laboratories. A research project undertaken for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, addressing performance of flood damage reduction measures on alluvial fans, was continued. The total reimbursable program was $830,000, with individual projects ranging from a few thousand dollars to over $100,000. Projects include watershed modeling, river hydraulics, water quality, flood frequency analysis, reservoir analysis, interior flooding, water control hardware replacement studies and related software development, and minor participation in the National Drought Study. The planned program for FY93 continues emphasis on development of technical guidance products in support of HQUSACE initiatives and concentrated efforts to develop new HEC software packages for engineering desktop computers. Training activities will be up to nine courses totaling ten weeks. Technical assistance will continue to be substantial. R&D funding will continue near past levels. The new R&D program in real-time water control scheduled to begin in FY93 was not funded and will not likely be resubmitted. INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES NAVIGATION DIVISION The IWR Navigation Division provides support to Corps field divisions and districts for project-specific and system studies of navigation improvements. It also provides support for the Inland Waterways Users Board and performs special studies as directed by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. The special studies address a variety of subjects where expertise in economic analysis is required, and range from assessment of transportation infrastructure to identification of economic impacts. Continuing Support Activities. The foundation for evaluation of navigation projects, both inland waterway and deep draft harbors, is the comparison of transportation costs with and without proposed improvements. The division maintains and annually updates data on ocean and inland waterway vessel operating costs, the dimensions of those vessels, the distribution of ocean vessel sizes in the world fleet, and the configuration of barge tows on inland waterways. Coordination of Navigation Studies. The Inland Waterways Users Board, created by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, is charged with advising Congress on priorities for improving inland waterways. To provide information desired by the Board and by the Corps, the division leads a Corps Task Force which has evaluated 38 high priority inland navigation projects to determine the sequence which would maximize net national transportation benefits and observe the budget constraints imposed by the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. POLICY AND SPECIAL STUDIES DIVISION The Policy and Special Studies Division undertakes investigations, studies and research on current or emerging water resources and public works management issues and assists in the development of the Corps national water resources issues policy. The Division program for FY92 included policy analysis, strategic planning and major studies of wetlands mitigation banking, water management during drought, development of a Federal infrastructure strategy, and a separate program of policy and strategic studies focusing on implementing and improving the Corps legislated responsibilities. The Wetlands Mitigation Banking Study is reviewing and analyzing technical, legal, financial and other administrative aspects relevant to the establishment and operation of wetland mitigation banks. Also included is an evaluation of potential application to the Corps Regulatory Program and the feasibility of a demonstration program. Work on the study is scheduled to be completed in FY93. The National Study of Water Management During Drought has designed an archetypal water resources management approach which integrates long established planning principles and innovations in computer modeling, demand management, dispute resolution and public involvement. This method is results oriented, rather than process oriented, with two subsequent advantages over traditional planning methods. First, the outputs of the planning process itself (not just the alternatives studied) are quantified, which allows more effective management, including time and cost control. Second, the requirements for defining objectives and study team composition encourage every player to invest energy in the planning process, rather than litigation or lobbying after the planning budget is exhausted. This method has been tested and refined in four Drought Preparedness case studies across the country, and will be published in the Fall of FY93 at the conclusion of the National Drought Study. The Federal Infrastructure Strategy is designed to develop innovative ways to advance technical, administrative, governmental, public and private financing, economic policies, and other opportunities for improving infrastructure performance and ensuring more efficient investments. The program is being managed by the Corps as a cooperative, intergovernmental effort. Study development has involved representatives of Federal, state and local governments, numerous organizations, the academic community, and public works associations in a far-reaching dialogue of the barriers and opportunities to the delivery and management of the Nation's public works infrastructure. 47-2 The FY92 projects included in the general policy studies program, among others, were the Global Change Program (representing Army in UNCED, IPCC, CEES), the Study of Dredged Material Management (Deep Draft), preparation of An Environmental Desk Reference, the Great Lakes Levels Reference Study, and work with the National Science Foundation on the Economic Impacts of Climate Change. TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH DIVISION The Technical Analysis and Research Division responds to the water planning research needs of the field offices, as well as one-of-a-kind projects assigned by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. At the same time, technical assistance is given to Corps field divisions and districts. Staff members of the Technical Analysis and Research Division apply specialized knowledge in fields such as economics, environmental science, sociology and engineering, to develop and conduct a broad range of research aimed at producing practical and effective planning and management tools. Research outputs are applied in Civil Works (CW) throughout the Corps. During FY92, the Technical Analysis and Research Division was responsible for two long range research programs: Planning Methodologies and Risk Analysis Planning. Planning Methodologies and Risk Analysis focused on developing economic, financial, and environmental evaluation techniques for planning and operating flood control, navigation, and other water resources projects. Work included developing economic evaluation manuals, environmental planning guidelines, navigation project evaluation procedures, and flood control evaluation. An overview manual for evaluating National Economic Development benefits of water projects was produced as part of a comprehensive manual series. Also, guidelines to assist the planning of environmental mitigation have been published which incorporate economic considerations into the traditional biologically based mitigation planning process. The technique, incremental cost analysis, will greatly improve our ability to assure that mitigation plans are cost-effective as well as environmentally sound. The Risk Analysis area was expanded to include development of evaluation techniques which integrated planning and engineering reliability to be used in major rehabilitation studies. PROGRAM ANALYSIS DIVISION Created in 1991, IWR's newest division provides analytic and process management services in support of improving the effectiveness of Civil Works program execution. During FY92, the primary clients of the division were Programs Division, Operations and Management Division, and Project Management Division. Representative projects include the continued development of an incremental analysis procedure for prioritizing maintenance projects; the refinement of a database for making improved estimates of planning study attrition rates for the General Investigations (GI) program, and for creating improved cost commitment curves for estimating Construction General (CG) expenditures; the completion of a study of "lessons learned" for the Corps Reorganization Program Office; and, assistance to the Project Management Division in the completion of the revised Engineering Regulation 5-7-1 on the Project Management System. In addition, in FY92 the division administered the HQUSACE Process Action Team (PAT) process to facilitate the improvement of key headquarters business processes. Division personnel also designed and managed the PAT study on improving the Civil Works project review process. As part of its Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) program of reimbursable support, division personnel assisted Mobile District in developing a conflict management plan for the ACT/ACF comprehensive study, and successfully mediated a dispute over a levee alignment for the Kansas City District. NAVIGATION DATA CENTER The Navigation Data Center's mission is to collect, process, manage, and distribute information regarding the characteristics of the U.S. waterway system, including use, operation and performance, and physical aspects. Included is system-wide use data such as domestic and foreign commodity tonnage and ton-miles, passengers, vessel movements and lockages; physical facilities, vessels and waterways; and, operation and performance data for dredging and locks. During FY92, the Center focused on the design and development of new executive products for the decision-making process. In addition, NDC implemented standardized ORACLE relational database design for the major systems, and the majority of the data systems are linked via the CEAP communication environment. Geographic Information System navigation products were deployed at Headquarters. The modernization and integration of each data area continues. The Center consists of the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center, the Ports and Waterways Division, the Waterways Systems Division, the Lock Performance Monitoring Program, and the Dredging Statistics Program. WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS CENTER (WCSC) In FY92, the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center began producing advanced copies of the 1990 Waterborne 47-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Commerce of the United States publication using their new computer software system. The revised publication format uses a new commodity classification system that is hierarchically compatible with the Lock Performance Monitoring System commodity codes which facilitates comparing the two data sets. The new format also includes subtotals for major commodity groups such as petroleum products, fertilizers, chemicals, iron and steel products, grains, etc. In addition, WCSC completed the design of a computer representation of the waterway network for the 50 states, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, and Pacific Islands in U.S. trust. It includes the inland waterway system, coastal channels, the Great Lakes, and major shipping lanes. WCSC's routing algorithm uses this waterway network to route vessel movements from origin to destination which enables through traffic and past-a-point computations. PORTS AND WATERWAYS Automated port facility information is being integrated into the overall NDC database. Latitude/longitude coordinates are being included in each facility record, as well as being computed for each waterway mile point, thereby forming a commonality for interagency dissemination of port and waterway information. Descriptive data encompassing over 9,300 docking facilities is resident in the NDC database. Focus for FY92 - Linkage across databases including key terms, data dictionary standardization. In FY92, five reports were completed: Number 20A 60 61 Title Mississippi River Ports Below and Above New Orleans, LA Pittsburgh, PA, and Ports on the Ohio, Monongahela, and Allegheny Rivers, PA Huntington, WV, Ports on Ohio River Miles 40-317, and Kanawha River, WV 63 70 Louisville, KY, Ports on Ohio River Miles 560-980, and Cumberland and Green Rivers St. Louis, MO, and Ports on Upper Mississippi River Miles 0-300 AOR LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM (LPMS) FY92 was a year of enhancing the LPMS Database System to provide management and executive information in quick, easily accessible and geographical display formats. This included the linkage of LPMS with Geographical Information Systems, creation of a summary file for an executive information system and transfer method to graphic software. A relational database design was completed to link LPMS with WCSC and the newly created Lock Characteristics database. DREDGING STATISTICS PROGRAM The Dredging Statistics Program entered Phase II of the planned three-phase approach in the development and full implementation of a national Dredging Information System. The Interim Dredging Information System (IDIS), a refinement of the 1991 prototype system, has been distributed to all Corps districts responsible for dredging contract administration. The database includes data elements that track a dredging contract from initial pre-bid stages through final execution. It also contains a representative latitude and longitude for all dredging and disposal sites for use in an integrated NDC data management system. Data entered at the districts are transmitted to the central database at NDC where data integrity and quality control procedures are executed. This national database, at the NDC, addresses other Corps, Federal, and private sector data requests. Database refinement and the establishment of improved communication links between the field and the NDC central database are ongoing. THE WASHINGTON LEVEL REVIEW CENTER The mission of the Washington Level Review Center (WLRC) is to review feasibility reports, post authorization change reports, detailed project reports where approval authority has not been delegated, general design memoranda, and other decision documents recommending USACE implementation that the Director of Civil Works may request. These reports address proposed water resource developments involving deep-draft harbors, inland navigation, flood damage reduction, fish and wildlife restoration and mitigation, hydroelectric power, water supply, recreation, beach erosion, hurricane and storm damage protection, and other related water resource needs. In addition to reviewing reports, during FY92, WLRC: a. Managed the concurrent Washington level review process for feasibility reports in which projects have been recommended for Corps implementation. b. Coordinated feasibility report review comments from Washington echelons and provided information to assist the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH), the Chief of Engineers, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, and the Office of Management and Budget. 47-4 c. Monitored and tracked the review and processing of feasibility reports recommending Corps action beginning with issuance of the division commander's public notice through project authorization. d. Provided all administrative support to the BERH and its advisory staff. e. Conducted professional training in water resources planning and project management as directed by the Chief of Engineers. WLRC managed the comprehensive review of 17 feasibility reports recommending USACE action. In addition, WLRC staff reviewed and provided written documentation for 40 design memoranda, 10 detailed project reports, 3 post authorization change reports, 19 feasibility reports recommending no USACE action, and 39 miscellaneous documents. Also, staff members reviewed draft reports in preparation for attendance at 21 conferences. The WLRC Education and Policy Division conducted the Planners and Project Managers (PPM) Program. This program is an 11-month internship for Corps water resource planners and project managers from various areas of expertise who exhibit exceptional promise and demonstrate potential for advancement to positions of greater responsibility. There were 20 participants who graduated from this program in June 1992, including 6 women. Instruction in the form of lectures, workshops, short courses, case studies, and field trips was presented by staff members ofWLRC, BERH, and HQUSACE, and by representatives from other government agencies and private consulting firms. Also, PPMs were assigned to work at HQUSACE for 6 weeks, and they taught the Planners and Project Managers Orientation Course for 2 weeks in several Corps offices. 47-5 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESS (PIANC) The Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization consisting of approximately 40 national members, with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a clearinghouse where technology and experiences relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements are exchanged among engineers, scientists, port operators, and marina and vessel owners, to name a few. Its objective, broadly stated, is to promote the worldwide progress of inland and maritime navigation through the exchange of technical information on port and waterway development. The objective of the Association is met by holding International Congresses and by publishing quarterly technical bulletins and special reports. Special reports are published as a result of international research teams, called Working Groups, made up of those national members interested in the particular subject under study. Examples include methods of disposal of dredged material, means of combating oil spills, an international survey of dry dock facilities and their characteristics, the beneficial use of dredged material, and other various topics relating to port and waterway development. The organization also serves as an excellent source of identifying individual and corporate expertise throughout the world on PIANC-related subjects. Personal interchange of ideas and information also is promulgated by members attending the International Congresses held once every four years. The affairs of the Association are managed by a Permanent International Commission (PIC), composed of delegates from each member government. It is in this way that member governments are represented in PIANC. The number of delegates is determined by the size of the national membership, but may not exceed eleven per country. The United States has been a member of PIANC since 1902 and has since provided an annual appropriation for the support and maintenance of the organization. This includes an annual subvention to PIANC International and payment of the travel expenses of properly accredited national delegates (Commissioners) of the United States to meetings of the International Commission and Congresses. Total appropriations for the U.S. Section, PIANC are currently $45,000 per year, including the annual subvention of approximately $12,000 to PIANC International. The United States Section is administered, by law, under the auspices of the Department of the Army (Corps of Engineers). The U.S. Section is composed of both individual and corporate members who pay their own membership dues. Membership of the U.S. Section on December 31, 1992, totaled 433, consisting of 356 individual members and 77 corporate members. Like all other member nations, the United States National Commission constitutes the governing body of the National Section. The ex-officio offices of the U.S. National Commission are: Chairman (Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW)); President (Director of Civil Works); and Secretary (Mr. DuWayne A. Koch). During calendar year 1992, U.S. National Commissioners were: Mr. J. Ron Brinson, President and Chief Executive Officer, Port of New Orleans; Mr. Charles F. Connors, Director of Maritime Services, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers; Dr. Tudor T. Davies, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Dr. G. Edward Dickey, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works); Mr. John M. Pisani, Maritime Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation; Mr. Charles R. Roberts, Executive Director, Port of Oakland; Mr. R. Erik Stromberg, President, American Association of Port Authorities; and Dr. Alan R. Thomas, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The U.S. Section representatives to the two Permanent Technical Committees (PTCs) and Working Groups of PTCs were as follows: International Commission on the Environment - Dr. Robert M. Engler, USACE WES Permanent Committee for Developing Countries - Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, LSU/GW Ports and Waterways Institute Permanent Technical Committee I (Inland Waterways and Ports) - Major General Robert F. Seedlock, USA (Ret.) Working Group 1, Economic Implications of Inland Waterway Development - George Antle, USACE IWR Working Group 2, Disposal of Dredged Materials - Charles C. Calhoun, USACE WES Working Group 3, Consideration of Risk in Determining Bank Protection - Alan D. Crowhurst, River & Sea Gabions (Birmingham, U.K.) Working Group 4, Guidelines for the Design and Construction of Flexible Revetments Incorporating Geotextiles for Inland Waterways- Max Lamb, USACE LMVD Working Group 5, Container Transport with Inland Vessels - John M. Pisani, USDOT/MarAd Working Group 6, Brackish Water Penetration in Inland Canals and Rivers: Consequences, Control and Adaptation Measures - Christina E. Correale, USACE SAW Working Group 7, Management of Dredged Material from Inland Waterways - Charles C. Calhoun, USACE WES Working Group 8, Automatic Management of Canalized Waterways and Its Hydraulic Problems - Jack R. Niemi, USACE LMS Working Group 9, Standardization of Inland Waterways' Dimensions, Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, LSU/GW Ports and Waterways Institute Working Group 10, Supervision and Control of Long Lateral Embankments - No U.S. Representative Working Group 11, Analysis of Cost of Operating Vessels on Inland Waterways - George Antle, USACE IWR Working Group 12, Design, Installation and Maintenance of Natural Vegetation Bank Protections Utilizing Geotextile Reinforcement for Inland Waterways - Max Lamb, USACE LMVD Working Group 13, Special Inland Waterway Craft - Charles F. Lehman, American Commercial Barge Line 48-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 Co. Working Group 14, Inland Waterway Craft and Pollution - Darrell D. Brown, International Maritime Organization (London, England) Working Group 15, Barge Fleeting--Jerry F. Lavelle, P.E., Tri-City Regional Port District Working Group 16, Coasters-No. U.S. Representative Working Group 17, Treatment and/or Disposal of Contaminated Dredged Material - U.S. Representative not appointed Working Group 18, Advanced Control of Locks and Bridges - U.S. Representative not appointed Permanent Technical Committee II (Maritime Ports and Seaways) - Mr. Thorndike Saville, Jr. (Retired) Working Group 1, Navigation in Muddy Areas - No U.S. Representative Working Group 2, Stability of Rubble Mound Breakwaters in Deeper Water- Eugene H. Harlow, Eugene H. Harlow, Inc. Working Group 3, Ice Navigation - C. Allen Wortley, University of Wisconsin Working Group 4, Dangerous Goods in Ports - No. U.S. Representative Working Group 5, Underkeel Clearance for Large Ships in Maritime Fairways with Hard Bottoms - Ronald C. Uhlin, Exxon International Working Group 6, Classification of Soils and Rocks to be Dredged - James W. Bean, C.F. Bean, Inc., New Orleans Working Group 7, Dimensions and Layout of One and Two-Way Channels and Fairways- Dr. Ernst G. Frankel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Working Group 8, The Damage Inflicted by Ships with Bulbous Bows on Underwater Structures - Wesley Allen, Jr., Georgia Ports Authority Working Group 9, Development of Modern Marine Terminals - Charles R. Roberts, Port of Oakland Working Group 10, Disposal of Dredged Material at Sea - Robert Engler, USACE WES Working Group 11, Consequences of New Developments of Car/Passenger Ferries - No U.S. Representative Working Group 12, Performance and Design Parameters of Rubble Mound Breakwaters - Robert Whalin, USACE WES Working Group 13, Floating Breakwaters - John Oliver, USACE NPD Working Group 14, Economic Methods of Channel Maintenance - DeWitt D. Barlow, Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Co. Working Group 15, Dry Docks - Michael Yachnis, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Working Group 16, Specification of Quantities and Related Risks on Maritime Transportation of Hazardous Chemicals and Wastes - Patrick Tobin, USEPA Working Group 17, Inspection, Maintenance and Repair of Maritime Structures Exposed to Material Degradation Caused by a Salt Water Environment - Charles F. Connors, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers Working Group 18, Planning of (Commercial) Fishing Ports - No U.S. Representative Working Group 19, Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material - Jesse Pfeiffer, USACE CERD-C Working Group 20, Capacity of Ship Manoeuvring Models forApproach Channels and Fairways in Harbours - Haruzo Eda, Stevens Institute of Technology Working Group 21, Flexible Revetments in the Marine Environment - Gene Chatham, USACE WES Working Group 22, Armored Slopes Under Piled Piers - Dennis V. Padron, Han-Padron Associates Working Group 23, Site Investigation Requirements for Dredging - Richard M. Lowry, Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Co. Working Group 24, Movement of Moored Ships - Gary K. Greene, LPA Group, Inc. Working Group 25, Coastal Instrumentation - U.S. Representative resigned Working Group 26, Means of Combating Oil Spills - U.S. Representative resigned Working Group 27, Artificial Islands - Dr. Ernst G. Frankel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Working Group 28, Breakwaters with Vertical and Inclined Concrete Walls - U.S. Representative not appointed Working Group 29, Recommendations for By-Pass Systems for Harbours on Sandy Coasts - J. Richard Weggel, Drexel University Working Group 30, Dimensions of Channels and Fairways- A Practical Guide - U.S. Representative not appointed Special Commission on Sport and Pleasure Navigation - John M. Nichol, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers (Retired) Working Group 1, Ecological Conservation in Relation to Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Neil W. Ross, International Marina Institute Working Group 2, Wave Climate Criteria for the Design of Yacht Harbors and Marinas - Orson Smith, Anchorage, AK Working Group 3, Provision of Navigation Aids for Pleasure Craft - Austin E. Brant, Jr., TAMS Working Group 4, Chartering Services-Their Growth and Impact on Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Eugene H. Harlow, Eugene H. Harlow, Inc. Working Group 5, Guidance on Facility and Management Specifications for Marine Yacht Harbours and Inland Waterway Marinas with Respect to User Requirements- William A. Jansen, McClure Engineers Associates Working Group 6, Use ofJetskis and Similar Personal Powered Craft on Controlled Waters - Roger F. Hagie, Kawasaki Motors Corp. Working Group 7, Marine Sanitation Pumpouts - U.S. Representative not appointed. 48-2 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps Divisions and districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation numerous international boards, committees, and other groups. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering, technical, or study boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources ofjoint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineer memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 49-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the various boards and committees, see the FY 77 and FY 80 annual reports. An innovative study organization, neither a board nor a committee, was established to initiate a study of impact from fluctuating Great Lakes levels pursuant to a Reference to the IJC from the Governments of Canada and the United States, dated August 1, 1986. A discussion of that study organization, which has since appointed a formal study board, follows Table 49-1. TABLE 49-1 IJC BOARDS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 1. Int. Lake Superior 2. Int. St. Croix River 3. Int. Lake of the Woods 4. Int. Lake Champlain 5. Int. Kootenay Lake 6. Int. Rainy Lake 7. Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St. Lawrence River 10. Int. Skagit River 11. Int. Souris River 12. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineer 13. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 14. Int. Great Lake Diversios and Consumptive Uses Study 15. Int. Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board YEAR ESTABLISHED 1914 1915 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1953 1953 1967 1959 1948 1975 1977 1979 *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Div. Engr., NCD *Div. Engr., NED *Dist. Engr., St. Paul *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Dist. Engr., Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *Dist. Engr., St. Paul 1. Dist. Engr., Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma, WA 3. Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission, Olympia, WA * 1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. St. Lawrence-Eastern Ontario Commission, Waterton, NY 3. NY Power Authority, Massena, NY *Dist. Engr., Seattle 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. ND State Engr., Bismark, ND 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Bismark, ND 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, BOR, Washington, D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Reston, VA *1. New York Dept. Environ. Conser. 2. Dist. Engr., New York 3. Vermont Agency Environ. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commision, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior F&WS Boston, MA *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Michigan Dept. Nat. Res. 3. Illinois Dept. of Trans. 4. Pennsylvania Dept. of Envir. Res. 5. Dept. of Energy, FERC, New York, NY * 1. CENCE-ED, Detroit, MI 2. Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab., NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 3. USGS, Reston, VA 49-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 OTHER INTERNATIONAL BOARDS OR GROUPS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 16. Int. Lake Memphremagog 17. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 18. Int. Niagara Committee 19. Columbia River Treaty Entities 20. Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering YEAR ESTABLISHED 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. Study of Fluctuating Great Lakes Levels Under the August 1, 1986, Reference. In 1986, the Governments of Canada and the United States issued a reference to the IJC to study methods to alleviate the adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. The IJC was requested to address the immediate high lake level crisis and identify and evaluate intermediate and long-term potential measures, while considering such vital matters as domestic waste supply and sanitation, navigation, agriculture, shore property, flood control, wildlife and others. The IJC is to determine the full costs and benefits of any works or measures and indicate how the various interests on either side of the boundary would be affected. Compensatory works or measure to offset costs to the interests which may be adversely affected by any proposed regulatory measures also must be determined. The IJC proceeded with its reference responsibilities on three tracks. First, it submitted an initial report to the federal governments on November 14, 1986, listing immediate actions that could be taken to lessen damages from the then current high water levels. Second, the IJC formed a taskforce to evaluate measures which could be implemented within approximately one year to reduce high lake levels. The third track is the comprehensive study of long-term measures. UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Eng. Div., North Central Div. 2. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Rockville, MD * Div. Engr., NCD 1. Div. Engr., NPD *2. Bonneville Power Admin., Portland, OR *1. HQUSACE, CECW-ZB, Washington, D.C. 2. Dept. of Energy, Tulsa, AR The IJC, through the U.S. Department of State, requested by letter dated November 24, 1986 that the Corps of Engineers provide lead agency support on what became known as the Levels Reference Study. The Division Commander, NCD assumed the role of U.S. Chair of a multi-discipline study group which functioned as a Project Management Team. The team consisted of five functional groups co-chaired by U.S. and Canadian representatives. The Canadian counterpart to the Corps of Engineers was Environment Canada. A Plan of Study was completed in April 1987. The plan called for a twophase study with the initial phase emphasizing problem identification and a program of measures for detailed study and evaluation in Phase II. The Phase I progress report was submitted to the IJC in July 1989. After a period of public review in February 1990, the IJC issued a directive for the Phase II study, which included the appointment of a ten-member Levels Reference Study Board. The Board appointed a full-time study director and a 18-member Citizens Advisory Committee. Upon completion of the Phase II Plan of Study in May 1990, the Board also appointed four Working Committees to carry out the detailed study plan. The working committees are: (1) Public Participation and Information; (2) Land use and Management; (3) Existing Regulation, System-wide Regulation, and Crisis Conditions; and (4) Principles, Measures Evaluation, Integration and Implementation. 49-2 INVESTIGATION OF PROJECTS UNDER FEDERAL POWER ACT Federal Water Power Act of June 10, 1920 created the Federal Power Commission (in 1377 named the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC) composed of the Secretaries of War, Interior, and Agriculture, with authority to grant permits and licenses for hydroelectric development in all water over which Congress has jurisdiction. The act further required that work of the Commission be preformed by and through the Department of War, Interior and Agriculture and their engineering, technical, and other personnel except as may be otherwise provided by law. By an act of June 23, 1930, entitled "An Act to reorganize the Federal Power Commission" Sections 1 and 2 of the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 were amended. A commission was provided for, to be composed of five commissioners to be appointed by the president, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The necessity of performing work through the departments of War, Interior and Agriculture was removed and the Commission was authorized to appoint such officers and employees as necessary in executing its function. By Title II, Public Utility Act of 1935, the original Federal Water Power Act was made Part I of the Federal Power Act, and Part II and III were added to the act. On October 1,1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of the Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 991 Stat. (August 4, 1977) and Executive Order No. 12009, Federal Regulation 46267 (September 1, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary of the Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission within the Department of energy was activated on October 1, 1977. Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act provides that no water power license affecting navigable capacity of any navigable waters of the United States shall be issued until plans of the dam or other structures affecting navigation have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of the Army. By an action, notice of which was published in the Federal Register Volume 40, Number 74, dated April 16, 1973, the Secretary of the Army delegated to the Chief of Engineers his authority under Section 4(e) of the Federal power Act. The Chief of Engineers on 5 September 180 delegated to the Corps division engineers the authority for Section 4(e) approval of the plans for non-Federal hydropower development affecting navigation. The following work of an engineering nature was accomplished by the Corps division and district offices under the direction of the Chief of Engineers during the fiscal year: (1) 308 applications from non-Federal entities for planning, design, construction and operation of hydropower projects were reviewed and appropriate recommendations in the interest of flood control, navigation, structural safety, and environmental impacts, relative to Corps projects, were furnished to the FERC; (2) 24 licensed power plants were in various stages of design review and approval for addition of power at Corps dams; and (3) 6 COPE approved non-Federal power plants were in active construction stages by the end of the fiscal year. The Corps bills FERC licensees for the cost incurred by the Corps for reviewing and approving final design, plans and specifications for construction of power plants at Corps projects. In FY 92 the total cost reimbursement to the Corps for this service was $ 197,294. Review and approval of license applications for hydro development at non-Corps dams are funded by the Corps as a line item in the General Investigation Account. In FY 1992, the cost of this activity was $ 00,000. This cost was reported to FERC for the Commission's assessment of annual charges to licensees. 50-1 REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL & NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 1. Regulatory Activities Authorities. The following authorities charge the Corps of Engineers with the regulation of various waterrelated construction activities: Sections 9 and 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 (structures in an alteration of waterways, e.g., boat docks); Section 103 of the Marine Protection Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (ocean dumping); and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (discharge of dredged and fill material). Work Completed. During FY 1992, the Corps received approximately 15,100 applications for permits and issued about 5,400 permits and 3,300 letters of permission. In addition about 16,000 activities were authorized by regional or statewide permits which did not require individual applications from the public. More than 50,000 other minor activities were authorized by the Corps' nationwide permits. Significant improvements were made in several areas of the regulatory program during Fiscal Year 1992. Pursuant to Section 404(q) of the Clean Water Act, regulatory agreements with the Departments of Commerce and Interior and the Environmental Protection Agency were revised. The agreements streamline the regulatory process by reducing unnecessary delays caused by the "threat" of elevation, i.e., the agencies' power to refer final decision on permits to Washington. This threat was not only unfair to applicants but also caused substantial additional work effort for the Corps - for no reason. In May of 1992, the Corps issued formal guidance clarifying its role as the decision maker in the permit process. Comments from the agencies continue to be actively used in the process. The agencies concurred in their recognition of the Corps as solely responsible for making final permit decisions. As a result, permit decisions can be made on a more timely basis with full opportunity for agencies to provide substantive in put. During FY 92 the wetlands delineation problem was diffused thru adoption of the Corps 1987 wetlands manual for identifying and delineating wetlands. Difficulties with an interagency manual published in 1989 had become a national environmental issue. In August 1991, as an interim solution to the problem, the Corps began using its 1987 manual to delineate wetlands. The manual proved to be a successful tool through FY 92 and the Corps worked with the administration and EPA to formally adopt the Corps 87 manual. In August 1992, the Corps and EPA jointly proposed regulation changes in the Federal Register to close a loophole in the 404 regulations that has allowed discharges of excavated material in conjunction with wetlands drainage activities to go unregulated. The changes also clarify the definition of discharge of dredged material, define when pilings are regulated under Section 404, and codify the Corps 1990 regulatory guidance that exempts prior converted croplands from 404 regulation. Over 6,000 comments were received on this proposal - mostly favorable. During FY 92 the Corps began an initiative to promote the use of state programmatic general permits. These permits reduce duplication of effort between the Corps and states by reducing Corps review of minor activities that are already covered by state programs. TABLE 51-A GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 91 ......... $ 2,328,907 Allotments ..................... ................ 86,000,000 Total Funds Available ........................ 88,328,907 Obligations.................... ................... 86,216,895 Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 92 ........... $ 2,112,021 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 91 ........... $ 4,330,329 Allotment ...................... ............... 86,000,000 Total Funds Available ....................... 90,330,329 Expenditures ...... ................ 85,170,678 Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 92 ........... $ 5,097,813 2. Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels Under the authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899, the Corps of Engineers investigated sunken vessels in navigable waters and removed those obstructing navigation. For obligation expenditures, see Table 51-B. TABLE 51-B REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 90 ........... $ A llotm ents ............................................. Total Funds Available .................... O bligations................ ..... .............. Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 91 ........... $ Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 90 ......... $ Allotments ....................... Total Funds Available ..................... Expenditures ..... ......... ............ Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 91 ........... $ 282,191 592,456 874,647 853,272 21,375 314,392 592,456 906,848 878,318 28,530 51-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1992 3. National Emergency Prepardness Activities Authorities. Executive Order 12656, as amended, assigns responsibilities to executive departments and agencies in order to undertake the national emergency planning and preparedness necessary to develop an effective national capability to meet essential civilian and defense needs during major domestic emergencies and national securities emergencies. Status. During FY 92, the Corps of Engineers continued its effort to improve the command readiness posture and its ability to respond to various national emergencies. Emphasis was placed on the initiation of activities which would contribute to the successful transition in program emphasis that is required as a result of the end of the "cold war" era, and the attendant new military strategy, as well as the evolving philosophy associated with natural disaster preparedness and response. This included the continuation of Engineer Command Readiness Program (ECRP) activities. During FY 92, ECRP activities were designed to address Corps readiness roles and responsibilities for the 1990's (and into the 21st century) as well as the resources and organization required to accommodate them. Consideration of Corps roles associated with Military Support to Civil Authorities, as outlined in the new Department of Defense Directive 3025.1, were included in this effort. Other activities included a continuation of the planning for and maintenance of emergency facilities needed to support continuity of operations and increased emphasis on the planning required to meet the Nation's water needs during a national emergency. In the latter case, Executive Order 12656 has tasked the Corps of Engineers to be the Executive Agency responsible for emergency water planning. For fiscal year obligations and expenditures, see Table 51-C. TABLE 51-C NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Obligations Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 91............ $ 693,406 Appropriations FY 92 ........................... 7,692,800 Total Funds Available .......................... 8,386,206 Obligations......................... 7,181,103 Unobligated Balance - 30 Sep 92............ $ 1,205,103 Expenditures Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 91 ....... $ Appropriations FY 92 .............................. 1,380,183 7,692,800 Total Funds Available .......................... 9,072,983 Expenditures ..................... 7,192,738 Unexpended Balance - 30 Sep 92 ........ $ 1,880,245 51-2 NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ACTIVITIES Activities. Disaster preparedness activities included the review and update of existing emergency response plans, creation of generic division and district plans, training response personnel, procurement and maintenance of critical supplies and equipment used during emergency response activities, upgrading emergency operation centers, coordination with Federal, State and local response agencies, and development of training courses to support USACE missions under the Federal Response Plan. Through the winter several series of storms caused flooding in Arizona, Southern California, Southeast and Southcentral Texas, Iowa, Ohio and Western New York. Response efforts included emergency contracting, reservoir control, sandbags,, and technical assistance. With the spring came the Great Chicago Tunnel Flood. Water from the Chicago River entered a breached freight tunnel system located under the City of Chicago. The resultant flooding filled subbasements of multi-story buildings, disrupted power, closed the subway system, and required the evacuation of the Flood Area for several days. FEMA tasked the Corps of Engineers to stop the flow of water into the tunnel and dewater the tunnel system. The Corps successfully plugged the breach and drained the system. At the peak of operations 150 personnel were involved in the mission and contracts totalling more than $57 million were awarded. Late August saw the arrival of Hurricane Andrew in Florida and Louisiana, and Typhoon Omar in Guam. Hurricane Andrew was the costliest disaster in U.S. history estimated at $20 billion. There was widespread devastation, more than 50 people had died, and over 200,000 people were left homeless. FEMA authorized the Cops of Engineers to expend $382 million in response and recovery missions that included debris clearance, removal and disposal; garbage removal; school repair; potable water and ice; technical assistance; temporary shower and laundry facilities; temporary roofing generators to support public utilities; and preparation of damage survey reports. The U.S. Air Force authorized the Corps $15 million for missions on Homestead AFB. For Typhoon Omar in Guam, FEMA tasked USACE to restore power, place plastic sheeting as temporary roofing, provide potable water, and complete Damage Survey Reports. September brought with it Hurricane Iniki to the island of Kauai, Hawaii. This tie FEMA authorized USACE $40.5 million for response and recovery missions. Again, the Corps provided temporary roofing, potable water, ice, debris clearance, and technical assistance. Hurricane Andrew and Iniki brought several hundreds of Corps employees together to accomplish these missions. Never before had so many Federal, state, and local agencies worked together to achieve a common goal. 52-1 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) ALASKA Chena River Lakes ARIZONA Adobe Alamo Cave Buttes Dreamy Draw New River Painted Rock Tat Momolikot Whitlow Ranch ARKANSAS Blakely Mountain Dam Blue Mountain DeGray DeQueen Dierks Gillham Millwood Narrows Dam Nimrod CALIFORNIA Black Butte Brea Buchanan Dam- H.V. Eastman Lake Carbon Canyon Coyote Valley Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Farmington Fullerton Hansen Harry L. Englebright Hidden Dam- Hensley Lake Isabella Lopez Martis Creek Merced County Stream Group: Bear Bums Mariposa Owens Mojave River New Hogan North Fork Pine Flat Prado San Antonio Santa Fe Sepulveda Yukon -Kuskokwim Gila Colorado Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Chena River Skunk Creek Bill Williams River Cave Creek Dreamy Draw New River Gila River Santa Rosa Wash Queen Creek Ouachita Ouachita Arkansas Ouachita Red Red Red Red Ouachita Arkansas Petit Jean River Caddo Rolling Fork River Saline River Cossatot River Little River Little Missouri Fourche La Fave River Sacramento Stony Creek Santa Ana Brea Creek San Joaquin Chowchilla River Santa Ana Carbon Canyon River Russian East Fork Russian River Russian San Joaquin Santa Ana Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin Mojave San Joaquin Sacramento San Joaquin Santa Ana Santa Ana San Gabriel Los Angeles Dry Creek Littlejohn Creek East Fullerton Creek Big Tujunga Wash Yuba River Fresno River Kern River Pacoima Wash MartiCsr eek Bear Creek Bums Creek Mariposa Creek Owens Creek Mojave River Calaveras River American River Kings River Santa Ana River San Antonio Creek San Gabriel River Los Angeles River Fairbanks Phoenix Wenden Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Gila Bend Casa Grande Superior Hot Springs Paris Arkadelphia DeQueen Dierks Gillham Ashdown Murfreesboro Plainview Orland Fullerton Chowchilla Brea Ukiah Healdsburg Farmington Fullerton Los Angeles Marysville Madera Bakersfield San Fernanado Reno Merced Merced Merced Merced Victorville Valley Springs Auburn Piedra Corona Upland Duarte Van Nuys 1979 2,000 NPP FR 1982 18,350 1968 1,046,310 1979 46,600 1973 320 1985 43,520 1959 2,476,340 1974 198,550 '960 34,500 NPP FR 560 FRWX NPP FRX NPP FRX NPP F NPP FRWX NPP GWX NPP FX 1955 2,768,500 20,900 FP 1947 257,900 1971 881,900 1977 136,100 1975 96,800 1975 221,800 1966 1,854,930 1949 407,900 1942 336,010 2,910 FRWX 6,400 FRZRS 1,680 FSQRW 1,360 FSRAW 1,370 FSQW 29,200 FSW 2,500 FP 3,550 FSWX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 50 40,200 109 2,275 283 975 109 2,275 50 448 104 2,320 1281 4,780 75.5 12,500 149 637 235 1,100 Earth 115 2,800 Earth 243 3,400 Earth 160 2,360 Earth & Rock 153 2,500 Earth & Rock 160 1,750 Earth 88 17,554 Concrete 175 941 Concrete 97 1,012 1963 160,000 770 FIRX Earth 156 2,970 1942 4,010 NPP FRX Earth 87 1,765 1975 150,000 470 FIRW Earth & Rock 205.5 1,800 1961 6,610 NPP FERX 1959 122,500 1,700 FRX 1983 381,000 1952 52,000 1941 760 1940 25,450 1941 69,000 1975 90,000 1953 570,000 1954 440 1971 20,400 1954 7,700 1950 7,000 1948 15,000 1949 3,600 1971 89,670 1963 325,000 1939 14,700 1954 1,000,000 1941 196,240 1956 7,700 1948 22,110 1941 17,430 500 FRSW NPP F NPP FRX 120 FRWX 400 DR 5,000 FIRW 1,850 FIRW NPP FX 71 FSR NPP F NP F NPP F NPP F NPP FRWX 715 FIRX 280 DR NPP FIRX NPP FRX NPP FX NPP FRX NPP FRX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth 99 2,610 160 3,500 319 3,000 60 7,800 45 575 97 10,475 280 1,142 163 5,730 185 4,952 50 1,300 113 2,670 92 1,830 55 4,075 88 1,330 75 790 200 2,200 210 1,960 155 620 429 1,820 106 2,280 160 3,850 92 23,800 57 15,444 A-1 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA (Continued) Success Terminus Whittier Narrows COLORADO Bear Creek Chatfield Cherry Creek John Martin Trinidad CONNECTICUT Black Rock Colebrook River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Mansfield Hollow Northfield Brook Thomaston West Thompson IDAHO Lucky Peak ILLINOIS Carlyle Farmdale Fondulac Shelbyville Rend Lake INDIANA Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M. Harden Huntington Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie San Joaquin Tule River San Joaquin Kaweah River San Gabriel San Gabriel River ;and Rio Hondo Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Housatonic Connecticut Housatonic Housatonic Thames Thames Housatonic Thames Bear Creek South Platte River Cherry Creek Arkansas River Purgatoire River Branch Brook West Branch, Farmington River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Natchaug River Northfield Brook Naugatuck River Quinebaug River Columbia Boise River Upper Kaskaskia River Mississippi Upper Farm Creek Mississippi Upper Fondulac Creek Mississippi Upper Kaskaskia River Mississippi Upper Big Muddy River Mississippi Ohio East Fork of Whitewater River Ohio Mill Creek Ohio Raccoon Creek Ohio Wabash River Ohio Mississinewa Ohio Salt Creek Ohio Patoka River Ohio Salamonie IOWA Coralville Red Rock Rathbum Saylorville Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Missouri Upper Mississippi Iowa River Des Moines River Chariton River Des Moines River Porterville Visalia El Monte Denver Denver Denver Lamar Trinidad Thomaston Riverton Plymouth Middlebury Willimantic Thomaston Thomaston Thompson Boise Carlyle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville Benton Brookville Tere Haute Rockville Huntington Peru Harrodsburg Ellsworth Wabash Iowa City Des Moines Centerville Des Moines 1960 85,000 400 FIRX Earth '1961 150,000 345 FIRX Earth 1967 35,150 NPP FRWX Earth 1978 30,810 1974 231,429 1950 93,920 1943 608,250 1977 123,523 1970 8,700 1969 97,700 1960 4,030 1968 6,970 1952 52,000 1965 2,430 1960 42,000 1965 26,800 109 1,412 852 1,844 280 20 760 40 21 450 8 NPP 200 FRX FRX FRX FIR FIRX FR FRSX FRW FR FRW FRW F FRW Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 1945 307,000 2,820 FIR Earth 1967 983,000 1951 15,500 1951 3,780 1970 684,000 1970 294,000 1974 359,600 1952 228,120 1960 132,800 1969 153,100 1967 368,400 1964 441,000 1978 301,600 1966 263,600 1958 492,000 1969 1,830,000 1969 552,000 1975 602,000 26,000 NPP NPP 11,100 18,900 2,250 1,400 1,100 500 1,100 3,280 2,010 976 1,820 8,950 11,000 74,000 FSNRWA Earth F Earth F Earth FSNRW Earth FQRSW Earth FRSW FRX FRX FRW FRW Earth& Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth FARS Earth FRSQW Earth & Rock FRW Earth FARW Earth FARWQ Earth FNRWXQ Earth FARWQ Earth 142 3,490 250 2,375 56 19,960 180 5,300 148 12,400 141 14,300 106 13,962 200 6,610 154 933 223 1,300 57 630 97 520 68 12,420 118 810 142 2,000 70 2,550 340 1,700 67 6,570 80 1,275 67 1,000 108 3,000 54 10,600 182 3,000 150 950 117 1,790 91 5,332 137 8,100 93 1,400 84 1,550 133 6,100 100 1,400 110 5,676 86 10,600 125 6,750 A-2 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) KANSAS Clinton Council Grove El Dorado Elk City Fall River Hillsdale John Redmond Kanopolis Marion Melvern Milford Pearson Skubitz Big Hill Perry Pomona Toronto Tuttle Creek Wilson KENTUCKY Barren River Buckhorn Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Fishtrap Grayson Green River Martins Fork Paintsville Nolin Rough River Taylorsville Yatesville LOUISIANA Bayou Bodcau Caddo Lake Wallace Lake MARYLAND Jennings Randolph Lake MASSACHUSETTS Barre Falls Birch Hill Buffumville Charles River Natural Valley Storage Conant Brook East Brimfield Hodges Village Knightville Littleville Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Red Red Red Wakamusa River Grand (Neosho) Walnut River Elk River Fall River Big Bull Creek Grand (Neosho) Smoky Hill River Cottonwood River Marais des Cygnes Republican River Big Hill Creek Deleware River 110 Mile Creek Verdigris River Big Blue River Saline River Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River Carr Fork Licking River Johns Creek Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River Little Sandy Green River Martins Fork Paint Creek Nolin River Rough River Salt River Blain Creek Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Cypress Bayou Potomac North Branch Potomac River Connecticut Connecticut Thames Charles Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Ware River Millers River Little River Charles River Conant Brook Quinebaug River French River Westfield River Middle Branch, Westfield River Lawrence Council Grove El Dorado Independence Fall River Hillsdale Burlington Marquette Marion Melvem Junction City Cherryvale Perry Pomona Toronto Manhattan Wilson Glasgow Buckhorn Hazard Farmers Paintsville Pikeville Grayson Campbells -vile Harlan Paintsville Kyrock Leitchfield Taylorsville Yatesville Shreveport Shreveport Shreveport Barnum Barre So. Roylaston Charlton Millis Monson Fiskdale Oxford Huntington Chester 1977 397,200 1964 112,882 1981 236,200 1966 287,300 1949 256,400 1981 160,000 1964 628,540 1948 450,000 1968 141,770 1972 363,000 1965 1,160,000 1981 39,740 1969 770,000 1963 230,000 1960 200,800 1962 2,346,000 1964 776,000 1964 815,200 1960 168,000 1976 47,700 1974 614,100 1949 93,000 1968 164,360 1967 118,990 1969 723,200 1978 21,00 1983 73,500 1963 609,400 1958 334,400 1983 291,670 1988 86,951 1949 357,300 1971 175,000 1946 96,100 7,000 FSWAXR Earth 3,310 FSQR Earth 8,000 FSQR Earth 4,122 FSQ Earth 2,350 FSX Earth 4,580 FSQR Earth 9,710 FSQR Earth 3,815 FRWX Earth 6,210 FRQS Earth 6,930 FRQWX Earth 15,600 FRSXWQ Earth&Rock 1,190 FSR Earth 12,500 FRSXW Earth&Rock 4,000 FRSWXQ Earth&Rock 2,660 FX Earth 15,800 FRWXQAN Earth&Rock 9,000 FIRWXNA Earth 4,340 FARS 550 FQRW 530 FQRW 6,790 FQRW 1,100 FARW 569 FARW 1,050 FQRW 5,070 FRSQW 578 FQ 261 FQRW 2,890 FAR 2,180 FRX 1,625 FQRW 3,921 FQRW NPP FRW 32,700 NFRS 2,300 FQRS Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Concrete Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Concrete & Earth Earth 1981 130,900 952 FQRS Earth & Rock 296 2,130 1958 24,000 1941 49,900 1958 12,700 1983 35,000 1966 3,740 1960 30,000 1959 12,800 1941 49,000 1965 32,400 NPP FRW NPP FRW 200 FRW NPP F NPP F 360 FRW NPP FRW NPP FRW 275 FRWS Earth & Rock 62 885 Earth & Rock 56 1,400 Earth & Rock 66 3,255 Nonstructural -- -- Earth & Rock 85 1,050 Earth & Rock 55 520 Earth & Rock 55 2,140 Earth & Rock 160 1,200 Earth & Rock 1,164 1,360 A-3 114 9,250 96 6,500 99 20,930 107 4,840 94 6,015 75 11,600 86.5 21,790 131 15,360 67 8,375 98 9.700 126 6,300 83 3,902 96 7,750 85 7,750 90 4,712 157 7,500 160 5,600 146 3,970 162 1,020 130 720 148 2,740 118 913 195 1,100 120 1,460 142 2,350 97 574 160 1,600 174 990 124 1,530 164 1,280 105 760 70 12,850 3,700 30 4,994 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) MASSACHUSETTS (Continued) Tully West Hill Westville MINNESOTA Big Stone Lake- Whetstone River Lac Qui Parle Chippewa River LacQui Parle Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake MISSISSIPPI Ariabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake Okatibbee Sardis Lake MISSOURI Clearwater Long Branch Little Blue River Lakes Blue Springs Lake Longview Pomme de Terre Smithville Wappapello NEBRASKA Harlan County Paipillion Creek and Tributaries Glenn Cunningham (Site 11) Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) Ed Zorinsky (Site 18) Wehrspann (Site 20) Salt Creek & Tributaries Olive Creek (Site 2) Blue Stem (Site 4) Wagon Train (Site 8) Stagecoach Site (9) Connnecticut Tully River Blackstone West River Thames Quinebaug River Upper Minnesota River Mississippi Upper Chippewa River Mississippi Upper Minnesota River Mississippi Upper Minnesota River Mississippi Red River Otter Tail River of the North Red River Red Lake River of the North Lower Coldwater River Mississippi Lower Yocona River Mississippi Lower Yalobusha River Mississippi Pascagoula Okatibbee Creek Lower Little Tallahatchie Mississippi River White Grande Chariton Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Lower Mississippi Black River Little Charlton Little Blue River Little Blue River Pomme de Terre River Little Platte River St. Francis River Missouri Republican River Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri M:i;ssouri Misouri Knight Creek Trib of Big Papillion Creek Boxelder Creek S. Pipillion Creek S. Trib. Olive Br. Creek N. Trib Olive Br. Creek N. Trib. Hickman Creek S. Trib. Hickman Creek Fryville Uxbridge Sturbridge Ortonville Montevideo Montevideo Montevideo Fergus Falls Red River Arkabutla Enid Grenada Meridian Sardis Piedmont Macon Kansas City Kansas City Hermitage Smithville Wappapello 1949 22,000 300 FRW Earth & Rock 62 1,570 1960 12,350 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 51 2,400 1961 11,100 23 FRW Earth & Rock 78 560 1973 45,000 12,700 1950 (2) 1950 122,800 1953 14,100 1953 14,100 1951 3,270,000 1943 525,300 1951 660,000 1954 1,337,400 1969 142,400 1940 1,570,000 NPP 6,500 210 210 279;000 5,100 6,100 9,800 1,280 10,700 FRW FRWX FRWX FARS FARS FARSX F F F FQSR F Earth 25 13,700 Earth & Rock 21 17,97 Earth & Rock 21 4,100 Earth & Rock 19.5 11,800 Eaarth & Rock 47 1,355 Earth & Rock 15.5 36,500 Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock 81 11,500 99 8,400 102 13,900 67 6,543 117 15,300 1948 413,700 1,630 FRWX Earth & Rock 154 4,225 1980 65,000 2,430 FRSQW Earth 71 3,800 1988 26,600 1986 46,900 1961 650,000 1982 246,500 1941 613,200 560 930 7,820 7,190 4,100 FRWQ FRWQ FRWX FSQRW FR Earth&Rock Earth&Rock Earth&Rock Earth Earth & Rock 78 2,500 120 1,900 155 4,630 95 4,200 109 2,700 Republican City 1952 850,000 13,600 FIRWX Earth & Rock 107 11,827 Omaha Omaha Omaha Omaha Kramer Sprague Holland Hickman 1975 17910 1973 5,220 1991 6,910 1991 1,990 1964 5,470 1963 10,260 1963 9,280 1964 6,640 391 137 418 203 174 316 303 196 FQEX FRX FR FR FR FR FR FB Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 67 1,940 70 1,460 64 11,400 59 11,810 45 3,020 57 2,760 52 1,650 48 2,250 A-4 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) NEBRASKA (Continued) Yankee Hill (Site 10) Conestoga (Site 12) Town Lake (Site 13) Holmes ark Lake (Site 17) Branched Oak (Site 18) NEW HAMPSHIRE Blackwater Edward MacDowell Franklin Falls Hopkinton-Everett Otter Brook Surry Mountain NEVADA Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon NEW MEXICO Abiquiu Cochiti Conchas Galisteo Jemez Canyon Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rocky Dam Santa Rosa Dam & Reservoir NEW YORK Almond Axkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point NORTH CAROLINA B. Everett Jordan Falls W. Kerr Scott NORTH DAKOTA Baldhill Borman-Haley Homme Pipestem Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Connecticut Connecticut Cardwell Creek Holmes Creek Middle Creek Antelope Creek Oak Creek Blackwater River Nubanusit Brook Pemigewasset River Contoocook River Piscataquog River Otter Brook Ashuelot River Colorado Mathews Canyon Colorado Pine Canyon Rio Grande Rio Grande Arkansas Rio Grrande Rio Grande Rio Grande Rio Grande Pecos Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Genesee Susquehanna Cape Fear Neuse Yadkin- Pee Dee Rio Charma Rio Grande Canadian River Galisteo Creek Jemez River Rio Hondo Rocky Arroyoo Pecos Canacadea Creek Canisteo Creek Ouleout Creek Genesee River Otselic River New Hope Neuse Yadkin Red River Sheyenne River of the North Denton Denton Pleasantdale Lincoln Raymond Webster West Peterborough Franklin West Hopkinton East Weare Keene Keene Caliente Caliente Abiquio Pena Blanca Tucumcari Santa Fe Bemailillo Roswell Santa Rosa Homell Arkport Franklin Mount Morris Whitney Point Durham Raleigh Wilkesboro Valley City Missouri North Fork, Grand River Haley Red River South Branch of Park River of the North Park River James River Pipestem Creek Jamestown 1966 7,560 1964 10,640 1966 8,080 1963 6,510 1968 97,560 1941 46,000 1950 12,800 1943 154,000 1962 71,500 1962 87,500 1958 18,300 1941 32,500 208 FR 230 FR 255 FR 100 FR 1,780 FR NPP FRW NPP FRW NPP FRW 200 FRW 120 FRW 85 FRW 265 FRW 1957 6,271 NPP FX 1957 7,747 NPP FX 1963 1,198,500 1975 589,159 1939 513,900 1970 89,468 1953 100,485 1963 163,775 1979 439,860 1949 14,600 1940 7,900 1950 33,550 1952 337,000 1942 86,440 1982 753,500 1983 374450 1963 153,000 1950 70,000 1967 92,980 1951 3,660 1974 146,880 NPP FXS 1,200 FRWX 2,694 FI NPP FX NPP FX NPP FX NPP FIX 124 FRW NPP F 210 FRW 170 FR 1,200 FRW Earth 52 3,100 Earth 63 3,000 Earth Pawnee (Site 14) Missouri Earth 55 7,700 Earth 70 5,200 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete Earth 14,300 FQRSWX Earth 11,300 FQRSWX Earth 1,470 FARSX Earth 325 FARS Earth 1,750 FSRWK Earth 51 FARS Earth 885 FRWX Earth A-5 75 1,150 67 1,030 140 1,740 76 790 115 2,000 133 1,288 86 1,670 71 800 92 884 325 1,540 241 28,300 200 19,400 156 2,820 146.6 780 998 4,885 118 2,940 212 1,950 90 1,260 113 1,200 130 2,010 210 1,028 95 4,900 112 1,330 92 1,915 148 1,740 61 1,650 79 5,730 67 865 108 4,000 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OHIO Alum Creek Berlin Caesar Creek Clarence J. Brown Deer Creek Delaware Dilon Michael J. Kirwan Mosquito Creek Muskingum River Reservoirs: Atwood Beach City Bolivar Charles Mill Clendening Dover Leesville Mohawk Mohicanville Piedmont Pleasant Hill Senecaville Tappan Wills Creek North Branch, Kakosing River Lake Paint Creek Tom Jenkins West Fork Mill Creek William H. Harsha OKLAHOMA Arcadia Birch Canton Copan Fort Supply Great Salt Plains Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaw Oologah Optima Pine Creek Sardis Skiatook Waurika Wister OREGON Applegate Blue River Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Red Arkansas Red Arkansas Rogue Alum Creek Mahoning Creek Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek Licking River Licking River West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Indian Fork Sugar Creek Sandy Creek Black Fork Brushy Fork Tuscarawas River McGuire Creek Walhondoing River Lake Fork Stillwater Creek Clear Fork Seneca Fork Little Stillwater Creek Wills Creek North Branch of Kakosing River Paint Creek East Branch, Sunday Creek Mill Creek Little Miami River Deep Fork River Birch Creek North Canadian River Little Caney River Wolf Creek Salt Fork of the Arkansas River Polecat Creek Kiamichi River Caney River Arkansas River Verdigris River North Canadian River Little River Jackfork Creek Hominy Creek Beaver Creek Poteau River Applegate River Columbia Blue River Africa Deerfield Wilmington Springfield New Holland Zanesville Zanesville Newton Falls Cortland New Cumberland Beach City Bolivar Mufflin Tippecanoe Dover Leesville Nellie Mohicanville Piedmont Perrysville Senecaville Tappan Conesville Fredericktown New Petersburg Gloucester Mount Healthy Williamsburg Edmond Bamsdall Canton Copan Fort Supply Cherokee Sapulpa Hugo Bartlesville Ponca City Oologah Hardesty Wright City Clayton Skiatook Waurika Wister Medford Blue River 1975 134,800 1943 91,200 1978 242,200 1974 63,700 1968 102,500 1961 273,000 1961 273,000 1966 78,700 1944 104,100 1937 49,700 1937 71,700 1938 149,600 1936 88,000 1937 54,000 1938 203,000 1937 37,400 1937 285,000 1936 102,000 1937 65,000 1938 87,700 1937 88,500 1936 61,60-0 1937 196,000 1973 14,900 1972 145,000 1951 26,900 1952 11,380 1978 284,500 1986 92,010 1977 58,200 1948 377,100 1983 227,700 1942 100,700 1941 271,400 1950 55,395 1974 966,700 1951 289,000 1976 1,348,000 1963 1,519,000 1978 29,460 1969 465,780 1984 396,900 1985 500,700 1977 343,500 1949 427,900 348 240 13,300 1,010, 727 1,325 1,325 580 700 1,540 420 NPP 1,350 1,800 350 1,000 NPP NPP 2,270 850 3,550 2,350 900 98 710 394 200 18,760 1,820 1,137 7,910 4,850 1,820 8,690 880 13,250 3,570 17,040 29,460 5,340 3,750 13,610 10,190 10,100 5,360 FRSW Concrete & Earth FARSWQ Concrete & Earth FRSQW Earth & Rock FQRW Earth & Rock FRW Earth FRWX Earth FRWX Earth FAQRSW Earth FARSWQ Earth FRX FRX FR FRX FRX FRX FRX FR FR FRX FRX FRSX FRX FRX FRW FRSQW FRSWX FRX FRSQW FSR FSQRW FSI FSQRW FSX FRWX FRWXS FSQRW FSAX FSQRW FSN FSRW FSQWR FSRW FSQRW FISQWR FSAX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 93 10,000 96 5,750 165 2,750 72 6,620 93 3,880 118 1,400 118 1,400 83 9,900 47 5,650 65 3,700 64 5,600 87 6,300 48 1,390 64 950 83 824 74 1,694 111 2,330 46 1,220 56 1,750 113 775 45 2,350 52 1,550 87 1,950 71 1,400 118 700 84 944 100 1,100 200 1,450 102 5,250 97 3,190 68 15,140 70 7,730 85 11,865 68 6,010 89 2,920 101 10,200 94 5,200 125 9,466 137 4,000 120 15,200 124 7,712 81 14,138 143 3,590 106 16,600 99 5,700 1981 82,000 988 AFIQRSW Gravel 242 1,300 Embankment 1968 85,000 975 FINR Earth 319 1,329 A-6 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OREGON (Continued) Cottage Grove Dorena Fall Creek Fern Ridge Willow Creek PENNSYLVANIA Alvin R. Bush Aylesworth Creek Beltzville Blue Marsh Conemaugh Cowanesque * Crooked Creek Curwensville East Branch, Clarion River Foster Joseph Sayers Francis E. Walter (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Indian Rock Kinzua Loyalhanna Mahoning Creek Prompton Raystown Shenanago Stillwater Tioga-Hammond Lakes Hammond Lakes Tionesta Union City Woodcock Creek Youghiogheny River Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Susquehanna Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Coast Fork, Willamette R iver Row River Middle Fork, WillametteRiver Long Tom River Willow Creek Kettle Creek Aylesworth Creek Pohopco Creek Tulephoken Creek Conemaugh River Cowanesque River Crooked Creek West Branch, Susquehanna River East Branch, Clarion River Bald Eagle Creek Lehigh River Dyberry Creek Codorus Creek Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Creek Lackawaxem River Raystown Branch, Juniata River Shenanago River Lackawanna River Tioga River Crooked Creek Tionesta Creek French Creek French Creek Youghiogheny River Cottage Grove Cottage Grove Eugene Eugene Heppner Renovo Archbald Lehighton Reading Saltsburg Lawrenceville Ford City Curwensville Wilcox Blanchard White Haven Honesdale York Warren Saltsburg New Bethlehem Honesdale Huntingdon Sharpsville Uniondale Tioga Tioga Tionesta Union City Meadville Confluence 1942 30,060 1949 70,500 1965 115,000 1941 110,000 1983 13,250 1962 75,000 1970 1,700 1971 68,250 1978 50,010 1952 274,000 1980* 89,000 1940 93,900 1965 124,200 1952 84,300 1969 99,000 1961 107,610 1960 24,500 1942 28,000 1965 1,180,000 1942 95,300 1941 74,200 1960 52,000 1973 762,000 1966 191,400 1960 12,000 1978 62,000 1978 63,000 1940 133,400 1970 47,640 1973 20,000 1943 254,000 1,155 1,885 1,865 10,305 96 160 NPP 947 960 300 1085 350 790 90 1,730 80 NPP NPP 1,900 210 170 290 8,300 1,910 85 470 680 480 NPP 118 450 FINR FINR FINR FINR FRN Concrete & & Earth Concrete & Earth Rockfill Rockfill & Concrete Roller Compacted Concrete FRW Earth & Rock F Earth & Rock FQRSWA Earth & rock FAQRSW Earth & Rock FW Concrete & Earth FRS Earth & Rock FRW Earth FR Earth FARQW Earth FRW Earth FRW Earth & rock F Earth FRW Earth PFAQRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete FRW Earth FRW Earth & Rock FAQRW Concrete FS Earth FR Earth & Rock FR Earth & Rock FRW Earth F Earth FQRA Earth FARWQ Earth * Project became operable for water supply FY 1990 SOUTH DAKOTA Cold Brook Missouri Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Missouri Cottonwood Springs Creek Lake Traverse: Reservation Control Red River Bois de Sioux River Dam of the North White Rock Red River Bois de Sioux River of the North Hot Springs Hot Springs Wheaton Wheaton 19534 7,200 36 FRWX Earth 1970 8,385 41 FRWX Earth 1941 164,500 10,925 FRX Earth 1941 85,500 6,500 FRX Earth A-7 114 145 193 49 160 165 90 170 98 137 151 143 131 184 100 234 109 83 1'77 114 162 140 225 68 77 140 122 154 88 90 184 2,110 3,352 5,100 6,624 1,780 1,350 1,270 4,560 1,775 1,265 3,100 1,480 2,850 1,725 6,835 3,000 1,255 1,000 1,877 960 926 1,200 1,700 720 1,700 2,710 6,450 1,050 1,420 4,650 1,610 127 925 123 1,190 14 9,100 16 14,400 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) TEXAS Addicks Aquilla Barker Belton Benbrook Canyon Cooper Lake and Channel Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' the Plains Granger Dam and Lake Grapevine Hords Creek Joe Pool Lake Kemp Lavon Lewisville Navarro Mills North San Gabriel Dam, Lake Georgetown O.C. Fisher Pat Mayse Proctor Ray Roberts Somerville Stillhouse Hollow Waco Wright Patman VERMONT Ball Mountain North Hartland North Springfield Townshend Union Village VIRGINIA John W. Flannagan Gathright Dam & Lake Moomaw North Fork of Pound River San Jacinto Brazos San Jacinto Brazos Trinity Guadalupe Red Red Brazos Trinity Colorado Trrinity Red Trinity Trinity Trinity Brazos Colorado Red Brazos Trinity Brazos Brazos Brazos Red Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Ohio James Chehalis South Mayde Creek Aquilla Creek Buffalo Bayou Leon River Clear Fork, Trinity River Guadallupe River Sulphur River Cypress Creek San Gabriel River Denton Creek Hords Creek Mountain Creek Wichita River East Fork, Trinity River Elm Fork, Trinity River Richland Creek North Fork, San Gabriel River North Concho River Sanders Creek Leon River Elm Fork Yegua Creek Lampasas River Bosque River Sulphur River West River Ottauguechee River Black River West River Ompompanoosuc River Pound River Jackson Wynoochee River Addicks Hillsboro Barker Belton Fort Worth New Braunfels Cooper Jefferson Granger Grapevine Coleman Grand Prairie Wichita Falls Fort Worth Lewisville Corsicana Georgetown San Angelo Paris Comanche Denton Somerville Belton Waco Texarkana Jamaica North Hartland Springfield Townshend Union Village Haysi Alleghany Montesano 1948 204,500 1983 146,000 1945 207,000 1954 1,097,600 1952 258,600 1964 366,400 1991 441,200 1959 842,100 1980 244,200 1952 425,500 1948 25,310 1986 304,000 1972 502,900 1953 748,200 1954 989,700 1962 212,200 1980 130,800 1952 396,400 1967 189,100 1963 374,200 1987 1,064,600 1967 507,500 1968 630,400 1965 726,400 1957 2,654,300 1961 54,600 1960 71,420 1960 51,067 1961 33,700 1950 38,000 1963 145,700 1979 123,739 1972 70,000 NPP 3,280 NPP 12,300 3,770 346,400 19,305 18,700 4,400 7,280- 510 7,470 15,590 21,400 23,280 5,070 1,310 5,440 5,993 4,610 29,350 11,460 6,430 7,270 20,300 75 220 290 100 NPP 310 2,532 1,150 FX FSX FX FIRSX FNRXA FRSX FRSWX FRS FRSWX FNRSXA FARSX FRSX FX FRSW FRSX FRSX FRSWX FRSX FRSW FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FAWR FQR FSARI Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Earth & Rock Concrete & Earth 49 104.5 27 192 130 224 79 97 115 137 91 109 115 81 125 82 164 128 96 86 109 80 200 140 100 265 185 120 133 170 250 257 177 61,166 11,890 72,844 5,524 9,130 4,410 28,070 10,600 16,320 12,850 6,800 22,360 8,890 19,483 32,888 6,700 6,700 40,885 7,080 13,460 14,965 26,175 15,624 24,618 18,500 915 1,520 2,940 1,700 1,100 960 1,172 1m700 A-8 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) WASHINGTON Howard A. Hanson Mill Creek Mud Mountain WEST VIRGINIA Green Columbia Puyallup Green River Mill Creek White River Kanaskat 1961 106,000 Walla Walla 1942 8,300 Enumclaw 1953 106,000 1,600 FAS Rock 225 FR Earth NPP FR Rock Beech Fork Ohio Bluestone Ohio Bumsville Ohio East Lynn Ohio R. D. Bailey OhioG Stonewall Jackson L.,WV Ohio Summersville Lake Ohio Sutton Ohio Tygart River Ohio WISCONISIN Beech Fork New River Little Kanawha Twelve Pole Creek uynabdot River West Fork River Gauley River Elk River Tygart River Lavalette Hinton Burnsville East Lynn Justice Wested Summersville Sutton Grafton 1977 37,540 1952 631,000 1977 65,400 1970 82,500 1979 203,700 1988 74,650 1965 413,800 1960 265,300 1938 287,700 450 FRW Earth 86 1,080 1,800 FRWX Concrete 180 2,048 550 FQRW Earth & Rock 89 1,400 823 FQRW Earth & Rock 122 650 440 FQRW Earth & Rock 310 1,397 3,470 FAQAS Concrete 45 620 407 FANR Rock 390 2,280 270 FNAR Concrete 220 1,921 620 FNAR Concrete 230 1,921 Chippewa Eau Galle Spring Valley 1969 43,600 150 FR A-9 235 675 125 3,200 425 700 Eau Galle Earth 122 1,800 FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Permanent Pod Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acacage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA Big Dry Creek Camanche2 Cherry Valley 3 Del Valle Eaton Wash New Bullards Bar2 New Don Pedro 3 New Exchequer2 Oroville2 Tahchevah Creek COLORADO Pinon Canyon CONNECTICUT East Branch Hall Meadow Brook Mad River Sucker Brook HAWAII Kaneohe-Kailua Area IDAHO Ririe MARYLAND Savage River MISSOURI Bear Creek NEW YORK Onandaga OKLAHOMA Altus4 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Lake Hudson5 UTAH Big Wash VERMONT East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville San Joaquin Big Dry Creek San Joaquin Mokelumne River Tuolumne Cherry Creek Alameda Arroyo Del Valle Rio Hondo Eaton Wash Sacramento Yuba River San Joaquin Tuolumne River San Joaquin Merced River Sacramento Feather River Whitewater Tahchevah Creek Colorado Pinon Canyon Arroyo Housatonic East Branch, Naugatuck River Housatonic Hall Meadow Brook Connecticut Mad River Connecticut Sucker Brook Kaneohe Kaneohe Stream Upper Snake Willow Creek Potomac Savage Upper Bear Creek Mississippi Oswego Red Arkansas Arkansas Beaver Winooski Winooski Winooski Fresno Clements Sonora' Livermore Pasadena Marysville Modesto Merced Oroville Palm Springs Trinidad Torrington Torrington Winchester Winchester Kaneohe Idaho Falls Westem Port Hannibal Onondaga Creek Syracuse North Fork, of the Red Riv. Altus Grand (Neosho) River Disney Grand (Neosho) River Locust Grove Big Wash Jail Branch Waterbury North Branch, Milford East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville 1948 16,250 NPP F 1963 431,500 NPP FRS 1956 268,000 475 FS 1968 77,000 200 FRS 1937 960 NPP F 1968 960,000 1,910 FIRPW 1970 2,030,000 3,520 FISP 1966 1,026,000 1,900 FIR 1964 3,539,000 5,838 FIRSW 1965 960 NPP F 1954 4,350 NPP FW 1964 4,350 NPP FR 1962 8,620 NPP F 1963 9,700 10 FR 1970 1,480 NPP F 1981 3,800 26 FR 1979 100,500 364 FIR 1952 20,000 360 FRS 1962 8,700 NPP F 1949 18,200 NPP F 1948 152,429 6,260 FISR 1941 2,197,000 46,5006 FRP 1964 444,500 10,9006 FRP 1961 1,200 NPP F 1938 12,050 NPP F 1938 37,000 890 FRP 1938 20,300 570 FR Earth 40 Earth & Rcck 171 Earth & Rock 315 Earth 223 Earth 82 Concrete 645 Earth & Rock 565 Rock 480 Earth 770 Earth 42 Earth 92 Earth 92 Earth & Rock 73 Earth 178 Earth 68 Earth 92 Earth 253 Earth & Rock 184 Earth 65 Earth Concrete Concrete Concrete & Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 67 98 147 90 34 65 158 115 A-10 20,038 2,450 2,500 880 1,795 2,323 1,920 1,200 6,850 3,610 700 100 1,200 940 1,160 100 1,070 1,050 1,450 1,782 1,112 6,565 4,494 2,814 1,460 1,800 1,525 FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Pod Chaacteristic of Dun Cal. Year Total (Acaeage) Community Placed in Storag or No Project Height Length Name River Balin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acse-Pt.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Fet) (Pot) WASHINGTON Wynoochee Chehalis Wynoochee River Montesano 1972 70,000 1,150 FSARI Concrete 177 1,700 & Earth NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS A - Low Flow Augmentation D - Debris Control F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Navigation P - Power Q - Water Quality Control R - Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S - Water Supply W - Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) X - Water Conservation and Sedimentation 1 Acres of water surface at top of permanent pool 2 Federal Government contributed for flood storage 3 Cherry Valley Reservoir: Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on interim basis. Second and final phase,N ew Don Pedro Reservoir: Federal Government contributed for flood protection. Construction and operation by City and County of San Francisco and Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts. 4 Construction by Bureau of Reclamation. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 5 Construction by Grand River Dam Authority. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 6 Top of power pool. A-l11 APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Alton to Gale Levee System, Mississippi River, IL and MO.................................... ...... Arcadia Lake, OK .................................... ........ Ardsley, NY ..................................... ............ Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control (Area VIII). OK, TX, and KS (Stage II)................... Ascalmore-Tippo Items, MS ............................................ Atchafalaya Basin, LA..................................................... Atlantic Coast of Maryland...................................... B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC............................... Baraga County, MI (Sec 14) ............................................ Batesville Sewage Lagoon ...................................... Bassett Creek, MN ...................................... ........ Bayou Des Glaises, LA ..................................... .... Big Blue River, Blue Springs, NE Sewerline and Road (Sec 140)..................................... Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (Sec 14) ......... Black River, Hwy HH, Wayne Co., MO............................ Blue River Basin, Overland Park (Indian Creek), KKS (Sec 205).................................... Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO............................... Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL............................................ Browns Creek, Nashville, TN............................ ............ Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO........................................... Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX.................................... Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX, Addicks and Barker, Dam Safety Assurance................................... Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA ....................................... Candy Lake, OK ....................................... ......... Cannonball River, Grant County, ND (Sec 14) .................. Canton Bridge, Trigg Co., KY .......................................... Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO ........................................... Cascade, IA ........................................ ............ Cedar Creek, Spaulding, NE (Sec 14)................................. Central and Southern, FL ................................................. Century Park, Lorain, OH (Sec 103) ................................... Chagrin River, Solon Rd, Chagrin Falls, OH (Sec 14) ....... Chaska, MN................................... ............. Chatfield Lake, CO ...................................... ....... Chena River Lakes, AK ................................................... Clear Creek, TX .................................................................. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX .......................................... Corte Madera Creek, CA................................... .... County Line Road Bridge, Mantachie, MS (Sec 14)........... Cowanesque Lake, PA ..................................... ..... Cox Rum, Wellsburg, WV...................................... Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL ................................... Cuyahoga River, Brecksv ille, KD, UH (Sec 14) ............... 1983 1980 1987 1976 1984 1928 1990 1967 1991 1990 1987 1938 1991 1985 1988 1992 1984 1990 1988 1991 1956 1986 1990 1976 1991 1986 1990 1992 1991 1950 1990 1991 1988 1968 1973 1988 1958 1966 1989 1987 1992 1990 1992 B-1 1992 1986 Indefinite 4 1990 1989 1987 (2) 1982 1991 1990 1939 1991 1985 1989 1991 1988 1992 1992 1992 1991 1991 1980 1979 1991 1990 1990 1991 1993 1988 3 1987 2010 2043 1993 1991 1990 1993 1939 1992 8 1991 1986 1989 1993 1998 1992 1991 1995 Indefinite 1993 1993 Deferred 1992 1987 1994 1992 1992 1998 1991 1991 1995 1992 1989 1997 1995 Indefinite 1992 1990 1993 1992 1993 Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Chloride Control Local Protection Floodway and Levees Beach Erosion Control/ Shore Protection Reservoir Shoreline Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Interior Drainage Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Dam Safety Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection and Nourishment Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Reservoirs and Levee Local Protection Reservoir, channel improvement Local Protection Streambank Protection Water Supply Modification Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Dade County, FL........................................ ......... Deleware Coast Protection, DE............................ ......... Demonstration Erosion Control, MS................................. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA............. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel...................... Dunbar (Sewage Facilities), WV (Sec 14)........................ East Bow Creek, Wynote, NE (Sec 14) .............................. East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, IA (Sec 14) East St. Louis and Vicnity, IL - Rehabilitation.................... El Paso, TX ..................................... ............. Elizabeth, NJ ..................................... ............ Elk Creek Lake, OR ....................................... ....... Elkhorn River, West Point, NE (Sec 205)............................ Emeryville, Alameda, CA........................................ Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL(Sec 205) ................................. Evansville, IN................................ .... .............. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA ........................................ Falls Lake, NC....................................... ............ Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY............................... (Remainder) ...................................... .............. Fisher Ferry Road, MS (Sec 14) ....................................... Fletcher Creek, Memphis, TN (Sec 14) ............................ Fort Toulouse, Wetlampka, AL........................................... Four Rivers Basin, FL ...................................... ...... Fourche Bayou, Vicinity of Little Rock, AR .................... Fox River, Bridge Site #4, IA (Sec 14)............................. Fox River, Route J40 Bridge, IA (Sec 14)........................ Gallatin River, (1-90), Gallatin County, MT (Sec 14)......... Grand Mound, State Historic Site, MN (Sec 14) .............. Great Bend,KS.............................. .............. Greenwood Bendway, Site 3, MS ..................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 4, MS ..................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 5, MS ..................................... Guadalupe River, CA ........................................ ......... Guntersville Lake, Guntersville, AL ................................... Halstead,KS............... ........................................... ...... Hannibal, MO................................... ............ Humboldt, TN (Sec 205) ..................................................... Hurricane Creek , Prentiss Co., MS (Sec 14)....................... Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City,MD (Sec 14)......................... Joe Pool Lake, TX ........................... ...................... Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, HI (Sec 205)............................. Kahoma Stream, Maui, HI ........................................ Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Leeve Dist., IL...................... Kirbyville, TX (Sec 205)................................. ...... Lake Chicot Pumping Plant, AR ....................................... Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY (Sec 14)..................................... Lake Pontchartrain, LA ...................................... ..... Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX ................................... Larose to Golden Meadow, LA......................................... Lead Bayou, MS (Sec 205)................................................... Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River & 1975 1971 1985 1989 1967 1986 1992 1992 1988 1971 1972 1971 1989 1992 1988 1939 1985 1973 1963 1963 1987 1991 1991 1966 1987 1992 1992 1991 1990 1987 1986 1987 1987 1992 1988 1989 1989 1986 1989 1989 1975 1989 1986 1980 1989 1981 1992 1967 1987 1972 1982 2038 1990 2021 Indefinite Indefinite 1983 1993 1987 1992 1992 1992 1992 1995 1973 Indefinite 1991 Indefinite 1991 1993 1993 1995 1992 1983 1994 Indefinite Indefinite 1990 1991 1991 1993 1986 1995 1991 1992 1992 1992 1992 1992 1992 1991 1993 1988 1988 1988 1997 1989 1994 1992 1988 1988 1990 1992 1990 1991 1986 1993 1990 1990 1990 1990 1986 1992 1992 1992 1992 2013 1995 2002 1988 1988 Shore Protection Local Protection Local Protection Recreation Reservoir Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Beach Erosion Control Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Shoreline Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection B-2 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Cumberland River, KY, WV & VA.............................. Liberty State Park, Levee and Seawall, NJ (Sec 205)......... Little Blue River Lakes, MO.............................. ........... Little Calumet River, IN ..................................... .... Little Dell Lake, UT................................. Little Kanawha River, Glenville, WV (Sec 14) .................. Little Red River, Clinton, AR (Sec 205)............................. Lock Haven, PA ............................................................. Long Branch Lake, MO ..................................... ..... Loves Park, IL ................................................................. Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA....... Lower Green River, King County, WA (Sec 205).............. Lower San Joaquin River, CA (Snagging & Clearing)....... Main Street, Wellsburg, WV.................... ........... Martin Creek, Prentiss Co., MS ........................................ Masefau Bay, Tutuila Island, American Samoa (Sec 14).. Maumee Bay State Park, OH ........................................... Mauvaise Terre, IL......................................... Mayfield Creek, KY........................... McGee Creek Drainage and Levee Dist., IL..................... Merced County Streams, CA ........................................... Middle River at Argyle, ND (Sec 205) ...................... Middle School, Wellsburg, WV.......................................... Mill Creek, OH ..................................... .......... Mill Creek, Dalton, GA .................................................... Mill Creek, Salem, OR (Sec 14) ....................................... Millington, TN ..................................... .......... Mingo Creek, OK...................................... ........ Miss. River Channel Improvements (AR, IL, KY, LA, MI, MO & TN)..................................... ......... Miss. River Levees .............................................................. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO ......... Mound State Park, Moundville, AL.................................... Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA................................ Muddy Creek Cascade, Vaughn, MT (Sec 14) ................... Mudline to Pineville, MS ..................................... .. Murder Creek, Brewton, AL (Sec 205)................................... Muskegon (Duck Lake), MI (Sec 14) ............................... Muskingham River Lakes, OH ......................................... Muskingum River Lakes, OH (Dam Safety Assurance)........................................... New Orleans to Venice, LA............................................. Newark, OH ..................................... ............ NonconnanhCreek, TN & MS............................................. North Branch Chicago River, IL....................................... Oates Creek, GA ........................................ ......... O'Hare Reservoir, IL ....................................... ...... One Hundred Two River, Nodaway Co., MO County Road and Bridge (Sec 14)............................. Otter Creek, Shannon Hills, AR (Sec 205) ................... Paintsville Lake, KY .................................................. 1981 1987 1978 1990 1985 1986 1985 1991 1973 1991 1961 1988 1985 1992 1986 1989 1990 1985 1992 1979 1985 1985 1992 1981 1990 1990 1990 1988 1928 1928 1948 1991 1986 1992 1984 1986 1990 1976 1982 1969 1976 1990 1988 1990 1990 1991 1984 1973 Indefinite 1988 1988 1992 1996 1993 1987 1986 1987 1994 1980 Indefinite 1997 Indefinite 1992 Indefinite 1993 1987 1992 1992 1991 1991 1987 1994 1985 Indefinite 1990 1992 1993 Indefinite 1990 1992 1990 1993 1992 1996 (4) (2) 1990 1985 1991 1992 1984 1983 2010 2008 Indefinite 1993 1993 1994 1985 1991 1992 1988 1995 2013 1992 1994 1993 1992 1995 1992 1986 1991 Local Protection Shore Protection Reservoir Local Protection Reservoirs Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Channel Improvement Main Line Levees Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Major Rehabilitation Modernization of Dams Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir S treambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir B-3 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Pajaro River, CA ........................................ ......... Panola-Quitman Item C, MS ............................................ Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE ........................ Pearl River, MS ..................................... ......... Pelucia Creek, Item 1, MS .................................. Pelucia Creek, Item 1A, MS ............................................ Pelucia Creek, Item 2....................................................... Pennypack Creek, Hatboro, PA........................................... Perkins Street Bridge, TN (Sec 14)...................................... Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO.............................. Petit Jean River, Hwy 309, AR (Sec 14)............................. Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (including New River) ............. Plum Creek, Norden Dam Road, NE (Sec 14).................... Poquessing Creek, Bucks Co., PA .................................... Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX ........................................... Porter Bayou, MS (Sec 205) ............................................ Portersville Bay, Mobile County, AL ............................... Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR....................................... Presque Isle Peninsula, PA (Permanent)........................... Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA (Sec 205).................................. Pt. Leflore, MS ..................................... .......... R. D. Bailey Lake, WV ...................................... .... Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections......................................... Ray Roberts Lake, TX................................... ....... Redbank & Fancher Creeks, CA....................................... Red River Basin Chloride Control (Area X) OK and TX................. ............ ........... Red River Below Deanson Dam ....................................... Reno Beach, Howard Farms, OH........................................ Republican River, Clifton, KS, Sewage Lagoon (Sec 14)..................................... ....... Reserve Sewage Lagoon, NM (Sec 14) ..................... Richmond, VA............................... ... ... ............. Roanoke River, Upper Basin, VA ..................................... Rochester, MN ..................................... .......... Roseau River Duxby Levee, MN.................................. Running Slough Ditch...................................... ..... Sabana Grande, PR (Sec 205) ........................................... Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA ........................... Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA ......... Sacramento River Flood Control, CA............................... Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction, CA........... Saginaw River, MI ....................................... ....... San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX............................. San Luis Rey River, CA................................. ....... Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA.......................................... San Vincente Arroyo, Silver Spring, NM ........................... Savan Gut, VI (Sec 205) .................................... Saw Mill River at Ardslay ............................. Saylorville Lake, IA ........................................ ................ 1987 1984 1972 1984 1985 1987 1990 1988 1987 1977 1991 1980 1991 1987 1966 1982 1992 1975 1990 1989 1985 1967 1965 1975 1987 1991 1971 1990 1992 1986 1989 1990 1987 1991 1990 1987 1963 1963 1918 1990 1965 1957 1988 1990 1988 1987 1987 1965 1989 1974 1989 1989 1985 1991 1992 1988 1984 1986 1987 1992 1989 1993 1995 1985 1987 1987 1993 1989 1990 1985 1991 1994 1992 1988 1995 1988 1992 1993 1993 1992 1986 1988 Indefinite 1996 1993 Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Breakwaters Local Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Local Protection Reservoir Reservoir Indefinite Chloride Control Indefinite Levee & Streambank Protection 1992 Shoreline Protection 1992 1992 1989 1987 1993 1997 1995 1992 1992 1990 1990 1989 1990 1996 Indefinite Indefinite 1993 1979 Indefinite 1996 1996 Indefinite 1988 1988 1989 1990 1989 1990 1977 1994 Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir B-4 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Scotts Creek, Newberry, SC (Sec 205) ............................. Sewer Line Protection, Valley, AL (Sec 14)....................... Sewer Outfall, Glendale, WV ............................................ Sheyenne River, ND ..................... ...... Shupe Run, Mt. Pleasant, PA ............................................ Sicily Island, LA, Levee ......................................... Silver Creek, Rome, GA (Sec 205)...................................... Sim s Bayou, TX .................................................................. Sims Park, Euclid, OH (Sec 103)...................................... Soap Creek, Bridge Site 3, IA (Sec 14)............................... Socastee Creek, Harry conty, SC (Sec 205)........................ Solomon Creek, Ashley, PA (Sec 14) ............................... Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD (Sec 14)................. Sope Creek, Marietta, GA...................................... Souris River Basin, ND..................................... ... South Platte River, Logan County Bridge, Proctor, CO (Sec 14).................................. ..... South Shore Park, Milwaukee County, WI....................... Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ................................. Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS....................................... State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texoma, TX (Sec 14) .... State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI................................... Steele Bayou, MS ...................................... ......... St. Francis Basin ........................................ ......... St. Paul, MN........................ .. .... ............. Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV ........................................... Swan Creek, Taney County, MO (Sec 14).......................... Sweetwater River, CA...................................................... Tallahatchie River, Site 1, MS .......................................... Tama, IA (Sec 205) ....................................... ....... Taylors Bayou, TX ........................................................... Taylorsville Lake, KY ...................................... ..... Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant, LA ............................... Tensas Cocodrie, LA, Levee (5)........................................ Texas City and Vicinity, TX (1958 authorization) ............. Threemile Creek, AL................................. ......... Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS ....................... Town Brook, Quincy;, MA ....................................... Town River Bay, Quincy, MA (Sec 14) ........................... Tributary Kill Creek, DeSoto, KS, Sewage Treatment Plant (Sec 14) ............ ...................... Tulsa and Wst Tulsa, OK................................................. Tynes Branch, Houston School Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS ........................................................................ Upper Scioto River, Marion County, OH (Sec 205)........... Upper Yazoo Projects, MS ................................................. U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL (Sec 14)........................ U.S. Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS (Sec 14) .................. U.S. Hwy 190, Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, LA (Sec 214)..................... .................. 1986 1985 1992 1990 1992 1983 1989 1990 1992 1992 1992 1992 1992 1986 1985 1992 1992 1974 1988 1992 1988 1966 1938 1991 1977 1984 1972 1988 1991 1982 1974 1983 1974 1962 1988 1965 1992 1992 1992 1943 1986 1986 1976 1985 1985 1991 1986 1991 1992 1992 1988 1989 1992 1999 1992 20005 1992 2002 1992 1992 1993 1993 1993 1990 1994 1992 1992 1993 1993 1983 1993 1992 1993 1994 1993 2010 (4) 1999 1994 1988 1986 1986 1993 1988 1994 1994 1983 1990 Indefinite 6 19927 1987 1992 1992 1993 1990 Indefinite 1997 1992 1992 1992 1945 1986 1986 1992 1992 1993 9 1987 1987 2013 1986 1986 1993 Local Protection Sewer Line Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection and Nourishment Streambank Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Tributary levees & channels Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Bridge Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection B-5 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project U.S. Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL (Sec 14)................. Valley Creek, AL (Sec 14)............. ................................. Village Creek, AL ....................................... ........ Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX .................................. Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN (Sec 14) ....................... Walnut Creek, CA ............................................................ Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (Sec 14)..... Westerly Creek, Colorado.............................. ....... West Des Moines, IA ...................................... ...... West Ray, Marshall, PA (Sec 14) ..................................... West River, New Haven, CT (Sec 205) ............................ West Tennessee Tributaries ............................................. Westwego to Harvey, LA................................ ...... Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX (Sec 205)....................... White River, Batesville, AR (Sec 14) ............................... White River, Jacksonport, AR (Sec 205).......................... White River, Newport, AR (Sec 14).................................... White River, St. Paul, AR (Sec 208).................................... White River, Tripp Sounty, SD (Sec 14) .......................... Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA..................................... Wilamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR...................... Willow Creek Lake, OR.................................. ...... Wolf River at 2nd Street, Memphis, TN (Sec 14)................ Wyoming Valley, PA...................................... ...... Yatesville Lake, KY..................... ....... Zintel Canyon, Kennewick, WA....................................... 1985 1985 1989 1968 1989 1964 1989 1988 1991 1990 1991 1960 1991 1983 1984 1984 1988 1988 1991 1980 1938 1991 1988 1983 1964 1992 1986 1989 1992 1991 1990 1094 1986 1986 1989 1990 1992 1989 1976 1993 1987 1986 1994 1990 1992 1994 1992 1992 1997 1990 1993 Indefinite 1 2002 1984 1986 1986 1989 1990 1992 1995 Indefinite 1994 1990 1991 1991 1993 Streambank Protection Sewerline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Drainage and Flood Control Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Rehabilitation of levee system Reservoir Local Protection 1 Construction of further channel improvement was halted in 1987 due to the denial of water quality certification. Construction work currently underway includes the stabilization of bridge, utility and tributary crossings in the uncompleted portion of the project. 2 Project was in useful operation before Corps started working on it. Work consists primarily of improvements to existing channels, levees, pumping stations and other flood control structures. 3. Completion of Stage I (Truscott facilities) only. Stage II (Ross facilities) indefinite. 4. Remaining recreation unscheduled. Lawsuit was resolved by a Consent Decree Feb 10, 1992. The Decree was for the City of Edmond and the Edmond Public Works Authority to reimburse the government $7,207,636 over a period of 40 years for the recreation contract and $16,253, 644 for the water supply contract over a period of 43 years. 5 Project consists of levee upgrade and enlargement. B-6 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 6 Durham Prong Diversion local support problem. 7 Item 2A temporarily deferred. 8 A maintenance contract for a culvert replacement was completed Nov 1990. 9 Present work is for repair of the levee and pipes. BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Revere Beach, Revere, MA Southeast Lighthouse Block Island, RI Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT 1991 1993 1992 1992 1992 1993 1993 B-7 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Type 1 l (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (fe(t) Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL Claiborne Lock & Dam Millers Ferry Lock and Dam Jones Bluff Lock and Dam Allegheny River, PA and NY Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, GA, AL and FL Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam George W. Andrews Lock and Dam Walter F. George Lock and Dam Atlantic Intracoastal Wasterway Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal Route: Great Bridge Lock Dismal Swamp Canal Route: Deep Creek Lock South Mills Lock Bayou Teche, LA Berwick Lock Keystone Lock Black Rock Channel and Tonawonda Harbor, NY Black Rock Lock Black Warrior, Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL Coffeeville (Jackson) Lock and Dam Demopolis Lock and Dam Armstead I. Selden Lock and Dam Wm. Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement) HoltL ock and Dam John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam (New Lock) Canaveral Harbor, FL Canaveral Lock Cape Fear River, NC Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 William O. Huske Lock and Dam Central and Southern Florida S-61 Lock S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock 81.82 142.32 254.42 6.7 14.5 24.2 30.4 36.3 45.7 52.6 62.2 Qaibome, AL Camden, AL Benton, AL Aspinwall, PA Cheswick, PA Natrona, PA Freeport, PA Qinton, PA Kittanning, PA Templeton, PA Rimer, PA 84 600 30 16 13 Movable 3,1603 1973 60.5 9 200 84 600 45 16 13 Movable 9,9003 1969 103.1 9 200 84 600 45 16 13 Movable 14,9623 1974 88.0 9 200 56 360 56 360 56 360 56 360 56 360 56 360 56 360 56 360 11 13 10 12 12 13 18 22 11 12 9 10 11 11 14 11 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed 1,393 19342 1,436 193420 876 1927 780 1927 1,140 1928 916 1930 984 1931 950 1938 7.8 9 9.7 9 6.2 9 5.9 9 9.4 9 6.9 9 9.6 9 9.8 9 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 107.64 Chattahoochee, FL 82 450 33 14 14 Movable 5,924 1957 46.7 6 100 182.85 Columbia, GA 182.85 Fort Gaines, GA 82 450 25 19 13 Movable 620 1963 28.5 6 100 82 450 88 18 13 Movable 13,371 1963 85.0 6 100 11.56 Great Bridge, VA 72 530 3 167 167 10.66 33.26 1.53 72.53 Deep Creek, VA South Mills, NC Berwick, LA New Iberia, LA 0.0 Buffalo, NY None 52 300 12 127 127 None 52 300 12 127 127 None 45 307 79 97 97 36 162 9 9 9 None Fixed 1932 12 90 1940 6 50 1941 6 1950 175 1913 68 625 5 21.6 21.6 None 50 8 80 34.5 6 50 1914 7.1 21 200 116.610 Coffeeville, AL 110 600 33 13 13 Movable 1,185 1965 96.6 9 200 213.210 Demopolis, AL 110 600 40 13 13 Fixed 1,485 1962 47.9 9 200 261.110 32770 347.010 Eutaw, AL Tuscaloose, AL Holt, AL 365.1 Adger, AL 2.7 Cocoa, FL 67.0 Kings Bluff, NC 40 99.0 Browns Landing, NC 40 123.0 Tolars Landing, NC 40 0.0 56.0 46.0 32.0 25.0 St. Cloud, FL Frostproof, FL Avon Park, FL Sebring, FL Sebring, FL 110 600 22 13 13 Movable 1,832 1962 77.0 9 200 110 600 28 18 110 600 64 19 18 Fixed 800 n/a 8.9 9 200 13 Movable 1,138 1969 18.1 9 200 110 600 68 13 13 Fixed 1,170 1975 42.7 9 200 90 600 3 14 14 None 200 11 9 9 Fixed 200 9 12 12 Fixed 300 9 9 9 Fixed 90 90 90 90 90 None None None None None 1965 12 125 275 1915 32.0 8 100 229 1917 24.0 8 100 220 1935 20.0 8 100 1963 1964 1967 1965 1965 8 28.0 3 10.0 3 14.0 3 7.0 3 20 30 30 30 30 C-1 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Central and Southern Florida (continued) S-65D Lock S-65E Lock S-308B S-310 16.0 12.0 38.7 0.0 Okeechobee, FL Okechobee, FL Port Mayaca, FL Clewiston, FL Chicago Harbor, IL Chicago Lock 0.0 Chicago, IL 30 90 6 6 30 90 5 6 56 400 14 14 50 60 5 13 80 600 4 23 None None Movable Movable 23 None 1964 1964 1977 1980 9.0 3 4.0 3 5.0 8 .5 6 30 30 100 50 1939 .15 21 470 Columbia River, OR and WA Bonneville Lock and Dam The Dalles Lock and Dam John Day Lock and Dam McNary Lock and Dam Cross-Florida Barge Canal Inglis Lock, Dam and Spillway Eureka Lock and Dam Harry H. Buckman Lock Cumberland River, KY and TN Barkley Dam Cheatham Lock and Dam Old Hickory Lock and Dam Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir Fox River, WI DePere Lock DePere Dam Little Kaukauna Lock Little Kaukauna Dam Rapide Croche Lock Rapide Croche Dam Kaukauna Fifth Lock Kaukauna Fourth Lock Kaukauna Third Lock Kaukauna Second Lock Kaukauna First Lock Kaukauna Dam Kaukauna Guard Lock Little Chute combined Lock Lower Upper Little Chute Second Lock Little Chute First (Guard) Lock Little Chute Dam Cedars Lock Cedars Dam Appleton Fourth Lock Appleton Lower Dam Appleton Third Lock Appleton Second Lock Appleton First Lock Appleton Upper Dam Menasha Lock Menasha Dam Freshwater Bayou, LA Freshwater Bayou Lock Green and Barren Rivers, KY Green River: Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Inner Harbor Navigation Channel Lock Harvey Lock 146.0 Bonneville, OR 190.0 The Dalles, OR 215.0 Rufus, OR 292.0 Umatilla, OR 168.611 Inglis, FL 20.0 Spare, FL 90.4 Palatka, FL 76 500 65 32 24 Movable 2,680 1938 86 675 88 15 15 Movable 8,735 1957 86 675 110 15 15 Movable 5,900 1968 86 675 75 15 20 Movable 7,365 1953 84 84 84 600 28 18 600 20 14 600 20 14 30.6 Kuttawa, KY 110 800 57 148.7 Ashland City, TN 110 800 26 216.2 Old Hickory, TN 84 400 60 313.5 Carthage, TN 7.1 7.2 13.0 13.1 19.2 19.3 22.8 23.1 23.3 23.4 23.6 24.0 24.0 25.4 25.4 26.4 26.5 26.6 27.3 27.4 30.7 30.9 31.3 31.6 31.9 32.2 37.8 37.8 Movable 5,100 1968 Movable 3,830 1971 None 1972 Movable 9,959 1964 Movable 801 1959 Movable 3,605 1957 11 14 14 47.5 27 25,0 14 76.0 14 64.0 14 300 250 250 250 11.0 12 150 12 150 21.2 12 150 118.1 9 150 67.5 9 150 97.3 9 150 84 400 59 14 13 Movable 1,138 1973 71.9 9 150 DePetr, WI DePere, WI DePere, WI DePere, WI Wrightstown, WI Wrightstown, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Menasha, WI Menasha, WI 146 146 146 144 144 144 144 144 147 144 144 144 144 144 145 145 144 9 7 8 9 10 10 10 11 9 11 11 14 7 10 8 9 10 10 8 10 12 8 10 9 10 7 9 7 6 7 6 6 6 7 6 19.08 Intracoastal City, LA 84 600 16 9.1 Spottsville, KY 84 600 12 12 63.1 Calhoun, KY 84 600 14 15 92.612 98.312 New Orleans, LA Harvey, LA 1936 5.9 6 100 Movable 986 1929 1938 6.2 6 100 Movable 588 1926 1934 3.6 6 100 Movable 461 1930 1898 0.3 6 100 1879 0.2 6 100 1879 0.1 6 100 1903 0.2 6 100 1883 0.4 6 100 Movable 603 1931 1891 1.4 6 100 1879 6 100 1879 6 100 1881 1.0 6 100 1904 0.7 6 100 Movable 562 1932 1888 3.4 6 100 Movable 654 1933 1907 0.6 6 100 Movable 549 1934 1900 0.3 6 100 1901 0.3 6 100 1884 5.1 6 100 Movable 691 1940 1899 28.3 6 100 Movable 401 1937 16 None 11 Fixed 12 Fixed 75 640 99 317 317 None 75 425 109 127 127 None 1968 12 125 482 1956 54.0 9 200 519 1956 45.4 9 200 1923 1934 12 150 12 125 C-2 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (continued) Algiers Lock Bayou Bouef Lock Bayou Sorrel Lock Port Allen Lock Calcasieu Lock Brazos River Floodgates Colorado River East Lock West Lock Hudson River, NY Troy Lock and Dam Illinois Waterway, IL LaGrange Lock and Dam Peoria Lock and Dam Starved Rock Lock and Dam Marseilles Lock Marseilles Dam Dresden Island Lock and Dam Brandon Road Lock and Dam Lockport Lock Thomas J. O'Brien Lock and Dam Inland Route, MI Crooked River Lock and Weir Kanawha River, WV Winfield Lock and Dam Marmt Lock and Dam London Lock and Dam Kaskaskia River, IL Kaskaskia Lock and Dam Kentucky River, KY Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 62 Lock and Dam No. 7 2 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No.9 24 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 112 Lock and Dam No. 122 Lock and Dam No. 13 2 Lock and Dam No. 142 Lake Washington Ship Canal Kiram M. Chittenden Lock Large Lock Small Lock McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR and OK Norell Lock and Dam Wilbur D. Mills, Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 88.012 93.3 131.013 228.512 238.513 404.113 Algiers, LA Morgan City, LA Plaquemine, LA Port Allen, LA Lake Charles, LA Freeport, TX 75 75 56 84 75 75 797 1,158 800 1,198 1,205 109 69 109 45 69 137 137 14 7 14 7 137 157 137 13 7 147 147 13 7 15 7 444.8 Matagorda, TX 75 1,200 59 15 157 444.8 Matagorda, TX 75 1,200 59 15 7 15 153.8 Troy, NY None None None None None None None None 1956 1954 1952 1961 1950 1943 1954 1954 45 493 17 16 13 Fixed 1,495 1917 16 16 12 12 16 12 150 150 125 125 200 125 12 125 12 125 22 14 200 80.2 Beardstown, IL 110 600 10 16 13 Movable 1,066 1939 77.5 9 300 157.7 PoriaI,L 110 600 11 16 12 Movable 536 1939 73.3 9 300 231.0 Uitca, IL 244.6 Marseilles, IL 247.0 Marseilles, IL 271.5 Morris, IL 286.0 Joliet, IL 291.1 Lockport, IL 326.5 Chicago, IL 30.0 Alanson, MI 31.1 67.8 82.8 Winfield, WV Marmet, WV London, WV .8 Ellis Grove, IL 4.0 31.0 42.0 65.0 82.2 96.2 117.0 139.9 157.5 176.4 201.0 220.9 239.9 249.0 Carrolton, KY Lockport, KY Gest, KY Frankfort, KY Tyrone, KY High Bridge, KY High Bridge, KY Camp Nelson, KY Valley View, KY Ford, KY Irvine, KY Ravenna, KY Willow, KY Heidelberg, KY 1.3 Seattle, WA 1.3 Seattle, WA 10.3 13.3 40.5 Arkansas Post, AR Arkansas Post, AR Arkansas Post, AR 110 600 19 17 14 Movable 1,280 1933 13.6 9 110 600 24 19 14 1933 26.9 9 Movable 819 1933 24.6 300 300 110 600 22 17 12 Movable 1,616 1933 14.5 9 300 110 600 34 18 14 Movable 2,373 1933 5.1 9 300 110 600 40 12 15 None 1933 9 300 110 1,000 2 14 14 Movable 257 1960 6.9 9 300 17.8 66 1 6.9 7.9 SSP Weir 83 1967 4.0 5 30 56 56 56 360 360 360 28 24 24 12 12 12 Movable 834 1937 Movable 707 1934 Movable 707 1934 36.7 9 300 15.0 9 300 7.8 9 300 84 600 32 18 11 Movable 130 1973 35.0 9 225 38 38 38 38 38 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 145 145 145 145 145 147 147 146 148 148 148 148 148 148 8 14 13 13 15 14 15 19 17 17 18 17 18 17 88 96 10 9 9 11 11 9 10 10 10 9 80 760 26 33.5 28 123 26 166 110 110 600 30 16 600 20 18 15 6 766 6 7 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed 424 1839 400 1939 465 1844 534 1844 556 1844 413 1891 350 1897 257 1900 362 1907 472 1907 208 1906 240 1910 248 1915 248 1917 29 Movable 235 1916 16 Movable 235 1916 15 Fixed *4,577 1967 14 1967 Movable *42,073 1968 27.0 6 11.0 6 23.0 6 17.2 6 14.0 6 20.8 6 22.9 6 17.6 6 18.9 6 24.6 6 19.9 6 19.0 6 9.1 6 9.6 6 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 17.0 34 150 17.0 34 150 3.0 9 250 36.9 9 250 C-3 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR and OK (continued) Joe Hardin Lock and Dan (No. 3) Emmett O. Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) Lock and Dam No. 5 David D. Terry Lock and Dam Murray Lock and Dam Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam No. 9 Dardanelle Lock and Dam Ozark-JetaTaylor Lock * James W. Trimble Lock and Dam N(o. 13) W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir Webbers Falls Lock and Dam Chouteau Lock and Dam Newt Graham Lock and Dam Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers Lock and Dam No. 27 Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN Locak and Dam No. 26 2 6 Melvin Price Locks & Dam Lock and Dam No. 25 Lock and Dam No. 24 Lock and Dam No. 22 Lock and Dam No. 21 Lock and Dam No. 20 Lock and Dam No. 19 Lock and Dam No. 18 Lock and Dam No. 17 Lock and Dam No. 16 Lock and Dam No. 15 Lock and Dam No. 14 Lock and Dam No. 13 Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 5A Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 1 50.2 Grady, AR 66.0 Pine Bluff, AR 86.3 Redfield, AR 108.1 Little Rock, AR 125.4 Little Rock, AR 155.9 Conway, AR 176.9 Morrilton, AR 205.5 Russellville, AR 256.8 Ozark, AR 292.8 Fort Smith, AR 319.6 Fort Smith, AR 336.2 SallisawOK 366.6 Webbers Falls, OK 401.4 Muskogee, OK 4421.7 Inola, OK 185.114 Granite City, IL 202.915 Alton, IL 200.8 Alton, IL 241.4 15 Cap Au Gris, MO 273.415 Clarksville, MO 301.215 Saverton, MO 324.915 Quincy, IL 343.215 Canton, MO 364.215 Keokuk, IA 410.515 Burlington, IA 437.115 New Boston, IL 457.215 Muscatine, IA 482.915 Rock Island, IL 493.115 LcClair, IA 493.315 LeClaire, IA 522.5 1 5 Clinton, IA 556.715 Bellevue, IA 583.015 Dubuque, IA 615.115 Guttenberg, IA 647.915 Lynxville, IA 679.215 Genoa, WI 702.515 Dresbach, MN 714.315 Trempealeau, WI 728.515 Winona, MN 738.115 Minneiska, MN 752.815 Alma, WI 796.915 Red Wing, MN 815.215 Hastings, MN 847.615 Minneapolis,, MN St. Paul 110 600 20 18 14 Movable *6,1110 1968 110 600 14 18 110 600 17 18 110 600 18 18 110 600 18 18 110 600 16 18 110 110 110 110 110 600 19 18 600 54 18 600 34 18 14 Movable *5,745 1968 14 Movable *7,455 1968 14 Movable *8,890 1968 14 Movable (3,930 1969 14 Movable *1,580 1969 14 Movable *1,505 1969 14 Movable **1,815 1969 15 Movable *12,480 1969 600 20 18 14 Movable *4,725 1969 600 20 14 15 Movable 7,400 1970 110 600 48 18 110 600 30 19 110 600 21 15 14 Movable 7,230 1970 16 Movable 4,370 14 Movable 11,690 1970 110 600 21 15 14 Movable 11,630 1970 110 1,200 21 16 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 100 110 110 110 80 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 56 600 24 360 24 1,200 24 600 15 600 15 600 10 600 10 600 10 1,200 38 600 10 600 8 600 9 600 16 360 16 320 11 600 11 600 11 600 9 600 11 600 8 600 9 600 11 600 8 600 7 600 6 600 9 600 7 600 8 600 12 400 38 400 38 19 16 23 19 19 18 17 15 15 17 16 17 27 27 18 21 19 17 19 15 16 22 18 17 18 18 17 17 22 13 13 15.8 9 250 20.3 9 250 21.8 9 250 17.3 9 250 30.5 9 250 21.0 9 250 28.6 9 250 51.3 9 250 36.0 9 250 26.8 9 250 16.6 9 250 30.4 9 250 1970 34.8 9 20.2 9 150 23.7 9 150 15 Fixed 3,240 1953 17.8 9 200 10 Movable 1,725 1938 10 18 Moveable 1160 1990 12 Movable 1,296 1939 12 Movable 4,280 1940 14 Movable 1,024 1938 12 Movable 1,066 1938 12 Movable 2,144 1936 13 Fixed 4,434 1913 14 Movable 1,350 1937 13 Movable 921 1939 12 Movable 1,099 1937 11 Movable 1,203 1934 11 11 1922 14 Movable 1,343 1939 13 Movable 1,066 1939 13 Movable 849 1938 13 Movable 1,278 1937 12 Movable 763 1937 13 Movable 811 1937 14 Movable 935 1937 12 Movable 940 1937 13 Movable 893 1936 13 Movable 682 1936 12 Movable 1,619 1935 13 Movable 1,367 1935 14 Movable 365 1938 13 Movable 822 1930 8 Fixed 574 1932 10 1917 38.5 9 300 40.6 9 300 32.0 9 300 27.8 9 300 23.7 9 NS 18.3 9 NS 21.0 9 NS 46.3 9 NS 26.6 9 NS 20.1 9 NS 25.7 9 NS 10.4 9 NS 29.2 9 NS 34.2 9 NS 26.3 9 NS 32.1 9 NS 32.8 9 NS 31.3 9 NS 23.3 9 NS 11.8 9 NS 14.2 9 NS 9.6 9 NS 14.7 9 NS 44.1 9 NS 18.3 9 NS 32.4 9 NS 5.7 9 NS C-4 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam Upper Lock and Dam Monongahela River, PA and WV Locks and Dam No. 2 Locks and Dam No. 3 Locks and Dam No. 4 Maxwell Locks and Dam Locks and Dam No. 7 Point Marion, Lock 8 Replacement Morgantown Lock and Dam Hildebrand Lock and Dam Opekiska Lock and Dam Ohio River Locks and Dam No. 53 Locks and Dam No. 52 Smithland Locks and Dam Uniontown Locks and Dam Newburgh Locks and Dam Cannelton Locks and Dam McAlpine Locks and Dam Markland Locks and Dam Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam Greenup Locks and Dam Gallipolis Locks and Dam Racine Locks and Dam Belleville Locks and Dam Willow Island Locks and Dam Hannibal Locks and Dam Pike Island Locks and Dam New Cumberland Locks and Dam Montgomery Island Locks and Dam Dushield Locks and Dam Emsworth Locks and Dam Okeechobee Waterway, FL St. Lucie Lock and Dam Moore Haven Lock Ortona Lock and Dam W. P. Franklin Lock and Control Structure Port Mayoca 853.315 Minneapolis, MN 56 400 25 14 10 Movable 188 1956 0.6 9 100 853.915 Minneapolis, MN 56 400 49 16 14 Fixed 3,584 1963 3.8 9 100 11.2 Braddock, PA 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 41.5 MonessenP,A 61.2 Maxwell, PA 85.0 Greensboro, PA 90.8 Point Marion, PA 102.0 Morgantown, WV 108.0 Morgantown, WV 115.4 Morgantown, WV 18.4 Mound City, IL 42.1 Brookport, IL 35.3 Smithland, KY 135.0 Uniontown, KY 204.9 Newburgh, IN 260.3 Cannelton, IN 374.2 Louisville, KY 449.5 Markland, IN 544.8 Chilo, OH 640.0 Greenup, KY 701.8 Hogsett, WV 743.5 Letart Falls, OH 777.1 Reedsville, OH 819.3 Waverly, WV 854.6 New Martinsville , WV 896.7 Warwood, WV 926.6 Stratton, OH 949.3 Industry, PA 967.7 Glenwillard, PA 974.8 Emsworth, PA 15.1 Stuart, FL 78.0 Moore Haven, FL 93.6 LaBelle, FL 121.4 Fort Myers, FL 38.5 Pahokee, FL 56 110 56 56 56 56 84 84 56 56 84 84 84 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 110 56 110 56 360 9 720 9 360 8 720 8 360 17 720 17 720 20 720 20 360 15 360 19 600 17 600 21 600 22 600 12 1,200 12 600 12 1,200 12 1,200 22 1,200 22 1,200 22 600 22 1,200 16 600 16 1,200 25 600 25 1,200 37 600 37 360 37 1,200 35 600 35 1,200 30 600 30 1,200 30 600 30 600 23 360 23 1,200 22 600 22 1,200 22 600 22 1,200 20 600 20 1,200 21 600 21 1,200 21 600 21 1,200 21 600 21 600 18 360 18 600 10 360 10 600 18 360 18 16 16 12 12 20 20 21 21 11 15 18 14 18 15 15 15 15 34 34 34 34 32 32 38 38 49 19 19 50 50 45 45 45 45 18 18 37 37 37 37 35 35 38 38 17 17 17 17 16 16 13 13 17 16 50 250 13 14 50 250 2 10 50 250 11 12 56 400 3 14 56 400 4 14 16 Fixed 748 1951 16 195321 12 Fixed 670 1907 12 190721 11 Movable 535 1932 11 193221 15 Movable 460 1964 15 1964 10 Fixed 610 192521 10 Movable 560 192521/22 15 Movable 410 1950 15 Movable 530 1959 14 Movable366 1964 7.0 10 Movable 3,978 1929 10 Temporary Lock 1980 11 Movable 3,073 1928 11 Temporary Lock 1969 12 Movable 3,560 1980 12 12 Movable 3,516 1975 12 16 Movable 2,272 1975 16 13 Movable 1,965 1972 13 12 Movable 8,627 1961 11 1921 11 1930 15 Movable 1,395 1963 15 1963 15 Movable 1,756 1962 15 1962 15 Movable 1,287 1962 15 15 Movable 1,132 1937 15 15 Movable 1,202 1970 15 15 Movablel,206 1969 36.4 15 15 Movable 1,128 1973 15 17 Movable 1,098 1972 17 18 Movable 1,306 1965 18 15 Movable 1,315 1961 15 15 Movable 1,379 1936 15 18 Fixed 1,585 1929 18 13 Movable 1,717 1921 13 12 Movable 170 1941 11 None 1953 11 Movable 104 1937 14-- Movable 1,150 1965 14 Movable 1977 12.6 9 300 17.7 9 300 19.7 9 300 23.8 9 300 5.8 9 300 11.2 9 300 6.0 9 300 7.4 9 300 9 300 23.7 9 300 35.8 9 300 99.7 9 300 69.9 9 300 55.4 9 300 116.3 9 400 75.3 9 300 95.3 9 300 9 300 95,2 9 300 61.8 9 300 41.7 9 300 33.6 9 300 9 300 35.3 9 1,000 36.0 9 300 29.9 9 300 22.7 9 300 18.4 9 300 7.1 9 300 6.2 9 300 15.1 8 80 15.6 8 90 15.6 8 90 7.9 8 90 8 100 C-5 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Old River, LA Old River Lock Ouchita and Black Rivers, AR & LA Jonesville Lock and Dam (Black River) Columbia Lock and Dam (Ouachita River) Calion Lock (Ouachita River) Felsenthal Lock (Ouachita River) Parl River, MS and LA Lock 1 Lock 2 Lock 3 Red River Waterway Lock 1 Lock 2 Lock 3 Sacramento River, CA Barge Canal Lock Snake River, WA Ice Harbor Lock and Dam Little Goose Lock and Dam Lower Granite Lock and Dam Lower Monumental Lock and Dam St. Mary's River, MI South Canal: MacArthur Lock Poe Lock North Canal: Davis Lock Sabin Lock Savannah, GA New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam Tennessee River, TN, AL, MS, and KY 1 8 Kentucky Lock and Dam Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam Auxiliary Lock Main Lock Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, AL and MS Gainesville Lock and Dam Aliceville Lock and Dam Columbus Lock and Dam Aberdeen Lock and Dam Lock A and Spillway Lock B and Spillway Lock C and Spillway Lock D and Spillway Lock E and Spillway Bay Springs Lock and Dam Wilson Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxiliary Lock General Joe Wheeler Lock and Dam 304.0 Simmsport, LA 25.0 Jonesville, LA 117.2 Columbia, LA 75 1,200 35 11 11 None 1963 84 600 30 18 14 Movable 450 1972 84 600 18 18 13 Fixed 12 125 92.2 9 100 400 1972 106.2 9 100 281.7 84 600 12 18 13 Movable 350 1984 226.8 84 600 13 18 29.417 learl River, LA 40.717 Bush, LA 43.917 Sun, LA 310 26.7 10 310 15 10 310 11 10 43.8 84 685 38 86.5 84 685 24 141.0 84 685 31 42.8 West Sacramento, CA 9.7 Pasco, WA 70.3 Starbuck, WA 107.5 Pomeroy, WA 41.6 Kahlotus, WA 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 187.2 Augusta, GA 22 23.5 25 13 Movable 350 1984 10 None 10 None 10 None 1951 1951 1951 13 Movable 550 1984 15 Movable 300 1987 18 Novable 360 1991 86 600 4 13 13 None 86 675 100 86 675 101 86 675 100 86 675 98 80 110 80 80 800 22 31 1,200 22 32 1,350 22 24 1,350 22 24 20 Movable 20 Movable 20 Novable 20 Movable 31 None 32 None 23 None 23 None 50.3 9 100 55.2 9 100 11.1 7 80 3.2 7 80 13.2 7 80 44.2 9 200 74.3 9 200 116.5 9 200 1961 1.5 13 120 1962 1970 1975 1969 1943 1968 1914 1919 56 360 15 14 12 Movable 360 1936 22.4 Gilbertsville, KY 110 600 56 11 13 Tainter 7,976 1944 206.7 Hamburg, TN 110 600 55 10 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1937 206.7 Hamburg, TN 110 1,000 55 10 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1984 49.1 Gainesville, AL 89.8 Aliceville, AL 117.6 Columbus, MS 140.4 Aberdeen, MS 154.1 Amory, MS 159.3 Smithville, AL 174.0 Fulton, MS 181.4 Fulton, MS 189.7 Belmont, MS 194.9 Tupelo, MS 259.4 Florence, AL 259.4 Florence, AL 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 36 600 27 600 27 600 27 600 30 600 25 600 25 600 30 600 30 600 84 110 600 94 60 292 94 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 15 Movable 15,460 1978 15 Movable 14,790 1979 15 Movable 10,040 1981 15 Movable 10,640 1984 15 Movable -- 1985 18 Movable -- 1985 18 Movable -- 1985 18 Movable -- 1985 18 Movable -- 1985 18 None 10,640 1985 13 13 Bulkhead 3,728 1959 11 11 Bulkhead 3,728 1927 1 14 250 14 250 14 250 14 250 27 16.2 9 90 184.3 9 300 52.7 9 300 52.7 9 300 49.1 9 300 40.7 9 300 27.8 9 300 22.8 9 300 13.7 9 300 14.7 9 300 7.4 9 300 8.3 9 300 5.2 9 300 64.5 9 300 15.5 9 300 15.5 9 300 C-6 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Type 1 (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Main Lock Auxiliary Lock Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tenonsssee Rivers, AL and MS (continued) Guntersville Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxiliary Lock Nickajack Lock and Dam Chickamauga Lock and Dam Watts Bar Lock and Dam Fort Loudon Lock and Dam Melton Hill Lock and Dam (Clinch River) WillarnmeRt iver at Willameti Falls, OR Lock No. 1 Lock No. 2 Lock No. 3 Lock No. 4 Guard Lock 274.9 Florence, AL 274.9 Florence, AL 110 600 48 13 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1963 74.1 9 300 60 400 48 15 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1962 74.1 9 300 349.0 Guntersville, AL 110 600 39 13 13 Tainter 3,837 1965 75.7 9 300 349.0 Guniersville, AL 60 400 39 13 12 Tainter 3,837 1939 75.7 9 300 424.7 Ghattanooga, TN 110 600 39 13 11 Tainter 3,763 1967 46.3 9 300 471.0 Chattanooga, TN 60 360 49 10 14 Tainter 5,654 1940 58.9 9 300 529.9 Breendenton, TN 60 360 58 12 12 Tainter 2,646 1942 72.4 9 300 602.3 Lenoir City, TN 60 360 72 12 12 Tainter 3,687 1943 49.8 9 300 23.1 Kingston, TN 75 400 54 13 13 Tainter 1,072 1963 38.2 9 30019 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 20 6 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 26.4 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 8 None 8 None 8 None 8 None 1872 6 150 1872 1872 1872 .4 1872 23.6 6 1 Fixed; crest without gates or other facility to control streamflow. Movable; includes any type of crest gates, tainter gates, wickets, or others to control streamflow. 2 Above mouth of Mobile River. 3Includes length of earth dikes. 4 From mouth of Apalachicola River. 5 From mouth of Chattahoochee River. 6 Above Norfolk, VA. 7 With reference to mean low water, or low mean Gulf as case may be. 8 From Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. 9 Average high and low water conditions, lift varying widely, depending on tides and river stages. From foot of Government Street, Mobile, AL. 1 1 From mouth of St. Johns River. 12Above Head of Passes. 1 3 1 4From New Orleans, LA. Salt water barrier in down position. Will clear 15-foot vessels in normal position. 15Above the Ohio River. 1 6 17 Channel completed to depth of 6.5 feet. From mouth of West Pearl River. 1 8 TenrnesseeR iver locks operated by the Corps, dams operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority. 1 9 300-foot width from lock to mouth of Clinch River and 175-foot width upstream from lock to Clinton, TN. 20Dates shown represent replacement structures. 2 1 Dates shown represent reconstruction for locks and dams Nos. 2-8 inclusive. 22Dam was rebuilt in 1959. 23 Ol1d1 10 X 358 lock replaced in 1957. 24 nop-rable, caretaker status September 7, 1982. 2 Inoperable, caretaker status October 1, 1981. 26 Lock and Dam 26 has been removed and replaced by Melvin Price Locks and Dam * Includes length of left and right embankments ** Includes length of left embankment C-7 APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam (Sec 107).......................... AIWW - Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC..... Baltimore Harbor (50 foot), MD & VA............................ Barnegat Inlet, NJ ............................................ Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR & WA ......................... Brazos Island Harbor, TX ........................................ Buffalo Smallboat Harbor, NY .......... ........................ Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) .............. Channel to Newport News, VA (1986 Mod.) ................... Charleston Harbor, SC .................... ..... Cleveland Harbor, OH (NCH/Pier 34)................................ Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR .................................. ... ................. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ..................................... Delaware River in the Vicinity of Camden, NJ ................ Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, IN and KY ..................................... ...................... Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VW.................................. Freeport Harbor, TX ..................... ...... Gallipolis Locks and Dam, Ohio River............................. Grays Harbor, WA ..................... ....... Grays Landing Lock & Dam (Lock & Dam 7) M onongahela River, PA....................... ............... Gulfport Harbor, MS ..................... ...... Helena Harbor, AR ............................ Hempstead Harbor, NY.......................................... Kill Van Kull - Newark Bay, NJ and NY .................... Krebs Lake, MS (Sec 107) ....................................... LaGrange Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL ............... Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI ..................................... Lock and Dams 3, 5A, 6,7,8 and 9, MN, WI and IA .......... Lock and Dam 17, IL .................... ...... Lock and Dam 18, IA..................... ....... 1987 1974 1987 1985 1985 1992 1991 1967 1987 1988 1992 1991 1972 1987 1984 1988 1987 1985 1990 1986 1991 1989 1992 1986 1983 1986 1988 1989 1989 1989 1989 1986 1 1990 1992 1968 1989 1990 1988 1988 1983 1992 1988 1989 Dredging and breakwater 1999 Replacement of existing bridges 1993 Deepdraft channel deepening 1992 Jetty realignment and dredging 1994 New larger lock 1994 Enlarging and Deepening Deep Draft Channel to 42 foot depth 1992 Emergency Dike Repair Indefinite Deferred anchorage construction Indefinite Dredge 50 ft. Channel. Deepen to 55 feet 1994 Dredging and channel wideningand deepening 1993 Recreation Navigation Indefinite 1994 1988 Construction of support structure Dredging Dredging Indefinite Protection of a National Natural Landmark 1988 Dredging 1994 Dredging, jetty construction, and recreation 1999 Replacement of existing locks and major rehabilitation of the dam 1994 Navigation channel widening and deepening 1995 Construct new lock & dam to replace existing lock & dam 7 1994 Deepen Channel 1994 New Slackwater Harbor 1994 Removal of derelect barges 1995 Deepdraft channel - widening and deepening 1984 Dredging, navigation channel 1992 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1988 Breakwater 1999 Major rehabilitation of electrical/mechanical systems 1992 Major maintenance of lock and dam 1993 Major maintenance of lock and daml D-1 APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Lock and Dam 20, MO ..................................... ..... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR .. Melvin Price Lock and Dam, MO..................................... Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers IL and MO.................................................................... Mississippi River, Gulf Outlet, LA ................................... Mississippi River, Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA................................................. Moriches Inlet, NY ........................................... Mouth of Colorado River, TX (Gulf Intracoastal Waterway) .................... ................... Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI .......................................... New York Harbor, NY and NJ............................................ Newburgh Locks & Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY............. Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.)......................... Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1986 Mod) ....................... 1986 1963 1974 1910 1958 1987 1987 1984 1985 1976 1965 1966 1987 Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel, VA.................... 1987 Oakland Harbor, CA ........................... 1987 Olmsted Locks and Dam, IL & KY ................................. 1992 Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA............................... 1964 Peoria Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL ................... Point Marion, Lock & Dam 8 Monongahela River, PA...................................... Portsmouth Harbor & Piscataqua River, ME and NH ........ Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA........ Richmond Harbor, CA ........................................... 1986 1986 1989 1974 1985 Rudee Inlet, VA................................... 1990 Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA.............. 1986 San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA............................... San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels), CA ............................. 1991 1971 Savannah Harbor Widening, GA ..................................... 1990 Schinnecock Inlet, NY ........................................ 1990 1970 1990 1992 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 2000 Locks and dams 1997 Replacement 2000 Regulating works 1975 Dredging and jetties 1987 2 Indefinite 3 Dredging 55-foot channel 1994 Dredging channels 1994 Breakwaters, dredging, and recreation 1987 1987 Breakwater repair Incremental Indefinite Collection and removal of drift 1969 1974 Replacement of locks and dams 46 and 47 1967 Indefinite Deferred anchorage const. 1989 Indefinite Dredge 50 ft. channel and deepen to 55 feet Indefinite Dredge outbound element and deepen to 55 feet 1995 Channel deepening and widening turning basin 2006 Navigation 1984 Indefinite Replacement of six locks and dams, channel deepening to 9 feet and realignment 1992 1992 Major Rehabilitation of lock and dam 1994 Replaces existing 56x360' lock chamber with new 84'x720' chamber 1992 1992 Dredging (widening channel) 19844 Indefinite Lock and dam construction. Channel improvement and realignment 1995 Channel deepening and turning basin 1991 1991 Dredge 7 foot channel Indefinite Deep draft channel, widening and deepening 1994 Dredging and breakwater 1998 Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging 1992 Widening channel 1993 Dredging and repair of jetties D-2 APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1992 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Smithland Locks and Dam, IL, IN, and KY .................... 1971 Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) .................................. Tenn River, Decatur Morgan County Port, AL................... Tombigbee River, Columbus Port, MS (Sec 107) ............. Tongue Point, OR .................................. ...... Toussaaant River, Caroll Twsp. , OH (Sec 107) ................ W allisville Lake, TX ........................................................ 1976 1988 1987 1989 1991 1967 1980 1987 1990 Winfield Lock and Dams, Kanawha River, WV.................. 1990 Wood Island harbor, Biddeford, ME................................ 1992 1987 Replacement of existing locks and dams 50 and 51 1987 Dredging 1989 Channel excavation 1989 Navigation channels & turning basin 1992 Dredging 1992 Dredging 1997 Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreational) 1997 Construction of new lock 1993 Improvement Dredging 1 Walter Jones and Joseph P. Knapp completed; Core Creek is under construction; Hobucken and Fairfield have been funded for design. 2 Phase I, forty-five foot channel to New Orleans, LA. Forty-five foot channel to Mile 181 (Donaldsonville, LA) placed in useful operation in 1988. 3 Awaiting further LCA's to extend project to Baton Rouge, LA, and to go deeper than 45 feet. 4 Lock and Dam No. 1 placed in useful operation in 1984. Lock and Dam No. 2 in 1987. and Lock and Dam No. 3 in 1992. Construction was initiated on Lock and Dam Nos 4 and 5 in 1991. D-3 APPENDIX E MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Flood Cmtrod and/oar Total Nay. Feature Storage Placd Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimase Community Capability in useful Power Installtion Installation Installation Project Height Length Project River inVicinity (acre-feet) 1 OperationC Y In PFY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (fet) (fet) Albeni Falls, ID Fend Oreille Allatoona Lake,GA Etowah Barkeley Dam & Cumberland Lake Barkeley, KY KY & TN BeaverLake, AR White Big Bend Dam (Lake Sharpel), SD Missouri Blakely Mountain Ouachita Dam Lake Ouachit BonnmvilLle& D Columbia Lake Bonneville, OR &WA Broken Bow Lake, Mountain Fork OK Buford Dam, Chattahoochee Lanier, GA Bull Shoals Lake White AR & MO Clazence Cannon Salt Dam CartersDam, GA Coosawate Center Hill Lake, Caney Fork TN Ceatham L&D, TN Cumberland ChiefJosephDam Columbia (Rufus Woods Lake),WA Cooper River, Santee Charleston Harbor, SC Cordell Hull L&D, Cumberland TN Cougar Lake, OR S. Fork McKenzie Dale Hollow Lake, Obey TN & KY Dardanelle L&D, Arkansas AR DeGray Lake, AR Caddo DenisonDamn(Lake Red Texoma), TX & OK Detroit Lake, OR, North Santiam including Big Cliff Lake, OR DworshakDam N. Fork, & Reservoir, Clearwatr ID Eufaula Lake, OK Canadian Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) Lake Fort Peck Lake, Missouri MT Fort Randal Dam Missouri (Lake Francis Case), SD Garrison Dam Missouri (Lake Sakakawea), ND Gavins Point Dam Missouri (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NE Green Peter Middle Santiam Lake,OR, including Foster Lake, OR GreersF erry Little Red Lake, AR Harry S. Truman Osage Dam & Res. Hartwell Lake, Savannah GA & SC Hills Coeek Lake, Middle Fork OR Wilanetet Ice Harbor LAD Snake (LSacajawea), Sacajawea), WA NewportWA 1,153,000 1952 Caroersville,GA 670,000 1950 Frand Rivers, 2,082,000 1964 Eureka Springs, ChamberlainSD Mt. Pine, AR 1,952,000 1,883,000 2,768,000 1963 1964 1953 1955 1950 1966 1965 1965 1956 42,600 74,000 130,000 112,000 468,000 75,000 Bonneville,OR 537,000 1938 1938 1,145,700 Broken Bow, 1,368,230 OK Buford, GA 2,554,000 MountainHome 5,408,000 AR Perry, MO 1,428,000 Carters, GA 472,756 Lancaster,TN 2,092,000 Ashland City, TN 104,000 Bridgeport, WA 593,000 St. Stephen, SC 2,560,000 Carthage, TN Blue River, OR Clina, TN Dardancle, AR Arkadelphia, AR Denison, TX Mill City, OR 310,900 219,000 1,706,000 486,200 831,900 5,312,300 1968 1956 1952 1983 1975 1948 1952 1955 1970 1957 1953 1985 1975 1951 1958 1956 100,000 86,000 340,000 58,000 500,000 135,000 36,000 2,457,384 N/A 1985 84,000 1973 1963 1943 1969 1969 1944 1974 1964 1949 1965 1972 1945 100,000 25,000 54,000 124,000 68,000 70,000 461,000 1953 1954 118,000 Orofino, ID 3,453,000 1972 1973 400,000 Eufaula, OK 3,825,400 Ft. Gibson, OK 1,284,400 Glasglow, MT 18,909,000 Lake Andes, SD 5,574,000 Riverdale, ND 24,137,000 Yankton, SD 1964 1949 1938 1953 1964 1953 1944 1954 90,000 45,000 185,250 320,000 1954 1956 430,000 504,000 1956 1957 100,000 Sweet Hoae, OR 491,000 Heber Spings Warsaw, MO Hartwell, GA OakridgOe,R Pasco, WA 2,844,000 5,202,000 2,842,700 356,000 417,000 1967 1967 100,000 1962 1982 1961 1961 1962 1964 1982(4) 1962 1962 1961 96,000 160,000 344,000 30,000 603,000 42,600 NFPR C 90 1,055 74,000 FPRW C 190 1,250 130,000 NPFR CE 157 9,959 112,000 FPSR CE 228 2,575 468,000 FPRIW E 95 10.570 75,000 FPRW E 235 1,100 1,145,700 NPR C 122 2,690 100,000 FPWSR E 225 2,750 86,000 NFPW E 192 5,400 340,000 FPR C 258 2,256 58,000 FNPRSW CE 138 1,700 500,000 FPRW ER 450 1,950 135,000 FPR CE 250 2,160 36,000 NPR C 75 801 2,457,384 PIR C 230 5,998 84,000 NPW CE 86 876 100,000 NPR CE 93 1,306 64,600 NFPRI ER 445 1,738 54,000 FPR C 200 1,717 124,000 NPR C 68 2,683 108,000 FNPRS E 243 3,400 175,000 FPRSN E 165 17,200 118,000 NFPRI C 382 1,528 1,060,000 PNFR CG 717 3,300 90,000 FNPS CE 114 3,200 67,500 FP CE 110 2,990 185,250 NFPRIW E 251 21,026 320,000 NFPRIW E 165 10,700 430,000 NFPRIW E 210 11,300 100,000 NFPRIW E 74 8,700 100,000 PFNIR C 340 1,380 96,000 FPRS C 243 1,704 160,000 FPRW CE 96 5,000 344,000 NFPRS (E 204 17,880 30,000 NFPRI GE 304 2,150 603,000 NPRI CG 130 2,790 E-1 APPENDIX E (Continued) MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Flood Control Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community Capability in useful Power Inatallation Installation Installation Project Height Length Project River inVicinity (acre-feet) 1 Operation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (feet) (fet) J.l PrcyP riest Stones Dam & Reservoir, TN J. Strom Thurmond Savannah Dam & Reservoir GA & SC Jim Woodruff Dam Appalachicola (Lake Seminole), FL, GA & AL JohnD ay L&D Columbia (Lake Umatilla), OR &WA John H. Kerr Roanoke Dam & Reservoir, NC & VA KeystornLea ke, Arkansas OK LakeG reesonA,R Little Missouri Laurel River, KY Laurel Libby Dam, Lake Kootenai Koocanusa, MT Little GooseL &D Snake (Lake Bryan), WA Lookout Point Middle Fork Lake including Willam tte Dexter Lake, OR Lost Creek Lake, Rogue OR Lower Granite Snake L&D, WA Lower Snake Monumental L&D (Lake Herbert G. West), WA McNaryL&D Columbia OR & WA Millers Ferry Alaberna L&D, AL Mississippi Delta Region, LA (Caernarvon Freshwater Diversion) Mississippi Nanpil River Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, FSM New Melones Stanislaus Lake, CA 6 Norfork Lake, AR North Fork & MO Oahe Dam (Lake Missouri Oahe)S,D & ND Old Hickory L&D, Cumberland TN Ozark-Jeta Arkansas Taylor L&D, AR Philpott Lake, VA Roanoke Richard B. Russell GA and SC Robert F. Henry Alaberm L&D, AL Robert S. Kerr Arkansas L&D and Reservoir, OK Sam Raybum Dam Angelima & Reservoir, TX St. Mary's River, Great Lakes MI Snettisham, AK 7 Speel StocktonLake, MO Sac Table Rock White Lake, AR & MO Tenkller Lake, Illinois OK TheDba les L&D Columbia (Lake Celilo), WA & OR Walter F. George Chattahooche L&D, GA & FL Nashville, TN 652,000 1967 1970 28,000 Augusta, GA 2,900,000 1952 1953 280,000 CQattahooche, FL 367,300 Rufus, OR 1957 1957 30,000 2,500,000 1968 1969 2,160,000 Boydton, VA 2,750,300 1952 1953 204,000 Tulsa, OK 1,737,600 Murfreesboro,AR 407,900 London, KY 435,600 Libby, MT 5,809,000 Starbuck, WA 565,000 Lowell, OR 483,000 Trail, OR Pomeroy, WA Kahlotus, WA 465,000 484,000 376,000 1964 1968 1950 1950 1973 1978 1972 1975 1970 1970 1954 1955 1977 1977 1975 1975 1969 1969 70,000 25,500 61,000 525,000 810,000 135,000 49,000 810,000 810,000 Umatilla, OR 1,550,000 1953 1954 980,000 Camden, AL 331,8090 1969 1979 75,000 Braithwaite, LA Pohnpei, FSM 1991 1 1987 1988 2,000 Oakdale, CA 2,400,000 1978 1979 300,000 Norfolk, AR Pierre, SD Hendersonville, TN Ozark AR Bassett, VA Augusta, GA Benton, AL Sallisaw, OK Jasper, TX Sault Ste. Marie MI Juneau, AK Stockton, MO BransoMnO, Gore, OK The Dalles, OR 1,983,000 23,337,000 545,000 148,400 318,500 1,026,244 234,200 522,700 1943 1944 1959 1962 1954 1957 1969 1973 1951 1954 1984 1984 1972 1975 1970 1971 3,997,600 1965 1966 --- 1855 1952 352,400 1973 1,674,000 1969 1973 3,462,000 1958 1959 1,230,800 1952 1953 53,000 1957 1957 80,550 595,000 100,000 100,000 14,000 300,000 68,000 110,000 52,000 18,400 73,700 45,200 200,000 40,000 1,806,800 Fort Gaines, GA 934,000 1963 1963 130,000 28,000 FPRW CE 147 2,716 280,000 NFPRSW (E 200 5,680 30,000 NPRW CE 67 6,150 2,700,000 NPRFI CE 161 5,900 204,000 FPRW CE 144 22,285 70,000 FNPWS E 121 4,600 25,500 FPRW C 183.5 941 61,000 FPRW R 282 1,420 840,000 FPR C 420 3,055 810,000 NPRI CG 165 2,655 135,000 NFPRI CE 243 3,381 49,000 DFPISWR CE 345 3,600 810,000 NPRIF CG 146 3,200 810,000 NPRI CG 135 3,800 1,754,000 NPRI CG 181 7,365 75,000 NPRW (E 90 11,380 W CE 38.5 371 2,000 P C 17 70 300,000 FIPRW FR 625 1,560 163,000 FPRS .C 216 2,624 595,000 NFPRIW E 245 9,300 100,000 NPR CE 98 3,605 100,000 NPR C 58 2,480 14,000 FPR C 220 892 600,000 NPR (E 195 4,524 68,000 NPRW CE 101 14,962 110,000 NPR E 75 7,230 52,000 FPWR CE 120 19,430 18,400 NP Control Gate 73,700 P C 9 18 338 45,200 FPRW CE 128 5,100 200,000 FPR (E 252 6,423 40,000 FP E 197 3,000 1,806,800 NPR CR 300 8,875 130,000 NPRW CE 114 13,585 E-2 APPENDIX E (Continued) MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Flood Control azxVor Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Conmunity Capability inuseful Power Installatila tista llaion Installation Project Height Length Project River in Vicinity (acr -f�et) 1 OperatioCnY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functim Type 2 (aet) (fet) Webbers Falls Arkansas Wevbbers Palls, OK 170,100 1970 1973 60,000 60,000 NP E 84 4,370 L&D, OK West Point Chattahooche West Point, GA 604,500 1975 1975 73,375 108,375 FPRW CE 97 7,250 Lake, AL & GA Whitney Lake, TX Brazos Whitney, TX 1,999,500 1953 1954 30,000 30,000 FPR CE 159 17,695 WoldfCekDam Cumberland Jamestown, KY 6,089,000 1950 1952 270,000 270,000 FPR CE 258 5,736 (Lake Cumberland), KY 1 Total of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normalf ull pool level 2:. gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth 4 Units 4 and 5 were declared commercially operable by Southwestrn Power Administration 9SWPA) on 1 May 1982. No other units have been declared commercially operable by SWPA. All six units have successfully generated power, but one or two units at a time will be out of service for sepairs and modifications until late 1995. 6 Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Bureau of Reclamation 7Being operated by the Alaska Power Administartion 8 Weir for Long Lake 9 Formerly Clarks Hill Lake Nomanclature for Project Functions D--Debris Control P--Power F--Flood Control R--Public Recreation Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000 I--Irrigation S-Water Supply N--Navigation W--Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) E-3 APPENDIX F MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 Nameplate Capacity Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Year for for Scheduled Ultimate Project Started Operation Completion Functions Installation Installation Bonneville Second Powerhouse, OR and WA .................... 1974 1981 1996 PR 558,200 558,200 Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO................................ 1966 1985 1990 FNPRSW 58,000 58,000 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ... ................................... 1965 19821 19931 FRPW 160,000 160,000 New Melones Lake, CA2 ...... . .... ... . . . . . . . ... . . .. . . .. ... . 1966 1979 Indefinite1 DFIPRW 300,000 300,000 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah River, GA and SC........................................ 1975 1985 1995 FRP 600,000 600,000 Cooper River, Charleston Hbr, SC 3 ......................................... 1977 1985 2001 NWDP 84,000 84,000 Snettisham, AK.................................................. 1967 1989 1993 P 73,700 27,000 KEY DFI NP RS W Redevelopment Flood Control Irrigation Navigation Power Recreation Water Supply Fish and Wildlife 1 Units 4 and 5 were declared commercially operable by Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA) on 1 May 1982. No other units have been declared commercially operable by SWPA. All six units h ave successfully generated power, but one or two units at a time will be out of service for repairs and modifications until late 1995. 2 New Melones Lake was turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation for operation on November 20, 1979. Corps retains responsibility for facilities along the lower Stanisalaus River. Remaining construction consists of unscheduled recreation facilities and minor feature closeouts. 3 Remaining construction consists of a two-lane bridge and highway facility which the SC HWY Dept has an option to initiate construction on until May 2001. F-1 Flood Damages Prevented in the United States 17.6 17.4 40- 35- 30- 25- 20- 15 10- LLLLLL&LLL z 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Fiscal Year Flood damages prevented (damages in billions of dollars) in the United States by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers since Fiscal Year 1982. The ten (fical) year (1982-91) average is shown for comnparison. '"""" " 10- Year (1982- 1991) S8.1 Average -$13.3 8.1Billion 27.3 23.2 O o u c m 16.8 10.8 11n......... m I I..II.I. .III 4.3 5- O- 1/11,1111111111111111111111111111 8.3 5.2 Flood damages prevented (in thousands of dollars) in the United States, by state, by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for 10 fiscal years (1983-92). Location FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 FY 91 FY 2 Average Alabama 3,350 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 335.0 Alaska 4,885 5,055 6,846 6,828 17,000 0 8,000 0 8,100 10,000 6,671.4 Arizona 12,000 90,630 14,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,945 12,087.5 Arkansas 1,006,930 812,472 265,510 466,429 397,754 240,694 401,796 635,569 478,008 65,947 477,110.9 California 1,097,869 102,360 72,800 13,910,920 154,858 98 4,770 9,500 64,022 406,036 1,582,323.3 Colorado 9,173 2,639 440 502 1,442 1,755 0 0 482 9,367 2,580.0 Connecticut 4,123 391,130 250 25 224,314 0 1,892 53,180 100 4,228 67,924.2 Delaware 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Florida 16,687 297 2,079 0 2,619 6,461 456 256 1,305 17,591 4,775.1 Georgia 2,251 19,426 811 0 4,220 0 850 37,618 1,689 1,474 6,833.9 Hawaii 869 0 0 220 220 8,540 82 1,085 5,457 194 1,666.7 Idaho 47,140 43,271 338 20,757 623 113 14,900 5,073 23,018 253 15,548.6 Illinois 97,712 25,570 75,446 68,235 262,386 2,105 7,925 450,687 64,996 10,369 106,543.1 Indiana 22,370 32,725 117,822 46,287 14,257 9,032 61,145 57,583 149,239 27,288 53,774.8 Iowa 156,763 200,359 17,060 106,878 376,965 476 76 128,746 77,099 14,662 107,908.4 Kansas 72,487 143,594 26,722 114,694 284,377 16,712 105,716 78,201 30,816 298,933 117,225.2 Kentucky 57,646 217,046 9,976 16,110 20,768 7,718 96,757 25,868 159,089 35,464 64,644.2 Loulsana 17,863,178 8,474,126 8,463,296 8,478,185 113,053 1,001,845 5,007,949 9,623,200 13,670,272 1,005,357 7,370,046.1 Maine 0 1,982 0 0 7,605 0 0 0 0 0 958.7 Maryland and 0 1,011 1,404 109,102 7,000 364 3 9 14 93,074 21,198.1 Dstridct o Columbia Maasachusett 1,348 422,587 304 437 203,457 230 237 6,975 9,472 574 64,562. 1 Michigan 1,649 1,198 15,197 10,411 31,352 8,477 3,654 3,405 0 412 7,575.5 Minnesota 4,016 3,790 2,861 22,083 5,888 411 21,995 1,485 5,400 2,929 7,085.8 Missiaasppi 1,486,446 866,631 1,072,098 360,552 226,975 198,604 549,885 626,709 1,196,409 155,364 673,967.3 Missouri 544,166 827,765 100,086 717,926 1,006,876 42,370 117,726 245,361 200,669 299,878 410,282.3 Montana 434 985 555 19,531 277 0 27 7,394 15,408 4,483 4,909.4 Nebraska 13,817 124,083 1,082 72,187 172,657 457 17,427 11,007 58,559 7,351 47,862.7 O N> (continued). Flood damages prevented (in thousands of dollars) in the United States, by state, by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for 10 fiscal years (1983-92). Lcaocon FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 FY 90 FY1 FY92 Averge Nevada 15,015 2,000 0 14,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,101.5 New Hampshire 27 9,837 0 350 14,397 0 0 0 0 0 2,461.1 New Jersey 0 136 135 121 94 4,907 3,336 4,991 1,247 445 1,541.2 New Mexico 29,968 100,220 119,648 87,139 97,900 21,528 2,755 42,531 91,189 27,619 62,049.7 New York 13,192 567,993 15,158 80,610 34,739 5,656 39,507 12,879 17,566 6,120 79,342.0 North Carolina 24,630 7,886 14,220 4,034 94,430 65 18,362 17,063 23,231 8,474 21,239.5 North Dakota 7,883 1,141 53 4,324 53,497 0 47,131 6,429 1,591 942 12,299. 1 Ohio 74,027 38,520 113,279 97,966 80,260 45,183 89,977 140,824 250,242 6,601 93,687.9 Oklahoma 32,500 45,177 56,900 61,857 758,329 109,979 123,272 220,136 19,116 52,838 148,010.4 Oregon 499,103 826,337 28,013 1,394,551 38,568 294,945 840,765 693,409 42,633 47,243 470,556.7 Pennsylvania 33,543 1,981,162 24,387 224,267 9,971 15,290 27,845 16,424 40,498 3,046 237,643.3 Puerto Roo and 0 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 4,665 2,966.5 Virgin islands Rhode Island 298 10,541 175 0 9,975 0 0 2,940 1,620 0 2,554.9 South Caroini 1,300 167 796 157 694 17 1,434 59 2,849 625 609.8 South Dakota 1,149 1,046 511 811 536 457 457 460 572 4,140 1,013.9 Tennessee 28,187 192,529 43 10,749 5,253 4,864 9,651 7,588 310,926 496 57,028.6 Texas 21,527 5,270 46,346 208,333 192,464 6,245 537,403 4,122,558 13,860 5,197,449 1,035,145.5 Utah 140,000 31,000 2,200 2,300 0 0 500 500 1,500 .700 17,870.0 Vermont 2,000 2,952 535 1,362 6,295 782 2,298 1,874 2,525 2,275 2,289.8 Virginia 0 1,186 3,265 87,703 124,709 5,375 11,243 10,035 1,686 124,553 3,975.5 Washington 7,720 113,407 65,444 98,808 86,774 1,039 62,403 258,333 357,877 54,343 110,614.8 West Virginia 31,450 44,054 9,088 354,265 49,269 458 18,592 7,406 76,882 40,152 63,161.6 Wisconsin 1,700 0 11 127 24 0 0 0 0 0 186.2 Wyoming 545 6,492 0 10,637 91 62 779 2,603 4,424 1,373 2,700.6 Totals 23,493,073 16,799,785 10,767,490 27,317,770 5,195,212 2,063,314 8,260,978 17,577,953 17,481,657 8,059,272 13,701,650.4 C0 N h> 9> Flood Damages Suffered in the United States 7 6-6 O C 5 0 C) m 4 4 I- 4 3 o sses ssss I+ I() L_ 11 1111112- III(( III .16 |.IISS1 uS o 2 1.5 1.5 .6 00.8 0.5 0.5 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Fiscal Year 10- Year (1982- 1991) Average - $2.2 Billion Flood damages suffered (damages in billions of dollars) in the United States since Fiscal Year 1982. The ten (fiscal) year (1982-91) average is shown for comparison. *I i 33.3 27.2 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 20.8 E C .a c) 00 LL [I' III 4I1i 5.8 1982 1983 1984 1985 Potential Flood Damages in the United States 19.2 19.1 n nI 11s1'111 111 /lll1illll1110 lll111111s 9.4 m==I 6.7 2.6 1986 1987 1988 Fiscal Year 1989 111 1IIi ig. 11 ll l 111 11g 8.9 10 - Year(1982- 1991) Average - $15.5 Billion 1990 1991 1992 Flood damages suffered LI Flood damages prevented Potential flood damages (damages in billions of dollars) in the United States since Fiscal Year 1982. The potential damages for each year is the sum of the damages suffered and the damages prevented. The ten (fiscal) year (1982-91) average is shown for comparison. I isIIIIIsI 4 iIiI l11.31ll 11.3 C) .fr 5- 0- _ __ m_ I _ -L- \ YY _-- ------ U -- j---U ------- U ------- YI Flood damages prevented (in millions of dollars) the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers during Fiscal Year 1992. in the United States, by region, by Damage Preverted Damages Prevered FY 1992 Damages Prwered Region Fiscal Year 192 FY1982 - 91 Compared to FY 1982 - 91 Average New England 4.5 162.7 Low MidAtlanlc 97.9 300.6 Low Gulf and South Alagic 150.7 51.4 Very High Ohio 102.8 318.7 Low Tennessee 18.9 35.9 Medium Great Lakes 5.7 23.9 Low Upper Mississippi 19.0 156.8 Low SourwRedRainy 0.5 15.8 Low MIssour 609.6 498.4 Medium Arkansas- ed-White 87.8 249.8 Low Lower Mississippi 1,213.7 8,475.9 Low F.o Grande 39.8 61.7 Medium Teous and GuM 5,184.6 555.6 Very High Colorado 3.9 11.8 Low Great Basin 0.7 6.3 Low Casomia 406.0 1,570.2 Low Coelubl-North Pacic 102.8 781.9 Low Alaska 10.0 6.1 Medium Hawai .2 3.4 Low Total 8,059.3 13,286.9 61 percent of 1982- 1991 average 1 fi Major floods in the United States during Fiscal Year 1992 and their effects (damages in millions of dollars). Month Location Lives Lost Damages Suffered December 1991 Texas 14 137 January 1992 Puerto Rico 23 88 February 1992 California 2 91 March 1992 Texas 1 0.5 May 1992 New Mexico 0 32 June 1992 Florida 2 40 June 1992 Connecticut 1 10 June 1992 Kentucky 0 25 July 1992 Ohio/Kentucky 6 17 August 1992 Indiana/Kentucky 2 33 September 1992 lowa/Wisconsin 0 75 Subtotals 51 , 549 Totals (All Floods in U.S.) 87 800 Other major weather events in the their effects (damages in millions of dollars). United States during Fiscal Year 1992 and Events Number Total Damages Lives Lost Suffered Tropical Cyclones 8 51 up to 30.000 Tornadoes 1148 11 404 Drought 3 - Not Available Dust Storms 1 17 Not Available Hail Storms 1 0 60 Totals 1158 79 up to 30.464 G-6 Flood Damages Prevented Compared to Average D!,. U Alaska -o o" Hawaii Flood Damages Suffered Compared to Average D -J .* a Hawaii Puerto Rico (Top) Fiscal Year 1992 flood damages prevented by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as compared to the nine (fiscal) year (1983-91) averages. (Bottom) Fiscal Year 1992 flood damages sufered as compared to the nine (fiscal) year (1983-91) averages. G-7 Puerto Rico Alaska l.c urn -erv r.ian I ~ Flood damages prevented (in thousands of dollars) in by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers during Fiscal Year 1992. the United States, by state, Deages Damages Prevented Total Flood Average Damages FY 1992 Damages Location Prevented by by Corps-Supported Damage Prevented Prevented Prevented Compared CorpControlled Emergency by the Corps FY 1983 -91 to FY 1983 -91 Projects Operation of Engineers Average Alabemn 0 0 0 372 Low Alaska 10,000 0 10,000 6,301 High Artrona 3,945 0 3,945 12,992 Low Arklaes 65,947 0 65,947 522,791 Low Caifomrnia 406,036 0 406,036 1,713,005 Low Colorado 9,367 0 9,367 1,826 Very High Connectcut 4,228 0 4,228 75,001 Low Delaware 0 0 0 0 Low Florida 17,591 0 17,591 3,351 Very High Georgla 1,474 0 1,474 7,428 Low Hawal 194 0 194 1,830 Low Idaho 253 0 253 17,248 Low IInot 10,369 0 10,369 117,228 Low indlan 27,288 0 27,288 56,717 Low lowa 14,662 0 14,662 118,268 Low Kawas 298,933 0 298,933 97,034 High Karaucky 35,464 0 35,464 67,886 Medium Louisiana 1,005,357 0 1,005,357 8,077,153 Low Maine 0 0 0 1,065 Low Maryland and 93,002 72 93,074 13,212 Very High Disbidt of Columbia Massachies 574 0 574 71,671 Low MIchigan 412 0 412 8,371 Low Minnesota 2,929 0 2,929 7,548 Low Miessppi 155,364 0 155,364 731,583 Low MissourI 298,778 1,100 299,878 422,545 Medium Montana 4,483 0 4,483 4,957 Medium Nebraska 7,351 0 7,351 52,363 Low (continued). Flood damages prevented (in thousands of dollars) in the United States, by state, by the US. Army Corps of Engineers during Fiscal Year 1992. ODmages Damages Prevented Total Flood Average Damages FY 1982 Damages Location Prevented by by Corps-Supported Damages Prevented Prevented Prevented Compared Controled Emergency by the Corps FY 1983-91 to FY 1983 - 91 Projects Operations of Engineers Average Nevada 0 0 0 3,446 Low New Hampshire 0 0 0 2,735 Low New Jersey 445 0 445 1,663 Low New Mexico 27,619 0 27,619 65,875 Low New York 5,770 350 6,120 87,477 Low North Carolina 8,474 0 8,474 22,658 Low North Dakota 942 0 942 13,561 Low Ohio 6,601 0 6,601 103,363 Low Oklahoma 52,838 0 52,838 158,584 Low Oregon 47,243 0 47,243 517,586 Low Penneylvania 3,046 0 3,046 263,707 Low Puerto Floo and 4,665 0 4,665 2,778 Medium Virgh ands Rhode and 0 0 0 2,839 Low Soult Caroin 625 0 625 830 Medium Soulh Dakota 4,140 0 4,140 667 Very High Tennessee 496 0 496 63,309 Low Texas 5,196,377 1,072 5,197,449 572,662 Very High Utah 700 0 700 19,778 Low Vermont 2,275 0 2,275 2,291 Medium Virginia 124,553 0 124,553 27,244 High Washington 54,343 0 54,343 116,866 Low West Virginia 40,152 0 40,152 65,718 Medium Wisconsin 0 0 0 207 Low Wyoming 1,373 0 1,373 2,848 Low Totals 8,056,678 2,594 8,059,272 14,328,438 0 Flood damages suffered (in thousands of dollars) in the United States, by state, during Fiscal Year 1992. Lives Lost Average Damages FY 1992 Damages Location Property Agricultural Total Suffered Suffered Compare FY 1992 FY 1983 -92 Damages Loe Damages FY 1983 -91 to FY 1983- 91 10 Years Average Alabama 2 30 320 0 320 21,316 Low Alaska 0 2 7,302 0 7,302 3,744 High Adrizon 3 38 5,187 2 5,189 49,387 Low Arkansas 0 31 909 0 909 79,122 Low California 2 54 93,152 0 93,152 130,117 Medium Colorado 0 0 1,602 0 1,602 13,083 Low Connedicut 1 1 10,216 150 10,366 9,725 Medium Delaware 0 3 0 2 2 739 Low Florida 2 5 41,776 162 41,938 32,320 Medium Georgia 1 20 1,156 0 1,156 16,373 Low Hawaii 6 10 9,180 80 9,260 8,292 Medium Idaho 0 5 192 32 224 899 Low Illinois 0 20 187 2 189 63,253 Low Indiana 1 8 21,278 24,146 45,424 32,495 Medium Iowa 0 10 31,667 19,133 50,800 135,228 Low Kansas 1 7 5,547 4,580 10,127 45,638 Low Kentucky 8 36 42,028 4,842 46,870 24,809 High Louisiana 1 31 4,191 0 4,191 316,719 Low Maine 0 7 2,179 0 2,179 10,695 Low Maryland and 0 8 339 0 339 1,321 Low Distriocft Columbia Massachusetts 0 11 176 0 176 14,367 Low Michigan 0 10 355 0 355 54,685 Low Minnesota 0 5 1,760 0 1,760 6,398 Low Mississippi 0 20 1,010 0 1,010 133,989 Low Missoud 3 37 2,042 2 2,044 46,876 Low Montana 0 11 1,027 375 1,402 6,004 Low Nebraska 0 5 2,857 3,826 6,683 30,601 Low Does no include flood damages caused by storm surges (i.e. hurricanes) or coastal flooding. C0 (continued). Flood damages suffered (in thousands of dollars) in the United States, by state, during Fiscal Year 1992. Lives lot Average Damages FY 192 Damages Location Property Agricultural Total Suffered Suffered Compre FY 1992 FY 1983- 92 Damages Loses Damage FY 1983- 91 to FY1983 -91 10 Years Average Nevada 0 8 1,621 0 1,621 2,417 Medium New Hampshire 0 1 0 0 0 3,599 Low New Jersey 0 8 500 0 500 40,989 Low New Mexico 0 16 32,264 0 32,264 6,571 High New York 0 30 1,830 32 1,862 45,881 Low North Carolina 2 15 9,567 3,360 12,927 9,757 Medium North Dakota 0 0 0 0 0 2,366 Low Ohio 2 41 18,713 1,365 20,078 22,099 Medium Oklahoma 2 45 10,871 0 10,871 128,203 Low Oregon 0 3 32 0 32 11,706 Low Pennsylvania 0 25 1,805 0 1,805 18,163 Low Puerto Rico and 25 101 84,127 6,000 90,127 14,756 Very High Virgin Islands Rhode island 0 0 16 0 16 87 Low South Carolina 0 16 0 0 0 5,441 Low South Dakota 0 0 1,810 1,650 3,460 24,299 Low Tennessee 2 33 188 16 204 17,246 Low Texas 19 184 181,733 17,623 199,356 176,638 Medium Utah 0 7 24 0 24 116,802 Low Vermont 0 2 2 0 2 8,647 Low Virginia 1 38 6,792 579 7,371 100,078 Low Washington 0 15 176 0 176 39,520 Low West Virginia 3 44 5,791 0 5,791 93,447 Low Wisconsin 0 2 8,804 20,501 29,305 13,647 High. Wyoming 0 12 0 0 0 4,897 Low Totals 87 1,071 654,301 108,460 762,761 2,195,448 Does not include flood damages caused by storm surges (i.e. hurricanes) or coastal flooding. CO Deaths and Flood Losses for Fiscal Year 1992 200 180 169 - 160 o 140 C .2 120 97 102 ; 100 88 n 75 30 ~ 80 28 26 59 59 26 326 j 24 40 0 22 20,20 10 g 20 -0.2 18 0 N 16 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 14 12- 10 10 8 5 55 6 4 3 4 2 2 0 "" Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Month Monthly flood losses (deaths (bottom), and damages (top) in millions of dollars) in Fiscal Year 1992. Flood insurance claims (in actual amounts) in the United States, by state, through the National Flood Insurance Program during Fiscal Year 1991. C a i 8P To al Claims Clikn Pad Total Claims Number Amount Number Amount Number Amount Number Amount Alabama 223 1,869,833.98 283 2,903,008.00 Nevada2 14,811.9 6 25,81100 Alaska 29 433,231.30 41 449,503.00 New HampshIre 12 38,928.78 32 53,161.00 Arizona 5 15,241.12 11 19,104.00 New Jersey 213 1,459,761.54 388 2,363,178.00 Arkanse. 273 1,805,890.94 332 8,217,930.00 New Medoo 6 6,833.27 11 66,532.00 Califormi 123 1,182,003.49 228 1,724,526.00 New York 268 1,975,346.82 559 2,975,644.00 Colorado 24 115,435.55 47 259,285.00 North Carolina 203 1,475,902.08 320 8,488,989.00 Connectict 65 287,414.49 131 438,063.00 North DakaQ 25 109,385.48 47 128,710.00 Delaware 2 10,800.15 4 12,308.00 Ohio 367 2,841,660.86 489 4,137,302 00 Flord 486 2,738,078.32 788 4,073,886.00 Oklahomu~a 17 180,738.23 32 209,419.00 Georgi 258 3,505,047.96 331 14,853,064.00 Oregon 16 158,037.31 23 178,956.00 Hawaii 116 1,157,325.11 171 3,425,213.00 Pennsylvania 257 2,402,469.68 333 4,121,998.00 Idaho 3 30,292.56 4 34,678.00 PuArto ioo and 44 274,939.75 50 334,673.00 IllInos 252 1,294,728.37 428 2,535,810.00 Fhode Island 442 6,327,523.87 635 8,922,798.00 Indiana 702 9,504,596.79 906 12,675,013.00 Sousih Carolna 154 670,990.76 258 2,463,969.00 Iowa 8 8679,082.16 123 1,101,896.00 Soih Dakota 2 3,248.71 7 4,298.00 Kansas 10 48,761.53 16 67,504.00 Tennmese 221 2,026,629.18 254 4,412,200.00 Kerducky 325 2,199,534.48 371 12,387,578.00 Tern 1,600 15,951,180.71 2,112 32,635,267.00 LouIstana 7,121 72,249,953.43 8,353 100,313,871.00 Utah 4 4,300.35 10 6,225.00 Mane. 71 945,366.21 134 1,103,807.00 Vermont 1 5,603.79 7 6,104.00 Maryland and 8 64,448.51 25 72,106.00 Virginia 63 419,754.85 113 626,392.00 District of Columbia Massachusetts 2,493 44,269,446.53 3,014 52,723,890.00 Washington 1,123 17,446,478.76 1,351 23,578,664.00 Michigan 40 434,088.83 75 665,681.00 West Virginia 71 589,761.07 101 1,136,207.00 Minnesota 17 108,170.53 31 1,370,563.00 Wisconsin 6 29,220.98 18 33,506.00 Mississipi 1,615 13,704,933.78 1,882 67,284,513.00 Wyoming 1 1,309.71 13 2,503.00 Missour 181 2,187,171.06 225 2,866,450.00 Montana 12 137,241.88 23 148,297.00 Totals 19,681 215,831,106.85 25,182 387,209,213.00 Noebraska 23 440,171.29 36 569,180.00 Administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration. Data include only flood damage claims ( g damage caused by hurricanes, tornadoes, winds, etc.). Dollar amounts do not include administrative costs. Total claims includes claims paid, claims denied, insurance deductibles, and damages in excess of insurance policies. C) - Flood insurance claims (in actual amounts) in the United States, by state, through the National Flood Insurance Program during Fiscal Year 1992. * Location Number Amount Number Amount Location Number Amount Number Amount Alabama 51 389,614.33 67 749,672.00 Nebraska 16 105,503.55 35 176,557.00 Alaska 19 396,286.01 23 305,312.00 Nevada 4 56,641.56 10 132,199.00 Artrzona 93 546,530.65 121 616,335.00 New Hampshire 186 1,865,047.29 255 2,354,734.00 Arkansas 15 28,826.43 20 34,870.00 New Jersey 4,094 33,777,697.83 5,049 42,484,231.00 California 400 3,085,508.06 661 4,962,601.00 New Mexico 58 556,885.72 81 920,672.00 Colorado 6 10,143.84 15 11,644.00 New York 2,969 35,528,641.24 3,657 52,689,070.00 Connectictd 470 4,632,407.71 653 7,054,528.00 North Carolina 910 8,978,656.67 1,096 25,348,135.00 Delaware 550 4,728,692.11 721 5,978,118.00 North Dakota 1 1,865.20 3 2,366.00 Flordda 5,899 43,803,528.25 10,042 47,822,158.00 Ohio 158 1,058,801.30 226 3,147,992.00 Georgia 101 566,746.79 133 1,047,562.00 Oklahoma 83 567,703.56 108 716,583.00 Guam 3 48,356.77 4 57,658.00 Oregon 1 0.00 2 0.00 Hawai 579 5,087,070.80 710 6,914,597.00 Pennsylvania 88 678,916.93 113 1,391,130.00 Idaho 3 2,711.61 8 4,774.00 Pueto Rco and 412 3,750,112.10 448 5,309,868.00 88nols 25 138,225.90 53 222,952.00 FRhode Wsland 53 283,164.66 100 360,272.00 kdlana 133 1,193,440.12 186 1,630,055.00 South Carolina 64 169,608.86 97 188,754.00 lw 11 20,141.91 15 27,196.00 South Dakota 6 9,387.43 7 13,119.00 Kansas 65 684,414.27 74 846,069. 0 Tennessee 61 277,721.79 72 348,035.00 Kentucky 216 985,637.10 281 3,124,256.00 Texes 4,536 75,140,530.22 5,362 112,108,780.00 Louisiana 3,351 30,749,833.02 3,988 38,575,442.00 Utah 0 0.00 2 0.00 Maine 384 4,522,707.99 541 5,411,948.00 Vermnnont 68 1,326,284.96 91 1,627,429.00 Maryland and 352 4,518,148.75 468 5,277,802.00 Virginia 664 8,883,142.68 890 11,986,621.00 District ol Columbia Massachusets 3,888 81,720,958.02 4,301 448,478,184.00 Washington 11 19,069.55 22 32,985.00 Michigan 8 29,134.85 21 115,742.00 West Virginia 109 589,122.18 150 1,245,793.00 Minnesota 13 61,228.79 20 118,680.00 Wisconsin 24 77,657.18 34 102,016.00 Mississippi 151 624,081.87 182 4,441,315.00 Wyoming 0 0.00 1 0.00 Missouri 97 443,185.04 127 546,264.00 Montana3 36,544.26 4 41,291.00 Totals 31,462 362,756,267.71 41,350 847,104,36600 Administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration. Data include only flood damage claims (e damage caused by hurricanes, tornadoes, winds, etc.). Dollar amounts do not Include administrative costs. Total claims includes claims paid, claims denied, insurance deductibles, and damages in excess of insurance policies. SData are preliminary for Fiscal Year 1992. Amounts are likely to increase as claims near the end of the fiscal year are compiled n.ttr r.,l!,, I R' mic,,, (. ....... t � - 11";, #"zd" .. :1 ... .. .. ... I� r-.~. ... . I Drought Severity Start of Fiscal Year 1992 " 'remr '.? aerate / Se sere %C 'rcuant End of Fiscal Year 1992 E "t-me SNo Drougnt Data from NWS, Climate Analysis Center. Drought severity (from Palmer Long-tm Drought Inde) in the United States at the start of Fiscal Year 1992 (top) and at the end of Fiscal Year 1992 (bottom). G-12 . Atlantic Tropical Cyclones 1982-1992 Fiscal Years 12 9 1111..11..111..... .. 1 .III.. 1111 I 1982 1983 1984 1982 1983 1984 12 11 ie.e esi IsIaI..III. s s iii is s 8 8 7 5 .,,p,,..*e* 7 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 Fiscal Year 12 *, 10-Year(1982- 1991) Tropical Storm Average - 9.3 I' 10- Year (1982-1991) Hurricane Average - 4.8 1990 1991 1992 No. of tropical cyclones (winds of greater than 35 mph) No. of hurricanes (tropical cydones with winds of greater than 74 mph) Data from NWS, National Ilurncanc Ccnicr. Tropical cyclones in the Atlantic Oceanu Basin since Fiscal Year 1982. The ten (fiscal) year (1982-91) average is shown for comparison. 14- 12- 10 2 (0 c 0 o i- E Z c) D Distribution of tornadoes and their effects (damages in thousands of dollars) in the United States, by state, during Fiscal Year 1992. Number of Tomadoes Lost Number of Tomernadoes LoUs Los 7 2 2,400 Nevada 4 0 75 1 0 0 New Hampshire 0 0 0 10 0 1,166 New Jersey 4 0 125 6 0 5.376 New Mexoo 24 0 536 5 0 1,016 New York 25 0 9,091 81 0 179 North Carolina 14 0 2,383 4 0 1 North Dakota 15 0 930 6 0 240 Ohio 59 0 24,025 45 0 5,950 Oklahoma 70 0 4,603 3 0 77 Oregon 4 0 60 0 0 0 Pennsylvhrania 30 0 5.357 4 0 25 Puerto Rioo and 0 0 0 Virgin slands 27 0 31.427 Rfhode Wland 0 0 0 26 0 15,616 Souh Caroina 5 0 70 30 0 4.241 South Dakota 41 0 35,228 91 0 22,687 Tennessee 8 0 747 7 0 2,606 .Texas 175 0 48,934 55 2 23,040 Utah 4 0 5 0 0 0 Vermont 0 0 0 12 0 548 Virginia 2 0 5 2 0 10 Washington 1 0 0 21 0 7,270 We t Virginia 1 0 0 39 1 69,140 Wisoonsln 22 1 36.,728 39 3 7,638 Wyoming 10 0 0 25 2 16,626 9 0 140 Totals 1148 11 404,160 75 0 17,839 Data from NWS, National Severe Storms Forecast Center. 1. There is no single source of tornado damage statistics. Damage estimates may be underestimated. Information on tornado events that occurred at the end of the fiscal year is subject to greater uncertainty because reports may be either preliminary or unavailable. These data reprint the best data available at the time of publication, and provide a good indication of the scope of damage in each state. SThis number represents the sum of all of the tornadoes reported by all of the states through the end of the fiscal year. Final confirmation and/or verification of tornadoes can take several months, therefore the number of tornadoes is subject to change. These data represent the best available data at the time of publication, and provide a reasonably accurate estimate of the number of confirmed tornadoes. Atlantic Ocean Basiz tropical cyclones and their effects (damages in dollars) on the United States during Fiscal Year 1992. Name Month and Year Location U.S. Deaths U.S. Damage 1. Tropical Storm Fabian Oct. 1991 Caribbean/Florida 0 - 2. Hurricane Grace Oct. 1991 Atlantic/Bermuda 0 - 3. Unnamed Hurricane Nov. 1991 Atlantic/Nova Scotia 0 4. Hurricane Andrew Aug. 1992 Bahamas/Southeastern U.S. 50 $ 20 - 30 billion 5. Hurricane Bonnie Sep./Oct. 1992 Atlantic/Azores 0 - 6. Hurricane Charley Sep. 1992 Atlantic/Azores 0 7. Tropical Storm Danielle Sep. 1992 Atlantic/Eastern U.S. 1 - 8. Tropical Storm Earl Sep. 1992 Atlantic 0 - i. This hurricane formed near the center of a large non-tropical storm (the great "Halloween Storm). Though never named, the hurricane was a true tropical cyclone, and thus is being included as such in this report. The hurricane had no impact on the United States. Rather, it was the huge Halloween Storm which was blamed for at least four deaths and hundreds of millions of dollars of damage along much of the Eastern Seaboard, due to extraordinary sea conditions, high winds, beach erosion and coastal flooding. 2. Of these 50 United States fatalities, 44 occurred in Florida (15 as a direct result of the hurricane, another 29 as an indirect result), while six perished in Louisiana (all directly related to the hurricane). Of the deaths directly related to the hurricane, most occurred as a result of the high winds. Others died as a result of high sea conditions, tornadoes or other hurricane effects. No deaths were reported as a result of rainfall-induced flooding. Four other deaths were reported in the Bahamas (three direct and one indirect). Thus, Hurricane Andrew resulted in a total of 54 fatalities: 24 as a direct result of the storm's effects, and 30 due to indirect causes. 3. Damage estimates in Florida range from $15-30 billion. I)amages in Louisiana are estimated at close to $1 billion. Damages in the Bahamas are estimated at $0.25 billion. The majority of the damages produced by lurricane Andrew were caused by the strong winds. Other hurricane effects which caused damages included storm surges and coastal flooding, tornadoes, high seas and beach erosion. Only a minimal amount of damage was produced by rainfall-induced flooding. 4. This death occurred when a sailboat east of New Jersey sank in the storm, drowning one person. C) I 01 A AIWW - Mooring Basins (SAW) 6-29 AIWW - New River Onslow County, NC (SAW) 6-29 AIWW - Norfolk to St. Johns River, FL (SAJ) 9-51 AIWW - Peltier Creek, 12-foot project (SAW) 6-29 AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut (SAW) 6-29 Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD (MRO) 26-21 Aberdeen Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Aberdeen, MS (SAM) 10-56 Aberdeen, OH (ORH) 17-22 Abescon Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Abilene, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Abiquiu Dam, NM (SWA) 32-5, 32-14, 32-18 Absecon Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Accotink Creek, VA (NAB) 4-32 Acequias Irrigation System, NM (SWA) 32-1, 32-12, 32-16 Active Investigations Charleston District (SAN) 7-9 Ada County Unit (NPW) 39-17 Adams Creek, SC (SAN) 7-17 Adams, Hossie River Basin, MA (NAN) 2-32 Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX (SWG) 31-11 Addison, NY (NAB) 4-12, 4-24 Adena, OH (Short Creek) (ORP) 18-24 Adkin Branch, NC (SAW) 6-29, 6-32 Advance Engineering and Design Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-20 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-15 Detroit District (NCE) 21-46 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-12 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-8 Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 Mobile District (SAM) 10-31 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Portland District (NPP) 37-21 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 Seattle District (NPS) 38-12 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-17 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-12 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-8 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-18 Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Agana Bayfront, Guam (POD) 36-12 Agana River, Guam (POD) 36-9 Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-7 Agat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-7 Akutan, AK (NPA) 40-13 Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-10 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA (SAM) 10-24, 10-37, 10-52, 10-47 Alabama River at Montgomery, AL (SAM) 10-50, 10-51 Alabama River, Selma AL (SAM) 10-51 Alameda Creek, CA (SPK) 35-38 Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, NM (SWA) 32-19 Alamogordo, NM (SWA) 32-2, 32-12 Alamosa, CO (SWA) 32-2, 32-12, 32-16 Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal, VA (NAO) 5-16 Albeni Falls Dam, ID (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-23 Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM (SWA) 32-2, 32-13 Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-3, 36-5, 36-6 Alford, Green River, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-55 Algoma Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-84 Alhambra Creek, CA (SPK) 35-40 Alii Drive, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-11 Aliso Creek Dam (SPL) 33-32 Allatoona Dam - Coosa River Basin, GA (SAM) 10-26, 10-37 Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-23 Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP) 18-23 Allegheny River, open channel work (ORP) 18-21 Allegheny River, PA (ORP) 18-2, 18-13, 18-17, 18-25 Allentown, Lehigh River, PA (NAP) 3-27 Allenville, AZ (SPL) 33-30 Alley Bay, Beals, ME (NED) 1-46 Alligator Branch, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Allison Lake (Valdez Hydropower), AK (NPA) 40-12 Alloway Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-25, 3-26 Alma Harbor, WI 25-7 Almond Lake, NY (NAB) 4-12, 4-24 Almond Village, NY (NAB) 4-36 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 I-1 Aloha Rigolette, LA (LMK) 12-3, 12-10, 12-12 Alpena Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-2, 21-48, 21-69 Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL (NCR) 23-14 Alpine, TX (SWA) 32-19 Alsea River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers (SAS) 8-2, 8-11, 8-13 Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN) 11-15 Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir (NED) 1-47, 1-49 Alton, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO (LSM) 14-3, 14-9, 14-12 Altoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, GA (SAM) 10-47 Alum Creek Lake, OH (ORH) 17-2, 17-12, 17-17 Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Amazon Creek, OR (NPP) 37-38 Ambrose Channel (NAN) 2-28 American and Sacramento Rivers, CA (SPK) 35-34 American River, CA (SPK) 35-38 Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA (NCR) 23-13 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-56 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA (LMN) 11-15 Amite River and Tributaries, LA (LMN) 11-17 Amory, MS (SAM) 10-56 Amsterdam, OH (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Anacortes Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-1, 38-14, 38-20 Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA (NPS) 38-25 Anacostia River (NAB) 4-38 Anacostia River and Flats (NAB) 4-32 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation, Improvements, DC & MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-30, 4-35 Anacostia River Basin (NAB) 4-38 Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-29 Anahuac Channel, TX (SWG) 31-8 Anchor Point, AK (NPA) 40-13 Anchorage Harbor (Uncompleted Portion), AK (NPA) 40-12 Anchorage Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-1, 40-7, 40-9 Anchorages, VA (NAO) 5-15 Anclote River, FL (SAJ) 9-49, 9-51 Andalusia Harbor, IL 25-7 Anderson, IN (White River) (ORL) 16-26 Anderson Park, Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-18 Andover Lake, CT (NED) 1-47, 1-49 Andrews River, MA (NED) 1-41 Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO (LSM) 14-18 Annapolis Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-32 Ansonia-Derby, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-55 Antelope and Blackburn Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-44 Antelope Creek, CA (SPK) 35-43 Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE (MRO) 26-21 Antelope - Little Bear Creek, Eagle Point, OR (NPP) 37-42 Apalachicola Bay, FL (SAM) 10-3, 10-33, 10-39, 10-52 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA (SAM) 10-27, 10-37, 10-48, 10-53 Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NPP) 37-10, 37-24, 37-33, 37-43 Appomattox River, VA (NAO) 5-2, 5-9, 5-13, 5-17 Appon Mouth of Yukon River, AK (NPA) 40-11 Apponaug Cove, RI (NED) 1-41 Appoquinimink River, DE (NAP) 3-25, 3-28 Apra Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-11 Aquashicola Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-28 Aquatic Plant Control Charleston District (SAN) 7-1, 7-10, 7-13, 7-17 Galveston District (SWG) 31-2, 31-19, 31-23, 31-38 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-2, 9-26, 9-34, 9-34 Mobile District (SAM) 10-3, 10-33, 10-39 New England Division (NED) 1-3, 1-26, 1-35 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-15 New York District (NAN) 2-3, 2-18, 2-22 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-26 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-26, 35-38 Savannah District (SAS) 8-2, 8-11, 8-13 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-2, 6-19, 6-26 Aquia Creek, VA (NAB) 4-32 Aquilla Lake, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Ararat River, Mount Airy, NC (SAW) 6-28 Arcadia Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-3, 21-48, 21-69 Arcadia Lake, OK (SWT) 29-2, 29-13, 29-20 Arch Creek, Dade County, FL (SAJ) 9-50 Archers Creek, SC (SAN) 7-17 Archusa Creek, MS (SAM) 10-56 Ardsley, NY (NAN) 2-32 Area East of Albany, OR (NPP) 37-40 Area V, Estelline Springs, TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-13, 29-21 Area VIII, TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-13 Arecibo Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-26, 9-34 I-2 Arkansas City (SWT) 29-30 Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK and TX (SWT) 29-3, 29-13, 29-21 Arkansas River Basin, AR and OK (SWT) 29-29 Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK and KS (SWL) 28-2, 28-14, 28-18 Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK and KS: Navigation 28-24, 28-25, 28-26, 28-27 Arkansas River Basin Multiple-Purpose Plan (SWT) 29-26 Arkansas River, Great Bend, KS to Tulsa, OK (SWT) 29-29 Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR (SWL) 28-21 Arkansas River, Moffett, OK (SWT) 29-27 Arkport Dam, NY (NAB) 4-12, 4-24 Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR (NPP) 37-38 Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 Arlington Lake, MO (MRK) 27-18 Armuchee Creek, GA (SAM) 10-50 Arroyo Colorado, TX (SWG) 31-14, 31-38 Arthur Kill Channel (NAN) 2-28 Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9), AR (SWL) 28-2 Asan Village, Guam (POD) 36-9 Ashland Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-3, 21-48, 21-69 Ashland, KY (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Ashley River, SC (SAN) 7-17 Ashtabula Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-2, 20-16, 20-24 Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID (NPW) 39-15 Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID & WA (NPW) 39-17 Asquiroga Bay, Guam (POD) 36-8 Astoria Turning Basin, OR (NPP) 37-36 Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA (LMN) 11-15 Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA (LMN) 11-15 Atchinson, KS (MRK) 27-17 Athalia, OH (ORH) 17-22 Athens, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Atkinson Creek, Green County, MS (SAM) 10-51 Atka, AK (NPA) 40-13 Atlantic Beach Channels, NC (SAW) 6-26 Atlantic City, NJ (NAP) 3-28 Atlantic Coast of Maryland (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-30 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (SAS) 8-3, 8-11, 8-13 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-26, 9-34 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (SAW) 6-2, 6-19, 6-23 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (SAN) 7-2, 7-10, 7-13 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL (NAO) 5-2, 5-9, 5-13 Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Auasi Harbor American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Auburn, NY, Owasco Outlet (NCB) 20-42 Auburn Water Pump Facility, Auburn, NY (NCB) 20-44 Auglaize River, Paulding County, OH (NCB) 20-44 Augusta, KY (ORH) 17-21 Augusta LPP, KS (SWT) 29-24 Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA (NED) 1-51 Aunuu Harbor American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Aurora, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam, CO (MRO) 26-19 AuSable Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-3, 21-48, 21-69 Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects Detroit District (NCE) 21-38 Authorized Bridge Alteration New England Division (NED) 1-9 Avalon (SPL) 33-28 Avoca, NY (NAB) 4-12, 4-24 Avon Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-26 Avon, OH (NCB) 20-43 Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA (NAB) 4-11, 4-24 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC (SAW) 6-11, 6-21 Bachelor Island, WA (NPP) 37-40 Back Creek, MD (NAB) 4-32 Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre, SD (MRO) 26-19 Badger Creek, Glacier City, MT (MRO) 26-24 Bagaduce River, ME (NED) 1-46, 1-41 Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-47, 1-49 Bailey Creek, Indianapolis, IN (ORL) 16-37 Bainbridge, NY (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Baker Brook, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-49 Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-2, 9-26, 9-34 I-3 Ball Mountain Lake, VT (NED) 1-12, 1-29, 1-53 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA (NAB) 4-3, 4-22, 4-27, (NAO) 5-2, 5-9, 5-13, 5-19 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD (Ferry Bar and Spring Garden Channel) (NAB) 4-36 Baltimore Harbor, MD Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-4, 4-22, 4-28 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR (NPP) 37-36 Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Banning Levee-San Gorgonio River, Riverside County (SPL) 33-31 Bar Harbor Bar, ME (NED) 1-41 Bar Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41 Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Bar Point Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Barataria Bay Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-15 Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Barbour Creek, Eufaula, AL (SAM) 10-51 Barbourville, KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Barcelona Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-40 Bardwell Lake, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Barkley Dam and Lake, Barkley, KY and TN (ORN) 15-14 Barnard, KS (MRK) 27-17 Barnegat Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-2, 3-16, 3-20 Barnegat Light, NJ (NAP) 3-28 Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River) (ORL) 16-29 Barre Falls Dam, MA (NED) 1-12, 1-29, 1-53 Barren River Lake, KY (ORL) 16-5, 16-14, 16-32 Barrow, AK (NPA) 40-13 Bartley, NE (MRK) 27-1727-20 Bass Harbor Bar, ME (NED) 1-41 Bass Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41, 1-51 Bassett Creek, MN (NCS) 24-4, 24-18 Bastrop Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Batavia and Vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, NY (NCB) 20-42 Bath, NY (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Baton Rouge Harbor Segment between Mi 2.5 and 5.0 (LMN) 11-18 Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek, NE (MRO) 26-20 Baudette Harbor, MN (NCS) 24-23 Bay City Harbor, WI 25-7 Bay Ridge, Red Hook Channels, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-18, 2-22, 2-28 Bay River, NC (SAW) 6-26 Bayard, WV (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 Bayfield Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-84, 21-90 Bayou Bartholomew, LA and MO (LMK) 12-16, 12-23 Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, AR and LA (LMK) 12-4, 12-10, 12-12, 12-19 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Bayou Bonfouca, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Choupique, LA (LMN) 11-17 Bayou Coden, AL (SAM) 10-3, 10-33, 10-39, 10-52 Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Dupre, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Grosse Tete, LA (LMN) 11-18 Bayou La Batre, AL (SAM) 10-4, 10-33, 10-39, 10-52 Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Lacombe, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA (LMK) 12-19 Bayou Pierre in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-19, 12-20, 12-21 Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Rapides, LA (LMN) 11-17 Bayou Rigolette, LA (LMN) 11-13 Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Teche & Vermillion River, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Teche, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Terrebonne, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayou Vermillion, LA (LMN) 11-15 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA (LMK) 12-16 Bayport, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Bayport Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-4, 21-48, 21-69 Baytown, TX (SWG) 31-38 Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) New England Division (NED) 1-10 Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction C-1 Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization Baltimore District (NAB) 4-8 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-12 Charleston District (SAN) 7-8 I-4 Chicago District (NCC) 22-7 Detroit District (NCE) 21-39 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-20 Mobile District (SAM) 10-15 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-7, 5-11 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-6 Beal Slough, NE (MRO) 26-23 Beals Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41 Bear Creek, County Route 276, Marion County, MO (NCR) 23-16 Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Bear Creek Lake, CO (MRO) 26-226-9, 26-12 Bear Creek, Flathead County Bridge, near Essex, MT (NPS) 38-26 Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID (NPW) 39-15 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Bear Creek, Medford, OR (NPP) 37-38 Bear Creek, NC (SAW) 6-32 Bear Creek, Vernonia, OR (NPP) 37-42 Bear River, CA (SPK) 35-40 Bear Stream, CA (SPK) 35-42 Beards Brook Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-49 Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE (MRK) 27-18 Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-19, 6-24 Beaver Bay, MN (NCE) 21-84 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Beaver Brook Lake, NH (NED) 1-49 Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA (SAM) 10-50 Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR (NPP) 37-38 Beaver Creek, Platte County, NE (MRO) 26-24 Beaver Creek, Troutdale, OR (NPP) 37-42 Beaver Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-38 Beaver Lake, AR (SWL) 28-10, 28-16, 28-30 Beaver Run/Walnut Creek, Millcreek, PA (NCB) 20-43 Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA (MRK) 27-17 Beebe Lake, Frankfort, MN (NCS) 24-30 Beech Fork Lake, WV (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Beechwood Girl Scout Camp, Sodus, NY (NCB) 20-44 Belfast Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41, 1-58 Belford, NJ (NAN) 2-35 Belhaven Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-26 Belington, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR (SWL) 28-22, 28-30 Bellaire, PA (ORP) 18-24 Bellamy River, NH (NED) 1-41 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River, SD (MRO) 26-19 Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD (MRO) 26-15 Belle River, MI (NCE) 21-84 Bellevue, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Bellingham Harbor (I&J Street Waterway), WA (NPS) 38-25 Bellingham Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-20 Bellville Point, GA (SAS) 8-18 Belpre, OH (ORH) 17-22 Beltline Road, Cameron, TX (SWF) 30-23 Belton Lake Modification, TX (SWF) 30-22 Belton Lake, TX (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Beltzville Lake, PA (NAP) 3-11, 3-18, 3-23 Benbrook Lake, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Bennett Creek, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-9, 5-13, 5-17 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-21 Bennington Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-49 Bennington, VT (NAN) 2-34 Benwood, WV (ORP) 18-22 Berkeley Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-13 Berkeley Marina, CA (SPN) 34-13 Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP) 18-6, 18-13, 18-18 Berrien County, MI (St. Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-86 Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River, AK (NPA) 40-12 Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-8, 40-10 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-7, 40-9, 40-11 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA (NAP) 3-27 Bettendorf, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Betterton Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-36 Beverly Harbor, MA (NED) 1-41 Beverly Hills, McLennan County, TX (SWF) 30-23 Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH (NCB) 20-40 Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks (SWT) 29-30 Big and Little Sallisaw Navigation Project (SWT) 29-23 Big Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-4, 21-49, 21-69 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-6, 26-11, 26-14, 26-18 Big Bend Wildlife Restoration (MRO) 26-22 I-5 Big Bend, WV (ORH) 17-23 Big Black River, MS (LMK) 12-16, 12-21 Big Blue Lake, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31, 16-33 Big Blue River, Seward, NE (MRK) 27-17 Big Brown Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-21 Big Coulee to Devils Lake, ND (NCS) 24-31 Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR (LMM) 13-7 Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN (LMM) 13-6 Big Darby, OH (ORH) 17-23 Big Dry Creek Dam and Diversion, CA (SPK) 35-38 Big Fork River, MN (NCS) 24-30 Big Fossil Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Big Fossil Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges, MT (MRO) 26-19 Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin, MT (MRO) 26-19 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA (LMN) 11-15 Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24 Big Pine Lake, TX (SWT) 29-24 Big River Reservoir, RI (NED) 1-49 Big Run, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Big Sandy Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-15 Big Sioux River/Dakota Dunes, SD (MRO) 26-23 Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau, SD (MRO) 26-19 Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh, SD (MRO) 26-19 Big Sioux River, Jefferson, SD (MRO) 26-19 Big Sioux River, North Sioux City, SD (MRO) 26-19 Big Sioux River, Plymouth County, IA (MRO) 26-21 Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau, SD (MRO) 26-19 Big Sioux River, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-21 Big Sioux River, Union County, SD (MRO) 26-19 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN (ORN), 15-4, 15-9 Big Spring, TX (SWF) 30-22 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD (NCS) 24-4, 24-18, 24-29 Big Stranger Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17 Big Suamico Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-84, 21-90 Big Sunflower River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Big Swan D&L District, Illinois River, IL (LSM) 14-18 Big Thompson River, Johnstown, CO (MRO) 26-19 Big Timber Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Big Walnut Creek, 500 W. Putnam Co., IN (ORL) 16-37 Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-33 Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT (SPK) 35-38 Big Wood River, ID (NPW) 39-15 Billings, MT (MRO) 26-17 Biloxi Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-4, 10-33, 10-40, 10-52 Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Binghamton, NY (NAB) 4-13, 4-24 Birch Hill Dam, MA (NED) 1-13, 1-29, 1-53 Birch Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-13, 29-21 Birch, WV (ORH) 17-23 Bird Rock Area, La Jolla, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-29 Biscayne Bay, FL Hurricane Protection (SAJ) 9-50 Bitter Creek and Rock Springs, WY (SPK) 35-44 Bitterroot River, Florence, MT (NPS) 38-26 Black Bayou Lake, LA (LMK) 12-20 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA (LMK) 12-21 Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Crow Wing City, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Black Creek, Gadsden, AL (SAM) 10-50 Black Creek, Town of Chili, NY (NCB) 20-43 Black Fork at Hendricks, WV (ORP) 18-23 Black River (Alcona County), MI (NCE) 21-84 Black River (Port Huron), MI (NCE) 21-4, 21-49, 21-69 Black River, AR and MO (SWL) 28-21 Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (SWL) 28-22 Black River Falls, WI (NCS) 24-29 Black River Harbor (U.P.), MI (NCE) 21-5, 21-49, 21-70 Black River Harbor, Alcona County, MI Authorized Dec. 17, 1979 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act (NCE) 21-86 Black River Harbor, MI (1936 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-86 Black River Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-40 Black River Lake, WI (NCS) 24-26 Black River, NC (SAW) 6-26, 6-28 I-6 Black River Obstruction Removal, Butler County, AR (SWL) 28-5, 28-14 Black River, WI (NCS) 24-23, 24-26, 24-29, 24-30 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-2, 20-16, 20-24 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY, 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY, 1935 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Black Rock Harbor, CT (NED) 1-41 Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Black Rock Lake, CT (NED) 1-17, 1-31, 1-55 Black Walnut Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-32 Black Walnut Point, MD (NAB) 4-35 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL (SAM) 10-5, 10-33, 10-40, 10-54 Black Warrior River, North Port, AL (SAM) 10-51 Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL (SAM) 10-50 Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA (SAW) 6-32 Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE (MRO) 26-15, 26-20 Blackboy Creek, Tulsa County, OK (SWT) 29-27 Blackfoot Reservoir, ID (NPW) 39-17 Blackfoot River, ID (NPW) 39-18 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT (NPS) 38-26 Blackhawk Creek, Davenport, IA (NCR) 23-15 Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI (NED) 1-11 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-53 Blackwater Dam, NH (NED) 1-19, 1-31, 1-56 Blackwater River, Milton, FL (SAM) 10-49, 10-51, 10-52 Blackwater River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-17 Blaine Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 Bldwn, Sqw Creek Lndr Swg Lgn, WY (MRO) 26-23 Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Blue Bluff Road, Morgan County, IN (ORL) 16-37 Blue Marsh Lake, PA (NAP) 3-11, 3-18, 3-23 Blue Mountain Lake, AR (SWL) 28-5, 28-14, 28-28 Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO (MRK) 27-2, 27-10, 27-13 Blue River Lake, OR (NPP) 37-11, 37-25, 37-33, 37-43 Blue River, Salem, IN (ORL) 16-24 Bluegrass Creek, Audubon, IA (MRO) 26-23 Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-1,7 Bluff Creek, MS (SAM) 10-49 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors 41-1 Bodega Bay, CA (SPN) 34-7 Bodie Island, NC (SAW) 6-29 Boeuf River, LA (LMK) 12-16 Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA (NPS) 38-26 Bogachiel River, Undie Road, near Forks, WA (NPS) 38-26 Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso, FL (SAM) 10-15, 10-35, 10-46 Boggy Creek, Bryan County, OK (SWT) 29-28 Boggy Creek, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Boise River, ID (NPW) 39-15 Boise Valley, ID (NPW) 39-17 Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL (SAM) 10-50 Bolivar, NY (ORP) 18-29 Bolles Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-5, 21-49, 21-70 Bon Secour River, AL (SAM) 10-7, 10-33, 10-41, 10-52 Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND (NCS) 24-24 Bonneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-32 Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and WA (NPP) 37-15, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (NPP) 37-2, 37-22, 37-29 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Bonum Creek, VA (NAB) 4-4, 4-22, 4-28 Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) (ORL) 16-23 Boothbay Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41, 1-58 Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) (NED) 1-49 Boston Harbor, MA (NED) 1-3, 1-26, 1-35 Boswell Lake, OK (SWT) 29-24 Boulder, CO (MRO) 26-17 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA (NED) 1-46 Bowman-Haley Lake, ND (MRO) 26-2, 26-9, 26-12 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA (ORP) 18-24 Bradenton Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-61 Bradford, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Bradford, TN (LMM) 13-6 Bradley Lake, AK (NPA) 40-12 Brake Branch, Montgomery County, VA (SAW) 6-32 Bramwell, WV (ORH) 17-24 I-7 Branford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-41 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA (NAB) 4-32 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA (NED) 1-49 Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 Brays Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-11 Brazos Island Harbor, (SWG) 31-2, 31-19, 31-23, 31-39, 31-40, 31-45 Brazos River, Velasco to Old Washington, TX (SWG) 31-38 Breton Bay, MD (1902 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-36 Breton Bay, MD (NAB) 4-32 Brevard County, FL (SAJ) 9-16, 9-31, 9-45 Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Bridge, Mary Creek, TX (SWF) 30-23 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (NED) 1-41, 1-58 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) (NPP) 37-36 Bridgewater, VA (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 Brigantine Island (NAP) 3-27 Brilliant, OH (ORP) 18-24 Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI (NED) 1-41 Broad Creek, Beaufort, NC (SAW) 6-28 Broad Creek, MD (NAB) 4-32 Broad Creek River, DE (NAB) 4-32 Broad Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Broadkill River, DE (NAP) 3-25 Broadwater Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 Broadway Street, Pecan Creek, Gainsville, TX (SWF) 30-23 Brockway Lake, VT (NED) 1-49 Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 Broken Bow Lake, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-19, 29-22 Broken Bow, Mud Creek, NE (MRO) 26-20 Bromley, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Bronx River, NY (NAN) 2-29, 2-34 Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 Brookfield, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Brookgreen Gardens, SC (SAN) 7-2, 7-10, 7-13 Brooklyn, WV (ORH) 17-22 Brookport, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Brookville Lake, KY (ORL) 16-5, 16-15 Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project (SAJ) 9-16, 9-31, 9-45 Browder Creek, Springton, TX (SWF) 30-23 Browns Creek (NAN) 2-28, 2-29, 2-34 Browns Creek, Nashville, TN (ORN) 15-18 Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-22 Brunswick County Beaches (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line), NC (SAW) 6-28 Brunswick County Beaches - Long Beach Portion - Berm, NC (SAW) 6-29 Brunswick Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-3, 8-11, 8-13 Brush Creek, Jeanette, PA (plans and specifications) (ORP) 18-30 Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-13 Buck Creek, NC & SC (SAN) 7-18 Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA (SPK) 35-5, 35-27 Buckhannon River, WV (ORP) 18-21 Buckhannon, WV (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Buckhorn Lake, KY (ORL) 16-6, 16-15, 16-32 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME (NED) 1-41 Bucksport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41 Buena Vista, OH (ORH) 17-22 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 31-10, 31-20, 31-35 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, Scranton, ND (MRO) 26-15 Buffalo Harbor Drift Removal, NY (NCB) 20-45 Buffalo Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-2, 20-16, 20-25 Buffalo, Johnson County, Diversion Channel, WY (MRO) 26-17 Buffalo River, MS (LMK) 12-23 Buffalo Ship Channel, Buffalo, NY (NCB) 20-45 Buffalo Small Boar Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-3, 20-16, 20-26 Buffumville Lake, MA (NED) 1-21, 1-32, 1-57 Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA (SAM) 10-28, 10-37, 10-48 Bull Run, PA (NAB) 4-35 Bull Shoals Lake, AR (SWL) 28-10, 28-17, 28-30 Bullocks Point Cove, RI (NED) 1-41 Bunker Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41 Burch and Jewett Creeks near Corning, CA (SPK) 35-44 Burch Creek, Weber County, UT (SPK) 35-38 I-8 Burgettstown, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT (NED) 1-45 Burketts Creek, Amory, MS (SAM) 10-50, 10-51 Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND (NCS) 24-24 Burlington Harbor, VT (NAN) 2-29 Burlington, IA (NCR) 23-14 Burns Stream, CA (SPK) 35-42 Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-2, 22-12, 22-15, 22-19 Burns Waterway SBH, IN (NCC) 22-2, 22-12, 22-15, 22-19 Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Burt-Washington Counties, NE (MRO) 26-21 Butler County Drainage District 3, MO (SWL) 28-22 Butler, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Buttahatchee Creek, MS (SAM) 10-50 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA (NED) 1-41 Buttermilk Channel, NY (NAN) 2-29 Butternut Creek, East Syracuse, NY (NCB) 20-44 Bypass Levees, CA (SPK) 35-43 Byram River at Pemberwick, CN (NAN) 2-32 C Cabrillo Beach (SPL) 33-29 Cache Creek Basin, (Cache Creek Settling Basin), CA (SPK) 35-6, 35-25, 35-27, 35-34 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant), CO (MRO) 26-19 Cache La Poudre River, Greely, CO (MRO) 26-23 Cache La Poudre River, Windsor, CO (MRO) 26-19 Cache River Diversion, IL (LSM) 14-16 Cache River Levee, IL (ORL) 16-34 Cache River, Upper Basin, IL (ORL) 16-24 Caddo Lake Dam, LA (LMK) 12-21 Caddo Lake, LA (LMK) 12-19 Cadet Bayou, MS (SAM) 10-52, 10-49 Cadle Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 Caesar Creek Lake, OH (ORL) 16-6, 16-15, 16-32 Cagles Mill Lake, IN (ORL) 16-6, 16-15, 16-32 Cairo, WV (ORH) 17-24 Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II, Illinois Waterway, IL and IN (NCR) 23-13 Calabash Creek, Brunswick County, NC (SAN) 7-17 Calapooya River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA (SPK) 35-6, 35-27 Calcasieu Pass Channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA (LMN) 11-16 Calcasieu River and Pass, LA (LMN) 11-15 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA (LMN) 11-15 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA (LMN) 11-15 Calcasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA (LMN) 11-15 Caledonia, Genesee River, NY 1950 FC Act (NCB) 20-45 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT (NED) 1-45 Calhoun County (SAM) 10-56 Caliente Creek, CA (SPK) 35-34 California (Cincinnati), OH (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Calion, AR (H.K. Thatcher) (LMK) 12-15, 12-18 Calispell Creek, WA (NPS) 38-30 Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF) 30-22 Calloway Branch, Richland Hills, TX (SWF) 30-23 Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (NCC) 22-2, 22-12, 22-15, 22-19, 22-21 Calumet River Bridges (NCC) 22-20 Camas Creek, ID (NPW) 39-17 Cambridge Harbor, MD (1948 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-36 Cambridge Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-32 Cambridgeport Lake, VT (NED) 1-49 Camden Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41, 1-58 Camelsback Dam (Gila River) (SPL) 33-30 Camp Facility, Red River, Telephone TX (SWT) 29-28 Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-24 Camp Perry, OH (NCB) 20-42 Campbells Island, Mississippi River, IL (NCR) 23-13 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY (NCB) 20-43, 20-44 Canadian River, OK, TX, NM (SWT) 29-29 Canal 43, AR (LMK) 12-4, 12-10, 12-12 Canapitsit Channel, MA (NED) 1-41 Canaseraga Creek, Dansville, NY (NCB) 20-44 Canaveral Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-3, 9-26, 9-34, 9-52 Candy Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-14, 29-21 Cane River, LA (LMN) 11-15 Caney Creek, MS (LMK) 12-12 Caney Fork River, Carthage, TN (ORN) 15-18 Caney Fork River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Canisteo, NY (NAB) 4-13, 4-24 I-9 Cannelton, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Canneries to Breakers Point, American Samoa (POD) 36-12 Cannon River at Faribault, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Cannonball River, Sheilds, ND (MRO) 26-23 Cano Cacul, Aguidilla, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Canton (Nimishillen), OH (ORH) 17-24 Canton Creek, GA (SAM) 10-56 Canton Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Canton Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-14, 29-21, 29-26 Canton, MA (NED) 1-46 Canton, MO (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Canyon County Unit (NPW) 39-17 Canyon Lake, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Cap Vincent Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-40 Cape Charles, VA (NAO) 5-7, 5-11, 5-15, 5-17, 5-19 Cape Cod Canal, MA (NED) 1-3, 1-26, 1-36 Cape Fear River, Above Wilmington, NC (SAW) 6-4, 6-19 Cape Fear River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-10, 6-31 Cape Florida State park, FL (SAJ) 9-50 Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO (LSM) 14-4, 14-9, 14-12 Cape Girardeau, MO No. 2, MO (LSM) 14-16 Cape Girardeau, MO Reaches Nos. 1, 3 and 4 (LSM) 14-18 Cape Henry Channel, VA (NAO) 5-13 Cape Lookout, NC (SAW) 6-29 Cape May City, NJ (NAP) 3-28 Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (NAP) 3-10, 3-18, 3-23 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Carlyle Lake, IL (LSM) 14-16 Carneros Creek, CA (SPL) 33-8, 33-14 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, NC (SAW) 6-11, 6-21 Carpenters Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Carr Fork Lake, KY (ORL) 16-7, 16-15, 16-32 Carrabelle Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-52, 10-49 Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-13 Carrollton, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Carson River below Lahontan Dam, Fallon, NV (SPK) 35-44 Carters Creek, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-17 Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA (SAM) 10-24, 10-37 Caruthersville Harbor, MO (LMM) 13-5 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME (NED) 1-41 Carysville, FL (SAM) 10-51 Cascadia Lake, OR (NPP) 37-38 Cascadia Lake, OR (NPP) 37-40 Caseville Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-6, 21-50, 21-70 Caseyville, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Cashie River, NC (SAW) 6-26 Casino Beach, IL (NCC) 22-6, 22-13, 22-17 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA (NPP) 37-38 Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO (MRO) 26-17 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene, TX (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 Cataldo, ID (NPS) 38-31 Catching Inlet Drainage District, Coos River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Catfish Branch, Kingston, NC (SAW) 6-32 Cathance River, ME (NED) 1-41 Catherine Creek Lake, OR (NPW) 39-12, 39-15, 39-17 Catherine Creek, OR (NPW) 39-12, 39-15 Cathlamet, WA (NPP) 37-36 Cattaraugus Creek, NY (NCB) 20-40 Cattaraugus Creek, Village of Arcade, NY (NCB) 20-44 Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-3, 20-16, 20-26 Cattlesburg, KY (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Cave-in-Rock, IL (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Cave Run Lake, KY (ORL) 16-7, 16-15, 16-32 Cave Springs, GA (SAM) 10-56 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY (NCB) 20-42 Cazenovia Creek, NY (NCB) 20-43 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN (ORL) 16-7, 16-15, 16-32 Cedar Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Cedar Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-52 Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD (MRO) 26-15 Cedar Creek at Cedar Lodge, NE (MRO) 26-23 Cedar Creek, Jacksonville, FL (SAJ) 9-61 Cedar Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-2, 3-16, 3-20 Cedar Creek, Spaulding, NE (MRO) 26-23 Cedar Falls, Cedar River, IA (NCR) 23-15 Cedar Hammock, Bradenton, FL (SAJ) 9-61 Cedar Key Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-49, 9-51 Cedar Point, GA (SAS) 8-18 Cedar Point Lake, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-29 I-10 Cedar River Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84 Cedar River, Kenton, WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-31 Cedar River, King County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Celina Dam, KY (ORN) 15-14 Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-17 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-20, 9-32, 9-47, 9-55, 9-57, 9-58, 9-59 Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA (NCR) 23-13 Centralia-Chehalis Flood Warning System, WA (NPS) 38-31 Century Park, Lorain, OH (NCB) 20-21, 20-38 Ceredo-Kenova, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Chacon Creek, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Chadakoin River, Jamestown, NY (plans and specifications) (ORP) 18-30 Chagrin River, East Branch, Route 84, OH (NCB) 20-44 Chagrin River, Solon Road, OH (NCB) 20-44 Chambersburg, OH (ORH) 17-22 Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT (NAN) 2-29 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, NC (SAW) 6-26 Channel Connecting York River, VA Back Creek to Slaights Wharf (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-19 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-3, 9-26, 9-34 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, NC (SAW) 6-26 Channel from Phoebus, VA to deepwater in Hampton Roads (NAO) 5-17 Channel Islands Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-12, 33-16 Channel, Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-51 Channel to Liberty, TX (SWG) 31-9 Channel to Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-9, 5-13, 5-17 Channel to Port Bolivar, TX(SWG) 31-2, 31-19, 31-24, 31-39 Channels in Straits of Mackinac, MI (NCE) 21-84 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY (ORL) 16-23 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act) Inactive Units Little Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act) (MRK) 27-17 Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork Units only (MRK) 27-1 Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) (MRK) 27-17 Charleroi, PA (complete) (ORP) 18-30 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA (NED) 1-11, 1-29, 1-39 Charles River Dam, MA (NED) 1-46 Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR (NPP) 37-36 Charleston Harbor, Coos Bay, OR (NPP) 37-41 Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC (SAN) 7-3, 7-10, 7-14 Charleston Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-2, 7-10, 7-13 Charlestown, NH (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Charlevoix Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-6, 21-50, 21-70 Charlotte County, FL (SAJ) 9-45 Charlotte Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-26, 9-34 Chartiers Creek, PA (ORP) 18-4, 18-13, 18-29 Chaska, MN (NCS) 24-5, 24-18 Chatfield Lake, CO (MRO) 26-2, 26-9, 26-12 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (NED) 1-4, 1-26, 1-36 Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL (SAM) 10-50 Chattahoochee River, Franklin, GA (SAM) 10-51 Chattooga River, Trion, GA (SAM) 10-51 Chauvin Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-5, 12-11, 12-13 Cheat River, WV (ORP) 18-21 Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 Cheboygan Harbor, Isle Royale, MI (NCE) 21-84, 21-90 Cheesequake Creek (NAN) 2-28, 2-29, 2-34 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA (LMN) 11-15 Chehalis River, City of Chehalis, Raw Water Pumphouse, WA (NPS) 38-26 Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Chehalis River, Montesano, WA (NPS) 38-26 Chehalis River, Salzer Creek, WA (NPS) 38-31 Chena River Stabilization, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-8, 40-10 Cherokee County, GA (SAM) 10-56 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 Cherry Creek Lake, CO (MRO) 26-3, 26-9, 26-12, 26-18 Cherryfield, ME (NED) 1-46 Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE, 3-20 (NAP) 3-2, 3-16 I-11 Chesapeake, OH (ORH) 17-22 Chesconessex Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Chesire, OH (ORH) 17-22 Chester, CA (SPK) 35-38 Chester River, Delaware County, PA (NAP) 3-28 Chester River, MD (1873 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-36 Chester River, MD (NAB) 4-4, 4-22, 4-28 Chetco River, OR (NPP) 37-2, 37-22, 37-29 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR (NPP) 37-38 Chicago Harbor, (NCC) 22-3, 22-12, 22-15, 22-19 Chicago River, IL (NCC) 22-4, 22-12, 22-16, 22-19 Chicago River, IL (North Branch) (NCC) 22-7, 22-13 Chickasah, OK (SWT) 29-27 Chickasaw Bouge Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL (SAM) 10-50 Chickasawhay River, MS (SAM) 10-56 Chickasha, OK (SWT) 29-27, 29-29 Chico Landing, CA (SPK) 35-40 Chicopee Falls, MA (NED) 1-46 Chicopee, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-23 Chignik, AK (NPA) 40-13 Chikaskia River, Blackwell, OK (SWT) 29-27 Chikaskia River, Blackwell, OK (SWT) 29-28 Chikaskia River, Ft. Oakland, OK (SWT) 29-28 Chillicothe, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Chilo, OH (ORH) 17-22 Chincoteague Bay, VA (NAO) 5-17 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA (NAO) 5-17 Chincoteague Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-9, 5-13, 5-17 Chino Canyon Improvements, Palm Springs (SPL) 33-31 Chippewa River, Montevideo, MN (NCS) 24-30 Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL (SAM) 10-49 Choptank River, MD (NAB) 4-32 Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK (SWT) 29-26 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venic Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-16 Chowan River, NC (NAO) 5-17 Chowan River, NC (SAW) 6-26 Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-49 Chubb Run, Franklin, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Cibolo Creek, TX (SWA) 32-19 Cilley Creek, Cincinnati, OH (ORL) 16-37 Cincinnati, OH (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Cincinnatus, NY (NAB) 4-38 City Creek Levee, San Bernardino County, CA (SPL) 33-30 City Dam, Little Caney River, KS (SWT) 29-28 City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO (MRO) 26-15 City of Isleton, CA (SPK) 35-44 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR (NPP) 37-38 Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-25, 10-37 Clairborne County Port, MS (LMK) 12-16 Clairborne Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-32 Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA (NPS) 38-26 Clallam County (Various Locations), WA (NPS) 38-26 Clallam River, Highway 112, WA (NPS) 38-26 Clanton, AL (SAM) 10-50 Claremont Lake, NH (NED) 1-49 Claremore, OK (SWT) 29-29 Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Salt River, MO (LSM) 14-7, 14-10, 14-14 Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, OH (ORL) 16-8, 16-16 Clarendon to Laconia Circle White River Basin, AR (LMM) 13-7 Clarington, OH (ORP) 18-24 Clarion River, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT (NPS) 38-26 Clark Fort River, Drummond, MT (NPS) 38-26 Clark Fort River, Superior, MT (NPS) 38-26 Clark Fort River, Vicinity of Plains, MT (NPS) 38-26 Clark Maritime Center, Jeffersonville, IN (ORL) 16-37 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA (NED) 1-45 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek, NE (MRO) 26-20 Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek (MRO) 26-15 Clarksville, AR (SWL) 28-22 Clatskanie Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-40 Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-40 Clatskanie River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR (NPP) 37-40 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR (NPP) 37-40 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR (NPP) 37-40 1-12 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-40 Clayton County, AL (SAM) 10-56 Clayton County Bridge, Osterdock, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton County, Elport, Osterdock, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton County Road Creek C1X, Site 1, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton County Road Creek, Site 2, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clayton County Road, NW, Osterdock, IA (NCR) 23-16 Clear & Burnt River, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX (SWG) 31-38 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-18 Clear Creek, TX (SWG) 31-12, 31-20, 31-35 Clear River, Burrilville, RI (NED) 1-46, 1-53 Clearwater Lake, MO (SWL) 28-5, 28-15, 28-30 Clearwater Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-49, 9-51 Clearwater River, ID (NPW) 39-18 Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA (NPS) 38-26 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-26 Cleveland Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-3, 20-17, 20-26 Cleves, OH (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI (NED) 1-45 Clifton, AZ (SPL) 33-9, 33-15 Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ (SPL) 33-30 Clifton, WV (ORH) 17-22 Clifty Creek Lake, IN (ORL) 16-27 Clinch River, TN and VA (ORN) 15-13 Clinton Harbor, CT (NED) 1-41, 1-58 Clinton Harbor, IA 25-7 Clinton, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Clinton, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-13 Clinton River, MI (NCE) 21-7, 21-50, 21-70 Cloucester Harbor, Gloucester, MA (NED) 1-51 Cloverport, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Clyde, RI (NED) 1-49 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN (ORN) 15-13 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Coal Creek, Henryetta, OK (SWT) 29-27 Coal Grove, OH (ORH) 17-22 Coal River, WV (ORH) 17-21 Coan River, VA (NAB) 4-36 Coast of California, Point Mugu, to San Pedro Breakwater, CA (SPL) 33-29 Coasters Island Harbor, RI (NED) 1-41 Cobscook Bay, ME (NED) 1-41 Cocheco River, NH (NED) 1-41, 1-46 Cochiti Lake, NM (SWA) 32-6, 32-14, 32-18 Cochiti Wetfields, NM (SWA) 32-2, 32-12 Cochrane, Mississippi River, WI (NCS) 24-29 Cockrells Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Coeur d'Alene River (North Fork), ID (NPS) 38-31 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID (NPS) 38-26 Coeur d'Alene, Springston, ID (NPS) 38-26 Coffee County, AL (SAM) 10-56 Coffee Creek, WA (NPS) 38-26 Cohasset Harbor, MA (NED) 1-41 Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory 44-1 Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-16, 3-20 Coldwater Creek, MO (LSM) 14-4, 14-12 Colebrook River Lake, CT (NED) 1-13, 1-29, 1-53 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Colfax, Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-13, 39-15 Collection and Study of Basic Data Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-20 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-14 Chicago District (NCC) 22-11 Detroit District (NCE) 21-47 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-13 Galveston District (SWG) 31-18 Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-13 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-8 Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 Mobile, District (SAM) 10-31 Nashville District (ORN) 15-8 New England Division (NED) 1-25 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-8, 5-11 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-15 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Portland District (NPP) 37-21 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-6 1-13 Savannah District (SAS) 8-10 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-16 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-12 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-8 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-18 Colliers, WV (ORP) 18-29 Collinsville, AL (SAM) 10-50 Collinsville, CA (SPK) 35-40 Colonial Beach, MD (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-30 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO (SPK) 35-44 Colorado River at Riverside, CO (SPK) 35-44 Colorado River, Matagorda, TX (SWG) 31-38 Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, CO (Templeton Gap Floodway) (SWA) 32-19 Colquitt County, GA (SAM) 10-56 Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (NPP) 37-2, 37-22, 37-29, 37-41 Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Dredging, OR and WA (NPP) 37-16, 37-26, 37-34 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL (LSM) 14-16 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR (NPP) 37-40 Columbia, LA (LMK) 12-15, 12-18 Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA (NPW) 39-15 Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA (NPP) 37-3, 37-22, 37-30 Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA (NPP) 37-4, 37-22, 37-30 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NPW) 39-1, 39-12 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA (NPS) 38-26, 38-30 Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island (NPP) 37-4, 37-22, 37-30 Columbia River between The Dalles and Umatilla, OR (NPP) 37-41 Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR (NPP) 37-4, 37-22, 37-30 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA (NPP) 37-36 Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (The Dalles, 37-26 Project), OR and WA (NPP) 37-16, 37-34 Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (Walla Walla District) (NPW) 39-3, 39-10, 39-13 Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR (NPP) 37-5, 37-22, 37-30 Columbia River, Vancouver, WA (NPP) 37-41 Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA (NPS) 38-25 Columbia Slough, OR (NPP) 37-40 Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-20 Columbus, IN (ORL) 16-24 Columbus, Loup River, NE (MRO) 26-20 Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-56 Columbus, OH (ORH) 17-22 Colusa, CA (SPK) 35-40 Commercial Port Road, Guam (POD) 36-12 Compo Beach, Westport, CT (NED) 1-45 Conant Brook Dam, MA (NED) 1-13, 1-29, 1-53 Conchas Lake, NM (SWA) 32-3, 32-13 Concordia, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-6, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Conesus Lake, Livonia, NY (NCB) 20-22, 20-38 Conetoe Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 Coney Island Channel (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 Coney Island Creek (NAN) 2-28, 2-29, 2-34 Conklin-Kirkwood, NY (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Conneaut Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-4, 20-17, 20-29 Conneaut Lake, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT (NED) 1-49 Connecticut River Basin Fish Passage Facilities for Townshend and Ball Mountain Lakes, West River, VT (NED) 1-14, 1-29, 1-39 Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT (NED) 1-11 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (NED) 1-4, 1-26, 1-36, 1-58 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT (NED) 1-13, 1-29, 1-39 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH (NED) 1-46 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH (NED) 1-46 Connell, WA (NPW) 39-15 Connellsville, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Connoquenessing Creek, Marion Township, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Connoquenessing Creek, Sewickley Township, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Conoho Creek, NC (SAW) 6-29 1-14 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory 43-1 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORD) 19-1, 19-5, 19-6, 18-2 Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River (ORH) 17-2 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORL) 16-2, 16-28 Contentnea Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26, 6-28, 6-29 Continuation of Planning and Engineering Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-12 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Mobile District (SAM) 10-32 Savannah District (SAS) 8-10 Conway County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Conway County Levee District Nos. 1, 2 and 8, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Cook Inlet Shoals, AK (NPA) 40-11 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-4, 7-10, 7-14 Cooper River, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC (SAN) 7-19 Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC (SAN) 7-4, 7-10, 7-14 Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR (NPP) 37-36 Coos Bay, OR (NPP) 37-5, 37-23, 37-30 Coosa River, GA (SAM) 10-56 Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL (SAM) 10-25, 10-37 Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay Rivers, Vicinity of Ellijay, GA (SAM) 10-56 Copan Lake, OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-14, 29-21 Copes Corner Lakes, NY (NAB) 4-36 Coquille River, OR (NPP) 37-6, 37-23, 37-31, 37-40, 37-41 Coralville Lake, IA (NCR) 23-4, 23-10 Coraopolis, PA (ORP) 18-24 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Cordele Creek & Malcolm Branch, GA (SAM) 10-56 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 Cordova, AK (NPA) 40-13 Cordova Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-7, 40-9, 40-11 Core Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME (NED) 1-41 Corning-Monkey Run, NY (NAB) 4-38 Corning, NY (NAB) 4-13, 4-25 Cornucopia Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-8, 21-50, 21-70 Corporation Gulch, Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-23 Corpus Christi Beach (Restoration Project), TX (SWG) 31-10, 31-20, 31-35 Corpus Christi, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal, TX (SWG) 31-38 Corpus Christi Channel, TX (SWG) 31-3, 31-19, 31-24, 31-39, 31-40, 31-45 Corsica River, MD (NAB) 4-32 Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Corte Madera Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Corte Madre Creek, CA (SPK) 35-7, 35-28, 35-35 Cortland, NY (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Cottage Grove Lake, OR (NPP) 37-11, 37-25, 37-33, 37-43 Cottonwood Creek, CA (SPK) 35-38 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID (NPW) 39-17 Cottonwood Creek near Walker Lake Community, NV (SPK) 35-44, 39-15 Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL (LMM) 13-6 Cotuit Harbor, MA (NED) 1-49 Cougar Lake, OR (NPP) 37-17, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) (MRO) 26-15 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) (MRO) 26-15 Council Bluffs, IA (MRO) 26-18, 26-20 Council Grove Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-14, 29-21 County Bridge, Elk River, Elk City, KS (SWT) 29-28 County Bridge, Walnut River, Arkansas City, KS (SWT) 29-28 County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba County, MS (SAM) 10-16, 10-35, 10-46 County Road, (Sec. 2), Deer Creek, KS (SWT) 29-28 County Road, (Sec. 6), Deer Creek, KS (SWT) 29-28 County Road 55, Etowah County, AL (SAM) 10-51 County Road, North Canadian River, OK (SWT) 29-28 County Road, Tyner Creek, Adair (SWT) 29-28 County Road, Washita River, Caddo, OK County Road, Washita River, Caddo City, OK (SWT) 29-28 County Road, Washita River, Carter County, OK (SWT) 29-28 Courtnay Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Cove Island, Stamford, CT (NED) 1-45 I-15 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA (NED) 1-46 Covington County, MS (SAM) 10-56 Covington, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Cow Castle Creek, SC (SAN) 7-18 Cow Castle, Orangeburg County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Cow Creek, Comache, OK (SWT) 29-28 Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS (SWT) 29-25 Cowanesque Lake, PA (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR (NPP) 37-40 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA (NPP) 37-37 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA (NPP) 37-40 Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA (NPP) 37-38 Cowlitz River, WA (NPP) 37-36 Cowpens Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-18 Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Cowskin Creek, Haysville, KS (SWT) 29-27 Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA (SPL) 33-30 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Coyote Creek (Known as Coyote and Berryessa Creeks), CA (SPK) 35-25, 35-34, 35-38 Coyote Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) Channel Improvement below Dam on Lower 98 miles of Russian River, CA (SPK) 35-42, 35-43 Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA (NPS) 38-30 Crabtree Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-18 Craig, AK (NPA) 40-13 Craig Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-7, 40-11 Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Cranes Creek, VA (NAO) 5-3, 5-9, 5-13 Crawford County Levee District, AR (SWL) 28-22 Creede, Willow Creek, CO (Floodway) (SWA) 32-19 Crescent City Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-7 Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL (SAM) 10-16, 10-35, 10-46 Criehaven Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41 Crisfield Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-32 Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN (ORL) 16-37 Crooked Creek, J. Paul Park, Madison, IN (ORL) 16-37 Crooked Creek Lake and Levee, AR (SWL) 28-23 Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-6, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Crooked Creek, Union County, NC (SAW) 6-32 Cross Creek, Fayetteville, NC (SAW) 6-32 Cross Florida Barge Canal, (SAJ) 9-4, 9-27, 9-35, 9-52, 9-53 Cross Lake, NY (NCB) 20-43 Cross Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA (NED) 1-41 Cross Village, MI (NCE) 21-84 Crow River, Rockford, MN (NCS) 24-30 Crutcho Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-24, 29-29 Crystal River, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-13, 33-23 Cuckold Creek, MD (NAB) 4-36 Cuivre River, MO (LSM) 14-15 Cumberland County Streams, NC (SAW) 6-32 Cumberland, KY (ORN) 15-9 Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV (NAB) 4-10, 4-23, 4-30, 4-38 Cumberland River above Nashville, TN (ORN) 15-14 Cumberland River, TN and KY (ORN) 15-2, 15-9, 15-11, 15-15 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT (NED) 1-45 Cunninghill Cove, MD (NAB) 4-36 Curiosity Creek, Tampa, FL (SAJ) 9-61 Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Current River, AR and MO (SWL) 28-21 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA (SAS) 8-19 Curwensville Lake, PA (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR (NPP) 37-36 Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (NED) 1-5, 1-26, 1-37 Cuyahoga River, Akron Peninsula Road, OH (NCB) 20-44 Cuyahoga River at County Highway 10, OH (NCB) 20-44 Cuyahoga River Basin, OH (NCB) 20-42 I-16 Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Road, OH (NCB) 20-44 Cuyahoga River, Tinkers Creek, OH (NCB) 20-43 Cuyahoga River, Valley View, OH (NCB) 20-43 Cuyahoga River, West Creek, Independence, OH (NCB) 20-43 Cypress Bayou and Waterway Between Jefferson, TX and Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-16 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA (LMN) 11-15 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY (ORL) 16-34 Cypress Creek, MD (NAB) 4-32 Cypress Creek, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21, 31-35 Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-61 D Dade County, FL (SAJ) 9-21, 9-32, 9-45 Dade County, North of Haulover Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-22, 9-32, 9-45 Dale County, AL (SAM) 10-56 Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY (ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-17 Dallas Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 Dam "A" Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Dam and Bridge, Neosho River, KS (SWT) 29-28 Dam Safety Program (ORN) 15-7 Damariscotta River, ME (NED) 1-41 Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plan, NC (SAW) 6-28 Dana Point, Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-28 Danbury, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-55 Dansville and Vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, NY (NCB) 20-42 Danvers River, Danvers, MA (NED) 1-51 Danville, VA (SAW) 6-32 Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), AR (SWL) 28-11, 28-17 Darien Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-18 Dauphin Island, AL (SAM) 10-7, 10-33, 10-41, 10-52 Davenport Center Lake, NY (NAB) 4-36 Davenport, IA (NCR) 23-13 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), AR (SWL) 28-3 Davids Creek Lake, IA (MRO) 26-17 Davis Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Davis, NC (SAW) 6-29 Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) (NPP) 37-38 Dayton, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Dayton, Touchet River, WA (NPW) 39-15 Dayton, WY (MRO) 26-17 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD (MRO) 26-15, 26-19 Deadman's Run, NE (MRO) 26-23 Dearborn River, Lewis-Clark County, MT (MRO) 26-24 Dearmenville and Golden Springs, AL (SAM) 10-56 Decorah, (Dry Run), IA (NCS) 24-29 Deefield River, Wilmington, VT (NED) 1-52 Deep Creek, Accomack County, VA (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, NC (SAW) 6-28 Deep Creek, Newport News, VA (NAO) 5-17 Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Deep River, WA (NPP) 37-36 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Deer Island Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME (NED) 1-41, 1-58 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL (LSM) 14-16 DeGray Lake, AR (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 DeKalb, IL (NCR) 23-14 Delaware Bay to Lebanon Jetties and entrance at mouth (NAP) 3-25 Delaware Coast Protection, DE (NAP) 3-12, 3-18, 3-24 Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-4, 17-12, 17-17 Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (NAP) 3-3, 3-16, 3-20 Delaware River, PA, NJ and DE Philadelphia to the sea (NAP) 3-4, 3-16, 3-20 Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ (NAP) 3-5, 3-16, 3-21 Delphi, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Delware Bay to Millville, Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project (NAP) 3-25 Delware River, Mouth of Neversink (NAP) 3-28 Delware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing (NAP) 3-25 Dennis Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-26 1-17 Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR (NPP) 37-38 Depoe Bay, OR (NPP) 37-6, 37-23, 37-31, 37-36 DeQueen Lake, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15, 28-29 Derby, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-55 Derby, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Des Lacs River, Burlington, ND (NCS) 24-30 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO (NCR) 23-11 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO (NCR) 23-14 Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 Deschutes River, Bend, OR (NPP) 37-38 Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA (NPS) 38-26 Detour Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84 Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR (NPP) 37-17, 37-26, 37-34; 37-43 Detroit River, MI (NCE) 21-8, 21-51, 21-71, 21-88 Detroit River, Trenton Channel, MI (1950 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-86 Detroit River, Trenton Channel, MI (1968 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-86 Devil, East Twin and Warm Creeks Channel Improvements and Lytle Creek Levee (SPL) 33-30 Devils Lake, ND (NCS) 24-5, 24-18, 24-29, 24-30 Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORH) 17-4, 17-13, 17-17 Dice Grove, Lampasas River, Bell County, TX (SWF) 30-23 Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, ME (NED) 1-49 Dickinson Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Dierks Lake, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15, 28-29 Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Diking District 5, Catsop County, (NPP) 37-37 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Dillingham Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-7, 40-9 Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-4, 17-13, 17-17 Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) (ORP) 18-24 Dismal Swamp Canal (Canal Creek), VA (NAO) 5-16 Dismal Swamp Canal (South Mills), NC (NAO) 5-16 District of Columbia & MD Projects (NAB) 4-39 Dively Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-16 Dixie Creek, GA (SAM) 10-56 Dodge City, KS (SWT) 29-27 Doe & Watanga River, Elizabethtown, TN (ORN) 15-18 Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (SAM) 10-8, 10-34, 10-42 Doheny Beach State Park, CA (SPL) 33-29 Domonakas Library, Sheffield, OH (NCB) 20-44 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (NED) 1-41 Dorena Lake, OR (NPP) 37-11, 37-25, 37-33, 37-43 Double Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Double Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Douglas Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Dover, KY (ORH) 17-22 Downers Run, Fayette City, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Downyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-33 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Drainage District No. 13, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Drakes Island Beach, Wells, ME (NED) 1-51 Drinkwater Sewer, MO (LMM) 13-6 Drum Inlet, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-19 Drury Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA (SPK) 35-30, 35-42, 35-43 Dry Creek, Goodlettsbille, TN (ORN) 15-18 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA (MRO) 26-15, 26-20 Dry Creek, WA (NPW) 39-15 Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO (MRK) 27-18 Dry Pass, AK (NPA) 40-11 Dry Pass Channel, AK (NPA) 40-13 Dry Run, IA (NCS) 24-24 DuBois, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Dubuque Harbor, IA 25-7 1-18 Dubuuqe, IA (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-22 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN (ORL) 16-37 Duck Creek, Garland, TX (SWF) 30-23 Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA (SPK) 35-38 Duck Creek, Scott County, Davenport, and Bettendorf, IA (NCR) 23-15 Duck Island Harbor, CT (NED) 1-41 Duck Island Water Refuge, Lake Barkley, KY (ORN) 15-18 Duck Point Cove, MD (NAB) 4-32 Duck River, TN (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI (NCE) 21-9, 21-51, 21-71 Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, MN (1960 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-86 Duncan Creek, Bloomer, WI (NCS) 24-30 Dungeness River, Area #5, WA (NPS) 38-26 Dungeness River, Area #8, WA (NPS) 38-26 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA (NPS) 38-26 Dunkirk Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-5, 20-17, 20-29 Dunkirk Harbor, NY WRDA 1986 (NCB) 20-45 Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden (SAS) 8-19 Duval County, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-31, 9-46 Duxbury Harbor, MA (NED) 1-41 Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (NPW) 39-4, 39-10, 39-13, 39-18 Dworshak Units 5 and 6, ID (NPW) 39-17 Dyersburg, TN (LMM) 13-6 Dymers Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 E Eagle Creek Lake, KY (ORL) 16-24 Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH (ORP) 18-24 Eagle Creek, SC (SAN) 7-18, 7-18 Eagle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84 East Agana, Guam (POD) 36-12 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, VT (NAN) 2-32 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX (SWG) 31-38 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA (NPS) 38-25 East Boothbay Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41 East Bow Creek, Cedar County Bridge, WY (MRO) 26-24 East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, (ORP) 18-6, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 East Branch Dam, CT (NED) 1-46 East Brimfield Lake, MA (NED) 1-21, 1-32, 1-57 East Cap Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-18 East Chester Creek, NY (NAN) 2-3, 2-18, 2-22, 2-28, 2-34 East Fork, Deer Creek, Slaughters, KY (ORL) 16-37 East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail, IA (MRO) 26-21 East Fork of Clarks River, KY (ORN) 15-18 East Fork, TX (SWF) 30-22 East Fork White River, Brownstown (Jackson County), IN (ORL) 16-35 East Harbor State Park, OH (NCB) 20-43 East Hartford, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-54 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-11, 23-14 East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 East Moline, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 East Muddy Creek, MO (MRK) 27-17 East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA (MRO) 26-15 East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold, IA (MRO) 26-21 East Nishnabotna River, Page Bny Brdg., IA (MRO) 26-23 East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex, IA (MRO) 26-21 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, IA (MRO) 26-21 East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL (SAM) 10-8, 10-34, 10-42 East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 East Peoria, IL (NCR) 23-15 East Peoria Sanitary District, IL (NCR) 23-14 East Point, LA (LMK) 12-21 East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO (SWL) 28-22 East Rainelle, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 East River (NAN) 2-28, 2-29, East River, Wareham, MA (NED) 1-51 East Rockaway Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-4, 2-18, 2-22, 2-28, 2-34 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY 2-31, 2-34 I-19 East Sidney Lake, NY (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (LSM) 14-4, 14-9, 14-12 East Weaver Creek, CA (SPK) 35-38 East Weaver Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act (NCB) 20-45 Eastpoint Channel, FL (SAM) 10-51 Eastport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-49 Eau Galle River, WI (NCS) 24-5, 24-18 Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-4, 9-27, 9-35, 9-51 Echo Bay Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 Edenton Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-26 Edgartown Harbor, MA (NED) 1-41 Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Edisto River, North Fork, SC (SAN) 7-18 Edisto River, SC (SAN) 7-17, 7-18 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC (SAN) 7-18 Ediz Hook, WA (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-20 Edmonds Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-25 Edward MacDowell Lake, NH (NED) 1-19, 1-31, 1-56 Eel River at Sandy Prairie, CA (SPN) 34-14 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN (ORL) 16-34 Eel River, CA (SPK) 35-40 Egegik River, AK (NPA) 40-11 Eight Mile Creek, Richland County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY (ORL) 16-35 Eire Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 El Dorado Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-14, 29-21 El Dorado, West Branch, Walnut River, KS (SWT) 29-25 El Paso, TX (SWA) 32-3, 32-13, 32-16 El Turque Beach, Ponce, PR (SAJ) 9-50 Elder and Unionhouse Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-44 Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-12 Eldred, IL (LSM) 14-18 Eldred, PA (ORP) 18-29 Elfin Cove, AK (NPA) 40-11, 40-13 Elizabeth, NJ (NAN) 2-32, 2-34, 2-35 Elizabethtown, IL (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD (NAB) 4-32 Elk City Lake (Table Mound), KS (SWL) 28-28 Elk City Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-14, 29-21, 29-26 Elk Creek, Clyde, KS (MRK) 27-17 Elk Creek Harbor, PA 1966 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Elk Creek, Jackson, NE (MRO) 26-20 Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR (NPP) 37-11, 37-25, 37-33 Elk Creek, Willis, NE (MRO) 26-20 Elk River, AL and TN (ORN) 15-1318 Elk River, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29, 24-30 Elk River, WV (ORH) 17-20 Elkhorn River, Beemer, NE Bridge (MRO) 26-24 Elkhorn River Bridge, Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-20 Elkhorn River, Ewing, Holt County, NE (MRO) 26-20 Elkhorn River, Near Beemer, NE (MRO) 26-20 Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna, NE (MRO) 26-20 Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-20 Elkins, WV (ORP) 18-4, 18-13, 18-18, 18-22 Elkland, PA (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Elkport, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, NC (SAW) 6-28 Ellicott Creek, NY (NCB) 20-12, 20-22, 20-38 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, NC (SAW) 6-28 Elm Creek, Burt County, NE (MRO) 26-20 Elm Creek, Decatur, NE (MRO) 26-20 Elm Fork Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 Elmira, NY (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Elochoman Slough, WA (NPP) 37-41 Elochoman Slough, WA (NPP) 37-36 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY (LMM) 13-5 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA (NPS) 38-26 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Emergency Bank Protection Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-12 Emergency Bank Protection for Certain Highway and Railroad Facilities at Price Landing, MO (LSM) 14-16 Emergency Flood Control Activities Norfolk District (NAO) 5-8, 5-11 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-10 Emergency Protection for Certain Highway and Railroad Facilities at Chester, IL (LSM) 14-16 Emergency Protection for Illinois Approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge, IL (LSM) 14-16 I-20 Emergency Repairs to Levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (LSM) 14-16 Emergency Shore Protection Detroit District (NCE) 21-38 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization Charleston District (SAN) 7-9 Galveston District (SWG) 31-16 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7 Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN (NCS) 24-6, 24-18, 24-29, 24-30 Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) (SWL) 28-3 Emory River, Harriman, TN (ORN) 15-18 Empire-Stratton, OH (ORP) 18-24 Enderline, Maple River, ND (NCS) 24-24 Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Engineer Topographic Laboratories 46-1 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 English, IN (Little Blue River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Enid Diversion Channel, OK (SWT) 29-27 Enid LPP, OK (SWT) 29-24 Entiat River, Chelan County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Entiat River, WA (NPS) 38-30 Entiat River, WA (NPS) 38-26 Erie Harbor, PA (NCB) 20-5, 20-17, 20-30 Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Escambia Bay, FL (SAM) 10-52 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL (SAM) 10-49 Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL (SAM) 10-16, 10-35, 10-46 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Essex River, MA (NED) 1-41 Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-61 Etna, PA (ORP) 18-29 Euclid Creek, OH (NCB) 20-22, 20-38 Eufaula Lake, OK, (SWL) 28-28 Eufaula Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-19, 29-22, 29-26 Evansdale, IA (NCR) 23-14 Evanston, IL (NCC) 22-20 Evansville, IN (ORL) 16-3, 16-14, 16-29, 16-34 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (NPS) 38-3, 38-14, 38-20, 38-30 Everett Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-31 Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Exeter River, NH (NED) 1-41 Existing leveees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe. LA (LMK) 12-18 F Fabius River Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Fair Grounds Park, Clarksville, TN (ORN) 15-18 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK (NPA) 40-12 Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE (MRK) 27-17 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (SPK) 35-8, 35-28 Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Fairport Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-5, 20-17, 20-30 Fajardo Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-49 Falcon/Little Eagle Creeks, IN (ORL) 16-37 Falfurrias, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21, 31-36 Fall Brook Lake, PA (NAB) 4-36 Fall Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-12, 37-25, 37-33, 37-43 Fall River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-3, 26-9, 26-12 Fall River Harbor, MA (NED) 1-41 Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Fall River Lake, KS, (SWL) 28-28 Fall River Lake, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-21, 29-26 Falls Lake, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-21 Falmouth Harbor, MA (NED) 1-41 Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-32 Far Creek, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-19 Fargo, ND (NCS) 24-29 Farm Creek, IL (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX (SWF) 30-23 Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL (NCR) 23-13 Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Farmington, Des Moines River, IA (NCR) 23-16 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT (NED) 1-14, 1-29, 1-39 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Felsenthal, AR (LMK) 12-15, 12-16 Ferguson Creek, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-40 1-21 Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-42 Fern Ridge Lake, OR (NPP) 37-13, 37-25, 37-33, 37-43 Fernandina Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-27, 9-35 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-15, 30-19 Filberts Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA (NAO) 5-17 Fire Island Inlet (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-4, 2-18, 2-22, 2-31 Fire Island to Montauk Point, NY (NAN) 2-32 Fisher Creek, Tulsa County, OK (SWT) 29-28 Fisherman's Wharf Areas, San Francisco Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-7 Fishing Bay, MD (NAB) 4-32 Fishing Creek, MD (NAB) 4-32 Fishing Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV (ORH) 17-24 Fishpond Drain and Tributaries, GA (SAM) 10-56 Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) (NED) 1-46 Fivemile River Harbor, CT (NED) 1-41 Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Flat Branch, Gulfport, MS (SAM) 10-51 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, Tulsa, OK (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT (NPS) 38-26 Flathead River, MT (NPS) 38-25, 38-26 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT (NPS) 38-26, 38-31 Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT (NPS) 38-26 Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Fletcher Creek at Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-1, 13-4 Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Mobile District (SAM) 10-31 Flood Control Projects Under Construction B-1 Flood Control Reservoir Operations New England Division (NED) 1-23 Flood Control Reservoirs Operable A-1 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Alaska District (NPA) 40-5 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-11 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-19 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-13 Charleston District (SAN) 7-9 Chicago District (NCC) 22-11 Detroit District (NCE) 21-41 Galveston District (SWG) 31-16 Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-7 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-6 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-8 Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 Memphis District (LMM) 13-2 Mobile District (SAM) 10-23 Nashville District (ORN) 15-6 New England Division (NED) 1-24 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-9 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Omaha District (MRO) 26-6 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-12 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-11 Portland District (NPP) 37-13 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-23 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7 Seattle District (NPS) 38-8 St. Louis District (LSM) 14-7 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-10 Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-9 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-15 Flood Damages Sustained and Prevented G-1 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR (NPP) 37-40 Florence LPP, KS (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT (NPS) 38-26 Floyd County, GA (SAM) 10-56 Floyd River, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-15, 26-20 Flushing Bay and Creek, NY (NAN) 2-5, 2-18, 2-22, 2-28 Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL (SAM) 10-9, 10-34, 10-42, 10-52 Follansbee, WV (ORP) 18-24 Folly Beach, SC (SAN) 7-8, 7-12, 7-16 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Folly River, SC (SAN) 7-4, 7-11, 7-14 Folsom Lake, American River, CA (SPK) 35-38 I-22 Forest Heights, MD (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Forestville Harbor, MI (1968 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-86 Forked Deer River, TN, including South Fork (LMM) 13-5 Forsyth, MT (MRO) 26-15 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL (LSM) 14-16 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL (LSM) 14-18 Fort Fisher and Vicinity, NC (SAW) 6-27 Fort Gaines, Dauphin Island, AL (SAM) 10-51 Fort Gibson Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Fort Gibson Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-19, 29-23, 29-26 Fort Kent, ME (NED) 1-46 Fort Leavenworth Bridge Removal (MRK) 27-16 Fort Lupton, CO (Lagoon) (MRO) 26-23 Fort Macon Park, NC (SAW) 6-27 Fort Macon State Park, NC Remaining Work (SAW) 6-29 Fort Madison Harbor, IA 25-7 Fort Myers Beach, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-27, 9-35, 9-51 Fort Niagara State Park, NY Sec. 201 1965 FC Act (NCB) 20-45 Fort Peck Lake, MT (MRO) 26-6, 26-11, 26-14, 26-18 Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-5, 9-27, 9-36 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-6, 26-11, 26-14, 26-18 Fort Scott Lake Marmaton River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Fort Supply Lake, OK (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-21 Fort Toulouse, Wetumpka, AL (SAM) 10-17, 10-35, 10-46 Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX (SWF) 30-22 Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX (SWF) 30-22 Fortuna Bay, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-61 Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA (NPS) 38-26 Foster Creek, West Fork, WA (NPS) 38-26 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA (NAB) 4-19, 4-26 Fosters Loop Road, Tuscaloosa County, AL (SAM) 10-51 Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO (SWA) 32-4, 32-13, 32-16 Four Holes Swamp, Orangeburg County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Four River Basins, FL (SAJ) 9-22, 9-32, 9-48, 9-60, 9-61 Fource Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (SWL) 28-6, 28-15 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR (SWL) 28-22 Fourmile Creek, Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-15 Fourmile Run, VA (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 Fourpole Creek, WV (ORH) 17-24 Fowl River, AL (SAM) 10-52 Fox Point Barrier, RI (NED) 1-46 Fox River, Bridge Site #4, Davis County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Fox River, Bridge Site #7, Davis County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Fox River Locks and Dams (NCE) 21-89 Fox River, Route J40 Bridge, Davis County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Fox River, WI (NCE) 21-10, 21-51, 21-72 Foxholm, ND (NCS) 24-30 Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (NAP) 3-12, 3-18, 3-24 Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS (MRK) 27-17 Frankfort Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-11, 21-51, 21-72 Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek)(Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-29 Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort)(Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort)(Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-29 Franklin Falls Dam, NH (NED) 1-19, 1-32, 1-56 Frazer-Wolf Point, MT (MRO) 26-15 Frazeysburg, OH (ORH) 17-23 Freeport and Vicinity, Hurricane Flood Protection, TX (SWG) 31-38 Freeport Harbor, TX (SWG) 31-3, 31-19, 31-26, 31-39, 31-40, 31-45 Freeport, IL (NCR) 23-13 Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 Fremont, OH, Sandusky River (NCB) 20-42 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN (ORN) 15-13 French Creek, Wattsburg, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Frenchboro Harbor, ME (NED) 1-41 Freshwater Bayou, LA (LMN) 11-15 Friday Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-3, 38-14, 38-20 Friendly, WV (ORH) 17-22 I-23 Friendsville, MD (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 From North Little Rock to Gillett (Above Plum Bayou), AR (SWL) 28-22 Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK (SWT) 29-30 Ft. Clinch State Park, Nassau County, FL (SAJ) 9-61 Ft. Collins, CO (MRO) 26-21 Fullerton, KY (ORH) 17-22 Fulton County, GA (SAM) 10-56 Fulton, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 G Galax, VA (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Galena, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Galisteo Dam, NM (SWA) 32-6, 32-14, 32-18 Gallatin River, Gallatin County, MT (MRO) 26-23 Gallipolis, OH (ORH) 17-22 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (SWG) 31-4, 31-19, 31-27, 31-39, 31-41 Ganargua Creek, Plasermill Road, NY (NCB) 20-44 Gapway Swamp, NC and SC (SAW) 6-28 Gapway Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-18 Gardner, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Gardners Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 Garland City, AR (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18, 27-20 Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND (MRO) 26-7, 26-11, 26-14, 26-18 Garvin Brook, Stockton, MN (NCS) 24-30 Gasconade River, MO (MRK) 27-16 Gastineau Channel, AK (NPA) 40-11 Gate Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-38, 37-40 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (NAO) 5-8, 5-11, 5-15 Gauley River, WV (ORH) 17-20 Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD (MRO) 26-7, 26-11, 26-14, 26-17, 26-18 Gaysville Lake, VT (NED) 1-49 Genegantslet Lake, NY (NAB) 4-36 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-13, 3-18, 3-24 Genesee River, Back River Road, Amity, NY (NCB) 20-44 Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH (NCB) 20-40 Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, NC (SAW) 6-28 George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 10-28, 10-37, 10-48 Georges River, ME (NED) 1-41 Georgetown Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-5, 7-11, 7-15 Gering Valley, Gering Drain and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-20 Gering Valley, NE (MRO) 26-15 Gibson Creek, TN (ORN) 15-18 Gila and Salt Rivers Levee and Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-30 Gila River Basin, AZ (SPL) 33-5, 33-30 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE (MRO) 26-17 Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Gillham Lake, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15, 28-29 Gills Creek Above Lake Catherine, Richland County, SC, 7-18 Gills Creek Below Lake Catherine, Richland County, SC, 7-18 Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN (NCS) 24-30 Girty's Run, Millvale, PA (ORP) 18-22 Glade Creek, Roanoke County and Vinton, VA (SAW) 6-32 Glasgow, MT (MRO) 26-15, 26-18 Gleason Creek, NV (SPK) 35-40 Glen Cove Creek, NY (NAN) 2-29 Glen Cove Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-34 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA (NED) 1-41 Golconda, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Gold Creek, AK (NPA) 40-12 Goldsboro, Neuse River, NC (SAW) 6-28 Goleta, CA and Vicinity (SPL) 33-30 Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Gooding Area, ID(NPW) 39-16 Goose Creek, Boulder, CO (MRO) 26-21 Goose Creek, MD (NAB) 4-32 Gordon Creek, Iowa Park, TX (SWT) 29-27 Gordon's Landing, VT (NAN) 2-29 Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-50, 10-51 Goshen Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-26 Governors Run, MD (NAB) 4-36 Gowanas Creek Channel, NY (NAN) 2-29 Grafton, ND (NCS) 24-26, 24-29 Grafton Pumping Station, ND (NCS) 24-24 Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL (LSM) 14-18 Grahn, KY (ORH) 17-24 I-24 Grand Bayou Pass, LA (LMN) 11-15 Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI (NCE) 21-11, 21-52, 21-72 Grand Haven Harbor, MI (1945 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-86 Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (LMN) 11-4, 11-10, 11-13 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees (SWT) 29-26 Grand Marais Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-13, 21-52, 21-73 Grand Marais Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-13, 21-52, 21-73 Grand Mound-State Historical Site, MN (NCS) 24-6, 24-18, 24-29, 24-30 Grand Neosho River Basin, KS and OK (SWT) 29-29 Grand Prairie (Landfill), TX (SWF) 30-22 Grand Prairie (Meyers Road), TX (SWF) 30-22 Grand River at Grandville, MI (1965 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-86 Grand Ronde Valley, OR (NPW) 39-17 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-16 Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-13, 21-53, 21-73 Grande Ronde Lake, OR (NPW) 39-17 Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Grandview, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Grant Parish, Below Colfax, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Granville, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Grapevine Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-15, 30-19 Grasse River (Massena), NY (NCB) 20-40 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IL (Muscatatuck River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Graves Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 Grays Creek Canal, Shelby County, TN (LMM) 13-6 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River (1948 R&H Act), WA (NPS) 38-30 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (NPS) 38-3, 38-15, 38-20 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River (Uncompleted portion), WA (1968 R&H ACT) (NPS) 38-30 Grays Harbor County (Various Locations), WA (NPS) 38-26 Grays Reef Passage, MI (NCE) 21-84, 21-90 Grays River, WA (NPP) 37-36 Grayson Lake, KY (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 Grayville, IL (ORL) 16-24 Great Bend, KS (SWT) 29-5, 29-15, 29-21 Great Chazy River, NY (NAN) 2-29 Great Coharie Creek, NC (SAW) 6-32 Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-13, 3-19, 3-24 Great Falls, MT (MRO) 26-15 Great Kills Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI (R&H Acts of 1946 and 1956) (NCE) 21-86 Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, NY (NAN) 2-29 Great Miami River, Brookville Lake, IN (ORL) 16-32 Great Miami River, Port Jefferson, OH (ORL) 16-37 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH (ORL) 16-35 Great Pee Dee River, SC (SAN) 7-17 Great Salt Plains Lake, OK (SWT) 29-6, 29-15, 29-21 Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-41 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-6, 20-18, 20-31 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1941 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Great South Bay, NY (NAN) 2-5, 2-22, 2-28 Green and Barren Rivers, KY (ORL) 16-2, 16-14, 16-19, 16-28 Green Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-13, 21-53, 21-73 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Green Brook (Regional Center), NJ (NAN) 2-34 Green Harbor, MA (NED) 1-5, 1,27, 1-37 Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA (NCR) 23-13 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR (NPP) 37-17, 37-26, 37-43 Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA (NPS) 38-26 Green River, Calhoun, KY (ORL) 16-35 Green River Lake, KY (ORL) 16-8, 16-16, 16-32 Green River, State Highway 181, WA (NPS) 38-26 Green Swamp, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA (SPK) 35-38 Greene County, AL (SAM) 10-56 Greene, NY (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-29 Greenport Harbor (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 Greens Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-11 Greens Creek, Petal, MS (SAM) 10-51 I-25 Greenup, KY (ORH) 17-22 GreenvaleCreek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Greenville, TX (SWF) 30-22 Greenwich Bay, RI (NED) 1-41 Greenwich Harbor, CT (NED) 1-41 Greenwich Point Beach, CT (NED) 1-49 Greers Ferry Lake, AR (SWL) 28-11, 28-17, 28-30 Gregory Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Greilickville Harbor (Formerly Traverse City Harbor, )MI (NCE) 21-84, 21-90 Greybull, WY (MRO) 26-15, 26-19 Griffithville-Yawkey, WV (ORH) 17-24 Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), TX (SWG) 31-38 Guadalupe River, CA (SPK) 35-9, 35-28 Guayanes Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-49 Guilford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-5, 1,27, 1-37, 1-58 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT (NED) 1-45 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-45f Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa County, FL (SAM) 10-50 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL & Mexican Border TX (SWG) 31-5, 31-19, 31-28, 31-39, 31-43, 31-44, 31-45, 31-46 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, & Mexican Border (LMN) 11-15 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL & Mexican Border (SAM) 10-9, 10-34, 10-42 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, St. Marks to Tampa Bay, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Gulf Street, Milford, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Gulfport Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-10, 10-34, 10-42 Guttenberg, IA (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17 H Haaula Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 Hackensack River (NAN) 2-28 Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO (MRK) 27-18 Haikey Creek, OK (SWT) 29-27 Haines Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Halfway Branch, Spartenburg, SC (SAN) 7-18 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-55 Halls Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Halstad, MN (NCS) 24-29 Halstead, KS (SWT) 29-6, 29-15, 29-21 Hamlet City Lake, NC (SAW) 6-13, 6-21 Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Hamlin Beach State Park, NY (NCB) 20-41 Hammersley Inlet (Uncompleted Portion), WA (NPS) 38-30 Hammersley Inlet, WA (NPS) 38-25 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT (NED) 1-45 Hammond Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-14, 21-53, 21-73 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR (NPP) 37-36 Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-45 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH (NED) 1-45 Hampton Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Hampton Harbor, NH (NED) 1-41 Hampton Institute, VA (NAO) 5-18 Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) (NAO) 5-4, 5-10, 5-14 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-10 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-10 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-10 Hanapepe River, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-9 Hancock Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-17, 1-31, 1-55 Hancock County, Seawall, MS (SAM) 10-51 Hanging Rock, OH (ORH) 17-22 Hannibal Harbor, MO 25-8 Hannibal, MO (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-10 Hannibal SBH, MO (NCR) 23-11 Hanover, Hennepin County, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Hansen Dam, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-15, 33-30 Harbor Beach Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-15, 21-54, 21-73 Harbor of Refuge (NAP) 3-25 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-41 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Harbor of Refuge, NC (SAW) 6-29 Harbor Office at Morro Bay, CA (SPL) 33-28 Harbors of Washington Island, WI (R&H Act of 1937) (NCE) 21-86 Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-13, 27-20 Harlem River, NY (NAN) 2-29 Harpers Ferry, WV (NAB) 4-36 Harpeth River, Williamson County, TN (ORN) 15-18 1-26 Harraseeket River, ME (NED) 1-41 Harrisburg, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, IL (LSM) 14-16 Harrisville Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84, 21-90 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) (MRK) 27-17 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO (MRK) 27-8, 27-12, 27-16 Hartford, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Hartford, White River, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Hartford, WV (ORH) 17-22 Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-12 Hartwell Lake, GA and SC (SAS) 8-8, 8-12, 8-17 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA (LMN) 11-17 Hastings Harbor, MN 25-7 Hatchie River, Alcorn County, MS (LMM) 13-6 Haverhill, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-56 Havre, MT (MRO) 26-15, 26-18 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam (MRO) 26-18 Hawesville, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY (NED) 1-42 Hay Creek, Belle Fource, SD (MRO) 26-23 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA (NAP) 3-27 Hayden Island, OR (NPP) 37-38 Hays, Big Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Haysi, VA (ORH) 17-21 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA (NED) 1-46 Hazard, KY (ORL) 16-20 Hazard, KY (ORL) 16-24 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-10 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID (NPW) 39-16 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Helena Harbor, AR (LMM) 13-5 Hellens Creek, MD (NAB) 4-37 Helm Lake, IL (ORL) 16-27, 16-33 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Hempstead Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-6, 2-18, 2-23, 2-34 Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA (NPS) 38-26 Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL (NCR) 23-12 Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Henderson Creek, Warren County, IL (NCR) 23-16 Henderson Harbor Cut, NY (NCB) 20-43 Henderson River, IL (NCR) 23-13 Henderson, WV (ORH) 17-22 Hendrick's Harbor, ME (NED) 1-42 Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Henrys Fork Unit (NPW) 39-17 Henson Creek, Lake City, CO (SPK) 35-44 Hereford Inlet (NAP) 3-27 Hergot Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-14 Herkimer, NY (NAN) 2-32 Herreid, Spring Creek, SD (MRO) 26-15, 26-19 Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD (NAB) 4-32, 4-38 Herring Creek, MD (NAB) 4-32 Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK (SWT) 29-6, 29-15, 29-21 Hickman Run, Little Tyron Township, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (SPK) 35-10, 35-28 Higginsport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Highland Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Highway 12, CO (SWA) 32-19 Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, FL (SAM) 10-50 Hills Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-18, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43 Hills Point Road, Dorchester County, MD (NAB) 4-35 Hillsborough Bay, FL (SAJ) 9-50 Hillsborough River, FL (SAJ) 9-43 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS (MRK) 27-3, 27-10, 27-14, 27-20 Hillview Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-12 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Hilslboro Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Hingham Harbor, MA (NED) 1-42 Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Hiwassee River, Polk and Bradley Counties, TN (ORN) 15-14 Hockingport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-32 Hodges Village Dam, MA (NED) 1-21, 1-33, 1-57 I-27 Hoh River, County Road 216, WA (NPS) 38-26 Hoh River, near Forks, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hokah, MN (NCS) 24-29 Hoko River, Sekiu, WA (NPS) 38-27 Holbrook, AZ (SPL) 33-9, 33-15 Holbrook Levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ (SPL) 33-30 Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio (Great Miami River) (ORL) 16-24 Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI (1954 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-86 Holland Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-15, 21-54, 21-74 Holley Lake, OR (NPP) 37-38, 37-40 Holly, CO (SWA) 32-19 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-20 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME (NED) 1-46 Holmes Creek, FL (SAM) 10-49 Holston River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Holyoke, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Homasassa River, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Homer Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-2, 40-7, 40-9, 40-11 Homer Spit Erosion, AK (NPA) 40-5, 40-8, 40-10 Hominy Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-29, 6-32 Homme Lake and Dam, ND (NCS) 24-6, 24-19, 24-31 Homochitto River, MS (LMK) 12-16, 12-21 Honey Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Honey Hill Lake, NH (NED) 1-49 Honga River and Tar Bay, MD (NAB) 4-32 Honga River and Tar Bay (NAB) 4-38 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA (NPS) 38-27 Hoonah Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Hooper, Elkhorn River, NE (MRO) 26-20 Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, NY (NAN) 2-32 Hop Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-17, 1-31, 1-55 Hoper, NE (MRO) 26-16 Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH (NED) 1-19, 1-32, 1-56 Hoquiam, Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WA (NPS) 38-30 Hoquiam River, WA (NPS) 38-25, 38-27 Hords Creek Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 Horn Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-17 Hornell, NY (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Horsepen Branch, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Horseshoe Bend, WA (NPS) 38-31 Horseshoe Cove, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Hoskins Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel, SD (MRO) 26-19 Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS (SAM) 10-50 Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA (NED) 1-17 Housatonic River, CT (NED) 1-42, 1-58 Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-55 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-55 Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-55 Houston County, AL (SAM) 10-56 Houston, MN (NCS) 24-7, 24 19 Houston School Road Bridge, Itawamba County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Houston Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 31-6, 31-20, 31-30, 31-39, 31-41, 31-46 Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-22 Howards Mill Lake, NC (SAW) 6-28 Hudson Harbor, WI (NCS) 24-26 Hudson River Channel, NY & N.J. (NAN) 2-7, 2-19, 2-23, 2-28 Hudson River, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Hudson River, NY (NAN) 2-6, 2-19, 2-23, 2-27 Hudson River, NYC to Albany (NAN) 2-34 Hugo Lake, OK (SWT) 29-6, 29-15, 29-21 Hulah Lake, OK (SWT) 29-6, 29-16, 29-21 Hull Branch, MS (SAM) 10-56 Humboldt Bay (Buhne Point), CA (SPN) 34-13 Humboldt Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA (SPN) 34-7 Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV (SPK) 35-40 Humboldt, TN (LMM) 13-6 Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Hunting Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Hunting Island Beach, SC (SAN) 7-17 Huntingdon, TN (LMM) 13-7 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA (NPP) 37-37 Huntington Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29, 2-34 Huntington Lake, IN (ORL) 16-8, 16-16 Huntington, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Huntington, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Huot, MN (NCS) 24-29 I-28 Huron Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-6, 20-18, 20-32 Huron Harbor, OH 1962 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Hurricane Barrier Operations New England Division (NED) 1-24 Hurricane Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-17, 10-35, 10-46 Hutchins, KY (ORH) 17-24 Hutchinson LPP, KS (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 Hutto Creek, Austin, IN (ORL) 16-37 Hyannis Harbor, MA (NED) 1-6, 1,27, 1-37 Hyde County Dike, NC (SAW) 6-29 I I-38 Lake, MO (LSM) 14-18 Iao Stream, Maui, HI (POD) 36-9 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA (NAP) 3-26 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE (NAP) 3-26 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam - Lake Sacajawea, WA (NPW) 39-5, 39-10, 39-13, 39-19, 39-23 Ida Grove, IA (MRO) 26-16 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek, IA (MRO) 26-20 Iliuliuk Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, (NCR) IL 23-2, 23-7 Illinois Beach State Park, IL (NCC) 22-6, 22-13, 22-17 Illinois River, Liverpool, IL (NCR) 23-15 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL (NCC) 22-21 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-21 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL (NCC) 22-20 Illinois Waterway, (NCR) IL and IN 23-22, 23-7, 23-8 Illinois Waterway Existing Locks and Dams (NCR) 23-17 Illinois Waterway, IL (LSM) 14-2 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN (NCR) 23-19, 23-20 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Additional Features (NCR) 23-18, 23-19 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Lock and Dam Construction (NCR) 23-17, 23-18 Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks (NCR) 23-13 Illinois Waterway, Marseilles Canal, IL (NCR) 23-14 Illinois Waterway, Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) (NCR) 23-13 Imperial Beach, CA (SPL) 33-29 Inarajan Shoreline, Guam (POD) 36-11 Indian Bend Wash (SPL) 33-30 Indian Creek at Emerson, IA (MRO) 26-16, 26-21 Indian Creek, Burton Road, Morgan County, IN (ORL) 16-37 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Indian Creek, Hastings, IA (MRO) 26-23 Indian Creek Lake, IA (MRO) 26-17 Indian Grave Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Indian Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-18 Indian River County, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-31, 9-46 Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (NAP) 3-5, 3-17(NAP) 3-21 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, IN (NCC) 22-7, 22-13, 22-17 Indiana Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-4, 22-12, 22-16, 22-19 Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN (NCC) 22-7, 22-13, 22-18 Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section)(White River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section)(White River) (ORL) 16-24 Indianola, NE (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Industry, PA (ORP) 18-24 Inex, KY (ORH) 17-24 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay (NAP) 3-25 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, MD, 3-17 (NAP) 3-5, 3-21 Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA (LMN) 11-15 Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE (NAP) 3-6, 3-17, 3-22 Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects New England Division (NED) 1-10 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Alaska District (NPA) 40-5 Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-10 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-19 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-13 Charleston District (SAN) 7-9 Detroit District (NCE) 21-41 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-11 Galveston District (SWG) 31-16 Huntington District (ORH) 17-10, 17-19 I-29 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-24 Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-7, 27-12 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-7 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-8 Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 Memphis District (LMM) 13-2 Mobile District (SAM) 10-23 Nashville District (ORN) 15-5 New England Division (NED) 1-23 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-9 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Omaha District (MRO) 26-5, 26-10 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-14 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-11 Portland District (NPP) 37-13 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-22 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-7, 8-11 Seattle District (NPS) 38-9 St. Louis District (LSM) 14-6 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-16 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-10 Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-8 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-15 Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works (NPW) 39-2 Inspection of Non-Federal Levees Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-14 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-20 International Boundary Waters Board 49-1 Interstate 59 Bridges, Foster, AL (SAM) 10-50 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (SAJ) 9-6, 9-27, 9-36 Interstate Bridge, Colubmia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver, WA (Alteration) (NPP) 37-36 Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), OR (NPP) 37-36 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA (LMN) 11-15 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL (SAJ) 9-6, 9-27, 9-36 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act 50-1 Iola LPP, KS (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 Iowa River, Chelsea, IA (NCR) 23-16 Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Ipswich River, MA (NED) 1-42 Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Irondequoit Bay, NY (NCB) 20-6, 20-18, 20-32 Ironton, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Irving Township at Nichols Road, Jackson County, WI (NCS) 24-24 Irving Township, Jackson County, WI (NCS) 24-24 Irvington Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-34 Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (SPK) 35-10, 35-28 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA (NED) 1-46 Island Creek, MD (NAB) 4-32 Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MD (NAB) 4-32 Island End River, Chelsea, MA (NED) 1-42 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-30 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME (NED) 1-42 Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH (NED) 1-42, 1-58 Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD (NAB) 4-10, 4-23, 4-30 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME (NED) 1-46 Isreal River, NH (NED) 1-52 Ithaca, Cayuga Inlet, NY (NCB) 20-42 Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-45 Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-45 J J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-17 J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) (SAS) 8-8, 8-11, 8-17 Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA (NPS) 38-27 Jackson Brand, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 Jackson County Levee District No. 2, White River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Jackson Creek, Richland County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Jackson Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY (NPW) 39-16 Jackson Hole, WY (NPW) 39-2, 39-10 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL (SAM) 10-6, 10-33, 10-41 Jackson Township, Bulter County, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 I-30 Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV (ORH) 17-24 Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL (SAJ) 9-7, 9-28, 9-37 Jacksonville Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-7, 9-28, 9-37 Jamaica Bay, NY (NAN) 2-8, 2-19, 2-24, 2-28 James R. Olin Flood Control Project (NAO) 5-7, 5-11, 5-15 James River Environmental, SD (MRO) 26-22 James River, VA (NAO) 5-19 James River, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-10, 5-14 James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) (SWL) 28-3 Jamestown Reservoir, ND (MRO) 26-16 Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI (NCR) 23-13 Jarvis Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Jefferson County (Various Locations), WA (NPS) 38-27 Jefferson County, AL (SAM) 10-56 Jefferson River, Bank Protection, Near Waterloo, MT (MRO) 26-19 Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, Near Three Forks, MT (MRO) 26-19 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Jeffries Creek, Darlington County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Jemez Canyon Dam, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-14, 32-18 Jenks LPP, OK (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-45 Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV (NAB) 4-10, 4-24, 4-30 Jeremy Creek, SC (SAN) 7-5, 7-11, 7-15 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA (SAM) 10-29, 10-37, 10-48 Joe Creek LPP, OK (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 Joe Ilardin Lock and Dam (No. 3), AR (SWL) 28-4 Joe Pool Lake, TX (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA (NPP) 37-18, 37-27, 37-34, 37-44 John Day River (West), OR (NPP) 37-38 John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 John Day River, OR (NPP) 37-40 John Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, VA and NC (SAW) 6-15, 6-22 John Marvin Reservoir, CO (SWA) 32-4, 32-13 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS (SWT) 29-7, 29-16, 29-21 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18 John's Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-28, 9-37 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME (NED) 1-46 Johnson Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX (SWF) 30-23 Johnson Creek, OR (NPP) 37-38 Johnsonburg, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Johnstown, PA (ORP) 18-22 Johnstown, PA (ORP) 18-4, 18-13, 18-18 Jones Inlet (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 Jonesport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-6, 1,27, 1-37 Jonesville, LA (LMK) 12-15 Josias River, ME (NED) 1-42, 1-58 Joyce Creek, Camden County, NC (SAW) 6-28 Juan Mendez Channel, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Julian, Rock Creek, NE (MRO) 26-20 Juneau Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 K Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Kaaawa Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 Kaelepulu Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-12 Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kahoma Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kahului Beach Road, Maui, HI (POD) 36-7 Kahului Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-7 Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-11 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-10 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-10 Kake Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA (NPP) 37-40 L Lake River Delta Area, WA (NPP) 37-40 Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA (NPP) 37-36 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek), MI (NCE) 21-85 Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI (1954 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-86 Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI (1958 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-86 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-7 Kanawha River, WV (ORH) 17-2, 17-12, 17-17 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 1-31 Kankakee River, IL and IN Levee Between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge, IN (NCC) 22-21 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS (MRK) 27-4, 27-11, 27-14, 27-20 Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod.) (MRK) 27-17 Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS (MRK) 27-17 Kansas River and Minor Tributaries (MRK) 27-20 Kansas River Navigation (MRK) 27-18 Kapaa Town, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-8 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-10 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Kasilof Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-5, 14-9, 14-12, 14-16 Kaskaskia River, IL (LSM) 14-11, 14-16 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, HI (POD) 36-11 Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-10 Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-10 Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-9 Kaw Dam to Keystone Lake (SWT) 29-29 Kaw Lake, OK (SWT) 29-7, 29-16, 29-21 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5, 36-6 Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-12 Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (SPK) 35-11, 35-28 Kawishiwi River, MN (NCS) 24-30 Kawkawlin River, MI (NCE) 21-85 Kays Creek, UT (SPK) 35-38 Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-18 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Keene, NH (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Keg Creek, Minden, IA (MRO) 26-21 Kehoe Lake, KY (ORH) 17-21 Keithsburg Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-14 Kekaha Beach, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-8 Kelleys Island, OH (NCB) 20-40 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID (NPW) 39-18, 39-18 Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-21 Kennebec River, ME (NED) 1-6, 1,27, 1-37, 1-52, 1-58 Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Kennebunk River, ME (NED) 1-42 Kenosha Harbor, WI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-86 Kenosha Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-16, 21-55, 21-74 Kentucky River, Frankfort, KY (ORL) 16-37 Kentucky River, KY (ORL) 16-2, 16-14, 16-28 Kentucky River, National Recreation Area (ORL) 16-24 Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA (SPK) 35-38 Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Ketchikan, AK (NPA) 40-13 Ketchikan Harbor (West Breakwater), AK (NPA) 40-12 Ketchikan Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Keuka Lake, NY (NCB) 20-22, 20-39 Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-10 Kewaunee River, WI (1960 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-86 Kewaunee, WI, WI (NCE) 21-17, 21-55, 21-74 Keweenaw Waterway, MI (NCE) 21-17, 21-55, 21-74 Key West Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-49, 9-51 Keyport Harbor (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 Keystone Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Keystone Lake, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-19, 29-23, 29-26 Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Kihei Beach, Maui, HI (POD) 36-8 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Kill Van Kull Channel (NAN) 2-28 Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-8, 2-19, 2-24 Kindred Lake, ND (NCS) 24-26 King County (Various Locations), WA (NPS) 38-27 King Cove Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-13 Kings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Kingston-Edwardsville, PA (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA (NED) 1-42 Kingston Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-25 Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY, (ORP) 18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 I-32 Kiowa Tribe Housing Development, Andarko, OK (SWT) 29-28 Kirbyville, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21 Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL (NCR) 23-12 Kissemmee River Restoration, FL (SAJ) 9-25, 9-32, 9-48, 9-49 Kittanning, PA Part I (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Kittanning, PA part II (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 Kitzmiller, MD (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Klamath River, CA (SPK) 35-38 Klawock, AK (NPA) 40-13 Klutina River, Cooper Center, AK (NPA) 40-12 Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Knapps Narrows, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-28 Knife River Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-84 Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA (SPN) 34-13 Knightville Dam, MA (NED) 1-14, 1-30, 1-53 Knobb's Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Kodiak Harbor (Near Island Channel), AK (NPA) 40-13 Kodiak Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-8, 40-10, 40-11 Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID (NPS) 38-27 Kootenai River, ID and MT (NPS) 38-25 Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID (NPS) 38-27 Koyuk, AK (NPA) 40-13 Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-9 L La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA (NPS) 38-27 La Crosse, WI (NCS) 24-26 La Farge Lake and Channel Improvemnet, WI (NCS) 24-8, 24-19 La Trappe, MD (NAB) 4-33 Lac La Belle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84, 21-90 Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN (NCS) 24-7, 24-19, 24-31 Lac qui Parle, MN (NCS) 24-30 Lacakawanna, NY, Smokes Creek (NCB) 20-42 Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12 Lackawanna River Basin, PA (NAB) 4-11, 4-30 Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24 Lafayette River, VA (NAO) 5-17 Lago de Cerillos, PR (SAJ) 9-48 Lago de Portuges, PR (SAJ) 9-48 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA (NED) 1-42 LaGragne Bayou, FL (SAM) 10-52 LaGrange Bayou, FL (SAM) 10-49 LaGrange Gut, Frederiksted, St. Croix, VI (SAJ) 9-61 Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-10 Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-29 Lake Andursia, Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-24 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND (NCS) 24-8, 24-19 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur Bulkheads and Jetties (LMN) 11-18 Lake Brownwood Modification, TX (SWF) 30-22 Lake Camanchie, CA (SPK) 35-38 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA (LMN) 11-15 Lake Charles, LA (LMN) 11-12 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY (ORP) 18-24 Lake City Harbor, MN 25-7 Lake Creek, Round Rock, TX (SWF) 30-23 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Lake Crockett, WA (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-21, 38-31 Lake Darling Dam, ND (NCS) 24-24 Lake Douglas, Decatur, GA (SAM) 10-50 Lake Elsinore, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-15 Lake Erie, Cooley Canal, Lucas, OH (NCB) 20-43 Lake Erie, Eastlake, OH (NCB) 20-44 Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY (NCB) 20-44 Lake Erie, Middle Bass Island, Deist Road, OH (NCB) 20-44 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act (ORP) 18-24 Lake Erie, SR 531, Ashtabula, OH (NCB) 20-44 Lake Erie Sturgeon Point, NY (NCB) 20-21 Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX (SWF) 30-22 Lake George, Hobart, IN (NCC) 22-8, 22-14, 22-18 Lake Herman (Dredging), SD (MRO) 26-17 Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) (SWT) 29-26 Lake Kemp, TX (SWT) 29-7, 29-16, 29-21 Lake Michigan Diversion (NCC) 22-6, 22-13, 22-16 Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL (NCC) 22-20 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL (NCC) 22-20 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL (NCC) 22-20 Lake Montauk Harbor (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 Lake Ogleton, MD (NAB) 4-37 Lake Oroville, CA (SPK) 35-38 I-33 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane protection) (LMN) 11-4, 11-10, 11-13 Lake Pontchartrain, North Shore, LA (LMN) 11-13 Lake Providence Harbor, LA (LMK) 12-16 Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN (NCS) 24-24 Lake River, WA (NPP) 37-36 Lake Sawyer, Camp Miakonda, Toledo, OH (NCB) 20-44 Lake Shelbyville, IL (LSM) 14-16 Lake Shirley, Lunenburg, MA (NED) 1-52 Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels in (NCE) 21-18, 21-56, 21-75 Lake Texoma (Denison Dam) OK and TX (SWT) 29-11, 29-19, 29-23, 29-29 Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN (NCS) 24-9, 24-19 Lake Traverse, MN and SD (NCS) 24-23 Lake Washington Ship Channel, WA (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-21, 38-30 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (SWT) 29-7, 29-16, 29-22 Lakeport Lake, CA (SPK) 35-38 Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, OH (NCB) 20-21, 20-38 Lakeside,OR (NPP) 37-42 Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH (NCB) 20-41 Lamoille River, VT (NAN) 2-34 Lamoille River, VT: Hardwich Dams (NAN) 2-32 Lamprey River, NH (NED) 1-42 Lancassange Creek, Clark County, IN (ORL) 16-37 Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY (NCB) 20-42 Lancaster, Israel River, NH (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Lansing (Grand River), MI (1958 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-86 Lansing Harbor, IA 25-7 LaPoint Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-18, 21-56, 21-75 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID (NPW) 39-16 Larchmont Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 Largo Sound Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Lamed LPP, KS (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurrican protection) (LMN) 11-5,, 11-14 11-10 Larsen Bay, AK (NPA) 40-13 Las Animas, CO (SWA) 32-19 Las Cruces, NM (SWA) 32-19 Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-29 Las Vegas Wash Tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV (SPL) 33-32 LaSueur, MN (NCS) 24-29 Latrobe, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Latta Brook Road, NY (NAB) 4-35 Lauderdale County, MS (SAM) 10-56 Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa (POD) 36-11 Lauliituai-Aumi, American Samoa (POD) 36-12 Launiupoko, Maui, HI (POD) 36-11 Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORN) 15-7, 15-9, 15-17 Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID (NPW) 39-16 Lavaca-Navidad River, TX (SWG) 31-38 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 Lavon Lake, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 Lawrence, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Lawrenceburg, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Lead Bayou, MS (LMK) 12-13, 12-21 Leading Creek, WV (ORH) 17-23 Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-50 Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS (SAM) 10-50, 10-51 Leaf River, MS (SAM) 10-56 Leavenworth, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Lee County, FL (SAJ) 9-50 Lee, Housatonic River, MA (NED) 1-46 Leesville, VA (SAW) 6-28 Leetonia, OH (ORP) 18-22, 18-29 Leetsdale, PA (ORP) 18-24 Leipsic River, DE (NAP) 3-26 Leith's Creek, SC (SAN) 7-18 Leith's Creek, Scotland County, NC (SAW) 6-28 Leland Bowman Lock, LA (LMN) 11-15 Leland Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-19, 21-56, 21-75 Lemon Creek, NY (NAN) 2-34 Lepua Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI (NCE) 21-84 Letart Falls, OH (ORH) 17-22 Letart, WV (ORH) 17-22 Levee, Arkansas River, Tulsa, OK (SWT) 29-28 Levee Districts Between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 2, 5, 6, and 7 (LSM) 14-18 I-34 Levee Districts Between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10 and 13 (LSM) 14-18 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-26 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Levee Unit 10, White River, IN (ORL) 16-26 Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN (ORL) 16-26 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Levee Unit 2, White River, IN (ORL) 16-30 Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN (ORL) 16-26 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-26 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Levee Unit 9, White River, IN (ORL) 16-26 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Levee Unit No. 8, White River, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL (ORL) 16-26 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18, 17-20 Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Lewis River Area, WA (NPP) 37-40 Lewis River, WA (NPP) 37-36 Lewisport, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and WA (NPW) 39-13, 39-17 Lewisville Dam, TX (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 Lexington Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-19, 21-56, 21-75 Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT (NPS) 38-11, 38-18, 38-24 Liberty Island Anchorage (NAN) 2-28 Liberty Local Protection Project, TX (SWG) 31-38 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, NJ (NAN) 2-32 Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County) (ORL) 16-35 Lick Run, Roanoke, VA (SAW) 6-28 Licking River, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Lighthouse Beach, Chatham, MA (NED) 1-51 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT (NED) 1-45 Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID (NPS) 38-26 Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge, near Tumwater, WA (NPS) 38-26 Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY (NCB) 20-43 Lincoln Lake, IL (ORL) 16-27 Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA (NPS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22 Lincoln, Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-20 Linderberg Bay Area, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-61 Linton, ND (MRO) 26-16 Linville River, Avery County, NC (SAW) 6-32 Lisle, NY (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 Little Arkansas River, Sedgwick, KS (SWT) 29-27 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84 Little Bay, TX (SWG) 31-38 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Little Blue River Lakes, MO (MRK) 27-4, 27-11, 27-14 Little Browns Creek, AL (SAM) 10-50 Little Caillou Bayou, LA (LMN) 11-15 Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN (NCC) 22-8, 22-14, 22-18 Little Calumet River, IL and IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN (NCC) 22-21 Little Calumet River, IN (NCC) 22-8, 22-14, 22-18, 22-20 Little Chena River Dam, AK (NPA) 40-12 Little Colorado River at Holbrook, AZ (SPL) 33-30 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL (SAM) 10-50 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Little Cross Creek, Fayetteville, NC (SAW) 6-32 Little Deep Fork Creek, OK (SWT) 29-28 Little Dell Lake, UT, CA (SPK) 35-13, 35-28 Little Diomede, AK (NPA) 40-13 Little Egg Harbor, NJ (NAP) 3-26 Little Fork River, Hwy 75, MN (NCS) 24-30 Little Goose Lock and Dam - Lake Bryan, WA (NPW) 39-5, 39-10, 39-13, 39-20, 39-23 Little Harbor, NH (NED) 1-42 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA (NED) 1-42 Little Harpeth River, Brentwood, TN (ORN) 15-18 Little Kanawha River, WV (ORH) 17-20 Little Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-20, 21-57, 21-75 Little Machipongo River, VA (NAO) 5-17 I-35 Little Manatee River, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH (ORL) 16-35 Little Miami River, Milford, OH (ORL) 16-35 Little Miami River, South Lebanon, OH (ORL) 16-37 Little Missouri River, AR (LMK) 12-16 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR (LMK) 12-18 Little Neck Bay, NY (NAN) 2-29 Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE (MRO) 26-17 Little Nemaha River, Tangeman, NE (MRO) 26-20 Little Papillion Creek, NE (MRO) 26-16 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek, NE (MRO) 26-20 Little Popo Agie River, Lander, WY (MRO) 26-24 Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15, 28-19 Little Red River, District 1, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little River (Creek), VA (NAO) 5-17 Little River, AR (LMK) 12-16 Little River at Cayuga Island, NY (NCB) 20-40 Little River Basin, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15 Little River, Belfast, ME (NED) 1-46 Little River, Cameron, TX (SWF) 30-23 Little River, DE (NAP) 3-25 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (SAN) 7-6, 7-11, 7-15 Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Fourche Bayou, AR (SWL) 28-22 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, NC (SAW) 6-28 Little Scooba Creek, MS (SAM) 10-56 Little Sioux River, Anthon, IA (MRO) 26-21 Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-3, 26-9, 26-12 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-6, 20-18, 20-32 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, NC (SAW) 6-28 Little Tallahatchie River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Little Tennessee River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT (SPK) 35-40 Little Wabash River, Carmi, IL (ORL) 16-37 Little Walnut Creek, Austin, TX (SWF) 30-23 Little Walnut Creek, Mansfield, TX (SWF) 30-23 Little Walnut Creek, Seguin, TX (SWF) 30-23 Little Walnut Creek, Springtown, TX (SWF) 30-23 Little White Oak Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-12 Little Wicomoco River (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Little Wills Creek, AL (SAM) 10-51 Little Wood River, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-17 Little Yankee Creek, Hubbard, OH (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Littleville Lake, MA (NED) 1-14, 1-30, 1-53 Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Lock and Dam 13, AR (SWT) 29-26 Lock and Dam No. 1 25-9 Lock and Dam No. 2 25-9 Lock and Dam No. 5, AR (SWL) 28-4 Lock Haven, PA (NAB) 4-11, 4-24, 4-31 Lock No. 2 and Wilber D. Mills Dam (No. 2), AR (SWL) 28-3 Lockwoods Folly River, NC (SAW) 6-5, 6-19 Lodgepole Creek, Arvada, CO (MRO) 26-23 Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft, NE (MRO) 26-20 Logan Creek, Pender, NE (MRO) 26-23 Logan, OH (ORH) 17-23 Lone Rock, Buffalo River, AR (SWL) 28-23 Long Beach Island (NAP) 3-27, 3-28 Long Branch, Jacksonville, FL (SAJ) 9-61 Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO (MRK) 27-4, 27-11, 27-14 Long Island Intracoastal W/W, NY (NAN) 2-9, 2-19, 2-24, 2-28 Long Lake Area, Helena, AR (LMM) 13-7 Long Lake Dam, AK (NPA) 40-12 Long Tom River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Longboat Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-28, 9-37 Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR (NPP) 37-19, 37-27, 37-34, 37-43 Lorain Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-7, 20-18, 20-32 Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act modified by 1930 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX (SWF) 30-23 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-12, 33-16 Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-23 Los Coches Creek, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-25 Lost Creek at Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-3, 26-9, 26-12 Lost Creek, Carbon Hill, AL (SAM) 10-51 Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 I-36 Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River, OR (NPP) 37-19, 37-27, 37-34, 37-43 Lost River, MN (NCS) 24-24 Lost River, Orleans & Orange Counties, IN (ORL) 16-37 Louisville, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-24, 16-29, 16-34 Louisville, KY (Partial) (ORL) 16-26 Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-33 Loup River, Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-16 Loves Park, IL (NCR) 23-5, 23-7, 23-10 Lowell Creek, AK (NPA) 40-12 Lowell, MA (NED) 1-46, 1-56 Lower Big Sioux River, IA and SD (MRO) 26-16 Lower Branch Rush River, ND (NCS) 24-24 Lower Butte Basin, CA (SPK) 35-43 Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA (NPP) 37-13, 37-25, 37-33 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Lower Creek, Lenoir, NC (SAW) 6-13, 6-21 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA (NPW) 39-16 Lower Fox River, WI (1925 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Lower Gila River Levee and Channel Improvements (Gila River and Tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) (SPL) 33-30 Lower Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (NPW) 39-6, 39-10, 39-13, 39-20, 39-23 Lower Green River, King County, WA (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-23 Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-22 Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND (MRO) 26-16 Lower Heart River, ND (MRO) 26-16 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA (NAB) 4-33 Lower Mauvais Coulee/Devils Lake, ND (NCS) 24-31 Lower Mission Creek, CA (SPL) 33-9, 33-15 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. West, WA (NPW) 39-6, 39-11, 39-14, 39-21, 39-23 Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX (SWG) 31-13, 31-21, 31-36 Lower San Francisco Bay, CA (SPN) 34-13 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA (SPK) 35-38 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, CA (SPK) 35-30 Lower San Joaquin River, CA (SPK) 35-13, 35-29 Lower Santa Cruz, AZ (SPL) 33-10, 33-15 Lower Savannah River (SAS) 8-7 Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR and ID (NPW) 39-7, 39-11, 39-14 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Lower Walla Walla River, WA (NPW) 39-17 Lower Woonsocket, RI (NED) 1-46, 1-53 Lowes Wharf, MD (NAB) 4-33 Lowndes County, MS (SAM) 10-56 Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Lubec Channel, ME (NED) 1-42 Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet, ID (NPW) 39-17 Lucky Peak Lake, ID (NPW) 39-2, 39-10, 39-13 Ludington Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-20, 21-57, 21-75 Ludlow, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Ludlow Lake, VT (NED) 1-49 Lukfata Lake, OK (SWT) 29-24, 29-29 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL (ORL) 16-35 Lutsen Harbor, MN (NCE) 21-84 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Lyman Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-18 Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC (SAN) 7-17 Lynn Harbor, MA (NED) 1-42 Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA (NED) 1-45 Lynnhaven Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana Basin, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-25 Lytle Creek, Murfreesboro, TN (ORN) 15-18 M Maalaea Harbor, Maui, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5, 36-6 Machias River, Machias, ME (NED) 1-46 Machias River, ME (NED) 1-42 Mackay Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26, 6-29 Mackinac City Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84, 21-90 Mackinac Island Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84 Macon County, GA (SAS) 8-19 Macy, Blackbird Creek, NE (MRO) 26-20 Mad River at Blue Lake, CA (SPN) 34-14 Mad River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-40 Mad River, CA (SPN) 34-14 Mad River Lake, CT (NED) 1-46, 1-53 Mad River, Waterbury, CT (NED) 1-52 Mad River, Wolcott, CT (NED) 1-52 I-37 Madison Bay, MD (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Madison, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks (MRO) 26-16, 26-20 Madison River, Quake Lake, MT (MRO) 26-19 Madisons Parish Port, LA (LMK) 12-16 Magby Creek, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-50 Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-44 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Magruder Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-40 Mahnomen, MN (NCS) 24-29 Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-7, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Mahoning River, Hwy. 139a, Trumbull County, OH (construction completed) (ORP) 18-30 Mahukona (North Kohala), Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-11 Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA (NAP) 3-28 Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, AR (SWL) 28-4 Malden River, MA (NED) 1-42 Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR (NPW) 39-16 Malheur Lake Project, OR (NPW) 39-16 Malheur River, OR (NPW) 39-17 Malheur River, OR Vale Unit (NPW) 39-18 Maline Creek, MO (LSM) 14-5, 14-12 Mamaroneck Harbor (NAN) 2-28, 2-29 Manasquan River, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Manatee County, FL (SAJ) 9-50 Manatee County, FL (SAJ) 9-17, 9-31, 9-46 Manatee Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-8, 9-28, 9-37 Manatee River, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Manchester Harbor, MA (NED) 1-49 Manchester, OH (ORH) 17-22 Mandan, Heart River, ND (MRO) 26-16, 26-19 Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, HI (POD) 36-7 Manhasset Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-34 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Maniece Bayou, AR (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 Manistee Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-20, 21-57, 21-75 Manistique Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-21, 21-58, 21-76 Manitowoc Harbor, WI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Manitowoc Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-21, 21-58, 21-76 Mankato and North Mankato, MN (NCS) 24-9, 24-19, 24-29 Mann's Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-29 Manokin River, MD (NAB) 4-33 Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT (NED) 1-21, 1-33, 1-57 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, NC (SAW) 6-6, 6-20 Mantua Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Maple Creek, East Fork, Howells, NE (MRO) 26-23 Maple Creek, Nickerson, NE (MRO) 26-23 Maple River, ND (NCS) 24-26, 24-29 Mapleshade, OH (ORH) 17-22 Maquoketa River County Road 47 Bridge, IA (NCR) 23-16 Marblehead Harbor, MA (NED) 1-49 Marengo County, AL (SAM) 10-56 Marengo, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME (NED) 1-46 Marietta, OH (ORH) 17-22 Marina Del Rey, CA (SPL) 33-2, 33-12, 33-19 Marion County Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Marion, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-26, 16-33 Marion, KS (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 Marion Reservoir, KS (SWT) 29-7, 29-16, 29-22 Mariposa, CA (SPK) 35-42 Markham Ferry Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Marmarth, ND (MRO) 26-16, 26-19 Marne Creek, Yankton, SD (MRO) 26-19 Marquette Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-22, 21-58, 21-76 Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY (NCB) 20-42 Marshall, MN (NCS) 24-9, 24-19, 24-29 Marshalltown, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Martin County, FL (SAJ) 9-46 Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Martin, KY (ORH) 17-21 Martins Creek, Unicoi County, TN (ORN) 15-18 Martins Ferry, OH (ORP) 18-24 Martins Fork Lake, KY (ORN) 15-4, 15-9, 15-17 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA (SPK) 35-14, 35-29 Mary's Creek, Fort Worth and Benbrook, TX (SWF) 30-23 Marysville, KS (MRK) 27-18 Marysville Lake, CA (SPK) 35-38 Masefau Bay, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Mason County (Various Locations), WA (NPS) 38-27 I-38 Mason Creek, NC (SAW) 6-32 Mason J. Niblack Levee, (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Mason, WV (ORH) 17-22 Massillon, OH, (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (SWG) 31-7, 31-20, 31-31, 31-41, 31-46 Matawan Creek (NAN) 2-28, 2-29, 2-34 Matinicus Harbor, ME (NED) 1-42 Mats Mats Bay, WA (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Mattapoiset Harbor, MA (NED) 1-49 Mattaponi River, VA (NAO) 5-17 Mattituck Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-29 Mauckport, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Maumee Bay State Park, OH (NCB) 20-11, 20-21, 20-37 Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act (NCB) 20-45 Maumee River, Providence Metropark, OH (NCB) 20-44 Maumee River, Wallbridge Park, OH (NCB) 20-44 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-10 Maurice River, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Maurice River, NJ-Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth 3-26 Maurice River, NJ, Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project (NAP) 3-28 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-13, 14-16 Maxwell Creek, Parker County, TX (SWF) 30-23 Mayaguez Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-9, 9-28, 9-37, 9-51 Maynard Bayou, Muskogee County, OK (SWT) 29-27 Maynor Creek State park, Wayne, MS (SAM) 10-51 Maysville, KY (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Mazon River, Goose Lake, Grundy County, IL McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Recertification, AR (SWL) 28-3, 28-14, 29-26 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK (SWT) 29-2, 29-13, 29-20, 29-26 McCook and Thorton Reservoirs, IL (NCC) 22-9, 22-14, 22-18 McCook Lake, SD (MRO) 26-16 McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR (NPP) 37-38 McGary Hollow Run, Weston, WV (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-13, 14-16 McGinnis Levee, IN (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX (SWT) 29-24, 29-30 McGregor Park, Montgomery County, TN (ORN) 15-18 McKees Rocks, PA (ORP) 18-24 McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR (NPP) 37-38 McKinney Bayou, AR (LMK) 12-19 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR (LMK) 12-23 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 McNary Lock and Dam - Lake Wallula, OR and WA (NPW) 39-7, 39-11, 39-14, 39-22 McNary Second Powerhouse, OR & WA (NPW) 39-17 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek, NE (MRO) 26-20 Medicine Knoll, Blunt, SD (MRO) 26-23 Medomak River, ME (NED) 1-42 Meherrin River, VA (NAO) 5-17 Mekorykuk, AK (NPA) 40-11 Melbourne Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-9, 9-28, 9-37, 9-51 Melvern Lake and Pamona Lake (Road Improvements), KS (1974 Act) (MRK) 27-18, 27-20 Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS (MRK) 27-5,, 27-14 27-11, 27-20 Melvin Price Locks & Dam (Formerly Lock and Dam No. 26 (Replacement)) (LSM) 14-11 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM) 13-6 Menemsha Creek, MA (NED) 1-42 Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI (NCE) 21-23, 21-58, 21-76 Meramec Park Lake, MO (LSM) 14-18 Meramec River Basin Valley Park, MO (LSM) 14-5, 14-9, 14-13 Merced County Stream Group, CA (SPK) 35-15, 35-29, 35-42 Merced County Streams, CA (SPK) 35-14, 35-29 Merced River, CA (SPK) 35-38 Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-16 I-39 Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Merkle Creek, Norman, OK (SWT) 29-27 Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA (LMN) 11-15 Mermentau River, LA (LMN) 11-15 Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME (NED) 1-46 Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA (NED) 1-18 Merrimack River, MA (NED) 1-42 Metamora Lake, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-32 Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA (NPS) 38-27 Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA (NPS) 38-27 Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA (NPS) 38-27 Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA (NPS) 38-27 Methow River, WA (NPS) 38-27, 38-30 Metlakatla Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-7, 40-9 Metropolis, IL (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 MFS, Howard Complex, Cranston, RI (NED) 1-59 Miami and Vicinity, OK (SWT) 29-29 Miami Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-9, 9-29, 9-38, 9-51 Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH (ORL) 16-20, 16-24 Miami River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Mianus River, CT (NED) 1-42 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP), 18-8, 18-14, 18-19, 18-28 Michigan City Harbor, IN (NCC) 22-5, 22-13, 22-17, 22-19 Middle Beach, CT (NED) 1-45 Middle Creek, CA (SPK) 35-38 Middle Gila River Channel Improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) (SPL) 33-30 Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder, NE (MRO) 26-20 Middle Penn, Orangeburg County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-14, 32-17 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33 Middle River at Argyle, MN (NCS) 24-10, 24-19, 24-30 Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Middleport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Middlesboro (Diversion Canal) KY (ORN) 15-18 Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-14, 15-18 Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY (ORN) 15-5, 15-9 Midland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Midland Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-38 Milan, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Miles City, MT (MRO) 26-16 Milford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-42, 1-58 Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Milford Lake, Republican River, KS (MRK) 27-5, 27-11, 27-14, 27-20 Milk River, Havre, MT (MRO) 26-17 Milk River, Malta, MT (MRO) 26-19, 26-23 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT (NED) 1-46, 1-54 Mill Brook-Highland Park, NJ (NAN) 2-35 Mill Creek, City of Moab, UT (SPK) 35-44 Mill Creek, Dalton, GA (SAM) 10-17, 10-35, 10-46 Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (SWL) 28-7, 28-15 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-35 Mill Creek Lake, WA (NPW) 39-3, 39-10, 39-13 Mill Creek Levees (SPL) 33-31 Mill Creek, Mcgee, MS (SAM) 10-51 Mill Creek, MD (NAB) 4-37 Mill Creek, NC (SAW) 6-29, 6-32 Mill Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 Mill Creek, OH (ORL) 16-4, 16-14 Mill Creek, Salem, OR (NPP) 37-14, 37-25, 37-33, 37-42 Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS (SAM) 10-17, 10-35, 10-46 Mill Creek, TX (SWG) 31-38 Mill Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Mill Creek, WA (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Mill Creek, Yarmouth, MA (NED) 1-51 Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR (NPP) 37-38 Mill Lake, Blue River, MO (MRK) 27-18 Mill Run, Sinclairville, NY (plans and specifications) (ORP) 18-30 Miller, OH (ORH) 17-22 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL (LSM) 14-16 Miller Run, Cecil Township, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-25, 10-37 Millersburg, OH (ORH) 17-23 I-40 Millford Haven, VA (NAO) 5-17 Millican, TX (SWF) 30-22 Millington, TN (LMM) 13-2, 13-4 Millwood Lake, AR (SWL) 28-8, 28-16, 28-29 Millwood, WV (ORH) 17-22 Milton Harbor (NAN) 2-28, 2-30 Milton, KY (ORL) 16-26, 16-30 Milton, PA (NAB) 4-38 Milwaukee Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-23, 21-59, 21-77 Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Mines Creek, Spring Valley, WI (NCS) 24-29 Mingo Creek, OK (SWT) 29-7, 29-17, 29-22 Mingo Creek, SC (SAN) 7-17 Mingo Junction, OH (ORP) 18-24 Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-32 Minneota, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Minnesota River at Henderson, MN (NCS) 24-10, 24-19, 24-30 Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN (NCS) 24-24 Minnesota River, MN (NCS) 24-2, 24-18, 24-22, 24-30 Minot, ND (NCS) 24-24 Mispillion River, DE (NAP) 3-7, 3-17, 3-22 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI (NED) 1-45 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID (NPW) 39-16 Mission Beach, CA (SPL) 33-29 Missisquoi River at Richford, VT (NAN) 2-32 Mississinewa Lake, IN (ORL) 16-9, 16-16 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN (NCS) 24-23 Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO (LSM) 14-16 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO (LSM) 14-18 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO (LSM) 14-16 Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor (LSM) 14-18 Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO (LSM) 14-16 Mississippi River Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA (LMN) 11-12, 11-16 Mississippi River Between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MN (NCS) 24-23 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (NCS) 24-2 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (Includes Melvin Price Locks & DAM) (LSM) 14-2 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN 25-1, 25-10 Mississippi River Between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN (NCR) 23-3 Mississippi River betwen Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL (LSM) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 Mississippi River Commission 42-1 Mississippi River, First Avenue, Hampton IL (NCR) 23-16 Mississippi River, Fridley, MN (NCS) 24-30 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (LMN) 11-2, 11-10, 11-12 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA (LMN) 11-16 Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA (LMN) 11-16 Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA (LMN) 11-2, 11-10, 11-12 Missoula (Sewage Treatment Plant), MT (NPS) 38-27 Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD (MRO) 26-3, 26-9, 26-12 Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 Act) (MRK) 27-17 Missouri River, Aten, NE (MRO) 26-16 Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood, SD (MRO) 26-19 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton, MT (MRO) 26-19 Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS and MO (MRK) 27-2, 27-10, 27-13 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND (MRO) 26-18 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-4, 26-10, 26-12 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-5, 27-11, 27-14, 27-18, 27-19, 27-20 Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE (MRO) 26-4, 26-18 Missouri River Levees, IA, NE, KS and MO (MRO) 26-10, 26-12, 26-18, 26-21 Missouri River Main Stem (MRK) 27-20 Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-21 1-41 Missouri River Master Water Control Review and Update (MRO) 26-7, 26-11, 26-14 Missouri River, Niobrara, NE (MRO) 26-16 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (MRK) 27-2, 27-10, 27-13 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-2, 26-9, 26-12 Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT (MRO) 26-15 Mitigation of Shore Damages Detroit District (NCE) 21-39 Mobile Harbor, AL (SAM) 10-10, 10-34, 10-43 Mocassin Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-29 Moccasin Springs, MO (LSM) 14-15 Moclips River, Moclips, WA (NPS) 38-27 Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-25 Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR (NPP) 37-38 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR (NPP) 37-38 Moline Harbor, IL 25-7 Moline, IL (NCR) 23-13 Mon River, Sewage Treatment Plant, Pt. Marion, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Mon River, Water St., Pt. Marion, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Moncreif Creek, Jacksonville, FL (SAJ) 9-61 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County, IA (MRO) 26-21 Monongahela River, PA and WV (ORP) 18-2, 18-13, 18-17, 18-26, 18-27, 18-28 Monoosnoc Brook, MA (NED) 1-49 Monoosnoc Lake, MA (NED) 1-49 Monroe and West Monroe Parish, LA and Ouachita Parish, LA (LMK) 12-13 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Monroe County, AL (SAM) 10-56 Monroe County, FL (SAJ) 9-46 Monroe County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Monroe County, MS (SAM) 10-56 Monroe Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-24, 21-59, 21-77 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 Monroe Lake, IN (ORL) 16-9, 16-16, 16-32 Montcalm, WV (ORH) 17-24 Monterey Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-13 Montgomery County, AL (SAM) 10-56 Montour Falls, Oswega River Basin, NY (NCB) 20-42 Moore, OK (SWT) 29-29 Moorefield, WV (NAB) 4-37 Moores Ferry, VA (ORH) 17-23 Moorhead, MN (NCS) 24-26 Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR (NPP) 37-36 Moosabec Bar, ME (NED) 1-42 Morais River, ND (NCS) 24-30 Moravian Creek, Wilksboro, NC (SAW) 6-32 Morehead City Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-20 Morehead City Harbor, NC Jetties at Beaufort Inlet (SAW) 6-29 Morgan City and Vicinity, LA (Hurrican protection) (LMN) 11-6, 11-11, 11-14 Moriches Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-30 Mormon Slough, CA (SPK) 35-38 Morris Cove, New Haven, CT (NED) 1-51 Morrison, Bear Creek, CO (MRO) 26-17 Morristown Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-40 Morro Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-12, 33-20 Moscow, OH (ORL) 16-27, 16-30 Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORP) 18-8, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Mott, ND (MRO) 26-16 Moss Street, Pecan Creek, Gainsville, TX (SWF) 30-23 Mound State Park, Moundville, AL (SAM) 10-18, 10-35, 10-41 Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL (LMM) 13-6 Moundsville, WV (ORP) 18-24 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MI (NCE) 21-85 Mount Morris Lake, NY Genesee River (NCB) 20-13, 20-22, 20-38 Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, WA (NPP) 37-38 Mount Vernon, IN (ORL) 16-24 Mountain Brook Dam, NH (NED) 1-49 Mountain Point, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-7, 40-13 Mouth of Yazoo River, MS (LMK) 12-16 Moycock Creek, NC (SAW) 6-29 Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN (NCC) 22-20 Mt. Holly, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (NPP) 37-14, 37-25, 37-33 Mucky creek, Mapleton, IA (MRO) 26-21 I-42 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE (MRO) 26-16 Mud Lake Area, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Mud Mountain Dam, WA (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-23 Mud River, WV (ORH) 17-23 Muddy Creek, Cascade, Vaughn, MT (MRO) 26-24 Muddy Creek Dam, PA (ORP) 18-24 Muddy Creek Near Syracuse, NE (MRO) 26-20 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, MD (NAB) 4-33 Mulberry Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power in Operation F-i Multiple Purpose Projects, Including St. Marys River, MI (NCE) 21-85 Multnomah Channel, OR (NPP) 37-36 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-38 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR (NPP) 37-37 Muncie, IN (White River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Munday, TX (SWF) 30-22 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL (SAM) 10-50, 10-51 Murder Creek, Brewton, AL (SAM) 10-18, 10-35, 10-46 Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL (SAM) 10-50 Murder-Goose Neck Creek, Corfu, NY (NCB) 20-43 Murder-Goose Neck Creek, Pembroke, NY (NCB) 20-43 Murderkill River, DE (NAP) 3-7, 3-17, 3-22 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake (LMK) 12-21 Murray County, GA (SAM) 10-56 Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), AR (SWL) 28-4 Murrells Inlet, SC (SAN) 7-6, 7-11, 7-15 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN (ORL) 16-35 Muscatine Harbor, IA (NCR) 23-11 Muscatine Harbor, IA 25-7 Muscatine Island, IA (NCR) 23-8, 23-10 Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine-Louisa County, Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA (NCR) 23-12, 23-14 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL (NCR) 23-11 Muskegon Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-25, 21-60, 21-77 Muskingum River Lakes, OH (ORH) 17-7, 17-14, 17-18 Muskingum River, OH (OIRH) 17-20 Muskogee, OK (SWT) 29-27 Mustinka River, MN (NCS) 24-28 Myers Chuck Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11, 40-12 Mystic, CT (NED) 1-49 Mystic River, CT (NED) 1-42 Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Mystic River, MA (NED) 1-42 N N. Fork, Maquoketa River, Cascade, IA (NCR) 23-16 Naches River, Naches, WA (NPS) 38-27 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River, IA (MRO) 26-20 Naguabo River, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Nahunta Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-29 Naknek River, AK (NPA) 40-11 Nameless Creek, County Road 850 N, IN (ORL) 16-37 Namo River, Guam (POD) 36-9 Nan Cove, MD (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Nandua Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia (POD) 36-3, 36-5, 36-6 Nansemond River, VA (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA (NED) 1-52 Nantasket Beach, MA (NED) 1-49 Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork), DE and MD (NAB) 4-33 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Nanticoke River, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-28 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA (NED) 1-42 Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-49 Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-49 Napa River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-38 Napa River, CA (SPK) 35-26, 35-34 Napa River, CA (SPN) 34-7 Napatree Beach, RI (NED) 1-49 Narragansett Pier, RI (NED) 1-50 Narraguagus River, ME (NED) 1-42, 1-58 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR (LMK) 12-18, 12-21 Narrows of Lake Champlain, NY & VT (NAN) 2-9, 2-19, 2-24 Nashua, NH (NED) 1-46, 1-56 Nassau County, FL (SAJ) 9-18, 9-31, 9-46 Natches Port Area, MS (LMK) 12-21 Natchitoches Parish, LA (LMK) 12-20 National Emergency Preparedness Buffalo District (NCB) 20-13 I-43 Chicago District (NCC) 22-6 Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-7, 27-12 Mobile District (SAM) 10-31 Omaha District (MRO) 26-8 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-14 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery Activities 52-1 Navarro Mills Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Navasota Lake Navasota River, TX (SWF) 30-22 Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) New England Division (NED) 1- Navigation Locks and Dams Operable D-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction E-1 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Baltimore District (NAB) 4-8 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-11 Charleston District (SAN) 7-8 Detroit District (NCE) 21-38 Galveston District (SWG) 31-10 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-16 Louisville District (ORL) 16-3 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-4 Memphis District (LMM) 13-1 Mobile District (SAM) 10-15 Nashville District (ORN) 15-4 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-3 New York District (NAN) 2-14 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-7, 5-11 Omaha District (MRO) 26-2 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 Portland District (NPP) 37-6 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-5 Seattle District (NPS) 38-5 St. Louis District (LSM) 14-3 Vicksburg District (LMK) 12-3 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-1 Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai., HI (POD) 36-10 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Neabsco Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33 Neabsco Creek, VA (1811 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-37 Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Neah Bay, WA (NPS) 38-25 Neale Sound, MD (NAB) 4-33 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL (NCR) 23-12 Neavitt Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-33 Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier to Beaumont, TX (SWG) 31-38 Needles, San Bernardino, CA (SPL) 33-30 Nehalem Bay, OR (NPP) 37-41 Nehalem Bay, OR (NPP) 37-36 Nehalem River, Sunset Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-42 Nelson Run, Ross Township, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Neodesha Lake, KS (SWL) 28-28 Neodesha Lake, KS (SWT) 29-25, 29-26 Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-35 Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA (NAP) 3-25 Neshannock Creek, New Castle, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR (NPP) 37-38 Nestucca River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR (NPP) 37-38 Neuse River, 300-foot wide channel in front of New Bern, NC (SAW) 6-29 Neuse River Barrier, NC (SAW) 6-29 Neuse River Basin, NC (SAW) 6-12, 6-31 Neuse River, NC (SAW) 6-29 Neuse River, Oriental, NC (SAW) 6-14, 6-21, 6-26 Neva and Olga Straits, AK (NPA) 40-11 Neville Island, PA (ORP) 18-24 New Albany, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 New Amsterdam, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-30 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (NED) 1-42 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (NED) 1-19, 1-32, 1-39 New Buffalo Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-25, 21-60, 21-77 New Bullards Bar, CA (SPK) 35-38 New Cumberland, WV (ORP) 18-24 New Harbor, ME (NED) 1-42 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-24, 16-29 New Harmony, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-30 New Haven Breakwater, CT (NED) 1-42 New Haven Harbor, CT (NED) 1-42, 1-58 I-44 New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-8, 3-17, 3-22 New Kensington and Parnassus, PA (ORP) 18-24 New London, CT (NED) 1-20, 1-32, 1-39 New London Harbor, CT (NED) 1-42 New Madrid Harbor, MO (LMM) 13-5 New Martinsville, WV (ORH) 17-22 New Matamoras, OH (ORH) 17-22 New Melones Lake, CA (SPK) 35-23 New Metlakatla Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-13 New Orleans to Venice, LA (Hurrican protection) (LMN) 11-7, 11-11, 11-14 New Pass, Sarasota, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-29, 9-39 New Richmond, OH (ORL) 16-27, 16-30 New River, FL (SAJ) 9-49 New River, NC (SAW) 6-28 New River, Onslow County, NC (SAW) 6-28 New River, WV and VA (ORH) 17-20 New Rochelle Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-30 New York and New Jersey Channels (NAN) 2-9, 2-19, 2-24, 2-34 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN) 2-10, 2-20, 2-24 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas (NAN) 2-11, 2-20, 2-25 New York Harbor-Main Ship Channel (NAN) 2-28 Newark Bay (NAN) 2-28 Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, NJ (NAN) 2-30, 2-34 Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) (ORH) 17-21 Newark, OH (ORH) 17-7, 17-14, 17-18, 17-24 Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA (NPS) 38-27 Newbegun Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Newburgh, IN (Ohio River) (ORL) 16-23 Newburyport Harbor, MA (NED) 1-7, 1,27, 1-37 Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Newmarket Creek, VA (NAO) 5-18 Newport Bay Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-28 Newport Harbor, RI (NED) 1-42 Newport, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Newport News Creek, VA (NAO) 5-4, 5-10, 5-14, 5-17 Newport, OH (ORH) 17-22 Newport, OR (NPP) 37-41 Newport, White River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Newport-Wilder, KY (ORL) 16-27 Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK (SWT) 29-26 Newtown Creek (NAN) 2-28, 2-30 Niagara Remedial Works, NY (NCB) 20-40 Niagara River, Compensating Works, 1930 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Niagara River, NY (NCB) 20-40 Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT (NED) 1-42 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY (ORL) 16-35 Nichols, NY (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Nimrod Lake, AR (SWL) 28-8, 28-16, 28-28 Nine Mile Drain, Scottsbluff, NE (MRO) 26-23 Ninilchik Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-7, 40-9 Niobrara River (Carns Bridge), NE (MRO) 26-24 Niobrara River, Bassett, NE (MRO) 26-20 Niobrara River-Carns Bridge, Bassett, NE (MRO) 26-20 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-16, 26-20 Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-23 Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA (NPS) 38-27 Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA (NPS) 38-27 Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA (NPS) 38-27 Nixon Creek, TN (LMM) 13-6 NJ Pierhead Channel (NAN) 2-28 Nogales Wash, AZ (SPL) 33-10, 33-15, 33-30 Nolin Lake, KY (ORL) 16-9, 16-16, 16-32 Nome Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-9 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM) 13-6 Nonconnah Creek at Perkins, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-2, 13-4 Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-6 Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT (NED) 1-46 Nookagee Lake, MA (NED) 1-50 Noosack River, Acme, WA (NPS) 38-27 Noosack River, Everson, WA (NPS) 38-31 Noosack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA (NPS) 38-27 Noosack River, Marietta, WA (NPS) 38-31 Noosack River, Middle Fork, Deming, WA (NPS) 38-27 Noosack River, above Highway 1Z Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-27 Noosack River, Sumas, WA (NPS) 38-31 I-45 Noosack River, WA (NPS) 38-27 Noosack River, Whatcom County, WA (NPS) 38-31 Norfolk Floodwall, VA (NAO) 5-18 Norfolk Harbor, Eastern Branch, VA (NAO) 5-14 Norfolk Harbor, Southern Branch, VA (NAO) 5-14, 5-19 Norfolk Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-5, 5-10, 5-14 Norfolk Harbor, Western Branch, VA (NAO) 5-15, 5-19 Norfolk Lake, AR (SWL) 28-12, 28-17, 28-30 Norfolk, NE (MRO) 26-16 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River, NE (MRO) 26-20 Normal, KY (ORH) 17-22 Norrel Lock and Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, AR (SWL) 28-4 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, MA (NAN) 2-32 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-16 North Andover and Lawrence, MA (NED) 1-50 North Branch, Chicago River, IL (NCC) 22-10, 22-14, 22-18 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-18 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT (NED) 1-47, 1-55 North Canadian above Lake Overholser (SWT) 29-29 North Canadian River, Okfuskee County, OK (SWT) 29-28, 29-29 North Canadian River Wastewater Plant, Oklahoma City, OK (SWT) 29-27 North Ellenville, NY (NAN) 2-15, 2-21, 2-26 North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-19 North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA (SPK) 35-38 North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH (NED) 1-50 North Hartland Lake, VT (NED) 1-15, 1-30, 1-53 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA (NED) 1-51 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-56 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA (NED) 1-47 North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare, NE (MRO) 26-20 North Ridgeville, OH (NCB) 20-43 North River Dike, NC (SAW) 6-29 North Sandy Pond, Oswego County, NY (NCB) 20-43 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA (NED) 1-45 North Second Street at Wolf River, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-4, 13-6 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY (NAN) 2-34 North Shore, Santa Rosa Island, FL (SAM) 10-51 North Springfield Lake, VT (NED) 1-15, 1-30, 1-53 North Stratford, NH (NED) 1-54 Northeast Cape Fear River, NC (SAW) 6-28 Northeast Cape Fear River, NC (SAW) 6-26 Northeast Harbor, ME (NED) 1-42 Northeast River, MD (NAB) 4-33 Northfield Brook Lake, CT (NED) 1-18, 1-31, 1-55 Northhampton, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-54 Northport Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-30 Northport Harbor, WI (1975 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-87 Northport Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-84 Norwalk, Ct (NED) 1-47 Norwalk Harbor, CT (NED) 1-42 Norwalk-Wilton, CT (NED) 1-50 Norwich, CT (NED) 1-47, 1-57 Norwich, NY (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Nottoway River, VA (NAO) 5-17 Nouma Navigation Canal, LA (LMN) 11-15 Noxubee River, MS (SAM) 10-49 Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS (SAM) 10-50 Noyo River and Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-6, 34-7 Nua-Amaluia, American Samoa (POD) 36-12 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-13, 14-17 O O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 O'Hare Reservoir, IL (NCC) 22-10, 22-14, 22-18 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND (MRO) 26-7, 26-11, 26-14, 26-18 Oahe Wildlife Restoration (MRO) 26-22 Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, MA (NED) 1-51 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA (NED) 1-45 Oak Orchard Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-7, 20-19, 20-33 Oakdale, PA (ORP) 18-23 Oakford Special Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 I-46 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI (NED) 1-45 Oakland Harbor (Deepen Tidal Canal), CA (SPN) 34-13 Oakland Harbor (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge), CA (SPN) 34-13 Oakland Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-1, 34-7, 34-11 Oates Creek, Richmond County, GA (SAS) 8-6, 8-11, 8-17, 8-19 Obey River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Obion River, TN (LMM) 13-5 Occohannock Creek, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-17 Occoquan Creek, VA (NAB) 4-33 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-29 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-29 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-37 Ocean City, NJ (NAP) 3-28 Ocean Springs Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-51 Oceana, WV (ORH) 17-21 Oceanside Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-12, 33-20, 33-30 Oceanside Harbor Sand Bypass, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-12, 33-20 Oceanside, San Diego County, CA (SPL) 33-29 Oceanside, Sand By-pass, CA (SPL) 33-29 Oconto Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-26, 21-60, 21-78 Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, NC (SAW) 6-29 Ocracoke Island, NC (SAW) 6-29 Oelwein, Fayette County, IA (NCR) 23-16 Ofu Airstrip (West End), American Samoa (POD) 36-11 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-40 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) (ORH) 17-8, 17-14 Ohio River Basin (Louisville District) (ORL) 16-10, 16-16, 16-19 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) (ORN) 15-5, 15-12, 15-17 Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) (ORP) 18-9, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY (ORL) 16-35, 16-37 Ohio River, Chester, WV (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Ohio River, City Park, West Point, KY (ORL) 16-37 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY (ORL) 16-35, 16-37 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Madison, IN (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Moscow, OH (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Moundsville, WV (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Ohio County, IN (ORL) 16-37 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Rockport/Rockport Landing, IN (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Switzerland County, IN (ORL) 16-37 Ohio River, Troy, IN (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY (ORL) 16-35 Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN (ORL) 16-35 Oil City Ice Control Structures, PA (ORP) 18-22 Oil City, PA (ORP) 18-22, 18-30 Oil Creek, Oil City, Verango County, PA (reconnaissance) (ORP) 18-30 Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN (NCR) 23-12 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA (NPS) 38-25 Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA (NPS) 38-27 Okanogan River, Omak, WA (NPS) 38-27 Okanogan River, Oroville, WA (NPS) 38-27 Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, WA (NPS) 38-27 Okanogan River, WA (NPS) 38-27, 38-30 Okatibbee Lake, MS (SAM) 10-18, 10-36, 10-46 Okeechobee Waterway, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-29, 9-39, 9-54 Oklahoma City, Floodway, OK (SWT) 29-27 Oklahoma City LPP, OK (SWT) 29-24 Oklawaha River, FL (SAJ) 9-10, 9-29, 9-39, 9-51 Oktassi Creek, AL (SAM) 10-56 I-47 Olcott Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-7, 20-19, 20-34 Old Field Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-28 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK (NPA) 40-11 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN (ORN) 15-14 Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-50 Old Kingstree Canal, Williamsburg County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Old Metlakatla Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-13 Oldmans Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-25, 3-28 Olean, NY (ORP) 18-22 Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL (SAM) 10-6, 10-33, 10-41 Olympia Harbor (1945 R&H Act), WA (NPS) 38-30 Olympia Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-21 Omaha, NE (MRO) 26-16, 26-18, 26-20 Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS (MRK) 27-18 Onancock River, VA (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Oneida Creek, NY (NCB) 20-43 Oneonta, NY (NAB) 4-38 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY (NCB) 20-42 Ontonagon Harbor, MI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Ontonagon Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-26, 21-61, 21-78 Oologah Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Oologah Lake, OK (SWT) 29-8, 29-17, 29-22, 29-26 Oostanaula River, GA (SAM) 10-56 Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY (ORL) 16-2, 16-14, 16-22 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORD) 19-3, 19-5, 19-6, 18-3 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORH) 17-2 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORL) 16-3 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing (NPW) 39-23 Open River Pasco to Lewiston (NPW) 39-23 Optima Lake, OK (SWT) 29-8, 29-17, 29-22 Oracoke Inlet, NC (SAW) 6-26 Orange River, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Orange Road, Mercer County, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), OR (NPP) 37-36 Orleans, IN (ORL) 16-27 Oro Grande Wash Channel Improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-30 Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID (NPW) 39-16 Orowoc Creek, NY (NAN) 2-34 Orwell Lake, MN (NCS) 24-31 Orwell River (Otter Tail River), MN 24-28 Osage River, KS and MO (MRK) 27-20 Osage River, MO lock and dam (MRK) 27-16 Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Osceola Harbor, AR (LMM) 13-5 Oslo, MN (NCS) 24-29 Oswego Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-34 Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Otranto Watershed, Charleston County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Ottawa, IL (NCR) 23-16 Ottawa,- OH (NCB) 20-42 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Ottawa River Harbor, MI and OH (NCB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-34 Otter Brook Lake, NH (NED) 1-15, 1-30, 1-53 Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR (SWL) 28-22 Otter Creek, VT (NAN) 2-34 Otter Tail River, MN (NCS) 24-28 Otto Creek, Leshara, NE (MRO) 26-23 Ottumwa, IA (NCR) 23-12 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (LMK) 12-2, 12-10, 12-12 Ouachita River and Tributaries, AR and LA (LMK) 12-5, 12-13 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (LMK) 12-18 Ouachita River Levees, LA (LMK) 12-5, 12-11 Overton-Red River Waterway, LA (LMK) 12-16 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, NY (NCB) 20-42 Owego, NY (NAB) 4-38 Owens, CA (SPK) 35-42 Owensboro, KY (ORL) 16-27, 16-30 Owl Creek, West Carrolton, OH (ORL) 16-37 Owl's Head Harbor, ME (NED) 1-42 Owyhee River, OR (NPW) 39-13, 39-16 Oxford, MD (NAB) 4-34 Oxford, NY (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 Oyster Channel, VA (NAO) 5-17 Oyster Creek, TX (SWG) 31-38 Ozan Creek, AR (LMK) 12-18 I-48 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 13), AR (SWL) 28-12, 28-17 Ozona, FL channel and turning basin (SAJ) 9-49 P Paauau Stream, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-9 Paducah, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Pagan River, VA (NAO) 5-17 Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH (ORH) 17-24 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH (ORH) 17-24 Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-19 Paint Rock River, AL (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Painted Post, NY (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ (SPL) 33-5, 33-13, 33-23 Paintsville Lake, KY (ORH) 17-8, 17-15, 17-19 Pajaro River, CA (SPK) 35-15, 35-29 Pajaro River, CA (SPN) 34-14 Palm Beach County, FL (SAJ) 9-18, 9-31, 9-46 Palm Beach County, FL, from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet (SAJ) 9-50 Palm Beach, FL side channel and basin (SAJ) 9-49 Palm Beach Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-29, 9-39, 9-51 Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, NC (SAW) 6-7, 6-20 Pamona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS Pamunkey River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-17 Panacea Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-49, 10-52 Panama City Beaches, FL (SAM) 10-44 Panama City Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-11, 10-34, 10-44 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 Panther Creek, KY (Green River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-35 Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, IL (NCR) 23-16 Panther Creek, WV (ORH) 17-23 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE (MRO) 26-4, 26-10, 26-13 Parish Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33 Park City, KS (SWT) 29-27 Park River, Hartford, CT (NED) 1-47, 1-54 Park Row, Arlington, TX (SWF) 30-23 Parker Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Parker Lake, OK (SWT) 29-8, 29-17, 29-22 Parkersburg, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Parrots Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Parsons, Hambleton, Hendricks, WV (complete) (ORP) 18-30 Pascagoula Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-12, 10-34, 10-44 Pascagoula River, MS (SAM) 10-49 Pasquotank River, NC (SAW) 6-28 Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Pass Christian Harbor, MS (SAM) 10-49 Pass Manchac, LA (LMN) 11-16 Passaic River (NAN) 2-28 Passaic River Basin, N.J. & NY (NAN) 2-16, 2-21, 2-26 Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME (NED) 1-48 Pat Mayse Lake, TX (SWT) 29-8, 29-17, 29-22 Patchogue River, CT (NED) 1-42 Patoka Lake, IN (ORL) 16-10, 16-17, 16-32 Patoka River, Jasper, IN (ORL) 16-35 Patoka River, Winslow, IN (ORL) 16-35 Patriot, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-30 Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Pattonsburgh Lake, Grand River, MO I-35 Highway Relocation Town Relocation (MRK) 27-18 Patuxent River, MD (NAB) 4-33 Paw Paw Lake, MI (NCE) 21-85 Pawcatuck, CT (NED) 1-47 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI & CT (NED) 1-50 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT (NED) 1-42 Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Pawtucket, RI (NED) 1-50 Pawtuxet Cove, RI (NED) 1-42 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI (NED) 1-47, 1-53 Pax, WV (ORH) 17-24 Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID (NPW) 39-16 Payette Valley, ID (NPW) 39-17 Pea & Choctawhatchee Rivers, Geneva, AL (SAM) 10-51 Pea River, Elba, AL (SAM) 10-51 Peachtree Creek, Basin, Atlanta, GA (SAM) 10-51 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA (SAS) 8-19 Pearl River Basin, MS and LA (LMK) 12-6, 12-11, 12-13 Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS (LMK) 12-21 Pearl River, MS (LMK) 12-16 I-49 Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA (LMK) 12-7, 12-11, 12-14 Pearson-Skubitz Bill Hill Lake, KS (SWT) 29-9, 29-17, 29-22 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE (MRO) 26-4, 26-10, 26-13, 26-20, 26-23 Pecan Bayou, TX (SWT) 29-29 Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI (NCR) 23-14 Peconic River (NAN) 2-28, 2-30 Pecos, TX (SWA) 32-19 Peekskill Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-30 Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Pelican Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Pelican Lake, Frankfort, MN (NCS) 24-30 Pembina, ND (NCS) 24-29 Pembina River Lake, ND (NCS) 24-26 Pembina River, ND (NCS) 24-24 Pembroke Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR (NPP) 37-40 Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR (NPP) 37-39 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR (NPP) 37-39 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR (NPP) 37-37, 37-40, 37-42 Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR (NPP) 37-38 Peninsula, TX (SWG) 31-38 Penitentiary Jones Run, KY (ORL) 16-37 Penn Township, Butler County, PA (complete) (ORP) 18-30 Penny Slough, Rock River, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Penobscot River, ME (NED) 1-42, 1-47 Pensacola Beach, FL (SAM) 10-51 Pensacola Harbor, FL (SAM) 10-12, 10-34, 10-45, 10-52 Pensacola Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Pensaukee Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-27, 21-61, 21-78 Pentwater Harbor, MI (1892 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Racine Harbor, WI (1945 R&H Act and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Pentwater Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-27, 21-61, 21-78 Peoria, IL (NCR) 23-13 Peoria Levees, IL (NCR) 23-14 Pepin Harbor, WI 25-7 Pepper Creek, DE (NAP) 3-25 Pepperell Cove, ME (NED) 1-42 Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Percosin Creek and Tributaries, GA (SAM) 10-56 Perdido Pass Channel, AL (SAM) 10-13, 10-35, 10-45, 10-52 Perkins Cove, Ogunquit, ME (NED) 1-51 Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (NED) 1-47 Permenant International Association of Navigation Congresses 48-1 Perquimans River, NC (SAW) 6-26, 6-28 Perry County Drainage and Levee District Nos. 1, 2 and 3, MO (LSM) 14-17 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS (MRK) 27-11 Perryville, KY (ORL) 16-34 Perth Amboy Channel (NAN) 2-28 Perth Amboy, NJ (NAN) 2-34 Petaha Creek, Pomeroy, WA (NPW) 39-16 Petaluma River, CA (SPN) 34-8 Petersburg Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Petit Jean River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Petit Jean River, Highway 309, AR (SWL) 28-8, 28-16 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA (LMN) 11-16 Petoskey Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84 Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Peyton Creek, TX (SWG) 31-38 Phillipi, WV (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Phillippi Creek Basin, FL (SAJ) 9-50 Phillips Lake, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-56 Philpott Lake, VA (SAW) 6-16, 6-22 Phoenix, AZ and Vicinity (Including New River)(Stage 2 and Remaining Work) (SPL) 33-6, 33-13, 33-23 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-6, 27-14 Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha District) (MRO), 26-5, 26-13 Pickens County, AL (SAM) 10-56 Pierce County (Various Locations), WA (NPS) 38-27 Pierce, NE (MRO) 26-16, 26-20 Pig Island Gut, ME (NED) 1-42 Pilchuck River, Everett, WA (NPS) 38-27 Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA (NPS) 38-27 Pilchuck River, WA (NPS) 38-27 Pillar Point Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-8 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 I-50 Pinal Creek Channel Improvements (Globe) (SPL) 33-30 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV (SPL) 33-7, 33-14, 33-25 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection (LMK) 12-18 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN (NCS) 24-23 Pine Creek Lake, TX (SWT) 29-9, 29-17, 29-22 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (SPK) 35-16, 35-29 Pine Ford Lake, MO (LSM) 14-6, 14-9 Pine Mountain Lake, AR (SWL) 28-22 Pine River, MI (NCE) 21-84 Pinellas County, FL (SAJ) 9-19, 9-31, 9-46 Pineville, KY (ORN) 15-13, 15-18 Pineville, Red River, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-21 Piney Creek, Spring City, TN (ORN) 15-18 Pinole Creek, CA (SPK) 35-38 Pinole Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, CO (Sec. 212) (SWA) 32-19 Pioneer Lake, KS (MRK) 27-18 Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN (ORL) 16-37 Pipestem Lake, ND (MRO) 26-5, 26-10, 26-14 Pithlachascotee River, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Pittsburgh Harbor, PA (ORP) 18-21 Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) (ORP) 18-24 Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) (ORP) 18-24 Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) (ORP) 18-24 Placer Creek, ID (NPS) 38-27 Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN (LMM) 13-4, 13-6 Planning and Engineering (SWG) 31-17 Planning Engineering and Design (NED) 1-25 Planting Island Causeway, Marion, MA (NED) 1-51 Plants Creek, Seymour, TX (SWF) 30-23 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE (MRO) 26-16 Platte River and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-16 Platte River, Ashland, NE (MRO) 26-20 Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville, NE (MRO) 26-20 Platte River, Brady, NE (MRO) 26-20 Platte River, Cedar Creen, NE (MRO) 26-23 Platte River, Ginger Cove Near Valley, NE (MRO) 26-20 Platte River, Hansen-Chris Lakes, Bellevue, NE (MRO) 26-20 Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island, NE (MRO) 26-20 Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement (MRK) 27-17 Platte River, Near North Bend, NE (MRO) 26-20 Platte River near Schuyler, NE (MRO) 26-16 Plattsburgh Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-30 Pleasant Bay, MA (NED) 1-50 Pleasant Meadow Swamp, Lori, SC (SAN) 7-18 Pleasant Point, Perry, ME (NED) 1-47 Pleasant River, ME (NED) 1-42 Pleasanton, TX (SWF) 30-22 Plum Creek at New Haven Township, MN (NCS) 24-29, 16-35 Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora, CO (MRO) 26-19 Plum Creek, Norden Dam Access Road, NE (MRO) 26-23 Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (plans and specifications) (ORP) 18-30 Plum Island, MA (NED) 1-45 Plymouth Harbor, MA (NED) 1-42 Plymouth, PA (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Poca, WV (ORH) 17-23 Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) (NAB) 4-37 Pocomoke River, MD (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Pocotaligo River, Manning, SC (SAN) 7-18 Pogues Run, Indianapolis, IN (ORL) 16-37 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-7 Point Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-52 Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI (NED) 1-42 Point Judith, RI (NED) 1-50 Point Lookout Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84, 21-90 Point Place, Toledo, OH (NCB) 20-42 Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA (NED) 1-51 Poison Bay, Flathead Lake, MT (NPS) 38-25 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA (NED) 1-42 Poloa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Pomeroy, OH (ORH) 17-22 Pomme de Terre Lake (Power Addition), MO (MRK) 27-19 Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO (MRK) 27-6, 27-11, 27-15, 27-20 1-51 Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS (MRK) 27-6, 27-11, 27-15 Pompton Lake, PA (NAP) 3-14, 3-19, 3-24 Ponca City, OK, Flood Forecast Map (SWT) 29-29 Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-11, 9-29, 9-40, 9-51 Ponce Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-11, 9-29, 9-40,'9-51 Ponce, PR (SAJ) 9-48 Ponce Regional, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Pond Creek, Cheatham County, TN (ORN) 15-18 Pontiac Diversion, RI (NED) 1-50 Poppenessett Spit, Mashpee, MA (NED) 1-51 Popperdam Creek, North Charleston, SC (SAN) 7-18 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT (NED) 1-47 Port Alexander (Inner Harbor), AK (NPA) 40-12 Port Alexander, AK (NPA) 40-11 Port Alexander Channel, AK (NPA) 40-13 Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-7 Port Angeles Harbor (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-30 Port Angeles Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-25 Port Arthur and Vicinity (Hurricane Flood Protection), TX (SWG) 31-14, 31-21, 31-36 Port Austin Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-28, 21-61, 21-78, 21-90 Port Bay, NY 1950 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Port Chester Harbor (NAN) 2-28, 2-30, 2-34 Port Clinton Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-40 Port Dickerson, NY (NAB) 4-38 Port Everglades Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-12, 9-30, 9-40, 9-51 Port Gamble Harbor (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-30 Port Gamble Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-25 Port Henry Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-30 Port Hueneme, CA (SPL) 33-3, 33-12, 33-20 Port Jefferson Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-30, 2-34 Port Lions, AK (NPA) 40-11, 40-13 Port Lions Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-13 Port of Gold Beach, OR (NPP) 37-41 Port of Kalama, WA (NPP) 37-37 Port of Morrow, Morrow, OR (NPP) 37-41 Port Ontario Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-35 Port Orchard Bay, WA (NPS) 38-25 Port Orford, OR (NPP) 37-6, 37-23, 37-31 Port Royal Harbor, SC (SAN) 7-7, 7-11, 7-16 Port San Luis, CA (SPL) 33-28 Port San Luis Shore and Bluff Erosion (SPL) 33-29 Port Sanilac Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-28, 21-62, 21-8 Port St. Joe, FL (SAM) 10-49, 10-52 Port Townsend, WA (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Port Washington Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-28, 21-62, 21-78 Port Wing Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-29, 21-62, 21-79 Portage Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84, 21-90 Portage, PA (ORP) 18-22 Portage, WI (NCS) 24-10, 24-19 Porter Bayou, MS (LMK) 12-7, 12-11, 12-14 Portersville Bay-East, Mobile County, AL (SAM) 10-19, 10-36, 10-46 Portersville Bay-West, Mobile County, AL (SAM) 10-19, 10-36, 10-46 Portland Harbor, ME (NED) 1-42 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-35 Portland, OH (ORH) 17-22 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit (NPW) 39-18 Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH (NED) 1-7, 1-28, 1-37 Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond Ordinance Depot, (NAO) 5-17 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (SAJ) 9-23, 9-32, 9-48 Portville, NY (ORP) 18-22 Post Oak Creek, Corsicana, TX (SWF) 30-23 Posten Bayou, AR and LA (LMK) 12-19, 12-21 Poteau River, LeFlore County, OK (SWT) 29-28 Poteau River Navigation Project, OK and AR (SWT) 29-23 Poteet, TX (SWF) 30-22 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut (NAB) 4-33 Potomac River - Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Potomac River at Alexandria, VA (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD (NAB) 4-33 Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA (NAB) 4-33 Potomac River at North Side of Washington Channel, DC (NAB) 4-33 I-52 Potomac River Below Washington, DC (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-29 Potowomut River, RI (NED) 1-43 Pottstown, PA (NAP) 3-27 Poverty Point, LA (LMK) 12-22 Powder Horn Branch, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Powder River, Arvada, WY (MRO) 26-23 Powder River, Broadus, MT (MRO) 26-23 Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT (NPS) 38-27 Powhaten Point, OH (ORP) 18-24 Praire du Chien, WI (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI 25-7 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL (LSM) 14-17 Prairie du Rocher and Vicinity, IL (LSM) 14-17 Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL (SAM) 10-50 Preconstruction Engineering and Design - See Advance Engineering and Design Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-40 Presque Isle Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-29, 21-63, 21-79 Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (NCB) 20-11, 20-21, 20-37 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME (NED) 1-47 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-18 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-17 Prestonsburg, KY (ORH) 17-24 Prestonville, KY (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-29 Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA (NPS) 38-29 Princeton, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 Pringle Creek, Salem, OR (NPP) 37-42 Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA (SAM) 10-19, 10-36, 10-46 Proctor Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Proctor, WV (ORP) 18-24 Proctorville, OH (ORH) 17-22 Project Condition Surveys Alaska District (NPA) 40-4 Portland District (NPP) 37-7 Seattle District (NPS) 38-5 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (SWG) 31-17 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Under Special Authorization Savannah District (SAS) 8-7 Prospect Beach, West Haven CT (NED) 1-45, 1-51 Prosperity Lake, MO (SWL) 28-23 Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA (NPS) 38-25 Providence River and Harbor, RI (NED) 1-43 Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA (NED) 1-50 Provincetown Harbor, MA (NED) 1-43, 1-51 Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Pt. Pleasant, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Pudding River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Pueblo, Arkansas River, CO (Floodway levee extension) (SWA) 32-19 Puerco River, Gallup, NM (SWA) 32-5, 32-13, 32-16 Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA (NPS) 38-6, 38-15, 38-22 Pullman, Palouse River, WA (NPW) 39-17 Pultneyville Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-40 Pumpkinville Creek, Emerson, GA (SAM) 10-50 Punaluu Highway, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-11 Pungo River, NC (SAW) 6-28 Punta Salinas, PR (SAJ) 9-50 Punxsatawney, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-5, 18-13, 18-18 Punxsutawney, PA (ORP) 18-22 Put in Bay, OH (NCB) 20-40 Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-27 Pysht River, Sekiu, WA (NPS) 38-27 Q Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino, CA (SPL) 33-30 Queens Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Queenstown Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA (NPS) 38-27 Quillayute River (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-30 Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-28 Quillayute River, WA (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-22, 38-31 Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-28 Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA (NPS) 38-28 I-53 Quinault River, WA (NPS) 38-31 Quinby Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Quince Road Bridge, Memphis, TN (LMM) 13-2, 13-4 Quincy Harbor, IL 25-8 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel (NCR) 23-11 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy MA (NED) 1-45 R R.B. West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern, IA (MRO) 26-21 R.D. Bailey Lake, WV (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA (SAM) 10-20, 10-36, 10-46 Raccoon Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Raccoon Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-16 Racine, OH (ORH) 17-22 Rahway, NJ (NAN) 2-32 Rahway River, NJ (NAN) 2-34 Rainmaker Hotel, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Ralston & Leydon Creeks, CO (MRO) 26-21 Ramapo River, Monroe, NJ (NAN) 2-35 Rancocas River, NJ (NAP) 3-28 Randleman Lake, NC (SAW) 6-11, 6-21 Ranier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Ranier Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-38 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam, SD (MRO) 26-19 Rapid Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD (MRO) 26-16, 26-19 Rapidan River, Orange, VA (NAO) 5-18 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, VA (NAO) 5-17 Rappahannock River, VA (NAO) 5-17 Rappahannock Shoal Channel, VA (NAO) 5-13 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, NJ (NAN) 2-32 Raritan River (NAN) 2-28, 2-30, 2-34 Raritan River Cut-off (NAN) 2-28, 2-30 Rat Root River, MN (NCS) 24-30 Rathburn Lake, Chariton River, IA (MRK) 27-6, 27-12, 27-15 Rathburn Lake Fish Hatchery (MRK) 27-17 Rawls Creek, Irmo, SC (SAN) 7-18 Ray Roberts Lake, TX (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Raymondville, TX (SWG) 31-14 Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA (NAB) 4-11, 4-24, 4-31 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-12 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-8 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-10 Charleston District (SAN) 7-8 Chicago District (NCC) 22-6 Detroit District (NCE) 21-38 Galveston District (SWG) 31-10 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-15 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-5 Mobile District (SAM) 10-15 New England Division (NED) 1-9 New York District (NAN) 2-14, 2-28 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-14 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-5 Red Arroyo, San Angelo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Red Bluff, CA (SPK) 35-40 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA (NED) 1-43 Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act (NCB) 20-45 Red Hook Flats Anchorage (NAN) 2-28 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN (NCS) 24-23 Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Red Lake River at Huot, MN (NCS) 24-24 Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Red Lake River, East Grand Forks, MN (NCS) 24-31 Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater River, MN (NCS) 24-11, 24-20 Red Lake River, Red Lake County, Hwy 3, MN (NCS) 24-30 Red River at East Grand Forks, MN (NCS) 24-28 Red River at Fargo, MN (NCS) 24-28 Red River at Grand Forks, MN (NCS) 24-28, 24-30 Red River Bank Stabilization below Denison, OK and TX (SWT) 29-24 Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX and OK (SWT) 29-4, 29-13 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabiliation (Vicksburg District) (LMK) 12-7, 12-11, 12-14, 12-19 Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) (LMK) 12-7, 12-14 Red River below Fulton, AR (LMK) 12-16 I-54 Red River Emergency Bank Protection (LMK) 12-2(LMK) 12-10 (LMK) 12-10, 12-12 Red River from Fulton, AR to Mouth of Washita River (SWT) 29-23 Red River, Hwy 71, Little River County, AR (SWL) 28-9, 28-16 Red River, Hwy. 31, Little River County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Red River, 1-30, Little River County, AR (SWL) 28-9, 28-16, 28-22 Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-22 Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-24 Red River of the North at Argusville, ND (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, MN (NCS) 24-30 Red River of the North at Oslo, MN (NCS) 24-24 Red River of the North at Halstad, MN (NCS) 24-24 Red River of the North, County Road 2, ND (NCS) 24-30 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Red River of the North at Fargo, ND - Moorehead, MN (NCS) 24-11, 24-20, 24-31 Red River of the North, Grand Forks, ND (NCS) 24-31 Red River of the North at Pembina, ND (NCS) 24-24 Red River of the North, MN and ND (NCS) 24-23 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND (NCS) 24-11, 24-20 Red River of the North, Walsh County (NCS) 24-30, 24-31 Red River Parish, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-22 Red River, TN (ORN) 15-13 Red River Waterway, LA, AR, OK and TX (LMK) 12-16 Red River-Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (LMK) 12-3, 12-10, 12-12 Red River-Waterway-Shreveport, LA to Index, AR (LMK) 12-8, 12-11, 12-124 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX (LMK) 12-16 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA (NCR) 23-5, 23-7, 23-10 Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI (1970 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-87 Red Wing Harbor, MN 25-7 Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA (SPK) 35-17, 35-29 Redbank Creek Lake, PA (ORP) 18-24 Redbird Creek, O'Neill, NE (MRO) 26-20 Reddies River Lake, NC (SAN) 7-18, 6-28 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-13, 33-20, 33-28 Redwater River and Hay Creek, Belle Fourche, SD (MRO) 26-17 Redwood City Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-8 Redwood Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Redwood River below Marshall, MN (NCS) 24-24 Redwook Creek, Humboldt County, CA (SPK) 35-38 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-10 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR (NPP) 37-39 Reedy Creek, Sullivan County, TN (ORN) 15-18 Reedy River, SC (SAN) 7-18 Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV (SPK) 35-38 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans (CDC) 35-1A, 35-5A, 35-7A Regulatory Functions Program Mobile District (SAM) 10-31 Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal & National Emergency Preparedness 51-1 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, DE (NAP) 3-28 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida, (SAJ) 9-12, 9-30, 9-41, 9-56 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA (LMN) 11-16 Removing of snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMM) 13-5 Removing of snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMK) 12-16 Removing Water Hyacinths (SAM) 10-49 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL (LSM) 14-13, 14-17 Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, OH (NCB) 20-13, 20-22, 20-38 Republican River, NE and KS (MRK) 27-20 Research and Development Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-8 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 Savannah District (SAS) 8-10 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-2, 24-18, 24-22, 24-27, 24-31 I-55 Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, OR (NPP) 37-39 Revere Beach, MA (NED) 1-9, 1-28, 1-38 Reynoldsville, PA (ORP) 18-22 Rheem Creek, CA (SPK) 35-38 Rheem Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD (NAB) 4-33 Rice Creek, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-17 Richland Creek, IL (LSM) 14-18 Richland Lake, MO (MRK) 27-19 Richmond Filtration Plant, VA (NAO) 5-18 Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA (SPN) 34-2, 34-8, 34-11 Richmond Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43 Richmond, VA (NAO) 5-8, 5-11, 5-15 Richmond's Island Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43 Richwood and Fenwick, WV (ORH) 17-24 Ridgeley, WV (NAB) 4-39 Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River) (ORP) 18-23 Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) (ORP) 18-22 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY (ORH) 17-24 Rillito River, AZ (SPL) 33-10, 33-15 Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio De La Plata, PR (SAJ) 9-48 Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio El Ojo De Aqua, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio Fajardo, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio Grande Basin, NM (SWA) 32-5, 32-14, 32-17 Rio Grande Floodway, NM (SWA) 32-7, 32-14, 32-17, 32-18 Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM (SWA) 32-8, 32-14, 32-17 Rio Guadiana, Naranjito, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio Guamani, Guayama, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio La Plata, Comerio, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio Loco, Guanica, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio Manati, Bareceloneta, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio Niqua, Arroyo, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR (SAJ) 9-48 Riol Manati, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Ripley, OH (ORH) 17-22, 17-24 Ririe Lake, ID (NPW) 39-16 Rising Sun, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 River des Peres, MO (LSM) 14-6, 14-13 River Rouge, MI (NCE) 21-85 Riverdale, West Springfield, MA (NED) 1-15, 1-30, 1-39, 1-54 Riverland Levee District, MO (LSM) 14-18 Rivers and Harbors, Contributed Funds Mobile District (SAM) 10-32 Riverside Area, Pasco, WA (NPW) 39-16 Riverside Levees (SPL) 33-31 Riverview, WV (ORH) 17-22 Road Knife River, Staton, ND (MRO) 26-24 Roanake River Upper Basin, VA Headwaters Area (SAW) 6-14, 6-21 Roanoak Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Roanoke River, 50-mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon (SAW) 6-29 Roanoke River Basin, VA and NC (SAW) 6-15, 6-31 Roanoke River, NC (SAW) 6-26 Roaring River Lake, NC (SAW) 6-28 Roaring River, Wilkes County, NC (SAN) 7-18 Roaring Springs Road, Bridge, TX (SWF) 30-23 Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (SWF) 30-11, 30-16, 30-21 Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL (SAM) 10-26, 10-37 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK (SWT) 29-26 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK (SWT) 29-11, 29-19, 29-23 Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK (SWT) 29-26 Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Rochester Harbor, NY (NCB) 20-9, 20-19, 20-35 Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA (NCR) 23-14 Rochester, MN (NCS) 24-12, 24-20 Rochester, PA (ORP) 18-24 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rock Creek, Maxwell, IA (NCR) 23-16 Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rock Creek Road, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rock Creek, Unicoi County, TN (ORN) 15-18 Rock Hall Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-33 Rock Island Harbor, IL 25-7 Rock Island, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Rock Island Slough, Wellington, KS (SWT) 29-27 Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL (NCR) 23-13 Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island) NY (NAN) 2-14, 2-21, 2-25 I-56 Rockfish Creek, NC (SAW) 6-29 Rockford, IL (NCR) 23-12 Rockland Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43, 1-58 Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Rockland Lake, TX (SWF) 30-22 Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, MA (NED) 1-43 Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA (NED) 1-43 Rockport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43 Rockport, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS (SAM) 10-56 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12 Rocky Pass, AK (NPA) 40-11 Rocky River, OH (NCB) 20-9, 20-20, 20-35 Rocy Fork, OH (ORH) 17-23 Rodeo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-38 Rodeo Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Rogers City Harbor, MI (1910 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR (NPP) 37-7, 37-23, 37-31 Rogue River, OR (NPP) 37-39 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-22 Rolling Fork, Lebanon Junction, KY (ORL) 16-37 Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, AR (SWL) 28-22 Rollison Channel, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-20 Rome, Coosa River, GA (SAM) 10-50, 10-51 Rome, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Rome Mohawk River, NY (NAN) 2-34 Rondout Harbor (NAN) 2-30 Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME (NED) 1-9, 1-28, 1-38 Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (ORP) 18-22 Root River at Hokah, MN (NCS) 24-12, 24-20 Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, CA (SPL) 33-30 Roseau River, MN (NCS) 24-13, 24-20 Rosendale Harbor, MS (LMK) 12-16 Rosendale, NY (NAN) 2-32 Roseville, OH (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19, 17-24 Rosiclaire, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Rossview Lake, TN and KY (ORN) 15-14 Rota Harbor, CNMI (POD) 36-7 Rouge River, MI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Rouge River, MI (1958 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Rouge River, MI (1962 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Rouge River, MI (NCE) 21-29, 21-63, 21-79 Rough River, KY (ORL) 16-29, 16-35 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY (ORL) 16-10, 16-17, 16-22 Rough River Lake, KY (ORL) 16-32 Roughans Point, Revere, MA (NED) 1-20, 1-32, 1-40 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-30 Rouseville, PA (ORP) 18-23 Rowlesburg Lake, WV (ORP) 18-23 Royal River, ME (NED) 1-43 Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, Near Twin Bridges, MT (MRO) 26-19 Rudee Inlet, VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-10, 5-15 Ruffy Brook, MN (NCS) 24-26 Rumphs Hill Creek, Dorchester County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Rush Creek, Arlington, TX (SWF) 30-23 Rush River, MN (NCS) 24-28 Rushford, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-29 Russell, KY (ORH) 17-21 Russian River Basin, CA (SPK) 35-18, 35-30, 35-35, 35-42, 35-43 Russian River, CA (SPN) 34-14 Rutland Otter Creek, VT (NAN) 2-34 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX (SWF) 30-22 Rye Creek, MT (NPS) 38-28 Rye Harbor, NH (NED) 1-43 S S. River Drainage District, Marion County, MO (NCR) 23-16 Sabana Grande, PR (SAJ) 9-61 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (SWG) 31-7, 31-20, 31-32, 31-39, 31-41, 31-46 Sabine River and Tributaries (Echo to Morgan Bluff), TX (SWG) 31-38 Sabula, IA (NCR) 23-12 Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Sackets Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-40 Saco, MT (MRO) 26-16, 26-18 Saco River ME (NED) 1-8, 1-28, 1-38 Saco River ME (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 I-57 Sacramento, CA (SPK) 35-40 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (Debris Control) (CDC) 35-2A, 35-5A Sacramento River and Tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, CA (SPK) 35-19, 35-30, 35-36, 35-43 Sacramento River, CA (CDC) 35-3A, 35-5A, 35-7A Sacramento River, CA (SPK) 35-2, 35-27, 35-35 Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA (SPK) 35-3, 35-27 Sacramento River, Tehama, CA (SPK) 35-44 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD (MRO) 26-16 Sag Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-30, 2-34 Saginaw River, MI (NCE) 21-30, 21-39, 21-63, 21-67, 21-79, 21-82 Saipan Beach Road, CNMI (POD) 36-2 Saipan Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-10 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI (POD) 36-7 Sakonnet Harbor, RI (NED) 1-43 Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Sakonnet River, RI (NED) 1-43 Salado Creek near Patterson, CA (SPK) 35-44 Salamanca, NY (ORP) 18-22 Salamonie Lake, IN (ORL) 16-11, 16-17 Salamonie River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY (ORL) 16-35 Salamonie River, Montpelier, IN (ORL) 16-37 Salem Harbor, MA (NED) 1-43 Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Salem River, NJ (NAP) 3-8, 3-17, 3-22 Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS (MRK) 27-17 Salinas River, CA (SPK) 35-38 Saline Point, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-22 Saline River & Tributaries, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-35 Salkahatchie River, SC (SAN) 7-17 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR (NPP) 37-39 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA (NPP) 37-39 Salmon River, AK (NPA) 40-12 Salmon River, Colchester, CT (NED) 1-47, 1-54 Salmon River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE (MRO) 26-5, 26-10, 26-14 Salt Creek Levees, Lincoln, NE (MRO) 26-23 Salt Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln, NE (MRO) 26-20 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT (SPK) 35-38 Saluda River, SC (SAN) 7-18 Salyersville, KY (ORL) 16-4, 16-14, 16-21 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (SWF) 30-11, 30-16, 30-20 Sam Rayburn Spillway (Dam Safety Assurance), TX (SWF) 30-12, 30-20 Sammamish River, WA (NPS) 38-28 San Antonio Channel Improvements, TX (SWF) 30-9, 30-17, 30-20 San Antonio Floodway, TX (SWF) 30-22 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA (SPL) 33-29 San Diego Creek, Alice, TX (SWG) 31-38 San Diego Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-13, 33-20 San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-30 San Diego River & Mission Bay, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-13, 33-22 San Francisco Bay-Delta Model Structure, CA (SPN) 34-3, 34-8 San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA (SPN) 34-4, 34-8 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPN) 34-3, 34-8 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels), CA (SPK) 35-3, 35-27 San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-29 San Gabriel River, TX (SWF) 30-9, 30-17, 30-20 San Jacinto River Levee & Bautista Creek Channel (SPL) 33-31 San Joaquin River, CA (SPK) 35-4, 35-27, 35-41 San Juan Dam (SPL) 33-32 San Juan Harbor, PR (SAJ) 9-14, 9-30, 9-42 San Juan, PR (SAJ) 9-50 San Leandro Creek, CA (SPK) 35-38 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Leandro Marina, CA (SPN) 34-8 San Lorenzo Creek (Upper Portion), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Lorenzo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-38 San Lorenzo River, CA (SPK) 35-38 San Luis Rey River, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-13, 33-22 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (SPN) 34-9 I-58 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo), CA (SPN) 34-13 San Rafael, CA (SPN) 34-9 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME (NED) 1-47 Sand Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI (NED) 1-45 Sand Hill River, MN (NCS) 24-28 Sand Island, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-2, 36-5 Sand Lake, OK (SWT) 29-24 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, NY (NAN) 2-32 Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI (NCS) 24-30 Sandusky Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-9, 20-20, 20-35 Sandusky River, OH (NCB) 20-40 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA (NED) 1-43 Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Sandy Creek, Jackson, TN (LMM) 13-6 Sandy Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-38 Sandy Hook Bay at Atlantic Highlands (NAN) 2-28 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo (NAN) 2-28, 2-30 Sandy Hook Bay, NJ (NAN) 2-30 Sandy Hook Channel (NAN) 2-28 Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (NAN) 2-14, 2-21, 2-26, 2-31 Sandy Point, West Haven, CT (NED) 1-51 Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR (NPP) 37-38 Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR (NPP) 37-42 Sangamon River (Mouth), IL (NCR) 23-12 Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL (NCR) 23-15 Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK (SWT) 29-26 Santa Ana Mainsteam, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-14, 33-26 Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-14 Santa Ana River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-30 Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA (SPL) 33-10, 33-27 Santa Barbara Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-4, 33-13, 33-22 Santa Clara River, Fillmore, CA (SPL) 33-31 Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-31 Santa Cruz County, CA (SPN) 34-13 Santa Cruz Harbor, CA (SPN) 34-9 Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, NM (SWA) 32-19 Santa Paula Creek, CA (SPL) 33-11, 33-14 Santa Paula Creek Channel and Debris Basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-31 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM (SWA) 32-8, 32-15 Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) (SPL) 33-30 Santee River, NC & SC (SAN) 7-17 Sapelo Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-18 Sarasota County, FL (SAJ) 9-20, 9-32, 9-47 Sardis Lake, OK (SWT) 29-9, 29-18, 29-22 Sardis, OH (ORH) 17-22 Sasanoa River, ME (NED) 1-43 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-45 Satilla River, GA (SAS) 8-18 Saucelito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA (SPN) 34-13 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI (NCE) 21-34, 21-65, 21-81 Saugerties Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-30 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA (NED) 1-51 Sauk River, Skagit County, WA (NPS) 38-28 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-38 Savage River Dam, MD (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-48, 9-61 Savanna Harbor, IL 25-7 Savannah City Park, TN (ORN) 15-18 Savannah Harbor, GA (SAS) 8-4, 8-11, 8-14 Savannah River above Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-18 Savannah River at Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-18, 8-19 Savannah River Basin, GA and SC (SAS) 8-8 Savannah River Below Augusta, GA (SAS) 8-5, 8-11, 8-16 Saw Mill Run, PA (ORP) 18-22 Saw Mill Run Road, Salamanca, NY (plans and specifications) (ORP) 18-30 Sawmill Branch, SC (SAN) 7-18 Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh, NY (NAN) 2-32 Saxis Island, VA (NAO) 5-18 Saxon Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-84, 21-90 Saxonville, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-56 Saylorville Lake, IA (NCR) 23-5, 23-7, 23-10 Scajaquada Creek, NY (NCB) 20-42 Scammon Bay, AK (NPA) 40-12 Scappoose Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-37 Scappoose, OR (NPP) 37-42 Scarboro River, ME (NED) 1-43 I-59 Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations Albuquerque District (SWA) 32-10 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-19 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-11 Kansas City District) (MRK) 27-7, 27-12 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-8 Mobile District (SAM) 10-30 Omaha District (MRO) 26-6, 26-10 Portland District (NPP) 37-14 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-23 Seattle District (NPS) 38-10 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-10 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-3 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-16 Schuyler, Lost Creek and Platte River, NE (MRO) 26-20 Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA (NAP) 3-25 Schuylkill River, PA (NAP) 3-9, 3-18, 3-22 Scioto River at Portsmith, OH (ORH) 17-20 Sciotovile, OH (ORH) 17-22 Scituate Harbor, MA (NED) 1-43 Scott County D&L District, Illinois River, IL (LSM) 14-18 Scotts Creek, SC (SAN) 7-18 Scotts Creek, VA (NAO) 5-15 Scottsville, VA (NAO) 5-18 Scranton, Buffalo, ND (MRO) 26-19 Scranton, PA (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Scuppernong River, NC (SAW) 6-26, 6-29 Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT (NED) 1-45 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Searsport Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43, 1-58 Seaside, OR (NPP) 37-42 Seaside Park, CT (NED) 1-45 Seattle Harbor (A Completed portion) (1925 R&H Act), WA (NPS) 38-30 Seattle Harbor (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-30 Skagit River (Uncompleted portion), WA (NPS) 38-30 Seattle Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-22 Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME (NED) 1-47 Sebasticook River, Pittsfield, ME (NED) 1-52 Sebewaing Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-35, 21-65, 21-81 Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI (NCE) 21-41, 21-67, 21-82 Section 20 Aqueduct, Washita River, Caddo County, OK (SWT) 29-28 Section 24 Aqueduct, Washita River, Caddo County, OK (SWT) 29-28 Section 24 Road North Canadian River, Pottawatomie County, OK (SWT) 29-28 Section 27 Road North Canadian River, Pottawatomie County, OK (SWT) 29-28 Seekonk River, RI (NED) 1-43 Seldovia Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, NY (NCB) 20-41 Selkirk Shores State Park, OH 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Seneca Falls, NY (NCB) 20-44 Sequoyah Hills Park, Knoxville, TN (ORN) 15-18 Sesuit Harbor, MA (NED) 1-8, 1-28, 1-38 Sergius Whitestone, AK (NPA) 40-11 Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA (SPL) 33-31 Seveir River near Redmond, UT (SPK) 35-38 Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR (NPW) 39-16 Sewage Lagoons, North Canadian River, New Castle (SWT) 29-28 Sewage Lagoons, South Canadian River (SWT) 29-28 Seward Expansion, AK (NPA) 40-13 Seward Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Seward, NE (MRK) 27-17 Sewer Outfall, Glendale, WV (construction completed) (ORP) 18-30 Sewerline Protection Valley, AL (SAM) 10-50 Seymour Creek, Seymour, TX (SWF) 30-23 Shad Landing State Park, MD (NAB) 4-33 Shades Creek, AL (SAM) 10-56 Shallotte Inlet, NC (SAW) 6-30 Shallotte River, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-20 Shallow Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33 Shark River, NJ (NAN) 2-30 Shawnee, OK (SWT) 29-29 Shawneetown, IL (ORL) 16-23, 16-27, 16-31, 16-34 Sheboygan Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-25, 21-65, 21-81 Sheburne, NY (NAB) 4-38 Sheepshead Bay (NAN) 2-28, 2-30 Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 Sheffield Water Intake, AL (ORN) 15-18 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH (NED) 1-47 I-60 Shell Creek, County Road Near Columbus, NE (MRO) 26-20 Shell Creek, NE (MRO) 26-17 Shelley Area, Snake River, ID (NPW) 39-18 Shelton Creek, WA (NPS) 38-28 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, OR (NPP) 37-40 Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH (ORP) 18-9, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks, WY (MRO) 26-19 Sheridan, OR (NPP) 37-42 Sheridan, WY (MRO) 26-16 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT (NED) 1-45 Sheyenne River, ND (NCS) 24-13, 24-20, 24-26, 24-29 Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND (NCS) 24-24 Shidler Lake, OK (SWT) 29-24 Shields River, near Clyde Park, MT (MRO) 26-16, 26-18 Shields River, Park County, MT (US 89) (MRO) 26-23 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA (NPS) 38-25 Shinnecock Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-11, 2-20, 2-25, 2-29 Shipyard River, SC (SAN) 7-7, 7-12, 7-16, 7-17 Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-30 Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) (ORL) 16-27 Shooters Island, NJ & NY (NAN) 2-34 Short Beach, CT (NED) 1-45 Short Creek, Connerville, OH (complete) (ORP) 18-30 Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell, WY (MRO) 26-19 Shoshone River, Byron, MW (MRO) 26-19 Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (NAN) 2-12, 2-20, 2-25, 2-28, 2-34 Shufflebarger Levee, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Shupe Run. Mt. Pleasant, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Sid Simpson Project, IL (NCR) 23-12 Sierra Madre Wash Channel, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA (SPL) 33-32 Silver Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-52 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (NED) 1-45, 1-50 Silver Creek, Rome, GA (SAM) 10-20, 10-36, 10-46 Silver Lake Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-8, 6-20, 6-24 Simmons Bay, NC (SAW) 6-28 Simms Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-14, 31-21, 31-36 Simpson Creek, SC (SAN) 7-18 Sims Park, Euclid, OH (NCB) 20-22, 20-38 Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX (SWF) 30-23 Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River, SD (MRO) 26-19, 26-21 Sioux Falls, SD (MRO) 26-16 Sisterville, OH (ORH) 17-22 Sitka Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11, 40-13 Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Siuslaw River Near Florence, OR (NPP) 37-41 Siuslaw River, OR (NPP) 37-7, 37-23, 37-31 Six Bridge Lake, MD & PA (NAB) 4-37 Six Runs Creek, NC (SAW) 6-29 Slaughter Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33 Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR (SWL) 28-23 Skagit County (Various Locations), WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River (Avon Pass), WA (NPS) 38-30 Skagit River (Levee and Channel Improvements), WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, WA (NPS) 38-25 Skagway Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Skagway River, AK (NPA) 40-12 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA (NPP) 37-40 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA (NPP) 37-37 Skamokawa Creek, WA (NPP) 37-36, 37-41 Skiatook Lake, OK (SWT) 29-9, 29-18, 29-22 Skiatook, OK (SWT) 29-29 Skipanon Channel, OR (NPP) 37-8, 37-24, 37-32 Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA (NPS) 38-28 Slovan, PA (ORP) 18-22 Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL (LSM) 14-18 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA (MRO) 26-15 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA (NED) 1-47 Smith Creek, CO (SWA) 32-19 Smith Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33 Smith Ferry, PA (ORP) 18-24 Smith River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), NC (SAW) 6-26 Smithfield, WV (ORH) 17-24 1-61 Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO (MRK) 27-6, 27-12, 27-15 Smoky Hill, Saline, and Soloman Rivers (MRK) 27-20 Smyrna River, DE (NAP) 3-25 Snake River, Alvarado, MN (NCS) 24-30, 24-31 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-18 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID (NPW) 39-7, 39-11, 39-14 Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID (NPW) 39-16 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID (NPW) 39-16, 39-18 Snettisham, AK (NPA) 40-6, 40-8, 40-10 Snohomish County (Various Locations), WA (NPS) 38-28 Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA (NPS) 38-28 Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA (NPS) 38-28 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA (NPS) 38-28, 38-31 Sny Basin, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL (NCR) 23-12, 23-15, 23-16 Soap Creek, Bridge Site #3, Davenport, IA (NCR) 23-16 Soap Creek, WA (NPP) 37-40 Socastee Creek, SC (SAN) 7-8, 7-12, 7-16 Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries or Rio Grande, NM (SWA) 32-19 Soldier River, Near Ute, IA (MRO) 26-21 Soleduck River Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-28 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA (NPS) 38-28 Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne County, PA (NAB) 4-16, 4-25, 4-31 Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD (NAB) 4-16, 4-25, 4-31 Somerville Lake, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-20 Sonomo Creek, CA (SPK) 35-38 Sope Creek, Marietta, GA (SAM) 10-50 Souris River Basin, ND (NCS) 24-13, 24-20 Souris River, Velva, ND (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 South Agat (Route 2), Guam (POD) 36-11 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, NY (NAN) 2-32 South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, AR Tucker Lakes (SWL) 28-23 South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL, (NCR) 23-13 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 South Beloit, IL (NCR) 23-14 South Bristol Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43, 1-58 South Channel, Government Island, OR (NPP) 37-36 South Coventry Lake, CT (NED) 1-50 South Creek, Martinburg, NE (MRO) 26-20 South Creek, NC (SAW) 6-28 South Deer Creek, OK (SWT) 29-27 South Ellenville, NY (NAN) 2-32 South Fork, Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), AR (SWL) 28-23 South Fork, Boise River, ID (NPW) 39-16 South Fork, Bon Secour River, AL (SAM) 10-51 South Fork, Clearwater River, ID (NPW) 39-17 South Fork, Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID (NPW) 39-16 South Fork, Elkhorn River, Ewing, NE (MRO) 26-23 South Fork of Cumberland River, KY (ORN) 15-13 South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA (SPL) 33-31 South Fork of Wildcat Creek, County Road 7 East, Tippecanoe County, IN (ORL) 16-35 South Frankfort, KY (ORL) 16-21 South Haven Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-36, 21-65, 21-81 South Holston River, Kingsport, TN (ORN) 15-18 South Main Channel, TX (SWG) 31-14 South Milwaukee Harbor, WI (1836 Flood Control Act) (NCE) 21-87 South Orange, NJ (NAN) 2-32 South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington Street, Water and Sanitary District, CO (MRO) 26-19 South Platte River Basin, CO (MRO) 26-5, 26-14 South Platte River, Iliff, CO (MRO) 26-19 South Platte River, Kersey, CO (MRO) 26-19 South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, CO (MRO) 26-16 South Platte River, Logan County Bridge, NE (MRO) 26-23 South Platte River, Merino, CO (MRO) 26-19 South Platte River/Merino, Logan City, CO (MRO) 26-23 South Platte River, Platteville, CO (MRO) 26-19 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 87, CO (MRO) 26-23 I-62 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 28, CO (MRO) 26-23 South Platte River, Weld County Bridge 61, CO (MRO) 26-23 South Plymouth Lake, NY (NAB) 4-37 South Point, OH (ORH) 17-22 South Portsmouth, KY (ORH) 17-22 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 South River, Conway, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-54 South River Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 South River, NC (SAW) 6-26 South Skunk River Logjam, Keokuk, IA (NCR) 23-16 South Slough (Charleston), OR (NPP) 37-36 South Table Creek, Nebraska City, NE (MRO) 26-23 South Turnbridge Lake, VT (NED) 1-50 South Williamson, KY (ORH) 17-24 Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI (NED) 1-10, 1-38 Southeast Missouri Port, MO (LSM) 14-11 Southeast Missouri Port, MO (LSM) 14-2, 14-9 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 4-12, 4-31 Southport Beach, CT (NED) 1-45 Southport Harbor, CT (NED) 1-43 Southwest Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43 Southwest Ohio Urban Waterfront Development (ORL) 16-24 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY (ORL) 16-4, 16-14, 16-34 Southwind Maritime Center, Mt. Vernon, IN (ORL) 16-37 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS (SAM) 10-20, 10-36, i0-46, 10-47 Spanish Fork River, UT (SPK) 35-40 Spokane River, Spokane, WA (NPS) 38-28, 38-30 Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA (NAB) 4-16, 4-26, 4-31 Spring City, KY (ORN) 15-18 Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Springdale, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-54 Springers Branch, MS (SAM) 10-56 Springfield, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-54 Springfield Millrace, OR (NPP) 37-42 Springfield, SD Water Intake (MRO) 26-17 Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA (NPS) 38-25 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT (NED) 1-47 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL (NCR) 23-11 St Catherines Sound, MD (NAB) 4-33 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, NY (NAN) 2-30 St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam 25-9 St. Augustine Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-30, 9-41 St. Clair County, AL (SAM) 10-56 St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI (1930 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 St. Clair River, MI (NCE) 21-31, 21-64, 21-79, 21-88 St. Croix River, ME (NED) 1-43 St. Croix River, MN and WI (NCS) 24-23, 24-30 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, AR (LMM) 13-5 St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR (LMM) 13-6 St. George, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-8, 40-10 St. Georges Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33, 4-37, 4-38 St. Hilaire, MN (NCS) 24-30 St. James, Beaver Island, MI (NCE) 21-84 St. James Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-90 St. Jeromes Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 St. John River Basin, ME (NED) 1-47 St. Johns County, FL (SAJ) 9-47 St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-30, 9-41, 9-51 St. Jones River, DE (NAP) 3-25 St. Jones River, DE, Delaware Bay to Lebanon Jetties and new entrance at mouth (NAP) 3-26 St. Joseph Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-31, 21-64, 21-80 St. Joseph River, MI (NCE) 21-84 St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO (LSM) 14-18 St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL (LSM) 14-3, 14-11 St. Lucie Inlet, FL (SAJ) 9-13, 9-30, 9-41, 9-51 St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID (NPS) 38-28 St. Marks River, FL (SAM) 10-52, 10-49 St. Mary's, AK (NPA) 40-13 St. Mary's River, GA and FL, and North River, GA (SAS) 8-18 St. Mary's, WV (ORH) 17-22 St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI (1942 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 St. Marys River, MI (NCE) 21-32, 21-64, 21-80 St. Michael Canal, AK (NPA) 40-11 St. Michaels Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-33 I-63 St. Patricks Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33 St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-24 St. Paul Harbor, MN 25-7 St. Paul Island Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-8, 40-10, 40-13 St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-15, 24-20 St. Peters Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 St. Petersburg Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-49 St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT (NPS) 38-28 St. Regis River, MT (NPS) 38-28, 38-30 St. Thomas Harbor, VI (SAJ) 9-49 Stamford, CT (NED) 1-20, 1-32, 1-40 Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions), (NED) 1-50 Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) (NED) 1-50 Stamford Harbor, CT (NED) 1-43, 1-58 Starlings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17, 5-19 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA (NPS) 38-28 State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texana, TX (SWG) 31-15, 31-21 State Highway 156, Kay County, OK (SWT) 29-28 State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA (NPP) 37-37 State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI (NCS) 24-24 State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI (NCS) 24-14, 24-20 Staten Island, NY (NAN) 2-32 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur Kill, NY (NAN) 2-30 Ste. Genevieve Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO (LSM) 14-18 Ste. Genevieve, MO (LSM) 14-13 Steinhatchee River, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Sterling, KS (SWT) 29-29 Stevens Creek, Decatur, IL (NCR) 23-16 Stevens Creek, Village of Forsyth, IL (NCR) 23-16 Stewart Canyon Debris Basin and Channel (SPL) 33-31 Stikine River, AK (NPA) 40-11 Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA (NPS) 38-28 Stillaguamish River, WA (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23, 38-30, 38-31 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-20 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT (NPS) 38-28 Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA (NAB) 4-17, 4-26, 4-31 Stillwater River, MT (NPS) 38-28 Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR (NPP) 37-39 Stockton Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO (MRK) 27-9, 27-12, 27-16, 27-20 Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson County, KS (MRK) 27-17 Stoner Creek, North Middleton, KY (ORL) 16-35 Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORP) 18-9, 18-14, 18-20, 18-28 Stoney Creek, Branford, CT (NED) 1-43 Stoneycreek River, Johnstown, PA (complete) (ORP) 18-30 Stonington Harbor, CT (NED) 1-43 Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Stonington Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43, 1-50, 1-58 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH (NED) 1-47 Stratford, CT (NED) 1-50 Stream 5B13, Dallas, TX (SWF) 30-23 Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL (LSM) 14-17 Strong Creek, Hope, ID (NPS) 38-28 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID (NPW) 39-17 Stuart, VA (SAW) 6-28 Stumpy Point Bay, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-20 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI (NCE) 21-36, 21-66, 21-81 Sturgeon Point, Evans, NY (NCB) 20-11, 20-37 Sturgis, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Sucker Brook Dam, CT (NED) 1-47, 1-53 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH (ORL) 16-37 Sugar Creek Levee, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Sugar Creek, Watermelon Hollow Road, Montgomery County, IN (ORL) 16-37 Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH (NED) 1-50 Suisun Bay Channel, CA (SPN) 34-9 Suisun Channel, CA (SPN) 34-9 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43 Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX (SWF) 30-23 Sulphur River, AR and TX (LMN) 11-16 Sulphur RW Red River, Franklin City, TX (SWF) 30-23 I-64 Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 Summerville Creek, Dorchester County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Sumner Parker Airport, OR (NPP) 37-39 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, NY (NAN) 2-30 Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) (ORN) 15-18 Sunbury, PA (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), CA (SPL) 33-28 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-1, 2-2, 2-13, 2-20, 2-27 Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) (NAO) 5-6, 5-11 Surry Mountain Lake, NH (NED) 1-16, 1-30, 1-53 Surveillance of Northern Waters and International Water Studies Detroit District (NCE) 21-42, 21-68 Surveys Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Baltimore District (NAB) 4-20 Buffalo District (NCB) 20-14 Chicago District (NCC) 22-11 Detroit District (NCE) 21-46 Fort Worth District, (SWF) 30-12 Galveston District (SWG) 31-17 Huntington District (ORH) 17-11 Jacksonville District (SAJ) 9-23 Little Rock District (SWL) 28-13 Los Angeles District (SPL) 33-8 Louisville District (ORL) 16-13 Mobile District (SAM) 10-31 Nashville District (ORN) 15-7 New England Division (NED) 1-24 New York District (NAN) 2-17 Norfolk District (NAO) 5-8, 5-11 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 Philadelphia District (NAP) 3-14 Pittsburgh District (ORP) 18-12 Portland District (NPP) 37-21 Rock Island District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento District (SPK) 35-25 San Francisco District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah District (SAS) 8-10 Seattle District (NPS) 38-12 St. Paul District (NCS) 24-16 Tulsa District (SWT) 29-12 Walla Walla District (NPW) 39-8 Wilmington District (SAW) 6-17 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD (NAB) 4-33 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA (NAB) 4-33 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA (NAB) 4-17, 4-31 Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 Suwannee River, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Swan Creek Bank Stabilization, Taney County, AR (SWL) 28-23 Swan Creek, Toledo, OH (NCB) 20-22, 20-39 Swanton Harbor, VT (NAN) 2-34 Swash Channel (NAN) 2-29 Sweetwater Creek, Austell, GA (SAM) 10-51 Sweetwater Creek, NC (SAW) 6-29 Sweetwater River, CA (SPL) 33-11, 33-14 Swift Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, NC (SAW) 6-28 Swinomish Channel, WA (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-22, 38-31 Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 Sycamore Creek, Coffeyville, KS (SWT) 29-27 Sykesville, PA (ORP) 18-22 Sylvia State Beach, Oak Bluffs, MA (NED) 1-51 Syracuse, OH (ORH) 17-22 Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, NY (NCB) 20-42 T Table Rock Lake, MO (SWL) 28-12, 28-17, 28-30 Tacoma Harbor, WA (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-22 Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Tahchevah Creek Detention Basin and Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-31 Tahola, WA (NPS) 38-28 Tahquitz Creek (SPL) 33-31 Talkeetna River, AK (NPA) 40-12 Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS (SAM) 10-21, 10-36 Tallahalla Creek, Pascagoula River, MS (SAM) 10-47, 10-47 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS (LMK) 12-16 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam (POD) 36-11 I-65 Tama, IA (NCR) 23-16 Tamaqua, PA (NAP) 3-27 Tampa and Hillsborough Bays, FL (SAJ) 9-43 Tampa Harbor Branch Channels, FL (SAJ) 9-30, 9-45 Tampa Harbor East Bay Channel, FL (SAJ) 9-30, 9-45 Tampa Harbor, FL (SAJ) 9-15, 9-30, 9-31, 9-43 Tangier Channels, VA (NAO) 5-5, 5-10, 5-15, 5-17, 5-19 Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA (NAO) 5-18 Tangipahoa River, LA (LMN) 11-16 Tar River and Tributaries, NC (SAW) 6-28 Tar River, NC (SAW) 6-28 Tarentum, PA (ORP) 18-22 Tarrytown Harbor, NY (NAN) 2-13, 2-20, 2-25, 2-29 Taskinas Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-7 Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-50 Taunton River, MA (NED) 1-43 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84 Taylors Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-15, 31-21, 31-36, 31-46 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-29, 16-34 Taylorsville Lake, KY (ORL) 16-11, 16-17 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA (SPL) 33-31 Tell City, IN (ORL) 16-23, 16-24, 16-29, 16-34 Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX (SWF) 30-23 Ten Mile Creek, Lancaster, TX (SWF) 30-23 Ten Mile River, Chesire, CT (NED) 1-52 Tenants Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43, 1-58 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-20, 29-23, 29-26 Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA (ORP) 18-22 Tennessee River, Chattanooga, TN (ORN) 15-18 Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY (ORN) 15-3, 15-9, 15-11, 15-16, 15-17 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS (ORN) 15-3, 15-9, 15-12 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS (SAM) 10-13, 10-35, 10-45, 10-55 Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL and MS (SAM) 10-14, 10-35, 10-46 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA (LMK) 12-16 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-23, 16-34, 16-37 Terre Haute, IN (ORL) 16-27 Terre Noire Creek, AR (LMK) 12-18 Teton River, Chateau/Teton County, CO (MRO) 26-24 Teton River, ID (NPW) 39-17 Teton River, Teton County, MT (MRO) 26-24 Teton RV/Chateau/Teton County, MT (MRO) 26-23 Texas City and Vicinity (Hurricane Flood Protection), TX (SWG) 31-15, 31-21, 31-36 Texas City Channel, TX (SWG) 31-8, 31-20, 31-33, 31-39 Thames River Basin, CT, RI and MA (NED) 1-20 Thames River, CT (NED) 1-43 Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Thatcher Brook, Gowanda, NY (NCB) 20-44 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR (NPP) 37-36 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, OR and WA (NPP) 37-36 The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lacke Celilo, WA and OR (NPP) 37-20, 37-27, 37-34, 37-43 The Inland Route, MI (NCE) 21-16, 21-54, 21-74 The Island Lake, VT (NED) 1-50 Thimble Shoals Channel, VA (NAO) 5-17 Thomas Creek, CA (SPK) 35-43 Thomas Creek, Reno, NV (SPK) 35-44 Thomaston Dam, CT (NED) 1-18, 1-31, 1-55 Thoroughfare Swamp, NC (SAW) 6-29 Three Forks, Lower Madison River (MRO) 26-18 Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN (ORN) 15-14 Three Rivers, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-54 Three Rivers, TX (SWG) 31-38 Threemile Creek, Mobile, LA (SAM) 10-21, 10-36, 10-47 Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA (NED) 1-50 Thurman to Hamburg, IA (MRO) 26-21 Thurston County (Various Locations), WA (NPS) 38-28 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA (LMN) 11-16 Ticonderoga River, NY (NAN) 2-34 Tiger Creek, Columbus, GA (SAM) 10-51 Tijuana River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-31 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD (NAB) 4-33 Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR (NPP) 37-8, 37-24, 37-32, 37-41 I-66 Tillamook River, OR (NPP) 37-42 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-10, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), AR (SWL) 28-4 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only), PA (NAP) 3-28 Tocks Island, PA, NJ and NY (NAP) 3-28 Todd Swamp, SC (SAN) 7-18 Toledo Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-9, 20-20, 20-36 Tolovana River (Snagging), AK (NPA) 40-12 Tolu, KY (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-19 Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID (NPW) 39-16 Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL (SAM) 10-21, 10-36, 10-47 Tombigbee River & Tributaries, MS & AL (SAM) 10-22, 10-36, 10-47 Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS (SAM) 10-49 Tombigbee River Bridge #6, Monroe County, MS (SAM) 10-51 Tombigbee River, Demopolis, AL (SAM) 10-51 Toms River, NJ, Channel 12 feet deep (NAP) 3-28 Toms River, NJ, Channel 5 feet deep (NAP) 3-25 Tongue Point, OR (NPP) 37-8, 37-24, 37-32 Tongue Point, OR (NPP) 37-41 Tongue River Lake, ND (NCS) 24-26 Topeka, Kansas River, KS (MRK) 27-17, 27-20 Topsail Bay and Surf City, NC (SAW) 6-29 Toronto Lake, KS (SWL) 28-28 Toronto Lake, KS (SWT) 29-9, 29-18, 29-22 Torrington, East Branch, CT (NED) 1-47, 1-55, 1-55 Torrington, West Branch, CT (NED) 1-47, 1-55 Totuskey Creek, VA (NAO) 5-17 Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA (NPW) 39-16, 39-17, 39-18 Toussaint River, Carroll Township, OH (NCB) 20-21, 20-37 Towanda Lake, KS (SWT) 29-25 Town Beach, Madison, CT (NED) 1-51 Town Beach, Narragansett, RI (NED) 1-51 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-50 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (NED) 1-45 Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-21 Town Branch Creek, Lockhart, TX (SWF) 30-23 Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (NED) 1-22, 1-33, 1-40 Town Creek, Americus, GA (SAM) 10-50 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY (ORL) 16-23, 16-34 Town Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33 Town Creek, SC (SAN) 7-7, 7-12, 7-16 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA (NED) 1-50 Town River Bay, Quincy, MA (NED) 1-22, 1-33, 1-40 Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ (NAP) 3-27 Townshend Lake, VT (NED) 1-16, 1-30, 1-53 Trabuco Dam (SPL) 33-32 Tradewater River, KY (ORL) 16-22 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, TX (SWG) 31-38 Tranters Creek, NC (SAW) 6-29 Trask River, Tillamook County, OR (NPP) 37-39 Treasure Island, MO (LMM) 13-6 Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA (CDC) 35-2A, 35-5A Tred Avon River, MD (NAB) 4-33 Tremplealeau River, Arcadia, WI (NCS) 24-29 Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, NC (SAW) 6-29 Trent River, NC (SAW) 6-26, 6-28 Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Trexler Lake, PA (NAP) 3-28 Tri Pond Levee, IL (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Trim Cane Creek, Okitbbeha County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO (MRK) 27-17 Trinidad Lake, CO (SWA) 32-9, 32-15 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (SWG) 31-8, 31-20, 31-34, 31-39, 31-46 Trinity River Project, TX (SWF) 30-2, 30-15, 30-21 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-35 Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV (SPL) 33-11, 33-14 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY (ORL) 16-35 Troy, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Truckee Meadows, NV (SPK) 35-25, 35-34 Truckee River and Tributaries, CA and NV (SPK) 35-38 I-67 Trumbell Creek, MT (NPS) 38-31 Trumbull Lake, CT (NED) 1-47 Trussville, AL (SAM) 10-50 Truth or Consequences Unit, NM (SWA) 32-8, 32-14, 32-18 Tualatin, OR (NPP) 37-39 Tucannon River, Wooten, WA (NPW) 39-16, 39-18 Tuckahoe River, MD (NAB) 4-33 Tuckerton Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY (ORN) 15-5, 15-9 Tully Lake, MA (NED) 1-16, 1-30, 1-53 Tulsa and West Tulsa, OK (SWT) 29-9, 29-18, 29-22, 29-24 Tulsa/West Tulsa Levees, OK (SWT) 29-27 Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA (NAB) 4-35 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Turkey River, Elkader, IA (NCR) 23-16 Turner Creek, Corinth, MS (LMM) 13-6 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR (NPP) 37-40 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI (SAJ) 9-61 Turtle Cree, PA (ORP) 18-22 Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK (SWT) 29-24 Turtle Creek, PA (ORP) 18-5, 18-13 Tuscon Diversion Channel (SPL) 33-30 Tuskahoma Lake, OK (SWT) 29-24 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-7, 27-12, 27-16, 27-20 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road Improvement - 1974 Mod.) (MRK) 27-19 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS Road and Bridge (1976 Act) (MRK) 27-19, 27-20 Twelvemile Bayou, LA (LMK) 12-22 Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS (SAM) 10-50 Twin Valley Lake, MN (NCS) 24-24 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-29, 4-33 Two Harbors, MN (NCE) 21-37, 21-66, 21-82 Two Rivers Dam, NM (SWA) 32-10, 32-15 Two Rivers Harbor, WI (1935 R&H Act) (NCE) 21-87 Two Rivers Harbor, WI (NCE) 21-37, 21-66, 21-82 Tyaskin Creek, MD (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Tybee Island, GA (SAS) 8-6, 8-11, 8-16 Tygart Lake, WV (ORP) 18-3, 18-13, 18-18 Tylers Beach Channel, VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-10, 5-15, 5-17 Tyrone, PA (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 U U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, TX (SWG) 31-16, 31-21 Umatac Shoreline, Guam (POD) 36-11 Umatilla Harbor, OR (NPP) 37-36 Umatilla River (Echo), OR (NPP) 37-40 Umatilla River, OR (NPW) 39-16 Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR (NPP) 37-39, 37-42 Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR (NPP) 37-39 Umatilla River Water District, OR (NPP) 37-42 Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR (NPP) 37-39 Umpqua River, OR (NPP) 37-9, 37-24, 37-32 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR (NPP) 37-40 Unadilla, NY (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-10, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Union Creek/Stanton Bridge, NE (MRO) 26-23 Union Lake, MO (LSM) 14-18 Union River, ME (NED) 1-43 Union Township Drainage District, MO (NCR) 23-13 Union Village Dam, VT (NED) 1-16, 1-31, 1-53 Uniontown, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-29, 16-34 Uniontown, PA (ORP) 18-24 University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA (SPL) 33-32 Unnamed Creek, Tioga, ND (MRO) 26-23 Upper Butte Basin, CA (SPK) 35-43 Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS (SAM) 10-22, 10-36, 10-47 Upper Grand River, MO (MRK) 27-17 Upper Grays River Area, WA (NPP) 37-37 Upper Iowa River, IA (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Upper Jordan River, CA (SPK) 35-34 Upper Little Arkansas River Watershed, KS (SWT) 29-30 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Upper Marlboro, MD (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program (LSM) 14-7 Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study (NCR) 23-3, 23-7 Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP)(NCS) 24-3 I-68 Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI (NCR) 23-3, 23-7, 23-9 Upper Missouri River, SD Streambank Erosion Control Project (MRO) 26-17 Upper Puyallup River, WA (NPS) 38-28 Upper River Rouge, MI (NCE) 21-85 Upper White Oak Bayou, TX (SWG) 31-38 Upper White River, AR (SWL) 28-21 Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Urban Areas of Alton, IL (LSM) 14-17 Urbanna Creek, VA (NAO) 5-18 US Highway 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN (LMM) 13-6 Utica, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Utica, OH (ORH) 17-23, 17-24 V Valdez Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-11 Valley City Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-17 Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-23 Van Meter, IA (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Vanceburg, KY (ORH) 17-21 Vancouver Lake Area, WA (NPP) 37-38 Vatia Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Vaughn, MT, Sun River, Great Falls (MRO) 26-16, 26-18 Velva (Bonnes Coulee), ND (NCS) 24-29 Velva, ND (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Ventura Harbor, CA (SPL) 33-5, 33-13, 33-23, 33-31 Ventura-Pierpoint Area, CA (SPL) 33-29 Ventura River Basin, CA (SPL) 33-31 Ventura River Levee (SPL) 33-31 Verdigris River City Dam, Independence, KS (SWT) 29-28 Vermilion Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-36 Vermillion River and Tributaries, SD (MRO) 26-17 Vermillion River Basin, SD (MRO) 26-21 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Vermillion River, Vermillion, SD (MRO) 26-19 Vernon Branch, Columbus, MS (SAM) 10-51 Verona (Mouth of Feather River), CA (SPK) 35-40 Verona Lake, VA (NAB) 4-35 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Vevay, IN (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR (NPP) 37-39 Victory Lake, VT (NED) 1-50 Villa Park Dam (SPL) 33-32 Village Creek, Birmingham, AL (SAM) 10-22, 10-36, 10-47 Village Creek, Jackson and Lawerence Counties, AR (SWL) 28-23 Village Creek, SC (SAN) 7-17 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, AR (SWL) 28-23 Village of New Athens, IL (LSM) 14-17 Village of Saxtons, VT (NED) 1-47 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX (SWG) 31-16, 31-21, 31-36 Vincennes, IN (Partial) (ORL) 16-27 Vincennes, IN (Uncompleted Portion) (ORL) 16-31 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-29, 16-34 Vineyard Haven, MA (NED) 1-43 Vinton Waterway, LA (LMN) 11-18 Virginia Beach Canal No. 2, VA (NAO) 5-18 Virginia Beach, VA (NAO) 5-7, 5-11, 5-15 Volga, IA (NCR) 23-14 W W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY (LMM) 13-6 W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, NC (SAW) 6-15, 6-21 W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK (SWT) 29-26 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL (LSM) 14-15 Wabash River, Adams County, IN (ORL) 16-35 Wabash River Basin (ORL) 16-12, 16-2- Wabash River, near Merom, IN (ORL) 16-35 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN (ORL) 16-36, 16-37 Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West (ORL) 16-36 Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road (ORL) 16-36 Wabash River, York Township, Clark County, IL (ORL) 16-24 Wabasha County, Hyw 11, MN (NCS) 24-30 Wabasha Harbor, MN 25-7 Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN (NCS) 24-15, 24-20, 24-30 Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, NC & SC (SAW) 6-28 I-69 Waccamaw River, NC & SC (SAN) 7-17 Waco Lake, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-21, 30-23 Wagoner County, CO (SWT) 29-29 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No.1, WA (NPP) 37-37 Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, WA (NPP) 37-38 Wahway, South Branch, NJ (NAN) 2-32 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-7 Waihanau Stream, Molokai, HI (POD) 36-12 Waikiki Beach, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-8 Wailele Stream, Oahu, HI (POD) 36-12 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, HI (POD) 36-9 Waimea Beach, Kauai, HI (POD) 36-11 Wainwright, AK (NPA) 40-13 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island (POD) 36-11 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR (NPP) 37-40 Wallabout Channel, NY (NAN) 2-30 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, NC (SAW) 6-26 Wallace Lake, LA (LMK) 12-20, 12-22 Wallace, WV (ORP) 18-23 Wallawa River, Weaver Bridge, OR (NPW) 39-16 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH (NED) 1-45 Wallisville Lake, TX (SWG) 31-9 Walluski River Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Walnut Bottom Run, Beaver Falls, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 Walnut Creek, CA (SPK) 35-21, 35-30 Walnut Creek, Purcell, OK (SWT) 29-27 Walnut River, Cowley County, KS (SWT) 29-28 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA (SAM) 10-29, 10-37, 10-48 Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, NY (NAN) 2-32 Wappinger Creek, NY (NAN) 2-30 Ware, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-54 Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) (NED) 1-50 Wareham Harbor, MA (NED) 1-43 Wareham-Marion, MA (NED) 1-50 Warner Road at Sibley Street, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS), 24-15, 24-20, 24-30 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Warren River, RI (NED) 1-43 Warrenton Diking District 1, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Warrenton Diking District, OR (NPP) 37-42 Warrenville Township, Mill Creek, OH (NCB) 20-44 Warroad Harbor and River, MN (NCS) 24-23, 24-26 Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN (NCS) 24-26 Warsaw Harbor, IL 25-8 Warsaw, NY, Oatka Creek (NCB) 20-42 Warwick Cove, RI (NED) 1-43 Warwick River (NAB) 4-38 Warwood, WV (ORP) 18-24 Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-20 Washington Canal and South River, NJ (NAN) 2-30 Washington DC and Vicinity (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 Washington Harbor, DC (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-29 Washington Island, WI (NCE) 21-84 Washington, PA (ORP) 18-22 Washington Street Bridge, Laredo, TX (SWF) 30-23 Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR (NPP) 37-38 Wastewater Treatment Pond, Great Miami River, Ross, OH (ORL) 16-36 Water Resources Support Center 47-1 Water Valley, Eleven Point River, AR & MO (SWL) 28-23 Water Works, Park and Pool, Wellsburg, WV (construction) (ORP) 18-30 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, VT (NAN) 2-32 Waterbury, VT (NAN) 2-34 Waterbury-Watertown, CT (NED) 1-47, 1-55 Wateree River, SC (SAN) 7-17 Waterford, NY (NAN) 2-34 Waterloo, IA (Bridges) (NCR) 23-13 Waterloo, IA (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Waterloo, NE (MRO) 26-16, 26-20 Waterman Creek, Near Sutherland, IA (MRO) 26-21 Watertown and Vicinity, SD (MRO) 26-21 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-20, 6-24 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, NC (SAW) 6-26 Waterway from Empire, LA to Gulf of Mexico (LMN) 11-16 Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE (NAP) 3-25 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA (LMN) 11-16 I-70 Waterway From Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA (LMN) 11-13 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD (NAB) 4-37 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA (LMN) 11-16 Waterway - Norfolk, VA to Sounds of NC (SAW) 6-26 Waterway on the Coast of VA (NAO) 5-6, 5-11, 5-15 Waterways Experiment Station 45-1 Watkins Glen, NY 1941 FC Act (NCB) 20-45 Waukegan Harbor, IL (NCC) 22-5, 22-13, 22-17, 22-19 Waurika Lake, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-18, 29-22 Waverley, WV (ORH) 17-22 Waycake Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-34 Webb District Improvement Co, Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Webber Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK (SWT) 29-26 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK (SWT) 29-12, 29-20, 29-23 Weber River and Tributaries, UT (SPK) 35-40 Weegie/Pipe Creeks, Shadyside, OH (complete) (ORP) 18-30 Weiser River, Cambridge-Midvale (NPW) 39-18 Weiser River, ID (NPW) 39-16 Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID (NPW) 39-17, 39-18 Welles Harbor, Midway Island (POD) 36-7 Wellfleet Harbor, MA (NED) 1-43 Wells Harbor, ME (NED) 1-43, 1-58 Wellsburg, WV (ORP) 18-24 Wellsville, NY Genesee River (NCB) 20-42 Wellsville, OH, Section I (ORP) 18-22 Wellsville, OH, Section II (ORP) 18-22 Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, WA (NPS) 38-30 Wenatchie River, WA (NPS) 38-30 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA (NED) 1-45 West Antioch Creek, CA (SPK) 35-44 West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA (LMN) 11-14 West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 West Branch, Indian Creek, Neveda, IA (NCR) 23-16 West Branch Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY (NCB) 20-43 West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA (NAB) 4-18, 4-31 West Branch, Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE (MRO) 26-20 West Branch, Pebble Creek, Dodge, NE (MRO) 26-23 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA (NED) 1-47 West Bridgewater, PA (ORP) 18-24 West Brookfield Reservoir, MA (NED) 1-50 West Canaan Lake, NH (NED) 1-50 West Des Moines, IA (NCR) 23-6, 23-8, 23-10 West Fork, Blue River, Salem, IN (ORL) 16-37 West Fork, Des Moines River, MN (NCR) 23-16 West Fork, Drakes Creek, TN & KY (ORL) 16-24 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH (ORL) 16-12, 16-17, 16-24, 16-32 West Fork River, Clarksburg, PA (detalied project report underway) (ORP) 18-30 West Fork, WV (ORH) 17-23 West Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-37 West Haven Beaches, CT (NED) 1-51 West Hill Dam, MA (NED) 1-11, 1-29 West Hill, Worcester, MA (NED) 1-52 West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (ORP) 18-22 West Makinster Road, Wilson River, OR (NPP) 37-39 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL (NCR) 23-15 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR (NPP) 37-40 West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Hastings, IA (MRO) 26-21 West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern, IA (MRO) 26-21 West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock, IA (MRO) 26-21 West Nishnabotna River, Near Oakland, IA (MRO) 26-21 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR (SWL) 28-23 West Oneonta Lake, NY (NAB) 4-37 West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA (SAM) 10-50 West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and FL (SAS) 8-10 West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA (SAM) 10-30, 10-38, 10-48 West Point, NE (MRO) 26-16, 26-20 West River, New Haven, CT (NED) 1-22, 1-33, 1-40, 1-57 West Springfield, MA (NED) 1-16, 1-31, 1-39, 1-54 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-24, 16-29, 16-34 1-71 West Thompson Lake, CT (NED) 1-21, 1-33 West Union, Middle Island, WV (ORH) 17-24 West Warren, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-54 Westchester Creek, NY (NAN) 2-13, 2-20, 2-25, 2-29, 2-34 Westcott Cove, CT (NED) 1-43 Westerly Creek, CO (MRO) 26-5, 26-10(MRO) 26-14 Westerly, RI (NED) 1-50 Westfield, MA (NED) 1-50 Westfield, RI (NED) 1-50 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA (NPS) 38-25 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA (NPS) 38-26 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Weston Mills, Olean, NY (ORP) 18-23 Weston Mils, Portville, NY (ORP) 18-23 Weston, VT (NED) 1-47, 1-54 Westpoint, KY (ORL) 16-24, 16-31 Westport, CT (NED) 1-50 Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR (NPP) 37-37 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (NED) 1-43 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Westport Harbor, Westport, MA (NED) 1-51 Westport, KY (ORL) 16-27, 16-31 Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA (NPP) 37-41 Westport River, MA (NED) 1-50 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) (NPP) 37-40 Westport Slough, OR (NPP) 37-36 Westville Lake, MA (NED) 1-22, 1-33, 1-57 Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (Hurrican protection) (LMN) 11-8, 11-11 Wet Spottedtail Creek, Mitchell, NE (MRO) 26-23 Weymouth Back River, CT (NED) 1-43 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivers, MA (NED) 1-43 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge (NAP) 3-25, 3-28 Whatcom (Nooksack River), WA (NPS) 38-28 Wheeler Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling) (ORP) 18-24 Wheeling, WV (ORP) 18-24 Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island) (ORP) 18-24 Whelton Ditch, OR (NPP) 37-38 Whiskey and Rock Creeks, Independence, KS (SWT) 29-27 White City Park, OH 1954 R&H Act (NCB) 20-45 White Lake Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-38, 21-67, 21-82, 21-90 White Oak Creek, OH (ORH) 17-23 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, NC (SAW) 6-28 White River, AR (below Newport) (LMM) 13-5 White River, at Hwy. 14, 1/4 mile east of Oil Trough, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River Bank Stabilization, Batesville, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River Basin (Little Rock District, AR & MO) (SWL) 28-9, 28-16, 28-19, 28-30 White River, Batesville, AR (SWL) 28-10, 28-16 White River, Elnora, IN (ORL) 16-37 White River, Franklin County, IN (ORL) 16-37 White River, Hagerstown, IN (ORL) 16-37 White River, Hazleton, IN (ORL) 16-37 White River; IN (ORL) 16-22 White River, Jacksonport, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River Jacksonport, AR (SWL) 28-21 White River, Newport, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN (ORL) 16-36 White River, Petersburg, IN (ORL) 16-37 White River, Road 400W, Pike County, IN (ORL) 16-37 White River, St. Paul, AR (SWL) 28-23 White River, Tripp County Road, SD (MRO) 26-24 White River, Winner, SD (MRO) 26-19 Whitebird Creek, ID (NPW) 39-17 Whitefish Point Harbor, MI (NCE) 21-84 Whites and Ewing Creeks, TN (ORN) 15-18 Whitesburg Bridge, Morgan County, AL (ORN) 15-18 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork, Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-35 Whitewater River and Tributaries, IN & OH (ORL) 16-24 Whitewater River Basin Floodwarning System, CA (SPL) 33-7, 33-14 Whitewater River, CA (SPL) 33-31 Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN (ORL) 16-36 Whitings Creek, VA (NAO) 5-18, 5-19 Whitmanville Lake, MA (NED) 1-47, 1-56 Whitney Lake, TX (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-21 I-72 Whitney Point Lake, NY (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 Whitney Point Village, NY (NAB) 4-16, 4-25 Whittier, AK (NPA) 40-13 Whorton's Bend Road, Etowah County, AL (SAM) 10-50 Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS (SWT) 29-24, 29-27 Wichita Falls, TX, Plum Creek (SWT) 29-27 Wichita, KS (SWT) 29-29 Wickford Harbor, RI (NED) 1-43 Wicomico River, MD (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-30 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO (LSM) 14-18 Wilcox, PA (ORP) 18-24 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers, MN (NCS) 24-28 Wild Rice River at Mahnomen County, MN (NCS) 24-29 Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee, MN (NCS) 24-30 Wild Rice River, Lake Ida, MN (NCS) 24-30, 24-31 Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN (NCS) 24-24 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA, CA (SPK) 35-22, 35-30 Wildcat Creek, CA (SPN) 34-14 Wiley Creek Lake, OR (NPP) 37-40 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR (NPP) 37-40 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portion) (NPP) 37-40 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR (NPP) 37-9, 37-24, 37-32, 37-40, 37-42 Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR (NPP) 37-14, 37-26, 37-33 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging (NPP) 37-38 Willamette River, OR (NPP) 37-42 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-22 Willapa River at Raymond, WA (NPS) 38-28 Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA (NPS) 38-28 Willard Beach, South Portland, ME (NED) 1-45 William H. Harsha Lake, OH (ORL) 16-12, 16-17, 16-32 William L. Springer Lake, Decatur, IL (NCR) 23-14 Williamson, WV (ORH) 17-21, 17-24 Williamsport, AK (NPA) 40-13 Williamsport, PA (NAB) 4-35, 4-38 Williamstown, WV (ORH) 17-22 Williamsville Reservoir, VT (NED) 1-50 Williston, ND Water Intake (MRO) 26-17 Willoughby Channel, VA (NAO) 5-18, 5-19 Willow Creek, CA (SPK) 35-43 Willow Creek, ID (NPW) 39-16 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR (NPP) 37-15, 37-26, 37-33 Willow Creek Lake, OR (NPW) 39-16 Willow Creek Unit (NPW) 39-17 Wilmington Harbor, DE (NAP) 3-10, 3-18, 3-23 Wilmington Harbor, NC (SAW) 6-9, 6-21 Wilmington Harbor, NC, Passing Lane (SAW) 6-30 Wilmington Harbor, NC, Turns and Bends (SAW) 6-30 Wilmington Harbor Widening and Deepening, NC (SAW) 6-29 Wilmington Ice Control Demonstration (NCC) 22-21 Wilmore, PA (ORP) 18-22 Wilson Creek, Sumter County, SC (SAN) 7-18 Wilson Harbor, OH (NCB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-37 Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS (MRK) 27-7, 27-12, 27-16, 27-20 Wilson Point Harbor, CT (NED) 1-43 Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR (NPP) 37-39 Winchester bay, Umpqua River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Winfield L&D (ORH) 17-12 Winfield LPP, KS (SWT) 29-24, 29-29, 29-30 Winnipesaukee Lake, NH (NED) 1-43 Winona Harbors, MN 25-7 Winona, MN (NCS) 24-24, 24-29 Winooski River, VT (NAN) 2-32 Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ (SPL) 33-31 Winsted, CT (NED) 1-47, 1-54 Winter Harbor ME (NED) 1-43, 1-58 Winter Harbor, VA (NAO) 5-18 Winthrop Beach, MA (NED) 1-45 Winthrop Beach, MA (uncompleted portion) (NED) 1-50 Winthrop Harbor, MA (NED) 1-43, 1-51 Wisconsin River, WI (NCS) 24-23 Wishart Point Channel, VA (NAO) 5-18 Wister Lake, OK (SWL) 28-28 Wister Lake, OK (SWT) 29-10, 29-18, 29-22, 29-26 I-73 Withlacoochee River, FL (SAJ) 9-49 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS (SAM) 10-49, 10-52 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, KS (MRK) 27-19 Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY (ORN) 15-7, 15-10 Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Wolf Creek, LaPorte City, IA (NCR) 23-16 Wolf Creek, Lawton, OK (SWT) 29-27 Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS (SAM) 10-50 Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN (LMM) 13-5 Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, ME (NED) 1-8, 1-28, 1-38, 1-58 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL (LSM) 14-13, 14-17 Wood River, Grand Island, NE (MRO) 26-21 Woodbridge Creek, NJ (NAN) 2-30 Woodbury Creek, NJ (NAP) 3-25 Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA (ORP) 18-10, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Woodlands, WV (ORP) 18-24 Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (NED) 1-10, 1-28, 1-38 Woods Hole Channel, MA (NED) 1-43 Woodson Drainage District', Columbia County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Woodson Drainage District, OR (NPP) 37-38 Woonsocket, RI (NED) 1-47 Woonsocket, RI (NED) 1-53 Worcester Diversion, MA (NED) 1-47 Worcester, MA (NED) 1-53 Worthington, MN (NCR) 23-15 Wrangell Harbor, AK (NPA) 40-4, 40-8, 40-10 Wrangell Narrows, AK (NPA) 40-11, 40-13 Wrangell Narrows Channel (Mile 20), AK (NPA) 40-13 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-21 Wrights Creek, NC (SAW) 6-26 Wrightsville Beach, NC (SAW) 6-28 Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, VT (NAN) 2-32 Wynoochee Lake, WA (NPS) 38-10, 38-17 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (NPS) 38-28 Wyoming Valley, PA (NAB) 4-35 Y Yadkin River Basin, NC and SC (SAW) 6-14, 6-31 Yakima County (Yakima River), WA (NPS) 38-28 Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA (NPS) 38-30 Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA (NPS) 38-28 Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA (NPS) 38-28 Yakima River, Easton, WA (NPS) 38-31 Yakima River, West Richland, WA (NPS) 38-28 Yakima River, West Richland, WA (NPW) 39-16 Yakima River, Yakima, WA (NPS) 38-28 Yalobusha River, MS (LMK) 12-17 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR (NPP) 37-10, 37-24, 37-32 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, OR (NPP) 37-36 Yaquina River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Yaquina River, Port of Toledo, OR (NPP) 37-41 Yatesville Lake, KY (ORH) 17-10, 17-15, 17-19 Yazoo River, MS (LMK) 12-17 Yellow Bend Port, AR (LMK) 12-17 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA (SAM) 10-50 Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings, MT (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Glendive, MT (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Highway 89 Bridge, MT (MRO) 26-24 Yellowstone River, MT (MRO) 26-24 Yellowstone River, Near Miles City Water Intake and Sewage Lagoon (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Route 111, Livingstone, MT (MRO) 26-24 Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, New Big Timber, MT (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT (MRO) 26-16, 26-18 Yellowstone River Water Plant, Livingston (MRO) 26-18 Yellowstone River, Yellowstone County Bridge, Near Billings, MT (MRO) 26-19 Yolo Basin Wetlands, Sacramento River, CA (SPK) 35-26 Yonkers, Nepera Park, NY (NAN) 2-35 Yonkers, NY (NAN) 2-32 I-74 York Harbor, ME (NED) 1-44, 1-58 York, Indian Rock Dam, PA (NAB) 4-19, 4-26, 4-32 York River, VA (Active portion) (NAO) 5-18 Yough, Turkeyfoot Township, PA (terminated) (ORP) 18-30 Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD (ORP) 18-11, 18-15, 18-21, 18-28 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization) (ORP) 18-24 Youngs and Claskine River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR (NPP) 37-36 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR (NPP) 37-37 Youngstown, OH (ORP) 18-22 Z Zacate Creek Channel, TX (SWF) 30-22 Zacate Creek, TX (SWF) 30-22 Zanesville, OH (ORH) 17-22 Zippel Bay Harbor, MN (NCS) 24-23 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN (NCS) 24-3, 24-18, 24-29 Zumbro River at Genoa, MN (NCS) 24-16, 24-20, 24-29 Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN (NCS) 24-25, 24-29 Zumbro River, MN (NCS) 24-25, 24-29, 24-30 ^ U.S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1993 - 3 5 6 - 5 3 4/ 9 0 0 8 5 I-75 3 1364 0012767 1